Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/21/99 PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 21, 1999 Present: Johnnette Phillips Tom Stone James Johnson, Jr. James Fritze James Hartmann Sara J. Fisher Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Attorney County Administrator Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: Consent Calendar Chairman Phillips stated the first item on the agenda was the consent calendar as follows: A) Approval of bill paying for week of June 21, 1999, subject to review by County Administrator B) Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting for June 1, 1999 C) Change Order No.1 for West Edwards Trail Project D) Revision to Award for supplies or services for the Federal Aviation Grant, increasing funding to allow for an additional Air Traffic Controller position E) Consent by County to Assignment of Airport Facilities Lease between Freeskate Co and Jet Capital, Inc F) Safekeeping Agreement between Eagle County and Norwest Bank Minnesota G) M.A.P.M.P. Agreement between Eagle County and Office Tecknowledgy H) Sign Change Orders 11, 12, 13,20,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31 and 32 for the Grandstands Contract with Evans Mendel Allison I) Agreement between Casey Smith, Shannon Rohr and Eagle county Board of County Commissioners for Steve to perform as a Bull Fighter at the 1999 Eagle County Rodeo J) Agreement between Les Olhauser and Eagle County Board of County Commissioners for Les to perform as an announcer at the 1999 Eagle County Rodeo K) Agreement between Steve Toman and Eagle County Board of County Commissioners for Steve to perform as a clown at the 1999 Eagle County Rodeo L) Sign 10 Fair and Rodeo Entertainment Contracts for the 1999 Eagle County Fair and Rodeo M) Sign the 4-H Judges Contracts for the 1999 Eagle County Fair and Rodeo N) Resolution 99-107 concerning appointments to the Eagle County Fair Rodeo Board 0) Contract Agreement between David Ball and Eagle County Board of County Commissioners to provide a Country Music Show for the 1999 Eagle County Fair and Rodeo P) Children Youth & Families Infrastructure Provision and Requirements Q) Intergovernmental Agreement to establish a task force exploring recreation uses of the Mt. Sopris Tree Farm. Bob Loeffler, Deputy County Attorney, stated item I consists oftwo separate agreements. On item L, only five signed contracts have been received. The Chairman should be authorized to sign the contracts once received. 1 06-21-1999 Commissioner Stone questioned item C. He stated he noticed the largest portion of the increase was to relocate the water and fire line. Ellie Caryl, representing the West Edwards Trail System, stated they ran into the line which was not supposed to be there and needed it moved to another location. She stated they had to dig underneath ,power lines and stated the original estimate was $16,000 and it is costing $8,900. She stated this area is at the intersection of Edwards Village Blvd and Highway 6. Chairman Phillips asked if these funds will come out of the trails moneys. Ms. Caryl stated the funds come from contributions from Eagle County, the Metro District and the ECO. Commissioner Stone moved to approve the consent calendar as presented, items A through Q, authorizing the Chairman to sign the contracts once received. Chairman Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Johnson was not present at this hearing. Plat & Resolution Signing Scot Hunn, Planner, presented the following plats and resolutions for the Board's consideration: 5MB-00182. Lot 8, Cordillera Subdivision. Filing No. 34. He stated this was a Minor "Type B" Subdivision, a resubdivision of Lot 8 to create Lot 8 and Tract 8 A. Lot 8 will remain a single- family residential lot and Tract 8 A is being created solely to provide access to Lot 8 and adjacent Lot 7. Mr. Hunn read staff findings as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (I) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. 1. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a. Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Commissioner Stone questioned why a final plat for an easement. Eric McCafferty, Planner, stated to include this into the right-of-way would mean the entire roadway would have to be re-surveyed and it would be costly. He stated this is the second of these applications for Cordillera. Commissioner Stone questioned if permanent restrictions are on this lot. Mr. McCafferty stated the plat identifies this area as access and it is not a buildable lot. Commissioner Stone moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-OO 182, Minor Subdivision of Lot 8, Block 5, Filing 34, Cordillera Subdivision, incorporating staff findings. Chairman Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote was declared unanImous. Bid Acceptance for Landfill Scale Ron Rasnic, Solid Waste Manager, presented the bid acceptance for the new Landfill Scale. He stated the existing scales are a Cardinal product and the computerized additions are also Cardinal. He stated this company is very attentive to the Landfill needs and it will be helpful to maintain. He read his 2 06-21-1999 memo as follows: On June I, 1999 bids for the replacement and installation of the landfill scales were opened. Two vendors offered bids; Fairbanks Scales, $38,706 and Cardinal Scales, $43,734. I am requesting permission to accept the higher Cardinal bid for the reasons listed below: 1) Existing scale is a Cardinal product. Cardinal is a well known, established scale manufacturer with worldwide operations. 2) Maintenance service and calibration has been very satisfactory over the years. The service technician and local support operates out of Denver and they have been very responsive to our needs on demand. 3) Existing digital weight indicator, manual beam weight indicator, vehicle weighing and recording software are all Cardinal products. 4) While interfacing between another vendors scale electronics (load cell), weigh bean and Cardinal digital weight indicator should be compatible, I would prefer to maintain a single vendors ,integrated system. By doing so, in the event of future problems, finger-pointing from different vendors would be eliminated and would facilitate correction of any problem. 5) I am completely satisfied with the Cardinal products and support and have no reason to change products solely because of a lower bid for the scale replacement. A few thousand dollars buys a lot of peace of mind when dealing with an established vendor relationship. It is true that Fairbanks is an established, worldwide manufacturer of scale products. However, I have had no experience with their services and support functions, both locally or otherwise. I believe it is in the best interest of Eagle County landfill and the public it serves to provide the best service we possibly can. I further believe that by selecting Cardinal Scale as the successful bidder we can continue to provide this service. Commissioner Stone questioned the difference of possible problems with the Fairbanks bid. He stated he believed the only way to accept the low bid is to replace the scales. Mr. Rasnic stated to replace the existing equipment it would be approximately $8,000. Chairman Phillips questioned if peace of mind is worth the difference of$5,OOO. Mr. Rasnic answered yes. Commissioner Stone moved to accept the bid of Cardinal for the new Landfill Scale, as recommended by Staff. Chairman Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote was declared unanImous. 1999 Gravel Haul Brad Higgins, Road & Bridge Director, presented the contract for the 1999 gravel haul for Colorado River Road and Frying Pan Road. He stated there was a bid that was rejected as it was late and this bidder was the only other bid submitted. Mr. Loeffler stated there are parameters that the County must follow. He stated there were bids rejected in the past because they were late. Commissioner Stone moved to approve the contract with Harry's Heavy Haulers, Inc. for the 1999 gravel haul for Colorado River Road and Frying Pan Road. Chairman Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote was declared unanImous. Treasurer's Interest Report Karen Sheaffer, Eagle County Treasurer, presented the Treasurer's Interest Report for the first 3 06-21-1999 quarter. She explained the report to the Board. She related the Interest Income, January through March, 1999 is $520,484.15 and comparison to previous the previous year of$382,652.91. The Portfolio Balance as of March 31,1999 is $43,732,314.13 as compared to March of 1998 of $42,573,904.40. She ,stated she believes the County continues to earn a healthy interest income. The Board accepted the report from the Treasurer. MOU, Student Union, Inc. Bob Loeffler presented a Memorandum of Understanding between Eagle County and Eagle County Student Union, Inc., concerning advance of funds through a grant and loan to carry out summer programs for youth in the Eagle River Valley. He explained the agreement to the Board. Shawn Comad, representing the Student Union, explained summer projects that will be funded with these monies. Commissioner Stone questioned if there was a plan for repayment of loans. He stated the County is agreeing to loan the money for a period of one year. Patrick Paul, representing the Student Union, stated they have visited the Courts and their grant process is on track. He stated if something should happen they have two fund raisers coming in July plus they are going to start working for Laurie Asmussen and helping at all of her events, which will be paid directly to the Student Union. Mr. Paul spoke to new members. Commissioner Stone questioned the budget surplus. He does not want to see the Student Union have to come back and ask for additional funds. Mr. Paul stated the Town of Gypsum is voting on the Lundgren property tomorrow night. If that goes through the Student Union will have an acre and a half of property for a skate park and teen center. Commissioner Stone moved to approve the Memorandum of Understanding between Eagle County and Eagle County Student Union, Inc., and the advance of funds through a grant and loan to carry out summer programs for youth in the Eagle River Valley. Chairman Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote was declared unanImous. RFRHA Award Presentation George Roussos, County Engineer, stated the next item on the agenda was the RFRHA Award Presentation, recognizing Eagle County's Assistance in the rail corridor purchase. He thanked the Board for all of their support and donation. He presented a recognition picture and novelty bond. VIS-0002, Homestead Drive Variance George Roussos and Peter Sulmeisters, Engineering Department, presented file number VIS- 0002, Homestead Drive Variance. Mr. Roussos reviewed prior meetings and a work session for the Board. He stated the Board directed staff to come up with an acceptable platform for bicycles and 'pedestrians. He stated they decided to go with the 8 foot sidewalk. Mr. Roussos stated he received one letter in support of the proposed sidewalk. Bob Warner, developer, stated when the project was proposed the sidewalk was for walkers or children going to school and not for bikers. He stated they are dealing with a narrow platform. He stated a 3 foot expansion will require a great deal of cut and fill. He stated the path dumps into what he referred to as no mans land which has no bike path nor sidewalk. He stated he understands the standards and the County Engineer but does not agree with the recommendations. He stated Berry Creek did a 4 06-21-1999 similar project and would not have been able to do the project per the new standards. Chairman Phillips asked if Mr. Warner wanted to see a 5 foot sidewalk. Mr. Warner answered yes. He stated anything you do is an improvement but it requires sizable costs and questioned who was going to bear the costs. Commissioner Stone asked about staff recommendation of an 8 foot sidewalk. Mr. Warner stated the company he is negotiating with only has the capability for a 5 foot sidewalk. He stated they would have to go with a different company. Commissioner Stone stated they discussed all of those items last week when Mr. Warner was not present. He stated Mr. Loche's original recommendation was 12 feet. Mr. Warner stated the Edwards Metropolitan District met last week and indicated they would not be putting any more money towards the sidewalk. Chairman Phillips questioned why curb and gutter was not installed at the beginning. Mr. Warner stated it was apparently not required at that time. He stated in 1990 sidewalks were not in some subdivisions as the developer was trying and keep the neighborhood as rural. Chairman Phillips stated last week after they meet, staff comprised to eliminate the bike path and just make an 8 foot sidewalk. She stated it is necessary to have something in there due to the number of people in the subdivision. She stated she believes the 8 foot sidewalk is necessary. Mr. Warner stated going from nothing to 5 feet is a definite improvement. He stated if the County is willing to look at some cost sharing it is something to be looked into. He stated the homeowners do not want the expanded sidewalk. They want a slow walking path not a fast paced bicycle path. Commissioner Stone stated Mr. Warner's example of Summit County was a perfect reason the wider sidewalk is needed. He stated he understands Mr. Warner's concerns but he is trying to encourage everyone to invest the money now rather than waiting until down the road when there is no choice. He stated it would be safer to make it wider now. He stated the comprise the Board has come up with is doable. Mr. Warner stated the sidewalk at 8 feet will be asphalt and a 5 foot sidewalk will be concrete. Commissioner Stone asked who is responsible for maintenance of the sidewalk. Brad Higgins, Road & Bridge Director, stated the homeowners association would be responsible for maintenance. He stated he is holding up paving Homestead Drive until he hears from the ,homeowners association and developer, but he cannot wait much longer. Mr. Roussos stated it would be the developers engineer who would determine if the guard rail would need to be moved. He explained the two foot curb and gutter rather than two and a half feet. Mr. Warner stated he believes the regulations do not apply to existing subdivisions. Chairman Phillips stated what has been compromised to is half of what staff would like to see. Mr. Warner stated he believes it would be foolish not to accept the 5 foot sidewalk. Chairman Phillips stated the developer and homeowners should not expect to spend over a certain amount before they know staff recommendation. Mr. Warner stated they spent week discussing whether they were subject to the Land Use Regulations. He stated he believes the regulations do not apply to existing subdivisions. He stated what is going to happen is people are going to try and make improvements as the subdivisions mature. Mr. Sulmeisters read the project description and staff findings as follows: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Edwards Metropolitan District is desirous of adding curb, gutter and sidewalk to one side of Homestead Drive from southerly of Edwards Village Boulevard to Arlington Place to improve the safety for the pedestrian traffic. Edwards Metropolitan District is proposing to construct the curb, gutter and sidewalk to a standard which does not comply with the classification for Homestead Drive in the Land Use Regulations. This is a petition for a Variance from the requirements of Section 4-620.1: Geometric Standards. 5 06-21-1999 This Section defines the standards of road design and construction for each Functional Classification of roadway in Eagle County. The Functional Classifications are defined in Section 4-620.D. The ,Functional Classification for each roadway in Eagle County is designated in Appendix C. Homestead Drive has been designated a Suburban Residential Collector in Appendix C. The typical section for a Suburban Residential Collector is show on the attached sheet of typical sections and is labeled Typical Section Per Land Use Regulations Staff has the following major concerns with this application: Equivalent Level of Durability and Public Safety. The Land Use Regulations in section 4-610 A.2. require the County Engineer to evaluate the proposed variance to have an equivalent level of durability and public safety. The typical road section proposed by Edwards Metropolitan District does increase the safety for the pedestrian from the existing conditions by providing a dedicated sidewalk for pedestrians but does not provide for a equivalent level of safety for the bicyclist or the motoring public because the vertical curb would limit the mobility options available to the cyclist and its associated affect on the motoring public. Homestead Drive is classified a Suburban Residential Collector in the current Land Use Regulations. Under this classification it requires 15' of driving lane with attached 4' bike lane with Class III-B curve widening with barrier curb with 24" gutter and a 6' detached sidewalk. The County Engineer may recommend approval of a variance from the improvement standards if the alternative will provide for an Equivalent level of public safety. I have reviewed the site in the field and have drawn the following recommendations. Eagle County land use regulations call for 15' of lane width but due to site conditions and to act as a traffic calming scenario a 12' travel lane on both sides of the centerline would ,be acceptable and conforms to the recommendations in the Highway Capacity Manual Special Report 209 Third Edition. Per the Traffic Engineering Handbook from The Institute of Transportation Engineering the minimum width for a bike lane on a curbed street without parking and a street without curb and gutter is 4' in addition to the travel lane. To separate the pedestrian traffic from the roadway barrier curb with 24" gutter instead of the 18" gutter you have proposed is a good idea. According to the land use regulations a detached 6' sidewalk is required but the land use regulations also specify that where terrain mandates attached paths are permitted. Because of the terrain and site conditions I believe a 5' wide sidewalk may be acceptable. Eagle County Engineering Department is recommending two 12' travel lanes one each side of centerline with 4' bike lanes on each side for a pavement section of 32' with barrier curb with 24" gutter per Colorado Department of Transportation M&S Standards M-609-1 on one side with a 5' attached sidewalk. The bike lanes and traffic lanes need to be delineated with a 6" white stripe and bike lane markings per the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices. This design standard would provide an improved road design for the community of roadway users to wit pedestrians cyclists and motorists. Applicant Has Demonstrated Hardship. The applicant has identified several hardships that will be imposed on the public if the Suburban Residential Collector Road Standard is adhered to. These include using more land than may be necessary, and creating an urban feature that disturbs the surrounding area. The Suburban Residential Collector Road design may be impractical and cost prohibitive at this time. Issues Raised By The Edwards Metropolitan District. A. The Edwards Metropolitan District only has the funds available for the curb, gutter and sidewalk. They have not budgeted for the additional bike lanes and grading necessary to do the cross section recommended by the Eagle County Engineering Department. B. The Edwards Metropolitan District's primary concern of the project proponent is for pedestrian safety. Their desire is to allow movement of school children safely along Homestead Drive. C. There is a concern on the impact this cross section would have on the landscaping and esthetics within the county owned right-of-way. 6 06-21-1999 D. There is a concern that if the Eagle County Engineering Department recommended standard is adopted it would result in the project not being undertaken this year. Ability To Implement. If this project is to be done this summer it is desirous of the Edwards Metropolitan District to do their portion of the work prior to the overlay project Eagle County Road and Bridge has planned for this summer. If the typical section proposed by Eagle County Engineering is adopted it will require time for the engineer for the Edwards Metropolitan District to prepare construction drawings for review and approval by Eagle County Engineering Department. This timing may not coincide with the overlay project that the Eagle County Road and Bridge Department has scheduled for this summer. Because the overlay project has begun the proposed overlay for Homestead Drive has been put at the tail end of the project. Overlay of Homestead Drive is expected to occur shortly after the Board of County ,Commissioners considers this request. Following the expected Board of County Commissioners decision an appropriate action may be taken to either proceed with the overlay or postpone the overlay to allow for completion of any needed engineering effort and related construction Mr. Sulmeisters read staff findings as follows: 1. The applicant has filed a petition for a Variance Permit from the Improvement Standards in conformance with the requirements of Section 5-260.G of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. 2. The petition has been properly advertised and is ready for consideration by the Board of County Commissioners. 3. The applicant has demonstrated hardship to the public if there is strict adherence to the Suburban Residential Collector Functional Classification for Homestead Drive. 4. The proposed standard will enhance safety for the pedestrians of the Edwards area and provide an adequate platform for other users of Homestead Drive. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS FOllOWING THE JUNE 14. 1999 DELIBERATION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: The Variance was tabled at the June 14, 1999 public hearing in order to look at the possibility of constructing the curb and gutter at 12 feet from centerline and then adding a wider path on the outside of the curb for bicyclists and pedestrians. Review of the AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS GUIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BICYCLE FACILITIES revealed the following: 1. Many bicyclists will use the roadway instead of the bicycle path because they have found the roadway safer, more convenient, or better maintained. Bicyclists using the roadway are often subject to harassment by motorists who feel that in all cases bicyclists should be on the path. 2. Bicyclists using the path. generally are required to stop or yield at all cross streets and driveways, while bicyclists using the roadway usually have priority over cross traffic, because they have the same right-of-way as motorists. 3. Where the distance between the edge of the roadway and the path is less than 5 feet a suitable physical divider may be considered. The divider should be a minimum of 4.5 feet high. 4. The recommended width for a two-direction bicycle path is 10 feet. In some instance a minimum of 8 feet can be adequate. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for a Variance from the strict interpretation of the Road Improvements Standards in Section 4-620.J, Section 4-620.D, and Appendix C, which classifies Homestead Drive as a Suburban Residential Collector, with the condition that the improvements on Homestead Drive shall be constructed to the lesser standard as shown on the attached sheet of typical sections as the section labeled Typical Section Proposed By Eagle County Engineering. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners guidance on June 14, 1999, and in view of the existing topographical constraints coupled with an examination of the AMERICAN ASSOCIA nON OF 7 06-21-1999 STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS GUIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BICYCLE FACILITIES guidelines, an 8 foot sidewalk outside of a 2.5 foot curb and gutter is proposed. Commissioner Stone stated he would like to approve this application based on staffs recommendation, but he understands the applicant will not improve the subdivision. Chairman Phillips stated the Board can approve the request as recommended and the applicant can continue with what they would like to. Commissioner Stone moved to approve file number VIS-0002 Homestead Drive Variance, incorporating staff findings and condition it be built with an 8 foot sidewalk and a 2 and ~ curb and gutter. Chairman Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote was declared unanImous. 1041 Completeness Hearing Tambi Katieb, Environmental Health, presented a 1041 Permit completeness hearing for Ten Peaks Mesa Homeowners Association for a major new domestic water treatment system, storage, distribution system for the Ten Peaks Mesa 35-acre subdivision development located above El Jebel on Missouri Heights, and the efficient utilization thereof. He reviewed a memo submitted to the Board as follows: The action that will be requested from the Board is to determine completeness of a 1041 Permit application and to estimate associated processing fees. Staff has reviewed the above referenced application and has found it to be complete. Estimated fees for the above referenced 1041 Permit application is as follows: Community Development Staff 10 Hrs @ $42.50 = $ 425.00 Engineering Staff 4 Hrs @ $42.50 = $ 170.00 Attorney Staff 8 Hrs @ $75.00 = $ 600.00 TOTAL = $1,195.00 Staff recommended the Board find the application complete and set the estimated fees as noted above. Commissioner Stone moved the Board accept the application, submitted by Ten Peaks Mesa Homeowners Association for a major new domestic water treatment plant and the efficient utilization of the municipal water project at Ten Peaks Mesa Subdivision, as complete and set the estimated fee to process this application is $1,195.00 which may be altered to cover the actual cost of review and public hearings. Chairman Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote was declared 'unanImous. AFP-00069, Cordillera Filing 17, Lot 16, Block 2 Jean Garren, Planner, presented file number AFP-00069, Cordillera, Filing 17, Lot 16, Block 2. She stated this was a request to alter a portion of the platted building envelope for this lot. Pursuant to the Cordillera Subdivision Fourth Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development Control Guide, which is the current Cordillera PUD Guide, adjustments to a building envelope may be made if approved by the Eagle County Director of Community Development. She read staff findings as follows: 1. Pursuant to Section 5.290.B.3. Amended Final Plat of the Eagle County Land Use 8 06-21-1999 Regulations: (a) The proposed Amended Final Plat IS part of a previously approved Final Plat. (b) The proposed amendment to the Final Plat IS NOT INCONSISTENT with the intent of the Final Plat. (c) The proposed amendment to the Final Plat DOES NOT adversely affect adjacent property owners (d) The proposed amendment to the Final Plat DOES NOT create a new lot or lots. 2. Pursuant to Section 5.290.1. Minimum contents of Application ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations: (a) Final Plat. The final plat of the proposed amendment IS in conformance with Final Plat requirements. (b) Zoning. The land included within the proposed amendment IS PROPERTY ZONED for the proposed use, AND CONFORMS with existing zoning on the property. (c) Access. All lots HAVE DEMONSTRATED legal and physical access to a public street or rights-of-way by conventional vehicle. (d) Water Supply. All lots HAVE DEMONSTRATED the existence of a legal, physical, adequate and dependable water supply for each lot. (e) Waste Water Disposal. All lots HAVE DEMONSTRATED the existence of a waste water disposal system, or other lawful means of disposing of human wastes, which complies with all applicable public health laws. (f) Fire Protection. Each proposed lot HAS DEMONSTRATED adequate fire protection. (g) Hazards. Satisfactory evidence EXISTS that all site conditions associated with the subdivision will not create hazards and all lots will contain safe, adequate building sites. (h) Site Plan. A site plan HAS BEEN SUBMITTED that depicts proposed building locations, access drives, parking areas, landscaping, fences, signs, and any other pertinent site data. (i) Agreements. A "Subdivision Improvements Agreement," off-site road improvements agreement or other agreement IS NOT REQUIRED.. G) Restrictions. A copy ofthe protective covenants, declaration, party wall agreements or other restrictions placed on the subdivision HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY RECORDED in the office of the Clerk and Recorder. (k) Schools. It has been demonstrated that all applicable school land dedication or cash-in-lieu requirements have been satisfied. (l) Adjacent Property Owners. All present property owners of pubic record HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED. 3. Pursuant to Section 5.290.G.2. Standards for Amended Final Plat of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: (a) Adjacent Property. The proposed amendment to the Final Plat DOES NOT adversely affect adjacent property owners. (b) Final Plat Consistency. The proposed amendment to the Final Plat IS CONSISTENT with the intent of the Final Plat. (c) Conformance with Final Plat Requirements. The Amended Final Plat proposed DOES CONFORM to the Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies and guidelines. 9 06-21-1999 (d) Improvements Agreement. Is not required. (e) Restrictive Plat Note Alteration. Not applicable. 4. Pursuant to the Cordillera Subdivision Fourth Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development Control Document, Section 1.05.3.i and iii, the Director of Community Development has found that: 1. Letters of approval from all property owners within 75 feet of the outer boundaries of the lot in which the building envelope adjustment is being proposed HAVE BEEN received; 2. The Cordillera Design Review Board HAS approved the building envelope amendment; 3. The proposed amendment WILL NOT substantially impact in an adverse manner the view corridor of any property owner to whom notice of the proposed building envelope amendment has been sent, or is required by geologic or other hazard considerations; 4. The envelope change DOES NOT adversely affect wildlife corridors; 5. The envelope change DOES NOT adversely impact ridge lines nor create any increase in impacts to ridge lines; 6. The envelope amendment IS NOT inconsistent with the intent of the Final Plat; and 7. The envelope amendment IS NOT an alteration of a restrictive plat note. Staff recommended approval. Commissioner Stone moved the Board approve file number AFP-00069, incorporating staff findings. The Chairman shall be authorized to sign the plat. Chairman Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote was declared unanImous. There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until June 28, 1999. Attest: Clerk to the Bo ~Qi!;tp 10 06-21-1999