Loading...
Minutes 09/03/2002 Present: Michael Gallagher Am Menconi Tom Stone Diane Mauriello Jack Ingstad Sara J. Fisher SEPTEMBER 3, 2002 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Attorney County Administrator Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: GENERAL FUND 21 ST CENTURY PHOTO SUPPLY 3CMA A GREAT TIME DJS AAA COLLECTORS ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS ABE WAGNER & ASSOCIATES ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS ADAMS COUNTY ASSESSORS ADAMS MARK HOTEL DENVER ADVANTAGE NETWORK SYSTEMS AFFLECK PHOTOGRAPHY AFFORDABLE PORTABLE AIRBORNE ALlMED INCORPORATED ALL PRO FORMS INC ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE, INC ALPH INTERACTIVE GROUP AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMERICAN TOWER CORP AMERICINN LODGE & SUITES AMERIGAS AMICH AND JENKS INCORPORA ANDIE WILKERSON ANDRIA L COLLINS ANN MUNCASTER APEX SECURITY APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY ARAPAHOE COUNTY SHERIFF ARCHITECTURAL IMPACT ARETSKY & ARETSKY ARIEL HERNANDEZ RODRIQUEZ ARMY & FACTORY SURPLUS ARNOLD AND ARNOLD ARNOLD VARELA SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 126.51 525.00 450.00 103.10 39.38 429.97 27.00 729.00 138.00 32.44 875.00 88.00 1,500.00 195.96 1,954.90 2,983.36 979.69 65.00 87.00 875.00 1,659.15 576.36 480.00 102.35 102.35 60.60 455.00 13.80 160.04 127.50 25.00 3.72 167.66 30.00 1,162.43 I 09-03-2002 ASFPM ASI SIGN SYSTEMS INC ASPEN BASALT CARE CLINIC ASPEN BASE OPERATON ASPEN BOARD OF REALTORS ASPEN CTR FOR WOMENS HL TH ASPEN TIMES THE AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES AV TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVCARD AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS BABA VANKIRK BACK ALLEY PIZZA BAILEY FUNERAL HOME BAILEYS BARBARA McDOUGALL BATTLE MOUNTAIN HS BATTLE MTN HS CHEERLEADER BATTLE MTN HS DANCE TEAM BATTLE MTN HS SOCCER TEAM BATTLE MTN HS SPEECH TEAM BCI COMMERCIAL BEllA RAMIREZ BEN GALLOWAY MD BENCHMARK ENGINEERING BERGLUND RUTH BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER BERNICE WHITE BEST WESTERN EAGLE LODGE BETSY ROSS FLAG GIRLS BEVERLY KUNKEL BLOSSOM SOFTWARE BOB BARKER COMPANY BOB'S PLACE BOISCLAIR & TAYLOR BOULDER PUBLISHING INC BOY SCOUT TROOP 222 B RATW EAR BRC/HARRIS INC BRENT BLAKE BRIAN J REICHEL BRIGADE QUARTERMASTERS LI BRUCE CAMPBELL BRUCELLI ADVERTISING CO BUDDIES PROGRAM, THE BUTLER RENTS C & H DISTRIBUTORS INC C & K WINDOW CLEANING SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 180.00 72.42 5,400.00 598.42 6.06 1,800.00 193.50 5,862.82 18,239.18 831.57 246.29 115.50 220.00 350.00 124.50 19.80 420.00 720.00 580.00 4,440.00 2,100.00 3,712.66 15.18 5,005.00 900.00 102.35 50.00 90.00 92.23 572.50 180.00 30.00 375.45 2,500.00 25.02 1,754.50 580.00 3,586.50 1,435.00 19.26 25.00 12.53 343.30 603.50 960.00 1,927.50 956.16 2.48 2 09-03-2002 C & S PRODUCTIONS C RICHARD DONOVAN CALOIA & HOUPT PC CAPITAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS CASEY SMITH CASFM CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CASTOR & ASSOCIATES CATHOLIC CHARITIES CEHA CENTRAL CREDIT CORP CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CENTRAL VALLEY PROFESSION CENTURYTEL CHARLES B DARRAH CHARLES CUNNIFFE CHARLES D JONES CO, INC. CHEF DE CUISINE CHEMATOX INC. CHESS CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES CHILDBIRTH GRAPHICS CHRISTINE L MOTT CHRISTINE PAPPAS CLE INTERNATIONAL CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION CO BAR ASSOCIATION CO BUREAU INVESTIGATION CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CO MITIGATION & WILDFIRE CO POSTER COMPLIANCE CO STATE FOREST SERVICE CO STATE TREASURER COLLECTION CENTER COLORADO AVALANCHE COLORADO COMMERCIAL COLORADO FOUNDATION FOR COLORADO HEAD START ASSC= COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COLORADO WEST MENTAL HL TH COLUMBINE HOME HEALTH INC COM-LINK COMFORT INN COMPED SOLUTIONS CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE B.TREU.CO BAR ASSN.DUES02/03 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 2,720.00 78.10 646.85 179.30 2,400.00 145.00 330.42 25.00 6,000.00 365.00 44.42 798.70 6.29 647.29 3,898.10 103.10 2,000.00 215.76 2,000.00 225.00 467.00 8.68 76.74 1,733.00 46.12 495.00 280.00 160.00 66.24 755.86 350.00 46.25 350.50 9,800.00 15.08 1,000.00 209.75 125.00 150.00 1,872.00 27,202.38 7,162.50 21,090.00 795.50 25.19 296.80 139.00 194.76 3 09-03-2002 CONTINENTAL DIVIDE COORS DISTRIBUTING COPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING CORRA CPHA CPRA DAILY SENTINEL THE DAKTRONICS INC DAMON BAILLIE DAVID A BAUER DAVID CARTER DAVID GUINNEE, DVM DAYS INN DEB ALMONY DEENA EZZELL DEEP ROCK WEST DELL INC DENNIS GIBBONS DENNIS KARPUSKA DENVER NEWSPAPER AGENCY DEPT OF REVENUE DIANA JOHNSON DOCTORS ON CALL DOLORES PEREZ DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP DONNA BARNES CORONER DOSIA LAEYENDECKER DREAMCATCHER IMAGING E CNTY WOMEN'S SHELTER EAGLE AMOCO EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE CONVENIENCE STORE EAGLE COUNTY CLERK EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DIST EAGLE DIRECT INC EAGLE EYE PHOTO EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE PRINTING EAGLE RIVER VILLAGE EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE VAIL ANIMAL HOSPITA EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE EAGLE VALLEY HS BAND EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE 45.00 4,379.52 44.00 4,980.31 259.00 45.00 540.00 6,000.00 151.97 3,178.25 155.25 46.28 264.00 2,468.19 384.00 25.00 42.50 454.85 7,913.53 11.01 11.31 648.00 75.00 90.00 420.00 29.98 112.08 19.44 117.00 275.00 1,500.00 355.10 7,936.00 6,281.60 400.00 75.00 700.00 11,118.01 37.23 553.19 275.00 25.00 57.53 10.00 20.00 109.22 1,360.00 20.00 4 09-03-2002 EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EAGLE VALLEY SENIORS EAGLE WINDOW CLEANING EASTERN TECHNICAL ASSOC. EDWARDS STATION LLC ELAINE WOLF ELISA ACOSTA ELLEN MATLOCK EMC2 EMILIA GONZALEZ ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD ENTERPRISES FLEET SERVICE EPS DESIGN AND PRINT ERIC W WALTER ERMOLD PARK RECREATION ESTHER MEHL EXTENSION PROGRAM FUND FALCON ASSOCIATES INC FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM FARMER BROTHERS FARRELL, GOLDSTEIN, FEDERAL EXPRESS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG FERRELLGAS FIESTA'S CAFE FILE FINDERS L TD FIRST BANKS FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY FLO HABENICHT FLYING COLORS HORSE SUPPL FRANK J BALL FRANKLIN COVEY GA THOMPSON CO GALAPAGOS GALLS INCORPORATED GATES MARGE PHN GATEWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS GE CAPITAL GIRL SCOUT TROOP #293 GIRL SCOUT TROOP #48 GIRL SCOUT TROOP 292 GIRSH AND ROTTMAN GLENWOOD MEDICAL ASSOC GORE RANGE NATURAL GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GRATITUDES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE 6,383.50 767.13 2,975.00 700.00 400.00 29.16 93.15 162.00 231.68 90.00 82.00 23,316.07 597.77 2.48 879.16 96.00 5,609.67 180.00 1,218.45 8,638.07 1,117.10 58.06 224.72 13,001.31 51.24 2,186.00 30.00 17,183.94 80.00 90.00 360.00 25.00 246.44 149.36 48.00 801.59 2,087.50 285.69 159.99 2,100.00 1,940.00 2,070.00 18.80 48.00 2,480.00 1,637.23 140.75 170.50 5 09-03-2002 GREENBERG & ASSOCIATES GREGG ROSSI HAMPTON INN DENVER WEST HART INTERCIVIC HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELEN MIGCHELBRINK HELLO DIRECT INC HERMAN MILLER INC. HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HIGH COUNTRY SHIRTWORKS HILL & COMPANY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IAAO LOCAL CENTRAL AZ IMAGE DENTAL IMAGESELLER IN DOFF INC INJOY VIDEOS INTAB INTEGRAL RECOVERIES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY INTERNETV AIL. COM J BAR D CATERING J MATTHEW DEPETRO JACQUELINE ALLEN JAMAICA STUMP JAMES PUBLISHING COMPANY JAMIE HUMPHREY JANET CONNORS JENNIFER N SHEPHERD JENNY WAHRER JEPPESEN SANDERSON JIMMIE ANDERSON JO ANN ALBERTSON JODY CARUTHERS JOHN GUTHRIE JON SHEPARD PHOTOGRAPHY JONES & KELLER JOSEPH SCHMITT JOURNEYWORKS PUBLISHING JULIE SNYDER KARA BETTIS, DEPUTY KATHLEEN SCHMITT KATHY REED KATIE HARPER KELLY TO ON KEN CALL KEN WILSON REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENIFIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 238.64 685.00 420.00 783.45 7,662.50 62.21 1,616.98 30.94 165.00 615.45 21,200.94 16,118.58 850.00 267.00 1,197.24 106.56 989.60 84.16 37.40 270.00 400.00 1.00 10,644.50 13.76 293.13 24.84 65.94 1,332.35 65.10 8.68 666.65 918.00 90.00 123.60 41.67 1,000.00 20.00 2.48 90.00 493.90 12.33 109.45 33.60 36.97 564.46 3.10 122.25 250.00 6 09-03-2002 KENDRA DOEPKEN KESSLER MARY J KEVIN CASSIDY KIDS SAFETY OF AMERICA KINDER MORGAN INC KUHN, CARNES & ANDERSON LAB SAFETY SUPPLY LAFARGE CORPORATION LAND TITLE LANIE MARTIN LASER JUNCTION LAURA L MAGNER LAURETTA WOLTER LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LESLIE KEHMEIER LEXISNEXIS LIBERTY FLAG SPECIALTY CO LIMITED ENERGY SOLUTIONS LINCOLN GRADUATE CENTER LINDA HUBBELL LISA DAILEY LOGO PRO LUCY GREWE LYNN PERKINS MACHOL&JOHANNES MAINTENANCE WAREHOUSE MARICELA HERNANDEZ MARIO VARELA MARJORIE J MARKS MARK CHAPIN MARKS PLUMBING PARTS MARLENE MC CAFFERTY MARRIOTT HOTEL MARY ELLEN COLRICK MATRIX DESIGN GROUP INC MAURI NOTTINGHAM MAVERICK FLOORING MBIA MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS MCI WORLD COM MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MEGAN HAMMER MERCEDES GARCIA MICHAEL BAKER MICHELLE BALL MICHELLE FAWN RAMOS MICRO WAREHOUSE MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP REIMBU RSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES 29.96 376.94 102.35 784.31 911.22 50.00 240.77 133.90 96.00 29.74 861.90 15.00 21.51 1,960.13 20.00 542.00 144.85 2,875.00 610.00 994.00 30.00 1,311.32 18.99 85.50 111 .78 625.09 150.00 4.34 400.00 102.35 207.56 105.96 510.00 25.00 20,774.28 126.00 1,700.00 4,322.98 281.95 9,221.58 2,339.00 129.03 11.91 102.35 210.11 25.00 1,387.37 69.00 7 09-03-2002 MICROWAREHOUSE MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN MIKE GALLAGHER MIKE MCWILLIAM MILLE LACS COUNTY FAMILY MITCHELL SILAS MONTGOMERY KOLODNY MOORE MEDICAL CORP MORGAN HERRING & MORGAN MOTHERS AGAINST MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN GLEN HOUSING MOUNTAIN MOBILE VETERINAR MOUNTAIN OFFICE REPAIR MOUNTAIN VALLEY NACHSA NANCY NOTTINGHAM NAPA AUTO PARTS NATIONAL BUSINESS NATIONAL EVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL GRAPHICS COMPANY NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL NETWORK ASSOCIATES NEW ELECTRIC INC NICOLETTI FLATER ASSOC NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORDIC REFRIGERATION NORTHWEST COLORADO LEGAL NOVELL INCORPORATED NWCCOG OLSON PROPERTY OMB POLICE SUPPLY OMNIFAX ORTEN & HINDMAN OSI COLLECTION SERVICES OSM DELIVERY LLC OTTO, PORTERFIELD, POST OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP PAINT BUCKET THE PAPER DIRECT PAPER THERMOMETER COMPANY PAPER WISE PARAMOUNT FABRICS INC. PAT MAGDZIUK PAT NOLAN PATHOLOGY GROUP PATTERSON NUSS & SEYMOUR PAUL ZIEMBA SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 3,133.06 1,089.43 87.02 61.67 25.00 24.45 25.00 241 .48 25.00 50.00 44,261.91 100,000.00 190.43 230.00 9,000.00 50.00 90.00 280.56 1,509.16 75.00 70.25 31.20 1,587.60 244.00 195.00 4,762.26 109.92 1,000.00 9,017.00 25.00 3,000.00 49.95 90.84 25.00 14.88 418.00 4.34 3,316.00 137.38 149.90 59.00 1,190.00 52.80 33.82 435.00 700.00 25.00 28.02 8 09-03-2002 PEAK PERFORMANCE COPIER & PEARSON, MILLIGAN, AND PEGASUS SATELLITE PEGGY GRAYBEAL PEPPERDINE'S MARKET PERRI ENTERTAINMENT PET FOOD L TD PETER HART PETER KEENAN BUCKLEY PETRIE, BAUER, VRIESMAN PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PFM ELECTRONICS PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED PRIMEDIA WORKPLACE PSS, INC PTSI, INC QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION QWEST QWEST INTERPRISE NETWRKNG READYS ICE REALI GENT REBECCA GAD ELL REBECCA LEONARD RED STONE CASTLE RED LEAF PRESS REE FARRELL RENZELMAN JANET RESORT CONCEPTS RESOURCE CENTER OF EAGLE RICHARD KESLER RIVERW ALK @ EDWARDS ROARING FORK FAMILY ROARING FORK FENCING ROBERT B EMERSON, PC ROCKIE TALKIE COMMUNICATN ROCKY MOUNTAIN RECORDS ROCKY MOUNTAIN REPROGRAPH ROGER MOORE ROOKS PITTS POUST ROSARIO PEREZ ROSIE MORENO ROSS & WHITE COMPANY RUTH A SHARP SALVATION ARMY SANDYS OFFICE SUPPLY SARA J FISHER SAWAYA AND ROSE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 194.91 25.00 30.98 140.00 10.65 834.18 352.19 732.50 6.20 9.46 1,621.47 100.00 201.72 388.00 113.54 311.90 245.52 80.10 7,828.75 1,633.42 339.30 159.90 525.00 10.00 165.00 109.85 39.39 79.13 7,829.25 1,000.00 3,505.92 10,012.80 2,000.00 1,476.61 94.00 828.00 138.00 68.50 41.12 50.00 25.00 3,051.52 344.66 18.80 5,000.00 17.70 479.82 9.38 9 09-03-2002 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SEARS SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SHAINHOL TZ TODD H DDS SHAREE WETTSTEIN SHRM SIGNATURE SIGNS SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SNOWBOARD OUTREACH SCTY SNOWHITE LINEN SOFTMART INC SOMES UNIFORMS SPEAKOUTINCORPORATED ST CLARE OF ASSISI PARISH ST VINCENTS CATHOLIC STARBUCK SURVEYORS & ENGI STATUTES UNLIMITED STERICYCLE INC STEVE SOWELL STRAWBERRY PATCH STUVER & LeMOINE SULLIVAN GREEN LLC SUMMIT COUNTY SENIORS SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLY CACHE SUSAN LITTLE & ASSOCIATES SUSPENSE FUND SYDNEY SUMMERS THE GOURMET COWBOY THE HEALTH CONNECTION THOMAS D SILVERMAN THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP TODD GRADOLPH DDS TOM C STONE TONY VANCAMPEN TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF EAGLE TOWN OF VAIL TRANE COMPANY TRANSCOR AMERICA INC TUBE TECH SERVICES UNIFORM KINGDOM UNIPATH UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED RESOURCE SYSTEMS UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO UNIVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE 100.85 549.95 1,971.00 31,618.67 1,398.00 104.00 160.00 3,889.25 807.78 660.00 186.54 4,286.05 518.00 750.00 75.00 740.00 1,645.00 320.00 167.27 4.96 428.97 15.00 2,316.83 3,170.98 978.05 2,354.37 50.00 72,185.60 27.25 2,500.00 154.08 6.20 299.00 231.00 20.54 1,800.00 546.00 5,487.75 165,795.87 3,034.00 4,538.53 118.20 1,144.47 186.20 282.86 14.88 220.00 238.50 10 09-03-2002 US LATEX PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 607.50 VAIL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE SERVICE 750.00 VAIL ELECTRONICS SERVICE 225.00 VAIL LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 154.30 VAIL MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROU SERVICE 7,758.02 VAIL PBK LLC REIMBURSEMENT 19.22 VAIL RESORTS MANAGEMENT SERVICE 1,300.00 VAIL SIGN CORPORATION SERVICE 90.00 VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER SERVICE 99.36 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR SERVICE 26,698.88 VAIL VALLEY SOCCER CLUB SERVICE 500.00 VAILNET INC SERVICE 1,096.85 VALLEY LUMBER SERVICE 5.56 VALLEY PARTNERSHIP SERVICE 5,320.00 VALLEY PINES HOMEOWNERS SERVICE 570.07 VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 3,951.08 VERIZON SELECT SERVICES SERVICE 97.50 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 3,411.67 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 170.82 VILLAGE AT BRECKENRIDGE SERVICE 3,798.90 VIOLA ULLERICK SERVICE 240.00 VISION GRAPHICS SERVICE 1,289.17 WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 95.00 WAYNE CARLEY SERVICE 1,119.32 WEDGLE AND SHPALL REIMBURSEMENT 25.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 285,280.85 WELLS FARGO BANK SERVICE 300.00 WENDY BOGNER REIMBURSEMENT 37.10 WEST GROUP SERVICE 1,393.00 WESTED SERVICE 1,481.00 WESTERN COLLECTIONS REIMBURSEMENT 21.98 WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY SERVICE 3,931.25 WESTERN PAGING SERVICE 8.00 WESTERN SLOPE SERVICE 530.50 WHITE RIVER INSTITUTE SERVICE 6,000.00 WILLARD B HARDESTY REIMBURSEMENT 3.72 WIND RIVER TREES SERVICE 3,282.50 WRS GROUP L TD SERVICE 170.06 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 254.53 XCELENERGY SERVICE 38.78 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 8,046.07 Y & S PHARMACY SERVICE 642.76 YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICE 73.30 YOUR PERSONAL CHEF SERVICE 440.00 YOUTH ZONE SERVICE 1,500.00 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES SERVICE 252.00 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 691.81 11 09-03-2002 PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 647,046.12 2,053,142.90 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND AFFORDABLE PORTABLE SERVICE 434.25 APWA CONFERENCE SERVICE 75.00 ASPEN TIMES THE SERVICE 288.00 B & H SPORTS SERVICE 499.48 BILL BOCELAWATZ REFILL KIT 75.00 BOGUE CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 115,815.61 BUD JACOX REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 18.20 CHOICE SOLUTIONS, LLC SERVICE 2,770.38 COpy PLUS SUPPLIES 20.00 DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICE 74.50 DOLAN CONSTRUCTION INC SERVICE 2,000.00 DOUG MCKIERNAN REIMBURSEMENT 300.00 EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE SUPPLIES 9.08 EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL SERVICE 73.00 ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO SERVICE 1,153.60 ENVIROTECH SERVICE 2,257.78 FRONTIER PAVING INC SERVICE 47,299.45 GONZALES CONSTRUCTION CO. SERVICE 40,287.94 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 609.79 HENKES & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE 75.00 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS SERVICE 280.00 HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 1,270.42 INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY SUPPLIES 1,295.78 KINDER MORGAN INC SERVICE 8.86 LAKE CREEK METRO DISTRICT SERVICE 250.00 LAWRENCE BERMAN SERVICE 100.00 METEORLOGIX SERVICE 696.00 MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN REIMBURSEMENT 2,000.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 128,491.38 MULLIN & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE 250.00 NAPA AUTO PARTS-CARBONDLE SUPPLIES 30.39 NICK KERN SERVICE 250.00 PROPERTY IMAGING, LLC SERVICE 430.00 RHONDA PARKER REIMBURSEMENT 7.95 ROD CARTER REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 RSC SERVICE 167.16 SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 245.74 SCOTT S TURNIPSEED SERVICE 250.00 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICE 885.59 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 16.64 SUNDANCE PLUMBING SERVICE 250.00 12 09-03-2002 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 4,369.30 TNT TREE SERVICE, INC. SERVICE 250.00 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 34,127.08 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 27,159.95 WILLIAM ANDREE SERVICE 100.00 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 3,765.73 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 69.15 PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 64,095.08 485,398.26 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND ABC SCHOOL INC SERVICE 1,703.44 ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 15.00 ALlMED INCORPORATED SERVICE 161.97 ARLlSS SIMS REIMBURSEMENT 8.38 CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, MA SERVICE 150.00 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 615.55 EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF REIMBURSEMENT 74.88 EAGLE PRINTING SERVICE 225.00 EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE SERVICE 562.50 EC SOCIAL SERVICES SERVICE 20.00 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY REIMBURSEMENT 168.00 GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF REIMBURSEMENT 5.00 HART INTERCIVIC SERVICE 110.76 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 1,014.41 JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFFS REIMBURSEMENT 33.41 JOHN McCORMICK SERVICE 240.00 JOSEPH L FORINASH REIMBURSEMENT 187.43 KATHY REED REIMBURSEMENT 108.77 LYONS KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 60.23 MARGE BELLATRECHE SERVICE 258.90 MARY B EZEQUELLE LCSW SERVICE 180.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 774.50 NACHSA SERVICE 50.00 PEAK PERFORMANCE COPIER & SERVICE 159.4 7 RAMADA INN SERVICE 225.00 RED STONE CASTLE SERVICE 135.00 RENEE FIELDS REIMBURSEMENT 469.78 RITA WOODS REIMBURSEMENT 86.79 SAMARITAN CNTR OF ROCKIES SERVICE 480.00 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 5,791.54 WDI SERVICE 350.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 16,727.83 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 358.70 PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 33,387.91 13 09-03-2002 64,900.15 WRAP FUND CAMP CHIP-A-TOOTH SERVICE 40.00 JULIE M LEWIS SERVICE 360.00 PATRICIA SENA REIMBURSEMENT 91.77 RENEE FIELDS REIMBURSEMENT 336.68 TERRI ALLENDER SERVICE 240.00 1,068.45 RETIREMENT FUND SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 58,273.29 58,273.29 INSURANCE RESERVE FUND AMERICAN GLASS SERVICE 533.70 BROTHER'S AUTO BODY SERVICE 1,167.50 CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE SERVICE 32.30 1,733.50 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND BAND B EXCAVATING SERVICE 637,860.13 BAI/BRAUN ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE 2,217.50 BEAUDIN GANZE CONSULTING SERVICE 280.77 C H DISTRIBUTORS INC SERVICE 213.65 CENTURYTEL SERVICE 79,855.46 DESIGN WORKSHOP, INC SERVICE 9,366.86 HYDROSYSTEMS INC SERVICE 4,415.00 LORIS & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE 12,583.59 PEAK LAND CONSULTANTS INC SERVICE 8,118.06 US TREASURY SERVICE 1,000.00 755,911.02 SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. ABART A MEDIA SERVICE 300.00 ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY SERVICE 1,244.22 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES SERVICE 350.16 AUDRA MEYERS REIMBURSEMENT 17.68 BAND B EXCAVATING SERVICE 8,564.74 BRODY CHEMICAL SERVICE 213.99 CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 422.88 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 3.68 CHOICE SOLUTIONS, LLC SERVICE 2,770.37 14 09-03-2002 COLLETTS COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLUMBINE MARKET COMPUMASTER CORPORATE EXPRESS CREDIT SYSTEMS INC CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC DAVEY COACH SALES INC DCS AMERICA INC DODD DIESEL INCORPORATED DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE COUNTY FAIR EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE RIVER AUTO BODY EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE EUCLID PRODUCTS COMPANY FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FEDERAL EXPRESS G & K SERVICES GAY JOHNSONS INC GENERAL ELECTRIC GILLIG CORPORATION HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS INDEPENDENT TOOL SUPPLY INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTMS JAY MAX SALES JIM LAIR KINDER MORGAN INC KINETICO WATER PROS KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAWSON PRODUCTS LEADING EDGE TECHNOLOGIES LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC M & M AUTO PARTS MAIN AUTO PARTS MOTOR POOL FUND NEOPART PHIL HUFF QWEST ROBERT SLAGLE RON E BECK SAFETY KLEEN SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE BENIFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES 917.20 487.51 112.36 239.00 170.79 201.63 3,143.77 230.18 731 .22 4,000.00 17,889.66 6,409.83 2,025.00 11,937.60 165.18 1,100.00 40.52 991.56 230.76 5.50 493.80 496.37 269.16 1,831.96 680.74 4,448.70 5.00 321.69 105.95 67.45 98.74 31.04 131.90 300.00 1,569.81 380.00 290.00 15.72 39.61 3,405.96 105.00 116.22 143.29 350.00 3,100.00 113.06 55.37 59.90 15 09-03-2002 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICE 3,101.13 SHOP TOOLS INC SUPPLIES 25.98 SPECIAL TY INCENTIVES INC SERVICE 2,900.80 SPORTSWORKS NORTHWEST,INC SERVICE 1,168.05 STEAMBOAT PILOT/TODAY SERVICE 60.00 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 34.79 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 7,191.88 TOWN OF AVON SERVICE 1,237.50 UNITED LABORATORIES SUPPLIES 155.64 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV SERVICE 1,000.00 UNITED STATES WELDING SERVICE 27.54 VAIL VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICE 150.00 VALLEY SIGNS SERVICE 69.30 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 123.20 VISION CHEMICAL SYSTEMS SERVICE 1,155.25 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 40,423.82 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 199.13 XCELENERGY SERVICE 37.95 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 10.67 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 102.17 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY SERVICE 44.95 PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 98,068.82 241,232.00 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 702.00 COLUMBINE MARKET SERVICE 29.50 EAGLE PHARMACY SERVICE 17.49 FRED HASLEE REIMBURSEMENT 35.53 HEAL TH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 5.36 IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICE 102.50 MIKE TOUGH ILL REIMBURSEMENT 37.60 R J THOMAS MFG CO INC SERVICE 1,017.15 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 30.27 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 132.10 VAIL TRAIL THE SERVICE 198.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 836.28 3,143.78 AIRPORT FUND A & H GRAPHICS SERVICE 132.00 AAAA SEPTIC PUMPING SERVICE 300.00 AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC SERVICE 36.49 16 09-03-2002 ALPINE TIRE COMPANY AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES BAND B EXCAVATING BENCHMARK ENGINEERING BERTHOD MOTORS BRENT SERVICES BRIAN SCHOFIELD BROWNING FERRIS IND CALOIA & HOUPT PC CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CENTURYTEL CO AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSN COLLETTS COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLUMBINE MARKET COpy PLUS CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN CYGNUS BUSINESS MEDIA D JENSEN ELECTRIC INC. DAILY JOURNAL THE DEEP ROCK WEST DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE FAIRFIELD INN FOX & COMPANY FUTURA CARWASH SYSTEMS GALLS INCORPORATED GLENWOOD RADIATOR REPAIR GYPSUM TOWN OF HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HERTZ CORPORATION HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC INNERMOUNTAIN DISTRIBUTNG INTERFLlGHT KENNY MAENPA KINDER MORGAN INC LAFARGE CORPORATION LAWSON PRODUCTS LP DOCTOR M & M AUTO PARTS MACDONALD EQUIPMENT CO MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING MARKOS PIZZERIA MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENIFIT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 1,803.44 111.54 62,187.56 12,245.00 14.12 7,088.83 649.40 234.71 817.20 25.37 2,431.08 220.00 321.30 6.00 273.00 34.08 403.50 115.23 900.00 403.87 263.25 44.90 6,200.00 101.54 409.61 1,344.30 1,234.40 436.00 331.94 146.00 334.25 410.34 804.26 1,4 72.99 47.96 16,254.70 986.00 33.58 588.38 167.42 264.15 562.90 43.28 22.44 87.86 183.33 32,408.00 794.88 17 09-03-2002 NASCO LLC SERVICE 25.00 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT SERVICE 168.12 OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION SERVICE 424.58 OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY SERVICE 1,106.60 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 167.10 SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICE 1,161.49 SIEMENS AIRFIELD SOLUTION SUPPLIES 999.45 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 395.44 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 2,799.63 VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER SERVICE 62.57 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 176.22 WAGNER RENTS SUPPLIES 3.13 WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICE 46,816.94 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 14,450.00 WESTERN IMPLEMENTS SUPPLIES 1,308.25 WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. SERVICE 689.43 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 445.03 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 476.94 PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 37,283.79 265,692.09 MICROWAVE MAINTENANCE FUND BUCHHOLZ FAMIL Y SERVICE 4,632.67 HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 2,958.47 7,591.14 JMC-COP DEBT SERVICE FUND US BANK SERVICE 2,700.00 2,700.00 LANDFILL FUND CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 46.93 CHADWICK, STEIN KIRCHNER SERVICE 105.00 DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICE 105.55 DODSON ENGINEERED SERVICE 685.60 DOWN VALLEY SEPTIC SERVICE 330.00 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES 8.53 EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE SUPPLIES 8.09 EPG COMPANIES SUPPLIES 3,427.59 GENERAL FUND SERVICE 660.00 HDR INC SERVICE 140.00 18 09-03-2002 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 337.27 KRW CONSUL TING INC SERVICE 27,184.85 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 49,398.17 OXFORD RECYCLING INC SERVICE 25,943.18 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICE 128,219.63 SANDYS OFFICE SUPPLY SUPPLIES 50.90 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 67.98 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICE 1,651.18 SIGNATURE SIGNS SERVICE 70.00 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 1,653.15 SW ANA SERVICE 98.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 6,174.76 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 5.30 YARGER SERVICES LLC SERVICE 450.00 PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 15,526.34 262,348.00 MOTOR POOL FUND A1 AUTO ELECTRIC COMPANY SUPPLIES 199.01 AL-JON INC SUPPLIES 42.11 BERTHOD MOTORS SUPPLIES 285.20 CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 70.82 CCG SYSTEMS SERVICE 1,897.50 CENTURY EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 307.30 COLLEEN WIRTH REIMBURSEMENT 8.00 COLLETTS SUPPLIES 34,934.04 COLORADO MOTOR PARTS SUPPLIES 1,519.89 COpy PLUS SUPPLIES 130.00 DELTA KITS SERVICE 118.50 DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES 390.92 EAGLE AMOCO SERVICE 28.00 EATON SALES & SERVICE SERVICE 390.45 EDDIE VELASQUES REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 G & K SERVICES SUPPLIES 382.40 GAY JOHN SONS INC SUPPLIES 149.90 GLENWOOD RADIATOR REPAIR SERVICE 298.75 GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE SUPPLIES 2,915.40 HANSON EQUIPMENT SERVICE 2,876.37 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 226.62 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS SERVICE 140.00 HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 3,284.53 INDEPENDENT TOOL SUPPLY SUPPLIES 414.63 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTMS SERVICE 54.95 KEMP AND COMPANY INC SUPPLIES 56.24 KINDER MORGAN INC SERVICE 22.93 19 09-03-2002 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 371.37 LOGISTIXX FLEET SALES SUPPLIES 866.15 M & M AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 348.86 MAIN AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 87.95 MERCEDES GARCIA REIMBURSEMENT 12.50 MESA MACK SALES & SERVICE SERVICE 201.45 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 7,316.88 MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 1,319.55 NAPA AUTO PARTS-CARBONDLE SUPPLIES 326.04 PETTY CASH MOTOR POOL SERVICE 190.00 POWER MOTIVE SUPPLIES 262.14 RENAISSANCE HOTEL SERVICE 1,308.00 REY MOTORS INCORPORATED SUPPLIES 255.68 RHONDA PARKER REIMBURSEMENT 39.99 SAFETY KLEEN (WHICITA) SERVICE 308.87 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE REIMBURSEMENT 55.39 SANDRA L SKILES REIMBURSEMENT 17.51 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICE 2,289.62 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 1,499.33 UNITED LABORATORIES SERVICE 342.48 UNITED STATES WELDING SERVICE 274.91 VEEDE~ROOTCOMPANY SERVICE 198.00 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SUPPLIES 1,537.54 WAGNER RENTS SERVICE 44.56 WEAR PARTS EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 3,144.25 WEBB CRANE INC SERVICE 523.76 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 7,261.04 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SERVICE 34.00 PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 20,389.75 102,047.03 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 2,925.00 MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 56,179.05 PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 3,563.03 UNITED STATES LIFE INS EMPLOYEE BENIFIT 4,384.90 67,051.98 ENHANCED E911 FUND CENTURYTEL SERVICE 181.58 JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC SERVICE 4,424.25 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES SERVICE 439.45 NASCO MODESTO SERVICE 34.23 20 09-03-2002 QWEST TOWN OF VAIL SERVICE SERVICE 29,477.93 142,820.00 177,377.44 REPORT TOTAL 4,549,611.03 This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: Consent Agenda Chairman Gallagher stated the first matter before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A) Approval of bill paying for the week of September 2,2002, subject to review by County Administrator B) Approval of payroll for September 5,2002, subject to review by County Administrator C) Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting for August 13,2002 D) First Amendment to the Subdivision and Off-Site Improvements Agreement for Cordillera, Filing 33 E) Escrow Agreement between Mountain High Aviation, LLC and Eagle County F) Agreement to renew Jail Medical Care and Health Services Agreement, (Mental Health Services) G) Resolution 2002-121, Re-establishing the rate of charge for Emergency Telephone Service H) Contract with M.A. Mortenson for replacement of bus wash flooring in Building D, Eagle County Regional Transportation Authority I) Facility Rental Agreement between the Glenwood Springs Parks and Recreation Department and the County of Eagle for Early Head Start Parent Orientation. Chairman Gallagher asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Brian Treu, Asst. County Attorney, stated item H will be pulled today and brought back after further review next week. Chairman Gallagher asked for comments from the Board. There were none. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, pulling item H, the contract with M.A. Mortenson. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Plat & Resolution Signing Cliff Simonton, Planner, presented the following plats and resolutions for the Board's consideration: Resolution 2002-122, to Approve a Special Use Permit for the Operation of a Food Service Receiving and Distribution Center Within the Beaver Creek Maintenance Center. (Eagle County File No. ZS-00092). The Board considered the Applicant's request on July 2nd, 2002. Commissioner Stone moved to approve Resolution 2002-122, to Approve a Special Use Permit for the Operation of a Food Service Receiving and Distribution Center Within the Beaver Creek Maintenance Center. 21 09-03-2002 Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Dedication Plat. Cordillera Valley Club West Entrance Ri~ht of Way Easement. This Dedication Plat is associated with the PUD Amendment for the Cordillera Valley Club West Entrance, Hillcrest Drive (File PDA-00016) approved by the Board in March of 1999, and is outlined in Resolution 01-108, "Adoption of the Unsigned Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Cordillera Valley Club Planed Unit Development" signed by the Board on September 4, 2001. Staff findings are as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a) Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Mr. Simonton stated no motion is required today, however, the Chairman must now sign the plat. Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as the Board of Equalization. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Appeal Hearing, Senior Property Tax Exemption Denials Chairman Gallagher stated the next matter on the agenda was an Appeal Hearing for the Senior Property Tax Exemption Denials. He stated they will hear these individually Brian Treu stated he understands that Ed Schorsch will be rescheduled next week as he is unable to be present today. Chairman Gallagher stated the first case is appeal #2002-002, Jerry Kokes, schedule number R027102. He stated the denial has to do with ownership of the property. J ody Caruthers, Eagle County Assessor, stated this property is shown to be transferred to Stephanie Billingsly in October 1996 and in 1999 it was transferred back to Jerry and Carol Kokes. She stated there is not a continuous ten years of ownership for Mr. Kokes as required by Statute. Chairman Gallagher asked if Mr. Kokes understands the reason for denial. Mr. Kokes spoke to his letter of August 19,2002 to the.Assessor, relating that Stephanie Billingsley is his daughter. He was previously diagnosed with a sickness that he thought was terminal. He therefore gave the title to his daughter and he went to Florida. He has since recovered and is in the process of refinancing his home so his daughter transferred it back to him. He spoke to Article 2, Sub- Title A, which reads, "title to the property can be held either by the qualifying senior together with his spouse, or by the qualifying senior together with other individuals." He suggested that means that he could have title with someone else. He stated this house was never been meant to be owned by someone else. He stated he has proofthat he never left that house and that it has been his primary residence since 1980. He showed the proof of occupancy, proof of his date of birth and of taxes paid. He showed his proof of income tax payment. He spoke to the date of filing and he has a receipt that shows that. Chairman Gallagher stated the only question is the ownership and occupancy. Mr. Kokes stated he has occupied the house since 1980 and gave it to his daughter only because 22 09-03-2002 he thought he was going to pass away. Chairman Gallagher asked how much money was received by him when he signed the title over to him. Mr. Kokes stated nothing. Chairman Gallagher asked how much money his daughter received from him when he recieved the title back. Mr. Kokes stated nothing. Commissioner Stone spoke to the form letter that was sent out to everyone and that it could be a little confusing. Mrs. Caruthers replied they are in the process of updating those letters so they are not confusing. Commissioner Stone suggested that since Mr. Kokes was not the owner of record continuously for the past ten years, do the Commissioners have the ability, after listening to evidence, decide a taxpayer has been the owner for the past ten years. Brian Treu stated the law does make two exceptions, one being a Trust, the other is a Partnership. Commissioner Stone stated what he believes right now to be the case, there are exemptions, but unfortunately, in his opinion, Mr. Kokes does not qualify for that. Mr. Kokes spoke to the sharing of ownership. Commissioner Stone stated it sounds as though the deed needs to be with someone else and that was not the case as the deed was turned over to his daughter. Mr. Kokes stated it is not very clear and has not been explained that the qualifying of senior citizen has to be owner of record. He stated it doesn't say what record. He stated there was no transfer of funds, so there is no record. Commissioner Stone suggested that this will in fact get passed on to the State and though County Government is an arm of the state, they have to follow the rules of the State. Commissioner Menconi suggested if they were to find in favor of Mr. Kokes and let the State determine what happens is that a possible action they can take. Mrs. Caruthers stated since this is the first year, she does not know what process the State will follow. She stated there is a requirement for the individual to pay back any monies refunded. Commissioner Menconi asked if there is an appeal process. Mrs. Caruthers stated there is not, either for herself or for the taxpayer. She reiterated that Mr. Kokes may be required to pay back any taxes plus interest. Mr. Treu stated it is difficult to relate what the State will say. He stated the liability to the County is that the State will not pay that percentage ofthe tax. The liability to Mr. Kokes is that the State will ask for additional taxes plus interest. Commissioner Menconi suggested if they do in fact find in favor of Mr. Kokes today, the State may in fact require repayment of the taxes down the road. Mr. Kokes suggested the law for eligibility is not very clear either for the Commissioners or for the tax payer. He suggested it is not clear what is a matter of record. Commissioner Menconi stated the deed of record will be the document they rely on. He stated it sounds like they agree with the problem. He feels that the best thing to do will be to deny this as the State is going to do that in the future. Mr. Kokes stated the eligibility is purely an assumption that the record has to be filed with the County. He stated he has no recourse. Commissioner Menconi stated because this is a new law, there is nothing they can look back at and it would be a hope that the State doesn't catch this. He suggested it is a possible action, but he does not see it as a responsible action. Chairman Gallagher spoke to a quit claim deed from Stephanie Billingsley to Gerry Kokes. He stated that the bar code indicates that it is recorded and shows that on that date Mr. Kokes bought the property and that prior to that date Stephanie Billingsley owned it. He suggested they give this a year 23 09-03-2002 and perhaps by next year there will be some case law. Commissioner Stone moved the County Board of Equalization uphold the Notice for Termination and deny the appeal by Mr. Kokes. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Mrs. Caruthers did make a recommendation to Mr. Kokes and others to contact his State Representatives. Mrs. Caruthers spoke to file SE-2002-003, Tom Steinberg. She stated their records show that Dr. Steinberg has owned this property for 10 years but rented the property for a period oftime. Dr. Steinberg stated he built and has resided in this house since 1967. He stated he did build an employee housing apartment which he has since rented. He stated he is required to file personal property filings for the rental unit. Chairman Gallagher asked if the request for exemption is for the portion Mr. Steinberg resides m. Mr. Steinberg answered yes. Commissioner Stone asked if there is a way to exempt that property which is the primary residence then the exemption should be granted. Commissioner Menconi moved to overturn the denial for schedule number R010150, Tom Steinberg, for that portion of the home that is the primary residence. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion, clarifying that it would not be for the portion of the home used as a rental. The vote was declared unanimous. Mrs. Cartuthers spoke to file SE-2002-005, Dick Gustafson. She stated this file is the same as Dr. Steinberg's. Mr. Gustafson stated he does have a letter certified by the County Clerk and Recorder stating that he has been a resident and registered voter at this residence since 1976. He stated they did rent a room to as a B & B and as required by law, he did file a personal property tax on that room. Chairman Gallagher asked how long the rental was for. Mr. Gustafson stated it was for a period ofthree years and it ended in 1996. Commissioner Stone spoke to the what ifs and if the exemption is given for the entire property. Mrs. Caruthers stated she would give the exemption for the entire property. Commissioner Stone moved that the County Board of Equalization grant the appeal for file number SE-2002-005, Dick Gustafson, based on testimony at the hearing. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Gallagher asked about Joseph Darlak and Derrald Newman and ifthey received notice. Commissioner Stone suggested they continue files, R020526, Ed Schorsch, R022185, Joseph Dar1ak, and R029233, Derra1d Newman and that they make contact with these individuals providing them notice of the rescheduled meeting. Commissioner Menconi moved to table file numbers R020526, Ed Schorsch and R029233, Derrald Newman. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Board of Equalization and reconvene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 24 09-03-2002 Resolution 2002-123, Property Tax Increase Brian Treu stated the next matter on the agenda was the hearing on and adoption of Resolution 2002-123, providing for the submission to the registered qualified electors of Eagle County, Colorado, a question to authorize a property tax increase of up to 1.5 mills, said question to the submitted at the election to be held November 5, 2002 providing the form of ballot question for certification ofthe election question to the County Clerk & Recorder. He stated they did make one change to the Resolution adding the work annually. Chairman Gallagher asked to see the new copies. He asked where the word annually goes. Mr. Treu stated it would be after the $7,000,000. He read the ballot question as follows: "Shall Eagle County taxes be increased in 2003 up to a maximum amount of $2,989,525 and annually thereafter up to a maximum amount of $7,000,000 annually through 2025, such taxes to consist of an advalorem tax mill levy imposed on all taxable property of the County at a rate not in excess of 1.5 mills, to be used for the purpose of acquiring, maintaining, or permanently preserving open space in Eagle County such as: preserving wildlife habitat, protecting working farms and ranches, conserving scenic landscapes and vistas, protecting wetlands and flood plains, providing public access points to rivers and streams, and servicing future voter approved debt for the above stated purpose; and shall all revenue expenditures be made by the Board of County Commissioners after considering the recommendations of a citizens advisory committee; and in connection therewith, as a voter approved revenue change, shall the proceeds of such taxes and investment income thereon be collected and spent by the County in 2003 and in each year thereafter, without regard to any spending, revenue raising or other limitation contained within Article X, Section 20 ofthe Colorado Constitution, or any other law as it currently exists or as it may be amended in the future and without limiting in any year the amount of other revenues that may be collected and spent by the County?" Chairman Gallagher asked for public comment. Dianna Sicala, a resident of Edwards and coordinator of the Open Space Initiative, stated their recent survey has indicated a 60% approval and they strongly feel this is in the interest of the public and she thanked the Commissioners for helping to bring it forward. Richard Kestler, citizen of Eagle County, asked if the right of condemnation is tied to this ballot question. Chairman Gallagher suggested the Board has limited rights of condemnation Tom Steinberg thanked the Board for coordinating his two items today. He encouraged the Board to pass this Resolution today. Chairman Gallagher asked if there was further comment. There was none. He spoke to a letter received today from the Town of Vail. He asked Commissioner Stone to read the letter into the record. Commissioner Stone read as follows: "Dear Commissioner Gallagher, it is my understanding that the Commissioners will be acting on the open space resolution later today and I wanted to take this opportunity to comment on the proposed ballot initiative prior to the discussions. Although the Vail Town Council has not taken a formal position on this matter at this time, I have discussed this issue with them. I wanted to pass on their concerns about this proposition to you. The Town of Vail is a huge proponent and supporter of open space. Over the past 20 years the Town of Vail has purchased over 1,300 acres of open space. As you are aware the Vail Town Council had the wisdom, foresight, and political courage in the 1980's to implement a mechanism to fund the acquisition of open space via a real estate transfer tax. It is our belief that a County wide assessment to purchase open space is inherently unfair to those communities that have purchased open space previously. My suggestion is that the Town of Vail be exempted from this tax. In other words the taxing boundaries would terminate at the Western boundary of the Town of Vail. If this is not possible it is out desire to seek reimbursement for some of the previous purchases that we have made in order to make sure the tax is equitably assessed. Another one of our concerns is the 25 09-03-2002 lack of a plan to fund this money. We have not been briefed on this issue and do not understand what land will be purchased and how it will be maintained. Finally the Town of Vail, in order to fund the basic services required to support the Resort is moving forward with a 4 mill levy property tax increase on the taxpayers in the Town of Vail. I believe that Vail taxpayers should not be subjected to an additional 1.5 mills on top of the requested 4 mill increase within the Town. The importance ofthis election to the Town's financial health cannot be over stated. We are concerned that additional ballot issues will have a negative impact on the Town of Vail's initiative and therefore our ability to continue to fund services to support our economic engine. Thank you for your consideration of our comments. I understand there are many sides and perspectives to this issue, however please take our concerns into account when making you decisions. Sincerely, Town of Vail, Robert W. McCloren, Town Manager." Chairman Gallagher asked for comments from the Board. There were none. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve Resolution 2002-123, providing for the submission to the registered qualified electors of Eagle County, Colorado, a question to authorize a property tax increase of up to 1.5 mills, said question to the submitted at the election to be held November 5, 2002 providing the form of ballot question for certification of the election question to the County Clerk & Recorder. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. In discussion, Commissioner Stone asked Mr. Treu if they are able to exempt any body. Mr. Treu stated the way the question is written they are unable to exempt any body. Chairman Gallagher suggested had they created a district they could in fact put up boundaries but under County taxation processes they are unable to do so. Commissioner Stone stated they did speak with the Town of Vail and understood their position. The citizens group, understanding this, determined that they would not look at this as forming a district, but move forward with the tax question. He spoke to the request to receive reimbursement for some of the monies that have already been spent. He suggested he understands that would not be the intention of the ballot initiative though it does allow for recommendations to be made by the citizens board. He stated he is concerned, but this is always something that the citizens group understands that there will be competing tax increases on the ballot. He stated he has heard some concerns that over in the Roaring Fork Valley there is concern that this may be a competing vote. He suggested there is education that needs to go on, specifically with the Town of Vail and in the Roaring Fork Valley. He stated he hopes they can inform the voters to make judicious decisions. Commissioner Menconi stated this weekend he was able to be back in Chicago and was able to see what they have done right and what they have done wrong. He stated the park system in Chicago is the largest in the Country and he hopes that the ballot issue will pass and will create a future for environmental health and for Eagle County. Chairman Gallagher asked if there is anything in the ballot question that precludes them from buying open space in the Town of Vail that can be improved upon. Dr. Steinberg stated he did go before the Town of Vail Council and suggested that one of the alternatives for them to transfer from their real estate transfer tax, the same amount of money out of the budget each year as the mill levy will create. They could put this money into their general fund. Chairman Gallagher called for the question on the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 1041 Permit Application, Frost Creek & Salt Creek pun Ross Easterling, Planner, presented a 1041 Permit application and completeness hearing for a major extension of an existing water system; the construction of major new sewer treatment systems and the efficient utilization of the municipal water projects to serve the proposed Frost Creek and Salt Creek PUD, located approximately 6 miles South of Eagle. The action that will be requested from the Board on September 3, 2002 is to determine 26 09-03-2002 completeness of a 1041 Permit application and to estimate associated processing fees. Adams Rib has submitted a 1041 Permit application for the construction of major new wastewater treatment systems in addition to a major extension of the Town of Eagle's existing water system as well as efficient utilization of both municipal water systems to serve the Frost Creek Development. Staff has reviewed the above referenced application and has found it to be complete. We have tentatively scheduled the hearings for the Planning Commission and Permit Authority on October 16, 2002 and December 3,2002, respectively. Estimated fees for the above referenced 1041 Permit application are as follows: Community Development Staff 15 Hrs @ $55.00 = $ 825.00 Administration Staff 8 Hrs @ $55.00 = $ 440.00 Engineering Staff 10 Hrs @ $55.00 = $ 550.00 Miscellaneous 6 Hrs @ $55.00 = $ 330.00 TOTAL = $2,145.00 Mr. Easterling stated all elements for the application have been submitted, but they are not making a recommendation the application will be approved. Commissioner Stone moved the Board accept the application submitted by Adam's Rib for site selection and construction of major new domestic water and sewage treatment systems; the major extension of a domestic water treatment system and the efficient utilization of the municipal water projects as complete. The estimated fee to process this application is $2,145.00 and may be altered to cover the actual cost of review and public hearings. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Stone moved the Board approve the applicant's request for waiver of the special use permit requirement as allowed in Section 3-310 (I) 2, of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Liquor License Consent Agenda Earlene Roach, Liquor Inspector, presented the Liquor License Consent Agenda for September 3, 2002, as follows: A) Big Sky Restaurant Company LLC Beaver Creek Chophouse This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant liquor license. This establishment is located at 20 Avondale Ln in Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. B) Vista Hospitality Ine Splendido at the Chateau This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant liquor license. This establishment is located at 17 Chateau Ln in Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. 27 09-03-2002 C) Kotobuki Inc Sushi Ya Go Go This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant liquor license. This establishment is located at 60 EI Iebel Rd #103 in E1 Iebel. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. D) Swiss Stubli LLC Swiss Stubli Authentic Swiss Restaurant This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant liquor license. This establishment is located at 76 Avondale Ln in Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. E) MRT Wines Inc Beaver Creek Fine Wines This is a renewal of a retail liquor store license. This establishment is located at 210 Offerson Rd in Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. F) Feather Petroleum Company Stop N Save No 18 This is a renewal of a 3.2 % beer retail liquor license. This establishment is located at 47 Edwards Village Blvd in Edwards. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. G) Beaver Creek Food Services The Inn at Beaver Creek This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license. This establishment is located at 40 Elk Track Rd in Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. H) Vail Food Services Inc Eagle's Nest This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license with optional premises. This establishment is located on Vail Mountain in Vail. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. I) Vail Food Services Inc Mid Vail Restaurant This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant liquor license with optional premises. This establishment is located on Vail Mountain in Vail. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. J) Terrance S Marcum Shop & Hop #3 This is a renewal of a 3.2% beer retail liquor license. This establishment is located at 15 Eagle Vail Rd in Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the pa~t year. Ms. Roach stated there have been no complaints or disturbances in the last year at any of these premIses. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the Consent Agenda for September 3,2002, as presented. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Eagle County Government Chairman Gallagher asked about the Mexican Rodeo which is to follow the weekend after this next file. 28 09-03-2002 Ms. Roach explained the applicant is not a non-profit organization and has chosen not to follow through with the request. Earlene Roach presented a special events permit application for Eagle County Government for September 13, 2002 from 6:00 p.m. to 11 :00 p.m., September 14, 2002 from noon to 11 :00 p.m. and September 15, 2002 from noon to 5 :00 p.m. She stated this is for the CPRA which is a first time event for Eagle County. Dick Kesler and Rusty Williams, applicants, are present for the hearing. Mr. Kesler explained they will be serving beer and County Coolers as they did at the fair. There will be no hard liquor. He handed out a map ofthe facility. He stated that all employees are TIPS trained and Ms. Roach will be supervising this event. Commissioner Stone asked about service at the golftournament. Mr. Kesler stated they will not be serving at that event. Commissioner Menconi asked ifthe Colorado Pro Rodeo Association is the only sanctioned group for Pro Rodeo Riders in Colorado. Mr. Kesler stated that is correct for Colorado. He stated nation wide it is the Professional Rodeo Association. Commissioner Stone moved to approve a special events permit for Eagle County Government for September 13, 2002 from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., September 14, 2002 from noon to 11:00 p.m. and September 15,2002 from noon to 5:00 p.m. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority and reconvene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Resolution 2002-124, Sediment Control Action Plan George Roussos, Asst. County Administrator, presented Resolution 2002-124, expressing Eagle County's support for the implementation of the sediment control action plan developed by the Colorado Department of Transportation for Black Gore Creek and requesting the creek be added to the 303(d) list of the Clean Water Act. He stated it is a reiteration of what they have previously discussed and allows the stream to be added to the list which will enhance their opportunities for funding. He stated it will also is parallel action with CDOT to get the project moving along and finally to request funding over and above the State of Colorado's allocation. He requested the Board approve the Resolution. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve Resolution 2002-124, expressing Eagle County's support for the implementation of the sediment control action plan developed by the Colorado Department of Transportation for Black Gore Creek and requesting the creek be added to the 303( d) list ofthe Clean Water Act. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDA-00038, Homestead, Filings 1, 2 & 3 J ena Skinner, Planner, presented file number PD A -00038, Homestead, Filings 1, 2 and 3. She stated the applicant wishes to amend the Homestead PUD (filings 1,2 and 3) to allow wireless internet as a "use by right," pending approval from the Homestead Design and Review Committee. Currently, the Eagle County Land Use Regulations recognizes this use, however, the Homestead PUD (written prior to the existence of wireless internet), does not. The PUD must be amended to incorporate this use into the PUD. Netbeam, Inc., a wireless internet provider, currently has tentative approval from the Homestead Design Review Committee (DRC) to construct the small tower antenna 10-15 ft in height, next to the Eagle 29 09-03-2002 River and Sand District water tank (Tract I, Homestead, Filing 2), pending the outcome of the amendment. The tower antenna will provide internet service to approximately 90% of homeowners in the Homestead area. The residents may then install a small antenna on their home which receives the signal from the tower antenna. The chronology ofthe application is as shown on staffreport and as follows: 1981: Homestead existed as part of Edwards Village. 1984: The residential area of Edwards Village was changed into Homestead PUD. 1996: The Homestead PUD was last amended. The Planning Commission had no issue with the proposed amendment. They unanimously recommended approval of this proposal. Referrals were sent to the following: Eagle County Attorney, Engineering, Environmental Health, and Sheriff CenturyTel, Holy Cross Electric, Fire District, Metro District (Edwards) South Forty, Lake Creek and Homestead Homeowners' Associations No referral responses were received. Staff findings are as follows and as shown on staff report: Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F.3.e Standards for the review of a Sketch and Preliminary plan for PUD: STANDARD: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] - The title to all land that is part of a PUD shall be owned or controlled by one (1) person. A person shall be considered to control all lands in the PUD either through ownership or by written consent of all owners of the land that they will be subject to the conditions and standards of the PUD. The Applicant has demonstrated that the entire site is represented by the Homestead Homeowners Association. [+] FINDING: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] The title to all land that is part of this PUD IS owned or controlled by multiple persons, however, IS represented by one (1) entity. STANDARD: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] - The uses that may be developed in the PUD shall be those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule", or Table 3-320, "Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule",for the zone district designation in effectfor the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these use designations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3f, Variations Authorized. The proposed use is currently defined as Telecommunications Facility within the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. Currently, this use is allowed by Special Use in the County's standard zone districts. Wireless Internet did not exist as part ofthe initial Preliminary Plans for Homestead. The 'use' of wireless internet is more accurately described as a Low Power Wireless Communication Facility. If approved, the 'use' of low power wireless communication equipment shall be incorporated as a use by right in the Homestead PUD. Wireless internet is comparable to a television satellite in its overall visual impact. [+] FINDING: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] The uses that may be developed in the PUD ARE uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule" for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. STANDARD: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] - The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD shall be those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for the zone district designation in effectfor the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these dimensional limitations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3f, Variations 30 09-03-2002 Authorized. provided variations shall leave adequate distance between buildings for necessary access and fire protection, and ensure proper ventilation, light, air and snowmelt between buildings. [+] FINDING: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD ARE those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. ST ANDARD: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] - Off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. A reduction in these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that: (a) Shared Parking. Because of shared parking arrangements among uses within the PUD that do not require peak parkingfor those uses to occur at the same time, the parking needs of residents, guests and employees of the project will be met; or (b) Actual Needs. The actual needs of the project's residents, guests and employees will be less than those set by Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. The applicant may commit to provide specialized transportation services for these persons (such as vans, subsidized bus passes, or similar services) as a means of complying with this standard. Parking requirements shall remain the same. [+] FINDING: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] It HAS been demonstrated that off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD complies with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards, without a necessity for a reduction in the standards. STANDARD: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] - Landscaping provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaoing and Illumination Standards. Variations from these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that the proposed landscaping provides sufficient buffering of uses from each other (both within the PUD and between the PUD and surrounding uses) to minimize noise, glare and other adverse impacts, creates attractive streetscapes and parking areas and is consistent with the character of the area. Landscaping requirements shall remain the same. [+] FINDING: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] It HAS previously been demonstrated that landscaping provided in the PUD can comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards. STANDARD: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (6)] - The sign standards applicable to the PUD shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations. unless, as provided in Section 4-340 D., Signs Allowed in a Planned Unit Develooment (PUD), the applicant submits a comprehensive sign plan for the PUD that is determined to be suitable for the PUD and provides the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to and within the PUD. Signage requirements shall remain the same. [+] FINDING: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e(6)] The sign standards applicable to the PUD ARE NOT as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations. However, the current the Arrowhead at Vail PUD has a comprehensive sign plan, as provided in Section 4- 340 D., Signs Allowed in a Planned Unit Development (PUD), that IS suitable for the PUD and provides the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to and within the PUD. STANDARD: AdequateFacilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] - The applicant shall demonstrate that the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. All applicable services for the proposed use are existing and available. 31 09-03-2002 [+] FINDING: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] The Applicant HAS clearly demonstrated that the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for sewage disposal, electrical supply, and roads; the applicant HAS clearly demonstrated that the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for pUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable water, solid waste disposal and fire protection. In addition, the Applicant HAS demonstrated that the proposed PUD will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. STANDARD: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] - The improvements standards applicable to the development shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards. Provided, however, the development may deviate from the County's road standards, so the development achieves greater efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts, when the following minimum design principles are followed: (a) Safe, Efficient Access. The circulation system is designed to provide safe, convenient access to all areas of the proposed development using the minimum practical roadway length. Access shall be by a public right-of-way, private vehicular or pedestrian way or a commonly owned easement. No roadway alignment, either horizontal or vertical, shall be allowed that compromises one (1) or more of the minimum design standards of the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) for that functional classification of roadway. (b) Internal Pathways. Internal pathways shall be provided to form a logical, safe and convenient system for pedestrian access to dwelling units and common areas, with appropriate linkages off-site. (c) Emergency Vehicles. Roadways shall be designed to permit access by emergency vehicles to all lots or units. An access easement shall be granted for emergency vehicles and utility vehicles, as applicable, to use private roadways in the development for the purpose of providing emergency services and for installation, maintenance and repair of utilities. (d) Principal Access Points. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to provide for smooth traffic flow, minimizing hazards to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. Where a PUD abuts a major collector, arterial road or highway, direct access to such road or highway from individual lots, units or buildings shall not be permitted. Minor roads within the PUD shall not be directly connected with roads outside of the PUD, unless the County determines such connections are necessary to maintain the County's road network. (e) Snow Storage. Adequate areas shall be provided to store snow removed from the internal street network and from off-street parking areas. No new improvements are proposed, as the primary site is located on a previously improved lot. [+] FINDING: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] AS CONDITIONED It HAS been clearly demonstrated that the improvements standards applicable to the development will be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards regarding: (a) Safe, Efficient Access. (b) Internal Pathways. (c) Emergency Vehic1es (d) Principal Access Points. ( e) Snow Storage. STANDARD: Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] - The development proposed for the PUD shall be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. As Homestead is an existing PUD, this finding has previously been made. [+] FINDING: Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] The development proposed for the pUD IS compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. STANDARD: Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] - The PUD shall be 32 09-03-2002 consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The consideration of the relevant master plans during sketch plan review is on a broad conceptual level, i. e, how a proposal compares to basic planning principles. As a development proposal moves from sketch plan to preliminary plan review, its conformance or lack thereof to aspects of the master plans may not necessarily remain static.. As Homestead is an existing PUD development, all Master Plan considerations have been resolved. The new use is not contemplated in any of Eagle County's master/sub-area plans. STANDARD: Phasing [Section 5-240.F.3.e (11)] - The Preliminary Planfor PUD shall include a phasing plan for the development. If development of the PUD is proposed to occur in phases, then guarantees shall be provided for public improvements and amenities that are necessary and desirable for residents of the project, or that are of benefit to the entire County. Such public improvements shall be constructed with the first phase of the project, or, if this is not possible, then as early in the project as is reasonable. Not applicable / necessary, as is no new development is proposed with this amendment. [+] FINDING: Phasing Section 5-240.F.3.e (11) A phasing plan IS NOT necessary for this application. STANDARD: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] - The PUD shall comply with the follOWing common recreation and open space standards. (a) Minimum Area. It is recommended that a minimum of 25% of the total PUD area shall be devoted to open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi-public. In addition, the PUD shall provide a minimum often (10) acres of common recreation and usable open space landsfor every one thousand (1,000) persons who are residents of the PUD. In order to calculate the number ofresidents of the PUD, the number of proposed dwelling units shall be multiplied by two and sixty-three hundredths (2.63), which is the average number of persons that occupy each dwelling unit in Eagle County, as determined in the Eagle County Master Plan. (1) Areas that Do Not Count as Open Space. Parking and loading areas, street right-ol-ways, and areas with slopes greater than thirty (30) percent shall not count toward usable open space. (2) Areas that Count as Open Space. Water bodies, lands within critical wildlife habitat areas, riparian areas, and one hundred (100) year flood plains, as defined in these Land Use Regulations, that are preserved as open space shall count towards this minimum standard, even when they are not usable by or accessible to the residents of the PUD. All other open space lands shall be conveniently accessible from all occupied structures within the PUD. (3) Improvements Required. All common open space and recreational facilities shall be shown on the Preliminary Plan for PUD and shall be constructed and fully improved according to the development schedule established for each development phase of the PUD. (4) Continuing Use and Maintenance. All privately owned common open space shall continue to conform to its intended use, as specified on the Preliminary Plan for PUD. To ensure that all the common open space identified in the PUD will be used as common open space, restrictions and/or covenants shall be placed in each deed to ensure their maintenance and to prohibit the division of any common open space. (5) Organization. If common open space is proposed to be maintained through an association or nonprofit corporation, such organization shall manage all common open space and recreational and culturalfacilities that are not dedicated to the public, and shall providefor the maintenance, administration and operation of such land and any other land within the PUD not publicly owned, and secure adequate liability insurance on the land. The association or nonprofit corporation shall be established prior to the sale of any lots or units within the PUD. Membership in the association or nonprofit corporation shall be mandatory for all landowners within the PUD. No new land development is proposed with this application. [+] FINDING: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] 33 09-03-2002 The PUD HAS demonstrated that the proposed development will comply with the common recreation and open space standards with respect to: (a) Minimum area; (b) Improvements required; (c) Continuing use and maintenance; or (d) Organization. STANDARD: NaturalResourceProtection. [Section5-240.F.3.e (13)] - ThePUDshall consider the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards. The Preliminary Plan has addressed this section previously. No new land development is proposed with this application. [+] FINDING: Natural Resource Protection. [ Section 5-240.F.3.e (13)] The PUD DOES demonstrate that the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents available at the time the application was submitted, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards, have been considered. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-280.B.3.e. Standards for the review of both a Sketch Plan, and Preliminary Plan for Subdivision: STANDARD: Consistent with Master Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (1)] - The proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the FLUM of the Master Plan. See discussion above, "Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] [+] FINDING: Consistent with Master Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (1)] The PUD IS consistent with the Master Plan, and it IS consistent with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). STANDARD: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)] - The proposed subdivision shall comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts. and Article 4, Site Development Standards. Article 4, Site Development Standards [ +] Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1) [ +] Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2) [+] Sign Regulations (Division 4-3) [+] Natural Resource Protection Standards (Division 4-4) [+] Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410) - [+] Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420) - [+] Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430) - [+] Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) [+] Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450) [ +] Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460) [ +] Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5) [+] Improvement Standards (Division 4-6) [ +] Roadway Standards (Section 4-620) [ +] Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630) [ +] Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640) [+] Drainage Standards (Section 4-650) [ +] Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660) [ +] Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670) [+] Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680) [+] Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690) 34 09-03-2002 [+] Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7)- Not applicable. All findings under this standard are either favorable or do not apply to this project. [+] FINDING: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)] The Applicant HAS fully demonstrated that the proposed subdivision complies with all of the standards ofthis Section and all other provisions ofthese Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards. STANDARD: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)] - The proposed subdivision shall be located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (a) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road extensions shall be consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital Imorovements Plan. (b) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (c) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area. This proposal will not cause inefficiencies, nor will it be a leapfrog pattern of development, as Homestead is an existing development, and is not expanding as a result of this application. [+] FINDING: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)] The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. ST ANDARD: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)] - The property proposed to be subdivided shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. All suitability issues have been address at Preliminary Plan, and/or during the Building Permit process. [+] FINDING: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)] The property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development ofthe property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. STANDARD: Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)] - The proposed subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. See previous discussion. [+] FINDING: Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)] The proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and SHALL NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F.3.a.(3) Preliminary Plan for PUD Application Contents: Applicant shall submit the following: "Proposed PUD guide setting forth the proposed land use restrictions and standards of development." An amended Planned Unit Development Guide is provided as part ofthe application which appears to be sufficient. [+] FINDING: Preliminary Plan for PUD Application contents [Section 5-240.F.3.a.(3)] Applicant HAS submitted a PUD guide that demonstrates that the requirements ofthis Section HAVE been fully met. 35 09-03-2002 PDA-00038:PUD AMENDMENTS DISCUSSION The proposed changes to the PUD guide are minor in nature, and have no significant issues surrounding them. The proposed changes are as follows: Add a new Section in each of the filings (Section 14 in Filing 1, Section 12 in Filing 2, and Section14 in Filing 3) addressing the permitted use of Low Power Wireless Communications Equipment. This addition to the PUD Guide is necessary as the primary relay antenna for low power wireless use (wireless internet), will be able to serve approximately 90% of Homestead residents. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F. 3.m Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD: STANDARD: Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD [Section 5-240.F.3.m.] - No substantial modification, removal, or release of the provisions of the plan shall be permitted except upon afinding by the County. . . that (1) the modification, removal, or release is consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire Planned Unit Development, (2) does not affect in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the planned unit development or the public interest, and (3) is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person. The addition of the use Low Power Wireless Communications Equipment, will not create a discernible difference in the nature of the development. Consequently, the proposed amendment is consistent with the existing PUD, will not adversely affect nearby property owners (through DRC controls), and would not be granted solely to confer a special benefit on anyone individual or property owner. [ +] FIND IN G: Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD The proposed PUD Amendment (1) IS consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire Planned Unit Development, (2) DOES NOT affect in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment ofland abutting upon or across a street from the planned unit development or the public interest, and (3) IS NOT granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person. Gregory Freedman, Chairman of Net Ware, was present for the hearing. Chairman Gallagher asked why they regulate antennas, because they are ugly or because of their visual impact. Ms. Skinner explained the regulation is in place because ofthe power requirements. Chairman Gallagher asked why they control this if they are not controlling certain antennas if it is other than the visual impact. Ms. Skinner stated all telecommunications are regulated by the FCC. Mr. Freedman stated the comsumer antenna they install falls under the same regulation. Chairman Gallagher asked what the criteria is for the regulation of this type of antenna compared to another type of antenna. Commissioner Stone spoke to previous discussion. He stated the real issue is the power antenna, not the receiver. Where they don't comply is with the antenna where they send out the signal. He stated those are typically reviewed by County Government, such as a radio station. He spoke to the potential for visual impacts and thinks it makes sense for the Board to have review ofthose. He stated his interest would be to try to keep up with technology and suggested they mayor may not choose to amend the Land Use Regulations. Mr. Freedman stated Summit County has carved them out as a separate use. Chairman Gallagher concluded there seems to him to be no other reason other than the visual impact. Bob Narracci, Planning Manager, stated for the low power telecommunications it is simply the esthetics. For high power, there may be health impacts. Commissioner Menconi move that the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners approve File No. PDA-00038, incorporating all Staff findings. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 36 09-03-2002 ZS-OOlOl, Crawford Commercial Building Bob N arracci, Planning Manager, presented file number ZS-OO 1 01, Crawford Commercial Building. He stated the Applicant is requesting approval of this Special Use to allow the construction of a new building within the Commercial Limited Zone District located on their property. The new building will contain three businesses which are currently located in existing structures on the subject property. Pending approval of this application, these existing structures will be removed and replaced with a single new building inclusive of ancillary parking, drainage and access. The commercial uses proposed for the new building are uses-by-right in the Commercial Limited zone district, however, because the site is unplatted Special Use review and approval is required. The applicant is also requesting, through this Special Use, the ability to locate two I-bedroom apartments within the anticipated new building. Dwelling Units are allowed via Special Use review and approval in the Commercial Limited zone district. The chronology ofthe application is as shown on staff report and as follows: The subject property was rezoned from Resource and Residential Suburban Medium C Density to Commercial Limited on September 2, 1975. No other documented activity, with the exception of building permits, has occurred on the site. The existing metal structures to be removed were originally constructed in 1974 and 1979 respectively. The Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of this application with four additional recommended conditions of approval: 1. South entrance be restricted to a right turn in, and a right turn out; 2. This recommendation has been incorporated as a condition of approval number 3. 3. Restrict access on the east side of the subject site to one access point with two lanes; 4. This applicant has satisfied the Eagle County Engineering Department with regard to this recommendation. 5. Plans to be finalized with Engineering Staff; 6. This condition has been incorporated as condition number 2. 7. Revisit the Special Use when Blue Ridge Road plans are finalized. Staff recommends that this condition be rephrased so as to not necessitate an entire Special Use process. Rather, the applicant should be required to submit a revised site plan to the Eagle County Engineering Department which demonstrates how access to the trash dumpsters, parking areas and access drive can be reconfigured to conform with the County's regulations at the time that Blue Ridge Road is constructed. This recommendation as revised by Staff has been incorporated as condition of approval number 4. Referral responses are as shown on staff report and as follows: Eagle County Attorney's Office - Responded with 'No Comment'. Eagle County Engineering - Please reference the attached memorandum dated August 27,2002. Town of Basalt - The Town's response indicates full endorsement ofthis proposed Special Use. Additional Referrals were sent to the following, with no response received: Eagle County Department of Environmental Health, Eagle County Assessor, Eagle County Sheriff's Office, US West/PTI, Excel EnergylKN Energy, Holy Cross Electric and the Basalt & Rural Fire Protection District. Staff findings are as follows and as shown on staff report: Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-250.B Standards for the review of a Special Use Permit: ST ANDARD: Section 5-250.B.l Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed Special Use shall be appropriate for its proposed location and be consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the Master Plan and the FLUM of the Master Plan, including standards for building and structural 37 09-03-2002 intensities and densities, and intensities of use. EAGLE COUNTY MASTER PLAN Environmental Open Space! Development Affordable Transportation COl11ll1unity FLUM Quality Recreation Housing Services Conformance X X X X Non Conformance Mixed Conformance Not X X X Applicable The subj ect site is already zoned Commercial Limited and all of the proposed commercial uses are defined as uses-by-right in this zone district. The Eagle County Land Use Regulation contemplates that Dwelling Units are also acceptable uses in the Commercial Limited zone district subject to Special Use review and approval. This Special Use proposal to improve existing commercial development, inclusive of a residential element, in the Roaring Fork Valley satisfies many of the applicable Guiding Policies regarding Environmental Quality, Development, Affordable Housing set forth in the Eagle County Master Plan. The proposed use is also consistent with the Community Center designation ofthe Future Land Use Map. MID V ALLEY COMMUNITY PLAN Housing Transportation Community Open Space! EI Jebell Lower Ruedi Missouri Facilities Environment Basalt Frving Pan Reservoir Heights Conformance X X Non Conformance Mixed Conformance Not X X X X X X Applicable Two additional affordable dwelling units will contribute positively to the current shortage of affordable housing units in the Roaring Fork Valley. The Mid Valley Community Plan designates the subj ect property as 'Service Center'. Indeed, the proposal is to continue to provide improved services to the residents ofthe Roaring Fork Valley. [+] FINDING: Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed Special Use Permit IS appropriate for its proposed location and IS consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies ofthe Master Plan and Master Plan FLUM. STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.2 Compatibility. The proposed Special Use shall be appropriate for its proposed location and compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. The subject site is already zoned Commercial Limited and all of the proposed commercial uses are defined as uses-by-right in this zone district. The Eagle County Land Use Regulation contemplates that Dwelling Units are also acceptable uses in the Commercial Limited zone district subject to Special Use review and approval. The site has been utilized commercially since 1974 and is located on an arterial intersection with State Highway 82. Existing uses located in the immediate vicinity ofthe subject site stand to benefit from the approval ofthis Special Use application because, several older structures will be removed 38 09-03-2002 and replaced with a modem, more aesthetically pleasing facility, parking, landscaping, drainage and access improvements. As such, this proposed Special Use will increase compatibility with existing and allowed adjacent land uses. It is not anticipated that the proposal will in any way compromise this vicinity of Eagle County. [+] FINDING: Compatibility. The proposed Special Use IS appropriate for its proposed location and IS compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.3 Zone District Standards. The proposed Special Use shall comply with the standards of the zone district in which it is located and any standards applicable to the particular use, as identified in Section 3-310, Review Standards Avvlicable to Particular Residential. Agricultural and Resource Uses and Section 3-330, Review Standards Avplicable to Particular Commercial and Industrial Uses. The proposed Special Use does comply with all applicable standards as set forth in Section 3-330 of the Land Use Regulations. [+] FINDING: Zone District Standards. The proposed Special Use DOES fully comply with the standards of the zone district in which it is located and the standards applicable to the particular use, as identified in Section 3-330, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Commercial and Industrial Uses ST ANDARD: Section 5-250.B.4 Design Minimizes Adverse Impact The design of the proposed Special Use shall minimize adverse impacts, including visual impact of the proposed use on adjacent lands; furthermore, the proposed Special Use shall avoid significant adverse impact on surrounding lands regarding trash, traffic, service delivery, parking and loading, odors, noise, glare, and vibration, and shall not create a nuisance. This proposed Special Use will allow the subject property to be improved from its current state and which improvements will include correction of a number of existing adverse impacts such as access, drainage and visual impacts. [+] FINDING: Design Minimizes Adverse Impact. The design of the proposed Special Use DOES adequately minimize adverse impacts, including visual impact of the proposed use on adjacent lands; furthermore, the proposed Special Use WILL avoid significant adverse impact on surrounding lands regarding trash, service delivery, parking and loading, odors, glare, vibration, noise and traffic, and WILL NOT create a nuisance. STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.5 Design Minimizes Environmental Impact. The proposed Special Use shall minimize environmental impacts and shall not cause significant deterioration of water and air resources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources, and other natural resources. The proposed Special Use will allow the subject property to be improved from its current state and will improve the area's overall scenic resources. Drainage improvements associated with the anticipated improvements will also help to minimize deterioration of water resources. [+] FINDING: Design Minimizes Environmental Impact. The proposed Special Use WILL minimize environmental impacts, and WILL NOT cause significant deterioration ofwater and airresources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources and other natural resources. STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.6 Impact on Public Facilities. The proposed Special Use shall be adequately served by public facilities and services, including roads, pedestrian paths, potable water and wastewater facilities, parks, schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. All public facilities necessary to serve the subject site are available and able to serve the new facility. [+] FINDING: Impact on Public Facilities. The proposed Special Use IS adequately served by public facilities and services such as roads, pedestrian paths, potable water and waste water facilities, parks, schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.7 Site Development Standards. The proposed Special Use shall comply with the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site Develovment Standards. Article 4, Site Development Standards 39 09-03-2002 [ +] Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1) Sufficient parking to satisfy the minimum requirements of Division 4-1 will be provided on site. [+] Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2) Landscaping and illumination will be provided on site pursuant to the minimum requirements of Division 4-2. [+] Sign Regulations (Division 4-3). Any signage located on the subject site will require sign permits and will conform with the minimum requirements of Division 4-3. [+] Natural Resource Protection Standards (Division 4-4) [nJa] Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410)- [nJa] Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420)- [nJa] Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430)- [+] Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) Any wood burning devices will be required to conform to the standards of this section. [nJa] Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450) This site is not identified as an area of possible Ridgeline impact on related maps. [nJa] Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460) An Environmental Impact Report was not required [+] Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5) All commercial operations located on the subject property shall comply with all performance standards as set forth in Division 4-5 with regard to noise and vibration; smoke and particulate standards; heat, glare, radiation and electrical interference; storage of hazardous and non-hazardous materials, and; water quality standards. [+/-] Improvement Standards (Division 4-6) [+/-] Roadway Standards (Section 4-620) The proposed site access will conform to related standards in this section. [ +] Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630) [nJa] Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640) [+/-] Drainage Standards (Section 4-650) [ +] Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660) [ +] Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670) [ +] Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680) File 1041-019-92: Expansion ofthe El J ebel Wastewater Collection and Potable Water Distribution Systems was approved via Resolution # 92-195. [+] Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690) File 1041-019-92: Expansion of the El Jebel Wastewater Collection and Potable Water Distribution Systems was approved via Resolution # 92-195. The applicant is working to provide information to Staff which will eliminate the +/- designation. As conditioned, this Special Use proposal will satisfy the above requirements. [+] Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7). A Road Impact Fee is applicable to the new facility, and will be due at the time a building permit is issued. [+/-] FINDING: Site Development Standards. As conditioned, the proposed Special Use WILL comply with all the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site Development Standards. STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.8 Other Provisions. The proposed Special Use shall comply with all standards imposed on it by all other applicable provisions of these Land Use Regulations for use, layout, and general development characteristics. No other applicable provisions ofthe Land Use Regulations were found relevant to this proposal for Special Use. [+] FINDING: The proposed Special Use DOES comply with all standards imposed on it by all other applicable provisions of these Land Use Regulations for use, layout, and general development 40 09-03-2002 characteristics Mr. Narracci spoke to a letter from Kevin and Tammy Tucker and they voiced some concerns regarding the right turn lanes. Rollin Gories, representing the Crawfords, spoke to the future Blue Ridge Road and what they intend to do. He stated when this road gets developed, the intersection will be revamped. They have agreed to eliminate the side entrance and turn the parking lot to the other direction. The other item of concern were the large amounts of entry points. He showed their proposed access point to service the commercial uses in the other building and in this new building. He spoke to the limited, no left hand turn access on to El J ebel Road. He stated they don't really understand the validity of this decision. He spoke to the curb cut they would install. He stated they would like to see that the no left turn condition be reconsidered. He spoke to the letter regarding the bus stop. He stated they have moved the bus stop to make a better and safer condition. He spoke to the easements in the area. He suggested ifthere ever is another development down Blue Ridge Road, there will actually be a frontage road. He suggested in the future, that bus stop may disappear. Chairman Gallagher asked for public comment. Steve Isom, Isom and Associates, stated he is present today representing Kevin and Tammy Tucker. He stated they have asked that the building get moved back twelve feet so that they do not have to rebuild the bus station itself. As far as left in, left out, that might be necessary for the future. He suggested it probably isn't needed right now. He suggested on the rest ofthe issues they can work them out. He stated he assumes that there is a right of way for El Jebel Road and all its improvements. Chairman Gallagher asked which building it is they want moved back 12 feet. Mr. Isom stated it would be the bus stop. Commissioner Stone spoke to the letter and that the date is May 2,2001. Mr. Isom suggested that might be the wrong date. Commissioner Stone stated there are a couple of other issues Mr. Isom didn't mention including the bike path. Mr. Isom stated he failed to mention that and feels there should be a bike path along El Jebel Road. Commissioner Stone asked about water drainage. Mr. Isom stated in his review of the recommendations he notes that they have not addressed that issue. He stated the building is in a hole and the more they can elevate the building the better offthey will all be. He thinks they can work on this together. Commissioner Stone spoke to the sidewalks in the back of the building. He read the letter as follows: "Dear Keith & Helen, I would like to address some questions on the new site plan for the NAP A building in El J ebel. First I would like to address the new bus stop on sheet 3 of High Country Engineering. Prom the plans it looks like it is in the new proposed right turn lane from El lebel Road to Blue Ridge Lane for the Blue Ridge PUD file PDP-0035. Please see sheet 7 ofSopris EngineeringLLC El Jebel Road/Blue Ridge Lane Intersection (copy enclosed). This bus stop is a great asset to the community and the two engineering firms could place the bus stop for both it and the right turn lane to work. With this new work on El Jebel Road for the building should the Crawford's not dedicate the necessary right of way on El Jebel Road to the County? In light of all the confusion over El Jebel Road and the right of way maybe this is the time to work it out. The next item is the road they are calling a County Road. This is Blue Ridge Lane, and at this time is an easement to the Blue Ridge PUD. When Blue Ridge signs the final plat this will become a County Road. From looking at their site plan the NAP A store will have access off of this road. If this is the case should this not be dedicated to the County and asphalted and sidewalks to the back of their new building? Also, will the Crawford's be required to continue the bike path next to Highway 82 from the underpass to the west property line of Blue Ridge? This would bring the developments together very nicely. 41 09-03-2002 Once again, I believe the two engineering firms should work together on this. The last item I have is water drainage. Is all the water from the east side of the Ridge has done planning for the water from Blue Ridge Lane to drain to the west and go into dry wells. I do not know if they can handle more or not. Please do not hesitate to contact me at any time. Thanks you for your understanding in this matter. Sincerely, Kevin Tucker." Mr. Isom spoke to drainage and they would want to be sure the drainage basin they have planned will be sufficient. He stated it would make some sense that the two get together regarding Blue Ridge Road. He asked the Board to give direction to the two firms to work together to ensure this is built correctly. He stated he would like to see a walk way to the back ofthe building but believes that will happen when Blue Ridge Road is complete. He spoke to the desire to have the walkway on the main road. Chairman Gallagher asked for further public comment. There was none. Mr. Gories stated he appreciates the cooperation ofthe other land owner and stated he looks forward to working with them. He spoke to the detention parcel which they will share with Mr. Isom upon completion. John Vengrin, Engineering Department, stated they do not have a complete traffic study at this time. He stated they think that the intersection will make better sense if it is right in, right out. He stated they have a drainage plan which has been revised, but they do not have the documentation that backs up the design. He spoke to an August 27 memo and that is currently in effect. He spoke to condition #14 and reiterated they do not have a fully designed drainage plan. Chairman Gallagher stated he is wondering if this application is before them prematurely. He questioned if the two engineering firms should get together first. Mr. Gories stated this is the replacement of existing buildings. He stated they realize there are some drainage problems and they are raising the buildings three feet. He stated they appreciate the way staff is working with them and he believes everyone is on the same page. He stated if the drainage must be addressed with their engineers, he believes they will make this happen. Chairman Gallagher asked about the expedient nature. Mr. Gories stated this has been a situation that has existed for a long time. He stated this property has not been platted for some time. In order to follow the code as written, they had to come forward for a special review. He stated they are here to meet the code as best they can and hopefully replace this before the existing uses find elsewhere to go. Chairman Gallagher stated he has no problem with the unit. He stated he is wondering if engineering doesn't have enough data to review and approve the project. Mr. Vengrin stated he doesn't think the problems are significant enough that they couldn't be handled with conditions. Commissioner Stone stated when they heard the Blue Ridge PUD, traffic was a concern at that time. He stated what he hopes to do is solve, once and for all, the traffic component. He stated he doesn't want to inflict any undue process on this applicant, however, he thinks they all have the same goal in mind to come up with a safe intersection for all. He asked if they should look at moving the bus stop further back. Adell Hubbel, applicant, stated the bus stop seems to be a big deal. She stated by going back in history, the first RFT A area was further up the road. They then moved the location behind the bow ling alley. At such time that Blue Ridge is developed, the bus stop will no longer come down E1 J ebel Road. She stated if this is a terrible thing, they can eliminate it. Her obj ective is to get as many people on the bus and off the highway. She explained that the bus stop will ultimately be moved. Commissioner Stone asked if the Blue Ridge development has the easements that are necessary to install the right turn lanes. Ms. Hubbel stated the last she heard they were going to take the road through Kodiak Lake. Commissioner Stone asked about Kodiak Park and the Blue Ridge Subdivision and those two applicants working together. He stated there was discussion at the time about how those two areas get access 42 09-03-2002 to EI J ebel Road. He stated he wants to be sure that they are looking at all the files together so that everyone knows what the other is doing. Mrs. Hubble spoke to the easement they gave to the phone company in 1999. In 1964 they worked with Mountain Bell and they can not overlap an easement for a road. Commissioner Stone asked if Blue Ridge Development has a requirement to put in a right turn lane. Mr. Vengrin stated they have to widen the existing roadway considerably and put in a right turn lane as well as a left egress. He stated the easement is not sufficient for the intersection improvements they intend to make. Commissioner Stone suggested maybe this is something that is better resolved between the different parties. Chairman Gallagher stated it is his understanding that ifthe easement is in the way of pavement, that the utilities can be moved. Mrs. Hubble stated she would be willing to discuss this, but she is not willing to cover the cost to move the head for the fiberoptic's. Commissioner Stone asked how they solve the traffic issues. Mr. Vengrin stated the right in right out, south entrance, does line up across from Favre lane. They would like to see all the driveways closed up to Blue Ridge Road. He stated what they are recommending is an improvement at this time as well as the bus stop being an improvement at this time. He stated they might need to move the bus stop later on. He stated they are not doing anything to block them from doing a better job in the future. They think this plan does the best at achieving their goals at this time. Chairman Gallagher asked if a referral included a response from Roaring Fork Transit Authority regarding the bike path. Commissioner Stone stated he didn't understand the response concerning the bike path. Mrs. Hubble stated they are willing to work with the bike path on El J ebel Road, but they are looking for the bike path to run from the tunnel. She spoke to the tailings where they took out the gas station and put in Wendy's. Chairman Gallagher suggested the bike path issue needs to be dealt with according to the trails plan for the County. Commissioner Stone asked for clarification from the applicant on the recommended conditions. He suggested they seem to be in agreement with the remaining issues. He asked if they are in agreement or not with suggested condition 3, the right in right out. Mr. Gories stated they are in disagreement with that. They are in agreement with everything else. Commissioner Stone asked why they are in disagreement. He asked the Engineering Department what their opinion is. Mr. Vengrin stated they do not have a complete traffic report. Mr. Gories stated they are dealing with the existing uses that exist at this time. Commissioner Stone stated what they are offering are tremendous improvements to the area. He stated he is just trying to make sure that what they are requiring makes sense. He suggested it may not be necessary to move it if they are going to move it again. Mrs. Hubble stated the present location for the bus stop is a nightmare and this will be a drastic improvement. Commissioner Gallagher suggested that whomever is making the motion include that the bus stop may not be required at this location. Mr. Vengrin spoke to a letter from RFT A dated June 4, 2002, in which they support the new bus stop and that it will be an improvement over the existing bus stop. Chairman Gallagher suggested that the right in right out not be a restriction at this time. Commissioner Menconi suggested that RFT A is interested in maintaining a bus stop there and he questioned whether Chairman Gallagher is hoping to eliminate that bus stop. Chairman Gallagher stated he would like to have a condition added to the approval that the bus stop 43 09-03-2002 is required until such time that it is moved. Commissioner Stone moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve File No. ZS-OO I 0 I, incorporating Staff findings, with the following conditions: 1. Except as otherwise modified by this application, all material representations of the Applicant in this application and all public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the proposed commercial building, the applicant must adequately satisfy the three remaining issues pertaining to drainage, traffic and access as delineated in Eagle County Engineering's Memorandum dated August 27,2002. 3. The applicant must submit a revised site plan to the Eagle County Engineering Department which demonstrates how access to the trash dumpsters, parking areas and access drive will be reconfigured to conform with the County's regulations at the time that Blue Ridge Road is constructed. 4. The County accept the location of the bus stop as provided for on the plans for this proposed building, recognizing that this is not a required, permanent bus stop. As future traffic and routes may dictate, this bus stop may be abandoned for a better location in the future. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. AFP-00155, Lot 20, River Ranch Subdivision Joseph Forinash, Planner, presented file number AFP-00155, Lot 20, River Ranch Subdivision. He stated this was an amended final plat which would adjust the building envelope to permit an addition on to an existing dwelling unit. The net result will be a slight reduction in the building envelope. He stated in 1989 the final plat for River Ranch Subdivision approved, creating Lot 20. Staff findings are as shown on staffreport and as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290.G.2 of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the Community Development Director has made the following findings: a. The Amended Final Plat DOES NOT adversely affect adjacent property owners. [The following adjacent property owners have been notified: Sopris Village Properties, Inc., c/o Russell Scott; George McDonald; William Vannice; and River Ranch Homeowners Association. No letters of opposition have been received by the Community Development Department prior to the distribution of this Staff Report.} a. The Amended Final Plat IS consistent with the intent of the Final Plat. b. The Amended Final Plat DOES conform to the Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies and guidelines. c. An Improvements Agreement IS NOT applicable. d. This amendment IS NOT an alteration of a restrictive plat note. Nancy Gallagher, applicant, was present for the hearing. Commissioner Menconi moved the Board of County Commissioners approve File No. AFP-00155, River Ranch Subdivision, incorporating the Staff findings and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until September 10, 2002. Attest: Clerk to the Boar ~.... 44 09-03-2002