Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/04/2002 Present: Michael Gallagher Arn Menconi Tom Stone Tom Moorhead Jack Ingstad Earlene Roach PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 4, 2002 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Attorney County Administrator Deputy Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: GENERAL FUND 3CMA AAA COLLECTORS AAAA SEPTIC PUMPING ACTION SHOP SERVICES ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS ADAMS COUNTY ASSESSORS AFFORDABLE PORTABLE ALBUQUERQUE PUBLISHING CO ALIMED INCORPORATED ALLIANT FOOD SERVICE AMADEO GONZALES AMERA CHEM INC AME~CANLINENSTEINER AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW AME~CAN TOWER CORP AMERICINN LODGE & SUITES ANDREW POHLMAN ANN MUNCASTER APEX INVESTIGATIVE GROUP APEX SECU~TY APOLLO CREDIT AGENCY ARMY & FACTORY SURPLUS ASPEN BASE OPERATON ASPEN BOARD OF REALTORS AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES A V TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVCARD SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 315.00 25.00 250.00 38.50 62.00 400.00 88.00 352.80 54.94 2,864.88 48.00 22.50 8.68 45.00 875.00 265.00 360.00 66.00 21.90 364.50 13.96 132.62 381.09 6.03 168.28 583.01 20.00 1 06-04-2002 AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS B J ROWE BENCHMARK ENGINEERING BERGLUND RUTH BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS BEVERLY KUNKEL BILL G BAKER BLANCA ARUIZO BLOSSOM SOFTWARE BLUE LAKE OWNERS ASSN BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY BOISCLAIR & TAYLOR BONDED ADJUSTING SERVICE BOULDERCOUNTYSHE~F BRANDON CAUSEY BRATWEAR BRC/HARRIS INC BRITTANY SCHIEGEL BROWNING FERRIS IND BRUCE CAMPBELL BRYAN TREU C & H DISTRIBUTORS INC CALOIA & HOUPT PC CASFM NW REGION CDW CELERITY CORPORATION CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CENTURYTEL CHARLES B DARRAH CHECKMATE INC CHESS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL CHRIS A PORTER CHRIS GUNION CHRISTINE L MOTT CITY MARKET #34 CLE IN COLORADO INCORPORA CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION CO BUREAU INVESTIGATION CO COUNTY ATTORNEY ASSOC SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 2,054.64 15.18 300.00 75.90 465.26 67.20 19.55 6.20 30.00 1,897.43 50.00 6.82 15.00 15.40 45.00 2,051.00 1,210.77 1,000.00 866.64 102.42 230.11 609.61 2,659.28 50.00 149.86 426.75 489.16 8.16 8,054.79 3.76 46.45 467.00 150.00 35.00 215.76 855.00 168.79 177.00 170.00 66.24 575.00 2 06-04-2002 CO DEPT OF HEALTH CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CO SECRETARY OF STATE CO STATE ASSOC CLERK AND CO STATE TREASURER COLLECTION CENTER COLLEEN WIRTH COLORADO ACTIVITY CTR INC COLORADO CORONERS COLORADO COUNTIES INC COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO RURAL COLORADO STATE UNERSITY COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH COM-LINK COMFORT INN LONGMONT CONCEPT MECHANICAL CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING COPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COURTNEY DIEHL DAILY SENTINEL THE DALLAS S TURLEY DARLING BERGSTROM MILLGAN DATA COMM WAREHOUSE DAVID D CH~SLIP DAVID GUINNEE, DVM DEEP ROCK WEST DELL INC DENNIS & GAIL MATHISEN DENNIS WILLEY DENVER NEWSPAPER AGENCY DIANA JOHNSON DOCTORS ON CALL DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP DONALD OWNSBEY DONNA BARNES CORONER DOSIA LAEYENDECKER SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 237.00 64.80 10.00 255.00 5,850.00 33.68 202.00 375.00 600.00 178.75 250.00 3,625.21 275.00 50.00 7,162.52 1,486.40 25.19 292.00 230.40 187.40 4.20 4,309.68 1,289.67 20.00 148.29 25.00 33.76 447.97 1,667.00 2,010.37 270.23 12,942.23 625.00 192.34 231.52 109.50 915.00 112.08 60.00 20.12 88.20 3 06-04-2002 DOUBLE M ASPHALT COATINGS DURRANT EAGLE AMOCO EAGLE AUTO PARTS EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL EAGLE EYE PHOTO EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLERNER WATER AND EAGLE V AIL ANIMAL HOSPIT A EAGLE V ALLEY PRINTING EARL GLENWRIGHT EAST WEST RESORTS ELISA ACOSTA ELIZABETH P GREDIG EMBASSY SUITES DENVER EMC2 ES~ EXTENSION PROGRAM FUND FALCON ASSOCIATES INC FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY F AMIL Y VISITOR PROGRAM FARMER BROTHERS FARRELL, GOLDSTEIN, FEDERAL EXPRESS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG FIESTA'S CAFE FILE FINDERS LTD FINELINE FIRST BANKS FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY FORINASH KATHLEEN FRENCH WEST WOOD & BROWN G H DANIELS III & ASSOC GALLS INCORPORATED GATES MARGE PHN GATEWAY SECURE STORAGE GE CAPITAL GILBERT MATURINO SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 5,295.00 2,800.00 302.15 183.20 3,250.00 3,970.58 81.28 360.00 2.36 170.60 83.30 28.00 1,352.13 90.00 1,832.66 57.96 30.00 112.00 231.68 1,600.00 1,353.50 90.00 1,758.45 4,387.58 981.82 25.00 444.02 5,072.10 117.00 30.00 1,995.90 21,506.27 140.00 468.76 1.86 152.00 390.78 1,187.50 170.00 159.99 25.00 4 06-04-2002 GLENN PADGETT GLENWOOD MEDICAL ASSOC GLENWOOD SHOE SERVICE GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD GRAINGER INC ORP ORA TED GREENBERG & ASSOCIATES GYPSUM FIRE PROTECTION HARRYE COFF HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELEN MIGCHELBRINK HELLO DIRECT INC HERMAN MILLER INC. HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HILL & COMPANY HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC ID EDGE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE JACQUELINE ALLEN JAMES J PETERS JAMES J STANDLEY JAMIE HUMPHREY JB T'S JODIE BRANDT JODY CARUTHERS JOHN HILDRETH JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC JON HARRISON JOSEPH L FORINASH JOY OVERBECK JOYCE HANSON JOYCE P BOARDMAN KELLY LIEKIS KESSLER MARY J KINDER MORGAN INC KING CAMPBELL DDS LANDS END INCORPORATED LEFFERDINK LAW OFFICE LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LEONARD VALDEZ LESLIE KEHMEIER REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT INCENTIVE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE INCENTIVE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 195.00 159.00 230.00 20,940.00 56.18 79.52 720.00 18.60 11,672.82 35.68 249.19 841.32 2,567.00 1,400.00 534.00 10,341.75 71.42 405.00 664.44 25.00 2.60 1,230.00 1,800.00 129.77 95.34 63.01 490.00 141.48 169.40 270.00 311.19 31.20 79.36 67.09 3,599.45 748.00 1,964.45 6.20 671.60 195.00 100.00 5 06-04-2002 LETN LEXISNEXIS LINDA MAGGIORE LINDA P ANKUCH LO~S & ASSOCIATES INC LUKE GRAY MACHOL & JOHANNES MAE PITTMAN MAINTENANCE WAREHOUSE MALINDA GRIFFIN MARGARET COLLINS MARJO~E J MARKS MARK CHAPIN MARKS PLUMBING PARTS MARRIOTT CTY CNT/GALLIV AN MARSHALL AUSTIN PRODUCTNS MATT ROYER MATTHEW GENNETT MAXWELL MEDALS & AWARDS MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MEINHOLD ST A WIARSKI & MEINSTER & MEINSTER MERCK ATL MICHAEL CIRKOVIC MICHAEL J DOBERSEN MD MICHELLE BALL MICRO WAREHOUSE MICROW AREHOUSE MIKE GALLAGHER MIKES CAMERA INC. MONICA JACOX MONTAG KEITH P MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES MR ROOTER NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL FOREST SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 388.00 542.00 98.87 20.77 8,078.00 1,000.00 43.60 115.32 262.43 94.30 9.92 85.50 42.46 40.40 714.00 2,100.00 69.47 42.39 282.00 144.98 2,905.31 281.00 75.00 3.10 327.20 81.48 830.00 184.58 2,916.00 262.98 71.28 332.00 240.00 100.00 26.49 48,374.37 3,250.00 819.00 75.00 95.00 30,000.00 6 06-04-2002 NATIONAL GRAPHICS COMPANY NATIONAL INTERAGENCY FIRE NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP NCR CORPORATION NESTING COMPANY, LLC THE NETTIE REYNOLDS NFSA NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORTH AME~CAN WILDFIRE NW COLORADO COUNCIL OF OLSON PROPERTY ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO OSM DELIVERY LLC OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP PAINT BUCKET THE PAPER WISE P ASE INC PATHOLOGY GROUP PEGASUS SATELLITE PENNSYLVANIA COALITION PEPPERDINE'S MARKETING PETER FRALICK PETTY CASH PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PRCA PRECINCT POLICE PRODUCTS PROFESSIONAL FINANCE PROTECTORS LTD PSS,INC QUALITY INN AT THE MART QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION QUINLAN PUBLISHING COMP AN QWEST QWEST INTERPRISE NETWRKNG REBEKAH WENTWORTH RELIABLE RICHARD KESLER ~CHARD M HODGES RIGOBERTO SARELLANO SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 274.57 17.93 594.00 584.65 289.00 383.40 298.00 2,998.01 150.00 25.00 600.00 6,937.84 418.00 612.00 230.31 2,469.25 520.00 1,777.00 30.98 17.45 21.50 49.82 96.77 1,963.54 904.40 225.00 126.35 25.00 525.00 628.04 217.00 209.54 42.97 105.81 7,444.68 1,297.58 1,000.00 55.78 3,394.42 3.10 280.00 7 06-04-2002 ROB WHEELER ROCKY MOUNTAIN REPRO GRAPH ROGER MOORE ROLF LIPPERT ROSIE MORENO RSC SARA J FISHER SARAH SCHIPPER SCAN AIR OF COLORADO INC SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP SCHUTZMAN NBS INC SECOND CHANCE BODY ARMOR SECRETARY OF STATE SEC~TY PEOPLE SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICIOS DE CONSEJERIA SHEAFFER KAREN SHELLEY OWNSBEY SHIP IT SIERRA INDUST~ES, INC SILVERTREE HOTEL SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SMITH EDWARD SNOWBRIDGE ROTO ROOTER SNOWHITE LINEN STARBUCK SURVEYORS & ENGI STEPHEN ELZINGA STERICYCLE INC STERLING DESIGN STRAWBERRY PATCH SUMMIT LUMBER SUSPENSE FUND SUZANNE BERG MSW T T A CERTIFIED TERRI ALLENDER TODD PIERCE PHOTOGRAPHY TOM MOOREHEAD TOWN OF EAGLE TOX TRAPS INCORPORATED TRAER CREEK LLC/K LORD EQ TRANSCOR AME~CA INC REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 15.00 56.70 3.10 36.09 464.30 94.24 286.01 764.25 1,052.68 1,954.08 214.32 1,450.00 10.00 17.65 63,237.34 100.00 130.40 11.65 32.44 110.24 148.20 844.85 75.90 970.00 166.44 407.00 47.05 93.17 27.48 312.50 702.84 101,397.21 50.00 8.68 110.00 275.00 66.00 2,318.50 1,080.00 300.00 1,236.93 8 06-04-2002 UNIFORM KINGDOM UNITED P ARCEL SERVICE UNITED REPRO GRAPHIC UNITED RESOURCE SYSTEMS UNIVERSAL LICENSING SRVC V AIL BOARD OF REALTORS V AIL DAILY THE V AIL ELECTRONICS V AIL MOUNTAIN SCHOOL V AIL NET V AIL V ALLEY EMERGENCY V AIL V ALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VAILNET INC V AN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY VERIZON SELECT SERVICES VERIZON WIRELESS, VICTIMS ASSISTANCE FUND VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS VOLUNTEER SOFTWARE WAGNER RENTS W AHRER JENNIE RN WASTE MANAGEMENT WEAVER & FITZHUGH WELLS FARGO WEST GROUP WESTERN PAGING WHITE RIVER INSTITUTE WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XCELENERGY XEROX CORPORATION Y AMP A V ALLEY ELECT~C YOUR PERSONAL CHEF Z DELI INC ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR MAY SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 1,815.45 372.90 207.02 8.68 79.00 15.00 463.00 3,670.50 1,780.00 39.95 1,080.00 406.45 25.00 1,345.80 390.00 2,902.42 140.00 256.52 250.00 1,191.20 788.30 95.00 14.88 406,482.48 443.50 8.00 450.00 133.83 279.24 5,627.88 210.25 560.00 137.50 145.30 151.34 PAYROLL 9,10 & 11 912,098.14 1,874,319.48 9 06-04-2002 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND BAND B EXCAVATING BERRY CREEK METROPOLITAN BOGUE CONSTRUCTION BROWNING FERRIS IND CENTRAL SERVICES/EC COLORADO COUNTIES INC COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS DAY TIMERS INCORPORATED DOLAN CONSTRUCTION INC EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED CNL ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO ENVIROTECH GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GYPSUM CREEK RANCH HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELLERSTEIN & SHORE PC HILLSIDE MACHINE SHOP INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY JMC COP DEBT SERVICE FUND KINDER MORGAN INC M&MAUTOPARTS MIKE BETTIS MOTOR POOL FUND PETER OR ABBY DANN PITKIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORK PROPERTY IMAGING, LLC RED TABLES ACRES SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL STEVE NEAL SUMMIT LUMBER SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF GYPSUM WELLS FARGO WESTERN SLOPE AGGREGATE WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE 250.00 100.00 47,485.28 35.25 24.00 325.00 104.00 31.98 250.00 10.54 10.49 30,000.00 966.07 32,469.26 11,228.67 250.00 902.03 300.00 175.00 662.29 183,544.00 160.89 39.57 100.00 157,403.57 113.00 20,943.73 300.00 250.00 136.15 1,771.19 250.00 19.60 7,135.67 232.88 38,996.43 59.68 608.26 134.93 10 06-04-2002 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 31.57 PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL 9,10 & 11 84,898.55 622,709.53 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND BONJOUR BAKERY SERVICE 14.40 CATHERINE CRAIG REIMBURSEMENT 144.55 CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, M.A. SERVICE 420.00 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 464.15 CHILD HEALTH ADVOCATES SERVICE 222.03 CO VETERAN'S SRVC OFFICER SERVICE 10.00 COLORADO COUNTIES INC SERVICE 146.25 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 5.83 CSED SERVICE 185.31 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES 66.50 EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF REIMBURSEMENT 56.74 EAGLE PHARMACY SERVICE 99.99 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY REIMBURSEMENT 84.00 FORINASH KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 561.35 GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF REIMBURSEMENT 13.50 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 939.33 HELLO DIRECT INC SERVICE 203.88 JENNIFER WORCESTER REIMBURSEMENT 88.32 JOSE BANUELOS SERVICE 2,100.00 JUNIPER V ALLEY PRODUCTS SERVICE 458.87 KAREN LAJOY SMITH MA LPC SERVICE 300.00 KATHY REED REIMBURSEMENT 366.98 LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF REIMBURSEMENT 30.00 LYONS KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 183.16 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 1,196.25 NCSEA SERVICE 100.00 PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF REIMBURSEMENT 34.34 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 12.89 QWEST SERVICE 191.12 RENEE FIELDS REIMBURSEMENT 676.83 ROCHELLE A BOWER REIMBURSEMENT 172.50 SAMARITAN CNTR OF ROCKlES SERVICE 630.00 SHELLEY OWNSBEY REIMBURSEMENT 9.52 SUE INGRAM SERVICE 40.00 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 8,839.22 11 06-04-2002 TE~ ALLENDER SERVICE 240.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 24,284.79 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 790.56 PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL 9, 10 & 11 53,233.86 97,617.02 WRAP FUND ASPEN V ALLEY PEDIA T~CS SERVICE 146.00 JULIE M LEWIS SERVICE 240.00 LEARNING CAMP SERVICE 2,800.00 M~ J MARTINEZ SERVICE 53.94 PANDABEARPRESCHOOL SERVICE 648.00 ROCHELLE A BOWER REIMBURSEMENT 196.00 RUBEN BURCIAGA SERVICE 200.00 SHARON JOUY SERVICE 86.00 TOWN OF AVON SERVICE 1,008.00 UNIVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC SERVICE 250.00 5,627.94 RETIREMENT FUND SUSPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 84,678.01 84,678.01 INSURANCE RESERVE FUND AME~CAN GLASS SERVICE 1,474.00 COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICE 917.00 EAGLE RIVER AUTO BODY SERVICE 198.15 2,589.15 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND AMERICAN CIVIL CONSTRUCTR SERVICE 10,455.30 ASPEN MOVING & STORAGE SERVICE 5,107.75 BACHSHVAC SERVICE 895.00 BAI/BRAUN ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE 5,107.50 BEAUDIN GANZE CONSULTING SERVICE 3,085.02 BENCHMARK ENGINEERING SERVICE 395.00 12 06-04-2002 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS SERVICE 552.88 BRADS ELECTRICAL SERVICE SERVICE 260.00 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 168.00 DESIGN WORKSHOP SERVICE 4,638.39 HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI SERVICE 430.00 HERMAN MILLER INC. SERVICE 23,001.61 LONG SHOTS AERIAL SERVICE 390.00 MICRO WAREHOUSE SERVICE 4,718.05 MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN SERVICE 392.80 MOUNTAIN TERRASCAPE SERVICE 16,100.00 NATIONAL BUSINESS SERVICE 4,300.00 PARAMOUNT F AB~CS INC. SERVICE 2,850.00 PEAK LAND CONSULTANTS INC SERVICE 16,856.29 PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING SERVICE 86.88 RENO SMITH ARCHITECT SERVICE 6,409.28 ROARING FORK FENCING SERVICE 1,245.00 SALSBURY INDUSTRIES SERVICE 332.00 SEARS SERVICE 1,219.82 SHAW SIGNS SERVICE 4,617.00 THE PHOENIX FIRE SERVICE 2,475.00 V AIL ELECTRONICS SERVICE 2,186.50 VOGT'S ELECT~C CO SERVICE 375.00 WESTERN SLOPE SERVICE 15,398.18 134,048.25 SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. AME~CAN PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE 6,912.00 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES SERVICE 708.53 B & H SPORTS SERVICE 201.62 BENCHMARK ENGINEERING SERVICE 940.00 BRODY CHEMICAL SUPPLIES 726.31 BROWNING FERRIS IND SERVICE 123.38 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS SUPPLIES 79.90 CAROLINE NEILANDS REIMBURSEMENT 250.00 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 5.09 CHILI WILL YS SERVICE 150.00 COLLETTS SUPPLIES 583.55 COLORADO MOTOR PARTS SUPPLIES 2.62 COLUMBINE MARKET SERVICE 48.98 COpy PLUS SERVICE 104.40 13 06-04-2002 CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DAVID JOHNSON DEAN PAUL DEEP ROCK WEST DESIGN GLASS INCORPORATED DOCTORS ON CALL DODD DIESEL INCORPORATED DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE AUTO PARTS EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER AUTO BODY EAGLE V ALLEY HARDWARE EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL EAGLE V ALLEY PRINTING F AMIL Y SUPPORT REGISTRY FEDERAL EXPRESS G & K SERVICES GATEWAY SECURE STORAGE GAY JOHNSONS INC GENERAL ELECT~C GILLIG CORPORATION GRAEME KINGHORN GRAHAM BAILEY HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HIGH COUNTRY LOCK & KEY IAN CARDWELL IAN SOUNESS IMS OF COLORADO INDEPENDENT TOOL SUPPLY INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTMS J J KELLER JIM KLECKNER JIM LAIR KINDER MORGAN INC KINETIC 0 WATER PROS LAMINATION SERVICE INC LAWSON PRODUCTS LEADING EDGE TECHNOLOGIES LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE 5,698.69 400.00 250.00 21.75 286.00 220.00 1,638.48 9,942.38 35.05 24,328.34 414.96 48.85 334.00 38.25 73.00 2,740.00 346.14 29.80 504.04 1,836.00 1,512.96 269.16 4,324.21 400.00 516.45 1,565.28 35.00 416.45 400.00 19.04 255.40 362.85 130.75 151.35 412.45 563.41 35.00 5,289.32 987.39 93.75 356.80 14 06-04-2002 LUMINATOR SUPPLIES 114.08 M&MAUTOPARTS SUPPLIES 64.52 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 3,169.67 MOTOROLA INCORPORATED SERVICE 3,604.32 MURRAY TWIGG REIMBURSEMENT 416.45 NEOPART SUPPLIES 77.57 NEW PIG CORPORATION SERVICE 107.52 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 1,724.71 QWEST SERVICE 153.67 RAC TRANSPORT COMPANY SERVICE 52.26 ROBERT VISKER REIMBURSEMENT 400.00 ROBYN LOVE REIMBURSEMENT 500.00 ROD BERRY REIMBURSEMENT 420.00 RON E BECK SERVICE 3,000.00 ROWAN ANSTIS REIMBURSEMENT 400.00 SAFETY KLEEN SERVICE 308.87 SALOON, THE SERVICE 30.00 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE REIMBURSEMENT 83.05 SERVICEMASTER OF V AIL SERVICE 6,202.28 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 8,905.19 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 815.53 TOWNSEND MANAGEMENT SRVCS SERVICE 2,356.23 V AIL ELECTRONICS SERVICE 424.00 V AIL V ALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICE 163.95 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 84.85 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 67,596.56 WESTERN SLOPE PAINT SUPPLIES 426.70 WHITEALLS ALPINE SUPPLIES 86.25 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 135.24 XCELENERGY SERVICE 82.68 YOUR PERSONAL CHEF SERVICE 265.00 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 225.94 ZEP MANUF ACT~G COMPANY SERVICE 52.76 PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL 9,10 & 11 162,301.11 342,870.09 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS COLUMBINE MARKET SERVICE 34.61 EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL SERVICE 270.74 15 06-04-2002 EAGLE EYE PHOTO SERVICE 9.92 EAGLE PHARMACY SERVICE 6.94 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 8.04 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 157.87 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 979.35 1,467.47 AIRPORT FUND ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY SERVICE 77.35 AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT SERVICE 350.00 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES SERVICE 115.58 A VIATION SEC~TY CLEARHS SERVICE 1,589.00 BENCHMARK ENGINEERING SERVICE 5,364.38 BROWNING FERRIS IND SERVICE 472.27 CALOIA & HOUPT PC SERVICE 757.10 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 58.35 CENTURY EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 520.00 CHARLIE TANGO CAFE INC REIMBURSEMENT 200.00 COLLETTS SERVICE 1,716.08 COLUMBINE MARKET SUPPLIES 112.17 CURTIS INDUST~ES INC SUPPLIES 170.22 DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICE 79.50 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES 146.48 FOX & COMPANY SERVICE 1,799.14 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 500,000.00 GYPSUM TOWN OF SERVICE 334.25 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 628.17 HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS SUPPLIES 100.00 HILTON GREATER CINC AIRPT SERVICE 436.56 HOLYCROSS ELECT~C ASSOC SERVICE 1,834.56 HONEY BUN BAKERY SERVICE 20.50 JAMES YANTZER REIMBURSEMENT 1,060.00 JA V ALINA TRADING CO. SUPPLIES 207.09 JAY MAX SALES SUPPLIES 316.21 KEY-~TE SEC~TY SERVICE 3,125.00 KINDER MORGAN INC SERVICE 831.84 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 163.64 M&MAUTOPARTS SUPPLIES 148.32 MARKOS PIZZERIA SERVICE 287.32 MCI COMMERCIAL SERVICE W SERVICE 230.85 16 06-04-2002 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 188.51 MICAH RADER REIMBURSEMENT 337.50 MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE 34,325.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 1,569.60 NAPA AUTO PARTS - VAIL SUPPLIES 63.02 NASCO LLC SERVICE 125.00 OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION SUPPLIES 1,789.77 OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP SERVICE 363.00 PRECISION WEST SIGNS SERVICE 14,475.00 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 1,740.16 SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICE 1,161.49 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 4,032.22 VALLEY SIGNS SERVICE 68.90 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 124.81 WAGNEREQU~MENTCOMPANY SUPPLIES 4,250.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 21,042.74 WESTON INCORPORATED SERVICE 2,500.00 WHEAT LAND FIRE EQU~MENT SUPPLIES 50.59 WORKRITE SERVICE 486.76 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 173.32 PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL 9,10 & 11 53,950.90 666,070.22 MICROWAVE MAINTENANCE FUND BUCHHOLZ F AMIL Y SERVICE 300.00 300.00 DEBT SERVICE FUND US BANK TRUST NA SERVICE 65,230.00 65,230.00 JMC-COP DEBT SERVICE FUND US BANK TRUST NA SERVICE 361,403.75 361,403.75 17 06-04-2002 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND MICROW AREHOUSE SUPPLIES 39,100.12 SONY ELECTRONICS INC. SUPPLIES 8,812.00 47,912.12 LANDFILL FUND ACZ LABORATORY INC SERVICE 3,700.00 CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING SERVICE 250.30 CENTRAL SER VICES/EC SERVICE 40.36 DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICE 95.62 DOWN V ALLEY SEPTIC SERVICE 330.00 EAGLE AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 10.30 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 470.83 KRW CONSULTING INC SERVICE 6,683.80 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 50,359.94 OXFORD RECYCLING INC SERVICE 3,241.54 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 429.90 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEP ARTMEN SERVICE 68,382.13 RONALD RASNIC REIMBURSEMENT 500.00 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICE 3,302.36 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 18.53 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 2,222.86 SWANA SERVICE 121.00 V AIL DAIL Y THE SERVICE 104.00 V ANDERW ALKER TIRE SERVICE SERVICE 648.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 9,455.62 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 45.67 YARGER SERVICES LLC SERVICE 525.00 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 184.56 PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL 9,10 & 11 22,468.57 173,590.89 MOTOR POOL FUND ADAMSON INDUST~ES SERVICE 48.00 AL-JON INC SUPPLIES 1,498.22 BERTHOD MOTORS SERVICE 93.26 BRODY CHEMICAL SUPPLIES 131.42 18 06-04- 2002 BROWNING FE~S IND CENTURY EQUIPMENT COMPANY COLLETTS COLORADO MOTOR PARTS DEERSKIN MFG INC DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE AMOCO EAGLE AUTO PARTS EAGLE V ALLEY HARDW ARE EAGLE V ALLEY MEDICAL EATON SALES & SERVICE EM ED COMPANY INC EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE G & K SERVICES GAY JOHNSONS INC GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE HANSON EQUIPMENT HEALTH INSURANCE FUND INDEPENDENT TOOL SUPPLY INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTMS J &S CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO JMC COP DEBT SERVICE FUND KENDRA DOEPKEN KINDER MORGAN INC LAWSON PRODUCTS LEADING EDGE TECHNOLOGIES LISA GRIGGS M & M AUTO PARTS MOTOR POOL FUND NAPA AUTO P ARTS-CARBONDLE OFFICE FURNITURE & DESIGN POWER EQUIPMENT COMPANY POWER MOTIVE REY MOTORS INCORPORATED SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS CO SUMMIT LUMBER SUPER 8 MOTEL SUSPENSE FUND SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE 91.09 521.00 56,278.72 1,146.10 18,672.00 823.87 32.50 82.14 19.70 73.00 1,595.49 259.43 150.00 542.75 2,196.38 16,563.19 871.32 2,579.60 368.59 526.73 61.95 599.66 474,535.00 14.00 415.97 244.87 290.00 25.00 179.09 7,231.72 9.99 116.05 145,767.47 137,650.00 820.28 83.09 4,579.21 300.00 504.30 98.78 2,743.94 19 06-04-2002 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 602.12 TRUCKS TUFF AND HITCHES SERVICE 1,261.89 UNITED STATES WELDING SERVICE 257.60 WAGNEREQUWMENTCOMPANY SUPPLIES 1,419.89 WEAR PARTS EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 2,415.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 13,733.29 WESTERN SLOPE CHRYSLER SERVICE 138,026.00 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 13,356.17 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 92.40 PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL 9,10 & 11 34,275.08 1,086,874.31 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 975.00 MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 38,878.36 PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 3,576.79 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 111.78 UNITED STATES LIFE INS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 4,011.30 47,553.23 ENHANCED E911 FUND CENTURYTEL SERVICE 179.86 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES SERVICE 49.75 QWEST SERVICE 16,122.08 16,351.69 GRAND TOTAL 5,631,213.15 Consent Agenda Chairman Gallagher stated the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A) Approval of bill paying for the weeks of June 3 & 10,2002, subject to review by County Administrator B) Approval of payroll for June 13, 2002, subject to review by County Administrator C) Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of May 14, 2002 D) Resolution 2002-078, regarding approval ofthe appointments to the Board of Directors ofthe Golden Eagle Housing Corporation 20 06-04-2002 E) Resolution 2002-079, regarding the approval of an order of cancellation of certain uncollectible taxes F) Lease Agreement between County of Eagle and Habitat for Humanity for the former Road & Bridge site G) Agreement between County of Eagle and Roaring Fork School District H) Agreement between County of Eagle and Eagle Enrichment Program for Care Quality Improvement I) Agreement between County of Eagle and ABC School, Inc. for Child Care Quality Improvement J) Agreement between County of Eagle and St. Mary's Preschool for Child Care Quality Improvement K) Agreement between County of Eagle and Brush Creek Preschool for Child Care Quality Improvement L) Agreement between County of Eagle and Mountain Tots Preschool for Child Care Quality Improvement M) Agreement between Eagle County Health and Human Services and John McCormick N) Agreement between Eagle County Health and Human Services and Terri Allender 0) Agreement for Household Hazardous Waste Collection Event Services Between the County of Eagle and Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. Chairman Gallagher asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Tom Moorhead, County Attorney, stated the Consent Agenda is ready for approval. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Plat & Resolution Signing Matt Gennett, Planner, presented the following plats and resolutions for the Board's consideration: 5MB-00298. Village Townhomes at Arrowhead. Phase III: A Part of Lot 31A. Arrowhead at Vail. Filing 13. A Type B Minor Subdivision, the intent of which is to create four (4) residential condominium units in "Building I" of the Village Townhomes at Arrowhead. Staff findings are as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a) Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Commissioner Stone moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-00298, Village Townhomes at Arrowhead, Phase III, a part of Lot 31A, Arrowhead at Vail, Filing 13, incorporating staff findings. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 21 06-04-2002 Intergovernmental Agreement Amendment, Eagle, Pitkin, Garfield, Lake, Summit Counties Kathleen Forinash, Director of Health & Human Services, presented an Intergovernmental Agreement between the County of Eagle, County of Pitkin, County of Garfield, County of Lake and the County of Summit, concerning a regional child care project. She stated this agreement was entered into in December 1999 with the five Counties mentioned above. Beginning July 1, 2002, this project will become a tri-county agreement with Eagle, Pitkin and Garfield Counties. Summit and Lake Counties will do their own day care licensing projects. Chairman Gallagher stated when governments try to improve efficiency by working together to try and solve problems, they need to learn how to improve on those efforts. He asked what was good and bad about the project. Commissioner Stone asked about the funding of the project. Ms. Forinash stated the reason this is being changed is the funding. In 1999, Eagle and Garfield County had sufficient and additional Child Care and TANF funds to help fund this project. Since 1999, Eagle County does not have excess funds, Garfield County Commissioners believe the funds should be focused in their County only, so it comes back to lack of funding. Summit County prefers to fund its own endeavors, and Lake County is trying to figure out how to fund child care. She stated she is meeting with the Board later in the day to discuss helping Lake County figure out how to continue their licensing program. In the beginning there were surplus funds available and they are there no longer. Chairman Gallagher stated there was cooperative efforts by governments and it seems that would save some momes. Ms. Forinash stated that was the case. From Eagle County's position, it is much cheaper to join with other Counties. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve an Intergovernmental Agreement between the County of Eagle, County of Pitkin, County of Garfield, County of Lake and the County of Summit, concerning a regional child care project. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Petition for Annexation, National Guard Tom Moorhead presented the First National Guard Petition for Annexation to the Town of Gypsum. He stated the extent of the annexation is the footprint of the building. The reason for the annexation is that they are receiving water from the Town of Gypsum. Chairman Gallagher asked if there was additional action to be taken by the Board. He questioned the pre-annexation agreement. Mr. Moorhead stated this is the only action to be taken by the Board. He stated the pre- annexation agreement will require further discussion. Commissioner Menconi moved to sign the petition for annexation for the First National Guard Petition for Annexation to the Town of Gypsum. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Liquor License Consent Agenda Earlene Roach, Eagle County Liquor Inspector, presented the Liquor License Consent Agenda as follows: 22 06-04-2002 A) Beaver Creek Food Services Saddleridge at Beaver Creek This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant liquor license. This establishment is located at 44 Meadow Ln, Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. B) Daniel's Foods Inc Mirabelle at Beaver Creek This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant liquor license. This establishment is located at 55 Village Road, Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. C) Boaters Bar LLC Boaters Bar This is a renewal of an optional premise liquor license. This establishment is located at 4199 Trough Road, Bond. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. Commissioner Stone moved to approve the Liquor License Consent Agenda for June 4, 2002, as presented. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Catholic Charities - Western Slope Earlene Roach presented a special events permit application for Catholic Charities - Western Slope, for June 18,2002 from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. The application is in order and all fees have been paid. Tom Ziemann, applicant, is present for the hearing. She stated the applicant has questioned if all alcohol servers must be TIPS trained or if they can train two to supervisor other staff. The Board concurred that all servers must be trained. Chairman Gallagher suggested Mr. Ziemann check with other parishes in the neighborhood. He stated he believes some of them are already trained. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve a special events permit for Catholic Charities - Western Slope for June 18,2002 from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority and reconvene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Agreement, Temporary License for Access Chairman Gallagher stated the next matter is an Agreement of Temporary License for Access to the Berry Creek Equestrian Center. Tom Moorhead stated this will provide access for the horse owners to cross the property and attend to their stock. Commissioner Stone moved to approve the Agreement for Temporary License for Access as presented. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. SD-0025, Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District Bob Narracci, Planning Manager, presented file number SD-0025, Crown Mountain Park and 23 06-04-2002 Recreation District. He stated the applicant is proposing to form the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District to implement plans for recreational development of the Mount Sopris Tree Farm Property in the El J ebel area and to undertake other recreational developments and management. The newly formed District will collect a property tax mill levy and issue bonds for development and management ofthe Tree Farm Property. The proposed District's boundaries encompass approximately 450 square miles inclusive of the Town of Basalt, as well as, portions of Eagle and Pitkin Counties. In documenting the need for park and recreational facilities, the application cites the ever- growing demand versus the static deficiency in playing fields for organized sports including soccer, baseball/softball, football and tennis. With the exception of a limited number of fields owned by the Roaring Fork School District, most other fields are on private land and are subject to landowner imposed restrictions. The Willits Subdivision soccer field is the only fully accessible, full-size public soccer field in the area. Existing facilities are overused, thereby creating difficulties with scheduling maintenance and field time for practices and games. Based upon National Park and Recreation Association industry standards for fields per participant, it is projected that by the year 2010, there will be a shortfall oftwo publically available soccer fields, eight publically available baseball/softball fields and 18 public ally available tennis courts. The industry standards account for adequate maintenance schedules and periods of non-use. The District also intends to develop a variety of other active recreational opportunities on the Mount Sopris Tree Farm property in addition to soccer and baseball/softball fields. This recreational development shall occur pursuant to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Guide which was approved by the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners on March 20, 2001. The site development plan which was incorporated into the PUD Guide identifies two basketball courts, two tennis courts, a BMX bicycle track, a skateboard park and two volleyball courts. Additionally, the plan anticipates trails, playgrounds, picnic areas and a dog park. The District intends to construct these improvements concurrent with development of the ball fields and courts. Phased in accordance with public demand, the District will also eventually construct improvements for ice skating/hockey, skateboarding, climbing walls, squash and handball courts and other indoor sports installations. The mid-valley area is also deficient in areas for passive recreation. No developed public facilities for picnicking, river access, playgrounds or quiet enjoyment of the outdoors exist between the Towns of Carbondale and Basalt. The only existing opportunity in the mid-valley area is within the Blue Lake Subdivision which is not a public recreation area. Again, based upon growth projections and growth in school enrollment in Carbondale and Basalt, there is a growing need for unorganized play opportunities for children ranging from pre-school to 10 years. It is anticipated that development of the Mount Sopris Tree Farm property will provide many passive recreational options. If approved, the District will finance all development and improvement of the Mount Sopris Tree Farm property. The District will be responsible for contracting for design, planning, construction, proper land use procedures and purchasinglinstallation of infrastructure, facilities and equipment. The District will also be responsible for on-going maintenance in perpetuity and for managing all programs and activities on the Mount Sopris Tree Farm property (with the exception of the Eagle County Building). The District will work closely with adjacent jurisdictions to coordinate programs and maximize its efficiency and effectiveness. The District will enter into Intergovernmental Agreements with the adjacent jurisdictions to the extent that such agreements will further the interests and responsibilities of all of the parties. The proposed District's boundaries overlap with those of the Mid-Valley Metropolitan District which, also has park and recreation activities in its service plan. The proposed District will work with the Mid- Valley Metro District to avoid providing redundant services and to obtain the Mid-Valley District's consent to establish overlapping powers. The service plan identifies seven primary responsibilities of the proposed District: 1. Plan and supervise completion of playing fields, as well as, plan and supervise construction of 24 06-04-2002 additional park and recreational facilities on the Mount Sopris Tree Farm property in accordance with the approved PUD Guide and associated site development plan; 2. Manage operations and maintenance of all facilities on the Mount Sopris Tree Farm property (with the exception of the Eagle County building); 3. Undertake an update and expansion of the site development plan based on findings of the Tree Farm Task Force, the District Organizing Committee and local governments; 4. Manage and maintain open space and other undeveloped lands on the Tree Farm Property; 5. Provide for low-impact and passive uses of undeveloped land; 6. Represent the interests of the Mount Sopris Tree Farm property in dealings with Eagle and Pitkin Counties, the Town of Basalt, the Division of Wildlife, the U.S. Forest Service and other jurisdictions, agencies and interest; 7. Work with established programs in the mid-valley vicinity. The District will provide facilities to accommodate the programs of existing recreational programs to the extent possible and will provide park and recreational facilities to the public at large. The current financial plan does not include resources for planning and management of existing recreational programs. Development ofthe Mount Sopris Tree Farm property will be phased to provide the most critically needed facilities first. A consensus on phasing of development will be achieved by consulting the findings of the approved PUD guide and site development plan and by conferring with local interest groups and the public. The aggregate general obligation debt of the District shall not exceed $5,100,000 to support construction and maintenance of specific facilities deemed critical to District operations and to support the cost of planning for the future of the buildings on the Mount Sopris Tree Farm property. The estimate does not include costs associated with new or different facilities. The estimate also does not include the cost of any additional lands. Other expenses that may be incurred include planning for use of buildings, design and engineering for building redevelopment, remodel/addition or other redevelopment of buildings and development of other facilities. Estimated assessed valuation within the proposed District's boundaries is $234,000,000. This figure represents a 26% increase in local property values since 1999. The mill levy for the District is projected to be 2.589 mills per $1000 of assessed value until the year 2022 generating approximately $760,000 per year in gross revenue. This does not include any existing mill levy currently on the property within the proposed District's boundaries. This works out to $50.43 additional tax/year/$200,000 home. Additional tax/year for a $350,000 home would be $88.25. It is anticipated that the District will obtain a portion of its annual income from user fees, as well as, the Colorado Conservation Trust Fund (Lottery Proceeds) and from grants from appropriate private and public foundations and agencies such as the Great Outdoors Colorado, the Colorado Division of Wildlife, the State Trails Program and the Colorado Department of Transportation. Based upon the projections set forth in the Service Plan, it appears that the District will be able to support operations, planned capital construction and retire its debt within 20 years. If the Service Plan is approved, the District will continue to develop and refine cost estimates and prepare for bond issuance. 1. If either Pitkin or Eagle County fail to approve the Service Plan then financing assumptions upon which the plan is premised will no longer be valid. 2. The proposed function being proposed in the Service Plan overlaps with the Mid-Valley Metropolitan District and the Roaring Fork Open Space District. Consent from these Districts is necessary. 3. Any and all functions and facilities associated with the District which are located within Eagle County, must be in conformance with the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and/or applicable State Statutes governing Special Districts. 4. The applicant needs to demonstrate conformance to the "long range water quality management 25 06-04-2002 plan" as specified in the statutory findings. 5. The Eagle County Master Plan and Future Land Use Map identify the majority of the property within the proposed District's boundaries as appropriate for Community Center Development. The Plan identifies community oriented recreation facilities as necessary within Community Centers. The Plan specifically anticipates development ofthe Mount Sopris Tree Farm property for active recreation purposes. The Mid Valley Community Master Plan generally encourages the development of recreation facilities, community parks and play fields. This plan further identifies the need for a community park of at least 15 acres in area in the Basalt/El J ebel vicinity. The existing Mount Sopris Tree Farm PUD Guide and site development plan are a direct reflection of the Mount Sopris Tree Farm Master Plan. 6. Pursuant to the Mount Sopris Tree Farm PUD Guide, the "Tree Farm" property consists of 124.31 acres. The proposed Service Plan identifies the "Tree Farm" site as consisting of 128 acres. 7. The applicant needs to address all of the attached referral comments including: Comments made by Michael Roeper, Eagle County Director of Finance in e-mail dated 4/22/02; Comments made by Rich Cunningham, Eagle County Director of Facilities in e-mail dated 5/21/02; Comments made by Diane Mauriello, Deputy County Attorney in Memorandums dated April 24, 2002 and May 16, 2002; Comments made by Town of Basalt in their letter dated April 26, 2002; Comments made by Loyal Leavenworth, Counsel for the Mid Valley Metropolitan District in his letter dated April 24, 2002; Summary of Bob Noon's response to Mr. Leavenworth's comments in letter dated May 13, 2002; Comments made by Theodore Guy as President of the Mid Valley Metropolitan District in his letter dated May 23,2002; Letter of concern received from Mr. & Mrs. Tracy Dillingham, dated May 17, 2002. Staff findings are as shown on staff report and as follows: The Board of County Commissioners shall disapprove the service plan unless evidence satisfactory to the Board of each of the following is presented: a. There is sufficient existing and projected need for organized service in the area to be serviced by the special district; b. The existing service in the area to be served by the special district is inadequate for present and projected needs; c. The special district is capable of providing economical and sufficient service to the area within its boundaries; d. The area included in the District has, or will have, the financial ability to discharge the proposed indebtedness on a reasonable basis. The Board of County Commissioners may disapprove the service plan if evidence satisfactory to the Board of any of the following is not presented: a. Adequate service is not, or will not be, available to the area through Eagle County or other existing municipal or quasi-municipal corporations, including existing special districts, within a reasonable time and on a comparable basis; b. The facility and service standards of the District are compatible with the facility and service standards of Eagle County, and each municipality which is an interested party under Section 32-1- 204(1), c.R.S.; c. The service plan is in substantial compliance with the master plan adopted pursuant to Section 30-28-106, C.R.S.; d. The service plan is in compliance with the duly adopted long range water quality management plan for the area; e. The service plan will be in the best interest of the area proposed to be served. The Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission made positive findings and recommended approval of this application with the following eight conditions: I. Referral comments must be addressed by the applicant during the presentation to the Board of County Commissioners; Six Petitions for Exclusion have been received. C.R.S. 32-1-203 grants the Board of County Commissioners the authority to exclude territory from a proposed special district prior to approval of the service plan. The Board may consider the petitions and any testimony or evidence presented by those seeking exclusion. The petitioner of the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District service plan has the burden of proving that the exclusion of such property is not in the best interest of the proposed district. After weighing the evidence the Board shall determine whether to include or exclude the property which is the subject of the petitions. The six petitions received are from: Arthur Bowles - Owns Metes & Bounds parcel located 30 miles from Basalt on the Eagle Thomasville Road and is only accessible in the summer months. Please note that this particular property is automatically exempt pursuant to C.R.S. 32-1-307. Dan and Lynne Levinson - Own 9 separate parcels located above Reudi Reservoir. Cumulatively, the 9 separate parcels add up to 179.19 acres. However, none of the 9 separate parcels contain 40 or more acres individually. Jacque & Jill LLLP by Art Bowles, General Partner - Owns Metes & Bounds parcel located 25 miles from Basalt on the Eagle Thomasville Road and is uses as pasture for horses in the summer months. Please note that this particular property is automatically exempt pursuant to C.R.S. 32-1- 307. James L. Cotherman - 1315 Reudi Creek Road, Basalt - 9.772 acres. Gerald R. Terwilliger and Anna M. Naeser - 216 East Homestead Drive, Basalt - Platted Residential Lot of less than forty acres. Mary Gail Caruso - 2255 Emma Road, Basalt - 6.49 acres. The Board of County Commissioners should move to grant or deny, based on evidence received, each petition for exclusion. The Board should consider and make a separate motion for each petitions. Mr. Narracci stated there have been six petitions for exclusion submitted that do not own over forty acres of property. Any parcel of more than 40 acres is automatically excluded. He stated he has also received two late petitions for exclusion from Kent Wintery, who has related they did not receive the applicants notice until after the deadline for response had passed. The other petition received late is from Kay Callison who states the same reason as receiving it after the deadline. Chairman Gallagher stated the Attorneys have advised the Board before they can consider the service plan for the proposed district, they must first deal with the properties requesting exemption. He questioned ifthe Board would consider the two late notices. Mark Fuller, applicant, stated all notices were mailed from the Basalt Post Office on May 11, 2002. Diane Mauriello, Deputy County Attorney, advised the Board there was notice mailed by the applicant and also this matter was published in all newspapers. She stated the Statutes allow the Board to consider late information. Bob Noon, Attorney for the Park & Rec District, stated the proceedings at the court level state interested parties to object or express their concerns and they shall be given notice. Chairman Gallagher asked Crown Mountain people to notify all those interested parties if they are or are not excluded. 27 06-04-2002 Commissioner Stone stated he had no problem with accepting the late petitions. Commissioner Menconi stated he had no concerns with the late petitions. Chairman Gallagher stated the Board concurred to accept the two late petitions. Mark Fuller stated there are several requirements to be met before the Board can approve a service plan. Mr. Fuller reviewed the He discussed the following items: 1. Description of proposed services, found in the service plan in area 1, 2,4 & 5. a. The district proposes to develop the Tree Farm property in accordance with the PUD site plan. b. To manage and maintain facilities on the Tree Farm and elsewhere. c. To manage and maintain open space and undeveloped land. d. To plan for redevelopment of the buildings on the Tree Farm e. To work with other agencies to provide and expand recreational programs within the district, i.e soccer and baseball fields in the first year of operation f. To move forward immediately with development of park and passive recreational facilities g. To maintain the 60 acres that are reserved in the PUD Site Plan for Open Space and undeveloped land h. To move forward immediately with planning for the future ofthe buildings on the property i. To move forward with planning of recreational programs to be managed by the district. He noted the Service Plan does not call for any night use or night use type lighting on the property. 2. Include a financial plan within the Service Plan, found in part 6, appendix C ofthe Service Plan: a. Operating revenues for the first year is estimated to be $624,000 which comes strictly from the table of bond return and repayment, ofthat $624,474 to repay debt and $150,000 would be for management and maintenance. That income would be augmented by $50,000 to $60,000 from other sources as Mr. Fuller pointed out a few moments ago. b. The debt repayment schedule can be found in appendix C c. There is no alteration in the debt repayment plan anticipated at this time. That which is assumed in appendix C could have variables, including future of exclusions, interest rate, total assessed valuation within the district and the cost of bond issue. They do not expect any ofthose material representations to affect the structure, income or debt repayment assumptions. 3. Preliminary engineering and architectural survey a. The site plan, taken from the PUD, they are going on the premise that constitutes a survey of the facilities they intend to install. He stated they do not have the resources to go much beyond this. That would certainly be done before anything was built on the site. As far as the buildings, that would be part of the planning process on the property. 4. Map, estimated population and estimated valuation a. The map shown on the screen shown by staff is accurate as far as their boundaries go. These issues are addressed in part 2, section 5, appendix D. b. The estimated population is12,000 people and the estimated valuation is $234,000,000 5. General description of facilities and standards a. The facilities are as shown on the site plan and include two baseball fields, two soccer fields, a multi-use practice area, concession stand, restroom, two sheltered areas, skateboard park, playgrounds, various lawn and wooded areas, trail system, community garden, botanical garden, parking areas, two tennis courts, two volleyball courts, a bmx track, scout cabin and basketball courts. This does not address any recreational programs the district might supply. They are trying to move forward with the Town of Basalt to provide recreational programs throughout the district and not just on the tree farm property. 28 06-04-2002 6. Construction standards: a. They expect the construction will meet all applicable codes and standards from the National Park and Recreation Association. b. Any structures will meet all codes and will be consistent with the architecture of the Eagle County Building on site. The only structures that are contemplated in the first phase of development are the concession stands, restrooms and picnic shelters. c. They will be looking at energy efficiency, low angle lighting, provision of mass transit and pedestrian access facilities d. Integrated pest management systems to minimize pesticide and herbicide use e. Coordinated maintenance with Eagle County so that whatever the County does to maintain their property, the district is not providing redundant services f No night lighting. 7. Estimated costs, in part 6 of the Service Plan, appendix C & E: a. Land costs would be zero, provided they reach a favorable lease with the County b. Engineering costs for construction of the facilities as described at around $400,000 c. Legal and administrative at $200,000 associated with construction and another $50,000 associated with management and maintenance within the first year d. Debt issuance is targeted at $5,1000,000 at an estimated interest rate of7%, which they would also represent as the maximum interest rate e. Other expenses associated with development include $3,043,000 for recreation facilities, $880,000 for infrastructure, $1,200,000 for design and construction fees and $150,000 for first year management and maintenance, which would go to $200,000 for the second year and by 10% for the additional years of operation. 8. Intergovernmental Agreements a. In discussions with the Mid-Valley Metropolitan District b. Holland Hills Metropolitan District is located entirely within Pitkin County and they have had preliminary discussions with them c. There is a letter of approval from the Roaring Fork Open Space District d. They expect to have an IGA with the Town of Basalt regarding mutual maintenance, recreation program management and revenues e. They expect to enter into an IGA and property lease with Eagle County f They may enter into an IGA with the Division of Wildlife for mutual management of their property The criteria for their Intergovernmental Agreements is avoidance of redundant services between themselves and the other agencies. Maximizing efficiency and minimizing costs, fair apportionment of costs between agencies and mutual provision of easements. Mr. Fuller addressed staff comments. He stated all properties do not meet the automatic exclusion of more than 40 acres. Infrastructure costs are necessary. The Basalt Planning Department asked to defer the plan to mid-valley businesses. There are no amendments to the service plan yet. He stated they are prepared to amend the service plan as per the Commissioners and Planning and Zoning. He spoke to the memo from Mike Roeper that called into question the revenue projections, indicating they were $50,000 too high. They will be re-evaluating those and will put Mr. Roeper in contact with that representative. He spoke to the Colorado Trust Fund Contribution which came from the conversations with Outdoors Colorado and their estimates of income. He spoke to maintenance costs which will escalate yearly. They put them at a low level to start slowly and work their way up. Mr. Fuller stated as per the letter from Tracy Dillingham, tax rates are subject to voter approval. He raised the question whether Mid-Valley Metropolitan District had the power for recreation facilities. He stated they have not undertaken development and have no plans to do so. 29 06-04-2002 Mr. Fuller stated they are happy to exclude all properties over 40 acres but would request all properties under 40 acres be included in the proposed district. He stated they have not seen any requests that make sense. He stated also included is a memo from Bob Narracci indicating they need to comply with the Land Use Regulations and any applicable State Statutes. They need to conform to water quality plans. They will be doing that in conjunction with site specific facility plans. As far as the acreage discrepancy, they will get with DHM and determine which one is correct acreage. Bob Noon, Attorney representing the applicant, concerning the request for exclusions, the agricultural exclusion, the district does have the right to change and petition for the inclusion ofthose 40 acre parcels at a later date. Chairman Gallagher asked what percentage of the revenues will be user fees. Mr. Fuller stated approximately $5,000.00 per year, which is premised on use of the Tree Farm. He stated if they take over the Basalt recreational program later on, there is an entire set of use fees that have not been included in the program. That amounts to about $70,000 per year. Chairman Gallagher stated he did not think a recreation district would operate a charity. He stated it is reasonable to charge teams and individual members a fee for use of the facility. He questioned the IGA's and the apportionment of costs. Mr. Fuller stated the Town of Basalt has fields and park properties they maintain. Some may be appropriate for use by district programs. In developing an IGA with the Town it may be appropriate for them to contract with the District to maintain certain properties that are used solely by District programs. Chairman Gallagher stated in the Planning Commission conditions, he asked how far apart is the discrepancy in acres. Mr. Narracci answered four acres. Chairman Gallagher asked about aligning with the Tree Farm PUD Guide. Mr. Fuller stated there are specific guidelines in the PUD Guide that address the development of the recreational amenities, i.e pedestrian access. Chairman Gallagher asked about the relationship in that they lease the property to the District, would it be better to use a contract. Where is the County obliged to follow the PUD Guide rather than the district who operates the facilities. Ms. Mauriello stated that is why she is suggesting an Intergovernmental Agreement be signed, which will spell out all the issues, how the planning components will work, who will have responsibility for the maintenance. Chairman Gallagher asked about the bottom two bullets that were dropped, which refer to an annual report. Mr. Narracci stated in the first paragraph, just above section seven. Chairman Gallagher stated the Planning Commission seems to be saying they do not want to do anything other than something specific. Mr. Fuller stated the Planning Commission wanted to be sure that once they were prepared to redevelop the fields and around them, that there was not an assumption that was already a part of the Service Plan. They would have to come back before the Board for those things. Chairman Gallagher asked about the ballot question and suggested the question should be clear and written in an understandable manner. He stated the District can check with a number of County Clerks. Commissioner Stone asked about the Planning Commission recommendation. He questioned the site across Valley Road. Mr. Narracci stated it was the entire Tree Farm site. They were concerned with a condition placed on the Tree Farm PUD, speaking to terms and conditions and the pedestrian access. Commissioner Stone stated there was discussion concerning the District, if formed, would be required to build an under pass or over pass. He stated that needs to be clearly defined. He stated he felt the total burden should be on the recreation district. He does not know ifhe would like to include it as a 30 06-04-2002 line item. Chairman Gallagher asked about the triggers for the over or under pass. Mr. Narracci stated it is Phase II. Chairman Gallagher suggested changing the word management of recreation to all recreation and recreation support. That would exclude such things as buildings that have not been developed. Ms. Mauriello reminded the Board they may still want to consider issues concerning the Mid- Valley Metropolitan District. Chairman Gallagher stated the Board will take up the petitions for exclusion. The first is Dan and Lynn Levinson, owners of 9 separate parcels located above Reudi Reservoir. Accumulative they have 179.9 acres, however none of the 9 parcels have 40 acres or more. Mr. N arracci stated this property is zoned Rural Residential. Some properties are still vacant or are residential. Mr. Noon stated they encourage the Board to exclude only those parcels that are over 40 acres in size. Those parcels, if their use changes, can be added to the district at a later time. That does not apply to those parcels not zoned agriculture. Commissioner Stone moved to deny the request from Dan and Lynn Levinson for exclusion into the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District, schedule numbers R052590, R052592, R052587, R052591, R052586, R052589, R052585, R052584, R052588. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Gallagher stated the next request is by James L. Cofferman, a parcel containing 9 acres on Reudi Creek Road. Mr. Narracci stated the property is zoned Rural Residential. Commissioner Menconi moved to deny the exclusion request by James Cofferman. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Gallagher stated the next exclusion request is from Gerald R Terwilliger and Anna M. Mazer. They live on East Homestead Drive in Basalt, a lot ofless than 40 acres. Commissioner Stone moved to deny the exclusion request from Gerald R. Terwilliger and Anna M. Mazer, owners of the residence on E. Homestead Drive in Basalt. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Gallagher stated the next exclusion request if from Mary Gayle Caruso on Emma Road, in Basalt, a parcel of nearly 6.5 acres. Commissioner Menconi moved to deny the exclusion request from Mary Gayle Caruso on Emma Road in Basalt. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Gallagher stated the next exclusion request is from Kay Callison, Trustee of the Nicholls Family Trust. They are requesting exclusion for ten parcels. Mr. Narracci stated schedule numbers 045306, 048533, 029221, 020764 are all over 40 acres and are automatically excluded. He stated the other properties are zoned Resource. Commissioner Stone moved to deny the exclusion request for Kay Callison, Trustee of the Nicholls Family Trust, parcel numbers 0629152, 028491 and 630004. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Gallagher stated the next request for exclusion was from Kay Callison, on behalf of Verona Associates. Commissioner Menconi moved to deny the request for exclusion for Verona Associates, schedule number 31889,31890 and 31891. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Gallagher stated the next exclusion request if from Kent Wintery, on behalf of the Basalt Highlands Homeowners Association for six parcels that are zoned PUD and their size if less than 40 acres. 31 06-04-2002 Commissioner Stone moved to deny the exclusion request for Kent Wintery, Basalt Highlands Homeowners Association for six parcels that are zone PUD and their size is less than 40 acres. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Gallagher asked for public comment. There was none. He closed public comment. Loyle E. Leavenworth, Attorney representing the Mid-Valley Metropolitan District, stated the district was created in the early 80's. The District has three powers to perform under their formation, they are water, sewer and parks and recreation. He stated the District is a park and recreation district but at this time does have an active role in that part of their formation. The statutes refers to an overlapping district. He stated the proposed district will totally overlap the Mid-Valley District. He stated they met to discuss proposed conditions they would ask be included in the approval of the proposed Service Plan. He spoke to a letter from Ted Guy and they made several changes in response to that letter. The conditions are as follows: 1. The Park and Recreation District shall consult with MVMD as a referral agency on any purchase, or acquisition by condemnation, or property or easements, or on construction of any capital improvements within MVMD's boundary, within any areas being considered by MVMD for inclusion (and which have submitted a Petition for Inclusion, pursuant to c.R.S. 32-1-401), or within one (1) mile ofMVMD's boundary. 2. The Park and Recreation District will not object, and will consent, if such consent is necessary, to the approval of a service plan for and the development of active recreation sites and facilities by MVMD within MVMD's boundary. MVMD will consult with the proposed Park and Recreation District prior to filing any service plan and will attempt to avoid the creation of redundant services, provided, however, MVMD retains sole discretion as to its final service plan. 3. Upon formation, the Board of Directors of the Park and recreation District shall enter into an intergovernmental agreement with the Board of Directors ofMVMD. The two Districts shall work together to develop terms and conditions for the intergovernmental agreement that are acceptable to both Districts, and which will serve the purposes of avoiding the provision of redundant services and ensuring continued communications and cooperation between the Districts. Once entered, if any provision(s) of the intergovernmental agreement contradict or vary from any ofMVMD's terms or conditions for approval of the Park and Recreation District, the intergovernmental agreement shall control and supercede such terms or conditions, provided, however, that all other terms or conditions shall remain in effect. 4. In the event that the Park and Recreation District acquires property, in fee, for the purpose of open space (passive recreation), the Park and Recreation District agrees to provide, without land acquisition costs, easements over any properties so owned by the Park and recreation District within the boundaries ofMVMD, or over any properties so owned by the Park and Recreation District adjacent to the boundaries ofMVMD which easements are needed by MVMD for the construction of underground water and / or wastewater treatment and distribution facilities to serve the customers ofMVMD. MVMD shall use reasonable construction methods to minimize the impact upon the Park and Recreation District properties during construction, and shall fully mitigate, by re-vegetation and other reasonably necessary actions approved by the Park and recreation District, the damage caused by the installation and lor maintenance of MVMD's water and/or wastewater treatment and distribution facilities so that the surface ofthe Park and Recreation District's properties are returned to their natural condition after such construction and re-vegetation. To the extend possible, all such easement shall be located along rights of way adjacent to the Park and Recreation District's properties. The location of all such easements shall be subject to the approval of the Park and Recreation District, which approval shall not be unreasonable withheld. 5. In the event that the Park and recreation District acquires property, in fee, for the purpose of open space (passive recreationO located within or adjacent to MVMD's boundaries, and when such use is not inconsistent with the management plan for a property, the Park and recreation District will allow 32 06-04-2002 the construction, in reasonable locations, (e.g. along the property's boundaries and/or in areas less visible to users of other parts of a property), of above ground facilities to serve the water and/or wastewater treatment and distribution needs ofMVMD. Such construction shall be subject to the same reasonable construction methods set forth in paragraph three above and shall be screened by natural vegetation or other means approved by the Park and Recreation District. MVMD shall be solely responsible for all construction and screening costs. There shall be no cost to MVMD for use of the land and a reasonable easement shall be granted to MVMD for construction and maintenance of such above ground water and/or wastewater facilities. 6. Any modification of the Park and Recreation District's Service Plan that requires County approval will again require MVMD's consent and approval pursuant to C.R.S. 32-1-107(3)(b)(IV); provided, however, that MVMD will not object to a modification of the Park and Recreation District's Service Plan to provide recreation services or recreation facilities not then provided by MVMD or intended to be provided by MVMD in the near future. 7. Subject to the same terms and conditions of Condition No.4, MVMD agrees to provide to the Park and Recreation District an easement for park and recreation purposes, as needed, over property that is owned by MVMD in fee. The location of all such easements shall be subject to the approval of MVMD, which approval shall not be unreasonable withheld. Mr. Leavenworth spoke to condition number 6, stating the way the Statute reads, they have veto power over the formation of this proposed district and they are reluctant to allow the district to be formed and have a veto power over their district. That is the reason for the condition. He stated it is clear to him that any member of the board of this district, has the right to come before the Board with an objection to the modification ofthe service plan. They are unwilling to give Crown Mountain the veto power but would rather have them appear at a Board hearing and state their case. Commissioner Stone stated it should be even for both sides. He stated as Mr. Leavenworth has faith in the Commissioners, why not put that faith in both directions. Mr. Leavenworth stated they did add in paragraph 6 that they would agree to not object to any modification of Crown Mountain District to provide recreational services not them provided by Mid- Valley. Commissioner Stone stated he believes that Mid-Valley Metropolitan is over reaching. They have had recreational powers and authority but have chosen not to exercise those. He stated it appears they are trying to have an unfair advantage over the Crown Mountain District and not have the same thing for themselves. He can understand easements across properties, but to require for above ground facilities, if the park and recreation district, paragraph number 5, if they were able to purchase some property and Mid-Valley wanted to put in a water and sewer plant on the property, it does not seem fair that they have to let them use that property for free. It seems to be a little over reaching in his opinion. Mr. Leavenworth stated he does not read the condition that it would allow them to do that. Commissioner Stone stated it states "in the event that the Park and recreation District acquires property, will allow the construction, in reasonable locations, of above ground facilities to serve the water and/or wastewater treatment and distribution needs ofMVMD, there shall be no cost to MVMD for use of the land." That sounds like they bought the land and MVMD wants to use the land for free. Mr. Leavenworth stated there is supposed to be an added sentence that was omitted. Commissioner Stone stated it would still read that MVMD would not have to pay for the use of the property. Mr. Leavenworth stated they were speaking about a well and well head. An underground lift station does have a facility above ground. Chairman Gallagher asked if they are willing to put a square foot limitation to that. Mr. Leavenworth stated he believes they would but he would have to check with the district first. Commissioner Stone stated the condition does state water or waste water treatment facility. Mr. Leavenworth stated the intent is for wells and pump station. He pointed out that their service 33 06-04-2002 plan does not allow that and it would have to be approved by the Board. Commissioner Stone questioned condition 3, speaking to the IGA. He stated this County has entered into a number ofIGA's and there has to be a process to resolve differences. Ifthere is an even say in an IGA, how would they resolve an issue that both parties would not agree on. He suggested perhaps the County should become a party to that IGA. Mr. Leavenworth stated he would be willing to discuss that with the Board. Commissioner Stone stated the County has the authority over both districts and their service plans, so it would make sense for the County to be the arbitrator. Mr. Leavenworth pointed out, the service plan is a single purpose service plan. Their financing plan indicates the Tree Farm is the only thing they will be doing for the next 20 years. He stated it is likely that MVMD will come in with a recreational proposal. That is why they did not want to give a veto power to the new district. Commissioner Stone asked if condition number two refers to changes in the service plan. Mr. Leavenworth stated they have a service plan that authorizes them to provide water and wastewater services. They do not have a service plan at this time that allows them to develop recreational amenities. They are authorized by a Court Decree to provide those services once they have approval of a service plan. Commissioner Stone asked if Crown Mountain has any objections to the changes as recommended. Mr. Noon stated the suggestion of the County acting as arbitrator is a great idea. He stated the district would agree to the elements of the Mid Valley proposal. Commissioner Stone stated if they include language that neither district would have veto power over the other district, the County is the ultimate arbitrator. Mr. Leavenworth stated he believes the County is currently the arbitrator. Chairman Gallagher stated he would like to see an area limitation for the above ground facility. He stated from the tone of the conditions, it seems that MVMD must have already had recreational facilities in place. He questioned how long Mid-Valley District had been in existence. Mr. Leavenworth stated they were formed in 1980 or 1982. Chairman Gallagher questioned the amount of money they have donated for recreation. Mr. Leavenworth stated they give approximately $50,000 per year. They have always passed that out between the Town of Basalt and individual groups. Chairman Gallagher stated he is trying to understand why the district is now waving the recreation flag. Mr. Leavenworth stated Mid-Valley is a park and recreation district and it has talked over the years about performing those functions. He believes in the future they most likely will perform those functions. The Board wants to approve it ability to do so and not get into a battle with a veto power. Chairman Gallagher stated the Statutes put them in the drivers seat. Commissioner Menconi stated in listening to the dialog, it appears the general intention ofthe Mid-Valley Metropolitan District has always been to pursue open space and Crown Mountain Park is to pursue recreational amenities at the Tree Farm. He questioned if that was correct. Ms. Mauriello stated open space is also a component of the Crown Mountain plan as well. Commissioner Menconi asked if it the intent that open space be limited to the Tree Farm. Mr. Fuller stated they do not have any specific plans to acquire open space other than what is at the Tree Farm. However they do not have any limitations on the ability to do so in the future. Commissioner Menconi stated it was his understanding that a lot of the momentum behind the creation ofthis district is to find funding to create more recreation at the Tree Farm. Mr. Fuller stated that was correct. Commissioner Menconi asked if they have created the correct wording and conditions to allow both districts to continue to operate as to what their specific plans are. 34 06-04-2002 Ms. Mauriello stated the Mid Valley Metropolitan District is primarily a water and sewer district. There is a component of their plan that allows them to pursue open space and recreation. That is not something that they have pursued at this time. What the Crown Mountain District is asking for today is to be allowed to move forward and allow active recreation and open space. At this point is what they are hearing is that there is no redundancy or overlap in those districts. The conditions are to be designed to eliminate redundancy or duplicating services. Commissioner Menconi asked if she felt that they have accomplished that goal. Ms. Mauriello stated the way the statutory frame work is, the Metro District has the ability to create conditions in terms of consent. She believes them to be appropriate. Chairman Gallagher stated they have modified conditions somewhat and asked what needs to happen to allow approval today. Ms. Mauriello advised the Board, for formal approval, which happens by resolution, the applicant needs to submit those. Mr. Noon asked that Eagle County acting as arbitrator, be involved in writing the appropriate IGA. Mr. Leavenworth stated he has indicated he will recommend to his Board what has been stated today but he cannot give their approval until he speaks with them. Mr. Fuller questioned the provision regarding pedestrian access. Commissioner Stone stated there are a number of conditions he is not going to include. Commissioner Stone moved the Board approve File No. SD-0025, Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District, incorporating the following conditions, which include the two additional conditions included by the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission, incorporating staff findings: 1. The applicant must provide evidence of concurrence with the Roaring Fork Open Space District and the Mid Valley Metropolitan District; 2. Include language referencing the Mount Sopris Tree Farm PUD Guide as the driving force for development of the Tree Farm property, the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District can only build on the property known as the Mount Sopris Tree Farm, in concurrence with the PUD Guide, unless a change in the PUD Guide is effected. 3. Bottom two bullets of the four listed on Page 17 of the Service Plan be dropped. The two bullets in question are: a. Remodel, addition or other redevelopment of buildings; b. Development of other facilities not anticipated by the Master Plan. 4. If Pitkin County does not approve then, the Eagle County approval should become null and void. 5. Correct the stated acreage of the Mount Sopris Tree Farm Property to coincide with the approved PUD Guide. 6. That the proposed district or formed district enter into such Intergovernmental Agreements as are necessary to address issues raised in the service plan and which are acceptable to Eagle County. 7. That the applicant, based on findings today of inclusion or request for exemption, they revise its boundaries to reflect which property is part of the boundary and which are not, as required by C.R.S. 32-1-307 (Forty acre parcels, zoned and used agriculturally.) 8. The request for the conditions as requested by MVMD, shall be changed to properly reflect what was discussed today. Chairman Gallagher asked condition 8 be removed as Mid Valley Metro District must already give their consent. Commissioner Stone concurred. Commissioner Menconi suggested in condition number 7, the language within 120 days of voter approval and add that language to condition 2. He stated Mr. Fuller related that condition 3 and 7 were redundant. The only language that was not made clear was within 120 days. 35 06-04-2002 Commissioner Stone stated it was condition 7, which was "the applicant, within 120 days of voter approval, commence a modification process to align their recreational facilities with the Mount Sopris Tree Farm PUD Guide." He stated he is not sure that is necessary because the Crown Mountain District can only build what is allowed for in the PUD Guide, unless the County amends the PUD Guide. Mr. Narracci stated this was a condition from Mr. Shultz without a great deal of thought. Commissioner Stone stated they can add that the Crown Mountain District can only build in accordance with the PUD Guide. Commissioner Menconi concurred. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Ms. Mauriello assumed the applicant will be back on June 18th with revisions. Mr. Noon stated that is correct. SE-00029, Kasiewicz - Galloway Exemption Cliff Simonton presented file number SE-00029, Kasiewicz - Galloway Exemption. He stated the Applicants seek to use the Subdivision Exemption Plat process to gain approval of a lot line adjustment between two un-platted parcels in the rural center community of McCoy, which is located in northern Eagle County on US Highway 131. One parcel, owned and resided on by Mr. Kasiewicz, will be reduced in size by approximately Y2 acre. The other parcel, owned by Mr. Galloway, will increase in size by the same Y2 acre. Mr. Galloway's land is currently home to the former McCoy School Building and Teacherage, which is presently used as the McCoy Community Center. The majority of the Y2 acre effected by this lot line adjustment lies within the 50 foot setback off of Highway 131. It is traversed by an irrigation ditch, and will retain its present use as agricultural pasture. Both resulting parcels will conform to the underlying zone district, which is Rural Center. Mr. Simonton stated as far as the chronology of this application goes, no land use action predates this file for either parcel of land. Referrals were sent to the following, with no response received: Eagle County Engineering, Eagle County Attorney, Eagle County Environmental Health, Eagle County Sheriff, Eagle County Assessor and the Colorado Department of Transportation. Staff findings are as shown on staff report and as follows: Section 5-270 Subdivision Exemption, specifically, Section 5-270.A.1.d, Lot Line Adjustments, are for the purpose of making a lot line adjustment to correct boundary errors, align boundaries with topographic features, or straighten boundaries. This applies only to contiguous lots, neither of which lies in a subdivision approved pursuant to these Land Use Regulations, which are not subject to merger with each other pursuant to Section 6-120.B, Contiguous Parcels under Single Ownership. The Board may exempt a lot line adjustment if: STANDARD: Section 5-270.A.1.d(1) Total Area - the total area ofland subtracted from the one lot and added to the other, net any addition to that lot as a result of the lot line adjustment, does not exceed 25% of the total area of the lot from which it is subtracted. The Kasiewicz property (Lot 1) will lose .523 acres, or approximately 9.5 % of its original 5.498 acres. [+] FINDING: The total area ofland subtracted from Lot 1 and added to Lot 2 DOES NOT exceed 25% of the total area of Lot 1. STANDARD: Section 5-270.A.1.d(2) Confieuration - The resulting lots are in substantially the same configuration as the original lots before the adjustment. The .523 acre portion ofland effected by this lot line adjustment consists of a narrow tongue that projects eastward from the southeast comer of Lot 1, filling a space between Lot 2's southern boundary and the road right-of-way of US Highway 131. This lot line adjustment adds this "tongue" to Lot 2, essentially straightening the north-south 36 06-04-2002 boundary between the lots. [+] FINDING: The resulting lots ARE in substantially the same configuration as the original lots before the adjustment. STANDARD: Section 5-270.A.1.d(3)(a) Zoning Conformance - the lot line adjustment does not create a nonconforming (in terms of applicable zoning) lot or increase the non-conformity of any lot. The existing parcels conform to the Rural Center zoning, and both resulting parcels will be significantly larger than the required minimum of .183 acres (8000 square feet) in this zone district. [+] FINDING: The lot line adjustment DOES NOT create a nonconforming (in terms of applicable zoning) lot or increase the nonconformity of any lot. Chairman Gallagher stated he has received several requests for assistance from the applicant because of the time frame it takes to go through the process for un-platted property. He asked what would happen if Lots 1, 2 and 3 were unavailable. Mr. Simonton stated then it would not be possible. Chairman Gallagher asked will the property now become platted. Mr. Narracci stated they are still exempt from subdivision but the two parcels will be recognized as a properly created building site. Rick Plyman, representing the applicant, stated staff did an excellent presentation and he would be happy to answer any questions. Chairman Gallagher stated while there is a possibility of a fire station here there are some issues surrounding the ownership of the parcel. Commissioner Menconi moved the Board approve File No. SE-00029, Kasiewicz - Galloway Exemption, incorporating Staff findings and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. LUR-0042, Wildfire Regulations Cliff Simonton, Planner, presented file number LUR-0042, Wildfire Regulations. He requested this matter be tabled to June 25, 2002, as requested by the applicant. Commissioner Stone moved to table file number LUR-0042, Wildfire Regulations, to June 25, 2002 at the applicants request. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. SE-00031, Crotzer Exemption Ross Easterling, Planner, presented file number SE-00031, Crotzer Exemption. He stated when originally submitted this file was under Crotzer Exemption but it is now called the Dolphin A Exemption. He stated the purpose of this application is to obtain subdivision exemption approval in accordance with Section 5-270 ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations. The parcel is a pre-existing lot of record created prior to August 22, 1984. The chronology of the application is as shown on staff report and as follows: The subject parcel was created and conveyed by Champ C. and May B. Scott to Earl E. Coffern on September 15, 1975. Coffern then conveyed the property to Ronald W. Crotzer in September 2000. At this time Mr. Crotzer plans to sell the property to Pat and Suzanne Dauphinais. Referral responses are as follows and as shown on staff report: Natural Resources Conservation Service: No comment Colorado State Forest Service: Fire Hazard is currently Moderate Eagle River Fire Protection District: No comment Eagle County Engineer: The geologic hazards report dated May 13, 2002 fulfills our 37 06-04-2002 requirement of the Land Use Regulation (Article 5-270 B.1.e Hazards.) No outstanding issues remain. Staff findings are as follows and as shown on staff report: Pursuant to Section 5-270 Subdivision Exemption of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, findings are as follows: STANDARD: Section 5-270.A1.c, Pre-Existing Lots - The lot in question was created and established in the records of the Clerk and Recorder prior to August 22, 1984 notwithstanding compliance with Eagle County Land Use Regulations in existence at the time ofthe creation of the parcel. The lot was created on September 15, 1975. [+] FINDING: The lot in question was created and established in the records ofthe Clerk and Recorder prior to August 22, 1984. STANDARD: Section 5-270.B1.a, Survey - A certified survey ofthe parcel has been submitted which includes legal description meeting the minimum requirements of a land survey plat pursuant to 38-51-106 C.R.S. and record and apparent rights of way, easements and monumentation are indicated on the Plat. [+] FINDING: A certified survey of the parcel has been submitted. STANDARD: Section 5-270.B1.b, Access - Demonstration that the proposed exemption has legal and physical access to a public street or right-of-way by a conventional vehicle. [+] FINDING: Easements are in place and access by a conventional vehicle has been demonstrated. STANDARD: Section 5-270.B1.c, Water Supply - Demonstration that the land proposed for exemption has a legal, physical, adequate, and dependable potable water supply. [+] FINDING: The land proposed for exemption has a legal, physical, adequate, and dependable water supply. STANDARD: Section 5-270.B1.d, Wastewater Disposal- Demonstration that the land proposed for exemption has a wastewater disposal system, or other lawful means of disposing human wastes that complies with all public health laws. [+] FINDING: The land proposed for exemption has a wastewater disposal system, or other means of disposing human wastes that complies with all public health laws. STANDARD: Section 5-270.B1.e, Hazards - Satisfactory evidence demonstrating that the exemption will not create hazards and the lot will contain a safe adequate building site. [+] FINDING: Satisfactory evidence that the exemption will not create hazards and that the site contains a safe adequate building site has been demonstrated. Sid Fox, representing the applicant, stated they are prepared to answer questions. Commissioner Menconi moved the Board of County Commissioners approve File No. SE-0031, Crotzer Exemption, incorporating the findings and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until June 11,2002. Attest: Clerk to the Boa 38 06-04-2002