The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 06/01/99 Present: Johnnette Phillips Tom C. Stone James Johnson, Jr. James Fritze James Hartmann Sara J. Fisher GENERAL FUND 1-800-BA TTERIES 3CMA A TO Z HOME REPAIR & ABC DISTRIBUTING ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS ABELMAN LAW OFFICES ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS ADVANTAGE BRANDS ADVANTAGE NETWORK SYSTEMS AIR TOUCH CELLULAR AIR TOUCH CELLULAR - ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE ALPHA INTERACTIVE GROUP ALPINE AREA AGENCY AGING ALPINE LOCKSMITH COMPANY AMERICAN BANK NOTE CO AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMUSEMENT BUSINESS ANDREE KIM ANGELA WURTSMITH . ANIMAL HOSPITAL HIGH COUN APEX SECURITY APPLIED ELECTRONICS ASPEN BOARD OF REALTORS ASPEN CTR FOR WOMENS HL TH ASPEN PUBLISHERS INC ASPEN TIMES THE ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL AT&T AT & TWIRELESS SERVICES AVON COMMERCIAL CENTER AVON PET CENTER B J ROWE BARTELL & BARTELL BASALT VETERINARY CLINIC PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 1, 1999 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Attorney County Administrator Clerk to the Board SUPPLIES SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SU PPLI ES/SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES 80.00 330.00 25.00 26.42 2.48 27.48 30.00 59.95 64.26 3,106.32 128.65 2,164.99 65.00 2,227.20 405.00 222.00 539.80 149.00 596.86 190.40 60.00 6.00 61.50 5.99 1,525.00 266.91 46.80 41.15 44.28 185.18 24,806.75 651.00 73.71 9,291.50 153.00 1 06-01-1999 BEN GALLOWAY M.D BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYSTEMS BFI WASTE SYSTEMS INC BILL DOWNS BLACK BOX CORPORATION BLAHA ASSOCIATES INC . BOARD REAL ESTATE APPRAIS BOB BARKER COMPANY BONDED COLLECTION SERVICE BOYDS BAIL BONDS BRC/HARRIS, INC BRIAN BISHOP BUSINESS PRODUCTS INC C & S PRODUCTIONS CATA CALOIA, HOUPT & LIGHT PC CAPITOL ADVANTAGE CAROL TATHAM CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CCO AND ERA CENTURYTEL CHAMPION DUPLICATORS INC CHESS CHRIS GUN ION CHRISTIE LODGE CHRISTINE SASSE CITY MARKET #34 CLEAN DESIGNS CLINT EMMONS CMC RESCUE INCORPORATED CO BUREAU INVESTIGATION CO COUNTIES INCORPORATED CO DEPT AGRICULTURE CO DEPT LABOR/EMPLOYMENT CO DEPT OF HEALTH CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CO DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S CO PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC CO STATE ASSOC CLERK AND CO STATE INVESTIGATORS COLORADO COUNTIES INC COLORADO DEPT REVENUE COLORADO JAIL ASSOCIATION . COLORADO JOURNAL COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE COLORADO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE COLORADO WEST MENTAL SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES 1,330.00 70.50 287.03 75.00 32.32 1,076.00 78.00 2,127.20 2.48 25.00 133.93 13.01 1,405.00 13,144.14 200.00 1,344.40 25.90 1,075.00 26.71 46,052.37 1,465.81 22.50 317.83 210.49 1,161.00 1,189.15 1,207.05 559.50 46.20 25.78 66.24 30.46 32.00 1,114.00 6.00 25.00 9.00 35.00 213.00 900.00 35.67 4,770.00 50.00 14.00 450.00 27.50 3,408.40 2 06-01-1999 COLUMBINE HOME HEALTH INC COLUMBINE MARKET COMPUMASTER COORS DISTRIBUTING CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COUNTY SHERIFFS COLORADO DAILY SENTINEL THE DAN SEIBEL DANA LOU RIA DANKA OMNIFAX DATA COMM WAREHOUSE DATA GENERAL CORPORATION DAVE LUSSIER DAVID GUINNEE, DVM . DAVID L HOPWOOD DEEP ROCK WEST DENVER MARRIOTT SOUTHEAST DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR DIANA KAFKA DISTRICT COURT TRUSTEE DOCTORS ON CALL DON OLSEN DOUG HAWKINS DWYER HUDDLESTON & RAY EAGLE AUTO PARTS EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY CONFISCATED EAGLE COUNTY HEALTH AND EAGLE EYE PHOTO EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS . EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY CTR EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EAGLE VALLEY TEMPS EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER ELIZABETH ANN VARDAMAN EWING TRUCKING CONSTRUCTI EXEMPLA HEAL THCARE FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FARMER BROTHERS FEDERAL EXPRESS FERRELLGAS FILE FINDERS, LTD. SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT APRIL EXPENSES - SHELTER VET REFUND SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES 3 965.00 171.68 1,790.00 678.30 52.54 132.00 390.00 191.05 37.80 504.88 165.00 148.77 317.05 91.21 1,210.00 3.70 112.05 80.00 18,750.00 69.30 276.94 180.00 8.92 150.00 8.68 27.67 1,540.53 2,800.00 225.00 48.93 560.90 80.84 2,025.13 1,925.79 75.00 259.90 2,897.25 944.00 24.99 4.34 292.50 225.00 826.36 244.46 215.25 110.37 30.00 06-01-1999 FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES FIRST BANKS FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY FOOTE READ CO FORENSIC LABORATORIES INC FRANKLIN COVEY GALLS INCORPORATED GEMPLERS INC GEORGE M FOSHA GEORGE ROUSSOS GIS JOBS CLEARINGHOUSE GLENWOODINDEPENDENT GLENWOOD MEDICAL ASSOC GLENWOOD POST THE GLENWOOD SHOE SERVICE GLOBAL ELECTION SYSTEMS GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GYPSUM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HANSEN STEVE R HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELLO DIRECT INC HEWLETT PACKARD HILL & TASHIRO MARKETING . HODGES BADGE COMPANY HOLME ROBERTS OWEN HOLY CROSS ENERGY HOUSING FUND HUME GROUP, THE IAFE IFMA IMLA INCENTIVE MARKETING INC INTEGRAL RRECOVERIES INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNATIONAL ASSOC OF JACK W INGSTAD JAMES E JOHNSON JR. JEANETTE BLANKENSHIP JEFF FORBES JEFFERSON COUNTY JENNIFER REEVES JETCAFE, LLC JOHN E REID & ASSOCIATES JOHN VENGRIN JOHNNETTE PHILLIPS SERVICES SU PPLI ES/SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REFUND SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 1,497.50 20,562.86 89.72 16.98 60.00 131.92 667.01 111.49 984.00 100.11 25.00 46.80 68.00 55.00 185.00 400.70 523.24 371.47 250.00 912.91 91,301.40 994.97 936.00 800.00 41.25 201.53 14,835.86 46,573.00 49.00 120.00 225.00 300.00 29.31 36.90 1,934.83 270.00 159.00 130.20 685.02 13.86 13.23 470.00 25.00 208.29 2,100.00 13.80 445.87 4 06-01-1999 JOHNSON CONTROLS JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC JON HARRISON JULIE FELDMAN JULIE SNYDER-EATON K N ENERGY INC K-D FLAGS KAREN FILTER KATIE HARPER KING CAMPBELL, DDS KSKE/KZYR RADIO LAND L SANITATION LA QUINTA INN & SUITES LAB SAFETY SUPPLY . LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LEONARD VALDEZ LETN LILLIAN F SMITH CONFER. LINDA JONES LORI E STEADMAN HUFF LORIE CRAWFORD MARK CHAPIN MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS MCI WORLDCOM MCMANIS ASSOCIATES INC MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL MEGAN HAMMER MICHAEL BEALS, D.O. P.C. MICHAEL JAMES NOSAL MICHAEL M/LLSAPPS MID VALLEY KENNEL MILLAR ELEVATOR SERVICE MONTAG KEITH P MONTROSE EXTENSION FUND MOORE BUSINESS MOORE MEDICAL CORPORATION MOTOR POOL FUND MOTOROLA MOTOROLA INCORPORATED MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS NAPA AUTO PARTS NAT'L SANITARY/UNISOURCE NATIONAL GRAPHICS COMPANY NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT NATIONAL MS SOCIETY NEVES UNIFORMS SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES EQUIPMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SU PPLI ES/SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PARTS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES 158.59 1,541.00 74.00 570.00 114.80 7,493.86 567.80 67.71 442.89 310.00 525.00 330.00 1,250.00 857.29 2,180.11 120.50 388.00 45.00 91.17 412.86 119.49 59.80 37.17 1,903.68 19.63 1,050.49 3,470.00 20.05 810.00 1.24 31.88 1,738.00 597.66 203.29 5.00 13,255.40 13.77 38,713.26 7,200.00 3,447.30 179.00 3.09 699.53 656.36 925.00 100.00 3,487.10 5 06-01-1999 NICOLE DEWELL NICOLETTI FLATER ASSOC NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORDIC REFRIGERATION NORWEST BANK NOVELL SALES OFFICE PAVILION OP DENVER ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO ORRISON DISTRIBUTING PAINT BUCKET, THE PAM EHRENBERG PAT MAGDZIUK PATRICIA HAMMON PC MAGAZINE EXTRA PEGGY GRAYBEAL PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENTS PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PHOTOKARDS ID SYSTEMS PITKIN COUNTY ANIMAL PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED POSTMASTER . POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PRCA MOUNTAIN STATES PRECINCT POLICE PRODUCTS PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATES PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS PROPACIFIC PROTECTORS L TD PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY QUILL CORPORATION RAYMONDS OFFICE MACHINES REGAL HARVEST HOTEL RENTX/EZ WAY RESPONSE RIFLE PACKING & SAUSAGE ROBERT LOEFFLER ROBERT WARNER ROBIN BURGDORF ROCKHURST COLLEGE ROCKY MOUNTAIN REPROGRAPH RON BRAVE RONALDSOMMERHAUSE ROPIR CABLEVISION ROSS PRODUCTS DIVISION RUBBERMAID RUSTY WILLIAMS REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES FURNITURE SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICES EQUIPMENT SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES 1999 HS GRANT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 41.04 65.00 4,160.62 283.34 204,454.68 2,006.30 9,951.20 128.32 2,690.40 1,115.40 161.02 258.73 16.00 42.84 49.95 320.00 174.00 905.35 1,084.00 50.00 475.00 94.03 100.00 20.00 63.90 25.00 195.50 727.29 75.00 385.08 622.51 308.00 252.00 505.00 875.00 462.39 50.36 13.23 51.39 447.00 112.44 45.36 172.04 46.79 287.62 70.28 224.27 6 06-01-1999 SACHS LAWLOR SANDYS OFFICE SUPPLY SARAJ FISHER SARAH SCHIPPER SCHUTZMAN NBS INC SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SECRETARY OF STATE SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SNOWHITE LINEN SODEXHO MARRIOTT SOMES UNIFORMS SOUTHERN STEEL COMPANY SPECIALTIES INCORPORATED STARBUCK SURVEYORS & ENGI STEVENS HOME CARE INC STRAWBERRY PATCH SUMMIT LUMBER SUN BADGE COMPANY SUPER 8 MOTEL SUSPENSE FUND SUTTONS SPORTSWEAR TERRY ROUNDS THIRD SECORT INNOVATIONS TOM DEVEREAUX TOMAHAWK LIVE TRAP CO TOP DRAWER OFFICE SUPPLY TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF BASALT TOWN OF EAGLE TOWN OF GYPSUM . TOWN OF MINTURN TOWN OF VAIL TUXALL UNIFORM COMPANY UGC CONSULTING UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO US WESTCOMMUNICATIONS US WEST SECURITY DEPT VAIL ASSOCIATES VAIL BOARD OF REALTORS VAIL ELECTRONICS VAIL TRAIL THE VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VAILNET INC VALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES PARTS/SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES 19.00 17.70 138.88 1,178.10 54.97 1,308.36 20.00 26,855.71 466.07 93.02 49.50 134.00 67.50 265.50 1,007.00 1,850.00 91.45 476.94 501.00 54.90 26,854.77 1,136.73 234.20 1,500.00 221.20 72.13 30.40 (1,071.15) (365.57) 2,230.95 (430.70) (121.14) 210,902.43 78.03 100,704.31 272.19 520.00 5,276.91 16.20 975.00 15.00 1,065.00 1,018.20 596.32 18,738.70 627.15 3.38 7 06-01-1999 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 30.22 WALMART /AVON SUPPLIES/SERVICES 134.15 WALMART /GLENWOOD SUPPLIES/SERVICES 245.09 WELLS HUMOR ORGANIZATION SERVICES 3,200.00 WEST PUBLISHING SUPPLIES 1,919.43 . WESTERN PAGING SERVICES 28.00 WHERE ITS AT SUPPLIES 19.00 WINGS OF EAGLE TRAVEL & SERVICES 792.00 WPRA SERVICES 150.00 WRISTBANDS MEDTECH SUPPLIES 34.50 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 1,265.08 YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICES 62.47 PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL # 9 & 10 437,509.31 1,547,509.19 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 3,418.02 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC REIMBURSEMENT 39.13 D T N CORPORATION SERVICES 941.24 EAGLE PHARMACY SUPPLIES 4.19 . HARRYS HEAVY HAULERS SUPPLIES/SERVICES 175,176.33 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 9,282.11 MACDONALD EQUIPMENT CO EQUIPMENT 6,400.00 MOTOR POOL FUND REIMBURSEMENT 121,358.13 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLIES 108.35 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 18,524.65 PETTY CASH ROAD & BRIDGE SUPPLIES 72.00 POLICE DATA SYSTEMS SERVICES 800.00 RELIABLE SUPPLIES 54.46 RESPOND SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 103.40 SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION SUPPLIES 172.67 SUSPENSE FUND SUPPLIES/SERVICES 2,539.61 TOWN OF AVON SERVICES 35,705.02 TOWN OF BASAL T SERVICES 12,185.70 TOWN OF EAGLE SERVICES 12,674.99 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICES 14,356.60 TOWN OF MINTURN SERVICES 4,038.16 TOWN OF VAIL SERVICES 167,780.28 WILLIE WARE REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 27.60 PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL 9 & 10 41,623.79 627,461.43 8 06-01-1999 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND 20/20 EYECARE INC AIR TOUCH CELLULAR ASPEN COUNSELING CENTER BOSSOW RITA R CAROL TATHAM CATHERINE CRAIG CCO AND ERA CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER CITY MARKET CO COUNTIES INCORPORATED CO SECRETARY OF STATE COLORADO WEST MENTAL CSED EAGLE COUNTY ATTORNEY EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY CTR EDWARD GILLILAND FIRST CIRCUIT COURT FRANKLIN COVEY GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF GLENWOOD MEDICAL ASSOC HEALTH INSURANCE FUND INTEGRITY PLUMBING AND ISABEL SANCHEZ JERRI ISRAEL JOYCE L REICHE . KAREN LAJOY SMITH MA LPC KING CAMPBELL, DDS LORI HUTCHENS LYONS KATHLEEN MARIAN MCDONOUGH MICHELLE GUSTAVE MOTOR POOL FUND NCSEA NORWEST BANK PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF POSTMASTER RACHEL FAVELA RENEE FIELDS RITA WOODS ROBERT J DURHAM AND SANDY ALFRED SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT PAYROLL EXPD REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT 138.20 224.46 400.00 188.89 300.00 134.51 2,840.27 423.62 9.80 53.68 24.91 10.00 243.00 308.88 2,225.25 905.03 302.92 50.00 1,020.00 35.00 99.79 15.62 22.50 9,829.03 1,583.03 167.90 331.69 310.35 350.00 59.07 69.30 180.50 69.26 246.14 889.36 100.00 14,091.67 20.00 76.93 225.68 698.65 121.59 275.00 70.88 9 06-01-1999 SANDY GAINES REIMBURSEMENT 262.08 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 25.31 STATE FORMS PUBLICATIONS SUPPLIES 147.81 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICES 4,168.09 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 353.14 US WEST CONFERENCING SERV SERVICES 98.80 VANASK WAREHOUSE COMPANY SUPPLIES/SERVICES 352.17 WALMART /GLENWOOD SUPPLIES 34.42 WESTERN PAGING SERVICES 53.85 WRAP FUND TRANSFER 10,000.00 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 42.75 PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL #9 & 10 29,633.63 84,914.41 WRAP FUND BLUE LAKE PRESCHOOL SERVICES 320.00 ELlAH LEVY SERVICES 525.00 ROSETTA BALTAZAR SERVICES 198.82 . SUSAN BROADWELL, PSY. D. SERVICES 500.00 WALMART /AVON SUPPLIES 400.00 1,943.82 RETIREMENT FUND CCO AND ERA EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 40,733.09 40,733.09 INSURANCE RESERVE FUND AGENCY AUTO GLASS PARTS/SERVICES 810.55 LIGHTNING SERVICES PARTS/SERVICES 859.00 VAIL ANESTHESIA ASSOC PARTS/SERVICES 47.55 VALLEY LUMBER PARTS/SERVICES 57.34 1,774.44 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND CJC PROPERTIES, L TD SUPPLIES 1,350.00 DEBT SERVICE FUND TRANSFER 356,482.50 DESIGN WORKSHOP SERVICES 4,651.35 EAGLE CO BUILDING DIV SERVICES 214.23 10 06-01-1999 EAGLE COUNTY RECREATION SERVICES 6,933.85 EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE SERVICES 72.00 EVANS MENDEL ALLISON SERVICES 341,414.60 GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD VEHICLE 16,021.60 INDEPENDENT TESTING SERVICES 840.00 LAYTON HITCH & PICKUP PARTS/SERVICES 1,498.16 MARCIN ENGINEERING INC SERVICES 4,790.00 OFFICE PAVILION FURNITURE 296.00 VAIL RESORTS MANAGEMENT SERVICES 10,000.00 744,564.29 SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. AIR TOUCH CELLULAR SUPPLIES/SERVICES 319.09 AIRLlNK SHUTTLE SERVICES 1,275.00 AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICES 248.00 AMISYS INC EQUIPMENT 479.00 ASCOM SERVICES 125.00 AVON TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 206,309.43 BERTHODS,INC SERVICES 1,250.00 CASTA SERVICES 100.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 613.16 CITY MARKET #34 SUPPLIES 21.32 COpy COPY SUPPLIES/SERVICES 202.17 CRESTLlNE CO. INC PARTS/SUPPLIES 1,205.99 D & M MAINTENANCE SERVICE SERVICES 270.00 DEBBIE BUCKLEY REIMBURSEMENT 81.90 EAGLE CO BUILDING DIV SERVICES 1,101.36 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES 323.85 EAGLE SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS SERVICES 223.20 EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE SERVICES 37.20 EAGLE VALLEY TEMPS SERVICES 2,624.00 FEDERAL EXPRESS SERVICES 46.25 GARY BROWN SERVICES 120.00 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 1,076.01 HENDERSON ASSOCIATES SERVICES 1,200.00 HILL & TASHIRO MARKETING SERVICES 8,239.23 HOLYCROSS ENERGY SERVICES 93.89 INTERMOUNTAIN ENGINEERING SERVICES 1,200.00 MCI WORLDCOM SERVICES 10.18 MONROE & NEWELL SERVICES 330.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 223.44 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 4,221.52 PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING SUPPLIES 400.00 PUBLIC SERVICE SERVICES 365.20 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY SERVICES 190.24 11 06-01-1999 SDT/TRANSIT INFORMATION SERVICES 200.00 SLIFER MANAGEMENT SERVICES 5,994.66 TOWN OF AVON SUPPLIES/SERVICES 146,899.59 TOWN OF VAIL SERVICES 7,866.24 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 818.01 VAIL VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES 118.46 PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL #9 & 10 8,905.04 405,327.63 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 107.44 CONTRA ENGINEERING INC SERVICES 136.25 CONTRA ENGINEERING INC SERVICES 9,451.21 COPY COPY SUPPLIES 42.75 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 96.11 IDEA ART SUPPLIES 136.89 KEMP AND COMPANY INC SUPPLIES 1,061.59 . NELSON MARKETING SUPPLIES 269.32 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 672.49 PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING SUPPLIES 300.00 TOWN OF AVON SUPPLIES/SERVICES 30.00 12,304.05 SALES TAX R.F.V. TRANSP. ROARING FORK TRANSIT AGEN CONTRIBUTION 76,336.00 76,336.00 AIRPORT FUND A-NET CONSULTING SERVICES 300.00 ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 41.89 AIR TOUCH CELLULAR SERVICES 773.06 . AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT SERVICES 1,885.00 AMERICAN EAGLE TIRE PARTS/SERVICES 19.64 ARCH COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 147.58 A VIA TION WEEK SUPPLIES 58.59 BACK ALLEY PIZZA SUPPLIES 182.70 BERTHOD MOTORS PARTS/SERVICES 1,617.70 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS SERVICES 144.60 BRENT SERVICES SERVICES 157.18 BROWNING FERRIS IND SERVICES 178.20 12 06-01-1999 CALOIA, HOUPT & LIGHT PC CCO AND ERA CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CENTURYTEL CITY MARKET #34 CO BOILER INSPEC BRANCH COLUMBINE MARKET CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC DEEP ROCK WEST DODSON ENGINEERED DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE AUTO PARTS EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE EYE PHOTO EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EDDIE STORER FLIGHT MINIATURES FRONT RANGE FIRE G&R SUNDOWN CONSTRUCTION GLENWOOD SHIRT COMPANY GYPSUM TOWN OF HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HERMAN MILLER INC HERTZ CORPORATION HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC JAMES P ELWOOD . JIM JACKSON KN ENERGY INC LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC M & M AUTO PARTS MAIN STREET GALLERY AND MCI COMMERCIAL SERVICE MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS MICAH RADER MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN STEEL & WELDING NATRONA COUNTY AIRPORT NORWEST BANK ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP PAINT BUCKET, THE PRO SPORTS POLARIS REO WELDING . RIPPYS LOCATING SERVICE SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SUPPLIES PARTS/SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FURNITURE SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REI MBU RSEMENT SERVICES SERVICES PARTS SUPPLIES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES 188.10 1,631.62 97.99 3,672.81 47.61 66.00 99.35 264.01 65.80 14,903.22 400.67 135.20 362.43 30,970.25 205.36 8.96 16.50 74.94 321 . 15 1,018.20 35,925.20 735.85 96.95 3,703.00 2,129.80 123.96 3,265.79 14.03 154.57 1,525.59 525.00 26.99 2,307.82 41.26 86.00 96.86 760.00 23.61 1,800.00 8,098.62 55.00 207.01 1,164.00 389.30 14,292.00 120.00 1,925.00 13 06-01-1999 SAFETY KLEEN SUPPLIES 3,475.50 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 258.99 SETON NAME PLATE COMPANY SUPPLIES 43.47 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 146.38 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY PARTS/SUPPLIES 273.59 WILDERNESS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 37,219.50 WRANGLER ELECTRIC SERVICES 1,493.75 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 159.52 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICES 396.00 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 117.11 PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL #9 & 10 21,501.42 204,734.75 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND TRANSFER 200,000.00 200,000.00 DEBT SERVICE FUND US BANK TRUST NA SERVICES 105,885.00 105,885.00 JUSTICE CENTER BOND FUND US BANK TRUST NA SERVICES 356,482.50 356,482.50 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND CHAMPION DUPLICATORS INC EQUIPMENT 1,895.00 DELL INC EQUIPMENT 27,556.25 HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS EQUIPMENT 799.00 HOUSING FUND TRANSFER 3,580.00 JERRY'S SPORT CENTER EQUIPMENT 3,876.00 OFFICE PAVILION FURNITURE 442.40 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND FURNITURE 262.50 VAIL RESORTS MANAGEMENT SERVICES 23,075.00 XEROX CORPORATION EQUIPMENT 5,840.00 67,326.15 14 06-01-1999 HOUSING FUND CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 547.58 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SERVICES 123.09 EAGLE EYE PHOTO SUPPLIES 9.88 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 578.82 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 1,816.49 PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL #9 & 10 4,335.97 7,411.83 RA, VOUCHER ASSISTANCE PRG GARFIELD COUNTY HOUSING SERVICES 590.00 590.00 LANDFILL FUND CARDINAL SCALE MFG CO SERVICES 495.00 CCO AND ERA PAYROLL EXPD 916.83 CENTRAL SERVICES/EC SERVICES 47.77 DEEP ROCK WEST SUPPLIES/SERVICES 66.50 EAGLE AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 24.71 . EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES 4.50 EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE SERVICES 124.00 EAGLE-SUMMIT NEWSPAPERS SERVICES 24.04 F G & S SEPTIC SERVICE SERVICES 340.00 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY SERVICES 184.62 GRAND VALLEY RECOVERY SERVICES 374.47 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 2,579.92 KRW CONSULTING INC SERVICES 11,141.52 MILLER WATER MONITOR SERVICES 720.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICES 84,316.20 NAT'L SANITARY/UNISOURCE SUPPLIES 31 .44 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLIES 135.89 NORWEST BANK PAYROLL EXPD 5,169.96 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICES 198,444.18 SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SUPPLIES 177.37 SERVICEMASTER OF VAIL SERVICES 1,330.85 SILEO COMPUTER INC SERVICES 55.00 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICES 260.00 PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL #9 & 10 10,530.25 317,495.02 15 06-01-1999 MOTOR POOL FUND ALCAN SPRING ALPINE TECH DISTRIBUTING ARMADILLO IRON WORKS AVIATION INDUSTRIAL BAND B EXCAVATING BRAD RAGAN INC BRODY CHEMICAL CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS CCO AND ERA CHEMBRITE CLERK OF ADAMS COUNTY COLLETTS CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC . EAGLE AMOCO EAGLE AUTO PARTS EAGLE PHARMACY GAY JOHNSONS INC GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND HANSON EQUIPMENT HEALTH INSURANCE FUND J & S CONTRACTORS SUPPLY KAR PRODUCTS INCORPORATED LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC M & M AUTO PARTS MACDONALD EQUIPMENT CO MICHAEL SCHEELE MIDAS MUFFLER & BRAKES MOTOR POOL FUND NAFA REGISTRATION NAPA AUTO PARTS . NATIONAL SANITARY NORWEST BANK PETTY CASH ROAD & BRIDGE POWER MOTIVE QUALITY QUICK PRINT ROY F WESTON, INC SAFETY KLEEN SHARON WILMORE SMITH WILLIAM SUMMIT LUMBER SUSPENSE FUND TRI COUNTY FIRE UNITED STATES WELDING PARTS SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PARTS/SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES VEHICLE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICES PARTS/SUPPLIES PARTS PARTS/SERVICES PARTS/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES PARTS SUPPLIES PAYROLL EXPD SERVICES PARTS/SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICES SUPPLIES SERVICES 18.50 78.00 139.25 229.66 850.50 328.72 121.66 89.50 1,114.49 113.69 230.76 13,889.47 115.85 27.00 3,019.06 20.91 566.64 20,732.61 117.01 29.65 3,732.47 41.28 216.93 157.80 242.42 89.60 209.95 1,234.61 3,511.84 730.00 3.09 113.09 6,864.06 15.00 480. 11 96.00 4,800.00 288.40 98.78 17.84 235.01 500.00 238.00 128.20 16 06-01-1999 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY PARTS/SUPPLIES 4,805.82 WESTERN SLOPE CHRYSLER VEHICLES 36,590.00 WESTERN SLOPE PUBLICATION SERVICES 90.00 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY PARTS/SUPPLIES 3,967.78 . PAYROLL FOR MAY PAYROLL #9 & 10 14,314.12 125,645.13 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND ALPINE BANK SERVICES 150,000.00 DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY SERVICES 12,778.20 PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT SERVICES 2,477.41 ROCKY MOUNTAIN HMO SERVICES 31,638.60 UNITED STATES LIFE INS SERVICES 2,961.18 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO SERVICES 1,936.00 VISION SERVICE PLAN - CO SERVICES 3,960.7.7 205,752.16 ENHANCED E911 FUND CENTURYTEL SERVICES 333.74 JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC SERVICES 1,790.75 2,124.49 GRAND TOTAL 5,136,315.38 Consent Agenda Chairman Phillips stated the first item on the agenda was the consent agenda as follows: A) Approval of bill paying for weeks of June 1 & June 7, 1999, subject to review by County Administrator B) Approval of payroll for June 1, 1999, subject to review by County Administrator C) Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of May 17, 1999 D) Resolution 99-090, Final Release of Collateral and termination of the Subdivision Improvements Agreement for EI Jebel Texaco PUD E) Resolution 99-091, Amending the Eagle County Financial Guide for reimbursable .mileage rate for business use of private automobiles F) Resolution 99-092 concerning appointments to the Board of Appeals G) Resolution 99-093 concerning appointments to the Zoning Board of Adjustment H) Resolution 99-094 concerning appointments to the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission 17 06-01-1999 I) Resolution 99-095 concerning appointments to the Eagle County Planning Commission J) Sign Change Orders 10, 16, 17, 18, 19 & 22 for the Grandstands Contract with Evans Mendel Allison K) Agreement between the Junior Livestock Sales Commission, Inc. and the County of Eagle for the Junior Livestock Auction L) COPS Universal Hiring program Grant. Commissioner Stone questioned the Roaring Fork Planning Commission appointments. He stated he believed Don Barnes was to be a regular member rather than an alternate. He stated Temple had related he would like to continue. Keith Montag, Director of Community Development, stated they were anticipating the Town of Basalt to nominate an individual. He reviewed the current members and stated there would have been five members with the appointment from the Town of Basalt. He questioned if the Board would like to wait for the Town of Basalt to submit their appointment. Commissioner Johnson stated he believes the appointment from the town of Basalt is by regulation. Commissioner Stone stated he would like staff to send communication to the Town of Basalt indicating the County is still waiting for their appointment. Commissioner Johnson stated if the resolution could be done re-affirming the current members. Renee Black, Asst. County Attorney, stated she has been given that suggestion. Commissioner Johnson questioned item E, he stated this amendment needs to be effective June 1, 1999 and the Resolution should state that. Terry Lowell, Finance Officer, stated the mileage reimbursement was at 32.5 cents per mile and it is now going down to 31 cents per mile. Jim Hartmann, County Administrator, stated the way to draft the resolution is to tract the federal rate and when that changes the County would then change their rates. Renee Black stated what is changed is in the financial guide. Chairman Phillips stated she also agrees to change the April date to June 1, 1999. Ms. Black stated the way the Resolution reads is, it is effective when signed by the Board. Commissioner Stone questioned the Junior Livestock Auction. Ms. Black stated the Board needs to authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement when received. Commissioner Johnson questioned the monies received. Mr. Deveroux stated the Junior Livestock Commission keeps 3% ofthe sales. He stated expenses comes in at about $3,000 to $4,000 per year. Q Commissioner Johnson questioned if there should be a cap limit. He stated all other County contracts have a cap. Chairman Phillips stated she agrees with a cap or not to exceed amount. Mr. Deveroux stated some of the sales loose money and those funds will be made up next year. He stated they usually carry over about $2,000 each year which covers the cost of a buyer not paying. Commissioner Johnson stated he would like to see a not to exceed 5% included in the agreement. The Board concurred. Ms. Black stated the Sheriffs Grant, item L, she does not have a copy of the grant. Commissioner Johnson stated this item is only giving the Sheriff authority to proceed. Commissioner Johnson questioned item H and I stating the regular member to the Eagle Planning Commission should be Chuck Powers and the alternate be Ron Brave. Chairman Phillips stated she would not like to change items they decided on previously. Commissioner Stone concurred. 18 06-01-1999 Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the consent calendar items, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, as presented. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Stone questioned item L. Commissioner Johnson stated this specific grant would not allow the County to terminate employees hired by this grant. Commissioner Stone moved to approve item and I on the consent calendar as presented. Commissioner Johnson seconded motion. Commissioners Phillips and Stone voting aye, Commissioner Johnson voting no. Commissioner Johnson moved to table item L to June 14, 1999, until discussion can be held with the Sheriff. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Plat & Resolution Signing Scot Hunn, Planner, presented the following plats and resolutions for the Board's consideration: 5MB-00124, Lot 39. Berry Creek Ranch. FiIinl: No.4. He stated this was a Minor "Type B" Subdivision, a resubdivision of Lot 39 to create two lots, Lot 39 A and Lot 39 B, along with a an access for Lot 39 B. This plat does contain a duplex split caveat stating that only one (1) two- family residence may be built on the combined area ofthe two lots. He read staff findings as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. 1. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a. Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Commissioner Stone moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-00124, Lot 39, Berry Creek Ranch, Filing No.4, incorporating staff findings. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 5MB-00184. Lot 23, The Homestead, FiIinl: No.2. He stated this was a Minor "Type B" Subdivision, a resubdivision of Lot 23 to create two lots, Lot 23 A and Lot 23 B, along with a an access for both lots. This plat does contain a duplex split caveat stating that only one (1) two-family residence may be built on the combined area of the two lots. He read staff findings as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-290 (G) (1) of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 5-290 (G) (1) Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision (G) Standards. The Board of County Commissioners and the Community Development Director shall consider the following in the review of a Type A Subdivision, a Type B Subdivision, and an Amended Final Plat. 1. Standards for Type A and Type B Subdivision. a. Access, potable water, and sewage disposal on the land to be subdivided are adequate; 19 06-01-1999 b. The plat does conform to Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines; and c. No Improvement Agreement is applicable. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve final plat file number 5MB-00184, Lot 23, The Homestead, Filing No.2, incorporating staff findings. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Resolution 99- 096. PDA-00018. Arrowhead PUD Amendment. He stated this was a resolution to approve the PUD Amendment to the Arrowhead at Vail Planned Unit Development to transfer a total of 10 units of residential density from Tracts J, L, 0, and Q to Tract U (Bear Paw), within Lower Bachelor Gulch Village. The Board considered this file on May 19, 1999. Commissioner Stone moved to approve Resolution 99-096, file number PDA-00018, Arrowhead PUD Amendment. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Agreement, Gibson Reno Architects Rich Cunningham, Facilities Management Director, presented an agreement between Eagle County and Gibson Reno Architects. He explained the agreement to the Board. He stated this agreement concerns the Tree Farm in EI Jebel. He stated the total contract amount is $324,786.00. Commissioner Johnson questioned the preliminary schedule, including information gathering and public workshops. Jim Hartmann, County Administrator, stated it is contemplated that the County initiate due diligence, including information gathering, pulling together old and new information, and involving the public in allowing them to see what has happened for this project and getting their input. He stated they .are trying to assure they have established legitimacy. Ms. Black stated there has been a clarification, "aia, exhibit b" has been added to the contract. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the agreement between Eagle County and Gibson Reno Architects. The Chairman shall be authorized to sign the contract. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDA-OOOIO, Bachelor Gulch Village Arrowhead PUD Scot Hunn presented file number PDA-00010, Bachelor Gulch Village Arrowhead PUD. He stated this is a request to amend building height in, and enlarge the areas of the Village Core area of Tract D from 55' to 75'; amend Tracts C & D and the platted road alignment for Day Break Ridge to decrease the size of Tract C, increase the size of Tract D and change the land use description on Tract C from Village Core to Open Space and Recreation. Scot handed out revised findings regarding this file. Mr. Hunn explained tract C and D were approved in 1994. This is the fourth amendment. He pointed out the written response from the Town of Avon. He stated during the Planning Commission hearing they discussed the visual analysis and the road improvement requirements. He stated they were looking for details on the road realignment. They have received that information and the conditions speak to any remaining concerns. He spoke to visual analysis and the discussion at Planning Commission. Most of the controversy regarding ridge lining on the upper portions was an issue but not .in the village core. He spoke to the revised staff findings and the change in item #8. He stated the proven standards have been met. Commissioner Johnson asked they proceed with the hearing. Peter Jamar, representing the applicant, was present for the hearing. He stated after resolving the 20 06-01-1999 issues, staff and the Planning Commission have recommended approval. They also have the support of the Bachelor Gulch Homeowners Association. They wanted to make sure the owners understood the proposal regarding the height. He showed the areas on a map and pointed out the core being tract D. He stated they met with a number of property owners and identified seven points where they used computer simulation to depict what the increase in height would do. They shrunk the village core area by 1.6 acres and relocated the road. They placed the additional 1.6 acres in open space. Mr. Jamar handed out copies of the simulations and explained those to the Board. He shared that the impacts are almost imperceptible. At Buckhorn, in the center portion, there is a difference. They used the simulations to show the property owners what would be effected and they have received their support. He spoke to the change by the Planning Commission regarding towers and steeples. Those must comply with the 75 foot maximum height. He asked the Board for questions. Commissioner Stone referred to the process. Mr. Jamar spoke to the peak of the roof and the height being 55 feet in this location. Commissioner Johnson stated the language would read much better if it read maximum building height within Tract D, depicted on appendix F, 75 feet except for chimneys. He stated it currently reads as if chimneys were included. Chairman Phillips asked about steeples and towers. Commissioner Johnson stated the only things allowed above the 75 foot height would be the chimneys. Towers and steeples would have to be within the 75 feet. Mr. Jamar agreed to that stipulation. He stated the way it is currently written, chimneys, towers and steeples can all be above 75 feet. Commissioner Johnson questioned Daybreak Ridge Road and the design speed ofthat road. John Vengrin, Engineering Department, stated the design speed is the design in their criteria. He stated he believes the speed on that road will be 15 miles per hour. He stated cars can travel faster of course. He stated the design speed is the criteria the engineer will use when they go through their design manuals. Commissioner Johnson asked if they are talking about designing a road for driving 20 miles per hour. He questioned emergency vehicles. Mr. Venegrin stated emergency vehicles are allowed to go faster. Mr. Jamar stated with the change of the intersection this road will be designed at a 20 mile speed and adequate safeguards will be in place. He stated there is no road that is designed specifically for emergency vehicles. He stated this is not an abnormal way to design the road. He stated typically the roads are designed for a much faster road than what is posted. Commissioner Johnson stated this is the first time he can remember having a condition for a design speed. Chairman Phillips questioned condition number 3, towers and steeples, will those be replaced with chimneys. Mr. Hunn reviewed the condition for the Board. He read the proposed condition and staff findings as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-240.A.1.F.3.m, Amendment to Preliminary Plan for Planned Unit Development, Eagle County Land Use Regulations; 1) The modification, removal, or release of the provisions of the plan ARE consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire Planned Unit Development; 2) The modifications, removal, or release of the provisions of the plan does NOT affect in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the planned unit development or the public interest; 3) The modification, removal, or release ofthe provisions ofthe plan is NOT granted solely to confer a special benefit upon anyone person; 21 06-01-1999 Pursuant to Section 5-240.F.3.e, Standards for the review of a Sketch and Preliminary Plan for PUD, Eagle County Land Use Regulations; 1) It IS represented that title to all land is owned or controlled by one person; 2) Uses that may be developed in the PUD ARE those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-000 or Table 3-320 for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD; 3) The proposal DOES meet the purposes listed for granting a Section 5-240.F.3.f.3 variation; 4) It HAS been demonstrated that off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off Street Parking and Loading Standards; 5) Landscaping provided in the PUD DOES comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards; 6) The PUD sign standards ARE as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations; 7) The applicant HAS demonstrated that the development proposed will be provided with adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads, and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services; 8) It has been demonstrated that the improvement standards applicable to the development are as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards, or that the development achieves greater efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts; a) It HAS been demonstrated that there is safe, efficient access to all areas ofthe proposed development b) Internal pathways DO form a logical, safe and convenient system for pedestrian accesses with appropriate linkages off-sit c) It HAS been demonstrated that the roadways are designed to provide for smooth traffic 'flow, minimizing hazards to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic d) The principal vehicular access point IS designed to provide for smooth traffic flow, minimizing hazards to vehicluar, pedestrian or bicycle traffic e) Plans HAVE been provided showing adequate areas for snow storage; 9) The development proposed for the PUD IS compatible with the character of surrounding land uses; 10) The PUD IS consistent with the Master Plans, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map; 11) The PUD DOES include a phasing plan for the development; 12) The PUD DOES comply with the following common recreation and open space standards, Minimum Area, recommended minimum open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi- public as defined is 25%, all common open space and recreational facilities are shown, Continuing Use and Maintenance; all privately owned open space shall continue to conform to its intended use, adequate provisions for organizational controls of maintenance administration, operation and insurance are provided; 13) The PUD HAS considered the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendation received by responding referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards. Staff recommended approval with conditions as follows: 1) The applicant shall submit an Amended Final Plat for Bachelor Gulch Village, Filing No.3, Tracts C, D and Daybreak Ridge Road prior to issuance of any building or other related permits. All associated site improvements in compliance with required Improvement Standards shall be subject to co llateralization; 22 06-01-1999 2) The intersection of Daybreak Ridge Road and Bachelor Gulch Trail Road shall be designed to a maximum design speed of twenty (20) miles per hour and the Amended Final Plat shall show Clear Site Easements preserving all site distanced for this intersection. 3) Section XI.22, paragraph C, on page 43 of the Amended and Restated Guide to the Arrowhead at Vail Planned Unit Development shall be amended to read as follows: Maximum Building Height; for the areas within Tract D depicted on Appendix F; 75 feet, except for chimneys. All other areas within the Village Core; 45 feet, except for architectural features such as chimneys, towers and steeples. Chairman Phillips asked for public comment. There was none. Commissioner Stone moved to approve file number PDA-00010, Bachelor Gulch Village Arrowhead PUD, incorporating the proposed findings and staffs recommended conditions as read. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. VIS~OOOl, Fairgrounds Road John Venegrin presented file number VIS-0001, Fairgrounds Road, variance from improvement . standards. He stated this was a request to approve a petition for a Variance Permit from the Industrial Road Standards, established in Section 4-620.J of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations for the design of Fairgrounds Road. He stated the variance application was signed by Terrill Knight representing Western Mobile and Jim Hartman representing Eagle County. Mr. Venegrin stated the first issue is the designation of the road as industrial. Because there is industrial use going on there, it may have been thought to be industrial. He believes it is inappropriate to name it industrial for a temporary use. He spoke to the design standards and the desire to have it match to a standard in the table. He stated in reviewing the design standards, the rural residential collector for rolling terrain most closely matches the requirements. The last item referred to number four and the hardship of using more land than necessary. Ken Long, Isom & Associates, was present for the hearing. He spoke to the adoption of the new land use regulations. They have attempted to design something that best meets County needs. He spoke to the bike path and the desire to keep it separate. He spoke to the curb and gutter and the fact that it is not necessary. They are planning a road that meets the standards and will be beneficial to those it serves. Commissioner Johnson asked if the design standards are from the ASHTO or if they are a mixture with the Counties. He suggested they might want a design standard that is temporarily industrial so that you have a higher standard for servicing a gravel pit. He suggested you would have a larger platform than just on a regular rural road. He suggested the heavier truck traffic may require a larger platform but when the industry went away, it may be able to be reclaimed. He was speaking of future projects. Chairman Phillips suggested that curb and gutter aren't needed. Commissioner Johnson stated he agrees with staffs recommendation as this fits the needs for the fairgrounds. He spoke to the bike paths and the fact they may need to be required by the Board of County Commissioners. Mr. Vengrin read staff findings as follows: 1) The applicant has filed a petition for a Variance Permit from the Improvement Standards in conformance with the requirements of Section 45-260.G of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. 2) The petition has been properly advertised and is ready for consideration by the Board of County Commissioners. 3) The road design standard associated with the Functional Classification for Rural Residential Collector for rolling terrain designation would provide a road design that is equally durable and equally safe to the Industrial Road designation, but would be considerably less expensive and use less land. 23 06-01-1999 4) The applicant has demonstrated hardship to the public ifthere is strict adherence to the Industrial Road Functional Classification for Fairgrounds Road. Staff recommended the Board approve the request for a Variance Permit from the strict interpretation of the Road Improvements Standards in Section 4-620.J, Section 4-620.D and Appendix C, with the condition that the reconstruction of Fairgrounds Road shall be construction to the lesser standard associated with the Functional Classification of Rural Residential Collector for rolling terrain instead of Industrial Road. Commissioner Johnson suggested there be fifth finding that states that Fairgrounds Road was misclassified. Mr. Venegrin suggested the variance is not a reclassification. Commissioner Johnson suggested the variance is happening as there was a misclassification, thus the reason for the variance. Mr. Venegrin suggested the may need to change the determination and reclassify. Chairman Phillips suggested that it may identify for future applicants the reason for the variance being the road was misclassified in the first place. The Board concurred there will be finding number 5 as follows: 5) Fairgrounds Road was misclassified as an industrial road because it does not service any industrial zone and the industrial service is temporary. Chairman Phillips asked for comment from the applicant and public. There was none. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve file number VIS-0001, Fairgrounds Road, incorporating staff findings as amended. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. G-00008, Logan Park pun John Venegrin presented file number G-00008, Logan Park PUD, variance from improvement standards. He stated this was a request to approve a petition for a Variance Permit from the standards established in Section 4-620.J of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations for width of right-of-way, horizontal curvature, and vertical curvature requirements. The Variance Permit petition is in accordance -with Section 5-260.G and Section 4-61O.A.2 of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. He stated that this is a different number and the proper number should be VIS instead of G. He stated the road requested here has be designated as a rural access road. Oran & Paula Palmateer are applying for approval ofa Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan under File No. PDP-00013. The application is known as Logan Park PUD. He stated alternatives B through F are functional and meet the standards. Mr. Venegrin read staffs major concerns and issues as follows: The applicant's proposed design for the realignment of Edwards Cemetery Road will require several variances from the Geometric Standards for Road construction defined in Section 4- 620.1. In accordance with Section 5.260.G of the Land Use Regulations, the applicant has requested variances from the minimum required right-of-way, vertical curvature requirements and horizontal curvature requirements. The Board must decide whether or not to grant the Variance Permits for these deviations from the regulations. The Planning Commission is not required to hold hearings on these varIances. The Functional Classification of Cemetery Road (Edwards Cemetery Road), as defined in Appendix C of the Land Use Regulations, is Rural Access. Roads of this classification in Eagle County include Cattle Creek Road, Hooks Spur Road, Copper Spur Road and Turkey Creek Road. Roads of this type are rugged, dirt or gravel roads, characterized by lower speed limits and low traffic volumes. The geometric alignment of the roads typically follows the terrain resulting in a curving, rolling alignment. The standards required for the Rural Access type roadway are the lowest of all the road classification in 24 06-01-1999 .the Land Use Regulations. The proposed design does not meet the requirements ofthis lower classification and required variances. He has prepared examples of alternative designs that he believes could be implemented without variance from the road standards. These are attached as Alternatives B through F, Alternative A is the applicants proposed design. An evaluation of the merits of these Alternatives follows. This design required an undesirable sharp reverse horizontal curvature near the bridge which does not meet the road standards. The vertical curvature near the bridge also does not meet the road standards. It requires a retaining wall along the eastern boundary which will be an added maintenance responsibility for the Road & Bridge Department. Since the proposed road is much shorter than the existing road, yet must still make the same change in elevation from Highway 6 to the bridge, it is consequently much steeper. The plans call for a 10% gradient, whereas the existing road is about 5%. The proposed road will be north facing and sunk down into the earth where it will get significantly less solar exposure than the existing road, this causing greater winter maintenance responsibilities for the Road & Bridge Department. As stated above, the proposed alignment will keep all five units to the west of Edwards Cemetery Road. This also means that the private driveway will serve five units. Section 4-620.J.9.c (4) of the Land Use Regulations requires that a driveway should not serve more than three units. Unless this driveway is built to private road standards as required by Section 4-620.J, it is not in compliance with the Land Use Regulations. Alternative B moves the access to Highway 6 to the far western side of the parcel. The relocated portion of Edwards Cemetery Road can be constructed in accordance with the road standards. Greater public access to the river is possible. It eliminates the need for the front driveway since access to the lots can be from the rear. Lots 1,2 and 3 would need reconfiguration under this alternative. Alternative C is very similar to Alternative B. However, it isolates Lot 1 from the cluster. Alternative D is very interesting. Although it splits the cluster, it enables Lots 1 & 2 to be served by a private driveway along the north side, which is in accordance with the Land Use Regulations. Lots 3,4 and 5 could be served from Edwards Cemetery Road, thus eliminating the front driveway. The relocated portion of Edwards Cemetery Road can be construction in accordance with the road standards, and the access to highway 6 is very close to the location of the existing access. Alternative E is also very interesting. Although it also splits the cluster, it enables Lots 1 & 2 to be served by a private driveway along the north side, which is in accordance with the Land Use Regulations. Lots 4 & 5 could be served from Edwards Cemetery Road, or from their own private driveway. The relocated portion of Edwards Cemetery Road can be construction in accordance with the road standards, and the access to Highway 6 is very close to the location of the existing access. Alternative F isolates Lot 5 from the cluster and will result in a steeper alignment than the existing road. However, the relocated portion of Edwards Cemetery Road can be construction in accordance with the road standards and it does not require the retaining wall as does Alternative A. It is his opinion, alternative E is the best option for balancing the needs of the applicant with "those of the motorists of Eagle County. Alternative A is the least desirable. Of course Alternatives B - F require some reconfiguration of lot lines and other modification to the plans. However, they demonstrate that it is possible to provide the applicant with the requested upzoning without resorting to deviations from the road standards in the land use regulations. The availability of these alternatives also demonstrates that there is no hardship to the applicant in meeting the requirements of the road standards. Should the variances be granted and the proposed road relocation be approved, it would represent a step backward for the motorists of Eagle County. The proposed design does not meet the intent of Section 4-620 of the Land Use Regulations cited above. It will result in increased maintenance responsibilities for the Road and Bridge Department. It certainly does not enhance safety and functional 25 06-01-1999 needs by proposing steeper grades, tighter turns, and inadequate sight distance. The proposed design is not only less safe and effective than the regulations require, it is less safe and effective than the existing alignment of Edwards Cemetery Road. Commissioner Johnson asked about the dash line. Mr. Vengrin explained the dash line shows the alternatives. Chairman Phillips asked what staffs concerns are with alternative A. He stated staff also feels the standard for Cemetery Road, being the lowest standard, it is very difficult to make the finding that this road would provide equal or better service than the standard. He stated since there are alternative designs that do meet the standards, he does not feet the applicant has shown a hardship. Commissioner Johnson asked which standards they are asking a variance from. Mr. Vengrin stated right of way width, horizontal curvature, and the vertical alignment of the roadway. He explained the differences. Chairman Phillips stated some of those are listed in the findings. Tom Boni, Knight Planning Services, was present representing the Palmateers. He introduced Gran Palmateer and stated they did introduce the variance plan and the road application together. They have been split. He introduced Kevin Lindahl and Eric Tune from High Country Engineers. Gran Palmateer stated he and his wife own the property. He reiterated why they came at sketch plan with the location of their proposal. First is to act as a buffer between the property and the gas transmission line to the east of them. He stated some time ago, with the old road that runs through the property, he had concerns when the school district was building. He stated he and James walked that property and found the road to be a safety issue. He stated having the road along there from a planning point of view makes better sense than to divide the property. He spoke to the configuration as it is now with people backing out of parking spaces. He stated thirdly is the issue of whether the road is a legal road. He spoke to the history since he bought it in 1973. In their opinion the hardship is the fact the road goes through their property and exists at all. Bob Loeffler, Deputy County Attorney, asked about the pictures submitted to the Board and .asked for them to be explained. Mr. Boni shared while Mr. Palmateer was describing the area, he handed out photos of the area in question. Kevin Lindahl, representing the Palmateers, spoke to the background on the road. He reminded Johnnette and James they might remember the discussion they had at sketch plan. The County claims a prescriptive right to the use of the road by the public. The Palmateers don't necessarily agree. It has been used for access to the Miller Ranch, the cemetery and Jessie's tires. There has been an increased use on that road and people are now using it to access areas further than previously. He showed the area on a map and where the bridge crosses, which was built in 1930. He stated the road splits the parcel in half. He stated the road varies in width from 12 feet to 15 feet in some areas. It does not meet County standards. At sketch plan their desire was to settle the dispute as to whether the road is County or not. He explained the desire to dedicate land to the County to create a road. Staff had concerns about this proposal and that it would not meet County standards. The BoCC agreed to a thirty foot right of way. They believe that this is at least as good as the one that exists today. There is a comer of this road that would be untouched as it crosses the Donovan property and then returns to their property. Some of the issues in design, in the layout they were concerned about removing the easement from the middle of the property and cluster the houses on one side of the road. They want a design that won't interfere with the residents for safety and esthetic reasons. What they would get is a road constructed at 18 feet wide with two drainage ditches on each side. When they got sketch plan approval it was understood that this -would not meet County standards. Mr. Lindahl stated the hardships must be balanced against the health, safety and welfare and 26 06-01-1999 adverse impact on the lands. Mr. Lindahl explained there are no health, safety or welfare concerns being impacted. He explained the standards and the curve meeting those standards at 15 miles per hour. He spoke to the minimized impacts to the Eagle River. He stated their design meets Engineering safety standards. He explained the road design materials. Eric Tune, High Country Engineering, stated the two areas they are requesting variances from are the curvature and maintenance. He suggested the maintenance and the retaining wall are questionable. He stated they want to isolate one access point from the highway. He explained how the traffic moves now. This would eliminate other traffic from entering their site. He stated they did get stopping distance, the 10% grade being within the standards, and they also have provided a transition curve. He said the vertical curve is within ASHTO standards. Mr. Boni summarized by saying from an Engineering point of view this design works. He spoke to the location of the bridge and the need to avoid the gas service. He stated if they will look at the standards in the new regulations 5-27-G2, on page 557, it states that under standards the BoCC shall balance the hardships of not granting the variance with the adverse impact on the land and the health, safety and welfare. It is not the same section that speaks to the zoning. Here the BoCC has to consider the hardship by abiding by the regulations. Moving the road outside the development, there is a safety improvement. Their retaining wall has been engineered, is not high or terribly long. In fact they are .replacing an existing substandard road with a better road. Commissioner Johnson stated looking at the alternatives is looking at where the center line is and how far out it goes. He suggested there would be set back issues. He asked if all of the alternatives would allow for the development as proposed. Mr. Lindahl stated they couldn't do the development as proposed with any of the alternatives. He stated their proposed development doesn't work with any ofthe alternatives. Commissioner Johnson suggested that would be one of the hardships to take into consideration. He asked Eric McCafferty what the setback would be for a road such as this. Mr. McCafferty stated the standard set back would be 25 feet from the property edge. As this is a PUD they are proposing five feet but had originally proposed no set back. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. McCafferty ifhe had reviewed the alternatives. He asked which one or ones would allow for the PUD to go forward with the development as proposed as far as the number of units proposed. Mr. McCafferty stated he is not sure and didn't look at that with his analysis. He stated they would all have substantial effect on the development. He suggested alternative B might be possible. Mr. Vengrin stated these alternatives were not drawn for them to get the five buildings and the caretaker. He also clarified when the BaCC adopted the new land use regs it was not the intent to say that County roads don't meet the standards but that all new roads would be able to handle increased traffic. He stated these alternatives do not guarantee that they will meet County standards but that they .could meet the standards in most locations. He stated the applicants design will add another non conforming curve. He doesn't believe that it is safer than the existing condition. Chairman Phillips asked if Mr. Venegrin took the gas line into consideration. Mr. Venegrin stated there are no impacts caused on this site by the gas transmission facility. He stated there are no restrictions placed on the Palmateer property. Mr. Lindahl suggested Mr. Vengrin looked at this from a road perspective. Mr. Lindahl stated the biggest issue are the uses adjacent to the road. He doesn't believe that is being taken into consideration. Mr. Lindahl spoke to the reduction of the number of units by moving the road. He suggest there needs to be a balance eliminating the traffic from where the children are playing. He stated the gas transmission facility is not what was described by the company at the County meetings. Mr. Palmateer agreed to this as the need was there, but they didn't describe what they built. This is an attempt to mitigate some of the esthetics. Who wants their house next to that thing. 27 06-01-1999 Mr. Venegrin stated he is coming at this from a road standard perspective and not necessarily from a land use perspective. He would hate to see them waive the road standards for upzoning. Mr. Lindahl stated this is an opportunity to balance the other factors with the safety of the road. Commissioner Stone asked if they are suggesting they lower the standards from 20 miles per .hourto 15. Mr. Boni stated the existing road is posted at 15 miles per hour as well as a children's playing sign. He stated their design accommodates a 15 mile an hour road. Commissioner Stone stated in the previous application the road is designed for a higher speed than what is posted. He asked if it is being designed for a 15 mile per hour guideline. Mr. Boni stated yes it is designed at 15 miles per hour. Mr. Venegrin stated that would be an additional variance. Chairman Phillips stated the speed limit is currently 15 miles per hour and they are planning on designing a better road. Mr. Boni stated there is a driveway of some sort going across the river now. When they received sketch plan there were five conditions, none pertinent to this issue. They went to preliminary plan and understood they would replace the existing road with a better road but not have to build a County road. Commissioner Johnson questioned that requirement of another variance. Mr. Vengrin stated one of the standards is design speed which is the 11th standard from the top. He explained. Commissioner Johnson asked about the definition of rural access road and the statement of design and posting speeds of 15 to 25 miles per hour. Mr. Vengrin stated he would suggest the table would take precedence over the explanation as it is more explicit. He explained the preamble to the table stating the conformation to the table. Mr. Loeffler stated the fact is that the definition is explicit and says design so that it is not just traffic speed but design speed. It is hard to say which is the mistake. He disagreed with Mr. Vengrin. Commissioner Johnson stated if it were going to match the table the design speed would have to go up to 30 miles per hour. Mr. Vengrin agreed there are inconsistencies. Chairman Phillips asked if Mr. Vengrin considered the approved sketch plan. Mr. Vengrin stated he was only reviewing the demonstmtion of conforming design. He understood that they would later have to show they meet the re,\uirements. Commissioner Johnson asked what the Edwards access plan calls for at this location. Mr. Vengrin stated he recalls it makes a connection at Wmslow Ranch but does not specifically say there must be one at that point. Commissioner Johnson asked about the application for inprovement and replacement of Cemetery Road. Mr. Vengrin stated they have applied for money to study tlte need. Commissioner Johnson stated a part of his difficulty comes in when they look at the road placement of accessing the other side of the river. He stated if they need the road for something greater, they are talking suburban residential. He stated if they are looking .at it in a location in this area, do they have to acquire additional lands. He questioned if they do, would tIley need to adjust their development proposal. Mr. Vengrin stated if they are looking at replacing that road, they may need the right of way. Commissioner Johnson suggested granting the variance will not be close to the standard they will need. Mr. Vengrin agreed they will not meet the requirements. Mr. Loeffler stated he doesn't believe this can be looked for as a sight for the future river crossing. He stated the road does not serve that development but replaces a road that is already there. 28 06-01-1999 Mr. Venegrin stated he is coming at this from a road standard perspective and not necessarily from a land use perspective. He would hate to see them waive the road standards for upzoning. Mr. Lindahl stated this is an opportunity to balance the other factors with the safety of the road. Commissioner Stone asked if they are suggesting they lower the standards from 20 miles per hour to 15. Mr. Boni stated the existing road is posted at 15 miles per hour as well as a children's playing sign. He stated their design accommodates a 15 mile an hour road. Commissioner Stone stated in the previous application the road is designed for a higher speed than what is posted. He asked if it is being designed for a 15 mile per hour guideline. Mr. Boni stated yes it is designed at 15 miles per hour. Mr. Venegrin stated that would be an additional variance. . Chairman Phillips stated the speed limit is currently 15 miles per hour and they are planning on designing a better road. Mr. Boni stated there is a driveway of some sort going across the river now. When they received sketch plan there were five conditions, none pertinent to this issue. They went to preliminary plan and understood they would replace the existing road with a better road but not have to build a County road. Commissioner Johnson questioned that requirement of another variance. Mr. Vengrin stated one of the standards is design speed which is the 11 th standard from the top. He explained. Commissioner Johnson asked about the definition of rural access road and the statement of design and posting speeds of 15 to 25 miles per hour. Mr. Vengrin stated he would suggest the table would take precedence over the explanation as it is more explicit. He explained the preamble to the table stating the conformation to the table. Mr. Loeffler stated the fact is that the definition is explicit and says design so that it is not just traffic speed but design speed. It is hard to say which is the mistake. He disagreed with Mr. Vengrin. Commissioner Johnson stated if it were going to match the table the design speed would have to go up to 30 miles per hour. Mr. Vengrin agreed there are inconsistencies. Chairman Phillips asked if Mr. Vengrin considered the approved sketch plan. Mr. Vengrin stated he was only reviewing the demonstration of conforming design. He understood that they would later have to show they meet the requirements. Commissioner Johnson asked what the Edwards access plan calls for at this location. Mr. Vengrin stated he recalls it makes a connection at Winslow Ranch but does not specifically say there must be one at that point. Commissioner Johnson asked about the application for improvement and replacement of Cemetery Road. Mr. Vengrin stated they have applied for money to study the need. Commissioner Johnson stated a part of his difficulty comes in when they look at the road placement of accessing the other side of the river. He stated if they need the road for something greater, they are talking suburban residential. He stated if they are looking at it in a location in this area, do they have to acquire additional lands. He questioned if they do, would they need to adjust their development proposal. Mr. Vengrin stated if they are looking at replacing that road, they may need the right of way. Commissioner Johnson suggested granting the variance will not be close to the standard they will need. Mr. Vengrin agreed they will not meet the requirements. Mr. Loeffler stated he doesn't believe this can be looked for as a sight for the future river crossing. He stated the road does not serve that development but replaces a road that is already there. 28 06-01-1999 He suggested they look at this as a replacement of what they've got. Chairman Phillips suggested to put a road right in the middle of an approved development bothers her. She would like to see it stay on the edge. She suggested they look at lot five as far as future development. Commissioner Johnson stated this is not an approved development, it has conceptual approval. Chairman Phillips stated the sketch plan has been approved and the discussion on the road took place as were the five units approved. Diana Donovan was present for the hearing. She stated she owns the adjacent ten acres. She stated the bridge goes straight across the river. She stated she is here on her own. She stated they have been looking for a place for Honey Wagon and have researched this road a lot. She does not believe this is a public road. She stated there are private easement agreements with all owners. She stated there is no prescriptive easement by the users as they haven't been there long enough to do so. She spoke to the need for the bridge to come through this parcel. Public Service is there and can not be moved. She stated it is a horrible place to try to improve the bridge. The two banks are at different heights. She stated their or the Palmateers property will have to be condemned. She believes they will have to have a secondary approach. This will not work or be safe. She stated as a hardship it is one to turn a private driveway into a public road, serving Singletree and Berry Creek. What they are suggesting is a hugh .improvement in safety, but it is definitely a hardship requiring them to put a road through their property to access property across the river. Mr. Venegrin read staff findings as follows: 1) The applicant has filed a petition a Variance Permit from the Improvement Standards in conformance with the requirements of Section 5-260-G. 2) The petition has been properly advertised and is ready for consideration by the Board of County Commissioners. 3) The road design proposed by the applicant is not equally durable nor equally safe as the design standard for the Rural Access Road designation, and will be more difficult to maintain. The Rural Access designation has the lowest design standards of any County Road Functional Classification. 4) The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship in complying with the land use regulations. Alternative designs that meet the Rural Access Road standards and allow the applicant to develop the property are available. Staff recommended the Board deny the request for a Variance Permit from the Road Improvements Standards in Section 4-620.J, Section 4-620.D and Appendix C. The applicant has not demonstrated that the proposed road design provides an equivalent level of durability and public safety as the required road standard. The applicant, also, has not demonstrated the nature of the exceptional and undue hardship that compliance with the road standards would bring upon them. Chairman Phillips asked for further comment or questions. Mr. Lindahl responded to the findings stating they believe they have demonstrated hardships and especially so with the alternative designs presented. In staffs recommendation they are suggesting a requirement to demonstrate the nature of the exceptional and undue hardship that compliance with the road standards would bring upon them. They believe the Board must balance the hardships against the public benefits and they think they have clearly met the required standards. Commissioner Johnson stated he doesn't know that staffhas shown sufficient evidence that this is a County Road and if not then they are discussing a driveway. He suggests there has been evidence presented that this is not a prescriptive easement but a held road with private easements. Mr. Venegrin stated the County does own the bridge and there is a thirty foot strip of land described that the County maintains. He stated it is as well on the County Road inventory. Commissioner Stone stated that doesn't necessarily verify anything. Mr. Loeffler stated the real world matter is that a lot ofthe roads can't be documented. He stated 29 06-01-1999 this mayor may not be on the 1913 map. He stated frequently and often the evidence is that it has been maintained. Chairman Phillips spoke to the private easement agreements. Commissioner Johnson questioned the submission with a preliminary plan. Mr. Boni explained that the Planning Commission tabled the variance agreement and the two files got split. Mr. McCafferty explained the determination of the preliminary plan is to be heard after this has .been determined. Commissioner Johnson asked about another variance and the advertising of such. Mr. Loeffler stated that may happen at the final plat stage. Commissioner Johnson clarified there would be another hearing. Mr. Lindahl stated they are aware of that and the timing will need to be worked out. Commissioner Stone stated he would move that the Board approve the variance file number G- 00008, Logan Park PUD for the following reasons, changing staff findings 1) The applicant has filed a petition a Variance Permit from the Improvement Standards in conformance with the requirements of Section 5-260-G. 2) The petition has been properly advertised and is ready for consideration by the Board of County Commissioners. 3) The applicant has demonstrated a hardship in complying with the land use regulations. 4) The board finds there is no adverse impact on the health safety and welfare on the persons this effects or the citizens of Eagle county. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. Commissioner Stone stated though they are trying to upgrade the standards, he does not see any proof that this is a County road and future uses for this road will have to be taken into consideration at the time. Commissioner Johnson stated that in looking into the future most would appreciate the County 'having their checkbook ready as well. Chairman Phillips called for the question on the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until June 14, 1999. Attest: Clerk ~ 30 06-01-1999