HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 09/03/2002
Present: Michael Gallagher
Am Menconi
Tom Stone
Diane Mauriello
Jack Ingstad
Sara J. Fisher
SEPTEMBER 3, 2002
Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
County Attorney
County Administrator
Clerk to the Board
This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County
Commissioners for their consideration:
GENERAL FUND
21 ST CENTURY PHOTO SUPPLY
3CMA
A GREAT TIME DJS
AAA COLLECTORS
ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS
ABE WAGNER & ASSOCIATES
ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS
ADAMS COUNTY ASSESSORS
ADAMS MARK HOTEL DENVER
ADVANTAGE NETWORK SYSTEMS
AFFLECK PHOTOGRAPHY
AFFORDABLE PORTABLE
AIRBORNE
ALlMED INCORPORATED
ALL PRO FORMS INC
ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE
ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE, INC
ALPH INTERACTIVE GROUP
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
AMERICAN TOWER CORP
AMERICINN LODGE & SUITES
AMERIGAS
AMICH AND JENKS INCORPORA
ANDIE WILKERSON
ANDRIA L COLLINS
ANN MUNCASTER
APEX SECURITY
APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY
ARAPAHOE COUNTY SHERIFF
ARCHITECTURAL IMPACT
ARETSKY & ARETSKY
ARIEL HERNANDEZ RODRIQUEZ
ARMY & FACTORY SURPLUS
ARNOLD AND ARNOLD
ARNOLD VARELA
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
126.51
525.00
450.00
103.10
39.38
429.97
27.00
729.00
138.00
32.44
875.00
88.00
1,500.00
195.96
1,954.90
2,983.36
979.69
65.00
87.00
875.00
1,659.15
576.36
480.00
102.35
102.35
60.60
455.00
13.80
160.04
127.50
25.00
3.72
167.66
30.00
1,162.43
I
09-03-2002
ASFPM
ASI SIGN SYSTEMS INC
ASPEN BASALT CARE CLINIC
ASPEN BASE OPERATON
ASPEN BOARD OF REALTORS
ASPEN CTR FOR WOMENS HL TH
ASPEN TIMES THE
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
AV TECH ELECTRONICS INC
AVCARD
AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS
BABA VANKIRK
BACK ALLEY PIZZA
BAILEY FUNERAL HOME
BAILEYS
BARBARA McDOUGALL
BATTLE MOUNTAIN HS
BATTLE MTN HS CHEERLEADER
BATTLE MTN HS DANCE TEAM
BATTLE MTN HS SOCCER TEAM
BATTLE MTN HS SPEECH TEAM
BCI COMMERCIAL
BEllA RAMIREZ
BEN GALLOWAY MD
BENCHMARK ENGINEERING
BERGLUND RUTH
BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER
BERNICE WHITE
BEST WESTERN EAGLE LODGE
BETSY ROSS FLAG GIRLS
BEVERLY KUNKEL
BLOSSOM SOFTWARE
BOB BARKER COMPANY
BOB'S PLACE
BOISCLAIR & TAYLOR
BOULDER PUBLISHING INC
BOY SCOUT TROOP 222
B RATW EAR
BRC/HARRIS INC
BRENT BLAKE
BRIAN J REICHEL
BRIGADE QUARTERMASTERS LI
BRUCE CAMPBELL
BRUCELLI ADVERTISING CO
BUDDIES PROGRAM, THE
BUTLER RENTS
C & H DISTRIBUTORS INC
C & K WINDOW CLEANING
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
180.00
72.42
5,400.00
598.42
6.06
1,800.00
193.50
5,862.82
18,239.18
831.57
246.29
115.50
220.00
350.00
124.50
19.80
420.00
720.00
580.00
4,440.00
2,100.00
3,712.66
15.18
5,005.00
900.00
102.35
50.00
90.00
92.23
572.50
180.00
30.00
375.45
2,500.00
25.02
1,754.50
580.00
3,586.50
1,435.00
19.26
25.00
12.53
343.30
603.50
960.00
1,927.50
956.16
2.48
2
09-03-2002
C & S PRODUCTIONS
C RICHARD DONOVAN
CALOIA & HOUPT PC
CAPITAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS
CASEY SMITH
CASFM
CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY
CASTOR & ASSOCIATES
CATHOLIC CHARITIES
CEHA
CENTRAL CREDIT CORP
CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING
CENTRAL SERVICES/EC
CENTRAL VALLEY PROFESSION
CENTURYTEL
CHARLES B DARRAH
CHARLES CUNNIFFE
CHARLES D JONES CO, INC.
CHEF DE CUISINE
CHEMATOX INC.
CHESS
CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES
CHILDBIRTH GRAPHICS
CHRISTINE L MOTT
CHRISTINE PAPPAS
CLE INTERNATIONAL
CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION
CO BAR ASSOCIATION
CO BUREAU INVESTIGATION
CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH &
CO MITIGATION & WILDFIRE
CO POSTER COMPLIANCE
CO STATE FOREST SERVICE
CO STATE TREASURER
COLLECTION CENTER
COLORADO AVALANCHE
COLORADO COMMERCIAL
COLORADO FOUNDATION FOR
COLORADO HEAD START ASSC=
COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
COLORADO WEST MENTAL HL TH
COLUMBINE HOME HEALTH INC
COM-LINK
COMFORT INN
COMPED SOLUTIONS
CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
B.TREU.CO BAR ASSN.DUES02/03
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
2,720.00
78.10
646.85
179.30
2,400.00
145.00
330.42
25.00
6,000.00
365.00
44.42
798.70
6.29
647.29
3,898.10
103.10
2,000.00
215.76
2,000.00
225.00
467.00
8.68
76.74
1,733.00
46.12
495.00
280.00
160.00
66.24
755.86
350.00
46.25
350.50
9,800.00
15.08
1,000.00
209.75
125.00
150.00
1,872.00
27,202.38
7,162.50
21,090.00
795.50
25.19
296.80
139.00
194.76
3
09-03-2002
CONTINENTAL DIVIDE
COORS DISTRIBUTING
COPY PLUS
CORPORATE EXPRESS
CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING
CORRA
CPHA
CPRA
DAILY SENTINEL THE
DAKTRONICS INC
DAMON BAILLIE
DAVID A BAUER
DAVID CARTER
DAVID GUINNEE, DVM
DAYS INN
DEB ALMONY
DEENA EZZELL
DEEP ROCK WEST
DELL INC
DENNIS GIBBONS
DENNIS KARPUSKA
DENVER NEWSPAPER AGENCY
DEPT OF REVENUE
DIANA JOHNSON
DOCTORS ON CALL
DOLORES PEREZ
DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP
DONNA BARNES CORONER
DOSIA LAEYENDECKER
DREAMCATCHER IMAGING
E CNTY WOMEN'S SHELTER
EAGLE AMOCO
EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC
EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS
EAGLE CONVENIENCE STORE
EAGLE COUNTY CLERK
EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DIST
EAGLE DIRECT INC
EAGLE EYE PHOTO
EAGLE PHARMACY
EAGLE PRINTING
EAGLE RIVER VILLAGE
EAGLE RIVER WATER AND
EAGLE VAIL ANIMAL HOSPITA
EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE
EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE
EAGLE VALLEY HS BAND
EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
45.00
4,379.52
44.00
4,980.31
259.00
45.00
540.00
6,000.00
151.97
3,178.25
155.25
46.28
264.00
2,468.19
384.00
25.00
42.50
454.85
7,913.53
11.01
11.31
648.00
75.00
90.00
420.00
29.98
112.08
19.44
117.00
275.00
1,500.00
355.10
7,936.00
6,281.60
400.00
75.00
700.00
11,118.01
37.23
553.19
275.00
25.00
57.53
10.00
20.00
109.22
1,360.00
20.00
4
09-03-2002
EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING
EAGLE VALLEY SENIORS
EAGLE WINDOW CLEANING
EASTERN TECHNICAL ASSOC.
EDWARDS STATION LLC
ELAINE WOLF
ELISA ACOSTA
ELLEN MATLOCK
EMC2
EMILIA GONZALEZ
ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD
ENTERPRISES FLEET SERVICE
EPS DESIGN AND PRINT
ERIC W WALTER
ERMOLD PARK RECREATION
ESTHER MEHL
EXTENSION PROGRAM FUND
FALCON ASSOCIATES INC
FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY
FAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM
FARMER BROTHERS
FARRELL, GOLDSTEIN,
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG
FERRELLGAS
FIESTA'S CAFE
FILE FINDERS L TD
FIRST BANKS
FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY
FLO HABENICHT
FLYING COLORS HORSE SUPPL
FRANK J BALL
FRANKLIN COVEY
GA THOMPSON CO
GALAPAGOS
GALLS INCORPORATED
GATES MARGE PHN
GATEWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS
GE CAPITAL
GIRL SCOUT TROOP #293
GIRL SCOUT TROOP #48
GIRL SCOUT TROOP 292
GIRSH AND ROTTMAN
GLENWOOD MEDICAL ASSOC
GORE RANGE NATURAL
GRAINGER INCORPORATED
GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND
GRATITUDES
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
6,383.50
767.13
2,975.00
700.00
400.00
29.16
93.15
162.00
231.68
90.00
82.00
23,316.07
597.77
2.48
879.16
96.00
5,609.67
180.00
1,218.45
8,638.07
1,117.10
58.06
224.72
13,001.31
51.24
2,186.00
30.00
17,183.94
80.00
90.00
360.00
25.00
246.44
149.36
48.00
801.59
2,087.50
285.69
159.99
2,100.00
1,940.00
2,070.00
18.80
48.00
2,480.00
1,637.23
140.75
170.50
5
09-03-2002
GREENBERG & ASSOCIATES
GREGG ROSSI
HAMPTON INN DENVER WEST
HART INTERCIVIC
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
HELEN MIGCHELBRINK
HELLO DIRECT INC
HERMAN MILLER INC.
HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS
HIGH COUNTRY SHIRTWORKS
HILL & COMPANY
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
IAAO LOCAL CENTRAL AZ
IMAGE DENTAL
IMAGESELLER
IN DOFF INC
INJOY VIDEOS
INTAB
INTEGRAL RECOVERIES
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY
INTERNETV AIL. COM
J BAR D CATERING
J MATTHEW DEPETRO
JACQUELINE ALLEN
JAMAICA STUMP
JAMES PUBLISHING COMPANY
JAMIE HUMPHREY
JANET CONNORS
JENNIFER N SHEPHERD
JENNY WAHRER
JEPPESEN SANDERSON
JIMMIE ANDERSON
JO ANN ALBERTSON
JODY CARUTHERS
JOHN GUTHRIE
JON SHEPARD PHOTOGRAPHY
JONES & KELLER
JOSEPH SCHMITT
JOURNEYWORKS PUBLISHING
JULIE SNYDER
KARA BETTIS, DEPUTY
KATHLEEN SCHMITT
KATHY REED
KATIE HARPER
KELLY TO ON
KEN CALL
KEN WILSON
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
EMPLOYEE BENIFIT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
238.64
685.00
420.00
783.45
7,662.50
62.21
1,616.98
30.94
165.00
615.45
21,200.94
16,118.58
850.00
267.00
1,197.24
106.56
989.60
84.16
37.40
270.00
400.00
1.00
10,644.50
13.76
293.13
24.84
65.94
1,332.35
65.10
8.68
666.65
918.00
90.00
123.60
41.67
1,000.00
20.00
2.48
90.00
493.90
12.33
109.45
33.60
36.97
564.46
3.10
122.25
250.00
6
09-03-2002
KENDRA DOEPKEN
KESSLER MARY J
KEVIN CASSIDY
KIDS SAFETY OF AMERICA
KINDER MORGAN INC
KUHN, CARNES & ANDERSON
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
LAFARGE CORPORATION
LAND TITLE
LANIE MARTIN
LASER JUNCTION
LAURA L MAGNER
LAURETTA WOLTER
LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC
LESLIE KEHMEIER
LEXISNEXIS
LIBERTY FLAG SPECIALTY CO
LIMITED ENERGY SOLUTIONS
LINCOLN GRADUATE CENTER
LINDA HUBBELL
LISA DAILEY
LOGO PRO
LUCY GREWE
LYNN PERKINS
MACHOL&JOHANNES
MAINTENANCE WAREHOUSE
MARICELA HERNANDEZ
MARIO VARELA
MARJORIE J MARKS
MARK CHAPIN
MARKS PLUMBING PARTS
MARLENE MC CAFFERTY
MARRIOTT HOTEL
MARY ELLEN COLRICK
MATRIX DESIGN GROUP INC
MAURI NOTTINGHAM
MAVERICK FLOORING
MBIA
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
MCI WORLD COM
MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE
MEGAN HAMMER
MERCEDES GARCIA
MICHAEL BAKER
MICHELLE BALL
MICHELLE FAWN RAMOS
MICRO WAREHOUSE
MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP
REIMBU RSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
29.96
376.94
102.35
784.31
911.22
50.00
240.77
133.90
96.00
29.74
861.90
15.00
21.51
1,960.13
20.00
542.00
144.85
2,875.00
610.00
994.00
30.00
1,311.32
18.99
85.50
111 .78
625.09
150.00
4.34
400.00
102.35
207.56
105.96
510.00
25.00
20,774.28
126.00
1,700.00
4,322.98
281.95
9,221.58
2,339.00
129.03
11.91
102.35
210.11
25.00
1,387.37
69.00
7
09-03-2002
MICROWAREHOUSE
MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN
MIKE GALLAGHER
MIKE MCWILLIAM
MILLE LACS COUNTY FAMILY
MITCHELL SILAS
MONTGOMERY KOLODNY
MOORE MEDICAL CORP
MORGAN HERRING & MORGAN
MOTHERS AGAINST
MOTOR POOL FUND
MOUNTAIN GLEN HOUSING
MOUNTAIN MOBILE VETERINAR
MOUNTAIN OFFICE REPAIR
MOUNTAIN VALLEY
NACHSA
NANCY NOTTINGHAM
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NATIONAL BUSINESS
NATIONAL EVIRONMENTAL
NATIONAL GRAPHICS COMPANY
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL
NETWORK ASSOCIATES
NEW ELECTRIC INC
NICOLETTI FLATER ASSOC
NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES
NORDIC REFRIGERATION
NORTHWEST COLORADO LEGAL
NOVELL INCORPORATED
NWCCOG
OLSON PROPERTY
OMB POLICE SUPPLY
OMNIFAX
ORTEN & HINDMAN
OSI COLLECTION SERVICES
OSM DELIVERY LLC
OTTO, PORTERFIELD, POST
OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP
PAINT BUCKET THE
PAPER DIRECT
PAPER THERMOMETER COMPANY
PAPER WISE
PARAMOUNT FABRICS INC.
PAT MAGDZIUK
PAT NOLAN
PATHOLOGY GROUP
PATTERSON NUSS & SEYMOUR
PAUL ZIEMBA
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
3,133.06
1,089.43
87.02
61.67
25.00
24.45
25.00
241 .48
25.00
50.00
44,261.91
100,000.00
190.43
230.00
9,000.00
50.00
90.00
280.56
1,509.16
75.00
70.25
31.20
1,587.60
244.00
195.00
4,762.26
109.92
1,000.00
9,017.00
25.00
3,000.00
49.95
90.84
25.00
14.88
418.00
4.34
3,316.00
137.38
149.90
59.00
1,190.00
52.80
33.82
435.00
700.00
25.00
28.02
8
09-03-2002
PEAK PERFORMANCE COPIER &
PEARSON, MILLIGAN, AND
PEGASUS SATELLITE
PEGGY GRAYBEAL
PEPPERDINE'S MARKET
PERRI ENTERTAINMENT
PET FOOD L TD
PETER HART
PETER KEENAN BUCKLEY
PETRIE, BAUER, VRIESMAN
PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING
PFM ELECTRONICS
PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED
PRIMEDIA WORKPLACE
PSS, INC
PTSI, INC
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS
QUILL CORPORATION
QWEST
QWEST INTERPRISE NETWRKNG
READYS ICE
REALI GENT
REBECCA GAD ELL
REBECCA LEONARD
RED STONE CASTLE
RED LEAF PRESS
REE FARRELL
RENZELMAN JANET
RESORT CONCEPTS
RESOURCE CENTER OF EAGLE
RICHARD KESLER
RIVERW ALK @ EDWARDS
ROARING FORK FAMILY
ROARING FORK FENCING
ROBERT B EMERSON, PC
ROCKIE TALKIE COMMUNICATN
ROCKY MOUNTAIN RECORDS
ROCKY MOUNTAIN REPROGRAPH
ROGER MOORE
ROOKS PITTS POUST
ROSARIO PEREZ
ROSIE MORENO
ROSS & WHITE COMPANY
RUTH A SHARP
SALVATION ARMY
SANDYS OFFICE SUPPLY
SARA J FISHER
SAWAYA AND ROSE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
194.91
25.00
30.98
140.00
10.65
834.18
352.19
732.50
6.20
9.46
1,621.47
100.00
201.72
388.00
113.54
311.90
245.52
80.10
7,828.75
1,633.42
339.30
159.90
525.00
10.00
165.00
109.85
39.39
79.13
7,829.25
1,000.00
3,505.92
10,012.80
2,000.00
1,476.61
94.00
828.00
138.00
68.50
41.12
50.00
25.00
3,051.52
344.66
18.80
5,000.00
17.70
479.82
9.38
9
09-03-2002
SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND
SEARS
SERVICEMASTER CLEAN
SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL
SHAINHOL TZ TODD H DDS
SHAREE WETTSTEIN
SHRM
SIGNATURE SIGNS
SINTON DAIRY COMPANY
SNOWBOARD OUTREACH SCTY
SNOWHITE LINEN
SOFTMART INC
SOMES UNIFORMS
SPEAKOUTINCORPORATED
ST CLARE OF ASSISI PARISH
ST VINCENTS CATHOLIC
STARBUCK SURVEYORS & ENGI
STATUTES UNLIMITED
STERICYCLE INC
STEVE SOWELL
STRAWBERRY PATCH
STUVER & LeMOINE
SULLIVAN GREEN LLC
SUMMIT COUNTY SENIORS
SUMMIT LUMBER
SUPPLY CACHE
SUSAN LITTLE & ASSOCIATES
SUSPENSE FUND
SYDNEY SUMMERS
THE GOURMET COWBOY
THE HEALTH CONNECTION
THOMAS D SILVERMAN
THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP
TODD GRADOLPH DDS
TOM C STONE
TONY VANCAMPEN
TOWN OF AVON
TOWN OF EAGLE
TOWN OF VAIL
TRANE COMPANY
TRANSCOR AMERICA INC
TUBE TECH SERVICES
UNIFORM KINGDOM
UNIPATH
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
UNITED RESOURCE SYSTEMS
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
UNIVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
100.85
549.95
1,971.00
31,618.67
1,398.00
104.00
160.00
3,889.25
807.78
660.00
186.54
4,286.05
518.00
750.00
75.00
740.00
1,645.00
320.00
167.27
4.96
428.97
15.00
2,316.83
3,170.98
978.05
2,354.37
50.00
72,185.60
27.25
2,500.00
154.08
6.20
299.00
231.00
20.54
1,800.00
546.00
5,487.75
165,795.87
3,034.00
4,538.53
118.20
1,144.47
186.20
282.86
14.88
220.00
238.50
10
09-03-2002
US LATEX PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 607.50
VAIL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE SERVICE 750.00
VAIL ELECTRONICS SERVICE 225.00
VAIL LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 154.30
VAIL MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROU SERVICE 7,758.02
VAIL PBK LLC REIMBURSEMENT 19.22
VAIL RESORTS MANAGEMENT SERVICE 1,300.00
VAIL SIGN CORPORATION SERVICE 90.00
VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER SERVICE 99.36
VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR SERVICE 26,698.88
VAIL VALLEY SOCCER CLUB SERVICE 500.00
VAILNET INC SERVICE 1,096.85
VALLEY LUMBER SERVICE 5.56
VALLEY PARTNERSHIP SERVICE 5,320.00
VALLEY PINES HOMEOWNERS SERVICE 570.07
VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 3,951.08
VERIZON SELECT SERVICES SERVICE 97.50
VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 3,411.67
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 170.82
VILLAGE AT BRECKENRIDGE SERVICE 3,798.90
VIOLA ULLERICK SERVICE 240.00
VISION GRAPHICS SERVICE 1,289.17
WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 95.00
WAYNE CARLEY SERVICE 1,119.32
WEDGLE AND SHPALL REIMBURSEMENT 25.00
WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 285,280.85
WELLS FARGO BANK SERVICE 300.00
WENDY BOGNER REIMBURSEMENT 37.10
WEST GROUP SERVICE 1,393.00
WESTED SERVICE 1,481.00
WESTERN COLLECTIONS REIMBURSEMENT 21.98
WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY SERVICE 3,931.25
WESTERN PAGING SERVICE 8.00
WESTERN SLOPE SERVICE 530.50
WHITE RIVER INSTITUTE SERVICE 6,000.00
WILLARD B HARDESTY REIMBURSEMENT 3.72
WIND RIVER TREES SERVICE 3,282.50
WRS GROUP L TD SERVICE 170.06
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 254.53
XCELENERGY SERVICE 38.78
XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 8,046.07
Y & S PHARMACY SERVICE 642.76
YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICE 73.30
YOUR PERSONAL CHEF SERVICE 440.00
YOUTH ZONE SERVICE 1,500.00
ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES SERVICE 252.00
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 691.81
11 09-03-2002
PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 647,046.12
2,053,142.90
ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND
AFFORDABLE PORTABLE SERVICE 434.25
APWA CONFERENCE SERVICE 75.00
ASPEN TIMES THE SERVICE 288.00
B & H SPORTS SERVICE 499.48
BILL BOCELAWATZ REFILL KIT 75.00
BOGUE CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 115,815.61
BUD JACOX REIMBURSEMENT 75.00
CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 18.20
CHOICE SOLUTIONS, LLC SERVICE 2,770.38
COpy PLUS SUPPLIES 20.00
DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICE 74.50
DOLAN CONSTRUCTION INC SERVICE 2,000.00
DOUG MCKIERNAN REIMBURSEMENT 300.00
EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE SUPPLIES 9.08
EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL SERVICE 73.00
ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO SERVICE 1,153.60
ENVIROTECH SERVICE 2,257.78
FRONTIER PAVING INC SERVICE 47,299.45
GONZALES CONSTRUCTION CO. SERVICE 40,287.94
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 609.79
HENKES & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE 75.00
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS SERVICE 280.00
HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 1,270.42
INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY SUPPLIES 1,295.78
KINDER MORGAN INC SERVICE 8.86
LAKE CREEK METRO DISTRICT SERVICE 250.00
LAWRENCE BERMAN SERVICE 100.00
METEORLOGIX SERVICE 696.00
MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN REIMBURSEMENT 2,000.00
MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 128,491.38
MULLIN & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE 250.00
NAPA AUTO PARTS-CARBONDLE SUPPLIES 30.39
NICK KERN SERVICE 250.00
PROPERTY IMAGING, LLC SERVICE 430.00
RHONDA PARKER REIMBURSEMENT 7.95
ROD CARTER REIMBURSEMENT 75.00
RSC SERVICE 167.16
SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 245.74
SCOTT S TURNIPSEED SERVICE 250.00
SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICE 885.59
SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 16.64
SUNDANCE PLUMBING SERVICE 250.00
12 09-03-2002
SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 4,369.30
TNT TREE SERVICE, INC. SERVICE 250.00
WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 34,127.08
WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 27,159.95
WILLIAM ANDREE SERVICE 100.00
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 3,765.73
XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 69.15
PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 64,095.08
485,398.26
SOCIAL SERVICES FUND
ABC SCHOOL INC SERVICE 1,703.44
ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 15.00
ALlMED INCORPORATED SERVICE 161.97
ARLlSS SIMS REIMBURSEMENT 8.38
CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, MA SERVICE 150.00
CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 615.55
EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF REIMBURSEMENT 74.88
EAGLE PRINTING SERVICE 225.00
EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE SERVICE 562.50
EC SOCIAL SERVICES SERVICE 20.00
FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY REIMBURSEMENT 168.00
GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF REIMBURSEMENT 5.00
HART INTERCIVIC SERVICE 110.76
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 1,014.41
JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFFS REIMBURSEMENT 33.41
JOHN McCORMICK SERVICE 240.00
JOSEPH L FORINASH REIMBURSEMENT 187.43
KATHY REED REIMBURSEMENT 108.77
LYONS KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 60.23
MARGE BELLATRECHE SERVICE 258.90
MARY B EZEQUELLE LCSW SERVICE 180.00
MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 774.50
NACHSA SERVICE 50.00
PEAK PERFORMANCE COPIER & SERVICE 159.4 7
RAMADA INN SERVICE 225.00
RED STONE CASTLE SERVICE 135.00
RENEE FIELDS REIMBURSEMENT 469.78
RITA WOODS REIMBURSEMENT 86.79
SAMARITAN CNTR OF ROCKIES SERVICE 480.00
SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 5,791.54
WDI SERVICE 350.00
WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 16,727.83
XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 358.70
PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 33,387.91
13 09-03-2002
64,900.15
WRAP FUND
CAMP CHIP-A-TOOTH SERVICE 40.00
JULIE M LEWIS SERVICE 360.00
PATRICIA SENA REIMBURSEMENT 91.77
RENEE FIELDS REIMBURSEMENT 336.68
TERRI ALLENDER SERVICE 240.00
1,068.45
RETIREMENT FUND
SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 58,273.29
58,273.29
INSURANCE RESERVE FUND
AMERICAN GLASS SERVICE 533.70
BROTHER'S AUTO BODY SERVICE 1,167.50
CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE SERVICE 32.30
1,733.50
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
BAND B EXCAVATING SERVICE 637,860.13
BAI/BRAUN ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE 2,217.50
BEAUDIN GANZE CONSULTING SERVICE 280.77
C H DISTRIBUTORS INC SERVICE 213.65
CENTURYTEL SERVICE 79,855.46
DESIGN WORKSHOP, INC SERVICE 9,366.86
HYDROSYSTEMS INC SERVICE 4,415.00
LORIS & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE 12,583.59
PEAK LAND CONSULTANTS INC SERVICE 8,118.06
US TREASURY SERVICE 1,000.00
755,911.02
SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP.
ABART A MEDIA SERVICE 300.00
ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY SERVICE 1,244.22
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES SERVICE 350.16
AUDRA MEYERS REIMBURSEMENT 17.68
BAND B EXCAVATING SERVICE 8,564.74
BRODY CHEMICAL SERVICE 213.99
CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 422.88
CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 3.68
CHOICE SOLUTIONS, LLC SERVICE 2,770.37
14 09-03-2002
COLLETTS
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS
COLUMBINE MARKET
COMPUMASTER
CORPORATE EXPRESS
CREDIT SYSTEMS INC
CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN
CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC
DAVEY COACH SALES INC
DCS AMERICA INC
DODD DIESEL INCORPORATED
DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES
EAGLE COUNTY FAIR
EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL
EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING
EAGLE RIVER AUTO BODY
EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE
EUCLID PRODUCTS COMPANY
FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY
FEDERAL EXPRESS
G & K SERVICES
GAY JOHNSONS INC
GENERAL ELECTRIC
GILLIG CORPORATION
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS
INDEPENDENT TOOL SUPPLY
INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTMS
JAY MAX SALES
JIM LAIR
KINDER MORGAN INC
KINETICO WATER PROS
KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LEADING EDGE TECHNOLOGIES
LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC
M & M AUTO PARTS
MAIN AUTO PARTS
MOTOR POOL FUND
NEOPART
PHIL HUFF
QWEST
ROBERT SLAGLE
RON E BECK
SAFETY KLEEN
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE
SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
EMPLOYEE BENIFIT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
917.20
487.51
112.36
239.00
170.79
201.63
3,143.77
230.18
731 .22
4,000.00
17,889.66
6,409.83
2,025.00
11,937.60
165.18
1,100.00
40.52
991.56
230.76
5.50
493.80
496.37
269.16
1,831.96
680.74
4,448.70
5.00
321.69
105.95
67.45
98.74
31.04
131.90
300.00
1,569.81
380.00
290.00
15.72
39.61
3,405.96
105.00
116.22
143.29
350.00
3,100.00
113.06
55.37
59.90
15
09-03-2002
SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICE 3,101.13
SHOP TOOLS INC SUPPLIES 25.98
SPECIAL TY INCENTIVES INC SERVICE 2,900.80
SPORTSWORKS NORTHWEST,INC SERVICE 1,168.05
STEAMBOAT PILOT/TODAY SERVICE 60.00
SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 34.79
SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 7,191.88
TOWN OF AVON SERVICE 1,237.50
UNITED LABORATORIES SUPPLIES 155.64
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV SERVICE 1,000.00
UNITED STATES WELDING SERVICE 27.54
VAIL VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICE 150.00
VALLEY SIGNS SERVICE 69.30
VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 123.20
VISION CHEMICAL SYSTEMS SERVICE 1,155.25
WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 40,423.82
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 199.13
XCELENERGY SERVICE 37.95
XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 10.67
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 102.17
ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY SERVICE 44.95
PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 98,068.82
241,232.00
SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 702.00
COLUMBINE MARKET SERVICE 29.50
EAGLE PHARMACY SERVICE 17.49
FRED HASLEE REIMBURSEMENT 35.53
HEAL TH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 5.36
IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICE 102.50
MIKE TOUGH ILL REIMBURSEMENT 37.60
R J THOMAS MFG CO INC SERVICE 1,017.15
SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 30.27
SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 132.10
VAIL TRAIL THE SERVICE 198.00
WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 836.28
3,143.78
AIRPORT FUND
A & H GRAPHICS SERVICE 132.00
AAAA SEPTIC PUMPING SERVICE 300.00
AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC SERVICE 36.49
16 09-03-2002
ALPINE TIRE COMPANY
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
BAND B EXCAVATING
BENCHMARK ENGINEERING
BERTHOD MOTORS
BRENT SERVICES
BRIAN SCHOFIELD
BROWNING FERRIS IND
CALOIA & HOUPT PC
CENTRAL SERVICES/EC
CENTURYTEL
CO AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSN
COLLETTS
COLORADO MOTOR PARTS
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS
COLUMBINE MARKET
COpy PLUS
CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN
CYGNUS BUSINESS MEDIA
D JENSEN ELECTRIC INC.
DAILY JOURNAL THE
DEEP ROCK WEST
DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS
EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING
EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE
FAIRFIELD INN
FOX & COMPANY
FUTURA CARWASH SYSTEMS
GALLS INCORPORATED
GLENWOOD RADIATOR REPAIR
GYPSUM TOWN OF
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
HERTZ CORPORATION
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
INNERMOUNTAIN DISTRIBUTNG
INTERFLlGHT
KENNY MAENPA
KINDER MORGAN INC
LAFARGE CORPORATION
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LP DOCTOR
M & M AUTO PARTS
MACDONALD EQUIPMENT CO
MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING
MARKOS PIZZERIA
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC
MOTOR POOL FUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
EMPLOYEE BENIFIT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
1,803.44
111.54
62,187.56
12,245.00
14.12
7,088.83
649.40
234.71
817.20
25.37
2,431.08
220.00
321.30
6.00
273.00
34.08
403.50
115.23
900.00
403.87
263.25
44.90
6,200.00
101.54
409.61
1,344.30
1,234.40
436.00
331.94
146.00
334.25
410.34
804.26
1,4 72.99
47.96
16,254.70
986.00
33.58
588.38
167.42
264.15
562.90
43.28
22.44
87.86
183.33
32,408.00
794.88
17
09-03-2002
NASCO LLC SERVICE 25.00
NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT SERVICE 168.12
OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION SERVICE 424.58
OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY SERVICE 1,106.60
SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 167.10
SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICE 1,161.49
SIEMENS AIRFIELD SOLUTION SUPPLIES 999.45
SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 395.44
SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 2,799.63
VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER SERVICE 62.57
VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 176.22
WAGNER RENTS SUPPLIES 3.13
WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICE 46,816.94
WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 14,450.00
WESTERN IMPLEMENTS SUPPLIES 1,308.25
WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. SERVICE 689.43
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 445.03
XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 476.94
PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 37,283.79
265,692.09
MICROWAVE MAINTENANCE FUND
BUCHHOLZ FAMIL Y SERVICE 4,632.67
HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 2,958.47
7,591.14
JMC-COP DEBT SERVICE FUND
US BANK SERVICE 2,700.00
2,700.00
LANDFILL FUND
CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 46.93
CHADWICK, STEIN KIRCHNER SERVICE 105.00
DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICE 105.55
DODSON ENGINEERED SERVICE 685.60
DOWN VALLEY SEPTIC SERVICE 330.00
EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES 8.53
EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE SUPPLIES 8.09
EPG COMPANIES SUPPLIES 3,427.59
GENERAL FUND SERVICE 660.00
HDR INC SERVICE 140.00
18 09-03-2002
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 337.27
KRW CONSUL TING INC SERVICE 27,184.85
MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 49,398.17
OXFORD RECYCLING INC SERVICE 25,943.18
ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICE 128,219.63
SANDYS OFFICE SUPPLY SUPPLIES 50.90
SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 67.98
SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICE 1,651.18
SIGNATURE SIGNS SERVICE 70.00
SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 1,653.15
SW ANA SERVICE 98.00
WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 6,174.76
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 5.30
YARGER SERVICES LLC SERVICE 450.00
PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 15,526.34
262,348.00
MOTOR POOL FUND
A1 AUTO ELECTRIC COMPANY SUPPLIES 199.01
AL-JON INC SUPPLIES 42.11
BERTHOD MOTORS SUPPLIES 285.20
CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 70.82
CCG SYSTEMS SERVICE 1,897.50
CENTURY EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 307.30
COLLEEN WIRTH REIMBURSEMENT 8.00
COLLETTS SUPPLIES 34,934.04
COLORADO MOTOR PARTS SUPPLIES 1,519.89
COpy PLUS SUPPLIES 130.00
DELTA KITS SERVICE 118.50
DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES 390.92
EAGLE AMOCO SERVICE 28.00
EATON SALES & SERVICE SERVICE 390.45
EDDIE VELASQUES REIMBURSEMENT 75.00
G & K SERVICES SUPPLIES 382.40
GAY JOHN SONS INC SUPPLIES 149.90
GLENWOOD RADIATOR REPAIR SERVICE 298.75
GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE SUPPLIES 2,915.40
HANSON EQUIPMENT SERVICE 2,876.37
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 226.62
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS SERVICE 140.00
HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 3,284.53
INDEPENDENT TOOL SUPPLY SUPPLIES 414.63
INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTMS SERVICE 54.95
KEMP AND COMPANY INC SUPPLIES 56.24
KINDER MORGAN INC SERVICE 22.93
19 09-03-2002
LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 371.37
LOGISTIXX FLEET SALES SUPPLIES 866.15
M & M AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 348.86
MAIN AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 87.95
MERCEDES GARCIA REIMBURSEMENT 12.50
MESA MACK SALES & SERVICE SERVICE 201.45
MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 7,316.88
MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 1,319.55
NAPA AUTO PARTS-CARBONDLE SUPPLIES 326.04
PETTY CASH MOTOR POOL SERVICE 190.00
POWER MOTIVE SUPPLIES 262.14
RENAISSANCE HOTEL SERVICE 1,308.00
REY MOTORS INCORPORATED SUPPLIES 255.68
RHONDA PARKER REIMBURSEMENT 39.99
SAFETY KLEEN (WHICITA) SERVICE 308.87
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE REIMBURSEMENT 55.39
SANDRA L SKILES REIMBURSEMENT 17.51
SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICE 2,289.62
SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 1,499.33
UNITED LABORATORIES SERVICE 342.48
UNITED STATES WELDING SERVICE 274.91
VEEDE~ROOTCOMPANY SERVICE 198.00
WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SUPPLIES 1,537.54
WAGNER RENTS SERVICE 44.56
WEAR PARTS EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 3,144.25
WEBB CRANE INC SERVICE 523.76
WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 7,261.04
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SERVICE 34.00
PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 20,389.75
102,047.03
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 2,925.00
MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 56,179.05
PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 3,563.03
UNITED STATES LIFE INS EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 4,384.90
67,051.98
ENHANCED E911 FUND
CENTURYTEL SERVICE 181.58
JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC SERVICE 4,424.25
LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES SERVICE 439.45
NASCO MODESTO SERVICE 34.23
20 09-03-2002
QWEST
TOWN OF VAIL
SERVICE
SERVICE
29,477.93
142,820.00
177,377.44
REPORT TOTAL
4,549,611.03
This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of
County Commissioners for their consideration:
Consent Agenda
Chairman Gallagher stated the first matter before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows:
A) Approval of bill paying for the week of September 2,2002, subject to review by
County Administrator
B) Approval of payroll for September 5,2002, subject to review by County Administrator
C) Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting for August
13,2002
D) First Amendment to the Subdivision and Off-Site Improvements Agreement for
Cordillera, Filing 33
E) Escrow Agreement between Mountain High Aviation, LLC and Eagle County
F) Agreement to renew Jail Medical Care and Health Services Agreement, (Mental
Health Services)
G) Resolution 2002-121, Re-establishing the rate of charge for Emergency Telephone
Service
H) Contract with M.A. Mortenson for replacement of bus wash flooring in Building D,
Eagle County Regional Transportation Authority
I) Facility Rental Agreement between the Glenwood Springs Parks and Recreation
Department and the County of Eagle for Early Head Start Parent Orientation.
Chairman Gallagher asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent
Agenda.
Brian Treu, Asst. County Attorney, stated item H will be pulled today and brought back after
further review next week.
Chairman Gallagher asked for comments from the Board. There were none.
Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, pulling item H, the
contract with M.A. Mortenson.
Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Plat & Resolution Signing
Cliff Simonton, Planner, presented the following plats and resolutions for the Board's
consideration:
Resolution 2002-122, to Approve a Special Use Permit for the Operation of a Food Service
Receiving and Distribution Center Within the Beaver Creek Maintenance Center. (Eagle County
File No. ZS-00092). The Board considered the Applicant's request on July 2nd, 2002.
Commissioner Stone moved to approve Resolution 2002-122, to Approve a Special Use Permit
for the Operation of a Food Service Receiving and Distribution Center Within the Beaver Creek
Maintenance Center.
21
09-03-2002
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Dedication Plat. Cordillera Valley Club West Entrance Ri~ht of Way Easement. This
Dedication Plat is associated with the PUD Amendment for the Cordillera Valley Club West Entrance,
Hillcrest Drive (File PDA-00016) approved by the Board in March of 1999, and is outlined in
Resolution 01-108, "Adoption of the Unsigned Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Cordillera
Valley Club Planed Unit Development" signed by the Board on September 4, 2001. Staff findings are as
follows:
Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations:
5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision
(G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director
shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an
Amended Final Plat.
Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision.
a) Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate;
b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations,
policies, standards, and guidelines; and
c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable.
Mr. Simonton stated no motion is required today, however, the Chairman must now sign the plat.
Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as
the Board of Equalization.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Appeal Hearing, Senior Property Tax Exemption Denials
Chairman Gallagher stated the next matter on the agenda was an Appeal Hearing for the Senior
Property Tax Exemption Denials. He stated they will hear these individually
Brian Treu stated he understands that Ed Schorsch will be rescheduled next week as he is unable
to be present today.
Chairman Gallagher stated the first case is appeal #2002-002, Jerry Kokes, schedule number
R027102. He stated the denial has to do with ownership of the property.
J ody Caruthers, Eagle County Assessor, stated this property is shown to be transferred to
Stephanie Billingsly in October 1996 and in 1999 it was transferred back to Jerry and Carol Kokes. She
stated there is not a continuous ten years of ownership for Mr. Kokes as required by Statute.
Chairman Gallagher asked if Mr. Kokes understands the reason for denial.
Mr. Kokes spoke to his letter of August 19,2002 to the.Assessor, relating that Stephanie
Billingsley is his daughter. He was previously diagnosed with a sickness that he thought was terminal.
He therefore gave the title to his daughter and he went to Florida. He has since recovered and is in the
process of refinancing his home so his daughter transferred it back to him. He spoke to Article 2, Sub-
Title A, which reads, "title to the property can be held either by the qualifying senior together with his
spouse, or by the qualifying senior together with other individuals." He suggested that means that he
could have title with someone else. He stated this house was never been meant to be owned by someone
else. He stated he has proofthat he never left that house and that it has been his primary residence since
1980. He showed the proof of occupancy, proof of his date of birth and of taxes paid. He showed his
proof of income tax payment. He spoke to the date of filing and he has a receipt that shows that.
Chairman Gallagher stated the only question is the ownership and occupancy.
Mr. Kokes stated he has occupied the house since 1980 and gave it to his daughter only because
22
09-03-2002
he thought he was going to pass away.
Chairman Gallagher asked how much money was received by him when he signed the title over
to him.
Mr. Kokes stated nothing.
Chairman Gallagher asked how much money his daughter received from him when he recieved
the title back.
Mr. Kokes stated nothing.
Commissioner Stone spoke to the form letter that was sent out to everyone and that it could be a
little confusing.
Mrs. Caruthers replied they are in the process of updating those letters so they are not confusing.
Commissioner Stone suggested that since Mr. Kokes was not the owner of record continuously
for the past ten years, do the Commissioners have the ability, after listening to evidence, decide a
taxpayer has been the owner for the past ten years.
Brian Treu stated the law does make two exceptions, one being a Trust, the other is a Partnership.
Commissioner Stone stated what he believes right now to be the case, there are exemptions, but
unfortunately, in his opinion, Mr. Kokes does not qualify for that.
Mr. Kokes spoke to the sharing of ownership.
Commissioner Stone stated it sounds as though the deed needs to be with someone else and that
was not the case as the deed was turned over to his daughter.
Mr. Kokes stated it is not very clear and has not been explained that the qualifying of senior
citizen has to be owner of record. He stated it doesn't say what record. He stated there was no transfer
of funds, so there is no record.
Commissioner Stone suggested that this will in fact get passed on to the State and though County
Government is an arm of the state, they have to follow the rules of the State.
Commissioner Menconi suggested if they were to find in favor of Mr. Kokes and let the State
determine what happens is that a possible action they can take.
Mrs. Caruthers stated since this is the first year, she does not know what process the State will
follow. She stated there is a requirement for the individual to pay back any monies refunded.
Commissioner Menconi asked if there is an appeal process.
Mrs. Caruthers stated there is not, either for herself or for the taxpayer. She reiterated that Mr.
Kokes may be required to pay back any taxes plus interest.
Mr. Treu stated it is difficult to relate what the State will say. He stated the liability to the
County is that the State will not pay that percentage ofthe tax. The liability to Mr. Kokes is that the
State will ask for additional taxes plus interest.
Commissioner Menconi suggested if they do in fact find in favor of Mr. Kokes today, the State
may in fact require repayment of the taxes down the road.
Mr. Kokes suggested the law for eligibility is not very clear either for the Commissioners or for
the tax payer. He suggested it is not clear what is a matter of record.
Commissioner Menconi stated the deed of record will be the document they rely on. He stated it
sounds like they agree with the problem. He feels that the best thing to do will be to deny this as the
State is going to do that in the future.
Mr. Kokes stated the eligibility is purely an assumption that the record has to be filed with the
County. He stated he has no recourse.
Commissioner Menconi stated because this is a new law, there is nothing they can look back at
and it would be a hope that the State doesn't catch this. He suggested it is a possible action, but he does
not see it as a responsible action.
Chairman Gallagher spoke to a quit claim deed from Stephanie Billingsley to Gerry Kokes. He
stated that the bar code indicates that it is recorded and shows that on that date Mr. Kokes bought the
property and that prior to that date Stephanie Billingsley owned it. He suggested they give this a year
23
09-03-2002
and perhaps by next year there will be some case law.
Commissioner Stone moved the County Board of Equalization uphold the Notice for
Termination and deny the appeal by Mr. Kokes.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Mrs. Caruthers did make a recommendation to Mr. Kokes and others to contact his State
Representatives.
Mrs. Caruthers spoke to file SE-2002-003, Tom Steinberg. She stated their records show that
Dr. Steinberg has owned this property for 10 years but rented the property for a period oftime.
Dr. Steinberg stated he built and has resided in this house since 1967. He stated he did build an
employee housing apartment which he has since rented. He stated he is required to file personal
property filings for the rental unit.
Chairman Gallagher asked if the request for exemption is for the portion Mr. Steinberg resides
m.
Mr. Steinberg answered yes.
Commissioner Stone asked if there is a way to exempt that property which is the primary
residence then the exemption should be granted.
Commissioner Menconi moved to overturn the denial for schedule number R010150, Tom
Steinberg, for that portion of the home that is the primary residence.
Commissioner Stone seconded the motion, clarifying that it would not be for the portion of the
home used as a rental. The vote was declared unanimous.
Mrs. Cartuthers spoke to file SE-2002-005, Dick Gustafson. She stated this file is the same as
Dr. Steinberg's.
Mr. Gustafson stated he does have a letter certified by the County Clerk and Recorder stating that
he has been a resident and registered voter at this residence since 1976. He stated they did rent a room to
as a B & B and as required by law, he did file a personal property tax on that room.
Chairman Gallagher asked how long the rental was for.
Mr. Gustafson stated it was for a period ofthree years and it ended in 1996.
Commissioner Stone spoke to the what ifs and if the exemption is given for the entire property.
Mrs. Caruthers stated she would give the exemption for the entire property.
Commissioner Stone moved that the County Board of Equalization grant the appeal for file
number SE-2002-005, Dick Gustafson, based on testimony at the hearing.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Chairman Gallagher asked about Joseph Darlak and Derrald Newman and ifthey received notice.
Commissioner Stone suggested they continue files, R020526, Ed Schorsch, R022185, Joseph
Dar1ak, and R029233, Derra1d Newman and that they make contact with these individuals providing
them notice of the rescheduled meeting.
Commissioner Menconi moved to table file numbers R020526, Ed Schorsch and R029233,
Derrald Newman.
Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Board of Equalization and reconvene as the Board
of County Commissioners.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
24
09-03-2002
Resolution 2002-123, Property Tax Increase
Brian Treu stated the next matter on the agenda was the hearing on and adoption of Resolution
2002-123, providing for the submission to the registered qualified electors of Eagle County, Colorado, a
question to authorize a property tax increase of up to 1.5 mills, said question to the submitted at the
election to be held November 5, 2002 providing the form of ballot question for certification ofthe
election question to the County Clerk & Recorder. He stated they did make one change to the
Resolution adding the work annually.
Chairman Gallagher asked to see the new copies. He asked where the word annually goes.
Mr. Treu stated it would be after the $7,000,000. He read the ballot question as follows:
"Shall Eagle County taxes be increased in 2003 up to a maximum amount of $2,989,525 and
annually thereafter up to a maximum amount of $7,000,000 annually through 2025, such taxes to consist
of an advalorem tax mill levy imposed on all taxable property of the County at a rate not in excess of 1.5
mills, to be used for the purpose of acquiring, maintaining, or permanently preserving open space in
Eagle County such as: preserving wildlife habitat, protecting working farms and ranches, conserving
scenic landscapes and vistas, protecting wetlands and flood plains, providing public access points to
rivers and streams, and servicing future voter approved debt for the above stated purpose; and shall all
revenue expenditures be made by the Board of County Commissioners after considering the
recommendations of a citizens advisory committee; and in connection therewith, as a voter approved
revenue change, shall the proceeds of such taxes and investment income thereon be collected and spent
by the County in 2003 and in each year thereafter, without regard to any spending, revenue raising or
other limitation contained within Article X, Section 20 ofthe Colorado Constitution, or any other law as
it currently exists or as it may be amended in the future and without limiting in any year the amount of
other revenues that may be collected and spent by the County?"
Chairman Gallagher asked for public comment.
Dianna Sicala, a resident of Edwards and coordinator of the Open Space Initiative, stated their
recent survey has indicated a 60% approval and they strongly feel this is in the interest of the public and
she thanked the Commissioners for helping to bring it forward.
Richard Kestler, citizen of Eagle County, asked if the right of condemnation is tied to this ballot
question.
Chairman Gallagher suggested the Board has limited rights of condemnation
Tom Steinberg thanked the Board for coordinating his two items today. He encouraged the
Board to pass this Resolution today.
Chairman Gallagher asked if there was further comment. There was none. He spoke to a letter
received today from the Town of Vail. He asked Commissioner Stone to read the letter into the record.
Commissioner Stone read as follows:
"Dear Commissioner Gallagher, it is my understanding that the Commissioners will be acting on
the open space resolution later today and I wanted to take this opportunity to comment on the proposed
ballot initiative prior to the discussions. Although the Vail Town Council has not taken a formal
position on this matter at this time, I have discussed this issue with them. I wanted to pass on their
concerns about this proposition to you. The Town of Vail is a huge proponent and supporter of open
space. Over the past 20 years the Town of Vail has purchased over 1,300 acres of open space. As you
are aware the Vail Town Council had the wisdom, foresight, and political courage in the 1980's to
implement a mechanism to fund the acquisition of open space via a real estate transfer tax. It is our
belief that a County wide assessment to purchase open space is inherently unfair to those communities
that have purchased open space previously. My suggestion is that the Town of Vail be exempted from
this tax. In other words the taxing boundaries would terminate at the Western boundary of the Town of
Vail. If this is not possible it is out desire to seek reimbursement for some of the previous purchases that
we have made in order to make sure the tax is equitably assessed. Another one of our concerns is the
25
09-03-2002
lack of a plan to fund this money. We have not been briefed on this issue and do not understand what
land will be purchased and how it will be maintained. Finally the Town of Vail, in order to fund the
basic services required to support the Resort is moving forward with a 4 mill levy property tax increase
on the taxpayers in the Town of Vail. I believe that Vail taxpayers should not be subjected to an
additional 1.5 mills on top of the requested 4 mill increase within the Town. The importance ofthis
election to the Town's financial health cannot be over stated. We are concerned that additional ballot
issues will have a negative impact on the Town of Vail's initiative and therefore our ability to continue
to fund services to support our economic engine. Thank you for your consideration of our comments. I
understand there are many sides and perspectives to this issue, however please take our concerns into
account when making you decisions. Sincerely, Town of Vail, Robert W. McCloren, Town Manager."
Chairman Gallagher asked for comments from the Board. There were none.
Commissioner Menconi moved to approve Resolution 2002-123, providing for the submission to
the registered qualified electors of Eagle County, Colorado, a question to authorize a property tax
increase of up to 1.5 mills, said question to the submitted at the election to be held November 5, 2002
providing the form of ballot question for certification of the election question to the County Clerk &
Recorder.
Commissioner Stone seconded the motion.
In discussion, Commissioner Stone asked Mr. Treu if they are able to exempt any body.
Mr. Treu stated the way the question is written they are unable to exempt any body.
Chairman Gallagher suggested had they created a district they could in fact put up boundaries but
under County taxation processes they are unable to do so.
Commissioner Stone stated they did speak with the Town of Vail and understood their position.
The citizens group, understanding this, determined that they would not look at this as forming a district,
but move forward with the tax question. He spoke to the request to receive reimbursement for some of
the monies that have already been spent. He suggested he understands that would not be the intention of
the ballot initiative though it does allow for recommendations to be made by the citizens board. He
stated he is concerned, but this is always something that the citizens group understands that there will be
competing tax increases on the ballot. He stated he has heard some concerns that over in the Roaring
Fork Valley there is concern that this may be a competing vote. He suggested there is education that
needs to go on, specifically with the Town of Vail and in the Roaring Fork Valley. He stated he hopes
they can inform the voters to make judicious decisions.
Commissioner Menconi stated this weekend he was able to be back in Chicago and was able to
see what they have done right and what they have done wrong. He stated the park system in Chicago is
the largest in the Country and he hopes that the ballot issue will pass and will create a future for
environmental health and for Eagle County.
Chairman Gallagher asked if there is anything in the ballot question that precludes them from
buying open space in the Town of Vail that can be improved upon.
Dr. Steinberg stated he did go before the Town of Vail Council and suggested that one of the
alternatives for them to transfer from their real estate transfer tax, the same amount of money out of the
budget each year as the mill levy will create. They could put this money into their general fund.
Chairman Gallagher called for the question on the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
1041 Permit Application, Frost Creek & Salt Creek pun
Ross Easterling, Planner, presented a 1041 Permit application and completeness hearing for a
major extension of an existing water system; the construction of major new sewer treatment systems and
the efficient utilization of the municipal water projects to serve the proposed Frost Creek and Salt Creek
PUD, located approximately 6 miles South of Eagle.
The action that will be requested from the Board on September 3, 2002 is to determine
26
09-03-2002
completeness of a 1041 Permit application and to estimate associated processing fees.
Adams Rib has submitted a 1041 Permit application for the construction of major new
wastewater treatment systems in addition to a major extension of the Town of Eagle's existing water
system as well as efficient utilization of both municipal water systems to serve the Frost Creek
Development.
Staff has reviewed the above referenced application and has found it to be complete. We have
tentatively scheduled the hearings for the Planning Commission and Permit Authority on October 16,
2002 and December 3,2002, respectively. Estimated fees for the above referenced 1041 Permit
application are as follows:
Community Development Staff
15 Hrs @ $55.00 = $ 825.00
Administration Staff
8 Hrs @ $55.00 = $ 440.00
Engineering Staff
10 Hrs @ $55.00 = $ 550.00
Miscellaneous
6 Hrs @ $55.00 = $ 330.00
TOTAL = $2,145.00
Mr. Easterling stated all elements for the application have been submitted, but they are not
making a recommendation the application will be approved.
Commissioner Stone moved the Board accept the application submitted by Adam's Rib for site
selection and construction of major new domestic water and sewage treatment systems; the major
extension of a domestic water treatment system and the efficient utilization of the municipal water
projects as complete. The estimated fee to process this application is $2,145.00 and may be altered to
cover the actual cost of review and public hearings.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Commissioner Stone moved the Board approve the applicant's request for waiver of the special
use permit requirement as allowed in Section 3-310 (I) 2, of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as
the Local Liquor Licensing Authority.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Liquor License Consent Agenda
Earlene Roach, Liquor Inspector, presented the Liquor License Consent Agenda for September 3,
2002, as follows:
A) Big Sky Restaurant Company LLC
Beaver Creek Chophouse
This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant liquor license. This establishment is
located at 20 Avondale Ln in Avon. There have been no complaints or
disturbances during the past year.
B) Vista Hospitality Ine
Splendido at the Chateau
This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant liquor license. This establishment is
located at 17 Chateau Ln in Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances
during the past year.
27
09-03-2002
C) Kotobuki Inc
Sushi Ya Go Go
This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant liquor license. This establishment is located
at 60 EI Iebel Rd #103 in E1 Iebel. There have been no complaints or disturbances
during the past year.
D) Swiss Stubli LLC
Swiss Stubli Authentic Swiss Restaurant
This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant liquor license. This establishment is located
at 76 Avondale Ln in Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances during
the past year.
E) MRT Wines Inc
Beaver Creek Fine Wines
This is a renewal of a retail liquor store license. This establishment is located at 210
Offerson Rd in Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past
year.
F) Feather Petroleum Company
Stop N Save No 18
This is a renewal of a 3.2 % beer retail liquor license. This establishment is located
at 47 Edwards Village Blvd in Edwards. There have been no complaints or
disturbances during the past year.
G) Beaver Creek Food Services
The Inn at Beaver Creek
This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license. This establishment is located at 40
Elk Track Rd in Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the
past year.
H) Vail Food Services Inc
Eagle's Nest
This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license with optional premises. This
establishment is located on Vail Mountain in Vail. There have been no complaints
or disturbances during the past year.
I) Vail Food Services Inc
Mid Vail Restaurant
This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant liquor license with optional premises. This
establishment is located on Vail Mountain in Vail. There have been no complaints
or disturbances during the past year.
J) Terrance S Marcum
Shop & Hop #3
This is a renewal of a 3.2% beer retail liquor license. This establishment is located
at 15 Eagle Vail Rd in Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances during
the pa~t year.
Ms. Roach stated there have been no complaints or disturbances in the last year at any of these
premIses.
Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the Consent Agenda for September 3,2002, as presented.
Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Eagle County Government
Chairman Gallagher asked about the Mexican Rodeo which is to follow the weekend after this next
file.
28
09-03-2002
Ms. Roach explained the applicant is not a non-profit organization and has chosen not to follow
through with the request.
Earlene Roach presented a special events permit application for Eagle County Government for
September 13, 2002 from 6:00 p.m. to 11 :00 p.m., September 14, 2002 from noon to 11 :00 p.m. and
September 15, 2002 from noon to 5 :00 p.m. She stated this is for the CPRA which is a first time event for
Eagle County.
Dick Kesler and Rusty Williams, applicants, are present for the hearing. Mr. Kesler explained they
will be serving beer and County Coolers as they did at the fair. There will be no hard liquor. He handed out
a map ofthe facility. He stated that all employees are TIPS trained and Ms. Roach will be supervising this
event.
Commissioner Stone asked about service at the golftournament.
Mr. Kesler stated they will not be serving at that event.
Commissioner Menconi asked ifthe Colorado Pro Rodeo Association is the only sanctioned group
for Pro Rodeo Riders in Colorado.
Mr. Kesler stated that is correct for Colorado. He stated nation wide it is the Professional Rodeo
Association.
Commissioner Stone moved to approve a special events permit for Eagle County Government for
September 13, 2002 from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., September 14, 2002 from noon to 11:00 p.m. and
September 15,2002 from noon to 5:00 p.m.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority and reconvene
as the Board of County Commissioners.
Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Resolution 2002-124, Sediment Control Action Plan
George Roussos, Asst. County Administrator, presented Resolution 2002-124, expressing Eagle
County's support for the implementation of the sediment control action plan developed by the Colorado
Department of Transportation for Black Gore Creek and requesting the creek be added to the 303(d) list of
the Clean Water Act. He stated it is a reiteration of what they have previously discussed and allows the
stream to be added to the list which will enhance their opportunities for funding. He stated it will also is
parallel action with CDOT to get the project moving along and finally to request funding over and above
the State of Colorado's allocation. He requested the Board approve the Resolution.
Commissioner Menconi moved to approve Resolution 2002-124, expressing Eagle County's support
for the implementation of the sediment control action plan developed by the Colorado Department of
Transportation for Black Gore Creek and requesting the creek be added to the 303( d) list ofthe Clean Water
Act.
Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
PDA-00038, Homestead, Filings 1, 2 & 3
J ena Skinner, Planner, presented file number PD A -00038, Homestead, Filings 1, 2 and 3. She stated
the applicant wishes to amend the Homestead PUD (filings 1,2 and 3) to allow wireless internet as a "use
by right," pending approval from the Homestead Design and Review Committee. Currently, the Eagle
County Land Use Regulations recognizes this use, however, the Homestead PUD (written prior to the
existence of wireless internet), does not. The PUD must be amended to incorporate this use into the PUD.
Netbeam, Inc., a wireless internet provider, currently has tentative approval from the Homestead
Design Review Committee (DRC) to construct the small tower antenna 10-15 ft in height, next to the Eagle
29
09-03-2002
River and Sand District water tank (Tract I, Homestead, Filing 2), pending the outcome of the amendment.
The tower antenna will provide internet service to approximately 90% of homeowners in the Homestead
area. The residents may then install a small antenna on their home which receives the signal from the tower
antenna.
The chronology ofthe application is as shown on staffreport and as follows:
1981: Homestead existed as part of Edwards Village.
1984: The residential area of Edwards Village was changed into Homestead PUD.
1996: The Homestead PUD was last amended.
The Planning Commission had no issue with the proposed amendment. They unanimously
recommended approval of this proposal.
Referrals were sent to the following:
Eagle County Attorney, Engineering, Environmental Health, and Sheriff
CenturyTel, Holy Cross Electric, Fire District, Metro District (Edwards)
South Forty, Lake Creek and Homestead Homeowners' Associations
No referral responses were received.
Staff findings are as follows and as shown on staff report:
Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F.3.e Standards for the review
of a Sketch and Preliminary plan for PUD:
STANDARD: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] - The title to all land that
is part of a PUD shall be owned or controlled by one (1) person. A person shall be considered to control
all lands in the PUD either through ownership or by written consent of all owners of the land that they will
be subject to the conditions and standards of the PUD.
The Applicant has demonstrated that the entire site is represented by the Homestead Homeowners
Association.
[+] FINDING: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)]
The title to all land that is part of this PUD IS owned or controlled by multiple persons, however,
IS represented by one (1) entity.
STANDARD: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] - The uses that may be developed in the PUD shall
be those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited
use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule", or Table 3-320,
"Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule",for the zone district designation in effectfor the
property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these use designations may only be
authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3f, Variations Authorized.
The proposed use is currently defined as Telecommunications Facility within the Eagle County Land
Use Regulations. Currently, this use is allowed by Special Use in the County's standard zone districts.
Wireless Internet did not exist as part ofthe initial Preliminary Plans for Homestead. The 'use' of wireless
internet is more accurately described as a Low Power Wireless Communication Facility. If approved, the
'use' of low power wireless communication equipment shall be incorporated as a use by right in the
Homestead PUD. Wireless internet is comparable to a television satellite in its overall visual impact.
[+] FINDING: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)]
The uses that may be developed in the PUD ARE uses that are designated as uses that are allowed,
allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource
Zone Districts Use Schedule" for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the
application for PUD.
STANDARD: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] - The dimensional limitations
that shall apply to the PUD shall be those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations",
for the zone district designation in effectfor the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations
of these dimensional limitations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3f, Variations
30
09-03-2002
Authorized. provided variations shall leave adequate distance between buildings for necessary access and
fire protection, and ensure proper ventilation, light, air and snowmelt between buildings.
[+] FINDING: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)]
The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD ARE those specified in Table 3-340,
"Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time
of the application for PUD.
ST ANDARD: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] - Off-street parking and
loading provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking
and Loading Standards. A reduction in these standards may be authorized where the applicant
demonstrates that:
(a) Shared Parking. Because of shared parking arrangements among uses within the PUD that do
not require peak parkingfor those uses to occur at the same time, the parking needs of residents, guests and
employees of the project will be met; or
(b) Actual Needs. The actual needs of the project's residents, guests and employees will be less than
those set by Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. The applicant may commit
to provide specialized transportation services for these persons (such as vans, subsidized bus passes, or
similar services) as a means of complying with this standard.
Parking requirements shall remain the same.
[+] FINDING: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)]
It HAS been demonstrated that off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD complies with
the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards, without a necessity for a
reduction in the standards.
STANDARD: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] - Landscaping provided in the PUD shall
comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaoing and Illumination Standards. Variations
from these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that the proposed landscaping
provides sufficient buffering of uses from each other (both within the PUD and between the PUD and
surrounding uses) to minimize noise, glare and other adverse impacts, creates attractive streetscapes and
parking areas and is consistent with the character of the area.
Landscaping requirements shall remain the same.
[+] FINDING: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)]
It HAS previously been demonstrated that landscaping provided in the PUD can comply with the
standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards.
STANDARD: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (6)] - The sign standards applicable to the PUD shall
be as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations. unless, as provided in Section 4-340 D., Signs
Allowed in a Planned Unit Develooment (PUD), the applicant submits a comprehensive sign plan for the
PUD that is determined to be suitable for the PUD and provides the minimum sign area necessary to direct
users to and within the PUD.
Signage requirements shall remain the same.
[+] FINDING: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e(6)]
The sign standards applicable to the PUD ARE NOT as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign
Regulations. However, the current the Arrowhead at Vail PUD has a comprehensive sign plan, as provided
in Section 4- 340 D., Signs Allowed in a Planned Unit Development (PUD), that IS suitable for the PUD and
provides the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to and within the PUD.
STANDARD: AdequateFacilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] - The applicant shall demonstrate that
the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable
water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads and will
be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services.
All applicable services for the proposed use are existing and available.
31
09-03-2002
[+] FINDING: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)]
The Applicant HAS clearly demonstrated that the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for
PUD will be provided adequate facilities for sewage disposal, electrical supply, and roads; the applicant
HAS clearly demonstrated that the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for pUD will be provided
adequate facilities for potable water, solid waste disposal and fire protection. In addition, the Applicant
HAS demonstrated that the proposed PUD will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and
fire protection, and emergency medical services.
STANDARD: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] - The improvements standards applicable
to the development shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards. Provided,
however, the development may deviate from the County's road standards, so the development achieves
greater efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of
development or achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts, when the following minimum design
principles are followed:
(a) Safe, Efficient Access. The circulation system is designed to provide safe, convenient access to
all areas of the proposed development using the minimum practical roadway length. Access shall be by a
public right-of-way, private vehicular or pedestrian way or a commonly owned easement. No roadway
alignment, either horizontal or vertical, shall be allowed that compromises one (1) or more of the minimum
design standards of the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) for that functional
classification of roadway.
(b) Internal Pathways. Internal pathways shall be provided to form a logical, safe and convenient
system for pedestrian access to dwelling units and common areas, with appropriate linkages off-site.
(c) Emergency Vehicles. Roadways shall be designed to permit access by emergency vehicles to
all lots or units. An access easement shall be granted for emergency vehicles and utility vehicles, as
applicable, to use private roadways in the development for the purpose of providing emergency services and
for installation, maintenance and repair of utilities.
(d) Principal Access Points. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to provide for
smooth traffic flow, minimizing hazards to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. Where a PUD abuts a
major collector, arterial road or highway, direct access to such road or highway from individual lots, units
or buildings shall not be permitted. Minor roads within the PUD shall not be directly connected with roads
outside of the PUD, unless the County determines such connections are necessary to maintain the County's
road network.
(e) Snow Storage. Adequate areas shall be provided to store snow removed from the internal street
network and from off-street parking areas.
No new improvements are proposed, as the primary site is located on a previously improved lot.
[+] FINDING: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)]
AS CONDITIONED It HAS been clearly demonstrated that the improvements standards applicable
to the development will be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards regarding:
(a) Safe, Efficient Access.
(b) Internal Pathways.
(c) Emergency Vehic1es
(d) Principal Access Points.
( e) Snow Storage.
STANDARD: Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] - The
development proposed for the PUD shall be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses.
As Homestead is an existing PUD, this finding has previously been made.
[+] FINDING: Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)]
The development proposed for the pUD IS compatible with the character of surrounding land uses.
STANDARD: Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] - The PUD shall be
32
09-03-2002
consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM).
The consideration of the relevant master plans during sketch plan review is on a broad conceptual
level, i. e, how a proposal compares to basic planning principles. As a development proposal moves from
sketch plan to preliminary plan review, its conformance or lack thereof to aspects of the master plans may
not necessarily remain static..
As Homestead is an existing PUD development, all Master Plan considerations have been resolved.
The new use is not contemplated in any of Eagle County's master/sub-area plans.
STANDARD: Phasing [Section 5-240.F.3.e (11)] - The Preliminary Planfor PUD shall include
a phasing plan for the development. If development of the PUD is proposed to occur in phases, then
guarantees shall be provided for public improvements and amenities that are necessary and desirable for
residents of the project, or that are of benefit to the entire County. Such public improvements shall be
constructed with the first phase of the project, or, if this is not possible, then as early in the project as is
reasonable.
Not applicable / necessary, as is no new development is proposed with this amendment.
[+] FINDING: Phasing Section 5-240.F.3.e (11)
A phasing plan IS NOT necessary for this application.
STANDARD: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] - The PUD shall
comply with the follOWing common recreation and open space standards.
(a) Minimum Area. It is recommended that a minimum of 25% of the total PUD area shall be
devoted to open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi-public. In addition, the PUD
shall provide a minimum often (10) acres of common recreation and usable open space landsfor every one
thousand (1,000) persons who are residents of the PUD. In order to calculate the number ofresidents of
the PUD, the number of proposed dwelling units shall be multiplied by two and sixty-three hundredths
(2.63), which is the average number of persons that occupy each dwelling unit in Eagle County, as
determined in the Eagle County Master Plan.
(1) Areas that Do Not Count as Open Space. Parking and loading areas, street right-ol-ways, and
areas with slopes greater than thirty (30) percent shall not count toward usable open space.
(2) Areas that Count as Open Space. Water bodies, lands within critical wildlife habitat areas,
riparian areas, and one hundred (100) year flood plains, as defined in these Land Use Regulations, that are
preserved as open space shall count towards this minimum standard, even when they are not usable by or
accessible to the residents of the PUD. All other open space lands shall be conveniently accessible from
all occupied structures within the PUD.
(3) Improvements Required. All common open space and recreational facilities shall be shown on
the Preliminary Plan for PUD and shall be constructed and fully improved according to the development
schedule established for each development phase of the PUD.
(4) Continuing Use and Maintenance. All privately owned common open space shall continue to
conform to its intended use, as specified on the Preliminary Plan for PUD. To ensure that all the common
open space identified in the PUD will be used as common open space, restrictions and/or covenants shall
be placed in each deed to ensure their maintenance and to prohibit the division of any common open space.
(5) Organization. If common open space is proposed to be maintained through an association or
nonprofit corporation, such organization shall manage all common open space and recreational and
culturalfacilities that are not dedicated to the public, and shall providefor the maintenance, administration
and operation of such land and any other land within the PUD not publicly owned, and secure adequate
liability insurance on the land. The association or nonprofit corporation shall be established prior to the
sale of any lots or units within the PUD. Membership in the association or nonprofit corporation shall be
mandatory for all landowners within the PUD.
No new land development is proposed with this application.
[+] FINDING: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)]
33
09-03-2002
The PUD HAS demonstrated that the proposed development will comply with the common
recreation and open space standards with respect to:
(a) Minimum area;
(b) Improvements required;
(c) Continuing use and maintenance; or
(d) Organization.
STANDARD: NaturalResourceProtection. [Section5-240.F.3.e (13)] - ThePUDshall consider
the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendations of
referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards.
The Preliminary Plan has addressed this section previously. No new land development is proposed
with this application.
[+] FINDING: Natural Resource Protection. [ Section 5-240.F.3.e (13)]
The PUD DOES demonstrate that the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents
available at the time the application was submitted, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as
specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards, have been considered.
Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-280.B.3.e. Standards for the review
of both a Sketch Plan, and Preliminary Plan for Subdivision:
STANDARD: Consistent with Master Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (1)] - The proposed subdivision
shall be consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the FLUM of the Master Plan.
See discussion above, "Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)]
[+] FINDING: Consistent with Master Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (1)]
The PUD IS consistent with the Master Plan, and it IS consistent with the Future Land Use Map
(FLUM).
STANDARD: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)] - The proposed
subdivision shall comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use
Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts. and Article
4, Site Development Standards.
Article 4, Site Development Standards
[ +] Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1)
[ +] Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2)
[+] Sign Regulations (Division 4-3)
[+] Natural Resource Protection Standards (Division 4-4)
[+] Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410) -
[+] Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420) -
[+] Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430) -
[+] Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440)
[+] Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450)
[ +] Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460)
[ +] Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5)
[+] Improvement Standards (Division 4-6)
[ +] Roadway Standards (Section 4-620)
[ +] Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630)
[ +] Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640)
[+] Drainage Standards (Section 4-650)
[ +] Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660)
[ +] Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670)
[+] Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680)
[+] Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690)
34
09-03-2002
[+] Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7)- Not applicable.
All findings under this standard are either favorable or do not apply to this project.
[+] FINDING: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)]
The Applicant HAS fully demonstrated that the proposed subdivision complies with all of the
standards ofthis Section and all other provisions ofthese Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited
to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards.
STANDARD: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)] - The proposed
subdivision shall be located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the
delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in
a "leapfrog" pattern of development.
(a) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's
service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road
extensions shall be consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital Imorovements Plan.
(b) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population
of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines.
(c) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed when the
entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service
into an otherwise un-served area.
This proposal will not cause inefficiencies, nor will it be a leapfrog pattern of development, as
Homestead is an existing development, and is not expanding as a result of this application.
[+] FINDING: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)]
The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause
inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public
facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development.
ST ANDARD: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)] - The property proposed to
be subdivided shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and
natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and
probable future public improvements to the area.
All suitability issues have been address at Preliminary Plan, and/or during the Building Permit
process.
[+] FINDING: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)]
The property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for development, considering its topography,
environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development ofthe
property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area.
STANDARD: Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)] - The proposed
subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely
affect the future development of the surrounding area.
See previous discussion.
[+] FINDING: Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)]
The proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and
SHALL NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area.
Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F.3.a.(3) Preliminary Plan for
PUD Application Contents: Applicant shall submit the following: "Proposed PUD guide setting forth the
proposed land use restrictions and standards of development."
An amended Planned Unit Development Guide is provided as part ofthe application which appears
to be sufficient.
[+] FINDING: Preliminary Plan for PUD Application contents [Section 5-240.F.3.a.(3)] Applicant
HAS submitted a PUD guide that demonstrates that the requirements ofthis Section HAVE been fully met.
35
09-03-2002
PDA-00038:PUD AMENDMENTS DISCUSSION
The proposed changes to the PUD guide are minor in nature, and have no significant issues
surrounding them. The proposed changes are as follows:
Add a new Section in each of the filings (Section 14 in Filing 1, Section 12 in Filing 2, and
Section14 in Filing 3) addressing the permitted use of Low Power Wireless Communications
Equipment. This addition to the PUD Guide is necessary as the primary relay antenna for low power
wireless use (wireless internet), will be able to serve approximately 90% of Homestead residents.
Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F. 3.m Amendment to
Preliminary Plan for PUD:
STANDARD: Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD [Section 5-240.F.3.m.] - No substantial
modification, removal, or release of the provisions of the plan shall be permitted except upon afinding by
the County. . . that (1) the modification, removal, or release is consistent with the efficient development and
preservation of the entire Planned Unit Development, (2) does not affect in a substantially adverse manner
either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the planned unit development or the
public interest, and (3) is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person.
The addition of the use Low Power Wireless Communications Equipment, will not create a
discernible difference in the nature of the development. Consequently, the proposed amendment is
consistent with the existing PUD, will not adversely affect nearby property owners (through DRC controls),
and would not be granted solely to confer a special benefit on anyone individual or property owner.
[ +] FIND IN G: Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD The proposed PUD Amendment (1) IS
consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire Planned Unit Development, (2)
DOES NOT affect in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment ofland abutting upon or across
a street from the planned unit development or the public interest, and (3) IS NOT granted solely to confer
a special benefit upon any person.
Gregory Freedman, Chairman of Net Ware, was present for the hearing.
Chairman Gallagher asked why they regulate antennas, because they are ugly or because of their
visual impact.
Ms. Skinner explained the regulation is in place because ofthe power requirements.
Chairman Gallagher asked why they control this if they are not controlling certain antennas if it is
other than the visual impact.
Ms. Skinner stated all telecommunications are regulated by the FCC.
Mr. Freedman stated the comsumer antenna they install falls under the same regulation.
Chairman Gallagher asked what the criteria is for the regulation of this type of antenna compared
to another type of antenna.
Commissioner Stone spoke to previous discussion. He stated the real issue is the power antenna,
not the receiver. Where they don't comply is with the antenna where they send out the signal. He stated
those are typically reviewed by County Government, such as a radio station. He spoke to the potential for
visual impacts and thinks it makes sense for the Board to have review ofthose. He stated his interest would
be to try to keep up with technology and suggested they mayor may not choose to amend the Land Use
Regulations.
Mr. Freedman stated Summit County has carved them out as a separate use.
Chairman Gallagher concluded there seems to him to be no other reason other than the visual impact.
Bob Narracci, Planning Manager, stated for the low power telecommunications it is simply the
esthetics. For high power, there may be health impacts.
Commissioner Menconi move that the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners approve File
No. PDA-00038, incorporating all Staff findings.
Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
36
09-03-2002
ZS-OOlOl, Crawford Commercial Building
Bob N arracci, Planning Manager, presented file number ZS-OO 1 01, Crawford Commercial Building.
He stated the Applicant is requesting approval of this Special Use to allow the construction of a new
building within the Commercial Limited Zone District located on their property. The new building will
contain three businesses which are currently located in existing structures on the subject property. Pending
approval of this application, these existing structures will be removed and replaced with a single new
building inclusive of ancillary parking, drainage and access. The commercial uses proposed for the new
building are uses-by-right in the Commercial Limited zone district, however, because the site is unplatted
Special Use review and approval is required.
The applicant is also requesting, through this Special Use, the ability to locate two I-bedroom
apartments within the anticipated new building. Dwelling Units are allowed via Special Use review and
approval in the Commercial Limited zone district.
The chronology ofthe application is as shown on staff report and as follows:
The subject property was rezoned from Resource and Residential Suburban Medium
C Density to Commercial Limited on September 2, 1975. No other documented activity, with the exception
of building permits, has occurred on the site. The existing metal structures to be removed were originally
constructed in 1974 and 1979 respectively.
The Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of
this application with four additional recommended conditions of approval:
1. South entrance be restricted to a right turn in, and a right turn out;
2. This recommendation has been incorporated as a condition of approval number 3.
3. Restrict access on the east side of the subject site to one access point with two lanes;
4. This applicant has satisfied the Eagle County Engineering Department with regard to this
recommendation.
5. Plans to be finalized with Engineering Staff;
6. This condition has been incorporated as condition number 2.
7. Revisit the Special Use when Blue Ridge Road plans are finalized.
Staff recommends that this condition be rephrased so as to not necessitate an entire Special Use
process. Rather, the applicant should be required to submit a revised site plan to the Eagle County
Engineering Department which demonstrates how access to the trash dumpsters, parking areas and access
drive can be reconfigured to conform with the County's regulations at the time that Blue Ridge Road is
constructed. This recommendation as revised by Staff has been incorporated as condition of approval
number 4.
Referral responses are as shown on staff report and as follows:
Eagle County Attorney's Office - Responded with 'No Comment'.
Eagle County Engineering - Please reference the attached memorandum dated August 27,2002.
Town of Basalt - The Town's response indicates full endorsement ofthis proposed Special Use.
Additional Referrals were sent to the following, with no response received:
Eagle County Department of Environmental Health, Eagle County Assessor, Eagle County Sheriff's
Office, US West/PTI, Excel EnergylKN Energy, Holy Cross Electric and the Basalt & Rural Fire Protection
District.
Staff findings are as follows and as shown on staff report:
Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-250.B Standards for the review of
a Special Use Permit:
ST ANDARD: Section 5-250.B.l Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed Special Use shall
be appropriate for its proposed location and be consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies
of the Master Plan and the FLUM of the Master Plan, including standards for building and structural
37
09-03-2002
intensities and densities, and intensities of use.
EAGLE COUNTY MASTER PLAN
Environmental Open Space! Development Affordable Transportation COl11ll1unity FLUM
Quality Recreation Housing Services
Conformance X X X X
Non
Conformance
Mixed
Conformance
Not X X X
Applicable
The subj ect site is already zoned Commercial Limited and all of the proposed commercial uses are
defined as uses-by-right in this zone district. The Eagle County Land Use Regulation contemplates that
Dwelling Units are also acceptable uses in the Commercial Limited zone district subject to Special Use review
and approval. This Special Use proposal to improve existing commercial development, inclusive of a
residential element, in the Roaring Fork Valley satisfies many of the applicable Guiding Policies regarding
Environmental Quality, Development, Affordable Housing set forth in the Eagle County Master Plan. The
proposed use is also consistent with the Community Center designation ofthe Future Land Use Map.
MID V ALLEY COMMUNITY PLAN
Housing Transportation Community Open Space! EI Jebell Lower Ruedi Missouri
Facilities Environment Basalt Frving Pan Reservoir Heights
Conformance X X
Non
Conformance
Mixed
Conformance
Not X X X X X X
Applicable
Two additional affordable dwelling units will contribute positively to the current shortage of
affordable housing units in the Roaring Fork Valley. The Mid Valley Community Plan designates the
subj ect property as 'Service Center'. Indeed, the proposal is to continue to provide improved services to the
residents ofthe Roaring Fork Valley.
[+] FINDING: Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed Special Use Permit IS appropriate for
its proposed location and IS consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies ofthe Master Plan
and Master Plan FLUM.
STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.2 Compatibility. The proposed Special Use shall be appropriate
for its proposed location and compatible with the character of surrounding land uses.
The subject site is already zoned Commercial Limited and all of the proposed commercial uses are
defined as uses-by-right in this zone district. The Eagle County Land Use Regulation contemplates that
Dwelling Units are also acceptable uses in the Commercial Limited zone district subject to Special Use
review and approval. The site has been utilized commercially since 1974 and is located on an arterial
intersection with State Highway 82. Existing uses located in the immediate vicinity ofthe subject site stand
to benefit from the approval ofthis Special Use application because, several older structures will be removed
38
09-03-2002
and replaced with a modem, more aesthetically pleasing facility, parking, landscaping, drainage and access
improvements.
As such, this proposed Special Use will increase compatibility with existing and allowed adjacent
land uses. It is not anticipated that the proposal will in any way compromise this vicinity of Eagle County.
[+] FINDING: Compatibility. The proposed Special Use IS appropriate for its proposed location
and IS compatible with the character of surrounding land uses.
STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.3 Zone District Standards. The proposed Special Use shall
comply with the standards of the zone district in which it is located and any standards applicable to the
particular use, as identified in Section 3-310, Review Standards Avvlicable to Particular Residential.
Agricultural and Resource Uses and Section 3-330, Review Standards Avplicable to Particular Commercial
and Industrial Uses.
The proposed Special Use does comply with all applicable standards as set forth in Section 3-330
of the Land Use Regulations.
[+] FINDING: Zone District Standards. The proposed Special Use DOES fully comply with the
standards of the zone district in which it is located and the standards applicable to the particular use, as
identified in Section 3-330, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Commercial and Industrial Uses
ST ANDARD: Section 5-250.B.4 Design Minimizes Adverse Impact The design of the proposed
Special Use shall minimize adverse impacts, including visual impact of the proposed use on adjacent lands;
furthermore, the proposed Special Use shall avoid significant adverse impact on surrounding lands
regarding trash, traffic, service delivery, parking and loading, odors, noise, glare, and vibration, and shall
not create a nuisance.
This proposed Special Use will allow the subject property to be improved from its current state and
which improvements will include correction of a number of existing adverse impacts such as access,
drainage and visual impacts.
[+] FINDING: Design Minimizes Adverse Impact. The design of the proposed Special Use DOES
adequately minimize adverse impacts, including visual impact of the proposed use on adjacent lands;
furthermore, the proposed Special Use WILL avoid significant adverse impact on surrounding lands
regarding trash, service delivery, parking and loading, odors, glare, vibration, noise and traffic, and WILL
NOT create a nuisance.
STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.5 Design Minimizes Environmental Impact. The proposed
Special Use shall minimize environmental impacts and shall not cause significant deterioration of water and
air resources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources, and other natural resources.
The proposed Special Use will allow the subject property to be improved from its current state and
will improve the area's overall scenic resources. Drainage improvements associated with the anticipated
improvements will also help to minimize deterioration of water resources.
[+] FINDING: Design Minimizes Environmental Impact. The proposed Special Use WILL
minimize environmental impacts, and WILL NOT cause significant deterioration ofwater and airresources,
wildlife habitat, scenic resources and other natural resources.
STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.6 Impact on Public Facilities. The proposed Special Use shall
be adequately served by public facilities and services, including roads, pedestrian paths, potable water and
wastewater facilities, parks, schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services.
All public facilities necessary to serve the subject site are available and able to serve the new facility.
[+] FINDING: Impact on Public Facilities. The proposed Special Use IS adequately served by
public facilities and services such as roads, pedestrian paths, potable water and waste water facilities, parks,
schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services.
STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.7 Site Development Standards. The proposed Special Use shall
comply with the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site Develovment Standards.
Article 4, Site Development Standards
39
09-03-2002
[ +] Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1)
Sufficient parking to satisfy the minimum requirements of Division 4-1 will be provided on site.
[+] Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2)
Landscaping and illumination will be provided on site pursuant to the minimum requirements of
Division 4-2.
[+] Sign Regulations (Division 4-3).
Any signage located on the subject site will require sign permits and will conform with the minimum
requirements of Division 4-3.
[+] Natural Resource Protection Standards (Division 4-4)
[nJa] Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410)-
[nJa] Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420)-
[nJa] Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430)-
[+] Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) Any wood burning devices will be required to conform
to the standards of this section.
[nJa] Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450) This site is not identified as an area of possible Ridgeline
impact on related maps.
[nJa] Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460) An Environmental Impact Report was not
required
[+] Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5)
All commercial operations located on the subject property shall comply with all performance
standards as set forth in Division 4-5 with regard to noise and vibration; smoke and particulate standards;
heat, glare, radiation and electrical interference; storage of hazardous and non-hazardous materials, and;
water quality standards.
[+/-] Improvement Standards (Division 4-6)
[+/-] Roadway Standards (Section 4-620) The proposed site access will conform to related
standards in this section.
[ +] Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630)
[nJa] Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640)
[+/-] Drainage Standards (Section 4-650)
[ +] Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660)
[ +] Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670)
[ +] Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680) File 1041-019-92: Expansion ofthe El J ebel Wastewater
Collection and Potable Water Distribution Systems was approved via Resolution # 92-195.
[+] Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690) File 1041-019-92: Expansion of the El
Jebel Wastewater Collection and Potable Water Distribution Systems was approved via Resolution # 92-195.
The applicant is working to provide information to Staff which will eliminate the +/- designation.
As conditioned, this Special Use proposal will satisfy the above requirements.
[+] Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7). A Road Impact Fee is applicable to
the new facility, and will be due at the time a building permit is issued.
[+/-] FINDING: Site Development Standards. As conditioned, the proposed Special Use WILL
comply with all the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site Development Standards.
STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.8 Other Provisions. The proposed Special Use shall comply with
all standards imposed on it by all other applicable provisions of these Land Use Regulations for use, layout,
and general development characteristics.
No other applicable provisions ofthe Land Use Regulations were found relevant to this proposal for
Special Use.
[+] FINDING: The proposed Special Use DOES comply with all standards imposed on it by all
other applicable provisions of these Land Use Regulations for use, layout, and general development
40
09-03-2002
characteristics
Mr. Narracci spoke to a letter from Kevin and Tammy Tucker and they voiced some concerns
regarding the right turn lanes.
Rollin Gories, representing the Crawfords, spoke to the future Blue Ridge Road and what they intend
to do. He stated when this road gets developed, the intersection will be revamped. They have agreed to
eliminate the side entrance and turn the parking lot to the other direction. The other item of concern were
the large amounts of entry points. He showed their proposed access point to service the commercial uses
in the other building and in this new building. He spoke to the limited, no left hand turn access on to El
J ebel Road. He stated they don't really understand the validity of this decision. He spoke to the curb cut
they would install. He stated they would like to see that the no left turn condition be reconsidered. He spoke
to the letter regarding the bus stop. He stated they have moved the bus stop to make a better and safer
condition. He spoke to the easements in the area. He suggested ifthere ever is another development down
Blue Ridge Road, there will actually be a frontage road. He suggested in the future, that bus stop may
disappear.
Chairman Gallagher asked for public comment.
Steve Isom, Isom and Associates, stated he is present today representing Kevin and Tammy Tucker.
He stated they have asked that the building get moved back twelve feet so that they do not have to rebuild
the bus station itself. As far as left in, left out, that might be necessary for the future. He suggested it
probably isn't needed right now. He suggested on the rest ofthe issues they can work them out. He stated
he assumes that there is a right of way for El Jebel Road and all its improvements.
Chairman Gallagher asked which building it is they want moved back 12 feet.
Mr. Isom stated it would be the bus stop.
Commissioner Stone spoke to the letter and that the date is May 2,2001.
Mr. Isom suggested that might be the wrong date.
Commissioner Stone stated there are a couple of other issues Mr. Isom didn't mention including the
bike path.
Mr. Isom stated he failed to mention that and feels there should be a bike path along El Jebel Road.
Commissioner Stone asked about water drainage.
Mr. Isom stated in his review of the recommendations he notes that they have not addressed that
issue. He stated the building is in a hole and the more they can elevate the building the better offthey will
all be. He thinks they can work on this together.
Commissioner Stone spoke to the sidewalks in the back of the building. He read the letter as
follows:
"Dear Keith & Helen, I would like to address some questions on the new site plan for the NAP A
building in El J ebel. First I would like to address the new bus stop on sheet 3 of High Country Engineering.
Prom the plans it looks like it is in the new proposed right turn lane from El lebel Road to Blue Ridge Lane
for the Blue Ridge PUD file PDP-0035. Please see sheet 7 ofSopris EngineeringLLC El Jebel Road/Blue
Ridge Lane Intersection (copy enclosed).
This bus stop is a great asset to the community and the two engineering firms could place the bus
stop for both it and the right turn lane to work.
With this new work on El Jebel Road for the building should the Crawford's not dedicate the
necessary right of way on El Jebel Road to the County? In light of all the confusion over El Jebel Road and
the right of way maybe this is the time to work it out.
The next item is the road they are calling a County Road. This is Blue Ridge Lane, and at this time
is an easement to the Blue Ridge PUD. When Blue Ridge signs the final plat this will become a County
Road. From looking at their site plan the NAP A store will have access off of this road. If this is the case
should this not be dedicated to the County and asphalted and sidewalks to the back of their new building?
Also, will the Crawford's be required to continue the bike path next to Highway 82 from the underpass to
the west property line of Blue Ridge? This would bring the developments together very nicely.
41
09-03-2002
Once again, I believe the two engineering firms should work together on this.
The last item I have is water drainage. Is all the water from the east side of the Ridge has done
planning for the water from Blue Ridge Lane to drain to the west and go into dry wells. I do not know if
they can handle more or not.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at any time. Thanks you for your understanding in this matter.
Sincerely, Kevin Tucker."
Mr. Isom spoke to drainage and they would want to be sure the drainage basin they have planned will
be sufficient. He stated it would make some sense that the two get together regarding Blue Ridge Road.
He asked the Board to give direction to the two firms to work together to ensure this is built correctly. He
stated he would like to see a walk way to the back ofthe building but believes that will happen when Blue
Ridge Road is complete. He spoke to the desire to have the walkway on the main road.
Chairman Gallagher asked for further public comment. There was none.
Mr. Gories stated he appreciates the cooperation ofthe other land owner and stated he looks forward
to working with them. He spoke to the detention parcel which they will share with Mr. Isom upon
completion.
John Vengrin, Engineering Department, stated they do not have a complete traffic study at this time.
He stated they think that the intersection will make better sense if it is right in, right out. He stated they have
a drainage plan which has been revised, but they do not have the documentation that backs up the design.
He spoke to an August 27 memo and that is currently in effect. He spoke to condition #14 and reiterated
they do not have a fully designed drainage plan.
Chairman Gallagher stated he is wondering if this application is before them prematurely. He
questioned if the two engineering firms should get together first.
Mr. Gories stated this is the replacement of existing buildings. He stated they realize there are some
drainage problems and they are raising the buildings three feet. He stated they appreciate the way staff is
working with them and he believes everyone is on the same page. He stated if the drainage must be
addressed with their engineers, he believes they will make this happen.
Chairman Gallagher asked about the expedient nature.
Mr. Gories stated this has been a situation that has existed for a long time. He stated this property
has not been platted for some time. In order to follow the code as written, they had to come forward for a
special review. He stated they are here to meet the code as best they can and hopefully replace this before
the existing uses find elsewhere to go.
Chairman Gallagher stated he has no problem with the unit. He stated he is wondering if engineering
doesn't have enough data to review and approve the project.
Mr. Vengrin stated he doesn't think the problems are significant enough that they couldn't be
handled with conditions.
Commissioner Stone stated when they heard the Blue Ridge PUD, traffic was a concern at that time.
He stated what he hopes to do is solve, once and for all, the traffic component. He stated he doesn't want
to inflict any undue process on this applicant, however, he thinks they all have the same goal in mind to
come up with a safe intersection for all. He asked if they should look at moving the bus stop further back.
Adell Hubbel, applicant, stated the bus stop seems to be a big deal. She stated by going back in
history, the first RFT A area was further up the road. They then moved the location behind the bow ling alley.
At such time that Blue Ridge is developed, the bus stop will no longer come down E1 J ebel Road. She stated
if this is a terrible thing, they can eliminate it. Her obj ective is to get as many people on the bus and off the
highway. She explained that the bus stop will ultimately be moved.
Commissioner Stone asked if the Blue Ridge development has the easements that are necessary to
install the right turn lanes.
Ms. Hubbel stated the last she heard they were going to take the road through Kodiak Lake.
Commissioner Stone asked about Kodiak Park and the Blue Ridge Subdivision and those two
applicants working together. He stated there was discussion at the time about how those two areas get access
42
09-03-2002
to EI J ebel Road. He stated he wants to be sure that they are looking at all the files together so that everyone
knows what the other is doing.
Mrs. Hubble spoke to the easement they gave to the phone company in 1999. In 1964 they worked
with Mountain Bell and they can not overlap an easement for a road.
Commissioner Stone asked if Blue Ridge Development has a requirement to put in a right turn lane.
Mr. Vengrin stated they have to widen the existing roadway considerably and put in a right turn lane
as well as a left egress. He stated the easement is not sufficient for the intersection improvements they
intend to make.
Commissioner Stone suggested maybe this is something that is better resolved between the different
parties.
Chairman Gallagher stated it is his understanding that ifthe easement is in the way of pavement, that
the utilities can be moved.
Mrs. Hubble stated she would be willing to discuss this, but she is not willing to cover the cost to
move the head for the fiberoptic's.
Commissioner Stone asked how they solve the traffic issues.
Mr. Vengrin stated the right in right out, south entrance, does line up across from Favre lane. They
would like to see all the driveways closed up to Blue Ridge Road. He stated what they are recommending
is an improvement at this time as well as the bus stop being an improvement at this time. He stated they
might need to move the bus stop later on. He stated they are not doing anything to block them from doing
a better job in the future. They think this plan does the best at achieving their goals at this time.
Chairman Gallagher asked if a referral included a response from Roaring Fork Transit Authority
regarding the bike path.
Commissioner Stone stated he didn't understand the response concerning the bike path.
Mrs. Hubble stated they are willing to work with the bike path on El J ebel Road, but they are looking
for the bike path to run from the tunnel. She spoke to the tailings where they took out the gas station and
put in Wendy's.
Chairman Gallagher suggested the bike path issue needs to be dealt with according to the trails plan
for the County.
Commissioner Stone asked for clarification from the applicant on the recommended conditions. He
suggested they seem to be in agreement with the remaining issues. He asked if they are in agreement or not
with suggested condition 3, the right in right out.
Mr. Gories stated they are in disagreement with that. They are in agreement with everything else.
Commissioner Stone asked why they are in disagreement. He asked the Engineering Department
what their opinion is.
Mr. Vengrin stated they do not have a complete traffic report.
Mr. Gories stated they are dealing with the existing uses that exist at this time.
Commissioner Stone stated what they are offering are tremendous improvements to the area. He
stated he is just trying to make sure that what they are requiring makes sense. He suggested it may not be
necessary to move it if they are going to move it again.
Mrs. Hubble stated the present location for the bus stop is a nightmare and this will be a drastic
improvement.
Commissioner Gallagher suggested that whomever is making the motion include that the bus stop
may not be required at this location.
Mr. Vengrin spoke to a letter from RFT A dated June 4, 2002, in which they support the new bus stop
and that it will be an improvement over the existing bus stop.
Chairman Gallagher suggested that the right in right out not be a restriction at this time.
Commissioner Menconi suggested that RFT A is interested in maintaining a bus stop there and he
questioned whether Chairman Gallagher is hoping to eliminate that bus stop.
Chairman Gallagher stated he would like to have a condition added to the approval that the bus stop
43
09-03-2002
is required until such time that it is moved.
Commissioner Stone moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve File No. ZS-OO I 0 I,
incorporating Staff findings, with the following conditions:
1. Except as otherwise modified by this application, all material representations of the Applicant in
this application and all public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposed commercial building, the applicant must
adequately satisfy the three remaining issues pertaining to drainage, traffic and access as delineated in Eagle
County Engineering's Memorandum dated August 27,2002.
3. The applicant must submit a revised site plan to the Eagle County Engineering Department which
demonstrates how access to the trash dumpsters, parking areas and access drive will be reconfigured to
conform with the County's regulations at the time that Blue Ridge Road is constructed.
4. The County accept the location of the bus stop as provided for on the plans for this proposed
building, recognizing that this is not a required, permanent bus stop. As future traffic and routes may
dictate, this bus stop may be abandoned for a better location in the future.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
AFP-00155, Lot 20, River Ranch Subdivision
Joseph Forinash, Planner, presented file number AFP-00155, Lot 20, River Ranch Subdivision.
He stated this was an amended final plat which would adjust the building envelope to permit an addition
on to an existing dwelling unit. The net result will be a slight reduction in the building envelope.
He stated in 1989 the final plat for River Ranch Subdivision approved, creating Lot 20.
Staff findings are as shown on staffreport and as follows:
Pursuant to Section 5-290.G.2 of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the Community
Development Director has made the following findings:
a. The Amended Final Plat DOES NOT adversely affect adjacent property owners.
[The following adjacent property owners have been notified: Sopris Village Properties, Inc., c/o Russell
Scott; George McDonald; William Vannice; and River Ranch Homeowners Association. No letters of
opposition have been received by the Community Development Department prior to the distribution of this
Staff Report.}
a. The Amended Final Plat IS consistent with the intent of the Final Plat.
b. The Amended Final Plat DOES conform to the Final Plat requirements and other applicable
regulations, policies and guidelines.
c. An Improvements Agreement IS NOT applicable.
d. This amendment IS NOT an alteration of a restrictive plat note.
Nancy Gallagher, applicant, was present for the hearing.
Commissioner Menconi moved the Board of County Commissioners approve File No. AFP-00155,
River Ranch Subdivision, incorporating the Staff findings and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat.
Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous
There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until
September 10, 2002.
Attest:
Clerk to the Boar
~....
44
09-03-2002