HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/19/2001
PUBLIC HEARING
JUNE 19,2001
Present:
Tom Stone
Michael Gallagher
Arn Menconi
Tom Moorhead
Jack Ingstad
Sara J. Fisher
Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
County Attorney
County Administrator
Clerk to the Board
This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of
County Commissioners for their consideration:
Consent Agenda
Chairman Stone stated the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows:
A) Approval of bill paying for the week of June 18,2001, subject to review by County
Administrator
B) Approval ofthe minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting for May 29,
2001
C) Eagle County Annual Wildfire Operating Plan for control and extinguishment of wild
land fires
D) Resolution 2001-080, authorizing the Chairman of the Board of County
Commissioners to sign CDBG Contract Change Letter
E) Assignment of Contract C2000-295-48 with Office Tecknowledgy
F) Intergovernmental Agreement between the County of Eagle and the Town of Vail
concerning Child Care Programs
G) Agreement between Eagle County and Judy Edeen for a Quality Child Care Grant
H) Agreement between Eagle County and Tina Beers for a Quality Child Care Grant
I) Agreement between Eagle County and Carol Tatum for a Quality Child Care Grant
J) Agreement between Eagle County and Linda Foley for a Quality Child Care Grant
K) Agreement between Eagle County and Cheryl Buker for a Quality Child Care Grant
L) Agreement between Eagle County and Early Childhood Connections for a Quality
Child Care Grant
M) Agreement between Eagle County and Rumpe1stiltskin for a Quality Child Care Grant
N) Agreement between Eagle County and Blue Lake Preschool for a Quality child Care
Grant
0) Agreement between Eagle County and Panda Bear Preschool for a Quality Child Care
Grant
P) Agreement between Eagle County and St. Mary's Preschool for a Quality Child Care
Grant
Q) Agreement between Eagle County and the Foundation of Trustees for the Family
Learning Center for a Quality Child Care Grant
R) Eagle Airport Terminal Addition, relocation of underground electric service
S) Intergovernmental Agreement between County of Eagle and The Town of Eagle for
use of portable stage
I
06-19-2001
T) License Agreement with Union Pacific Railroad Company for a bicycle and pedestrian
trail crossing in Edwards, from Union Pacific Railroad Company
U) Resolution 2001-081, authorizing the conveyance of real property from ECRTA to
qualified entities.
Chairman Stone asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda.
Tom Moorhead, County Attorney, stated there were no changes that he was aware of.
Commissioner Gallagher asked that item F, an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Town of
Vail concerning child care programs, be removed to schedule a work session. He stated he has a
question on Item R, Eagle Airport Terminal Addition, and asked if it was the relocation of underground
electric service. He asked if this was done a year ago.
Jim Elwood, Airport Manager, stated a year ago they did some utility expansion under the road
ways.
Rick Cunningham, Director of Facilities Management, stated they will be moving the existing
utility pad for the expansion of the concourse.
Commissioner Gallagher asked after item U, the conveyance of real property from ECRTA to
qualified entities. He stated since this is a bus he does not believe it to be "real property".
Tom Moorhead stated he believes the body of the document was changed to refer to it as
property .
Chairman Stone asked Rusty Williams, Director of Animal Control, about item S for the use of
the portable stage and that there has been discussion regarding the condition of the stage and if it should
or shouldn't be replaced.
Mr. Williams explained some work has already been done on the stage just before the Oyster
Feed. He stated because of the replacement scheduled for 2002, he did not want to put more money into
it. He spoke to the Town of Eagle wanting to use the stage for Flight Days. He stated the Town of Eagle
has volunteered to build the top on the stage and this contract spells out the specifics of the Town's
being able to continue to use the stage.
Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the consent agenda of items A through U, deleting the
word "real" in item U, and withdrawing item F.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Plat & Resolution Signing
Matt Gennett, Planner, presented the following plats and resolutions for the Board's
consideration:
AFP-00122. Cordillera. Filing 7. Lot 16. The purpose of this Amended Final Plat is to
alter the shape and orientation of the platted building envelope in order to preserve existing Aspen trees
and improve aesthetics. Staff findings are as shown on staff report and as follows:
Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations:
5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision
(G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director
shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an
Amended Final Plat.
Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision.
a) Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate;
b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations,
policies, standards, and guidelines; and
c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable.
Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve final plat file number AFP-00122, Cordillera, Filing
2
06-19-2001
7, Lot 16, incorporating staff findings and authorizing the Chairman to sign the plat.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
5MB-00269. Arrowhead at Vail- Filing No. 26. ARe-subdivision of Lot 3. The
intent ofthis Type B Minor Subdivision is to re-subdivide Lot 3 into two ~ duplex lots, Lot 3A and Lot
3B. Staff findings are as shown on staff report and as follows:
Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations:
5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision
(G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director
shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an
Amended Final Plat.
Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision.
a) Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate;
b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations,
policies, standards, and guidelines; and
c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable.
Commissioner Gallagher stated in as much as the findings have been previously recorded he
doesn't see a purpose for the Clerk to incorporate those in the minutes again.
Chairman Stone responded that on these types of plats, this Board has chosen to hear these where
other communities do not.
Commissioner Gallagher stated he understands that on a Minor Type B Subdivision.
Mr. Gennett stated it follows in their regulations under a Minor Type B Subdivision.
Commissioner Gallagher stated his question is not whether the plat has been reviewed but rather
if the Board should be asking the Clerk to incorporate the findings.
Commissioner Menconi moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-00269, Arrowhead at
Vail, Filing No. 26, a Resubdivision of Lot 3.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Resolution 2001-082 To Approve The PUD Sketch Plan For Woodland Hills (Ea2le
County File No. PDS-00028). The Board of County Commissioners considered this application at its
regular hearing on May 29th, 2001.
Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve Resolution 2001-082, to approve the PUD Sketch
Plan for Woodland Hills, file number PDS-00028.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Resolution 2001-083 To Approve The Amendment To The Arrowhead At Vail PUD
Guide. The Board of County Commissioners considered this application at its regular hearing on May
29th, 2001.
Commissioner Menconi moved to approve Resolution 2001-083 to approve the amendment to
the Arrowhead at Vail PUD Guide.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Chairman Stone asked if there is reason to convene as the Eagle County Air Terminal
Corporation.
Mr. Elwood responded only to discuss the bond meeting from last week.
Jack Ingstad suggested they may want to meet to discuss the fireplace and some other issues.
Commissioner Gallagher moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and
reconvene as the Eagle County Air Terminal Corporation.
3
06-19-2001
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Commissioner Gallagher moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Air Terminal Corporation and
reconvene as the Board of County Commissioners.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Appointment of County Attorney
Commissioner Gallagher moved to appoint Tom Moorhead as Eagle County Attorney. A
Resolution shall be drafted to reflect this decision.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene
as the Local Liquor License Authority.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Liquor License Consent Agenda
Earlene Roach, Eagle County Liquor Inspector, presented the Liquor License Consent Agenda as
follows:
A) MRT Wines, Inc.
Beaver Creek Fine Wines
This is a renewal of a retail liquor store license. This establishment is
located near the Charter at Beaver Creek. There have been no complaints
or disturbances during the past year.
B) Equestrians, Inc.
Ranch at Berry Creek
This is a renewal of an optional premise license. This establishment is
located on the Berry Creek 5th property. There have been no complaints or
disturbances during the past year.
C) Beaver Creek Arts Foundation
Vilar Center for the Arts
This is a renewal of an arts license. This establishment is located at the
Plaza in Beaver Creek. There have been no complaints or disturbances
during the past year.
D) Beaver Creek Arts Foundation
Vilar Center for the Arts
This is a managers registration for Martha Brassel. She has worked for
The Vilar Center, Chamber of Commerce, Hyatt Regency and Casually
Elegant Catering. She was an alcohol server for the Hyatt and the house
manager for the Vilar Center and has been involved with the service of
alcohol. She is reported to be of good moral character.
E) State Bridge Lodge Corporation
State Bridge Lodge
This is a renewal of a Tavern License. This establishment is located along
the Trough Road next to Rancho Del Rio in Bond. There have been no
complaints or disturbances during the past year.
F) Gloria J. Deschamp
4
06-19-2001
EI Jebel Liquors
This is a renewal of a Retail Liquor Store License. This establishment is
located along Highway 82 in EI Jebel. There have been no complaints or
disturbances during the past year.
G) Wolcott Yacht Club LLC
Wolcott Yacht Club
This is a renewal of a Tavern License. This establishment is located along
Highway 6 next to Wolcott Market in Wolcott. There have been no
complaints or disturbances during the past year.
H) Wolcott Yacht Club LLC
Wolcott Yacht Club
This is a managers registration for Charles E. Howard III. Chip has been a
manager for Vail Associates and Jan Jouflas, owner of Wolcott Market.
He is reported to be of good moral character.
I) Extended Family Stone LLC
The French Press
This is a renewal of a tavern license. This establishment is located in
Riverwalk. It is the old Quattros. There have been no complaints or
disturbances during the past year.
J) Eagle-Vail Restaurant Group, Ltd.
Paddy's
This is a renewal of a hotel and restaurant license. This establishment is
located along Highway 6 in Eagle-Vail. There have been no complaints
or disturbances during the past year.
K) Edwards Liquor Mart, Inc.
Riverwalk Wine and Spirits
This is a renewal of a retail liquor store license. This establishment is
located in Riverwalk in Edwards, next to Village Market. There have been
no complaints or disturbances during the past year.
Commissioner Gallagher asked about State Bridge Lodge Corporation and if this license holder
was involved with the RAVES last year.
Ms. Roach responded no.
Commissioner Gallagher asked about the incident at Paddy's and the presumption of over
servIce.
Ms. Roach explained there was an incident involving a women in Paddy's on December 31,2000
with her four (4) year old son for approximately six (6) hours. After leaving Paddy's she passed out
along Highway 6 in Eagle-Vail still with her son in attendance. A passerby stopped to help and kept the
child out of the street. Interviews were conducted with the bartenders but it was decided that she was
not visibly intoxicated while in the establishment. There were no citations issued to Paddy's. A warning
letter was sent to the establishment.
Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve the Liquor License Consent Agenda for June 19,
2001, as presented.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority and
reconvene as the Board of County Commissioners.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
5
06-19-2001
SMA-00009, ZC-00031, Nystrom Ranch
Jena Skinner, Planner, presented file numbers SMA-00009 and ZC-00031, Nystrom Ranch,
Minor Subdivision and Zone Change. She stated this matter is to be tabled indefinitely at the applicant's
request.
Commissioner Gallagher moved to table file numbers SMA-00009 and ZC-00031 indefinitely at
the applicants request.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
ZS-00076 State Bridge Special Use Permit
Joseph Forinash, Planner, presented file number ZS-00076, State Bridge Special Use Permit. He
stated the applicant is requesting this matter be tabled to June 26, 2001.
Commissioner Menconi moved to table file number ZS-00076, State Bridge Special Use Permit,
at the applicants request to June 26, 2001.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
1041-0037, Nova Guides
Ray Merry, Environmental Health Officer, and Ross Easterly presented file number 1041-0037,
Nova Guides. He stated they do have a couple of referral responses for the Board to review. Ross
Easterling, Planner, handed those out to the Board. One is from the Fire Chief for the Town of Minturn,
and the other from the State Forest Service. The third is from the Colorado Geological Survey. He
stated they faxed those copies to the applicant as well.
Mr. Easterling stated Nova Guides currently operates under an amended Special Use Permit
(Resolution 94-117). That permit allowed, among other uses, two single-family dwellings, six two-
bedroom rental cabins, six one-bedroom rental cabins and a restaurant/lodge.
At this time, the applicant proposes the construction of the restaurant/lodge facility which is a 50
seat restaurant with the capability of serving 150 patrons per day. The total water use of the dwellings,
cabins and the proposed restaurant/lodge, allowed under the Special Use Permit, is 14.7 EQR. 1041
permitting is a condition of Resolution 94-117.
Mr. Easterling pointed out the locations of the existing cabins and those proposed. He spoke to
the road access for fire fighting. He stated the main concern with the 1041 is the cumulative effect ofthe
seven different leach fields and septic systems associated with the development.
Chairman Stone asked if those individual systems are outlined in orange.
Mr. Easterling stated those are not in service at this time. He showed those that are. He stated
another issue raised were flood plain issues. He showed the proposed lodge stating they do not have a
building permit application.
Referral responses are as shown on staff report and as follows:
Eagle County Engineer:
The engineering plans included in Attachment D of the application should be supplemented with
a site plan showing the distribution and supply lines that will be built as part of the project. There
should also be specification for the well depth, motor, and pump to ensure that the 100 GPM capacity
will be provided. (Comments Attached)
NWCOGG:
The NWCCOG expressed concerns regarding degradation of surface and groundwater and siting
of the water and wastewater treatment facilities.
With respect to antidegradation of surface and groundwater the NWCCOG suggested that the:
6
06-19-2001
Land Use activities should be regulated to maintain the existing hydrologic characteristics.
Prohibit the direct discharge of storm water through the use of filter strips and or infiltration.
Storm water detention and minimization of impervious surfaces.
That the restaurant septic systems be required to have operation, maintenance, and monitoring
requirements. Restaurants have higher in fluent concentrations of BOD, TSS and potential for leach field
failure due to clogging by oil and grease. (Comments Attached)
Referral Agents Not Responding:
County Attorney
Assessor
Colorado Geologic Survey
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Wildlife Division
Colorado State Forest Service
Water Conservation Board
U. S. Forest Service
Eagle County Historical Society
Minturn Fire Department
Nova Guides is located on an important hydrologic resource which is a key source water area for
the County. The aquifer's volume is vast compared to the septic tank volumes considered in the overall
operation, but staff would like further assurances from the applicant that the cumulative effects of the
systems will not pollute groundwater.
The Planning Commission raised questions about fire flow because the Applicant's preferred
alternative does not have a water storage tank. The applicant proposes to use the aquifer for storage.
There is no power supply at Nova Guides--all electricity is generated on site. The applicant will install a
dry hydrant from the existing pond. The cabins will be either sprinkled, with a C02 booster, or the
applicant will purchase a used fire engine.
Mr. Easterling stated they are recommending approval with conditions. He spoke to Condition
# 1. He then turned it over to the applicant.
Tom Zancanella, Steve Batell and Greg Caretto, owners of Nova Guides, were present for the
hearing.
Greg Caretto stated the site originally belonged to Eagle County and was a school site. In the
early 40's the site was converted to use for a training center. They bought the property in the 1989 after
having leased the property for a number of years. They have been working on the phasing for twelve
years. One of the requirements of the prior Commissioners was to have the 1041 permit and that is why
they are here today.
Tom Zancanello stated Nova Guides is surrounded by Forest Service Land. One of the questions
in regard to the flood plain, is that they not build in the 100 year flood plain. He spoke to the Army
moving the river and creating the channel that has been constructed. He stated Eagle Park Reservoir
does stream off the higher stream flows. They are currently doing on site soils investigation for the
lodge permit. One of the comments from the Colorado Geologic Survey was to do site analysis and that
is what they are doing now.
Chairman Stone clarified that this is a 1041 hearing regarding the extension of the water/sewer
service. He suggested they do not want to get this confused with the land use and planning issues. He
spoke to fire concerns.
Mr. Merry stated they focus on the approval criteria for the permit review. He stated the way the
County looks at this is more holistic than the way the State might review it. He spoke to Red Sky Ranch
and the look at the entire development. He stated some of the issues, State Fire for example, questions if
there are significant risks to cause system operational breakdown. He stated the applicant has selected
alternative C which limits the risks. The other is flood plain issues. His recommendation is to review
7
06-19-2001
the approval criteria.
Chairman Stone opened it to questions from the Board. He asked if condition #1 is one they
want to remove.
Mr. Easterling stated yes. Since the State looks at the individual systems and the County looks at
ground water, they are not going to be able to get the letter they are looking for.
Chairman Stone asked if Condition #2 is what they would be considering. He read those
conditions as follows:
1. The site plan associated with the construction drawings submitted with the Building Permit
Application for the lodge must detail the location of existing streams, disturbed areas, impervious cover
and illustrate the implementation ofBMP's.
2. No vegetation should be removed, or soil disturbed or covered, within 25 feet of a wetland,
stream, lake, or other body of water.
Mr. Easterling stated yes. Those conditions came from NWCOG, but he wants the applicant to
know what is expected.
Commissioner Gallagher asked how many beds will be in the lodge.
Steve Batell stated this is not a housing type lodge but a recreational facility. The only beds are
those in the cabins.
Commissioner Gallagher asked if he has talked to City of Colorado Springs and Aurora and the
possible contamination of the aquifer.
Mr. Zancanella stated he has spoken with them and asked ifthey might want to review this. He
understands them to feel the impact is very small.
Commissioner Gallagher asked the elevation of the development above the stream bed.
Mr. Zancanella stated to get out of the channel it is about 10 feet.
Commissioner Gallagher suggested it would have to fill the whole valley to get within this range.
Commissioner Menconi stated in reviewing the file there appears to be great sensitivity around
the water sources.
Mr. Merry stated regarding the sensitive nature of the environment.
Commissioner Menconi asked Mr. Merry to review the concerns ofNWCOG.
Mr. Merry stated they were mainly interested in the sentiment transport offthe site. He
explained with the condition of approval, the building coordinator will check for the existence of the
document and be sure that it is in place and enforceable. He spoke to the ground water and the ISDS
approval. He stated they will have to be designed to his satisfaction otherwise the building permits will
not be granted.
Commissioner Menconi asked about the information from Minturn.
Mr. Merry reviewed the letter and that the application seems to be in good shape. He thinks
Alternative C is the better alternative, but that some of the points could be bolstered. He stated that
letter summarizes his desires and he would like to see Alternative A coupled with Alternative C. He
stated they would like to know if an operational breakdown is a significant risk. He suggested anything
pertinent to the application is worth talking about. The Colorado Geological Survey letter indicated this
is somewhat of an unknown area. They are not in a flood hazard area. They spoke to the geology of the
area and the clay areas that can swell. However, Alternative C does not include tank storage. He stated
geo-technical reports will be required and addressed in the building permit process. He stated the other
referral is the State Forest Service and they have suggested three ideas they would like to have included.
Mr. Easterling stated those issues have been included.
Chairman Stone stated he failed to ask for public comment. He did so. There was none.
Mr. Merry stated if they could label the first exhibit, the electronic slide show, as S-I. The
referral letters be labeled as R-l, Minturn Fire Chief, R-2 the Geological Survey letter and R-3, the State
Forest Service letter.
Mr. Easterling spoke to the elevation and the contour map showing 180 feet.
8
06-19-2001
Chairman Stone reviewed the proposed findings as follows:
In accordance with Section 6.03.15 of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, and as more
specifically described in the application for the Nova Guides Water and Sewage Treatment
Systems:
a) New domestic water and sewage treatment systems shall be constructed in areas which
will result in the proper utilization of existing treatment plants and the orderly development of
domestic water and sewage treatment systems of communities within this County within the
development area and source development area;
(+)Finding: New domestic water and sewage treatment system proposed will be constructed in
an area which will result in the proper utilization of existing treatment plants and the orderly
development of domestic water and sewage treatment systems of communities within this County within
the development area and source development area.
The Nova Guides Camp Hale Site is located in a remote inholding in the White River National
Forest. The closest municipal water systems are located in the towns of Redcliff to the North and
Leadville to the South. Additionally, Ski Cooper is located in the source development area
approximately 7 miles to the South of the proposed fire suppression and water system. Leadville is
approximately 15.5 miles from the Nova Guides Site. Redcliffis approximately 6 miles from the Nova
Guides Site by road and over 4.5 miles by straight line. Redcliff is not located in the development area or
the source development area. These distances combined with the rugged terrain in this region to make
connecting to any of these water systems infeasible.
b) The proposed development does not conflict with an approved local master plan or other
applicable regional, state or federal land use or water plan;
(+)Finding: The proposed development does not conflict with an approved local master plan or
other applicable regional, state or federal land use or water plan.
The Eagle County Board of County Commissioners approved an application for a special use
permit for the proposed recreational facility. This approval states that the proposed special use conforms
to the requirements of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. The approval also states that the
proposed special use will be compatible with existing uses in the area. Additionally, the approval states
that the Nova Guides Facility is in conformance with the Eagle County Master Plan. The recreational
facility is compliant with the Eagle County Resource Zone District within which it is located. The area
is included within the 1996 Northwest Colorado Council of Government's 208 water quality
management plan, but is not included in any site specific wastewater service area due to its remote
location.
The Eagle County Master Plan generally designates the area ofthis project as a Resource Zone.
The Board of County Commissioners found that the proposed special use conforms to the requirements
of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and that the project is consistent with the Eagle County
Master Plan.
c) The proposed development does not adversely affect either surface or subsurface water
rights of upstream or downstream users;
(+ )Finding: The proposed development does not adversely affect either surface or subsurface
water rights of upstream or downstream users.
The Water Judge of Water Division No.5 on July 6, 1993 approved a plan for augmentation
including appropriative exchange. (Case No. 91CW192)
d) Adequate water supplies, as determined by the Colorado Department of Health, are
available for efficient operational needs;
(+)Finding: Adequate water supplies, as determined by the Colorado Department of Health, are
available for efficient operational needs.
The proposed water systems will be classified as transient non-community public water systems.
9
06-19-2001
The water systems will be regulated under the applicable CDPHE regulations. The existing system,
which is representative of the source water proposed for use in this application, has been tested for
nitrates, which were below detectable limits, and for bacteria, which was determined to be absent.
e) Existing domestic water treatment systems servicing the area must be at or near
operational capacity;
(NA)Finding: This finding is not applicable there are no existing domestic water treatment
systems servicing this area.
f) Existing domestic sewage treatment facilities servicing the area must be at or greater
than eighty percent (80%) of operational capacity;
(NA)Finding: This finding is not applicable there are no existing domestic sewage treatment
systems capable of servicing this area.
g) The scope and nature of the proposed development will not compete with existing water
and sewer service or create duplicate services;
(+)Finding: The scope and nature ofthe proposed development will not compete with existing
water and sewer service or create duplicate services. There are no existing sewage treatment or water
treatment systems servicing this area.
h) Age of existing water and sewage systems, operational efficiency, state of repair or level
of treatment is such that replacement is warranted;
(NA)Finding: This finding is not applicable. Replacement of an existing water and sewage
treatment system is not contemplated in this application.
i) Area and community development and population trends demonstrate clearly a need for
such development;
(+ )Finding: Area and community development and population trends demonstrate clearly a
need for such development.
Nova Guides at Camp Hale represents a unique recreation opportunity for Eagle County residents
and visitors to experience the many surrounding acres of public lands. Nova Guides provides both
summer and winter tours which provides a significant economic benefit.
The Center for Business and Economic Forecasting (CBEF) is a private research firm
specializing in the economy of Colorado. The CBEF states that this region's (including Eagle and
Summit Counties) economy is based largely on tourism and recreation. In addition to the major ski areas
that attract winter visitors, the summer season tourism is also important. The tourism industry has
driven a 4.0 percent increase in employed persons in this region since 1998. Continued expansion ofthe
recreation industry is crucial to providing jobs in an area that has grown by more than 22,000 people
since 1990. This proposed water and fire suppression system would allow for the expansion of the Nova
Guides recreational facility, which will provide additional jobs for Eagle County residents. Vail Valley
Tourism and Convention Bureau data indicate that 57% of sales taxes is the direct result of tourism.
j) Existing facilities cannot be upgraded or expanded to meet waste discharge permit
conditions of the Colorado Water Quality Control Division.
(+)Finding: Existing facilities cannot be upgraded or expanded to meet waste discharge permit
conditions of the Colorado Water Quality Control Division.
k) Appropriate easement can be obtained for any associated collector or distribution
system that will serve existing and proposed needs;
(+)Finding: Appropriate easements can be obtained for any associated collector or distribution
system that will serve existing and proposed needs. The improvements proposed in this application are
entirely on the developers land and no additional easements are required.
I) The benefits of the proposed development outweigh the losses of any natural resources or
agricultural lands rendered unavailable as a result of the proposed development;
(+ )Finding: The benefits of the proposed development outweigh the losses of any natural
10
06-19-2001
resources or agricultural lands rendered unavailable as a result of the proposed development. There are
no existing agricultural uses or lands within the project boundaries.
m) The proposed development will not decrease the quality of peripheral or downstream
surface or subsurface water resources below that designated by the Colorado Water Quality
Control Commission as established on May 22, 1979, and effective July 10, 1979, or more stringent
standards subsequently adopted;
(+ )Finding: The proposed development will not decrease the quality of peripheral or
downstream surface or subsurface water resources below that designated by the Colorado Water Quality
Control Commission as established on May 22, 1979, and effective July 10, 1979, or more stringent
standards subsequently adopted;
Due to the small scale ofthe project this temporary impact should be insignificant. Appropriate
silt fencing and erosion controls will be used during construction to minimize sedimentation impacts on
the Eagle River. All lands disturbed by the construction of the Nova Guides development will be
reclaimed within the same growing season as the completion of the improvements or in the following
spring is improvements are completed after October 15. Best Management Practices (BMPs) as adopted
by the 1996 Northwest Council of Government's Water Quality Management Plan, have been included
as Attachment M of this application as the recommended methods to best deal with water quality issues.
n) The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution system or new
service areas will not violate federal or state air quality standards;
(+ )Finding: The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution system or new
service areas will not violate federal or state air quality standards.
There will be little or no impact to air quality generated by the water and wastewater systems
except that generated by construction equipment during the brief construction period. There will be some
emissions from the vehicular traffic generated by patrons and employees of the recreation center. The
only public transportation in this area is an early morning and late day commuter bus that provides
service to the residents of Leadville to access their places of employment in Eagle County.
0) The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution system will not
significantly deteriorate aquatic habitats, marshlands and wetlands, groundwater recharge areas,
steeply sloping or unstable terrain, forests and woodlands, critical wildlife habitat, big game
migratory routes, calving grounds, migratory ponds, nesting areas and the habitats of rare and
endangered species, public outdoor recreation areas, and unique areas of geologic, historic, or
archaeological importance;
(+ )Finding: The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution system will not
significantly deteriorate aquatic habitats, marshlands and wetlands, groundwater recharge areas, steeply
sloping or unstable terrain, forests and woodlands, critical wildlife habitat, big game migratory routes,
calving grounds, migratory ponds, nesting areas and the habitats of rare and endangered species, public
outdoor recreation areas, and unique areas of geologic, historic, or archaeological importance.
The wetlands evaluation determined that the proposed mound system locations the sites as
proposed are not located within wetland areas (see Attachment L, Wetland Evaluation). No sensitive
natural areas are impacted by the installation of the proposed mound improvements.
The geologic study of the site did not identify any unique geologic features. Project impacts are
discussed in Attachment A. In summary, the project is located out of any significant geologic hazard
area. The southern portion of the property has some debris fan deposits. It is likely that these areas will
be protected by Highway 24 and the railroad.
Impacts on wildlife were evaluated during the Special Use Permit review. The Division of
Wildlife did not identify any specific impacts on wildlife. The area is at an elevation to high to function
as critical winter range for deer or elk.
p) The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution system will not
11
06-19-2001
significantly degrade existing natural scenic characteristics, create blight, nor cause other
nuisance factors such as excessive noise or obnoxious odors;
(+ )Finding: The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution system will not
significantly degrade existing natural scenic characteristics, create blight, nor cause other nuisance
factors such as excessive noise or obnoxious odors.
With the employment of the BMP's proposed in the application any environmental degradation
associated with the development will be minimal and temporary. During construction of the water and
wastewater systems, there will be some temporary nuisance factors typical of construction activities
including noise, exhaust, and traffic associated with the movement of equipment.
The applicant represents that once the proposed revegetation establishes itself, any impacts from
site disturbances will nearly disappear as viewed from the U.S. Highway 24 road system.
The impacts from this project will be very minor given the low-density character ofthe
development and its remote location.
q) The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution system will not
create an undue financial burden on existing or future residents within the development area and
the source development area. The cost of securing an adequate supply of water for existing and
future needs of the residents of the County shall be considered in determining whether an "undue
financial burden" will result;
(+)Finding: The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution system will not
create an undue financial burden on existing or future residents within the development area and the
source development area. The cost of securing an adequate supply of water for existing and future needs
ofthe residents ofthe County shall be considered in determining whether an "undue financial burden"
will result.
All project facilities are privately financed by the owners of the development. There will be no
impact on the public to secure water or water rights for the project since the developer has provided all
necessary water rights through the approved augmentation plan.
r) The salinity and advanced wastewater treatment offset plans required by Subsection
6.03.13(7)b)6) and 6.03.13(8)e) have been approved by the Permit Authority and required fees
associated therewith, if any, have been paid.
(NA)Finding: This finding is not applicable. No salinity or advanced wastewater treatment
offset plans are required with the ISDS systems proposed in this development.
s) The construction of structures, buildings and improvements associated with the
proposed development will not significantly impact existing or proposed communities within the
development area and source development area.
(+ )Finding: There are no other existing or proposed communities within the development area or
the source development area; so, the construction of structures, buildings and improvements associated
with the proposed development will not significantly impact any existing or proposed communities.
t) The development site of a major new domestic water or sewage treatment system is not
subject to significant risk from earthquakes, floods, fires, snowslides, landslides, avalanches,
rockslides or other disasters which could cause a system operational breakdown.
(+ )Finding: The development site ofthe major new domestic water or sewage treatment system
proposed in this application is not subject to significant risk from earthquakes, floods, fires, snowslides,
landslides, avalanches, rockslides or other disasters which could cause a system operational breakdown.
The water system proposed has been designed with appropriate consideration of natural hazards.
The system will be protected from flood, avalanche, and rockslides.
The project site could experience moderately strong earthquake related ground shaking. Camp
Hale falls within the Seismic Risk Zone 1 Region in the Uniform Building Code (UBC). All building
permits will meet the requirements of the Eagle County Building Department and the UBC.
12
06-19-2001
6.05.15 Approval of Permit Application
In accordance with Section 6.05.15 (Efficient Utilization of Municipal and Industrial Water
Projects) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, and as more specifically described in the
application for the Nova Guides Water and Sewage Treatment Systems:
a) The need for the proposed water project can be substantiated;
(+)Finding: The need for the proposed water project can be substantiated.
Nova Guides at Camp Hale represents a unique recreation opportunity for Eagle County residents
and visitors to experience the many surrounding acres of public lands. Nova Guides provides both
summer and winter tours which provides a significant economic benefit.
The Center for Business and Economic Forecasting (CBEF) is a private research firm
specializing in the economy of Colorado. The CBEF states that this region's (including Eagle and
Summit Counties) economy is based largely on tourism and recreation. In addition to the major ski areas
that attract winter visitors, the summer season tourism is also important. The tourism industry has
driven a 4.0 percent increase in employed persons in this region since 1998. Continued expansion of the
recreation industry is crucial to providing jobs in an area that has grown by more than 22,000 people
since 1990. This proposed water and fire suppression system would allow for the expansion ofthe Nova
Guides recreational facility, which will provide additional jobs for Eagle County residents. Vail Valley
Tourism and Convention Bureau data indicate that 57% of sales taxes is the direct result of tourism.
b) Assurances of compatibility of the proposed water project with federal, state, regional
and County planning policies regarding land use and water resources;
(+)Finding: This 1041 application is to meet a condition of approval imposed on the applicant by
the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners under the Special Use Permit for the recreational
facility. Evidence submitted in the Special Use Permit application, and in this 1041 application assures
compatibility of the proposed water project with federal, state, regional and County planning policies
regarding land use and water resources.
The Nova Guides Facility is in conformance with the Eagle County Master Plan. The Eagle
County Master Plan generally designates the area of this project as a Resource Zone. The recreational
facility is compliant with the Eagle County Resource Zone District within which it is located.
The area is included within the 1996 Northwest Colorado Council of Government's 208 water
quality management plan, but is not included in any site specific wastewater service area due to its
remote location.
c) Municipal and industrial water projects shall emphasize the most efficient use of water,
including, to the extent permissible under existing law, the recycling and reuse of water. Urban
development, population densities, and site layout and design of storm water and sanitation
systems shall be accomplished in a manner that will prevent the pollution of aquifer recharge
areas;
(+)Finding: The municipal and industrial water project proposed in this application emphasizes
the most efficient use of water, including, to the extent permissible under existing law, the recycling and
reuse of water. Urban development, population densities, and site layout and design of storm water and
sanitation systems shall be accomplished in a manner that will prevent the pollution of aquifer recharge
areas.
This system is to be used to suppress a fire in the lodge as well as wild land fires in the
surrounding area. There are no storm water or central sanitation systems proposed in this development.
The lodge and the other facilities will be served by ISDS systems that are sparsely located.
d) Provisions to insure that the proposed water project will not contaminate surface water
resources;
(+)Finding: With the implementation of the BMP's proposed the applicant has made adequate
provisions to insure that the proposed water project will not contaminate surface water resources.
13
06-19-2001
All areas disturbed during construction will be revegetated. At no time will more than five acres
be disturbed at one time, therefore, a NPDES discharge permit will not be required. The individual
sewage disposal systems will be designed in compliance with the Colorado Department of Health and
Environment regulations. The developer will provide silt fencing during construction of the lodge
project. Best Management Practices as outlined in Attachment M will be utilized.
e) The proposed water project is capable of providing water pursuant to standards ofthe
Colorado Department of Health;
(+)Finding: The proposed water project is capable of providing water pursuant to standards of
the Colorado Department of Health (CDPHE.).
The proposed water systems will be classified as transient non-community public water systems.
The water systems will be regulated under the applicable CDPHE regulations. The existing system,
which is representative of the source water proposed for use in this application, has been tested for
nitrates, which were below detectable limits, and for bacteria, which was determined to be absent.
1) The proposed diversion of water from the source development area will not decrease the
quality of peripheral or downstream surface and subsurface water resources in the source
development area below that designated by the Colorado Water Quality Control Division on May
22,1979, and effective July 10, 1979, or more stringent standards subsequently adopted;
(+)Finding: With the implementation of the BMP's and revegetation proposed in this application
the proposed diversion of water from the source development area will not decrease the quality of
peripheral or downstream surface and subsurface water resources in the source development area below
that designated by the Colorado Water Quality Control Division on May 22, 1979, and effective July 10,
1979, or more stringent standards subsequently adopted.
No injury to surface or subsurface water users is anticipated by virtue of the court approved
augmentation decree submitted with the application. The augmentation plan approves all water uses
associated with the improvements proposed in this application.
g) The proposed development and the potential diversions of water from the source
development area will not significantly deteriorate aquatic habitats, marshlands and wetlands,
groundwater recharge areas, steeply sloping or unstable terrain, forests and woodlands, critical
wildlife habitats, big game migratory routes, calving grounds, migratory ponds, nesting areas and
the habitats of rare and endangered species, public outdoor recreational areas, and unique areas
of geologic, historic or archaeological importance;
(+ )Finding: The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution system will not
significantly deteriorate aquatic habitats, marshlands and wetlands, groundwater recharge areas, steeply
sloping or unstable terrain, forests and woodlands, critical wildlife habitat, big game migratory routes,
calving grounds, migratory ponds, nesting areas and the habitats of rare and endangered species, public
outdoor recreation areas, and unique areas of geologic, historic, or archaeological importance.
The wetlands evaluation determined that the proposed mound system locations the sites as
proposed are not located within wetland areas (see Attachment L, Wetland Evaluation). No sensitive
natural areas are impacted by the installation of the proposed mound improvements.
The geologic study of the site did not identify any unique geologic features. Project impacts are
discussed in Attachment A. In summary, the project is located out of any significant geologic hazard
area. The southern portion ofthe property has some debris fan deposits. It is likely that these areas will
be protected by Highway 24 and the railroad.
Impacts on wildlife were evaluated during the Special Use Permit review. The Division of
Wildlife did not identify any specific impacts on wildlife. The area is at an elevation to high to function
as critical winter range for deer or elk.
h) The salinity and advance wastewater treatment offset plans required by Subsections
6.05.13(16) and (17) have been approved by the Permit Authority and required fees associated
14
06-19-2001
therewith, if any, have been paid;
(NA)Finding: This finding is not applicable. No salinity or advanced wastewater treatment
offset plans are required with the ISDS systems proposed in this development.
i) The construction of structures, buildings, and improvements associated with the
proposed development will not significantly impact existing or proposed communities within the
development area and source development area.
(+)Finding: There are no other existing or proposed communities within the development area or
the source development area; so, the construction of structures, buildings and improvements associated
with the proposed development will not significantly impact any existing or proposed communities.
Commissioner Gallagher stated he believes if they follow the guidelines that this is probably the
case and the facilities will be okay. He is wondering what will happen if there is a fire. He questioned
Alternative C which he thinks it is good to the point of sprinklers and getting people out is the highest
priority. He asked about the distribution lines and where they go from and to.
Mr. Zancanella stated the four inch lines are for fire protection and the two inch lines are for
domestic use.
Commissioner Gallagher asked about the dry systems. He asked what kind of water is available
in the worst possible case.
Mr. Batell stated it is eight to ten feet deep and it only freezes a couple of feet because ofthe
snow fall.
Mr. Zancanella stated there is a spring that feeds the lake year round.
Commissioner Gallagher asked them to speak with the Leadville Fire Department and the new
captain in Minturn who will help provide training and direction.
Greg Caretto stated they have people looking for pumper trucks.
6.05.15 Approval of Permit Application
In accordance with Section 6.05.15 (Efficient Utilization of Municipal and Industrial Water
Projects) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, and as more specifically described in the
application for the Nova Guides Water and Sewage Treatment Systems:
a) The need for the proposed water project can be substantiated;
(+)Finding: The need for the proposed water project can be substantiated.
b) Assurances of compatibility of the proposed water project with federal, state, regional
and County planning policies regarding land use and water resources;
(+ )Finding: This 1041 application is to meet a condition of approval imposed on the applicant by
the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners under the Special Use Permit for the recreational
facility. Evidence submitted in the Special Use Permit application, and in this 1041 application assures
compatibility of the proposed water project with federal, state, regional and County planning policies
regarding land use and water resources.
c) Municipal and industrial water projects shall emphasize the most efficient use of water,
including, to the extent permissible under existing law, the recycling and reuse of water. Urban
development, population densities, and site layout and design of storm water and sanitation
systems shall be accomplished in a manner that will prevent the pollution of aquifer recharge
areas;
(+ )Finding: The municipal and industrial water project proposed in this application emphasizes
the most efficient use of water, including, to the extent permissible under existing law, the recycling and
reuse of water. Urban development, population densities, and site layout and design of storm water and
sanitation systems shall be accomplished in a manner that will prevent the pollution of aquifer recharge
areas.
d) Provisions to insure that the proposed water project will not contaminate surface water
resources;
15
06-19-2001
(+)Finding: With the implementation of the BMP's proposed the applicant has made adequate
provisions to insure that the proposed water project will not contaminate surface water resources.
e) The proposed water project is capable of providing water pursuant to standards of the
Colorado Department of Health;
(+)Finding: The proposed water project is capable of providing water pursuant to standards of
the Colorado Department of Health (CDPHE.).
f) The proposed diversion of water from the source development area will not decrease the
quality of peripheral or downstream surface and subsurface water resources in the source
development area below that designated by the Colorado Water Quality Control Division on May
22, 1979, and effective July 10, 1979, or more stringent standards subsequently adopted;
(+)Finding: With the implementation of the BMP's and revegetation proposed in this application
the proposed diversion of water from the source development area will not decrease the quality of
peripheral or downstream surface and subsurface water resources in the source development area below
that designated by the Colorado Water Quality Control Division on May 22, 1979, and effective July 10,
1979, or more stringent standards subsequently adopted.
g) The proposed development and the potential diversions of water from the source
development area will not significantly deteriorate aquatic habitats, marshlands and wetlands,
groundwater recharge areas, steeply sloping or unstable terrain, forests and woodlands, critical
wildlife habitats, big game migratory routes, calving grounds, migratory ponds, nesting areas and
the habitats of rare and endangered species, public outdoor recreational areas, and unique areas
of geologic, historic or archaeological importance;
(+)Finding: The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution system will not
significantly deteriorate aquatic habitats, marshlands and wetlands, groundwater recharge areas, steeply
sloping or unstable terrain, forests and woodlands, critical wildlife habitat, big game migratory routes,
calving grounds, migratory ponds, nesting areas and the habitats of rare and endangered species, public
outdoor recreation areas, and unique areas of geologic, historic, or archaeological importance.
h) The salinity and advance wastewater treatment offset plans required by Subsections
6.05.13(16) and (17) have been approved by the Permit Authority and required fees associated
therewith, if any, have been paid;
(NA)Finding: This finding is not applicable. No salinity or advanced wastewater treatment
offset plans are required with the ISDS systems proposed in this development.
i) The construction of structures, buildings, and improvements associated with the
proposed development will not significantly impact existing or proposed communities within the
development area and source development area.
(+ )Finding: There are no other existing or proposed communities within the development area or
the source development area; so, the construction of structures, buildings and improvements associated
with the proposed development will not significantly impact any existing or proposed communities.
Chairman Stone stated the reason he read through all those was to show the desire to treat all
applications the same. He spoke to the Adam's Rib hearings. He stated some of the findings that were
not applicable or common sense in this case were questionable in other situations.
Commissioner Menconi spoke to the alternatives and asked how they are addressing the different
alternatives.
Commissioner Gallagher stated he understands the applicant wants to do Alternative C and
unless they can find good cause that it won't work, they will agree. There are other alternatives, but the
cost is prohibitive. He suggested the applicant is looking for the most safe and manageable alternatives.
Chairman Stone confirmed the applicant has requested Alternative C.
Commissioner Menconi moved the Eagle County Permit Authority approve file number 1041-
0037, Nova Guides, incorporating staff findings with the following conditions:
16
06-19-2001
1. The site plan associated with the construction drawings submitted with the Building Permit
Application for the lodge must detail the location of existing streams, disturbed areas, impervious cover
and illustrate the implementation ofBMP's.
2. No vegetation should be removed, or soil disturbed or covered, within 25 feet of a wetland,
stream, lake, or other body of water.
Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
AFP-00121, Beaver Creek Subdivision
Cliff Simonton, Planner, presented file number AFP-00121, Beaver Creek Subdivision. He
stated this was an Amended Final Plat, the purpose of which is to shift the previously platted building
envelope approximately 10 feet to the south. This adjustment to the building envelope will position the
house in a more favorable location on the lot, providing for a better driveway configuration. The Beaver
Creek Design Review Board has approved this building envelope change subject to the successful
completion of all Eagle County Amended Final Plat procedures, and the approval of this file by the
Board of County Commissioners. He referred to the plat copies in the Board's files.
Staff findings are as shown on staff report and as follows:
Pursuant to Section 5-290.G1 of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the Community
Development Director has considered the following in the review of the Type B Minor Subdivision:
a. Access, Water and Sewage. The access, potable water, and sewage on the land to be
subdivided are adequate;
b. Conformance with Final Plat Requirements. The Amended Final Plat is in conformance
with the Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and
c. Improvements Agreements. A Subdivision Improvements Agreement is not applicable.
He stated they received a fax from an adjacent property owner, Berry Maher, which outlines
various concerns he has. There is a map attached that shows his lot and the position. He stated it is a
rather steeply slopped hill. He stated the Beaver Creek Design Review Board is present and the
applicant, Mr. R.G. Miller is also here.
Chairman Stone asked ifthey are talking about lot 1. Mr. Meyer is the owner oflot 7. He stated
he knows the area and understands the grade change. Chairman Stone spoke to finding #1 and asked
what his concern is.
Mr. Simonton suggested he is concerned with the possible view corridor and it appears that he is
uncomfortable with a process that allows this type of thing to happen and that it is just unfair.
Chairman Stone read Mr. Maher's fax for the record as follows:
"We have reviewed the building plans and the proposed move of the building envelopes. We
question whether the move is necessary. It would make more sense to reduce the footprint of the house
to accommodate the driveway within the existing envelope. The Miller lot was purchased with all
adjacent improvements and easements in place. Additionally, the improvements constructed on the lots
adjacent to the Miller lot were constructed with Miller's existing building envelope and view corridors
in place. It seems a bit unfair to allow this change affecting all adjacent improvements when a simple
reduction in square footage would accomplish the same. For the reasons stated herein, we do not agree
with the proposed change. Berry Maher." Chairman Stone asked the applicant to step forward.
R. G. Miller, representing his Family Investment LP, stated they currently own a home in Beaver
Creek and will building this home and selling the one they are in. Mr. Miller showed the orientation of
the lot and the location ofthe house, the mountain and the road. He showed Mr. Maher's house and
stated there is approximately 100 feet difference from the elevation of their house. One view corridor,
the only view corridor that will be effected is that looking onto the road. He stated the ten foot move
could not possibly effect the view corridor and will only effect the amount of road they could see. He
17
06-19-2001
spoke to their request to reduce the size of the foot print.
Chairman Stone asked what the purpose is for moving the building envelope.
Mr. Miller showed the utility easement and the line of the driveway. By moving the envelope he
is able to have less of the drive in the utility easement. He could still build the same house and the same
drive. By moving it, he is moving closer to the VA property, and separating the easement between
homes and toward an un-platted area that will not be adversely effected. He stated the area between his
driveway and neighbor will be far less steep and will require less retaining. He has received positive
comments from his other neighbors. He spoke to the sprinkler system encroachments onto his property.
He feels by moving the house south it is no closer to any of the property owners uphill or across the
street and only provides greater distance and separation to the north. Vail Resorts has no problem with
them moving the building envelop 10 feet towards their un-platted property.
Commissioner Menconi asked if there is a property owner or building on parcel 8.
Mr. Miller responded yes.
Commissioner Menconi asked if he has been in conversation with that owner.
Mr. Miller stated he has approval from property owner on parcels 8 and 9.
Commissioner Menconi asked Mr. Simonton if staff has heard any comments from those owners.
Mr. Simonton stated staff has not heard from those owners.
Mr. Miller stated those owners have approved of the move.
Commissioner Menconi asked if they plan to reside in this home or if it is an investment
property.
Mr. Miller stated they plan to reside there.
Commissioner Menconi asked if the property owner on parcel 7 is a resident or if it was a
vacation home.
Mr. Miller stated he does not know.
Scott Hunn, representing the Beaver Creek Design Review Board, stated that Mr. Miller has
worked with them on sketch plan, final plat and building envelope amendment.
Chairman Stone asked if they feel comfortable with the approval of this file and related the
Design Review Board is fairly strict with their requirements.
Mr. Hunn stated they have the support of the other property owners.
Commissioner Gallagher moved the Board approve File No. AFP-00121, Beaver Creek
Subdivision, an Amended Final Plat to the 5th Filing of Lot 1, Block 5, incorporating staff findings and
authorize the Chairman to sign the plat.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until
June 26, 2001.
Attest:
Clerk to the Boar
.~
Chairman
18
06-19-2001