HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 01/16/96
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
EAGLE, COLORADO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
FORM 50 HOECKEL'S 387869
PUBLIC HEARING
JANUARY 16, 1996
Present: James Jolmson, Jr.
Johnnette Phillips
Sara J. Fisher
Commissioner
Commissioner
Clerk to the Board
Absent: George "Bud" Gates
Chairman
This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented
to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration:
Plat & Resolution Signing
Kathy Eastley, Planning Technician, presented the following plats and
resolutions to be signed:
01) SM-I000-95, Columbine Townhomes. She stated this is a Minor
Type "B" Subdivision, a re-subdivision of Eagle-Vail, Filing 1, Lot 103,
Block 3, to create four lots. A variance was granted for this lot due to
setback encroachments. The resolution for the variance has not yet been
signed. Staff is recommending approval.
commissioner Jolmson moved to approve final plat, file number SM-I000-
95, Columbine Townhomes and authorized the Chair Pro-tem to sign once the
resolution is signed.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting
commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous.
02) SM-I020-95, Arrowhead at Vail, Filing #19, Lot 29. She stated
this was a Minor Type "B" Subdivision, a re-subdivision of Lot 29 to create
Lots 29A and 29B. This plat does contain the Duplex Split Caveat, which
states only one two-family residence may be constructed on the combined area
of the lots.
Commissioner Johnson moved to approve final plat file number SM-I020-95,
Arrowhead at Vail, Filing #19, Lot 29.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting
Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous.
03) PD-I08-95-AF2, Berry Creek Ranch, Filing 4, Lots 46A and 46B,
Block 1. She stated this is a correction plat necessitated by a technical
correction in the common lot line between these two lots. ThlS correct plat
is presented for approval pursuant to the Eagle County Land Use Regulation
Section 2.19.03(2).
Commissioner Jolmson moved to approve final plat file number PD-I08-95-
AF2, Berry Creek Ranch, Filing 4, Lots 46A and 46B, Block 1.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting
commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous.
04) Resolution 96-07, file number ZS-343-95-S, St. Clare of Assisi
Parish. She stated this was a resolution for approval of a POD Sketch Plan
which would allow for the conditional development of a Church, Early Learning
Center, Elementary School, Rectory, Carrpus Maintenance and twenty housing
units.
Commissioner Johnson moved to approve Resolution 96-07, file number ZS-
343-95-S, St. Clare of Assisi Parish.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting
commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous.
05) Resolution 96-08, file number PD-293-95-A and PD-293-95-S,
Amendment to the Cordillera POD. She stated this was a resolution for
approval of a POD amendment to add 320 acres, the Bearden Parcel, into the
POD and to reallocate 65 dwelling units to this parcel from the existing
approved zoning.
Commissioner Jolmson moved to approve Resolution 96-08, file numbers PD-
293-95-A and PD-293-95-S, Amendment to the Cordillera POD.
1
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting
Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous.
ZS-362-95, Eagle Wings Property
Paul Clarkson, Planner, presented file number ZS-362-95, Eagle Wings
Property. He stated this was a request for a contractors storage and auto
salvage. He explained the applicant is planning to request a tabling. What
is the Board's pleasure.
commissioner Jolmson moved to table file number ZS-362-95, Eagle Wings
Property for thirty days.
Jim Fritze, County Attorney, stated this would be at the applicant's
request based on the telephone call.
Mr. Clarkson stated February 20, 1996 would be the new hearing date.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting
Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous.
Wendy's Tourist Oriented Signs
Paul Clarkson presented the next item on the agenda, Wendy's Tourist
Oriented Directional Signs in EI Jebel. He stated this was a request for
approval and signature on a Colorado Department of Transportation application
for Tourist Oriented si$I1s on Highway 82. He indicated he has not heard from
the applicant and anticlpated he would be at the hearing. What he is asking
for is an 18 x 72 square inch sign to be placed on a current sign. This is
different than what has been heard before. COOT refers to this as a specific
business and informational sign. The TODD sign is intended for rural areas
only. The EI Jebel area still meets the definition of rural. Staff has
listed three sections of the land use regulations which are relevant in this
issue. The business plaque does use logos. Mr. Clarkson continued to review
the application. He referred to the Zoning Board of Adjustment's
recommendation. The concern for precedent should be considered in this case.
In spite of the applicant's concern, visibility does not I?rovide enough of a
problem. COOT does require the Board's signature and thelr approval by
resolution.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips asked if there is another sign there.
Mr. Clarkson stated there is not one for any specific business, they are
more generic. Mr. Clarkson described the sign.
Commissioner Johnson moved to deny the application to the Colorado
Department of Transportation for tourist directional oriented signs on
Highway 82 in El Jebel.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting
Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous.
ZS-374-95, Hidden Treasure Adventures
Kathy Eastley presented file number ZS-374-95, Hidden Treasure
Adventures. She stated this was a request for a recreational facility for
overnight accommodations provided to cross-country skiers, hikers and
equestrians. She explained the application to the Board. The applicants,
RalI?h and Terry Thomas, were present for the hearing. Ms. Eastley stated the
facllity currently exists on this site and is a fully outfitted yurt. The
applicants are proposing a commercial activity. It lS a combined area of
four mining claims and the proposed zoning is resource. The issues and
concern are with proximity to the Holy Cross Wilderness area. There are
concerns with overuse. The US forest service has granted a limited access
permit. Concern with the wildlife to the area is an issue. The row has
recommended some conditions. The application for a building permit has been
an issue. When the Yurt was built a permit was not required. The decking
must be permitted as it is required. This file was presented to the Eagle
County Planning commission and they adopted staffs findinss and conditions.
Staff recommended approval with the following conditlons:
01) The parcel of land proposed for this facility is described as
the Left Bower, Hidden Treasure, Right Bower and Receiver Lodes mining claims
located in the Fulford Minins District. This area shall be limited to the
use of this recreational facllity on a minimum area of 36 acres, which shall
be allowed a maximum of one yurt. The yurt shall be limited to a maximum of
2
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
EAGLE, COLORADO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
FORM 50 HOECKEL'S 387869
eisht beds. The location of the ~rt shall remain consistent with the
bUllding permit site plan as provlded by the applicant to the Eagle County
Building Division.
02) The yurt may not be used for commercial purposes until such
time as a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Eagle County Building
Official and the United States Forest Service access easement is granted.
03) Access shall be limited to non-motorized vehicles except for
use by the owners to resupply the yurt and as necessary to provide
maintenance to the facility.
04) No equestrian uses associated with the overnight lodging
facility shall be permitted.
05) No domestic animals shall be permitted on this property.
06) Peripheral fencing shall be as recommended by the Colorado
Division of wildlife
07) Any outside storage of trash or garbage shall be in bear-proof
containers which meet North American Bear Society, CDOW or U.S. National Park
Service Specifications.
08) There shall be no dumps or underground disposal of refuse on
the site.
09) With the exception of bird feeders, the feeding, baitin9,
salting or other means of attracting wildlife to the property is prohlbited.
10) The applicants hereby waive the right to any future wildlife
damage claims against the Division of Wildlife, State of Colorado.
11) All disturbed areas shall be reseeded or replanted with native
plant species originally present in the sub-alpine environment. Neither
ornamental nor non-native species of plants shall be permitted on the site.
The Planning Commission recommends a semi-annual project report be
submitted and the special use permit should expire three years from the date
of approval. The project report came about as the Tenth Mountain Division
requires this of their huts. The Planning Commission did not direct staff as
to what should be contained in the report.
The three year expiration came about as a means for staff to review with
the applicant the area and the purpose of its use.
Commissioner Jolmson stated a special use permit is an annual renewal
process.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips asked if they would then reapply after the
third year.
Ms. Eastley stated they would be providing the annual reports which
would contain numbers of use, what sort of upgrades were done, maintenance
and corrplaints.
Ralph Thomas, applicant, stated they are offering an alternative to the
visitors to Eagle County. This will be more intimate. They are asking for
eight beds. They are looking at groups of 4 - 6. It's a nice alternative
without having to carry in extra equipment. They would like to offer
educational seminars there in the future. Mr. Thomas stated having to come
throuSh this process again in three years is asking too much as well as the
additlonal $550.00. He understands the governing bodies on the use. He has
established a trial head on their property. He feels they are in full
corrpliance with the forest service. The equestrian use is a concern for them
and they would like to offer that use. They believe the surrounding
environment will not cause a problem for boarding.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips asked if the outfitters would be providing the
water and feed.
Mr. Thomas stated they are required to meet certain regulations as is.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips questioned snow melt for cooking and drinking
in the winter. She believes water should be provided.
Mr. Thomas stated in the summer they would set up a container and fill
from his truck. They would collect rain water. Mr. Thomas explained snow
melt is regularly used in the hut system.
CUrt Oakley, resident of Minturn, encouraged the Commissioners approval.
He stated this Yurt is a very small business and fits into the County's
master plan. It is unique, more geared toward couples and small groups.
Impact should be minimal as there is no corrpetition factor. As far as the
impact to the wilderness, this type of facility should be encouraged rather
3
than larger facilities or individual carrps. He I d rather see horses and the
equestrian facility centralized. The size of the facility on 36 acres should
not cause an irrpact. Mr. Oakley stated the Thomas' are terrific keepers of
the back country.
Jolm Seiple, area resident, read a letter from folks who used the Polar
Star hut, which corrplimented the facilities. They went on to write about the
Yurt and the close proximity of this to the Polar Star. Mr. Seiple referred
to pase four of staff's findings. Mr. Seiple stated a limitation to eight
beds lS not enough of a mitigation. Mr. Seiple believes there will be
conflicts of the water use available. He is on water on a year round basis.
He asked if the grey water has been addressed. He is concerned how this can
detrimentally effect his water supply. Page 7, item 2, states the
certificate of occupancy must be issued prior to commercial use. Mr. Seiple
asked if the Board had heard the planning commission tapes. Mr. Seiple
explained the closure of the road in 1991. Mr. Thomas drove over it and took
an outhouse up there as well as a building. Mr. Seiple felt the outhouse is
a threat to his water supply.
Commissioner Johnson asked if the grey water situation had been looked
at.
Ray Merry, Eagle County Environmental Health, stated their aPI?lication
has not shown any drain lines. He has not been there. The privy lS a
concern. The equestrian uses can be very irrpacti ve as evidenced at Piney
Lake. He encourages the Board to keep the irrpacts in mind unless we can
evaluate these areas. Regarding the water, Mr. Merry pointed out there may
be a question as to what type of water source there is. It is considered a
public water supply it may require testing.
Mr. Thomas stated they collect water in a five gallon bucket and they
use the privy for disposal.
Mr. Merry stated vault privy are a minimum of 400 capacity and they are
not usually receiving water. The applicant has I?ut in a septic system. Mr.
Merry stated he would need an engineer's evaluatlon.
Terry Thomas, applicant, stated they are looking at this at the same
time. Next summer they are planning on using deep rock water. They can't
afford to dig a well now. The horses would only be there two months in the
summer and perhaps two to four horses. They would like to have that option.
Peter Looram, Tenth Mountain Division Hut Association, spoke to the
question of when is enough enough in a concentrated area. In the summer, in
their huts, they sometimes have to cut back on the irrpact. Mr. Looram asked
if it is ten or eight beds.
Ms. Eastley stated they are recommendins a maximum on eight beds.
Mr. Looram stated unless the applicant lS up there on a regular basis,
disposal of grey water doesn't happen.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips asked about restroom facilities in the 10th
mountain huts.
Mr. Looram responded they have two one thousand sealed vault tanks. He
stated pumping out of the vaults is not a problem.
Mr. Merry stated the problem with the on site vault systems is the odor.
To come up with a well ventilated engineered system is the solution.
James Close, caretaker Polar Star, discussed an encounter with Mr.
Thomas and the signage for rental. Mr. Close stated in December he called
and asked about the rental of the Yurt, rates, etc. Mr. Close stated he
rented the Yurt from them for the 12th of this month paying a $100.00
minimum. He brought a copy of the cancelled check. Mr. close went up there
on the 10th and took pictures. He sees a blatant disregard to the process.
Ms. Eastley stated she was at this site in September and she saw no
signs at that point. She does know that the Thomas' have been working on a
brochure. Mrs. Phillips asked if there is a CO at this time. Ms. Eastley
responded no.
Carl Darnell, local business owner and Yurt user, stated Ralph and Terry
are well meaning people trying to start a small business. He has stayed at
the Polar Star. He does not see this as a big issue. On the equestrian
issue, they are talking about a few horses during a short time of year. Why
not use the annual permit instead of requiring them to come back in three
years and go through this process again. He understands Jolm' s concerns and
lf there are problems, the bi-annual review should take care of that. Terry
and RaII?h will do anything they can to do a good job. He feels the Planning
Commisslon is putting a lot of undo requirements on the applicant.
4
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
EAGLE, COLORADO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
FORM 50 HOECKEL'S 387869
Commissioner Jolmson responded to Mr. Darnell's statements regarding
government. He does feel the grey water is an issue and wants to know how
that is going to be dealt with. A brochure to users would be helpful. He
would like to see the semi-annual reports and believes if we are going to
look at these types of uses, we need the tract record. He would like to
strike the condition regarding the use of horses. The semi-annual reporting
should take care. He would like it to be an allowed use unless it cannot be
supported during the semi-annual review. He would also amend #9, even bird
feeders are not allowed. He would also put the responsibility on Community
Development to check this annually so it can be determined what the irrpacts
really are. Chairman Johnson asked about ADA. Commissioner Johnson stated
federal regulations require corrpliance whether private or public. He stated
this is not a condition but a recommendation.
Terry Thomas stated the Forest Service will not allow them use of the
road to make it accessible.
Discussion continued on the application.
Commissioner Jolmson moved to table file number ZS-374-95, Hidden
Treasure Adventures to January 30, 1996 for additional submittal's regarding
equestrian use and grey water disposal until January 30, 1996.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting
Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous.
ZS-379-95, Contractors Storage
Pattie Haefeli, Planning Teclmician, presented file number ZS-379-95,
Contractors Storage. She stated this was a request for a maintenance
building. She explained the application to the Board. The request is coming'
from Eagle County Buildings and Grounds and Road and Bridge. Ms. Haefeli
explained the history of the site from gravel pit to now. The County
purchased the land from the BLM and they want to construct a maintenance
storage facility. The county is responsible for revegetation. The site is
limited to a cistern water supply. No irrpacts to surrounding lands. The
closest neighbor is 4/10 of a mile away. There has been some vandalism. Ms.
Haefeli read Staff findings and conditions. The Planning Commission
requested an additional condition to screen from the Colorado River Road.
Mike Bradley, Buildings and Grounds supervisor, stated the one issue to
consider is the site is hidden on three sides. There is less than 50 yards
where you can actually see a part of the site. Shielding of this site is
helpful in reducing vandalism. There have been problems alons the Colorado
River Road. He asked the Board to waive the condition regardlng hiding the
site.
Commissioner Jolmson questioned vandalism.
Mr. Bradley stated if you I?ut up screening in front of the site you
provide the vandal the opportunlty to break in. Mr. Bradley stated having it
open to view will provide some security. Mr. Bradley shared the different
types of vandalism.
Commissioner Johnson asked if this were a private developer would
screening be required. The Planning Commission suggested screening of things
not stored in the facility.
Mr. Bradley stated this is approximately 2.9 acres with a small portion
available for storage.
Ms. Haefeli stated it is visible from the river road but not at all from
the other side.
Don Fessler, Road & Bridse Supervisor, stated they are not changing the
use of the site except by addlng a building. They've used the site since
1985. This will just clean it up and get rid of the equipment. Mr. Fessler
stated if they are required to have a fence, he would want a wooden cedar
fence that will withstand the wind. He wants to set away from chain link.
Commissioner Johnson asked about storage behlnd the building.
Mr. Fessler suggested once the building is up, perhaps they can revisit
this issue. Once the building is up they can move things around.
Commissioner Jolmson asked how long it will take to construct the building.
Mr. Bradley responded the contract has a completion date of June 1,
5
1996.
commissioner Jolmson sugsested they follow Mr. Fessler's recommendation
until they are able to do a slte visit.
COmmlssioner Jolmson moved to approve file number ZS-379-95, Contractors
Storage, incorporating staff findings and staff recommendations with
conditions, adding a decision regarding screening to be made by September,
1996 following a field trip by the Board and the Planning COmmlssion.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion.
Jim Fritze suggested perhaps they want to leave this with the Board as
this may seem to create a precedent wlth the County being the applicant. Mr.
Fritze sugsested they exclude the Planning commission and sugsested the Board
approve thlS as owner of the property rather than as a conditlon.
Commissioner Jolmson amended his motion as stated by Mr. Fritze.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the amendment. Of the two voting
Commissioners the vote was declared unanimous.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips called for the question on the motion. Of the
two voting Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous.
PD-311-95-A, Blue Ridge POD Amendment
Paul Clarkson presented file number PD-311-95-A, Blue Ridge POD
Amendment. He stated this aI?plication is to remove a Preliminary Plan
condition which requires dedlcation of right-of-way through neighboring
property to Highway 82/Willits Lane intersection. This POD Amendment
application is intended to perform two functions: 1) seek complete relief
from the preliminary plan condition of approval requiring dedication and
collateralization of Blue Ridse Lane form the east edge of Phase I through
the Ace Lane property to the lntersection of Highway 82 and the proposed
realigned willits Lane, and 2) adjust the approved phasing plan effectively
switching the approved Phases II and III.
Mr. Clarkson explained the chronology of the file and the site data. He
reviewed the application and the referrals. The county engineer responded to
the referral. He listed statements that were on the staff report. This
issue, the removal of the condition of the requirement, is not a new issue.
It has been discussed many times with the planning commission and before this
board. The minutes support that. It is staff's contention the original
proposal provided for the road. It was part of the sketch plan and the
preliminary plan. Effecting this frontage road has been in the plans and
remains sood, long range planning. Mr. Clarkson reiterated this road has
been an lntricate part of the proposal. Removing the condition changes the
entire proposal. He susgested if removed it go back to sketch plan.
Mr. Clarkson questloned the applicant's desire to switch phases and
staff is not considering that request in it's recommendations. Staff
recommended denial.
Commissioner Johnson asked what the planning commissions recommendation
was?
Mr. Clarkson responded they recommended denial based on the proposal has
always been reviewed with this as an integral part.
Steve Isom, representing the applicant, showed the original plan as it
was submitted. This was originally a dead end road. The roadway was
penciled in. Mr. Isom stated when they came back in with Ace Lane, they
questioned what would happen if one of the developers did not corrplete the
project. Ace Lane has his property for sale and understands he cannot get a
final plat until he fills that condition. Mr. Isom stated the road is not
needed for each project but for both projects when corrpleted. They would
like to find a way for Kevin and Tammy to start on their commercial area.
Mr. Isom showed the phases of the development as they are now. They are
asking to start the far end commercial now and not build the other until Ace
Lane comes in. They would like to do phase I and II without the right-of-way
and he knows he can't build until he grants that right-of-way. Mr. Isom
reminded the Board this expires in three years.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips asked what problems the planning department
has.
Mr. Clarkson stated from sketch plan, sprins of 1993, the proposal has
always included and been labeled "future connectlon to willits Lane". The
sketch plan was conditioned with the frontage road as part of the project.
Mr. Clarkson read the other conditions which refer to the road.
6
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
EAGLE, COLORADO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
FORM 50 HOECKEL'S 387869
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips reviewed her recollection.
Commissioner Johnson stated one of the original conditions was the road
and it having to be done immediately. That condition was amended. He
discussed the condemnation agreements made previously. He stated there was
an agreement between the parties and it was part of the Resolution.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips reiterated the whole discussion from the start
included Ace Lane.
Phil Scott, Engineering Technician, stated from the beginning and with
all subsequent traffic studies, there has been a frontage road outlined for
that area. Allowing for community circulation has been the goal.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips questioned the road without the development.
Mr. Scott stated he has not talked with the Tucker's traffic engineer,
but in reviewing all of the historical data, he does not agree with the 1 -
2% increase in traffic if the road does not go through. Mr. Scott stated it
is more than if Ace Lane is there, using Matt's #'s used in the traffic
study, a figure of 13%, they are estimating 336 vehicles. Mr. Scott referred
to a December 1993 study. Mr. Scott reviewed the figures and the Board's
adoption of road level C. This road operates at a level of service B now.
Mr. Scott read from the studies and indicated any small increase will reduce
the level of service with Blue Ridge alone.
Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Isom to remind him of the Kodiak Park
development phasing. Mr. Isom stated it is 12,000 square feet of commercial.
Mr. Isom stated Mr. Scott's report does not take into consideration the
irrprovements on EI Jebel road as a result of Wendy's.
Mr. Scott stated their plans included the Frontage road. Ace's project
will be less than 10%. They are trying to bleed traffic off from the EI
Jebel intersection. Under the existing conditions, and there have been
improvements which have been implemented, it won't take much to get to an
unacceptable level.
Mr. Clarkson stated this proposal is approaching its third year and Mr.
Isom's request to extend will need to be considered.
Mr. Clarkson stated the area for this proposal has changed significantly
in the last two years. While this won't have the percentage of irrpact of two
years ago, the irrpact is still high. Staff would feel very uncomfortable in
changing the nature of the proposal. It si$I1ificantly alters it. Whether or
not the road can work without the intersectlon is only part of the question.
The reason this road was so stronsly advanced by the planning staff, was the
applicant volunteered it. This klnd of development must be on a flow through
access.
Commissioner Johnson reviewed the situation and suggested the need for a
traffic study.
Kevin Tucker, applicant, believes the road has to go through there.
What they would like to do is start their project and defer the building of
the road until they have some commercial development. Working with Ace is
like hitting a stone wall. They would like to start the project, not build
out, and then complete the road when the development is underway.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips sees the road as happening eventually.
Whoever buys may have a different plan. A request to amend the phasing is
what is the issue.
Mr. Clarkson stated the first phase is the same and that is where the
road issue comes into play. He stated they would like to see how much
development can take place without the road and questions the incentive for
the applicant to build the road.
Commissioner Phillips stated she knows it will be required, it's a
matter of when. The stumbling block is they have not been able to work
together.
Commissioner Johnson stated he needs to see a current traffic study
rather than the 1993 numbers with the addendum.
Mr. Isom stated they have no objection to revising their numbers. He
doesn't want to go through the costs if the Board is not going to consider
the request.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips asked if community development would
reconsider their stand if the numbers are such to allow for some development
without the road.
7
Mr. Clarkson stated right now, they have nothing to indicate the
errployee housing will ever be built. The change in phasing is farther
reachlng than allowing the development to proceed.
Mr. Isom reviewed their intentions. They would not have an obj ection to
tabling this until a traffic study can be done. A main concern with Ace Lane
is not seeing the hotel go in because much of this commercial will be based
on that.
Phil Scott stated they need to update the intersection studies. He
stated their manuals, requlrements, etc. have been uPdated. The applicant is
running a risk of seeing numbers that show build out now.
Commissioner Jolmson asked Mr. Fritze if there are not two different
items before them now. He asked if the planning commission denied both of
the issues and if they discussed phasing. He questioned sending it back to
the plannins commission.
Mr. Frltze stated the planning commission has ruled on both of these
things.
Mr. Clarkson stated the planning commission considered the applicant's
request on the right-of-way but not on the phasing. He stated there was no
hearing on switching the phasing.
Mr. Scott suggested the latest resources be used in the traffic study.
Commissioner Jolmson suggested the phasing issue go to the planning
commission while this is going on.
Mr. Fritze suggested they persue the extension.
Commissioner Johnson moved to table file number PD-311-95-A, Blue Ridge
PUD Amendment for one month to February 20, 1996 for the Board to hear the
portion which seeks relief from dedication and to request the planning
commission give a recommendation on the phasing.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting
Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous.
Consent Calendar
Chairman Gates stated the next item on the agenda was the consent
calendar as follows:
01) Bill paying for January 15, 1995
02) Payroll for January 18, 1995.
03) Intergovernmental Agreement Between Eagle county, State of
Colorado and the Town of Eagle for Building Inspection Services
04) Intergovernmental Agreement between Easle County , State of
Colorado and the Town of Gypsum for Building Inspectlon services.
Commissioner Jolmson moved to approve the consent calendar as I?resented.
Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two votlng
Commissioners the vote was declared unanimous.
Cellular for the Cammmity Award Presentation to Echo Ranch.
Craig Goudy, A T & T representative, presented the next item on the
agenda, cellular for the community award I?resentation to Echo Ranch. This
year they have received over 300 applicatlons. One of the new organizations
selected is Echo Ranch. He presented a cellular phone to Paul Barben of Echo
Ranch.
Attest:
C
~~.v+dL
Chal
8