The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 08/02/99 Present: Johnnette Phillips Tom C. Stone James Johnson James Fritze Jack Ingstad Sara J. Fisher PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 2,1999 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Attorney County Administrator Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: GENERAL FUND 3CMA A & I SOL T & NUT INC AARON WYLE ACCOUNT BROKERS ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS ADVANCED MICROSYSTEMS INC AGENCY OF CREDIT CONTROL AGM RADIO GROUP AIR TOUCH CELLULAR AIR TOUCH CELLULAR - AIRBORNE ALAN GREENBERG ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE ALPHA INTERACTIVE GROUP ALPINE ANIMAL HOSPITAL ALPINE LOCKSMITH COMPANY ALPINE SIGN & GRAPHICS AMERICAN MONEY MANAGEMENT AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC ANNA ONTIVEROS ANNE K BRENNER ANNE KRAUS DAVIS APEX SECURITY ARIZONA PLANNING ASSOC ARNOLD AND ARNOLD ARTHUR AND PERLMUTTER ARTWORKS, THE ASCENT ELECTRIC ASCOM ASISTENCIA PARA LATINOS ASPEN BASALT CARE CLINIC ASPEN BUDDY PROGRAM SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REFUND REFUND SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES 1999 HS GRANT 1999 HS GRANT 1999 HS GRANT 570.00 23.02 384.00 5.78 51.00 273.50 25.00 1,060.00 315.90 3,700.54 1,200.00 41.12 1,505.28 195.00 40.00 486.00 155.00 4,914.40 587.00 110.00 54.56 68.60 888.05 795.00 25.00 27.48 148.00 220.00 120.00 750.00 1,312.50 375.00 1 08-02-1999 ASPEN CTR FOR WOMENS HL TH ASPEN DAILY NEWS AT & TWIRELESS SERVICES AV TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVON COMMERCIAL CENTER BAI/BRAUN ASSOCIATES INC BAILEY FUNERAL HOME BARBARA SCHUMACHER BARTELL & BARTELL BASALT FAMILY RESOURCE BASALT SANITATION DISTRIC BASALT TOWN OF BEN GALLOWAY M.D BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER BEST READ GUIDE BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS BIG SKY RACKS INC BILL LOPEZ BLACK BOX CORPORATION BLUE LAKE OWNERS ASSN BOB BARKER COMPANY BONDED COLLECTION SERVICE BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO BRATWEAR BRC/HARRIS, INC BRETT KA YSEN BRIGETTE MALESSA BRUCE CAMPBELL BURNS RODEO COMPANY CALAMITY JANES EMBROIDERY CALOIA, HOUPT & LIGHT PC CAMERON ONEAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND CARLA FARRAND CASCADE MEDICAL CENTER CASEY SMITH CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CCO AND ERA CENTURYTEL CHARLES H DUNCAN CHEMATOX INC. CHESS CHOICE RECOVERY NETWORK CHRISTINE SASSE CITY MARKET #34 CLAYTON MONROE SIMMONS SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES 1999 HS GRANT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB. REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND 2,400.00 70.00 502.81 6,791.34 9,140.10 1,305.00 150.00 500.00 446.25 1,500.00 103.50 51.00 665.00 50.00 1,080.00 612.26 204.95 210.80 76.39 1,336.88 128.66 40.00 627.00 103.50 573.10 150.00 575.00 120.46 5,000.00 3,424.00 374.30 50.00 34,846.31 93.40 128.50 1,500.00 107.69 67,995.69 17,020.22 38.02 200.00 317.83 3.90 199.00 307.44 25.00 2 08-02-1999 CLERK OF ADAMS COUNTY CLI NT SCHWAB CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION CO BUREAU INVESTIGATION CO CHILDRENS IMMUNIZATION CO DEPT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS CO WEST INSURANCE GROUP CO WEST MENTAL HEALTH COLLEEN WHITFORD COLORADO FASTENERS COLORADO INTERMOUNTAIN COLORADO WEST MENTAL COLUMBINE BAKERY CONNIE CARTHY CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING CONSOLIDATED PLASTIC CO CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COUNTRY GENERAL CROSSLAND ECONOMY STUDIOS CSU COOPERATIVE EXTENSION CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE DAILY JOURNAL THE DANA LOU RIA DANKA OMNIFAX DATA COMM WAREHOUSE DATA GENERAL CORPORATION DAVID A BAUER DAVID GUINNEE, DVM DAYS INN GRAND JUNCTION DEEP ROCK WEST DENVER COUNTY SOCIAL DENVER POST CORPORATION T DEPARTMENT REGULATORY AGE DICK AYRES DISCO PRINT WHOLESALE DISTRICT COURT TRUSTEE DOC PLUMBER DOCTORS ON CALL DON OLSEN DONNA BARNES, CORONER DUANE REICHART DWYER HUDDLESTON & RAY EAGLE AUTO PARTS EAGLE AUTO RECYCLING & EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 1999 HS GRANT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES 99 CONTRIBUTION SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REFUND PARTS SERVICES SERVICES 52.53 50.00 120.00 66.24 25.00 35.00 330.25 2,500.00 2.89 85.16 25,000.00 2,500.00 300.00 50.00 1,194.52 44.63 399.74 3,052.50 148.76 132.00 30.00 605.00 47.55 726.90 544.33 1,133.86 317.05 2.48 2,964.45 164.00 110.51 25.00 1,111.98 42.00 300.00 200.00 415.41 100.00 450.00 20.31 37.22 3,200.00 8.68 123.80 170.00 4,796.22 3 08-02-1999 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE EYE PHOTO EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS EAGLE VALLEY BIG A EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE VALLEY LIBRARY DIST EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL EAGLE VALLEY PET HOSPITAL EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EAGLE-SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS EARLY CHILDHOOD EBY CREEK ROAD EDWIN J OYLER ELITE LIMOUSINE ELITE PRODUCTS ELK RIVER ENTERPRISES INC EMMY LERMA EMPLOYERS COUNCIL SERVICE ENTERPRISES FLEET SERVICE ERICA DAVIS ESRI EVES PRINT SHOP EWING TRUCKING CONSTRUCTI FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM FARNUM HOLT FUNERAL HOME FEDERAL EXPRESS FIDELITY FILE FINDERS, LTD. FIRST BANKS FITNESS WHOLESALE FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY FLYING COLORS HORSE SUPPL FOODS OF VAIL, HOME FORENSIC LABORATORIES INC FORINASH KATHLEEN FRANK J BALL FRANKLIN COVEY GALLS INCORPORATED GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF GARFIELD YOUTH SERVICES GENE HOFFMAN GLENWOOD SHOE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES PARTS SERVICES PARTS/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES 1999 HS GRANT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES 1999 HS GRANT SERVICES SERVICES 16.17 26.50 550.62 78.39 2,429.61 1.25 557.70 368.00 10.00 206.00 406.14 10,809.00 4,802.12 760.00 1,000.00 1,400.00 250.00 571.87 1,000.00 81.00 1,740.00 2,679.37 150.00 1,095.00 675.07 227.50 1,239.54 1,200.00 450.00 263.50 74.68 70.00 14,166.66 431.60 50.00 478.39 380.27 337.50 136.18 131.82 449.30 56.36 22.50 375.00 100.00 78.00 4 08-02-1999 GLOBAL ELECTION SYSTEMS GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GREG KIRK HAL BURNS HALL AND EVANS HART INFORMATION SERVICES HAWKQUEST HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HERMAN MILLER INC HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HILL & TASHIRO MARKETING HODGES BADGE COMPANY HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOLIDAY INN NORTH HOLME ROBERTS OWEN HOLY CROSS ENERGY HUME GROUP, THE ICBO IFR REFRESHER IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS INDOFF INC INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND I NTERMOU NT AI N PRODUCTIONS INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION J ALBERT BAUER JACKIES OLD WEST INC JACQUES S RUDA JAMES E JOHNSON JR. JAMES G ANDERSON JAMIE WILSON JANE FORD JAYNE RIVELLI JEAN GARREN JEAN WOOD JEANNIE MAY ENTERPRISES JODIE BRANDT JOHN J RUDDY JOHN VENGRIN JOHNNETTE PHILLIPS JOHNNETTE PHILLIPS JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC JOLlE B RAMO JP AVIONICS JULIE FELDMAN SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FURNITURE SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT TRAVEL ADVANCE SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 2,860.26 273.93 79.45 398.50 11,485.00 26.38 126.30 950.00 145,579.68 442.40 576.00 4,350.00 846.00 150.00 168.00 400.00 14,473.21 24.50 13,009.81 39.00 274.33 42.01 1,868.35 10,000.00 405.00 373.00 13.02 2,587.10 10.54 428.57 38.64 75.00 17,550.00 150.00 10.05 112.00 1,675.00 111.91 148.68 88.76 168.47 300.00 945.25 88.00 208.04 100.00 ERR 5 08-02-1999 JUNIPER VALLEY PRODUCTS KAREN MERRITT STURGILL KARLA CLARK KEITH E BELK KING CAMPBELL, DDS KN ENERGY INC KRISTEN MELSEN KVS INFORMATION SYSTEMS I LAURIE ASMUSSEN LAW AND ORDER LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LES OHLHAUSER LETN L1L JOHNS WATER TREATMENT LISA ANN BOVIER LISA VASQUEZ LONG'S EXCAVATION INC. LORI E STEADMAN HUFF LORIE CRAWFORD L YLAH ROBIN L KESER MACHOL & JOHANNES MAIN STREET GALLERY AND MAINTENANCE WAREHOUSE MARGARET MARY KRATZER MARGARET NORIEGA MARGERY STONE MARSHALL AUSTIN MARY KRAFT MARY LOU COLTON MARY LOU WILSON MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS MCMANIS ASSOCIATES INC MEDTECH W.B., INC. MEGAN KORZEP MESA COUNTY HEALTH DEPART METROCALL MEYER LAND SYSTEMS MICHAEL BEALS, D.O. P.C. MICHAEL L BLAKE MICHAEL MILLSAPPS MICRO PLASTICS MID VALLEY KENNEL MIKES CAMERA INC. MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 82.61 55.18 50.00 130.00 181.00 2,316.96 68.60 590.00 1,500.00 22.00 379.76 1,500.00 388.00 735.00 5.58 11.85 500.00 619.29 69.44 15.00 6.20 44.62 451.36 15.00 500.00 18.91 1,538.00 184.59 250.00 75.00 1,783.32 3,521.43 1,166.00 89.82 10.50 10.10 1,900.00 720.00 25.00 32.30 179.25 1,733.00 134.00 597.66 45,595.95 3,600.00 6 08-02-1999 NAT'L SANITARY/UNISOURCE NATIONAL PROPANE NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL NCR CORPORATION NEVES UNIFORMS NEWELL AND MARTENS NOAHS ARK PETTING ZOO NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORTHWEST COLORADO LEGAL NORWEST BANK OFFICE TEC KNOWLEDGY ORACLE CORPORATION OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP PAINT BUCKET, THE PAPER WISE PAT MAGDZIUK PATTY MUHME PEGGY GRAYBEAL PENNY WISE PEPSI PEREGRINE PRESS PETTY CASH PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PHILLIP C GANS PHILLIS L L1L1SCHKIES PITNEY BOWES PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PRESTIGE CLEANERS PROFESSIONAL FINANCE PROFESSIONAL FLOOR PROGRESSIVE SPORTS PSS, INC PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY PUENTES CUL TURALES QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION R & D INDUSTRIES RBS SUPPLY COMPANY RED BLUFF BUCKLES RENEE BLACK RENTX/EZ WAY RESOURCE CENTER OF EAGLE RESPONSE RICHARD J CUNNINGHAM SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES 1999 HS GRANT PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES PARTS/SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES MILEAGE REIMBURSE/CCAA SERVICES 1999 HS GRANT 1999 HS GRANT SERVICES 571.54 72.00 99.00 30.00 744.38 2,882.75 16.20 1,000.00 1,752.28 500.00 344,880.40 1,342.31 3,380.00 1,017.02 1,118.02 6,468.00 13.64 100.00 180.00 360.00 3,799.86 128.70 130.64 1,654.02 6.98 15.00 86.25 2,282.05 13,013.66 71.25 11.90 22.50 1,140.00 415.75 223.45 540.00 426.30 129.99 295.00 109.57 2,120.00 60.76 9.97 1,250.00 875.00 4,640.00 7 08-02-1999 RICK MURR RIDDER BRADEN INC RIDER & WOULF RIOH MEDICAL GROUP INC RITA HEROLD ROACH EARLENE ROBERT KURTZMAN DO ROBERT LOEFFLER ROCHELLE BOWER ROCKY MOUNTAIN INTERNET ROCKY MTN INFO NETWORK RONALD MARTINI ROPIR CABLEVISION ROSALINDA VENZOR RUTH A SHARP SPI SACHS LAWLOR SAFE SYSTEMS SAGE & VARGO SALVATION ARMY SANDRA A DE LA TORRE SANDYS OFFICE SUPPLY SAWAYA AND ROSE SCOBIE & MORLAND SCOTT MESSINA SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SHANNON ROHR SHAWN APT SHEAFFER KAREN SHELLEY STARK SHIRKIE EVANS SIGN PRO SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SKILLPATH SEMINAR SKYLINE DESIGNS INC SKYLINE TALENT AND SNOWHITE LINEN STARBUCK SURVEYORS & ENGI STEVE TO MAC STEVENS HOME CARE INC STRAWBERRY PATCH SUMMIT LUMBER SUSPENSE FUND TACO BELL 19449 TAMBI KATIEB SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES REFUND REFUND SUPPLIES PARTS SERVICES REFUND 1999 HS GRANT REFUND SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT DEPOSIT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 50.00 2,500.00 40.54 50.00 84.10 19.46 3,604.50 80.60 200.00 39.90 150.00 200.00 46.79 300.00 2.48 1,020.00 11.35 92.91 25.00 1,000.00 25.00 172.75 31.20 46.13 1,000.00 3,771.84 27,992.31 1,500.00 200.00 139.94 8.72 2,000.00 332.50 399.81 556.00 6,386.00 7,420.00 128.73 1,708.50 2,400.00 1,480.00 212.45 920.38 37,685.60 100.35 100.00 8 08-02-1999 TERENCE J QUINN -ATTY AT TERRY CONKLIN TERRY ROUNDS THIRD SECTOR INNOVATIONS TOM C STONE TOM DEVEREAUX TOP DRAWER OFFICE SUPPLY TOWN OF EAGLE TRANSCOR AMERICA INC TRI COUNTY FIRE TURNTABLE RESTAURANT TUXALL UNIFORM COMPANY UGC CONSULTING UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED REPROGRAPHIC UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV UNITED WAY OF EAGLE URBAN QUINT US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST SECURITY DEPT VAIL LOCK AND KEY VAIL TRAIL THE VAIL VALLEY CARES VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VAILNET INC VALLEY LUMBER VALLEY SIGNS VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VALLEY WIDE MECHANICAL IN VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY VICTIMS ASSISTANCE FUND VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS WALMART /AVON WALMART /GLENWOOD WANDA REDMOND WATER RESOURCE CONSULTANT WAYNE CARLEY WENDY BOGNER WESTERN EAGLE VALLEY WESTERN ENTERPRISES INC WESTERN PAGING WESTERN SLOPE PUBLICATION WESTERN WOOD PRODUCTS WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC WILLARD B HARDESTY WILLIAM A EKSTROM REFUND REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT EXPO TRAVEL SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVOCES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 1999 HS GRANT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES 6.20 75.00 100.00 1,186.75 1,485.30 183.03 135.08 7,576.65 720.34 20.00 30.75 78.03 81,767.43 236.18 1,376.22 500.00 181.51 85.96 5,351.96 5.40 10.50 2,908.71 650.00 2,289.10 627.15 1.59 503.35 434.50 195.00 3,581.11 140.00 830.60 383.38 88.82 90.30 855.82 2,130.00 88.06 175.00 6,000.00 46.60 300.00 12.50 690.67 20.38 200.00 9 08-02-1999 WINTERSET AGENCY SERVICES 250.00 WKA WEST SERVICES 35.50 WOOD ASSOCIATES INC SERVICES 952.34 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 76.09 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 5,232.48 YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICES 46.70 YOUR PERSONAL CHEF SERVICES 150.00 PAYROLL FOR JULY PAYROLL #13, 14 & 15 713,551.35 1,945,994.40 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND AVALANCE CONSTRUCTION INC COLLATERAL RELEASE 250.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 5,311.64 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICES 11.66 EAGLE PHARMACY SUPPLIES 7.94 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY SERVICES 92.31 FERRELLGAS SUPPLIES 15.64 GENERAL FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB. 926.14 GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD VEHICLE 26,362.00 HARRYS HEAVY HAULERS SUPPLIES/SERVICES 2,664.19 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 15,018.25 INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY SUPPLIES 64.87 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 6,288.62 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 30,096.13 RICK ETTLES REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN REIMBURSEMENT 29.81 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 7.39 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICES 3,507.69 WALMART /GLENWOOD SUPPLIES 10.96 PAYROLL FOR JULY PAYROLL #13,14 & 15 68,233.07 158,973.31 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND ADAMS MARK HOTEL SERVICES 100.00 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR SERVICES 190.36 ALlMED INCORPORATED SUPPLIES 559.35 ARLlSS SIMS REIMBURSEMENT 8.46 ASPEN COUNSELING CENTER SERVICES 400.00 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB. 3,953.54 CATHERINE CRAIG REIMBURSEMENT 57.52 10 08-02-1999 CCO AND ERA CEDER SPRINGS BEHAVIORAL CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CO TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE CSED DELL INC EAGLE COUNTY ATTORNEY EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF ELIZABETH THEYSON FORINASH KATHLEEN HEALTH INSURANCE FUND INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND ISABEL SANCHEZ JEANETTE BLANKENSHIP JERRI ISRAEL JOEL KARR JOSE BANUELOS JUNIPER VALLEY PRODUCTS LABORATORY CORPORATION OF LYONS KATHLEEN MARGERY STONE MARIAN MCDONOUGH MICHELLE GUSTAVE MOTOR POOL FUND NORWEST BANK PEREGRINE PRESS QUILL CORPORATION RACHEL FAVELA RENEE FIELDS ROBERT J DURHAM AND SANDY ALFRED SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND STATE FORMS PUBLICATIONS SUSPENSE FUND UNITED WAY OF EAGLE US WEST COMMUNICATIONS US WEST CONFERENCING SERV VANASK WAREHOUSE COMPANY WALMART /AVON WELD COUNTY SHERIFF WESTERN PAGING XEROX CORPORATION PAYROLL FOR JULY PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES COMPUTER SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICES EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 4,590.83 1,268.40 366.28 37.00 463.32 14,298.84 1,713.25 509.98 133.90 5.00 136.31 13,583.06 1,528.65 10.17 5.00 371.18 1,125.00 500.00 52.24 171.00 42.72 47.43 94.09 68.20 955.92 20,638.06 105.30 106.35 272.49 289.23 225.00 121.54 279.94 6.28 5,491.48 63.49 282.32 83.22 126.42 35.98 6.25 53.85 99.90 PAYROLL #13,14 & 15 43,927.98 11 08-02-1999 119,562.08 WRAP FUND 20/20 EYECARE INC SERVICES 172.28 CAMP CHIP-A-TOOTH SERVICES 1,250.00 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB. 88.60 CO OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL SERVICES 75.00 CO WEST MENTAL HEAL TH SERVICES 1,037.50 DISCOUNT SHUTTLES SERVICES 150.00 GENERAL FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB. 150.00 LAURIE P JUENEMAN SERVICES 540.00 MARGERY STONE SERVICES 130.00 MEET THE WILDERNESS SERVICES 2,750.00 MELANIE ESTELLE SERVICES 75.00 MICHAEL CLAUSSNER SERVICES 325.00 SUSAN BROADWELL, PSY. D. SERVICES 675.00 TOWN OF AVON SERVICES 312.00 TOWN OF BASAL T SERVICES 75.00 VAIL VALLEY LEARNING CAMP SERVICES 263.80 WALMART /AVON SUPPLIES 428.07 8,497.25 RETIREMENT FUND CCO AND ERA EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 62,477.27 62,477.27 INSU~NCE RE$ERVI; FUND COL0RADO COUNTIES INC SERVICES 62,234.00 ... " COU~TY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICES 1,064.40 MOTOR POOL FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB 10,346.95 73,644.15 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND CALOll~., HOUPT & LIGHT PC SERVICES 76.50 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB. 370.35 D & R TRUCKING SERVICES 780.00 DIGITAL BiOMETRICS EQUIPMENT 37,900.00 ELEANOR BINDLEY SERVICES 2,000.00 ERIK & JUDY EDEEN SERVICES 7,500.00 EVANS MENDEL ALLISON SERVICES 140,371.42 12 08-02-1999 GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD HARRYS HEAVY HAULERS HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI MARCIN ENGINEERING INC MORTER ARCHITECTS MOTOR POOL FUND ROARING FORK CABINETS INC SUMMIT LUMBER WILDERNESS SIGN & GRAPHIC WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. AIR TOUCH CELLULAR AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSIT ASCOM BERTHODS, INC CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND CCOAND ERA COPY COPY D & M MAINTENANCE SERVICE EAGLE COUNTY HEALTH AND EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE FEDERAL EXPRESS FOODS OF VAIL, HOME GENERAL FUND GEORGE K BUAM HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HIGH COUNTRY LOCK & KEY HILL & TASHIRO MARKETING HOLY CROSS ENERGY KEVIN FOLEY LENA CAMPA MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS MOTOR POOL FUND NORWEST BANK PRUDENT PUBLISHING SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SIGN PRO TOWN OF AVON US WEST COMMUNICATIONS VALLEY RESTAURANT WALMART /AVON VEHICLE SU PPLI ES/~Pt\1ICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB. PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB. SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES 13 32,323.20 1,332.50 470.50 9,080.00 668.71 17,924.65 685.00 1,651.48 55.00 503.22 253,692.53 88.47 3,286.00 120.00 17,675.00 1,942.66 991.39 735.51 120.00 5,000.00 30.00 18.75 292.25 1,181.78 308.75 1,939.41 132.00 5,926.47 22.80 122.85 50.00 47.27 326.04 7,160.78 167.72 285.21 77.76 178,787.42. 1,081.67 110.00 7.85 08-02-1999 PAYROLL FOR JULY PAYROLL #13,14 & 15 14,682.34 242,718.15 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC SERVICES 148.00 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND LIAS. 202.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 165.29 COpy COPY SUPPLIES 34.67 GENERAL FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND LIAS. 29.00 HEAL TH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 144.09 IMBA SERVICES 35.00 IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SUPPLIES 145.00 MARCIN ENGINEERING INC SERVICES 4,092.50 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD .1,061.75 SCOTT GREEN EXCAVATING SERVICES 92,308.79 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 24.52 STEVENS HOME CARE INC SERVICES 880.00 WALMART /AVON SUPPLIES/SERVICES 27.78 99,298.39 SALES TAX R.F.V. TRANSP. ROARING FORK TRANSIT AGEN CONTRIBUTION 76,336.00 76,336.00 AIRPORT FUND AIR TOUCH CELLULAR SERVICES 893.97 ALPINE TIRE COMPANY PARTS/SERVICES 165.90 AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT SERVICES 89.95 ASMI SERVICES 7,375.00 BARNARD DUNKELBERG & CO SERVICES 5,184.56 BERTHOD MOTORS PARTS/SERVICES 103.21 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS SERVICES 59,542.00 BRENT SERVICES SERVICES 630.12 BROWNING FERRIS IND SERVICES 258.20 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION SERVICES 500.00 CALOIA, HOUPT & LIGHT PC SERVICES 75.00 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND LIAS. 1,447.36 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 2,443.50 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICES 97.18 CENTURYTEL SERVICES 476.70 14 08-02-1999 CO BOILER INSPEC BRANCH SERVICES 16.50 COLUMBINE MARKET SUPPLIES 21.92 DEEP ROCK WEST SUPPLIES/SERVICES 46.50 DRAGONS BOOT & SHOE SERVICES 70.21 EAGLE EYE PHOTO SUPPLIES/SERVICES 54.00 EAGLE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 25.52 GENERAL FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB. 203.91 GLENWOOD SHIRT COMPANY SUPPLIES 128.40 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SUPPLIES 817.98 GYPSUM TOWN OF SERVICES 96.95 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 5,569.50 HERTZ CORPORATION SERVICES 174.87 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC SERVICES 2,248.36 INN AT ASPEN SERVICES 216.30 INTERMOUNTAIN SWEEPER EQUIPMENT 146,762.00 JAMES P ELWOOD REIMBURSEMENT 396.39 KN ENERGY INC SERVICES 134.09 LEIBOWITZ AIRPORT MGT CON SERVICES 9,928.10 M & M AUTO PARTS PARTS 97.05 MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING SERVICES 19.08 MESA ALTERNATOR SERVICE PARTS 40.00 MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES 22,000.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 860.70 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 13,195.82 NW CHAPTER AMERICAN ASSN SERVICES 50.00 PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING SUPPLIES/SERVICES 735.66 REO WELDING SERVICES 60.00 SA-SO COMPANY SUPPLIES 210.04 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 167.90 VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER SERVICES 20.73 VALLEY RESTAURANT SERVICES 197.78 VAN SANT GROUP SERVICES 8,579.96 WALMART /GLENWOOD SUPPLIES 39.88 WESTERN IMPLEMENTS SUPPLIES 135.21 WOOD ASSOCIATES INC SUPPLIES 1,412.47 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 26.40 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 105.00 PAYROLL FOR JULY PAYROLL #13, 14 & 15 34,262.81 328,410.64 LOCAL IMPROVE. DISTRICTS CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB. 116.32 ERIK & JUDY EDEEN REFUND 329.24 15 08-02-1999 445.56 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND DELL INC COMPUTERS/MONITORS 33,363.96 DISCO PRINT WHOLESALE EQUIPMENT 1,590.05 DYNAMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 7,429.00 EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT 2,056.00 OFFICE OUTFITTERS EQUIPMENT 1,231.20 OFFICE PAVILION FURNITURE 5,497.05 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND FURNITURE 769.72 SMARTZ TECHOLOGIES INC EQUIPMENT 2,380.00 SWAB WAGON COMPANY INC EQUIPMENT 15,170.00 69,486.98 HOUSING FUND BLACK DIAMOND INVESTIGATI SERVICES 1,381.60 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 840.95 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES 76.65 EAGLE EYE PHOTO SUPPLIES 33.74 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 868.23 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 89.25 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 2,976.93 ROCKY MTN VALUATION GROUP SERVICES 3,950.00 PAYROLL FOR JULY PAYROLL #13, 14 & 15 7,097.84 17,315.19 DPA CDSG FUND DPA CHAFA FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB 25,000.00 25,000.00 LANDFILL FUND BROWNING FERRIS IND SERVICES 30,000.00 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB. 2,032.86 CARDINAL SCALE MFG CO SERVICES 771.37 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 1,334.45 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SUPPLIES 49.64 CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & SERVICES 15,373.35 16 08-02-1999 DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICES 73.15 EAGLE VALLEY BIG A SUPPLIES 19.69 F G & S SEPTIC SERVICE SERVICES 340.00 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY SERVICES 184.62 GENERAL FUND SETTLEMENT INTER FUND L1AB. 716.87 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SUPPLIES 46.37 HARRYS HEAVY HAULERS SUPPLIES/SERVICES 41,584.92 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 3,185.42 HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI SERVICES 791.00 KRWCONSULTING INC SERVICES 19,119.90 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 682.10 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 7,342.27 OFFICE TEC KNOWLEDGY SERVICES 65.00 ROARING FORK RESOURCES SUPPLIES/SERVICES 110,094.20 RONALD RASNIC REIMBURSEMENT 220.64 SAFETY-KLEEN (WHICITA) SERVICES 11,087.00 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES/SERVICES 54.41 SUSPENSE FUND SUPPLIES/SERVICES 390.00 UNISOURCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 31 .44 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SUPPLIES 7,821.80 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 95.00 PAYROLL FOR JULY PAYROLL #13,14 & 15 17,480.95 270,988.42 MOTOR POOL FUND APWA SERVICES 100.00 BRAD RAGAN INC SERVICES 426.24 CCOAND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 1,545.05 CHEMBRITE SUPPLIES 431 . 16 CLERK OF ADAMS COUNTY SERVICES 293.61 COLLETTS SUPPLIES 8,493.72 DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES 31.03 EAGLE AMOCO SUPPLIES 3.00 EAGLE PHARMACY SUPPLIES 12.69 GAY JOHNSONS INC SUPPLIES 895.04 GENERAL FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB. 1,392.81 GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD VEHICLES/PARTS 19,189.69 HANSON EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 96.82 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 3,461.08 JAY MAX SALES PARTS/SUPPLIES 317.05 JIM-N-I AUTO CARE SERVICES 91.90 JOHN HAINES CHEVROLET SUPPLIES 71.06 M & M AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 630.58 17 08-02-1999 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 839.90 NAPA AUTO PARTS PARTS 36.50 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 7,705.49 POWER MOTIVE SERVICES 1,571.58 PRESSURE WASHER PLUS PARTS 277.19 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 51.92 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICES 64.50 SAFETY KLEEN SERVICES 102.00 SHRUM'S SERVICES 227.73 SMITH WILLIAM REIMBURSEMENT 14.65 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 12.88 SUSPENSE FUND SUPPLIES/SERVICES 750.00 SWAB WAGON COMPANY INC SUPPLI ES/SERVICES 1,600.00 TEAGUE EQUIPMENT VEHICLE/SERVICES 56,495.00 UNISOURCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/SERVICES 31.44 UNITED STATES WELDING SERVICES 141.40 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SUPPLIES 419.36 WALMART /GLENWOOD SUPPLIES 73.75 WYLACO SUPPL Y COMPANY PARTS 285.07 PAYROLL FOR JULY PAYROLL #13, 14 & 15 16,555.87 124,738.76 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND AIRPORT FUND SERVICES 111.81 ALPINE BANK SERVICES 200,000.00 GENERAL FUND SERVICES 3,136.53 HOUSING FUND SERVICES 181.05 LANDFILL FUND SERVICES 111.81 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 338.19 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND SERVICES 447.22 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND SERVICES 740.05 TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SERVICES 21.71 UNITED STATES LIFE INS SERVICES 519.71 VISION SERVICE PLAN - CO SERVICES 8,279.35 213,887.43 ENHANCED E911 FUND AT & T LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 50.00 CENTURYTEL SERVICES 171.03 GENERAL FUND SETTLEMENT INTERFUND L1AB. 29.56 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 4,203.77 18 08-02-1999 4,454.36 GRAND TOTAL 4,095,920.87 Consent Agenda Chairman Phillips stated the first item on the agenda was the consent agenda as follows: A) Approval of bill paying for week of August 2, 1999, subject to review by County Administrator B) Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of July 6, 1999 C) Resolution 99-138 authorizing the final release of collateral and termination of the warranty period for Western Slope Utilities, Inc., releasing the assignment of Certificate of Deposit No. 0111111742 issued by Colorado Community First State Bank in the amount of $2,000 for road cut permit #2432 D) Change Order #1 for 1999 gravel hauling on Colorado River Road 12.8 - 14mm and Frying Pan River Road 0-4 mm E) Change Orders 15 & 40 for the Grandstands Contract with Evans Mendel Allison. Commissioner Johnson stated he would like to pull item B as he has not had the opportunity to review the minutes. Commissioner Stone moved to approve the consent calendar as presented with the exception of item B, to be placed on the agenda for the 9th. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Plat & Resolution Signing Scot Hunn, Planner, presented the following plats and resolutions for the Board's consideration: 5MB-00188. Lot 16. Berry Creek Ranch. Filine No.2. He stated this was a Minor "Type B" Subdivision, a re-subdivision of Lot 16 to create two lots, Lot 16 A and Lot 16 B, along with an access easement for both lots. This plat does contain a duplex split caveat stating that only one (1) two-family residence may be built on the combined are of the two lots. He reviewed staff findings for the Board as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. 1. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a. Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. 19 08-02-1999 Commissioner Johnson moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-00188, Lot 16, Berry Creek Ranch, Filing No.2, incorporating staff findings. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 5MB-00190. Lot 16. Berry Creek Ranch. Filine No.3. He stated this was a Minor "Type B" Subdivision, are-subdivision of Lot 16 to create two lots, Lot 16 E and Lot 16 W, along with an access easement for both lots. This plat does contain a duplex split caveat stating that only one (1) two-family residence may be built on the combined are ofthe two lots. He reviewed staff findings for the Board as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. 1. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a. Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Commissioner Stone moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-00190, Lot 16, Berry Creek Ranch, Filing No.3, incorporating staff findings. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Resolution 99-139. PDA-00019. Cordillera Planned Unit Development Amendment. He stated this was a resolution to approve the PUD Amendment for the Cordillera Planned Unit Development to remove uses from the Beatty Parcel, to add an 18-hole golf course and associated facilities and buildings, and to make certain changes to the Cordillera Subdivision Fourth Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development Control Document. The Board considered this file on July 12, 1999. Commissioner Johnson stated there are two changes to be made, one on page 8, the line which starts with four, 7th line, he stated after the word times, "per day" needs to be inserted. He stated the way it reads it could be four tee times per week. On page 9, third line down, inside of the parenthesis before the word two, "at least" should be added so it will read at least two charities shall be local. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve Resolution 99-139, file number PDA-00019, Cordillera Planned Unit Development Amendment, with the changes as stated, to be signed later today. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. Commissioners Phillips and Johnson voting yes and Commissioner Stone abstained as he did not vote on the original application. Ms. Garren stated there is also a PUD Agreement to be signed. 5MB-00112, Highland Park, Filing 1, Lot 37 Scot Hunn presented file number 5MB-00112, Highland Park, Filing 1, Lot 37. He stated this was a Minor "Type B" Subdivision, are-subdivision of Lot 37 to create two lots, Lot 37 A and Lot 37 B. The sole purpose of this subdivision is to create two (2) single family lots from the previous lot which allowed for a potential maximum density oftwo dwelling units (duplex). The topography of Lot 37 is more conducive to the proposed two lot configuration as there is a gully which runs through the center portion of the lot. Both single family lots created by this plat have more than the minimum area required 20 08-02-1999 (15,000 square feet minimum) under the RSL - Residential Suburban Low Density Zone District. Mr. Hunn reviewed staff findings as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. 1. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a. Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Mr. Hunn stated staff has not received the plat to date and related this matter needs to be tabled. He suggested since this matter was tabled at the last hearing and should be tabled for at least one month. Commissioner Stone moved to table file number 5MB-00112, Highland Park, Filing 1, Lot 37, to September 7, 1999. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Final Settlement, Gonzales Construction Peter Sulmeisters, Engineering Department, presented final settlement for Gonzales Construction Company, Inc., for the 1999 guardrail project. This matter was published and no claims have been received. He stated the contract has been completed and inspected. Renee Black, Asst. County Attorney, stated the Attorney's Office received no claims. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve final settlement for Gonzales Construction Company, Inc. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Petitions for Board of Equalization, Reconsideration Renee Black presented petitions for the Board of Equalization that were heard on July 26, 1999. She stated after approval the Board decided they would like to re-consider those petitions. Commissioner Johnson moved to reconsider resolution #99-E-02, of July 26, 1999 concerning the petitions before the Board of Equalization. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Ken Call, Hearing Officer, stated with the scheduling and assistance from the Attorney's Office and Assessor staff things have gone well. Commissioner Johnson questioned docket numbers 93, 104 and 126 on the adjustments considered last week. Mr. Call stated during the course of the hearing a stipulated price was put out and was agreed to by both the petitioner and the Assessor's Office. Commissioner Johnson asked for specifics. Mr. Call stated on docket 99-126, the Assessor's Office presented comparable's that supported the valuation. He stated on docket 104, it was based on the commercial rents as it is commercial property. He stated both the commercial property and the residential property was adjusted because of the location of the property. On docket 93, there were very few comparable's in this location so the Assessor's Office decided to return the value of the property as in previous years. Commissioner Johnson questioned the standard used for adjusting property to a minimum value. 21 08-02-1999 Mr. Call stated the appraiser's judgment was used. Commissioner Johnson stated he would like to pull this docket number and have the appraiser provide additional information. Mr. Call stated the value was based on $7,000.00 per acre. Ms. Black stated stipulations are not reviewed by the hearing officer but agreed to between the Assessor and the petitioner. She asked the Board not direct their questions concerning the stipulations to the hearing officer but rather the Assessor. Commissioner Johnson questioned the stipulations for docket number 52,53 & 54. He stated he shows figures for the original valuation but has no stipulation figures. Mr. Call explained the way the stipulations are worked. Jody Caruthers, Eagle County Assessor, further explained the stipulation process to the Board. Commissioner Johnson pointed out there is an amount on the original valuation and in the adjusted column there is no figure. Ms. Black stated the petitioner is agreeing to the original amount. She stated they will start putting the word "same" in that space if the valuation does not change. Commissioner Johnson questioned docket numbers 68, 73,86,94,98, 99, 100 and 101. Ms. Caruthers stated there is a recommendation sheet included in the files. She stated docket 68 is a commercial hangar at the Airport and summary is based on the uniqueness of the hangar. An increase was not warranted. She explained on docket 73, some of the improvements were calculated incorrectly. Docket 86 was a 2 bedroom 2 bath home and the land value was adjusted to be more comparable. Docket numbers 94, 98 and 101, the subdividers discount was applied to those. She explained the adjustments to docket number 104, a mixed use property on Broadway in Eagle. It was determined the value should be adjusted. Docket 126 is for a 6,678 square foot property with four bedrooms and five baths. Appraisals and comparable's were submitted and the value was changed. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve Resolution 99-E-02, holding the adjustment holding back E99-93 for further clarification. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Johnson stated on Resolution 99-E-03 he would like clarification on docket numbers 134, 144, 153, 160,405,412" 413, 446, 459, 464. Mr. Call explained docket 134. The Assessor's Office was not aware there is no water on the parcel, thus the reason for the lowering the valuation. Docket 144 was a stipulated value due to three comparable's.. Docket 153 was the result ofa zoning change, halfthe land was being used as a duplex so when the appraiser looked at the parcel and discussed what could be built on the property, the petitioner agreed with the valuation. Docket 160, the petitioner made his own case which was what the Assessor had arrived at after further research. Docket 405, the parcel is located next to the water tank and has been designated as a pump house site. Dockets 412 & 413, the subdivision discount has been applied. Docket 446, the Assessor came in with a suggested value after further research and by using the income approach and the petitioner agreed. The income approach was used on docket 459 as they did not have many comparable's. The house was valued at $25.00 per square foot. Docket 464 also had few comparable's but had a sale outside ofthe time frame that was allowed due to the lack of comparable's. Commissioner Johnson questioned 88, 112, 164, 167, 168, 169, 173,224,376,380,381,382, 386,441,442,443 on the adjustment schedule. Mr. Call stated on docket 88, it was supported by comparable sales for vacant land. Docket 112 was based on the over valuation due to exposure to 1-70 and the service road. Docket 164, a portion of the property was brought into alignment with other holdings. Dockets 167, 168, 169, property brought into compliance with other holdings. Docket 173, the Assessor recommended a value based on comparable's. Docket 224, the Assessor used comparable's. Dockets 376,380,381,382,386,389,440, 441,442 & 443 pull to next hearing. 22 08-02-1999 Commissioner Johnson moved to approve resolution 99-E-03, pulling, 376, 380, 381, 382, 386, 389,440,441,442,443. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Abatement, Michael & David Dantas Renee Black presented a petition for abatement for Michael and David Dantas, schedule number 23213. Commissioner Johnson stated the Board has no backup for this abatement. Jody Caruthers stated this is an abatement the Board has seen and processed before. She stated when this abatement was first presented it was approved all the way to the State of Colorado. It was then that it was discovered the figures were backwards. She stated almost $5,000 was set to be abated and it should have been only $267. This is a correction to the original abatement, correcting the amount and to abate $130.87 for 1997 and $137.04 for 1998. She stated the original abatement was due to the fact this is an irregular shaped lot, therefore a smaller lot than the neighbors. Chairman Phillips asked what happened to the amount originally abated. Ms. Caruthers stated the original amount was not dispersed as she found the mistake before the Treasurer's Office issued a check. Robert Barr, representing the applicants, gave a chronology ofthe events. He stated there were four opportunities to find the error. He stated he also thought the abatement was wrong and brought it to the attention of the Assessor's Office. He stated both the Assessor's Office and the Commissioners had the opportunity to catch the error. He stated he retrieved a copy from the state of what they approved. He stated in the case of a clerical error, the Board can make changes, but only in the case of an abatement or refund. Only in the case of fraud can it be changed the other way. He stated he does not know if the Board has the legal authority to change the abatement at this time. Commissioner Johnson stated he needed clarification of the record at the original hearing to hear what was approved by the Board at that time. He asked if Mr. Barr had a transcript of the original hearing. Mr. Barr stated he was not going to pay for a transcript. Commissioner Johnson stated but what Mr. Barr is asking for is unearned and undeserved enrichment. He stated what he is asking for is clarification of the original motion made and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Chairman Phillips stated an error is an error. She stated the Board will need a legal opinion from the Attorney as to correcting the abatement. Ms. Black stated what the Board is looking at is rescinding a previous motion before any payment has been made. She stated there is a new supreme court case that says it can go either way rather than just downward. It is important the petition for abatement is corrected to the correct value. She stated the intent of the Statute is to have a correct value. Mr. Barr asked if after the Board acts, is there a vested right. He stated this abatement has already gone trough the State process. Commissioner Johnson stated he believes Mr. Barr is trying to take from the taxpayers a total of $4,669.31 which is not deserved. He asked Mr. Barr if he would not turn the money in. Mr. Barr stated there are laws governing lost and found. It is in the Statutes. Commissioner Johnson stated Mr. Barr even knows who's money it is and he wants to keep it. Mr. Barr stated if he did not bring this up it could not happen again and the County could get into more trouble with a $200,000 dollar abatement. He stated he is not trying to steal from the County. He stated the petitioners are not going to sue the County. Commissioner Johnson asked if Mr. Barr would be happy if the Board recognized he was ornery 23 08-02-1999 and make sure the amount due to the petitioners is recognized as a mistake, corrected and the correct amount abated. Mr. Barr stated he does not know if the Board can correct the abatement at this time. He stated they have already been penalized by the Treasurer's Office for not paying taxes on time. Chairman Phillips stated the error was found and the abatement has been corrected. She stated the penalty fees can be waived. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve an abatement schedule number 23213, Michael & David Dantas, for an amount of$130.87 for 1997 and $137.04 for 1998. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous Paul Clarkson, Senior Planner, introduced Joe Forinash, the new planner for Community Development. AFP-00066, Amended Final Plat, Beaver Creek Sub, Filing 4 Scot Hunn presented file number AFP-00066, Amended Final Plat, Lot 23, Tract I, Beaver Creek Subdivision, Filing No.4. He stated the purpose of this plat is to amend the building envelope to accommodate existing structures. He related the original home was built in 1981 (BP-2019) and an alteration (BP-4450) and addition (BP-4464) were completed in 1991. In September, 1996 the current owner applied for another addition/alteration (BP-10796). Review of this permit request revealed that the previous addition had been built outside the approved building envelope. The applicant was informed that an amendment to the building envelope was required. The requested permit (BP-I0796) was granted because the addition was to be constructed within the approved building envelope. A Certificate of Occupancy has not been granted on this permit. The applicant has since applied for another alteration to the property and will not be granted the permit without the amendment to the building envelope. Mr. Hunn reviewed referral responses as follows: Independent Surveyor (Johnson & Kunkel): Owner information in certificates incorrect. Encroachments into easements noted. Owner information corrected and standard encroachment note added to plat. No comments were noted by the County Engineering Dept., County Environmental Health Dept., or the County Assessors' Office., or County Attorney's office. Mr. Hunn read staff findings as follows: The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of an Amended Final Plat pursuant to Section 5-290.G.2 of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. a. The Amended Final Plat DOES NOT adversely affect adjacent property owners. b. The Amended Final Plat IS consistent with the intent of the Final Plat. c. The Amended Final Plat DOES conform to the Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies and guidelines. d. An Improvements Agreement IS NOT applicable. e. This amendment IS NOT an alteration of a restrictive plat note. Staff recommended approval. Commissioner Stone questioned if the building envelope was entirely on the property owners property. Mr. Hunn answered no, the deck crosses the property boundary. Bob Loeffler, Deputy County Attorney, questioned why this was before the Board. He stated it sounds like someone built illegelly and staff is amending the final plat. 24 08-02-1999 Paul Clarkson stated the encroachments are outside the current building envelope. They exceeded the PUD Guide. He stated PUD Guides are very specific. He stated the Beaver Creek PUD Guide allows decking outside the building envelope. He stated the encroachments would be allowed but in this case they also go across property lines. He stated the problem has been around for the past three years. Mr. Hunn stated they are creating a building envelope that allows for the building, an expansion to the building, and the deck which encroaches another property line. Commissioner Stone stated part of his concern is not wanting to set a precedent. Why would you have a building envelope then allow someone to build beyond that. Commissioner Johnson stated his concern is why was it not caught by the building department before. He also agrees with Commissioner Stone. Chairman Phillips stated once in awhile it does happen where something is overlooked. Mr. Clarkson stated Commissioner Johnson's point is very well taken, thus the reason for the dedicated planner who will be reviewing all applicationss. He stated this permit was issued in the early 1990's and not enough review was done. Commissioner Stone stated you will still get these problems from contractors. Mr. Clarkson stated if the building is to be within 18 inches of the boundary line an ILC is required at foundation time. He stated he believes most items are now covered. Mr. Hunn reviewed subsequent permits for the Board. He stated this is a ground level deck. Commissioner Stone stated the County is trying to have the livable part of the building inside a building envelope. Mr. Hunn stated a CO has not been issued. Mr. Clarkson stated the additions were done several years ago. He stated the applicant wants to do additional construction, which staff is holding up. He stated the applicant has a TCO which has expired. Commissioner Stone questioned if the applicant wants to add on to the structure. Mr. Clarkson stated yes but it is on the other side of the building. Commissioner Stone asked if the addition would be in the original building envelope. Mr. Clarkson answered yes. Commissioner Johnson asked how much the building envelope is being increased. Mr. Clarkson answered about 25%. He stated the Beaver Creek PUD has no lot coverage as such. Mr. Hunn stated the only restriction Beaver Creek has on size is on the secondary units. Commissioner Johnson stated in some cases landscaping must be included in the building envelope. He stated by amending the building envelope the Board would also be allowing the increase of the building. Mr. Clarkson answered yes because there are no restrictions in size. Commissioner Johnson stated he is not inclined to increase the building envelope. He stated in the past they have been people who have made mistakes and the Board understands that. He believes building envelopes were made a certain size and in certain areas for a reason. But what staff is talking about is increasing the size of the building envelope and size of the building. Chairman Phillips stated the applicant is not building in the new area they are only building in the old envelope area. She stated they are just trying to correct the envelope for the deck. Commissioner Johnson stated the increase in building envelope size is 25%. Mr. Hunn stated the new building envelope will encompass the house and not the deck. Commissioner Johnson stated when reviewing plans, the building envelope is placed in a certain area for a reason. He stated what they are asking for is an increase in size of the units. Commisisoner Stone stated he did not have enough information to make a decision at this time. 25 08-02-1999 He stated there are a couple of options for the Board. Mr. Clarkson asked if the building envelope were designed so as not to increase the size would that make the Board more comfortable. The Board concurred. Commissioner Stone moved to table file number AFP-00066, Amended Final Plat, Lot 23, Tract I, Beaver Creek Subdivision, Filing No.4, to September 7, 1999. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. ZS-00048, Bellyache Ridge Expansion of Telecommunication Scot Hunn presented file number 2S-00048, Bellyache Ridge Expansion of Telecommunication Site. He stated the applicant is proposing to expand the building and tower capacity of the existing multi-user telecommunications site on the top of Bellyache Ridge. The expansion consists of: 1) addition of a new equipment building (15' x 36') adjacent to the existing structure, 2) addition of an 80' Rohn 80 SSV tower, 3) reduction of the height of the present 80' tower to 40', 4) addition of a new liquid propane generator and removal of existing generator and enclosure, 5) upgrades to electrical service and wiring. The building is equipped with fire/smoke alarms, fire extinguishing equipment and contains emergency power in the form of a propane generator. The private access/BLM drive from Bellyache Ridge Road is approximately 900'. The facility is unmanned, but requires year-round maintenance estimated by the applicant to be every 45-60 days. Water and sewer facilities will not be provided. Fencing is not proposed. This request is also for a Location and Extent review pursuant to C.R.S. 30-28-110. The purpose of this level of review is to provide residents and interested parties the opportunity to present input, thereby allowing the Planning Commission to inform the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners of the effect of its proposal on Eagle County and its residents. The Planning Commission's scope of this review is limited to the "Location and Extent" of the proposal. The site was constructed in 1982 without benefit of County Special Use review. Expansion of the site was conditionally approved by the Board of County Commissioners in December, 1995 (ZS-370- 95). At that time the building was expanded and the tower height increased to 40'. The site currently consists of an 18' x 24' building and three towers; one at 80' and 2 at 40'. The current expansion application was submitted in April, 1999 and is accompanied by a Location and Extent review. Mr. Hunn reviewed referral responses for the Board as follows: County Engineer: No concerns noted. Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS): Moderate wildfire rating using CSFS rating, high rating when emphasis placed on vegetation and topographic conditions. Heavy fuels adjacent to structure, propane tank aside this area. Current road quality not conducive to wildfire response. Defensible space thinning should be implemented. This application was also referred to: Eagle County Sheriff, State of Colorado Division of Wildlife, Bureau of Land Management, and the following Homeowners' Associations: Cordillera, Bellyache Ridge. Mr. Hunn reviewed staffs concerns as follows: Site Development (Article 4) Standards: Findings for Special Use Permits require compliance 26 08-02-1999 with development and use standards pursuant to Article 4 of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. Division 4-1: Off-street Parking and Loading Standards: The applicant has provided approximately two parking spaces and will construct turn-around space to accommodate fire protection vehicles. All standards have been met. Division 4-2: Landscaping and Illumination Standards: Landscaping is not required as this building is in a natural area. Some trees on site which buffer the structure on the east will require removal for the construction of the addition and to comply with wildfire hazard mitigation. It is not expected that the structure will be any more visible with the removal of these trees. Minimal outside illumination is on the building currently and is preset for a 15 minute period only. Division 4-3: Sign Regulations are not applicable to this application. Division 4-4:Natural Resource Protection Standards: Section 4-450: Ridgeline Protection: Because this site is located in a ridgeline protection area based on the Eagle County Ridgeline Protection Map, dated November 23, 1998, the applicant is required to submit a detailed visual analysis. In this instance, staff required only a brief analysis of the effects of the additional structure since few trees would be removed and visibility ofthe structure itself would not be affected greatly. However, the antennae, which rises above tree line, is to be almost tripled in bulk, from an 18" toa 48" triangular structure. Height is to remain at 80'. The Bellyache Ridge site is hardly visible from spots along 1-70, but is clearly visible from Highway 131, and most notably, from the Cordillera and Bellyache Ridge developments. Based strictly on the regulations, the antennae should be "located in such a manner that it does not appear to penetrate above the crest of a ridge whereby the proposed development has no backdrop and penetrates the skyline, as viewed from 1-70." The current structure does not adhere to the intent of this regulation and the proposed structure would further erode visual quality. Division 4-5:Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards It is not expected that this facility will produce any noxious side effects like noise, smoke, heat, glare or radiation and storage of hazardous materials is not contemplated. However, a condition relating to compliance with commercial and industrial performance standards will be included with this permit. Division 4-6: Improvements Standards are not required for this application. Division 4-7: Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards do not apply to this application. BLM Permit: An amendment to the application to construct on federal land has been submitted to the Bureau of Land Management, but has not yet been approved. Staff does not expect any problems with its approval, but has included a condition which anticipates unforeseen terms and/or conditions in that permitting process. Road Usage: The Bellyache II homeowners expressed concern to staffthat the facility's maintenance and construction traffic uses a portion of the road that they are required to maintain through BLM property. The homeowners' association (HOA) believes that MTM should provide an equivalent portion of the maintenance costs of the roadway. The applicant has contacted representatives of the HOA and staff understands that the HOA and the applicant have entered into a mutually beneficial agreement (draft attached). Staff suggests a condition which requires that the agreement be completed before the expansion of the facility is begun. Wildfire Concerns: In its referral to the County, The Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) expressed concerns about the potential wildfire hazards of this site considering its location and the potentially flammable vegetation. In response to these concerns, the applicant has entered into an agreement with the CSFS (attached) in order to mitigate these hazards, including clearing vegetation within 60' of the structure and construction on a larger turnaround for firefighting equipment. Visibility: Visibility of telecommunication sites is of primary concern to the County. The applicant has provided various photos of the site which indicate that its current visibility from a distance is minimal. The building structure is located on a high ridge in heavy tree cover. The tower, a triangulated metal lattice structure, when viewed from a distance is, what staff would term, "vague" 27 08-02-1999 because it blends with sky color. Staff notes, however, that the site will undoubtedly become more visible with the increase in bulk of the tower from a diameter of 18" to 48". See also staff comments under Article 4 Standards above. Conformance: Development of this nature poses a dilemma for the County as multi-user telecommunication facilities become more prevalent and are increasingly visible. The County's updated Open Space Plan places a high value on the visual quality of the community as it is " the primary means of enjoying and evaluating the surrounding environment." (P. 24) Further, "... if the open space plan had only one criterion to establish itself, visual quality would be the unquestionable representative of that responsibility." This sentiment is reiterated in the County Master Plan. The Visual Ouality Map which accompanies the Open Space plan recognizes the top of Bellyache Ridge as an area to be prohibited from development which decreases the visual quality which the County is trying to achieve. This expansion is clearly in conflict with those goals. Further, the County's Land Use Regulations require evaluation of the potential visual intrusion of development as it affects the 1-70 corridor (discussed above). Due to expanding population growth in mountain communities and advances in technology which provide residents, visitors, and institutions the means to up-to-date communications, the 1-70 corridor and other areas are increasingly home to a myriad of existing, new and expanding telecommunication sites. In MTM's case, co-locating facilities provides carriers specific locations through the corridor on which to mount their equipment eliminating the need for individual sites. In the past, the County has supported this type of development as a public service because it offers one concentrated location instead of the proliferation of many. However, there comes a point when any site reaches its expansion capacity due to negative impacts, in this case, site visibility. In order to more fully evaluate this site and its future impacts, staff requested an alternative sites analysis in addition to a more detailed visibility study. The Applicant has submitted such analysis both in graphic and text formats, as well as photo simulations showing current conditions and the proposed towers. The alternative sites analysis uses map overlays to demonstrate the differences in coverages between the two options of expanding use at the existing site and developing three new sites which would be constructed elsewhere throughout the valley to provide the coverage needed (north of Wolcott, south ofHwy. 6/ Wilmore just west of Edwards and north ofl-70 at Dowd Junction). The analysis overlays do depict more "breaks" in coverage using the three new sites than would be experienced expanding the existing facility. The comparison between the two options also shows that using three new sites will provide more linear coverage stretching from Wolcott to Vail Pass, while using the existing site provides wider coverage (north and south ofthe site) stretching from Eagle to West Vail. The overlays use a color scheme to demonstrate different levels of service generated from each site. At the time of writing, staff does not have clear information regarding what each color represents and the true implications of how the users of the sites will be impacted by the two different coverage options. The photo simulations do show the existing conditions at Bellyache as well as the proposed tower configurations from different view points surrounding the site. However, staff is of the opinion that the photo simulations are not an accurate representation of the visual impacts that will result with the addition of the proposed tower due to the losses in photo quality during the reproduction process. Further, no photo simulations were produced showing the three optional sites and the possible visual impacts generated by placing similar towers at those sites. Legal Considerations: Telecommunications facilities must be reviewed in light ofthe most recent legal constraints placed on local governments' ability to regulate such facilities. An overview of these issues has been provided by the County Attorney's office and is included in these back-up materials. Essentially, the applicant is bound by County Regulations and Plans, but denying use of a site may be prohibited if that site is found to be optimum based on the needs of the carriers. The burden falls 28 08-02-1999 to the applicant to prove that no other, less intrusive site exists for this purpose. In this instance, the applicant argues that the expansion of this site continues to provide multi-user capabilities and that because the site has not reached its maximum potential, no other site was investigated. Conclusion: Staff does not necessarily agree that this site has not reached its maximum potential. This development clearly increases visibility ( by almost three times), so strict adherence to the Land Use Regulations and the County's master plans would not support its expansion. This particular expansion may very well have implications for the type and location of future telecommunication facilities and their visual intrusion. In other words, how much is too much? Staff does not assume to have the right answers to these concerns, but raises these questions so that careful consideration can be given to the proposed expansion, its conformance to County regulations and master plans, and alternatives. Mr. Hunn read staff findings as follows: The following findings are made assuming compliance with staff recommended conditions pursuant to Section 5-250(B) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 1. The proposed Special Uses ARE appropriate for their proposed location and are consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the Master Plan and the FLUM of the Master Plan, including standards for building and structural intensities and densities, and intensities of use. 2. The proposed Special Use IS appropriate for its proposed location and IS compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. 3. The proposed Special Use DOES comply with the standards of the zone district in which it is located (Resource) and any standards applicable to the particular use(s), as identified in Section 3-330, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Residential. Agricultural and Resource Uses (telecommunications facility). 4. The design of the proposed Special Use DOES minimize adverse impacts, including visual impacts of the proposed use(s) on adjacent lands; furthermore, the proposed Special Use DOES avoid significant adverse impacts on surrounding lands regarding trash, traffic, service delivery, parking and loading, odors, noise, glare, and vibration, and DOES NOT create a nuisance. 5. The proposed Special Use DOES minimize environmental impacts and DOES NOT cause significant deterioration of water and air resources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources, and other natural resources. 6. The proposed Special Use IS adequately served by public facilities and services, including roads, pedestrian paths, potable water and wastewater facilities, parks, schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. 7. The proposed Special Use DOES comply with the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site Development Standards. 8. The proposed Special Use DOES comply with all standards imposed on it by all other applicable provisions of these Land Use Regulations for use, layout, and general development characteristics. And, pursuant to C.R.S. 30-28-110: 1. The proposed use WILL NOT be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of Eagle County. 2. The proposed use WILL NOT affect in a substantial manner, the use or enjoyment of adjacent lands. 3. The site HAS adequate access and water and sewer are not issues. 4. The use of the site IS consistent with the applicable policies of the Master Plan. 5. The advantages of the use DO outweigh the disadvantages. 6. There IS a demonstrated need for this proposal. Mac Newman, representing the applicant, explained the reason for the expansion. He stated the 29 08-02-1999 site was constructed by Doug McLaughlin. He reviewed prior happenings on the site for the Board. He stated the construction application was approved in 1995. In 1996 the PCS Business went into full swing. In 1997 the antennas were increased and in 1998 leases were signed which started this application process. All the old equipment and antennas were removed from the site anticipating the arrival of the new antenna. Mr. Newman stated they submitted enlarged photographs of the proposed antenna, tree loss and proposed construction. He reviewed the areas to be covered by the antennas. He stated the residnets of Eagle County are demanding and requesting the proposed services. He stated there is also a request for a wireless internet carrier. Commissioner Johnson questioned the height and width of the proposed antenna and if they had gone onto Cordillera's property. Mr. Newman stated they submitted a photographic display to Cordillera and have received no complaints or suggestions. He explained the size of all antenna and the antenna that has been removed. Chairman Phillips asked if the Bellyache Ridge Homeowners approved of the proposal. Mr. Newman stated those residents have submitted a letter of support to the planning staff. Mike Cacioppo, area resident & business owner, urged the Board to approve this application in the interest of safety. He stated at one point there were six cars off the road in the middle of a blizzard and unless you are in the right location you cannot use your cell phone. He stated you can only see the tower if you are looking for it. Staff recommended approval as follows: Approval with Conditions 1. The applicant shall comply with all BLM conditions of Right-of-way permit approval. If compliance with the terms and conditions of the BLM permit referenced in this application (Application for Transportation and Utility Systems and Facilities on Federal Lands) causes non- conformance with any of the terms and conditions of this approval, this special use permit shall be subject to amendment and may be subject to revocation. Against this event, prior to the issuance of a building permit and/or grading permit, whichever shall be first, the Applicant shall submit to the Eagle County Dept. Of Community Development a copy of the executed BLM permit noted above for its review. 2. Prior to the commencement of any applicable activity, the applicant shall submit to Eagle County proof of such applicable Federal, State, and Local permits and plans as are required for such activity. 3. Additional users shall be permitted on the facility without additional County approval if the additions comply with the requirements of this permit and necessary approvals are obtained from the Bureau of Land Management. 4. All uses approved by this Permit shall be subject to all applicable Site Development Standards of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, including but not limited to, Division 4-5 (Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards). 5. The site plan attached hereto represents the proposed, approved uses and is incorporated herein by this reference. 6. Except as otherwise modified by the Permit, all material representations of the Applicant in this application and public meeting shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval unless otherwise amended by other conditions. The Planning Commission came up with two additional condistions as follows: 7. The definsible space perimeter described in the Bellyache Ridge Communications Site Wildfire Defensible Space Agreement shall be maintained at all times by the applicant. 8. The applicant shall complete all cleanup activities on the site related to construction no later than 60 days following completion of construction or completion of final inspection by Eagle County. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve File No. ZS-00048 incorporating the findings and 30 08-02-1999 conditions, modifying condition number 8 to read, the cleanup activities be completed by final inspection. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. Commissioner Johnson amended his motion to continue the signing of the resolution to August 16, 1999. Commissioner Stone seconded the amendment. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Phillips called for the question on the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. LUR-0030, Land Use Regulation Amendment Jean Garren, Planner, presented file number LUR-0030, Land Use Regulation Amendment. She explained the changes to the Board. Regarding Section 2 of "Attachment A" (Minor Adjustments), considerable discussion took place about proposed revisions to Section 3-31O.C.3 Bed and Breakfast, including intensity of use (the line between a commercial operation and a home business secondary to residential use), the appropriateness of an on-site manager other than the owner of the residence, and enforcement. Ray Merry provided information on State regulations for food service; and noted that the State does not define "Bed and Breakfast." Staff was instructed to conduct further research to determine how other jurisdictions define and regulate "Bed and Breakfast." As did the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission, the Eagle County Planning Commission debated the proposed waiver provisions of Section 3-310.1 Major New Domestic Water or Sewer Systems and agreed that, as-written, sufficient assurances were given that if a Special Use Permit was appropriate an Applicant could be held to that requirement. Under Table 3-340. Zone District Dimensional Limitations, the Commission briefly discussed increasing the 50' stream setback to 75' as recommended in the Eagle River Watershed Plan, but agreed that this item deserved explicit public notice and broader public debate. Under Section 3 of "Attachment A" (New Sections or Major Overhauls), the Commission entered into debate about the proposed changes to Section 5-260.B Variance Standards and came to the decision that, as-written, the proposed language addresses concerns. The Commission had no comment on Section 4 of "Attachment A" (Not Recommended for Approval at this Time) other than to add Bed and Breakfast. The Commission had no comment on the Technical Corrections listed in Section 1 of "Attachment A: Table of Changes" of the Staff Report. Ms. Garren stated the Variance Standards were discussed at length with the Planning Commission who requested the Bed & Breakfast section be withdrawn and more research be done. She reviewed those changes not coming before the Board at this time. Ms. Garren stated the changes to Appendix A are basically technical corrections. There was quite a bit of discussion on the variance standards but it was decided those currently in the regulations are workable. Those items not coming before the Board at this time are adding an amended final plat to the Minor B Subdivisions and the definition of floor area. Both these items need additional work. Commissioner Stone asked about the Bed & Breakfast section. Ms. Garren stated there was discussion on the definition of a bed and breakfast and how many rooms are allowed. Does the owner have to be on site or can an assistant be present. Commissioner Johnson asked if staff if staff is recommending there not be any changes or if they are asking the Board to eliminate that from the regulations. Ms. Garren stated they are asking it be left as is until more research can be done. Chairman Phillips stated the Bed & Breakfast section should neither be approved or denied. Commissioner Johnson stated the only thing the Board is doing is not adding the language that says the owner or on-site manager must live within the bed and breakfast establishment. Also bed and 31 08-02-1999 breakfasts would be a secondary use. Mr. Clarkon stated the current regulations require the owner or manager to live on site. He stated it could be interpreted that the bed and breakfast be contained in one unit. Commissioner Johnson stated the Planning Commission decided there is no clear cut language on bed and breakfast operations verses a hotel. Mr. Clarkson stated they did not want to make the situation worse at this time. Commissioner Johnson stated he does not believe the language proposed would make the definition worse. Ms. Garren stated the Planning Commission decided the experience from those applications where they are substantially larger, the owner does not live on site. Commissioner Johnson stated if the owner or manager did not live on site it might be considered more a hotel. Chairman Phillips stated in Montrose the owner of the bed and breakfast there does not live on site. Mr. Clarkson stated how does the Board want to define a bed and breakfast. He stated typically it seems those operations should occure in someones home. He stated it was important to maintain the character of that neighborhood. There is the possibility of the use increasing and taking away the character of the residential neighborhood. Commissioner Johnson stated the Board should accept the proposed language. Mike Cacioppo asked how the Brett Ranch bed and breakfast would be handled. He stated the stipulation of the proposed sale is to leave the current building on site. He questioned if the language would preclude the buyer from having a bed and breakfast. He asked if the Board was going to discuss the 75 foot stream setback at today's hearing. Commissioner Stone stated the Board will be discussing that. Mr. Clarkson stated he believes Mr. Cacioppo was correct with the bed and breakfast definitions. Commissioner Johnson stated he does not believe the language precludes anyone from building another structure. Mr. Clarkson stated it is staffs belief that if another structure was built it would be the only structure allowed to be used for the bed and breakfast. Mr. Loeffler explained the regulations concerning bed and breakfast operations. Commissioner Johnson questioned the 75 foot set back on the streams. He stated the only items that can be changed is those items submitted by Keith. Ray Merry, Environmental Health Officer, explained the 75 foot setback issue and related this matter was noticed. He stated this item needs to be discussed at a broader public hearing. He stated concerning bed and breakfast establishments, if the zoning allowed for two structures on a site, there would need to be an owner or manager on site at both structures, if both of those are to be used as bed and breakfasts. Commissioner Johnson stated that was correct. Mr. Cacioppo stated the 75 foot setback diminishes peoples property rights and places invertebrates as more important than people. With a 75 foot setback he stated the Board would not have the georgeous Cotton Ranch Golf Course sitting next to the stream, nor would they have the Town of Minturn and all the charm that goes along with that beautiful community. He stated the beautifullots at Intermountain would not be there with their beautiful decks right up against Gore Creek. He stated the land owners know how to best use their property, not planners. Commissioner Johnson stated Mr. Cacioppo will be invited back when this matter is to be discussed again. Commissioner Johnson stated within appendix A, dedication of ownership, on page 2, exemptions, it says "County Commissioners" and the punctuation needs to be corrected. With the 32 08-02-1999 County Commissioners certificate, he agrees with the striking amended final plat but just wants to make sure everything else remains the same. He asked what a personal adornment shop is. Ms. Garren stated rings on your fingers and bells on your toes. She believes it to be some sort of piercing establishment. Commissioner Johnson suggested standardizing the language on all the tables concerning lot SIze. Ms. Garren explained the reasoning behind the current definitions. Mr. Clarkson discussed how staff came up with the definitions. Discussion continued on what type application can be submitted and how many units can be placed on certain size parcels. Commissioner Johnson stated he would like the lay person to be able to know what could happen on their property regardless of the size. Commissioner Johnson questioned handicapped parking. He stated if we are going to reduce the number of handicapped spaces, those spaces should be able to accomodate the handicapped van. Mr. Clarkson stated there is a specific definition as to what a handicapped parking space is. Mr. Loeffler stated the regulations state a handicapped space is 12 feet wide, which is designed to be an unusally wide space. Commissioner Johnson questioned posting of signage, in the third line, through no fault of the application of any such posted notice to remain in place after notice has been posted, shall not be deemed failure to comply with the standards or grounds to challenge the validity of any decision made on the application. He asked if someone stole the sign the day after it was posted, does the applicant not have any responsibility to try and replace that sign. He asked the attorneys office to prepare a statement concerning reasonable effort of the applicant to re-post the sign. Commissioner Johnson stated with adjacent property owners notification, it states a list of adjacent property owners is required except under minor b's, amended final plat and subdivision exemptions are not notified. He stated he would like that stricken as all property owners need to be notified. Commissioner Johnson stated he believes there are issues that need to be addressed. Commissioner Johnson questioned section, 5-2-.80 b.5.b, length of approval for preliminary plan, which states after approval of preliminary plan for subdivision, after it has been granted, an applicant shall submit to the director of community development, an application for final plat. He questioned if striking no more than 12 months, is there was no longer a time limit. Mr. Clarkson stated there is other places in the regulations where it states the preliminary plan expires in 2 years. He stated the twelve months conflicted with that. Commissioner Johnson stated items referred to the County Attorney would be reviewed within five working days. He asked what the wording means. Ms. Garren stated when they get the final executed mylar, that needs to be referred to the Attorney's Office in time for them to review that plat. The five days gives the Attorney the needed time to review that plat. She stated in the Land Use Regulations .;c.... s not enough time. Commissioner Johnson spoke to the application b g schJdti d for the next Board of County Commissioners hearing. · Mr. Clarkson clarified by stating perhaps the sent ce does need to be there. Maybe the regulations should just state the mylar must be referred to t Attorney's Office. Commissioner Johnson stated he believes there still needs to be an ending date. Upon approval within a certain amount of time it would be scheduled for the next Board of County Commissioners meeting. Commissioner Johnson questioned 4.2, building permits expiring in a 3 year period. He 33 08-02-1999 questioned a separate number and/or letters so notification to the applicant is on a timely basis. Commissioner Johnson questioned limited review requests. Mr. Clarkson stated limited review requests are submitted along with a building permit, which gets reviewed along with the permit. He stated as soon as the structure is built it goes on forever. Mr. Loeffler asked if it is intended for a limited review approval to be for the life of the building or forever. Mr. Clarkson stated it should be life of the building. Mr. Loeffler stated then it needs to be re-written. Commissioner Johnson asked if there was a provision for extension. Mr. Clarkson stated he does not know but will find out. Commissioner Johnson asked about accessory dwelling units, and the striking of the public notice. Is it because it was redundant. Mr. Clarkson stated it is taken care of in the limited review section. Chairman Phillips stated she would like the corrections well in advance rather than sitting in a public hearing and going through them. Commissioner Johnson stated items were given to the Board a couple of months ago. Chairman Phillips stated maybe the Board can have their suggested changes and have those typed up before the public hearing. It would still be discussed at a public hearing. Mr. Merry questioned if you have a building permit application and with it comes limited review, the applicant gets a zoning certificate for the accessory dwelling unit and build. 10 or 20 years down the road, the building is knocked down. The applicant then comes in for another building permit. Does the zoning certificate still apply. Commissioner Johnson stated once the structure does not exist the applicant would have to come in for a limited review. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve section 3-310.1 as ameded by the Planning Commission, and table the balance of File No. LUR-00030 to September 7, 1999, incorporating staff findings. The effective date is August 9, 1999. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until August 9, 1999. ~~~ ATTEST: 34 08-02-1999