HomeMy WebLinkAboutR02-023 sketch plan for Hook Spur Ranch PUDc c
Commissioner Atm I moved adoption
of the fo lowing Resolution:
BOARD OF EAGLE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO.2002 -
APPROVAL OF THE
SKETCH PLAN FOR HOOK SPUR RANCH
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
File No. PDS -00030
WHEREAS, on or about June 30,2001 the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, accepted for
filing an application submitted by Brian, Michael and Jon Davies, (hereinafter "Applicants ") for
approval of the Sketch Plan for the Hook Spur Ranch Planned Unit Development, File No. PDS-
00030; and,
WHEREAS, the Applicants requested the approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Sketch Plan which would allow for the development as follows:
The subdivision of a 73.575 acre parcel into three 16.488 acre single family lots and one 24
acre open space tract. Permitted uses on the property would be residential, agricultural and
open space with associated accessory uses and structures. Accessory dwelling units would
be allowed. Historic irrigation and grazing are proposed for areas outside of building
envelopes. Access would be from Hooks Spur Road, water would be from individual wells
and sewage disposal would be through individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS).
WHEREAS, at its public hearing held January 17, 2002, the Roaring Fork Valley Regional
Planning Commission, based upon its findings, recommended approval of the proposed Sketch
Plan of the Hook Spur Ranch Planned Unit Development, with certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter
the 'Board ") of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, on January 29, 2002; and,
Fishe E agle, a6,688;,,,
WHEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony, exhibits, and study of the Master Plan for
the unincorporated areas of Eagle County, comments of the Eagle County Department of
Community Development, comments of public officials and agencies, the recommendation of the
Planning Commission, and comments from all interested parties, the Board of County
Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, finds as follows:
That proper publication and public notice was provided as required by law for the
hearings before the Planning Commission and the Board.
Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations, Section 5- 240.F.3.e. Standards for the
review of a Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plan for a PUD:
(1) Unified ownership or control It may be represented that title to all land is owned
or controlled by one (1) entity.
(2) Uses. The uses that may be developed in the PUD are uses that are designated as
uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table
3 -300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule" for the
zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for
PUD.
(3) Dimensional Limitations. The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD
are not those specified in Table 3 -340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations ", for
the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application
for PUD. However, pursuant to Section 5 -240 F.31, Variations Authorized a
variation to allow for a minimum lot size of 15 acres does achieve the purpose of
obtaining desired design qualities and that the granting of the variation is necessary
for that purpose to be achieved.
(4) Off - Street Parking and Loading. The PUD does comply with the standards of
Article 4, Division 1, Off - Street Parking and Loading Standards without a necessity
for a reduction in the standards.
(5) Landscaping. The landscaping and illumination standards provided in the PUD may
be able to comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and
Illumination Standards
2
(6) Signs. The Applicant may submit a comprehensive sign plan for the PUD, as
provided in Section 4 -340 D., Signs Allowed in a Planned Unit Development UD),
that is suitable for the PUD and does provide the minimum sign area necessary to
direct users to and within the PUD.
(7) Adequate Facilities. The Applicant may be able to demonstrate that the
development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for PUD will be provided adequate
facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical
supply, fire protection and roads, and will be conveniently located in relation to
schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services.
(8) Improvements. The Applicant may be able to demonstrate that the improvements
standards applicable to the development will be as specified in Article 4, Division 6,
Improvements Standards regarding:
(9) Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. The development proposed for the
PUD is compatible with the character of surrounding land uses.
(10) Consistency with Master Plan. The PUD may be demonstrated to be consistent
with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map
(FLUM).
(11) Phasing. A general phasing plan may be provided for this development.
(12) Common Recreation and Open Space. The PUD may comply with the common
recreation and open space standards with respect to:
(1) Minimum area
(2) Improvements required;
(3) Continuing use and maintenance; or
(4) Organization.
(13) Natural Resource Protection. The PUD may be modified to consider the
recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents available at the time
the application was submitted, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies
as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards
ADDITIONAL FINDING
PUD Guide [Section 5- 240.F.2.a.(8)] — The Applicant has submitted a PUD Guide setting
forth the proposed land use restrictions.
3
C C
Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5- 280.B.3.e. Standards for
the review of a Sketch and Preliminary Plan for Subdivision:
(1) Consistency with Master Plan. The PUD maybe shown to be consistent with the
Eagle County Master Plan and the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Master Plan.
(2) Consistent with Land Use Regulations. The proposed subdivision may be shown
to comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these
Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of
Article 3, Zone Districts and Article 4, Site Development Standards
(3) Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. The proposed subdivision is located and
designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of
public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or
result in a "leapfrog pattern of development.
(4) Suitabilityfor Development. The property proposed to be subdivided is suitable for
development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or
man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and
existing and probable future public improvements to the area.
(5) Compatibility with Surrounding Uses. The proposed subdivision is compatible
with the character of existing land uses in the area, and shall not adversely affect the
future development of the surrounding area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the
County of Eagle, State of Colorado:
THAT, the application for approval of the Sketch Plan for the Hook Spur Ranch Planned
Unit Development be and is hereby approved, subject to compliance with the following conditions:
That concurrent with application for Preliminary Plan approval, the Applicant submit
an application for a Zone Change for the effected parcel.
2. That prior to Preliminary Plan approval the Applicant provide evidence that all three
owners of the subject parcel have agreed to abide by the conditions and standards of
the PUD.
n
3. That prior to Preliminary Plan approval the Applicant provide evidence that issues
related to site access as identified by Eagle County Engineering (11/29/01), the
Colorado Geological Survey (12/18/01), Colorado State Forest Service (12/14/01)
and the Basalt and Rural Fire Protection District (12/13/01) have been adequately
addressed.
4. That prior to Preliminary Plan approval the Applicant provide evidence that issues
related to potable water supply, as detailed by the State Engineer (12/10/01), have
been resolved.
5. That prior to Preliminary Plan approval the Applicant provide evidence that issues
related to the siting and design of Individual Sewage Disposal Systems, as identified
by Eagle County Environmental Health (12/17/01), the Colorado Geological Survey
(12/18/01), and the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments (12/17/01) have
been addressed.
6. That prior to Preliminary Plan approval the Applicant demonstrate that issues related
to storm water management and erosion control, as identified by the Northwest
Colorado Council of Governments (12/17/01) have been adequately addressed.
7. That prior to Preliminary Plan approval the Applicant provide evidence that issues
related to fire suppression and wildfire protection, as detailed in the referral responses
from the Colorado State Forest Service (12/14/01) and the Basalt and Rural Fire
Protection District (12/13/01) have been adequately addressed.
8. That prior to Preliminary Plan approval the Applicant demonstrate that issues
identified in the referral response from the Town of Basalt concerning
"environmental sensitivity ", specifically, lot coverage, the use of native vegetation
and weed control, fencing standards, restrictions on dogs, site lighting, accessory
building sizes and locations, and open space uses have been adequately considered
and/or incorporated into the plan.
9. That prior to Preliminary Plan approval, the Applicant respond with sufficient detail
to all requirements of Article 4, Site Development Standards of Eagle County's Land
Use Regulations, with particular emphasis on Division 4 -6, Improvements Standards,
as requested by Eagle County Engineering (11/29/01) and as further outlined in
referral responses from the Colorado Geological Survey (12/18/01), the Northwest
Colorado Council of Governments (12/17/01), the report by HP Geotech,
Inc.(09 /17/01), and the report by Western Ecological Resource, Inc.(11 /01).
10. That at application for Preliminary Plan the Applicant submit a draft PUD Guide that
has been modified to provide provisions related to long term maintenance of fire
protection systems, travel routes, irrigation systems and drainage features.
11. That a detailed Site Development Schedule identifying time frames for the
completion of those items considered public improvements be submitted as a part of
the application for Preliminary Plan approval.
12. That for the purpose of protecting wildlife movement through the area, fencing
standards be included in the PUD Guide that specify a maximum top strand height
of 42 inches and a minimum bottom strand height of 12 inches above the ground,
except within building envelopes.
13. That the PUD Guide provide limits regarding the number, size and location of
agricultural structures that will be allowed outside of established building envelopes.
14. That Accessory Dwelling Units of Lots 1 and 3 shall be attached and restricted to
1,000 square feet, and the Accessory Dwelling Unit on Lot 2 may be detached in
close proximity to the primary residence and shall not to exceed 1,200 square feet.
15. That the applicant investigate a reconfiguration of the proposed building envelopes
to provide a greater degree of clustering toward the northern edge of the property.
16. That the PUD Guide include provisions limiting the size of homes built on the
property.
17. That all material representations made by the Applicant in submitted materials and
in public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless
otherwise amended by other conditions.
THAT, the Sketch Plan submitted under this application and hereby approved, does not
constitute a "site specific development plan" as that phrase is defined and used in C.R.S. Section
24 -68 -101, et seq.
THAT, the Board of County Commissioners directs the Director of Community
Development to provide a copy of this Resolution to the applicant.
THAT, the Board further finds, determines and declares that this Resolution is necessary for
the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado.
2
MOVED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of the County
of Eagle, State of Colorado, at its regular meeting held the day of 2002,
nunc pro tunc to the 29 day of January, 2002.
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF
COLORADO, by and Through Its
BOARD OF COUNTY
ATTEST:
County Commissioners
COMMISSIONERS
I _/ , _..•_M..
Tom C. Stone, Chairman
By: WA . " '� —
Michael L. Gallagher, Co ssioner
By. d �, ,.
Am M. Menconi, Commissioner
Commissioner seconded adoption of the foregoing Resolution.
The roll having been called, the vote waA as follows:
Commissioner Tom C. Stone
Commissioner Michael L. Gallagher
Commissioner Am M. Menconi
This Resolution passed by `G7 vote of the Board of County Commissioners of the County of
Eagle, State of Colorado.
7
Clerk to the Board of