Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 01/16/96 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EAGLE, COLORADO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS FORM 50 HOECKEL'S 387869 PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 16, 1996 Present: James Jolmson, Jr. Johnnette Phillips Sara J. Fisher Commissioner Commissioner Clerk to the Board Absent: George "Bud" Gates Chairman This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: Plat & Resolution Signing Kathy Eastley, Planning Technician, presented the following plats and resolutions to be signed: 01) SM-I000-95, Columbine Townhomes. She stated this is a Minor Type "B" Subdivision, a re-subdivision of Eagle-Vail, Filing 1, Lot 103, Block 3, to create four lots. A variance was granted for this lot due to setback encroachments. The resolution for the variance has not yet been signed. Staff is recommending approval. commissioner Jolmson moved to approve final plat, file number SM-I000- 95, Columbine Townhomes and authorized the Chair Pro-tem to sign once the resolution is signed. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. 02) SM-I020-95, Arrowhead at Vail, Filing #19, Lot 29. She stated this was a Minor Type "B" Subdivision, a re-subdivision of Lot 29 to create Lots 29A and 29B. This plat does contain the Duplex Split Caveat, which states only one two-family residence may be constructed on the combined area of the lots. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve final plat file number SM-I020-95, Arrowhead at Vail, Filing #19, Lot 29. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. 03) PD-I08-95-AF2, Berry Creek Ranch, Filing 4, Lots 46A and 46B, Block 1. She stated this is a correction plat necessitated by a technical correction in the common lot line between these two lots. ThlS correct plat is presented for approval pursuant to the Eagle County Land Use Regulation Section 2.19.03(2). Commissioner Jolmson moved to approve final plat file number PD-I08-95- AF2, Berry Creek Ranch, Filing 4, Lots 46A and 46B, Block 1. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. 04) Resolution 96-07, file number ZS-343-95-S, St. Clare of Assisi Parish. She stated this was a resolution for approval of a POD Sketch Plan which would allow for the conditional development of a Church, Early Learning Center, Elementary School, Rectory, Carrpus Maintenance and twenty housing units. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve Resolution 96-07, file number ZS- 343-95-S, St. Clare of Assisi Parish. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. 05) Resolution 96-08, file number PD-293-95-A and PD-293-95-S, Amendment to the Cordillera POD. She stated this was a resolution for approval of a POD amendment to add 320 acres, the Bearden Parcel, into the POD and to reallocate 65 dwelling units to this parcel from the existing approved zoning. Commissioner Jolmson moved to approve Resolution 96-08, file numbers PD- 293-95-A and PD-293-95-S, Amendment to the Cordillera POD. 1 Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. ZS-362-95, Eagle Wings Property Paul Clarkson, Planner, presented file number ZS-362-95, Eagle Wings Property. He stated this was a request for a contractors storage and auto salvage. He explained the applicant is planning to request a tabling. What is the Board's pleasure. commissioner Jolmson moved to table file number ZS-362-95, Eagle Wings Property for thirty days. Jim Fritze, County Attorney, stated this would be at the applicant's request based on the telephone call. Mr. Clarkson stated February 20, 1996 would be the new hearing date. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. Wendy's Tourist Oriented Signs Paul Clarkson presented the next item on the agenda, Wendy's Tourist Oriented Directional Signs in EI Jebel. He stated this was a request for approval and signature on a Colorado Department of Transportation application for Tourist Oriented si$I1s on Highway 82. He indicated he has not heard from the applicant and anticlpated he would be at the hearing. What he is asking for is an 18 x 72 square inch sign to be placed on a current sign. This is different than what has been heard before. COOT refers to this as a specific business and informational sign. The TODD sign is intended for rural areas only. The EI Jebel area still meets the definition of rural. Staff has listed three sections of the land use regulations which are relevant in this issue. The business plaque does use logos. Mr. Clarkson continued to review the application. He referred to the Zoning Board of Adjustment's recommendation. The concern for precedent should be considered in this case. In spite of the applicant's concern, visibility does not I?rovide enough of a problem. COOT does require the Board's signature and thelr approval by resolution. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips asked if there is another sign there. Mr. Clarkson stated there is not one for any specific business, they are more generic. Mr. Clarkson described the sign. Commissioner Johnson moved to deny the application to the Colorado Department of Transportation for tourist directional oriented signs on Highway 82 in El Jebel. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. ZS-374-95, Hidden Treasure Adventures Kathy Eastley presented file number ZS-374-95, Hidden Treasure Adventures. She stated this was a request for a recreational facility for overnight accommodations provided to cross-country skiers, hikers and equestrians. She explained the application to the Board. The applicants, RalI?h and Terry Thomas, were present for the hearing. Ms. Eastley stated the facllity currently exists on this site and is a fully outfitted yurt. The applicants are proposing a commercial activity. It lS a combined area of four mining claims and the proposed zoning is resource. The issues and concern are with proximity to the Holy Cross Wilderness area. There are concerns with overuse. The US forest service has granted a limited access permit. Concern with the wildlife to the area is an issue. The row has recommended some conditions. The application for a building permit has been an issue. When the Yurt was built a permit was not required. The decking must be permitted as it is required. This file was presented to the Eagle County Planning commission and they adopted staffs findinss and conditions. Staff recommended approval with the following conditlons: 01) The parcel of land proposed for this facility is described as the Left Bower, Hidden Treasure, Right Bower and Receiver Lodes mining claims located in the Fulford Minins District. This area shall be limited to the use of this recreational facllity on a minimum area of 36 acres, which shall be allowed a maximum of one yurt. The yurt shall be limited to a maximum of 2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EAGLE, COLORADO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS FORM 50 HOECKEL'S 387869 eisht beds. The location of the ~rt shall remain consistent with the bUllding permit site plan as provlded by the applicant to the Eagle County Building Division. 02) The yurt may not be used for commercial purposes until such time as a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Eagle County Building Official and the United States Forest Service access easement is granted. 03) Access shall be limited to non-motorized vehicles except for use by the owners to resupply the yurt and as necessary to provide maintenance to the facility. 04) No equestrian uses associated with the overnight lodging facility shall be permitted. 05) No domestic animals shall be permitted on this property. 06) Peripheral fencing shall be as recommended by the Colorado Division of wildlife 07) Any outside storage of trash or garbage shall be in bear-proof containers which meet North American Bear Society, CDOW or U.S. National Park Service Specifications. 08) There shall be no dumps or underground disposal of refuse on the site. 09) With the exception of bird feeders, the feeding, baitin9, salting or other means of attracting wildlife to the property is prohlbited. 10) The applicants hereby waive the right to any future wildlife damage claims against the Division of Wildlife, State of Colorado. 11) All disturbed areas shall be reseeded or replanted with native plant species originally present in the sub-alpine environment. Neither ornamental nor non-native species of plants shall be permitted on the site. The Planning Commission recommends a semi-annual project report be submitted and the special use permit should expire three years from the date of approval. The project report came about as the Tenth Mountain Division requires this of their huts. The Planning Commission did not direct staff as to what should be contained in the report. The three year expiration came about as a means for staff to review with the applicant the area and the purpose of its use. Commissioner Jolmson stated a special use permit is an annual renewal process. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips asked if they would then reapply after the third year. Ms. Eastley stated they would be providing the annual reports which would contain numbers of use, what sort of upgrades were done, maintenance and corrplaints. Ralph Thomas, applicant, stated they are offering an alternative to the visitors to Eagle County. This will be more intimate. They are asking for eight beds. They are looking at groups of 4 - 6. It's a nice alternative without having to carry in extra equipment. They would like to offer educational seminars there in the future. Mr. Thomas stated having to come throuSh this process again in three years is asking too much as well as the additlonal $550.00. He understands the governing bodies on the use. He has established a trial head on their property. He feels they are in full corrpliance with the forest service. The equestrian use is a concern for them and they would like to offer that use. They believe the surrounding environment will not cause a problem for boarding. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips asked if the outfitters would be providing the water and feed. Mr. Thomas stated they are required to meet certain regulations as is. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips questioned snow melt for cooking and drinking in the winter. She believes water should be provided. Mr. Thomas stated in the summer they would set up a container and fill from his truck. They would collect rain water. Mr. Thomas explained snow melt is regularly used in the hut system. CUrt Oakley, resident of Minturn, encouraged the Commissioners approval. He stated this Yurt is a very small business and fits into the County's master plan. It is unique, more geared toward couples and small groups. Impact should be minimal as there is no corrpetition factor. As far as the impact to the wilderness, this type of facility should be encouraged rather 3 than larger facilities or individual carrps. He I d rather see horses and the equestrian facility centralized. The size of the facility on 36 acres should not cause an irrpact. Mr. Oakley stated the Thomas' are terrific keepers of the back country. Jolm Seiple, area resident, read a letter from folks who used the Polar Star hut, which corrplimented the facilities. They went on to write about the Yurt and the close proximity of this to the Polar Star. Mr. Seiple referred to pase four of staff's findings. Mr. Seiple stated a limitation to eight beds lS not enough of a mitigation. Mr. Seiple believes there will be conflicts of the water use available. He is on water on a year round basis. He asked if the grey water has been addressed. He is concerned how this can detrimentally effect his water supply. Page 7, item 2, states the certificate of occupancy must be issued prior to commercial use. Mr. Seiple asked if the Board had heard the planning commission tapes. Mr. Seiple explained the closure of the road in 1991. Mr. Thomas drove over it and took an outhouse up there as well as a building. Mr. Seiple felt the outhouse is a threat to his water supply. Commissioner Johnson asked if the grey water situation had been looked at. Ray Merry, Eagle County Environmental Health, stated their aPI?lication has not shown any drain lines. He has not been there. The privy lS a concern. The equestrian uses can be very irrpacti ve as evidenced at Piney Lake. He encourages the Board to keep the irrpacts in mind unless we can evaluate these areas. Regarding the water, Mr. Merry pointed out there may be a question as to what type of water source there is. It is considered a public water supply it may require testing. Mr. Thomas stated they collect water in a five gallon bucket and they use the privy for disposal. Mr. Merry stated vault privy are a minimum of 400 capacity and they are not usually receiving water. The applicant has I?ut in a septic system. Mr. Merry stated he would need an engineer's evaluatlon. Terry Thomas, applicant, stated they are looking at this at the same time. Next summer they are planning on using deep rock water. They can't afford to dig a well now. The horses would only be there two months in the summer and perhaps two to four horses. They would like to have that option. Peter Looram, Tenth Mountain Division Hut Association, spoke to the question of when is enough enough in a concentrated area. In the summer, in their huts, they sometimes have to cut back on the irrpact. Mr. Looram asked if it is ten or eight beds. Ms. Eastley stated they are recommendins a maximum on eight beds. Mr. Looram stated unless the applicant lS up there on a regular basis, disposal of grey water doesn't happen. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips asked about restroom facilities in the 10th mountain huts. Mr. Looram responded they have two one thousand sealed vault tanks. He stated pumping out of the vaults is not a problem. Mr. Merry stated the problem with the on site vault systems is the odor. To come up with a well ventilated engineered system is the solution. James Close, caretaker Polar Star, discussed an encounter with Mr. Thomas and the signage for rental. Mr. Close stated in December he called and asked about the rental of the Yurt, rates, etc. Mr. Close stated he rented the Yurt from them for the 12th of this month paying a $100.00 minimum. He brought a copy of the cancelled check. Mr. close went up there on the 10th and took pictures. He sees a blatant disregard to the process. Ms. Eastley stated she was at this site in September and she saw no signs at that point. She does know that the Thomas' have been working on a brochure. Mrs. Phillips asked if there is a CO at this time. Ms. Eastley responded no. Carl Darnell, local business owner and Yurt user, stated Ralph and Terry are well meaning people trying to start a small business. He has stayed at the Polar Star. He does not see this as a big issue. On the equestrian issue, they are talking about a few horses during a short time of year. Why not use the annual permit instead of requiring them to come back in three years and go through this process again. He understands Jolm' s concerns and lf there are problems, the bi-annual review should take care of that. Terry and RaII?h will do anything they can to do a good job. He feels the Planning Commisslon is putting a lot of undo requirements on the applicant. 4 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EAGLE, COLORADO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS FORM 50 HOECKEL'S 387869 Commissioner Jolmson responded to Mr. Darnell's statements regarding government. He does feel the grey water is an issue and wants to know how that is going to be dealt with. A brochure to users would be helpful. He would like to see the semi-annual reports and believes if we are going to look at these types of uses, we need the tract record. He would like to strike the condition regarding the use of horses. The semi-annual reporting should take care. He would like it to be an allowed use unless it cannot be supported during the semi-annual review. He would also amend #9, even bird feeders are not allowed. He would also put the responsibility on Community Development to check this annually so it can be determined what the irrpacts really are. Chairman Johnson asked about ADA. Commissioner Johnson stated federal regulations require corrpliance whether private or public. He stated this is not a condition but a recommendation. Terry Thomas stated the Forest Service will not allow them use of the road to make it accessible. Discussion continued on the application. Commissioner Jolmson moved to table file number ZS-374-95, Hidden Treasure Adventures to January 30, 1996 for additional submittal's regarding equestrian use and grey water disposal until January 30, 1996. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. ZS-379-95, Contractors Storage Pattie Haefeli, Planning Teclmician, presented file number ZS-379-95, Contractors Storage. She stated this was a request for a maintenance building. She explained the application to the Board. The request is coming' from Eagle County Buildings and Grounds and Road and Bridge. Ms. Haefeli explained the history of the site from gravel pit to now. The County purchased the land from the BLM and they want to construct a maintenance storage facility. The county is responsible for revegetation. The site is limited to a cistern water supply. No irrpacts to surrounding lands. The closest neighbor is 4/10 of a mile away. There has been some vandalism. Ms. Haefeli read Staff findings and conditions. The Planning Commission requested an additional condition to screen from the Colorado River Road. Mike Bradley, Buildings and Grounds supervisor, stated the one issue to consider is the site is hidden on three sides. There is less than 50 yards where you can actually see a part of the site. Shielding of this site is helpful in reducing vandalism. There have been problems alons the Colorado River Road. He asked the Board to waive the condition regardlng hiding the site. Commissioner Jolmson questioned vandalism. Mr. Bradley stated if you I?ut up screening in front of the site you provide the vandal the opportunlty to break in. Mr. Bradley stated having it open to view will provide some security. Mr. Bradley shared the different types of vandalism. Commissioner Johnson asked if this were a private developer would screening be required. The Planning Commission suggested screening of things not stored in the facility. Mr. Bradley stated this is approximately 2.9 acres with a small portion available for storage. Ms. Haefeli stated it is visible from the river road but not at all from the other side. Don Fessler, Road & Bridse Supervisor, stated they are not changing the use of the site except by addlng a building. They've used the site since 1985. This will just clean it up and get rid of the equipment. Mr. Fessler stated if they are required to have a fence, he would want a wooden cedar fence that will withstand the wind. He wants to set away from chain link. Commissioner Johnson asked about storage behlnd the building. Mr. Fessler suggested once the building is up, perhaps they can revisit this issue. Once the building is up they can move things around. Commissioner Jolmson asked how long it will take to construct the building. Mr. Bradley responded the contract has a completion date of June 1, 5 1996. commissioner Jolmson sugsested they follow Mr. Fessler's recommendation until they are able to do a slte visit. COmmlssioner Jolmson moved to approve file number ZS-379-95, Contractors Storage, incorporating staff findings and staff recommendations with conditions, adding a decision regarding screening to be made by September, 1996 following a field trip by the Board and the Planning COmmlssion. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Jim Fritze suggested perhaps they want to leave this with the Board as this may seem to create a precedent wlth the County being the applicant. Mr. Fritze sugsested they exclude the Planning commission and sugsested the Board approve thlS as owner of the property rather than as a conditlon. Commissioner Jolmson amended his motion as stated by Mr. Fritze. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the amendment. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips called for the question on the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. PD-311-95-A, Blue Ridge POD Amendment Paul Clarkson presented file number PD-311-95-A, Blue Ridge POD Amendment. He stated this aI?plication is to remove a Preliminary Plan condition which requires dedlcation of right-of-way through neighboring property to Highway 82/Willits Lane intersection. This POD Amendment application is intended to perform two functions: 1) seek complete relief from the preliminary plan condition of approval requiring dedication and collateralization of Blue Ridse Lane form the east edge of Phase I through the Ace Lane property to the lntersection of Highway 82 and the proposed realigned willits Lane, and 2) adjust the approved phasing plan effectively switching the approved Phases II and III. Mr. Clarkson explained the chronology of the file and the site data. He reviewed the application and the referrals. The county engineer responded to the referral. He listed statements that were on the staff report. This issue, the removal of the condition of the requirement, is not a new issue. It has been discussed many times with the planning commission and before this board. The minutes support that. It is staff's contention the original proposal provided for the road. It was part of the sketch plan and the preliminary plan. Effecting this frontage road has been in the plans and remains sood, long range planning. Mr. Clarkson reiterated this road has been an lntricate part of the proposal. Removing the condition changes the entire proposal. He susgested if removed it go back to sketch plan. Mr. Clarkson questloned the applicant's desire to switch phases and staff is not considering that request in it's recommendations. Staff recommended denial. Commissioner Johnson asked what the planning commissions recommendation was? Mr. Clarkson responded they recommended denial based on the proposal has always been reviewed with this as an integral part. Steve Isom, representing the applicant, showed the original plan as it was submitted. This was originally a dead end road. The roadway was penciled in. Mr. Isom stated when they came back in with Ace Lane, they questioned what would happen if one of the developers did not corrplete the project. Ace Lane has his property for sale and understands he cannot get a final plat until he fills that condition. Mr. Isom stated the road is not needed for each project but for both projects when corrpleted. They would like to find a way for Kevin and Tammy to start on their commercial area. Mr. Isom showed the phases of the development as they are now. They are asking to start the far end commercial now and not build the other until Ace Lane comes in. They would like to do phase I and II without the right-of-way and he knows he can't build until he grants that right-of-way. Mr. Isom reminded the Board this expires in three years. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips asked what problems the planning department has. Mr. Clarkson stated from sketch plan, sprins of 1993, the proposal has always included and been labeled "future connectlon to willits Lane". The sketch plan was conditioned with the frontage road as part of the project. Mr. Clarkson read the other conditions which refer to the road. 6 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EAGLE, COLORADO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS FORM 50 HOECKEL'S 387869 Chairman Pro-tem Phillips reviewed her recollection. Commissioner Johnson stated one of the original conditions was the road and it having to be done immediately. That condition was amended. He discussed the condemnation agreements made previously. He stated there was an agreement between the parties and it was part of the Resolution. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips reiterated the whole discussion from the start included Ace Lane. Phil Scott, Engineering Technician, stated from the beginning and with all subsequent traffic studies, there has been a frontage road outlined for that area. Allowing for community circulation has been the goal. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips questioned the road without the development. Mr. Scott stated he has not talked with the Tucker's traffic engineer, but in reviewing all of the historical data, he does not agree with the 1 - 2% increase in traffic if the road does not go through. Mr. Scott stated it is more than if Ace Lane is there, using Matt's #'s used in the traffic study, a figure of 13%, they are estimating 336 vehicles. Mr. Scott referred to a December 1993 study. Mr. Scott reviewed the figures and the Board's adoption of road level C. This road operates at a level of service B now. Mr. Scott read from the studies and indicated any small increase will reduce the level of service with Blue Ridge alone. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Isom to remind him of the Kodiak Park development phasing. Mr. Isom stated it is 12,000 square feet of commercial. Mr. Isom stated Mr. Scott's report does not take into consideration the irrprovements on EI Jebel road as a result of Wendy's. Mr. Scott stated their plans included the Frontage road. Ace's project will be less than 10%. They are trying to bleed traffic off from the EI Jebel intersection. Under the existing conditions, and there have been improvements which have been implemented, it won't take much to get to an unacceptable level. Mr. Clarkson stated this proposal is approaching its third year and Mr. Isom's request to extend will need to be considered. Mr. Clarkson stated the area for this proposal has changed significantly in the last two years. While this won't have the percentage of irrpact of two years ago, the irrpact is still high. Staff would feel very uncomfortable in changing the nature of the proposal. It si$I1ificantly alters it. Whether or not the road can work without the intersectlon is only part of the question. The reason this road was so stronsly advanced by the planning staff, was the applicant volunteered it. This klnd of development must be on a flow through access. Commissioner Johnson reviewed the situation and suggested the need for a traffic study. Kevin Tucker, applicant, believes the road has to go through there. What they would like to do is start their project and defer the building of the road until they have some commercial development. Working with Ace is like hitting a stone wall. They would like to start the project, not build out, and then complete the road when the development is underway. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips sees the road as happening eventually. Whoever buys may have a different plan. A request to amend the phasing is what is the issue. Mr. Clarkson stated the first phase is the same and that is where the road issue comes into play. He stated they would like to see how much development can take place without the road and questions the incentive for the applicant to build the road. Commissioner Phillips stated she knows it will be required, it's a matter of when. The stumbling block is they have not been able to work together. Commissioner Johnson stated he needs to see a current traffic study rather than the 1993 numbers with the addendum. Mr. Isom stated they have no objection to revising their numbers. He doesn't want to go through the costs if the Board is not going to consider the request. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips asked if community development would reconsider their stand if the numbers are such to allow for some development without the road. 7 Mr. Clarkson stated right now, they have nothing to indicate the errployee housing will ever be built. The change in phasing is farther reachlng than allowing the development to proceed. Mr. Isom reviewed their intentions. They would not have an obj ection to tabling this until a traffic study can be done. A main concern with Ace Lane is not seeing the hotel go in because much of this commercial will be based on that. Phil Scott stated they need to update the intersection studies. He stated their manuals, requlrements, etc. have been uPdated. The applicant is running a risk of seeing numbers that show build out now. Commissioner Jolmson asked Mr. Fritze if there are not two different items before them now. He asked if the planning commission denied both of the issues and if they discussed phasing. He questioned sending it back to the plannins commission. Mr. Frltze stated the planning commission has ruled on both of these things. Mr. Clarkson stated the planning commission considered the applicant's request on the right-of-way but not on the phasing. He stated there was no hearing on switching the phasing. Mr. Scott suggested the latest resources be used in the traffic study. Commissioner Jolmson suggested the phasing issue go to the planning commission while this is going on. Mr. Fritze suggested they persue the extension. Commissioner Johnson moved to table file number PD-311-95-A, Blue Ridge PUD Amendment for one month to February 20, 1996 for the Board to hear the portion which seeks relief from dedication and to request the planning commission give a recommendation on the phasing. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. Consent Calendar Chairman Gates stated the next item on the agenda was the consent calendar as follows: 01) Bill paying for January 15, 1995 02) Payroll for January 18, 1995. 03) Intergovernmental Agreement Between Eagle county, State of Colorado and the Town of Eagle for Building Inspection Services 04) Intergovernmental Agreement between Easle County , State of Colorado and the Town of Gypsum for Building Inspectlon services. Commissioner Jolmson moved to approve the consent calendar as I?resented. Chairman Pro-tem Phillips seconded the motion. Of the two votlng Commissioners the vote was declared unanimous. Cellular for the Cammmity Award Presentation to Echo Ranch. Craig Goudy, A T & T representative, presented the next item on the agenda, cellular for the community award I?resentation to Echo Ranch. This year they have received over 300 applicatlons. One of the new organizations selected is Echo Ranch. He presented a cellular phone to Paul Barben of Echo Ranch. Attest: C ~~.v+dL Chal 8