Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR02-100 sketch plan for Heritage Park PUDCommissioner moved adoption of the f iio�ving Resolution: BOARD OF EAGLE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 2002-" APPROVAL OF THE SKETCH PLAN FOR HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT File No. PDS -00031 WHEREAS, on or about October 24, 2001 , the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, accepted for filing applications submitted by Landel Company, L.C., A Texas Limited Liability Company and Barbara Allen (hereinafter "Applicant ") for approval of the Sketch Plan for the Heritage Park Planned Unit Development, File No. PDS - 00031; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requested the approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Sketch Plan which would allow for the development as follows: A total of 24 single - family detached residential lots which, range in size from 9,400 sq. ft. to 18,400 sq.ft. A `meandering park' encircling the Lots is contemplated for walking and light recreation. Gross density is 2.1 dwelling units per acre. WHEREAS, at its public hearings held January 16, 2002, February 20, 2002, March 20, 2002, April 17, 2002 and May 29, 2002, the Eagle County Planning Commission, based upon its findings, recommended DENIAL of the proposed Sketch Plan of the Heritage Park Planned Unit Development, with certain conditions; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter the "Board ") of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, on January 29, 2002, March 19, 2002, June 25, 2002, July 2, 2002 and July 9, 2002 and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony, exhibits, and study of the Master Plan for the unincorporated areas of Eagle County, comments of the Eagle County Department of Community Development, comments of public officials and agencies, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and comments from all interested parties, the Board of County 03662 Eagle, II III�III II�II IImw . r Sara J Fisher Commissioner moved adoption of the f owing Resolution: BOARD OF EAGLE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 2002-,160 APPROVAL OF THE SKETCH PLAN FOR HERITAGE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT File No. PDS -00031 WHEREAS, on or about October 24, 2001 , the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, accepted for filing applications submitted by Landel Company, L.C., A Texas Limited Liability Company and Barbara Allen (hereinafter "Applicant ") for approval of the Sketch Plan for the Heritage Park Planned Unit Development, File No. PDS - 00031; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requested the approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Sketch Plan which would allow for the development as follows: A total of 24 single- family detached residential lots which, range in size from 9,400 sq. ft. to 18,400 sq.ft. A `meandering park' encircling the lots is contemplated for walking and Iight recreation. Gross density is 2.1 dwelling units per acre. WHEREAS, at its public hearings held January 15, 2002, February 20, 2002, March 20, 2002, April 17, 2002 and May 29, 2002, the Eagle County Planning Commission, based upon its findings, recommended DENIAL of the proposed Sketch Plan of the Heritage Park Planned Unit Development, with certain conditions; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter the 'Board ") of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, on January 29, 2002, March 19, 2002, June 25, 2002, July 2, 2002 and July 9, 2002 and, WHEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony, exhibits, and study of the Master Plan for the unincorporated areas of Eagle County, comments of the Eagle County Department of Community Development, comments of public officials and agencies, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and comments from all interested parties, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, finds as follows: That proper publication and public notice was provided as required by Iaw for the hearings before the Planning Commission and the Board. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations, Section 5- 240.F.3.e. Standards for the review of a Sketch Plan for a PUD: (1) Un fed oivnership or control. It is represented that title to all land is owned or controlled by one (1) entity. (2) Uses The uses that may be developed in the PUD are uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3 -300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule" for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. However, pursuant to Section 5 -240 17.31, Variations Authorized, a variation to allow reduced lot sizes does achieve the purpose of obtaining desired design qualities and that the granting of the variation is necessary for that purpose to be achieved. (3) DimensionalLinritations. The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD are those specified in Table 3 -340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations ", for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. (4) Off - Street Parking and Loading. The PUD does comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off - Street Parking and Loading Standards, without a necessity for a reduction in the standards. (5) Landscaping. The landscaping and illumination standards provided in the PUD do comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscgpffig Landscaping and Illumination Standards (6) Signs. The sign standards applicable to the PUD shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations. (7) Adequate Facilities The Applicant has demonstrated that the development proposed in the Sketch Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and 2 emergency medical services. The applicant will be required to provide a secondary point of ingress /egress OR, a Variance from the Improvement Standard that requires dual access points must be approved at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. (8) Improvements. The Applicant has demonstrated that the improvements standards applicable to the development will be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards. The applicant will be required to provide a secondary point of ingress /egress OR, a Variance from the Improvement Standard that requires dual access points must be approved at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. (9) Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses The development proposed for the PUD is compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. (10) Consistency with Master Plan. The PUD is consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). (11) Phasing. A general phasing plan has been provided for this development. (12) Compton Recreation and Open Space. The PUD does comply with the common recreation and open space standards with respect to: (1) Minimum area (2) Improvements required; (3) Continuing use and maintenance; or (4) Organization. (13) Natural Resource Protection. The PUD does consider the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents available at the time the application was submitted, as well as the recommendations ofreferral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards. ADDITIONAL FINDING PUD Guide [Section 5- 240.F.2.a.(8)] — The Applicant has submitted a PUD Guide setting forth the proposed land use restrictions. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5- 280.B.3.e. Standards for the review of a Sketch and Preliminary Plan for Subdivision: 3 (1) Consistency with Master Plan. The PUD is consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Master Plan. (2) Consistent with Land Use Regulations. The proposed subdivision does comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards. (3) Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. The proposed subdivision is located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (4) SuitabilityforDevelopment. The property proposed to be subdivided is suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man -made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. (5) Compatibility with Surrounding Uses. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area, and shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado: THAT, the application for approval of the Sketch Plan for the Heritage Park Planned Unit Development be and is hereby APPROVED, subject to compliance with the following conditions: Prior to approval of the Preliminary PIan, the applicant must either provide a secondary point of ingress /egress OR, a Variance from the Improvement Standard (VIS) that requires dual access points must be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. Prior to Preliminary Plan application, site - specific geo- technical investigations and an erosion control plan must be provided pursuant to the Colorado Geologic Survey (dated December 18th, 2001). 3. Prior to Preliminary Plan application, a report documenting the amount of water which can be supplied to the proposed development without causing inj ury to existing water rights must be provided pursuant to comments from the Office of the State Engineer dated December 0 10`h, 200 1. 4. Eagle County School District RE 50J has determined the acceptable cash in lieu of land payment for this subdivision to be $22,317.75, which will be due at Final Plat. 5. Prior to Preliminary Plan approval, a 1041 application for major extensions of existing water and sewage treatment systems and efficient utilization of municipal and industrial water projects must be approved by the Eagle County Permit Authority pursuant to the Environmental Health Department Memorandum dated December 17'h,2001. 6. Prior to Preliminary Plan application, wood burning devices are to be prohibited from this development, and; a stormwater detention plan designed with NWCCOG's water quality standards for treating pre - construction and post - construction stormwater runoff to reduce sediment transportation must be provided pursuant to the Environmental Health Department Memorandum dated December 17`h, 2001.. 7. Prior to Preliminary Plan application, Environmental Health's recommendation regarding the landscape plan must be addressed. $_ Prior to Preliminary Plan application all of the recommendations made by the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments in their letter of December 11, 2001 must be addressed. 9. Prior to Preliminary Plan application, all comments of the Road & Bridge Department regarding incorporation of a Weed Management Plan into the Landscaping Plan need to be addressed. 10. Prior to Preliminary Plan application the recommendations of the Colorado Division of Wildlife as set forth in their letter dated December 10`h, 2001, stated that plans and proper methods dealing with trash, compost, pets, and feeders must be incorporated. 11. Prior to Preliminary Plan application the comments from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, dated December 26, 2001, must be adhered to and addressed. 12. The applicant must sufficiently address the findings identified by the Eagle County Housing Department in regards to the Eagle County Comprehensive Housing Plan and pending regulations. 13. Except as otherwise modified by this application, all material representations of the Applicant in this application and all public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. 5 THAT, the Sketch Plan submitted under this application and hereby approved, does not constitute a "site specific development plan" as that phrase is defined and used in C.R.S. Section 24 -68 -101, et seq. THAT the Board of County Commissioners directs the Director of Community Development to provide a copy of this Resolution to the applicant. THAT, the Board further finds, determines and declares that this Resolution is necessary for the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado. MOVED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Comm priers of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, at its regular meeting held theWU —day of _, 2002, nunc pro tunc to the 9th day of July, 2002. ATTEST: A,` 0Z,� q. ✓ i ffj S �� B �t y' Sara J. Fi here Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, by and Through Its BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By. V l� Michael L. Gallagher, By:_ Tom By: Am M. Ienconi, Commissioner Commissioner &a= seconded adoption of the foregoing Resolution. The roll having been called, the vote was as follows: Commissioner Michael L. Gallagher n 9 Commissioner Tom C. Stone Commissioner Am M. Menconi This Resolution passed by _G - vote of the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado.