The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About435 Fox Run Dr - 239128407020INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631 Telephone: (970) 328-8755 COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1986-00 BP NO. 13183 OWNER: MONIQUE AND NILE BRENNECKE PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1484, ASPEN, CO 81612 APPLICANT: STEFAN FRONKA PHONE: 970-379-7014 SYSTEM LOCATION: 0435 FOX RUN DRIVE, CARBONDALE, CO TAX PARCEL N02391-284-07-020 LICENSED INSTALLER: ASPEN EARTH MOVING, TROY BUSTER LICENSE NO. 21-00 PHONE: 970-963-0377 DESIGN ENGINEER: HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, SOILS REPORT ONLY PHONE NO. 970-945-7988 INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A 5 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 1500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK, 1875 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA, VIA 61 INFILTRATOR UNITS, AS REQUESTED BY CONTRACTOR SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL IN SERIAL DISTRIBUTION IN TRENCHES WITH A CLEANOUT BETWEEN THE TANK AND THE HOUSE, AND IN- SPECTION PORTALS IN EACH TRENCH. RAKE ALL TRENCH SURFACES TO PREVENT THE SMEARING OF SOILS, AND DO NOT INSTALL IN WET WEA- THER. DO NOT BACKFILL WITH ANY COBBLES LARGER THAN EIGHT (8) INCHES IN DIAMETER. BE SURE TO MAINTAIN ALL APPLICABLE SET -BACK REQUIREMENTS. CALL EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FOR FINAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO BACK -FILLING ANY PART OF THE IN- STALLATION, OR WITH QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INSTALLATION. BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE SEPTIC SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: 0ttAA_ J'7c DATE: DUNE 9, 2000 CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO, OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT, AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 1984 SQUARE FEET (VIA 64 INFILTRATOR UNITS ) INSTALLED CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK: 1500 GALLONS IS LOCATED 136 DEGREES AND 45 FEET INCHES FROM FROM THE CLEANOUT COMMENTS: THE FINAL INSPECTION WAS DONE BY HEATHER SAVALOX OF EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ON JUNE 27, 20W.: ADDITIONAL PHOTOS WERE NEEDED TO VERIFY THE CONNECTION OF THE LAST TRENCH. THOSE PHOTOS WERE RECEIVED ON MAY 29.2001, THIS SYSTEM IS LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE A FIVE BEDROOM RESIDENCE. ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL.�,{,QAt.Ok._ DATE: MAY 29, 2001 'mplete Applications Will NOT Be Accepted. elan MUST be attached) /1 ISDS Permit # "1 Building Permit # 13/93 APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY P. O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823 (El Jebel) * FEE SCHEDULE * PERMIT APPLICATION FEE. $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00 * SIZING AND SITE•VISIT FEE $85.00 (WHEN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SIZES THE * SYSTEM USING YOUR SOILS REPORT) * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" ************************************************************************** PROPERTY OWNER: 1470,fl/ce-c--;��G%L'!�/��`� MAILING ADDRESS: /17 01401Y l7 d'� /�"�d�� PHONE: APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: S�� 7--e oov PPHOONE : -� D! LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: /9fZFN Z;Wh ,~t11A 4 PHONE :379 l G l COMPANY/DBA: ADDRESS: *************************************************************************** PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: (X NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Legal Description: Z,97 /cr niqX olltl ''ftF4#w jcloo Tax Parcel Number • / ' /,,,—'0 70VO Lot Size: cJ ae- Physical 'Address: BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category) 25- ()<j Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms ( ) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type *These systems require design by a Registered Professional Engineer TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category) ( ) Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface ("�C) Public Name of Supplier: eLw Acl— APPLICANT SIGNATURE: Date: AMOUNT PAID:�.�a RECEIPT #: t��DATE: t7u�v CHECK #: ��i CASHIER: Community Development Department (970)328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com May 29, 2001 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 Monique and Nile Brennecke P.O. Box 1484 Aspen, CO 81612 RE: Final of ISDS Permit #1986-00, Tax Parcel #2391-284-07-020 Property. location: 0345 Fox Run Drive, Carbondale, CO. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Brennecke: This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at (970) 328-8755. Sincerely, °, 4AWr Janet Kohl Environmental Health Department Eagle County Community Development ENCL: Informational Brochure Final ISDS Permit cc: files Community Development Department (970)328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com DATE: June 9, 2000 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO TO: Aspen Earth Moving FROM: Environmental Health Division Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit #1989-00, Tax Parcel #2391-284-07-020. Property Location: 0435 Fox Run Drive, Carbondale, CO , Brennecke residence. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit 91986-00. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. If you have not been contracted to install this system please contact Eagle County Environmental Health. Also enclosed is the ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form. The items on this form need to be completed before you call for your final inspection. Also, please note any special conditions which may have been placed on the permit. Do not back fill any part of the installation until it has been inspected. If all items are not completed, a reinspection fee of $42.50 must be paid before a reinspection is made. Please call our office well in advance to allow for scheduling of final inspection. Your building permit TCO will not be issued until final approval has been given for the ISDS Permit. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files Enclosures: ISDS permit # 1986-00; ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form GecPtech October 5, 1999 Stefan Fronka P.O. Box 1614 Basalt, Colorado 81621 Hepworth-Paw•lak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax:970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No. 199 722 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Testing, Proposed Residence, Lot 18, Fox Run Meadows, Eagle County, Colorado, Dear Mr. Fronka: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated September 10, 1999. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. previously performed a preliminary subsoil study for the Fox Run Meadows Subdivision dated July 15, 1996, Job No. 195 460. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure with an attached garage located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. The lower level will be a walk -out basement daylighting to the south. Ground floors will be slab -on - grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 3 to 8 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The lot is vacant and located in the southwest portion of the subdivision. The ground surface appears natural and slopes strongly down to the southwest at grades of about 5 to 10%. Elevation difference_ across the proposed residence is about 4 or 5 feet and across the lot about 25 feet. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds. There. -are several_irrigoon ditches across the site that were dryat the= time-of.our field, work and are apparently abandoned,," Stefan Fronka October 5, 1999 Page 2 Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by observing two exploratory pits (Pits 1 and 2) at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The pits were excavated by the client prior to our site visit. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1'/2 to 2 feet of topsoil, consist of sandy gravel and cobbles with small boulders which was silty to slightly silty with depth. The gravel, cobble and boulder material was basalt fragments, appeared generally medium dense and extended to the pit depths of 8 and 9 feet. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a bulk sample of the gravel and cobble soils (minus 8 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Fig. 3. No free water was observed in the pits and the soils were slightly moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf for support of the proposed residence. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. All topsoil, loose or disturbed soils, and any existing fill encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural granular soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for the on -site soil excluding vegetation, topsoil and oversized rocks as backfill. Floor Slabs: The natural on -site granular soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly to moderately loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The H-P GEOTECH Stefan Fronka October 5, 1999 Page 3 requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free - draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on -site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can also develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff also can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1'/z feet deep. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in r pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard H-P GEOTECH Stefan Fronka October 5, 1999 Page 4 Proctor density in landscape areas. Wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on -site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on September 14, 1999 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. A profile pit (Pit 1.) and three percolation holes were dug at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes (nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in Pit l shown on Fig. 2 and consist of silty to slightly silty sandy gravel and cobbles. The percolation test results presented in Table I indicate average percolation rates ranging from about 9rito=42; minutes per inch. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the test area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 and to the depths shown on Fig. 2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If H-P GEOTECH Stefan Fronka October 5, 1999 Page 5 conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - David A. Young, P.E. Reviewed By: el E. Hardin, P.E. DAY/sd attachments H-P GEOTECH 613 S3�OH 1S31 NOLV�00�J3d ONd -ONI `-Id01NH031030 I ZZL 66L . Slid QJOJV60-IdX3 AO NOIl`d007I )rIV-1Mdd — HidOMd3H OLIL OZ I.L — — \ S312idONnoe 8 L lo-I I • I 0 311S -1VSOdS10 L—d OI1d3S 03SOdOHd �\ 02LL--i---- I \ z }'d I \ l I \ 30N3CIIS3N i \ 03SOdOHd I \ \� 3do-13nN3 �� I ON1an1ne f 2 l 1 o-I ! 1 \ 8 l 10� �\ Z I,10� / ! 0� lL 0C LL OZ LL .09 = „ L 3-I`dOS 31VVgIXOiJddV 330H 1S31 N011b-100213d V lld Al ]OlO�]McIX3 ■ CIN3031 PIT 1 PIT 2 ELEV. = 7129' ELEV. = 7126' LEGEND: Topsoil; organic sandy silty clay, medium stiff, slightly moist, brown, roots. C SOo" Gravel and Cobbles (GM); consisting of basalt fragments to boulder size, silty to slightly silty with o.od. depth, occasionally clayey, medium dense, slightly moist, very light brown, calcareous. i Disturbed bulk sample. �J NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were observed on September 13, 1999. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were approximated from contours on the site plan provided. Pit logs are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the --approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 1 199 722 HE WORTH IC PAWLA I LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS I Fig. 2 I HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE I PERCOLATION TE5T RE5ULT5 JOB NO.199 722 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL INCHES DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P-1 72 15 refilled refilled 7 1/8 5 7/8 1 114 17 7 7/8 6 718 1 8 5/8 7 114 1 3/8 7 1/4 6 1/4 1 6 114 5 5/8 5/8 5 518 4 5/8 1 P-2 76 15 refilled 8 3/4 7 518 1 1/8 20 9114 9 114 9 8 1/4 3/4 8 1/4 7 1/2 3/4 7 1/2 6 314 3/4 6 314 6 314 P-3 67 15 refilled refilled refilled 9 114 6 114 3 9 1/2 6 3/4 2 314 10 8 2 9 314 8 118 1 5/8 8 118 6 3/8 1 3/4 Note: Percolation holes were hand dug in bottom of backF ::ptand pre-soaked on September 13, 1999. Percolation tests were conducted on September 14, 1999 by Hepworth-P , e to - nical, Inc. a !,Wee ti; ISDS Permit Date ISDS Final Inspection Completeness F/onrm Tank is �.� b gal. Tank Materials " Tank is located �ft. and j3/0° degrees from�eGlVl'IUuil -l�,fJ d4i a/L- (permanent landmark) Tank is located ft. and degrees from (permanent landmark) VL Tank set level. Tank lids within 8" of finished grade. Size of field ftz �Oy units lineal ft. Technology �VI F/YS Cleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1/100ft). There is a "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and outlet of the tank. Inlet and outlet is sealed with tar -.tape,. rubber gasket etc. 666n1r& Tank 'has two compartments with the ;-1-:arger..coMpartment closest to the / house. V Measure> distance and relative direction to :,f;,ield ..Depth of fieldo? ft. Soil interface raked. Inspection portals at the.end of each trench.. L,/ Proper distance to setbacks. V Chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications. (Chambers latched, end plates properly installed, rocks removed from trenches etc.) Type of pipe uspc or `-e,ceu- �fa� i building • sewer line YL(� 3s leach field St%/e-?.5� r/ Other S o w i_ Inspection meets recauirements. Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement were suggested. ACTION TAKEN: Setbacks Well Potable House Property Lake Dry Tank Drain Water Lines line Stream Gulch Field 100 25 20 10 50 25 10 10 Tank 50 10 5 10 50 10 * 10 � -// L �� 1986-00 Tax #2391-284-07-020 JOB NAME, Lot #18, Fox Run BRENNECKE Meadows, 0435 Fax Rein T)riv VT JOB Ng / 3 13 JOB LOCATION BILL TO DATE STARTED DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED 4A &ta Z ��- ��4r ' Pic .t .O-2 v t 004 lu 4 l ` tIl aL 04 r cnctX&CA A -- r „ 1 a l /Yll rn e ,4 All, . b rn A . , 0 1 -1 JOB COSTSUMMARY TOTALPRICE _■SIZE IW�� TOTAL MATERIAL' SEE i 7— MISC. COSTS TOTAL JOB COST I �r+�r+/"I'1 P1l1 CIT } lb .,rr... �£. -712 a ---_ RES, 13u/Z D 11 ,6 41Vl/4 LO/JE 1 or f8 Aax Ruhr IVSAIOOI v sUB40 . ��A� E' pRo7 . axAu oar . Lz Za 94 NO 19S THY', 7S22S` /Y..'70 -.3 701 :7)