The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 02/06/2001 Present: Tom C. Stone Michael Gallagher Arn Menconi James Fritze Jack Ingstad Sara Fisher PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 6, 2001 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Attorney County Administrator Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: GENERAL FUND STERICYCLE INC 3CMA 4 EAGLE RANCH AM COLLECTORS AAAA SEPTIC PUMPING ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS ACCA ACSM-CLSA-NALS-WFPS ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS ADAM SOMMERS ALL PRO FORMS INC ALL US LADIES ALLEN CHRISTENSEN ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE ALPHA INTERACTIVE GROUP ALPINE AREA AGENCY AGING AMADEO GONZALES AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMERICAN SOCIETY CIVIL AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW AMERICAN TOWER CORP AMERICINN LODGE & SUITES AMERITEACH-UCI AMY WIEDEMAN ANGELA WURTSMITH ANIMAL HOSPITAL OF VAIL ANNIE LAWRENCE APPRAISAL OFFICE ASPEN L T AQUA TEC SYSTEMS ARACELI ACOSTA ARLENE STARK QUENON ASCOM ASPEN BUDDY PROGRAM ASPEN CTR FOR WOMENS HL TH SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 170.40 190.00 3,001.53 30.00 250.00 25.00 90.00 375.00 51.00 1,703.38 1,549.90 3.10 11.88 3,703.59 75.00 2,414.01 28.80 626.00 415.00 45.00 875.00 128.00 787.50 39.60 192.00 100.00 57.54 6,000.00 1,271.33 24.99 3.96 127.50 250.00 3,450.00 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS B J ROWE BAI/BRAUN ASSOCIATES INC BAILEY FUNERAL HOME BASALT FAMILY RESOURCE BEAniE & CHADWICK BENCHMARK ENGINEERING BERTHOD MOTORS BETTER ROADS MAGAZINE BEVERLY S RIORDAN BILL LOPEZ BLAKE LYNCH BOB BARKER COMPANY BOB SCHULTZ BOONE COUNTY CIRCUIT CLRK BRATWEAR BRC/HARRIS INC BRIAN O'REILLY BRIDGESTONE WINTER BRUCE WAYNE GILMORE CALOIA & HOUPT PC CARSE CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CCCMA CCO AND ERA CENTRAL CREDIT CORP CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTURYTEL CHARLES B DARRAH CHARLES D JONES CO, INC. CHARLES LESLIE HUMPHREYS CHEMATOX INC. CHESS CHRIS A PORTER CITY MARKET #34 CLIFF SIMONTON CLUB TWENTY CO 4H YOUTH FUND CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND CO DEPT PUBLIC SAFETY CO DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S CO SEARCH RESCUE BOARD CO STATE ASSOC CLERK AND CO WEST MENTAL HEALTH COAA COLLEEN WIRTH SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES PARTS SERVICES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT 127.86 116.87 43.88 3,252.50 175.00 1,000.00 49.34 2,075.00 3,545.08 48.00 25.00 91.00 39.60 718.77 27.72 25.00 9,182.00 1,195.00 98.02 7,150.00 19.62 635.85 260.00 20.00 140.00 86,895.67 43.02 122.75 11,760.90 20.04 72.75 13.02 315.00 467.00 20.00 257.45 100.00 1,250.00 268.00 20.00 236.50 66.24 26.50 40.00 550.00 3,025.00 350.00 9.25 COLORADO COUNTIES INC COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE COLORADO NAHRO COLORADO WEST MENTAL COLUMBIA PROPANE COLUMBINE MARKET CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING CORPORATE AIRCRAFT CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING CRA EDUCATION FUND CREDIT BUREAU ROCKIES CREST INDUSTRIES CROCKETT & ASSOCIATES CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE DAMON BAILLIE DAN SEIBEL DATA TRANSMISSIONS DAVE LUSSIER DAVE MOTT DAVID A BAUER DAVID CARTER DAVID GUINNEE, DVM DAVID MANZELLA DEB CROOK DECKER CELLULAR DEENA EZZELL DEEP ROCK WEST DELL INC DENVER MARRIOTT TECH CNTR DENVER POST CORPORATION T DESIRED OUTCOMES, INC DIANE MILLIGAN DIRECT DATA CORPORATION DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE DL T SOLUTIONS, INC. DOCTORS ON CALL DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP EAGLE AUTO PARTS EAGLE AUTO RECYCLING & EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE COUNTY SOIL CONSERV EAGLE DIRECT EAGLE EYE PHOTO EAGLE PHARMACY SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PARTS PARTS SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES 20,963.00 540.68 645.00 60.00 325.00 2,998.11 159.91 122.40 1,624.00 1,159.41 668.66 165.00 19.00 82.18 18,283.14 148,641.81 50.00 26.40 279.00 285.07 23.76 50.00 472.80 2,105.00 150.00 80.00 260.00 279.24 107.63 211.00 1,162.00 2,586.50 758.50 52.80 1.98 196,096.75 3,182.90 180.00 87.08 271.10 74.00 3,592.00 2,667.94 215.04 300.00 30,551.49 5.22 155.73 EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE EAGLE VALLEY HARDWARE EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING ECO LAB EMC2 EMILIA GONZALEZ EMPIRE GAS ESRI EVES PRINT SHOP FALCON ASSOCIATES INC FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM FARMER BROTHERS FARRELL, GOLDSTEIN, FEDERAL EXPRESS FERGUSON GARY B AlA FILE FINDERS L TD FILING SPECIALTIES FIRST BANKS FIRST CLASS PLUMBING FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY FORINASH KATHLEEN FOX & COMPANY FRANK ANDERSON FRANK J BALL FRANKLIN COVEY FRITZE JAMES R G & M INSURANCE AGENCY GARFIELD YOUTH SERVICES GARRETT METAL DETECTORS GARY & END GARY COX GARY ROSS GATES MARGE PHN GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION GLENWOOD SHIRT COMPANY GLENWOOD SHOE SERVICE GOOD TURNS SOFTWARE GOVERNMENT INFO SERVICES GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GRILLE AT SINGLETREE HCHRA HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELEN MIGCHELBRINK HELLO DIRECT INC SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFITS REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES 92.24 683.37 55.52 224.00 875.49 231.68 130.20 100.92 27,978.18 4,790.85 135.00 1,033.86 10,666.49 224.10 15.00 311.78 39.60 30.00 132.25 16,646.83 150.00 40.00 44.11 1,253.60 138.88 20.04 49.76 37.95 710.00 375.00 282.95 29.38 10.00 11.88 1,725.00 500.00 15.00 320.00 21,930.00 319.00 319.00 98.90 7.40 8,736.68 60.00 159,199.03 147.32 34.98 HELPING BABIES LEARN HERMAN MILLER WORKPLACE HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HILL & TASHIRO MARKETING HILTON DENVER TECH SOUTH HOGAN & HARTSON HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HOLY CROSS ENERGY HOPKINS MEDICAL PRODUCTS IACP NATIONAL LAW ICBO ICBO EDUCATION COMMITTEE IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS INSTITUTE FOR HEAL THCARE INSTITUTE PROFESSIONAL INTEGRAL RECOVERIES INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND INTELLlNET LLC INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNATIONAL NARCOTIC IRELAND STAPLETON PRYOR IRVIN BORENSTEIN J & J BROWN ENTERPRISES JACKIE HOWARD JACQUELINE ALLEN JACQUELINE CRAWFORD JANET BAILEY JA YCOR TACTICAL SYSTEMS JEFFERSON COUNTY JENNY WAHRER JOAN M MAXWELL RN JOBS AVAILABLE JODY CARUTHERS JOES WALLBAORD & SUPPLY JOHN KING JOHNNETTE PHILLIPS JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC JOHNSTONE SUPPLY JOSEPH L FORINASH KARA BETTIS, DEPUTY KARINA BARDALES KATIE HARPER KELLEY BLUE BOOK KENSINGTON PARTNERS KIM JOHNSON KN ENERGY INC LA CASA DE BUENA SALUD LA QUINTA INN - DENVER SO SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 24.00 227.15 74.25 1,125.00 212.00 18,227.14 1,603.72 10,078.11 548.35 50.00 25.00 1,365.00 305.17 64.80 158.00 22.32 2,033.98 1,680.00 270.00 40.00 215.25 43.08 899.00 250.00 120.12 68.23 251.02 3,348.00 240.00 157.42 32.50 119.60 134.38 436.80 1.32 108.03 3,876.25 879.94 100.00 305.76 81.25 115.38 100.00 6,393.00 6.60 11,251.57 310.90 372.00 LAFARGE CORPORATION LAMM NATHAN & BUTLER LANDS END INCORPORATED LANIE MARTIN LARS BURGHARDT LAURA FAWCETT LAUREN IMMEL LEDS INC LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LEIGH SCOTT & CLEARY INC LETN LEWAN AND ASSOCIATES L1L JOHNS WATER TREATMENT LINDA MAGGIORE LINDA NESTOR LK SURVEY INSTRUMENTS LOUISE CLARKE YOUNG LOYD SAMS & LANE M KELLY L1EKIS RN MACHOL&JOHANNES MAE PITTMAN MAIN STREET GALLERY AND MARKOS PIZZERIA MARQUEZ DEBBIE K MARY A HOLLEY MASA TO OKAMOTO MBIA MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS MCKESSON GENERAL MEDICAL MCMAHAN & ASSOCIATES LLC MEGAN GROSS MESA COUNTY TREASURERS OF MEYER LAND SYSTEMS MICHAEL JOHN BRUEN MICRO WAREHOUSE MICROWAREHOUSE MID VALLEY KENNEL MIKE GALLAGHER MIKES CAMERA INC. MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS MOUNTAIN TENTS & EVENTS MOUNTAIN VALLEY NACA; NATIONAL ASSOC NACO SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 1,965.11 2.48 513.45 88.50 25.00 6.30 25.00 2,500.00 276.94 3,870.27 388.00 4,064.80 725.00 105.95 36.40 61.67 44.26 25.00 60.13 33.68 361.45 264.78 294.96 11.88 5.94 4.96 7,825.97 45.50 6,739.14 82.64 3,337.92 132.60 125.00 300.00 1.24 901.78 98.59 1,700.00 670.80 65.00 611.19 383.47 57,805.92 84.61 3,587.00 2,250.00 50.00 398.00 NACRC NANCY BUSCH NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL GRAPHICS COMPANY NETTIE REYNOLDS NEVES UNIFORMS NEW ORLEANS MARRIOTT NEWARK ELECTRONICS NIVIA TROBAUGH NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORTHWEST COLORADO NW CO LEGAL SERVICE PROJ NWCCOG OJF SERVICES, INC. OMNIFAX OSI COLLECTION SERVICES OTTO, PORTERFIELD, POST PADDY O'DAYS PAINT BUCKET THE PALMER ROSS PAT MAGDZIUK PC CONNECTION PDS INCORPORATED PEAK LAND CONSULTANTS INC PEAK PERFORMANCE COPIER & PEGASUS SATELLITE PEGGY GRAYBEAL PEPPERDINE'S MARKET PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENTS PETER DOWNING PETTY CASH PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PIPARO TRUCKING PITNEY BOWES PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED PLSC POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PRECINCT POLICE PRODUCTS PRO SHOP PROFESSIONAL TREE & TURF PSS, INC PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUINLAN PUBLISHING COM PAN QWEST QWEST DEX RENEE BLACK RESOURCE CENTER OF EAGLE SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES 200.00 149.97 330.00 314.20 99.77 519.40 896.00 124.54 25.00 4,854.06 39,311.00 125.00 20,025.00 25.00 1,030.35 41.32 15.00 68.45 66.08 16.50 9.03 2,227.05 33.68 33,920.00 150.00 37.98 140.00 100.00 49.95 25.00 57.58 1,155.23 487.50 327.30 7.99 75.00 11,000.00 256.45 301.40 365.00 631.16 732.10 280.60 74.78 4,131.97 61.33 309.41 1,500.00 RIVERWALK TOPAZ BUILDING ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN ROARING FORK PROJECT MANG ROB KURTZMAN, DO ROBERT B EMERSON ROBERT MACH ROBERT MICHAEL LANGLEY ROBERT WARNER ROGER MOORE RON BRAVE RON GRUBER DVM ROPIR CABLEVISION ROSIE MORENO ROSS PRODUCTS DIVISION RURAL RESORT REGION RUTH LENZ SALVATION ARMY SANDRA COLLINS SARA J FISHER SARAH SCHIPPER SCHEDULE SOFT SCHWAAB SCOTT P LANDRY SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SENDER & WASSERMAN SENN LEWIS VISCIANO SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SHAINHOL TZ TODD H DDS SHELLEY STARK SHERRY LISKE SHINNERS & COOK SHURE INC SIGNATURE SIGNS SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SKI AREA SUPPLIES, INC SNOWHITE LINEN SOFTMART INC SOPRIS ELECTRIC SPECIALTIES INCORPORATED SP1ECKER HANLON & GORMLEY SPILLMAN DATA SYSTEMS STARBUCK SURVEYORS & ENGI STEPHEN D FOSTER STEPHEN ELZINGA STINER BECK & JONSON STRAWBERRY PATCH STUVER & LeMOINE SULLIVAN GREEN LLC SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES REFUND SERVICES REFUND SERVICES 1,940.54 135.00 900.00 2,724.75 334.00 44.88 15.00 11.88 25.00 74.25 134.00 61.06 62.17 1,109.52 13,812.50 94.25 1,000.00 100.00 32.27 226.69 679.15 170.80 26.24 1,922.43 25.00 9.92 53,968.38 439.00 282.25 250.00 1.24 26.07 190.00 624.80 645.00 36.21 1,984.40 47.00 373.00 7.44 12,925.00 1,070.00 25.00 79.70 2.48 121.25 40.00 2,046.60 SUMMIT COUNTY SUMMIT LUMBER SURVEY SOLUTIONS SUSPENSE FUND TECHNI-TOOL TERRILL KNIGHT THOMAS E CAMPBELL THOMAS F FARRELL THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP TIFFIN METAL PRODUCTS TOM DEVEREAUX TOM TALBOT, DEPUTY TOP DRAWER OFFICE SUPPLY TOWN OF EAGLE TRACY SISSEL TRI STAR AVIATION UNIFORM KINGDOM UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED REPROGRAPHIC UNITED WAY OF EAGLE UNIV COLORADO AT BOULDER UNIVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC URBAN AND REGIONAL VAIL CONOCO SERVICE VAIL DAILY THE VAIL ELECTRONICS VAIL VALLEY EMERGENCY VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER VALLEY LUMBER VALLEY PINES HOMEOWNERS VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VERIZON WIRELESS, VICTIMS ASSISTANCE FUND VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY C WALMART AVON WEARGUARD WELLS FARGO WELLS FARGO BANK WENDY GRIFFITH PHOTOGRAPH WEST PUBLISHING WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL WINTER DRIVING SCHOOL WOOD ASSOCIATES INC WYETH AYERST LABORATORIES WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC YOUR PERSONAL CHEF SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 3,939.49 738.61 5.95 3,161.40 493.12 52.80 25.00 30.00 254.00 2,750.00 76.09 205.52 37.46 2,191.25 1.98 12,070.00 12,934.75 540.22 3,000.80 211.26 160.00 122.00 132.00 61.10 2,039.25 438.00 900.00 944.91 40.77 587.52 86.50 5,193.76 2,290.00 44.60 54.28 139.33 250,099.83 150.00 100.00 1,652.69 148.93 275.00 117.90 1,371.70 102.96 3,541.66 106.94 735.00 YUNKER TRUCKING, INC SERVICES 455.00 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL 1 & 2 536.368.42 2,117,827.33 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND CARSE SERVICES 120.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 6,697.60 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY SERVICES 300.00 COpy PLUS SERVICES 37.00 COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICES 42,272.00 CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE SERVICES 79,747.99 DEEP ROCK WEST SUPPLIES 6.95 EAGLE PHARMACY SERVICES 4.99 EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE SERVICES 20.00 EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL SERVICES 270.00 ECONOMICS PRESS SERVICES 90.39 GONZALES CONSTRUCTION CO. SERVICES 5,146.70 HARRYS HEAVY HAULERS SERVICES 8,128.41 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 15,846.20 HOLIDAY INN DENVER SERVICES 312.00 IMPACT PROMOTIONAL PROD. SUPPLIES 425.35 J & S CONTRACTORS SUPPLY SUPPLIES 103.55 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICES 47.50 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 118,553.01 NATIONAL INFO-TECH CENTER SERVICES 199.00 POLICE DATA SYSTEMS SERVICES 450.00 QUALITY STORES INC SUPPLIES 87.44 ROARING FORK RESOURCES SUPPLIES 13,319.44 ROARING FORK SAND AND GRA SUPPLIES 5,357.14 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERVICES 110.76 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 67.10 SEARS PARTS 1,749.73 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICES 2,395.08 STRIPE WRIGHT SERVICES 37,504.27 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICES 76.92 VALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 7.49 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 20,100.59 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 49.75 XPECT FIRST AID SERVICES 102.65 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL 1 & 2 52,017.79 411,724.79 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND ASPEN COUNSELING CENTER BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO CATHERINE CRAIG CCO AND ERA CITY MARKET #34 COLORADO WEST MENTAL COMFORT SUITES LAKEWOOD CSED CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE DAYS INN DESIRED OUTCOMES, INC EAGLE COUNTY ATTORNEY EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE PHARMACY EDWARD GILLILAND FAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM FORINASH KATHLEEN HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS INDRA BRIEDIS INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND ISABEL SANCHEZ JERRI OLSON JOAN M MAXWELL RN JOEL KARR JOSE BANUELOS JUNIPER VALLEY PRODUCTS KAREN LAJOY SMITH MA LPC KATHY REED KATIE HARPER KELLEY BLUE BOOK LABORATORY CORPORATION OF LATINO COUNSELING SERVICE LG PRINTING COMPANY M KELLY lIEKIS RN MARGERY STONE MARIAN MCDONOUGH MOOREBU~NESSSOLUTIONS MOTOR POOL FUND PEAK PERFORMANCE COPIER & PITKIN COUNTY DSS QUILL CORPORATION QWEST RENEE FIELDS SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT 400.00 98.00 71.50 6,745.53 42.08 675.00 69.99 309.36 4,197.91 69.00 1,285.43 1,809.25 356.75 90.50 5.86 140.00 378.00 75.82 12,421.51 420.30 58.19 1,664.17 4.38 306.03 10.51 312.50 350.00 11.96 525.00 120.60 40.00 201.00 513.00 550.00 127.00 51.48 34.37 69.68 211.99 767.43 62.00 1,020.00 129.81 220.75 309.20 RITA WOODS REIMBURSEMENT 200.34 ROBERTJDURHAMAND SERVICES 200.00 ROCHELLE A BOWER REIMBURSEMENT 168.64 SAMARITAN CENTER OF THE SERVICES 125.00 SANDY ALFRED REIMBURSEMENT 33.15 SARAH SCHIPPER REIMBURSEMENT 81.73 SSTABS CONFERENCE SERVICES 25.00 SUPER 8 MOTEL SERVICES 64.80 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICES 721.54 SUZANNE SMITH REIMBURSEMENT 267.35 TERRI ALLENDER REIMBURSEMENT 350.00 UNITED WAY OF EAGLE SERVICES 40.18 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICES 229.53 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 19,689.75 WESTERN ACADEMY SERVICES 289.86 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 287.25 YOUTHTRACK, INC. SERVICES 230.13 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL 1 & 2 32.709.70 93,046.79 WRAP FUND JOSE BANUELOS SERVICES 500.00 STEPHANIE WILDE REIMBURSEMENT 124.00 624.00 RETIREMENT FUND CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 72.557.95 TOTAL 72,557.95 INSURANCE RESERVE FUND AGENCY AUTO GLASS SERVICES 4,058.53 AUSTIN PEIRCE SMITH SERVICES 7,215.45 COLORADO COUNTIES INC SERVICES 10,000.00 COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICES 249,765.00 EAGLE RIVER AUTO BODY SERVICES 1,818.45 GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD SERVICES 1,576.21 GYPSUM AUTO BODY SERVICES 2.595.80 277 ,029.44 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND CHOICE SOLUTIONS, LLC EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI MARCIN ENGINEERING INC MELDOR CONSTRUCTION NORRIS DULLEA COMPANY PAINT BUCKET THE RENO SMITH ARCHITECT RIELLY JOHNSON ARCHITECTR SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. AIR TOUCH CELLULAR ANNETTE PRESSLEY BERTHODS INC CCO AND ERA CHANNEL 5 COLUMBINE MARKET COPY PLUS COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER EAGLE PHARMACY GEORGE K BAUM HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HILL & TASHIRO MARKETING IMS OF COLORADO JANET FIELD KTUN-FM RADIO LAKE CREEK VILLAGE MOTOR POOL FUND PUBLIC SERVICE QWEST DEX RHONDA PARKER SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SILVER WHEELS AUTO RENTAL SUCCESSORIES INCORPORATED SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF AVON W. DEL PRESSLEY WELLS FARGO SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES 25.00 35,000.00 7,197.55 2,712.00 93,737.72 11,657.37 196.79 205,811.96 7.109.00 363,447.39 SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD 18.71 1,635.00 1,250.00 423.30 444.61 119.95 209.88 42,328.00 42,278.18 274.70 12.40 54.68 665.00 2,382.36 712.50 275.00 73.71 100.00 7,520.00 1,457.26 443.77 69.50 20.00 24.55 3,080.36 1,396.00 712.76 78.34 287,641.51 8,400.00 5,878.99 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL 1 & 2 11,794.58 421,775.60 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 172.13 COpy PLUS SERVICES 36.84 CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE SERVICES 249.54 FEDERAL EXPRESS SERVICES 8.05 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 165.60 IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICES 265.32 JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC SERVICES 1,076.90 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICES 675.72 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 732.25 3,382.35 AIRPORT FUND AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT SERVICES 1,615.00 AMERICAN AVIONICS INC SUPPLIES 3,985.00 ARCH COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 1,547.81 ASMI SERVICES 8,055.00 BARNARD DUNKELBERG & CO SERVICES 75,981.00 BRENT SERVICES SERVICES 483.20 CARL WALKER, INC SERVICES 1,000.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 3,530.10 CENTURYTEL SERVICES 1,621.54 CITY MARKET #34 SUPPLIES 11.06 CLIMATE CONTROL SERVICES 657.03 CLS TRANSPORTATION-ASPEN SERVICES 100.00 COLLETTS SUPPLIES 331.35 COLUMBINE MARKET SUPPLIES 10.94 CONCESSIONS INTERNATIONAL SUPPLIES 117.03 COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICES 30,732.00 CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE SERVICES 22,993.14 DEEP ROCK WEST SUPPLIES 67.13 DRAGONS BOOT & SHOE SUPPLIES 86.32 EAGLE SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS SERVICES 42.30 ELITE LIMOUSINE SERV INC REFUND 300.00 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 77,367.52 GYPSUM TOWN OF SERVICES 158.70 HEAL TH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,098.86 HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICES 61,700.00 HURD HARRY REIMBURSEMENT 21.26 INTERFlIGHT SERVICES 2,233.99 JAY MAX SALES SUPPLIES 87.50 KN ENERGY INC SERVICES 3,476.88 LARRY FAULKNER SERVICES 2,500.00 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICES 305.50 LEIBOWITZ AIRPORT MGT CON SERVICES 35,750.00 MARKOS PIZZERIA SUPPLIES 46.11 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 198.13 MESA SUPPLY COMPANIES SERVICES 71.82 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 798.21 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS SUPPLIES 2,231.71 NW CHAPTER AMERICAN ASSN SERVICES 75.00 OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION SUPPLIES 43.82 PRECISION WEST SIGNS SERVICES 9,370.00 RAYTHEON ENGINEERS & SERVICES 25,308.74 RJ LIMOUSINE & SEDANS REFUND 600.00 RYAN DEE REFUND 50.00 SPIEGEL MCDIARMID SERVICES 1,560.90 STEWART & STEVENSON POWER SUPPLIES 30,319.70 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 149.35 UNIFORM KINGDOM SUPPLIES 2,445.85 VAIL TRANSPORTATION SERV REFUND 300.00 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SUPPLIES 282,251.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 17,047.68 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 25.98 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 447.04 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL 1 & 2 41.181.05 757,489.25 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND BANKIMAGE.COM SUPPLIES 4,637.50 CASTELLE SUPPLIES 2,438.00 DELL INC SUPPLIES 9,621.00 EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 2,150.00 HERMAN MILLER WORKPLACE SUPPLIES 2,494.95 HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS SUPPLIES 439.45 JA YCOR TACTICAL SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 5,679.00 QWEST INTERPRISE NETWRKNG SERVICES 12.036.25 39,496.15 LANDFILL FUND ACZ LABORATORY INC SERVICES 3,138.00 ALL SEASONS HEATING SERVICES 421.15 ALTERNATIVE RECYCLE LLC SERVICES 21,223.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 1,844.77 CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & SERVICES 13,834.66 COLUMBIA PROPANE SUPPLIES 13.67 COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICES 20,720.00 CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE SERVICES 19,460.34 DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICES 49.60 DOWN VALLEY SEPTIC SERVICES 300.00 HEAL TH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,021.91 IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICES 256.00 KRW CONSULTING INC SERVICES 4,682.94 LP DOCTOR SERVICES 75.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 48,338.96 PAWNEE BUTTES SEED INC SERVICES 4,833.00 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICES 62,858.07 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICES 3,198.56 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 47.94 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICES 65.38 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 5,463.55 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 404.45 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 105.00 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL 1 & 2 13,301.57 229,657.52 MOTOR POOL FUND ATCO INTERNATIONAL PARTS 552.00 BERTHOD MOTORS PARTS 25.99 BOWMAN DISTRIBUTING PARTS 11.14 BRODY CHEMICAL SUPPLIES 153.56 CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 77.12 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 1,344.05 CENTURY EQUIPMENT COMPANY PARTS 30.24 COLLETTS SUPPLIES 16,620.40 COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICES 75,988.00 CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE SERVICES 11,315.09 CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN SERVICES 332.64 DEL T A KITS SERVICES 85.90 DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES PARTS 230.89 EAGLE AMOCO SERVICES 6.00 EAGLE AUTO PARTS PARTS 1,143.82 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY SERVICES 230.76 FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY SUPPLIES 20.00 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS SERVICES 358.00 GAY JOHNSONS INC SUPPLIES 4,167.21 HANSON EQUIPMENT SERVICES 19.58 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,355.04 INSTITUTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 79.00 J & S CONTRACTORS SUPPLY SERVICES 178.08 KOIS BROTHERS SUPPLIES 2,234.00 LEATRICE VASTEN SUPPLIES 3.14 MACDONALD EQUIPMENT CO SERVICES 270.45 MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKES SERVICES 149.95 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 5,546.17 NAPA AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 60.21 NAPA AUTO PARTS - VAIL PARTS 27.79 NAPA AUTO PARTS-CARBONDLE PARTS 28.87 POWER MOTIVE SERVICES 1,836.83 REY MOTORS INCORPORATED PARTS 1,869.63 RICH LUGO SUPPLIES 39.97 SEARS PARTS 349.98 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICES 6,192.56 SNAP ON TOOLS PARTS 2,093.63 UNITED STATE WELDING INC. SUPPLIES 330.59 VAIL DAILY THE SERVICES 120.00 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY PARTS 3,027.68 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 6,145.98 WHITEALLS ALPINE SERVICES 58.30 WRIDGHT'S WELDING SUPPLY SERVICES 2,476.00 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 306.18 XPECT FIRST AID SERVICES 97.90 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL 1 & 2 13.087.22 163,677.54 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND ALPINE BANK EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 250,000.00 DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 975.00 MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 18,599.58 PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,618.73 UNITED STATES LIFE INS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,855.10 VISION SERVICE PLAN - CO EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4.634.50 280,682.91 ENHANCEDE911 FUND AT & T LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 50.00 CENTURYTEL SERVICES 171.03 JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC SERVICES 2,231.25 QWEST SERVICES 60.685.40 63,137.68 GRAND TOTAL It.lltll',1I Executive Session Chairman Stone stated the first matter before the Board was an "Executive Session." Commissioner Gallagher moved to adjourn into "Executive Session" to discuss the following: To give instructions to negotiators with regard to La Farge Gravel Pit Lease and to receive legal advice regarding Frost Creek and the Ranch land use applications and to receive legal advice regarding contract negotiations on the Berry Creek 5th Filing. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. The time was noted at 8:47 a.m. Chairman Stone stated the time is now 9:40 a.m. Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn from the "Executive Session" and reconvene into the regular meeting. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Gallagher moved to amend the agenda, Item 8, scheduled at 1 :30 to be changed to 2: 15 to reflect the notification time as sent to the petitioners of abatement. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Jim Fritze, County Attorney, stated the first two items for which they adjourned for Executive Session were discussed. Chairman Stone reviewed those items, stating they did not get a chance to discuss contract negotiations on the Berry Creek 5th Filing. Consent Agenda Chairman Stone stated the next item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A) Approval of bill paying for week of February 4, 2001, subject to review by County Administrator B) Approval of payroll for February 8, 2001m subject to review by County Administrator C) 1. Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meetings for November 20, December 4, 11, 18,2000 and January 2, 2. Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meetings of January 9, 16 & 22, 2001 D) Holy Cross Energy Service Agreement for new airport lighting on the expanded south apron; Holy Cross Energy Trench, Conduit and Vault Agreement; Right-of-Way Easement E) Change Order #1 to Agreement between Concrete Works of Colorado and Eagle County F) Change Order No. 1 to the 2000 Centerline Marking Contract G) Contract between the County of Eagle and Colorado West Mental Health Counseling Services H) Contract between the County of Eagle and Basalt Family Resource Center I) Contract between the County of Eagle and Youth Zone 1) Contract between the County of Eagle and Family Visitor Program K) Contract between County of Eagle and Colorado West Mental Health Crisis Services L) Contract between County of Eagle and Eaglecare Medical Program M) Contract between County of Eagle and Mountain Valley Developmental Services N) Contract between County of Eagle and Salvation Army 0) Contract between County of Eagle and Gilliland Counseling P) Contract between Eagle County and Think First Central Mountains Q) Contract between County of Eagle and Northwest Colorado Legal Service Project R) Contract between County of Eagle and Catholic Charities, Western Slope S) Contract between County of Eagle and Asistencia Para Latinos T) Contract between County of Eagle and the Resource Center U) Contract between County of Eagle and Aspen-Basalt Health Care Clinic V) Intergovernmental Agreement for the purchase of administrative services in connection with the Housing Voucher Assistance Payments Program. Chairman Stone asked ifthere were any items that should be pulled by the County Attorney's Office. Bob Loeffler, Deputy County Attorney, stated no. Commissioner Gallagher asked about items D and E. He asked if these are regarding the lining. He asked why that didn't happen at the time of the paving. Jim Elwood explained it is a higher amount than anticipated and that is why it is coming forward today. There are additional signs and some areas added that were not previously considered. Commissioner Gallagher stated he did not see the contract for Brinkley. Mr. Elwood stated they are a subcontractor. Commissioner Menconi stated he would like to abstain from voting on item C 1. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the consent calendar except for item C 1. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve item C 1, being approval of the minutes of the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners Meetings for November 20, 2000, December 4, 11 & 18, 2000. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. Commissioners Gallagher and Stone voting aye, Commissioner Menconi abstained. Plat & Resolution Signing Matt Gennett, Planner, stated there were no plats or resolutions for the Board's consideration today. Eagle County Service & Support Corporation Meeting Commissioner Gallagher moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as the Eagle County Service and Support Corporation. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Service and Support Corporation and reconvene as the Eagle County Local Liquor License Authority. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Liquor License Consent Agenda Earlene Roach, Liquor Inspector, presented the Liquor License Consent Agenda as follows: A) EI Jebel LLC dba/EI Jebel Convenience Store This is a renewal of a 3.2% Off Premise Beer License. This establishment is located along Highway 82 and EI Jebel Road in EI Jebel. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. B) Beaver Creek Food Services, Inc. dbalBroken Arrow Cafe This is a renewal of a hotel and restaurant license. Following there will be a modification to delete the current optional premise. This establishment is located in Arrowhead at 0188 Terrell Creek Road. There has been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. C) Thomas J. Domenico dba/Pier 13 Liquors This is a renewal of a Retail Liquor Store License. This establishment is located in the Eagle-Vail business along Highway 6. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve the Liquor License Consent Agenda for February 6, 2001 as presented. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Broken Arrow Cafe Earlene Roach presented a modification of premises for Beaver Creek Food Services, Inc., dba/Broken Arrow Cafe. The applicant proposes to eliminate the optional premises known as the Alpine Club Yurt. She stated this application is in order and all fees have been paid. Staffrecommended approval. Julie Papangelis, Vail Resorts, Inc., was present for the hearing. She stated she brought maps to show where the Alpine Yurt is in relation to the existing facility. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the modification of premises for Beaver Creek Food Services, Inc., dba/Broken Arrow Cafe. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Gallagher stated he has three sketches one that includes the dock of Broken Arrow Cafe. Chairman Stone spoke to the submitted maps and asked if the after change the dock is still included in the licensed premise. Ms. Roach answered yes. Zach's Cabin Earlene Roach presented a modification of premises for Beaver Creek Food Services adding the Alpine Yurt Club as an optional premise to Zach's Cabin. Julie Papangelis explained it was originally going to be attached to the Alpine Club as it wasn't not constructed at the time. She explained that after the completion of the kitchen, they realized it would not handle both facilities and that the food preparation would come out of Zach's Cabin. Chairman Stone clarified it is still under Beaver Creek Food Services. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the modification of premises adding the Alpine Yurt Club as an optional premise to Beaver Creek Food Services Inc. doing business as Zach's Cabin. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. St. Clare of Assisi Earlene Roach presented a special events permit for St. Clare of Assisi for February 10,2001 from 6:00 p.m. to 1 :00 a.m. This application is in order and all fees have been paid. Ann "NuNu" Wallace, event manager, and Marilyn Brock, Perish Administrator were present for the hearing. Commissioner Gallagher asked who will be bartending. Chairman Stone asked if the alcohol management plan could be part of the record. Ms. Roach stated they can. Chairman Stone stated the alcohol management plans answer a number of questions the Board has at these hearings. He asked it be included into the minutes as follows: "V olunteer parents of children who attend the St. Clare of Assisi School and the Vail Christian High School are planning this event, called the Mardi Gras Ball. There will be seating for 380 persons. The proceeds generated from this event will be used to cover the operating costs of these schools. This 2001 Mardi Gras Ball is hoped to be the First Annual. The alcohol area applied for under this permit is located at 31622 U.S. Highway 6, Edwards, Colorado at the facility of St. Clare of Assisi School and Parish (see map). The physical boundaries will consist ofthe entry way and gymnasium of the facility. St. Clare and vail Christian Parents will police the area, in particular the front entrance for any concerns. The main entry way to the building will serve as the only entrance and exit. The doors in the Southwest and Southeast comers of the gym in addition to the west hallway doors will be available as emergency exits, otherwise these doors will be locked and no admittance allowed. A team of St. Clare and Vail Christian High School Employees and parent volunteers will handle the alcohol staff and security. This crew will work in conjunction with TIPS trained people supplied by the event caterer. Each dinner table will seat 10 guests at this event and on each table there will be 3 bottles of wine for their dinner. There will also be a glass of champagne offered to each guest as they enter the door. Throughout the evening a cash bar will be operating at three locations. All people who look 40 years and younger will be ID'd. The costs for drinks will be as follows; wine $3.00 for a 6 ounce glass, mixed regular drink, $4.00 for a 10 ounce glass, for a 12 ounce glass and a specialty mixed drink, $5.00 for a 10 ounce glass. Mo mixed drink will have over 2 ounces of liquor. St. Clare of Assisi will have a $1,500,000.00 general Liability policy in effect with Liquor Endorsement for the event." Ms. Wallace stated Mountain Catering will be providing TIPS trained personnel at each serving location. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve a special events permit for St. Clare of Assisi for on February 10, 2001 from 6:00 p.m. to 1 :00 a.m. including the Alcohol Management Plan as part of the record. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Ducks Unlimited Earlene Roach presented a special events permit for Ducks Unlimited for February 17,2001 from 5:00 p.m. to midnight. Wendy Sachs, Ducks Unlimited, was present for the hearing. Ms. Roach spoke to the Alcohol Management Plan in the packet. Chairman Stone asked after the bartenders. Ms. Sachs stated Bob Loyal from Bob's place and one of his TIPS trained bartenders will be the servers. The Board reviewed the Alcohol Management Plan and asked it be included into the record as follows: "The premises applied for is the Exhibition Hall at the Eagle County Fairgrounds for Saturday, February 17,2001. The event is scheduled to start at 5:30 p.m. There will be a full dinner served. The event usually ends around 11 :00 p.m. The event will be held entirely within the Exhibition Hall. No one will be allowed to leave the building with beverages. There will be volunteer staff at all exits as there is merchandise and or accounting tables at each end of the room. There will be TIPS trained bartenders from Bob's Place in Avon who will be personally supervised by Bob Doyle and Wendy Sacks. We typically do not have underage people attending the banquet but if there is any question regarding age, they will be carded. Beer - 12 ounce bottles $3.00 Wine - 7 ounce cups $4.50 Mixed Drinks - 8 ounce cups $4.50 Insurance certificate attached to application." Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve a special events pel111it for Ducks Unlimited for February 17,2001 from 5:00 p.m. to midnight including the Alcohol Management Plan as part of the record. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Champions Grill Commissioner Gallagher asked about the probable cause hearing for Champions Grill. Ms. Roach explained that on the 27th of this month there will be a renewal of the license for Champions. Commissioner Gallagher asked about the Show Cause hearing. Ms. Roach explained the delay is in receiving the Coroner's report. It may take some time. She stated because their license has expired, the renewal was scheduled for hearing. She stated the Board will have the option of approving, denying or approving with conditions. Commissioner Gallagher asked about subpoena authority and if that would help in obtaining the Coroner's report. Renee Black, Asst. County Attorney, stated the Board could subpoena the report but it would most likely not get here any faster. Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority and reconvene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Executive Session Commissioner Gallagher moved to adjourn into Executive Session to receive legal advice regarding negotiations on the Berry Creek 5th Filing. Chairman Stone seconded the motion noting that Commissioner Menconi was not present at this time but would be present for the Executive Session. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote was declared unanimous. The time was noted at 1 :31 p.m. Commissioner Gallagher moved to adjourn from Executive Session having discussed contract negotiations on the Berry Creek 5th Filing. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. The time was noted at 2:19 p.m. Abatements Max Schflaley, Assessor's Office, presented a petition for abatement for Moses Lerner, schedule number 039921. The abatement was filed for 1998 and 1999. The Assessor's record was incorrect based on the petitioner's statement. The statute dictates the plat is the controlling document on condominiums. Erroneous information was presented to the Board of Assessment Appeals. The Assessor recommended based on Statute, denial for 1998 and 1999. Commissioner Gallagher stated he did not see the recommendation for 1999. Mr. Schflaley stated for an abatement to be filed, they can not have filed during a protest period at that time. The abatement can not be petitioned for that year and no action is to be taken. Commissioner Gallagher asked if the date on the abatement should read 10/19/01. Mr. Schflaley explained. Renee Black asked if the order of the Board of Assessment appeals for 1999 were already handled. Mr. Schflaley stated the Board of Assessment Appeals rendered a decision for the year 1999. Moses Lerner was present for the hearing. He stated he is the owner of the condominium but is not an attorney. He stated he had originally filed a value for 1999 about a year ago or more. He based it on market values. This was set for hearing in July of last year. He came to the hearing and without any discussion the Assessor agreed with the market values. He stated the Assessor used a square footage that was greater than what he stated. He applied to the Board of Assessment Appeals and presented evidence. The Board agreed with him and his sources and set the value at the lower square footage. He stated all the taxes in the past had been in error. He filed an appeal in 1998 based on the error. He had already accepted and paid the tax for 1998. Only when there was an error in the calculations did he file. He filed a notice for all of the proceeding years. All eleven prior years would be in error. The evidence he has is the architectural design, the developer who sold him the unit, the escrow closing statement and a letter from the broker. He stated the area is 2,100 square feet and is exactly the same as it was when built. Chairman Stone asked if the appraisal for tax purposes is based on square footage, market approach or a combination. Mr. Schflaley stated by Statute, the plat is the dictator of the square footage. He stated the condominium owners are given a percentage of ownership. Chairman Stone asked what they show. Mr. Schflaley stated 2,244 square feet. Chairman Stone spoke to the large number of ways to calculate square footage. He explained the different ways. He stated he doesn't know what formula was used. He asked the Attorney's Office if that is germain at all or are they restricted by the State's regulations. Ms. Black stated because the condominium map and plat show the square footage owned, it is based on that recorded document. Chairman Stone asked if those are State requirements. Ms. Black stated they are. Chairman Stone spoke to the collection of taxes for multiple entities and the rules and guidelines they must follow. Jody Caruthers, Eagle County Assessor, stated on the attachment they have included a copy of the Statutes. Under Item E, it specifies the requirements and that being the document for referral. She suggested that specifies size. Commissioner Gallagher asked if that number would show the applicant's ownership of common area. Chairman Stone stated in a typical condominium ownership, every owner has some ownership of the building, but not necessarily through the common area. He stated the plat is not recorded with the County until after the building is completed and shows the number of square feet per unit. Commissioner Gallagher stated they have a condominium building and they divide it up excluding the common areas. Ms. Caruthers stated they receive a percentage of the common areas. Chairman Stone spoke to the "Homeowners Association" which is taxed in the value of the unit. Ms. Caruthers spoke to the unit boundaries and read from the Statutes accordingly. Chairman Stone suggested again that depending on measurements from sale to plat purposes, you could pick up an extra 144 square feet. Commissioner Gallagher asked about another 2100 square foot condo being taxed at a lesser amount. He asked if the 144 square feet exist. Mr.Schflaley explained how units are measured. Mr. Lerner spoke to the different ways of measuring the condominiums. He stated that isn't so. He stated they must measure from outside walls and half way to party walls. He stated that is how it has been measured by the architect, the developer, the builder and himself. He stated it is a very important area in determining the tax. The tax is determined by reaching a market value. He stated they agree completely on the market value for 1999. He never disputed the market values of the previous years. He learned only last year because of the difference then determined and that is about $400 per year for 11 years. Chairman Stone spoke to his occupation as a real estate broker and the requirement to disclose the actual square footage. He stated he respects Mr. Lerner's opinion whether they agree or disagree. He stated they have to get to agreement to what determination they mayor may not use to legally make this determination. He asked Ms. Black to confirm they are supposed to use the square footage used on the plat. Ms. Black suggested the Board of Assessment Appeals concluded that as well. Mr. Lerner asked if the Board can direct him so that he can amend the plat area. He stated at the hearing of the Board of Appeals from his architect he presented the documentation confirming his figures. Chairman Stone asked for a copy of the plat that was actually recorded. Commissioner Gallagher asked if there is something that tells them they can ignore the order of the BAA. Ms. Black stated they have that order for 1999. Mr. Lerner suggested if the Board determined it was different in 1999, then it has to be the same in the prior years. Ms. Black stated because 1999 went to the Board of Appeals they are bound to follow those orders. She stated they do have the 1998 abatement before them. The order does require that an amendment be made to the declaration. Mr. Schflaley stated the time periods are different. Mr. Lerner stated he is not disputing the market values. Commissioner Gallagher asked if there is a reason they have not filed a change in the plat. Mr. Lerner stated he may not have read the decision is full. He stated he saw they changed the value of 1999. He stated he will do that after this hearing and asked for direction. Commissioner Gallagher asked for a three minute recess. Commissioner Menconi suggested there may be problems with other units in the square footage of other condos. Mr. Lerner stated he has built his own and doesn't know about the other units. Commissioner Menconi asked if there are discrepancies in condominium units such as this. He asked if there is a burden on the County to go out and measure the square footage of each condominium. He suggested that would be the responsibility of the owner. Chairman Stone asked which unit this is. Mr. Lerner stated C 18 and C 19. Mark Chapin stated the larger copy is a photocopy of the plat and the 8.5 x 11 is the last page of the recorded declaration. Chairman Stone asked if C 18 and C 19 together are Mr. Lerner's unit. C 18 has 1171 square feet and C 19 has 473 square feet which brings them to 2244. He suggested what needs to happen is an amendment be made to that declaration. He asked how that will happen. Ms. Black stated it should say in the declarations and should be done through the Town of Vail. Chairman Stone stated either the architect came up with two different answers or a surveyor came up with the different numbers. Mr. Lerner stated he notices a triangle area that is showing as part of the common area. He suggested there may be another 30 or 40 square feet. Chairman Stone stated the Assessor's Office is not physically measuring the unit. They take their information from the recorded documents. Mr. Lerner asked if rather than making a decision today ifhe can get this changed. Ms. Black suggested he can withdraw the petition or it may be tabled. The changing of the declarations may take some time to do. Chairman Stone asked if they must pick a date certain. Mr. Lerner stated they could agree with him assuming he can get this done. Chairman Stone stated the law says they follow the declaration of condominium ownership. Commissioner Menconi suggested there may be more procedures than just meeting with the Town of Vail. Chairman Stone suggested it could be very expensive as well. He suggested they pick a time. Ms. Caruthers stated if this is changed, it may not effect the past, but may effect the future. Chairman Stone suggested Mr. Lerner may wish to receive legal counsel. Mr. Lerner asked for two months. Commissioner Gallagher moved to continue schedule number 039921, Moses Lerner, until the first Tuesday in April, April 3rd, to give the applicant the opportunity to pursue this with the Town of Vail. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Mr. Schflaley presented a petition for abatement for Sydney G. Pittman, schedule number R024473. The Assessor recommended denial for the years 1998 and 1999. For 1999 there was an appeal filed for that year and was dropped at the Assessor level, therefore the petitioner is precluded for filing for that year. For 1998, the collection period varies. In 2000 the petitioner has filed and there was an adjustment. The view was blocked. During 1998, three sales were used. He stated they believe the assessment was fair and the tax amount is correct. Sydney Pittman stated she thought she was following a certain process thinking her taxes jumped close to $600. She believes the value is inflated. She asked why her taxes would jump so high. Mr. Schflaley stated it could be a mill rate change or a valuation change. Ms. Pittman stated if it states the total value of $279,000 is the market value, she asked if she is paying taxes on that amount. Mr. Schflaley stated for the year 2000 they have corrected the value. The appeal was dropped after the Assessor level. Ms. Pittman asked if she can go back in years. Mr. Schflaley stated she could for 1998. Chairman Stone stated they have to do this by the year. Chairman Stone asked when the taxes jumped. Ms. Pittman stated about 2 years ago. Mr. Schflaley stated they have adjusted the value for 2000. Ms. Pittman asked if plats can be wrong. Chairman Stone stated it all depends on who filed the plat and who surveyed it. Commissioner Menconi moved to deny schedule number R024473, for 1998 and 1999, Sydney G. Pittman, as recommended by the Assessor. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Mr. Schflaley presented a petition for abatement for Box Office Video, schedule number P022536. The Assessor recommended denial based on the office having requested information from the petitioner for that year. It was never supplied. He stated the appraiser has requested additional information and not received it. He stated additional information is needed before processing. Jim Benson, owner of Box Office Video, stated Marty has been very professional and very helpful. He stated they have asked for the lease agreement or he can provide a letter from his landlord. He spoke to the air conditioning unit installed. He spoke to the other items that existed as depreciation. He stated in his notice for 2000, he stated he has no argument. Chairman StQpe suggested they table this for a short period of time and come back and get this taken care of. He asked for a good ~ate. Mr. Schflaley sthtedifthey ~ome to an agreement Mr. Benson does not need to be present. Commissioner Gallagher moved to table this file to March 13,2001. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Mr. Schflaley presented a petition for abatement for Vail Trail Condominium Association, schedule number R045472. The Assessor recommended denial for 1998 based on the parcel being conveyed to the Homeowner's Association by quit claim though it was not filed or recorded until 1998. He stated the classification can not be retroactive. Chairman Stone asked if partial year consideration is given. Mr. Schflaley responded they do not. Commissioner Menconi moved to deny the abatement for schedule number R045472, Vail Trail Condominium Association, as recommended by the Assessor. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Mr. Schflaley presented a petition for abatement for McAllister Grandchildren's Trust, schedule number R031499 for 1998 and 1999. The Assessor recommended an abatement for those years due to a clerical error by their office. Chairman Stone asked if the applicant has been notified and if they are in agreement. Mr. Schflaley stated as far as he knows they have agreed and have signed accordingly. Commissioner Gallagher asked where this is located. Mr. Schflaley stated it must be in Gypsum. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve schedule number R031499, McAllister Grandchildren's Trust, for 1998 as recommended by the Assessor in the amount of$123.24. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve abatement for schedule number R03l499, McAllister Grandchildren's Trust, for 1999 as recommended by the Assessor in the amount of $2,004.12. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. SUS-00009, Eby Creek Ranch Cliff Simonton, Planner, presented file number SDS-00009, Eby Creek Ranch. He stated topics discussed by the Eagle County Planning Commission include the following: Options and/or alternatives that might facilitate the protection of geologically and/or environmentally sensitive lands. Logic of annexation of this parcel to the Town of Eagle. Repeated attempts of Applicant to gain approval with the Town. Frustration with the Town's reluctance to annex property. Feasibility of hook up to public sewer. Town's "conditional" willingness to provide domestic water. Density of wells and individual septic systems in a small area. Ability of aquifer to support 5 wells. Water augmentation plan, and source of augmentation water. Possibility of locating a fire hydrant on access road. Emergency vehicle tum-arounds at the end of each drive. Use of building envelops to establish building sites on each lot. JJP Companies is proposing a subdivision that would create five (5) lots on a 56.94 acre parcel along side and to the east oflower Eby Creek just north of the Town of Eagle. Access to the proposed lots would be via Eby Creek Road at a point approximately .36 miles above the ambulance station. A dedicated rural residential lane, 175 feet in length, would cross Eby Creek at that point to access two driveways, one heading north to serve three lots and one heading south to serve the remaining two. The parcel is dominated by a steeply dissected ridge that rises approximately 300 feet above and parallel to the valley floor. This ridge exhibits a number of short, steep, and somewhat heavily treed but otherwise sparsely vegetated gullies interspersed by very steep barren slopes. The ridge transitions on its west flank in a series of alluvial fans and sloping benches which border Eby Creek. The stream itself zigzags through a somewhat narrow and steep sided channel that has been cut between this transition bench and the Eby Creek Road platform to the west. The Applicant proposes to develop sites for residential homes on the land between the steep hillside to the east and the creek to the west. Water for the homes is to be provided by individual wells; sewage disposal would be by ISDS. This parcel was first platted in November of 1981 as Lot 220 of the Eby Creek Mesa Subdivision, and is zoned Agricultural Residential. In the time since its creation, various proposals have been submitted to both the County and the Town of Eagle for its development. In early 1997, then owner David Faulkenberg presented to the Town of Eagle a plan for the annexation of Creekside Estates PUD, a development that included five single family lots with adjacent open space, pedestrian paths and a public park. This plan was withdrawn by the applicant prior to final plat approval. In July of 1999, an idea was presented to the County Staff by the current owner, Mr. John Poukish, that involved a subdivision of the parcel into 20 (more or less) lots. Staff was not comfortable with the concept, and Mr. Poukish was encouraged to return to the Town with a scaled back plan. A proposal for the annexation of eleven single family lots with an equestrian center and an additional parcel for employee housing was then developed and submitted to the Town in the fall of 1999. This plan went through a variety of modifications, eventually becoming File S-24, Eby Creek Ranch, a proposal for 6 single family lots with a seventh to be dedicated to the ambulance district for employee housing. The Town Staff and the Town's Planning and Zoning Commission approved the plan, with conditions, and supported the owners intent through the sketch and preliminary planning stages. At its meeting of July 25, 2000, however, the Town Board rejected the final plat for the plan, stating that the development was of "questionable value to the Town" and, essentially, that the advantages of approval did not significantly outweigh the disadvantages. In the summer of 2000, the owner installed culverts in Eby Creek (Army Corp of Engineers permit # 199775351) and completed initial grading (Eagle County permit # MI-11373) for the road segment proposed for access to the drive ways. With the exception of some old road tracks, a few abandoned fences and several recent soil study test holes, the site is undisturbed. Any development on this parcel will be subject to the protective covenants of the Eby Creek Homeowner's Association. He showed photographs of the site and showed first lot 5 and where the home would be built. He showed lot 4 and the buildable portion. He stated the other three homes could not be seen from the location. In another photo he showed lots 3 and 2. Lot one is behind the trees. The access would be where the culverts now exists. In the southern photo he showed the lot 1 buildable site location. He showed the building envelopes from the road and the screening during the summer. He spoke to the work done on Eby Creek road and that they may have to modify the vegetation, but don't know that as of yet. Referral responses are as shown on the staff report and as follows: Eagle County Engineer Additional requirements regarding road geometry will be required at Preliminary Plan. An updated drainage report will be required at Preliminary Plan. Eagle County Attorney No concerns at his time two. Not possible to predict direction of water flow in areas where homes would be built. Hydrologic analysis should be conducted to determine whether 50 foot set back provides adequate flood protection. Engineered septic systems may be required. Rockfall hazard is not severe, but should be addressed. Greater Eagle Fire Protection District Uniform fire code requires space for fire truck/fire apparatus turn around on dead end access roads in excess of 150 feet in length. Fire access roads and related bridges shall be designed to support loads of fire apparatus and shall be provided a surface to accommodate all-weather driving. Access roads shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide and shall provide a vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches. Fire hydrants are required along access roads, and should be spaced a maximum of 400 feet apart. Colorado Division of Water Resources Materials submitted with the application did not adequately address the issues of water quality, quantity and dependability. Lacking a water court approved aUf!mentation plan. the proposal will cause material iniurv to decreed water rights. Colorado Division of Wildlife The site contains critical deer habitat for migration and winter range. There is also concern for impacts to adjacent riparian areas, water quality in Eby Creek and mountain lion movement. Numerous mitigation measures are available (please see attached letter), including, but not limited to: Restricting the number of dogs per household and the way they are boarded; Restricting the types and amounts of fencing used; Prohibiting the boarding of any livestock. Restricting the size of building envelopes, and requiring construction disturbance areas to be delineated with siltation fencing. Require funds to be deposited in a wildlife mitigation trust, or instigate an internal real estate transfer fee to support wildlife mitigation efforts. Use established BMP for protection against unwanted bear activities. No development should be allowed in riparian areas. A 75 foot minimum setback is recommended from the stream. Drainage and runoff water should be contained and filtered prior to its leaving a home site. A raptor survey should be conducted CDOW should be indemnified against any claims from wildlife damage Open space areas should be managed to prevent harassment of wildlife. Temporary fencing and other passive means may be used to restrict wildlife on landscaped areas. The steep hillside area immediately east of the site should be restricted from use from December 15th through March 31 st of each year. A brochure or pamphlet should be developed to educate new residents about local wildlife concerns. Eagle County School District Cash in Lieu of School Land is estimated to be $1,006.36, payable at Final Plan approval. Town of Eagle (letter to the Applicant, copy to Staff 01110/01) Town is ready to serve the property, if applicant will commit to a water service agreement, which would include an annexation or pre-annexation agreement. Water rights dedication or cash-in-lieu fee would be required. Ownership of2.0 cfs from the Neilson Ditch has not been verified. Eby Creek Mesa Homeowner's Association The Board is in general support of the proposal. Proposed development is a part of the Eby Creek Mesa Subdivision, and will be subject to payment of homeowner's dues and to the design review process. Additional Referral Aeencies, not responding: Eagle County Assessor, Sheriff, Animal Control and Environmental Health; Colorado Water Conservation Board; BLM; US Army Corps of Engineers; Natural Resources Conservation Board; US West/PTI; Public Service; Holy Cross Electric. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-280.B.l, Overview of Procedures. Subdivision Sketch Plan Review; the review of a Sketch Plan for Subdivision provides an opportunity for the applicant, the County and the public to evaluate and discuss the basic concepts for the proposed development, and to determine if there are any alternative approaches the applicant should explore. A determination is made at this time as to whether or not the proposal is consistent with Master Plan documents, and whether the improvements proposed by the plan are generally compatible with surrounding uses. Consensus should be reached regarding the number of units proposed, the general location of development, the general alignment(s) for access, and whether water supply and sewage disposal should be provided on site or through connection to a public system. Issues and concerns that should be addressed relevant to the approval of a Preliminary Plan are identified. Staff utilizes the Standards for Sketch and Preliminarv Plan for Subdivision, as detailed in Section 5-280.B.3.e in the review of a Subdivision Sketch Plan application. Pluses and minuses appearing before each Finding indicate where Staff has found that the proposed development meets or could meet that Standard ([+]), will not be able to meet that Standard ([-]), is of mixed conformance (unavoidable negative impacts will likely result, but at an acceptable level) ([+/-]), or that the Standard does not apply ([n/aD. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-280.B.3.e., Standards for Sketch and Preliminary Plan for Subdivision: STANDARD (1): Consistent with Master Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (1)] - The proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the FLUM of the Master Plan. The Master Plan analysis thatfollows considers the proposal as submitted. Ea(lle County Master Plan. Environmental Ouality - Guiding Policy # I-The proposed development is located in a critical mule deer migration and winter range habitat area, and may negatively impact the function of the area as suitable habitat. Please see discussion under Eagle County Open Space Plan. Development - Guiding policy # 5 - Significant natural hazards may be present on this site to a degree that might limit development alternatives. The area is also identified as critical to mule deer for migration and winter range. Guiding policy # 6 - A Clustered Development option is available, and was not considered as an alternative to this plan. Given the characteristics ofthis site, however, the minimum lot size of 5 acres required by the clustering option would probably render it ineffective as a means of setting aside sensitive land areas. Current zoning does allow for the layout as submitted. FLUM - The Future Land Use Map shows this area to be "Countryside" and indicates the possibility of future annexation of this tract by the Town of Eagle. The Town of Eagle has been reluctant to accept the annexation of this parcel through previous applications, although they have not been approached with this specific plan. The proposed development does comply with uses allowed under its current zoning designation of Agricultural Residential. EAGLE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PLAN Eagle County Open Space Plan. Hazards - The site is delineated on the Eagle County Hazards Map as requiring detailed geologic and engineering studies, and is immediately adjacent to an area (the Eby Creek drainage) that requires extensive geologic and engineering studies. The Colorado Geological Survev orif!inallv recommended denial of the project as it is currentlv proposed (letter of 12/20/00). A second field investigation bv CGS with the Applicant's engineer resulted in a second letter from CGS (01/12/01). in which thev state their belief that the hazards can be mitigated with appropriate engineering. Staff remains concerned for the siting of safe building envelops and the close proximity of ISDS to the stream and/or flood zone set back, and is additionally concerned now for the site disturbance that may be required to accommodate "engineered geologic mitigation measures". Please see additional discussion under Site Development Standards and Suitability for Development. Wildlife - The proposed development is located in an area designated critical to wildlife. While the proposed density is low, access roads and activities associated with single family dwellings may disturb wildlife, and diminish the suitability of area as habitat. Strict adherence to the mitigating measures detailed in the report from Nature Tech Consultant Services, Inc. (10/19/00) and in the referral letter from the Colorado Division of Wildlife (12/20/00) should be sufficient to reduce these impacts to an acceptable level. See further discussion under Site Development Standards EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED PLAN Eagle River WaterShed Plan. Water Ouantity - While the use of individual wells may prove to be a viable option for this project, the Applicant must demonstrate that the use of individual wells is the only alternative available for domestic water given the close proximity of public systems (ECLUR Section 4-680.A.l). In addition, the Applicant will be required to address concerns for adequate water for fire suppression as required by Section 4-680.B ofECLUR, and as detailed in letter from the Greater Eagle Fire Protection District (12/13/00). Should it be shown that individual wells are the only alternative, the Applicant should make all reasonable efforts to acquire augmentation water from sources in the upper Eagle River or Gore Creek basins so as to avoid depletion of flows in the Eagle River. Water Ouality - Development is close to a live stream that is tributary to the Eagle River. While the Applicant's engineer has stated that the use of individual sewage systems is viable, and will not adversely effect ground or surface water, the Applicant must demonstrate that use of ISDS is the only alternative available given the close proximity of public sewage disposal systems (ECLUR Section4- 690.A.l). Please see additional discussions under Site Development Standards. Wildlife - The site is identified as critical winter range habitat for mule deer. Please see discussion under Eagle County Open Space Plan (above) and Site Development Standards. EAGLE AREA COMMUNITY PLAN Eagle Area Community Plan. Environment & Sensitive Areas - The area to be developed is identified as a sensitive wildlife habitat, and has potentially significant geologic hazards. Please note earlier discussions. Circulation and Transportation - While properties involved do border the Town of Eagle, steep topography forces a considerable separation of the proposed homes sites from the Town. No pedestrian or bike pathways that would tie the developed site to the Town are contemplated by this plan. [+/-] FINDING: Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (1)] The proposed subdivision IS NOT presently consistent with all policies of applicable Master Plans. However, the Applicant MAY BE able to demonstrate full conformance to all applicable Master Plan Guiding Policies at application for Preliminary Plan approval. STANDARD (2): Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)] - The proposed subdivision shall comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts. and Article 4, Site DeveloDment Standards. Article 3, Zone Districts [ +] The uses proposed by this plan ARE in conformance with standards for the existing zone designation of Agricultural Residential. Article 4, Site Development Standards [+] Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1) Adequate provisions for off-street parking and loading have been provided. [+] Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2) Submitted plans discuss issues related to landscaping and illumination, and are adequate for Sketch Plan approval. [+] Sign Regulations (Division 4-3). A discussion of signs and related standards is provided, and is adequate for Sketch Plan approval. [+/-] Natural Resource Protection Standards (Division 4-4) [+/-] Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410) - The site proposed for development is in an area designated as winter range, critical winter range and migration corridor for mule deer. A report by Nature Tech Consultants Corp. (10/19/00) recommends seven (7) mitigating measures. A similar but more extensive list of mitigations has been provided by the Colorado Division of Wildlife (referral letter of 12120/00). While plans submitted are adequate for Sketch Plan approval, the Applicant will be required to address and/or incorporate all of the recommendations made for the mitigation of impacts to wildlife in their application for Preliminary Plan Approval. [+/-] Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420) - Potential geologic hazards exist on the site. In their referral response (12/20/00), the Colorado Geologic Survey (CGS) stated that the geologic reports submitted by the Applicant were insufficient and recommended denial of the proiect pending further site specific geotechnical investigation and analysis. In a second letter (01/12/01) sent after a second field inspection. CGS reversed this decision. stating that the proposal would be possible if appropriately engineered. Staff remains concerned regarding the location of safe home sites and is additionally concerned for the site disturbance that may be required to implement geologic hazard mitigation measures. See additional discussion under Standard 5-280.B.3.e(4), Suitability for Development. [+/-] Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430) - The Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) has noted a moderate risk for wildfire on this site. In their referral response of 12/11/00, CSFS recommended the inclusion of adequate truck turn-arounds at the ends of each driveway, that defensible spaces be established around each home, that access to Eby Creek for the drafting of water be provided and that fire resistant roofing material be used. The Applicant will be required to incorporate these recommendations into the application for Preliminary Plan approval. [+] Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) - The applicant has agreed to incorporate existing Eagle County wood burning controls. [+] Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450) - The proposed development is in an area designated on the Ridgeline Protection Map. However, no ridgeline impacts will result from the proposed development. [+] Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460) - A preliminary Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was submitted with the application and was deemed to be sufficient for the Sketch Plan approval. [nla] Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5) Standards in this section do not apply. [+/-] Improvement Standards (Division 4-6) [+] Roadway Standards (Section 4-620) - The County Engineer has noted that road geometry specifications will be required at application for Preliminary Plan approval. Given the topographic characteristics of the site, it appears that the Applicant will be able to satisfy the appropriate requirements. Eagle County Road and Bridge has stated that they would rather not be responsible for the maintenance ofthe proposed access spur. This issue will also need to be resolved prior to Preliminary Plan approval. [nla] Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630) - No trails are proposed by the Eagle County Trails Plan for this area. [nla] Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640) - No irrigation outside of that used for individual homes is contemplated by this plan. [+] Drainage Standards (Section 4-650) - A drainage report dated June 16th, 1997 was included in the application and is deemed sufficient for Sketch Plan approval. As specified by referral from County Engineering, an updated drainage report will be required in application for Preliminary Plan approval. [+] Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660) - No information or plans related to grading or erosion control on the site have been submitted to date. The Applicant will be required to satisfy these standards in their application for Preliminary Plan approval. [+] Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670) - Standards for utilities lighting are discussed to a degree sufficient for Sketch Plan approval. Detailed information regarding utility layout and installation will be required at application for Preliminary Plan approval. Street lights are not required in the Agricultural Residential Zone District. [+/-] Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680) - Potable water is proposed to be provided by individual wells, and the Applicant is in the process of submitting an application for augmentation to the State Water Court. Lacking evidence of an official Water Resource Report and/or Water Court approved augmentation plan, The Colorado Division of Water Resources has stated in their referral response of 12/21/00 that the water supply is insufficient and that material injury to decreed water rights will result. The Applicant will be required to show evidence that water, in sufficient quality, quantity and dependability, will be available for this project in their application for Preliminary Plan approval. A domestic water line operated by the Town of Eagle currently exists in the Eby Creek Road right of way adjacent to this site. Section 4-680.A.l states that "Where approved public water supply is located withinfour hundred (400) feet of a development, the developer shall connect to such system...". This alternative to the use of individual wells is not adequately discussed in the application. The Applicant has asserted in subsequent conversation that by denying applications similar to this one, the Town of Eagle has, in effect, refused to serve the site. A letter from the Town to the Applicant's representative, dated 01/10/01, would indicate that the possibility of service by the Town remains open. The Town has placed conditions on hook up, however, that the Applicant is either not able to meet or is unwilling to accept. Prior to approval of the use of individual wells. the Applicant must also demonstrate that connection to the adiacent public water supply is not reasonably accessible or procurable. Water for fire suppression is also not contemplated by this plan, other than to point out that a fire hydrant exists 2000 feet to the north of the development on Eby Creek Road. Pursuant to section 4- 680.B, "the developer is required to supply fire fighting water, fire hydrants, and a fire fighting system of the type, size and number specified by the fire protection district having jurisdiction in the area." In their letter of 12/13/00, the Greater Eagle Fire Protection District provided requirements for road design and for the location and distribution of fire hydrants. The Applicant will be required to address water supply issues related to fire suppression. and specifically those items addressed in the referral response from the Greater Eagle Fire Protection District. in the application for Preliminary Plan approval. [+/-] Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690) - Individual Sewage Disposal Systems (ISDS) are proposed, and the Applicant's engineer has indicated that ISDS will work in the soils on the site. A domestic sewer line operated by the Eagle Sanitation District currently exists in the Eby Creek Road right of way. Section 4-690.A.I of Eagle County's Land Use Regulations states that "Where a public sanitary sewer system is located within four hundred (400) feet of a proposed development the applicant shall connect to such sanitary sewer system where and whenever feasible." This Alternative to the use ofISDS is not adequately discussed in the application. Staffhas learned in subsequent conversation that, given the topography and terrain, a forced main or lift station system would be required to connect the proposed homes to the public system, and that designs for both have been contemplated in previous applications to the Town. Again, the Applicant would assert that by denying applications for land use similar to this one, the Town of Eagle has, in effect, refused to serve the site. This issue remains unresolved at the writing of this report. Prior to approval of the use of individual sewage disposal systems. the Applicant must demonstrate that connection to the adjacent public sewage disposal system is not feasible. [+] Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7) As detailed in letter from Karen Strakbein, cash-in-lieu of school land dedication is preferred, and is estimated to be $1006.36. Road impact fees will be assessed on a per dwelling unit basis. Payment will be due as a part of Final Plan Approval. [+/-] FINDING: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)] The Applicant HAS demonstrated that the proposed subdivision complies with all of the standards of Article 3, Zone Districts. While the Applicant HAS NOT fully demonstrated that the proposed subdivision complies with all of the standards of Article 4, Site Development Standards, the Applicant MAYBE able to meet the applicable standards at application for Preliminary Plan approval. STANDARD: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)] - The proposed subdivision shall be located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (a) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road extensions shall be consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital Improvements Plan. (b) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (c) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area. The spatial patterns proposed by this development are not anticipated to cause the kind of inefficiencies contemplated by this standard. The Applicant is required to demonstrate that these standards will be met at application for Preliminary Plan approval. [+] FINDING: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)] The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. STANDARD: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)] - The property proposed to be subdivided shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. Concern exists for potentially significant geologic hazards and their impact on the location of safe home sites. The Colorado Geological Survey originally recommended denial of the project as submitted (letter of 12/20/00), pending additional site specific studies related to debris flow hazards, delineation of flood zones, stream channel stability and soil and bedrock conditions. A second and more thorough site visit by CGS resulted in a second letter (01/12/01), in which CGS reversed their earlier position and stated that the project, as proposed, could be accomplished if appropriate engineering were applied. The potential for debris or mud flows remains a concern, however, especially on lots 1 and 2 (please note earlier discussion under Eagle County Open Space Plan). Routing of storm water and debris flow material across alluvial fans, rock fall hazards, the delineation of the flood plain for Eby Creek and issues related to the location and engineering of individual sewage disposal systems will need to be resolved as the Applicant works to establish safe and buildable home sites. As a result of the on-going efforts of the Applicant and the Applicant's engineer to address these issues, Staff finds the application, as modified by referral response and as conditioned by this report, sufficient for Sketch Plan approval. [+/-] FINDING: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)] While the Applicant HAS NOT fully demonstrated that the property proposed to be subdivided is suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man- made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area, the Applicant MAYBE able to meet the applicable standards at application for Preliminary Plan approval. STANDARD: Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)] - The proposed subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. The use proposed is similar to and compatible with the existing land use in the surrounding area. It appears unlikely that the future development of the surrounding area would be adversely affected by the subdivision and development of this land. [+] FINDING: Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)] The proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and WILL NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Mr. Simonton stated while the site development standards require an applicant to provide fire fighting water it is exempted if there is one unit per 5 acres or less. As this is one unit per 11 acres, it is exempt, however this exemption does not apply to wildfire hazards. Sid Fox, representing the applicant, John Poukish stated Richard Michgelbrink was also present. He stated this site is one of four lots east of Eby Creek zoned agricultural residential. All of the lots are proposed between 10.75 of an acre up to 20 acres in size. They feel that the land use pattern is in conformance. He spoke to the steep slopes. What is on the site plan is a sketch plan approximation. They plan on disturbance of 5 to 6 acres of the 57 acre site. They are proposing access from the County road constructed to County standards and dedicated to the County for maintenance. He would anticipate some sort of cul-du-sac. They are proposing a private driveway to the south and to the north. They are proposing individual wells. Concerning the water supply, they have prepared an augmentation plan application. That application has been submitted to the Division 5 Water Court and they have passed the date of objection. The augmentation water, which is minimal, will be from Eagle Park Reservoir and from Wolford Mountain. That is proceeding in a reasonable manner and will be updated at preliminary plan. He spoke to the protective covenants and the design review guidelines. They will propose a supplemental covenant to Eby Creek Ranch as they come through the process. He spoke to the geologic hazards and believes they have made progress in that regard. The engineers have been on site and taken soil samples. Their assessment is pretty consistent with the State Geologist and they will provide suggested mitigation. He stated the next issue is the utilization of the Town water supply and sewage treatment systems. He stated they had extensive discussions with the Town to obtain Town utilities. He stated the Town policy to provide services would require an annexation or pre-annexation agreement. He stated this property has been before the Town since 1997 trying to get a mutually acceptable agreement. He has been involved for one year since the applicant has found they have not made progress. He explained the services are still there and whether they are accessible and procurable is the question. He stated that was addressed in a letter. They met with staff on April 7th and agreed to go back to the Town for annexation. He stated they went to the Planning Commission in June of2000 and received recommendation for approval from staff and the Planning Commission. The PUD application was denied by the Town. He stated they have demonstrated good faith efforts to obtain Town services but those are not available to them. This site is mapped as countryside and it is in the north area boundary of the Eagle Area Community Plan. In the countryside land use designation they believe it is supportable. In closing they request the conditional approval and the right to proceed to preliminary plan. Chairman Stone asked for public comment. Ted James, area resident, stated each month he collects water samples from this area. He stated 80% of the species are dependent on riparian areas for habitat. He is concerned with the deterioration of the habitat. He encouraged to Board to review the findings of the Town of Eagle before making a determination. He stated just the inclusion of the culvert has caused damage to the invertebrate habitat. He spoke to video taped evidence of the damage done when the culvert was installed. He is not convinced the work will be done properly. He stated the soils along the area are similar to those of Candy Land National Park. He stated residential building along an area as such does give reason for concern. He stated this is not suited to more than one building location. He spoke to the steep bench. He is concerned that during the construction process there will be undo sedimentation. He urged the Board to speak with the Town of Eagle and their Planning Commission about their concerns with building in this area. Commissioner Gallagher asked about the run off and cleaning up the culvert installation. Mr. James asked if the riparian corridor would be owned by each lot. He spoke to the samples they have collected and are working in the partnership with the BLM. He has concerns with the level of quality control. This will cause a tremendous impact to the community. He stated this is the first time he has spoken in opposition to this. His son has gotten pledges in supporting his efforts for turning this into open space. He stated at all meetings the Board of the Eby Creek Homeowner's have spoke in opposition. He stated when the culvert was installed there were no mitigation measures put in place. He spoke to the rains following the installation. He suggested that someone wanting a design as such having no regard for the habitat. He spoke to the suggestion they have horses. He stated this will create further impacts. To him it indicates a disregard for the habitat of the area. He is worried that during the construction phases of this project the sensitivity will disregarded. Commissioner Menconi stated one of staff's conditions, number 5, stated the issues have been addressed and/or incorporated into the Plan. Mr. Simonton stated the concerns seemed to be more towards the winter habitat and the deer. He stated they did not receive a report or response regarding the stream biotic's. The County does have set back requirements and regulations. Chairman Stone asked Mr. James if this could be mitigated if the construction was done properly and soundly. Mr. James stated perhaps for a couple of home sites. It was originally zoned for one house. Chairman Stone asked about five home sites. Mr. James stated he does not believe the Town will change their stance, therefore you are looking at individual septic systems and wells. He spoke to the effects on the water table and steam flows. Rosie Sherwood, area resident, commented that she believes this Commission must move carefully when developments as such are proposed. She suggested subdivision needs to be treated very carefully. As approved, there was probably an understanding that it would keep the stream flow in tack. Gordon Schicony, who owns a house up north, stated he thinks all of the issues discussed are admirable. He stated he bought his piece of land and some of the lots were much larger and then subdivided. He stated this is indeed one lot now with the ability to go to five. Understanding protection of environment is important, but 57 acres with five houses is not unreasonable. He does have concerns about the water, but thinks there are ways to mitigate around it. Chairman Stone asked for additional public comment. There was none. Commissioner Menconi stated he is confused by the comment that the Town of Eagle is not interested in allowing this and referred to a letter stating the Town would provide service if annexation or pre-annexation was allowed as a protector of water rights. Willy Powell, Eagle Town Manager, was present and stated the letter says they will service water and waste water if there is an annexation or pre-annexation agreement. He stated Mr. Poukish has stated he has water rights, however, he has not made those available. He spoke to the requirements they have to require appropriate water rights or cash-in-lieu. He was told by the applicant that the water rights may exist but it might cost too much money for him to procure. Chairman Stone stated if the applicant were able to perfect the water rights would the Town be willing to provide annexation. Mr. Powell suggested they would still show some concern for the other issues. He stated Mr. Poukish bought this land from David Faulkenberg who had a preliminary plan pending. It was similar to this plan for density. The concerns had to do with cattle, horses, what will be allowed to occur in addition to single family dwellings. Chairman Stone asked if this plan is different, and he will not hold Mr. Powell to his comments, but would like to know if it is similar. Mr. Powell stated it is somewhat similar. He stated if they are willing to approve the sketch plan they will make more substantive recommendations. Chairman Stone stated they will review the findings and those shown as positive they will skip and then review those found as negative. Commissioner Gallagher spoke to the fire water and asked about the flow. He asked if it flows year round. There was no certainty to the flow amount. Commissioner Gallagher asked about the construction of the culvert and asked if Eagle County has standards to the construction. Chairman Stone asked if there was a permit required and standards to be met. Adam Summers, Engineering, stated there are standards that outline what is required for erosion control both temporary and long term. He stated those measures are collateralized. He stated there was a grading permit approved for all of the work that has been done on this site. He suggested it would include erosion control measures. Commissioner Gallagher asked if it was monitored. Chairman Stone stated it will be important for him to make a decision and would make a recommendation to the Board that they continue this file until they get further information about the work that has been preformed. Commissioner Gallagher agreed. He stated there are other aspects of this he would like to learn. Jim Fritze stated they can continue this t~ither on their own or at the applicant's request. Chairman Stone suggested they won't need a long continuation but for a couple of weeks. Mr. Fox stated on behalf of the applicant they would like to understand the reasons for tabling and they can be addressed at the next hearing. Chairman Stone asked they be prepared to address the findings noted as a (+) and (-). He explained their desire to see how they can be successful in meeting the requirements. He stated he would also like specific information on what was done at the time the culvert was installed as an indication of future work to be done on the project. Commissioner Gallagher stated he is concerned with fire protection and water and if the Town would place a fire hydrant for fire protection. He is also interested in the now letter and the information submitted to the developer and the developer'~ response. Chairman Stone stated he has particular interest in .. rater supply and flows either locally and regionally. Commissioner Menconi stated he would like to give further direction to the terms of the transfer of water rights and the servicing by the Town of Eagle. Chairman Stone stated with the addition of one new member, the Town used the County as a referral for development east of Eagle on Highway 6. He spoke to the wells and private sewage systems and the preference of having it on Town services rather than individual systems. Mr. Fox stated they can respond to any arid all questions .'lOW, but they are willing to table to another time consideration. All agreed to the 27th of February as the date for continuation. John Poukish stated he is prepared to answer the questions at this time. Chairman Stone stated he would like to get the information spoken to. Mr. Poukish stated the proper wetlands permits were issued, code enforcement visited the site on numerous occasions. He stated to his knowledge they received no indication or written instruction that they were in violation in any way. Chairman Stone stated he would like to confirm this for the record. Commissioner Gallagher moved to table file SDS-00009, Eby Creek Ranch, to February 27, 2001 at the applicants request. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 1041-0030, SSA-0008, PDP-00015, ZC099935, VIS-0012, SD-0020, Frost Creek PUD 1041-0033, SSA-00I0, ZC-00037, PDSP-00012, Adam's Rib Ranch Chairman Stone listed the files to be heard today. He stated this setting for public hearing was tabled at the applicant's request to this date. Jim Fritze stated in addition, there are now two files that are no longer here. Those are the 1041 files. With the letter of withdrawal, it was indicated the applicant would file with the Town of Eagle . Chairman Stone stated he did not ask staff to have a presenter present today. He opened it up to the applicant. Randy Cloyd, representing Adam's Rib, stated they would like to get the PUDs on both The Ranch and Frost Creek and have those heard in the next four to six weeks. They would like to find out where the Board is on the PUD's and they can then work out the water agreements with the Town. They would like to get the direction the Board would place on the PUD's. Chairman Stone stated they have two different applications with the Ranch before the Planning Commission. He stated Frost Creek received sketch plan approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Mr. Cloyd stated they would like the Board to hear the two files so they can work out the water agreement with the Town. Chairman Stone stated the Land Use Regulations call for the Board to make a decision ifthere is a maj or change in the 1041. He stated they are coming through with a new 1041 that is different from what was initially submitted. Mr. Cloyd stated that could go either way. Chairman Stone stated what was approved was 100 sites being served by their own water system and 200 sites being served by the Town. He stated that is why they got into this discussion because there was concern over duplication of systems. He stated he doesn't recall if it was a change in the Ranch PUD. He stated there is a requirement to send it back to the Planning Commission if there is a substantial change to the plan. Mr. Cloyd stated the original sketch plan allowed it to go either way. Mr. Fritze stated the change is from the preliminary plan submitted to the Planning Commission. Chairman Stone stated he believes they will have to go back to the Planning Commission as there has been a major change to the Frost Creek application. Mr. Fritze stated if the Board believes there has been substantial change it will have to go back to the Planning Commission. He stated what is before the Planning Commission now on the Ranch is different than what is being proposed. He spoke to section 6 and that it doesn't make sense to push the other files out in front when in order to approve them they need the 1041 approval. Chairman Stone stated that is a separate procedural issue. Randy Cloyd stated he understands if it goes back to the P & Z it has to be done in 30 days. Mr. Fritze stated ifthey don't have the 1041, the recommendation will have to be denied. That is where the two are tied together. Chairman Stone asked if they are saying there is no flexibility. He suggested if they don't get through this in 30 days they would have to deny the preliminary plan approval. Mr. Fritze stated that is a requirement that the applicant would have to waive. Chairman Stone suggested if the Board does find there is a substantial change and that it does go back to planning that they hear the Ranch PUD somewhat concurrent but before Frost Creek. This is reliant on the Town approving a contract for water. He suggested Frost Creek go back to Planning and Zoning and waive the thirty day requirement so they can go through Planning & Zoning for the Ranch. The other item are the service agreements and since the service agreements have changed, it would probably be in their best interest to withdraw those agreements. Randy Cloyd stated they would want to speak with Boots Ferguson on that. Mr. Fritze stated the service plans that are currently filed contemplate the 1041's that have been withdrawn. If they want a service plan, they have to be what they actually want. Chairman Stone stated on the service plan item, what can they do. Mr. Fritze stated that can be tabled again. Mr. Cloyd stated he would like to talk with Boots on the service plan. Their desire is to move this forward so that they can get to the Town. Chairman Stone suggested they will need to finish up with the County Planning and Zoning but what he foresees happening is they would go through Planning & Zoning and then to the County Commissioners. That is when the applicant would be talking to the Town on water and sewer service. He stated the Board would allow a period of time for them to come up with a contract with the Town and then they would return to the County if that contract is in place. Mr. Cloyd stated that is why they would like to get thePUD's before the Board and then the 1041's will come through. Chairman Stone suggested they are all in agreement. Willy Powell stated they need to think through the timing and who is expected to do what at what time. He stated the Town would be considered the water server throughout this. He stated they wanted to see some changes to the land use plan and they still want to see those. Chairman Stone suggested the Town should be very involved in the Planning and Zoning process as well as when this comes before the Board of County Commissioners. He asked the concerns be resolved if possible with Planning and Zoning. He encouraged the Town to be involved in that process. He asked if they need to come up with a specific hearing schedule. Mr. Fritze stated as far as a specific hearing schedule for anything other than the special district file the Board need not come up with that. If the Board finds substantial change and sends it back the dates will be selected by Planning for the notification process. Mr. Cloyd asked they table both the Ranch and Frost Creek to sometime in March. That will give them time to work with Planning and Zoning. Chairman Stone spoke to the Service Plan for Frost Creek. Commissioner Gallagher moved to table SD-0020 the Service Plan for Frost Creek until February 13,2001 at the applicants request. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Randy Cloyd suggested the timing of the 1041 is that it will be heard before the Planning & Zoning on April 18 and the Board on April 18. He stated he talked with Ray Merry about these dates. Chairman Stone asked they speak to The Ranch PUD. Mr. Fritze stated it was originally scheduled to be out ofthe planning commission but it was not. Chairman Stone asked what action they should take. Mr. Fritze stated he doesn't see there to be any action taken at this time. Chairman Stone stated no action will be taken by the Board for files ZC-00037 and PDSP-00012, Adam's Rib Ranch PUD. Chairman Stone asked about files PDP-00015 and ZC-00035. He asked the Commissioners if they find there has been substantial change. He stated there is also the variance file VIS-00012. Commissioner Gallagher stated he finds that there is and asked if there should be a motion. Commissioner Gallagher moved that the Board find there is a substantial change in files PDP- 00015, ZC-0035 and VIS-00012. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Mr. Fritze stated he does not believe the variance file is heard by the Planning Commission. Mr. Cloyd stated they need to get the Planning and Zoning Commission to move the PUD files forward to the Board. Chairman Stone spoke to the Special District and that as these move forward, the Board will have to wait to see if a contract is agreed to between the Town and the Planning Comission. Roxy Deane, Town of Eagle, stated she was under the impression there would be some discussion about the mediation. She stated she feels they have come half way with the mediation. She doesn't see the process they are going to go through now will solve those issues. Chairman Stone stated the issues will be addressed. Ms. Deane stated they are to go to the Planning Commission and present their case and go through the process. Fred Kummer, president of Adam's Rib, stated so they don't waste everyone's time, it is his hope that they will do this and pass through these various areas and they will make their case, the Town and them, and Planning and Zoning will make a recommendation to the Commissioners. The County Commissioners will listen again and at that time the Commissioners will approve or disapprove a plan with conditions and then it will be up to the Town and Adam's Rib to either accept or reject that plan that has been approved by the Commissioners. Chairman Stone stated the Commissioners can not approve anything until they can show they have water and sewage service. He stated everyone will know what the County Commissioners are considering. Mr. Kummer suggested the County Commissioners will approve or disapprove with conditions and one of the conditions will be they can reach a waste water agreement with the Town. Chairman Stone stated that can not be a condition of approval. Mr. Fritze stated the Board will have their deliberation and continue the hearing to allow the applicant and Town to come forth with a water agreement. If the water agreement is there it will either be approved or denied. Chairman Stone stated after Board deliberations he will ask for any other requirements to make for a positive finding. He stated they will have a clear indication of the conditions that will be required to get either a positive or negative finding on the file. He suggested with a clear indication, and knowing where the Board is, they will not be making a vote at that time. Willy Powell asked at the Planning and Zoning Commission tomorrow, do they have to re- advertize and set a new hearing date on the Ranch. Mr. Fritze stated he thinks the application needs to conform to what they are doing and secondly the section read that the land use application and the 1041 should be heard in conjunction. Chairman Stone stated it does not need to be re-advertised as it is still in a fluid process. Mr. Fritze stated it will need to be continued to a date certain. Executive Session Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn into "Executive Session" to discuss personnel matters. Chairman Stone seconded the motion. He stated Commissioner Gallagher is not present at this time but will be in the "Executive Session". The vote was declared unanimous. The time was noted at 6:22 p.m. Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn from "Executive Session" in which the Board discussed personnel matters. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. The time was noted at 7:28 p.m. There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until February 13,2001. ~~.