Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/01/04 Present: Tom Stone Michael Gallagher Am Menconi Jack Ingstad Diane Mauriello Teak Simonton PUBLIC HEARING June 1,2004 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Administrator County Attorney Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: CENERAL FUND 21St CENTURY PHOTO SUPPLY AAAA SEPTIC PUMPING ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS ADAMS MARK HOTEL AFFORDABLE PORTABLE AGA SERVICE AILI FOSS AJ JO:fINSON ALL VALLEY LOCK OUT ALLIANT FOOD SERVICE, INC ALPINE COFFEE SERVICE,LLC ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY ALPINE PARTY RENTALS ALTERNATIVE REVENUE AMADEO GONZALES AMEroCANArnLINESADVERT AMERICANCANCERSOClliTY AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMERICAN PUBLIC WRKS ASSC AMERIGAS ANDERSON & KEIL APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY ASPEN BASE OPERATION ASPEN BOARD OF REALTORS ASPEN CTR FOR WOMENS HLTH AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES AVON CENTER AT BEAVER CK SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 1 6/01/2004 220.88 900.00 119.70 255.00 93.00 875.00 168.85 2,627.90 75.00 2,538.22 138.25 63.59 235.00 2.80 39.60 100.00 50.00 212.50 118.00 712.47 28.12 8.10 521.38 6.29 2,675.00 214.51 1,858.05 AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS BAJA SPORTS BAR BALCOMB AND GREEN BATTLE MOUNTAIN HS BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS BRAVO! VAIL VALLEY MUSIC BRC/HARRIS INC BRIAN HOLLENBAUGH BRUCE D GIESE CARMEN LOZOYO-VELEZ CDW CENTRAL BAG AND BURLAP CO CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTURYTEL CHARLES B DARRAH CHILDRENS HOSPITAL CHRIS HERNDON CHRIS MENCINI CHRISTINE L MOTT CLIFF SIMONTON CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION CO COUNTY ATTORNEY ASSOC CO DEPT AGRICULTURE CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND CO STATE TREASURER COLORADO COUNTIES INC COLORADO DEPT REVENUE COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO NAHRO COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH CONTRACTPHARMACYSERV~E COpy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING CSPIlNUTRITION ACTION DAKTRONICS INC DAN CORCORAN PLS DAN SPARKMAN DANIEL B BLUM DAVID A BAUER DAVID GUINNEE, DVM DA VIDSONS DEBORAH CHURCHILL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 2 6/01/2004 1,775.70 176.00 8,678.89 1,000.00 122.87 25,000.00 896.44 90.91 79.80 136.62 3,257.00 874.23 688.32 99.48 30.00 535.00 800.00 189.75 79.70 43.24 490.00 350.00 255.00 685.00 7,689.16 1,239.50 301.94 7,765.67 200.00 194.00 1,060.00 987.44 76.89 3,567.13 2,034.27 25.00 365.00 4,140.00 319.32 18.80 30.00 1,476.23 208.52 111.16 DEEP ROCK WEST DEFENSE FINANCE/ ACCOUNTNG DELL INC DENVER CHECKWRITER, INC. DENVER COMMUNITY FEDERAL DENVER NEWSPAPER AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR DIEBOLDELCECTION SYSTEMS DIVISION WATER RESOURCES DOCTORS ON CALL DON OLSEN DOSIA LAEYENDECKER DOUG WINTERS EAGLE AMOCO EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE EYE PHOTO EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE RIVER YOUTH COAL. EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE , EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING ELISA ACOSTA EMBLEM ENTERPRISE EMC2 ESI, ELEVATOR SERVICE,INC FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FEDERAL EXPRESS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG FIESTA'S CAFE FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES FIRST BANK OF VAIL FIRST BANKS FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY FLORIDA MICRO GE CAPITAL GEMPLERS INC GLENDA WENTWORTH GLENWOOD SPRINGS PARKS GOLDEN EAGLE ELDERLY GRAINGER INCORPORATED SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 3 6/01/2004 336.33 638.54 8,643.50 102.00 502.94 1,273.23 95.00 99.25 280.00 375.00 9.60 90.00 549.93 168.00 10,006.00 6,208.00 857.44 50.00 7.41 1,126.94 117.53 701.28 285.00 144.26 4,128.25 115.92 1,060.00 231.68 90.00 1,810.84 512.79 2,180.46 80.00 980.00 444.26 24,037.45 10.00 77.00 159.99 479.68 52.06 160.00 25,800.00 677.70 GUILLE OJEDA HART INTERCNIC HAWTHORN SUITES HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HECKER AND ASSOCIATES HERMAN MILLER INC. HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HILL & COMPANY HILLCARA LLC HOGAN & HARTSON HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HOME DEPOT SUPPLY HV AC SUPPLY IAAO IFMA INTEGRAL RECOVERIES INTERNALREVENUESERV~E IRVIN BORENSTEIN JAMES PUBLISHING COMPANY JANET CONNORS 1ENNIE W AHRER JENNY WOOD JEROME EVANS PH.D JOHN LOWERY KAMINSKY AND ASSOOCIATES KARA BETTIS, CORONER KATHLEEN BULL KESSLER MARY J KINDER MORGAN INC KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAF ARGE CORPORATION LANDS END INCORPORATED LASER JUNCTION LEDERHAUSE EDITH LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INe LINDA MAGGIORE LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES M&MAUTOPARTS MACHOL & JOHANNES MAGNETIC CONCEPTS CORP MAIN AUTO PARTS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 4 6/01/2004 341.55 319.74 1,035.00 316.07 8,389.00 20.80 234.50 99.99 10,780.81 5,000.00 531.85 12,983.57 302.44 118.45 89.00 296.00 96.80 200.00 23.32 69.94 138.60 214.02 55.00 900.00 86.74 650.00 98.47 189.75 133.58 9,062.07 100.00 4,802.35 364.50 593.85 44.40 770.00 36.57 598.00 5.82 31.88 32.40 18.01 MARIA WOOD MARILYN MENNS MARIO OJEDA MARKS PLUMBING PARTS MARLENE MC CAFFERTY MATT ROYER MBIA MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MCI WORLDCOM MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MERCKATL MICHAEL CIRKOVIC MICHAEL R DUNLEVIE MICRO PLASTICS MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN MIKE KERST MILLER & COHEN MOORE BUSINESS MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOtOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES MSR WEST, INC. NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT NATIONAL HS T/TA RESOURCE NATIONAL NETWORK SERVICES NATIONAL SPEAKER & SOUND NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORDIC REFRIGERATION NUTRITION CONSULTANTS ON TARGET MARKETING INC ORTEN & HINDMAN OSM DELIVERY LLC PAPER THERMOMETER COMPANY PAPER WISE PEGGY GRAYBEAL PEtTY CASH ACCOUNTING PETTY CASH MOTOR POOL PHNAC %JOLYNNIDLER PRINTRITE PSS, INC PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION PUBLIC SAFETY WAREHOUSE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE 5 6/01/2004 630.00 17.40 841.55 99.64 48.42 162.43 4,521.10 64.69 1,210.38 280.00 347.90 208.33 17.50 25.80 75.75 373.14 170.70 30.00 834.34 124.73 47,755.59 865.00 5,201.45 290.00 832.50 600.00 12,540.00 140.00 1,703.44 205.85 124.00 1,002.52 9.80 418.00 107.00 1,187.70 160.00 1,541.89 100.00 75.00 366.004239.17 94.50 7,954.90 PURCHASE POWER QWEST R L POLK & COMPANY R.S. MEANS COMPANY, INC. REBECCA WHEELERSBURG RENTAL SERVICE CORP RICHARD A KESLER ROBERT KURTZMAN DO ROCKY MOUNTAIN REPROGRAPH ROCKYNET.COM INC ROGER MOORE ROSIE MORENO ROSS PRODUCTS DIVISION ROY MOODY & ASSOCIATES RUMILDA CUBIAS SARA JARAMILLO SARAH SCHWPER SCHUTZMAN COMPANY, INe. SEBASTIAN RODRIQUEZ SECRETARY OF STATE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHEAFFER KAREN SILVIA LORENA DELGADO SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SIRCHlE FINGERPRINT SMALL FARM TODAY SOMIX TECHNOLOGIES INC SOUTHLAND MEDICAL CORP SPARTAN TOOLS SPEAKOUTV AIL INCORP. SPSS STATE OF COLORADO STEPHEN ELZINGA STERICYCLE INC STEVE TEIEN STEVENS HOME CARE INC STRAWBERRY PATCH SUMMIT COUNTY ASSESSOR SUSPENSE FUND TAMRABLACKARD TEAK SIMONTON TETON GREEN BUILDING CONF TEXAS COOPERATIVE EXT THE FLOWER MARt SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT , REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 6 6/01/2004 4,040.00 6,251.58 660.00 671.25 79.00 53.54 8,146.61 3,557.70 6,392.50 50.00 30.00 1,032.34 515.36 1,624.45 1,025.00 80.04 320.16 243.66 40.00 10.00 68,695.77 66.95 85.90 188.03 508.31 23.95 695.00 2,953.83 509.89 900.00 1,155.00 472.56 75.00 311.16 1,170.00 83.25 62.507575.00 83,025.49 170.22 42.89 395.00 46.00 45.00 THE OLD GYPSUM PRINTER THOMAS F FARRELL TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TOWN OF GYPSUM TRI COUNTY FIRE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED REPRO GRAPHIC UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV UPPER ARKANSAS VALLEY UTILITY TECHNICAL SERVICE VAIL DAILY THE VAIL ELECTRONICS V AIL LOCK AND KEY V AIL V ALLEY EMERGENCY V AIL V ALLEY MEDICAL CENTR V AILNET INC VALLEY LUMBER VALLEY P ARTNERSHW VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY VERIZON WIRELESS, VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS VILLAGE PROFILE VISA CARD SERVICES WALZ POSTAL SOLUTIONS INC WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WEST GROUP WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY WYNTTAYLOR WYNDHAM ANATOLE XCEL ENERGY XEROX CORPORATION Y AMP A V ALLEY ELECTRIC YASMINE DELGADO YOUR PERSONAL CHEF Z DELI INC ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR MAY SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE . SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE $ERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL 11 & 12 7 6/01/2004 348.89 65.72 199.20 800.00 422.00 50.00 280.68 660.75 6,000.00 195.00 350.00 100.00 564.25 6.50 720.00 1,265.85 67.80 250.56 6,740.00 165.00 6,107.20 3,025.23 11.27 3,595.00 2,513.41 342.16 852.43 271,637.88 2,247.72 1,053.50 438.89 160.28 3.50 966.00 793.33 7,688.49 247.49 80.00 205.00 45.45 789.13 614,547.54 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND A PEAK, INe. AAAA SEPTIC PUMPING BLUE SKY LIGHTING AND COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COpy PLUS DEEP ROCK WEST HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HIGGINS BRAD HILL BROTHERS CHEMICAL CO INTERVVEST SAFETY SUPPLY JP TRUCKING, INe. KINDER MORGAN INC LAFARGE CORPORATION MCPHEE CONSTRUCTION MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MOTOR POOL FUND PALIN EQUIPMENT, CORP. PROPERTY IMAGING, LLC SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SUSPENSE FUND TO\VN OF GYPSUM TRI COUNTY FIRE VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WEST EAGLE RANCH LLC WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY PAYROLL FOR MAY SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE PAY ROLL EXPD REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL 11 & 12 8 6/01/2004 1,476,212.39 1,820.00 260.00 5,725.00 646.20 213.04 31.30 670.17 320.85 13,661.49 202.46 117,627.17 696.55 270.00 2,350.00 70.30 254,118.19 607.89 462.50 149.42 1,826.11 5,887.74 239.85 9.88 206.39 35.24 25,271.55 2,000.00 1,500.00 339.83 59,489.82 496,708.94 TERRI ALLENDER V ANASK WAREHOUSE COMPANY VERIZON WIRELESS, VIRGINIA A VILA WELLS FARGO XEROX CORPORATION PAYROLL FOR MAY WRAP FUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT PAYROLLEXPD SERVICE 390.00 288.96 339.57 113.51 17,829.16 169.78 PAYROLL 11 & 12 38,445.44 94,042.67 COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH SERVICE JOELKARR SERVICE RETIREMENT FUND SUSPENSE FUND INSURANCE RESERVE FUND EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL OFFSITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 65.00 514.20 579.20 SERVICE 67,892.33 67,892.33 SERVICE 1,623.97 1,623.97 10 6/01/2004 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND AMERICINN LODGE & SUITES AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS BEST WESTERN EAGLE LODGE CAROL N VAUGHAN DESIGNS CARPET ONE COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO ENGINEERING COMPUTER GT ALLIANCE INC HbR INC HERMAN MILLER INC. OLD NATIONAL JASPER P-LOGIC SYSTEMS PEAK CNIL ENGINEERING IN PETER BERGH PREMIER ELECTRIC CO INe SQUARE ROOT SOLUTIONS INC STRATEGIC FENCE & WALL CO TRANE COMPANY UNIONP ACIFIC RAILROAD CO VOGELMAN WEST ASSOCIATES SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. A & E TIRE INC AIAUTOELECTroCCOMPANY AAAA SEPTIC PUMPING ABARTAMEDIA SERVICE SERVICE 516.96 11,067.23 11,584.19 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 134.00 3,000.82 330.00 202.50 4,222.65 1,156.80 284.25 38,659.07 1,608.00 2,465.00 3,592.04 1,421.00 31,711.30 3,712.50 1,330.00 1,000.00 756.00 5,350.00 12,963.40 9,727.54 31,371.82 510.00 155,508.69 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE 11 6/01/2004 3,587.95 132.65 260.00 880.00 ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSIT AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CMGG LLC COLORADO DEPT REVENUE COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLUMBINE MARKET COLUMBINE STORAGE CENTER COpy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DAVID JOHNSON DEEP ROCK WEST DOCTORS ON CALL DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL FEDERAL EXPRESS G & K SERVICES GE CAPITAL GILLIG CORPORATION GLENWOOD RADIATOR REPAIR HEALTH INSURANCE FUND IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS INTERMOUNTAIN ENGINEERING JANET FIELD JAY MAX SALES KELLEY S WILLIAMS KINDER MORGAN INC KINETICO WATER PROS KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAWSON PRODUCTS LIGHTS ON BROADWAY LTK ENGINEERING SERVICES M&MAUTOPARTS MAIN AUTO PARTS MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MHC KENWORTH-DENVER MID WEST TRUCK MOES ORIGINAL BBQ MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVlcE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 12 6/0112004 49.85 52.60 7,513.00 256.72 287.67 344.38 67.60 302.80 175.00 13.56 933.75 59.40 653.95 14,032.11 218.05 14.90 90.00 12,395.77 29,016.50 59.91 432.44 296.08 5,757.75 1,871.78 1,176.52 5.00 1,500.00 81.77 21.78 57.00 2,439.15 35.00 333.00 783.77 43.35 972.00 5.90 255.85 70.30 567.23 69.30 960.00 6,530.80 MOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE PALIN EQUWMENT, CORP. QWEST ROCKHURSTCOLLEGE RONALD F. GANN SAFETY KLEEN (WHICITA) SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SANDY MCCARTHY SERCK SERVICES INC SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SILVER WHEELS INC. SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF GYPSUM TOWN OF VAIL TRI COUNTY FIRE UNItED STAtES WELDING V AIL LOCK AND KEY VAIL RESORTS INC VALLEY CREDIT AND VERIZON WIRELESS, VISION CHEMICAL SYSTEMS WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XCELENERGY YOUR PERSONAL CHEF ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY PAYROLL FOR MAY SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS ALPINE ENGINEERING BILL MAC F ARLANE COLORADO PRINTING COMPANY COLUMBINE MARKET COpy PLUS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLLEXPD SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL 11 & 12 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 13 6/0112004 3,009.50 607.89 387.80 89.50 330.36 116.06 46.07 1,596.00 686.96 6,394.56 1,400.00 10,914.64 31,173.95 839.93 200.00 34.59 26.91 70.50 200.00 342.84 339.32 1,036.31 123.38 46,470.95 341.20 226.90 175.00 212.28 91.94 113,064.63 316,213.86 6,342.50 91.98 1,505.82 43.82 55.10 FEDERAL EXPRESS HEALTH INSURANCE FUND IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS KEMP AND COMPANY INC NEXGENCONSTRUCTORS PROMO DIRECT SUSPENSE FUND WELLS FARGO WYLACOSUPPLYCOMPANY YEH & ASSOCIATES INC SALES TAX R.F.V. TRANSP. ROARING FORK SALES TAXR.F.V. TRAILS ROARING FORK AIRPORT FUND AAAE ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY AMERICAN AVIONICS INC AMERICAN LINEN APEX SECURITY BARNARD DUNKELBERG & CO BERTHOD MOTORS SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLLEXPD SUPPLIES SERVICE 7.05 5.36 369.15 636.60 135,351.94 545.75 147.74 851.52 28.50 4,813.10 150,795.93 SERVICE 62,200.28 62,200.28 SERVICE 6,911.14 6,911.14 SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 14 6/0112004 145.00 26.00 366.18 57.00 675.16 141.25 3,000.00 1,659.51 BIG STEVES TOWING CHRIS ANDERSON COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COLORADO STATE FIRE CHIEF CONTRACT LIGHTING COpy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS DEEP ROCK WEST DISH NETWORK DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE VALLEY HUMANE ASSOC EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO ELIZABETH WILT FRUITA CONSUMER COOP ASSN GALLS INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PWE AND GYPSUM TOWN OF HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HILL & COMPANY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC JEPPESEN DATAPLAN INC KINDER MORGAN INC KKCH RADIO KSKE-NRC BROADCASTING KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAWSON PRODUCTS M & M AUTO PARTS MAIN AUTO PARTS MCI WORLDCOM MOTOR POOL FUND NEXTEL ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION SERVICEMASTER CLEAN STANDARD SIGNS INC SUMMITEX, LLC SUSPENSE FUND TRI COUNTY FIRE UNITED PARCEL SERVICE US BANK US CUSTOMS SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 15 6/01/2004 1,820.00 33.81 92.65 150.00 603.39 250.00 506.03 70.10 10.98 271.77 6.00 100.00 285.00 74,064.60 41.40 1,025.74 1.36 384.89 431.05 472.96 1,751.68 1,581.18 11,855.06 2,877.78 288.00 384.00 800.00 110.32 174.72 2.16 50.68 888.48 836.74 6.49 1,016.38 2,348.00 120.47 110.16 2,342.07 2,077.00 17.45 2,977.1002,529.80 V AIL VALLEY JET CENTER VISA CARD SERVICES WALSH ENVIRONMENTAL WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE W ASTEMANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN IMPLEMENTS WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY PAYROLL FOR MAY MICROW AVE MAINTENANCE FUND CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC QWEST CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL 11 & 12 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE MORALES CUSTOM WOODWORK SERVICE HOUSING FUND HOGAN & HARTSON MOUNTAIN REGIONAL SERVICE SERVICE 16 6/01/2004 300.86 1,617.20 69,127.45 32,413.09 890.04 13,367.69 43.93 1,024.06 122.20 30,303.77 271,047.84 286.83 2,812.89 19,225.50 643.99 22,969.21 2,000.00 2,000.00 106.25 2,500.00 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN FRONT RANGE FIRE GALLS INCORPORATED NAPA AUTO PARTS - VAIL PRO POLY OF AMERICA INC RAE SYSTEMS INC TSI INCORPORATED TTCI VISA CARD SERVICES LANDFILL FUND CAROLINA SOFTWARE CODEPT AGRICULTURE CORPORATE EXPRESS DEEP ROCK WEST DOWN VALLEY SEPTIC EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER HEALTH INSURANCE FUND KRW CONSULTING INC MOTOR POOL FUND RONALD RASNIC SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SUSPENSE FUND V AIL DAILY THE VISA CARD SERVICES WELLS FARGO ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLLEXPD SUPPLIES 17 6/01/2004 2,606.25 3,950.00 163.10 241.93 110.51 204.60 6,025.00 8,189.20 7,770.00 831.37 27,485.71 306.16 500.00 151.42 111. 75 405.00 125.61 300.00 371.35 7,969.56 124,299.23 102.72 795.00 3,489.86 1,654.91 210.32 167.92 6,637.01 199.95 PAYROLL FOR MAY MOTOR POOL FUND AL-JON INC ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTURY EQUIPMENT COMPANY COLLETTS COpy PLUS CTC ANALYTICAL SERVICES DAVID JOHNSON DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE AMOCO EAGLE PHARMACY EATON SALES & SERVICE ELMERS GLASS FABIAN LOPEZ FARIS MACHINERY CO G & K SERVICES GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE GRAND JUNCTION PWE AND HANSON EQUIPMENT HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HENSLEY BATTERY KINDER MORGAN INC LAWSON PRODUCTS M&MAUTOPARTS MACDONALD EQUWMENT CO MAIN AUTO PARTS MOTOR POOL FUND NAP A AUTO PARTS POWER MOTWE REY MOTORS INCORPORATED SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN PAYROLL 11 & 12 SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 18 6/01/2004 14,558.48 162,356.25 865.00 42.02 205.54 134.53 26.58 67,849.07 74.40 25.00 22.44 562.74 35.00 38.65 170.00 245.36 13.20 312.59 583.96 1,701.44 14.82 3,873.03 326.36 638.65 1,800.84 109.00 358.29 369.69 129.27 12,209.72 1,697.74 2,890.87 281.92 46.09 4,721.16 SUSPENSE FUND TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS TOWN OF GYPSUM TRI COUNTY FIRE TWO RNERS CHEVROLET UNITED STATES WELDING VEEDER-ROOT COMPANY WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY WASTE MANAGEMENT WEAR PARTS EQUWMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN SLOPE PAINT WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY PAYROLL FOR MAY HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT UNITED STATES LIFE INS ENHANCEDE911 FUND CENTURYTEL LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES QWEST SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE ' SUPPLIES PAYROLLEXPD SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL 11 & 12 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 19 6/01/2004 1,624.41 3,887.89 620.13 25.53 298.90 291.65 99.00 1,939.44 91.10 1,611.92 8,537.83 350.47 1,029.94 22,250.37 145,033.55 1,050.00 36,430.83 4,187.70 5,593.00 47,261.53 179.93 49.75 17,090.16 17,319.84 3,538;353.77 Consent Agenda A. Approval of Bill paying for the week of May 31,2004 and June 7, 2004, (subject to review by the County Administrator). B. Approval for Payroll for June 10,2004 (subject to review by the County Administrator) C. Approval of the minutes of the Eagle Board of County Commissioners meeting for May 11,2004 D. Contract with B.P. Reclamation, Inc. for hydro seeding. E. Intergovernmental Agreement for the Regional Trail at Arrowhead River Ranch F. Resolution 2004-063 Town of Minturn Representation ofthe Eagle County Regional Transportation Authority Board of Directors G. Agreement between Eagle County and the Vail Recreation District for After School Care start-up costs. H. Agreement between Eagle County and the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment for community Nursing I. Intergovernmental Agreement between Eagle, Garfield, Pitkin and Summit Counties concerning Joint Cooperation for Child Welfare Substance Abuse and Mental Health Core Services J. Addendum to the Agreement between Eagle County and Valley Partnership for Drug Prevention K. Resolution 2004-060 concerning the Ratification of an Appointment to the Basalt Regional Library District Board of Trustees L. Water Supply for the Eagle County Pond between the Upper Regional Water Authority and Eagle County, Colorado M. Project Agreement between Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District and County of Eagle N. Resolution 2004-061 Establishing Compensation of Election Judges in the County of Eagle, State of Colorado O. Public Improvements Agreement for the Wolf Parking Lot Grading Permit No. MI-11950 P. Identix Maintenance Agreement Addendum Q. Microsoft Select Enrollment v6.1 - State and Local Agreement R. Intergovernmental Master Software Licensing Program Enrollment Agreement between Eagle County and the Colorado State Purchasing Director S. Public Improvements Agreement for the Wolf Parking Lot Grading Permit No. MI- 11950 20 6/01/2004 T. Public Improvements Agreement for the Beaver Creek Maintenance Facility Grading Permit, File No. MI-11955 U. Microsoft Select Enrollment v6.1 - State and Local Agreement V. Intergovernmental Master Software Licensing Program Enrollment Agreement between Eagle County and the Colorado state Purchasing Director W. Bid Award 2004 Agreement for the Guardrail Project, Ideal Fencing Corporation, 8119 Indian Peaks Ave, Erie, CO 80516 Chairman Stone asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Walter Mathews, Eagle County Deputy Attorney, stated that item T will be pulled from the agenda. This is the public improvements agreement for Beaver Creek Maintenance Facility, File #MI11955. Commissioner Gallagher asked Ms. Simonton about the number of student judges verSus regular judges for the upcoming election. Ms. Simonton replied that according to statute only one student judge per polling place, a maximum of fifteen is allowed, and there will be eighty to one hundred judges for the General Election. Chairman Gallagher asked Mr. Denardo to clarify the need for items U and W. Mr. Denardo stated this is a way to be a part of the state purchasing plan. There is no required tfioneyup front and just pay as items ate purchased. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the consent agenda items A-W, omitting item T. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was approved unanimously. Plat and Resolution Signing Cliff Simonton, Community Development, presented a plat for a minor subdivision, File 5MB- 00334, Stone Creek Drive, Lot 64, Block 1, Filing 2, Eagle-Vail Subdivision, a Minor Type B Subdivision, the purpose of which is to condominium-ize the existing residence on Lot 64, creating two separate dwelling units aIld related common elements. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve aIld authorize the chairman to sign the plat for 5MB- 00334; Stone Creek Drive Condominiums, Lot 64, Block I, Filing 2, Eagle-Vail Subdivision. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was approved unanimously. Mr. Simonton presented Resolution 2004-062 to approve a Special Use Permit for the Edwards Congregation of Jehovah's Witness (Eagle County File No. ZS-00116). The Board considered the applicant's request on May 11, 2004. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve Resolution 2004-062 for Edwards Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, File ZS-00116. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The motion was approved unanimously. Chairman Stone stated the next item was a resolution adopting a Second Supplementary Budget and Appropriation of Anticipated Revenues for Fiscal Year 2004 and Authorizing the Transfer of Budgeted and Appropriated Monies between Various Spending Agencies. 21 6/01/2004 Mike Roeper, Finance Director, spoke to the board and clarified some of the line item requests. He stated that it is a bit unusual compared to prior requests. He stated that four pages of detail had been provided. He highlighted pages 7 - 10. On page 7 and in particular the available fund balances in the General Fund and Capital Improvements represent the balances available after the 25% reserve. He mentioned the balance in the Capital Improvement Fund anticipates revenue of 2.8 million dollars from CDOT for the cemetery bridge funding and 1.3 million dollars from the Districts to support the Miller Ranch project. He stated that in 2004 the County performed one time transfers from the Retirement Fund, Insurance Fund, and Debt Reserve Fund of approximately 2 million dollars. Chairman Stone asked the commissioners to nod at approvals or disapprovals. He reviewed specific line items to determine whether each ofthe commissioners would be in favor ofthem. He asked Mr. Ingstad about the temporary parking lot and cross walk at Miller Ranch. Mr. Ingstad responded that the money would be taken from the General Fund and moving it to the Road and Bridge Fund to repay that fund Mr. Brad Higgins stated that the crosswalk portion of the project hadn't been finished yet. He told the board that the materials would not be in for another two weeks. The budget request was for worst case scenario and stated this would come in under the request. ' Chairman Stone read items from Page 8. He asked about the emergency management generator. Mr. Higgins clarified that there were costs to install a usable panel on the generator. The project is underway using Fair money and this request represents a reimbursement. Chairman Stone continued to itemize the items on the supplemental budget. He asked Kathleen Forinash to explain the need for an additional nurse and caseworker and some of the other items in her request. Ms. Forinash clarified that currently there is one full time nurse in El Jebel and Eagle and one full time nurse in Avon and one almost full time nurse in Avon and another 32 hour nurse. Their work loads represent 85% oftheir time attending to the clinics and other services. She desires extending i:mrhunization services and well child services for the community and working with other health partners to achieve a better immunization rate for the children of Eagle County. Chairman Stone asked about our i:mrhunization rate. Ms. Forinash stated that only a small portion of children come through public health and that Eagle County is at the low end of the rate for the state. She stated that information on how the county as a whole is doing is not available because they have not had nurse time available to determine this information. It is difficult to fill times when staff are taking vacations. Mr. Ingstad stated that he and Ms. Forinash had agreed that this re-structure and staff addition were valid changes, in particular the nursing division to allow the department to move to the next level. Ms. Forinash spoke about some ofthe re-organization in her department to better handle the growth of Eagle County. She clarified her desire to offer better service to the community. They are currently in the process of recruiting the public health manager rather than a nurse manager because Eagle County doubled its population between the 1990 census and the 2000 census. They are anticipating future growth as well. She also stated that they are beginning to look at a community health clinic, which would greatly enhance the public health resources for Eagle County. Her desire is to do all possible to protect the people of Eagle County. This could happen under the umbrella of the private sector as well and helping to promote healthy lifestyles. She felt it was important to train and free up the nurses so that they could work not only with patients but also with the community partners. She spoke about the home visitor position. In El Jebel she has had two % positions and these are very difficult to 22 6/01/2004 fill. They received additional community service block grant of $18, 000 which would allow increasing the two % time positions and making them both full time positions. This would allow some parenting services. The Fatherhood Initiative training item is for a special training in Texas during the month of June, and her department had received $2000 to help cover the costs. The volunteer service coordinator had previously been % time. They determined that the job took more than 30 hours per week, and actually required a full time position. The supplemental request reflects the difference between full time and % positions. The additional case worker also represents the net difference in cost. Over time the number of families coming to Eagle County for welfare services has increased. This would allow 8 social case workers in her department and would allow for a reasonable case load per staff member. Chairman Stone clarified that additional staffing is usually put through the normal annual request process. He wondered why these positions had not come up during the normal budget schedule. Mr. Ingstad stated that FTE's had not been approved for some time. The reason that this request' was coming up now is that the needs of the County had not been being met. He did not believe that these requests could wait and that this is an urgent priority. Chairman Stone asked about the ergonomic requests. Ms. Forinash stated that it had been recommended that the ergonomics of her work stations be reviewed by CTSI. The request represented the recommended costs ofthe changes that were determined to be necessary for the changed work style. She stated that this cost would be less than workman's compensation claims. Commissioner Gallagher asked Ms. Forinash to clarify the Head Start vehicle request. She stated that they needed a more usable type of vehicle. Commissioner Gallagher asked if there would be additional costs related to the addition of staff. Ms. Forinash detailed some of these added expenses. Carla Budd, Director of Human Resources, spoke to the board about the compensation study. She clarified that the compensation plan had been changed from a point factor pay plan to a market based pay plan. When this occurred the commitment was made to review this information every two years. It is now time to review this plan and update the survey information. Chairman Stone stated that the board would need to be prepared to implement the recommended changes if there were any warranted based on a limited shelf life. He stated that the study could be more than $17,000 because there would be additional costs for staff raises. He suggested that it's most appropriate to have the study completed and recommendations made for next year's budget cycle. Commissioner Gallagher asked when this had been done before. Ms. Budd stated that the last time was two years ago for a full change and a partial change two and a half years ago and a final change two years ago in January. She stated that the estimate for completion would be the end of July. She clarified that they could project changes into the future so that if changes were implemented on January 1, 2005. Commissioner Menconi requested that the study be performed closer to the end of the year. Commissioner Gallagher stated that the budget process begins in July, and he believes that the budget officer should use that as a resource available during the process and not after the process. Mr. Ingstad agreed that a number should be available no later than September. Ms. Budd stated that the study should be started no later than mid-June. Chairman Stone stated that it needed to be clear that no changes would occur until January 1, 2005. Chairman Stone asked about the phone at the front desk. 23 6/01/2004 John Denardo clarified that this phone had already been installed and he was requesting budgetary reimbursement. Commissioner Gallagher asked Mr. Ingstad to identify items that would need to be spent within the next one, two or three years. Mr. Ingstad spoke about the radar and that the FAA had not committed to this project. Eagle County had sent a letter committing up to a million dollars of county money to get the radar. They still think it will be approved. He believed that it would be approved within the next two years. Cooley Mesa Road is an obligation that the previous board entered into with the Town of Gypsum. The $14 million figure represents the high end projection. If the board decided to keep the alignment where it is currently and not make changes, it might be done for $1,000,000. He was not sure Gypsum would be happy with that. He clarified that the Airport would like to re-locate the road to allow for future development. He stated that the project should have been done three or four years ago and the Town of Gypsum had allowed him to move it forward year after year, but at some point the Commissioners are obligated to fix this road. The runway extension is a $20,000,000 project over the next three years, and it's a 90-10 type match. The county share should be around $2,000,000. He explained that the county also entered into a grant application for air service with the Chamber and Vail Resorts. He believes under this request there could be a commitment of $300,000 in addition to the money being put to the air service program at this point. He reviewed the remainder of the line items with expected timelines for encumbrance. He spoke about the Lafarge gravel pit and the fact that the operation would be ending soon, and future recreation possibilities for this area. Helen Michelbrink spoke to the board about the $4.4 million. She stated that this was part of an overall pedestrian improvement plan that she has been working on. The board had asked about the likelihood of these improvements taking place in the next three years, She turned this question around and told the board that they would have to identify priorities. Commissioner Gallagher asked whether these items were a high priority. Ms. Michelbrink stated that many of these improvements were on county roads that were having a lot of pedestrian activity. She provided additional information about some of the other projects listed on the request. In her estimation the Fairgrounds Western Access would be the most likely use for immediate funds. She reviewed several other capital projects and the timelines associated with them. Commissioner Gallagher asked about the diversion at the Fairgrounds. Ms. Michelbrink stated that $90,000 represented the high end. She had recently received a $15,000 grant to help with this cost from CWRC. The $200,000 would take the project to another level. She stated that legal work has been really expensive in terms of sorting out the county's water rights related to this project. She estimated that the legal costs would be around $15,000. Chairman Stone asked for clarification that the $200,000 is above and beyond what had already been budgeted. Ms. Michelbrink stated that this was correct. She stated that only $90,000 had already been budgeted. She clarified that legal work is really expensive and she did not know exactly how much they would represent. Commissioner Menconi asked how much of the $200,000 would represent legal fees. Ms. Miche1brink stated that she did not know how much she had added in for legal fees. She clarified that the bulk of the $200,000 would be for planning, process, building trails and picnic shelters. Mr. Ingstad stated that some of these items had been previously budgeted for. Chairman Stone asked about the capital improvements list. 24 6101/2004 Mr. Roeper stated that capital improvements are around 130 million dollars. Mr. Stan Zoemler and John Gulick were present from the Town of Vail with a request for $1,000,000 for the West Vail Fire Station. It is their beliefthat this station would greatly improve the response and service not only to Vail, but to unincorporated areas including Dowd Junction and Vail Pass area. He believes the total cost would be around $2,000,000. Other potential development could help bring down the net cost. He told the board that the Town of Vail had identified that response to unincorporated areas was around 25%. There are 3.6 acres that might include opportunities for additional development. Mr. Ingstad asked about the actual 2004 costs. Mr. Zoemler stated that they would not be beginning construction on the facility based on the fact that the money is not currently available. They only have about $160,000 presently. Mr. Ingstad stated that this request might be premature, but for the board to give direction for actual expenditures in 2005. Chainnan Stone stated that the regular capital improvement process might be a more appropriate time to consider these requests, considering the size of the requests. He felt there would be a more exhaustive process involved at that point. Commissioner Menconi asked about their vision and plan for the recreation center. He infonned Mr. Zoemler that the Town of Gypsum would be coming forward with similar requests. Mr. Zoemler clarified that it would be a 2004 project, about an 8700 square foot facility for gymnastics and space for other activities such as yoga class types of activity. He stated there are a series of partners for the project: Vail Resorts, Eagle River Water District, the School District and the Town of Vail. They have a shortfall of $500,000.00. They desire to get the bulk of the construction completed prior to school beginning in the fall. The construction would be completed by December. Commissioner Menconi asked about the total projected cost. Mr. Zoemler stated that the cost would be around $1.5 million. He inquired as to the rate structure for unincorporated residents. Mr. Zoemler stated he was not sure of the answer, but would be happy to bring the question to the recreation district. Commissioner Menconi stated that he is in favor of approval today for this project based on prior a.pprovals for similar types of activities. Chairman Stone asked if there was a strategy to accomplish this without County participation. Mr. Zoemler stated that his strategy would be that the costs over time would be recouped with fees. Commissioner Gallagher asked why the town is building the rec center if there is a Vail Rec District. He agrees with Commissioner Menconi about supporting the concept. However, there are other items to consider, including the possibility of consolidating some of the county rec districts. He wondered about the request being considered during the budget process. He asked several questions about the Fire Station. He is well aware that the Vail Fire District provides services to the unincorporated areas. He believes that users should pay for their services and wondered about a Vail Fire Protection District. His dream is to see a map of the county covered with Fire Districts similar to the ambulance districts coverage. He stated that 25% ofthe total cost would be more like $625,000. He believes this might be a more reasonable request and looks forward to seeing the request as part of the capital request ptocess. 25 6/01/2004 Chairman Stone clarified that the Fire Station should be part ofthe regular budget cycle and wondered what the consensus was related to the gymnastics center. Commissioner Gallagher stated that he anticipated both requests coming in as part of the regular budget process. Mr. Ingstad suggested that Mr. Zoemler go back to the board of the rec district and inquire about the out of district fees if the county participated in this project. Mr. Zoemler stated that he is worried that he might force the fee structure to be more complicated. Mr. Gulick stated that they were considering the possibility of asking the Eagle County Health Services District to join them in a joint facility. Commissioner Menconi asked Mr. Gulick about the Fire Station. He commended the work that the Vail Fire group had helped with on Vail Pass. He indicated that he is in favor of helping with the West Vail Fire building. He asked about potential consolidation. Mr. Gulick stated that it remains a topic of discussion. He stated all districts work cooperatively together from Dotsero to Vail Pass. Commissioner Menconi asked about service to unincorporated Eagle County. Mr. Gulick stated that there are individual contracts in place with homeowners and commercial buildings. Mark Hurlbert, District Attorney spoke to the board about his request for bullet proof glass for his office. He explained the current situation where there is a pane of thin glass between his staff and the general public. His desire is to increase the safety of the building. Mr. Cunningham stated that the $10,000 represented not only the glass, but portions of wall sliITounding the window. There had previously been a request for access card system to be installed. Mr. Ingstadstated that he has always been concerned about the security in the county courthouse. He believes that the board should consider the request for additional security today and implementing these enhancements as soon as possible. He believes the request at hand should be approved, but that additional security improvements should be strongly considered. Mr. Cunningham spoke about the estimated cost to make these enhancements. Commissioner Gallagher agreed that this is an important request. He requested a more concise bid for the other improvements. Chairman Stone stated that the rest of the supplemental budget would be considered at a later time during the meeting. Mr. Ingstad stated that it was important to remember that this was not the only security enhancement that needs to be made at the courthouse. He believes that the full security enhancements are closer to $500,000.00. Chairman Stone offered members of the public the opportunity to speak about the supplemental budget. Commissioner Gallagher moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Eagle County Liquor License Authority Consent Agenda 26 6/01/2004 Ms. Simonton stated the only item for the board to consider was the Consent Agenda and the following renewals. The Edwards Liquor Mart represents a change in Corporate structure. Commissioner Gallagher stated that he would like some back up documents for the Consent Agenda. Chairman Stone clarified the information that had been provided to the board prior to the meeting to Commissioner Gallagher. Edwards Liquor Mart Riverwalk Wine & Spirits River House Restaurant Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the liquor license consent agenda. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. Commissioner Gallagher pointed out some deficiencies about preparation in the future for Consent Agenda. The vote was approved unanimously. Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority and reconvene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Report of Open Space Advisory Committee on the Bair Ranch Conservation Project (Continued from 5/11/04) Commissioner Gallagher stated that he wanted to report that he had listened to tapes and reviewed minutes of the previous meeting and had gone through pounds of email and read newspaper clippings. He believes he is very familiar with what transpired at the last meeting that this was considered. lIe feels he is prepared. He lamented that this file lost some dignity in this process by well intentioned but misguided efforts. One example would be an email mailed by a commissioner requesting additional emails to be sent. Another example was the request from our local Eagle County Land Trust people to the ski company to withhold their applications so as not to cloud this request. He wanted to address some of the comments that he had received. He made two columns, one positive and one with opposition comments. Comments in support speak of wildlife habitat. He agrees that this is a valid consideration. He stated another comment received was in support of ranching heritage of Eagle County. He is not sure this includes dude ranching. Another comment in support was the "view." That said, view is not one of his issues. He doesn't mind seeing someone else's home, but he does appreciate a good pristine view. He reminded all present that this county is over 80% federal lands. He commended the partnership and felt it was a plus. He felt that the fact that this was a future looking request was most essential thing for the next 20-30-40 years. He had heard that there was urgency to this project, but he has heard that before. He addressed the negative comments. Atthe top of his negative comments column he wrote access / private. He referred to the ballot language, which passed by the voters of Eagle County. The majority voted to tax themselves and give that money to the county to spend on open space. He read the ballot language. As a voter, he remarked, that when he read the language, he understood that public access was not a guarantee, but rather one of many purposes or 27 6/01/2004 options. When the OSAC committee guidelines were implemented and approved by the board, they made it a point to include many options. He believes there is a full range of desires for open space. He isn't swayed by the access question. If it is approved, the open space easement would be had for non- access price. He stated that at the same time if it were wide open to the public the ranching operation would be at risk. He had heard that another argument against this was personal benefit legislation, in other words, the question of whether the money would be used to support someone else's livelihood of "dude ranching." He believes that the consideration should be whether value for the dollar is being achieved. He spoke about the concept of "don't use my tax dollar." In the ballot question people weren't asked to give their tax dollars and then have the ability to veto individual projects. When taxes are paid the monies come to the board for spending decisions. The last comment he heard in opposition was that this money should be spent elsewhere. He told all present that when the county started the OSAC, opportunity for other proposals were encouraged. He is disappointed that the ski company withheld their application because they were encouraged to submit the same. He told the crowd that there were not competing proposals. This process requires a willing seller and a willing buyer. He spoke about other positive comments. The last one he spoke about was "development." This right he finds is the most important part ofthe project. Last year when he voted for approval he didn't believe this was about beauty, or the ranch preservation, but rather the benefit was that those thousands of acres would never be developed. This is what he finds to be of value to the people of Eagle County. The fact that for perpetuity the people of Eagle County would not have to pay the difference between residential taxes and residential expenses is what is important to him. He believes that ultimately water will slow the growth. Commissioner Gallagher moved that the Board of County Commissioner for Eagle County contribute $2,000,000 towards the acquisition of the Bair Ranch Conservation Easement from the Eagle County Open Space Tax fund subject to the following conditions: . That all Eagle County funds be used only for land located within Eagle County Colorado . That prior to release of any funds by Eagle County, County staff shall have . That after review by staff comments and relative documents will be presented to the Board for final review and approval at its discretion. . That the condition of the Conservation Easement requiring the entire 4318.17 acre Bair Ranch property consisting of both the Eagle and Garfield portions, excluding the 11.4 acre residential parcel, be kept under single ownership at all times, be modified to allow for the separation and sale of the Eagle County parcel to Eagle County, only to be held under the Conservation Easement or otherwise as open space, such sale to be on conditions mutually agreeable to Eagle County and the seller. . That absent a sale to Eagle County, the entire 4318.17 acre Bair Ranch property shall remain under single ownership at all times pursuant to the terms and conditions of the conservation easement. . That all material representations made by the requesting party in submitted materials and public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion with an amendment. He asked Commissioner Gallagher about Item 3 of the condition and asked that the following be added: "that this be brought to the commissioners on June 15th for attorney update." 28 6/01/2004 Commissioner Gallagher stated that if all parties are facilitating that date he did not object, but he did not want to tie the board to a date that could not be met if all of the requirements are not done in a timely fashion. Mr. Treu stated that the issue is the June 23rd inspection deadline. He stated that the attorney's office would have their end completed and he believed the Conservation fund could make the same commitment. Tom Macy from the Conservation Fund informed the board that he believes that the Conservation Fund could have all documents completed by June 15th. He saw no issues that could not be accommodated or worked through. He requested that the 15th be the date because of other deadlines. Commissioner Gallagher asked if condition #4 could be achieved by the deadline. Mr. Macy stated he felt this was a reasonable and creative way to deal with the right of first refusal. He would have to get concurrence from the Bairs and their attorney. Chairman Stone stated that Commissioner Gallagher's comments about the urgency and being rushed were important. He didn't think Commissioner Gallagher should be held to a timeframe that might eliminate the issues being resolved. Commissioner Gallagher stated he would not amend his motion, but would ask staff to attempt to get everything in order for the June 15th date. Chairman Stone clarified that this issue would not have to come before the board again, but could be covered during attorney update. Commissioner Menconi asked Commissioner Gallagher to review his schedule for the coming weeks. Commissioner Gallagher stated that he will be here next week and the 15th, then to a conference. This does not require a meeting of the board, but that county counsel reviews the documents and gives them the nod to move forward. He is confident that with cooperation of the parties involved, it can be accomplished. Mr. Caccioppo attempted to make public comments. Chairman Stone clarified the issue. Mr. Caccioppo argued with Chairman Stone about the language of the motion. Chairman Stone asked Mr. Caccioppo to stop his comments. He suggested an additional amendment to the motion. He suggested limiting commercial use of the Eagle County portion of the parcel, the mountain parcel. He believes that Eagle County money is being spent on the mountain parcel, which cannot be seen, and might as well be in Montana. To keep the environment preserved he suggested limiting commercial use on that portion of the property to sheep ranching for the future, not dude ranching. He agreed that four wheelers could be used for this type of ranching on the Eagle County portion of the property. Commissioner Gallagher stated that for the past many months, the sellers had been working and all of the participating parties had been working under the assumption of full use of the land which is permitted by Eagle County zoning. A legitimate use on agricultural land includes dude ranching and tourist activity. He anticipates that limiting that use is contrary to the County's good faith. Chairman Stone asked for a quick explanation. He stated that he would not be voting in favor of this request because he did not think Eagle County would be getting value for their dollars. There are other projects that the Eagle County Land Trust had yet to complete, that being the Vassar Meadows exchange. The transfer of ownership of that land with the forest service land located between Avon and Singletree is subject to development today. The Forest Service can trade that property for something 29 6/01/2004 else and somebody could develop it. He stated that there was a commitment made on East and West 'Brush Creek, and until that trade is completed, it leaves that property subject to development. He thinks a mistake is being made in not giving this process the dignity it deserves. He went on to say that he felt it was important for the board to come through with a list of priorities He thinks the biggest injustice is that part of the process that the other two commissioners are supporting is that the whole process for the first funding of the use of the open space dollars has been amended and created to support one project and one project only, which is the Bair Ranch. He thinks this is very obvious. His belief is that some of the allowances will come back to haunt the county. He hoped that one of the other commissioners would join him in a full review of the process that is fair and balanced and gives the ability and the encouragement for all acquisitions to be heard. Chairman Stone asked for a vote on the motion. Commissioner Gallagher and Commissioner Menconi voted to support the motion and Chairman Stone vote to oppose. The motion passed by a vote of two to one. Commissioner Menconi thanked all present for coming out with support. The county had received 1038 people in support of this project. He felt it was a stand for the vision and the future of Eagle County. He especially wanted to thank the hard work of the advisory committee who did the heavy lifting on reviewing the project and deciding 9-1 that this was the right thing to do. There was applause from the audience. Commissioner Gallagher suggested a break. Supplemental Budget (Con't) Chairman Stone asked Ms. Michelbrink about the sidewalk extension from Miller Ranch Bridge to Highway 6. Ms. Michelbrink asked to increase the amount from $65,000 to $85,000 to reflect some extra mobilization costs. The sidewalk would be 700 - 800 feet. The sidewalk currently ends at the end of the bridge. She felt because so many children are using the bus and using the bus stops, this sidewalk would connect the bridge to the two transit stops. She stated that there is no way to make it part of the funding request. The north side is particularly dangerous. She wants to complete the work with the overlay that is taking place in two weeks. Mr. Merry clarified the funding request for contract services the West Nile Virus program. The figure in the contract is $154,000 total. Mr. Merry added on a $6,000 contingency amount. Chairman Stone asked about the playground at Berry Creek. This money was originally contemplated to be reimbursed by the Berry Creek Metro District as tap fees are received. Commissioner Menconi stated that he is in support. Commissioner Gallagher expressed his concern about the design. Chairman Stone asked that an un-allocated but appropriated fund discussion at a later time. Chairman Stone asked about carpeting and painting in the Eagle County Building. Mr. Cunningham stated that this would complete the work that had been previously started. Commissioner Menconi asked ifthere had been a change order based on the work done in the commissioner's offices. Mr. Cunningham stated no, the assumption was not made that all carpet and paint in the building would need replacement in the entire building. He stated that certain areas of the building had not been allocated. These areas included all of the department areas on the first and second floor. 30 6/01/2004 Commissioner Gallagher asked if this was desired with a two to three year completion, or should it bedone at the same time. Mr. Cunningham stated that he had two bids from companies that could come in after hours. Commissioner Gallagher asked about the wisdom of doing the entire building every two to three years, or should it be done on a 3 year rotation basis. Ms. Forinash asked for ergonomic equipment for the general fund workstations as opposed to the social service fund workstations. The recommendation includes flat screen monitors; two in Avon and three in EI Jebel in addition to other equipment. Chainnan Stone stated that if the county is going to be looking at ergonomic changes they should be looked at County-wide. He is interested in a good and healthy workplace, but he is prompted to consider all of the departments at once. Commissioner Gallagher concurred. He feels that if current working conditions are unhealthy they need to be looked at. If they aren't, then perhaps a county wide effort would be better, said Commissioner Gallagher. Chairman Stone asked about the Mintuin Senior funding. He is in favor of funding continuing hut requested more information about the continued funding. He requested that this be placed in the un- allocated file. He spoke about flat screen monitors requested for the treasurer and the public trustee and believes that this should be looked at on a county-wide basis. Commissioner Gallagher asked about replacing these screens by attrition and asked for IT's input on these requests, Chainnan Stone asked about the request from the Sheriff's department for integrated dispatch. He inquired about.the T-l1ine from dispatch to Ski Cooper. He asked about several other line items on the appropriation request. He spoke about the microwave equipment lease payment. The new number is a net number of$19,734.00. He requested that the $10,000 for fencing around the soccer field be put into the appropriated hut unallocated account. The fence would be a green plastic coated chain link fence. Comrnissioller Gallagher stated that he is not interested in a chain link fence surrounding a soccer field; he requested more of an open design. He is in favor of setting aside money for that purpose however. Commissioner Menconi stated that he is also concerned with the design. He asked about the idea of rocks or boulders instead. Commissioner Gallagher requested the board had gone to the expense of involving an architect to look at the Freedom Park memorial. The estimate for planning purposes had been received in the amount of $5000 - $15,000. This amount represents a substantial discount for the people of Eagle - County. He requested that $15,000 be place in the appropriated but unallocated category. Commissioner Menconi expressed support for this funding as well. He wondered what the planning for completion would be. He inquired about fund-raising to help with completion of the project. He Wondered if the group was anticipating that the county would be responsible for the architecture ofthis project. Commissioner Gallagher anticipates that the County would end up funding a large portion, and be able to filld some fullding partners. He clarified that by spending the planning money an estimate of the total cost would become more possible. PDS-00039 Willits Bend PUD 31 6/01/2004 Joseph Forinash, Planner, Community Development, asked that this file be tabled to July 13, 2004. Commissioner Gallagher moved to table the file until July 13, 2004. Commissioner Menconi seconded the request. The motion carried unanimously. VIS...0023 Rivetstone SubdivisionN ariation from Improvement Standards Justin Hildreth, Project Engineer, Engineering, presented File VIS-00023, Variance From Improvement Standards - Riverstone Subdivision, aka Logan Park PUD. He summarized as follows: This is a petition for a Variance from Improvement Standards in accordance with Section 5-260 G ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations (ECLUR). Specifically, the Applicant is seeking a variance from the requirement that: 1. Two points of access from the development to the public roadway system (Section 4-620 J.1.h of the ECLUR) must be provided, and 2. Access approaches and driveways in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with adequate area for an emergency vehicle turnaround (Section 4-620 J.9.c.l of the ECLUR). The Riverstone Subdivision was first approved as the Logan Park PUD in 2001 as a 5 lot development. Cemetery Road, which was previously vacated by file number G-000I0, and replaced by Miller Ranch Road, ran through the center of this property. Last year, Riverstone Developers purchased the development from Oran Palmateer. Accompanying this variance file is an Amended Final Plat (AFP-00192.) The changes to the originally approved Logan Park Final Plat (PDF-00046) are reflected in this AFP application. However, this petition for a Variation from Improvement Standards must be approved prior to approval of the Amended Final Plat. The variance from the two points of access requirement is because the development win no longer gain access to US 6. The development will only gain access via Miller Ranch Road. The revised proposal is shown as Exhibit A. The variance from the driveway in excess of 150 feet without an emergency vehicle turnaround is necessary to accommodate the new proposed site layout. The emergency vehicle turnaround will be 210 feet away from the end of the farthest residence. Per Section 5-260 G Variance from Improvement Standards, the Board of County Commissioners is the authority that decides Variances from the Improvement Standards. Prior review by the Planning Commission is not stipulated in the Eagle County Land Use Regulations (ECLUR). Chronology 1999 - Preliminary Plan of the Logan Park PUD is approved. 2000 - Eagle County passes Resolution 2000-133 which will vacate the portion of Cemetery Road located in the Logan Park PUD with several conditions. 2001 - Final Plat of the Logan Park PUD is approved. 2003 - Riverstone Developers purchase the property [rom Oran Palmateer. 2003 - Eagle County completes construction of Miller Ranch Road and Bridge and removes the old Cemetery Bridge. 32 6/01/2004 2003 - All ofthe conditions ofthe Cemetery Road vacation resolution are met and the vacation becomes valid. Site Data Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning East: Residential/Arrowhead River Ranch Industrial/Excel Energy Gas Exchange Facility West: Residential/Paul and Shirley Kudel North: Residential/Jesse Alberts South: Residential/Arrowhead PUD Existing Zoning: Logan Park PUD Water: Eagle River Water and Sanitation District Sewer: Eagle River Water and Sanitation District Access: Miller Ranch Road Referral Responses Eaf!le County Planninf! Department The Planning Division has no comments regarding this fi1e-(Attached as Exhibit B.) No other referral responses have been received. DiscusSion This property was subdivided in 2001 as the Logan Park PUD but was not developed. Riverstone Developers purchased the development in 2003 and have proposed several minor changes that require a Variance from Improvement Standards. The first change to the development proposal is that the road layout has changed. Historically, Cemetery Road went through the center ofthe property, as shown on Exhibit C. The historic Cemetery Road easement was vacated in 2003 by file G-OO 1 O. The approved Logan Park road layout showed Cemetery Road being relocated to the eastern portion ofthe property (Exhibit D.) The vacation was approved with the condition that it be final upon the completion of a replacement road, although no specific road location was identified. With respect to the first variance, when the Logan Park PUD was approved in 2001, it was envisioned that the replacement road would be located along the east side of the property. Since that time, Miller Ranch Road has been constructed and is considered the replacement road. The Riverstone Development proposal shows a small road running from Miller Ranch Road and extending to the west side of the property as shown in Exhibit E. No connection is proposed to US 6 and therefore a variance is required from the two points of access requirement. The Eagle County Engineering Department, the Colorado Department of Transportation and the Highway 6 Corridor Feasibility Study all support the single point 33 6/01/2004 of access to Miller Ranch Road with no direct connection to US 6. The State Highway Access Code (CR 43-2-147) does not allow for an access onto US 6 if a connection can be obtained to a local road. The second variance request is from the requirement that access approaches and driveways in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with adequate area for emergency vehicle turnaround. The distance from the emergency vehicle turnaround to the farthest lot is 210 feet. The developer has discussed this with the Eagle River Fire Protection District (ERFPD) and has agreed upon hydrant locations to mitigate the impact of the longer distance from the turnaround. A letter from the ERFPD indicating approval of the proposed design is attached as Exhibit F. STAFF FINDINGS: Criteria for Evaluation by the County Ene:ineer The County Engineer's responsibility in a variance application is described in Section 4-61 0.A.2 of the ECLUR. It states,. in part, "The County Engineer's evaluation shall consider whether the alternative will provide for an equivalent level of public safety and whether the alternative will be equally durable so that the normally anticipated user and maintenance costs will not be increased." The County Engineer may also recommend approval of an alternative "If an alternate design, procedure, or material can be shown to provide performance and/or environmental sensitivity that reflect community values equal or better than that established by these standards..." For this evaluation, Staff interpreted the standards in the ECLUR to represent the minimum acceptable level of "community values," since the ECLUR Were adopted after extensive work and comments by the community. Criteria for Approval for the Board of County Commissioners The Board of County Commissioners' responsibility in a variance application is described in Section 5- 260.G.2. ofthe ECLUR. It states in part: "The Board of County Commissioners shall balance the hardships to the petitioner of not granting the Variance against the adverse impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the persons affected, and the adverse impact on the lands affected." Hardship is not defined in the ECLUR. HoWever, the Board may consider a hardship to be caused when the petitioner will be deprived of some or all of his right to use the land if the ECLUR is strictly followed. In addition to the above criteria, the ECLUR outlines the criteria for granting a variance from the improvement standards for the.dual access requirement in Section 4-620. The Board of County Commissioners may, at their discretion, grant a variance form the required improvement standards depending upon the following criteria: . Length of Road . Fire Hazard Rating 34 6/01/2004 . Number of Units Proposed . Topography, and . Recommendation from the Local Fire Authority having Jurisdiction. Hardship to the Applicant The Applicant has demonstrated hardships pertaining to the construction of an additional access to the subdivision. The first hardship is imposed by Eagle County and the Colorado Department of Transportation by not being in favor of the construction of an additional access onto US 6. This additional entrance would not be ideal for a small subdivision because it could promote cut-through traffic and any additional direct access onto US 6 would be too close to the intersection of US 6 and Miller Ranch Road. The Applicant could apply for a State Highway Access Permit to allow direct access to US 6 for emergency vehicles. The Applicant might be able to obtain this access, but it is not necessary because ofthe close proximity ofthe residences to US 6. The hardship of the emergency vehicle turnaround being more than 150 feet from the farthest lot is based on topographical constraints. . The topography of the subdivision is tight because it is sandwiched between US 6 and the Eagle River. This limits options for the placement of the emergency vehicle turnaround. Staff Finditu!s The Applicant must demonstrate that the hardship of not getting the variance exceeds the adverse impacts on the health safety and welfare of the persons affected and the adverse impact to the lands affected. The applicant has worked with the Eagle River Fire Protection District to mitigate any potential adverse impacts on the health, safety and welfare of the persons affected by constructing an additional fire hydrant for the development. Staff finds thatthe inclusion of these mitiga.tion measures, the short length of the road, the small size of the development, and the wildfire hazard rating support the single point of access and farther distance for the emergency vehicle turnaround. Staff further finds that granting of these two Variances from Improvement Standards will provide for an equivalent level of public safety that would occur if the developed area had two points of access and a turnaround within 150 feet from the farthest residence. Board of County ComIilissioner Findin2s The Board of County Commissioner must make the following findings in order to approve this file: The Property is encumbered by a topographical or other physical condition that prevents the applicant from providing a second point of access and an emergency turnaround within 150 feet fromthe farthest residence. ' The applicant has demonstrated a hardship if there is strict adherence to these requirements. 35 6/01/2004 The applicant has demonstrated that the hardship of not granting a variance exceeds any adverse impacts on the health, safety and welfare of the persons affected or adverse impacts to the affected lands. Chairman Stone asked for public comment. Shirley Kudel, owner of property just west of this property, informed the Board that she is concerned with water and sewer issues. She informed the board that they do not have water and sewer hookups, rather they have wells and septic systems. She stated that she had spoken with Ms. Michelbrink and that they have a letter on file with the water and sewer department. Chairman Stone stated that he believed that all of these properties were being served by gravity feed sewer and there is domestic water from the water and sanitation district coming to the properties. He believes that her request could probably get hooked up fairly easily. Ms. Kudel asked where the water comes in, because access couldn't be gained under the house on the west end. Commissioner Gallagher asked that Ms. Kudel get together with the Community Development staff to try to solve these issues while looking at the plans for the water and sewer. Helen Michelbrink recommended that this file be deferred for another two weeks so that some of the outstanding issues could be resolved. Chairman Stone was concerned about the emergency vehicle turn-around. Justin Hildreth stated that the layout is very tight. The applicant had worked with the local fire department to position the hydrants appropriately. Chairman Stone asked about an emergency gate for emergency access. He stated that the area is very congested and there would be the possibility for something to happen on Miller Ranch Road that close to the Bridge. Commissioner Gallagher concurred with Chairman Stone's concerns about the turn-around. He asked all to look at Exhibit "A". He wondered what the symbols represented. He asked about the old road as it enters the project. Mr. Hildreth explained that he wasn't sure. Commissioner Gallagher moved to table VIS-0023 Riverstone SubdivisionlVariation and AFP- 00192 Riverstone Improvement Standards until June 15th inasmuch as the applicant was not present for the hearing. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. AFP-00192 Riverstone Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Planner, Community Development, presented File AFP-00192 Riverstone Subdivision; An Amendment and Correction to the Logan Park PUD. File NO./Process: AFP-00192, Amended Final Plat Location: 0096,0091,0081,0071,0043 Riverstone Lane (formally 0009,0007, 0005, 0003, 0001 Logan Court); Northwest Corner of Miller Ranch Road and US 6, Edwards Owners: Riverstone Developers, LLC 36 6/01/2004 Applicant : Riverstone Developers, LLC Staff Recommendation: Approval Summary: The intent of this project, known as the Riverstone Subdivision, is to vacate elements of the previously platted Logan Park PUD and create new lot lines, building setbacks, easements and road names. The Logan Park PUD Guide shall remain in effect for this development. When Logan Park was originally platted, construction of the new Miller Ranch Road Bridge was not contemplated. Since the completion of the new bridge and road, the Logan Park PUD was sold to the current owners. Access is now proposed via Miller Ranch Road directly into the development (formerly, access was anticipated to be directly from U.S. Highway 6 and the old Cemetery Bridge), the current owner / developer has decided to alter the initial construction plans to slightly modify the design and road names. There will be no change to the number of lots previolislyplatted as the Logan Park PUD. This Amended Final Plat will solidify the amendments as proposed by the new owner. A Variance from Im.provement Standards (VIS- 00023) was also necessary to accomplish these changes. Site Data: Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning: East: Eagle County / Excel Energy Gas Exchange Facility / RSL West: Residential/Resource North: Residential/Resource South: ROW: Highway 6 Existing Zoning: Logan Park PUD Total Area: 1.873 acres Water: Public Sewer: Public Access: Via an easement through Eagle County property, known as Tract A, to Miller Ranch Road. Staff Findings: Pursuant to Section $-290.G.3. Standards for Amended Final Plat: a. Adjacent property. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the proposed amendment DOES NOT have an adverse effect on adjacent property owners. All adjacent property owners were notified for this file. No responses were received from the following adjacent property owners, as supplied by the applicant: Country Club of the Rockies, Paul and Shirley Kudel, Jesse Alberts, Eagle County and Public Service Co. of Colorado. 37 6/01/2004 b. Final Plat Consistency. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the proposed amendment IS NOT inconsistent with the intent of the Final Plat. Originally platted in January of2001, the intent of the original was to subdivide Logan Park into five, residential lots. This residential intent has not changed. The owners have decided to slightly modify the road construction designs, name of the development, easements and lot lines. At a quick glance, the overall design is almost exactly the same as was previously platted. c. COllformance with Final Plat Requirements. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the proposed amendment DOES conform to the Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies and guidelines. It was necessary to accomplish a Variance from Improvement Standards prior to the approval of this Amended Final Plat. Upon the VIS approval, this plat may also be approved. d. Improvement Agreement. DOES apply. A new Subdivision Improvements Agreement shall be signed with this Amended Final Plat. e. Restrictive Plat Note Alteration. DOES NOT apply. Staff Recommen.dation.: Approval Commissioner Gallagher moved to table AFP-00192 Riverstone Improvement Standards until June 15 inasllluch as the applicant was not present for the hearing. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The lllotion carried unanimously. LUR-0048 Road Impact Fee Amendment Package Bob Nartacci, Planning Manager, Co:tnmunity Development, presented File LUR-0048, Road Irti:pact Fee Amendment Package. Eagle County Land Use Regulations Amendments (ECLUR) LUR-0048; Amendment to the Road Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards. LOCATION: Unincorporated Eagle County STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. EAGLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to one condition. That being: The definition proposed for' Affordable Employee Housing' must properly cross- reference the definitions for 'Low Income Housing' and 'Moderate Income Housing', as well as, 'Qualified Employee'. Staffhas already incorporated the recommended condition into the Draft Regulation language attached hereto. TITLE: FILE NO./PROCESS: The Commission also inquired about the enforceability of one ofthe criteria for a 'Qualified Employee' . More specifically, a spouse or dependant of a Qualified Employee is by default recognized as Qualified Employee; what happens when an unqualified spouse is divorced or, otherwise separated, from the Qualified Employee and remains in the affordable home? Unless the subject property is otherwise deed restricted, the County would not be able to enforce this criterion beyond the initial sale of a Low or Moderate Income Housing unit. 38 6/01/2004 ROARING FORK V ALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONLAlso recommended Ullanimous approval, subject to the same condition recommended by the Eagle County Planning Commission. PROJECT DESCRWTION BACKGROUND: The Eagle County Land Use Regulation (LUR) consists of a series of Articles combined to create a document for "implementing the Eagle County Master Plan and to promote the health, safety and general welfare of the present and future residents of and visitors to Eagle County". The LUR's provide, in a single location, those standards and procedures applicable to development and the use of land in the unincorporated areas of the County. The LUR's are organized into seven Articles: 1) General Provisions; 2) Definitions; 3) Zone Districts; 4) Site Development Standards; 5) Administration; 6) Nonconformities and; 7) Enforcement. In addition to the seven Articles, the LUR's also contain six chapters and four appendices. The current LUR's were originally adopted on November 23, 1998 and became effective on January 1, 1999. Although a prodigious amount of thought and detail went into the LUR's prior to its original adoption, it is necessary from time to time to ainend the regulatory language in order to better reflect the original intent; to make the LUR more user friendly; to reconcile Ullintended discrepancies between sections ofthe LUR and; to add or subtract regulatory language in order to keep pace with Eagle County's growth. All proposed amendments are presented to the Board with the intent of furthering the health, safety and general welfare of Eagle County. SUMMARY: Proposed are modifications of Articles 4 ofthe Land Use Regulations for: The purpose of clarifying the intent of existing regulation; to ensure that school land dedication may be required more than once on a given property when there is an increase in allowed residential density and to insert language into the Section applicable to Road Impact Fees that will allow the Board of County Commissioners to waive the Road Impact Fee on the development oflow or moderate income housing or affordable employee housing. The proposed amendments are more particularly described as follows: . Article 4 - Site Development Standards: Division 4-7. Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards Sub-Section 4-700. School Land Dedication Standards · The proposed amendment is to 4-700.D.Dedication Requirements Shall Apply Only Once. Currently, the regulations allow school land dedication requirements to apply to the same land area only once. This amendment, would allow subsequent school land dedication requirements to apply if a given land area is re-subdivided and the re- subdivision results in a net increase of residential units. Sub-Section 4-710. Road Impact Fees 39 6/01/2004 · The proposed amendments to 4-710.D.Dejinitions, is to include definitions for the following terminology: 'Affordable Employee Housing'; 'Low Income Housing', 'Moderate Income Housing', and; 'Qualified Employee'. · The amendments proposed to 4-710.E.Imposition of Fee. 1. Time of Fee Obligation and Payment.a. are intended to further clarify the point that Road hnpact Fees will be assessed prior to the commencement of any land use activity requiring Eagle County approval unless the land use activity is exempt from the payment of Road hnpact Fees, as defined within Section 4-710. · The amendments proposed to 4-710.E.Impostion of Fee.2.d. are intended to clarify what types of re-plats of existing development will and will not incur additional Road Impact Fees. · The amendments to 4.710.E.Imposition ofFee.3.Waiver by the Board of County Commissioners. is entirely new language proposed for inclusion into the Road Impact Fee regulations. The amendment proposed includes statutory language that will allow the Board of County Commissioners to waive the applicable Road Impact Fee on the development of low or moderate-income housing or affordable employee housing as defined by Eagle County. STAFF REPORT REFERRAL RESPONSES: The proposed amendment package was referred for review and comment by the following agencies: . County Engineering Department . County Attorneys Office . County Department of Environmental Health . County Road and Bridge Department . County Sheriff s Office . County Housing Division . Board of County Commissioners . School Districts . Eagle County Planning Commission . Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission . Colorado State Division of Local Affairs . Colorado Department of Transportation . Knight Planning Services . Isom and Associates . Braun and Associates, Inc. . PJA Land Planning . Vail Resorts, Inc. . Cordillera . The Land Studio 40 6/0112004 . Sid Fox and Company . Johnson and Kunkel . Alpine Engineering . Peak Land Surveying . High Country Engineering . Lines in Space . White Surveying . Starbuck Surveying . Benchmark Engineering . Sopris Engineering . IntermountainEngineering . Marcin Engineering . Eagle Valley Surveying . Meyer Land Systems . Town of Avon . Town of Basalt . Town of Eagle . Town of Gypsum . Town of Minturn . Town of Red cliff . Town of Vail Responses were received from the following agencies, fIrms or individuals: Eagle County Engineering Department: Offered no comment with regard to the proposed amendments. Please see attached Memorandum dated April 22, 2004; Town of Basalt: .The Town offered the following fIve comments in their response letter dated May 3, 2004: 1) The Town strongly supports the creation of incentives for Affordable Housing; 2) The Town urges that waiver requests from traffIc impact fees should be carefully considered to assure that traffIc issues and safety concerns are still addressed. Waiver requests that impact the Town or Town streets should be referred to the Town and should only be granted in the Town . also concurs with the waiver. Applicable provisions of the IGA's with the Town regarding traffIc impact fees should be considered when evaluating waivers. The County and the Town should update their IGA to require Town approval for any waiver oftraffIc impact fees that affects Town streets; 3) No specifIc comments were noted regarding basic road impact fee administrative procedures; 4) The Town supports any efforts by the County to adopt comprehensive affordable housing regulations similar to the Town of Basalt's in order to further discourage jurisdictional shopping and provide housing attainable to residents and workers; 41 6/01/2004 5) Section 4-700 School Land Dedication Standards, item B., "Land Shall be Usable" should be revised to include, in addition to the option of selling land that is not needed or suitable for a school site, the option of developing said land for employee housing with priority to School District employees. Please be advised that employee housing is not a designated purpose by statutes that can be used for lands dedicated to school districts. Please see attached referral responses and letters. DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS: 1. Pursuant to Chapter 1, Section 1.15.04 Referrals of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: the proposed amendments HAVE been referred to the appropriate agencies, including the applicable towns within Eagle County, and to the Colorado Division of Local Affairs. 2. Pursuant to Chapter 1, Section 1.15.05 Public Notice of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: Public notice HAS been given. J. Pursuallt to Chapter 2, Sectioll 5-230.B.2 Text Amendment of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: (a) The proposed amendments AMEND ONLY THE TEXT of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, and do not amend the Official Zone District Map. (b) Precise wording ofthe proposed changes HAS been provided. 4. Pursuant to Chapter 2, Section 5-230.D Standards of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations as applicable: (a) The proposed amendments ARE consistent with the purposes, goals, policies, and Future Land Use Map of the Eagle County Master Plan. (b) The proposed amendments DO address a demonstrated community need. (c) The proposed amendments ARE in the public interest. Chairman Stone asked for public comment. There was none. (the follOWing amendments were requested by the board) Dedication Requirements Shall Apply Only Once. School land dedication requirements shall apply only once to the same land area. Dedications shall not be required of re-subdivisions of the same land when. a dedication has previously been made unless a net gain in residential units is realized as a result. oj a re-subdivision. In these instances, school land dedication 42 6/01/2004 requirements will be calculated proportionally, based upon the difference between the total number of allowed residential units prior to and after re-subdivision occurs. (am.-.-J Commissioner Menconi moved that the Board of County Commissioner's approve LUR-0048 incorporating all Staff findings as amended. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote carried unanimously. Supplemental Budget Con't Chairman Stone asked Karen Sheaffer about her request for a folder, stuffer and sealer for $13,432,92. Ms. Sheaffer stated that the old machine had been purchased in 1997. She was appointed Treasurer in 1996 and her great frustration was that they couldn't get the tax notices out before the last day of January. It used to cost the county $15,000 to hire a private firm to mail out the tax notices. She gave some financial comparisons related to hiring Someone to fold, stuff and seal envelopes. The machine that has been used is breaking down. She told the board that her staff completely stuffs 40,000 tax notices every year. She had saved the county $105,000 over the years and she is asking for $13,400 to replace the old machine. She offered the machine to other departments as well. The machine is available prior to January for mailing of tax notices. Commissioner Gallagher asked about leasing rather than purchasing. Ms. Sheaffer stated that the costs would be recouped in one year. Chairman Stone infotIIled Ms. Sheaffer about the decision to consider flat screen monitors for the county as a whole, not on a departmental basis. Ms. Sheaffer stated that her front desk at the Public Trustee terminal was very tight and a flat screen monitor would allow for better Use of the space. ChaitIIlart Stone asked SheriffHoy to clarify his request for EMS costs. Cotntnissionet Gallagher asked formore specifics. SheriffHoy stated that this is grant money for the EMS and is funded at the same level every year. Chairman Stone asked about the intergovernmental agreement for firecall. SheriffHoy clarified that this was also a carry forward for fire fighting and can only be used for the cost of fires. SheriffHoy stated that he had additional grant money available for any law enforcement projects. ChaitIIlan Stone requested confirmation on what SCAACP stands for and what the grant monies can be spent on. SheriffHoy stated that it is a grant that comes to the department and he doesn't know what it stands for ~ used. for law enforcement capabilities. He wants to use part of it to upgrade office equipment.and use half for replacing vehicles and possibly some specialty vehicles. Chairman Stone asked about acoustic work in the detention center. SheriffHoy stated that his officers in the detention center cannot have a secure conversation currently without the inmates hearing everything that is said. He told the board that two different systems would be used: one on the upper level and one on the gym level. Commissioner Menconi asked about the upstairs area and wondered if the workout equipment SheriffHoy stated that this equipment was removed because it represented a safety issue. Some of the old equipment could be used as a weapon. ChaitIIlan Stone asked aboutthe security request. He stated that the job of the County Sheriffis to provide security without using outside contractors. SheriffHoy stated that he would need an additional 8 staff members to provide the level of security for this lengthy period oftime during the trial. He informed the board that he already has staff burnout related to this type of detail. By outsourcing the Sheriffs office doesn't have to hire people off the street to provide security for the trial. The number provided is the worst case scenario. Chail11lan Stone wondered ifthe trial date had been set. Sheriff Hoy stated that the date had not been set, but September had been discussed. He stated that he had no idea of how long the trial could take. Commissioner Menconi asked SheriffHoy about how the security needs had been determined. Sheriff Hoy stated that the judge in the case ordered his department to provide security. He told the board that his department had done some research about how this type of security had been handled in other high profile cases. He stated this request represented a worst case scenario. Commissioner Menconi asked about implemental requests. SheriffHoy responded that he was certain that there would be a five day pre-trial in June and a five day pre-trial in July and after that no one knew what would happen. Commissioner Menconi stated that he did not mind Sheriff Hoy asking for the funds incrementally. SheriffHoy stated that he didn't think this would be possible. He committed to giving unused funds back to the General Fund. Mr. Ingstad clarified the need to appropriate only the funds that are needed. SheriffHoy stated that he would be able to get a revised estimate to the board. Commissioner Gallagher asked about approving $35,000 for the pre-trial hearings and then allowing SheriffHoy to come back with additional requests. Chairman Stone stated that he was still concerned about hiring an outside contractor to provide security. He was aware that Lonestar, the proposed contractor, had not handled previous security situations in a diplomatic matter. He asked how the Sheriffs office had handled the additional expense in providing security up to this point. Sheriff Hoy stated that he had sufficient funds in his payroll and overtime budgets. Commissioner Gallagher stated that he believes it is a reasonable request with some unknown factors. He expressed his desire to approve $35,000 for Lonestar and ask the Sheriff to come back for more funds as needed in the future. It's always possible that the case might be dismissed. Commissioner Menconi inquired as to whether county deputies and Lonestar work together. SheriffHoy stated that they worked together. The board approved the $35,000.00. Chairman Stone asked about the X-ray system. SheriffHoy clarified that this is necessary to expedite the courthouse screening process. There is currently a backlog with people trying to access the building. With an X-Ray machine they can expedite their processes. Chairman Stone asked about the generator. No-one could answer the question. 44 6/01/2004 Mr. Ingstad stated that the X-Ray machine at the airport had actually missed guns in the screening process. He stressed the importance of training for those viewing the X-Rays. Commissioner Gallagher suggested the possibility ofTSA training. Chairman Stone asked the board for their comments about the microwave lease payment. Chail11lan Stone asked Carla Budd about the Minturn Senior Services coordinator request. Ms. Budd told the board that Alpine Area Agency on Aging offered to fund the position initially, but because of budget cuts, they are unable to fund the position. The request is whether the county would be willing to fund the position. The position is a .5 position. Chairman Stone indicated that he favored this request. Commissioner Gallagher stated that the Senior Center in Minturn merits the staff, but he would be interested in seeing what other cuts the Alpine Agency had to make in other nutrition and Senior sites to understand why they chose Minturn. John Lowry, Senior Services Coordinator spoke to the board. He told the board that the agency had cut funding across their entire five county region. He stated that the cut was not just for our county, but would cover all five counties. It would affect transportation and staff. He clarified that nutrition would not be cut, just state projects. Commissioner Menconi asked about the possibility of the creation of a Kayak opportunity at the Fairgrounds. He wondered whether anyone else on the board is interested in this type of project. Commissioner Gallagher stated that he is interested in using the landing area in conjunction with fixing the diversion at the Fairgrounds, but not until plans are developed and participant funding is detailed. Chairman Stone agreed. He asked if someone could put a better pencil to this project. He requested more detail. Commissioner Menconi stated that ifhis figures are correct, approximately $4,000,000 is being appropriated with this budget. He wondered if this was correct. Mr. Roeper stated that his number is closer to $5.5 million. Commissioner Menconi asked what the original requested amount was. Mr. Roeper stated the original amount was approximately $6,692,000. Chairman Stone clarified that this request would have to be approved in the form of a resolution and could not be formally approved today. He also requested that major projects presented today be kept in the front of the other commissioners before looking at additional funding requests. Mr. Ingstad stated that one of the difficulties involved in anticipating how the funding needs might fall is that there are many unknowns, but he is committed to trying harder to provide this level of detail. He clarified that the worst case scenarios werebeing presented for larger projects. Mr. Roeper spoke about the capital improvements committee. He wondered if the previous candidates might be involved again. Chairman Stone asked if Mr. Roeper would send another request for this approval. Commissioner Gallagher expressed satisfaction with those involved. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the supplementary budget request as discussed and amended in today's hearing pending the resolution approving the same. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote carried unanimously. Application to the United Way of the Eagle River Valley for the Eagle County Volunteer Center 45 6/01/2004 Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services, explained that she was asking for approval from the cOIIlmissioners to submit a request for $2000.00 in funding from the Eagle River Valley United Way for this coming program year. They currently provide $1000.00 for the Eagle County volunteer center. The dollars are helpful and meaningful in terms of the partnership with United Vlay and its member agencies. She clarified that they had funded two county programs this year. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve the application for program funding to United Way of the Eagle River Valley. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote carried unanimously. Budget Revision Request to the US Department of Health & Human Services for the Eagle County Head Start Program Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services, followed up on earlier discussions about using some additional EarIy Head Start funds to trade in a car on a mini van and this request is to the US Department of Health and Human Services to make an appropriation change. Ms. Forinash stated that the total amount of the budget is shared. The request is only for an appropriation change. COII1II1issioner Menconi moved to submit the request to the Department of Health and Human Services for budget revision for the Eagle County Early Head Start program. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was carried unanimously. There was some discussion about Exhibit A on the Ottertail Environmental contract. There was some confusion from the board about Exhibit A. Chairman Stone stated that he was confused because the contract talked about larval surveillance but didn't talk about any control. Mr. Merry stated that he had inquired as to whether the local jurisdictions needed any help with mosquito abatement. He wondered what assistance might be available to the towns. Eagle County would be able to have a great level of detail, but this would not be available for the towns. He assured the board that the floater traps would help take care of traveling mosquitoes. He used the Fairgrounds as an example of mosquito habitat within the town boundaries, but that the county would be interested in controlling the larvae based on the vicinity to the county special event. Mr. Ingstad stated that the COncerns were that Districts that are currently doing mitigation are not included in the scope and inside the town boundaries are not included in the scope. Mr. Merry agreed that walking through the scope would give a good picture of the impression and is reflected in the scope of work that he has. The Town of Gypsum and Edwards Metro District both have contracts for mosquito abatement and have had for years for nuisance type mosquitoes. The intent of the county work is not to duplicate any services, but to in fact ask any local jurisdictions if they needed help. The County didn't hear back that they did or did not need help. So the question of the Towns is raised. the aerial photo is what Ottertail Environmental reviewed. Given the scope of work excluding the towns a trained delineator of habitat can see likely habitat quickly and make recommendations to the towns. In the county delineation the area will be gridded and zoomed in upon for detailed habitat mapping. This level of detail would not be provided to the towns. One reason is because this type of .. . mappmg IS expenSIve. Commissioner Gallagher raised concerns about mosquitoes crossing town boundary lines. 46 6/0112004 Mr. Merry stated that the floater traps would address this situation. He used the example of the Fairgrounds and noted that the county would probably be involved in this area with abatement. Mr. Ingstad clarified that there is an extensive amount of mapping which will require our GIS department to be involved. It isn't possible for the County to kill1arvae across the county. Mr. Merry expressed interest in having the GIS department get started on this right away. Chairman Stone asked to see Exhibit A before making a decision. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve the contract with Ottertail Environmental for mosquito surveying and control within the limits of the contract conditional upon the review and approval of Appendix A by Chairman Stone. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote carried unanimously. There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until June 15,2004. Attest: Clerk to the Bo ~ 47 6/01/2004