The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 03/12/2002 Present: Michael Gallagher Arn Menconi Tom Stone Tom Moorhead Jack Ingstad Sara J. Fisher PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 12, 2002 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Attorney County Administrator Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: GENERAL FUND 21ST CENTURY PHOTO SUPPLY 3C TECHNOLOGIES A 1 COLLECTION AGENCY AM COLLECTORS AARDVAC ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS ACCA ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS AEDEC INTERNATIONAL AFFORDABLE PORTABLE AICP ALDA L WHITE, ESQ ALEXANDER HAMILTON ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY ALL PRO FORMS INC ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE ALPHA INTERACTIVE GROUP ALPINE MEADOWS ANIMAL AMADEO GONZALES AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMERICAN POLICE BEAT AMERICAN SOCIETY AMERICAN TOWER CORP ANN LOPER ANN MUNCASTER APEX SECURITY ARDYTH NIMON ARN MENCONI ARVAL LEGAL SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE . SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 402.07 788.75 25.00 40.62 7.50 25.00 90.00 51.00 483.00 88.00 560.00 50.00 34.50 488.24 528.25 6,585.40 130.00 20.00 46.80 420.00 16.95 50.00 1,750.00 58.50 73.50 125.00 33.54 29.91 25.00 1 03-12-2002 ASPEN CTR FOR WOMENS HL TH AT & TWIRELESS SERVICES AV TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVCARD AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS BANKIMAGE.COM BASALT HIGH SCHOOL BATTLE MOUNTAIN HS BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER BERTHOD MOTORS BIG SKY RACKS INC BLOSSOM SOFTWARE BLUE LAKE OWNERS ASSN BOB BARKER COMPANY BONJOUR BAKERY BRIAN BISHOP BRIDGESTONE WINTER BRIEFINGS PUBLISHING BRYAN TREU CALOIA & HOUPT PC CAPITAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS CAPITOL ADVANTAGE PUB. CARLA HAGGART CARMEN LOZOYO CARSE CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CATHOLIC CHARITIES CCO AND ERA CENTRAL BAG AND BURLAP CO CENTRAL CREDIT CORP CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CENTURYTEL CGFOA CHARLES B DARRAH CHESS CHRISTINE L MOTT CITY MARKET #34 CLE INTERNATIONAL CLERK EAGLE COUNTY COURT CLIFF SIMONTON CLUB TWENTY SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 1,800.00 4,085.33 237.93 995.32 4,046.84 1,140.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 100.00 318.90 507.75 30.00 1,919.87 355.42 25.74 245.00 20,350.00 129.00 187.68 2,214.60 3,662.00 30.90 23.62 32.25 130.00 416.58 25,000.00 59,030.07 473.27 25.00 712.89 17.69 26,679.34 60.00 9.30 467.00 555.00 984.07 595.00 329.70 50.00 150.00 2 03-12-2002 CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION CO AUTO THEFT INESTIGATOR CO DEPT AGRICULTURE CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CO ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CO SENIOR SERVo CORP DIR CO STATE TREASURER COLBY RUSSELL COLORADO DEPT REVENUE COLORADO INDEPENDENT COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO RIVER HEADWATER COLORADO SEARCH RESCUE COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COLUMBIA PROPANE COM-LINK COPAT STATEWIDE CONFERNCE COPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COUNTY SHERIFFS OF CO COVA CRAWFORD PROPERTIES CRISIE BATEMAN CURVE DELI DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION DAMON BAILLIE DAMON MA TLON DATA COMM WAREHOUSE DAVID GUINNEE, DVM DEEP ROCK WEST DELL INC DENNIS WILLEY DENVER NEWSPAPER AGENCY DIANA JOHNSON DOCTORS ON CALL DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP DON OLSEN DONNA BARNES CORONER DOUGLAS EXPLORA TfON LLC DUCKS UNLIMITED DURANGO HERALD SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 70.00 10.00 313.60 521.60 60.00 75.00 6,205.27 650.00 175.00 34.00 3,265.90 350.00 40.00 195.00 511.63 25.79 310.00 822.39 2,441.52 4,822.18 2,738.00 100.00 3,870.00 38.70 570.00 637.00 2.43 42.33 171.87 1,775.00 289.13 2,146.49 125.00 1,424.27 58.50 290.00 162.08 6.66 19.42 12,865.00 50.00 108.50 3 03-12-2002 EAGLE AMOCO EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY CLERK EAGLE EYE PHOTO EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EARL GLENWRIGHT EAST WEST RESORTS ECO LAB EDWARDS STATION LLC ELAINE WOLF ELIZABETH P GREDIG EMC2 EMILIA GONZALEZ EPS DESIGN AND PRINT EVERGREEN LODGE EXTENSION PROGRAM FUND F & F FINANCIAL EQUIPMENT FAIRBANKS SCALES INC FALCON ASSOCIATES INC FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM FARMER BROTHERS FARRELL, GOLDSTEIN, FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG FILE FINDERS L TD FILEMAKER,INC FIRST BANKS FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY FORINASH KATHLEEN FRANK J BALL FRANKLIN COVEY GALLS INCORPORATED GATES MARGE PHN GATEWAY SECURE STORAGE GE CAPITAL GEORGE ROUSSOS GFOA GLENWOOD MEDICAL ASSOC GLENWOOD SHOE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 416.00 9,544.00 9,957.60 175.00 38.36 373.08 97.90 996.30 90.00 3,665.32 875.40 200.00 43.31 24.60 231.68 103.50 1,403.82 949.30 3,045.63 250.00 35.38 135.00 1,195.38 4,572.26 1,677.35 26.24 1,333.56 30.00 1,120.00 11,293.15 30.00 335.20 12.40 140.32 1,798.72 1,500.00 187.00 159.99 107.57 255.00 151.00 400.00 4 03-12-2002 GREENBERG & ASSOCIATES HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELEN MIGCHELBRINK HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HOTEL COLORADO HUD USER HYATT REGENCY TECH CENTER IAAO IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS IMS OF COLORADO INSTITUTE FOR PERFORMANCE INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL INTEGRAL RECOVERIES INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND INTELLlNET LLC INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNATIONAL NARCOTIC JAMIE HUMPHREY JEFFERSON COUNTY JEFFREY FEDRIZZI JEH/EAGLE SUPPLY INC JENNY WAHRER JOBS AVAILABLE JODIE BRANDT JODY CARUTHERS JON HARRISON JORDAN HALE JOSEPH L FORINASH JOSEPH S CALABRESE JOYCE HANSON KATHY REED KAZ MARKETING INC KEITH BARTO KELLY L1EKIS KEN WILSON KENDRA DOEPKEN KEVIN CASSIDY KINDER MORGAN INC KING CAMPBELL DDS LA VOZ LAN D TITLE REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 30.16 7,624.20 43.47 1,822.00 12,068.12 816.36 5.00 1,032.00 150.00 320.67 175.00 2,700.00 1,095.00 34.30 2,155.04 300.00 270.00 40.00 163.88 175.00 62.20 227.40 913.92 82.80 111.79 84.18 83.54 10.83 140.00 25.00 273.24 31.50 817.68 5.11 135.78 100.00 13.30 86.75 8,894.42 304.00 276.00 500.00 5 03-12-2002 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LESLEE SCOTT, INC LEWAN AND ASSOCIATES LIGHTNING SERVICES L1L JOHNS WATER TREATMENT LIMITED ENERGY SOLUTIONS LINDA MAGGIORE MACHOL&JOHANNES MACHOLJOHANNESVANSTROM MALINDA GRIFFIN MARY JANE LAYNE MASTERS LAW FIRM LLC MAX SCHLAFLEY MBIA MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS MCKINNEY DOOR & HARDWARE MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MEGAN HAMMER MELISSA JOHNSON MERCKATL METEORLOGIX MICHAEL CIRKOVIC MICHELLE BALL MICRO WAREHOUSE MID VALLEY KENNEL MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN MIKE GALLAGHER MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE MILLER & COHEN MILLER VISUAL ARTS MONICA JACOX MONTAG KEITH P MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS MULLANS PIERSEL & REED NATIONAL COMMISSION ON NATIONAL GRAPHICS COMPANY NATIONAL INTERAGENCY FIRE NETTIE REYNOLDS NICOLETTI FLATER ASSOC NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORTHWEST COLORADO SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE INCENTIVE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE 2,702.08 644.46 1,074.40 550.00 226.00 757.70 22.00 31 .40 6.40 13.30 58.95 25.00 99.36 3,552.07 3,550.04 83.14 141 .00 164.12 302.70 1,743.75 279.00 17.08 207.00 314.00 5,100.00 12.50 92.95 1,894.98 59.61 234.40 189.75 24.79 41,638.21 672.00 25.00 840.00 269.77 69.29 221 .40 260.00 5,913.54 7,000.00 6 03-12-2002 NOTARY PUBLIC AGENCY OF OLGA MEDRANO OMB POLICE SUPPLY OSM DELIVERY LLC PAPER DIRECT PAPER WISE PAT NOLAN PATHOLOGY GROUP PEARSON, MILLIGAN, AND PEGASUS SATELLITE PEGGY GRAYBEAL PEPPERDINE'S MARKET PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PHNAC % JO LYNN IDLER POWERWARE GLOBAL SERVICES PRCA PRIMEDIA WORKPLACE PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS PROTECTORS L TD PUBLIC SAFETY WAREHOUSE PUBLIC SERVICE QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QWEST QWEST INTERPRISE NETWORKING RESOURCE CENTER RETIREMENT FUND RICHARD KESLER RIVERWALK TOPAZ BUILDING ROBERT MACH ROCKY MOUNTAIN LAND USE ROCKY MTN ASSC OF FAIRS ROCKY MTN INFO NETWORK ROGER MOORE ROLF LIPPERT ROSIE STAHL RRC ASSOCIATES RSC SADDLE ISLAND INSTITUTE SALVATION ARMY SANDYS OFFICE SUPPLY SARA J FISHER SAWAYA AND ROSE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 126.80 30.00 206.93 418.00 66.81 1 , 190.00 135.00 293.45 21.20 30.98 180.00 12.60 905.77 450.00 1,368.00 282.00 388.00 299.00 450.00 36.87 495.80 430.48 4,703.77 332.93 2,000.00 153,948.75 3,394.42 2,424.96 30.62 239.00 125.00 150.00 30.58 45.90 538.20 6,438.07 656.00 675.00 1,000.00 141.40 404.95 25.00 7 03-12-2002 SCHEDULE SOFT SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SETCOM SHEAFFER KAREN SHEILA VIGIL SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SKILLPATH SEMINAR SNOWHITE LINEN SOFTMART INC STARBUCK SURVEYORS & ENGI STATE OF CALIFORNIA STEPHANIE RODRIQUEZ STERICYCLE INC STRAWBERRY PATCH SUMMIT LUMBER SUPER SEER CORPORATION SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO SUSPENSE FUND THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP TOM C STONE TOWN OF EAGLE TOWN OF GYPSUM TOX TRAPS INCORPORATED TRANE COMPANY TRANSCOR AMERICA INC UNIFORM KINGDOM UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED REPROGRAPHIC UNITED STATES POLICE UNIV COLORADO AT BOULDER UNIVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC UPPER ARKANSAS VALLEY VAIL BOARD OF REALTORS VAIL CASCADE HOTEL VAIL NET VAIL SIGN CORPORATION VAIL TRAIL THE VAIL VALLEY EMERGENCY VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VAILNET INC SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 679.15 1,428.15 26,939.70 698.19 89.38 189.75 709.92 99.00 249.66 560.68 182.00 801.02 43.02 157.84 159.75 29.99 1,123.92 585.00 3,618.96 279.00 229.11 2,312.25 37.50 104.00 1,303.50 451.92 3,375.90 317.55 1,236.57 40.00 125.00 15.25 1,480.00 15.00 130.00 79.90 187.92 96.00 1,440.00 264.87 17.95 937.25 8 03-12-2002 VALLEY OFFICE SUPPLY SUPPLIES 1,025.00 VALLEY PUBLISHING INC SERVICE 168.22 VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL SERVICE 216.00 VERIZON SELECT SERVICES SERVICE 2,323.75 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 1,918.86 VIOLA ULLERICK SERVICE 120.00 VISION CHEMICAL SYSTEMS SERVICE 2,032.32 WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 95.00 WCAEHO SERVICE 20.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 269,075.00 WEST GROUP SERVICE 1,561.35 WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY SERVICE 940.00 WESTERN PAGING SERVICE 8.00 WESTERN STATES SHERIFFS SERVICE 100.00 WYNDHAM EMERALD PLAZA SERVICE 560.24 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 5,126.40 XOCHITL HERNANDEZ REIMBURSEMENT 28.98 YOUR PERSONAL CHEF SERVICE 775.00 PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY PAYROLL 3 & 4 595,828.34 1,525,664.17 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND BLUESTAR SPECIALTY PROD. SERVICE 525.56 CARSE SERVICE 250.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 4,132.30 CELERITY CORPORATION SERVICE 143.85 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SUPPLIES 54.61 COLORADO CONTRACTORS ASSN SERVICE 150.00 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 174.00 COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC SERVICE 48.00 DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICE 29.00 EAGLE PHARMACY SUPPLIES 5.20 EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10.24 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 597.20 HIGGINS BRAD REIMBURSEMENT 15.66 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 180.69 INTERMOUNTAIN SWEEPER SERVICE 3,000.00 KINDER MORGAN INC SERVICE 527.38 MICROWAREHOUSE SERVICE 200.76 9 03-12-2002 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 106,930.67 MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT SERVICE 418.16 NAPA AUTO PARTS-CARBONDLE SUPPLIES 6.33 PRECISION CUT & DESIGN SERVICE 110.00 RELIABLE SUPPLIES 47.53 RETIREMENT FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 14,559.50 RHONDA PARKER SUPPLIES 28.42 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICE 896.85 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 232.88 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 20,999.53 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 381.98 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 121.89 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 56.58 PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY PAYROLL 3 & 4 50,855.67 205,690.44 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND AMAN DA BALES REIMBURSEMENT 105.93 ARGUS OF COLORADO INC SERVICE 227.50 BONJOUR BAKERY SERVICE 21.06 BOULDER COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICE 16.20 CAMBRIDGE CARE CENTER INC SERVICE 190.30 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 4,957.79 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 481.32 CINDY LEGACE REIMBURSEMENT 40.00 CSED SERVICE 123.72 EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF SERVICE 98.32 EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE SERVICE 8,581.99 EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING SUPPLIES 353.70 ENVIRONMENTS, INC SERVICE 200.90 FORINASH KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 743.29 HART INTERCIVIC SERVICE 109.33 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 585.95 INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND SERVICE 1,763.22 JOEL KARR SERVICE 570.00 JOHN C COLLINS PC SERVICE 1,080.00 JUNIPER VALLEY PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 153.38 KATHY REED REIMBURSEMENT 505.86 LINDA MAGGIORE INCENTIVE 18.00 10 03-12-2002 LISA GRIGGS REIMBURSEMENT 17.62 MEADOW MOUNTAIN ELEM SCHL SERVICE 9,780.00 MODERNISTIC CLEANING SERVICE 510.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 825.50 NATIONAL LEGAL LABORATORY SERVICE 163.50 PATRICIA SENA REIMBURSEMENT 65.00 QWEST SERVICE 182.39 RENEE FIELDS REIMBURSEMENT 670.94 RETIREMENT FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 9,742.25 RITA WOODS REIMBURSEMENT 120.91 ROARING FORK REPORTING SERVICE 54.25 ROCHELLE A BOWER REIMBURSEMENT 678.66 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 500.00 VANASK WAREHOUSE COMPANY SERVICE 319.20 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 248.56 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 15,093.92 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 247.89 PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY PAYROLL 3 & 4 32,708.44 92,856.79 WRAP FUND MOUNTAIN RADIOLOGY SERVICE 47.00 WALMART AVON SERVICE 300.00 347.00 RETIREMENT FUND CCO AND ERA EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 51,444.83 51,444.83 INSURANCE RESERVE FUND TOWN OF EAGLE SERVICE 1,982.00 1,982.00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 11 03-12-2002 AMERICAN CIVIL CONSTRUCTR SERVICE 45,976.00 B & B ELECTRIC INC SERVICE 4,662.00 DAVID ADAMS & ASSOCIATES SERVICE 720.00 HARNEY-NAILL INC SERVICE 10,653.75 LAND TITLE SERVICE 25,000.00 RENO SMITH ARCHITECT SERVICE 7,540.00 RUDD CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 110,350.21 204,901.96 SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. AT & TWIRELESS SERVICES SERVICE 376.10 BRODY CHEMICAL SERVICE 214.21 C & H DISTRIBUTORS INC SERVICE 428.11 CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 705.56 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 2,741.83 CHILI WILL YS SERVICE 150.00 CITY MARKET #34 SUPPLIES 22.11 COLLETTS SUPPLIES 2,017.20 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 3,253.96 COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC SERVICE 380.00 COPY PLUS SERVICE 158.18 CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN PARTS 21,577.87 DCS AMERICA INC SERVICE 498.80 DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICE 145.00 DESIGN GLASS INCORPORATED SERVICE 1,172.25 DOCTORS ON CALL SERVICE 575.00 DODD DIESEL INCORPORATED PARTS 35,814.69 DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES PARTS 18,603.79 EAGLE AUTO PARTS PARTS 131 .96 EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL SERVICE 24,760.66 EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL SERVICE 265.40 EAGLE PHARMACY SUPPLIES 8.97 EAGLE RIVER AUTO BODY SERVICE 1,835.00 EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE SUPPLIES 58.42 EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING SERVICE 780.00 EPS DESIGN AND PRINT SERVICE 186.73 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY REIMBURSEMENT 230.76 FEDERAL EXPRESS SERVICE 7.05 FLEET-NET CORPORATION SERVICE 11,470.00 G & K SERVICES SERVICE 195.20 12 03-12-2002 GAY JOHNSONS INC GENERAL ELECTRIC GILLIG CORPORATION GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HIGH COUNTRY LOCK & KEY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IMS OF COLORADO INTERMOUNTAIN SWEEPER INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTMS JAY MAX SALES JIM LAIR KINDER MORGAN INC KKCH RADIO KSKE-AGM KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAKE CREEK VILLAGE LAWSON PRODUCTS LEADING EDGE TECHNOLOGIES LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC L1FT-U M & M AUTO PARTS MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT NEOPART QUILL CORPORATION QWEST RETIREMENT FUND ROBYN LOVE RON E BECK SAFETY KLEEN SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SPECIALTY INCENTIVES INC SUMMIT LUMBER SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF GYPSUM UNITED LABORATORIES VAIL RESORTS INC VANDERWALKER TIRE SERVICE VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE SERVICE PARTS SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PARTS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PARTS SERVICE PARTS PARTS SUPPLIES SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENIFITS REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 6,546.54 269.16 4,026.05 5,659.52 1,064.85 35.00 632.75 175.00 3,000.00 241 .90 176.52 5.78 1,846.79 249.60 224.00 320.00 5,120.00 2,607.26 85.00 380.00 13,953.00 56.96 3,671.28 305.50 139.63 114.43 66.43 14,420.50 107.40 1,500.00 275.53 55.38 74.23 3,140.49 287.37 59.69 408.50 815.53 200.25 300.00 200.00 106.77 13 03-12-2002 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 63,103.93 WHITEALLS ALPINE SERVICE 67.20 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 90.44 XCELENERGY SERVICE 286.59 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 154.10 PAYROLL FOR FEBUARY PAYROLL 3 & 4 146,127.33 411,518.99 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS B & H SPORTS SERVICE 110.10 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 128.24 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 190.80 COPY PLUS SUPPLIES 72.91 EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL SERVICE 188.88 EAGLE PHARMACY SERVICE 3.97 FEDERAL EXPRESS SERVICE 10.10 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENIFITS 5.36 IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICE 94.70 PET PICK UPS SERVICE 65.60 UNIV COLORADO AT BOULDER SERVICE 40.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 807.37 1,718.03 AIRPORT FUND ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY SERVICE 239.55 ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 35.00 AT & TWIRELESS SERVICES SERVICE 115.74 BENCHMARK ENGINEERING SERVICE 7,858.75 BERTHOD MOTORS SUPPLIES 42.26 BROWNING FERRIS IND SERVICE 347.83 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 3,075.56 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 69.11 CITY MARKET #34 SUPPLIES 41.88 CO AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSN SERVICE 275.00 CO DEPT OF LABOR & EMPLMT SERVICE 35.00 COLORADO ACTIVITY CTR INC SERVICE 315.00 COLUMBINE MARKET SUPPLIES 85.24 14 03-12-2002 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC DCS AMERICA INC DEEP ROCK WEST DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE AUTO PARTS EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING FOX & COMPANY FUTURA CARWASH SYSTEMS GYPSUM TOWN OF HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HERTZ CORPORATION HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HONEY BUN BAKERY JAY MAX SALES KINDER MORGAN INC LAWSON PRODUCTS LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC M & M AUTO PARTS MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING MARKOS PIZZERIA MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC MOTOR POOL FUND NASCO LLC NW CHAPTER AMERICAN ASSN OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PRECISION WEST SIGNS RETIREMENT FUND RICHARD L GUSTAFSON SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUMMIT COMMERICAL LAUNDRY SUMMIT LUMBER TERRI MARTINEZ JOHNSON TRI COUNTY FIRE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER VERIZON WIRELESS, WELLS FARGO WESTERN IMPLEMENTS WESTERN RETARDER CO SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE PARTS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PARTS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SERVICE 47.99 5,000.00 54.75 457.48 47.14 27.91 485.00 1,705.28 297.50 334.25 462.98 109.73 3,033.95 14.58 65.00 2,934.54 108.44 571.66 344.97 1,889.60 102.63 162.17 28,881.75 1,129.32 411 .45 325.00 283.20 179.00 14,475.00 5,708.75 4,129.26 1,262.62 1,324.98 402.67 6.82 660.00 470.00 44.27 144.95 23,776.22 211 .40 1,485.00 15 03-12-2002 WORKRITE SERVICE 246.74 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS SERVICE 665.50 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SERVICE 10.89 PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY PAYROLL 3 & 4 58,727.28 175,755.54 MICROWAVE MAINTENANCE FUND HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 2,730.38 HOLYCROSS ENERGY SERVICE 2,730.38 MOTOROLA INCORPORATED SERVICE 65,962.68 71,423.44 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND GLOBAL TECHNOLOGYINC SERVICE 9,828.65 9,828.65 LANDFILL FUND ALL PRO FORMS INC SUPPLIES 211.45 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 1,187.05 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICE 82.83 DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICE 73.00 DOWN VALLEY SEPTIC SERVICE 330.00 EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL SERVICE 6.43 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 347.94 KRW CONSULTING INC SERVICE 11,253.27 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 72,315.74 NORMA ARAGON REIMBURSEMENT 80.70 RETIREMENT FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,693.75 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICE 36,513.33 RONALD RASNIC REIMBURSEMENT 79.66 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SERVICE 2,505.17 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICE 1,599.28 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 20.00 VAIL DAILY THE SERVICE 232.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 6,225.61 16 03-12-2002 PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY PAYROLL 3 & 4 16,064.42 152,821.63 MOTOR POOL FUND AL-JON INC SERVICE 409,747.00 AUTO BARN SUPPLIES 481.80 BERTHOD MOTORS SERVICE 66.23 BRODY CHEMICAL SUPPLIES 346.18 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 1,328.10 CO DEPT OF LABOR & EMPLMT SERVICE 175.00 CO DEPT PUBLIC HL TH/ENVIR SERVICE 20.00 COLLETTS SUPPLIES 57,651.53 COLORADO MOTOR PARTS SUPPLIES 1,456.78 DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES 274.67 EAGLE AMOCO SERVICE 15.00 EAGLE AUTO PARTS PARTS 255.49 EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE SERVICE 1.57 EMED COMPANY INC SERVICE 247.80 FARIS MACHINERY CO SUPPLIES 222.35 FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY SERVICE 20.00 G & K SERVICES SERVICE 297.92 GAY JOHNSONS INC SERVICE 7,176.88 GLENWOOD RADIATOR REPAIR SERVICE 681.00 GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD SERVICE 233.25 GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE SERVICE 1,904.97 HANSON EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 524.88 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 248.02 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 467.16 INDEPENDENT TOOL SUPPL Y SUPPLIES 884.53 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTMS SUPPLIES 762.40 J J KELLER SUPPLIES 516.03 KEMP AND COMPANY INC SUPPLIES 48.33 KINDER MORGAN INC SERVICE 1,363.53 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 1,391.55 LAYTON HITCH & PICKUP SERVICE 65.61 LISA GRIGGS REIMBURSEMENT 28.01 M & M AUTO PARTS PARTS 302.95 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 5,296.28 NAPA AUTO PARTS-CARBONDLE SERVICE 10.76 OFFICE FURNITURE & DESIGN SERVICE 355.50 17 03-12-2002 PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING REIMBURSEMENT 41.32 POWER MOTIVE SERVICE 1,397.50 RELIABLE SUPPLIES 47.54 RETIREMENT FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,025.75 REY MOTORS INCORPORATED SUPPLIES 85.00 ROCHELLE A BOWER REIMBURSEMENT 3.50 SAFETY KLEEN SERVICE 162.40 SAFETY KLEEN (WHICIT A) SERVICE 157.20 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE REIMBURSEMENT 55.38 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 35.99 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICE 2,318.66 SNAP ON TOOLS SERVICE 222.75 SUMMIT LUMBER SERVICE 10.00 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 76.92 TIMBERLINE STEEL SERVICE 33.18 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 602.12 UNITED STATES WELDING SERVICE 271.73 VAN DERWALKER SERVICE 47.73 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 1,212.72 WEAR PARTS EQUIPMENT PARTS 3,115.20 WEBB CRANE INC SERVICE 419.78 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 8,350.29 WESTERN RETARDER CO SERVICE 1,093.08 WESTERN SLOPE CHRYSLER SERVICE 15,647.50 WYLACO SUPPL Y COMPANY SUPPLIES 300.77 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 193.18 PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY PAYROLL 3 & 4 21,672.89 557,469.14 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 975.00 MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 51,240.90 PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,392.86 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,230.00 UNITED STATES LIFE INS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,081.20 60,919.96 ENHANCED E911 FUND 18 03-12-2002 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES QWEST TOWN OF VAIL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 50.00 1,384.24 142,820.00 144,254.24 REPORT TOTAL 3,668,596.81 Executive Session Chairman Gallagher stated the first matter before the Board was an Executive Session. Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn into an Executive Session to discuss personal matters pertaining to a termination grievance. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn from the Executive Session and reconvene into the regular meeting. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Consent Agenda Chairman Gallagher stated the next item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A) Approval of bill paying for the week of March 11,2002, subject to review by County Administrator B) Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting for February 12,2002 C) Agreement between the County of Eagle and Roaring Fork School District D) Resolution 2002-042, notifying the State Treasurer to distribute Federal Mineral Leasing Funds in accordance with the provisions of Section 34-63-102, C.R.S. E) Resolution 2002-043, Transferring and distributing revenues from the County Forest Reserve Fund, Fiscal Year 2001 F) Bid Award, 2002 Lift Truck, Materials Handling Equipment Company, 2025 Stetson Court, CO G) Bid Award, 2002 Pipe, 600' - 18" pipe, 600' - 24" pipe, 120' - 36" pipe, to Grand Junction Pipe, 240 Airpark Road, Gypsum, CO H) Bid Award, 2002 Water Pump, Wy1aco, 315 Vallejo Street, Denver, CO I) Approval of ECO Drug and Alcohol Policy J Development Agreement, Berry Creek 5th K) Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Vail and Eagle County. Chairman Gallagher asked the Attorney's Office ifthere were any changes to the Consent Agenda. 19 03-12-2002 Tom Moorhead, County Attorney, stated item I, the ECa Drug and Alcohol Policy, needs to be removed. Commissioner Stone moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented excluding item I. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. McCoy House Drawing Carla Budd, Human Resources Director, presented the drawing for the McCoy House. She explained the County owns the property and as in the past, they have made the property available for rent. She stated there are five employees that are interested in renting the property. She asked the Board to draw the names. Chairman Gallagher stated the names in the order they were drawn are as follows: 1. Dan Fitch, Information Technologies 2. Fred Haskins, Regional Transportation Authority 3. Bill Mertz, Regional Transportation Authority 4. Don Ivy, Road & Bridge, Landfill 5. Tim Minerovich, Regional Transportation Authority Chairman Gallagher asked how long the house is rented for. Ms. Budd stated in the past the house is rented to the employee for a maximum of three years. Settlement Stipulations Tom Moorhead presented the settlement stipulations stating there are twelve today. He spoke to the summary sheet and reviewed each property as follows: Galena Partners, schedule number R047864, total assessed valuation is $2,581,810, stipulated value is $478,570. Commissioner Stone asked how the County was this far off on valuation. It is a huge difference. Max Schlatley, Appraisal Coordinator, stated there is no building density left in this unit. He stated they spoke to Cordillera and Community Development and discovered there are no development rights left in this unit. Typically they would give an open space valuation of $3,500 per acre. Kensington Partners, schedule number R047839, total assessed valuation is $3,549,560, stipulated value is $2,750,000. Galena Partners, schedule number R039178, total assessed valuation is $4,791,970, total stipulated value is $2,750,000. Commissioner Stone asked what the current asking price was. Mr. Schlatley stated it is $5.5 million for two parcels. Commissioner Stone spoke to the shared ownership of one being owned by Kensington Partners and the other being owned by Galena Partners. Chapel Square LLC, schedule number R0481 08, total assessed valuation is 20 03-12-2002 $4,509,700, stipulated value is $3, 800,000. Mid Valley Development Company, schedule number R049750, total assessed valuation is $245,780, stipulated valuation is $210,880. Mid Valley Development Company, schedule number R049751, total assessed valuation is $107,200, stipulated value is $91,120. Mid Valley Development Company, schedule number R0149753, total assessed valuation is $84,000, stipulated value is $71,670. Mid Valley Development Company, schedule number R049752, total assessed valuation is $62,150, stipulated value is $52,500. Mid Valley Development Company, schedule number R049754, total assessed valuation is $101,600, stipulated value is $86,360. Mid Valley Development Company, schedule number R049755, total assessed valuation is $60,050, stipulated value is $50,730. Mid Valley Development Company, schedule number R049757, total assessed valuation is $98,080, stipulated value is $83,370. Mid Valley Development Company, schedule number R049758, total assessed valuation is $116,500, stipulated value is $107,410. Commissioner Stone asked if all the Mid Valley schedules are for the same reason. Mr. Sch1afley stated that was correct. All units on located on the second floor and have been for sale for two years. Chairman Gallagher reviewed the corrections to the values as stated and as shown in Exhibit A. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the stipulations as reflected on Exhibit A with the changes as stated above. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Resolution 2002-044, Contract to Buy & Sell Real Estate Tom Moorhead presented Resolution 2002-044, approving a Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate, dated February 12,2002, between Eagle County and/or assigns and Eagle Manor Limited Partnership. Commissioner Stone moved to approve Resolution 2002-044, approving a Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate, dated February 12,2002, between Eagle County and/or assigns and Eagle Manor Limited Partnership. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Public Hearing, V.S.D.A. Rural Development & Division of Housing Funding David Carter, Housing Director, stated the next item on the agenda was the public hearing relating to applications for V.S.D.A. Rural Development and Colorado Division of Housing Funding to acquire Golden Eagle Apartments. He spoke to the various interests that Eagle County has and its commitment to housing. He stated the proposed funding package consists of assuming existing loans with the united States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, 21 03-12-2002 obtaining a grant from the Colorado Division of Housing and providing County funds. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform the public and to provide a venue for any public comment or input. Chairman Gallagher asked for public comment. There was none. Mr. Carter stated in that case this public hearing is concluded. Resolution 2002-045, Applying for Financing, Golden Eagle Apartments Tom Moorhead, Attorney's Office, presented Resolution 2002-045, in the matter of applying for financing for the management of the Golden Eagle Manor Apartments from the United States of America acting through Rural Housing Service of the United States Department of Agriculture. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve Resolution 2002-045, in the matter of applying for financing for the management of the Golden Eagle Manor Apartments from the United States of America acting through Rural Housing Service of the United States Department of Agriculture. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. In discussion, Commissioner Stone suggested they might want to include an amendment as follows, "the Resolution authorizes the Chairman to execute documents as necessary and authorizes the assumption of loan balances, based on contract terms and conditions." Commissioner Menconi amended the motion to include "the Resolution authorizes the Chairman to execute documents as necessary and authorizes the assumption of loan balances, based on contract terms and conditions.". Chairman Gallagher called for the question on the motion. The vote was declared unammous. Resolution 2002-046, Applying for Grant Funds, Purchase of Golden Eagle Manor Tom Moorhead presented Resolution 2002-046, in the matter of applying for grant funds from the Colorado Division of Housing to provide funds for the purchase of Golden Eagle Manor Apartments as housing for elderly residents in Eagle County. Commissioner Stone moved to approve Resolution 2002-046, in the matter of applying for grant funds from the Colorado Division of Housing to provide funds for the purchase of Golden Eagle Manor Apartments. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Assisted Living Facility, Request for Funds David Carter stated the next matter was a public hearing concerning the request for funding to construct an Assisted Living Facility. He stated Eagle County is planning on building an assisted living facility on land owned in Eagle. The proposed plans call for a mixture of studio and one bedroom units. The financing and the financing packages are still being developed. He spoke of the various options, the U. S. Department of Agriculture, Rural 22 03-12-2002 Development, the Colorado Division of Housing, funds from the County as well as other possibilities. He stated this meeting is to allow members of the public to understand the project and provide comment. Chairman Gallagher asked if there was any public comment. There was none. Mr. Carter stated that concludes the public hearing. Plat and Resolution Signing Matt Gennett, Planner, presented the following plats and resolutions for the Board's consideration: Resolution 2002-047. To Approve An Amendment To Chapter II. Articles 1. 2.3.4.5.6. Appendix A. Chapter V. And Chapter VI Of The Ea2:le County Land Use Regulations. The Board of County Commissioners considered the proposed amendments at its regular hearing held on February 12th, 2002. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve Resolution 2002-047, to approve an Amendment to Chapter II, Articles 1,2,3,4,5,6, Appendix A, Chapter V, and Chapter VI ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Resolution 2002-048. To Approve An Amendment To Resolution No. 97-84. Approval Of A Zone District Amendment For Sopris Mesa Subdivision. File No. ZC-00004. A resolution to amend and correct the zoning designation for the Sopris Mesa Subdivision, changing it from Agricultural Residential (AR) to Agricultural Limited (AL) in order to reflect what was intended by Resolution No. 97-84. Commissioner Stone moved to approve Resolution 2002-048, to approve an amendment to Resolution 97-84, approval of a zone District Amendment for Sopris Mesa Subdivision, file number ZC-0004. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Eagle County Precinct Map Sara Fisher, Eagle County Clerk & Recorder, presented the Eagle County Precinct Map, which shows the change in the precinct boundary line between Precincts 17 and 18. The map also shows the new numbering system for each precinct. She stated this map was approved on the 5th and the Board was authorized to sign it at that time. The Board signed the map. Golden Eagle Assisted Living Corporation Board Jack Ingstad, County Administrator, requested this matter be tabled to March 19,2002. Commissioner Menconi moved to table the meeting for the Golden Eagle Assisted Living Corporation Board of Directors to March 19,2002. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 23 03-12-2002 SUP-OOOOS, Eby Creek Ranch Cliff Simonton, Planner, presented file number SUP-00005, Eby Creek Ranch. He stated the applicants have requested this matter be tabled to April 23, 2002. Commissioner Menconi moved to table file number SUP-00005, Eby Creek Mesa, to April 23, 2002, at the applicants request. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. ZS-00089, Harkias Accessory Dwelling Unit Cliff Simonton presented file number Z8-00089, Harkias Accessory Dwelling Unit. He stated the applicant has requested this matter be tabled to March 19, 2002. Commissioner Menconi moved to table file number ZS-00089 to March 19, 2002, Harkias Accessory Dwelling Unit, at the applicants request. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. AFP-0012S, Mountain Meadow Chairman Gallagher stated this is file number AFP-00125, Mountain Meadow. He recalls this file was tabled last fall and that the applicant and the neighbors were requested to go back to the drawing board and work together to make this acceptable by all parties. He stated he would like to know if that was successful and will limit public input to only those items that were not discussed at the first meeting. Joseph Forinash, Planner, stated there has been a revision in the amended final plat from what the Board saw previously. It is clear that neighbors are not satisfied and the proposed change is not sufficient. Adjacent property owners have been notified of the proposed change. Gary White, Attorney for the applicant, and Alexander Kim, applicant, was present for the hearing. Chairman Gallagher asked if the change was significant enough to be returned back to the Roaring Fork Planning Commission. Mr. Forinash stated an amended final plat does not go through the Planning Commission. Mr. White stated they are returning with a renewed request to allow Mr. Kim to move his building envelope. He spoke to the letters and the neighbors in opposition. What has changed? He stated the primary building envelope has been reduced in size by more than 35%, from 60,000 square feet to 10,000 square feet. The auxiliary building envelope has been reduced in size by about 35% from 140,000 square feet to 90,000 square feet. The north boundary of the primary building envelope has been moved an additional 75 feet farther away from the lot line boundary of Lot 27, so it is now 175 feet away at its closest point. They rotated the primary building envelope to the southeast to further minimize the ability for properties located to the north such as the Bright's, to see the improvements to be constructed. Mr. White stated the opposition to Mr. Kims' application was based primarily on the objections from neighbors that if the building envelopes were moved, their view would be blocked. Mr. Kims' application was tabled to provide an opportunity to obtain additional input 24 03-12-2002 from the neighbors and come up with a revised compromise proposal. First they gathered input and revised the proposed building envelopes by adjusting their location and decreasing their size. Second they confirmed that ifMr. Kims' revised application is approved and even it he builds a very large tall residence in the center of the proposed residential building envelope, no ones views will be blocked The Kims' application to amend their final plat to relocate their building is proper and should be granted. The Kims' proposal satisfies the requirements of Section 5-290 (g) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. The relocated building envelopes are consistent with good land planning. The revised location is the best balancing all concerns. There are no significant adverse effects on any of the neighbors. No views are blocked. The Eagle County Land Use Code requires that the Commissioners promote health, safety, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare. The Kims' have done everything required and requested. They contacted the neighbors, worked with the Division of Wildlife, created the best land use plan possible, revised their proposal to reasonably balance all interests and obtained a second review and evaluation of the proposal. The staff report has determined that the standards for approval contained in Section 5-290 (g) (2) have been satisfied. They agree to review the amended final plat to determine if the proposed amendment adversely affects adjacent property owners and review of the amended final plat to determine that the proposed amendment is not inconsistent with the intent of the final plat. Mr. White stated he believes a lot of the opposition is due to mis-information by Ms. Bright. He stated she has a crusade based on half truths and intentional mis-representations designed to upset her neighbors and to wrongly influence anyone who will listen to oppose the Kims' request to re-Iocate their building envelope. Neighbors contacted were Richard Condon, Don Synder, Jon and Stacy Stewart, Scott & Judy Samborski, Penny and Dennis Carruth, Susan McNally, Julie Powell, Paul and Jo Johnston, Hiram and Ann Richardson, Greg Smith, Dave and Claudis Griesser and Walt Williams. The experts say the following: Andrew Schaller, Manager of Transmission Engineering, Excel Energy, "when concerned over emissions from the power transmission lines because of the inclusive evidence, it is good to offer prudent avoidance". Craig Tate of Holy Cross Energy, "if you have any concerns over EMF transmissions, distance is your friend" and "given the choice of standing or living directly below or very near power transmission lines or not, you would simply choose not". Excel Energy's answer to frequently asked questions, "under grounding will not necessarily reduce magnetic fields". Ms. Bright has related that her property value will decrease by more than 25 percent if the Kims' proposal is granted. He stated moving the building envelope can only help the situation. Stan Clauson, Land Use Planner, showed the Board the photographs ofthe property and the plat. He stated Mr. Kim came to him about a month ago and was very concerned that he was doing the right thing and he wanted a second opinion. He showed the proposed building envelopes with the darker orange representing the building site. He stated they went out to the site and looked at the current situation of the building envelope and found that it was considerably lower than the bulk of the property. He showed the line of the power line and it 25 03-12-2002 being a 25 kilovolt and is part of the Holy Cross system. He stated it runs across the area of the envelope. It was their feeling that particularly with the power line from a visual and health perspective the building envelope was in an unfortunate position. They then looked at the proposed building envelope which can be seen with the story pole and the considerable distance. He explained their choice of the new location. He stated it was clear when the Brights residence was developed it was sighted to demand the same vista as the Kims. He stated it is at the same crest of the hill as what is being proposed. The Kims also asked them to provide something illustrative. He showed the drawing using the current codes. They have tried to provide for an organic feeling with matured trees and berming. He spoke to the small structure which is a green house. He stated given the thirty foot ridge line, the Brights will still have unobstructed views. He spoke to the history of the development of the property. He showed old lot 34 flanked by lots 27 and 28 which were the fathering parcels of the current configuration. He showed another rotation with the addition of the additional lots. He read from the minutes of a previous meeting of the Board, "the lot area from the old lot 34 will then become a part of re-platted lot 27 as well as open space. Newly constructed Vista Hi Drive will be re-platted along with the building envelope oflot 34". He stated when lot 24 was re-divided in, open space was created. It is deed restricted open space. He stated it seems clear to him that the deed restricted open space fulfills the intention of the approval as noted in the minutes. He stated while everyone wants to respect the landscape, there are no encumbrances on this land as it relates to open space. With that it mind, it seemed that a development such as this is good land use planning and keeps the dwelling away from the power lines. Chairman Gallagher asked for public comment and asked that comment be limited to the new file. Ann Richardson, area resident, stated she has lived at her property for 17 years and she bought it understanding that her views would not be encumbered. She stated she is sorry but this is an elk preserve. She spoke to the number of pictures that they have. She thinks it is unconscionable that they are able to build a trophy house in a beautiful field that was to remain open space. She believes that it is going to hurt her property. She knows Ruth Fendor and she believes that it was made clear to the Kims where they would be able to build. She spoke to the Kims coming in with loads of money and changing everything around. Mary Bright, area resident, stated she lives in Upper Cattle Creek Road. She thanked the Board for the opportunity to work things out and related it is unfortunate the building envelopes in this revision are still in the same location as the previous envelope. She stated it is not a new location. She spoke to the activities that took place from November on. She stated they suggested moving the envelope to the west which was the same as made by Joe Forinash. She stated their suggestions were not applied. She stated it does have an adverse effect on their property. She stated her property value could diminish up to $250,000. She spoke to the drawing and stated it is very nice but it is not realistic. She stated they bought their property for the unobstructed view. She stated the amended final plat is inconsistent with the intent of the final plat. The location of the current building envelope is very intentional and specific. Lot 34 has agricultural zoning and need to be preserved. Chairman Gallagher asked if Ms. Bright could wrap up her presentation and related the presentation sounds the same as the last time. 26 03-12-2002 Ms. Bright stated she has presented the Board with a second petition with over 100 signatures. She stated the intentions of Ruth Fendor in developing this land were in the best interest of the community and not of one individual. Commissioner Menconi asked if since the last hearing if she has been appro aced by Mr. Kim to work on a compromise. Ms. Bright stated on November 12th they met. She stated her Attorney was contacted by Mr. White. Commissioner Menconi asked if there were areas where they would like to see the building envelope. Ms. Bright showed their suggestion of moving it to the west of the revised envelope. Commissioner Menconi asked if they moved it to the west if would they be in agreement. Ms. Bright stated for them personally they would like to see it to the west. Rich Condon, a neighbor to the Kim property, stated some ofthe neighbors have asked why he is in favor of this proposal. He stated he currently isn't taking sides. He stated it has become a very emotional issue and he can see that some people do not oppose the application because they are trying to get along with all parties. Bud Gates, former County Commissioner, stated he was seated on the Board when the original application was made. He was asked to speak to shed light on what the original intent. He stated when they made the original application you have to go back to the night meetings with the surrounding Counties with the approval of subdivisions. He stated there was a big push for more open space and green belt and for the wildlife. He stated wildlife was a consideration. He knows Ruth Fendor and when she came in with this application she implied that she wanted this to be kept as open space and green belt. He questions the applicant moving the building location into the center for agricultural use. He spoke to the water, the haying and the livestock. He believes the original intent was to leave that as open space and that they would not have approved it if it would have been otherwise. He has listened to the minutes and to the tapes. He thinks it would be a travesty to build in the center of the property. Chairman Gallagher asked if this was supposed to be open space why wasn't it designated as such. Mr. Gates stated they came to that concensus because that was what was desired. Commissioner Stone thanked Mr. Gates for being here. He asked if having the building envelope placed in a certain location is an indication that homes should not be built any where except in that envelope. Mr. Gates stated that is correct. He is concerned with making a change and building a house in the middle. Would someone be back in within a couple of years to subdivide and add fourteen more houses. Mr. White stated he is a little surprised that when a building parcel was selected that it was located under the power lines. Mr. Gates stated that was the proposal and they didn't want to question his reasoning. Scott Dewind, area resident just above this location, stated the biggest concerns they have is that when they bought their property they did so with the building envelopes specified. He suggested that the process was all in vain. He wonders why this process is going so far. There was a specific reason for the location of the building envelope. He stated they addressed the 27 03-12-2002 concerns in many letters. He stated they have more danger within their own house than with the power line. He spoke to Don Snyder who is still opposed to the amendment. He spoke to the story pole heights and questions them being 30 feet high. He spoke to the elk in the area and that it would be unfortunate for them to be pushed out. He spoke to why they moved here and their desire to enjoy the area. Commissioner Stone asked what their feelings would be about moving the envelope to the right. Mr. Dewind stated that would put the house right in front of his and they would be opposed to that. They recommended a spot near the crest of a hill. Nancy Dewind, area resident, stated there have been so many words written and so many spoken with one absolute continual thing. She stated they don't know what will be lost until it is gone. She stated there are so many things at stake there. She stated they had never met the Kims until they came to the hearing. She stated up until the last hearing they had never heard from them. They tried to meet without lawyers and they had nice conversations. She spoke to the power lines and that they are 25 volt not 50 volt. She stated there are many things to look at. If the land is built on in those locations, the land is gone. She stated this is their heart, this is their land and as the closest neighbors they are opposed to the proposal. Pam Nelson, resident ofthe auxiliary unit, stated she is a lover of wildlife. She spoke to the elk. She stated she doesn't know if they have considered the impact on this herd and asked where they will go. She doesn't believe that this issue has been addressed. She stated this has been their home for a number of years and every spring and winter elk pasture there. Greg Wright, residing on lot 27, stated the power lines are service lines and they are not major lines. He spoke to confirmation from Holy Cross. He spoke to the location of the power lines. He stated the line is on the edge of the property. He stated the building envelope was there when the Kim's bought the property. He spoke to the fence they have on their property. He stated Mr. Snyder was misrepresented. He showed pictures outside of his door. Chairman Gallagher closed public comment. Gary White thanked the Board and stated he appreciates the difficulty to do the right thing. He stated that his client has tried to contact the neighbors. They have referred this matter to the DOW. He stated that he represented the previous buyers. He stated there is nothing that prevents them from developing the entire lot. He stated his client has no interest in subdividing and is willing to place that in writing. He stated as for the power lines, he can only say that the experts disagree. He stated they are proposing 100,000 square feet on 50 acres. This is not planning for a trophy home. He stated he can't speak for Don Snyder, but his client did. He stated one of the gentlemen suggested they just want to be neighborly. He stated as Ms. Dewind stated, the Kims initiated the contacts. He stated another interesting concern is that this is a compromise. He stated they have made their best attempt to compromise all the competing interest. The story poles they put up are 30 feet which is what they agreed to. Stan Clauson stated when they were asked to analyze the site, they looked at wildlife. He stated there isn't a map. There is no critical wildlife designation. He stated there are certainly elk there, but at different times they are in different locations. He stated the elk are migrating across the entire area. In their estimation they have to rely on the fact that the elk are there from time to time. It is not mapped or identified by the DOW. He stated as a landscape architect, they 28 03-12-2002 believe that this is an appropriate site. It is clear that the neighbors are upset, but with berming and tree plantings, the effects can be mitigated and eventually there would be a healing process. Mr. Kim, owner of lot 34, spoke to wildlife and stated the elk are indeed everywhere. He spoke to the overhead photo and stated he has been observing them this winter. He stated where the original building envelope is located there is a major pathway through it to water on the Crawfords property. He stated 60 to 70% of the Brights land is unaccessable to wildlife. He showed the view from the Richardson residence and the Bright residence. He showed where his building envelope will be and that it is 150 feet west of the original proposal. He stated all of the remaining property will remain open and unobstructed. He suggested what could have been simple has become a major confrontation. He stated the Dewinds and the Brights have only been concerned about what is good for them. He spoke to the contacts they have made with the neighbors. He spoke to the discussion with the Richards and Mr. Snyder. He stated when the second petition came to light, Mr. Snyder stated he signed it. Mr. Snyder stated he hadn't been told the whole truth. He spoke to Walt Williams who shared the same concerns. He stated Mr. Williams stated he doesn't want to take a sides and really has no opposition. He stated all the people who live above will see their building. As they are placing it to the west, no views will be obstructed. He then spoke to the power lines and handed out a paper that refers to the power. He read from the handout. He spoke to the test conducted by the Dewinds and suggested that they had not asked permission to be on their property so he then did additional research. He read from his findings. He stated there are two sides to the arguments according to EMFs. He spoke to the good neighbor policy. He rebutted the petitions that were distributed. He stated this has now become personal and they have been painted with the scarlet letter. He stated they closed on their property on the same day as the Brights. He stated they have no intention of building a trophy home. He spoke to the sight visit with Joe Forinash and Cliff Simonton. He believes that they have worked hard to find a compromise. He stated it is their wish to live here while preserving the nature of the area. Laura Foster, applicant, stated since the hearing they have met with their neightbors and the DOW. She stated they contacted those who sent letters and those who had signed the petition. She stated those they did contact they tried to go to their property to see it from their point of view. She stated they called the Dewinds and met with them, but they were never invited to see the sight from their property. She shared the discussions they had with their neighbors. She stated this has been a difficult and emotional task. They reduced their envelope and moved it further south and east. There were compromises made by them for their neighbors. She spoke to a discussion with Mary Bright and that she considers the Kims land as part of their view. She stated Mary Bright has campaigned in neighborhoods other than theirs. She stated her efforts have been so that the Brights would not have to look into their home. She stated being a good neighbor is a two way street. It does not consist of refusing to speak to them or refusing to return their phone calls. She stated with the exception of the neighbors who don't want to see this envelope moved, everyone who has seen the current proposal agree that it is the best site possible for the envelope. She stated it is of upmost importance to see their agricultural operations which are planned, which mayor may not include haying. She stated they are not blocking mountain views. They want to enjoy and use their land to its fullest extent. She asked the Board to not make them build under power lines. 29 03-12-2002 Commissioner Menconi asked Joe Forinash to review the standards that must be met for an amended final plat. Mr. Forinash stated the Amended Final Plat does not adversely affect adjacent property owners. He stated the location of the house is 175 to 475 feet from the Brights. He doesn't believe that any impact on the view from the north will be obstructed by a house on this sight. He stated the Land Use Regulations are silent on view corridors. The Amended Final Plat is consistent with the intent of the Final Plat. He stated staff has reviewed the files that have baring on this location. He stated they found no expression of intent or in staff report of minutes that indicated an intent to permenently restrict this for open space. He spoke to the contrary testimony from former Commissioners Phillips and Gates. The intent mayor may not have existed but it was not placed in writing. The Amended Final Plat does conform to the Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies and guidelines. He stated this finding is positive. An Improvements Agreement is not applicable and is not required. This amendment is not an alteration of a restrictive plat note. Commissioner Menconi asked for an elaboration on the DOW position. Mr. Forinash stated he would have to speculate understanding that the balance of the meadow will not be effected if the fencing is wildlife friendly and that dogs will not be running wild. He stated there was a recommendation to move the building envelopes closer together, but they did not do that. Commissioner Menconi asked what the distance is from the center of the original building envelope to the proposed envelope. Mr. Forinash suggested from the center of the currently proposed one to the previously proposed envelope it is about 600 feet. Commissioner Stone asked Scott Hunn if he would share his insight concerning this matter. He asked Mr. Hunn if he was a planner when this was previously heard. Scott Hunn, former Eagle County Planner, stated he was the planner for the original file. Commissioner Stone apologized that his good neighbor plan didn't work out. He asked if Mr. Hunn could give testimony as to why a building envelope is in a certain plgce. Mr. Hunn stated in a general sense their dealings with Ruth Fender recognized the desire to preserve this meadow. He stated with her intentions, they took the proposal ~n 1998 to their design team meeting. They responded with a letter that gave general direction back to her. They questioned ifit was her intent to preserve the open space. Mr. Hunn stated it doesn't show up on the plat or in writing and her reluctance to do so came from Mrs. Fender and from the planning staff. The direction they sent Mrs. Fender and her surveyor were to make it simple and creating a building site and restricting the use of the lot adjacent to development. They created the building envelope to minimize the impacts. Commissioner Stone asked if would be fair to state that the reason the building envelope was placed there was to restrict the building on that particular property. Mr. Hunn stated it was and it was a joint decision. Mrs. Fender is not well versed in planning history and it was their attempt to help her in this decision. Chairman Gallagher asked as planning staff for the County, if they told Mrs. Fender where to put the building envelope to maintain open space. 30 03-12-2002 Mr. Hunn stated working with Mrs. Fender she expressed what her overall intent was, which led them to this location. Chairman Gallagher questioned her not wanting to put on a plat restriction because she wanted this to be a temporary fix. Mr. Hunn stated he doesn't understand the question. Chairman Gallagher asked if the reason she didn't want to put anything in writing was because she wanted it to be temporary. Mr. Hunn stated that Mrs. Fender had a general reluctance to make anything final. Commissioner Stone asked what Mr. and Mrs. Kims rights are on this property as it is stands currently. Mr. Forinash stated their only option is to build it in the existing building envelope. Commissioner Stone stated the Kims have only the right to build in the existing building envelope and they have a right to due process. He suggested the Kims made a conscious decision to buy the property. He asked if they knew where the building envelope was when they bought the property. Mr. Kim stated they did know but they understood, as per Mrs. Fender, they could apply to move the building envelope. He stated this is his first time and he made his decisions on what he understood at the time. Commissioner Stone asked if they understood there were no guarantees. Mr. Kim stated he understood that. Gary White suggested to Scott Hunn that he is surprised and confused that a critical element of the plan is not part of the record. Mr. Hunn stated given the owner at the time and the direction Mrs. Fender wanted to take the application, it was a non-permenant solution that addressed her concerns and the concerns of the neighborhood at that time. Mr. Hunn stated Mrs. Fender did not want to put something in place as permanent as a conservation easement or deed restriction. Mr. White stated they way the approval was granted left any owner the ability to apply for a move in the building envelope. There is nothing in writing that would prevent this building envelope from being moved. Mr. Hunn stated given the owner at that time and the direction she wanted to take at that time, that this was a non-permanent solution that addressed her concerns and what she thought were the concerns of the entire development. He believes that current regulations reflect there is a process to apply for moving a building envelope. Commissioner Menconi asked if the applicant has seen Mrs. Fender's letter of November 10,2001. He stated what he is confused about and one of the aspects of the testimony is to shed light on the previous owner's intent. He questions what the intergrity of Ms. Fender's intent was. Mr. Kim stated in his dealings with Mrs. Fender when they first came into contact with her, the lot was under contract. He understands Ms. Fender agreed to sell her house as well. He stated Mrs. Fender had applied to move the building envelope and that if she had a previous obligation she would not have applied to have it moved. He stated she knew they planned on moving the building envelope. He stated there were people lined up. He stated he understands the perspective buyer did not back out because of the location of the building envelope. He stated he had to go back to Mrs. Fender on three occasions and she knew ofthis process. She 31 03-12-2002 was well aware of what was going on and she never voiced a concern to him about moving the envelope. He stated in all of his conversations with her she asked how it was going with the neighbors. When she looked at the plat she stated it was a good compromise. Commissioner Stone spoke to the letter signed by Mrs. Fender. He stated that his feelings are largely influenced by wanting to maintain the integrity of former County Commissioners. He again thanked Mr. Gates for coming in. He stated they make decisions on property and he would be offended if future Board members discounted what was done. He stated they had a definite line of reasoning when they approved this subdivision. He stated there was thought and this wasn't a haphazard position. It was all done for a reason. He stated he believes that both sides are guilty of exaggeration. He understands the energy about a decision that effects the lifestyle. He spoke to the really big power lines in Singletree. He stated he believes the Kims knew where the power lines were when they bought the property. If they bought the property under the assumption that moving the building envelope would be easy, it is not. He is not convinced that the wildlife issue is a real big consideration. The majority of his consideration is if things have changed considerably and he doesn't see that it has been significant enough to overturn the decisions of a previous board. He suggested that the location of the building envelope in relation to the first attempt has really changed. He suggested that for agricultural interests it probably doesn't make sense to build in the middle ofthe property. He is not moved to approve this application for the reasons he stated. Chairman Gallagher asked Mr. Moorhead ifthe presence of a building envelope on a plat if it has the effect of a plat note restriction. Mr. Moorhead stated it would not. Chairman Gallagher stated he has a bit of a problem with the idea that someone buys a house and that they can never change. He suggested things do change. This used to be a big agricultural area and then it subdivided. The idea that "it is going to stay the way I want it to stay" is unrealistic. He suggested that looking at someone else's home is manageable. He stated that the action taken by other Commissioners is not to be taken lightly. He agrees with the applicants on the position of power lines and he agrees there can be a difference of opinions. He believes that prudent avoidance is wise. He would be inclined to say that if this file is denied, he would encourage the applicant to persue a different location. Commissioner Menconi stated he feels that Mr. Kim has made a serious attempt to connect with the neighbors and in the surrounding area. He commends them on the hard work they have done. He thinks this has been a difficult decision to weigh in on. He is looking at the regulations and the standards. He is almost persuaded by the desire to move the location of the property. He stated he is more persuaded by the testimony heard for the preservation of open space. He suggested he would hope to see a future attempt to move the building envelope. He understands the difficult climate in which he was trying to negotiate and he has compassion for what he and his family are going to do. Commissioner Stone stated his motion is going to be for denial, but there are two choices. If the Kims think there is another location for a building envelope that would take them away from the power lines, or if they want to continue the file if they think the other location would work, he would agree to continue this file. Mr. White asked if there is a less formal work session in which they can discuss this 32 03-12-2002 where they might have a more effective proposal. Chairman Gallagher stated they should work with the planning staff. Mr. White suggested it would be in the best interest of his clients if they could continue this application. Commissioner Stone stated he is trying to recognize Mr. and Mrs. Kims interest and is trying to make this easier on them. Mr. White suggested neither he nor the Kims are ready to give up on this. Their primary goal is to move it away from the power lines. Chairman Gallagher asked if the applicant would like to request that this be tabled. Mr. Kim asked that the file be tabled. Commissioner Stone moved to table file number AFP-00125, Mountain Meadow, for an indefinite amount of time, at the applicants request. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Gallagher asked the neighbors to look at this as a new opportunity and that they communicate with one another. There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until March 19, 2002. Attest: Clerk to the Bo 33 03-12-2002 CERTIFICATE OF PRIVILEGED ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION I, R. Thomas Moorhead, Eagle County Attorney, hereby state that in my opinion, the discussion regarding Cacciopo vs. Eagle County School District, Eagle County Assessor, Eagle County Treasurer and Eagle County Commissioners and the Resort Region Litigation which took place in Executive Session on March 19,2002 at the Board of County Commissioners' Regular Meeting constitutes a privileged attorney-client communication. There has been no record kept of the discussion which constitutes a privileged attorney-client communication. \ Date:~j Ie; ~j- , A~or~~~meY /f~.,; !l1etJ t 0#; I, Midljt~l Ga11agher, Chairman of the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners, attest that the portion of the Execution Session that was not recorded was confined to the topic of Cacciopo vs. Eagle County School District, Eagle County Assessor, Eagle County Treasurer and Eagle County Commissioners and the Resort Region Litigation for discussion in an Executive Session pursuant to C.R.~ ' Date~.t. If /dzJ.?- ~ Micnael GaUaghcr, Chairman /Ill/v /tA. ~ ;J e{).v / I (! Ita {4 PA d