HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/01/04
Present:
Tom Stone
Michael Gallagher
Am Menconi
Jack Ingstad
Diane Mauriello
Teak Simonton
PUBLIC HEARING
June 1,2004
Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
County Administrator
County Attorney
Clerk to the Board
This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of
County Commissioners for their consideration:
CENERAL FUND
21St CENTURY PHOTO SUPPLY
AAAA SEPTIC PUMPING
ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS
ADAMS MARK HOTEL
AFFORDABLE PORTABLE
AGA SERVICE
AILI FOSS
AJ JO:fINSON
ALL VALLEY LOCK OUT
ALLIANT FOOD SERVICE, INC
ALPINE COFFEE SERVICE,LLC
ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY
ALPINE PARTY RENTALS
ALTERNATIVE REVENUE
AMADEO GONZALES
AMEroCANArnLINESADVERT
AMERICANCANCERSOClliTY
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
AMERICAN PUBLIC WRKS ASSC
AMERIGAS
ANDERSON & KEIL
APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY
ASPEN BASE OPERATION
ASPEN BOARD OF REALTORS
ASPEN CTR FOR WOMENS HLTH
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
AVON CENTER AT BEAVER CK
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
1
6/01/2004
220.88
900.00
119.70
255.00
93.00
875.00
168.85
2,627.90
75.00
2,538.22
138.25
63.59
235.00
2.80
39.60
100.00
50.00
212.50
118.00
712.47
28.12
8.10
521.38
6.29
2,675.00
214.51
1,858.05
AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS
BAJA SPORTS BAR
BALCOMB AND GREEN
BATTLE MOUNTAIN HS
BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS
BRAVO! VAIL VALLEY MUSIC
BRC/HARRIS INC
BRIAN HOLLENBAUGH
BRUCE D GIESE
CARMEN LOZOYO-VELEZ
CDW
CENTRAL BAG AND BURLAP CO
CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING
CENTURYTEL
CHARLES B DARRAH
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
CHRIS HERNDON
CHRIS MENCINI
CHRISTINE L MOTT
CLIFF SIMONTON
CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION
CO COUNTY ATTORNEY ASSOC
CO DEPT AGRICULTURE
CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND
CO STATE TREASURER
COLORADO COUNTIES INC
COLORADO DEPT REVENUE
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS
COLORADO NAHRO
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH
CONTRACTPHARMACYSERV~E
COpy PLUS
CORPORATE EXPRESS
CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING
CSPIlNUTRITION ACTION
DAKTRONICS INC
DAN CORCORAN PLS
DAN SPARKMAN
DANIEL B BLUM
DAVID A BAUER
DAVID GUINNEE, DVM
DA VIDSONS
DEBORAH CHURCHILL
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
2
6/01/2004
1,775.70
176.00
8,678.89
1,000.00
122.87
25,000.00
896.44
90.91
79.80
136.62
3,257.00
874.23
688.32
99.48
30.00
535.00
800.00
189.75
79.70
43.24
490.00
350.00
255.00
685.00
7,689.16
1,239.50
301.94
7,765.67
200.00
194.00
1,060.00
987.44
76.89
3,567.13
2,034.27
25.00
365.00
4,140.00
319.32
18.80
30.00
1,476.23
208.52
111.16
DEEP ROCK WEST
DEFENSE FINANCE/ ACCOUNTNG
DELL INC
DENVER CHECKWRITER, INC.
DENVER COMMUNITY FEDERAL
DENVER NEWSPAPER AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
DIEBOLDELCECTION SYSTEMS
DIVISION WATER RESOURCES
DOCTORS ON CALL
DON OLSEN
DOSIA LAEYENDECKER
DOUG WINTERS
EAGLE AMOCO
EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC
EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS
EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL
EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF
EAGLE EYE PHOTO
EAGLE PHARMACY
EAGLE RIVER WATER AND
EAGLE RIVER YOUTH COAL.
EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE
, EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND
EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING
ELISA ACOSTA
EMBLEM ENTERPRISE
EMC2
ESI, ELEVATOR SERVICE,INC
FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG
FIESTA'S CAFE
FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES
FIRST BANK OF VAIL
FIRST BANKS
FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY
FLORIDA MICRO
GE CAPITAL
GEMPLERS INC
GLENDA WENTWORTH
GLENWOOD SPRINGS PARKS
GOLDEN EAGLE ELDERLY
GRAINGER INCORPORATED
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
3
6/01/2004
336.33
638.54
8,643.50
102.00
502.94
1,273.23
95.00
99.25
280.00
375.00
9.60
90.00
549.93
168.00
10,006.00
6,208.00
857.44
50.00
7.41
1,126.94
117.53
701.28
285.00
144.26
4,128.25
115.92
1,060.00
231.68
90.00
1,810.84
512.79
2,180.46
80.00
980.00
444.26
24,037.45
10.00
77.00
159.99
479.68
52.06
160.00
25,800.00
677.70
GUILLE OJEDA
HART INTERCNIC
HAWTHORN SUITES
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
HECKER AND ASSOCIATES
HERMAN MILLER INC.
HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS
HILL & COMPANY
HILLCARA LLC
HOGAN & HARTSON
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
HOME DEPOT SUPPLY
HV AC SUPPLY
IAAO
IFMA
INTEGRAL RECOVERIES
INTERNALREVENUESERV~E
IRVIN BORENSTEIN
JAMES PUBLISHING COMPANY
JANET CONNORS
1ENNIE W AHRER
JENNY WOOD
JEROME EVANS PH.D
JOHN LOWERY
KAMINSKY AND ASSOOCIATES
KARA BETTIS, CORONER
KATHLEEN BULL
KESSLER MARY J
KINDER MORGAN INC
KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC
LAF ARGE CORPORATION
LANDS END INCORPORATED
LASER JUNCTION
LEDERHAUSE EDITH
LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INe
LINDA MAGGIORE
LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES
M&MAUTOPARTS
MACHOL & JOHANNES
MAGNETIC CONCEPTS CORP
MAIN AUTO PARTS
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
EMPLOYEE
INCENTIVE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
4
6/01/2004
341.55
319.74
1,035.00
316.07
8,389.00
20.80
234.50
99.99
10,780.81
5,000.00
531.85
12,983.57
302.44
118.45
89.00
296.00
96.80
200.00
23.32
69.94
138.60
214.02
55.00
900.00
86.74
650.00
98.47
189.75
133.58
9,062.07
100.00
4,802.35
364.50
593.85
44.40
770.00
36.57
598.00
5.82
31.88
32.40
18.01
MARIA WOOD
MARILYN MENNS
MARIO OJEDA
MARKS PLUMBING PARTS
MARLENE MC CAFFERTY
MATT ROYER
MBIA
MCCAULLEY REBECCA T
MCI WORLDCOM
MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE
MERCKATL
MICHAEL CIRKOVIC
MICHAEL R DUNLEVIE
MICRO PLASTICS
MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP
MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN
MIKE KERST
MILLER & COHEN
MOORE BUSINESS
MOORE MEDICAL CORP
MOtOR POOL FUND
MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS
MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES
MSR WEST, INC.
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
NATIONAL HS T/TA RESOURCE
NATIONAL NETWORK SERVICES
NATIONAL SPEAKER & SOUND
NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES
NORDIC REFRIGERATION
NUTRITION CONSULTANTS
ON TARGET MARKETING INC
ORTEN & HINDMAN
OSM DELIVERY LLC
PAPER THERMOMETER COMPANY
PAPER WISE
PEGGY GRAYBEAL
PEtTY CASH ACCOUNTING
PETTY CASH MOTOR POOL
PHNAC %JOLYNNIDLER
PRINTRITE
PSS, INC
PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION
PUBLIC SAFETY WAREHOUSE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
5
6/01/2004
630.00
17.40
841.55
99.64
48.42
162.43
4,521.10
64.69
1,210.38
280.00
347.90
208.33
17.50
25.80
75.75
373.14
170.70
30.00
834.34
124.73
47,755.59
865.00
5,201.45
290.00
832.50
600.00
12,540.00
140.00
1,703.44
205.85
124.00
1,002.52
9.80
418.00
107.00
1,187.70
160.00
1,541.89
100.00
75.00
366.004239.17
94.50
7,954.90
PURCHASE POWER
QWEST
R L POLK & COMPANY
R.S. MEANS COMPANY, INC.
REBECCA WHEELERSBURG
RENTAL SERVICE CORP
RICHARD A KESLER
ROBERT KURTZMAN DO
ROCKY MOUNTAIN REPROGRAPH
ROCKYNET.COM INC
ROGER MOORE
ROSIE MORENO
ROSS PRODUCTS DIVISION
ROY MOODY & ASSOCIATES
RUMILDA CUBIAS
SARA JARAMILLO
SARAH SCHWPER
SCHUTZMAN COMPANY, INe.
SEBASTIAN RODRIQUEZ
SECRETARY OF STATE
SERVICEMASTER CLEAN
SHEAFFER KAREN
SILVIA LORENA DELGADO
SINTON DAIRY COMPANY
SIRCHlE FINGERPRINT
SMALL FARM TODAY
SOMIX TECHNOLOGIES INC
SOUTHLAND MEDICAL CORP
SPARTAN TOOLS
SPEAKOUTV AIL INCORP.
SPSS
STATE OF COLORADO
STEPHEN ELZINGA
STERICYCLE INC
STEVE TEIEN
STEVENS HOME CARE INC
STRAWBERRY PATCH
SUMMIT COUNTY ASSESSOR
SUSPENSE FUND
TAMRABLACKARD
TEAK SIMONTON
TETON GREEN BUILDING CONF
TEXAS COOPERATIVE EXT
THE FLOWER MARt
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
, REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
6
6/01/2004
4,040.00
6,251.58
660.00
671.25
79.00
53.54
8,146.61
3,557.70
6,392.50
50.00
30.00
1,032.34
515.36
1,624.45
1,025.00
80.04
320.16
243.66
40.00
10.00
68,695.77
66.95
85.90
188.03
508.31
23.95
695.00
2,953.83
509.89
900.00
1,155.00
472.56
75.00
311.16
1,170.00
83.25
62.507575.00
83,025.49
170.22
42.89
395.00
46.00
45.00
THE OLD GYPSUM PRINTER
THOMAS F FARRELL
TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED
TOWN OF GYPSUM
TRI COUNTY FIRE
UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
UNITED REPRO GRAPHIC
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV
UPPER ARKANSAS VALLEY
UTILITY TECHNICAL SERVICE
VAIL DAILY THE
VAIL ELECTRONICS
V AIL LOCK AND KEY
V AIL V ALLEY EMERGENCY
V AIL V ALLEY MEDICAL CENTR
V AILNET INC
VALLEY LUMBER
VALLEY P ARTNERSHW
VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL
VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY
VERIZON WIRELESS,
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
VILLAGE PROFILE
VISA CARD SERVICES
WALZ POSTAL SOLUTIONS INC
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WELLS FARGO
WEST GROUP
WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY
WYNTTAYLOR
WYNDHAM ANATOLE
XCEL ENERGY
XEROX CORPORATION
Y AMP A V ALLEY ELECTRIC
YASMINE DELGADO
YOUR PERSONAL CHEF
Z DELI INC
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
PAYROLL FOR MAY
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE .
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
$ERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
PAYROLL EXPD
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
PAYROLL 11 & 12
7
6/01/2004
348.89
65.72
199.20
800.00
422.00
50.00
280.68
660.75
6,000.00
195.00
350.00
100.00
564.25
6.50
720.00
1,265.85
67.80
250.56
6,740.00
165.00
6,107.20
3,025.23
11.27
3,595.00
2,513.41
342.16
852.43
271,637.88
2,247.72
1,053.50
438.89
160.28
3.50
966.00
793.33
7,688.49
247.49
80.00
205.00
45.45
789.13
614,547.54
ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND
A PEAK, INe.
AAAA SEPTIC PUMPING
BLUE SKY LIGHTING AND
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS
COpy PLUS
DEEP ROCK WEST
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
HIGGINS BRAD
HILL BROTHERS CHEMICAL CO
INTERVVEST SAFETY SUPPLY
JP TRUCKING, INe.
KINDER MORGAN INC
LAFARGE CORPORATION
MCPHEE CONSTRUCTION
MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE
MOTOR POOL FUND
PALIN EQUIPMENT, CORP.
PROPERTY IMAGING, LLC
SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION
SERVICEMASTER CLEAN
SUSPENSE FUND
TO\VN OF GYPSUM
TRI COUNTY FIRE
VISA CARD SERVICES
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WELLS FARGO
WEST EAGLE RANCH LLC
WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY
PAYROLL FOR MAY
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
PAY ROLL EXPD
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
PAYROLL 11 & 12
8
6/01/2004
1,476,212.39
1,820.00
260.00
5,725.00
646.20
213.04
31.30
670.17
320.85
13,661.49
202.46
117,627.17
696.55
270.00
2,350.00
70.30
254,118.19
607.89
462.50
149.42
1,826.11
5,887.74
239.85
9.88
206.39
35.24
25,271.55
2,000.00
1,500.00
339.83
59,489.82
496,708.94
TERRI ALLENDER
V ANASK WAREHOUSE COMPANY
VERIZON WIRELESS,
VIRGINIA A VILA
WELLS FARGO
XEROX CORPORATION
PAYROLL FOR MAY
WRAP FUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
PAYROLLEXPD
SERVICE
390.00
288.96
339.57
113.51
17,829.16
169.78
PAYROLL 11 & 12
38,445.44
94,042.67
COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH SERVICE
JOELKARR SERVICE
RETIREMENT FUND
SUSPENSE FUND
INSURANCE RESERVE FUND
EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL
OFFSITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
65.00
514.20
579.20
SERVICE
67,892.33
67,892.33
SERVICE
1,623.97
1,623.97
10
6/01/2004
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS
FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
AMERICINN LODGE & SUITES
AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS
BEST WESTERN EAGLE LODGE
CAROL N VAUGHAN DESIGNS
CARPET ONE
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS
EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER
ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO
ENGINEERING COMPUTER
GT ALLIANCE INC
HbR INC
HERMAN MILLER INC.
OLD NATIONAL JASPER
P-LOGIC SYSTEMS
PEAK CNIL ENGINEERING IN
PETER BERGH
PREMIER ELECTRIC CO INe
SQUARE ROOT SOLUTIONS INC
STRATEGIC FENCE & WALL CO
TRANE COMPANY
UNIONP ACIFIC RAILROAD CO
VOGELMAN WEST ASSOCIATES
SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP.
A & E TIRE INC
AIAUTOELECTroCCOMPANY
AAAA SEPTIC PUMPING
ABARTAMEDIA
SERVICE
SERVICE
516.96
11,067.23
11,584.19
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
134.00
3,000.82
330.00
202.50
4,222.65
1,156.80
284.25
38,659.07
1,608.00
2,465.00
3,592.04
1,421.00
31,711.30
3,712.50
1,330.00
1,000.00
756.00
5,350.00
12,963.40
9,727.54
31,371.82
510.00
155,508.69
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
11
6/01/2004
3,587.95
132.65
260.00
880.00
ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS
ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY
AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSIT
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING
CMGG LLC
COLORADO DEPT REVENUE
COLORADO MOTOR PARTS
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS
COLUMBINE MARKET
COLUMBINE STORAGE CENTER
COpy PLUS
CORPORATE EXPRESS
CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN
DAVID JOHNSON
DEEP ROCK WEST
DOCTORS ON CALL
DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES
EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL
FEDERAL EXPRESS
G & K SERVICES
GE CAPITAL
GILLIG CORPORATION
GLENWOOD RADIATOR REPAIR
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS
INTERMOUNTAIN ENGINEERING
JANET FIELD
JAY MAX SALES
KELLEY S WILLIAMS
KINDER MORGAN INC
KINETICO WATER PROS
KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LIGHTS ON BROADWAY
LTK ENGINEERING SERVICES
M&MAUTOPARTS
MAIN AUTO PARTS
MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE
MHC KENWORTH-DENVER
MID WEST TRUCK
MOES ORIGINAL BBQ
MOTOR POOL FUND
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVlcE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
12
6/0112004
49.85
52.60
7,513.00
256.72
287.67
344.38
67.60
302.80
175.00
13.56
933.75
59.40
653.95
14,032.11
218.05
14.90
90.00
12,395.77
29,016.50
59.91
432.44
296.08
5,757.75
1,871.78
1,176.52
5.00
1,500.00
81.77
21.78
57.00
2,439.15
35.00
333.00
783.77
43.35
972.00
5.90
255.85
70.30
567.23
69.30
960.00
6,530.80
MOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE
PALIN EQUWMENT, CORP.
QWEST
ROCKHURSTCOLLEGE
RONALD F. GANN
SAFETY KLEEN (WHICITA)
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE
SANDY MCCARTHY
SERCK SERVICES INC
SERVICEMASTER CLEAN
SILVER WHEELS INC.
SUSPENSE FUND
TOWN OF AVON
TOWN OF GYPSUM
TOWN OF VAIL
TRI COUNTY FIRE
UNItED STAtES WELDING
V AIL LOCK AND KEY
VAIL RESORTS INC
VALLEY CREDIT AND
VERIZON WIRELESS,
VISION CHEMICAL SYSTEMS
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WELLS FARGO
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY
XCELENERGY
YOUR PERSONAL CHEF
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY
PAYROLL FOR MAY
SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS
ALPINE ENGINEERING
BILL MAC F ARLANE
COLORADO PRINTING COMPANY
COLUMBINE MARKET
COpy PLUS
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
PAYROLLEXPD
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
PAYROLL 11 & 12
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
13
6/0112004
3,009.50
607.89
387.80
89.50
330.36
116.06
46.07
1,596.00
686.96
6,394.56
1,400.00
10,914.64
31,173.95
839.93
200.00
34.59
26.91
70.50
200.00
342.84
339.32
1,036.31
123.38
46,470.95
341.20
226.90
175.00
212.28
91.94
113,064.63
316,213.86
6,342.50
91.98
1,505.82
43.82
55.10
FEDERAL EXPRESS
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS
KEMP AND COMPANY INC
NEXGENCONSTRUCTORS
PROMO DIRECT
SUSPENSE FUND
WELLS FARGO
WYLACOSUPPLYCOMPANY
YEH & ASSOCIATES INC
SALES TAX R.F.V. TRANSP.
ROARING FORK
SALES TAXR.F.V. TRAILS
ROARING FORK
AIRPORT FUND
AAAE
ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY
ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY
AMERICAN AVIONICS INC
AMERICAN LINEN
APEX SECURITY
BARNARD DUNKELBERG & CO
BERTHOD MOTORS
SERVICE
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
PAYROLLEXPD
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
7.05
5.36
369.15
636.60
135,351.94
545.75
147.74
851.52
28.50
4,813.10
150,795.93
SERVICE
62,200.28
62,200.28
SERVICE
6,911.14
6,911.14
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
14
6/0112004
145.00
26.00
366.18
57.00
675.16
141.25
3,000.00
1,659.51
BIG STEVES TOWING
CHRIS ANDERSON
COLORADO MOTOR PARTS
COLORADO STATE FIRE CHIEF
CONTRACT LIGHTING
COpy PLUS
CORPORATE EXPRESS
DEEP ROCK WEST
DISH NETWORK
DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP
EAGLE PHARMACY
EAGLE VALLEY HUMANE ASSOC
EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING
ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO
ELIZABETH WILT
FRUITA CONSUMER COOP ASSN
GALLS INCORPORATED
GRAND JUNCTION PWE AND
GYPSUM TOWN OF
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
HILL & COMPANY
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
JEPPESEN DATAPLAN INC
KINDER MORGAN INC
KKCH RADIO
KSKE-NRC BROADCASTING
KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC
LAWSON PRODUCTS
M & M AUTO PARTS
MAIN AUTO PARTS
MCI WORLDCOM
MOTOR POOL FUND
NEXTEL
ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO
OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION
SERVICEMASTER CLEAN
STANDARD SIGNS INC
SUMMITEX, LLC
SUSPENSE FUND
TRI COUNTY FIRE
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
US BANK
US CUSTOMS SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
15
6/01/2004
1,820.00
33.81
92.65
150.00
603.39
250.00
506.03
70.10
10.98
271.77
6.00
100.00
285.00
74,064.60
41.40
1,025.74
1.36
384.89
431.05
472.96
1,751.68
1,581.18
11,855.06
2,877.78
288.00
384.00
800.00
110.32
174.72
2.16
50.68
888.48
836.74
6.49
1,016.38
2,348.00
120.47
110.16
2,342.07
2,077.00
17.45
2,977.1002,529.80
V AIL VALLEY JET CENTER
VISA CARD SERVICES
WALSH ENVIRONMENTAL
WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE
W ASTEMANAGEMENT
WELLS FARGO
WESTERN IMPLEMENTS
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY
PAYROLL FOR MAY
MICROW AVE MAINTENANCE
FUND
CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC
QWEST
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
PAYROLL EXPD
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
PAYROLL 11 & 12
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
MORALES CUSTOM WOODWORK SERVICE
HOUSING FUND
HOGAN & HARTSON
MOUNTAIN REGIONAL
SERVICE
SERVICE
16
6/01/2004
300.86
1,617.20
69,127.45
32,413.09
890.04
13,367.69
43.93
1,024.06
122.20
30,303.77
271,047.84
286.83
2,812.89
19,225.50
643.99
22,969.21
2,000.00
2,000.00
106.25
2,500.00
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND
CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN
FRONT RANGE FIRE
GALLS INCORPORATED
NAPA AUTO PARTS - VAIL
PRO POLY OF AMERICA INC
RAE SYSTEMS INC
TSI INCORPORATED
TTCI
VISA CARD SERVICES
LANDFILL FUND
CAROLINA SOFTWARE
CODEPT AGRICULTURE
CORPORATE EXPRESS
DEEP ROCK WEST
DOWN VALLEY SEPTIC
EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING
EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
KRW CONSULTING INC
MOTOR POOL FUND
RONALD RASNIC
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION
SERVICEMASTER CLEAN
SUSPENSE FUND
V AIL DAILY THE
VISA CARD SERVICES
WELLS FARGO
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
PAYROLLEXPD
SUPPLIES
17
6/01/2004
2,606.25
3,950.00
163.10
241.93
110.51
204.60
6,025.00
8,189.20
7,770.00
831.37
27,485.71
306.16
500.00
151.42
111. 75
405.00
125.61
300.00
371.35
7,969.56
124,299.23
102.72
795.00
3,489.86
1,654.91
210.32
167.92
6,637.01
199.95
PAYROLL FOR MAY
MOTOR POOL FUND
AL-JON INC
ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY
CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE
CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING
CENTURY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
COLLETTS
COpy PLUS
CTC ANALYTICAL SERVICES
DAVID JOHNSON
DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES
EAGLE AMOCO
EAGLE PHARMACY
EATON SALES & SERVICE
ELMERS GLASS
FABIAN LOPEZ
FARIS MACHINERY CO
G & K SERVICES
GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE
GRAND JUNCTION PWE AND
HANSON EQUIPMENT
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
HENSLEY BATTERY
KINDER MORGAN INC
LAWSON PRODUCTS
M&MAUTOPARTS
MACDONALD EQUWMENT CO
MAIN AUTO PARTS
MOTOR POOL FUND
NAP A AUTO PARTS
POWER MOTWE
REY MOTORS INCORPORATED
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE
SERVICEMASTER CLEAN
PAYROLL 11 & 12
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
18
6/01/2004
14,558.48
162,356.25
865.00
42.02
205.54
134.53
26.58
67,849.07
74.40
25.00
22.44
562.74
35.00
38.65
170.00
245.36
13.20
312.59
583.96
1,701.44
14.82
3,873.03
326.36
638.65
1,800.84
109.00
358.29
369.69
129.27
12,209.72
1,697.74
2,890.87
281.92
46.09
4,721.16
SUSPENSE FUND
TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
TOWN OF GYPSUM
TRI COUNTY FIRE
TWO RNERS CHEVROLET
UNITED STATES WELDING
VEEDER-ROOT COMPANY
WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WEAR PARTS EQUWMENT
WELLS FARGO
WESTERN SLOPE PAINT
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY
PAYROLL FOR MAY
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY
MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN.
PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT
UNITED STATES LIFE INS
ENHANCEDE911 FUND
CENTURYTEL
LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES
QWEST
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE '
SUPPLIES
PAYROLLEXPD
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
PAYROLL 11 & 12
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
19
6/01/2004
1,624.41
3,887.89
620.13
25.53
298.90
291.65
99.00
1,939.44
91.10
1,611.92
8,537.83
350.47
1,029.94
22,250.37
145,033.55
1,050.00
36,430.83
4,187.70
5,593.00
47,261.53
179.93
49.75
17,090.16
17,319.84
3,538;353.77
Consent Agenda
A. Approval of Bill paying for the week of May 31,2004 and June 7, 2004, (subject to
review by the County Administrator).
B. Approval for Payroll for June 10,2004 (subject to review by the County Administrator)
C. Approval of the minutes of the Eagle Board of County Commissioners meeting for May
11,2004
D. Contract with B.P. Reclamation, Inc. for hydro seeding.
E. Intergovernmental Agreement for the Regional Trail at Arrowhead River Ranch
F. Resolution 2004-063 Town of Minturn Representation ofthe Eagle County Regional
Transportation Authority Board of Directors
G. Agreement between Eagle County and the Vail Recreation District for After School Care
start-up costs.
H. Agreement between Eagle County and the Colorado Department of Public Health &
Environment for community Nursing
I. Intergovernmental Agreement between Eagle, Garfield, Pitkin and Summit Counties
concerning Joint Cooperation for Child Welfare Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Core Services
J. Addendum to the Agreement between Eagle County and Valley Partnership for Drug
Prevention
K. Resolution 2004-060 concerning the Ratification of an Appointment to the Basalt
Regional Library District Board of Trustees
L. Water Supply for the Eagle County Pond between the Upper Regional Water Authority
and Eagle County, Colorado
M. Project Agreement between Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District and County of
Eagle
N. Resolution 2004-061 Establishing Compensation of Election Judges in the County of
Eagle, State of Colorado
O. Public Improvements Agreement for the Wolf Parking Lot Grading Permit No. MI-11950
P. Identix Maintenance Agreement Addendum
Q. Microsoft Select Enrollment v6.1 - State and Local Agreement
R. Intergovernmental Master Software Licensing Program Enrollment Agreement between
Eagle County and the Colorado State Purchasing Director
S. Public Improvements Agreement for the Wolf Parking Lot Grading Permit No. MI-
11950
20
6/01/2004
T. Public Improvements Agreement for the Beaver Creek Maintenance Facility Grading
Permit, File No. MI-11955
U. Microsoft Select Enrollment v6.1 - State and Local Agreement
V. Intergovernmental Master Software Licensing Program Enrollment Agreement between
Eagle County and the Colorado state Purchasing Director
W. Bid Award 2004 Agreement for the Guardrail Project, Ideal Fencing Corporation, 8119
Indian Peaks Ave, Erie, CO 80516
Chairman Stone asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda.
Walter Mathews, Eagle County Deputy Attorney, stated that item T will be pulled from the
agenda. This is the public improvements agreement for Beaver Creek Maintenance Facility, File
#MI11955.
Commissioner Gallagher asked Ms. Simonton about the number of student judges verSus regular
judges for the upcoming election.
Ms. Simonton replied that according to statute only one student judge per polling place, a
maximum of fifteen is allowed, and there will be eighty to one hundred judges for the General Election.
Chairman Gallagher asked Mr. Denardo to clarify the need for items U and W.
Mr. Denardo stated this is a way to be a part of the state purchasing plan. There is no required
tfioneyup front and just pay as items ate purchased.
Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the consent agenda items A-W, omitting item T.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was approved unanimously.
Plat and Resolution Signing
Cliff Simonton, Community Development, presented a plat for a minor subdivision, File 5MB-
00334, Stone Creek Drive, Lot 64, Block 1, Filing 2, Eagle-Vail Subdivision, a Minor Type B
Subdivision, the purpose of which is to condominium-ize the existing residence on Lot 64, creating two
separate dwelling units aIld related common elements.
Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve aIld authorize the chairman to sign the plat for 5MB-
00334; Stone Creek Drive Condominiums, Lot 64, Block I, Filing 2, Eagle-Vail Subdivision.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was approved unanimously.
Mr. Simonton presented Resolution 2004-062 to approve a Special Use Permit for the Edwards
Congregation of Jehovah's Witness (Eagle County File No. ZS-00116). The Board considered the
applicant's request on May 11, 2004.
Commissioner Menconi moved to approve Resolution 2004-062 for Edwards Congregation of
Jehovah's Witnesses, File ZS-00116.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The motion was approved unanimously.
Chairman Stone stated the next item was a resolution adopting a Second Supplementary Budget
and Appropriation of Anticipated Revenues for Fiscal Year 2004 and Authorizing the Transfer of
Budgeted and Appropriated Monies between Various Spending Agencies.
21
6/01/2004
Mike Roeper, Finance Director, spoke to the board and clarified some of the line item requests.
He stated that it is a bit unusual compared to prior requests. He stated that four pages of detail had been
provided. He highlighted pages 7 - 10. On page 7 and in particular the available fund balances in the
General Fund and Capital Improvements represent the balances available after the 25% reserve. He
mentioned the balance in the Capital Improvement Fund anticipates revenue of 2.8 million dollars from
CDOT for the cemetery bridge funding and 1.3 million dollars from the Districts to support the Miller
Ranch project. He stated that in 2004 the County performed one time transfers from the Retirement
Fund, Insurance Fund, and Debt Reserve Fund of approximately 2 million dollars.
Chairman Stone asked the commissioners to nod at approvals or disapprovals. He reviewed
specific line items to determine whether each ofthe commissioners would be in favor ofthem. He
asked Mr. Ingstad about the temporary parking lot and cross walk at Miller Ranch.
Mr. Ingstad responded that the money would be taken from the General Fund and moving it to
the Road and Bridge Fund to repay that fund
Mr. Brad Higgins stated that the crosswalk portion of the project hadn't been finished yet. He
told the board that the materials would not be in for another two weeks. The budget request was for
worst case scenario and stated this would come in under the request. '
Chairman Stone read items from Page 8. He asked about the emergency management generator.
Mr. Higgins clarified that there were costs to install a usable panel on the generator. The project
is underway using Fair money and this request represents a reimbursement.
Chairman Stone continued to itemize the items on the supplemental budget. He asked Kathleen
Forinash to explain the need for an additional nurse and caseworker and some of the other items in her
request.
Ms. Forinash clarified that currently there is one full time nurse in El Jebel and Eagle and one
full time nurse in Avon and one almost full time nurse in Avon and another 32 hour nurse. Their work
loads represent 85% oftheir time attending to the clinics and other services. She desires extending
i:mrhunization services and well child services for the community and working with other health partners
to achieve a better immunization rate for the children of Eagle County.
Chairman Stone asked about our i:mrhunization rate.
Ms. Forinash stated that only a small portion of children come through public health and that
Eagle County is at the low end of the rate for the state. She stated that information on how the county as
a whole is doing is not available because they have not had nurse time available to determine this
information. It is difficult to fill times when staff are taking vacations.
Mr. Ingstad stated that he and Ms. Forinash had agreed that this re-structure and staff addition
were valid changes, in particular the nursing division to allow the department to move to the next level.
Ms. Forinash spoke about some ofthe re-organization in her department to better handle the
growth of Eagle County. She clarified her desire to offer better service to the community. They are
currently in the process of recruiting the public health manager rather than a nurse manager because
Eagle County doubled its population between the 1990 census and the 2000 census. They are
anticipating future growth as well. She also stated that they are beginning to look at a community health
clinic, which would greatly enhance the public health resources for Eagle County. Her desire is to do all
possible to protect the people of Eagle County. This could happen under the umbrella of the private
sector as well and helping to promote healthy lifestyles. She felt it was important to train and free up the
nurses so that they could work not only with patients but also with the community partners. She spoke
about the home visitor position. In El Jebel she has had two % positions and these are very difficult to
22
6/01/2004
fill. They received additional community service block grant of $18, 000 which would allow increasing
the two % time positions and making them both full time positions. This would allow some parenting
services. The Fatherhood Initiative training item is for a special training in Texas during the month of
June, and her department had received $2000 to help cover the costs. The volunteer service coordinator
had previously been % time. They determined that the job took more than 30 hours per week, and
actually required a full time position. The supplemental request reflects the difference between full time
and % positions. The additional case worker also represents the net difference in cost. Over time the
number of families coming to Eagle County for welfare services has increased. This would allow 8
social case workers in her department and would allow for a reasonable case load per staff member.
Chairman Stone clarified that additional staffing is usually put through the normal annual request
process. He wondered why these positions had not come up during the normal budget schedule.
Mr. Ingstad stated that FTE's had not been approved for some time. The reason that this request'
was coming up now is that the needs of the County had not been being met. He did not believe that
these requests could wait and that this is an urgent priority.
Chairman Stone asked about the ergonomic requests.
Ms. Forinash stated that it had been recommended that the ergonomics of her work stations be
reviewed by CTSI. The request represented the recommended costs ofthe changes that were determined
to be necessary for the changed work style. She stated that this cost would be less than workman's
compensation claims.
Commissioner Gallagher asked Ms. Forinash to clarify the Head Start vehicle request.
She stated that they needed a more usable type of vehicle.
Commissioner Gallagher asked if there would be additional costs related to the addition of staff.
Ms. Forinash detailed some of these added expenses.
Carla Budd, Director of Human Resources, spoke to the board about the compensation study.
She clarified that the compensation plan had been changed from a point factor pay plan to a market
based pay plan. When this occurred the commitment was made to review this information every two
years. It is now time to review this plan and update the survey information.
Chairman Stone stated that the board would need to be prepared to implement the recommended
changes if there were any warranted based on a limited shelf life. He stated that the study could be
more than $17,000 because there would be additional costs for staff raises. He suggested that it's most
appropriate to have the study completed and recommendations made for next year's budget cycle.
Commissioner Gallagher asked when this had been done before.
Ms. Budd stated that the last time was two years ago for a full change and a partial change two
and a half years ago and a final change two years ago in January. She stated that the estimate for
completion would be the end of July. She clarified that they could project changes into the future so that
if changes were implemented on January 1, 2005.
Commissioner Menconi requested that the study be performed closer to the end of the year.
Commissioner Gallagher stated that the budget process begins in July, and he believes that the
budget officer should use that as a resource available during the process and not after the process.
Mr. Ingstad agreed that a number should be available no later than September.
Ms. Budd stated that the study should be started no later than mid-June.
Chairman Stone stated that it needed to be clear that no changes would occur until January 1,
2005.
Chairman Stone asked about the phone at the front desk.
23
6/01/2004
John Denardo clarified that this phone had already been installed and he was requesting
budgetary reimbursement.
Commissioner Gallagher asked Mr. Ingstad to identify items that would need to be spent within
the next one, two or three years.
Mr. Ingstad spoke about the radar and that the FAA had not committed to this project. Eagle
County had sent a letter committing up to a million dollars of county money to get the radar. They still
think it will be approved. He believed that it would be approved within the next two years. Cooley
Mesa Road is an obligation that the previous board entered into with the Town of Gypsum. The $14
million figure represents the high end projection. If the board decided to keep the alignment where it is
currently and not make changes, it might be done for $1,000,000. He was not sure Gypsum would be
happy with that. He clarified that the Airport would like to re-locate the road to allow for future
development. He stated that the project should have been done three or four years ago and the Town of
Gypsum had allowed him to move it forward year after year, but at some point the Commissioners are
obligated to fix this road. The runway extension is a $20,000,000 project over the next three years, and
it's a 90-10 type match. The county share should be around $2,000,000. He explained that the county
also entered into a grant application for air service with the Chamber and Vail Resorts. He believes
under this request there could be a commitment of $300,000 in addition to the money being put to the air
service program at this point. He reviewed the remainder of the line items with expected timelines for
encumbrance. He spoke about the Lafarge gravel pit and the fact that the operation would be ending
soon, and future recreation possibilities for this area.
Helen Michelbrink spoke to the board about the $4.4 million. She stated that this was part of an
overall pedestrian improvement plan that she has been working on. The board had asked about the
likelihood of these improvements taking place in the next three years, She turned this question around
and told the board that they would have to identify priorities.
Commissioner Gallagher asked whether these items were a high priority.
Ms. Michelbrink stated that many of these improvements were on county roads that were having
a lot of pedestrian activity. She provided additional information about some of the other projects listed
on the request. In her estimation the Fairgrounds Western Access would be the most likely use for
immediate funds. She reviewed several other capital projects and the timelines associated with them.
Commissioner Gallagher asked about the diversion at the Fairgrounds.
Ms. Michelbrink stated that $90,000 represented the high end. She had recently received a
$15,000 grant to help with this cost from CWRC. The $200,000 would take the project to another level.
She stated that legal work has been really expensive in terms of sorting out the county's water rights
related to this project. She estimated that the legal costs would be around $15,000.
Chairman Stone asked for clarification that the $200,000 is above and beyond what had already
been budgeted.
Ms. Michelbrink stated that this was correct. She stated that only $90,000 had already been
budgeted. She clarified that legal work is really expensive and she did not know exactly how much they
would represent.
Commissioner Menconi asked how much of the $200,000 would represent legal fees.
Ms. Miche1brink stated that she did not know how much she had added in for legal fees. She
clarified that the bulk of the $200,000 would be for planning, process, building trails and picnic shelters.
Mr. Ingstad stated that some of these items had been previously budgeted for.
Chairman Stone asked about the capital improvements list.
24
6101/2004
Mr. Roeper stated that capital improvements are around 130 million dollars.
Mr. Stan Zoemler and John Gulick were present from the Town of Vail with a request for
$1,000,000 for the West Vail Fire Station. It is their beliefthat this station would greatly improve the
response and service not only to Vail, but to unincorporated areas including Dowd Junction and Vail
Pass area. He believes the total cost would be around $2,000,000. Other potential development could
help bring down the net cost. He told the board that the Town of Vail had identified that response to
unincorporated areas was around 25%. There are 3.6 acres that might include opportunities for
additional development.
Mr. Ingstad asked about the actual 2004 costs.
Mr. Zoemler stated that they would not be beginning construction on the facility based on the
fact that the money is not currently available. They only have about $160,000 presently.
Mr. Ingstad stated that this request might be premature, but for the board to give direction for
actual expenditures in 2005.
Chainnan Stone stated that the regular capital improvement process might be a more appropriate
time to consider these requests, considering the size of the requests. He felt there would be a more
exhaustive process involved at that point.
Commissioner Menconi asked about their vision and plan for the recreation center. He infonned
Mr. Zoemler that the Town of Gypsum would be coming forward with similar requests.
Mr. Zoemler clarified that it would be a 2004 project, about an 8700 square foot facility for
gymnastics and space for other activities such as yoga class types of activity. He stated there are a series
of partners for the project: Vail Resorts, Eagle River Water District, the School District and the Town of
Vail. They have a shortfall of $500,000.00. They desire to get the bulk of the construction completed
prior to school beginning in the fall. The construction would be completed by December.
Commissioner Menconi asked about the total projected cost.
Mr. Zoemler stated that the cost would be around $1.5 million. He inquired as to the rate
structure for unincorporated residents.
Mr. Zoemler stated he was not sure of the answer, but would be happy to bring the question to
the recreation district.
Commissioner Menconi stated that he is in favor of approval today for this project based on prior
a.pprovals for similar types of activities.
Chairman Stone asked if there was a strategy to accomplish this without County participation.
Mr. Zoemler stated that his strategy would be that the costs over time would be recouped with
fees.
Commissioner Gallagher asked why the town is building the rec center if there is a Vail Rec
District. He agrees with Commissioner Menconi about supporting the concept. However, there are
other items to consider, including the possibility of consolidating some of the county rec districts. He
wondered about the request being considered during the budget process. He asked several questions
about the Fire Station. He is well aware that the Vail Fire District provides services to the
unincorporated areas. He believes that users should pay for their services and wondered about a Vail
Fire Protection District. His dream is to see a map of the county covered with Fire Districts similar to
the ambulance districts coverage. He stated that 25% ofthe total cost would be more like $625,000. He
believes this might be a more reasonable request and looks forward to seeing the request as part of the
capital request ptocess.
25
6/01/2004
Chairman Stone clarified that the Fire Station should be part ofthe regular budget cycle and
wondered what the consensus was related to the gymnastics center.
Commissioner Gallagher stated that he anticipated both requests coming in as part of the regular
budget process.
Mr. Ingstad suggested that Mr. Zoemler go back to the board of the rec district and inquire about
the out of district fees if the county participated in this project.
Mr. Zoemler stated that he is worried that he might force the fee structure to be more
complicated.
Mr. Gulick stated that they were considering the possibility of asking the Eagle County Health
Services District to join them in a joint facility.
Commissioner Menconi asked Mr. Gulick about the Fire Station. He commended the work that
the Vail Fire group had helped with on Vail Pass. He indicated that he is in favor of helping with the
West Vail Fire building. He asked about potential consolidation.
Mr. Gulick stated that it remains a topic of discussion. He stated all districts work cooperatively
together from Dotsero to Vail Pass.
Commissioner Menconi asked about service to unincorporated Eagle County.
Mr. Gulick stated that there are individual contracts in place with homeowners and commercial
buildings.
Mark Hurlbert, District Attorney spoke to the board about his request for bullet proof glass for
his office. He explained the current situation where there is a pane of thin glass between his staff and
the general public. His desire is to increase the safety of the building.
Mr. Cunningham stated that the $10,000 represented not only the glass, but portions of wall
sliITounding the window. There had previously been a request for access card system to be installed.
Mr. Ingstadstated that he has always been concerned about the security in the county
courthouse. He believes that the board should consider the request for additional security today and
implementing these enhancements as soon as possible. He believes the request at hand should be
approved, but that additional security improvements should be strongly considered.
Mr. Cunningham spoke about the estimated cost to make these enhancements.
Commissioner Gallagher agreed that this is an important request. He requested a more concise
bid for the other improvements.
Chairman Stone stated that the rest of the supplemental budget would be considered at a later
time during the meeting.
Mr. Ingstad stated that it was important to remember that this was not the only security
enhancement that needs to be made at the courthouse. He believes that the full security enhancements
are closer to $500,000.00.
Chairman Stone offered members of the public the opportunity to speak about the supplemental
budget.
Commissioner Gallagher moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and
reconvene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Eagle County Liquor License Authority Consent Agenda
26
6/01/2004
Ms. Simonton stated the only item for the board to consider was the Consent Agenda and the
following renewals. The Edwards Liquor Mart represents a change in Corporate structure.
Commissioner Gallagher stated that he would like some back up documents for the Consent
Agenda.
Chairman Stone clarified the information that had been provided to the board prior to the
meeting to Commissioner Gallagher.
Edwards Liquor Mart
Riverwalk Wine & Spirits
River House Restaurant
Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the liquor license consent agenda.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion.
Commissioner Gallagher pointed out some deficiencies about preparation in the future for
Consent Agenda.
The vote was approved unanimously.
Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority and
reconvene as the Board of County Commissioners.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Report of Open Space Advisory Committee on the Bair Ranch Conservation Project
(Continued from 5/11/04)
Commissioner Gallagher stated that he wanted to report that he had listened to tapes and
reviewed minutes of the previous meeting and had gone through pounds of email and read newspaper
clippings. He believes he is very familiar with what transpired at the last meeting that this was
considered. lIe feels he is prepared. He lamented that this file lost some dignity in this process by well
intentioned but misguided efforts. One example would be an email mailed by a commissioner
requesting additional emails to be sent. Another example was the request from our local Eagle County
Land Trust people to the ski company to withhold their applications so as not to cloud this request. He
wanted to address some of the comments that he had received. He made two columns, one positive and
one with opposition comments. Comments in support speak of wildlife habitat. He agrees that this is a
valid consideration. He stated another comment received was in support of ranching heritage of Eagle
County. He is not sure this includes dude ranching. Another comment in support was the "view." That
said, view is not one of his issues. He doesn't mind seeing someone else's home, but he does
appreciate a good pristine view. He reminded all present that this county is over 80% federal lands. He
commended the partnership and felt it was a plus. He felt that the fact that this was a future looking
request was most essential thing for the next 20-30-40 years. He had heard that there was urgency to
this project, but he has heard that before. He addressed the negative comments. Atthe top of his
negative comments column he wrote access / private. He referred to the ballot language, which passed
by the voters of Eagle County. The majority voted to tax themselves and give that money to the county
to spend on open space. He read the ballot language. As a voter, he remarked, that when he read the
language, he understood that public access was not a guarantee, but rather one of many purposes or
27
6/01/2004
options. When the OSAC committee guidelines were implemented and approved by the board, they
made it a point to include many options. He believes there is a full range of desires for open space. He
isn't swayed by the access question. If it is approved, the open space easement would be had for non-
access price. He stated that at the same time if it were wide open to the public the ranching operation
would be at risk. He had heard that another argument against this was personal benefit legislation, in
other words, the question of whether the money would be used to support someone else's livelihood of
"dude ranching." He believes that the consideration should be whether value for the dollar is being
achieved. He spoke about the concept of "don't use my tax dollar." In the ballot question people
weren't asked to give their tax dollars and then have the ability to veto individual projects. When taxes
are paid the monies come to the board for spending decisions. The last comment he heard in opposition
was that this money should be spent elsewhere. He told all present that when the county started the
OSAC, opportunity for other proposals were encouraged. He is disappointed that the ski company
withheld their application because they were encouraged to submit the same. He told the crowd that
there were not competing proposals. This process requires a willing seller and a willing buyer. He
spoke about other positive comments. The last one he spoke about was "development." This right he
finds is the most important part ofthe project. Last year when he voted for approval he didn't believe
this was about beauty, or the ranch preservation, but rather the benefit was that those thousands of acres
would never be developed. This is what he finds to be of value to the people of Eagle County. The fact
that for perpetuity the people of Eagle County would not have to pay the difference between residential
taxes and residential expenses is what is important to him. He believes that ultimately water will slow
the growth.
Commissioner Gallagher moved that the Board of County Commissioner for Eagle County
contribute $2,000,000 towards the acquisition of the Bair Ranch Conservation Easement from the Eagle
County Open Space Tax fund subject to the following conditions:
. That all Eagle County funds be used only for land located within Eagle County Colorado
. That prior to release of any funds by Eagle County, County staff shall have
. That after review by staff comments and relative documents will be presented to the Board for
final review and approval at its discretion.
. That the condition of the Conservation Easement requiring the entire 4318.17 acre Bair Ranch
property consisting of both the Eagle and Garfield portions, excluding the 11.4 acre residential
parcel, be kept under single ownership at all times, be modified to allow for the separation and
sale of the Eagle County parcel to Eagle County, only to be held under the Conservation
Easement or otherwise as open space, such sale to be on conditions mutually agreeable to Eagle
County and the seller.
. That absent a sale to Eagle County, the entire 4318.17 acre Bair Ranch property shall remain
under single ownership at all times pursuant to the terms and conditions of the conservation
easement.
. That all material representations made by the requesting party in submitted materials and public
meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval unless otherwise amended by
other conditions.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion with an amendment. He asked Commissioner
Gallagher about Item 3 of the condition and asked that the following be added: "that this be brought to
the commissioners on June 15th for attorney update."
28
6/01/2004
Commissioner Gallagher stated that if all parties are facilitating that date he did not object, but
he did not want to tie the board to a date that could not be met if all of the requirements are not done in a
timely fashion.
Mr. Treu stated that the issue is the June 23rd inspection deadline. He stated that the attorney's
office would have their end completed and he believed the Conservation fund could make the same
commitment.
Tom Macy from the Conservation Fund informed the board that he believes that the
Conservation Fund could have all documents completed by June 15th. He saw no issues that could not be
accommodated or worked through. He requested that the 15th be the date because of other deadlines.
Commissioner Gallagher asked if condition #4 could be achieved by the deadline.
Mr. Macy stated he felt this was a reasonable and creative way to deal with the right of first
refusal. He would have to get concurrence from the Bairs and their attorney.
Chairman Stone stated that Commissioner Gallagher's comments about the urgency and being
rushed were important. He didn't think Commissioner Gallagher should be held to a timeframe that
might eliminate the issues being resolved.
Commissioner Gallagher stated he would not amend his motion, but would ask staff to attempt to
get everything in order for the June 15th date.
Chairman Stone clarified that this issue would not have to come before the board again, but
could be covered during attorney update.
Commissioner Menconi asked Commissioner Gallagher to review his schedule for the coming
weeks.
Commissioner Gallagher stated that he will be here next week and the 15th, then to a conference.
This does not require a meeting of the board, but that county counsel reviews the documents and gives
them the nod to move forward. He is confident that with cooperation of the parties involved, it can be
accomplished.
Mr. Caccioppo attempted to make public comments.
Chairman Stone clarified the issue.
Mr. Caccioppo argued with Chairman Stone about the language of the motion.
Chairman Stone asked Mr. Caccioppo to stop his comments. He suggested an additional
amendment to the motion. He suggested limiting commercial use of the Eagle County portion of the
parcel, the mountain parcel. He believes that Eagle County money is being spent on the mountain
parcel, which cannot be seen, and might as well be in Montana. To keep the environment preserved he
suggested limiting commercial use on that portion of the property to sheep ranching for the future, not
dude ranching. He agreed that four wheelers could be used for this type of ranching on the Eagle
County portion of the property.
Commissioner Gallagher stated that for the past many months, the sellers had been working and
all of the participating parties had been working under the assumption of full use of the land which is
permitted by Eagle County zoning. A legitimate use on agricultural land includes dude ranching and
tourist activity. He anticipates that limiting that use is contrary to the County's good faith.
Chairman Stone asked for a quick explanation. He stated that he would not be voting in favor of
this request because he did not think Eagle County would be getting value for their dollars. There are
other projects that the Eagle County Land Trust had yet to complete, that being the Vassar Meadows
exchange. The transfer of ownership of that land with the forest service land located between Avon and
Singletree is subject to development today. The Forest Service can trade that property for something
29
6/01/2004
else and somebody could develop it. He stated that there was a commitment made on East and West
'Brush Creek, and until that trade is completed, it leaves that property subject to development. He thinks
a mistake is being made in not giving this process the dignity it deserves. He went on to say that he felt
it was important for the board to come through with a list of priorities He thinks the biggest injustice is
that part of the process that the other two commissioners are supporting is that the whole process for the
first funding of the use of the open space dollars has been amended and created to support one project
and one project only, which is the Bair Ranch. He thinks this is very obvious. His belief is that some of
the allowances will come back to haunt the county. He hoped that one of the other commissioners
would join him in a full review of the process that is fair and balanced and gives the ability and the
encouragement for all acquisitions to be heard.
Chairman Stone asked for a vote on the motion.
Commissioner Gallagher and Commissioner Menconi voted to support the motion and Chairman
Stone vote to oppose. The motion passed by a vote of two to one.
Commissioner Menconi thanked all present for coming out with support. The county had
received 1038 people in support of this project. He felt it was a stand for the vision and the future of
Eagle County. He especially wanted to thank the hard work of the advisory committee who did the
heavy lifting on reviewing the project and deciding 9-1 that this was the right thing to do.
There was applause from the audience.
Commissioner Gallagher suggested a break.
Supplemental Budget (Con't)
Chairman Stone asked Ms. Michelbrink about the sidewalk extension from Miller Ranch Bridge
to Highway 6.
Ms. Michelbrink asked to increase the amount from $65,000 to $85,000 to reflect some extra
mobilization costs. The sidewalk would be 700 - 800 feet. The sidewalk currently ends at the end of the
bridge. She felt because so many children are using the bus and using the bus stops, this sidewalk would
connect the bridge to the two transit stops. She stated that there is no way to make it part of the funding
request. The north side is particularly dangerous. She wants to complete the work with the overlay that
is taking place in two weeks.
Mr. Merry clarified the funding request for contract services the West Nile Virus program. The
figure in the contract is $154,000 total. Mr. Merry added on a $6,000 contingency amount.
Chairman Stone asked about the playground at Berry Creek. This money was originally
contemplated to be reimbursed by the Berry Creek Metro District as tap fees are received.
Commissioner Menconi stated that he is in support.
Commissioner Gallagher expressed his concern about the design.
Chairman Stone asked that an un-allocated but appropriated fund discussion at a later time.
Chairman Stone asked about carpeting and painting in the Eagle County Building.
Mr. Cunningham stated that this would complete the work that had been previously started.
Commissioner Menconi asked ifthere had been a change order based on the work done in the
commissioner's offices.
Mr. Cunningham stated no, the assumption was not made that all carpet and paint in the building
would need replacement in the entire building. He stated that certain areas of the building had not been
allocated. These areas included all of the department areas on the first and second floor.
30
6/01/2004
Commissioner Gallagher asked if this was desired with a two to three year completion, or should
it bedone at the same time.
Mr. Cunningham stated that he had two bids from companies that could come in after hours.
Commissioner Gallagher asked about the wisdom of doing the entire building every two to three
years, or should it be done on a 3 year rotation basis.
Ms. Forinash asked for ergonomic equipment for the general fund workstations as opposed to the
social service fund workstations. The recommendation includes flat screen monitors; two in Avon and
three in EI Jebel in addition to other equipment.
Chainnan Stone stated that if the county is going to be looking at ergonomic changes they should
be looked at County-wide. He is interested in a good and healthy workplace, but he is prompted to
consider all of the departments at once.
Commissioner Gallagher concurred. He feels that if current working conditions are unhealthy
they need to be looked at. If they aren't, then perhaps a county wide effort would be better, said
Commissioner Gallagher.
Chairman Stone asked about the Mintuin Senior funding. He is in favor of funding continuing
hut requested more information about the continued funding. He requested that this be placed in the un-
allocated file. He spoke about flat screen monitors requested for the treasurer and the public trustee and
believes that this should be looked at on a county-wide basis.
Commissioner Gallagher asked about replacing these screens by attrition and asked for IT's
input on these requests,
Chainnan Stone asked about the request from the Sheriff's department for integrated dispatch.
He inquired about.the T-l1ine from dispatch to Ski Cooper. He asked about several other line items on
the appropriation request. He spoke about the microwave equipment lease payment. The new number is
a net number of$19,734.00. He requested that the $10,000 for fencing around the soccer field be put
into the appropriated hut unallocated account. The fence would be a green plastic coated chain link
fence.
Comrnissioller Gallagher stated that he is not interested in a chain link fence surrounding a
soccer field; he requested more of an open design. He is in favor of setting aside money for that purpose
however.
Commissioner Menconi stated that he is also concerned with the design. He asked about the idea
of rocks or boulders instead.
Commissioner Gallagher requested the board had gone to the expense of involving an architect
to look at the Freedom Park memorial. The estimate for planning purposes had been received in the
amount of $5000 - $15,000. This amount represents a substantial discount for the people of Eagle
- County. He requested that $15,000 be place in the appropriated but unallocated category.
Commissioner Menconi expressed support for this funding as well. He wondered what the
planning for completion would be. He inquired about fund-raising to help with completion of the
project. He Wondered if the group was anticipating that the county would be responsible for the
architecture ofthis project.
Commissioner Gallagher anticipates that the County would end up funding a large portion, and
be able to filld some fullding partners. He clarified that by spending the planning money an estimate of
the total cost would become more possible.
PDS-00039 Willits Bend PUD
31
6/01/2004
Joseph Forinash, Planner, Community Development, asked that this file be tabled to July 13,
2004.
Commissioner Gallagher moved to table the file until July 13, 2004.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the request. The motion carried unanimously.
VIS...0023 Rivetstone SubdivisionN ariation from Improvement Standards
Justin Hildreth, Project Engineer, Engineering, presented File VIS-00023, Variance From
Improvement Standards - Riverstone Subdivision, aka Logan Park PUD. He summarized as follows:
This is a petition for a Variance from Improvement Standards in accordance with Section 5-260 G ofthe
Eagle County Land Use Regulations (ECLUR). Specifically, the Applicant is seeking a variance from
the requirement that:
1. Two points of access from the development to the public roadway system (Section 4-620
J.1.h of the ECLUR) must be provided, and
2. Access approaches and driveways in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with
adequate area for an emergency vehicle turnaround (Section 4-620 J.9.c.l of the
ECLUR).
The Riverstone Subdivision was first approved as the Logan Park PUD in 2001 as a 5 lot development.
Cemetery Road, which was previously vacated by file number G-000I0, and replaced by Miller Ranch
Road, ran through the center of this property. Last year, Riverstone Developers purchased the
development from Oran Palmateer.
Accompanying this variance file is an Amended Final Plat (AFP-00192.) The changes to the originally
approved Logan Park Final Plat (PDF-00046) are reflected in this AFP application. However, this
petition for a Variation from Improvement Standards must be approved prior to approval of the
Amended Final Plat. The variance from the two points of access requirement is because the
development win no longer gain access to US 6. The development will only gain access via Miller
Ranch Road. The revised proposal is shown as Exhibit A. The variance from the driveway in excess of
150 feet without an emergency vehicle turnaround is necessary to accommodate the new proposed site
layout. The emergency vehicle turnaround will be 210 feet away from the end of the farthest residence.
Per Section 5-260 G Variance from Improvement Standards, the Board of County Commissioners is the
authority that decides Variances from the Improvement Standards. Prior review by the Planning
Commission is not stipulated in the Eagle County Land Use Regulations (ECLUR).
Chronology
1999 - Preliminary Plan of the Logan Park PUD is approved.
2000 - Eagle County passes Resolution 2000-133 which will vacate the portion of Cemetery
Road located in the Logan Park PUD with several conditions.
2001 - Final Plat of the Logan Park PUD is approved.
2003 - Riverstone Developers purchase the property [rom Oran Palmateer.
2003 - Eagle County completes construction of Miller Ranch Road and Bridge and removes the
old Cemetery Bridge.
32
6/01/2004
2003 - All ofthe conditions ofthe Cemetery Road vacation resolution are met and the vacation
becomes valid.
Site Data
Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning
East: Residential/Arrowhead River Ranch
Industrial/Excel Energy Gas Exchange Facility
West: Residential/Paul and Shirley Kudel
North: Residential/Jesse Alberts
South: Residential/Arrowhead PUD
Existing Zoning: Logan Park PUD
Water: Eagle River Water and Sanitation District
Sewer: Eagle River Water and Sanitation District
Access: Miller Ranch Road
Referral Responses
Eaf!le County Planninf! Department
The Planning Division has no comments regarding this fi1e-(Attached as Exhibit B.)
No other referral responses have been received.
DiscusSion
This property was subdivided in 2001 as the Logan Park PUD but was not developed. Riverstone
Developers purchased the development in 2003 and have proposed several minor changes that require a
Variance from Improvement Standards. The first change to the development proposal is that the road
layout has changed. Historically, Cemetery Road went through the center ofthe property, as shown on
Exhibit C. The historic Cemetery Road easement was vacated in 2003 by file G-OO 1 O. The approved
Logan Park road layout showed Cemetery Road being relocated to the eastern portion ofthe property
(Exhibit D.) The vacation was approved with the condition that it be final upon the completion of a
replacement road, although no specific road location was identified.
With respect to the first variance, when the Logan Park PUD was approved in 2001, it was envisioned
that the replacement road would be located along the east side of the property. Since that time, Miller
Ranch Road has been constructed and is considered the replacement road. The Riverstone Development
proposal shows a small road running from Miller Ranch Road and extending to the west side of the
property as shown in Exhibit E. No connection is proposed to US 6 and therefore a variance is required
from the two points of access requirement. The Eagle County Engineering Department, the Colorado
Department of Transportation and the Highway 6 Corridor Feasibility Study all support the single point
33
6/01/2004
of access to Miller Ranch Road with no direct connection to US 6. The State Highway Access Code
(CR 43-2-147) does not allow for an access onto US 6 if a connection can be obtained to a local road.
The second variance request is from the requirement that access approaches and driveways in excess of
150 feet in length shall be provided with adequate area for emergency vehicle turnaround. The distance
from the emergency vehicle turnaround to the farthest lot is 210 feet. The developer has discussed this
with the Eagle River Fire Protection District (ERFPD) and has agreed upon hydrant locations to mitigate
the impact of the longer distance from the turnaround. A letter from the ERFPD indicating approval of
the proposed design is attached as Exhibit F.
STAFF FINDINGS:
Criteria for Evaluation by the County Ene:ineer
The County Engineer's responsibility in a variance application is described in Section 4-61 0.A.2 of the
ECLUR. It states,. in part, "The County Engineer's evaluation shall consider whether the alternative will
provide for an equivalent level of public safety and whether the alternative will be equally durable so
that the normally anticipated user and maintenance costs will not be increased." The County Engineer
may also recommend approval of an alternative "If an alternate design, procedure, or material can be
shown to provide performance and/or environmental sensitivity that reflect community values equal or
better than that established by these standards..." For this evaluation, Staff interpreted the standards in
the ECLUR to represent the minimum acceptable level of "community values," since the ECLUR Were
adopted after extensive work and comments by the community.
Criteria for Approval for the Board of County Commissioners
The Board of County Commissioners' responsibility in a variance application is described in Section 5-
260.G.2. ofthe ECLUR. It states in part:
"The Board of County Commissioners shall balance the hardships to the petitioner of not
granting the Variance against the adverse impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the persons
affected, and the adverse impact on the lands affected."
Hardship is not defined in the ECLUR. HoWever, the Board may consider a hardship to be caused when
the petitioner will be deprived of some or all of his right to use the land if the ECLUR is strictly
followed.
In addition to the above criteria, the ECLUR outlines the criteria for granting a variance from the
improvement standards for the.dual access requirement in Section 4-620. The Board of County
Commissioners may, at their discretion, grant a variance form the required improvement standards
depending upon the following criteria:
. Length of Road
. Fire Hazard Rating
34
6/01/2004
. Number of Units Proposed
. Topography, and
. Recommendation from the Local Fire Authority having Jurisdiction.
Hardship to the Applicant
The Applicant has demonstrated hardships pertaining to the construction of an additional access to the
subdivision. The first hardship is imposed by Eagle County and the Colorado Department of
Transportation by not being in favor of the construction of an additional access onto US 6. This
additional entrance would not be ideal for a small subdivision because it could promote cut-through
traffic and any additional direct access onto US 6 would be too close to the intersection of US 6 and
Miller Ranch Road. The Applicant could apply for a State Highway Access Permit to allow direct
access to US 6 for emergency vehicles. The Applicant might be able to obtain this access, but it is not
necessary because ofthe close proximity ofthe residences to US 6.
The hardship of the emergency vehicle turnaround being more than 150 feet from the farthest lot is
based on topographical constraints. . The topography of the subdivision is tight because it is sandwiched
between US 6 and the Eagle River. This limits options for the placement of the emergency vehicle
turnaround.
Staff Finditu!s
The Applicant must demonstrate that the hardship of not getting the variance exceeds the adverse
impacts on the health safety and welfare of the persons affected and the adverse impact to the lands
affected. The applicant has worked with the Eagle River Fire Protection District to mitigate any
potential adverse impacts on the health, safety and welfare of the persons affected by constructing an
additional fire hydrant for the development.
Staff finds thatthe inclusion of these mitiga.tion measures, the short length of the road, the small size of
the development, and the wildfire hazard rating support the single point of access and farther distance
for the emergency vehicle turnaround. Staff further finds that granting of these two Variances from
Improvement Standards will provide for an equivalent level of public safety that would occur if the
developed area had two points of access and a turnaround within 150 feet from the farthest residence.
Board of County ComIilissioner Findin2s
The Board of County Commissioner must make the following findings in order to approve this file:
The Property is encumbered by a topographical or other physical condition that prevents the
applicant from providing a second point of access and an emergency turnaround within 150
feet fromthe farthest residence. '
The applicant has demonstrated a hardship if there is strict adherence to these requirements.
35
6/01/2004
The applicant has demonstrated that the hardship of not granting a variance exceeds any
adverse impacts on the health, safety and welfare of the persons affected or adverse impacts
to the affected lands.
Chairman Stone asked for public comment.
Shirley Kudel, owner of property just west of this property, informed the Board that she is
concerned with water and sewer issues. She informed the board that they do not have water and sewer
hookups, rather they have wells and septic systems. She stated that she had spoken with Ms.
Michelbrink and that they have a letter on file with the water and sewer department.
Chairman Stone stated that he believed that all of these properties were being served by gravity
feed sewer and there is domestic water from the water and sanitation district coming to the properties.
He believes that her request could probably get hooked up fairly easily.
Ms. Kudel asked where the water comes in, because access couldn't be gained under the house
on the west end.
Commissioner Gallagher asked that Ms. Kudel get together with the Community Development staff to
try to solve these issues while looking at the plans for the water and sewer.
Helen Michelbrink recommended that this file be deferred for another two weeks so that some of
the outstanding issues could be resolved.
Chairman Stone was concerned about the emergency vehicle turn-around.
Justin Hildreth stated that the layout is very tight. The applicant had worked with the local fire
department to position the hydrants appropriately.
Chairman Stone asked about an emergency gate for emergency access. He stated that the area is
very congested and there would be the possibility for something to happen on Miller Ranch Road that
close to the Bridge.
Commissioner Gallagher concurred with Chairman Stone's concerns about the turn-around. He
asked all to look at Exhibit "A". He wondered what the symbols represented. He asked about the old
road as it enters the project.
Mr. Hildreth explained that he wasn't sure.
Commissioner Gallagher moved to table VIS-0023 Riverstone SubdivisionlVariation and AFP-
00192 Riverstone Improvement Standards until June 15th inasmuch as the applicant was not present for
the hearing.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
AFP-00192 Riverstone
Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Planner, Community Development, presented File AFP-00192
Riverstone Subdivision; An Amendment and Correction to the Logan Park PUD.
File NO./Process: AFP-00192, Amended Final Plat
Location: 0096,0091,0081,0071,0043 Riverstone Lane (formally 0009,0007,
0005, 0003, 0001 Logan Court); Northwest Corner of Miller Ranch Road
and US 6, Edwards
Owners: Riverstone Developers, LLC
36
6/01/2004
Applicant : Riverstone Developers, LLC
Staff Recommendation: Approval
Summary:
The intent of this project, known as the Riverstone Subdivision, is to vacate elements of the
previously platted Logan Park PUD and create new lot lines, building setbacks, easements and
road names. The Logan Park PUD Guide shall remain in effect for this development.
When Logan Park was originally platted, construction of the new Miller Ranch Road Bridge was
not contemplated. Since the completion of the new bridge and road, the Logan Park PUD was
sold to the current owners. Access is now proposed via Miller Ranch Road directly into the
development (formerly, access was anticipated to be directly from U.S. Highway 6 and the old
Cemetery Bridge), the current owner / developer has decided to alter the initial construction
plans to slightly modify the design and road names. There will be no change to the number of
lots previolislyplatted as the Logan Park PUD. This Amended Final Plat will solidify the
amendments as proposed by the new owner.
A Variance from Im.provement Standards (VIS- 00023) was also necessary to accomplish these
changes.
Site Data:
Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning:
East: Eagle County / Excel Energy Gas Exchange Facility / RSL
West: Residential/Resource
North: Residential/Resource
South: ROW: Highway 6
Existing Zoning: Logan Park PUD
Total Area: 1.873 acres
Water: Public
Sewer: Public
Access: Via an easement through Eagle County property, known as Tract A, to Miller
Ranch Road.
Staff Findings:
Pursuant to Section $-290.G.3. Standards for Amended Final Plat:
a. Adjacent property. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the proposed
amendment DOES NOT have an adverse effect on adjacent property owners. All
adjacent property owners were notified for this file. No responses were received from the
following adjacent property owners, as supplied by the applicant: Country Club of the
Rockies, Paul and Shirley Kudel, Jesse Alberts, Eagle County and Public Service Co. of
Colorado.
37
6/01/2004
b. Final Plat Consistency. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the
proposed amendment IS NOT inconsistent with the intent of the Final Plat. Originally
platted in January of2001, the intent of the original was to subdivide Logan Park into
five, residential lots. This residential intent has not changed. The owners have decided to
slightly modify the road construction designs, name of the development, easements and
lot lines. At a quick glance, the overall design is almost exactly the same as was
previously platted.
c. COllformance with Final Plat Requirements. Review of the Amended Final Plat has
determined that the proposed amendment DOES conform to the Final Plat requirements
and other applicable regulations, policies and guidelines. It was necessary to accomplish
a Variance from Improvement Standards prior to the approval of this Amended Final
Plat. Upon the VIS approval, this plat may also be approved.
d. Improvement Agreement. DOES apply. A new Subdivision Improvements Agreement
shall be signed with this Amended Final Plat.
e. Restrictive Plat Note Alteration. DOES NOT apply.
Staff Recommen.dation.: Approval
Commissioner Gallagher moved to table AFP-00192 Riverstone Improvement Standards until
June 15 inasllluch as the applicant was not present for the hearing.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The lllotion carried unanimously.
LUR-0048 Road Impact Fee Amendment Package
Bob Nartacci, Planning Manager, Co:tnmunity Development, presented File LUR-0048, Road
Irti:pact Fee Amendment Package.
Eagle County Land Use Regulations Amendments (ECLUR)
LUR-0048; Amendment to the Road Impact Fees and Land Dedication
Standards.
LOCATION: Unincorporated Eagle County
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
EAGLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to one
condition. That being: The definition proposed for' Affordable Employee Housing' must properly cross-
reference the definitions for 'Low Income Housing' and 'Moderate Income Housing', as well as, 'Qualified
Employee'. Staffhas already incorporated the recommended condition into the Draft Regulation language
attached hereto.
TITLE:
FILE NO./PROCESS:
The Commission also inquired about the enforceability of one ofthe criteria for a 'Qualified Employee' .
More specifically, a spouse or dependant of a Qualified Employee is by default recognized as Qualified
Employee; what happens when an unqualified spouse is divorced or, otherwise separated, from the Qualified
Employee and remains in the affordable home? Unless the subject property is otherwise deed restricted, the
County would not be able to enforce this criterion beyond the initial sale of a Low or Moderate Income
Housing unit.
38
6/01/2004
ROARING FORK V ALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONLAlso
recommended Ullanimous approval, subject to the same condition recommended by the Eagle County
Planning Commission.
PROJECT DESCRWTION
BACKGROUND: The Eagle County Land Use Regulation (LUR) consists of a series of Articles combined
to create a document for "implementing the Eagle County Master Plan and to promote the health, safety and
general welfare of the present and future residents of and visitors to Eagle County". The LUR's provide, in a
single location, those standards and procedures applicable to development and the use of land in the
unincorporated areas of the County.
The LUR's are organized into seven Articles: 1) General Provisions; 2) Definitions; 3) Zone Districts; 4) Site
Development Standards; 5) Administration; 6) Nonconformities and; 7) Enforcement. In addition to the
seven Articles, the LUR's also contain six chapters and four appendices. The current LUR's were originally
adopted on November 23, 1998 and became effective on January 1, 1999. Although a prodigious amount of
thought and detail went into the LUR's prior to its original adoption, it is necessary from time to time to
ainend the regulatory language in order to better reflect the original intent; to make the LUR more user
friendly; to reconcile Ullintended discrepancies between sections ofthe LUR and; to add or subtract
regulatory language in order to keep pace with Eagle County's growth. All proposed amendments are
presented to the Board with the intent of furthering the health, safety and general welfare of Eagle County.
SUMMARY: Proposed are modifications of Articles 4 ofthe Land Use Regulations for: The purpose of
clarifying the intent of existing regulation; to ensure that school land dedication may be required more than
once on a given property when there is an increase in allowed residential density and to insert language into
the Section applicable to Road Impact Fees that will allow the Board of County Commissioners to waive the
Road Impact Fee on the development oflow or moderate income housing or affordable employee housing.
The proposed amendments are more particularly described as follows:
. Article 4 - Site Development Standards:
Division 4-7. Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards
Sub-Section 4-700. School Land Dedication Standards
· The proposed amendment is to 4-700.D.Dedication Requirements Shall Apply Only
Once. Currently, the regulations allow school land dedication requirements to apply to
the same land area only once. This amendment, would allow subsequent school land
dedication requirements to apply if a given land area is re-subdivided and the re-
subdivision results in a net increase of residential units.
Sub-Section 4-710. Road Impact Fees
39
6/01/2004
· The proposed amendments to 4-710.D.Dejinitions, is to include definitions for the
following terminology: 'Affordable Employee Housing'; 'Low Income Housing',
'Moderate Income Housing', and; 'Qualified Employee'.
· The amendments proposed to 4-710.E.Imposition of Fee. 1. Time of Fee Obligation and
Payment.a. are intended to further clarify the point that Road hnpact Fees will be assessed
prior to the commencement of any land use activity requiring Eagle County approval
unless the land use activity is exempt from the payment of Road hnpact Fees, as defined
within Section 4-710.
· The amendments proposed to 4-710.E.Impostion of Fee.2.d. are intended to clarify what
types of re-plats of existing development will and will not incur additional Road Impact
Fees.
· The amendments to 4.710.E.Imposition ofFee.3.Waiver by the Board of County
Commissioners. is entirely new language proposed for inclusion into the Road Impact Fee
regulations. The amendment proposed includes statutory language that will allow the
Board of County Commissioners to waive the applicable Road Impact Fee on the
development of low or moderate-income housing or affordable employee housing as
defined by Eagle County.
STAFF REPORT
REFERRAL RESPONSES: The proposed amendment package was referred for review and comment by
the following agencies:
. County Engineering Department
. County Attorneys Office
. County Department of Environmental Health
. County Road and Bridge Department
. County Sheriff s Office
. County Housing Division
. Board of County Commissioners
. School Districts
. Eagle County Planning Commission
. Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission
. Colorado State Division of Local Affairs
. Colorado Department of Transportation
. Knight Planning Services
. Isom and Associates
. Braun and Associates, Inc.
. PJA Land Planning
. Vail Resorts, Inc.
. Cordillera
. The Land Studio
40
6/0112004
. Sid Fox and Company
. Johnson and Kunkel
. Alpine Engineering
. Peak Land Surveying
. High Country Engineering
. Lines in Space
. White Surveying
. Starbuck Surveying
. Benchmark Engineering
. Sopris Engineering
. IntermountainEngineering
. Marcin Engineering
. Eagle Valley Surveying
. Meyer Land Systems
. Town of Avon
. Town of Basalt
. Town of Eagle
. Town of Gypsum
. Town of Minturn
. Town of Red cliff
. Town of Vail
Responses were received from the following agencies, fIrms or individuals:
Eagle County Engineering Department: Offered no comment with regard to the proposed
amendments. Please see attached Memorandum dated April 22, 2004;
Town of Basalt: .The Town offered the following fIve comments in their response letter dated May 3,
2004:
1) The Town strongly supports the creation of incentives for Affordable Housing;
2) The Town urges that waiver requests from traffIc impact fees should be carefully considered to
assure that traffIc issues and safety concerns are still addressed. Waiver requests that impact the
Town or Town streets should be referred to the Town and should only be granted in the Town
. also concurs with the waiver. Applicable provisions of the IGA's with the Town regarding
traffIc impact fees should be considered when evaluating waivers. The County and the Town
should update their IGA to require Town approval for any waiver oftraffIc impact fees that
affects Town streets;
3) No specifIc comments were noted regarding basic road impact fee administrative procedures;
4) The Town supports any efforts by the County to adopt comprehensive affordable housing
regulations similar to the Town of Basalt's in order to further discourage jurisdictional shopping
and provide housing attainable to residents and workers;
41
6/01/2004
5) Section 4-700 School Land Dedication Standards, item B., "Land Shall be Usable" should be
revised to include, in addition to the option of selling land that is not needed or suitable for a
school site, the option of developing said land for employee housing with priority to School
District employees. Please be advised that employee housing is not a designated purpose by
statutes that can be used for lands dedicated to school districts.
Please see attached referral responses and letters.
DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS:
1. Pursuant to Chapter 1, Section 1.15.04 Referrals of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations:
the proposed amendments HAVE been referred to the appropriate agencies, including the
applicable towns within Eagle County, and to the Colorado Division of Local Affairs.
2. Pursuant to Chapter 1, Section 1.15.05 Public Notice of the Eagle County Land Use
Regulations: Public notice HAS been given.
J. Pursuallt to Chapter 2, Sectioll 5-230.B.2 Text Amendment of the Eagle County Land Use
Regulations:
(a) The proposed amendments AMEND ONLY THE TEXT of the Eagle County Land Use
Regulations, and do not amend the Official Zone District Map.
(b) Precise wording ofthe proposed changes HAS been provided.
4. Pursuant to Chapter 2, Section 5-230.D Standards of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations
as applicable:
(a) The proposed amendments ARE consistent with the purposes, goals, policies, and Future
Land Use Map of the Eagle County Master Plan.
(b) The proposed amendments DO address a demonstrated community need.
(c) The proposed amendments ARE in the public interest.
Chairman Stone asked for public comment. There was none.
(the follOWing amendments were requested by the board)
Dedication Requirements Shall Apply Only Once. School land dedication requirements shall
apply only once to the same land area. Dedications shall not be required of re-subdivisions of
the same land when. a dedication has previously been made unless a net gain in residential units
is realized as a result. oj a re-subdivision. In these instances, school land dedication
42
6/01/2004
requirements will be calculated proportionally, based upon the difference between the total
number of allowed residential units prior to and after re-subdivision occurs. (am.-.-J
Commissioner Menconi moved that the Board of County Commissioner's approve LUR-0048
incorporating all Staff findings as amended.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote carried unanimously.
Supplemental Budget Con't
Chairman Stone asked Karen Sheaffer about her request for a folder, stuffer and sealer for
$13,432,92.
Ms. Sheaffer stated that the old machine had been purchased in 1997. She was appointed
Treasurer in 1996 and her great frustration was that they couldn't get the tax notices out before the last
day of January. It used to cost the county $15,000 to hire a private firm to mail out the tax notices. She
gave some financial comparisons related to hiring Someone to fold, stuff and seal envelopes. The
machine that has been used is breaking down. She told the board that her staff completely stuffs 40,000
tax notices every year. She had saved the county $105,000 over the years and she is asking for $13,400
to replace the old machine. She offered the machine to other departments as well. The machine is
available prior to January for mailing of tax notices.
Commissioner Gallagher asked about leasing rather than purchasing.
Ms. Sheaffer stated that the costs would be recouped in one year.
Chairman Stone infotIIled Ms. Sheaffer about the decision to consider flat screen monitors for
the county as a whole, not on a departmental basis.
Ms. Sheaffer stated that her front desk at the Public Trustee terminal was very tight and a flat
screen monitor would allow for better Use of the space.
ChaitIIlart Stone asked SheriffHoy to clarify his request for EMS costs.
Cotntnissionet Gallagher asked formore specifics.
SheriffHoy stated that this is grant money for the EMS and is funded at the same level every
year.
Chairman Stone asked about the intergovernmental agreement for firecall.
SheriffHoy clarified that this was also a carry forward for fire fighting and can only be used for
the cost of fires.
SheriffHoy stated that he had additional grant money available for any law enforcement
projects.
ChaitIIlan Stone requested confirmation on what SCAACP stands for and what the grant monies
can be spent on.
SheriffHoy stated that it is a grant that comes to the department and he doesn't know what it
stands for ~ used. for law enforcement capabilities. He wants to use part of it to upgrade office
equipment.and use half for replacing vehicles and possibly some specialty vehicles.
Chairman Stone asked about acoustic work in the detention center.
SheriffHoy stated that his officers in the detention center cannot have a secure conversation
currently without the inmates hearing everything that is said. He told the board that two different
systems would be used: one on the upper level and one on the gym level.
Commissioner Menconi asked about the upstairs area and wondered if the workout equipment
SheriffHoy stated that this equipment was removed because it represented a safety issue. Some
of the old equipment could be used as a weapon.
ChaitIIlan Stone asked aboutthe security request. He stated that the job of the County Sheriffis
to provide security without using outside contractors.
SheriffHoy stated that he would need an additional 8 staff members to provide the level of
security for this lengthy period oftime during the trial. He informed the board that he already has staff
burnout related to this type of detail. By outsourcing the Sheriffs office doesn't have to hire people off
the street to provide security for the trial. The number provided is the worst case scenario.
Chail11lan Stone wondered ifthe trial date had been set.
Sheriff Hoy stated that the date had not been set, but September had been discussed. He stated
that he had no idea of how long the trial could take.
Commissioner Menconi asked SheriffHoy about how the security needs had been determined.
Sheriff Hoy stated that the judge in the case ordered his department to provide security. He told
the board that his department had done some research about how this type of security had been handled
in other high profile cases. He stated this request represented a worst case scenario.
Commissioner Menconi asked about implemental requests.
SheriffHoy responded that he was certain that there would be a five day pre-trial in June and a
five day pre-trial in July and after that no one knew what would happen.
Commissioner Menconi stated that he did not mind Sheriff Hoy asking for the funds
incrementally.
SheriffHoy stated that he didn't think this would be possible. He committed to giving unused
funds back to the General Fund.
Mr. Ingstad clarified the need to appropriate only the funds that are needed.
SheriffHoy stated that he would be able to get a revised estimate to the board.
Commissioner Gallagher asked about approving $35,000 for the pre-trial hearings and then
allowing SheriffHoy to come back with additional requests.
Chairman Stone stated that he was still concerned about hiring an outside contractor to provide
security. He was aware that Lonestar, the proposed contractor, had not handled previous security
situations in a diplomatic matter. He asked how the Sheriffs office had handled the additional expense
in providing security up to this point.
Sheriff Hoy stated that he had sufficient funds in his payroll and overtime budgets.
Commissioner Gallagher stated that he believes it is a reasonable request with some unknown
factors. He expressed his desire to approve $35,000 for Lonestar and ask the Sheriff to come back for
more funds as needed in the future. It's always possible that the case might be dismissed.
Commissioner Menconi inquired as to whether county deputies and Lonestar work together.
SheriffHoy stated that they worked together.
The board approved the $35,000.00.
Chairman Stone asked about the X-ray system.
SheriffHoy clarified that this is necessary to expedite the courthouse screening process. There is
currently a backlog with people trying to access the building. With an X-Ray machine they can expedite
their processes.
Chairman Stone asked about the generator.
No-one could answer the question.
44
6/01/2004
Mr. Ingstad stated that the X-Ray machine at the airport had actually missed guns in the
screening process. He stressed the importance of training for those viewing the X-Rays.
Commissioner Gallagher suggested the possibility ofTSA training.
Chairman Stone asked the board for their comments about the microwave lease payment.
Chail11lan Stone asked Carla Budd about the Minturn Senior Services coordinator request.
Ms. Budd told the board that Alpine Area Agency on Aging offered to fund the position initially,
but because of budget cuts, they are unable to fund the position. The request is whether the county
would be willing to fund the position. The position is a .5 position.
Chairman Stone indicated that he favored this request.
Commissioner Gallagher stated that the Senior Center in Minturn merits the staff, but he would
be interested in seeing what other cuts the Alpine Agency had to make in other nutrition and Senior sites
to understand why they chose Minturn.
John Lowry, Senior Services Coordinator spoke to the board. He told the board that the agency
had cut funding across their entire five county region. He stated that the cut was not just for our county,
but would cover all five counties. It would affect transportation and staff. He clarified that nutrition
would not be cut, just state projects.
Commissioner Menconi asked about the possibility of the creation of a Kayak opportunity at the
Fairgrounds. He wondered whether anyone else on the board is interested in this type of project.
Commissioner Gallagher stated that he is interested in using the landing area in conjunction with
fixing the diversion at the Fairgrounds, but not until plans are developed and participant funding is
detailed.
Chairman Stone agreed. He asked if someone could put a better pencil to this project. He
requested more detail.
Commissioner Menconi stated that ifhis figures are correct, approximately $4,000,000 is being
appropriated with this budget. He wondered if this was correct.
Mr. Roeper stated that his number is closer to $5.5 million.
Commissioner Menconi asked what the original requested amount was.
Mr. Roeper stated the original amount was approximately $6,692,000.
Chairman Stone clarified that this request would have to be approved in the form of a resolution
and could not be formally approved today. He also requested that major projects presented today be
kept in the front of the other commissioners before looking at additional funding requests.
Mr. Ingstad stated that one of the difficulties involved in anticipating how the funding needs
might fall is that there are many unknowns, but he is committed to trying harder to provide this level of
detail. He clarified that the worst case scenarios werebeing presented for larger projects.
Mr. Roeper spoke about the capital improvements committee. He wondered if the previous
candidates might be involved again.
Chairman Stone asked if Mr. Roeper would send another request for this approval.
Commissioner Gallagher expressed satisfaction with those involved.
Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the supplementary budget request as discussed and
amended in today's hearing pending the resolution approving the same.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote carried unanimously.
Application to the United Way of the Eagle River Valley for the Eagle County Volunteer Center
45
6/01/2004
Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services, explained that she was asking for approval from the
cOIIlmissioners to submit a request for $2000.00 in funding from the Eagle River Valley United Way for
this coming program year. They currently provide $1000.00 for the Eagle County volunteer center. The
dollars are helpful and meaningful in terms of the partnership with United Vlay and its member
agencies. She clarified that they had funded two county programs this year.
Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve the application for program funding to United Way of
the Eagle River Valley.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote carried unanimously.
Budget Revision Request to the US Department of Health & Human Services for the Eagle County
Head Start Program
Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services, followed up on earlier discussions about using some
additional EarIy Head Start funds to trade in a car on a mini van and this request is to the US
Department of Health and Human Services to make an appropriation change.
Ms. Forinash stated that the total amount of the budget is shared. The request is only for an
appropriation change.
COII1II1issioner Menconi moved to submit the request to the Department of Health and Human
Services for budget revision for the Eagle County Early Head Start program.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was carried unanimously.
There was some discussion about Exhibit A on the Ottertail Environmental contract. There was
some confusion from the board about Exhibit A.
Chairman Stone stated that he was confused because the contract talked about larval surveillance but
didn't talk about any control.
Mr. Merry stated that he had inquired as to whether the local jurisdictions needed any help with
mosquito abatement. He wondered what assistance might be available to the towns. Eagle County
would be able to have a great level of detail, but this would not be available for the towns. He assured
the board that the floater traps would help take care of traveling mosquitoes. He used the Fairgrounds as
an example of mosquito habitat within the town boundaries, but that the county would be interested in
controlling the larvae based on the vicinity to the county special event.
Mr. Ingstad stated that the COncerns were that Districts that are currently doing mitigation are not
included in the scope and inside the town boundaries are not included in the scope.
Mr. Merry agreed that walking through the scope would give a good picture of the impression and is
reflected in the scope of work that he has. The Town of Gypsum and Edwards Metro District both have
contracts for mosquito abatement and have had for years for nuisance type mosquitoes. The intent of the
county work is not to duplicate any services, but to in fact ask any local jurisdictions if they needed help.
The County didn't hear back that they did or did not need help. So the question of the Towns is raised.
the aerial photo is what Ottertail Environmental reviewed. Given the scope of work excluding the
towns a trained delineator of habitat can see likely habitat quickly and make recommendations to the
towns. In the county delineation the area will be gridded and zoomed in upon for detailed habitat
mapping. This level of detail would not be provided to the towns. One reason is because this type of
.. .
mappmg IS expenSIve.
Commissioner Gallagher raised concerns about mosquitoes crossing town boundary lines.
46
6/0112004
Mr. Merry stated that the floater traps would address this situation. He used the example of the
Fairgrounds and noted that the county would probably be involved in this area with abatement.
Mr. Ingstad clarified that there is an extensive amount of mapping which will require our GIS
department to be involved. It isn't possible for the County to kill1arvae across the county.
Mr. Merry expressed interest in having the GIS department get started on this right away.
Chairman Stone asked to see Exhibit A before making a decision.
Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve the contract with Ottertail Environmental for mosquito
surveying and control within the limits of the contract conditional upon the review and approval of
Appendix A by Chairman Stone.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote carried unanimously.
There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until
June 15,2004.
Attest:
Clerk to the Bo
~
47
6/01/2004