Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout102 Kanoshe Ct - 185521300076INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631 Telephone: (970) 328-8755 COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 2166-02 BP NO. 14022 OWNER: HOWARD W. AND MYRNA SCHMIDT PHONE: 303-985-9701 MAILING ADDRESS: 1170 SOUTH KLINE WAY, LAKEWOOD, CO 80232 APPLICANT: SAME PHONE: SYSTEM LOCATION: 102 KANOSHE COURT, WOLCOTT, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 1855-213-00-076 LICENSED INSTALLER: MEL SCHROEDER EXCAVATING, MEL SCHROEDER LICENSE NO. 9-02 PHONE: 970-835-3168 DESIGN ENGINEER: LKP ENGINEERING, LUIZA PETROVSKA PHONE NO. 970-926-9088 INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A 6 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 2000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK, 6750 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA CREDIT, VIA 218 INFILTRATOR UNITS AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: INSTALL AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN DATED 5-6-02. RAKE ALL TRENCH SURFACES TO PREVENT THE SMEARING OF SOILS, AND DO NOT INSTALL IN WET WEATHER. CALL THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FOR THE FINAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO BACK FILLING ANY PART OF THE INSTALLATION, OR WITH ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INSTALLA- TION. THE BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE SEPTIC SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: MAY 29, 2002 CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENT OFTHE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO, OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT, AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 6758 SQUAREFEET(VIA 218 TNFTT.TRATnR TTNTTS pER IlESLGN ) INSTALLED CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK: 2000 GALLONS IS LOCATED 90 DEGREES AND 2— FEET INCHES FROM THE EAST SIDE OF THE HOUSE FOUNDATION. COMMENTS: THE FINAL INSPECTION WAS DONE BY WILLIAM CARLSON OF EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ON JUNE 20, 2002. THE ENGINEER'S FINAL CERTIFICATION WAS RECEIVED ON THIS SYSTEM IS LARGE ENOUGH TO ACC MMODATE A SIX BEDROOM RESIDENCE. ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS W CT FORE AL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVA DATE: OCTOBER 30, 2002 JAN-8-2002 05:47P FROM:EACLE COUNTY ENV HEA 9703288789 TO:913034507064 P:2-6 Incomplete Applications Will NOT Be Accepted (Site Plan MUST be attached) ISDS Permit # Building Permit # APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 Eagle (970)328-8755, Fax (970)328-0349, El Jebel (970)927-3823 * FEE SCHEDULE * APPLICATION FEE $350.00 * THIS FEE INCLUDES THE ISDS PERMIT, SITE EVALUATION (PERCOLATION TEST, * SOIL PROFILE OBSERVATION) AND FINAL INSPECTION * ADDITIONAL FEES MAY BE CHARGED IF A REINSPECTION IS NECESSARY, OR A * PRE —CONSTRUCTION SITE VISIT OR CONSULTATION IS NEEDED * REINSPECTION FEE $47.00, PRE —CONSTRUCTION SITE VISIT FEE $85.00 * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" **�t*ylrie*I!***,t*�t*****ik****ik**�Ir****�kYe****dt***9t**ie******ie�Y****kk*•k*******rc****** PROPERTY OWNER: &©W goep f� -.5-_- Aeijj,'2 1 Afr,',V4- MAILING ADDRESS: -�5. / a� PHONE - APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: al. / PHONE:'�3� LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTORPHONE: 7L�•/ COMPANY/DBA: ADDRESS: PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: (v NEW INSTALLATION ( } ALTERATION ( } REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Legal Description: SE/ SE✓A 1' , Z •3 ��© 930, � ��v = I C1 �j � Tax Parcel Nu« er: l" ��� /qw. la/Sot Size: 40 44g Physical Address: /o`` f1 CvD 62. 816 BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category) n (&-I- Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms ( } Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms ✓✓✓ ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type *These systems require design by a Registered Professional Engineer TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category) ( Vi- Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface { ) Public Name of Supplier: APPLICANT SIGNATURE: Date: /-Ie-z7�7 AMOUNT PAID: �.� �✓ RECEIPT # : o DATE : CHECK ## : CASHIER: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (970) 328-8755 FAX (970) 328-8788 TDD: (970) 328-8797 TOLL FREE: 800-225-8136 www.eagle-county.com EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO October 30, 2002 Howard and Myrna Schmidt P.O. Box 385 Wolcott, CO 81655 Raymond P. Merry, REHS Director RE: Final of ISDS Permit #2166-02, Tax Parcel #1855-213-00-076. Property location: 102 Kanoshe Court, Wolcott, CO. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Schmidt: This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at (970) 328-8755. Sincerely, Janet Kohl Eagle County Environmental Health Department ENCL: Informational Brochure Final ISDS Permit, cc: files OLD COURTHOUSE BUILDING, 551 Broadway, P.O. Box 179, Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (970) 328-8755 FAX (970) 328-8788 TDD: (970) 328-8797 TOLL FREE: 800-225-8136 www.eagle-county.com EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Date: March 11, 2002 TO:. Mel Schroeder Excavating Raymond P. Merry, REHS Director FROM: Environmental Health Division RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No.2166-02. Tax Parcel # 1855-213-00-076. Property Location: 102 Kanoshe Court, Wolcott, CO., Schmidt residence. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 2166-02 and a field copy of the engineer design stipulated on the permit. It is valid for 120 days, or for the duration of your current building permit for this property. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Please note any special requirements that may have been added to the design by this department. Systems designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County Environmental Health .must also view the installation prior to back filling. Please call well in advance for your final inspection. Your TCO will not be issued until our office receives this certification from the engineer, and views the installation. Due to the onset of inclement weather, Eagle County will not perform final inspections after December 1, 2001. All field work will resume, weather permitting, on March 15, 2002. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. Please notify this office if you have not been contracted to perform this installation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files LKP Engineering, Luiza Petrovska OLD COURTHOUSE BUILDING, 551 Broadway, P.O. Box 179, Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (970) 328-8755 FAX (970) 328-8788 TDD: (970) 328-8797 TOLL FREE: 800-225-8136 www.eagle-county.com EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Date: May 29, 2002 TO: Mel Schroeder Excavating Raymond P. Merry, REHS Director FROM: Environmental Health Division RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No.2166-02. Tax Parcel f# 1855-213-00-076. Property Location: 102 Kanoshe Court, Wolcott, CO., Schmidt residence. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 2166-02 and a field copy of the engineer design stipulated on the permit. It is valid for 120 days, or for the duration of your current building permit for this property. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Please note any special requirements that may have been added to the design by this department. Systems designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County Environmental Health must also view the installation prior to back filling. Please call well in advance for your final inspection. Your TCO will not be issued until our office receives this certification from the engineer, and views the installation. Due to the onset of inclement weather, Eagle County will not perform final inspections after December 1, 2001. All field work will resume, weather permitting, on March 15, 2002. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. Please notify this office if you have not been contracted to perform this installation. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files LKP Engineering, Luiza Petrovska OLD COURTHOUSE BUILDING, 551 Broadway, P.O. Box 179, Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 1 UI _L 0'f zt3U' L LU' � 0 l _i f C�71b7nti� LIB' - Engineering, Inc. CTVZL/GE0T,FCHN1CA+L October 18, 2002 Mr. Howard Schmidt Via fax: 1-303-985-9701 Dear Howard: LKI' LNUINLLIKINU INS: RE: Inspection. of Septic System installation Lot 15, Horse Mountain Ranch 0102 Kanoshe Cowart, W03.cott Eagle County, Colorado Project No. 01146 - Permit No. 2166-02 HAUL U2 The following letter is a summary of the information provided to us for the inspection of the septic system installation for your residence on Lot 15, Horse Mountain loch, 0102 anoshe Court, Wolcott, Eagle County, Colorado. The information was provided by The Eagle County Environmental Health Department and you. We did not inspect the system before backfzlling, but we visited the site today. The information consisted of copies of photographs, ISDS inspection form and sketch, a transcript of Mr. Bill Carlson's notes, video, and receipts from Grand Junction Pipe and Copland Concrete. From all of the above information it can be concluded that they installed the system in overall compliance with the septic system design, Drawing No. 01146sd-infil.dwg, dated May 6, 2002, and as shown on the attached as -built ,sketch. They installed a 2000-gallon, two compartments, a precast, concrete septic tank. As. cleanout was installed between the house and the tsW,,. Based on the as -built by Mr. Bill Carlson, the building sewer was about 25 feet long an the effluent line was about 69 feet long. . Two hundred and eighteen Standard Infiltrator Chambers were installed trenches, as shown on the attached as -built sketch. The infiltrators were connected with serial distribution. In the first and last infi trator of each trench, inspection ports were installed. Horizontal distaaice from center to center of the trenches, was 9.5 feet oz more. All piping was SDR-35, 4-inch PVC. The depth of the trenches was no more d= 24 inches. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, LKP Engineerin Lulza Petrovska, PN. fA President ' �z'�� cc: Mx. Ray Merry, Eagle County Environmental Health Division, fax: 328-0349 C,\WP10-L KP\OI 146oShWpd P.O. Box 2837, Edwards, CO 91632, (970) 926-9088 Tel, (970) 926-9089 Fax EACH COUNTYCOLCMDO FAX COVER SHEET EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 179, EAGLE, CO 81631 970-328-8755 970-328-8788 FAX TO: Luiza Petrovska, LKP Engineering FAX #: 970-926-9089 FROM: Janet Kohl NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 4 REGARDING: Schmidt ISDS file notes Luiza, Here are the notes that Bill made on the final inspections he performed 6/13/02 and 6/20/02 at the Schmidt property: 6/13 "Final inspection, system installed accordingto LKP Engineering plansSeptic "T" at outlet not installed require follow-up inspection; 6/20 " Septic "T" at both inlet and outlet observed in place. System installed as indicated on engineered plan except it is located approximately 200 feet west of intended location as cited by LKP Engineering. Requires engineer's certification letter." I also included copies of the photos he took of the tank and the field and his final inspec- tion check list. Bill's penmanship is not very good, call me if you have trouble reading it! If you do not received all pages please call our office (970) 328-8755 m ISDS PERMIT # Z/ CG -® Z PERCOLATION TEST EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEATLH . OWNER: -PHSYSICAL ADDRESS: Tj a c', / ra o LEGAL DESCRIPTION: R `$ _cpw m ", C, MAILING ADDRESS: S </ ' 4 42 (7oa o Z Z TYPE OF DWELLING: e-s ' NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: S/Y TEST HOLES PRE-SOAKED: YES f NO SOIL TIME WATER DEPTH INCHES OF FALL RATE PROFILE )t ,/ k061 3/q "A/ 'A , 3'/ ?.,n 2 � 2' � ►�./aQ 31 1�3/ "Ar 26 ev c,o 41 c �j 61 c"5���� : 2C) I �� 2 i> � )/,L kZa 2c� 1 E� I -Y), (h X TIME TO DROP LAST INCH: PERC RATE:'ILI k"', MINIMUM LEACH FIELD SIZE: MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK SIZE: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST DATE hC aC'c M/� <. En leering, Ine• CNIUGEOTECHNICAL .j AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION SOIL A FOR SIDENCRANCH pgppOSED,IEP.M. HORSE MOUNTAIN OF 1HE 6Tx „LOT 15, VS, R83W SECTION E21, COI,ORADO SE114, Sw1/4AGLE COUNTY' paojECT NO. 01146 OCTOBER 5, 2001 \\111111111I I I I f Il!!!1� R EG/S ' 00 01 / U -"` / (1 �omuwa+am(.�L rc' ti�fif7l�s� O NIIM. 01\r�R`���`, PREPARED FOR: MR.130RB HITECTS FS'0 A 4157 p.O, BOX ED'WARDS, CO 81632 970) 926-9088 Tel, (970) 926-9089 Fax P.O. Box 2837, Edwards, CO 81632 ( TABLE OF CONTENTS ... ... 2 .. .. .............. .. . ...... • SUMMARY . .. ...... EXECUTIVE ..............•.......................... ...... SCOPE OF STUDY ......................... .......................... ................. .... ............. ......:........... SITE DESCRIPTION ..................... ............ ............... O ,BD CONSTIZ,-U O "ONDITION ......................... PROP VESTIGATION .. ... • ............. ................. .................. 4 FIELD IN UNDWATER C ....... OIL AND GRO SUBSURFACES IvIENDATIONS .............•• .. • • 4 .................. • RATION RECOM FOUN ... .................................. .. .... 5 EXCAVATIO N DIFFICULTIES............. .................. ............................................................ • •• • .' .. .• S • SLABCON . ....... ............................ ........................................................................ .... RETAININ G WALLS .................... .... ......... ....... ... 6 � SYSTEM............ .......................... ............................... ... SITE GRADING AND D WAGE ...................... E GRAD ............. .......... ........... ............... ..................... ............ LAWN IIGATI ................. 7 ................ SEPTIC SYSTEM RECOMMENDATION LIMITATION.............NO DRAWING I FIGURES ............................ FIGURENO'S I -5 LOCATION SKETCH . EXPLORATION LOGS • • • .. FIGURE NO.6 SUBS ......................... SUBSURFACE • • ,... DRAIN• • • ... . PERIMETER LKP Engineering, Inc• __.. K_,,unaation Investigation for a oe constructed on Lot 15, Horse Mountain Ranch, Sel/4, SW1/4, Section 21, T3S, R83W, of the 6th P.M., Eagle County, Colorado. The purpose of the subsurface soil and foundation investigation was to determine the engineering characteristics of the foundation soil and to provide recommendations for the foundation design, grading, and drainage. SITE DESCRIPTION Lot 15 is a 40.57-acre lot, in the Horse Mountain Ranch Subdivision off of Hwy 131, north of Wolcott, Eagle County, Colorado. The topography is moderate. Vegetation on the lot 4 r , PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION wood frame We have assumed that the proposed residence will consist of a twaoT-e an��lpated to be a lkout basement, on a concrete foundation. Loads construction, with a w light, typical o the notify f residential construction. differ significantly from the above understanding, should y If the finalized Plans g us to reevaluate the recommendations of this report. FIELD INVESTIGATION on September 10, 2001, consisted of boring, logging The field investigation conducted locatio ns are shown on Drawing No 1 Drilling s The test boring 'light' a power augeT, on a truck and sampling three test boring diameter, continuous Exploration of the test borings was done with a 4-inch dl s on the Subsurface Exp • , We show the soil profiles of the test boring analysis and observation mounted drill rig samples for laboratory soil h three. Soil samp samplers with Logs, Figure No's one throng Standard Split Spoon and California advancing were taken at selected intervals b a 140-pound hammer' falling 30inches. NDWATER CONDITION SUBSURFACE SOIL AND GROU were fairly uniform. They consisted of The soil profiles encountered in the test boringssil sand over sandstone silty f to soil underlain by two to three feet of brown, s at 9, 9, and 3 feet up to one foot o p ical drill rig refusal was encountered in all three boring bedrock. A Pract Ground "Water was not encountered. respectively. s at random intervals. We sampled the soil in the test boring LKP Engineering, Inc. 5 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed residence should be supported with conventional type spread footings, designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf. The footings should be placed on the undisturbed, firm, bedrock. The depth to firm bedrock varied from 3 to 4 feet in the borings. We recommend minimum width of 16 inches for the continuous footings and 2 feet for the isolated footing pads. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. l T A minimum °of 48 inches of backfill cover is recommended for frost protection of the p. footing subsoils. The undersigned engineer should observe the foundation excavation to verify that the soil conditions are uniform throughout the foundation excavation. The foundation excavation should be free from excavation spoils, frost, organics and standing water. We recommend proof -rolling of the foundation excavation. Soft spots detected during the proof -rolling, should be removed by overexcavation. Any overexcavation within the proposed foundation should be backfilled, in 8 inches loose level lifts and compacted to 100% of the maximum dry density and within 2 percent 'of the optimum moisture content as determined in a laboratory from a Standard Proctor test (ASTM D-698). Structural fill, placed under footings should be tested by the engineer or her representatives on regular basis. Voids left at the bottom of the foundation excavation, by the removal of boulders, should be filled with lean concrete. EXCAVATION DIFFICULTIES We assume that the excavation can be done with large excavation machinery. Hydraulic hammers and blasting might also be needed. Excavation of narrow utility trenches might be more difficult, LKP Engineering, Inc. w 6 SLAB CONSTRUCTION The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil and organics, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. An underslab fill, if necessary, should be constructed with a suitable material, compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum standard Proctor density (ASTM D-698). Suitable material should be free from topsoil, organics and rock fragments greater than 3 inches. The concrete slab should be constructed over a 4-inch layer of clean gravel consisting of - 3/4 inch gravel with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 3 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. They should reinforce the concrete slab -on -grade and scorecontroljoints according to the American Concrete Institute requirements and per the recommendations of the designer to reduce damage due to shrinkage. The concrete slab should be separated from the foundation walls and columns with expansion joints to allow for independent movement without causing damage. RETAINING WALLS They should design foundation walls retaining earth and retaining structures that are laterally supported to resist an equivalent fluid density of 60 pcf for an "at -rest" condition. Laterally unrestrained structures retaining the on -site earth should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid density of 40 pcf for the "active" case. The above design recommendations assume drained backfill conditions and a horizontal backfill surface. Surcharge loading due to adjacent structures, weight of temporary stored construction materials and equipment, inclined backfill and hydrostatic pressure due to undrained backfill should be incorporated in the design. They should try to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the retaining wall. LKP Engineering, Inc. 7 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM To reduce the risk of surface water infiltratingthe foundation subsoil (and the development of a perched water condition, which is common in foundations on bedrock) installation of a foundation perimeter drain is recommended. The foundation perimeter drain should consist of a 4-inch diameter perforated pipe sloped to a suitable gravity outlet. The drain should slope at 1/4 inch per foot if flexible or at 1/8 of an inch if rigid pipe is used: The bottom - of the trench adjacent to the footing should be lined with a polyethylene moisture barrier glued to - the foundation wall. The drain pipe should be placed over the moisture barrier and covered with a minimum of 6 inches of -3/4 -inch free -draining granular material,; Geotextile (Mirafi 140N or equivalent) should be used to cover the free -draining gravel to prevent siltation and clogging of the drain. The backfill above the drain should be granular material to within 2 feet of the ground surface to prevent a buildup of hydrostatic pressure. The top one foot of the backfill material should consist of a relatively impervious fill. The backfill should be sloping away from the building. SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE Grading plan was not available for our review. The following recommendations are general: The site surrounding the building structure should slope away from the building in all directions. A minimum of 12 inches in the first 10 feet is recommended in unpaved areas, and three inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. The top of the granular foundation backfill should be covered with a minimum of 1 foot of relatively impervious fill to reduce the potential of surface water infiltrating the foundation subsoils. Surface water naturally draining toward the proposed building site or permanent cuts, should be diverted around and away from it by means of drainage swales or other approved methods. The roof drains and downspouts should extend and. discharge beyond the limits of the backfill. Exterior backfill should be compacted at or near the optimum moisture content to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density under pavement, sidewalk and patio areas LKP Engineering, Inc. 8 and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density under landscaped areas. Mechanical methods of compaction should be used. Do not puddle the foundation excavation. LAWN IRRIGATION It is not recommended to introduce excess water to the foundation soils by installing sprinkler systems next to the building. The installation of the sprinkler heads should insure that.; the spray from the heads will not fall within 10 feet of foundation walls, porches or patio slabs. Lawn irrigation must be controlled. H SEPTIC SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS Three profile holes were dug within two proposed leachfield sites. The subsurface exploration logs of Boring No. 3 and Profile Hole No's 1 and 2, are appended to this report. Based on the typical soil profile, consisting of 2 to 4 feet of soil and topsoil over bedrock, and according to the Eagle County Environmental Health Department Guidelines on Individual Sewage Disposal Systems, the selected leachfield sites are not suitable for a standard absorption system. We recommend an engineered system for this lot. LIMITATION This report has been prepared according to locally accepted Professional Geotechnical Engineering standards for similar methods of testing and soil conditions at this time. There is no other warranty either expressed or implied. The findings and recommendations of this report are based on field exploration, laboratory testing of samples obtained at the specific locations shown on the Location Sketch, Drawing No.1 and on assumptions stated in the report. Soil conditions at other locations may vary, which may not become evident until the foundation excavation is completed. If soil or water conditions seem different from those described in this report we should be contacted LKP Engineering, Inc. 9 immediately to reevaluate the recommendations of this report. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. Bobby Ladd, of FSO Architects, for the specific application to the proposed residence to be constructed on Lot 15, Horse Mountain Ranch, Se 1 /4, S W 1 /4, Section 21, T3 S, R83 W, of the 6th P.M., Eagle County, Colorado. ��+�h+u+rrr►rrrniry����� Sincerely, ,� pORE'/ LKP ENGINEERING P ETq °• �tf'''. O`°.fr s • 29626 Luiza Petrovska, PE President �rrrr/irre,. C:\MyFi 1es\coreldoc\W PDOCS\011, 46roc. rpt. doc LKP Engineering, Inc. SE 1 /4, SW 1 /4, SECTION 21 T. 3 S. R. 83 WEST (HORSE MOUNTAIN LOT 15) 40.52 ACRES +/- w O rn i� o 0 z BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION 982.0' MAIN FLOOR ELEVATION — 991.0' \ UPPER FLOOR ELEVATION 1,001.0' i w PROFILEQ�HOLE 12 GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION — E GRAVEL DRIVE ® SPA SECTION 71 S"W'41'W SECTION 18 131679 NE 1 /4, NW 1 /4, SEC. 28 LOCATION SKETCH ""°�" "°' 01146 CIVIL/GEOTECHNICAL LOT 15, HORSE MOUNTAIN RANCH SCALE: ti � = 1 DO' SETA SWIA SECTION 21, T3S, R83W, 67H P.M. LKP Engineering, In c. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO °AT;. P,O. Box 2837 Edwards, CO 81632 PREPARED FOR: 10-05-2001 ORAiNNG NQ: tel (970) 926-9088 fox (970) 926-9089 FSO ARCHITECTS 1 DATE OBSERVED: September 10, 2001 BORING NO. i ELEVA11ON: S S Y A DEPTH BLOWS M M DESCRIP77ON OF MATERIAL LABOARTORY REMARKS FEET PER FT. B P AND SAMPLE LOCA77ON 7FST RESULTS 0 L L E Topsoil =` Brown, silty sand 50111 ;i" ❑ 5 '1 Sandstone bedrock 5010 Refusal @ 9 feet No Ground Water 10 Encountered 15 - 20 LEGEND: ❑ — 2—inch O.D. California Liner Sample ■ — Split Spoon 24112 - Drive sample blow count. Indicates that 24 blows of a 1 40--pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or the Split Spoon Sampler 12 inches. DD — Natural Dry Density (pcf) MC — Natural Moisture Content (9) —200 — Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve LL — Liquid Limit Pl — Plasticity Index GW — Ground water LIP ENGINEERING, INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG PRaEQT Ho::._ . .. 01146 FIGURE No.:- r- - -- . DATE OBSERVED: September 10, 2001 BORING NO. 2 ELEVATION: S S Y A DEPTH BLOWS M M DESCRIP77ON OF MATERIAL LABOARTORY REMARKS FEET PER FT. B P AND SAMPLE LOCATION TEST RESULTS 0 L L IE Topsoil _. _ ..... , t.Yi E Brown, silty sand 30112 ❑ 5 Sandstone bedrock 5% ■ Refusal ® 9 feet No Ground Water - 10 Encountered - 15 - 2° LEGEND: ❑ — 2—inch O.D. California Liner Sample ■ — Split Spoon 24112 — Drive sample blow count. Indicates that 24 blows of a 140—pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or the Split Spoon Sampler 12 inches. DD — Natural Dry Density (pcf) MC — Natural Moisture Content (9) —200 — Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve LL — Liquid Limit PI — Plasticity Index GW — Ground water I" ENGINEERING, INC. EXPLORATION LOG SUBSURFACEnglRf PRO ECT NO.: 01146 NO.: 2 a DATE OBSERVED: September 10, 2001 BORING NO. 3 ELEVATION: S S Y A DEPTH BLOWS M M DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL LABOARTORY REMARKS FEET PER FT. B P AND SAMPLE LOCATION TEST RESUL IS 0 L L E — Topsoil Several attempts were made, but _ refusal was Sandstone Bedrock encountered on shallow bedrock. Refusal @ 3 feet No Ground Water Encountered 5 - 10 - 15 20 LEGEND: ❑ - 2-inch O.D. California Liner Sample ■ - Split Spoon 24112 - Drive sample blow count. Indicates that 24 blows of a 140--pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or the Split Spoon Sampler 12 inches. DD - Natural Dry Density (pcf) MC - Natural Moisture Content (9) -200 - Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve LL - Liquid Limit PI - Plasticity Index GW - Ground water LKP ENGINEERING, INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG PRO.XCT NO.: 0114E FIGURE NO.: 3 DATE OBSERVED: October 4, 2001 PROFILE HOLE #1 ELEVATION: S S DEPTH FEET Y M B A M p DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL AND SAMPLE LOCATION LABOARTORY TEST RESULTS REMARKS 0 L L E Topsoil__..... . Light brown, clayey, gravelly sand Sandstone Bedrock s Refusal .at 6 feet No ground water encoun tered �o is - 20 UP ENGINEERING, INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG 01146 FIGURE NO.. _. 4 0 DATE OBSERVED: October 4, 2001 PROFILE HOLE #2 ELEVATION: S S _. Y A DEPTH M M DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL LABOARTORY REMARKS' FEET B p AND SAMPLE LOCATION TEST RESULTS 0 L L E Topsoil Light brown, silty, gravelly sand - ww} an stone Bedrock Refusal at 3.5 feet No ground water .5 encountered - 10 1s 20 LKP ENGINEERING, INC. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG PRaCCr Na,:. 01146 FIGURE NO.: ._ _ 5. _ ._ l� PLASTIC LINER, GLUED TO THE FOUNDATION WALL, (NOT NEEDED WHEN GROUND WA TER IS PRESENT GRAVEL THICKNESS SHOW D BE AT LEAST 24 INCHES AND SHOULD INCREASE IF HEA I/1ER SEEPAGE IS ANTI CIPA TED `- COARSE GRAVEL, J14 INCH DIAM. W1 TH LESS THAN 59 FINES 4-INCH DIAMETER PERFORA TED PIPE SLOPED TO A SUITABLE OUTLET AT 1/4" PER FOOT FOR FLEXIBLE AND A T 118" PER FOOT FOR RIGID PIPE PERIMETER DRAIN PRUECT NO.: 01146 CIVIL/GEOTECHNICAL LOT 15, HORSE MOUNTAIN RANCH SCALE: 1114, SWI/4, SECAON 21, T3S, R83W, 57H P.M. NIS L KjJ Engineering, Inc. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO DATE: PREPARED FOR: 10-05-2001 P.O. Box 1452 tel (97) 926 —9088 fox n( 7081 ) FSO ARCHITECTS FIGURE N0: 6 EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH P.O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631-0179 FAX TRANSMITTAL TO: L /<� % Zo p, 0 '-Q-1z cJ 9 FROM: Bill Carlson, Environmental Health Specialist II r DATE: RE: / cD 2 ®S� NUMBER OF PAGES: / Ck � ) (,-:j, PHONE NUMBER: 970-328-8758 FAX NUMBER: 970-328-8788 NOTE: Please call me if you have any questions. d,� :� ( � -� _ r'� -0 ISDB Permit #7i Date6 - -Za . d Z TSDS Final Inspection Cgwleteness Form Tank is 2 0 0 gal. Tank Material 66 s2 --'�' Tank is located : i ft. and 2�:- degrees from �/ -ce, P=fra�"m !� 1paswat l.ae.�Ict Tank is located ft. and degrees from {P lana.arlcl Tank set level. / — 19Tank lids within S" of finished grade. Size of field C..7!�rj-t2 units lineal ft. Technology = ..37'/i r P L Cleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1/100ft). :Zz,3 There is a "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and outlet of the tank-. - -e$ Inlet . and outlet is sealed with tar -,tape,. _rubber ket a c. e� T k ;hds twa� dompartments with the._f1ar . r-;,.q—a�tmeat closest _ to the house. G� M+saeure. distance and relative diretct qn; to:;-,XivkI.d, Depth of field. ft. -Soil interface raked. Inspection portals at the.end of each trench.. Proper distance to setbacks. Chambers properly installed as per manufacturer$ specifications. (Chambers latched, end plates properly installed, rocks 'removed from __.,,--trenches, etc.) S /� ,2 3 a Type of pipe used for building sewer line , leach field Other Inspection meets requirements. Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement Were suggested. ACTION TAKEN: Setbacks off► % %, ��, ca ��a l S�a�, S. r Well Potable House Property Lake Dry Tank Drain Q, C Water Lines line Stream Gulch - Field 100 25 20 10 50 25 10 10 50 10 5 10 50 10 10 P.O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 JOB SHEET NO. n /f OF CALCULATED BY ppJE CHECKED BY �J is q DATE ��...,�.. � <,.r� ,,,�.y,..n�oo�, �.,,�� wwK., c•=�®.�... W.M. ��m...�., �. �. �.., .��.� �..�,�« � o.r�.�.,o. 2166-02 Tax# 1855-213-00-076 JOB NAME_ Lot #1 5, Horse Mt. Ranch SCHMIDT 102 Kanoshe Ct., Wolcott JOB NO�- P - / q6 - 1 e%f1AT1,11J BILL TO DATE STARTE DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED -::4— — � V - T 3 .,�� /� ; !?•;��; �' JOB COST SUMMARY 40��1 �,�� <_�, ���,- a Z- + ��fL j,f TOTAL SELLING PRICE TOTAL MATERIAL .-r-=• y"7" �_ <_i!L S�1// �J•�S:.ci,'r �l TOTAL LABOR INSURANCE �' ►L, SALES TAX = Fri ou• i MISC. COSTS n a / z Cam; TOTAL JOB COST GROSS PROFIT l V' ✓ �; ! . / \ !� Le V f LESS OVERHEAD COSTS % OF SELLING PRICE �i NET PROFIT JOB FOLDER Product 278 JOB FOLDER Printed In USA t �40 S; �►�c l �i �S/fie/ C ©>a.Z �►�c / �� bdi�� �vv%2�`� cnc,i�51� V,__ •