The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 03/13/2000 Present: Tom C. Stone Johnnette Phillips Michael Gallagher Jack W. Ingstad James Fritze Sara 1. Fisher GENERAL FUND ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS ADVANTAGE NETWORK SYSTEMS AFFORDABLE PORTABLE AIMS MULIMEDIA AIR TOUCH CELLULAR AIR TOUCH CELLULAR - AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC AIRTOUCH CELLULAR ALL PRO FORMS INCORPORATE ALLIANT FOOD SERVICE ALPHA INTERACTIVE GROUP ALPINE SIGN & GRAPHICS AL TERNA TIVE REVENUE AMERICAN MONEY MANAGEMENT AMERlCINN ANDREW MONTOYA ANGELICA AGUIRRE ANIMAL HOSPITAL OF VAIL APEX SECURITY ARCH COMMUNICATIONS ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATION ASI TECHNOLOGIES ASPEN TIMES THE AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES A TC TOWER CORP A V TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVCARD AVON COMMERCIAL CENTER BAILEY FUNERAL HOME BARTON PINNEY BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER BERTHOD MOTORS BEST WESTERN EAGLE LODGE BEST WESTERN LANDMARK INN PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 13, 2000 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Administrator County Attorney Clerk to the Board REFUND REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PARTS SERVICES SERVICES 25.00 25.00 93.00 127.46 6.86 4,755.11 34.67 1,889.71 4,201.67 1,688.17 65.00 25.00 25.00 7,959.01 62.00 17.99 40.00 60.00 315.50 69.40 935.00 199,649.50 145.81 240.11 875.00 75.91 457.10 830.70 300.00 165.00 50.00 623.96 400.00 75.00 1 03-13-2000 BFI STERICYCLE INC BIGHORN MOTORS BILL G BAKER BLACK PARROT AUDIO BLUE LAKE OWNERS ASSN BOB BARKER COMPANY BRCIHARRIS, INC BREWER LAW OFFICES BRIDGES TONE WINTER BRUSH CREEK ELECTRIC INC BUREAU OF BUSINESS BURT CHEVROLET, INC BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC CAACO CALOIA, HOUPT & LIGHT PC CAMBRIA COFFEE CANTAFIO HARDY MOORE CAPITAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS CARLA BUDD CARTER & SANDS P.C. CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CATERINA GIBSON CCNA, INC. CCO AND ERA CCTA CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTURYTEL CHAMPLAIN PLANNING PRESS CHEMA TOX INC. CHESS CITY MARKET #34 CITY OF WHEELER CLERK SUPREME COURT CO CORONERS ASSOCIATION CO DEPT AGRICULTURE CO DEPT LABORlEMPLOYMENT CO DEPT OF HEALTH CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND CO DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S CO HUMAN RESOURCE ASSOC COLOMBIA PROPANE COLORADO GFOA COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE COLORADO SPECIAL TIES INC COLORADO STATE PATROL COLORADO WEST MENTAL COMFORT INN SERVICES PARTS REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES VEHICLE SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES FOR TREE FARM SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES 597.45 348.56 57.00 1,130.00 9,386.72 1,098.86 1,444.56 2.48 3,127.50 7,070.26 158.95 18,688.00 680.27 150.00 200.00 72.50 39.26 3,025.00 304.98 269.39 248.72 10.00 80.00 51,033.43 600.00 330.41 20,740.92 252.00 75.00 467.00 1,024.34 310.62 585.00 400.00 200.00 160.87 134.00 33.25 125.00 85.00 837.06 60.00 38.00 59.62 22,575.69 480.00 50.00 2 03-13-2000 CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING CRABTREES PHOTO WORKS CRAWFORD PROPERTIES CREDIT BUREAU ROCKIES CSU COOPERATIVE EXTENSION DAHL PLUMBING DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION DAILY SENTINEL THE DAN SPARKMAN DAN THEIMAN DATA COMM WAREHOUSE DATA GENERAL CORPORATION DAVID GUINNEE, DVM DA YS INN GRAND JUNCTION DEEP ROCK WEST DENVER POST CORPORATION T DIGITAL BIOMETRICS DISTRICT COURT TRUSTEE DOCUTEK INC DORA PRINCE DORIS E SATTERFIELD DOUBLETREE LITTLE ROCK DOUG WINTERS DOYLE WASHINGTON EAGLE AUTO PARTS EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY HEALTH AND EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE EYE PHOTO EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS EAGLE VALLEY CHAMBER COMM EAGLE V ALLEY ENTERPRISE EAGLE V ALLEY EVENTS EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY CTR EAGLE V ALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE V ALLEY PET HOSPITAL EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING ECO LAB ECONOMICS PRESS ENTERPRISES FLEET SERVICE EVES PRINT SHOP EVIDENT CRIME SCENE EXTENSION PROGRAM FUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES PARTS SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PARTS/SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 64.91 50.06 833.39 290.00 2,322.00 8.68 6,562.50 18.96 637.00 128.69 100.00 200.00 1,009.45 329.74 1,160.00 328.00 98.47 6,073.18 5,063.00 276.94 599.88 9.10 163.80 555.06 98.11 1,133.58 49.49 2,173.69 35.00 61.24 14.78 734.62 80.76 1,061.34 450.00 1,229.82 4,500.00 75.00 79.06 20.00 1,447.00 875.40 79.66 453.78 900.59 209.75 323.84 3 03-13-2000 FAITH OLDHAM FALCON ASSOCIATES FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FARMER BROTHERS FARRELL, GOLDSTEIN, FEDERAL EXPRESS FERRELL GAS FILE FINDERS, LTD. FINANCIAL EQUIPMENT COMPA FIRST BANKS FORENSIC LABORATORIES INC FRANK J BALL FRED PRYOR SEMINARS FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY FRITZE JAMES R GEORGE ROUSSOS GLENWOOD SHOE SERVICE GLENWOOD VET CLINIC GOLDEN SKY SYSTEMS INC GOVERNMENT FINANCE GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GRACE FINNEY GRAINGER INCORPORATED GYPSUM FIRE PROTECTION H20 POWER EQUIPMENT INC HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELLO DIRECT INC HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HILL & TASHIRO MARKETING HILL COUNTRY F AMIL Y HIL TON DENVER TECH SOUTH HODGES BADGE COMPANY HOLY CROSS ENERGY HORIZON ROOFING INC HOTEL AT OSU HUD USER HUME GROUP, THE IAAO ICBO IFMA INDUSTRIAL FIRE WORLD INT AB INTEGRAL RECOVERIES INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE J A SEXAUER JACK WINGSTAD REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES ' SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES PARTS/SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 200.00 90.00 1,552.16 663.30 25.00 335.95 1,606.33 100.00 229.50 12,035.05 51.00 25.00 149.00 10.00 122.85 188.40 760.00 10.00 71.96 75.00 319.00 39.00 453.66 720.00 252.04 100,573.99 71.98 139.00 2,800.00 250.00 83.00 916.00 13,595.56 250.00 40.00 5.00 24.50 235.00 50.00 225.00 300.00 40.87 6.20 3,957.89 270.00 482.21 114.50 4 03-13-2000 JAMES E JOHNSON JR. JAMES J STANDLEY JAMES PUBLISHING COMPANY JANICE DURAUX JEFFERSON COUNTY JENA SKINNER JERRI A MAYER JOBS AVAILABLE JOES W ALLBAORD & SUPPLY JOHN O'SULLIVAN JOHNNETTE PHILLIPS JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC JOYCE I REID KARA GREBING, DEPUTY KATHY ROSS KELLEY BLUE BOOK KEN WILSON KRENDL, HOROWITZ, KRENDL KRIsn BIGGINS KVS INFORMA nON SYSTEMS I LAF ARGE CORPORA nON LANDS END INCORPORATED LAURA HERNANDEZ LEADING FROM WITHIN LEGACY COMMUNICA nONS INC LETN LIL JOHNS WATER TREATMENT LK SURVEY INSTRUMENTS LOCAL GOVERNMENT LORIS & ASSOCIATES INC MACHOL & JOHANNES MARILYN RICE MARY KRAFT MCI COMMERCIAL SERVICE MCI TELECOMMUNICA nONS MED CENTER MEDICAL GROUP MERCK, HUMAN HEALTH DIV. METRO CALL MEYER LAND SYSTEMS MICRO WAREHOUSE MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP MID V ALLEY KENNEL MIKE GALLAHER MIKE GRUBER MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE MILLER & COHEN MONICA JACOX REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES TRA VEL ADVANCE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT 836.67 2.48 139.88 45.82 100.00 629.31 6.50 303.60 75.68 26.26 720.85 1,109.25 265.76 10 1.3 0 10.00 54.00 100.00 6.20 300.00 4,621.25 309.75 91.45 250.00 1,195.00 395.72 776.00 660.00 105.72 49.00 2,979.45 25.48 43.87 98.80 5.73 2,832.12 110.00 1,779.96 20.20 4,162.50 294.80 69.00 1,810.00 300.00 20.87 597.66 13.02 190.00 5 03-13-2000 MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOTION INDUSTRIES MOTOROLA INCORPORATED MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS MOUNTAIN MOBILE VETERINAR MOUNTAIN MUSIC MOUNTAIN VALLEY CABINETRY NACIO NACTFO NANCY LEWIS NATIONAL GRAPHICS COMPANY NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP NA TIONAL WILD TURKEY NEVES UNIFORMS NEW CASTLE VETERINARY NICOLETTI FLATER ASSOC NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORWEST BANK NOVELL RESEARCH ORDER NOVELL SALES NWCCOG OFFICE PAVILION OHLIN SALES OMNIF AX ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO ORTEN & HINDMAN OSI COLLECTION SERVICES OSU ENGINEERING EXTENSION PAINT BUCKET, THE PAPER DIRECT PEGGY GRAYBEAL PETER G BOWEN PETER SULMEISTERS PETTY CASH PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY PHYSICIANS DESK REFERENCE PITKIN COUNTY TREASURER POSTMASTER POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PROTECTORSLTD PSS,INC PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION RAMADA INN RAYMOND CHENOWETH SUPPLIES PARTS PARTS/SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES PARTS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES/SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT 144.38 345.30 3,855.23 748.62 20.00 250.00 38.90 25.00 50.00 75.60 165.95 395.00 500.00 2,583.80 10.00 520.00 1,450.82 221,345.52 110.00 16,799.40 50.16 134.40 234.64 455.79 2,257.20 27.48 25.62 410.00 636.58 159.84 160.00 157.05 45.63 59.36 826.04 16.83 90.90 41,080.00 95.84 14,500.00 600.00 581.97 617.735474.10 312.13 675.00 200.00 6 03-13-2000 RA YMONDS OFFICE MACHINES RBS SUPPL Y COMPANY RED BLUFF BUCKLES RENTX/EZ WAY RESPOND FIRST AID SYSTEMS RIVERWALK@EDWARDS ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN ROCKY MOUNTAIN REPRO GRAPH ROPIR CABLEVISION ROSS PRODUCTS DIVISION SANDYS OFFICE SUPPLY SARA CARRO SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SECRETARY OF STATE SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SHEAFFER KAREN SHEILA VIGIL SHIRLEE GILLEN SIGN ON DESIGN SIGN PRO SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SNOWHITE LINEN SOLDOFFDEVELOPMENT STARBUCK SURVEYORS & ENGI STATE FORMS CENTER STEVES BARB QUE STRAWBERRY PATCH STUN TECH INC SULLIVAN GREEN, LLC SUMMIT COUNTY SENIORS SUMMIT HABITATS SUMMIT LUMBER SUN BADGE COMPANY SUSPENSE FUND TALBOT TOM TECH LAW TECHNOLOGY EXPRESS TERENCE J QUINN -ATTY AT THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP TOM C STONE TOP DRAWER OFFICE SUPPL Y TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF BASALT TOWN OF EAGLE TOWN OF GYPSUM TOWN OF MINTURN TOWN OF VAIL SERVICES PARTS SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL EXPD REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES EQUIPMENT REFUND SUPPLIES TRAVEL ADVANCE SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 63.90 29.77 185.00 6.16 148.10 8,780.04 71.20 141.50 46.79 639.35 17.70 293.15 8,371.60 10.00 27,901.99 33.62 190.00 127.83 10.75 74.50 359.55 128.73 1,941.88 190.00 42.50 731.25 28.90 165.00 1,900.00 1,460.23 353.80 1,378.13 456.00 20,346.39 102.60 3,165.95 470.00 12.40 287.00 300.00 14.48 (37.71) (26.22) 2,705.81 (12.76)8(12.31) (241.53) 7 03-13-2000 TOX TRAPS INCORPORATED SUPPLIES 570.00 TRANE COMPANY SERVICES 200.00 TUXALL UNIFORM COMPANY SUPPLIES 281.95 UGC CONSULTING SERVICES 90,504.47 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE SERVICES 280.04 UNITED REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES 1,738.00 UNIVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC SERVICES 60.00 US WEST CELLULAR SUPPLIES 18.85 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 6,858.44 V AIL ELECTRONICS SERVICES 255.00 V AIL LOCK AND KEY SUPPLIES 12.80 V AIL V ALLEY EMERGENCY SERVICES 720.00 V AIL V ALLEY JET CENTER SERVICES 168.81 V AIL V ALLEY MEDICAL CENTR SERVICES 26,871.70 V AIL V ALLEY PLUMBING AND SERVICES 350.00 V AILNET INC SERVICES 630.20 V ALLEY JOURNAL SUPPLIES 25.00 V ALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 136.36 V ALLEY SIGNS SUPPLIES 12.30 V ALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL SERVICES 157.90 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 203.91 VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY C SUPPLIES 72.55 WAKEFIELD & ASSOCIATES REFUND 18.78 WALMART /GLENWOOD SUPPLIES 141.22 W ARNQUlST & ASSOCIATES REFUND 9.00 WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 86.25 WELDON KITE COMPANY PARTS 225.50 WEST PUBLISHING SUPPLIES 1,332.75 WESTERN PAGING SERVICES 851.90 WESTERN SLOPE PUBLICATION SERVICES 608.25 WHEELING PARK COMMISSION SERVICES 908.00 WINGS OF EAGLE TRAVEL & SERVICES 1,019.00 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS SERVICES 720.37 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 137.25 XEROX CORPORATION SUPPLIES/SERVICES 6,009.74 Y AMP A V ALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICES 242.73 PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY PAYROLL # 3 & 4 479,760.54 1,611,151.83 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 4,405.10 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICES 25.10 CLIFFORD ALLEN REIMBURSEMENT 24.55 DAY TIMERS INCORPORATED SUPPLIES 76.36 8 03-13-2000 DEEP ROCK WEST SUPPLIES/SERVICES 26.60 EAGLE PHARMACY SUPPLIES 22.12 HARRIS JOHN T REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 10,424.05 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICES 76.00 MOTORPOOLFUNO SERVICES 131,308.55 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPO 23,327.02 RICK ETTLES REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 ROARING FORK RESOURCES SUPPLIES 25,460.00 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 378.00 SUSPENSE FUND SUPPLIES/SERVICES 1,513.51 TOWN OF AVON SERVICES 1,257.10 TOWN OF BASALT SERVICES 873.80 TOWN OF EAGLE SERVICES 1,206.30 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICES 425.45 TOWN OF MINTURN SERVICES 410.21 TOWN OF VAIL SERVICES 8,051.08 WYLACOSUPPLYCOMPANY PARTS/SUPPLIES 313.37 PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY PAYROLL # 3 &4 50,134.27 259,888.54 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND AIRTOUCH CELLULAR SERVICES 62.63 CA THERINE CRAIG REIMBURSEMENT 174.35 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 3,566.08 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICES 471.91 CITY MARKET #34 SUPPLIES 5.15 CSED SERVICES 308.88 EAGLE COUNTY ATTORNEY SERVICES 3,118.50 EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF SERVICES 391.68 EAGLE VALLEY F AMIL Y CTR SERVICES 50.00 EOW ARD GILLILAND SERVICES 450.00 FORINASH KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 100.30 GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICES 20.62 GILBERT & ASSOCIATES SERVICES 25.00 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 8,418.55 INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND SERVICES 3,238.28 JERRI OLSON REIMBURSEMENT 371.89 JOSE BANUELOS SERVICES 800.00 KAREN LAJOY SMITH MA LPC SERVICES 200.00 LABORATORY CORPORATION OF SERVICES 171.00 MESA COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICES 32.17 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 15,259.27 POSTMASTER SUPPLIES 78.41 9 03-13-2000 PUEBLO COUNTY SHERIFF OFF SERVICES 33.60 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 180.17 RENEE FIELDS REIMBURSEMENT 374.72 RITA WOODS REIMBURSEMENT 14.00 ROBERT J DURHAM AND SERVICES 300.00 ROCHELLE A BOWER REIMBURSEMENT 470.06 SANDY ALFRED REIMBURSEMENT 33.15 SHERIFF SAGUACHE COUNTY SERVICES 38.06 STATE FORMS PUBLICATIONS SUPPLIES 146.35 SUSAN BROADWELL, PSY. D. SERVICES 400.00 SUSPENSE FUND PAYROLL EXPD 2,490.10 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 214.28 VITAL RECORDS SERVICES 15.00 WESTERN PAGING SERVICES 53.85 PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY PAYROLL # 3 & 4 28,666.75 70,744.76 WRAP FUND CAMP CHIP-A- TOOTH SERVICES 354.00 KATHLEEN SAYERS SERVICES 108.00 KIM HURST SERVICES 120.00 MEET THE WILDERNESS SERVICES 750.00 PANDABEARPRESCHOOL SERVICES 105.00 SAMARITAN CENTER OF THE SERVICES 210.00 1,647.00 RETIREMENT FUND CCO AND ERA EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 43,467.68 43,467.68 INSURANCE RESERVE FUND AGENCY AUTO GLASS PARTS/SERVICES 331.88 GYPSUM AUTO BODY PARTS/SERVICES 2,304.70 2,636.58 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS SERVICES 358.82 BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC SUPPLIES 193.00 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT EQUIPMENT 50,138.00 10 03-13-2000 JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC SERVICES 32.50 MARCIN ENGINEERING INC SERVICES 1,380.40 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 520.42 52,623.14 SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. AIR TOUCH CELLULAR SERVICES 26.10 AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICES 396.50 ANNETTE PRESSLEY SERVICES 553.14 AVON SELF STORAGE SERVICES 715.00 BERTHODS, INC SERVICES 1,250.00 CASTA SERVICES 3,604.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 473.54 CITY MARKET #26 SUPPLIES 64.10 COPY COPY SUPPLIES 242.05 D & M MAINTENANCE SERVICE SERVICES 120.00 DENCO DIVISIONS SUPPLIES/SER VICES 101.00 EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL SUPPLIES 36.00 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER SERVICES 23.70 GARY BROWN SERVICES 200.00 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 1,723.70 HOLYCROSS ENERGY SERVICES 45.79 JANET FIELD REIMBURSEMENT 62.37 MCI TELECOMMUNICA nONS SERVICES 23.02 NORWEST BANK EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 4,737.80 PREMIER MAINTENANCE CO SERVICES 713.65 PUBLIC SERVICE SERVICES 264.05 TOWN OF AVON SERVICES 454,548.30 US WEST COMMUNICA nONS SERVICES 870.19 V AIL NET SERVICES 200.00 V AIL V ALLEY EXCHANGE INC SERVICES 6,300.00 WALMART IAVON SUPPLIES 28.71 XEROX CORPORA nON SERVICES 324.00 PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY PAYROLL # 3 & 4 10,204.28 487,850.99 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 113.80 COPY COPY SUPPLIES 996.96 EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL SUPPLIES 10.00 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER SERVICES 100.00 EAGLE V ALLEY ENTERPRISE SERVICES 96.00 11 03-13-2000 FEDERAL EXPRESS SERVICES 73.09 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 103.64 MONROE & NEWELL SERVICES 660.00 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 714.50 2,867.99 SALES TAX R.F. V. TRAILS EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL SUPPLIES/SERVICES 108.00 108.00 AIRPORT FUND AIR TOUCH CELLULAR SERVICES 163.06 ALPINE TIRE COMPANY PARTS 206.04 AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT SERVICES 1,600.00 ASHLAND CHEMICAL CO SUPPLIES 17,500.46 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 21.93 BEST WESTERN EAGLE LODGE SERVICES 150.00 BROWNING FERRIS IND SERVICES 426.52 CALOIA, HOUPT & LIGHT PC SERVICES 426.50 CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 46.92 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 2,535.65 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICES 34.88 CENTURYTEL SERVICES 6,145.36 CO DEPT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 450.00 COLUMBINE MARKET SUPPLIES 2.37 CROUSE HINDS AIRPORT SERVICES 517.12 DAILY JOURNAL THE SERVICES 697.40 DEEP ROCK WEST SUPPLIES/SERVICES 35.79 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES 186.38 EAGLE V ALLEY PRINTING SUPPLIES 485.00 FRONT RANGE FIRE PARTS 311.31 GYPSUM TOWN OF SERVICES 91.21 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 3,816.74 HERTZ CORPORATION SERVICES 193.68 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICES 4,389.33 INTERFLIGHT SERVICES 375.00 JAMES PEL WOOD REIMBURSEMENT 238.49 JIM JACKSON REIMBURSEMENT 35.00 KN ENERGY INC SERVICES 2,553.61 LARRY FAULKNER SERVICES 4,500.00 LA WSON PRODUCTS PARTS 108.13 M&MAUTOPARTS PARTS 327.31 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 153.52 12 03-13-2000 MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES 24,825.25 MOTOROLA PARTS 1,064.25 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 14,574.62 OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORA nON PARTS 94.49 RENTX/EZ WAY SERVICES 22.40 ROY F WESTON, INC SERVICES 3,000.00 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 328.98 SEARS SUPPLIES 7.53 STEWART & STEVENSON POWER PARTS 8,131.42 SUMMIT COMMERICAL LAUNDRY SERVICES 1,351.50 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 5.43 UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SERVICES 235.00 V AIL V ALLEY JET CENTER SUPPLIES 19.19 PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY PAYROLL # 3 & 4 36,352.77 138,737.54 CONTINGENT FUND COLORADO STATE PATROL SUPPLIES 17,000.00 17,000.00 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND DELL INC EQUIPMENT 6,228.90 HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS EQUIPMENT 2,405.00 MICRO WAREHOUSE EQUIPMENT 549.95 MOUNTAIN MAX INTERNET PARTS 300.00 XEROX CORPORA nON EQUIPMENT 9,390.00 18,873.85 DP A, LOCAL MONIES FUND HOUSING FUND TRANSFER 11,647.00 11,647.00 DP A CDBG FUND DPA LOCAL MONIES FUND SETTLE OF INTERFND LIABILITY 20,000.00 HOUSING FUND TRANSFER 5,000.00 25,000.00 DPACHAFAFUND 13 03-13-2000 HOUSING FUND TRANSFER 25,000.00 25,000.00 LANDFILL FUND CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 1,424.78 CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING SUPPLIES 167.98 CENTRAL SERVICESIEC SERVICES 59.33 DEEP ROCK WEST SUPPLIES/SERVICES 66.50 EAGLE AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 29.87 EAGLECOUNTYPURCHASmG SUPPLIES 6.40 F G & S SEPTIC SERVICE SERVICES 350.00 GLOBAL OCCUPATIONAL SFTY SUPPLIES 543.47 HEALTH mSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 2,288.13 KRW CONSULTmG mc SERVICES 1,412.37 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS mc SERVICES 590.86 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 69,840.69 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 4,747.76 OFFICE PAVILION FURNITURE 4,079.25 OFFICE TEC KNOWLEDGY SERVICES 71.15 PEEP SERVICES 10,000.00 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 418.67 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICES 56,634.18 ROCKHURST COLLEGE SERVICES 278.00 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 155.99 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 16.54 SUSPENSE FUND PAYROLL EXPD 348.46 PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY PAYROLL # 3 & 4 11,222.42 164,752.80 MOTOR POOL FUND ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY SERVICES 1,288.65 ALCAN SPRING PARTS 158.00 ARMADILLO IRON WORKS SUPPLIES 16.80 BERTHOD MOTORS PARTS 25.73 BRAD RAGAN INC PARTS 1,257.68 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS SUPPLIES 358.75 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 1,051.36 CLERK OF ADAMS COUNTY SERVICES 230.76 COLLETTS SUPPLIES 21,713.72 DELTA KITS SUPPLIES 84.70 EAGLE AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 2,399.29 14 03-13-2000 GA Y JOHNSONS INC PARTS 1,772.62 GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD PARTS 80.00 HANSON EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 52.71 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 3,098.27 JAY MAX SALES SUPPLIES 106.40 JIM-N-I AUTO CARE PARTS/SERVICES 1,023.00 KARPRODUCTSINCORPORATED PARTS 143.72 KOIS BROTHERS SUPPLIES 1,301.67 M & M AUTO PARTS PARTS 201.66 MAC TOOLS SUPPLIES 30.95 MESA SUPPLY COMPANIES SERVICES 746.40 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 3,582.80 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 6,890.86 POWER MOTIVE PARTS 41.50 REY MOTORS INCORPORATED SUPPLIES 135.95 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CFC SERVICES 138.87 SUMMIT LUMBER PARTS 3.00 SUSPENSE FUND PAYROLL EXPD 500.00 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY PARTS 1,380.82 WESTERN SLOPE CHRYSLER PARTS/SERVICES 140.40 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 1,019.71 PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY PAYROLL # 3 & 4 14,698.46 65,675.21 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND ALPINE BANK TRANSFER 599,000.00 DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY SERVICES 15,291.73 PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT SERVICES 2,524.55 UNITED STATES LIFE INS SERVICES 3,049.50 VISION SERVICE PLAN - CO SERVICES 8,989.36 628,855.14 ENHANCED E911 FUND CENTURYTEL SERVICES 171.35 JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC SERVICES 1,312.50 5,840.06 GRAND TOTAL 3,634,368.11 15 03-13-2000 This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: Consent Calendar Chairman Stone stated the first item before the Board was the consent agenda as follows: A) Approval of bill paying for week of March 13,2000 subject to review by County Administrator B) Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meetings for February 14 & 22, 2000 C) Scheduled replacement of Unit #7425 D) Change order, Women's Infant and Children's Program E) Resolution 2000-033 authorizing the Eagle County Facilities Management Director, Richard Cunningham, to enter into Fair contracts up to Five Thousand Dollars regarding the Eagle County Fair and Rodeo F) Bid award, 2000 supply and distribution of magnesium chloride, approximately 571,466 gallons from Harry's Heavy Haulers, Rifle, Colorado G) Grant for communications center dispatchers for FY 2000 H) USGS Gaging Station Funding Agreement I) Resolution 2000-034 appointing Tom C. Stone to the Eagle County Regional Transportation Authority J) Resolution 2000-035 appointing Michael L. Gallagher to the Roaring Fork Transit Agency K) Resolution 2000-036 appointing Michael L. Gallagher to the Northwest Colorado Options for Long Term Care L) Resolution 2000-037 appointing Michael L. Gallagher to the Rural Transportation Authority Policy Committee M) Resolution 2000-038 appointing Michael L. Gallagher and Tom C. Stone to the Ruedi Reservoir Water & Power Authority N) Resolution 2000-039 concerning appointments to the Eagle County Regional Transportation Authority 0) Resolution 2000-040 concerning appointments to the Eagle County Planning commission, Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission, Zoning Board of Adjustment and Building Board of Appeals. Commissioner Gallagher asked the minutes listed in item B be pulled and approved separately. He stated he was not here on the 14th. Commissioner Phillips stated she was gone on the 14th as well. Commissioner Gallagher asked about item C and replacement of that unit. Brad Higgins, Director of Road & Bridge, stated it is a light plant generator which is used at the Land Fill for generator service. He stated it is used more as the light plant for the rodeo. Commissioner Gallagher asked about item F, the mag-chloride program. He asked if this is application as well. Mr. Higgins responded it is and it is for every gravel road in Eagle County. Commissioner Gallagher asked about item G, grant for communications center dispatchers for FY2000. He asked about the Telephone Emergency Authority. Jim Fritze, County Attorney, stated it is more often referred to as the E911 Board. He stated the fees are on the phone bills. Commissioner Gallagher asked what the $173,000 pays for. 16 03-13-2000 Terry Lowell, Finance Director, stated it goes to the dispatch center at Vail for the 911 services for all agencies. Commissioner Gallagher asked on item H, Gaging Station, why the County pays money to that. Ray Merry, Environmental Health Officer, stated they entered into an agreement back in the late 1980's with GulfWestem or New Jersey Zinc. He stated the County was interested in being a player in water quantity and quality data associated with the mine. The County agreed to pay for half of the staging station and U.S.G.S. pays the other half. The County is reimbursed half of the expense by Viacom. Commissioner Phillips stated it was earlier than the 1980's. She stated she believes it was early 70's. Jim Fritze stated at one time the Federal Government paid the whole thing but the Board thought they would have better data if involved monetarily. Commissioner Gallagher asked who has the information and uses it. Mr. Merry stated it is most relative to flood management. He stated the quality data is in a report that they received. It is used by those interested in Eagle River viability. He stated it is used for trend analysis. He stated it is used by Vicom. Mr. Fritze stated it is used by all the water engineers including their own. Commissioner Gallagher asked for the effective date on item 0 and the appointments to the Eagle County Planning Commission. Chairman Stone stated they had discussed looking at the files in the planning process and then making a determination. Keith Montag, Director of Community Development, stated he would suggest the effective date would be today, the date it is being enacted. Mr. Fritze stated he would like to note that the appointment of Gary Ferguson is the appointment to the Basalt seat. They, the Town of Basalt, has failed to appoint anyone, therefore the Board is taking this action. Commissioner Gallagher stated there is a correction on page 7 ofthe February 22 minutes in the middle of the page. Commissioner Phillips stated she also caught that correction. She stated it reads "Chairman Phillips stated, the Commissioners would not have bought the property." She related she is no longer Chairman and the rest should read "she did not believe Mr. Powell would have made those comments had the purchase of East/West Brush Creek not been completed". She stated on page 11 in the third paragraph it shows that "aerial" is misspelled. Commissioner Phillips moved to approve the consent calendar as presented with the exception of item B, Commissioner meeting minutes for February 14 and 22. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve the meeting minutes for February 22 as amended. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Phillips moved to approve the meeting minutes for February 14, relating she was not present on that date. Commissioner Gallagher was not present as well. Commissioner Phillips stated she did read the minutes. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. Commissioners Phillips and Stone voting aye and Commissioner Gallagher abstained. Plat & Resolution Signing Matt Gennett, Planner, presented the following plats and resolutions for the Board's consideration: 5MB-00209. Berry Creek Ranch. Filing No.4 ARe-subdivision of Lot 6. Block 1. 17 03-13-2000 He stated the purpose of this Minor Type B subdivision is to subdivide Lot 6 into Lots 6E and 6W, and to create an access easement for Lot 6E. He read staff findings as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. 1. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a. Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Commissioner Gallagher suggested this is the umpteenth time that lots have been subdivided in this area. Mr. Gennett agreed. Commissioner Gallagher questioned the changing in the zoning. Mr. Fritze explained this is for a lot zoned as duplex but until the duplex is built, they can't determine the numbering. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-00209, Berry Creek Ranch, Filing No.4, a resubdivision of Lot 6, Block 1, incorporating staff findings. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 5MB-00217. Miller's Creek on the Eae:le River. Lot 9. He stated the intent of this Minor Type B Subdivision is to re-subdivide Lot 9, Miller's Creek, to create two ~ duplex lots. He read staff findings as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. 1. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a. Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Commissioner Phillips moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-00217, Miller's Creek on the Eagle River, Lot 9, incorporating staff findings. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Stone explained that not all Counties review these files, even though they are straight forward. He spoke to one in Eagle-Vail which became an issue. He suggested the review is important. Commissioner Gallagher concurred. 5MB-00219. Berry Creek Ranch Filin~ No.4. Re-subdivision of Lot 42. Block 1 A Minor Type B that will re-subdivide Lot 42 into two lots, Lot 42A and 42B. He read staff findings as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 18 03-13-2000 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. 1. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a. Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-00219, Berry Creek Ranch, Filing No.4, resubdivision of Lot 42, Block 1, incorporating staff findings. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Resolution 2000-041. PDS-00015. A Resolution to approve of Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan for Kodiak Park. He stated on or about February P\ 1999, the County accepted for filing an application for approval of a Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan for Kodiak Park. The resolution being presented to the Board today is for the approval of the Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan for Kodiak Park. Commissioner Gallagher stated he has received mail opposing this and suggesting confusion between the findings with the Planning Commission and those of the Board of County Commissioners. He stated there has been concern with possible differences with what was presented to the Mid-Valley Planning Commission and what was presented to the Commissioners. Mr. Fritze stated that this was a quasi judicial hearing where Commissioner Johnson was then sitting and the resolution is the action of the Board at that time. He stated unless Commissioner Gallagher has reviewed the whole record he should not vote on this matter, but is certainly welcome to comment. Commissioner Gallagher stated the issue he believes is primary is the condition regarding the hotel. He understood the Planning Commissions approval was without the hotel or cabin. The Board's condition reads no hotel or cabin at the east end of the lake. Chairman Stone stated he understood this as did Commissioner Johnson as he made it apparent when Commissioner Johnson made the motion. He stated the Planning Commissions desires were clear as they had not originally suggested approval for the hotel appropriate. Once they learned, however, they were reducing the number of hotel rooms, they then saw it more favorably. He spoke to their desire to not have the cabin at the east end. Commissioner Phillips suggested the question was asked three times and she believes they did understand what they were approving. She asked if Commissioner Gallagher had been contacted by former Commissioner Johnson. Commissioner Gallagher stated he had not. That he had received the information from letters and newspaper clippings. Chairman Stone responded he believed the Board acted with full knowledge of the application. Commissioner Gallagher spoke to the resolution and the third page. He questioned the variance. Joe Forinash, Planner, stated what the two statements do is indicate the uses. He stated the dimensional limitations are different than what is normally approved. He stated this spells out the Board can review the additional uses at preliminary plan. Commissioner Phillips moved to approve Resolution 2000-041, file number PDS-00015, Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan for Kodiak Park. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. Commissioner Phillips and Stone voting aye and 19 03-13-2000 Commissioner Gallagher abstained. Glen Rappaport, Kodiak Park, was present and stated they did go to the Planning and Zoning two weeks later and related they were submitting a smaller lodge concept. They did request a work session with them to bring them back into the loop and get their comments. Chairman Stone thanked him for his efforts and thanked them for their spirit of cooperation. Mr. Rappaport stated regarding the letters, they did try to get the homeowners in and apprize them of the changes. He stated the official plan has never changed. Chairman Stone asked about Mr. Rappaports feeling about the hotel being there. Mr. Rappaport stated they came in with a plan that would allow the most flexibility. They need something that will fit more in scale. They have a client who is close to agreement. He thought the opposition would be more focused on the concept of having a lodge. The neighbors biggest concerns are the construction time. Chairman Stone stated as he made his decision he was not basing it on the person's business plan. He believes the appropriate questions were answered. Commissioner Phillips commended them on using lodge in lieu of hotel. 1041 Permit Amendment, Two Rivers PUD Ray Merry, Environmental Health Officer, presented a 1041 Permit Amendment Completeness Hearing for a major new domestic water and sewer treatment system and the efficient utilization of a municipal water project, Two Rivers PUD, Eagle County. The action that is being requested from the Board on March 13,2000, is to determine completeness ofa 1041 Permit amendment application and to estimate associated processing fees. Two Rivers Village Development Co., L.L.C. has submitted a 1041 Permit application for the construction of a major new domestic water and sewage treatment system for the 'Two Rivers PUD' property. This permit seeks to amend water tank size from 500,000 gallons (as previously approved by a 1041 permit for the same property) to 350,000 gallons. He stated several other items were requested to be amended. He referred to the memorandum. He stated it will be heard by the Planning Commission on may 3. Staff has reviewed the above referenced permit amendment application and has found it to be complete. We have tentatively scheduled this amendment permit hearing for the Permit Authority on May 15, 2000. Estimated fees for the above referenced 1041 Permit application are as follows: Community Development Staff 8 Hrs @ $42.50 = $ 340.00 Engineering Staff 5 Hrs @ $42.50 = $ 212.50 Attorney Staff 4 Hrs @ $75.00 = $ 300.00 TOT AL = $852.50 Mr. Fritze asked if they are still calling this an amendment? Mr. Merry explained in the 1041 permit approval, there is nothing that allows for an amendment. For something like this, it may be arguable that the Planning Commission need not review. The permit will go through the normal tracking, but many of the previous findings are the same. He stated it will track as a full blown amendment. He stated they have the opportunity through public notice to get it to the Planning Commission. Mr. Fritze stated in the rewrite of the regulations they are looking to clarify when amendments are viable and when not. Commissioner Gallagher asked ifthey should adjourn and reconvene as the Permit Authority. 20 03-13-2000 Mr. Fritze stated it is heard by the same Board. He suggested if it was a hearing of major consequence, it might be more appropriate. Commissioner Gallagher asked where they can get the attorney fees like those listed. Mr. Fritze suggested the fees being used may be out of date. Commissioner Gallagher moved the Board accept the permit amendment application, submitted by Two Rivers Development Co., for the construction of a major new domestic water and sewage treatment system for the Two Rivers PUD development located in Dotsero, as complete. The estimated fee to process this application is $852.50 and may be altered to cover the actual cost of review and public hearings. Additionally, the Board approve the applicants waiver request for the requirement of a special use permit, as applied from Section 3-310 I of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Phillips moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Boaters Bar Earlene Roach, Liquor Inspector, stated she has an application for a new tavern license for The Boaters Bar LLC, dba/The Boaters Bar. She requested this matter be tabled to April 3, 2000 at 11 :30 a.m. The applicant could not be present. Commissioner Gallagher moved to table the application for The Boaters Bar LLC, dba/The Boaters Bar to April 3, 2000 at 11 :30 a.m at the applicants request. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Phillips moved to adjourn as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority and reconvene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 1041-0025, Cordillera Mountain Tract Amendment Ray Merry, Environmental Health Officer, presented file number 1041-0025, Cordillera Mountain Tract Amendment. He stated this was a permit for "Major Extensions of existing domestic water and sewage treatment systems" and for "Efficient utilization of a municipal water project." Cordillera is proposing to amend the previously approved extension of water service to the Mountain Tract, a 2495 acre development south of Cordillera's Far Western parcel. During construction of the system, it was made aware to the applicant that the layout of the water lines did not coincide with the layout that was approved in the original 1041 permit, and that an amendment was needed. This amendment proposes to relocate most of the water lines, the water tank, roadways, and lot layout that was previously approved for the Mountain Tract. In large part, the relocation of these items is due to the addition of the Golf Course on the same property after the original 1041 permit(1041-0014) was already issued. The number of units receiving centralized water has also remained the same as the previously approved 1041 permit (140 units total). The location details of this proposed amendment are found in 'Attachment C' of the application. The applicant proposes to make centralized water distribution available to the non-35 acre lots of the Mountain Tract, along with 5 of the 35-acre lots in the Territories. These five lots were originally proposed to use groundwater, but may not have adequate potential. Additionally, all the residential lots within the Mountain Tract and the Territories will be served by individual sewage disposal systems. Mr. Merry reviewed referral responses as follows: 21 03-13-2000 County Engineer: No major concerns with this amendment.(Comments attached) Colorado Geological Survey: The only concern is the addition of the waterline to the first five lots of The Territories. This alignment crosses relic landslide terrain. Special consideration should be taken to assure that the placement of this line does not exacerbate slope instability. Should be addressed during the design phase of this project.(Comments attached) NWCCOG: Confusion over wetland impact areas and right-of-way delineations on maps provided. What are 'small' impacts from amendment? Recommends keeping wetlands out of Rights- of- Way. (Comments attached) Matt Dean, representing the applicant, stated the largest concern is the additional water line for the five lots. He stated that line was added to service 5 lots and the primary issue is geologic. He addressed the reason for the water line. He stated a few tests were done on wells. He presented copies of the study showing the reason for going to the domestic supply. He related the well water was too uncertain so they made a decision to put in the water line. Consequently this amendment for the 1041 came up and it crosses a few relic landslide areas. He pointed out on a map the location of the water line. Mr. Dean stated he hired H.P. Geotech to look at the landslide area. He stated they found the possibility of a landslide is slim. Bob Loeffler, Deputy County Attorney, asked if the water line was installed. Mr. Merry stated the line was installed before an amendment to their 1041 permit could be heard. Chairman Stone stated Cordillera believed they could make the changes without coming in for an amendment. He stated they found out they needed an amendment and stopped work and are here before the Board. Mr. Merry stated that was correct. He stated the territory lots can have a primary unit and a caretaker unit. Chairman Stone asked what is looked at when a 1041 permit is applied for. Mr. Merry stated geology was a consideration and wetlands were reviewed. He stated there are no wetlands. In order for the Board to make the findings, the Board can accept the letter from Hepworth Powlik. Chairman Stone reviewed the letter stating certain items were to be addressed during the design phase of the project. Mr. Merry stated there was no design phase and those items were not addressed during that time, but he believes they have been since. Commissioner Gallagher asked what was built different than what was originally applied for. Mr. Dean showed an overlay of the original permit and what was built. Nicole Gonzales, representing the applicant, stated the water line in the area is staying close to the original layout. She reviewed the map for the Board pointing out the landslide area. She stated the original line would have crossed the landslide area to some degree. Chris Williams, Johnson, Kunkel & Associates, stated the tank location did not change much and is the same height and same capacity. Chairman Stone addressed the letter from H.P. Geotech, and asked if those items have been addressed. Mr. Williams stated Cordillera Mountain Metropolitan District is the responsible party for the water line. Mr. Merry stated it seems to be a reasonable condition to permit approval. Chairman Stone stated Cordillera is usually pretty good and he does not believe this was intentional. Mr. Merry stated he is working with 1041 applicants about not putting themselves into a comer. They need to ask before any changes are made. 22 03-13-2000 Mr. Merry reviewed staffs concerns and issues as follows": Staff has no major issues of concerns with this permit amendment application as submitted. The impacts of the said amendment to the prior permit are minimal, and do not create any anticipated higher level of environmental impact. For clarification, the first page of 'Attachment A' (Scope of the Proiect) should be corrected to say that only 5 lots of the Territories (35-acre lots) are receiving water service. It should be noted that none of the 'legal' considerations to supply such a water system have changed since the applicants testimony during the original 1041 permit hearing (1041-0014). The overall Cordillera density (910 units) has not been increased, and to staff s determination, the original water augmentation plans from 1992 have not been altered. The water sources for the system are a combination of well-fields, Homestake, and Green Mountain Reservoir sources. At the original permit hearing, there was extensive discussion regarding potential Eagle River depletions caused by this development and the subsequent augmentation by Homestake Reservoir. Additionally, while most of the amendment modifications proposed are relatively minor adjustments, the applicant is now aware that 'field adjustments' of prior permit approvals are not permissible without first seeking to amend the original 1041 permit through formal action by Eagle County. Mr. Merry read staff findings as follows: In accordance with Section 6.04.15 ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations, and as more specifically described in the amendment application for the Cordillera Mountain Tract Water System. a. New domestic water and sewage treatment systems shall be constructed in areas which will result in the proper utilization of existing water and sewage treatment systems of communities within this County within the development area and source development area; FINDINGS: This amended water system, as proposed, will result in proper utilization ofthe water supply and wastewater systems for the development. b. The proposed development does not conflict with an approved local master plan or other applicable Regional, State or Federal land use or water plan; FINDINGS: The proposed development does not conflict with the Eagle County Master Plan, the Eagle County Open Space Plan, or other applicable Regional, State or Federal land use or water plans. c. The proposed development does not adversely affect either surface or subsurface water rights of upstream or downstream users; FINDINGS: The proposed development will not adversely affect either surface or subsurface water rights of upstream or downstream users. The applicant has sufficient legal water. d. Adequate water supplies, as determined by the Colorado Department of Health, are available for efficient operational needs; FINDINGS: Adequate water supplies, as determined by the Colorado Department of Health, will be available for efficient operational needs. e. Existing domestic water treatment systems servicing the area must be at or near operational capacity; FINDINGS: Existing water storage systems in the region are at or near operational capacity, and originally designed to serve only their respective developments. f. Existing domestic sewage treatment facilities servicing the area must be at or greater than eighty percent (80%) of operational capacity; FINDINGS: Existing systems are near capacity, or with little capacity which would require prohibitive costs to the feasibility ofthe proposed project. g. The scope and nature of the proposed development will not compete with existing water and sewage services or create duplicate services; FINDINGS: The scope and nature ofthe proposed development will not compete with existing water or sewage services, as it is not offering water taps outside their existing subdivision. 23 03-13-2000 h. Age of existing water and sewage systems, operational efficiency, state of repair or level of treatment is such that replacement is warranted; FINDINGS: The proposed extension does not intend to repair or replace an existing system, but are proposed as a new facility to enhance the capability of the existing systems that it will be connected to. i. Area and community development and population trends demonstrate clearly a need for such development; FINDINGS: Area and community development and population trends demonstrate clearly a need for increased domestic water supply storage and wastewater conveyance systems. j. Existing facilities cannot be upgraded or expanded to meet waste discharge permit conditions of the Colorado Water Quality Control Division; FINDINGS: This permit application does not propose a new \hlastewater treatment plant. k. Appropriate easements can be obtained for any associate1 collector or distribution system that will serve existing and proposed needs; FINDINGS: All easements required for proposed water systems servicing both the Mountain Tract and the Far Western Property are on property owned by the developer. l. The benefits of the proposed development outweigh The losses of any natural resources or agricultural lands rendered unavailable as a result of the proposed ,'evelopment; FINDINGS: The benefits ofthe proposed domestic water storage system outweigh the losses of any natural resources or agricultural lands rendered unavailable as a result of~he project. m. The proposed development will not decrease the quality of pedllheraI downstream surface or subsurface water resources below that designated by Colorado"Water Quality Control Commission as established on May 22, 1979, and effective July 10, 1979, of' more stringent standards subsequently adopted; FINDINGS: Not applicable. n. The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution system or new service areas will not violate Federal or State air quality standards; FINDINGS: The proposed development and its associated collector systemNTill not violate Federal or State air quality standards. o. The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution system will not significantly deteriorate aquatic habitats, marshlands and wetlands, groundwater recharge areas, steeply sloping or unstable terrain, forest and woodlands, critical wildlife habitat;' hig game migratory routes, calving grounds, migratory ponds, nesting areas and the habitat"' of rare and endangered species, public out-door recreation areas, and unique areas of geologic,\bistoric or archaeological importance; FINDINGS: The proposed development will not significantly deteriorate aquatic h::bitats, marshlands and wetlands, groundwater recharge areas, steeply sloping or unstable terrain, fcrest and woodlands, critical wildlife habitat, big game migratory routes, calving grounds, migratory p,':mds, nesting areas and the habitats of rare and endangered species, public out-door recreation area.s, and unique areas of geologic, historic or archaeological importance if the construction is in accon:4mce with the application submitted. p. The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution system will\.ltot significantly degrade existing natural scenic characteristics, create blight, nor cause other nuisance factors such as excessive noise or obnoxious odors; FINDINGS: The proposed development will not significantly degrade existing natural scenic characteristics, create blight, nor cause other nuisance factors such as excessive noise or obnoxious odors if the construction is in accordance with the application submitted. q. The proposed development or its associated collector or distribution systems will not 24 03-13-2000 create an undue financial burden on existing or future residents within the development area and the source development area. The cost of securing an adequate supply of water for existing and future needs of the residents of the County shall be considered in determining whether an "undue financial burden" will result; FINDINGS: The proposed development will not create an undue financial burden on existing or future residents within the development area and the source development area, since all project facilities will be paid for by the owner of the proposed development. r. The development site of a proposed major extension of an existing domestic water or sewage treatment system is not subject to significant risk from earthquakes, floods, fires, snowslides, landslides, avalanches, rock slides or other disasters which could cause a system operation breakdown; FINDINGS: The development site of the proposed water and sewage system extension is not subject to significant risk from earthquakes, floods, fires, landslides, avalanches, rock slides, or other disasters which could cause a system operation breakdown. s. Any proposed domestic water treatment and distribution system is capable of providing water meeting the requirements of the Colorado Department of Health; FINDINGS: The proposed development and associated distribution system is capable of providing water meeting the re,quirements of the Colorado Department of Health. t. The construction of structures, buildings, and improvements associated with the proposed development will not significantly impact existing or proposed communities within the development area and source development area; FINDINGS: The construction of structures, buildings, and improvements associated with the proposed development will not significantly impact existing or proposed communities within the development area and source development area. In accordance with Section 6.05.15 (Efficient Utilization of Municipal and Industrial Water Projects) ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations, approval of the Permit application: a. The need for the proposed water project can be substantiated; FINDINGS: The need for the proposed water system can be substantiated based on historic growth rate and prior land use approvals. b. Assurances of compatibility of the proposed water project with Federal, State, Regional, and County planning policies regarding land use and water resources; FINDINGS: The proposed development does not conflict with The Eagle County Master Plan, The Eagle County Open Space Plan, or other applicable Regional, State or Federal land use or water plans. c. The proposed development does not adversely affect either surface or subsurface water rights of upstream or downstream users. FINDINGS: The proposed development will not adversely affect either surface or subsurface , water rights of upstream or downstream users. The applicant has sufficient legal water. d. Adequate water supplies, as determined by the Colorado Department of Health, are available for 'efficient operational needs; FINDINGS: Adequate water supplies, as determined by the Colorado Department of Health, will be available for efficient operational needs; e. The proposed water project is capable of providing water pursuant to standards of the Colorado Department of Health; FINDINGS: The proposed water project is capable of providing water pursuant to standards of the Colorado Department of Health; f. The proposed diversion of water from the source development area will not decrease the quality of peripheral or downstream surface water resources in the source development area 25 03-13-2000 below that designated by the Colorado Water Quality Control Division on May 22,1979, and effective July 10, 1979, or more stringent standards subsequently adopted; FINDINGS: Not Applicable. g. The proposed development and the potential diversion of water from the source development area will not significantly deteriorate aquatic habitats, marshlands, and wetlands, groundwater recharge areas, steeply sloping or unstable terrain, forests and woodlands, critical wildlife habitat, big game migratory routes, calving grounds, migratory ponds, nesting area and the habitats or rare and endangered species, public outdoor recreational areas, and unique areas, and unique areas of geologic, historic or archaeological importance; FINDINGS: The proposed development will not significantly deteriorate aquatic habitats, marshlands and wetlands, groundwater recharge areas, steeply sloping or unstable terrain, forests and woodlands, critical wildlife habitat, big game migratory routes, calving grounds, migratory ponds, nesting areas, recreational areas, and unique areas, and unique areas of geologic, historic or archeological importance. h. The salinity and advanced wastewater treatment offset plans required by Section 6.05.13 (16) and (17) have been approved by the Permit Authority and required fees associated therewith, if any, have been paid; FINDINGS: Not applicable i. The construction of structures, buildings and improvements associated with the proposed development will not significantly impact existing or proposed communities within the development area and source development area; FINDINGS: The construction of structures, buildings and improvements associated with he proposed development will not significantly impact existing or proposed communities within the development area and source development area. In accordance with Chapter II, Article 3, Section 3.310.1 of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, approval of the Permit application: c. Major new domestic water or sewer systems, major extensions of such systems, and municipal and industrial water projects may be waived in whole or in part by the Board of County Commissioners upon a written petition by the applicant that: 2. That compliance with the special use permit requirements would be unreasonably burdensome for the applicant. FINDINGS: The applicant has requested a waiver of the special use permit requirements, as such application would serve no further legitimate planning, zoning or other land use objective. Chairman Stone asked for Mr. Merry to read staff s recommendations. Mr. Merry stated staff recommended approval with the following conditions: Staff recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. The approval of Lower water tank location depicted on the Mountain Tract Plans nullifies the previously approved water tank location on the Far Western Parcel, as approved by the Eagle County Permit Authority on May 27, 1997 in the Far Western Parcel 1041 permit application 1041-0004. 2. The applicant will consult with the Colorado Geological Survey regarding the line placement on the proposed five lots of the 'Territories' portion of this project, and copy Eagle County on such correspondence. The current CGS recommendations(EA-00-0012 Memo, dated January 18,2000), and any subsequent recommendations from the same agency, regarding line placement and potential adverse impact on slope stability shall be followed by the applicant. Chairman Stone stated the applicant has already dealt with the Colorado Geological Survey. Mr. Merry stated his recommendation would be not to include condition #2. Mr. Loeffler suggested they may want to require the systemic water leakage program, in which case that would be in lieu of the current condition number 2. Chairman Stone suggested they just handle it through the motion. 26 03-13-2000 Mr. Loeffler stated if that is included, findings 0 and G would be as read by Mr. Merry. 3. Except as otherwise modified by the Permit, all material representations of the applicant in this permit application, correspondence, and public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Commissioner Phillips moved to approve file number 1041-0025, Cordillera Mountain Tract, incorporating staff findings and conditions with the addition of the "the applicant shall implement and for the life of this system, maintain a systematic leak detection monitoring program, designed to detect water leakage in the web mountain landslide compacts and areas, mapped as QIS-2 and QIS-3, landslide areas, and findings as read by Mr. Merry, 0 & Q of the proposed findings." The waiver of special use permit shall be granted. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Stone stated for clarification, staffs recommended conditions included in the motion are as follows: 1) The approval of Lower water tank location depicted on the Mountain Tract Plans nullifies the previously approved water tank location on the Far Western Parcel, as approved by the Eagle County Permit Authority on May 27, 1997 in the Far Western Parcel 1041 permit application 1041-0004. 2) The applicant shall implement and for the life of this system, maintain a systematic leak detection monitoring program, designed to detect water leakage in the web mountain landslide compacts and areas, mapped as QIS-2 and QIS-3, landslide areas. 3) Except as otherwise modified by the Permit, all material representations of the applicant in this permit application, correspondence, and public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Resolution 20000-042, Building Resolution Amendments Dan Stanek, Chief Building Official, presented Resolution 2000-042, amendments to the Building Resolution. He said last January they adopted the Plumbing and the Electrical Codes. He spoke to the meetings of last year seeking input from the various entities. He is asking for adoption of the 1997 Uniform Plumbing Code and the 1999 National Electric Code. Mr. Stanek reviewed the amendments as follows: 3.06 The Uniform Plumbing Code, 1997 Edition, is specifically amended as follows: 3.06.01 PLUMBING LICENSE REQUIRED Pursuant to 12-58-115, C.R.S., only qualified licensed plumbers may install "Plumbing Systems" as defined in 202.0 ofthe Uniform Plumbing Code, 1994 Edition. 3.06.02 The Uniform Plumbing Code Section 103.4.1 "Permit Fees", is hereby amended. The amended schedule of Plumbing Permit Fees is contained in Table 5. Section 101.4.1.4. Conflicts Between Codes Amend to read: When the requirements withing the jurisdiction of this plumbing code conflict with the requirements of the mechanical code, the Building Official shall determine which code shall prevail. Section 103.4.4.2 Investigation Fees: Work without a Permit. Section 103.4.4 is amended to read: An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, may be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The invcstigation f-ce shall be equal to four times thc amoutlt of the pcrmit fcc. Thc minimum ilYvestigation fcc sha-ll be four times the mhiimum fcc gct forth in Table 5 . The investigation fee shall be four times the amount ofthe permit fee that would be required by this code if a permit were to be issued. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law. Section 203.0 Administrative Authority. Amend to read: The Eagle County Building Official 27 03-13-2000 is the Administrative Authority. Section 507.2 Combustion Air Amend the first sentence to read: All habitable Buildings shall be considered of unusually tight construction and all combustion air shall be obtained from the outside. Section 601.1 Running Water Required Delete the last sentence which reads: In jurisdictions which adopt Appendix J, water closets, urinal, and trap primers in designated non-residential building may be provided with reclaimed water as defined and regulated by Appendix J of this Code. Section 603.3.4 Heat Exchangers. Section 603.3.4 is amended to read: Heat exchangers and other assemblies or methods of construction using potable water shall be of listed construction and materials. The sections in contact with potable water shall be of material and weights suitable for potable water as set forth in this chapter. Section 603.4.4.1 Heat Exchangers Delete this section. Appendix I entitled "Private Sewage Disposal Systems" is hereby deleted. Section 609.1 Installation Amend the last sentence to read: The minimum cover shall be seven (7) feet below finish grade. Section 807.4 Appliances. Section 807.4 is amended to read: No domestic dishwashing machine shall be directly connected to a drainage system or food waste disposer without the use of an approved dishwasher air gap fitting on the discharge side of the dishwashing machine. Listed air gaps shall be installed with the flood level (FL) marking at or above the flood level of the sink or drain board, whichever is higher, or separately trapped with the air break located on the stand pipe. Section 906.1 Vent Termination. Section 906.1 is amended to include the following: Vent terminations on metal roofs shall be within 3 feet of the ridge or be provided with an alternate means of protection. Add Section 911 Horizontal and Vertical Wet Venting. Single bathroom groups - a single bathroom group of fixtures may be installed with the drain from an individually vented lavatory or lavatories serving as a wet vent for a bathtub, shower compartment, or floor drain and for a water closet provided the requirements listed below are met: (1) Not more than four fixture units drain into a minimum 2 inch diameter wet vent. Kitchen sinks, dishwashers, or automatic clothes washer connections are not permitted. (2) The horizontal branch drain connects to the stack at the same level as the water closet drain; or it may connect to the upper half of the horizontal portion of the water closet bend at an angle not greater than 45 degrees from the direction of flow. (3) Trap arm sizes and lengths shall conform to tables 4-1, 4-3, and 7-1. Section 1008.0-1008.5 Industrial Interceptors (Clarifiers) and Separators. Amend sections 1008-1008.5 to include the following: Sand Interceptors: Where Required Wherever a drain discharges through an oil interceptor, it must first discharge through a sand interceptor. Multiple floor drains may discharge into one sand interceptor. 2. Whenever the discharge of a floor drain may contain solids or semi-solids that would be harmful to a drainage system, or tend to choke the system, the discharge must be through a sand interceptor. Construction and Size: Sand interceptors shall be built of brick or concrete and be watertight. The interceptor shall have an interior brick or concrete baffle for the full separation of the interceptor into two sections. The outlet pipe shall be the same size as the inlet size of the oil interceptor, the minimum being 3 inches, and the baffle must have two openings of the same diameter as the outlet pipe and at the same invert as the outlet pipe. These openings must be staggered so that there cannot be a straight line of flow between any inlet pipe and the outlet pipe. The invert of the inlet pipes must be no lower than the invert of the outlet pipe. The sand interceptor shall have a minimum dimension of 2 feet square for the net free opening of the inlet section and a minimum depth under the invert of the outlet pipe of 2 feet. 28 03-13-2000 F or each 5 gallons per minute flow or fraction thereof over 20 gallons per minute, the area of the sand interceptor inlet section is to be increased by 1 square foot. The outlet section shall have at all times a minimum area of 50 percent of the inlet section. The outlet section must be covered by a solid removable cover set flush with the finished floor, and the inlet section shall have an open grating set flush with the finished floor and suitable for the traffic in the area in which it is located. Alternate Design: Alternate designs for construction or baffling of sand interceptors complying with the intent of this code may be submitted to the Building Official for approval. Discharge: When a sand interceptor is used by itself without also discharging through an oil interceptor, the outlet pipe must be turned down inside the interceptor under the water level to provide a 6-inch water seal. A clean out shall be installed to provide access to the outlet line. Oil And Flammable Liquids Separator: Where Required General: All commercial storage or repair garages; gasoline stations with grease racks, grease pits or wash racks; all motor vehicle laundries and all factories which have oily and/or flammable wastes as a result of manufacturing, storage, maintenance, repair or testing processes shall be provided with all necessary floor drains, sand interceptors, catch basins and oil interceptors properly vented through the roof on the sewer side of the diameter with a full-size clean out to grade and the vent pipe not less than 2-inches. Combination Oil And Sand Interceptor: A combination oil and sand interceptor may be installed when the design is approved in writing by the Building Official. Design, Overall Requirements: Oil separators shall have a depth of not less than 2 feet below the invert of the discharge drain. The outlet opening of the separator shall have not less than an 18-inch water seal. Motor Vehicle Garages: On each floor of garages where not more than three motor vehicles are serviced and stored, separators shall have a minimum capacity of 6 cubic feet, and 1 cubic foot capacity shall be added for each vehicle up to 10 vehicles. Above 10 vehicles, the Building Official shall determine the size of the separator required. Service Stations And Repair Shops: Where vehicles are serviced only and not stored, separator capacity shall be based on a net capacity of 1 cubic foot for each 100 square feet of surface to be drained into the separator with a minimum of 6 cubic feet. Section 1204.3.1 Rough Piping Inspection. Amend Section 1204.3.1 to add the following sentences: This inspection shall include air, CO2 or nitrogen pressure test, at which time the gas piping shall stand a pressure of not less than 10 psi for threaded pipe for not less than 15 minutes. Section 1209.6 Gas Meter Locations. Amend Section 1209.6 to add the following sentence: Gas meters shall not be located in an area subject to physical damage, i.e. areas subject to snow and/or ice falling from roofs or vehicle damage. 3.08 The National Electric Code, 1999 Edition, is specifically amended as follows: Pursuant to 12-23-105 C.R.S. only qualified licensed electricians may install "Electrical Work" as defined in 12-23-101 (1.7) by Colorado State Electrical Board 1996 Edition. Notwithstanding the foregoing provision, an Electrical License will not be required provided all conditions of Section 12-23- 111(2) C.R.S. have been satisfied. Article 210-8 Ground-Fault Circuit-Interrupter protection for Personnel. Amended to add the following sentence: All G.F.C.I. protection shall be resettable in rooms where protection is required including outside receptacles. (No change from 1996 NEC) Article 210-8 (a). 1. Ground Fault Circuit-Interrupter Protection for Personnel. Article 210-8 (a). 1. Is amended to read as follows: (1) Bathrooms. Accessible receptacle outlets shall not be located within 3 feet of the inside edge of bathtubs or hydro massage bathtubs. (No change from 1996 NEC) Article 210-11(c)(3) Branch Circuits Required Dwelling Units. Amended to add the following sentence: There shall be no more than four duplex receptacles on this 20 amp circuit. 29 03-13-2000 Article 210-21 Outlet Devices, 220-3 Computation of Branch Circuits, 220-4 Branch Circuits Required. Amendment of Articles 210-21,220-3,220-4 to add the following sentence to the first paragraph: Only eight receptacle outlets will be installed on 15 amp circuits; or ten receptacle outlets on 20 amp circuits for lighting branch circuits including receptacles. (No change from 1996 NEC) Article 229 5(b) 220-5(b)Small Appliance Branch Circuits-Dwelling Unit. Amendment of Article 220 4 (b) 220-16(a)to add the following sentence to the first paragraph: There shall be no more than four duplex receptacles on each small appliance branch circuit. (Article numbers changed from 1996 NEC) Article 305 Temporary Wiring. Amendment of Article 305-1 Scope to add a new subsection: ( e) Permanent services on buildings which are energized for construction work will be considered as temporary service equipment until such time as the final inspection is completed. (No change from 1996 NEC) Article 410-65 Temperature. Article 410-65 is amended by adding the following subsection: (d) All in-floor heat piping must be a minimum of 6 inches away from all recessed light fixtures. (No change from 1996 NEC) Article 680-70 Hydro massage Bathtubs. To add the following sentence: All G.F.C.I. protection shall be located within the same room. It is to be installed 5 feet + off of finished floor and 5 feet from hydro massage bathtub. The cord is not to exceed 3 feet from motor to receptacle installed near the access door protected by the resettable G.F.C.I. mounted on the wall. (The resettable G.F.C.I. is not to be installed under the tub). A 15" x 20" minimum access is required for hydro massage tub motors. (No change from 1996 NEC) Article 695-1. Scope. Article 695-1. Scope. (a) Covered. Is amended by adding the following: (3) This article applies to pumps used to supply sprinkler systems in one-and two-family dwellings. NFP A 13D- 1996, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two-Family Dwellings and Manufactured Homes. (No change from 1996 NEC) Article 695-6(a). Power Wiring. (a) Supply conductors. Article 695-8. (A) Is amended by adding the following: Where supply conductors for fire sprinkler systems in NFPA 13D systems cannot be routed outside buildings, they shall be permitted to be routed through the building provided they are installed under or enclosed within not less than 2 inches of concrete in accordance with Article 230, or in a one-hour fire resistive shaft. Article 695-(6) Power Wiring. (b) Circuit Conductors. Article 695. Is amended by adding the following: Wiring methods for fire pumps in buildings containing NFP A 13D systems may be in accordance with the manufacturer's listing. Article 695-6 Power Wiring. (E) Pump Wiring. Article 695. Is amended by adding the following: Wiring methods for fire pumps in buildings containing NFP A 13D systems may be in accordance with the manufacturer's listing. Article 695-8. Power Wiring. (a) Supply Conductors. Article 695-8. (a) Is amended by adding the following: Where supply conductors for fire sprinkler systems in NFP A 13D systems cannot be routed outside buildings, they shall be permitted to be routed through the building provided they are installed under or enclosed within not less than 2 inches of concrete in accordance with Article 230, or in a one-hour fire resistive shaft. Article 695 8. (b) 'NiriBg Mdllods. Miele 695 8. (b) Is amcfided by addifig the fullo'v'ving: 'Wiring methods for fire pumps in buildifigs cofitaifiifig NfPA IJD systems may be ifi accordance 'vVith the manufacturer's listifig. Article 695 9. (e) V/iriBg l\idllods. l'\..rticle 695 9. (e) Is amcfidcd by addifig the follo'vvifig: 'Nirifig methods for fire pumps ifi lmildifigs contaifiifig NfPl'\. 13D s)'stems may be in accordance 'Nith the manufaeturer's listifig. 30 03-13-2000 UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PROVISIONS FOR THE 1996 NEe: Section 304.4.2 Investigation Fee. Section 340.4.2 is amended to read: An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, may be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to four times the amount of the permit fee. The minimum investigation fee shall be four times the minimum fee set forth in Table 6. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law. Table 3B-Fee Schedule is hereby amended. A current schedule of Electrical Permit fees is contained in Table 6. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve the amendments and adopt the 1997 Uniform Plumbing Code and the 1999 National Electric Code. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDF-00047, Skywatch, Filing 2 Joe Forinash, Planner, presented file number PDF-00047, Skywatch, Filing 2. He stated this is a Final Plat which would subdivide Tract 0, Bachelor Gulch Village Filing No.3, to create seven (7) single-family residential lots, a common parcel, and easements. He reviewed the chronology of the property : 1996 - Tract 0 was originally platted as a part of Bachelor Gulch Village Filing No.3. Mr. Forinash reviewed the referral responses as follows: 1. Assessor No comments. 2. Engineering No comments. 3. Environmental Health No comments. 4. Surveyor (attached) Technical items. Mr. Forinash stated staff has no concerns with this application. Commissioner Gallagher asked if this is a change in density. Mr. Forinash responded it is not. He reviewed staff findings as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-280. B.5.b(3). Final Plat for Subdivision - Action by the Board of County Commissioners..ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the following findings are made: The Final Plat DOES conform to the approved Preliminary Plan for Subdivision for Lower Bachelor Gulch Village, Filing No.3., and Pursuant to Section 5-280.B.3.e, Subdivision Standards, of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the following findings are made: (1) Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed subdivision IS consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the Future Land Use Map of the Master Plan; (2) Consistent with Land Use Regulations. The proposed subdivision DOES comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards; (3) Spatial Patterns Shall Be Efficient. The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (a) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions IS consistent with the 31 03-13-2000 utility's service plan. Proposed road extensions ARE consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital Improvements Plan. (b) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines ARE sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (c) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions ARE allowed only when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area. (4) Suitability for Development. The property propi)sed to be subdivided IS suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental reSOllrces and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. (5) Compatible With Surrounding Uses. The propostld subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adverse".' affect the future development ofthe surrounding area. Commissioner Phillips moved the Board approve File NC:,PDF-00047, Skywatch, Filing 2, incorporating staff findings and authorize the Chairman to sign th?~)plat, subdividing Tract 0, Bachelor Gulch Village, Filing 3, to create 7 single family residential lots, c~~;~m.mOh parcel and easements. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote W\:'5 declared unanimous. PDS-00017, Red Sky Ranch Chairman Stone stated the Board will have to leave the meetin!:,today at 5 :00 p.m. so this file may need to be tabled if it is not finished by the end of the day. Jean Garren, Planner, presented file number PDS-00017, Red Sih~r Ranch. She stated they first heard part of this file in 1998. She spoke to the special use permit for tli~;;golf course and the 12 residential uses by right. She showed the lots on the map and the lots th~~ithe DOW has suggested be moved. She stated some of the lots were geologically restrained and thosd'vvere shown in yellow on the map. Ms. Garren did an overlay and then showed the moved lots on the m~~p in red and following the DOW recommendations they were moved to another cluster. She stated thb)ots in red were not moved. Chairman Stone asked about the lots in red on the right side of the nWp. Ms. Garren stated all lots shown in red were recommended to be mOYi~d by the DOW but were not moved by the applicant. She stated there were no specific lots that were ~,.;i.ginally approved. She stated there were roughly 12 sites identified. She stated the whole area had p~~~viously been subdivided under Senate Bill 35. "\ At the Planning Commission he~ing, they recommended they?e elimitltted,.they did say if they clustered, they would recommend a denSIty bonus. She stated that baSIcally sm,~fnarIzes the changes. '" What are seen in green are lots and what are in red are those still of concern to ," DOW. She stated staf:Ps basis for denial are based on zoning as it is primarily zone resource. She ...... ed they don't have a problem ,:ith development on the east side. It is the west.side th~y a:e having tr~~ble with. What is proposed IS 23 lots and a golf course. All of the surroundmg ZOnIng IS resource. 'i\\ey have concerns there is potential there will be inappropriate land uses in the future. They have diffis:ulty with the loss of game hunting. They have a problem with the building not taking part around the cq~nmunity center. She stated they have trouble making a development nexus in a rural designated area. Sh~:stated the Wolcott Area Plan suggests they maintain the rural mountain environment balancing residenti~\l with the overall expansion of the area. She spoke to the ISDS and the fact there is no unified plan. Sll(~ stated they have difficulty seeing how two golf courses and 87 homes is rural and mountain residential {:r how it enhances life in Wolcott. She stated they have problems with this application meeting1he Eagle County Land Use Regulations. She spoke to the Planning Commissions findings which she wiHreview at a later 32 03-13-2000 time. She showed an overhead ofthe area known as Old Faithful Ridge. She showed their support of the area to the east. She stated the area on the west, that area proposed for additional development, she stated everyone can see that the area is certainly rural in nature. Chairman Stone asked about the properties identified that may be undesirable for future development. He asked what access that would be. Ms. Garren spoke to the Jouflas property and Diamond S Ranch. She stated there is land to the northwest that may have potential. Commissioner Gallagher asked how far is considered proximate to a community center. Ms. Garren stated that is subjective. Commissioner Gallagher asked if Bellyache Ridge is considered a community center. Ms. Garren stated no it is Wolcott. She put the map back up. She stated there is a limited area on the south side of the interchange and an extended piece on land on the north that was designated as the activities center for Wolcott which is where the urban type development was specified. Everything else was outside the activity center. She stated two parts on the eastern side of Old Faithful Ridge were designated Countryside, which contemplates lot size of between 2 and 35 acres. Peter Jamar, representing the applicants, introduced the project team being Jim Thompson, President of Vail Resorts, Tom Ragonnetti, Legal Council, Mark Thome, Vail Resorts, Rick Plyman, Jamar & Associates, Joe Malone and Alex Ciscondarian, Vail Resorts, Rick Thompson, Western Ecological Resource, David Johnson, Western Ecological Resource, Jamie Pappas & Kent Rose, involved with the engineering of the project, Dave & Gary Plath, co-applicants, Tom Williamson, Helton & Williamson, Rick MacCutcheon, Vail Resorts Development, Kent Crane & Deborah Decraza, Alpine Engineering, Bill Kennedy, Vail Resorts Development, Frank Harrison, Goulder Associates, Glen Porzack, water attorney and David Lahey, transportation and traffic. Mr. Jamar stated they do in fact have a recommendation for approval from the Planning Commission having worked with all of the referral agencies. There have been compromises and consensus. He stated they did receive the special use permit in October of 1999 and at that time indicated they would be back with a PUD. They submitted this plan in August of 1999. He stated the Planning Commission did recommend approval with nine conditions with which they agree. He began a slide show which spoke to the demand for golf. He stated currently Vail Resorts controls nearly 50% of the golf. With the economy and the growth of summer business they are trying to capitalize. There is a demand for additional golf in the valley. The Vail Recreation District is turning down around 100 people per day. He showed the rounds of golf played in the Eagle River Valley in the last year. He stated the key number is the 124,840 rounds played by overnight visitors. He stated there is a potential un-met demand of about 41,000 rounds. He stated that is almost two golf courses. He stated Vail Resorts asked them to work together to find a site for additional golf. Adequate land size and configuration is required, suitable topography and adequate water rights. The land must be compatible with adjacent last uses, fit in with the environment and have access. He stated they looked at 13 different locations up and down the valley. The Jouflas property possessed the characteristics they are looking for. He showed slides of the area showing the water features and the criteria they were looking for. He showed Old Faithful Ridge looking east to west. In terms of the existing conditions of the site, Old Faithful Ridge separates the area. He showed the wetlands on the map stating they studied and understand the characteristics to work around in their proposal. He showed maps of the vegetation. He showed the geological constraints and where the land is or isn't suitable to build. He showed the wildlife habitat on the site and the areas the DOW wants to keep open. That includes the ridge and the calving area. He stated another spot that became an issue is where they have eliminated the lots. In terms ofthe adjacent land use, there is a land use pattern that has occurred. He spoke to the development on Bellyache Road and the Bellyache Subdivision averaging one to two acres. He stated in terms of the existing and surrounding zoning it is in fact agricultural/residential. He stated that is one unit per ten acres. He spoke to the acreage being retained by the Jouflas family. He stated the higher 33 03-13-2000 density is actually to the south. He stated the Master Plan indicates the area around the interchange as being the community center. He stated the designation for countryside is anywhere from two acres per unit to one unit per thirty five acres. He believes they fit in pretty well at ten acres per unit. He stated they have done a visual analysis and show the results by a computer file. County staff has concurred there are no ridge line impacts. The other important thing is that they establish a real design theme with attention to detail attempting to try to preserve the ranching character of the property with stone and wood, ranch type buildings. They will minimally disturb the nature design. Much care will and has been taken in making this development understated. The key features are the need for golf facilities, providing more golf supply than demand, residential density compatible with the surrounding land use pattern, minimizing environmental impacts. They have a water plan consistent with neighbor concerns and consistent with Wolcott Area Community Plan which suggests that a golf course is a desirable use within the Community Plan. He reminded the Board they are in the sketch plan process and still have the preliminary plan and final plat to do. He suggested they will have another six months of planning. That concluded the slides. Commissioner Gallagher asked how many of the 40,000 rounds will this provide. Mr. Jamar asked if he could hold that question for a little later. Mr. Jamar asked to summarize the points stating that Ms. Garren pointed out a number of lots on the western side. He stated between the December 15th Planning Commission hearing and the February meeting they planned to delete those lots and cluster them in another area. He stated there is a seventy acre parcel that has previously been divided and is owned by the Plaths. They are co-applicants. He spoke to the second eighteen hole golf course. They met with Bill Heicher, Division of Wildlife, and thought they had deleted the lots that were of concern. They agreed in the February meeting and have deleted 12 lots on the western side and clustered on the eastern golf course on 1/3 acre lots. This will be developed as one project. Chairman Stone asked for clarification oflots 65,66, and 67. Mr. Jamar stated those are the ones now deleted. He stated that broadens the migration corridor. He stated the concern was winter range. He stated on the west side they have 20 single family homes, creating a 220 acre area for additional winter range. He stated they have created a far better situation than under the resource zoning as the developer could do eight 35 acres developments and could have two separate structures with out buildings. He stated there was initial concern in the corner with geology and considered it may have been a misinterpretation. It then involved some moving of the lots to keep the areas of concern undisturbed. In terms of a logical transition of density, he believes this gets lower as one moves out to the western side. The operation of the golf courses would have primarily been 50% resort play and 50% for residents and seasonal residents. This will open up, under the current plan, the courses will alternate between resort plan and correspondingly being used for memberships. It basically creates an 18 hole capacity of resort play. They want to put people on the resort golf course every day that it is in operation. He stated when there is space available they want people on the course. If that doesn't happen, the golfers will be playing at other courses. That is why they have the support for additional resort play. He stated it would be a good guess that the resort course could play 25,000 rounds of golf each year. He spoke to the other courses being built such as Eagle Ranch. He suggested two golf courses not only allow them the marketing, but there is the ability to playa Tom Fozzie and/or Greg Norman course. This can be offered as a golf destination. He stated it allows a real efficiency of operation. In terms of the location, the question about the demonstrated need for the type of land use, there is clearly more need and demand for golf in the valley. He stated in serving the demand of the upper valley, he doesn't know that there is a place closer than this. He stated they have worked with the Bellyache residents who did not want 35 acre parcels with wells. They have the central water system which fits in with the Wolcott plan and the Eagle County plan. He believes this fits in. They have the water rights, the density is very low, the traffic impacts are minimal, however, they will be improving a substantial part of the road, correcting right of way problems and having a turn lane that will take care of 34 03-13-2000 the problem. Chairman Stone questioned that traffic impacts will be minimal. Mr. Jamar stated they will keep the road at a level of service C by improving the road that goes through their project. He stated in the future as the surrounding area builds out there may be need to upgrade the traffic facilities through the area. He stated they are prepared and obligated to pay the impact fee. The second thing is addressed in Planning Commission condition #7 and the pro-rata capital plan that would look at the impacts. He stated the districts could be set up to handle this for future development. They will quantify those and at preliminary plan they will address those types of things. One of the areas they are looking at is employee and affordable housing. They are estimating about 60 seasonal employees and 8 full time people. They have committed to onsite use on the project as well as utilize some of the 15,000 employee housing credits. He thinks more than likely the seasonal workers will work summers on the golf course and winter at the ski resort. The affordable housing is a little bit different and they are looking for direction from the County. He spoke to the policy of providing units for the local residents. In lieu of the regulations having been developed, they are at a loss as to the percentage and how to achieve that. He stated they would like to work with the Board to come up with a mechanism with an appropriate plan. He stated they have discussed this with David Carter and they agree that development other than at the golf course makes the best sense. He spoke to the caretaker units as well. He suggested it should be a menu approach and thinks caretaker units work pretty well. They have agreed to that on the lots on the east side. In terms of the nine conditions adopted by the Planning Commission, they reflect the issues they have talked about. He stated there has been loss of value on their side. He asked they consider one situation. He passed out handouts accordingly which was a plan that reflects two different densities on the eastern areas. He stated if they agreed to eliminate the tree lots to the west, there was a discussion they would get a 2 for 1 trade. He is requesting that they be given some consideration to follow through on that idea and rather than adding three into the cluster that they add six. He suggested Bill Heicher indicated support of that and that it wasn't so much the amount oflots, but where they are located. He stated they have given away a lot of value of the project trying to make everyone happy. Ms. Garren referred to the condition by the Planning Commission, she clarified specifically with the maker of the motion and the additional density was only to be done if the applicant was to cluster the units on the Plath area. Chairman Stone asked they open this up for public comment at this point in time. He asked if there was any public comment. There was none. Chairman Stone asked if everyone present was here to answer questions. Mr. Jamar spoke to the favorable comments in the Board's packet. Commissioner Gallagher asked if the DOW has had the ability to review the amended proposal. Mr. Jamar stated they have and were present at the February 2 meeting. He stated his feeling was a comfort level with Mr. Heicher. He stated he believes some of the other lots on the east side, those adjacent of Old Faithful Ridge the concerns were alleviated. He stated the parcels on the Plath property are on an average of 10 acres. He believes the Planning Commission was comfortable leaving the lots in and not having them subdivided into 35 acres parcels. Commissioner Gallagher stated he believes there is a conflict between staff and the applicant as to what the surrounding zoning is in the area. Ms. Garren showed the Agricultural/Rural zoning and the Resource zoning. Commissioner Gallagher asked how far the property is from the Wolcott Central Development area. Ms. Garren stated it is two miles from the Community Center designation. Mr. Jamar referred to the map and the pink zone. He suggested as the crow flies, 1,200 feet. Commissioner Gallagher asked about water for fire protection. Mr. Jamar stated it will be water tank constructed. He stated that will be detailed at preliminary 35 03-13-2000 plan. Water will be pumped up and treated at their own water treatment plant and disbursed to the three tanks. He stated they also will sprinkler the homes and have a central alarm system. Commissioner Gallagher asked where they are drawing the water. Mr. Jamar showed the location. Commissioner Gallagher asked if irrigation is with untreated water. Mr. Jamar answered yes. Chairman Stone spoke to Cordillera and asked where the closest fire station will be and what kind of response times? He asked if they anticipate another fire station being built. Mr. Jamar stated Avon has indicated they will service the area with the Edwards Station being the closest. He stated some ofthat hinges on the consolidation. They eventually see one in the Wolcott area. Chairman Stone asked about their involvement in that plan. Mr. Jamar stated that will be part of their capital plan. He stated it will be a couple of years before they see the residential units built and occupied. He stated they all have to work together to be sure that will get better. He stated sprinkling and the alarm system are good suggestions. He stated better fire protection is a goal. Commissioner Phillips spoke to the concern in the area with the existing aquifer and what impact this will have. Mr. Jamar stated there will be no impact as there will be no wells on the residential units. They have preserved the ability to have a restroom facility with a well. They may find that those will not be necessary. That was a key issue in working with Bellyache for the central water system. Chairman Stone asked about the 1041 plan. Mr. Jamar stated that will be forthcoming. He stated one of the beauties of the system is when they find the aquifer does have a problem they will extend the system allowing them to get on the water as well. Commissioner Phillips asked about moving of the units. Mr. Jamar stated on the maps they have shown two lots divided into two lots plus the additional lot. Chairman Stone asked what the smallest home site will be. Mr. Jamar stated about 1/3 of an acre with about 30 acres. Commissioner Gallagher stated in the staff report he sees responses to PUD considerations and responses to subdivision. Ms. Garren stated they have to look at both PUD and then subdivision as part of the PUD. Staff recommended the Board deny this application. The Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions. Chairman Stone suggested where the discussion comes in on a development like this is the Board trying to resolve planning issues in relationship to subdivision approvals of the past. This is a situation where the further you go up the ridge the more developed it is. The question is how to fill in the gap and what is the most logical between the two and to what extent. Does it meet the general notion of the Future Land Use Map and ofthe density. He suggested when you go over Old Faithful Ridge, does that form a natural separation of densities. That is what he is trying to determine. He stated in general, they have addressed it. The Plath property, as he sees it, saying it shouldn't be developed is exactly like the sites next to it. The clustering of the enclave site makes good sense. He thinks the Planning Commission did a good job coming up with the nine conditions. What he would like to do is expand on the conditions, one being employee housing. He thinks they are doing a good job and Vail Resorts has done a good job. He thinks that the precedent set has been troubling by putting money in a fund for employees to be able to purchase a home. He suggested that it doesn't necessarily have to be one sight but he thinks the time has come in Eagle County to have the units available for development. He asked if Mr. Carter had developed a ratio for the affordable homes to be built. He referred to Frost Creek. He 36 03-13-2000 stated they need some units on the ground. Mr. Jamar stated that would be their preference with the last resort being adding money in the fund. Chairman Stone asked for an explanation on their thoughts on the capital fund for roads. He explained the situation in Edwards. He stated it is like lilies in the pond. He stated the day before the pond is full is the day before the pond is full. He stated they will need to take care of the spur road and the intersection. He asked them to come up with a way for the funds to be set aside for them to pay their fair share for the development of the road. Mr. Jamar stated they will have to define potential future improvements and define the potential build out in the area. He stated this is not the last time they will see them on this. Chairman Stone stated he is just trying to give advanced warning of their concerns. Mr. Jamar stated the difference is they have an opportunity to get ahead ofthis rather than in Edwards. Here is an opportunity to make sure the impact fees are defined and paid. Chairman Stone stated in the absence of the County coming up with an impact fee, he would hope they will come up a pro-active approach to the resolve. Chairman Stone stated he will also need some convincing about the road from where they leave the Interstate and where their development starts. Mr. Jamar stated they will look at that more closely at preliminary plan. Commissioner Gallagher stated he is not inclined to add the three more lots and shares his concerns with the road. He spoke to the letter dated February 11 th from the Bellyache Metropolitan District requesting that a condition be made with interconnection. Jim Thompson stated they have put in front of them an agreement and the relationship has been excellent but they have not responded. They have agreed to oversize the system but they must agree to pay some of the over sizing costs. Chairman Stone asked what kind of findings does the Board have to make if they were to offer approval of this application. Mr. Fritze stated the planning staffhas set forth for them each of the issues on which they need to make findings. Ms. Garren spoke to condition #7 and the submission of agreements with the Bellyache Metropolitan District. Mr. Fritze stated if there is an issue it must be conditioned. Tom Ragonetti suggested in the interest of time the Board adopt the same conditions as the Planning Commission did as they went through a lengthly process to make those. Chairman Stone stated he is comfortable in coming to a conclusion today. He asked Commissioner Phillips if she is comfortable in making a decision. Commissioner Phillips pointed out that staff and the Planning Commission do not agree. He asked Commissioner Gallagher if he is prepared to take action. Commissioner Gallagher stated he is. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve file number PDS-00017, sketch plan for Red Sky Ranch, not sketch plan B, negating the three home sites, and including the conditions set forth by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Phillips asked for clarification incorporating the findings of the Planning Commission and eliminating the request for the additional cluster. Chairman Stone asked about the reading of the findings. Mr. Fritze stated the final conditions will be in the written resolution but understands the motion before the Board to approve this application adopting the Planning Commission findings and conditions. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. In discussion, Chairman Stone summarized the motion for approval adopting the Planning Commission's findings and conditions as follows: 1) Continued Geologic and Geotechnical Studies: 37 03-13-2000 a) The applicant shall continue to conduct additional geologic and geotechnical characterization on that "zone of influence" described in Condition 2 of Resolution 98-141, (file ZS- 00032). All written reports shall be submitted with the application for Preliminary Plan. The purpose of this additional characterization work is to identify any potential geotechnical impacts to the proposed development, and to add to the currently existing instrumentation for baseline condition monitoring. The work to be performed shall include mapping of any areas not previously mapped. b) The Preliminary Plan application shall also include further geotechnical studies to support the design drawings for various infrastructure associated with roads, cuts, fills and structures on site. The recommendations of the Eagle County Engineering Department in its memorandum of May 21, 1998 shall be followed. 2) Bellyache Ridge Road. The applicant acknowledges the Bellyache Ridge Road right- of-way is comprised of the aggregate ofthose rights-of-way described in that deed between Burens Properties and Eagle County, recorded in Book 226 at Page 960 and that deed between George P. Jouflas and Eagle County recorded in Book 227 at Page 981. Prior to application for Preliminary Plan, the applicant agrees to create a legal description of the Bellyache Ridge Road right-of-way fully encompassing and describing both deeds and submit an application pursuant to Section 5-2200, Public Way and Easement Vacation of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. Eagle County shall consider vacating the right-of-way the new roadway is to replace, and upon vacation, the applicant shall dedicate said new roadway to Eagle County as an 80 foot as built right-of-way by delivering to Eagle County a warranty deed therefor. In the event said contemplated vacation is denied by Eagle County the applicant will amend the approved Sketch Plan as necessary solely for that portion of the site east of Old Faithful Ridge in order to provide for the relocation of its golf course activities thereby affected. 3) Golf Course Component Requirements. The following shall be submitted for both golf courses with the application for Preliminary Plan: a) Water management Plan or Plans. A water management plan to minimize the potential for infiltration of all golf course irrigation water into groundwater regimes in the area comprehensively addressing irrigation practices and controls, surface drainage and water control features, and groundwater contingency controls. The applicant shall also submit a monitoring plan and system to monitor performance of the water management plan and provide warning of deficiencies. For the eastern course, the system shall consist of but not be limited to, piezometer, inclinometers, soil moisture sensors, weather station and stream gauge. For the western courses the applicant shall submit technical reports and information that define an appropriate system. These water management and monitoring plans shall be separate from the Golf Course Management and Monitoring Plans. b) Golf Course Management and Monitoring Plan. A golf course management and monitoring plan incorporating Regional Water Quality Management Plan (208), implementation recommendations, including but not be limited to wetlands impact mitigation, pest management, a chemical use program, monitoring of both well and irrigation water quantity and quality, water conservation measures, stormwater management, monitoring methodologies, and methods by which the plan shall e enforced. c) Preliminary Routing Plan. The plans shall include detailed grading and drainage plans, and be accompanied by on-going Erosion and Sediment Control Best Management Practice Plans. The easterly golf course routing plan where it crosses Bellyache Ridge Road shall show tunnel crossings beneath the road. d) Conceptual Site Plans. Conceptual site specific plans and architectural drawings (including, but not limited to; elevations, color and materials notations) shall be submitted for each clubhouse, maintenance facility, range building/s and or course restroom/so Said plans and drawings shall be accompanied by lighting and landscape plans and fire access for fire suppression plans acceptable to the Town of Avon Fire Department or any Eagle Valley Consolidated Fire District. 4) Wildlife Mitigation. The applicant shall submit with the application for Preliminary 38 03-13-2000 Plan, a site specific Red Sky Ranch Wildlife Mitigation Plan that has been agreed and signed by the applicant and the Colorado Division of Wildlife. 5) PUD Guide. The applicants draft PUD Guide submitted in compliance with the requirements for Sketch Plan shall be amended to include, but not be limited to the following: a) Golf Courses. That each course shall be subject to the following: I) Clubhouse buildings shall not exceed 30,000 square feet, restaurant seatings shall be limited to 110 seats, plus/minus five percent of indoor capacity. 2) Courses, facilities and facility operations shall be subject to such mitigation, limitations, and seasonal restrictions as set forth in the Wildlife Mitigation Plan. b) Statement ofthe Terms and Conditions of Public Play. The following shall be the public play policy of the combined Red Sky Ranch courses: During the shoulder seasons, i.e., prior to June 1 and after September 15, Vail Resorts Development Company will reserve eight tee times for a total of32 golfers, Monday through Thursday, for local play. If these tee times are not reserved by local players they may be assigned to hotel/resort guests on the morning of play. The cost of play for Eagle County residents will be discounted 40% from the hotel/resort fees in place at the time of play. During the shoulder seasons additional local play will be allowed for unused hotel/resort tee times on a standby basis. In addition, VRDC will make one of the courses available for two charity tournaments prior to June 1 and two charity tournaments after September 15, holidays and weekends excluded. There will be no charge for the use of the course, golf carts or golf course staff; however VRDC reserves the right to select the charity groups, tournament format and tournament dates and times. Said policy shall be implemented on the opening day of each season. c) Employee Housing. The employee housing shall be specifically set forth and include at a minimum: 1) The site specific location of and description of two on-site housing units for Red Sky Ranch full time employees. These units shall also be depicted on the Preliminary Plan maps. 2) The allocation of a specific number of off-site Red Sky Ranch seasonal "employee housing" units in other Vail Associates "employee housing" projects. 3) The requirement that the forty larger residential lots east of Old Faithful Ridge shall be allowed a caretaker unit not to exceed the square footage called for by lot size in the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. d) Wildlife Mitigation. That the terms and conditions of the recorded Wildlife Mitigation agreement apply to all lots. e) Individual Lot Site Disturbance. That individual lot site disturbance outside the approved building envelope shall be addressed. t) Sprinkling/Central Alarm. That all habitable structures shall have sprinkler systems, and shall have installed and maintained a central alarm system with 24 hour monitoring. 6) Affordable Housing Plan. The terms and conditions of any "affordable housing" plan shall be submitted with the Preliminary Plan application. 7) Service Districts. The applicant shall submit with the Preliminary Plan application a Capital Plan for the establishment of Districts or other public facilities to provide fire, ambulance, law enforcement, recreation and other community services for the Wolcott Area. Applicant's Capital Plan will be proportionate to its estimated impact on the Wolcott Area. Applicant shall also submit executed copies of all necessary agreements with the Bellyache Ridge Metropolitan District. 39 03-13-2000 8) Revised Preliminary Plan Site Plan. Lots 65, 66 & 67 west of Old Faithful Ridge as identified on the Site Plan submitted at the February 2, 2000 Planning Commission hearing and dated January 2000, shall be eliminated. Applicant may add three lots to that cluster on the eastern side of Old Faithful Ridge identified on the Site Plan as lots 24 - 47 inclusive. 9) Representations. All material representations of the applicant in its submittal package and in public hearing including, but not limited to, revegetation, avoidance of wetlands and wildlife and wildfire militations shall be binding. Chairman Stone called for the question on the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until March 20, 2000. ~Ch.~ al an Attest: Clerk to the Bo 40 03-13-2000