HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07/23/2002
PUBLIC HEARING
JULY 23, 2002
Present:
Menconi
Torn Stone
Torn Moorhead
Jack Ingstad
Sara J. Fisher
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
County Administrator
Clerk to the Board
Absent:
Michael Gallagher
Chairman
This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of
County Commissioners for their consideration:
Executive Session
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi stated the first matter on the agenda was an Executive Session.
Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn into an Executive Session to discuss the following:
1. Receiving legal advice on pending litigation, John Stauffer, threat oflitigation and
claim for back pay, which is an appropriate topic for discussion pursuant to C.R.S. 24-6-402 (4)(b)
2. Receiving legal advice on specific legal questions on Eagle County's legal obligation
to the Mountain Glen Housing Corporation and negotiations relative to Rocky Mountain Management
LLC, and developing strategy for negotiations relating to management of Mountain Glen Village which
are appropriate topics pursuant to C.R.S. 24-6-402 (4)(b) and (e)
3. Receiving legal advice on acquisition of the real property ofNunn and Levine, which is
an appropriate topic for discussion pursuant to c.R.S. 24-6-402( 4)(b), Colorado Revised Statutes.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
Consent Calendar
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi stated the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as
follows:
A) Approval of bill paying for the week of July 22, 2002, subject to review by County
Administrator
B) Approval of payroll for July 25,2002, subject to review by County Administrator
C) Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of June 28,
2002
D) EPSDT Renewal Letter, Early, Periodic, Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment
E) Agreement between the County of Eagle and Judy Edeen for Child Care Quality
Improvement
F) Retired and Senior Volunteer Program Continuation Grant
G) Lease Agreement between Eagle County and the Aspen Community Theater
H) Resolution 2002-093, Final Release of Collateral and Termination of the Warranty
Period for Edwards Station
I) Resolution 2002-094 authorizing the Final Release of Collateral and Termination of
the Warranty Period for Com Construction
1
07-23-2002
J) Agreement between Eagle County and John P and Diana Donovan, regarding Cemetery
Bridge Road
K) Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate between Eagle County and Mountain High
Aviation
L) Petitions to the Eagle County Board of Equalization
M) Resolution 2002-095, Town of Vail Representation to the ECRTA Board of Directors
N) Grant of Easements by Cordillera and Eagle River Mobile Home Park for
Construction of County Trail in Edwards. (to be deleted)
O)Residential Lease Agreement for 19214 Colorado River Road between Eagle County
and Don and Cher Ivie
P) Berry Creek 5th Recreation Fields Contract with B & B Excavating
Q) Annual Sanitarian's Contract between the State of Colorado, Department of Public
Health and Environment, Consumer Protection Division and Eagle County, Environmental Health
Department, to conduct the Food Safety Program
R) Public Trustee Software.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent
Agenda.
Torn Moorhead, County Attorney, stated item P, Berry Creek 5th Recreation Fields Contract with
B & B Excavating, needs to be pulled as it is not ready for Board approval. He suggested item L,
Petitions to the Board of Equalization, be pulled and handled on its own following approval of the
Consent Agenda.
Commissioner Stone moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented pulling items P and L.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
Plat & Resolution Signing
Cliff Simonton, Planner, presented the following plats and resolutions for the Board's signature:
Resolution 2002-096. To Approve The Site Specific Development Plan for the
Recreation Tract C of the Berry Creek / Miller Ranch Planned Unit Development (Eaele County
File No. PR-00019). The Board considered the applicant's request on July 2nd, 2002.
Commissioner Stone moved to approve Resolution 2002-096, To Approve The Site Specific
Development Plan for the Recreation Tract C of the Berry Creek / Miller Ranch Planned Unit
Development, Eagle County File No. PR-000l9.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
Statutory Report, CBOE, Assessed Value, Personal Property
Jody Caruthers, Eagle County Assessor, presented the Statutory Report to the Board of
Equalization of the total assessed value of personal property and action taken on each personal property
appeals. She stated the first item in the packet is the Master Protest Log of those properties that were
appealed. On the last page it shows that out of the 36 entries, 28 were adjusted and 8 were denied. The
second part of the packet was the abstract of assessment showing the total assessed and actual valuations
of all classes of property in Eagle County. The grand total of the taxable assessed value of Eagle County
which is $2,208,888,250.00.
The Board accepted the report.
2
07-23-2002
Interest Report, Second Quarter 2002
Karen Sheaffer, Eagle County Treasurer, presented the Interest Report for the second quarter of
2002. She presented a report from the County's Investment Advisor.
Commissioner Stone asked what the County had projected.
Ms. Sheaffer stated the County projected 1.9 million and they could still see that amount. She
stated they are still about $200,000 under previous years. She stated with only 6 months of interest in it
is hard to tell. She stated with investments at MBIA allows the County to achieve the most returns and
allows the County's money to be very safe.
The Board accepted the report.
Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as
the Local Liquor Licensing Authority.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
State Bridge Lodge
Earlene Roach, Liquor Inspector, presented the renewal of a tavern license for State Bridge
Lodge Corporation, d/b/a State Bridge Lodge. She requested this matter be tabled to August 20, 2002 to
continue with the investigation.
Commissioner Stone questioned the nature of the file.
Ms. Roach stated currently the hearing will be for a renewal but there will be lengthly discussion
on the death of John Ambrose, who had a blood alcohol level of .320.
Commissioner Stone moved to table the renewal of a tavern license for State Bridge Lodge
Corporation, d/b/a State Bridge Lodge until August 20, 2002.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority and reconvene
as the Board of County Commissioners.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as
the Board of Equalization.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
Consent Agenda Item L, Petitions to the Eagle County Board of Equalization
Torn Moorhead stated this is the Petitions to the Board of Equalization. He stated this identifies
the hearing referree and the representative from the Assessor's Office. He stated the change that one of
the hearings needed to be deleted when the Attorney representing the petitioner related they could not be
present at that time. The report is now complete and there was a notice of decision that had a
typographical error.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi asked about a motion at this time.
Jody Caruthers stated John Harris is the appraisal coordinator in the Assessor's Office now. He
replaced Max Schflaley.
3
07-23-2002
Commissioner Stone moved the BOE accept the findings as shown in Resolution 2002-E-2, with \
the minor changes as stated by County Attorney.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
Abatements
John Harris, Appraisal Coordinator, presented the following petitions for abatement for the
following properties:
2001 Properties, LLC, schedule number R029457.
Tax Year 1999, the original assessed value was $66, l20 with a tax amount of $3, 1 05.20 with an
abatement of$51,200 and a tax amount 0[$2,404.52, leaving a balance of$14,920 with a tax amount of
$700.68.
For 2000, the original assessed value was $66,120 with a tax amount of$3,539.08, with an
abatement of$51,200.00 and a tax amount of$2,740.48, leaving a balance of$14,920.00 and a tax
amount of$798.60.
Eugenia M. Grant LLLP, schedule number R045068.
Tax year 2000; the original assessed value was $55,570 with a tax amount of$3,723.80, with an
abatement of$34,750.00 with a tax amount of $2,328.64, leaving a balance of $20,820.00 with a tax
amount of$l,395.16.
Tax year 2001; the original assessed value was $65,920.00 with a tax amount of $4,036.42, with
an abatement of$30,680.00 and a tax amount 0[$1,878.60, leaving a balance of$35,240.00 with a tax
amount of$2,157.82.
Annette & Borys Goldfrajch, schedule number R039472.
Tax year 2000; the original assessed value was $70,270.00 with a tax amount of $4,840.40, with
an abatement of$19,200 and a tax amount of$1,322.54, leaving a balance of$3,517.86.
Tax year 2001; the original assessed value was $80,300.00 with a tax amount of$5,285.98, with
an abatement of $20,520.00 and a tax amount of$1,350.78, leaving a balance of$59,780 and a tax
amount of $3,935.20.
Millennium Asset Management LLC, schedule number R014285.
Tax year 2001; the original assessed value was $897,940.00 with a tax amount of$37,471.94,
with an abatement of$467,090 and a tax amount of$19,492.14, leaving a balance of $430,850 and a tax
amount of$17,979.80.
Millennium Asset Management LLC, schedule number R006734
Tax Year 2002; the original assessed value was $39,490 with a tax amount of$1,587.58, with an
abatement of$5,850 and a tax amount of$235.l8, leaving a balance of$33,640 and a tax amount of
$1,352.40.
William & Beth O'Neill, schedule number R015544.
Tax year 2000; the original assessed value was $29,000 with a tax amount of$1,846.74, with an
abatement of$19,260 and a tax amount of$1,226.48, leaving a balance of $9,740 and a tax amount of
$620.26.
Tax year 2001; the original assessed value was $52,200 with a tax amount of$3,164.68, with an
abatement of$35,730 and a tax amount of$2,166.16, leaving a balance of$16,470 and a tax amount of
$998.52.
Patricia O'Neill, schedule number R008244.
Tax year 2000; the original assessed value was $301,370 with a tax amount of$16,260.12, with
an abatement of$35,150 and a tax amount of$1,896.48, leaving a balance of $266,220 and a tax amount
of$14,363.64.
4
07-23-2002
Tax year 2002; the original assessed value was $375,540 with a tax amount of$19,463.12, with
an abatement of$119,430 and a tax amount of$6,189.71, leaving a balance of$256,110 with a tax
amount of $13,273.41.
Patricia O'Neill, schedule number R008244
Tax year 1998; the original assessed value was $251,160 with a tax amount of$16,527.58, with
an abatement of $30,880 and a tax amount of $2,032.05, leaving a balance of $220,280 and a tax amount
of$14,495.53.
Tax year 1999, the original assessed value was $303,280 with a tax amount of$17,434.06, with
an abatement of$35,490 and a tax amount of$2,040.15, leaving a balance of $267,790 and a tax amount
of$15,393.91.
Commissioner Stone moved to approve the petitions for abatement as presented by the
Assessor's Office.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
Commissioner Stone moved to deny the petition for James A. Lyle, schedule number R050883,
as recommended by the Assessor.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
AFP-00154, Grouse Bar Ranch, Parcel 2
Cliff Simonton presented file number AFP-OO 154, Grouse Bar Ranch, Parcel 2. He stated this
was an Amended Final Plat, the purpose of which is to move the existing building envelope
approximately 145 feet to the east. The size and configuration ofthe envelope will not change. This
plat amendment will position the envelope more favorably on the lot in relation to existing topography,
access and the applicant's desire to retain existing vegetation. The 100 foot lot line set back, as required
by the Grouse Bar Ranch PUD Guide, will be maintained.
Staff findings are as shown on staff report and as follows:
Pursuant to Section 5-290.G.2 of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the Community
Development Director has considered the following in the review of the Amended Final Plat:
a. Adjacent Property. The proposed amendment does not adversely effect adjacent property
owners. Letters have been submitted indicating the approval of all adjacent home owners. All adjacent
property owners have been duly noticed, with no response.
b. Final Plat Consistency. The proposed amendment is not inconsistent with the intent of the
Final Plat;
c. Conformance with Final Plat Requirements. The proposed amendment conforms to the
Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies and guidelines;
d. Improvements Agreement. An improvements agreement is not applicable; and
e. Restrictive Plat Note Alteration. A restrictive plat note alteration is not applicable.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi asked for public comment. There was none.
Commissioner Stone moved the Board approve File No. AFP-00154, Grouse Bar Ranch, Parcel
2, incorporating staff findings and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
ZS-00094, Lot 8, Colorow at Squaw Creek
Joseph Forinash, Planner, presented file number ZS-00094, Lot 8, Colorow at Squaw Creek.
5
07-23-2002
Questions and points of deliberation by the Planning Commission included the following:
Brief discussion of nature of the recent lot re-configuration (1989) which created Lot 8A.
Whether an additional well would satisfy Staff s concerns regarding legal and physical adequacy
of water. (Staff response: yes)
Whether the wildfire regulations currently under consideration be applicable to this site.
The nature of the dispute with the neighbor regarding access to the shared well.
The proposed special use is an accessory dwelling unit on a legal, non-conforming lot. The
subject lot is 8.9 acres. Minimum lot size in the RL zone district is 20 acres. All permitted uses other
than a single family dwelling, such as this accessory dwelling unit, require a special use permit. The
Applicants propose to build an addition to an existing single family residence, with the resulting
structure including an accessory dwelling unit. Complete details of the proposed structure have not been
provided as part of this special use permit application, but will be required at the time of application for
a building permit. The purpose of this application is to seek approval of an accessory dwelling unit as an
additional use on the site.
The chronology ofthe application is as shown on staff report and as follows:
1989 - Lot 8A, A Resubdivision of Lots 8A, 8B and llA of the Final Plat, A Resubdivision of
Colorow at Squaw Creek., recorded 8/14/89.
1999 - Existing home was constructed.
Referral responses are as follows and as shown on staff report:
Eagle County Engineering
No comments.
Staff findings are as shown on staff report and as follows:
File No. ZS-00094
Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-250.B Standards for the review
of a Special Use Permit:
Section 5-250.B.1. Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed Special Use shall be
appropriate for its proposed location and be consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies
of the Master Plan and the FL UM of the Master Plan, including standards for building and structural
intensities and densities, and intensities of use.
EAGLE COUNTY MASTER PLAN
Environmental Open Space! Development Affordable Transportation Community FLUM
Qualitv Recreation Housing Services
Conformance X X X
Non
Conformance
Mixed
Conformance
Not X X X X
Applicable
EAGLE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING PLAN
VISIONSTATEMENT: Housing for local residents is a major priority of Eagle County. There
should be a wide variety of housing to fulfill the needs of all its residents, including families, senior
citizens, and those who work here. Elements of Eagle County's vision for housing are:
6
07-23-2002
Housing is a community-wide issue
Housing should be located in close proximity to existing community centers, as defined in the
Eagle County master plan.
Development of local residents housing should be encouraged on existing. . . transit routes
Housing is primarily a private sector activity [but] . . . without the active participation of
government, there will be only limited success
It is important to preserve existing local residents housing
Persons who work in Eagle County should have adequate housing opportunities within the
county.
Development applications that will result in an increased need for local residents housing should
be evaluated as to whether they adequately provide for this additional need, the same way as they are
evaluated for other infrastructure needs
POLICIES:
ITEM
I YES I NO I N/A I
I. Eagle County will collaborate with the private sector & nonprofit organizations to
develop housing for local residents
2. Housing for local residents is an issue which Eagle County needs to address in
collaboration with the municipalities. . .
3. Steps should be taken to facilitate increased home ownership by local residents X
and workers in Eagle County
4. Additional rental opportunities for permanent local residents should be brought on X
line. Some... should be for households with an income equivalent to or less than
one average wage job
5. Seasonal housing is part ofthe problem & needs to be further addressed. It is X
primarily the responsibility of. . . employers. . .
6. New residential subdivisions will provide a percentage of their units for local X
residents
7. Commercial, industrial, institutional, and public developments generating
increased employment will provide local residents housing. The first preference X
will be for units on-site where feasible, or ifnot feasible, in the nearest existing
community center. . .
8. The County will seek to make land available for local residents housing in
proximity to community centers
9. Mixed use developments in appropriate locations are encouraged X
10. Factory-built housing is an important part of Eagle County's housing stock X
II. There is a need to segment a portion of the housing market to protect local
residents from having to compete with second home buyers. Where public X
assistance or subsidies are provided for housing, there should generally be limits
on price appreciation, as well as residency requirements
12. Eagle County recognizes that housing for local residents is an ongoing issue
EDWARDS SUB-AREA PLAN
Development Economy Housing Circulation Recreation
Concents
7
07-23-2002
Conformance X X
Non
Conformance
Mixed
Conformance
Not X X X
Applicable
EAGLE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PLAN
Land Use Open Space Unique Char. Visual Development Hazards Wildlife
Cooperation Provision Preservation Quality Patterns
Conformance X X X X
Non
Conformance
Mixed
Conformance
Not X X X
Applicable
EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED PLAN
Water Quantity Water Quality Wildlife Recreation Land Use
Conformance
Non
Conformance
Mixed
Conformance
Not X X X X X
Applicable
Alternative housing solutions, including accessory dwelling units, are generally encouraged by
the Master Plan. The proposed accessory dwelling unit does not represent an inconsistency with any of
the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the Master Plan.
The Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designates the area in which site is contained as
"Countryside", and indicates an expected dwelling unit (DU) density range of from 1 DU per 2 acres to 1
DU per 35 acres.
[+] FINDING: Section 5-250.B.1. Consistent with Master Plan.
The proposed Special Use Permit IS appropriate for its proposed location and IS consistent with
the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the Master Plan and Master Plan FLUM, including
standards for building and structural intensities and densities, and intensities of use.
Section 5-250.B.2. Compatibility. The proposed Special Use shall be appropriate for its
proposed location and compatible with the character of surrounding land uses.
Other uses in the area are single family residences that are well distanced from each other on
similar size or larger lots. On conforming (minimum 20 acres) lots in the RL zone district, accessory
8
07-23-2002
dwelling units are a permitted use with Limited (i.e., administrative) Review, reflecting the expectation
that accessory dwelling units are likely to be compatible in this zone district. The size of this and other
lots in the vicinity are such that the proposed use will be compatible with the surrounding land uses.
[+] FINDING: Section 5-250.B.2. Compatibility.
The proposed Special Use IS appropriate for its proposed location, and IS compatible with the
character of surrounding land uses.
Section 5-250.B.3. Zone District Standards. The proposed Special Use shall comply with the
standards of the zone district in which it is located and any standards applicable to the particular use,
as identified in Section 3-310, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Residential. Agricultural and
Resource Uses and Section 3-330, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Commercial and
Industrial Uses.
Section 3-310, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Residential. Agricultural and
Resource Uses, provides certain standards which must be met for all accessory dwelling units. The
standards address [1] number of ADUs, [2] size and use, [3] location, [4] parking, [5] ownership, [6]
dimensional limitations, and [7] adequate facilities. This Special Use Permit would allow one ADU on
this lot. Certain other standards will be satisfied prior to issuance of a building permit. All standards of
the RL zone district will continue to be applicable.
[+] FINDINGS: Section 5-250.B.3. Zone District Standards.
The proposed Special Use DOES comply with the standards of the zone district in which it is
located and the standards applicable to the particular use, as identified in Section 3-310, Review
Standards Applicable to Particular Residential. Agricultural and Resource Uses.
Section 5-250.B.4. Design Minimizes Adverse Impact. The design of the proposed Special Use
shall minimize adverse impacts, including visual impact of the proposed use on adjacent lands;
furthermore, the proposed Special Use shall avoid significant adverse impact on surrounding lands
regarding trash, traffic, service delivery, parking and loading, odors, noise, glare, and vibration, and
shall not create a nuisance.
Given the residential nature of the proposed use, the size of the lot, and the nature of the
surrounding area, an accessory dwelling unit will not create an adverse impact. Further, the nuisance
provisions of the Land Use Regulations will continue to apply.
[+] FINDING: Section 5-250.B.4. Design Minimizes Adverse Impact.
The design of the proposed Special Use DOES minimize adverse impacts, including visual
impact of the proposed use on adjacent lands; furthermore, the proposed Special Use DOES avoid
significant adverse impact on surrounding lands regarding trash, traffic, service delivery, parking and
loading, odors, noise, glare, and vibration, and DOES NOT create a nuisance.
Section 5-250.B.5. Design Minimizes Environmental Impact. The proposed Special Use shall
minimize environmental impacts and shall not cause significant deterioration of water and air
resources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources, and other natural resources.
This site is outside of the mapped critical wildlife habitat areas. Given the residential nature of
the proposed use, the size of the lot, and the nature of the surrounding area, an accessory dwelling unit
will not create an adverse environmental impact.
[+] FINDING: Section 5-250.B.5. Design Minimizes Environmental Impact.
The proposed Special Use DOES minimize environmental impacts and DOES NOT cause
significant deterioration of water and air resources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources, and other natural
resources.
Section 5-250.B.6. Impact on Public Facilities. The proposed Special Use shall be adequately
served by public facilities and services, including roads, pedestrian paths, potable water and wastewater
facilities, parks, schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services.
The proposed Special Use is adequately served by public facilities and services. A well exists on
9
07-23-2002
the site, and a septic system sized to serve a 5 bedroom structure is also in place.
[+] FINDING: Section 5-250.B.6. Impact on Public Facilities.
The proposed Special Use IS adequately served by public facilities and services, including roads,
pedestrian paths, potable water and wastewater facilities, parks, schools, police and fire protection, and
emergency medical services.
Section 5-250.B.7. Site Development Standards. The proposed Special Use shall comply with
the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site Develooment Standards.
The requirements of Article 4, Site Development Standards, are more generally applicable to the
subdivision of land. These or similar requirements were met at the time of previous approval of the
Colorow Subdivision, and are not the subject ofthis review. However, certain other requirements, such
as the Natural Resource Protection Standards (Division 4-4) are applicable for review at the discretion of
the Director of Community Development. There appears to be no significant adverse impacts in any of
these discretionary areas. Other requirements, most notably parking, are subject to review. However,
sufficient room is available on-site to easily accommodate the additional parking resulting from an
accessory dwelling unit.
[+] FINDING: Section 5-250.B.7. Site Development Standards.
The proposed Special Use DOES comply with all the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site
Development Standards.
Section 5-250.B.8. Other Provisions. The proposed Special Use shall comply with all standards
imposed on it by all other applicable provisions of these Land Use Regulations for use, layout, and
general development characteristics.
There are certain requirements of the Land Use Regulations that will be addressed as part of the
building permit application for the expanded dwelling, including setbacks, maximum building heights,
and so on. Adequacy of the individual sewage disposal system - which has a tank sized for an 8
bedroom residence, and a leach field sized for 5 bedrooms - will also be verified later, based on the
proposed addition to the existing structure.
It is Staff s understanding that the water well, located on this site and serving this residence, also
serves a residence on the adjacent Lot 10, to the south. The Applicant has not demonstrated that the well
is adequate - physically or legally - to serve two primary residences and an accessory dwelling unit. To
preclude any undue adverse impact of an accessory dwelling unit, and as a condition of approval, the
Applicant should be required to demonstrate, prior to issuance of a building permit for an accessory
dwelling unit, that the water well serving this and the adjacent residence provide a physically and legally
adequate supply of water for all of the existing and proposed uses.
[+] FINDING - Section 5-250.B.8. Other Provisions.
With the recommended condition, the proposed Special Use DOES comply with all standards
imposed on it by all other applicable provisions of these Land Use Regulations for use, layout, and
general development characteristics.
Michael Sanner, applicant, stated when they first bought the property they built the caretakers
unit first and that is what was built and what they have been living in. He stated what they would be
building now would be the main house. He stated there are two meadows that are connected and there
was no land to clear and the property is hidden from the Town. He stated a lot of properties in the area
are less than 20 acres.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi asked for public comment. There was none.
Commissioner Stone spoke to the letters on file that speak to access to the well. He questioned
staff on the proposed access.
Mr. Forinash stated that is a private matter.
Mr. Sanner stated they have been dealing with one neighbor concerning access to the well. He
stated they have not been using the access indicated but have been driving through what will be their
10
07-23-2002
front yard. That will not be possible once construction starts.
Commissioner Stone asked the County Attorney if the Board should not get into this if it is a
private matter.
Mr. Moorhead stated that is correct.
Commissioner Stone move that the Board approve File No. ZS-00094, Lot 8 Colorow at Squaw
Creek, with the following conditions:
1. Applicant demonstrate, prior to issuance of a building permit for an accessory dwelling unit,
that the water well serving this and the adjacent residence provide a physically and legally adequate
supply of water for all of the existing and proposed uses.
2. Except as otherwise modified by this permit, all material representations of the Applicant in
this application and all public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
AFP-00152, Cordillera Subdivision, Filing 35
Jena Skinner, Planner, presented file number AFP-00152, Cordillera Subdivision, Filing 35. She
stated the intent of this plat is to reconfigure the building envelope on lot 5 to accommodate proposed,
external building features such as patios, water features, and a hot tub. The building envelope will not
. ..
Increase In SIze.
Ms. Skinner stated staff received a request to table this matter as the neighboring property owner
has some concerns the applicant would like to address.
Commissioner Stone moved to table file number AFP-00152, Cordillera Subdivision, Filing 35,
to August 13, 2002.
Commissioner Stone moved the Board approve File No. AFP-00152, Cordillera Subdivision,
Filing 35, incorporating the findings and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat.
Chairman Pro-tern Menconi seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until
July 30, 2002.
Attest:
Clerk to the Board
11
07-23-2002