Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07/10/2000 PUBLIC HEARING JULY 10, 2000 Present: Tom C. Stone Johnnette Phillips Michael Gallagher Robert Loeffler Jack Ingstad Sara Fisher Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Deputy County Attorney County Administrator Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: GENERAL FUND 2000 NAE4-H CONFERENCE AAA COLLECTORS ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS ABC SIGN WORKS ADAM SOMMERS ADIRONDACK DIRECT AFFORDABLE PORTABLE AIRTOUCH CELLULAR ALL PRO FORMS INC ALL STATE FILTER ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE ALPHA INTERACTIVE GROUP ALPINE AREA AGENCY AGING ALPINE SIGN & GRAPHICS AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION AMERICAN FURNITURE AMERICAN INSTITUTE ARCHIT AMERICAN MANAGEMENT AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC ANDREW MONTOYA APEX SECURITY API FUND FOR PAYROLL ED ARCH PAGING ARLISS SIMS ASI TECHNOLOGIES ASPEN BUDDY PROGRAM ASPEN CTR FOR WOMENS HLTH AT&T ATC TOWER CORP A V TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS BAILEY AND PETERSON BAILEY FUNERAL HOME BAILEYS BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS BARTELL & BARTELL BAYER CAREY & MCGEE BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS BEST WESTERN EAGLE LODGE SERVICES REFUND REFUND SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES 195.00 99.18 58.68 1,215.70 50.67 251.95 634.00 6.81 1,439.76 1,174.17 3,088.81 107.50 1,008.00 80.00 811.75 675.00 70.00 169.00 233.00 20.55 956.55 695.00 91. 71 22.00 48,650.24 250.00 3,950.00 157.98 875.00 124.25 2,010.24 2.48 350.00 109.00 31.20 2,550.00 15.00 50.00 17.52 951.70 1 07-10-2000 BEST WESTERN LANDMARK INN BFI STERICYCLE INC BLUE LAKE OWNERS ASSN BOB BARKER COMPANY BOISCLAIR JAMES B BONDED BUSINESS SERVICES BRADS ELECTRICAL SERVICE BROOKS BRUCE CAMPBELL C & H DISTRIBUTORS INC C H DISTRIBUTORS INC C SANDERS EMBLEMS CALOIA & HOUPT PC CALOIA HOUPT & LIGHT PC CAMBRIA COFFEE CARLA HAGGART CASFM CCO AND ERA CENTRAL CREDIT CORP CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTURYTEL CHARLES B DARRAH CHECKRITE RECOVERY SERV CHEMATOX INC. CHESS CHILD DEVELOPMENT MEDIA CHRIS A PORTER CHRIS GUNION CITY MARKET #34 CO ASSOCIATION CO BAR ASSOCIATION CO BUREAU INVESTIGATION CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND CO WEST MENTAL HEALTH COLLEEN WHITFORD COLORADO FASTENERS COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COLORADO WATER CONGRESS COLORADO WEST MENTAL COLUMBIA PROPANE COLUMBINE MARKET COMMUNICATION SKILL BLDRS CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COWBOY CATERING CRABTREES PHOTO WORKS CREDIT BUREAU ROCKIES CSU COOPERATIVE EXTENSION DAILY SENTINEL THE DAN SPARKMAN DAN STANEK DATA TRANSMISSIONS DAVID A BAUER DAVID GUINNEE, DVM DAVID LICHTENSTEIN DAY TIMERS INCORPORATED SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES PAYROLLEXPD REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES/SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES 158.00 48.75 1,795.56 1,268.21 38.64 10.00 444.88 296.95 95.00 2,681.86 236.80 392.00 532.95 645.60 172.00 35.67 150.00 77,482.23 36.02 230.72 Il,185.35 28.10 15.72 75.00 467.00 902.00 13.64 35.00 270.64 75.00 530.00 66.24 25.00 448.75 100.00 67.80 250.00 750.00 1,088.00 693.60 97.14 13.74 623.57 227.76 850.50 1,581.28 2,200.00 50.00 6.20 208.44 199.80 215.75 9.06 279.00 10.32 3,658.34 15.00 27.79 2 07-10-2000 DAY-TIMERS, INC. DDM, INC. DECKER CELLULAR DEEP ROCK WEST DENNIS WILLEY DENVER POST CORPORATION T DISTRICT ATTORNEY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE DOCTORS ON CALL DOEHLING & DRISCOLL DOMONIC MEYERS-SCHREINER DON OLSEN DONNA BARNES CORONER DOUBLE M ASPHAL T COATINGS EAGLE AUTO PARTS EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY CLERK EAGLE EYE PHOTO EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS EAGLE VAIL METRO DISTRICT EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE EAGLE V ALLEY EVENTS EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EAST WEST RESORTS ELECTION CENTER THE EMP AMERICA INC EMPLOYMENT LAW INSTITUTE ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYOR ENGLEWOOD CAMERA EVES PRINT SHOP EXECUTIVE TOWERS INN F AMIL Y SUPPORT REGISTRY F AMIL Y VISITOR PROGRAM FARMER BROTHERS FARRELL, GOLDSTEIN, FEATHER LEGAL SERVICES FEDERAL EXPRESS FILE FINDERS L TD FIRST BANKS FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY FORENSIC LABORATORIES INC FORTNEY REFRIGERATIONS FOX & COMPANY FRANK J BALL FRANKLIN COVEY FREDERIC R HARRIS INC G H DANIELS III & ASSOC G NEIL DIRECT MAIL, INC GARFIELD YOUTH SERVICES GIRARD THOMAS A GLENDA WENTWORTH GLENN PADGETT GLENWOOD POST THE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES PARTS SUPPLIES/SERVICE SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES 22.98 81.00 45.00 238.04 11. 95 554.96 27.48 190,754.00 160.00 2.48 29.16 11.50 45.01 5,445.00 101.00 2,218.69 1,500.00 86.06 730.34 83.29 3,599.15 250.00 1,299.25 4,875.00 29.00 3,775.66 1,708.63 100.00 329.91 195.00 68.00 146.99 6,173.27 166.00 1,627.26 4,540.57 837.59 25.00 14.38 379.13 30.00 8,606.14 30.00 550.00 68.75 65.50 3,720.00 121. 08 184.40 954.60 213. 00 309.27 375.00 2,500.00 95.19 20.00 67.80 3 07-10-2000 GLOBAL ELECTION SYSTEMS GOLDEN SKY SYSTEMS INC GORE RANGE ELECTRIC GRACE FINNEY GRAJNGERINCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GRAND TRAVERSE COUNTY GYPSUM FIRE PROTECTION HARCOURT HEALTH SCIENCES HEAD START PUBLICATIONS HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HEATHERSAVALOX HELPING BABIES LEARN HERMAN MILLER HEWLETT PACKARD HILL & TASHIRO MARKETING HOLIDAY INN DENVER HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HOLYCROSS ENERGY HOPE INC HOTEL COLORADO IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNATIONAL ASSOC ELECT ISABEL SANCHEZ J A SEXAUER JACK W INGST AD JACQUELINE ALLEN JACQUELINE CRAWFORD JAMES PUBLISHING COMPANY JANET BAILEY JASON CHICOINE JENA SKINNER JERRI OLSON JERRY SIBLEY PLUMBING JESSIE ECHTLER JILL SPRAFKE JODY CARUTHERS JOHNNETTE PHILLIPS JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC JOHNSTONE SUPPLY KN ENERGY INC KATHLEEN WALSH KEN WILSON KEVIN KROMER KINDER FINDER KN ENERGY INC KUSTOM SIGNALS INC LABELS DIRECT INC LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGET LEDERHAUSE EDITH LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LETN LEWAN AND ASSOCIATES LIBERTY FLAG SPECIALTY CO LIL JOHNS WATER TREATMENT SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES PARTS/SERVICE PARTS/SERVICE REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFITS REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SCHOLARSHIP REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIESfSER VICE SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES 2,000.00 39.98 25.00 29.25 529.07 1,224.85 25.00 1,196.40 116.75 35.00 145,001.32 51.48 52.00 169.05 552.00 800.00 160.20 60.71 11,314.45 11,265.52 221.38 495.06 302.81 1,848.61 405.00 60.00 22.00 191.95 71.75 100.80 21.00 49.99 114.40 95.00 138.66 13.00 25.00 1,000.00 650.00 59.90 721.67 5,812.00 207.30 3,311.88 245.00 200.00 15.39 350.00 3,391.36 81.44 399.00 313.73 82.20 1,141.62 388.00 4,968.00 39.45 330.00 4 07-10-2000 LINDAHL ASSOCIATES LINHART PETERSON POWERS LIRTZMAN, NEHLS, NORMAN LK SURVEY INSTRUMENTS LORIE CRAWFORD LORIS & ASSOCIATES INC LYONS KATHLEEN MACHOL & JOHANNES MAE PITTMAN MAINTENANCE WAREHOUSE MARGERY STONE MARILYN RICE MARTIN ANDRADE MARY LOU CROISANT MATTHEW BENDER MATTHEW GENNETT MBIA MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MCCOLLUM PATRICIA MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS MELANIE BUREN MELODY BARELA MERCY HEALTH SERVICE NO MESA COUNTY BUILDING DEPT MESA COUNTY HEALTH DEPART METROCALL MEYER LAND SYSTEMS MID V ALLEY KENNEL MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE MILLER & COHEN MITZI HANDLER MONSTER.COM MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOORE MEDICAL CORPORATION MOTHERNET AMERICA MOTOR POOL FUND MOTOROLA INCORPORATED MOUNTAIN MUSIC MOUNTAIN PEDDLER MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES MOUNTAIN V ALLEY LUTHERAN NACA; NATIONAL ASSOC NAEYC NANCY BUSCH NANCY C PENKOFF-JAEGER NAPA AUTO PARTS - VAIL NATIONAL GRAPHICS COMPANY NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL NEBS NEBS BUSINESS FORMS NELIDA NEVAREZ NETTIE REYNOLDS NEW SHOES NICOLETTI FLATER ASSOC NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORWEST BANK NTIS REFUND SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT PARTS SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES 60.54 22,988.96 11.28 98.90 109.10 17,523.92 22.00 67.36 94.30 70.38 22.00 35.10 475.00 31.95 93.48 166.82 5,199.46 103.32 49.40 2,291.34 6.20 500.00 127.70 75.00 10.50 10.1 0 2,287.50 1,700.00 611.19 2.48 25.00 825.00 25.09 107.02 141.74 51,669.17 3,447.30 160.00 59.98 3,750.00 874.13 250.00 50.00 369.60 89.08 342.00 31.49 106.43 30.00 137.70 98.61 250.00 83.10 400.00 260.00 2,661.02 333,058.00 72.50 5 07-10-2000 NW CO LEGAL SERVICE PROJ OFFICE PAVILION OMNIFAX ORTEN & HINDMAN OSCAR GARCIA OTTO, PORTERFIELD, POST PADGETT THOMPSON PAINT BUCKET THE PAUL GREGG PEARSON, MILLIGAN, AND PEGGY GRAYBEAL PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENTS PETER HATZENBELLER PETTY CASH PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PITNEY BOWES POCATELLO SUPPLY DEPOT PRECINCT POLICE PRODUCTS PROFESSIONAL EQUIPMENT PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS PROTECTORS LID PRYOR RESOURCES, INC. PSS,INC PUBLIC SERVICE QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION RANDLE DEAMER MCCONKIE RANDY L BROWN RBS SUPPLY COMPANY READYS ICE REECE AND BAKER RENEE BLACK RENELLSTOTZFUS RENTX INDUSTRIES RENTX/EZ WAY RESOURCE ENGINEERING RESPONSE RICH CUNNINGHAM RICHMOND NEILEY & SPOUSE RIFLE PACKING & SAUSAGE ROARING FORK FENCING ROCKY MOUNTAIN INTERNET ROGER MOORE ROGERS OCCUPATIONAL MED ROPIR CABLEVISION ROSS ABBOTT LABORATORIES RUTH A SHARP SACHS LAWLOR SAFETY SYSTEMS CORP SAGE & VARGO SALVATION ARMY SANDRA LOPEZ SANDYS OFFICE SUPPLY SARA J FISHER SAWAYA AND ROSE SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SEARS SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SCHOLARSHIP SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REFUND SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT SERVICES 125.00 192.85 803.53 63.96 500.00 40.54 529.00 168.46 42.63 25.00 180.00 382.00 6,850.14 15.00 473.19 86.25 2,692.58 115.90 21.75 299.00 75.00 89.00 377.82 207.84 135.75 824.65 25.00 16.00 169.42 50.00 50.00 112.20 1,000.00 100.00 105.D7 31.25 375.00 490.95 1.24 37.80 425.00 79.80 1.24 110.20 46.79 1,162.00 46.08 11.35 1,651.92 22.64 1,000.00 500.00 25.60 139.80 16.98 2,632.76 4,295.39 28,846.66 6 07 -10-2000 SEZANNE TENER SHARON SMITH SHELLEY STARK SHERATON STEAMBOAT RESORT SHESHUNOFF INFORMATION SIGN PRO SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SNOWHITE LINEN SOFTMART INC SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEMS SOMES UNIFORMS SPECIAL PROTECTION INC SPIECKER HANLON & GORMLEY STARBUCK SURVEYORS & ENGI STEVENS HOME CARE INC STOCKYARDS RANCH SUPPLY STONE SHEEHY ROSEN BYRNE STUVER AND GEORGE SULLIVAN GREEN LLC SUMMIT LUMBER SUPER 8 MOTEL SUSPENSE FUND T H I WASTE TED VICKERMAN TERRI GOLD THE NORWEST PROGRAM TODD SCHLEGEL TOP DRAWER OFFICE SUPPLY TOWN OF EAGLE TOWN OF REDCLIFF TRANSCOR AMERICA INC TRI COUNTY FIRE TRI STAR AVIATION UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED REPROGRAPHIC UNIV COLORADO AT BOULDER UNIVERSITY EXTENSION UNIVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST DEX V AIL ELECTRONICS VAIL LOCK AND KEY V AIL PONY CLUB VAIL TRAIL THE VAIL V ALLEY EMERGENCY VAIL VALLEY GARAGE DOOR VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR V AILNET INC VALLEY LUMBER VALLEY SERVICE ELECTRICAL VALLEY SIGNS VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY V AUDELIO RIVERA VERBAL JUDO INSTITUTE VERIZON WIRELESS, VIRGINIA CERISE REFUND SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SCHOLARSHIP SUPPLIES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 15.62 10.80 217.97 285.00 322.95 76.33 397.34 164.44 1,577.21 55.11 188.20 631. 00 6.78 202.00 1,480.00 4,250.00 43.60 2.48 7,481.10 2,300.81 376.32 12,141.00 85.00 400.00 250.00 10.00 1,000.00 125.00 3,802.1 0 9.30 579.12 339.00 262.50 310.25 1,288.14 40.00 730.00 12.35 6,866.59 14.93 735.00 2.70 250.00 332.88 990.00 315.00 1,570.78 685.45 615.20 18.13 60.00 394.40 45.00 3,165.33 250.00 10,000.00 4,049.63 48.43 7 07-10-2000 WAGNER RENTS SERVICES 271.60 W AHRER JENNIE RN SERVICES 255.46 WALMART AVON SUPPLIES 937.17 WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 1.46 WENDY HOPPER SERVICES 1,107.69 WEST PUBLISHING SUPPLIES 1,037.83 WESTERN PAGING SERVICES 202.77 WESTERN SLOPE CHRYSLER SERVICES 19,653.00 WESTERN SLOPE PUBLICATION SERVICES 348.40 WILLIAM A AGNEW SERVICES 62.67 WILLIS PEMBER REFUND 85.00 WINGS OF EAGLE TRAVEL & SERVICES 110.00 WOOD ASSOCIATES INC SERVICES 715.42 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS SERVICES 146.38 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 43.17 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 8,788.86 YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICES 186.66 PAYROLL FOR JUNE PAYROLL 11, 12, 13 725,019.83 1,984,058.47 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND BASKET ORIGINALS BY LD SERVICES 30.00 BECK AND ASSOCIATES REFUND 100.00 BEST WESTERN SERVICES 47.00 BLAKE MARTIN REIMBURSEMENT 49.97 BOGUE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 27,102.37 CCO AND ERA PAYROLLEXPD 6,977. 78 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICES 19.38 DAKOTA DEVELOPMENT REFUND 250.00 DIVISION OF LABOR SERVICES 75.00 DOLAN CONSTRUCTION INC REFUND 250.00 EAGLE AUTO PARTS PARTS 113.06 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES 218.79 EAGLE PHARMACY SUPPLIES 1.18 ELAM CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 92,019.73 ERIC JOHNSON REFUND 250.00 GARY DEFINA REFUND 250.00 HARR YS HEAVY HAULERS SERVICES 31,223.38 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 15,937.44 IMPACT PROMOTIONS SERVICES 977.84 INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY SERVICES 1,253.08 JAKE J STULL REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 KEMP AND COMPANY INC SUPPLIES 168.00 KRUEGER DEVELOPMENT REFUND 250.00 LAND DESIGNS BY ELLISON REFUND 100.00 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICES 85.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 48,444.34 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT 143.64 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 36,596.20 PAUL M. JOHNSTON REFUND 250.00 RIVER'S EDGE BUlLDERS,INC REFUND 250.00 ROARING FORK RESOURCES SERVICES 34.06 SUSPENSE FUND PAYROLLEXPD 748.85 TIMBER WOLF INC REFUND 100.00 USWEST DEX SERVICES 73.68 8 07-10-2000 V ALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 10.98 WEAR PARTS EQUIPMENT SERVICES 862.50 WESTERN SLOPE UTILITIES REFUND 250.00 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 5.72 PAYROLL FOR JUNE PAYROLL 11, 12, 13 82,863.55 348,457.52 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND ARLISS SIMS SERVICES 18.00 ASPEN COUNSELING CENTER SERVICES 400.00 CATHERINE CRAIG SERVICES 200.85 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 6,334.83 CEDAR SPRINGS BEHAVIORAL SERVICES 238.58 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICES 447.55 CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER SERVICES 31.80 CITY MARKET #34 SUPPLIES 127.13 CSED SERVICES 463.80 DECISIONONE SUPPLIES INC SERVICES 97.70 EAGLE COUNTY ATTORNEY SERVICES 847.00 EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF SERVICES 93.98 EDWARD GILLILAND SERVICES 490.00 GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICES 8.00 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11,937.19 INDRA KIRSTEIN SERVICES 59.80 INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND SERVICES 1,512.50 ISABEL SANCHEZ SERVICES 18.00 JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFFS SERVICES 12.03 JERRI OLSON REIMBURSEMENT 363.05 JOEL KARR SERVICES 575.00 JOSE BANUELOS SERVICES 2,500.00 KATHY REED SERVICES 172.30 LABORATORY CORPORATION OF SERVICES 228.00 LYONS KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 118.75 MARGERY STONE SERVICES 18.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 1,654.92 NATIONAL CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES 100.00 NORWEST BANK PAYROLLEXPD 21,678.50 PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICES 26.00 RENEE FIELDS SERVICES 407.47 RITA WOODS REIMBURSEMENT 62.70 ROBERT J DURHAM AND SERVICES 300.00 ROCHELLE A BOWER SERVICES 196.68 SANDY ALFRED SERVICES 103.75 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 4.45 SMART CORPORATION SERVICES 12.33 SUSPENSE FUND PAYROLLEXPD 1,389.35 TERRI ALLENDER SERVICES 150.00 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 189.16 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICES 284.33 W AHRER JENNIE RN SERVICES 25.20 WALMART GLENWOOD SUPPLIES 315.46 WESTERN PAGING SERVICES 14.40 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 1,603.44 PAYROLL FOR JUNE PAYROLL 11, 12, 13 42,259.78 9 07-10-2000 98,091.76 WRAP FUND ACCOUNT ABIL TIY POLYGRAPH SERVICES 250.00 ANDERSON CAMP LTD SERVICES 1,795.00 CAMP CHIP-A-TOOTH SERVICES 1,654.00 CO WEST MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 830.00 HOLL Y GARTNER SERVICES 219.12 JOHN MCCORMICK SERVICES 335.65 KAREN LAJOY SMITH MA LPC SERVICES 250.00 KIM HURST SERVICES 240.00 KRISTIN O'DONNELL SERVICES 25.73 MEET THE WILDERNESS SERVICES 2,750.00 PUEBLO MONTESSORI CENTER SERVICES 300.00 THE LEARNING CAMP SERVICES 7,200.00 15,849.50 RETIREMENT FUND CCO AND ERA PAYROLLEXPD 65,773.03 65,773.03 INSURANCE RESERVE FUND AGENCY AUTO GLASS SERVICES 1,009.45 EAGLE RIVER AUTO BODY SERVICES 613.16 JOHN HAINES CHEVROLET PARTS 137.95 MOTOROLA PARTS 500.00 2,260.56 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND BAIIBRAUN ASSOCIATES INC SERVICES 975.06 CALOIA & HOUPT PC SERVICES 31.25 EAGLE SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS SERVICES 301.35 EAGLE V ALLEY ENTERPRISE SERVICES 86.85 EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND SERVICES 273.50 EAGLE V ALLEY TILE CARPET SERVICES 2,574.25 FULLER CONSULTING SERVICE SERVICES 1,345.91 JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC SERVICES 2,372.71 LAF ARGE CORPORATION SERVICES 270.00 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICES 380.00 MOTOROLA SERVICES 16,281.09 NORRIS DULLEA COMPANY SERVICES 2,176.00 RENTX INDUSTRIES SERVICES 1,030.51 RIELL Y JOHNSON ARCHITECTR SERVICES 24,387.39 STOCKYARDS RANCH SUPPLY EQUIPMENT 2,710.00 SUMMIT LUMBER SERVICES 436.43 TRANE COMPANY SERVICES 349.76 V AIL TRAIL THE SERVICES 96.00 10 07-10-2000 56,078.06 SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICES 3,438.00 ANNETTE PRESSLEY SERVICES 3,740.32 BERTHODS, INC SERVICES 1,250.00 CARTER & ALTERMAN SERVICES 1,580.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 370.86 CITY MARKET #26 SUPPLIES 10.96 COPY COpy SERVICES 274.00 D & M MAINTENANCE SERVICE SERVICES 120.00 EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL SERVICES 94.95 EAGLE-SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS SERVICES 61.80 FEDERAL EXPRESS SERVICES 24.10 GEORGE ROUSSOS REIMBURSEMENT 110.10 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,684.50 HENDERSON ASSOCIATES SERVICES 1,472.50 HILL & TASHIRO MARKETING SERVICES 8,605.90 HOLYCROSS ENERGY SERVICES 2.30 JANET FIELD REIMBURSEMENT 180.18 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 24.76 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 856.52 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 3,579.18 POSTMASTER AVON BRANCH SERVICES 300.00 PUBLIC SERVICE SERVICES 45.44 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 290.54 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 811.53 WALMART AVON SUPPLIES 24.86 PAYROLL FOR JUNE PAYROLL 11, 12, 13 9,011.27 37,964.57 SALES TAX E. V. TRAILS AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC SERVICES 153.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLLEXPD 170.70 CITY MARKET #26 SUPPLIES 32.57 CIVIL DESIGN GROUP, INC. SERVICES 9,000.00 COpy COpy SERVICES 183.75 EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL SERVICES 82.1 I HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 155.46 HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI SERVICES 1,699.00 JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC SERVICES 14,606.25 MARCIN ENGINEERING INC SERVICES 4,920.00 MONROE & NEWELL SERVICES 359.00 NORWEST BANK PAYROLLEXPD 1,071.75 POSTMASTER AVON BRANCH SERVICES 500.00 SEARL CONSTRUCTION LLC SERVICES 122,565.41 155,499.00 SALES TAX R.F.V. TRANSP. TOWN OF BASALT SERVICES 13,716.53 11 07-10-2000 13,716.53 AIRPORT FUND AIR WISCONSIN SERVICES 50.00 AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT SERVICES 4IO.00 BERTHOD MOTORS PARTS 237.91 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS SERVICES 144.17 BORDEN PROMOTIONS SERVICES 450.00 CALOIA & HOUPT PC SERVICES 502.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 3,497.17 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICES 90.74 CENTURYTEL SERVICES 2,214.03 CHARLIE TANGO REFUND 300.00 COLUMBINE MARKET SUPPLIES 112.13 FIRST AMERICAN HERITAGE SERVICES 790.00 GIRARD THOMAS A SERVICES 271.00 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SERVICES 1,362.33 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 5,725.11 HERTZ CORPORATION SERVICES 459.76 HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING SERVICES 884.00 HOLIDAY INN / CASPER SERVICES 250.00 JIM JACKSON REIMBURSEMENT 101.36 JJ KELLER AND ASSOCIATES SERVICES 144.48 LEIBOWITZ AIRPORT MGT CON SERVICES 3,811.19 M&MAUTOPARTS PARTS 72.32 M & M TIRE COMPANY SERVICES 16.50 MCI COMMERCIAL SERVICE W SERVICES 17.35 MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES 23,574.00 MIKE KERST REIMBURSEMENT 760.65 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES I,I06.91 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 13,658.54 ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO SERVICES 105.00 OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP SERVICES 283.00 PEAKS & PLANES SERVICES IOO.OO PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING SERVICES 560.60 RAYTHEON ENGINEERS & SERVICES 68,420.44 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 59.97 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL REFUND 200.00 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICES 151.16 WAGNER RENTS SERVICES 181.23 WATERFORD CORPORATION SERVICES 185.40 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 18.52 DELLINC SERVICES 7,247.00 EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS SERVICES 553.00 ENPOINTE TECHNOLOGIES INC SERVICES 1392.75 PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENTS EQUIPMENT IOO.OO US RADAR INCORPORATED EQUIPMENT 2,985.00 PAYROLL FOR JUNE PAYROLL 11, 12, 13 33,087.27 176,643.99 LANDFILL FUND ACZ LABORATORYINC SERVICES 2,675.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 2,455.07 CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING SUPPLIES 90.60 12 07-10-2000 CENTRAL SERVICESIEC SERVICES 46.11 DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICES 76.45 EAGLE SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS SERVICES 732.90 EAGLE V ALLEY ENTERPRISE SERVICES 324.00 EARTHTONES LAWN & GARDEN SERVICES 296.50 F G & S SEPTIC SERVICE SERVICES 350.00 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,958.65 KRW CONSULTING INC SERVICES 2,742.00 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC EQUIPMENT 1,028.18 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 1,243.19 NORWEST BANK PA '{ROLL EXPD 8,659.76 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 379.80 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICES 87,708.85 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICES 1,599.28 SUSPENSE FUND PAYROLL EXPD 212.69 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICES 10,245.00 YARGER SERVICES LLC SERVICES 225.00 PAYROLL FOR JUNE PAYROLL 11, 12, 13 21,312.70 147,361.73 MOTOR POOL FUND AGENCY AUTO GLASS SERVICES 335.64 ARMADILLO IRON WORKS SERVICES 51.48 ATCO INTERNATIONAL SERVICES 299.90 BERTHOD MOTORS PARTS/SERVICE 476.57 BEST WESTERN SERVICES 47.00 BRAD RAGAN INC SERVICES 500.40 BRODY CHEMICAL SERVICES 108.36 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS SERVICES 596.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 1,289.13 COLLETTS SERVICES 14,883.37 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC SERVICES 144.11 EAGLE AMOCO SERVICES 18.00 EAGLE AUTO PARTS PARTS 2,200.31 EMED COMPANY INC SERVICES 224.13 FACTORY SURPLUS SERVICES 26.98 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY SERVICES 346.14 FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY SERVICES 20.00 GAY JOHNSONS INC PARTS/SERVICE 1,472.34 GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD SERVICES 928.06 HANSON EQUIPMENT PARTS/SERVICE 1,571.29 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 4,207.98 HONNEN EQUIPMENT SERVICES 8,395.01 IMPACT PROMOTIONS SERVICES 977.84 JAY MAX SALES SERVICES 369.81 KARPRODUCTSINCORPORATED SERVICES 97.53 LEDOM HAYES TRUCK EQUIPME SERVICES 162.08 MAC TOOLS EQUIPMENT 7,492.85 MESA MACK SALES & SERVICE SERVICES 192.78 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 1,005.47 NAPA AUTO PARTS - VAIL PARTS 593.66 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT SERVICES 102.89 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 9,405.50 POWER MOTIVE PARTS/SERVICE 620.47 REY MOTORS INCORPORATED P ARTS/SERVICE 449.10 13 07-10-2000 RHONDA PARKER REIMBURSEMENT 9.99 SANDY ALFRED REIMBURSEMENT 7.01 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 166.12 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 2.97 SUSPENSE FUND PAYROLLEXPD 250.00 UNITED STATE WELDING INC. SERVICES 234.24 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICES 1,181.20 WEBB CRANE INC SERVICES 84.17 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 10.98 PAYROLL FOR JUNE PAYROLL 11, 12, 13 22,240.57 83,799.43 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY SERVICES 19,036.92 PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,678.20 UNITED STATES LIFE INS SERVICES 3,154.00 VISION SERVICE PLAN - CO SERVICES 4,469.84 29,338.96 ENHANCED E911 FUND AT & T LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 50.00 JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC SERVICES 1,470.00 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 58,846.58 60,366.58 REPORT TOTAL 3,275,259.69 Executive Session Chairman Stone stated the first item on the agenda was an "Executive Session". Commissioner Phillips moved to adjourn into an "Executive Session" to discuss: 1) The Board to advise regarding a request of guidance from the Board of County Commissioners regarding Fire Protection and Ambulance Districts in the Land Use Regulations; 2) Advise the Board of County Commissioners regarding the Fire Ban Ordinance; 3) Requesting guidance from the Board of County Commissioners regarding Edwards Special District; 4) To advise the Board of legal matters regarding prospective 6320 Housing Development; and 5) Advice from the Board regarding and receiving Board direction for Airport negotiations. She noted the time at 8:50 a.m. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion for discussion. In discussion, Commissioner Gallagher stated he concurred with the negotiations but he doesn't see the need for "Executive Session" regarding the Edwards Special District Zoning or regarding Fire Protection and Ambulance Districts in the Land Use Regulations. Bob Loeffler, Deputy County Attorney, stated in both instances it is to give legal advice regarding the issues. On the first issue it is more to find out what to do not what they should do. Commissioner Phillips asked about the fire ban. Mr. Loeffler stated it is to give them some legal advise. Mike Caccioppo, area resident and publisher, was present for the hearing. He asked if the first item is open to the public. 14 07-10-2000 Mr. Loeffler stated again, they are looking for direction from the Board. Mr. Caccioppo asked ifthey are conceding that number one is open to the public. Mr. Loeffler stated that is so. Mr. Caccioppo asked about the fire ban. Mr. Loeffler stated they want to give the Board legal advise. Mr. Caccioppo asked about the Special District in Edwards. Mr. Loeffler stated there is no zoning district in place at this time. Mr. Caccioppo suggested if they are talking about buying or leasing land that is appropriate. He questioned them meeting on this. Mr. Loeffler stated it has been suggested that with the amount of time needed on number 6, the Board may want to take that now and leave the others to another meeting. Mr. Caccioppo asked on item 6 who they are negotiating with. Mr. Loeffler stated the Vail Valley Jet Center. Mr. Caccioppo continued asking under the open meetings law, item 4, where does Mr. Loeffler get his opinion from. Chairman Stone stated at this time, it is imperative they discuss item six. He asked for an amendment to the motion to only discuss item 6. Commissioner Phillips withdrew her motion. Commissioner Gallagher concurred. Commissioner Phillips moved to adjourn into "Executive Session" to receive advice regarding the Board directions on Airport negotiations. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The time was noted at 8:56 a.m. Commissioner Phillips moved to adjourn from the "Executive Session" and reconvene into the regular meeting. The time was noted at 9:40 a.m. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Consent Agenda Chairman Stone stated the next item on the agenda was the Consent Agenda as follows: A) Approval of bill paying for weeks of July 10 and 17,2000, subject to review by County Administrator B) Approval of payroll for July 13,2000, subject to review by County Administrator C) Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of June 19 & 26,2000 D) Resolution 2000-E002, regarding equalizing property valuation throughout Eagle County E) Resolution 2000-093, concerning appointment of Jim Kleckner to the Eagle County Regional Transportation Authority F) Letter Agreement engaging Hogan and Hartson as Bond Counsel and as Special Corporation Counsel in connection with a proposed revenue bond financing by the Corporation for a Residential Rental Housing Project in the Town of Gypsum, Mountain Glen Housing Project G) Resolution 2000-094, regarding final release of collateral and termination of the warranty period for Cordillera Subdivision, Filing 3 H) Resolution 2000-095, regarding final release of collateral and termination of the warranty period for Cordillera Subdivision, Filing 6 I) Resolution 2000-096, regarding final release of collateral and termination of the warranty period for Cordillera Subdivision, Filing 7 J) Resolution 2000-097, regarding final release of collateral and termination of the 15 07 -10-2000 warranty period for Cordillera Subdivision, Filing 8 K) Resolution 2000-098, regarding final release of collateral and termination of the warranty period for Cordillera Subdivision, Filing 23 L) Noxious Weed management Agreement between Eagle County, Squaw Creek Metropolitan District and Cordillera Valley Club Property Owners Association, Inc. for year 2000 weed control at Cordillera and Cordillera Valley Club M) Contract between the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and Eagle County Commissioners N) Agreement between Eagle County and Bill Hames Shows, Inc., concerning amusements at the County Fair and Rodeo 0) Agreement between Eagle county and Hal Bums, concerning serving as a stock contractor at the County Fair and Rodeo. Commissioner Gallagher asked on item D, Resolution equalizing property within Eagle County, what is the purpose. Renee Black, Asst. County Attorney, stated this is a requirement by the State for the Assessor to provide notice regarding the appeals that have been done in house. It is a requirement State Statute. Commissioner Gallagher asked if this represents all of the appeals. Jody Caruthers, Eagle County Assessor, stated this is all appeals other than the personal property. Commissioner Phillips asked if all those denied will have the opportunity to appeal. She asked if these have been accepted. Ms. Caruthers stated if they appealed and have been denied, they will probably appeal to the Board. Ms. Black stated the Attorney's Office has received some appeals but only three thus far. Commissioner Phillips stated she has corrections to the minutes. On June 19, page 5, first paragraph, instead of "pomp and circumstance", she asked it read "lack of presentation by the applicants". On page 5, halfway down there is a typo which reads "they are not looking for a younger drinking crowed". It should read "drinking crowd". On page 22, two paragraphs from the bottom it reads "Commissioner Phillips reiterated Highway 82 is major highway". It should read is "a major highway" . Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve the consent agenda as presented with the changes to the minutes as stated. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Plat & Resolution Signing Matt Gennett, Planner, presented the following plats and resolutions for the Board's consideration: 5MB-00242. River Pines Condominiums - Buildin~ D. A Re-Subdivision of Future EXDansion Unit. He stated this is a Minor Type B Subdivision, the intent of which is to subdivide the future expansion unit into individual condominium units, with limited and general common elements. He asked staff findings as follow be placed into the record: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a) Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; 16 07-10-2000 b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Commissioner Phillips moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-00242, River Pines Condominiums, Building D, a resubdivision of Future Expansion Unit, incorporating staff findings. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion for discussion. In discussion Commissioner Gallagher asked if the findings are favorable to show compliance. Mr. Gennett stated they are. Chairman Stone called for the question on the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 5MB-00243. Bear Paw Lodge - Phase 2. ARe-subdivision of Tract U-Phase 3A. Bachelor Gulch Villa~e Filing No.3 - Tracts. He stated the intent ofthis Minor Type B Subdivision is to create and define fourteen (14) residential condominium units and associated general common elements. He asked staff findings as follow be included in the record: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a) Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-00243, Bear Paw Lodge, Phase 2, a resubdivision of Tract U, Phase 3A, Bachelor Gulch Village, Filing No.3-Tracts, incorporating staff findings. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 5MB-00244. Berry Creek Ranch. Filin2 No.4. ARe-subdivision of Lot 42. Block 5. He stated the intent of this Minor Type B Subdivision is to subdivide Lot 42 in order to create Parcels A, B, and C. He asked staff findings be included as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a) Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Commissioner Phillips moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-00244, Berry Creek Ranch, Filing No 4, a resubdivision of Lot 42, Block 5, incorporating staff findings. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Resolution 2000-099 To Approve The Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan For Mt. Sopris Tree Farm PUD. On or about April 21st, 2000, the County of Eagle accepted for filing 17 07-10-2000 an application submitted by Eagle County (Applicant) for approval of the Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan for the Mt. Sopris Tree Farm PUD, File No. PDS-00021. He stated on or about April 21st, 2000, the County of Eagle accepted for filing an application submitted by Eagle County (Applicant) for approval of the Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan for the Mt. Sopris Tree Farm PUD, File No. PDS-00021. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve Resolution 2000-099, approving the PUD Sketch Plan for Mt. Sopris Tree Farm PUD. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Resolution 2000-100 To Approve The Cordillera Subdivision Seventh Amended And Restated Planned Unit Development Control Document. File No. PDA-00027. Commissioner Phillips moved to approve Resolution 2000-100, approving the Cordillera Subdivision Seventh Amended and Restated PUD Control Document, file number PDA-00027. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Ranking of Berry Creek Housing Proposal Chairman Stone stated the Board is going to temporarily continue this next item until after the liquor license hearings to allow time for others to be present. Commissioner Gallagher moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Liquor License Consent Agenda Earlene Roach, Liquor Inspector, presented the Liquor License Consent Agenda for July 10, 2000 as follows: A) Riverwalk Restaurant LLC dba/Peppers Mexican Grill This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license, located at 0097 Main Street #E101 (Riverwalk) in Edwards. There have been no complaints and disturbances during the past year. B) State Bridge Lodge Corporation dba/State Bridge Lodge This is a renewal of a tavern license, located at 0127 Trough Road in Bond. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. C) Big Sky Restaurant Company, LLC dbaIBeaver Creek Chophouse This is a renewal of a hotel and restaurant license located at 20 Avondale Lane in Beaver Creek. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. D) MRT Wines, Inc. dbaIBeaver Creek Fine Wines This is a renewal of a retail liquor store license located at 210 Offerson Road, (St.James) in Beaver Creek. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. E) Rosestar Southwest, LLC 18 07 -10-2000 dbalHyatt Regency Beaver Creek This is a renewal of a hotel and restaurant license located at 136 E. Thomas Place in Beaver Creek. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. Commissioner Phillips asked if Ms. Roach had additional comments. Ms. Roach stated everything is in order and there were no complaints or disturbances during the past year. Commissioner Phillips moved to approve the Liquor License Consent Agenda for July 10, 2000, as presented. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Resolution 2000-101, Liquor License Fees Earlene Roach presented Resolution 2000-101, amending the liquor license fees for Eagle County. She explained the Resolution for the Board explaining the change in fees as follows: Resort complex facility permit, a new type of license in which an organization could license their establishment and each optional or outside area would be charged a separate fee of $50.00. Expired renewals, the local fee of $500.00 has been eliminated. Processing fees, the State processing fees has been increased by $200.00 and the concurrent review by the State was increased $200.00. Trade name change, there is no longer a County fee. Modifications, there is no longer a County fee. Duplicate license, there is no longer a County fee. Temporary license, the fees were reduced to $100.00. Commissioner Gallagher stated what shows in his notebook is exhibit A and asked if that is the new schedule. Ms. Roach responded yes. He asked about the fees being in addition to those listed. Ms. Roach responded that is correct. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve Resolution 2000-101, amending the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Fees. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Eagle County Government Earlene Roach presented an application for special events permit for Eagle County Government. She stated this permit is for the 2000 Eagle County Fair. The dates ofthe event are July 28, August 3, 4, and 6. This application is in order and all fees have been paid. Laurie Asmussen was present for the hearing. Chairman Stone asked if there were questions. Commissioner Phillips asked if they have a sufficient number of volunteers and staff. Ms. Asmussen stated they will have paid staffthat will be TIPS trained as well as those from Vail Resorts who will is TIPS trained. She explained security will be provided by Campbell and Company. She explained the map to the Board and the location ofthe beer booth. They will have a three sided tent selling area so the public will have three access points. She pointed out the entertainment will be staged on the grassy area. Chairman Stone asked ifthis meets with Ms. Roach's approval. 19 07-10-2000 Ms. Roach stated it does. Commissioner Phillips asked about the licensed premise. Ms. Asmussen explained they will enforce no beer in the barn and exhibit hall as in the past. Commissioner Phillips suggested they may want to revisit this issue again with the change in County Commissioners. Chairman Stone asked Commissioner Phillips to explain. Commissioner Phillips stated they used to have a dinner at which alcohol was served prior to and during the sale. She stated there was at least one Commissioner who did not want alcohol in the barn. Chairman Stone asked what the thinking was behind that. Commissioner Phillips stated it was because there was youth present. Chairman Stone asked what the feeling is from the Fairboard. Ms. Roach stated they still have a meal and beer is served, but it is not allowed in the barn. Chairman Stone asked for any input from Ms. Roach. Ms. Roach responded at previous sales when beer was allowed in the barn there was a good chance for buyers and their guests to get intoxicated. Commissioner Gallagher asked about the hours. Ms. Asmussen stated for Bull Riders night, July 28th it is 5:30 to 11 :15. On the rodeo nights August 3rd it is 5 :00 to 11 :00, August 4th 5 :00 to 11 :45, August 5th from 2:00 to 11 :45 and August 6th from 11 :00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Commissioner Gallagher asked how many uniform security people they will have. Ms. Asmussen explained they will not be in uniform, however they will have eleven security workers with two to four Eagle County Sheriff deputies patrolling the premises. Commissioner Gallagher asked about the entrance. Ms. Asmussen stated there will be only one entrance and exit. Commissioner Gallagher asked about people carrying in alcohol. Ms. Asmussen stated they check backpacks, bags and coolers. Chairman Stone asked about recycling and if those will be in cans or paper cups. Ms. Asmussen stated Coca-Cola has signed on as a sponsor as well. Commissioner Phillips moved to approve the special events permit for the 2000 Eagle County Fair for July 28th, August 3, 4, 5 & 6th, 2000. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Eagle County Republican Central Committee Earlene Roach presented a special events permit for the Eagle County Republican Central Committee for July 23, 2000 from 5:00 p.m. to 12:30 a.m. She stated this event will be held at the Lazy J Ranch in Wolcott. KT Gazunis is the event manager and she is present for the hearing. Ms. Gazunis stated the hours gives them a couple of hours before and after the party. Chairman Stone asked about security and control. Ms. Gazunis stated they have leased the Lazy J Ranch and they are providing three of their staff to act as security. She stated there will be one person at the entrance gate which is the only entrance to the property. Commissioner Phillips asked about signage. Ms. Gazunis stated there will be signs posted at the gate and throughout the area. Chairman Stone asked about alcohol service. Ms. Gazunis stated they have hired a professional catering company who are providing the bartending staff. Commissioner Gallagher asked what will be served. Ms. Gazunis responded wine, beer and liquor. 20 07-10-2000 Commissioner Phillips stated she believes there will be a limited amount of hard liquor served. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve the special events permit for the Eagle County Republican Central Committee for July 23, 2000 from 5:00 p.m. to 12:30 a.m. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Phillips moved to adjourn as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority and reconvene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Ranking of Berry Creek Housing Proposal David Carter, Housing Director, stated the next item on the agenda was the ranking of Berry Creek Housing proposal and authorization of negotiation. He stated the action today is to provide direction to staff as to what firms they would like them to negotiate with. Since this is a joint project with the Town of Vail and having interviewed the top three firms, he needs to know from the Board what their ranking is. He stated Vince Hooper with Arback Southwest is in the audience. Chairman Stone asked Tom Moorehead, Attorney for the Town of Vail, to introduce himself and offer his perspective. Mr. Moorehead stated he had an opportunity to be present during the presentations along with Nina Tim, Russell Forrest, Ludwig Kurz and Chuck Oglibee. He stated both have expressed that they were pleased with all three of the proponents. They thought all three were worthy of the project and impressed with the time and effort. He summarized that both Mr. Kurtz and Mr. Oglebee were impressed with the Lenar proposal and with the integration ofthe project by Arbach. He stated Nina, Russell and himse1fwere concerned with using tax credit financing for the project. He stated Vail would be satisfied to negotiate with either Auerbach or Lenar. Chairman Stone stated he too felt all three gave great presentations and the search brought them three good groups. He remembers them being Auerbach, Building Solutions and Lenar. He agrees with the Town of Vail and he would agree to negotiations first with Auerbach and then going to Lenar if the first was not possible. He stated he would like to see the better points being incorporated into Auerbach. Commissioner Gallagher concurred saying Lenar was rather overwhelming. He had the impression they may be more interested in doing it their way rather than the Boards way. He stated he would like to see Auerbach be the first choice. Commissioner Phillips suggested Lenar seems to have all of its ducks in a row, but feels she can go along with Auerbach also. Chairman Stone gave direction to begin negotiations first with Auerbach and then with Lenar. Commissioner Gallagher moved that Eagle County in conjunction with the Town of Vail begin negotiations with Auerbach as their primary choice and if those negotiations fail then begin negotiations with Lenar. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Stone thanked Mr. Moorehead for their participation. 1041-0023, Beaver Creek Resort Ray Merry, Environmental Health Officer, presented file number 1041-0023, Beaver Creek Resort. He stated this is a request for a permit for "Major Extensions of existing domestic water treatment systems" and "Efficient utilization of municipal water projects". He stated the applicant is requesting this matter be tabled to August 21, 2000 to allow for a site visit and address wildlife concerns. Commissioner Phillips moved to table file number 1041-0023, Beaver Creek Resort, to August 21, 2000, at the applicants request. 21 07 -10-2000 Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDA-00026, PUD Amendment, McGrady Acres, Lots 9, 10 & 12 Jean Garren, Planner, presented file number PDA-00026, PUD Amendment, McGrady Acres, Lots 9, 10 & 12. She stated at its hearing of June 7, 2000 the Commission found that the proposal helped fulfill currently unmet needs in Eagle County. She pointed out on an overhead the location of the applicants property and the surrounding properties. She explained lots 9 & 10 will be consolidated into one lot. She stated on that lot the applicant wishes to construct a church facility which will include non- profit office space and 1,000 square feet of retail space. She stated Lot 12 will be memorial gardens, a small chapel, residential building and an outdoor worship area. She stated the applicant is not in agreement with staff concerning the church office space including the square foot limitation. The second is the recreational amenities presented should not have blanket approval at this time. Third the applicant does not want to have the agreement between them and the Eagle-Vail Golf Course recorded. She stated staff can now recommend approval with conditions: There is a critical need for affordable non-profit office space in Eagle County; and that it is difficult for public service organizations to find it. Based on this need, and after testimony from Habitat for Humanity, Eagle Care Clinic, and the Resource Center, the Commission was comfortable with Applicant's request for 7,000 square feet of restricted office space, provided that amount of square footage included church offices as well. While the Commission was sympathetic to the stated "mission" of the Presbyterian Church of Minturn, incorporating reference to the same in the PUD guide was inappropriate (1) because such a reference is too vague; (2) that in the event of a future sale of the land to some other church its "mission" might differ substantially from that ofthe Presbyterian Church of Minturn; and (3) that a future sale of the land to other than a church would render such a statement inappropriate. The Deputy County Attorney expressed legal concerns as well. Although the Commission considered recreational facilities of some kind appropriate, it concurred with staffthat the magnitude of the proposed 5,000 square foot structure, plus outdoor facilities and summer camp for 100 people, as a Use-By-Right. is not appropriate. It supported staffs proposed condition that "minor" (limited) recreational facilities be a Use-By-Right; but that "major" recreational facilities require a Special Use Permit. It considered that, since the Church has no plans for a major facility now, it is appropriate to address its impacts in the context of conditions existing at the time. Major items the Commission felt should be addressed then are: changes to traffic, access, and parking needs and considerations; impacts on residential uses adjacent and across the river (hours of operation, night-time uses, noise, visual impacts, lighting, etc.); and the Church's specific operational plans. The Commission was of the opinion that a use-specific public hearing in the future is more appropriate than committing Eagle County to an undefined, but potentially significant, impact today. The Commission also expressed some concern that, given a different property owner, such recreational Uses-By-Right could inappropriately become the focus of the land use, away from the notion of "church." Note: Conditions of approval as they appear in this Staff Report Addendum reflect the changes made by the Planning Commission, with staff s concurrence. Staff agrees with the Planning Commission recommendation, based on public testimony and other demonstration of need, that Applicant's request for 7,000 square feet of church/non-profit office space be allowed. The current iteration ofthe PUD Guide submitted as back-up to this Staff Report Addendum does not contain this recommended change in full, omitting church offices from the 7,000 square feet (page 3 ofthe Guide). Recommended Condition 3 remains as amended by the Planning Commission. The applicant does not agree with the recreational changes proposed by staff and supported by 22 07-10-2000 the Planning Commission (now Recommended Condition 3). Since the current iteration of the PUD Guide submitted as back-up to this Staff Report Addendum does not contain this change (page 4 of the Guide), this Condition remains as amended by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission made no changes to staff s revised findings as given in the Planning Commission Staff Report Addendum. For ease of reference they are repeated below. The explicit finding to be made is presented verbatim from the Eagle County Land Use Regulations in the box. Where a finding of the Planning Commission and staff differ, this difference is presented side by side. Boxed symbols before the Standards indicate that the proposed development meets the Standard ([+]), does not meet the Standard ([-]), or that the Standard does not apply ([n/a]). She stated there needs to be an agreement with the Eagle-Vail Metropolitan District concerning the golf balls that may go into this property. She stated there is no intent of the church to sell the property. She stated all findings are now positive. Mike Butchen, representing the Presbyterian Parish, stated this is located in Avon. He showed a map of Phase I of the project. He stated Phase II will be the east side of the lot and will be a parking area next to the golf course. He stated the church offices have a general use that goes with all churches. He stated this is a critical part of the project. He stated he would like to provide affordable housing for residents. He stated the mission is to be as big as it can be and the offices are separate from the church and should be separated out from the church. He stated it will not take long for the church to fill up the space. He discussed the recreational facility. Traffic impacts; they have provided a traffic study to solve those issues. There are parking requirements. He stated if they had a recreation area they could deal with the parking problem. He stated someone brought up a 5,000 square feet building being a major building. The proposed building will be the size of a standard high school basketball court with a little extra around it. He stated the 1,000 square foot building would not be conducive to recreation. Lighting and noise issues; this is an indoor building and he does not believe there would be an issue with either of those items. Jim Potter, representing the applicant, spoke to the golf course concern. He stated they have spoken to the Metropolitan District and have a private agreement in place and felt it should not be public. He stated the County Attorney wanted that agreement recorded. He stated he has concern with the recordation of the agreement as it could create possible lender problems. He stated they are prepared to submit the agreement but do not want it recorded. Chris Caldwell, Pastor of the Presbyterian Parish, stated she wants to serve the wider community. She stated they want to be sensitive to the people and their building is at the end of the road and will not be effecting residences. She stated the concern with the noise and lights; they will only be affecting the golf course and the river. She stated there is a lack of gathering space in Eagle County. She stated if they had this building they may be able to have indoor equipment so that young mothers can come and utilize the facility at any time of the year. She stated this is a service and help and builds a connection with the community. Commissioner Gallagher asked about the office building and its location. Mr. Butchen stated they are not proposing an office building but rather a space which is a use by right. He stated the basement level of the 1 st phase will have some of the office space. Commissioner Gallagher asked about the square feet of church and office space. Mr. Butchen stated approximately 1,500 feet. Commissioner Gallagher asked about having a special use. Butchen stated they have seen how long it takes to get applications approved by the County. He stated part of the plan is not something they are committed to building, but they have researched the entire application. Commissioner Gallagher asked why that part of the plan is not shown as Phase III. Mr. Butchen stated they have been up front and honest as they could be. Beyond Phase I they have been trying to show what would happen as the community evolves. 23 07-10-2000 Commissioner Gallagher asked about the concerns of staff. Ms. Garren stated the applicant is including a day camp for 100 or more people for a period of up to two weeks which may require additional thought. Commissioner Gallagher asked about one week versus two weeks. Ms. Garren stated they believe the applicant needs to allow staff to address the impacts at the appropriate time. Commissioner Phillips asked if the Planning Commission agreed they need this much office space. Ms. Garren stated staff wanted to see 3,000 square feet of office space and the applicant wanted 7,000 so they compromised for a total of almost 10,000 square feet of office and retail space. Commissioner Gallagher asked about the purpose of the retail space. Mr. Butchen stated they would like to have a small book store when people could buy religious items. Chuck Christ, area resident, asked about caretaker housing and asked that be explained. Mr. Butchen stated the proposal included two church housing units. He stated those would house an intern or other church staff. John Krueger, owner oflot 8, stated he is in favor ofthe church, non-profit, recreation space, but he is concerned about the percentage of space being used on the lot. He questioned what happens on Lot 7. He stated he has a single family lot planned. Chairman Stone asked if he was going to see things differently. Mr. Krueger stated he is questioning Phase 2 and what that will be used for. He questions the bigger picture. Chairman Stone questioned the letter from him on April 20, 2000. He stated it reflects the question of what is a church. Mr. Krueger stated it is a great thing to have a church there but in the future maybe there will be a different kind of church there. He indicated they are concerned with the space being used on the lot. Chairman Stone stated where the Mormon Church is that was originally in the PUD as a church site. Ms. Garren stated the lots were zoned residential. Mr. Potter stated they are not amending the site the Mormon Church is on. Chairman Stone stated Mr. Kruger is just wanting to know what would be on the rest of the site. He stated he is also concerned with that. He stated he is concerned with this setting precedent. Pastor Caldwell stated their congregation does not own this property. She stated they cannot sell this property. From Mr. Krueger's perspective he is concerned with what will happen to the property twenty years from now. She stated it could not be done overnight. John McCalley, area resident, spoke in favor of this proposal. He stated he has been with the church for several years and they have always been a good neighbor. He stated they will continue to be a good neighbor. Martha Petrie, area resident, has been a member since 1985, and they want it to be more than a church and want it to be a place for people to come. She wants the people to look favorably on this project. Chairman Stone closed public comment. He stated he is in favor of a use as this. He stated he believes the County has been remiss in not having more designated church space. He is concerned this property could be sold somewhere down the road. In all of his decisions he tries to look into the future. He stated the Board has spent a lot of time fixing mistakes made by past Commissioners. He questioned staff on their concerns. Ms. Garren stated the concerns had to do with lot coverage and the land use was to do a church and was not to be office space. She explained they are more concerned with the dominant use on the property . 24 07-10-2000 Chairman Stone asked about 7,000 square feet total. Ms. Garren answered they would be satisfied with 7,000 total. Chairman Stone asked ifthe applicant would agree to 7,000 square feet plus no more than 1,500 square feet of church office space. Mr. Butchen answered yes they would agree to that. Chairman Stone stated the applicants concern about applying for a Special Use Permit and the length of time to go through the County process is disturbing to him. He stated if that is a problem it should be solved by the Commissioners. Commissioner Gallagher encouraged the Parish to make a choice on recreation or office. People are concerned with what will be there in 10 years. Would the parish be willing to place some deed restriction on the plat? With that in place it could possibly be sold a few years down the road for a similar use. Could the Board specify the office space could not develop into commercial use but rather be non-profit use. Ms. Garren stated that is how it is in the PUD Guide now. Commissioner Gallagher stated he likes 7,000 square feet total with 1,500 square feet being the Parish. He spoke to the church definition in the Land Use Regulations. He stated he is in favor of this project and likes how it sits on the property. He stated the Parish needs to decide what they want to do, recreation or office. Chairman Stone asked why the agreement with the Metropolitan District needs to be recorded. Ms. Garren stated this is a condition of approval that should be in place and is a matter of public safety and should carry forward with public notice. Bob Loeffler stated it was deemed important by staff to be a condition for this land use. A condition should be a matter of public record and will appear in the title. The agreement satisfies the condition and should be recorded. Chairman Stone questioned the harm that would come to the church from recording this agreement. Mr. Potter stated sometimes when they may have to apply for waivers and such. He stated the Metropolitan District wants to align that portion of the golf course. If that were to happen the errant golf ball concern would be no longer. He stated they entered into the agreement as a private contract. Mr. Loeffler stated he has not seen the agreement but it will stay the same whether recorded or not. He stated this should be attached to the Resolution changing the land use. Commissioner Gallagher asked how long would it take to come to an agreement with the Metropolitan District to realign the golf course. Mr. Potter stated they were going to start work on that in the fall but now have decided to redo the sand traps first so it could be next year or the year thereafter. Commissioner Gallagher stated he agrees with council's advice. Staff findings found in the staff report are as follows: Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F.3.e Standards. The Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plan for PUD shall comply with the following standards: Section 5-240.F.3.e (1). Unified ownership or control. The title to all land that is part of a PUD shall be owned or controlled by one (1) person. A person shall be considered to control all lands in the PUD either through ownership or by written consent of all owners ofthe land that they will be subject to the conditions and standards of the PUD. Section 5-240.F.3.e (1) Findin~ Unified ownership or control. Title to all land IS owned or controlled by one (1) person in the sense that a corporation is a "person." Section 5-240.F.3.e (2). Uses. The uses that may be developed in the PUD shall be those uses that are designated as uses that 25 07-10-2000 are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule", or Table 3-320, "Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule", for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations ofthese use designations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5- 240 F.3.f., Variations Authorized. Section 5-240.F.3.e (2) Findin~ Uses. The reference to Table 3-300 and Table 3-320 as stated are inappropriate for these applications since no new land addition is proposed. Subject property is currently zoned PUD and residential and church uses ARE uses that are currently allowed in the PUD; however, retail sales, offices, and recreational facilities are not. Pursuant to the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, Variations from established standards can only be granted pursuant a finding that one or more of the following Standards of Section 5-240.F.3.f (3) Basis for Granting Variations has been met, and that "... the granting of the variation is necessary for that purpose to be achieved." In order to determine whether a Variation to allow for retail sales. offices. and recreational facilities on Lot 12 and combined Lots 9 and 10 McGrady Acres. the following Section 5-240.F.3.f.(3) Basis for Granting Variations is found: (a) Obtain Desired Design Qualities. The proposed new uses PERMIT the integration of mixed uses or allow for greater variety in the type, design and layout of buildings. Structures SHALL BE designed to be compatible, in terms of height, mass, scale, orientation and configuration, with other units in the PUD and the surrounding area, yet shall avoid uniformity of design. Residential and non- residential uses ARE mixed together. Various types of residential uses may also be combined within the PUD to promote more efficient land use patterns and increased open space. (d) Trails. The proposed new uses PROVIDE incentive for Applicant to make a 10 foot trails easement contribution to the County's multi-use trail system across its property along Nottingham Ranch Road, in accordance with the recommendations of the latest version of the Ea~le County Trails Plan. Section 5-240.F.3.e (3). Dimensional Limitations. The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD shall be those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these dimensional limitations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3.f., Variations Authorized, provided variations shall leave adequate distance between buildings for necessary access and fire protection, and ensure proper ventilation, light, air and snowmelt between buildings. Section 5-240.F.3.e (3) Findings: Dimensional Limitations. The reference to Table 3-340 and Table 3-320 as stated is inappropriate for these applications since dimensional limitations are governed by the PUD Guide. Pursuant to the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, Variations from established standards can only be granted pursuant to a finding that one or more of the following Standards of Section 5-240.F.3.f (3) Basis for Granting Variations has been met, and that"... the granting ofthe variation is necessary for that purpose to be achieved." In order to determine whether a Variation to allow for Total Impervious Materials on combined Lots 9 and 10 be changed from 45% of net developable land to 65% of net developable land. the following Section 5-240.F.3.f.(3) Basis for Granting Variations is found: (a) Obtain Desired Design Qualities. The proposed change PERMITS the integration of mixed uses or allow for greater variety in the type, design and layout of buildings. Structures SHALL BE designed to be compatible, in terms of height, mass, scale, orientation and configuration, with other units in the PUD and the surrounding area, yet shall avoid uniformity of design. Residential and non- residential uses ARE mixed together. Various types of residential uses may also be combined within the PUD to promote more efficient land use patterns and increased open space. (d) Trails. The proposed change PROVIDES incentive for Applicant to make a 10 foot trails easement contribution to the County's multi-use trail system across its property along Nottingham Ranch 26 07-10-2000 Road, in accordance with the recommendations of the latest version of the Ea~le County Trails Plan. Section 5-240.F.3.e (4) Off-Street Parking and Loading. Off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. A reduction in these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that: (a) Shared Parking. Because of shared parking arrangements among uses within the PUD that do not require peak parking for those uses to occur at the same time, the parking needs of residents, guests and employees of the project will be met; or 1) Actual Needs. The actual needs ofthe project's residents, guests and employees will be less than those set by Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. The applicant may commit to provide specialized transportation services for these persons (such as vans, subsidized bus passes, or similar services) as a means of complying with this standard. Section 5-240.F.3.e (4) Findin~ Off-Street Parking and Loading. Off-street parking and loading provided CAN comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. Section 5-240.F .3.e (5) Landscaping. Landscaping provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards. Variations from these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that the proposed landscaping provides sufficient buffering of uses from each other (both within the PUD and between the PUD and surrounding uses) to minimize noise, glare and other adverse impacts, creates attractive streetscapes and parking areas and is consistent with the character of the area. Section 5-240.F.3.e (5) Findin~s Landscaping. The standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards did not apply at the time the PUD was approved. Landscaping proposed provides sufficient buffering of uses from each other (both within the PUD and between the PUD and surrounding uses) to minimize noise, glare and other adverse impacts, creates attractive streetscapes and parking areas and is consistent with the character of the area, and therefore is sufficient to grant a variation Section 5-240.F.3.e (6) Signs. The sign standards applicable to the PUD shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations, unless, as provided in Section 4-340 D., Signs Allowed in a Planned Unit Development (PUD), the applicant submits a comprehensive sign plan for the PUD that is determined to be suitable for the PUD and provides the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to and within the PUD. Section 5-240.F.3.e (5) Finding Signs. A comprehensive sign plan suitable for the lots affected by this PUD Amendment EXISTS with the proposed PUD Guide. Section 5-240.F .3.e (7) Adequate Facilities. The applicant shall demonstrate that the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. Section 5-240.F.3.e (7) Findin~s Adequate Facilities. As conditioned, the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for PUD WILL be provided adequate facilities for roads. The PUD, by virtue of its previous approval, HAS already been demonstrated to be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. Section 5-240.F.3.e (8) Improvements. The improvements standards applicable to the development shall be as specified in Article 4, 27 07-10-2000 Division 6, Improvements Standards. Provided, however, the development may deviate from the County's road standards, so the development achieves greater efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts, when the following minimum design principles are followed: (a) Safe, Efficient Access. The circulation system is designed to provide safe, convenient access to all areas of the proposed development using the minimum practical roadway length. Access shall be by a public right-of-way, private vehicular or pedestrian way or a commonly owned easement. No roadway alignment, either horizontal or vertical, shall be allowed that compromises one (1) or more of the minimum design standards of the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) for that functional classification of roadway. (b) Internal Pathways. Internal pathways shall be provided to form a logical, safe and convenient system for pedestrian access to dwelling units and common areas, with appropriate linkages off-site. (c) Emergency Vehicles. Roadways shall be designed to permit access by emergency vehicles to all lots or units. An access easement shall be granted for emergency vehicles and utility vehicles, as applicable, to use private roadways in the development for the purpose of providing emergency services and for installation, maintenance and repair of utilities. (d) Principal Access Points. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to provide for smooth traffic flow, minimizing hazards to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. Where a PUD abuts a major collector, arterial road or highway, direct access to such road or highway from individual lots, units or buildings shall not be permitted. Minor roads within the PUD shall not be directly connected with roads outside of the PUD, unless the County determines such connections are necessary to maintain the County's road network. (e) Snow Storage. Adequate areas shall be provided to store snow removed from the internal street network and from off-street parking areas. Section 5-240.F .3.e (8) Findin~s Improvements. As conditioned, the improvements standards applicable to the proposed development will be as specified in Article 4, Division 6. Section 5-240.F.3.e (9) Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. The development proposed for the PUD shall be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. Section 5-240.F.3.e (9) Findin~ Compatibility with surrounding land uses. As conditioned, the proposed change of land use to a church, other religious facilities, retail sales, and offices are compatible with the existing nature of the surrounding land uses. Section 5-240.F.3.e (10) Consistency with Master Plan. The PUD shall be consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). Section 5-240.F.3.e (to) Findin~s Consistency with Master Plan. The Amendment to the PUD IS primarily consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and Future Land Use Map designation of "Community Center," as well as with the Eagle County Open Space Plan. The proposed new uses will not affect the Eagle County Comprehensive Housing Plan. Section 5-240.F.3.e (11) Phasing The Preliminary Plan for PUD shall include a phasing plan for the development. If development of the PUD is proposed to occur in phases, then guarantees shall be provided for public improvements and amenities that are necessary and desirable for residents of the project, or that are of benefit to the entire County. Such public improvements shall be constructed with the first phase of the project, or, if 28 07-10-2000 this is not possible, then as early in the project as is reasonable. Section 5-240.F.3.e (11) Findinl: Phasing. A phasing plan for the development proposed by the PUD Amendment is established through the amended PUD Guide, and guarantees WILL BE provided with the Amended Final Plat for those public improvements and amenities not previously collateralized that are necessary and desirable for residents of the project, or that are of benefit to the entire County. Such public improvements SHALL BE constructed with the first phase ofthe project, or, if this is not possible, then as early in the project as is reasonable. Section 5-240.F.3.e (12) Common Recreation and Open Space. The PUD shall comply with the following common recreation and open space standards. (a) Minimum Area. It is recommended that a minimum of25% of the total PUD area shall be devoted to open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi-public. In addition, the PUD shall provide a minimum of ten (10) acres of common recreation and usable open space lands for every one thousand (1,000) persons who are residents ofthe PUD. In order to calculate the number of residents ofthe PUD, the number of proposed dwelling units shall be multiplied by two and sixty-three hundredths (2.63), which is the average number of persons that occupy each dwelling unit in Eagle County, as determined in the Eagle County Master Plan. Areas that Do Not Count as Open Space. Parking and loading areas, street right-of-ways, and areas with slopes greater than thirty (30) percent shall not count toward usable open space. Areas that Count as Open Space. Water bodies, lands within critical wildlife habitat areas, riparian areas, and one hundred (100) year flood plains, as defined in these Land Use Regulations, that are preserved as open space shall count towards this minimum standard, even when they are not usable by or accessible to the residents ofthe PUD. All other open space lands shall be conveniently accessible from all occupied structures within the PUD. Improvements Required. All common open space and recreational facilities shall be shown on the Preliminary Plan for PUD and shall be constructed and fully improved according to the development schedule established for each development phase of the PUD. Continuing Use and Maintenance. All privately owned common open space shall continue to conform to its intended use, as specified on the Preliminary Plan for PUD. To ensure that all the common open space identified in the PUD will be used as common open space, restrictions and/or covenants shall be placed in each deed to ensure their maintenance and to prohibit the division of any common open space. Organization. If common open space is proposed to be maintained through an association or nonprofit corporation, such organization shall manage all common open space and recreational and cultural facilities that are not dedicated to the public, and shall provide for the maintenance, administration and operation of such land and any other land within the PUD not publicly owned, and secure adequate liability insurance on the land. The association or nonprofit corporation shall be established prior to the sale of any lots or units within the PUD. Membership in the association or nonprofit corporation shall be mandatory for all landowners within the PUD. Section 5-240.F .3.e (12) Findin~ Common Recreation and Open Space. The McGrady Acres PUD HAS ALREADY BEEN shown to comply with the common recreation and open space standards above. Over 25% of the total PUD area IS devoted to open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi-public, and the PUD DOES provide a minimum of ten (10) acres of common recreation and usable open space lands for every one thousand (1,000) persons who are to be residents of the PUD. Section 5-240.F.3.e (13) Natural Resource Protection. The PUD shall consider the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource 29 07-10-2000 Protection Standards. Section 5-240.F.3.e (13) Findin~ Natural Resource Protection. It is assumed that the proposed Amendment to the PUD HAS considered the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards. 2. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-280.B.3.e. Standards the Preliminary Plan for Subdivision shall comply with the following standards: Section 5-280.B.3.e (1) Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the FLUM of the Master Plan. Section 5-280.B.3.e (1) Findin~ Consistency with Master Plan. The Amendment to the PUD IS primarily consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and Future Land Use Map designation of "Community Center," as well as with the Eagle County Open Space Plan. The proposed new uses will not affect the Eagle County Comprehensive Housing Plan. Section 5-280.B.3.e (2) Consistent with Land Use Regulations. The proposed subdivision shall comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards. Section 5-280.B.3.e (2) Finding Consistent with Land Use Regulations. As conditioned, the proposed re-subdivision IS compliant with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards. Section 5-280.B.3.e (3) Spatial Pattern Shalf Be Efficient. The proposed subdivision shall be located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road extensions shall be consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital Improvements Plan. Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area. Section 5-280.B.3.e (3) Finding The proposed consolidation of Lots 9 and 10 into one lot HAS NOT created spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (a) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions ARE consistent with the utility's service plan. (b) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines WILL BE sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (c) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area. 30 07-10-2000 Section 5-280.B.3.e (4) Suitability for Development. The property proposed to be subdivided shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. Section 5-280.B.3.e (4) Finding Considering its site constraints, the property proposed to be re-subdivided IS suitable for development under the current McGrady Acres PUD. Section 5-280.B.3.e (5) Compatible With Surrounding Uses. The proposed subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Section 5-280.B.3.e (5) Findin~ Compatibility with surrounding land uses. As conditioned, the proposed change of land use to a church, other religious facilities, retail sales, and offices is compatible with the existing nature of the surrounding land uses. 3. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F. 3.m Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD: Section 5-240.F.3.m Amendment to Preliminary Planfor PUD. No substantial modification, removal, or release of the provisions of the plan shall be permitted except upon a finding by the County, following a public hearing called and held in accordance with the provisions of section 24-67-104(1 )( e) Colorado Revised Statutes that the modification, removal, or release is consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire Planned Unit Development, does not affect in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the planned unit development or the public interest, and is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person. Section 5-240.F .3.m. Findin~ (1) Is consistent. As conditioned, the proposed PUD Amendment to (1) consolidate Lots 9 and 10 into one lot and alter its residential uses, and add a church, other religious facilities, retail sales, offices, and other uses as Use-By-Right; and (2) change residential uses on Lot 12 and add a chapel and other uses as Use-By-Right IS consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire Planned Unit Development; (2) Does not affect in a substantially adverse manner. As conditioned, the proposed PUD Amendment DOES NOT affect in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the planned unit development or the public interest, including the public's interest in the Eagle River; and (3) Does not grant special benefit. The proposed PUD Amendment IS NOT granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person. Commissioner Phillips moved the Board approve file number PDA-00026, McGrady Acres, incorporating the staff findings and conditions as follows: 1. Amended Final Plat. Prior to the approval of any Amended Final Plat pursuant to this PUD Amendment, Applicant shall: A. Stormwater Management Plan. Submit evidence that a Stormwater Management Plan approved by the Eagle County Department of Environmental Health is in place. B. Eagle-Vail Metropolitan District Agreement. Submit an executed Agreement with the Eagle-Vail Metropolitan District covering errant golf ball safety mitigation measures for recording with the Amended Final Plat. C. Trails Easement. Submit an executed deed to Eagle County for the 10' trails easement along Nottingham Ranch Road for acceptance by the Board of County Commissioners and recording with the Amended Final Plat. 31 07-10-2000 D. State Highway Access Permit. Submit evidence that a proper State Highway Access Permit accommodating the changes made in the PUD pursuant to this File No. PDA-00026 exists. E. Conditions of File No. G-00009 (Easement Vacation). Submit evidence that the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District has certified that the sewer lines have been satisfactorily relocated. Upon receipt of such evidence the Resolution approving File No. G-00009 and the Quit Claim Deed from Eagle County shall be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners for approval, signature, and recordation. F. Building Envelope Setback. The Amended Final Plat shall clearly show that all building envelopes are set either a minimum of fifty feet from the high water mark of the Eagle River (defined as the ten-year flood plain boundary), or at or beyond the hundred-year flood plain boundary, whichever shall be the greater of the two distances. 2) Offices. Prior to any hearing before the Board of Eagle County Commissioners, Applicant shall amend the PUD Guide to reflect that the floor area of all offices of the church and non-profit agencies shall not exceed a square footage of 7,000 of non-profit office space plus 1.500 square feet of church office space, for a total of 8500 square feet, when calculated from exterior wall to exterior wall, exclusive of hallways, mechanical rooms, stairwells, and space where floor-to-ceiling height is less than 4 ~ feet, but inclusive of bathrooms and storage rooms. 3) "Recreational Facilities". Prior to any hearing before the Board of Eagle County Commissioners, Applicant shall amend the PUD Guide to reflect the following changes affecting "Recreational Facilities": A. Definition Section. Section xii) "Recreational Facilities" of the pun guide shall be divided into three sections, "Major Recreational Facilities," "Minor Recreational Facilities," and "General Restrictions," defined as follows: (l) "Major Recreational Facilities" shall mean any physical improvements such as a gymnasium or other similar structure over 1,001 square feet but not to exceed 5,000 square feet, constructed on for the purpose of accommodating recreational or sports activities such as volleyball, basketball, or other similar activities, or for special religious or educational activities; and such outdoor improvements in excess of 5,000 square feet per lot as may be defined elsewhere under "Park, Playground, Open Space, or Greenbelt." These facilities shall be available for the general use ofthe church and for day or summer camps, not to exceed two weeks in length at any given time, for up to 100 persons, children and/or adults, on an occasional basis throughout the year. They shall be used by Owner solely for the purpose of recreation or spiritual education and may include dining facilities, kitchen facilities (not to exceed 500 square feet), storage facilities, restrooms, or other similar needs. (2) "Minor Recreational Facilities" shall mean a recreational building not to exceed 1,000 square feet, constructed for the purpose of accommodating limited recreational or sports activities, or special religious or educational activities; and such outdoor improvements up to a maximum of 5,000 square feet per lot as may be defined elsewhere under "Park, Playground, Open Space, or Greenbelt." These facilities shall be available for the general use of the church and for day or summer camps, not to exceed one week in length at any given time, for up to 30 persons, children and/or adults, on an occasional basis throughout the year. They shall be used by Owner solely for the purpose of recreation or spiritual education and may include limited cooking facilities (not to exceed 300 square feet), storage facilities, restrooms, or other similar needs. (3) "General Restrictions," Major and/or Minor Recreation Facilities shall be subordinate to the Church Complex, used solely by the Church or under its direct supervision, and be in conjunction with of the Church. By no means is any Recreation Facility to be in lieu of the Church Complex. B. Land Use Section. The following changes shall be made: "Minor Recreational Facilities" shall be a use-by-right on combined Lots 9 and 10. "Major Recreational Facilities" shall be a Special Use solely on combined Lots 9 and 10. "Minor Recreational Facilities" shall be a Special Use 32 07-10-2000 solely on Lot 12; "Major Recreational Facilities" shall not be allowed on Lot 12. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. G-00012, Vacation of Easement, Aspen Mesa Estates, Filing 1 John Vengrin, Engineering Department, presented file number G-00012, Vacation of Equestrian Easement on Lots 1 & 2, refiling of Lots 25 - 29, Aspen Mesa Estates, First Filing. He stated on May 18,2000, the Roaring Fork Regional Planning Commission recommended approval to the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners of this petition for vacation of the equestrian easement on Lots 1 & 2 ofthe Refiling of Lots 25-29 of Aspen Mesa Estates, First Filing. This is a petition for the vacation of an equestrian easement on Lots 1 & 2 in the Refiling of Lots 25-29 of Aspen Mesa Estates, First Filing. Under the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the equestrian easements are considered to be public and are therefore subject to the requirements of Section 5-2200 Public Way and Easement Vacations. On December 30, 1989, the Aspen Mesa Homeowners Association in the "Third Amendment to Reorganization and Amendment of Deed Restrictions for Aspen Mesa Estates" abolished all areas designated as "green areas" and "equestrian easements" on the recorded plat of Aspen Mesa Estates, First Filing. This document was recorded with the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder under reception No. 455701 on August 9, 1991 and is attached to this report. Mr. & Mrs. Isaacson wish to formally vacate the equestrian easement on Lots 1 & 2 in order to facilitate a building site on Lot 1, and to complete the vacation of the equestrian easements in the vicinity. Mr. Vengrin reviewed the referral responses as follows: Eagle County Planning: They have "... no problem with the vacation provided proper procedures are followed... ." The memorandum from Jean Garren is attached to this Staff Report. County Surveyor: James S. Kunkel, PLS of Johnson, Kunkel, & Associates had comments regarding the vicinity map and the need for an amended final plat. Mr. Kunkel's letter is attached to this Staff Report. An Amended Final Plat application is currently being processed for this property. Staff has no major concerns regarding the vacation of the equestrian easement as requested by the Isaacson's. Mr. Vengrin stated the following findings are made: 1. The applicant has filed a petition for a Vacation of Equestrian Easement in conformance with the requirements of Section 5-2200. 2. Proper Public Notification for the petition has been issued in conformance with Section 5- 2200.C.4.a and the petition is ready for consideration by the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners. 3. The petition has demonstrated the vacation request to be in the general interest of the public's health, safety, and welfare, not to be in violation oflaw, and to be in compliance with the Land Use Regulations, and the Master Plan. Staff recommended approval. On May 18,2000, the Roaring Fork Regional Planning Commission recommended approval to the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners of this petition for vacation of the equestrian easement on Lots 1 & 2 ofthe Refiling of Lots 25-29 of Aspen Mesa Estates, First Filing. Mr. Vengrin stated the applicant is not able to attend the hearing today. Chairman Stone asked for public comment. There was none. Chairman Stone asked if there are conditions on this file. Mr. Vengrin responded there are no conditions placed on this file. Commissioner Gallagher asked if the Isaacson's are the last of Aspen Mesa Estates who need to file this vacation. 33 07-10-2000 Mr. Vengrin stated he understands Ms. Garren has asked the Homeowner's Association to put a filing together, but they are coming in piece meal. Commissioner Phillips asked if each lot takes in the additional easement. Mr. Loeffler stated these are part oflots 1 and 2 already. They just weren't able to build in that portion previously. It might be more buildable as they will not have to stay out ofthe easement area. Mr. Vengrin stated this will not change the lot lines of 1 and 2 but will remove the dotted line that has been an encumbrance on lots 1 and 2. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve file number G-00012, Isaacson Easement Vacation, Lots 1 & 2 ofthe Refiling of Lots 25-29 of Aspen Mesa Estates, First Filing, incorporating staff findings. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. AFP-00095, Amended Final Plat, Aspen Mesa Estates Jean Garren presented file number AFP-00095, Amended Final Plat, Aspen Mesa Estates, Lots 1 & 2, refiling Lots 25 - 29. She stated staff has strongly encouraged the Homeowner's Association to amend the final plat for the entire subdivision. She stated that has been difficult and it has not been done. Therefore, it has been up to each of the owners to do so on their own. Mr. Loeffler asked the motion be amended authorizing the Chairman to sign the plat after the Resolution vacating the easement has been signed. Commissioner Phillips moved to approve file number AFP-00095, Amended Final Plat, Aspen Mesa Estates, Lots 1 & 2, Refiling Lots 25 - 29, authorizing the Chairman to sign the plat after the Resolution vacating of easement has been signed. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Mr. Vengrin stated he will have the resolution within a couple of weeks. There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until July 24, 2000. Attest: Clerk to the Bo ~,~ Chairman 34 07-10-2000