Loading...
Minutes 12/21/10 PUBLIC HEARING December 21, 2010 Present: Sara Fisher Chairman Peter Runyon Commissioner Jon Stavney Commissioner Keith Montag County Manager Bryan Treu County Attorney Kathy Scriver Deputy Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing, the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: Consent Agenda Chairman Fisher stated the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of Bill Paying for the Week of December 20, 2010 (subject to review by the Finance Director) Finance Department Representative B. Approval of Payroll for December 30, 2010 (subject to review by the Finance Director) Finance Department Representative C. Final Settlement of Agreement between Eagle County and GA Western for the Colorado River Road Bridge 301.8 Project - Contract Dated September 30, 2010 Rick Ullom, Project Management D. Resolution 2010 -154 Approving the Special Use Permit for Operation of a Pre - School / Daycare Facility at the Gracious Savior Lutheran Church, (Eagle County File No. ZS- 00143) Bob Narracci, Planning E. Resolution 2010 -155 Approving a Zone District Amendment for the Lane Property from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Resource (R) Zoning, (Eagle County File No. ZC -2757) Scot Hunn, Planning F. Ratification of Statement of Grant Award of $27,000 from the Colorado Department of Criminal Justice Victims of Crime Act for Contract Labor to Provide Direct Services to Victims of Crime Deena Ezzell, Sheriff's Office Chairman Fisher asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Bryan Treu, County Attorney stated that he had no comment. Commissioner Runyon moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items A -F. Chairman Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Citizen Input Chairman Fisher opened and closed citizen Input, as there was none. 1 12/21/2010 Certification of Mill Levies Cindy Preytis, Finance Mr. Treu explained the process. The commissioners were basically the clearing house for the mill levies for all the districts. The districts set their own mill levies and the county collects them once a year, compiles the data, and sends the information to the state. Ms. Preytis presented the 2010 summary and the impact to Eagle County. This year she included some additional information, the gross revenue, and bond debt, etc. The operating mill levies were consistent with last year. Most of the changes occurred in the general obligation bonds. Chairman Fisher spoke about a miscalculation years ago but applauded Ms. Preytis for working proactively to insure there were no problems in the future. Commissioner Runyon found the process fascinating. He thought it was interesting to see the range in mill levies. Commissioner Stavney suggested there be a work session in February or March to discuss the TIFS and new tax generation. Commissioner Stavney moved to approve the Certification of Mill Levies and revenue for 2011 as presented. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Stavney moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and re- convene as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Eagle County Liquor License Authority Kathy Scriver, Clerk and Recorder's Office Consent Agenda Renewals A. Downtown Brown, LLC d/b /a Cafe 163 #15- 75032 -0000 This is a renewal of a Hotel and Restaurant License in Edwards. There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. An Alcohol Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided. B. X -Bar Fly, Inc. d/b /a Sato Sushi #04- 33696 -0000 This is a renewal of a Hotel and Restaurant License in Edwards. There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. An Alcohol Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided. Commissioner Stavney moved that the Board approve the Liquor Consent Agenda for December 21, 2010 consisting of Items A -B. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 2 12/21/2010 APPLICANT: Doog Properties SB, LLC DBA: State Bridge REPRESENTATIVE: Douglas Moog, Owner LOCATION: 127 Trough Road — Bond, CO REQUEST: Tavern Liquor License STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Kathy Scriver DESCRIPTION: The applicant filed an application for a Tavern Liquor License on November 5, 2010. The proposed location is the historic State Bridge property. Mr. Moog purchased the property in September of 2009 and wishes to reestablish the historic use of the property as a resort recreation facility to host events and provide lodging. The applicant hopes to generate revenue the first year by focusing on music events and lodging. Business hours will be limited. Outside vendors will provide food service and prepackaged snacks will be available at all times. Fencing around the licensed perimeter is expected to be in place by late May. The first cabin will be used secure liquor storage. The area where State Bridge Lodge once stood which is currently dirt will be transformed into a seating area and dance floor in front of the stage. There will be tables and umbrellas throughout and a recycled tire base will provide as a dance floor. ESTABLISH NEIGHBORHOOD: The first order of business is to establish the neighborhood. Staff recommends that the definition of the "neighborhood" include the area within a 5 -mile radius from the proposed location including 1 mile on either side of Hwy 131 (north) to the county line, thus allowing the applicant to include the town of McCoy. Commissioner Stavney moved that the Local Liquor Licensing Authority establish the neighborhood to include the area within a 5-mile radius from the proposed location including one mile one either side of Hwy 131 (north) to the county line. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. LIOUOR AUTHORITY CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The board will consider the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood, the desires of the adult inhabitants of the neighborhood and whether the existing licenses are adequate to meet these needs and desires, per the Colorado Liquor Code, Section 12 -47 -301 (2) (a). 2. Whether the licensee shall possess and maintain possession of the premises for which the license is issued by ownership, lease, rental, or other arrangement for possession of such premises. 3. Whether the premises are within 500 feet of any public or parochial school or the campus of any college, university, or seminary. 4. Whether the fees have been paid. 5. Whether the applicants are of good moral character. 6. Section 12 -47 -301 (2) (b) of the Colorado Liquor Code reads as follows: "A local licensing authority or the state on stated owned property, may deny the issuance of any new tavern or retail liquor store license whenever such authority determines that the issuance of such license would result in or add to an undue concentration of the same class of license and, as a result, require the use of additional law enforcement resources." 3 12/21/2010 STAFF FINDINGS: 1. The applicants have filed an application on forms provided by the state licensing authority and provided information as required by the state licensing authority. All applicable requirements have been met, all the proper forms have been provided, and all fees paid. 2. The applicant is 21 years of age and reported to be of good moral character. 3. Public notice has been given by the posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the premises December 10, 2010 and publication in the Eagle Valley Enterprise on December 9 and December 16, 2010. 4. The premises are not within 500 feet of a location for which, within 2 years preceding the application, a license of the same class was denied for the reason that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the adult inhabitants were satisfied by existing outlets. 5. The premises are not within 500 feet of any public or parochial school or the campus of any college, university, or seminary. 6. The applicant has submitted proof of possession of premises. 7. The applicant addressed parking and traffic concerns with conditions of approval for the State Bridge Special Use Permit, ZS -2629, approved on September 28, 2010. As long as the conditions of approval are met, the County Engineering Department, Community Development Department, and Director of Road and Bridge had no concerns with respect to the liquor license. 8. Staff received no response from the Eagle County Sheriff's Office, Building Department, or Eagle County Treasurer. 9. The applicant is in the process of working with the Environmental Health Department to develop a satisfactory operating plan. 10. The applicants have provided an alcohol management plan per the requirements of the Eagle County Local Licensing Authority. STAFF CONCERNS: The proposed licensed premises are not currently secured. POSSIBLE CONDITION OF APPROVAL That the county license be held until the Clerk and Recorder's final inspection of the premises reveals that the premises has been properly secured as required by the Colorado Liquor Code and as proposed in Applicant's site plan. DISCUSSION: Ms. Scriver presented the request. She introduced Douglas Moog, new owner of the property and the applicant and Scott Stoughton who had assisted Doug through the application process and who would someday become the registered manager. Mr. Moog purchased the property in September of 2009 and wishes to reestablish the historic use of the property as a resort recreation facility to host events and provide lodging. The applicant hoped to generate revenue the first year by focusing on music events and lodging. Business hours would be limited. Outside vendors would provide most of the food service and prepackaged snacks will be available at all times. Fencing around the licensed perimeter was expected to be in place by late May. The first cabin would be used for liquor storage. The area where State Bridge Lodge once stood is currently a lot of dirt; however it would 4 12/21/2010 be transformed into a seating area and dance floor in front of the stage. There will be tables and umbrellas throughout and a recycled tire base will provide as a dance floor. The applicant met all the necessary requirements for a Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License and staff findings are positive. Mr. Stoughton explained food service proposed for the first year. Moe's and other vendors would provide a variety of food options on the weekends. Snack foods would available at all times. Ice would be brought in from outside sources. Ms. Scriver stated that the one concern staff did have was that the proposed licensed premises was not currently secured and suggested that the county license be held until staff could confirm that the premises was secure. Mr. Stoughton stated that liquor license request was in line with the approval of the special use permit issued earlier this year. They plan to do events this summer. He would be the one coordinating the summer bands. They hope to have the facility as beautified as possible before opening. There had been a lot of work done recently to clean the facility up. Stones would provide a boundary for the terraced amphitheater. The BBQ option/kitchen option was still in the works. Mr. Moog believed that what had happened so far was pretty amazing. He believed it was a labor of love for many. He thought they would be able to operate a successful and safe operation by summer. He recently moved to Eagle County and he was astonished by the excitement in the community about the reopening of State Bridge. He was hopeful and completely dedicated. He appreciated the support. Chairman Fisher expressed excitement and welcomed Mr. Moog to the community. Commissioner Runyon thanked the applicant for carrying on the long tradition of State Bridge, as she felt it would be a shame to lose it. Commissioner Runyon moved that the Board find that there is a reasonable requirement and desire for the issuance of this license, and therefore approve a tavern liquor license for Doog Properties SB, LLC d/b /a State Bridge based on the testimony, petitions, and evidence submitted today and incorporating the staff findings. Such license is to be issued upon the written findings and decision of this Board but held by the Clerk and Recorder until final inspection of the premises, the Clerk and Recorder determines that the applicant has complied properly secured the premises as proposed in Applicant's site plan and as may be required by the Colorado Liquor Code. Commissioner Stavney seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Runyon moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority and re- convene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Stavney seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Planning Files ZS -2925 Crawford Settlers Stone Sean Hanagan, Planning ACTION: The purpose of this Special Use Permit is for the construction of a mixed use building which will contain office and sales space for Settlers Stone as well as a residential unit. LOCATION: 51 Favre Lane, El Jebel FILE NO./PROCESS: ZS -2925 / Special Use Permit PROJECT NAME: Crawford Settlers Stone OWNER: Crawford Properties APPLICANT: Owner REPRESENTATIVE: The Land Studio -Julie Pratte 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5 12/21/2010 A. SUMMARY: The purpose of this application is to request a Special Use Permit to construct a building at 51 Favre Lane in unincorporated Eagle County. The proposed building will contain office space and sales space for Settlers Stone Sales in two thirds of the structure with a residential unit in one third of the structure. This unplatted parcel is zoned Commercial General (CG) but requires a Special Use Permit for its proposed use. (ECLUR Section 1 -140) d. No building or structure shall be erected nor shall any existing building or structure be altered or extended on land falling within any one or more of the following categories: (1) All unplatted public or semipublic uses, regardless of current zoning classification; (2) All unplatted lands zoned for multifamily; (3) All unplatted lands zoned planned unit development; (4) All unplatted lands zoned commercial; (5) All unplatted lands zoned industrial; (6) All previously platted lands which are, subsequent to the date of enactment hereof rezoned to one of the zone district classifications set forth in these Land Use Regulations. This subsection(d) shall not apply to: (1) Single family construction not occurring in a planned unit development or subdivision; (2) Parcels of 35 acres or larger which are not part of a planned unit development of subdivision; (3) Uses approved through another county review process, such as, but not limited to special use and 1041; (4) Statutory vacations; Dedications o easements and public ways. e .f P Y s. (5) B. SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning: Land Use Zoning Owninship ; North: Residential RSM Private South: County Complex PUD Eagle County East: Crawford Nursery PUD Crawford West: El Jebel MHP RSM Crawford Existing Zoning: Commercial General (GC) Proposed Zoning: No change Current Development: Multiple commercial buildings Site Conditi r Pre- existing Commercial center 6 12/21/2010 7'", w d y 's a ',..4' nta cs 11.504 s Si 501 Total, � ace ` '' N/A W ater : Pup P x y , _ ,, , a k ?Hyde: X A ecesst * ` Favre Lane C. CHRONOLOGY/BACKGROUND: • Site was previously used commercially as an antique store. This building has been removed from the site. 2. STAFF REPORT A. NECESSARY FINDINGS: • PROCESS INTENT ECLUR Section: 5 -250 Special Use Permits Section Purpose: Special Uses are those uses that are not necessarily compatible with the other uses allowed in a zone district, but which may be determined compatible with the other uses allowed in the zone district based upon individual review of their location, design, configuration, density and intensity of use, and the imposition of appropriate conditions to ensure the compatibility of the use at a particular location with surrounding land uses. All Special Uses shall meet the standards set forth in this Section. Standards: Section 5 - 250.B. The issuance of a Special Use Permit shall be dependent upon findings that there is competent evidence that the proposed use as conditioned, fully complies with all the standards of this Section, this Division, this Article, and these Land Use Regulations. The Planning Commission may recommend and the Board of County Commissioners may attach any conditions deemed appropriate to ensure compliance with the following standards, including conformity to a specific site plan, requirements to improve public facilities necessary to serve the Special Use, and limitations on the operating characteristics of the use, or the location or duration of the Special Use Permit STANDARD: Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5- 250.B.1] The proposed Special Use shall be appropriate for its proposed location and be consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the FL UM of the Comprehensive Plan, including standards for building and structural intensities and densities, and intensities of use. EAGLE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN w ; � :, ;1 1 6 _ a be . ' s$ r _ il 3 ti' FLUM << ', ' g' " i a.k 00 - 4 !$ Designation 1 711.: ` t') F i r J A i- „ i gates `f x x x x x x x x Recommendations - Does Not s itt*titAltte- Recoinmendations 7 12/21/2010 Not Applicable r X X FLUM Commercial Zone BASALT MASTER PLAN A .q th ii a+ �q C, x „d r • ... A 4. 1 v ., Deg 4x `^ 9* ' �' ' *'''. , a g, • Z.% 1.,, P. ' ,', . , s.. Exceeds Recommendation Incorporates Majority X X X Xl of Recommendations Does Not Incorporate Recommendations Not Applicable ' X X X X Zone EAGLE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PLAN ?. � 5 { ! 'Y f y ` iW' 1 Z} � " ` . �. 5 .1 n d ,: "�tR L Exceeds , R+nmendatiark ; .4ticip�,xates Majority of Reef nendatiot _` "Does Not hicorpota ? '1,Recomnendatibns Iot Applicable X x x x x x x EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Compatibility. [Section 5- 250.B.2] The proposed Special Use shall be appropriate for its proposed location and compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. The proposed commercial structure will be located in a Commercial General (CG) zone district with similar uses. The property has been used historically as a commercial building and the new proposed mixed use will not change the compatibility of this parcel. EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Zone District Standards. [Section 5- 250.B.3] The proposed Special Use shall comply with the standards of the zone district in which it is located and any standards applicable to the particular use, as identified in Section 3 -310, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Residential, Agricultural and Resource Uses and Section 3 -330, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Commercial and Industrial Uses. 8 12/21/2010 The existing zoning for this parcel is Commercial General (CG). The proposed stone business fits within the applicable uses of this zone district. The parcel has been used in the past as a commercia I building (antique shop). EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Design Minimizes Adverse Impact. [Section 5- 250.B.4] The design of the proposed Special Use shall minimize adverse impacts, including visual impact of the proposed use on adjacent lands; furthermore, the proposed Special Use shall avoid significant adverse impact on surrounding lands regarding trash, traffic, service delivery, parking and loading, odors, noise, glare, and vibration, and shall not create a nuisance. '''' '''''' ' 1 ' ' ' '' 7 0,..r,,,,..1 , ,,, ,.. , I H . .. , � � a " X1ts . _ 0 Satisfies °' X X X X It + , v. -its Does of - Sammy. EC UR; Requ me ► is k Not Appli ._ c X X X X X By utilizing similar design features as well as matching color schemes the proposed building will not have an adverse impact on the surrounding area. EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Design Minimizes Environmental Impact. [Section 5 - 250.B.5] The proposed Special Use shall minimize environmental impacts and shall not cause significant deterioration of water and air resources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources, and other natural resources. The proposed stone sales business with residential component unit will have no significant impact on water, air resources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources and other natural resources. EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARD DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS s 9 12/21/2010 ■ Exce geittit u rements k, Satisfies ECI equirement X X X X X X X Does Not Satisfy ECLUR Requirement Not Applicable, STANDARD: Impact on Public Facilities. [Section - 250..B.6] The proposed Special Use Permit shall be adequately served by public facilities and services, ncluding roads, pedestrian paths, potable water and wastewater facilities, parks, schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS k Exceeds ECLUR Requirements Satisfies ECT:UR X x X X X Recoir is Does Not satisfy ECLUR Regait: Not Applicable X X STANDARD: Site Development Standards. [Section 5- 250.B.7] The proposed Special Use shall comply with the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site Development Standards. i� ' M Site w ig ( `` �y � } `� 3 N` d.,�, g -'��"' T, t s K.4, Sit Y ' , ,.. ' 6' 44 , c I 17 ! ,, 1T y .. I ,Aas,j ` E X Off- Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4 -1) X Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4 -2) X Sign Regulations (Division 4 -3) X Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410) X Geologic Hazards (Section 4 -420) X Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430) X Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) X Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450) X Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460) 10 12/21/2010 X Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4 -5) X Noise and Vibration (Section 4 -520) X Smoke and Particulates (Section 4 -530) X Heat, Glare, Radiation and Electrical Interference (Section 4 -540) X Storage of Hazardous and Non - hazardous Materials (Section 4 -550) X Water Quality Standards (Section 4 -560) X Roadway Standards (Section 4 - 620) X Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4 -630) X Irrigation System Standards (Section 4 -640) X Drainage Standards (Section 4 -650) X Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4 -660) X Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4 -670) X Water Supply Standards (Section 4 -680) * X Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4 -690) NOT X Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 47) APPLICABLE EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS B. REFERRAL RESPONSES: Basalt and Rural Fire Protection District — Please refer to the attachment dated 10 /10 /10 Town of Basalt- Please refer to the attachment dated 10/4/10 Eagle County Environmental Health- Please refer to the attachment dated 9/13/10 Eagle County Engineering- Please refer to the attachment dated 10/7/10 NWCOG- Please refer to the attachment dated 9/20/10 * * *As well as the applicant's response to all referral comments From High Country Engineering dated 10/15/10 Additional Referral Agencies - This proposal was referred to the following agencies with no response received as of this writing: • Eagle County: Attorney's Office, Sherriff's Office Housing, Road and Bridge, School District • Other: CDOT, CDPHE, Water Conservation Board, US Army Corps of Engineers, Ambulance District, Holy Cross Electric and RAFTA C. PLANNING COMMISSION DELIBERATION: At their regularly scheduled meeting on December 2 The Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission unanimously voted to approve the Special Use Permit ZS -2925. One additional component was added to condition 6 requiring a 1.5 caliper size for the tree mitigation species chosen. Benefits/Disadvantages Benefits: 11 12/21/2010 - Location within a designated commercial area with historic commercial uses - Concealing techniques (fencing) will minimize visual impacts to the public. - One -way traffic will help alleviate any congestion on Favre Lane Disadvantages: - No real disadvantages are apparent with this requested use. D. Planning Commission OPTIONS: 1. Approve the [SPECIAL USE PERMIT] request without conditions if it is determined that the petition will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and the proposed use is attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 2. Deny the [SPECIAL USE PERMIT] request if it is determined that the petition will adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and/or the proposed use is not attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is not in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 3. Table the [SPECIAL USE PERMIT] request if additional information is required to fully evaluate the petition. Give specific direction to the petitioner and staff. 4. Approve the [SPECIAL USE PERMIT] request with conditions and/or performance standards if it is determined that certain conditions and/or performance standards are necessary to ensure public, health, safety, and welfare and/or enhances the attunement of the use with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). E. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS: 1. Except as otherwise modified by this development permit, all material representations made by the Applicant in this application and in public meeting shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. 2. Applicant agrees to no stone cutting or stone grinding on the premises. 3. Applicant will regularly inspect the drywell associated with this proposal and will pump or replace as necessary. 4. The site will be designated as one way access and the applicant will provide one -way traffic signs at the driveway entrance and exit to establish one -way traffic circulation. 5. Applicant shall address all recommendations contained within the letter from Bill Harding and the Basalt & Rural Fire Protection District dated 10/10/10 6. Applicant will plant six (6) new trees of 1.5 caliper or greater on the site to mitigate the removal of six trees currently on the site. Trees will be of the following species: 1. Shademaster Honey locust 2. Imperial Honey locust 3. Amur Chokecherry 4. Shubert or Canada Red Cherry 5. Autumn Purple Ash 6. Patmore Ash 12 12/21/2010 7. Spring Snow Crabapple 7. This Special Use Permit shall be valid for a period of not more than three (3) years prior to actual implementation of the permitted use. Upon implementation of the approved use, such permit shall remain valid, in perpetuity, and shall run with the land thereafter unless an expiration date or exception has been placed upon the permit by the Board of County Commissioners. DISCUSSION: Mr. Hanagan presented the request. The purpose of the application was to construct a building at 51 Favre Lane in the core of El Jebel. The building, a total of 1200 square feet would be used as commercial and residential space for Settlers Stone Sales, a stoneyard owned by the Crawford family. He presented some photos of the area. There would be no change in zoning. There were multiple commercial buildings on the site currently. The property was approximately 11.5 acres. The applicant had chosen to use the Crawford water and sewer system. Fencing would be used to minimize any visual impacts. One way traffic would help eliminate road congestion. There were no real apparent disadvantages. He presented the conditions. Commissioner Stavney wondered if not allowing any stone cutting was an inconvenience to the applicant. Julie Pratte stated that most of the stone would be shipped by pallet directly to the construction site. It was really just a place for contractors to view what's available, order and have it shipped directly to the job site Chairman Fisher wondered if there was any way to increase living space in the future. Julie Pratte explained that a modular unit would be brought in and then be finished to match the other unit currently on site. Doug Pratte stated that the focus was the office with a small residential unit attached to the back. Commissioner Fisher asked about the concerns for water and sewer. Mr. Hanagan stated that the system was adequate to handle the needs of the parcel. Ms. Pratte stated that the Crawfordshad an engineer that monitored things and currently the system ran fine. The applicant believed that until there was a need or plan that changed the issue, they would continue doing what they were doing. Mr. Montag stated that it was his understanding that there was a cap on the number of taps into the system. Commissioner Stavney wondered if there were any concerns with the lot lines. Mr. Hanagan stated that the lot lines in the illustrations were not intended for measurement. Mr. Pratte stated that they were not lot lines, they were more like activity lines. The activity would take place within the lines. The lines were more for illustration. Commissioner Runyon asked if most of the sales would be wholesale. Ms. Pratte stated that she believed most of the sales would be wholesale if they were going to contractors. Mr. Pratte believed there would be a retail component as well. Commissioner Stavney asked if the applicant agreed with the conditions. Mr. Pratte stated that they were satisfied with the conditions as proposed. Chairman Fisher opened and closed public comment, as there was none. Commissioner Stavney moved to approve file number ZS -2925 Crawford Settlers Stone. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Other Justice Center Dedication Ceremony / Lunch Break Eagle County Justice Center 13 12/21/2010 Flowing Uphill; Diversions, Rivers and the Future of Water in Colorado Ken Neubecker, Roaring Fork Conservancy Recorded Youth Foundation Update Susie Davis, The Youth Foundation Recorded There being no further business before : ie meetin . adjourned until uary 4, 2010. rti Attest: A, Clerk to the Board q��°' Chairm, r ' .110 14 12/21/2010