HomeMy WebLinkAbout730 Green Meadiw Dr - 239122309001INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631
Telephone: (970) 328-8755
COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 2072-01 BP NO. 13546
OWNER: THOMAS L. SCHRAMER PHONE: 970-963-6909
MAILING ADDRESS: 139 ARAPAHOE, CARBONDALE, CO 81623
APPLICANT: SAME PHONE:
SYSTEM LOCATION: 730 GREEN MEADOW DRIVE, CARBONDALE, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 239122309001
LICENSED INSTALLER: ELK PEAKS CONSTRUCTION, THOMAS SCHRAMER LICENSE NO. 39-01 PHONE: 970-963-6909
DESIGN ENGINEER: MCLAUGHLIN WATER ENGINEERS, DEAN DEROSIER PHONE NO. 970-925-1920
INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A 4 BEDROOM RESIDENCE
1500 GALLON 2 COMPARTMENT SEPTIC TANK, 2387 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA CREDIT, VIA 77 INFILTRATOR UNITS, AS PER ENGINEER'S
DESIGN DATED JANUARY 2001.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN WITH A CLEANOUT BETWEEN THE TANK AND THE HOUSE AND INSPECTION PORT-
ALS IN EACH TRENCH. KEEP THIS SYSTEM AS SHALLOW AS POSSIBLE. RAKE ALL TRENCH SURFACES TO PREVENT THE SMEARING OF SOILS AND
DO NOT INSTALL IN WET WEATHER. CALL EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER FOR FINAL INSPECTION
PRIOR TO BACK FILLING ANY PART OF THE INSTALLATION, OR WITH ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INSTALLATION.. AN AS BUILT
DRAWING IS REQUIRED FOR FINAL CERTIFICATION. THE BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE SEPTIC
SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND APPR V2
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: �"
CONDITIONS:
1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS,
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED.
2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING
REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO, OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL
AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT, AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT.
3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO
BE LICENSED.
FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR):
NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM
IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM.
INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 2821 SQUARE FEET (VIA 91 INFILTRATOR UNITS )
INSTALLED CONCRf,' . 15 0 0 GALLONS IS LOCATED 9 0 DEGREES AND 4 2 FEET INCHES
FROM SOUTH` SIDE OF THE HOUSE FOUNDATIOR_,:-_ '-,.
COMMENTS: THE FINAL INSPECTIONS WERE DONE BY WILLIAM CARLSON OF EAGLE COUNTY AND
THE DESIGN ENGINEER ON MAY 30, 2001. THE ENGINEER's FINAL CERTIFICATION WAS
RECEIVED ON JANUARY 2, 2002. THIS SYSTEM IS LARGE ENOUGH FOR A 4 BEDROOM HOME.
ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WIL CT D B INAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS
COMPLETED.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE:
FEBRUARY 6, 2002
FE% _:47P FROM:ERGLE COUNTY ENV HER 9703260349 TO:19709636909 P:2%7
Tnc: lalete Applications Will NOT Be Accepted
(Sitb Plan MUST be attached)
ISDS Permit #� a ��
Building Permit # :—If Lo
APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 179
EAGLE, CO 81631
328-8755/927-3823 (El Jebel)
* FEE SCHEDULE
* PERMIT APPLICATION) FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00
* SLING AND SITE VISIT FEE $85.00 (WHEN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SIZES THE
* SYSTEM USING YOUR SOILS REPORT)
* MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER"
Ye$r�tak*�irit7h*�*tkkie*aklrykdr*rie�ek#***ak5tir*lat�lryt9t�k*�Yvir*ait#�irkk�kak*�rirksk*Rr�kyt�k*k�c9e*irk*Ytat�tYtfi*it9tit
PROPERTY OWNER: TkD wA a J L • s� � r �
MAILING ADDRESS: 135 ArA Q hoe. le ,C'o ?16Z3 PHONE: 963-6105
APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: To� � j PHONE: 3 ;X9 - ,?8 ;Z 4.
LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: PHONE: `�---
COMPANY/DBA: ADDRESS: ^e `jam >�-
PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: X NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR
LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
Legal Description: L.4- ZO -TZy ; /�Gs � S•,,� cl i�i
Tax Parcel Number: 2 3 Ok 2++2 3 0 10 0 l Lot Size : �• `��
Physical Address: -730 6'reeh Megr%Jaw Zy-, Cam,&^aalc 23
BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category)
(Xj Residential/Single Family
( ) Residential/Multi-Family*
( ) Commercial/Industrial*
Number
Number
Type _
of Bedrooms
of Bedrooms
*These systems require design by a Registered Professional Engineer
TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category)
(x) Well { ) Spring ( ) Surface � _-y wa�I
) Public Name of 1 ' 57 d1y1'5'2 � '''' M v„�
APPLICANT SIGNATURE: Date;
A_MOTJJNT PAID: RECEIPT # DATE: 5 ( 16 I
CHECK #: CASHIER:
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
(970) 328-8755
FAX (970) 328-8788
TDD: (970) 328-8797
TOLL FREE: 800-225-8136
www.eagle-county.com
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
February 6, 2002
Thomas Schramer
139 Arapahoe
Carbondale, CO 81623
Raymond P. Merry, REHS
Director
RE: Final of ISDS Permit #2072-01 Tax Parcel #2391-223-09-001. Property
location: 730 Green Meadow Drive, Carbondale, CO.
Dear Mr. Schramer:
This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and
finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate
compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding
the care of your septic system.
Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic
system.
If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental
Health Division at (970) 328-8755.
Sincerely,
Janet Kohl
Eagle County Environmental Health Department
ENCL: Informational Brochure
Final ISDS Permit
cc: files
OLD COURTHOUSE BUILDING, 551 Broadway, P.O. Box 179, Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
Community Development Department
(970) 328-8730
FAX (970) 328-7185
TDD (970) 328-8797
Email: eccmdeva@vail.net
http: //www.eagle-county.com
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
Date: March 30, 2001
TO: Elk Peaks Construction
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
FROM: Environmental Health Division
RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No.2072-01. Tax Parcel
#2391-223-09-001. Property Location: 730 Green Meadow Drive, Carbondale,
CO Schramer residence.
Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 2072-01, and a field copy of the engineer design stipulated on
the permit. It is valid for 120 days, or for the duration of your current building permit for this
property. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes
in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Please note any
special requirements that may have been added to the design by this department.
Systems designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer
indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County Environmental Health
must also view the installation prior to back filling. Please call well in advance for your
final inspection. Your TCO will not be issued until our office receives this certification
from the engineer, and views the installation.
Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property
owner's attention.
This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. Please
notify this office if you have not been contracted to perform this installation.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328-
8755.
cc: files
McLaughlin Water Engineers, ltd, Dean Derosier
vC Li 1.1 "L VT. GTr.+ 1—IkjL—rlll un L l 11 W!l 1 Elm Gf I A f Ij — 0 1= Q — I ou (T
McLAUGI-LL1N WATER ENGINEERS, lid.
11 ! P AABC ASPLN, COLORAD0 9161 1
970-925-1920 970-925-1974 t4x tuwct�tipenr�lr:+l:nct
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 11, 2001
TO: EA.OLE County Environmental, Health, BILL C
From: Dean Derosier; McLaughlin Water Engineers, ntd,
RE: MIRAMER Septic System - Recommendation of Final Approval A-100.01
ECEH Permit # 2072-01
The system was designed and installed and placed into service is July of 2001.
MWE and GDD inspected the installation of the system and found it was
installed according to MWE's design and ECEH requirements. This letter is to
serve as the acceptance letter for MWE and recommendation to Sagle County for
final acceptance of the system.
To my knowledge the system was installed according to MWEZ standards, the
system layout was installed per the original design drawing, which can be used
as the asbuilt. The system consists of 1 - new 1,500 gallon and a 7 grow, (11
units in each ,cow), serial distribution system with 77 units. All trenches
were installed using a infiltrator gravelless chamber system. All setback
1 imitat ians;�
-any questions.
- -,. - - , -f 7.uluwu1
1
t67
ucrt:I"LucuL.•vtvvc,vurQv
vit It L
1:V- J .� 1V CLAl7CHLIN WATER ENCi"1:NE]EM, ltd.
II I PAAWA P 1, COLORADO 8W i
970-925_S42o 970-925-1974 ttx ntwcasip4D(d�rolncl
MEMORANDUM
Mc-11 MAGLB County EitNpa:i'CIP7mental Health, BILL Cawlson
Fromm Dean Peranier) XCLaughljn W&t:far E219iMera, Ltd.
SCRRA=Jk 9elstic System -- LPCXH Perfmit # 2072-03.
The 4saig'n of tkds byst@m ,nd the permit call for 77 infiltrators, 7 rawe of
11. 'units in each xow. The system was located Per the dasigd, but instead of 11
anito In each rcw, 13 were 'nstgt118d, 91 tatal, MY field boteo "nfirm th*t
91 units were :Lnctall,ed, when S wrote the DuceMber 11, 2001 Flnal ACCeptaUce
latter, �; listed this, regoir+ed roxmit number of inf,iltraLo3ca (77) instead of
the actual Mont (92) ill my filed notem. sDrty about the ccofumion. Attache4
Is a final, i.nsgec'ticn mean randnet with 91 unital.
Blma!w call a YOU halve Any Qunlgt;LOnr..
Cf« Dean ®r _
Tf k 1 ^ '"lfA. w!"Y 1 1f" 4 4 . ^Yf•, M TM . 1 ^F f r rnl IL 1-11 rk 11 1 I —, — I
McLAUGHLIN WATER ENGINEERS, ltd.
1 I I P AABC ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
970-925-1920 970-925-1974 fax mweaspen@rofnet
MEMORANDUM
Date: January 24, 2001
To: Eagle County Environmental health;
From: Dean Derosier; McLaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd.
RE: SCSRAMBR Residence - Septic System Design Notes - Lot 20 Sopris Mesa
Subdivision
The following are my design notes for the new Schramer Residence Septic System
design. The site is a sloped area next to the home.
- 4 - Bedrooms
- Approx. 3,400 Square Feet of living area
- 75 gallons per day per person
- Per Rates - 35 MPI (avg) By HP Geotech = Loading rate of .45 gals.sq ft
- Ground water 100'+\- feet from surface
Public water supply system.
Flow = Q m 4 bed rooms x 2 peo/br x 75 gal/day/per x 1.75(max flow) = 1,050
gallons per day.
Tank sizing - 4 - Bed Rooms requires 1,500 gallons of septic tanks; Q X 1.25
Install 1 - 1,500 gallon double chambered septic tank. Install tank to meet
site contours and allow access for cleaning.
This is a gravity feed system using infiltrators and serial distribution.
Area of Septic field required = A
Percolation Rate = 35 minute per inch = Loading Rate of .45 gals pe square
foot.
1,050/.45 = 2,333 square feet = 150 infiltrators
sagle County allowance - 50% for use of infiltrators
SO% reduction for infiltrators • 1,167 sq ft or 75 infiltrators.
rn,-v-mAmp swatem to 77 un is to a1JQW for even lenath trWches
Install 7 rows of 11 units in a serial distributed trench system of 77 total
infiltrators. Contour the trenches to fit site conditions and the topo of the
site, Trenchers are to be 106 apart. System size = 770 long R 660 wide. Minimum
depth n 240 maximum depth . 720 to top of infilArator. Install vents on every
other row of trenches. #� �;S� 4�S Pn" (Q-
Tank and disposal field will be installed in the general area South of the
home in the open area. Tess will be installed on both the inffluent and
effluent lines of the tank, set on the inside of the tank. Set top of line
from tee within 1' of the roof of the tank and extend line downward 140 below
center line of tee. Fill tank with water prior to backfill to check for leaks
and leave water in tank for placing the system in service. Septic tanks will
be a two -chambered tanks. Maxims cover over access to tank shall be 6' and
easily accessed for maintenance.
Piping from the home to the tanks will be 4' SDR 35 PVC laid at a minimum of
1%. Insulate lines with less than 5-foot of cover or in uninsulated crawl
spaces. Minimum depth is 3.50 for all piping
Distribution to the field from the tank and in the serial distribution system
shall be sch 4V PVC piping. All piping to be bedded in a minimum of 20 under
and 60 over of 3/401 screened rock.
Run 40 SCH 40 perforated PVC inside each trench of infiltrators for serial
distribution. Use solid Sch 40 PVC between each set of trenches. Trenches to
be with in %0 of level across the entire length. each row may be stepped down
to match contours and other site conditons.
Adjustments to fit site contours and conditions may be made per approval of
the engineer. Blevations of the tank and trenches shall be finalized in the
field by the engineer. installation and operation shall be approved by the
engineers prior to final acceptance. System must meet all PCBB and ME
standards.
System must meet all Nagle County ISDS requirements and must be inspected by
on and Ragle County prior to Final Approval. Owner is recommended to pump
the septic tank at 2 year intervals. Landscaping and watering us on top of
septic field shall be minimized or eliminated.
G. De:�. osier, P. 2.
oP�•E4� .
NAL
White - Customer Canary = El Jebel Office Pink -Treasurer _ Goldenrod - Department
- I,= W�.W 27
LZ
Thomas Schramer
P.O. Box 982
Basalt, Colorado 81621
Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone. 970-945-7988
Fax- 970-945-8454
hpgeo0hpgectech com
Job No. 100175
it Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed
Residence, Lot 20, Sopris Mesa Subdivision, Green Meadow Drive,
Eagle County, Colorado.
Dear Mr. Schramer:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and
percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study
was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services
to you dated February 7, 2000. The data obtained and our recommendations based on
the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this
report. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. previously conducted a preliminary
gotechnical study for the Sopris Mesa Subdivision and presented our findings in a
report dated October 23, 1997, Job No. 197 495.
Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame
structure over a walkout basement level located in the building envelope as shown on
Fig. 1. Basement floor is proposed to be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to
range between about 4 to 10 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are
assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The
septic disposal system is proposed to be located downhill to the southwest of the
building envelope.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
-described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Thomas Schramer
February 21, 2000
Page 2
Site Conditions: The site was vacant and covered with up to 12 inches of snow at the
time of our field work. The ground surface in the building area is gently rolling with a
slight slope down to the southeast. There is about 15 feet of elevation difference across
the building envelope. The lot is vegetated with scattered sagebrush, grass and weeds.
Scattered basalt cobbles are exposed on the ground surface.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
excavating two exploratory pits in the building area and two profile pits in the septic
disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are
presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about one foot of topsoil,
generally consist of relatively dense basalt cobbles and boulders in a silty sand and
gravel matrix. Between 1 and 3 feet of stiff, sandy silty clay with scattered gravel was
encountered between the topsoil and basalt rock in the profile pits. Results of a
gradation analysis performed on a sample of the gravel matrix (minus 3 inch fraction)
obtained from the site are presented on Fig. 3. The laboratory testing is summarized in
Table I. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils
were slightly moist to moist.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the
exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread
footings placed on the undisturbed natural basalt rock soils designed for an allowable
bearing pressure of 2,500 psf for supporrof the proposed residence. Footings should
be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose
disturbed soils and clays encountered at the foundation bearing level within the
excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the
undisturbed natural basalt rock. Boulders in the subsoils will make excavation difficult.
Voids created by the removal of large rocks should be backfilled with concrete or
compacted sand and gravel. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover
H-P GEOTECH
Thomas 5chramer
February 21, 2000
Page 3
above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 42
inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation
walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming
an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining
structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent
fluid unit weight of at least 45 pc€ for the on -site gravelly soils, excluding oversized
rock as backfill.
Floor Slabs: The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support
lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential
movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing waits and columns with
expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints
should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint
spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on
experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel
should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material
should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve
and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill
can consist of the on -site gravelly soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration,
it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop
during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring
runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such
H-P GEOTECH
Thomas Schramer
February 21, 2000
Page 4
as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic
pressure buildup by an underdrain system.
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain
should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent
finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining
granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2 % passing the
No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of
2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11h feet deep.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
1) inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90 % of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be
capped with about 2 feet of the on -site, finer graded soils to reduce
surface water infiltration.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement
and walkway areas.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of
all backfill.
H-P GEOTECH
Thomas Schramer
February 21, 2000
Page 5
Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on February 15, 2000 to
evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. Two profile
pits and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test
holes (nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of
shallow backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The holes
were covered with rigid foam insulation to protect against freezing overnight. The soils
exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the profile pits shown
on Fig. 2 and consist of about 1 foot of topsoil and 1 to 3 feet of sandy silty clay
overlying relatively dense gravel, cobbles and boulders: Refusal to the backhoe digging
was encountered in the profile pits at depths of 5 and 7 feet. The percolation test results
are presented in Table H. The percolation test results indicate an infiltration rate of
between 23 and 45 minutes per inch with an average of 35 minutes per inch. Based on
the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area
should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. Eagle County
may require an engineered system due to the shallow refusal on basalt boulders.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geoterhnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the
locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in
the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions
may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered
during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be
notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
H-P GsoTecH
Thomas Schramer
February 21, 2000
Page b
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes.
We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As
the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH - P.
A
Jordy Z. lkW V-.T.LV-'
Reviewed By:
��
Ljt4-
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E.
JZA/rso
attachments
INC.
H-P GEOTECH
APPRO UMATE SCALE
1" = 80-
714D-- —
LOT 19
GREEN MEADOW DRIVE
1
PROFILE
PIT 1 ■
7160
7150
` ■ PIT 1
{ � i
�_BU-IL�NG`\ PR 2
\
VELOPE
.., l
P 2 ``
P 1 11%%
PROFlLI= � --- —
\PIT 2
\
7150
t
LOT 21
--7140
nn 175 H_E_P_WORTH — PAWLAK LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS 1
.. - - --r- .ftr-n^ni A "nnC kt TCT unt CC C�.
t I Litt/ I LL;rlNlt-AL. IIVL_ AIMU 44-8- --w--
f t
PIT 1 PIT 2 PROFILE PIT 1 PROFILE PIT 2
ELEV. = 7151' ELEV. = 7152' ELEV. = 7142' ELEV. = 7141'
0 0
y F1•' ;-2i� DO 17 s .
i� I WaM s
p—a
� _ 5 5
a
m
0
10 10 .�
LEGEND:
TOPSOIL: sandy silty day, organic, fern, moist. dark brawn.
CLAY (CL). silty. sandy. scattered basalt grovel, stiff, slightly moist. reddish brown.
BASALT COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GM).- in a silty sand and grovel matrix. dense, slightly moist.
light brown to white. highly calcareous.
i Disturbed bulk sample.
TPractical refusal to digging in boulders.
NOTES:
1. Exploratory pits were excavated on February 14. 2000 Wirth a Cat 426E backhoe.
2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured aporoximately by pacing from features on the site
plan provided.
3. Elevations of the exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan
and checked by hand level. Logs are drawn to depth_
4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree
implied by the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate
boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating.
Fluctuations in water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
+4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve
—200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
LL = Liquid L'nmit ( A )
Pi = Plasticity Index ( Z )
inn 17.5 1 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK 1 LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS � Fig. 2
1 1 GEOTECHNICAL, IN(:. 1 r
..�... �_.�. =.a�� rfrff� rim ...� �...:..
�r �� �ffff[ �� fir _� � i r fffff�
�! afftfs � r�� t ���
rrrrf ��frifff'r�rrffff�' �irrrwt
w fffi w f�rr� �� ffffr �r �� fft �w
frfwf�wwffrfff��.��frr �fffr�r�i�
rrff� iUr �� at r� w ffI �r fr�r fe ref
w �� �wr�w rrff� �r �r rrrfr ffrfff� ��� � �� s� �� r�s r ��
�� fffw rf�r �.�� fw�a>•f�� rw� r�fr rrr� frwnf� frrrf� fffea_ �..�� i�i �� r �r
rrs it fri rrrr. f��f� r_� frffff�f �.� �� ■�w� w rfr rr� . �� r� f. ��
i rfi �� �.�� w �r afffff� �� ��� �� rfi s r� � a �� i r ii
i ��ffffrr�.��wl�fft �ffA rff�sfffi rrUf�aisw rr. ���frrrrf�r
fffrfa w ��� w war w w �� f�fr ��a� � r� � nfff ��a ffffffw .� ffrrf
rrffe �� �.� �.�� w flies .�� frrfffff f�� �wr ffr�� � �� s �� rrrr• i r rff�
.`� rf�rra �w rat �� �� w �r.w ��. �i� r i r ffffff�
i rrrf�f�rr�wrrrr�r�r�fffrl�f�fffffrlff{wfri frrf/� ��irffffi
fr�wwfrf.r.�ffffff�fRffffffff�wffffffw wrfffr wfrrr���>. ff��
ff� �� �� �� �r w �� �� �r i� fff�� rF= � sari �� s �
ffrf� w ff�� w ��� �� �� w �� �/� fry ff� fr l r! � aAI r �
i i f�fffffrfr frffr� �� rrrrf ffrrr/ ffff� rrfrr ���' w ffffffffflfllf�rM fluff r rrrr
�� r r�s
�� ��! �� rfrl �� �� frrfl r ��
w>iffr ��ww�w�lr�r��
�� �� frf� I �� �� �� i r rrf/
w �� r .r fr>_ f�wi �� �� r ffffffa
rrrf�f fri �► i f11�1 r� a��/ ffrlf� i r 1f�f
�t f�f� >•� w fffffffff� � lffffrrl r� fffffr� rr� !/ �� � rf� rffff� � i i �
i �� �fl ff� fff� w �� �fr ffffff�fi � >•ff� �r�l ffffrr�'rf� �� r fr�f
i �ffff��rrrrf rrrN��rrr��fri iAffflr�ffi•ff�ir�
r� r�� fffff�!- fff�ft ffff�i fr�� ffffffrfr fffi a_� w rl ffff� � w fff�f{ r rrrl
fl�f frrrf� rfi rrrs rrr� — � � � � ♦ rrff� �asrfffffff� fffffrfr � if �r
i fffrrrt fr�n! fffffffff� w �ff� fffffrw rrffffa w� fffffr fl rffff�s ffn7•� �� ar•frr ff�� � �f
i rr� rffffr� ffffffffffl fffi �>! � w ff�I aff r�lfr ff� rrff ffrffffr \� i r i
�� ffffrrf� � t. s ffffrrr � rr�ffffrrfrf� i r �ffr
rrr �r r�ff� rrr�a rrrlr>_r �� ��� ffffffrfft / i frir0! rrfffrl �� i r fflri
ifrffr��li�� fffffffff�fffffffff�wl�fff�f�/i�rwrsllUl�r ffrf�fffffffrfl �rfrfl�
i irrfffrrfrlrrffrffwffffffrr ���rrrrl� .i�awrffff��rrr�r�r�i1111frr�
fffffrif�rww#ffffffff��rif>_f�frs �frrfffff�nwr�w r��rfffffr
i it �r fffffffff� ws �A �fr �� frf� s rrffff�>_ ��� �� rrr� nrrf rafffr�
w��.ir fir >•� fffffr� w a�flif{ fffr�� �� � a f�r� fr ffff� �� r� � a frr�
fff�fwf�wfffffff�f�ff�f�ffffffrr� �rrffffrrrffff�>trf�fsrrrfrrrr�fffffrrffi
���� �wfffffffw w>s.��fffffffff�wirrrf�
i rrrrrffff.�ur�if�ffrrfffffffiws>•f�rsr�f. ei�rrfrf�rruf��ff��rr�fffrfffr iif�
ir��`t'i �� �wfrifrfrr�>•ffrwffffffrw �ifrrfeirrrl
rffrl fffffr�, ��� �� rww�A ffffrrs+� �� r•fffff� f�fl �� Yr frr w ffrrfw i fft��
i r��fff�fi rfi rr�Sl ���fffffrw ��ffr�fr�Rlffff�ffAilrrs
frf�f rffw r� � fffff� fffffw fff�fs- .tee w.w�f wsf� s� �.�. �� �.� r fr�fw
i ffiw>ir �r w rfi ��' �� ffrrlsiifR rrrra fffl fw� rfrrr rrrrf is fr�s
�a r� w w fs �.r �� ���� fri � �� �� fffrfffr � fr ��
�! �IIfIrA ffffrf� rfffff� rrr�a rr� � S # rrrrs rfffrf� �� r�_�rs itr rr� �� r fff�A
��� f� iflf� �� �� �r� ► �� �� rr� frrrr �� fffffrr/ fffffffffft ffrfrfr r� r rw�
i �� rrrrf rrr�r Ai ffffrs I�rlr ��r i rrrfw fir r! rrf ffr�r rr! rr� 1 irfM
i frrrs rrrf� w w �� . w � �� �� � f� ffff�fr�rfut rrww 1!�!• frr�
w frr�e ffw�w ��� ��� r .� a•� as rrni ffffff� ffl�lffiff�l ffnfw� rfi w>_ r r�
i �� �� �� i f� of w �r>•� i1t ff�� � >rfflft fffffffff� �1! i � ftllff��
i � l� �� rrrfr I � ifr� rwff�r � �� �� fr rA rff� frrff� � r ffffff�
��� ��� a_ r�rw � �f�
r w �� i.r rr i ���� �r+��w �� w �� fs � a_� i� �� i �r
a w rfi w — � w w ��� fri fffi ffrfw f� at �� �� rfffr r ��
frffff>•rffffrtlfffff/iffifffffffff�fl�lr#1��1w�� �!♦�>+Ir��1R���
�!>•r ��� �!� w fffi w 1rr� r� rrrfr �� a � �� frfrr� i r f�
w w fffi fffi ffffffffff!>_r frrli ��� frrflrl r�w�� rrffifrfffffr i r fffrr
rffri w ffffff�f w w rrrfr w�f� �ffff�� f� �>tii �ff�fl ffffffrr iff{>•�
i ri � rrrfffl ffffffffffl �t �� ��\ � � I� � Mr � itA i 1 �
�.�>-r � �� .irfrr �� w�� s �r. w� �r� i r a�
rrrw�fffffrffrr.�. ��ffffffffr rr�w �rr�.rwr>•���wf�,•��.�.�r ��r��
�� pis r �� �� ��� frffff� i.r a�� rr� �� fw nip rfrrf� r�fFfrw�r�f f�ii 4 y�
�� rrfffffffr i �r«r ��� few air„�rr� �.�>tw� s•� s�� � s.�.�r .�w� r�.� �r�
fir �� �� �� r�� rrrfr rr� rrrrt frrfrw �fw fri i� ifffrfraffr� r�ir �� ar a ff�
fw ffrr�fffr i �� fffr�e w �.>� rfrfffi �r rrrfr �f� r.� rf�r>i�>w�ff� rff� r ff�rf
�� wrrtr r f� � �� �rf� � ��.�� f�ffr�>�aff� rea ffffffff� ffffrf� ffw�>t rrwe
U
Z
J �
Q �
Z
uj
N
W 4W-
0
W - 0
C7 U4 F-
YmCc
In
0
arc a
o
a a
W
1111111
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE II
PERCOLATION
TEST
RESULTS JOB
NO. 100 175
HOLE NO.
HOLE DEPTH
(INCHES)
LENGTH OF
INTERVAL
(JINN)
WATER DEPTH
AT START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
WATER DEPTH
AT END OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
DROP IN
WATER
LEVEL
(INCHES)
AVERAGE
PERCOLATION
RATE
(MIN.MCH)
P-1
38
30
9114
8114
1
46
8 114
7 112
314
7 112
7 114
114
7 114
7
114
7
6 112
112
6 112
6 1/4
114
6 114
5 314
112
5 314
5 112
114
P-2
32
15
water added
7 112
6 314
314
23
6 314
5 314
1
5 314
5
314
6
4
1
6114
5 112
314
4 112
4 314
314
4 314
4
314
4
3 112
112
P-3
46
15
9 114
9
114
1 36
9
8 114
314
8 114
8
114
8
7112
112
7 112
7
112
7
6 314
1/4
6 314•
6 114
112
.6114
1 5 314
1 112
Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on
February 14, 2000. The holes were covered with rigid foam insulation to protect against
freezing. Percolation tests were conducted on February 15, 2000. The average
percolation, rate was based on the last three readings of each test.
ISDS Permit # 7Z - a / Date
ISDS Final InnRection
Cg=leteness Form
Tank is �gal. Tank Material Ca PC nQL k
Tank is located ��2 ft. and 2 degrees from,
(paimnent landoaskl
Tank is located ft. and degrees from
(perm^mit Um0mck)
Tank set level. /�J o Tank lids within 8" of finished grade.
Size of field �62 t2 wa}ts -- li eal ft. ,
Technology—aJ
-/e-S_ Cleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1/100ft).
There is a "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and
outlet of the tank:
� Inlet.and outlet is sealed with tar• -,tape] rubber gasket etc.
e Tank-- ;has twa d mpartments with the._=jargar-;:.cpmpartment closest to
house.
✓... ,
- -•mature: distance and relative direp��c�n;
f. Aepth of field. �_ fit. ti ,o
Soil interface raked.
:�fS Inspection portals at the.end of each trench.
`Y S Proper distance to setbacks.
Chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications.
(Chambers latched, end plates properly in ��lgg2py� rocks 'removed from
trenches, etc.) !"'
Type of pipe used for building sewer line f)8, M Q-1-4rleach field - 2
Other
�s Inspection meets reauirements.
Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement were
suggested.
ACTION TAKEN: S��S e/►C, rr✓+��'xL/�`�'�ca
Setbacks
Well Potable House Property Lake Dry Tank Drain
Water Lines line Stream Gulch
,Fie d 100 25 20 10 50 25 10 10
�, 50 10 5 10 50 10 * 10
2072-01 Tax #2391-223-09-001
JOB NAME_ Lot #20 Sopris Mesa SCHRAMER JOB NO.
730 Green Meadow Drive
C. a rh.on.dalP _ r
LOCATION
BILL TO
DATE STARTED
DATE COMPLETED
DATE BILLED
�',/9
r 1 el ;'� ��I a P n/!V. S's�1
xi X_ el-9 coo C%J
CCU f r! % fj z
( �'
�. � � Jam. L 4� � � @ d� �"/ � �f
f ./ �] �
� �? ...�j i°"�2 f l `"?a ,,� � � ��•=,� �'
C-/
"S 0B COST SUMMARY
TOTAL SELLING PRICE
'
""� e p�
TOTAL MATERIAL
TOTAL LABOR
o Co r /� \ UV �d 4�
INSURANCE
SALES TAX
r '` �'" ^
v �o Qc " Z7 �' a
MISC. COSTS
�'— ^ I r lam/' M-zz�yA,
'
-
TOTAL JOB COST
GROSS PROFIT
n
l�r
�
LESS OVERHEAD COSTS
°° OF SELLING PRICE
NET PROFIT
.los FOLDER Product r►s C CC G f S ,"f i� /,°�S JOB FOLDER
Printed In USA
Recycled Content
10% Post•Consumer
'
1
20 0 20 40
3
1 inc20 feet NOTES:
1, SEE ATT,4CHEC DES ICON MEMO FOR
MORE DETAIL 011 SYSTEM DESIGN,
AND INSTALLATION
= 2. SYSTEM MUST I%lE =T EAGLE COUNTY
REGULATIONS FCIR ISDS, SEE LATEST
VERSION OF RE6jLAT IONS PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION
3. SYSTEM LOCAlION MAY SE ADJUSTED
TO MEET FIELD COND IT IONS WITH ENGINEERS
APPROVAL
4. EAGLE COUNT' AND MWE
INSPECTION fREOLRED PRIOR TO
- FINAL ACCEPTANCE -
5, CONTRACTOR 'O PROVIDE AS5U ILTS
OF COMPLETED STEM TO ENGINEER AND COUNTY
ff
DATE CO N" REVISION BY
•
EXETNG AND FU LRE riQli LM --
M CICILL 311HO MAJG
b' -TOP am
E
OcnoNG zom - FNE NATNS
MATERIAL NO LARGER THM MINIMUM DEPTH 24"
Im N DWIMM WITH i ' OF MAX DEPTH 72" TO TOP OF WLTRATOR
NFLTRATOR
vvv vv
vvvv vvvv
vv v vvv
v v vvv 7 - 77 - FOM NFLTRATOR
v v v v TREJQ-Eb - a WITS N EACr�{
v v v v T3CHEL E TO BE FBA OEt> hEN®
v M nJM O@'TH 10 "= TO OOTTOM OF
v TFANCK I& APART MN1" t M
NPLTRATOR 1-EWT 15 -12" NFLT�?AtOR
E TO BE FED OETEpgMN D CY ENG iM
N 4" SCH 40 PVC PPNG TO END
I OF FIRST ROW OF WLTRATOR TRENCHES
AND BETUE£N EACW ROW OF TRENCHES, F STAL.L
4" PERFORATED SCH 40 PVC NSDE EACH ROW FOR T14E
SERIAL DISTRIBUTION TO EACH OF THE 7
ROWS OF THE TRENCH SYSTEM
TRENCH DETAIL NTS
'
�1✓j,
S SQL G
4�
Vfi ,
P S -
el 7-5
I dot
fl fit4-
)42_S
1 `s . 01
f
TOM AND LESL IE SCHRAMER
p
LOT 20 609R IS MES4 SU5D IV IS ION "
EAGLE COUNTY
PROJECT NUMBER
AO- 1000.1
DESIGN: GDD
DETAIL GDD
CHECK:
TOM AND LESLIE SCHRAMER
SEPTIC SYSTEM —
LOT 20 SOPRIS -MESA
SYSTEM PLAN AND
DETAILS
EAGLE COUNTY
MdaughGn�Wa�erc 2420 A03.4 Street, Denver, CO 80211
PH. 903.458.5550; Fax 303.480.9788
ena�.aa. ua. email mwe®mwewater.com
=DATE-./2001 DRAWING C
NUMBER S J Ll