Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 02/07/2000 Present: Tom C. Stone Johnnette Phillips James E. Johnson Jr. James R. Fritze Jack Ingstad Sara Fisher GENERAL FUND 4 EAGLE RANCH AMA SEPTIC PUMPING PORTA AAAE ABLEMAN LAW OFFICE ACCA ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS ADIRONDACK DIRECT ADVANCED MICROSYSTEMS INC AFFORDABLE PORTABLE AIR TOUCH CELLULAR AIR TOUCH CELLULAR- ALICIA HOLDER ALL PRO FORMS INCORPORATE ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE ALOIA HOUPT PC ALPHA INTERACTIVE GROUP ALPINE AREA AGENCY AGING ALPINE BANK ALPINE GLASS & MIRROR ALPINE LOCKSMITH COMPANY ALPINE SIGN & GRAPHICS AMAlKEYE PRODUCTIVITY CTR AMEILlA GRANT AMERICAN CONGRESS ON AMERICAN MONEY MANAGEMENT AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMERICAN SOCIETY CIVIL ANGELA WURTSMITH ANGELICA AGUIRRE ANIMAL HOSPITAL OF VAIL APEX SECURITY APPRAISAL JOURNAL APWA COLORADO CHAPTER ARTWORKS, THE ASI TECHNOLOGIES ASISTENCIA PARA LATINOS ASPEN BASALT CARE CLINIC PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 7, 2000 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Attorney County Administrator Clerk to the Board SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES FURNITURE SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PARTS/SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES 1999 HHS GRANT 1999 HHS GRANT 816.31 250.00 225.00 27.48 65.00 51.00 215.50 138.50 263.00 3,370.75 1,503.60 10.99 3,348.00 2,202.65 131.25 65.00 2,189.52 180.00 171.00 71.00 345.00 159.00 122.76 173.00 4,231.78 662.80 195.00 104.98 120.00 20.00 79.50 65.00 70.00 81.00 95,035.65 750.00 2,625.00 ASPEN BOARD OF REALTORS ASPEN CTR FOR WOMENS HL TH ASPEN PUBLISHERS INC AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES A TC TOWER CORP AVCARD AVON TRANSPORTATION B J ROWE BAILEY FUNERAL HOME BAILEY HARRING PETERSON BAI LEYS BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS BASALT FAMILY RESOURCE BASALT SANITATION DISTRIC BASALT TOWN OF BECK & CASSINIS BEN GALLOWAY M.D BERRYHILL CAGE & NORTH BEST WESTERN EAGLE LODGE BFI STERICYCLE INC BLUE LAKE OWNERS ASSN BOB BARKER COMPANY BONNIE KOWAR BOOTHE PLUMBING BRATWEAR BRC/HARRIS, INC BRIDGESTONE WINTER BUSINESS PRODUCTS fNC CAEYC CALIFORNIA AASSOCIATION CALOIA, HOUPT & LIGHT PC CARLOS PEREZ CARSE CARTER & SANDS P.C. CASFM CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CCO AND ERA CENTEX HOMES CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTURYTEL CEV MULTIMEDIA CHADWICK, STEINKIRCHNER CHARLES D JONES CO, INC. CHARLOTTE PADILLA CHEMATOX INC. CHESS CHRISTINE SASSE CITY MARKET #34 SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES REFUND 1999 HHS GRANT SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES 181 .43 2,575.00 71.52 132.09 1,750.00 44.00 735.00 118.20 300.00 10.00 49.00 6.20 1,500.00 103.50 51.00 2.62 1,330.00 74.98 65.00 48.75 3,617.25 197.38 43.40 2,282.10 354.50 310.00 3,375.00 990.00 58.00 25.00 1,971.85 1.86 130.00 35.15 30.00 152.40 50,663.88 2,777.00 366.05 11,004.41 247.50 150.19 46.11 170.00 150.00 934.00 31.00 280.66 CLUB TWENTY CO 4H YOUTH FUND CO BIG COUNTRY RESORT CO BOARD OF REAL ESTATE CO BOILER INSPEC BRANCH CO BUREAU INVESTIGATION CO DEPT OF HEALTH CO DEPT OF REVENUE CO SEARCH RESCUE BOARD CO ST ASSOC COUNTY CLERK CO STATE ASSOC CLERK AND CO STATE FOREST SERVICE CO WEST MENTAL HEALTH COM COLOMBIA PROPANE COLORADO CITY COLORADO COUNTIES INC COLORADO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE COLORADO NAHRO COLORADO WEED MANAGEMENT COLORADO WEST MENTAL COLUMBINE HOME HEALTH INC COMFORT INN COMPUTER LEARNING CENTER CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING CONSOLIDATED PLASTIC CO CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COUNTRY GENERAL COUNTY SHERIFFS COLORADO CRABTREES PHOTO WORKS CRAWFORD PROPERTIES CSU - EL PASO COUNTY CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE CYBERLlNK DAHL PLUMBING DAILY SENTINEL THE DAN SPARKMAN DANNY LEE HUBBARD DATA GENERAL CORPORATION DATA TRANSMISSIONS DAVID GUINNEE, DVM DAVID S HOOVER DAY AIRCRAFT REFINISHERS DAY TIMERS INCORPORATED DAYS INN GRAND JUNCTION DEEP ROCK WEST DELL INC SERVICES CONTRIBUTION SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES PARTS SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SUPPLIES 1,250.00 160.00 80.00 120.00 150.00 132.48 150.81 4.40 40.00 25.00 550.00 13,712.19 3,540.00 350.00 817.00 65.00 21 , 131 .00 625.00 25.00 50.00 1,126.40 812.50 320.00 149.00 1,859.83 210.59 598.68 481.58 3,055.81 2,596.00 150.00 2,322.00 100.00 137,929.40 5,204.82 24.58 337.71 200.00 25.00 1,298.74 273.00 1,736.80 4.96 13,850.00 45.97 328.00 199.98 128.00 DENVER MARRIOTT TECH CNTR DENVER POST CORPORATION T DISTRICT ATTORNEY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE DISTRICT COURT TRUSTEE DOCTORS ON CALL DONNA BARNES, CORONER EAGLE AUTO PARTS EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY HEALTH AND EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFF EAGLE INDUSTRIES UNLlMITD EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS EAGLE VAIL PAINT & SUPPLY EAGLE VALLEY CHAMBER COMM EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY CTR EAGLE VALLEY PET HOSPITAL EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATIONAL DISCOVERIES EFREN CUEVAS EMERALD ACRES LLC ENTERPRISES FLEET SERVICE ERIC W WALTER ESRI EVES PRINT SHOP EXTENSION PROGRAM FUND FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FARNUM HOLT FUNERAL HOME FARRELL, GOLDSTEIN, FEDERAL EXPRESS FERRELLGAS FILE FINDERS, LTD. FIRST BANKS FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY FORENSIC LABORATORIES INC FORINASH KATHLEEN FRANK J BALL FRANKLIN COVEY FRED PRYOR SEMINARS G & M INSURANCE AGENCY GARFIELD COUNTY D.A. GARFIELD YOUTH SERVICES GE SUPPLY SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT PARTS 1999 HHS GRANT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND REFUND SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND 1999 HHS GRANT SUPPLIES 996.00 521.30 27.48 190,754.00 276.94 310.00 97.50 5.69 6,000.00 2,245.69 160.00 7.50 153.11 1,032.85 79.18 1,656.50 204.20 75.00 1,123.61 25.00 216.74 2,880.75 475.00 1,200.00 25.00 550.00 453.78 12.60 33,126.76 1,256.85 140.00 1,552.16 1,200.00 25.00 212.25 845.48 100.00 11,756.57 40.00 34.00 112.33 25.00 32.60 5,000.00 270.00 3.10 375.00 164.49 GEORGE ROUSSOS GLENWOOD SHOE SERVICE GLOBAL ELECTION SYSTEMS GODEN EAGLE SENIORS GOVERNING GOVERNMENT FINANCE GRACE FINNEY GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GREENBERG & ASSOCIATES HAL DISHLER HARDEN HASS HAAG HALLBERG HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HEATHER SAVALOX HECTOR SANCHEZ HELLO DIRECT INC HEWLETT PACKARD HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HILL & TASHIRO MARKETING HOLIDAY INN DENVER HOLY CROSS ENERGY HUMAN RELATIONS MEDIA IACP NATIONAL LAW IAPMO ICBO ICBO EDUCATION COMMITTEE IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS IMS OF COLORADO INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND INTERMOUNTAIN LANDSCAPING INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY J A SEXAUER JAMES DUNCAN & ASSOC INC JAMES E JOHNSON JR. JAMES J STANDLEY JAMES STRYKER JANINE JEFFERIES DYCK JERRI A MAYER JOANIE HAGGERTY JOBS AVAILABLE JODIE BRANDT JODY CARUTHERS JOES WALLBAORD & SUPPLY JOHNNETTE PHILLIPS JOHNSON CONTROLS JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC JOHNSON, HOLSCHER & CO PC REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND REFUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES PARTS SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT PARTS/SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES 86.74 190.00 3,675.00 576.48 15.00 385.00 12.40 2,131.84 17.99 15.70 25.00 25.00 100,755.27 553.35 31.20 71.98 10.00 125.00 10,682.50 178.00 26,005.43 288.75 150.00 177.16 50.00 1,260.00 556.89 200.00 5,734.94 8.06 270.00 630.00 536.10 4,400.00 716.46 25.00 100.00 6.16 13.02 119.04 202.40 6.16 178.37 18.40 86.17 612.84 961.25 2,500.00 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY JUNIPER VALLEY PRODUCTS K N ENERGY INC KAREN MERRITT STURGILL KATHERINE PARSON-CORDOVA KATHY ROSS KATIE HARPER KEN WILSON KENNETH E DAVIDSON KESSLER MARY J KIDS FIRST LANIE MARTIN LAW ENFORCEMENT RESOURCE LEDSINC LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LESLIE KEHMEIER LEXUS LAW PUBLISHING LIGHTNING SERVICES L1L JOHNS WATER TREATMENT LINDAHL ASSOCIATES LITERACY PROJECT, THE LORI HUTCHENS LORIE CRAWFORD LORIS & ASSOCIATES INC LP DOCTOR M & M AUTO PARTS MACHOL & JOHANNES MAINTENANCE WAREHOUSE MARILYN RICE MARTYE MCGINNIS MASTER KEY & LOCK MATTHEW GENNETT MAX SCHLAFLEY MAXIMUM COMFORT POOL SPA MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS MCI WORLDCOM MCKESSON GENERAL MEDICAL MEGAN HAMMER MERCK, HUMAN HEALTH DIV. METROCALL MEYER LAND SYSTEMS MICRO WAREHOUSE MID VALLEY KENNEL MIKE JONES MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE MOTOR POOL FUND MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE MOTOROLA INC SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND 1999 HHS GRANT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES PARTS/SERVICES PARTS REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES 87.08 12.75 11,985.01 14.30 150.00 180.00 155.62 300.00 6.90 112.84 45.00 31.00 171.00 750.00 828.80 62.65 72.49 212.50 330.00 28.64 940.00 1,578.00 34.72 7,358.80 389.70 37.94 56.98 581.46 55.80 110.00 16.98 6.89 186.29 25.00 3,471.72 20.80 244.44 107.69 1,162.50 10.10 925.00 108.28 5,140.00 440.00 597.66 88,534.51 591.88 1,825.00 MOTOROLA INCORPORATED MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MOUNTAIN MAX INTERNET MOUNTAIN MOBILE VETERINAR MOUNTAIN MUSIC MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS MOUNTAIN VALLEY NACHSA NACO NACRC NANCY BUSCH NAT'L SANITARY/UNISOURCE NATIONAL 4H SUPPLY NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION LAW NATIONAL EVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL GRAPHICS COMPANY NCR CORPORATION NEBS NESTOR LINDA NEVES UNIFORMS NEWARK ELECTRONICS NICHOLE RENEE SISNEROS NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORDIC REFRIGERATION NORTHWEST COLORADO NORTHWEST COLORADO LEGAL NORWEST BANK OFFICE PAVILION OHLIN SALES OKLA LEGAL PROCESS SERVo OMNIFAX ORTEN & HINDMAN OSI COLLECTION SERVICES PAPER DIRECT PAPER WISE PATRICIA HAMMON PEGGY GRAYBEAL PEREGRINE PRESS PETER G BOWEN PETTY CASH PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PITNEY BOWES PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED PLSC PLUMB KENDALL POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PROCESS MEASUREMENT CO SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES 1999 HHS GRANT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES 1999 HHS GRANT PAYROLL EXPD FURNITURE SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES REFIMD REFIMD SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SU PPLI ES/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES 3,447.30 24.00 749.85 110.00 1,669.00 265.00 4,500.00 100.00 397.00 50.00 125.00 12.47 266.97 300.00 550.00 75.00 1,998.48 325.25 261.82 35.65 5,695.10 86.09 15.00 3,230.97 183.00 58,459.00 500.00 233,811.16 671.76 74.68 39.96 1,032.00 75.62 8.68 28.50 1,111.50 40.00 180.00 281.50 186.90 34.98 778.55 86.25 241.05 95.00 2,206.20 15,200.00 600.00 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATES PSS,INC PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY QUALITY TRAFFIC PRODUCTS QUA TTROS COFFEEHOUSE QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION RADISSON NORTH DENVER RAYMONDS OFFICE MACHINES RENTXlEZ WAY REPRINT CORP RESOURCE CENTER OF EAGLE RESPONSE RIA GROUP RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS ROARING FORK RENTALS ROBERT KURTZMAN DO ROBERT LOEFFLER ROCKY MOUNTAIN LAND USE ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS RONDIHENRY ROPIR CABLEVISION RUPPEL & ASSOCIATES RURAL RESORT REGION SAFE SYSTEMS SALVATION ARMY SANDYS OFFICE SUPPLY SARA CARRO SARAH SCHIPPER SCAN AIR OF COLORADO, INC SCHEDULE SOFT SCHUTZMAN NBS INC SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SEAN KOENIG SENTRY SECURITY FASTENERS SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SHEAFFER KAREN SHESHUNOFF INFORMATION SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SNOWHITE LINEN SNOWSHOE MOTEL SOMES UNIFORMS SPILLMAN DATA SYSTEMS STARBUCK SURVEYORS & ENGI STATE OF COLORADO STEINHILBER SWANSON & STEVE HUSKEY STEVEN J GOLDSTEIN REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES 1999 HHS GRANT 1999 HHS GRANT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES 1999 HHS GRANT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES THROUGH 9/30/99 REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SU PPLI ES/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND REIMBURSMENT REFUND 27.48 225.72 522.43 495.00 87.00 838.50 326.48 99.00 205.00 430.45 58.70 1,250.00 875.00 52.79 292.00 588.00 4,046.00 7.00 165.00 44.40 32.55 46.79 25.00 15,437.00 92.91 1,000.00 316.80 220.88 190.13 1,009.32 679.15 201.80 3,590.39 57.21 85.00 27,756.60 55.01 232.16 366.39 175.24 220.00 108.00 11,700.00 830.50 500.00 25.00 17.88 21.28 STOVALL GOODMAN & WALLACE STRAWBERRY PATCH SUMMIT LUMBER SUSPENSE FUND TALBOT TOM TAMBI KATIEB TECHNOLOGY EXPRESS TERRY PALMOS THOMAS A DAVIES THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP TNR TECHNICAL, INC. TOM BRANDL TOM OLSON GRAPHIC DESIGN TOP DRAWER OFFICE SUPPLY TOWN OF EAGLE TRAINING EDGE, INC TRANE COMPANY TRANSCOR AMERICA INC TRIMBLE NAVIGATION L TD TUXALL UNIFORM COMPANY UGC CONSULTING UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED REPROGRAPHIC UNITED WAY OF EAGLE UNIV COLORADO AT BOULDER UNIVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC US WEST US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST DIRECTORY VAIL BOARD OF REALTORS VAIL MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROU VAl L VALLEY CARES VAIL VALLEY EMERGENCY VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VAIL VALLEY PLUMBING AND VAILNET INC VALLEY LUMBER VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VICTIMS ASSISTANCE FUND VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS VIRGINIA CERISE VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY C WAGNER RENTAL WAHRER JENNIE RN WALMART IAVON WALTER F HORTON WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL EXPD REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REFUND REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES CONTRIBUTIONS SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 1999 GRANT 1999 HHS GRANT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICES 18.80 153.55 953.00 19,816.95 112.40 651.00 1 , 1 00.00 5.00 10.00 254.00 36.00 9.76 529.00 53.78 5,573.05 234.90 6,703.00 1,178.48 40.00 3,474.75 108,823.19 366.91 1,464.14 182.00 160.00 36.00 14.40 2,696.00 58.75 125.00 6,684.00 650.00 810.00 1,736.79 1,937.90 1,300.00 1,230.40 4.29 15.90 530.00 1,708.20 33.48 7.93 3,566.00 365.41 1,065.35 25.00 86.25 WATER QUALITY SERVICES 25.00 WATER RESOURCE CONSULTANT SERVICES 2,116.60 WEAR GUARD CORPORATION SUPPLIES 76.84 WEAR PARTS EQUIPMENT PARTS 91.13 WEARGUARD SUPPLIES 6.52 WENDY BOGNER REIMBURSEMENT 80.75 WEST PUBLISHING SERVICES 1,429.39 WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY SERVICES 775.00 WESTERN INTERIOR SUPPLY SUPPLIES 237.12 WESTERN SLOPE PUBLICATION SERVICES 362.60 WITWER OLDEN BERG BARRY REFUND 13.02 WOOD ASSOCIATES INC SUPPLIES/SERVICES 2,720.24 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS SERVICES 384.70 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 392.03 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 5,044.08 Y AGLA MCCOY & RILEY REFUND 2.60 YOUR PERSONAL CHEF SERVICES 300.00 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE REFUND 37.44 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL #1 & 2 498,142.82 2,096,007.78 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND BRATTON ENTERPRISE, INC. SERVICES 1,099.13 CARSE SERVICES 130.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPO 4,045.91 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICES 28.16 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY SERVICES 150.00 CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE SERVICES 74,238.00 DEEP ROCK WEST SUPPLIES/SERVICES 26.60 DIVISION OF LABOR SERVICES 25.00 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES 477.03 EAGLE PHARMACY SUPPLIES 15.95 EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE SERVICES 139.00 EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL SERVICES 385.00 ELAM CONSTRUCTION SUPPLIES/SERVICES 1,087.60 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 10,154.40 HOLIDAY INN DENVER SERVICES 231.00 KOIS BROTHERS EQUIPMENT 4,550.00 MAYNE BLOCK SUPPLIES 30.44 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 240,864.84 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS SERVICES 44.80 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPO 23,191.06 PITKIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORK SERVICES 10,709.49 POLICE DATA SYSTEMS SERVICES 500.00 POWER MOTIVE SERVICES 3,780.00 RANDY SCHLEGEL REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 RESPOND SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 5.85 ROARING FORK RESOURCES SU PPLI ES/SERVICES 682.35 STATE OF COLORADO SERVICES 225.00 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 378.00 SUSPENSE FUND PAYROLL EXPD 1,546.73 VALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 17.43 WALMART IGLENWOOD SUPPLIES 450.27 WARNING LITES & EQUIPMENT SERVICES 2,037.33 WESTERN PAGING SERVICES 900.00 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 459.03 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 132.00 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL #1 & 2 50,633.25 433,445.65 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFFS SERVICES 10.00 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR SERVICES 79.48 ASPEN COUNSELING CENTER SERVICES 800.00 CAROL PRATER REIMBURSEMENT 10.51 CAROLYN VAN DESEN SERVICES 306.59 CATHERINE CRAIG REIMBURSEMENT 17.05 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 3,607.43 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICES 549.13 CENTURYTEL SERVICES 37.80 CO WEST MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 250.00 CSED SERVICES 308.88 CTSI VOLUNTEER INSURANCE SERVICES 4,576.00 DENVER COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICES 31.80 EAGLE ACCESS CONTROL SERVICES 180.00 EAGLE COUNTY ATTORNEY SERVICES 827.75 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES 823.37 EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF SERVICES 78.32 EDWARD GILLILAND SERVICES 490.00 FORINASH KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 11.78 GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICES 8.00 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 8,708.81 INDRA KIRSTEIN REIMBURSEMENT 19.84 INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND SERVICES 4,161.49 JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFFS SERVICES 14.20 JERRI OLSON REIMBURSEMENT 115.32 JOEL KARR SERVICES 2,250.00 JOHN TRAUL, DDS SERVICES 900.00 KAREN LAJOY SMITH MA LPC SERVICES 300.00 KATHLEEN SAYERS SERVICES 230.00 KATHY REED REIMBURSEMENT 130.20 KELLEY BLUE BOOK SUPPLIES 162.00 KIM HURST SERVICES 517.50 MICHAEL CLAUSSNER SERVICES 200.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 1,430.32 MOUNTAIN BOCES SERVICES 2,700.00 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 15,178.60 OFFICE PAVILION SUPPLIES 31.02 PEAK PERFORMANCE COPIER & SERVICES 180.00 PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICES 3.20 QUICK VALLEY PRINTING SUPPLIES 45.00 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 190.58 RENEE FIELDS REIMBURSEMENT 346.27 ROBERT J DURHAM AND SERVICES 450.00 ROCHELLE A BOWER REIMBURSEMENT 168.11 SANDY ALFRED REIMBURSEMENT 75.16 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 147.39 SUSAN BROADWELL,PSY.D. SERVICES 200.00 SUSPENSE FUND PAYROLL EXPD 2,543.74 UNITED WAY OF EAGLE CONTRIBUTIONS 63.00 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 213.35 WESTERN PAGING SERVICES 53.85 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 105.30 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL #1 & 2 28,521.37 83,359.51 WRAP FUND AVALANCE VOLLEYBALL CLUB SERVICES 800.00 MIDVALLEY FAMILY PRACTICE SERVICES 473.00 TINA FLEISHMAN SERVICES 200.00 VICTOR H CORDERO,PSY.D SERVICES 400.00 1,873.00 RETIREMENT FUND CCO AND ERA EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 44,119.48 44,119.48 INSURANCE RESERVE FUND AGENCY AUTO GLASS PARTS/SERVICES 1,104.43 COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES CONTRIBUTION 416,593.00 GYPSUM AUTO BODY PARTS/SERVICES 615.00 418,312.43 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND ACTION TARGET INC SERVICES 7,584.45 ALLWEST SYSTEMS INC. SERVICES 8,761.70 ALPINE AIR & METAL SYSTEM PARTS/SERVICES 586.00 ASPEN TIMES THE SERVICES 143.79 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS PARTS 72.99 BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC EQUIPMENT 27,700.62 CENTURYTEL SERVICES 1,110.95 COLORADO SPECIAL TIES INC PARTS/SERVICES 1,562.81 CYBERLlNK SERVICES 1,805.52 DON ELLIS EQUIPMENT 1,535.00 EVANS MENDEL ALLISON SERVICES 8,569.55 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES 349,082.00 FURNITURE BY DESIGN INC EQUIPMENT 700.00 GIBSON RENO ARCHITECTS SERVICES 23,709.74 GLENWOODINDEPENDENT SERVICES 82.62 JIM'S CRITTER CUTTER SERVICES 275.00 LAFARGE CORPORATION SERVICES 9,145.00 NORWEST BANK SERVICES 1,184,735.32 REESE ENGINEERING INC SERVICES 1,101.72 RENTX/EZ WAY SERVICES 72.00 ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY CONTRIBUTION 20,000.00 SUMMIT LUMBER SERVICES 631.73 TECHNOLOGY EXPRESS PARTS 10,450.00 TRANE COMPANY PARTS/SERVICES 37,455.75 WESTERN SLOPE PUBLICATION SERVICES 343.41 1,697,217.67 SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. AASHTO SUPPLIES 23.50 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR SERVICES 37.18 ASCOM SERVICES 120.00 BERTHODS, INC SERVICES 1,250.00 CARPENTRY UNLIMITED SERVICES 5,671.36 CASTA SERVICES 1,380.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPO 473.54 CITY MARKET #26 SUPPLIES 6.93 CITY MARKET #34 SUPPLIES 26.38 COpy COPY SUPPLIES/SERVICES 316.77 CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE SERVICES 21,721.00 0& M MAINTENANCE SERVICE SERVICES 150.00 EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT SUPPLIES 73.20 GARY BROWN SERVICES 200.00 GEORGE K BAUM SERVICES 3,467.50 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 1,723.70 HIGH COUNTRY LOCK & KEY SUPPLIES 13.00 HILL & TASHIRO MARKETING SERVICES 4,789.07 HOLYCROSS ENERGY SERVICES 72.85 IMS OF COLORADO SERVICES 190.00 KANE MARTENS SERVICES 1,887.50 M K CENTENNIAL SERVICES 5,000.00 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 22.95 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 676.40 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPO 4,737.80 PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING SERVICES 700.00 PREMIER MAINTENANCE CO SERVICES 1,499.30 PUBLIC SERVICE SERVICES 146.37 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 76.66 SIGN PRO SUPPLIES 10.00 SLIFER MANAGEMENT SERVICES 1,938.74 TOWN OF EAGLE SERVICES 187,187.77 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 779.46 WALMART /AVON SUPPLIES 146.05 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL #1 & 2 10,204.28 256,719.26 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPO 113.80 CONTRA ENGINEERING INC SERVICES 15,885.00 COPY COpy SUPPLIES/SERVICES 72.50 CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE SERVICES 891.00 EAGLE SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS SERVICES 72.60 EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE SERVICES 48.00 ELLIE CARYL REIMBURSEMENT 45.29 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 103.64 HOLYCROSS ENERGY SERVICES 11,715.75 KANE MARTENS SUPPLIES/SERVICES 455.00 MARCIN ENGINEERING INC SERVICES 160.00 MOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE SERVICES 55.00 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPO 714.50 PREMIER MAINTENANCE CO SERVICES 93.57 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICES 122,625.00 153,050.65 AIRPORT FUND AIR TOUCH CELLULAR ALPINE TIRE COMPANY AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT AMERICAN AVIONICS INC AMERICINN ARCH COMMUNICATIONS BAGELOPOLlS BARNARD DUNKELBERG & CO BERTHOD MOTORS BRENT SERVICES BROWNING FERRIS IND CAMBRIA COFFEE CAT CONSTRUCTION INC CCO AND ERA CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CITY MARKET #34 CO AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSN COLLETTS COLUMBINE MARKET CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEEP ROCK WEST FLIGHT JOURNAL GLENWOOD SHIRT COMPANY GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GYPSUM TOWN OF HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC JAMES P ELWOOD KN ENERGY INC M & M AUTO PARTS MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING MARKOS PIZZERIA MC! TELECOMMUNICATIONS MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC MOTOR POOL FUND NORWEST BANK NW CHAPTER AMERICAN ASSN OJ WATSON COMPANY INC ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO POTESTIO BROTHERS RENTX/EZ WAY REO WELDING ROARING FORK RESOURCES ROCKY MOUNTAIN REDI MIX SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUMMIT LUMBER SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES PARTS/SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES PARTS SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES PARTS SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 45.50 2,126.54 1,485.00 2,512.00 59.00 1,824.15 126.90 4,500.00 56,900.00 4,458.47 166.19 130.90 3,000.00 2,102.32 91.90 146.12 425.00 11,932.35 46.93 22,048.00 3,751.80 66.33 39.90 89.50 51.48 66.85 3,816.74 60.00 1,545.53 251.18 2,312.56 3,056.52 582.62 115.49 148.57 23,574.00 1,396.88 16,844.76 150.00 214.50 55.00 10,771.55 22.40 180.00 143.88 369.75 239.38 268.06 VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER SUPPLIES 6.05 VAN SANT GROUP SERVICES 3,790.00 WESTERN SLOPE PUBLICATION SERVICES 132.00 WESTON INCORPORATED SERVICES 4,500.00 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY PARTS 144.33 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 479.74 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY SUPPLIES 375.75 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL #1 & 2 40,211.94 233,952.31 CONTINGENT FUND BRADS ELECTRICAL SERVICE SERVICES 13,857.50 CENTURYTEL SERVICES 1,419.00 EAGLE SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS SERVICES 309.15 EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE SERVICES 126.00 EMERGENCY ESSENTIALS INC PARTS 969.84 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 1,036.89 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICES 1,715.89 SAGEBRUSH SERVICES SERVICES 406.76 STAND BY POWER SUPPLIES 55.00 T H I TOILET SERVICES SERVICES 2,250.00 VALLEY ELECTRIC SUPPLY SUPPLIES 301.09 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY PARTS 3,744.66 WESTERN SLOPE TRAILERS PARTS 120.00 26,311.78 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND BOULDER COMMERCIAL FURNITURE 948.40 CENTURYTEL PARTS/SERVICES 16,663.45 DELL INC EQUIPMENT 15,709.85 EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 12,178.00 EQUIPMENT CONSULTING INC EQUIPMENT 5,399.00 HEWLETT PACKARD EQUIPMENT 1,415.00 HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS EQUIPMENT 799.00 MICRO WAREHOUSE EQUIPMENT 588.18 MOTOROLA INC EQUIPMENT 5,000.00 MOUNTAIN MAX INTERNET SERVICES 399.00 OFFICE PAVILION FURNITURE 1,485.17 60,585.05 HOUSING FUND DAVID CARTER REIMBURSEMENT 31.15 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES/SERVICES 960.56 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 154.00 NANCY BUSCH REIMBURSEMENT 103.99 ROCKHURST COLLEGE SERVICES 154.00 1,403.70 RA, VOUCHER ASSISTANCE PRG GARFIELD COUNTY HOUSING SERVICES 913.00 913.00 LANDFILL FUND ACZ LABORATORY INC SERVICES 3,212.00 ADIRONDACK DIRECT SERVICES 23.80 ARAPAHOE ROOFING INC REFUND 525.90 BELL COUNTRY HOMES SERVICES 5,670.00 BROWNING FERRIS IND SERVICES 30,000.00 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGMENT SERVICES 50.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPO 1,460.51 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICES 43.57 CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & SERVICES 13,472.57 CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE SERVICES 18,243.00 o JENSEN ELECTRIC INC. PARTS/SERVICES 717.30 DEEP ROCK WEST SUPPLIES/SERVICES 18.20 EAGLE AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 19.69 F G & S SEPTIC SERVICE SERVICES 690.00 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 2,357.66 KRW CONSULTING INC SERVICES 1,662.66 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 148,367.97 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPO 5,169.41 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICES 51,056.28 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 272.53 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICES 757.65 SUN RAY SUPPLIES 119.17 SUSPENSE FUND PAYROLL EXPD 348.46 TRASH HAULERS INC SERVICES 380.00 UNISOURCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 31 .44 VALLEY RESOURCE MGMT SERVICES 2,765.00 WYLACO SUPPL Y COMPANY SUPPLIES 103.56 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 99.00 YARGER SERVICES LLC SERVICES 25.00 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL #1 & 2 11,516.78 MOTOR POOL FUND ALEX CUNNINGHAM ALPINE TECH DISTRIBUTING BERTHOD MOTORS BRAD RAGAN INC BRODY CHEMICAL CCO AND ERA CLERK OF ADAMS COUNTY COLLETTS CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE EAGLE AMOCO EAGLE AUTO PARTS EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE FORCE AMERICA GAY JOHNSONS INC GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD HANSON EQUIPMENT HEALTH INSURANCE FUND JAY MAX SALES KAR PRODUCTS INCORPORATED KOIS BROTHERS LAWSON PRODUCTS LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC M & M AUTO PARTS MESA SUPPLY COMPANIES MITCHELL REPAIR MOTOR POOL FUND NAFAINCORPORATED NAPA AUTO PARTS NAPA AUTO PARTS - VAIL NORWEST BANK REY MOTORS INCORPORATED ROCKY MOUNTAIN FLEET SAFETY KLEEN SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUMMIT LUMBER SUSPENSE FUND UNITED STATES WELDING WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY WESTERN PAGING WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY PAYROLL FOR JANUARY 299,179.11 REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES PARTS SERVICES SUPPLIES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES PARTS SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PARTS SUPPLIES PAYROLL EXPD PARTS SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES PARTS SERVICES PARTS 16.89 161.70 68.61 886.38 530.95 1,033.54 230.76 28,980.83 10,293.00 132.82 2,960.05 33.90 96.00 614.43 1,581.88 498.49 857.06 3,404.62 397.31 128.59 394.30 190.23 123.50 613.56 198.73 1,460.75 6,004.96 365.00 150.04 23.33 6,909.42 164.00 25.00 150.25 7.40 3.00 500.00 236.24 3,125.91 150.00 202.51 PAYROLL #1 & 2 14,535.35 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND AIRPORT FUND DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY GENERAL FUND HOUSING FUND LANDFILL FUND MOTOR POOL FUND PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SOCIAL SERVICES FUND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY UNITED STATES LIFE INS VISION SERVICE PLAN - CO ENHANCED E911 FUND AT & T LANGUAGE LINE CENTURYTEL JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC US WEST COMMUNICATIONS GRAND TOTAL 88,441.29 SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 130.37 15,084.21 13,485.00 211.12 130.37 394.30 2,733.64 521.50 1,455.38 14.55 3,530.60 4,879.08 42,570.12 SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 50.00 171.35 1,633.50 4,373.26 6,228.11 5,943,689.90 This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: Executive Session Chairman Stone called the meeting to order stating the first item to be considered was a motion to adjourn into "Executive Session". He noted the time as 8:35 a.m. Commissioner Phillips moved to adjourn into "Executive Session" to discuss the following: 1) Board of Assessment Appeals Stipulation a) Piney Valley Ranches Trust b) Douglas and Joan Kirkpatrick 2) Saddle Ridge - instructions to counsel in negotiations with attorneys for Saddle Ridge LLC regarding an easement on County property 3) Discuss potential litigation involving San Isabel Telecom, Inc. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Stone stated the time was now 9:29 a.m. He asked for a motion to bring the Board out of "Executive Session". Commissioner Johnson moved to adjourn from "Executive Session" and reconvene for the regular business of the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Consent Calendar Chairman Stone stated the next item before the Board was the consent agenda as follows: A) Approval of bill paying for week of February 7, 2000, subject to review by County Administrator B) Approval of payroll for February 10, subject to review by County Administrator C) Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting for January 18,2000 D) Addition to fleet for the Airport E) Scheduled replacement of Unit 6892 F) Addition to fleet for E.C.O. G) Schedule replacement of unit #6382 and #6409, International Tamdem Dump Truck H) Scheduled replacement of unit #7022-19, #6564-24, #6994-42 and #7002-41 I) Scheduled replacement of unit #6948, to be moved to another user department J) Approve "911" Authority Grant to Town of Vail for 911 telephone lines K) Professional Services Contract with Linhart, Petersen, Powers Associates, for plan checking services for the Ritz Carlton L) Resolution 2000-024 adopting a second supplementary budget and appropriation of unanticipated revenues for fiscal year 2000, and authorizing the transfer of budgeted and appropriated moneys between various spending agencies. Commissioner Johnson asked about item I, replacement of unit #6948. Brad Higgins, Road & Bridge Director, stated that is the replacement of the Road & Bridge's Ford Explorer that will be used elsewhere. Commissioner Johnson asked if that carne through the budget. Mr. Higgins stated it did. Commissioner Johnson questioned item F, addition of a vehicle for ECO and asked if they need this particular type of vehicle. Jim Schrum, Department of Transportation, stated they believe that they do need the 4-wheel drive vehicle which will be used by the road supervisors because ofthe times of day and various road conditions they are called out on. Commissioner Johnson questioned them having two vehicles. Mr. Schrum replied both vehicles will be used by road supervisors but only one is being purchased. One is currently in the pool. Chairman Phillips stated she has corrections to the minutes. On page 7, about 12 to 14 lines from the bottom, please correct "areal" to read "aerial". On page 1 0, about six or eight lines from the top, she referred to a letter from Steve at Sopris Engineering. She asked his last name be included. About twenty lines from the bottom of the same page it should read Commissioner Johnson questioned "if the ridge line is for building of wildlife". It should read "if the ridge line is for building or wildlife". On page 13, in the quarter half of the page, it reads "lack of concrete resolution" it is underlined, and about the second line down, it reads "found that were 300 lots". It should read "found even if 300 lots were appropriate". On page 16, where it states "Commissioner Johnson questioned page nine being considered a separate offence", offence is misspelled. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the consent calendar as presented with the corrections to the minutes as stated by Commissioner Phillips. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Plat & Resolution Signing Matt Gennett, Planner, presented the following plats and resolutions for the Board's consideration: 5MB-00215. Arrowhead Alpine Club Condominiums. Arrowhead at Vail Filing No. 13. Lot34. He stated this was a Minor Type B Subdivision, the purpose of which is to create commercial and residential condominium units, common areas and easements. He read the findings as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. 1. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a. Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Commissioner Phillips moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-00215, Arrowhead Alpine Club Condominiums, Arrowhead at Vail, Filing No 13, Lot 34, incorporating staff findings. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Resolution 2000-025. VIS-0003. A Variance Permit from the Im{)rovement Standards for the roads in Cordillera Filin~s 35 & 36. He stated this is a Resolution for approval of the Applicant's petition to grant a variance from the Improvements Standards of Section 4-620.1,4- 620.D and Appendix C. The Board approved this file on June 28th, 1999. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve Resolution 2000-025, file number VIS-003, a variance permit from the Improvement Standards for the roads in Cordillera, Filings 35 & 36. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Change Order #1, Cat Construction Jim Elwood, Airport Manager, presented Change Order #1 to the agreement between Cat Construction and Eagle County for grading and paving at the Eagle County Regional Airport. He stated this is the only change order for the project. He stated this will begin the closeout process and final settlement for the project. He commended Cat on their work and this change order makes the contract price a total of $94,492. He stated this change order is eligible through a grant and the anticipated match is a little over $9000.00. Commissioner Phillips moved to approve Change Order #1 to the agreement between Cat Construction and Eagle County for grading and paving at the Eagle County Regional Airport. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Amendment #1, Isbill Associates/Raytheon Infrastructure, Inc. Jim Elwood presented Amendment #1 to the contract dated April 27, 1998 between Isbill Associates/Raytheon Infrastructure, Inc. and Eagle County. He stated this change order reflects the additional field engineering with the accelerated schedule. He stated that amount is $25,646.00 and is FAA eligible for 90% reimbursement with 10% being the County's obligation. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve Amendment #1 to the Contract dated April 27, 1998 between Isbill Associates/Raytheon Infrastructure, Inc. and Eagle County. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 1041-0025, Cordillera Mountain Tract Keith Montag, Director of Community Development, presented a request to table file number 1041-0025, Cordillera Mountain Tract, from February 14,2000 to March 13, 2000. He stated next week is the advertised hearing for this file, however, it is their understanding there may be a quorum issue as Commissioner Phillips will not be present and Commissioner Stone will not be sitting on the Board during that presentation. He stated they would then need to take action to move the file to March 13, 2000. Commissioner Johnson stated even if Commissioner Phillips is not going to be present and there may be an appearance of a potential conflict, Chairman Stone would have to vote out of necessity. Chairman Stone asked if this will have to be acknowledged again next week. Bob Loeffler, Deputy County Attorney, confirmed that to be the case. Commissioner Phillips moved to table file number 1041-0025, Cordillera Mountain Tract from February 14,2000 to March 13,2000, at the applicants request. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDS-00017, Red Sky Ranch Keith Montag presented a request to table file number PDS-OOO 17, Red Sky Ranch, from February 14,2000 to March 13,2000. He stated this is very similar to the previous item. The request is the same, however it is due to the applicant's consultant not being available on the 14th. Commissioner Johnson moved to table file number PDS-00017, Red Sky Ranch, from February 14,2000 to March 13,2000, at the applicants request. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Phillips moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Piney River Ranch Earlene Roach, Liquor Inspector, presented a transfer of ownership of a hotel and restaurant license with optional premises for H & H Ranches, Inc., dba/Piney River Ranch. She stated this application is in order and all fees have been paid. She stated Mr. Howard did receive a DUI in 1998 and had his license suspended. Since that time there has been nothing. All other applicants are reported to be of good moral character. Staff recommended approval. Julie Hanna and Paul Howard, applicants, were present for the hearing. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Howard to explain on the record what took place concerning his DUI. Mr. Howard stated he was found guilty of that offense and has learned his lesson accordingly. He stated he has been in this business for the last ten years. Commissioner Johnson asked what he does when he goes drinking now. Mr. Howard stated he does not drink in the bars. Commissioner Johnson asked what precautions he takes. Mr. Howard stated he either stays where he is or stays at home. Commissioner Johnson asked about the penalty. Mr. Howard stated he went to classes, attended therapy and had community service. He also paid a fine. Commissioner Johnson stated he can not only tell people what the law says but also what is wrong with drinking and driving from personal experience. Mr. Howard stated they will take all precautions and have vehicles available to get those who may consume too much safely to their destination. Chairman Stone suggested he was probably a better person for what he experienced. Mr. Howard stated he is not proud of what happened and believes it will not be an issue in the future. Commissioner Johnson asked about TIPS training. Ms. Hanna responded they will ensure that all employees are TIPS trained. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the transfer of ownership of a hotel and restaurant license with optional premises for H & H Ranches, Inc., dba/Piney River Ranch. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Ms. Hanna complimented Ms. Roach on her assistance and thanked her for her help. Inn at Beaver Creek Earlene Roach presented a modification of premises for Beaver Creek Food Services, Inc., dba/Inn at Beaver Creek. She stated the applicant is proposing to add the rooms and an outside area to the premises. The application is in order and all fees have been paid. Staff recommends approval. Steve Rose and Carrie O'Neil, applicants, were present for the hearing. Mr. Rose, general manager for the Inn at Beaver Creek, stated he was at Spruce Saddle for six years and at the Inn since last year. He stated one of the reasons they have been unable to provide room service is that the rooms aren't licensed. Their intent is to provide greater service to their customers. Commissioner Johnson asked about the requirement for taking alcohol to the rooms. Ms. Roach stated if they have leased the room, it is their room. Ms. Roach stated Mr. Rose must monitor whether or not overs ale is taking place. Commissioner Johnson questioned why they haven't served it previously. Ms. Roach suggested the previous manager did not feel it was worth the trouble. Commissioner Phllips moved to approve the modification of premises for Beaver Creek Food Services, Inc., dba/Inn at Beaver Creek. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Johnson moved to adjourn as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority and reconvene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDS-00015, Kodiak Park PUD Sketch Plan Paul Clarkson, Senior Planner, presented file number PFS-00015, Kodiak Park PUD Sketch Plan. He reviewed the history of the file stating it was originally to be heard in January but had to be tabled to today. He stated staff did remail the hearing notices to adjacent property owners and also telephoned them. He stated this is Kodiak Park, represented by Glen Rapaport and Glen Horn. He stated the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission initially heard this file on October 7, 1999, tabled it to October 21, 1999, and tabled it again to November 18, 1999 but did recommend approval with conditions. Glen Horn, Land Use Planner, introduced himself, Glen Rapaport and Kathleen Krieger. He stated their objective today is to receive sketch plan approval with conditions. He stated it is a 206 acre site across from the City Market shopping center in EI Jebel. He showed the location on a map. He stated the focal points are the Kodiak Ski Lake and the Win River Ranch. He showed the heavily wooded area saying this site is primarily irrigated meadow. He showed Mr. Lanes locations and spoke to the 9000 trees on the location. He stated the topography works to their advantage. He stated the lake is about 25 feet below Highway 82 and adds to the site. Access is from Highway 82 and from the Laura J Estates Frontage Road. In preparing their plan they have taken into consideration the Master Plans. He stated the plans call for a Higher Archy of land uses from the core out. Of the 206 acres, 182 acres are proposed to be open. Only 18 acres will be developed. He spoke to the loss of lodge rooms in the Roaring Fork Valley, that being 361. He referred to other losses of short term rooms. He stated also a lack of affordable short term accommodations are another reason for this project. The growth ofEI Jebel is a consideration and the lack of amenities for social functions. The development they are proposing is a mixed use development taking advantage of the open space. 11 lots are proposed with mixed use. It was shown on the map in purple. They would plan on places for offices on the lower floor with single family houses on the second floor. They figure 60 people would be housed in 30 some units. This is lot 1. In the red area, lot 2, would be the lodge. The brown area would be the marina and the lighter shade of green would be the nursery. The larger area would be open space. Glen Rappaport, Project Engineer, stated they were to try to look at a program that would provide uses that are not in existence in the Mid-Valley. He stated there isn't space for people and they want it to be flexible. He stated that is why there is a slide in the square footage. The single family component, detached single family houses which are less than 1500 square feet are designed for workers and rentals. They are not designed to be attractive to a second home market. He stated the project was reviewed favorably by the Town of Basalt and in line with their master plan. He stated the meetings with the Roaring Fork Planning and Zoning went well. They were first working with a developer who was interested in a larger hotel. They have someone interested in a smaller lake front lodge with banquet facilities, restaurant and health club. They have a letter of intent from him. In discussion with the Roaring Fork Planning Commission the vote was 4-1 in favor of the project. The decenting vote was in favor of the hotel but more of a lodge concept. He stated they have a built in mission. The Lanes do live on the parcel. He showed the model they constructed, stating they spent a fair amount of time convincing themselves they are doing the right thing. One of the amenities they are pushing for is the path around the ~ mile long ski lake. He stated he met with the homeowners and they are concerned about the buildings they are proposing at the Aspen end of the project. He built to scale the 60 foot cottonwoods. He stated there will be no retail use in the marina. The Planning Commissioners conditioned they eliminate the cabin at the far end of the lake. They wanted it as a nice amenity. He stated when they began the project they felt strongly about creating the town street in the area. He showed another map depicting the areas and the connection to Blue Ridge. He stated they hoped the character could be more like a town street than a frontage road. They are not proposing any speeds that are different but that people will go the posted speed. They see this as an important step in creating secondary streets. Glen Horn clarified the model is really the front part of the property from Highway 82 consisting of about 40 acres. The rest would stay as a working ranch. He stated the cottonwoods are on the up valley end and provide a buffer between this development and the Laura J Estates. Commissioner Phillips asked about the roundabout. Mr. Rappaport stated this is a sketch. The design has not yet begun. Kathleen Kreger, of Kreger and Associates, stated this is just a schematic. She stated this will have to receive a greater study. She stated she is a skeptic of roundabouts and will only endorse one if she feels it is the right thing. Commissioner Johnson asked about the distance between the entrance and exit site. Ms. Kreger concluded 1600 feet. Commissioner Johnson asked from left to right, A to B. Ms. Kreger concluded 700 feet. Commissioner Johnson asked from B to C. They concluded 1600 feet. Ms. Kreger spoke to the signals due to traffic at the first access. She stated the last access is a right in, right out. She explained what that would allow. Chairman Stone asked about pedestrian traffic across Highway 82. Ms. Kreger stated she believes the best place to cross is at signalized locations. She stated the standard signal design needs to be done. She stated in rare cases you can look at underpasses or overpasses, but those are less desirable. She stated where they don't work is where they have not been well designed. This is a new intersection and will have to meet ADA and all other requirements. Commissioner Phillips spoke to the discussion on water quality and lack there of and parking. Mr. Clarkson stated the concern was whether or not this was part and parcel of the Mid-Valley Metropolitan District service area. It has been determined it is within that area. Commissioner Phillips responded that was her concern. She questioned parking. Mr. Clarkson suggested staff believes it can be properly addressed. Chairman Stone opened the floor to public comment. Barbara Brevetti, area resident, stated in the development, as a homeowner, they are concerned with the two buildings adjacent to their property. The first being proposed is 5000 square feet. The second is proposed at 4000 square feet. From the highway, she believes it will be really obtrusive and an eye sore. She understands they will be storing cranes and that it is the workshop of the nursery. She stated they recommend they be moved nearer the nursery to be less visible. She spoke to the parking of employee cars and that the area will be heavily used. They are concerned about the Frontage Road and though they have assured them there will be a locked gate, they are concerned. There is a school at the other end. She stated as it is designed now, the semis can not enter. Commissioner Johnson questioned locking the gate. Mr. Rappaport stated between the wholesale and the resale there would be a locked gate. Ms. Brevetti showed this as the old Highway 82 and where it dead ends. They would like to see it remain closed off. She stated the plans came before the Planning Commission for them to make recommendations, as they live in the community. She stated they made the recommendations as their proposal would be obtrusive. She stated when there are no leaves on the trees, they can see it all. She stated the committee had recommended a scaled down version instead of a large hotel. They have two more hotels approved. She stated as for the convention center, she has a hard time believing it is a destination resort. She believes that is a concern. She voiced a concern with lighting. She understood they turned it down because of size and believed it to be less than what they are proposing. She stated she does have a letter she would like to introduce as well. Terry Rucker, Laura J Estates property owner, stated she feels the town has made recommendations that they not have the cabin and the commercial at the end of the lake. She stated with no foliage there will be a visual concern. She spoke to a letter from her husband addressing the concerns. What is the applicants backyard is her front yard. She believes the hotel is too big. She questioned the setbacks. She'd like to see a more reasonable set back for the subdivision. She spoke to the noise if they open up the Frontage Road to semis. She stated the plan at the town meeting did not show the two large buildings or the road. She stated there is a bus stop with fourteen children waiting to get on the bus. She stated the school uses the road as do the neighborhood children. She is concerned with the space. She spoke to the open space and pastures around Mr. Lane's house. She stated she knows the history of the private lake and his desire to have it as a private location. She stated they agreed to his private development and they have not fought with him. Since then, he is changing the plan. They have lived with the boat noise and the mosquitos. They have been told that only certain types of boats are allowed. What is their recourse if the buildings are put in and they don't put things away. She questioned the affordable housing and whether it will be rent controlled. She is concerned with the large size of the hotel. They don't have concerns with the EI Jebel end. She gave the letter written by her husband to the Board. Gary Johnson, homeowner of Laura J Estates, stated they have the third house closest to the water ski lake. They were part of the process and the approval and their big concern was the mosquitos. He stated Eagle County was supposed to help as was Mr. Lane. They took that to Ace Lane and he stated he put fish in there but would not use chemicals. He stated it didn't work and Eagle County doesn't seem to step in and do anything. This is a byproduct. With the new commercial and maintenance facilities they see it as new headaches. He stated right now they use the other end to bring in all the employees. He suggested the employees will use the other end to park the landscape vehicles which will turn it into a major access area. The gate will be unlocked and used most the time. Right across the highway is Willits and they are looking to have 300,000 commercial approved. With that and this they have 400,000 commercial approved. He asked if they have seen impact studies of what will happen to the traffic. He stated the number of employees it will take to staff this is already a huge problem in the valley. He stated there are less and less spots to house the employees. Carol Brice-Fulton, homeowner in Laura J Estates, stated they look right over this onto the lake. They are higher up and will look right into the sheds. She stated that is the main problem they have. When there are leaves on the trees it may be okay but it will be an eye sore. She has a concern with the size of the lodge. She thinks the affordable housing will be wonderful. She would like to see the storage attached to the nursery. Chuck Crist, an Eagle-Vail resident, stated he is concerned about recreation. He asked if this is a private lake. Mr. Rappaport responded it is a private lake and water skiing is the only activity. Mr. Crist asked about fishing and ice skating in the winter. Mr. Rappaport stated it is not deep and it is an aeration system. Mr. Crist questioned if the people who are going to live there can not swim there. Mr. Rappaport stated they are trying to make it open to the public by having the trail around. Mr. Clarkson read letters into the record. The first from Darlene A. Johnson as follows: "To Eagle County: this letter is in regards to Ace Lane's proposal at Kodiak Ski Lake. As a homeowner in Laura J Estates and as Realtor with Basalt Realty for over 10 years, I have some concerns regarding the proposal. First and foremost are the proposed buildings at our end by the lake. The storage/shops will impact the value of our subdivision as you drive and the first thing one sees are trucks and equipment pulling in and out and a storage area/shop. First impressions are very important and have a great impact on real estate. Also, I do question does EI Jebel really need a hotel of such a size. Is there any evidence to support the need in an area that is not a destination resort. Thank you for taking the time to address my concerns and I am confident the right decisions will be made. Sincerely, Darlene A. Johnson." Letter from David Meeker as follows: "Dear Commissioners: Due to the fact that I am unable to attend the Eagle County Commissioners meeting, I would like this letter read into the minutes of the meeting. I have recently been informed by the members of the Laura J. Estate Homeowners Association of the new proposal which will be presented by Kodiak Park. After carefully considering the proposal, I find I am in total agreement with the homeowners of Laura J. Estates. The proposal does not reflect the rulings made by the Eagle County Advisor Committee which was to remove the cabin from the far end of the lake. The committee also made a motion to decline the building of the hotel. The committee felt two hotels within a radius of approximately 1 ~ miles which has already been approved or is in the process of being approved was adequate for the area. They felt that an additional hotel would not be necessary. It was also the consensus of the committee that EI Jebel was not a destination resort and would therefore, not need a convention site or meeting area. They felt that it would only increase the volume of traffic already on Highway 82. In addition, the new wholesale buildings which are to be placed at the far end ofthe nursery are obtrusive and will be an eye sore from the highway not to mention the effect they will have on our property value in Laura 1. Estates. I, therefore, object to the building of the current proposed size of the hotel, placement of the wholesale buildings and the location of the cabin on the far end of the lake. I would ask the Eagle County Commissioners to carefully consider the needs of our community and make a motion against this proposal. Sincerely, David Meeker." A letter from Eric Brucker as follows: "Eagle County Planning Commission; I have been a vehicle shop manager/owner for 25 years. The promise that all activities performed at the proposed new maintenance shop and ranch storage facility for Kodiak Lake development is an empty promise. It is physically impossible to keep such a promise. It's an architect's concept of how a vehicle maintenance shop and storage facility should work but has no insight in reality. So please don't let the claim that all activities and all supplies, spare tires, barrels, plows, blades, spare parts, down vehicles, fuel tanks, etc will be store inside, be your decision because physically it can't happen. I have spent my whole career in and around shops, some neat and clean, some not, but in all cases there is always vehicles and workings going on outside the building. The other point is if the shop is approved and goes on line as an active maintenance facility what recourse would the neighbors have should the promise of total in doors storage and activities not be kept. Everything stored around and out back of these 2 facilities is in our front yards, highly visible and noisy. Producing a large amount of traffic with heavy equipment, producing fumes in our front yards, something we will look at and drive by every day, and this will have an impact on our subdivision and property values. I would like to see all development including the guest cabin on the Laura J. Estates end of Kodiak Lake be moved closer to the working ranch and garden facility. I feel the need for an 80,000 square foot hotel/motel/lodge is out of character for an area that has been rural and ranch like in nature, and I would hope you take the Town of Basalt planners advice and vote no on this out of place monstrosity. I feel Mr. Lane has had the opportunity to develop his property. With the approval ofthe lake and water skiing, boat storage, wholesale nursery and garden facility, log furniture business, etc, if there are any more approvals on this new submission I would like to see something in writing that this would be the end of his ability to develop any more of the property. Sincerely, Eric Brucker." Chairman Stone asked for the applicant's response. Mr. Rappaport stated they do want to respond to the real concerns. He stated with regards to the shop, they didn't promise everything would be inside. He stated what they are trying to show is that these are very low models. It could be a dirt back or built into the ground. He stated the distances of these buildings are between 150 to 250 feet. There are three lots that boarder this project. They want to do the right thing. If there are noise ordinances to be incorporated they will. They do not intend on this being a parking area for Mr. Lane's employees. They built the schematic design for the lodge and do not feel that it is obtrusive or massive. He stated regarding the mosquito mitigation, the individuals who provided the report are present. He stated Mr. Lane is doing the things that are required. They are addressing that concern as well and can speak to that issue. Commissioner Phillips asked what kind of problem it would be to eliminate the buildings or move them to the landscape area. Mr. Rappaport stated they are flexible. He stated in this location it is up against the bank. They believe that bringing them forward will cause a greater visual concern. Commissioner Phillips asked if this is a better location. Mr. Rappaport stated they believe that it is. He stated they put them there as they were trying to figure out a place that would be less obtrusive. Commissioner Phillips stated the Planning Commission spoke to eliminate the cabin and questioned why they would speak to that and not the buildings. Mr. Rappaport stated they placed the cabin in that location not thinking it would be an impact. Commissioner Johnson asked if Mid Valley Metropolitan District has any responsibility for the mosquito control. He asked to speak with the mosquito people. Bill Johnson, a hydrologist who constructed the lake, stated the mosquito problem has always been there. He stated the lake is not the problem itself. He stated the activity is in the adjacent wetlands which they were required to do as part of the construction of the lake by the Corps of Engineers. He spoke to the large wetland across the street which has no mosquito control and the gravel pit which has created a wetland and does not have mosquito control. He stated they are treating the mosquitos in their area, but none of the other areas are. Larry Gifford, hydrologist, stated he was hired in 1993 to address the mosquitos. He stated they need a stagnate area, but this area really does not provide the appropriate breedery ground. He stated there are very few larva in the lake. He stated they will be drawn to the lake in the evenings. He spoke to water management and irrigation around the trees that he has recommended and suggested they add a dead bacteria that is EP A approved that has been tested and is benign. He stated they won't get them all but it will knock it down up to 80%. Commissioner Johnson asked how often it is applied. Mr. Gifford stated it can be hand applied with a spreader, which is labor intensive, or use the donut shaped pellets which are time released and last up to 30 days. The later is what Mr. Lane has been usmg. Commissioner Johnson asked how often it is being applied. Mr. Gifford stated he could not answer that. Sean Roark, employee of Ace Lane, stated they do that application once a month during the summer, starting in May. Commissioner Johnson asked if that is once a month or once every thirty days. Mr. Roark stated once a month. Mr. Gifford stated the pellets are a time release donut application and he believes are better in circumstances as this. Chairman Stone asked for a review of the use of the proposed buildings. Mr. Rappaport stated those in pink are new buildings, the white are the marina, the single family/cabins will be short-term/weekend, maybe employee units. He showed the short-term and mixed use buildings, one to be a small restaurant, other mixed use with service commercial buildings. He showed another possible restaurant, the lodge, the wholesale and design studio. Chairman Stone asked what they would anticipate to be the number of year round residents. Mr. Rappaport suggested around sixty. Chairman Stone asked how many employees the new facilities would generate and what kind of employee/affordable housing would be necessary to go along with the proposed development. Mr. Rappaport stated the whole idea is to allow employee mitigation to be incorporated. He stated the buildings by design are to be affordable. He stated they are not designed as buildings to be high end residential units. Even the cabins are not for high end residential renters. Commissioner Johnson asked if there are time restrictions on when the lake can be used. Mr. Clarkson stated he believes there are restrictions. He believes the lake can't be used after dark. He suggested there is a restriction on weekends. Bill Johnson stated it varies throughout the times of the year. They originally had requested to have lights on the lake and that was turned down. He stated it is daylight to dark. Terry Bucker stated they start boating at 7:00 a.m. on weekends and during the week. She stated she does not believe that the Town of Basalt voted on the two buildings as they were not clearly on the map at that time. She stated she even asked the traffic consultant how they would bring the trees in around the roundabout. Commissioner Phillips asked if this is a change. Glen Rappaport stated when he met with the homeowners he indicated they would be modifying the plans. He stated even though there were some machinations, the plan has not changed. Chairman Stone asked if this plan is what was presented to the Town of Basalt and the Planning Commission. Mr. Rappaport stated it is. Mr. Clarkson concurred. Commissioner Johnson pointed them out in the project plan. He spoke to their being able to form the buildings in such a way they won't be seen. He stated they would be willing to plant conifers. Commissioner Johnson spoke to enforcement of the proposed plans. Glen Rappaport stated they would create two documents, one being the PUD control document and a Master Declaration that would be enforceable by the Homeowners Association. Barbara Brivetti stated aside from the fact of the neighbors seeing it, she stated coming down the Highway the buildings are highly visible. She stated there is plenty of that up and down the valley. She stated this could be a nice looking place. She stated the area really sticks out. Commissioner Johnson stated there is berming that can be done in the front part of the property to hide it. He spoke to the work done across from Arrowhead and suggested it can be mitigated. Chairman Stone closed public comment and asked for final questions and comments. Commissioner Johnson stated he agrees with much of what the Planning Commission set forth. He spoke to the cabin and because they don't know what it is or what it's use is, he would like to see it taken out of the application. He would not like to see it as a staging area for the boats. He stated they do need to have screening on both sides of the warehouse buildings and not have it be a staging area for employees. Commissioner Phillips stated by building it into the ground it would not be as visible. Commissioner Johnson asked George Roussos, County Engineer, about traffic and access into Highway 82. Mr. Roussos suggested it may be an expressway. He questioned the access points and that they may have been acquired by Colorado Department of Transportation. Commissioner Johnson stated he has a concern with the number of access points. Ms. Kreger stated the access points will have to be purchased from CDOT. Willits Lane is a pre- approved access. She stated the only one in question is the right in, right out. Mr. Roussos stated the issuing point for the permits is Eagle County. Commissioner Phillips asked about staff s recommendation to include the Mckelvey parcel within the PUD and an Environmental Impact Report. She asked if this was done after hearing the Planning Commissions recommendation. Mr. Clarkson responded that condition was after the fact as they were originally recommending denial. Mr. Gifford stated they went back and reviewed the environmental concerns with the lake. At that time they asked that further study be waived as they were not sure what would be needed. He suggested additional environmental work is not necessary at this time. He stated they can not control what independent owners will do in joining the PUD. They may need help from Eagle County in getting Mckelvey to join in the PUD application. Their problem is they can not control another property owner. If they can be nudged, they will work with them. Mr. Clarkson stated that staff believes they can convince Ms. Mckelvey this would be to her advantage. Otherwise, her parcel will expire. Her parcel has been exempted so she could build her house. The County tried to do the right thing. Commissioner Phillips suggested she doesn't believe it will work when they try to force it on someone. Mr. Clarkson suggested they may be able to convince Ms. Mckelvey to join this PUD as she will have a zoning violation with the dog kennel. Chairman Stone asked where this property is located. Mr. Gifford showed it as the white area outlined. Chairman Stone asked about the PUD. Mr. Gifford stated it is within it but is not part of the PUD. Chairman Stone asked if the access is effected by the PUD. Mr. Gifford stated it is. Commissioner Johnson stated he doesn't know how it is they don't do the Environmental Impact Report and referred to the regulations. He stated they don't have the report as it was not part ofthe original proposal. Mr. Gifford stated they included it. Bob Loeffler, Deputy County Attorney, stated at the sketch plan stage they require an Environmental Impact Report be submitted. He stated some of what was done might have some application, but now they are adding commercial and residential. There is no basis on which an exemption can be granted. Chairman Stone asked if they can move forward as a Board noting the absence of the Environmental Impact Study being completed. Mr. Clarkson stated what they have may be the sketch plan report. At preliminary plan, the details should be available. Mr. Loeffler stated he would agree, but it can not be exempted. Chairman Stone asked with what they have, would it be sufficient at this stage. Mr. Gifford asked ifthe scope ofthe report can be limited to the area where the development is proposed. Chairman Stone stated logically if they are not impacting it the report will be focused on the development. Commissioner Phillips suggested she would think an update would be sufficient. Mr. Loeffler stated these comments are not a conclusion. That will have to be concluded once examined. Mr. Gifford stated they understand that. Commissioner Phillips stated she believes they should clarify the inclusion of the Mckelvey property in this. Chairman Stone questioned that they would be able to do that. He suggested it can not be a strict requirement. Mr. Rappaport believes the strength of language must come from the County. Commissioner Johnson asked for the history on that parcel. Mr. Clarkson stated it is an illegally subdivided property purchased in the early 90's. At the same time Mr. Lane was bringing through his previous proposal, Ms. McKelvey wanted to own and operate a dog kennel and live on site. They zoned the parcel but the platting never occurred. Commissioner Johnson questioned if both owners came in and shared the PUD, would they have to get a sign off from the adjacent property owner on the use. Mr. Clarkson stated it would have to be very specific. Commissioner Johnson asked about changing the use ofthe parcel and if they would have to get a sign off. Mr. Clarkson stated it would be a PUD Amendment. Commissioner Johnson stated he would not favor the language. Mr. Clarkson stated he understands that. He stated the concern he has is more immediate as she will have an illegal use. Commissioner Phillips asked how the illegal use occurred. Commissioner Johnson stated she already has an illegal use as she has a parcel that is not zoned. Chairman Stone asked for more questions. He asked Mr. Clarkson to read staff findings. Mr. Clarkson spoke to staff Planning Commission recommendation #1 and that prior to the submittal of any preliminary plan for this development there shall be a road agreement in place with the developers of the Blue Ridge PUD satisfactory to Eagle County. He spoke to the letter from Glenn Horn on January 12. He stated the applicants make a good point in requiring a connection occur through another piece of property. The applicants have come up with some language. He stated proponents of the Blue Ridge PUD came in to speak to Kodiak Park. He spoke to Resolution 96-46 and if the Blue Ridge PUD doesn't happen. He stated then they will have all this development being accessed from Highway 82. He stated there are two developers and he agrees with the applicant that the language suggested by the Planning Commission places too much burden on the applicant to arrive at agreement with an adjacent property owner. The language in 96-46 does involve the County and gives emanate domain if certain things don't occur. He thinks staff generally likes the idea of this being a town road but the connection back to Willits Lane is still a critical issue. He suggested they could create more of a community. Mr. Lane has a vision, the problems don't all have to be worked out at this time. Chairman Stone stated he is not comfortable adopting either set of language as they have not had the opportunity to review them. Mr. Clarkson apologized for not having brought this forward. He spoke to 3A which is in conflict as it states the site plan shall contain no hotel or cabin at the southeast end of the ski lake. Commissioner Phillips stated sitting through all of the discussion regarding that road, the Lanes and the Tuckers both agree it should connect someday and she believes both of those parties will eventually make this work. Mr. Clarkson read staff findings for the Board as follows: Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F.3.e Standards for the review of a Sketch and Preliminary PUD Plan: (1) Unified ownership or control. It IS represented that title to all land is owned or controlled by one (1) entity. (2) Uses. Uses that may be developed through the proposed PUD ARE those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300 or Table 3-320 for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. (3) Dimensional Limitations. It CAN be demonstrated that the dimensional limitations are as specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations," for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations ofthese use designations HAVE NOT BEEN authorized pursuant to Section 5-240.F.3.f.(3)(d) & (f), Variations Authorized. He stated that is the only difference the Planning Commission had. They felt it could not be demonstrated. (4) Off-Street parking and Loading. Off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD DOES comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. Applicant also HAS NOT demonstrated that cause exists for a reduction in these standards for one of the following reasons: a) Shared Parking: That because of shared parking arrangements among uses within the PUD that do not require peak parking for those uses to occur at the same time, the parking needs of residents, guests and employees ofthe project will be met; or b) Actual Needs: That the actual needs of the project's residents, guests, and employees will be less than those set by Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. 5) Landscaping. Landscaping provided in the PUD DOES comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards. 6) Signs. The PUD sign standards ARE as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations. 7) Adequate Facilities. The applicant HAS demonstrated that the development proposed by the PUD will be provided with adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. (8) Improvements. The improvement standards applicable to the development ARE as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards. It HAS been demonstrated that the development achieves greater efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts. (a) Safe, Efficient Access. It HAS been demonstrated that there is safe, efficient access to all areas of the proposed development. (b) Internal Pathways. It HAS been demonstrated that internal pathways form a logical, safe and convenient system for pedestrian accesses with appropriate linkages off-site. (c) Emergency Vehicles. It HAS been demonstrated that the roadways are designed to permit access by emergency vehicles to all lots or units. (d) Principal Access Points. It HAS been demonstrated that the principal vehicular access points are designed to provide for smooth traffic flow, minimizing hazards to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. (e) Snow Storage. Adequate areas for snow storage HAVE NOT been provided on the plans submitted. (9) Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. The development proposed for the PUD IS compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. (10) Consistency with Master Plan. The PUD IS consistent with the Master Plans, including, but not limited to, the 1996 Future Land Use Map (FLUM). (11) Phasing. Not applicable at PUD Sketch Plan. (12) Common Recreation and Open Space. The PUD DOES comply with the following common recreation and open space standards: (a) Minimum Area: Recommended "minimum open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi-public" (as defined) is 25%; (b) Improvements Required: All common open space and recreational facilities shall be shown on the FINAL PLAT for the PUD and shall be constructed and fully improved according to the development schedule established for each development phase ofthe PUD. (c) Continuing Use and Maintenance: Not applicable: refers only to deed restrictions and/or deed covenants. The PUD DOES comply with the following common recreation and open space standard: (d) Organization: Common open space is proposed to be maintained through an association or nonprofit corporation, and such organization shall manage all common open space and recreational and cultural facilities that are not dedicated to the public, and shall provide for the maintenance, administration and operation of such land and any other land within the PUD not publicly owned, and secure adequate liability insurance on the land. (13) Natural Resources Protection. The PUD HAS considered the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendation received by responding referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards: Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410); Development in Areas Subject to Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420); Development in Areas Subject to Wildfire Hazards (Section 4-430); Wood Burning Controls (Section 4- 440); Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450); Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460). Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-280.B.3.e, Standards for the review of a Sketch Plan for Subdivision: (1) Consistency with Master Plan. The proposed subdivision IS consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan/so (2) Consistent with Land Use Regulations. The proposed subdivision IS consistent with the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. (3) Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. The project IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leap frog" pattern of development." (a) Utility and Road Extension: Proposed utility extensions ARE consistent with the utility's service plan or that County approval of a service plan amendment will be given; or that road extensions are consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital Improvements Plan. (b) Serve Ultimate Population: Utility lines WILL be sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (c) Coordinate Utility Extensions: "Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area." (4) Suitability for Development. The property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for development. (5) Compatibility with Surrounding Uses. The proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and WILL NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Commissioner Johnson suggested in reading 5-240.f.3.e in the standards it says that the sketch plan and preliminary plan for the PUD shall comply with the following standards. He stated he doesn't believe they can approve it if it doesn't meet all those standards. He stated where the Planning Commission says it cannot be demonstrated the dimensional limitations as specified 3-340, he does not understand where it does not comply with that section. Chairman Stone suggested it doesn't meet with resource as they are applying for a PUD so it doesn't meet that section. Mr. Clarkson stated the fact is a variation of these designations has not yet been authorized and will have to be applied for and separate findings will have to be met. Mr. Horn stated it is his understanding the zoning is no longer resource, it is a PUD. He stated they do not have a PUD plan. As part of that plan the uses will be designated. Mr. Clarkson stated he is right, it is an expired PUD and as such it has no uses. Commissioner Johnson stated he doesn't agree because if zoning expires, it goes back to the . . prevIOUS zomng. Mr. Loeffler stated yes but it requires an affirmative act and without such it sits as an inactive PUD. Chairman Stone questioned on the schedule of dimensional limitations, because of the previous PUD, which has expired, and with a lack of affirmative act by the Board, the zone district is still in effect for the expired PUD. Mr. Loeffler stated he wasn't conscious of the previous PUD approval and he suggests the most logical thing would be to look back at the zoning that pre-existed. He stated the reason they have the expired PUD zoning is their own failure to take any affirmative steps. Commissioner Johnson asked what section that is. Mr. Loeffler stated that is State Common Law. Commissioner Johnson suggested he thought that was in the Land Use Regulations. Mr. Loeffler stated it was but it would still require an affirmative action at this point. Chairman Stone asked if the Board were to do that at this point in time, would they be able to make a finding that it can be demonstrated. Mr. Loeffler stated not today as they have not noticed that this would be a change in zoning. He stated you could do so by finding the limitations do not conform to the underlying Resource District but there may be a basis for a variation. Chairman Stone suggested they would like to move forward in some form or fashion and he would not like to delay it for decision. Mr. Loeffler suggested the Planning Commission finding may be more appropriate to determine it can not be demonstrated that the dimensional limitations are as specified in Table 3-340 "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations ofthese use designations HAVE NOT BEEN authorized pursuant to Section 5-240.F.2.f.(3)(d)&(t). Commissioner Johnson spoke to page 6 and the question about adequate snow storage. He suggested there is nowhere within the regulations that states snow storage has to be defined but rather there needs to be adequate space for snow storage. He disagrees with staff and suggests it just hasn't been detailed. He spoke to page 5-47 and the expiration ofthe permit which is within the Land Use Regulations. Chairman Stone asked if they need to change the findings. The answer was yes. Commissioner Johnson moved the Board approve File PDS-00015, Kodiak Park, incorporating the proposed findings as read, changing 2-240.f.3.e.(3)(d)&(f) stating it cannot be demonstrated that the dimensional limitations as specified in the table, going on to state variations of these dimensions can be authorized prior to preliminary plan, as authorized pursuant to section 5-40.f.3.f.3(t)(d. Chairman Stone clarified Commissioner Johnson is leaving "can not" in and changing the "have not been" to "can be"? Commissioner Johnson stated that was correct. Also, section 5-240-f.3.e.8.e, shall be changed to "adequate area for snow storage have been provided on the plans submitted." All remaining findings shall remain as read. Included in this motion are the following conditions: 1. The applicants shall prepare a proposal for a signal warranty study of the Highway 82 intersection before or at Final Plat. 2. Any Preliminary Plan submittal for this development shall contain the following: a. The site plan shall contain no hotel, or cabin at the southeast end of the ski lake. b. The draft of a permanent mechanism (preferably a conservation easement) shall preserve open space in perpetuity. c. A fully defined paved bike path designed to link with a Valley-wide system and other projects according to the recommendations of ECO Trails. d. A traffic circle (should this option be retained) designed to maintain flow while providing for adequate stacking. e. A PUD Guide containing a specified list of uses allowed, and fully addressing landscaping and lighting. f. A detailed phasing plan is submitted. h. Documentation to support or reject the need for a second vehicular access to the project in light of future uses in the area dealing with the entrance on the northwest side of the property. 3. An Environmental Impact Report in compliance with Section 4-460 of the Land Use regulations shall be prepared. 4. That an employee/affordable housing plan also be submitted prior to PUD. 5. The two warehouse spaces on the southeast end that are to be used for the wholesale portion of the operation: a. they shall be designed to be either bermed or made to look earthen so it will be hidden from their view. b. there shall be berming and landscaping along Highway 82 to also effectively hide the development. 6. There be no access to old Highway 82 from this PUD except for emergency access/egress. Commissioner Phillips questioned getting to the two wholesale buildings. Chairman Stone stated the motion states old Highway 82. Mr. Rappaport questioned no access from these buildings to the Frontage Road. Commissioner Johnson stated that was correct. Commissioner Phillips questioned how those people get back and forth. Ms. Kreger showed how they enter. The problem will be the added traffic. Commissioner Johnson suggested when the applicant comes back for preliminary plan they will need to show adequate access. If there are improvements needed for adequate access, the applicant will have to make those improvements. Commissioner Phillips seconded the motion. Mr. Loeffler stated there is access from new Highway 82 to old Highway 82 and that can't be restricted. Chairman Stone called for the question on the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDF -00042, Final Plat, Cordillera Filing 37 Jean Garren, Planner, presented file number PDF-00042, Final Plat, Cordillera Filing 37. She stated as a resubdivision of Cordillera Filing 34, this Final Plat creates two ofthe fifteen remaining single family lots allowed in Planning Parcel U of the Mountain Tract under the Cordillera Subdivision Fifth Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development Control Document (July 12, 1999) approved by the Board July 12, 1999 and recorded at Reception No. 704767. It also replats portions of Filing 34's Future Development Tracts A and B. A Subdivision and Off-site Improvements Agreement has been prepared and approved by the Eagle County Engineering Department and Eagle County Attorney. Ms. Garren reviewed the chronology of the subdivision for the Board as follows: The Preliminary Plan for this development was approved by the Board when it approved the Preliminary Plan for the Mountain Tract on August 31, 1998 (File No. PDP-00009; Resolution No. 98- 126; Fourth Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development Control Document recorded at Reception No. 674252). Ms. Garren reviewed the referral responses as follows: Eagle County Engineering. The Engineering Department submitted numerous comments which have been satisfactorily addressed. Eagle County Surveyor. The nine changes required by the Eagle County Surveyor have been made. Matt Dean, representing the applicant, was present and had no comments. Ms. Garren reviewed staff findings as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-280.B.5.b.(3) Final Plat for Subdivision - Action by the Board of County Commissioners: This Final Plat for Subdivision CONFORMS to the approval given to the Preliminary Plan for Subdivision. Pursuant to Section 5-280.B.3.e Standards of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: (1) Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed subdivision IS consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the FLUM of the Master Plan; (2) Consistent with Land Use Regulations. The proposed subdivision DOES comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards. (3) Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (a) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions ARE consistent with the utility's service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road extensions ARE consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital Improvements Plan. (b) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines SHALL BE sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (c) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area. (4) Suitability for Development. The property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. (5) Compatible With Surrounding Uses. The proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and DOES NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Mr. Loeffler asked they include in the motion an authorization for the Chairman to sign the SIA. Commissioner Phillips move that the Board approve File No. PDF-00042, incorporating Staffs Findings, and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat and the Subdivisions Improvement Agreement. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until February 14,2000. Attest: Clerk to the Bo Ch~~