Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout391 Mountain View Rd - 239122301001INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631 Telephone: (970) 328-8755 COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1877-99 BP NO. 12602 OWNER: MIKE AND HEIDI LEVEY PHONE: 614-236-5947 MAILING ADDRESS: 2533 BRYDEN RD., COLUMBUS, OH 43209 APPLICANT: FINN CONSTRUCTION, HARVEY OR CRAIG PHONE: 970-963-1424 SYSTEM LOCATION: 391 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD. CARBONDALE CO TAX PARCEL NO. 2391-223-01-001 LICENSED INSTALLER: R LICENSE NO. 9-99 PHONE: 970-926-2734 DESIGN ENGINEER: HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, ROGER NEAL PHONE NO. 970-945-8676 INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: 1500 GALLON SEPTIC TANK 1332 SQUARE FEET OF TRENCH ABSORPTION AREA VIA 44 INFILTRATOR UNITS AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL IN TRENCHES IN SERIAL DISTRIBUTION AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN REVISIONS DATED 7/13/99. ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL INSPECTION. BUILDING TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL SEPTIC SYSTEM HAS RECEIVED FINAL APPROVAL. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: JULY 15, 1996 CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS, CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 1332 SQUAREFEET(VIA 44 TNFTT.TRATOR TTNTTS INSTALLED CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK: 1500 GALLONS IS LOCATED DEGREES AND FEET FROM SEE A — TT,T T)RAWTNG FOR SYSTEM COMPONENT LOCATTONS- COMMENTS: ENGINEER'S FINAL CERTIFICATION AND AS—BUILTS R CETV D A C'TTST 18, 19()(). ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE: AUGUST 20, 1999 Inc;omplete*Applications Will NOT Be Accepted pite Plan MOST be attached) ISDS Permit i Building Permit I IR &Q APPLICATION FOR .INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE.— EAGLE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823 (Basalt) * PERMIT APPLICATION FE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00 * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE'.TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" PROPERTY OWNER: MAI LING ADDRESS: bLO l 0 PHONE(461Aj__36 —jff APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: V7.1 I0 I Ch/AieUell©y'&40PHONE: fo.3�-.I L,.2 U AY i �rafic�V 1.J LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: YhG�� p �'`�c�� PHONE: 3 ? 3 y Q COMPANY/ DBA : S`i' u ADDRESS: ��-7 AIL-4 f 2-- &'tWL SY PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: (\/INEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Legal Description: L6T 13 AE tA,.. i %31) Msawt,'.t�, ilitwu P� Tax Parcel Number: ; [ �Q 02� b Lot Size: Ae-ye,, Physical Address: 39f 0Iew IQ� c��l�a �-e. T cz' S11k, �23 BUILDING YPE (Check applicable category) ( Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms (.) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type TYPE OF ),&TER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category) ( Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface ( ) Public Name of Supplier: A.34ew W_ iti-eu: 'sa-WhyiV ;row" *These systems require design SIGNATURE: 01­� ,/,� AMOUNT PAID: vu by a Registered Professional - Engineer Date: RECEIPT #: DATE: Z, CHECK: CASHIER: 660 Community Development Department (970) 328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com Date: July 15, 1999 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO TO: Stutsman/Gerbaz, Inc. FROM: Environmental Health Division Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1877-99. Tax Parcel # 2391-223-01-001. Property Location: 391 Mountain View Rd., Carbondale,. CO., Levey residence. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1877-99. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Systems designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County does not perform final inspections on engineer designed systems. Your TCO will not be issued until our office receives this certification. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files High Country Engineering, Roger Neal Community Development Department (970) 328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@4ail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO August 20, 1999 Mike & Heidi Levey 2533 Bryden Rd. Columbus, OH 43209 Eagle County Building ,P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Final of ISDS Permit #1877-99, Tax Parcel #2391-223-01-001. Property location: 391 Mountain View Rd., Carbondale, CO. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Levey: This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at (970) 328-8755. Sincerely, Janet Kohl Environmental Health Department Eagle County Community Development ENCL:Informational Brochure Final ISDS Permit cc: files t0-24_. t 99S G : 3241 FROh1 _ _ _ _' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I;A::. P. 1 a• HEPINIORT11-1WI LAIC GEOTEC'HNICAL, INC. 5020 itnacl 154 C;(anwu9d. $Fti.rin�;y, Co t•76Ui , January 22, 1999 F"IX 970 94g•5454 rIionc 970 945.7988 Dr. Michael Levey 2.533 Dryden Road Columbus, Ohio 43209 Job No, 199 102 Subl et: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed �. Levey Residence, Lot 13, Block 1, Oakridge 1, Aspen Mountain View, Eagle County, Colorado. Dear Dr, Levey: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Veotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and percolation test for foundation and septic. disposal designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to YOU dated January 4, 1999. The data obtained and our reconanendations based on the proposed constraction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Evaluation of potential geologic hazard impacts on the site are beyond the scope. Of this study. Proposed Gonstructi.on: The proposed residence will be a one story wood frame structure over a walkout basenjent level, Ground floor is proposed to be siab_on-grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 4 to S feet. foundation, loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The septic disposal system is proposed ,to be located downhill to the south of the residence. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly, different fruri� those do<scribed above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recOmn.lertdations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The site is located south of Mountain View Road, The ground surface. in the building area slopes strongly down to the south with. about 20 feet of elevation difference between Pit 1 and Pit 2, Vegetation at the site consists of grass, weeds and sagebrush. Numerous basalt cobbles and boulders are exposed on the ground surface. About 1 foot Of snow wigs present on the site at the time of our field work. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratc ry pits in the building area and one profile pit in �1ie septic disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig, 1. The logs of the presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, betopsoil, about. 1 foot of � s l its - typical of the area and consist of basalt gravel, cobbles and boulders in a and clay matrix. Practical refusal, to digging with a back:hoe was exicountere in the pits at 21/a Dr. Michael Levy January 22, 1999 Page 2 feet.. No free water was observed in the pits at. the time of excavation and 1:ll.e soils were slightly moist to moist. Foundation Recoaaniendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread . footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for. an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf for support of the prnposed residence, Due to the difficult excavation. conditions, we recommend that the foundations be stepped up the hillside to avoid deep cuts. It is likely that. cuts of 5 to 10 feet may encounter large basalt rocks requiring rode excavation such as splitting, chipping or blasting. Footings should be a minimum, width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils from you er removal encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended- down to the undisturbed natural soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at. least 2---A/2 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area.. Continuous foundation -- walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation wails acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on -site soil as backfill. Floor Slabs: The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support. lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction, To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated frond all bearing walls and colurmis with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control. joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrKage cracking. The. requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should bid placed beneath basement level. slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of nunus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 9.5 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a mo%sture content near optinium. Required fill can consist of the on -site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Although free water Was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater. can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade �� H-P GEOYEGH Tyr. Michael Levy January 22, 1999 Page 3 construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain systeTX The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall. backfill surrounded above the invert level with fiee•-draining granular material. The drain, should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining; granular material. used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximun, size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/z feet. deep. Surface Drainage- The ,following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all tirnes after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction, 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near Optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the On -site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 33) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be .sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions, We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10. feet, in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. A swale may be needed uphill to direct surface runoff around the residence, 4) hoof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limit,,, of all backfill. Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted can January 131 1999 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal systern at the site, One profile pit and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1, The test holes (nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were .hand slug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and were soaked, with water one day prior to testing. The percolation test holes were protected from freezing overnight, The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig. 2 and consist of about 1 foot of topsoil overlying basalt gravel; cobbles and boulders in a sandy clay matrix. Practical refusal to digging in basalt boulders with a backhoe %vas encountered in. the Profile Pit at a depth of 214'feet. The percolation test results are presented in Table H. -P GEOTECH Dr. Michael Levy January 22, 1999 Page 4 Limitations; This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted. geotechnical engineering principles and practic" in this area at this time. 'We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommmendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at ,the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation. and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those desc., ibed in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made, This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may.require additional analysis or -modifications, to the recommendations presented herein. We reconunend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strataand testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If ,you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, BEPWORT14 - PAWLAK GEOTECHN1CAL, INC. Lo, u Eller Reviewed 13y: Daniel E. Hard ,.E. LEE/rso attachments ce: Basalt Realty - Attn: Jack Musser H-P QEQTEGH UNTAIN VIEW ROAD �. ft" ■ PIT 1 LOT 12 PROFIL s 1 APPROXIMATE SCALE i"=sa' .OT 14 f 9 102 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK LOCATION OF EXPLC)RATORY PITS Fig, i GEOTECHNICAL, INC. AND PERCOLATION TEST HODS PIT 1 PIT 2 PROFILE PIT 0 0 Ol Vr 5 r ' ' w 10 10 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, scattered gravel, cobbles and boulders, organic, medium upper 6 inches frozen, moist, dark brown. stiff, GRAVEL, COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GP—Gc); in a sandy clay matrix, dense to very ..•.; moist, brown, calcareous, basalt rock. dense, T 4 1 1 Disturbed bulk sample, J I Procticol digging refusal with backhoe in basalt rock. T NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on January 12, 1999 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of Exploratory pits were. measured opproximotely by pacing from features on the plan provided. site 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and logs of exploratory piare drawn to pits Pit 2 was about 20 feet lower than Pit depth. 4. 1. The Profile Pit was about 5 feet tower than Pit The exploratory locations 2. pit should be considered accurate only to the degree Implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the a boundaries between material types and transitions ppr°ximate may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time, 199 102 1 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS __ GEOTECHNIGAL, INC Fig. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK OEO'TECHNICAL, 1 INC, TABLE PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 199 102 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INGlil3$) LENGTH OF INTERVAL WATER DEPTH AT START OF WATER DEPx AT END OF INTERVAL ..FZAVERAGE.{MIN) ;RATE RCOLATIONINTERVAL. P`1 (INCHESI iINCWE5) 'MLN,IINCH} x0 15 6 1 !2 3/4 - :4: 1 3!4 . (Waiter Added) 4 3/4 3 1/2 _ , 1 1/4 6 3/4 'A 1 P-2 5 3, 4 1, ` 31� 2 11 23 16 10 a 7 1/4 1 11 1 7 1 1/2 1/2 1/2 --, 4 31a 1 /4 4 3/4 4 1/2 E/4 45 P-3 1g 15 8 1 /4 7 1 /4 . 7 1/4 6 1/4 1 & 1/4 5 114 _ 1 5114 4 1/2 314 4 1/2 _ 3 3/4 3/4 3 3/4 3 _ 3/4 � 3 2 1 /4 314 20 Note. Percolation tests Were peformed on January 13, 1999. The aver were based on the last 3 readings of each test. age Percolation rates time a -7- 16 J:\SDSKPROJ\99\99004-20\DWG\20LEVEY.DWG Thu Jul 15 10:49:31 1999 f — — � i � Sri'— i_r.- T % it j i r , ( 7 ; ir, ! ( r ( � I +, + � '1• !! _ ast� 7p• ! �.> - 7 ! r .i , ! r i ' i 1 r 2!! ! % N11ba• `j 1 r l l ff -' CTA l ; F F 9og , 9g�z � 4 m .1 >R iv^mpg "� y� i?b 5� '1 $Az y o p 2 g`m y AmAza iN �� �g >E> mom-, - gF Si �8 2 \A 1zm A r ~oTUN A ao �$ A88 e rm -zo P rN F a n o M; m a>o' - >- E$ 8m m^ > o m�z0 a m" is ou'i r mz F �o; i ohm $9Rz no of oN m_�S €m -$o-m 5, N 4a -_ �nh imomi n i 559 i Yo -m ,no a mm$ 8 Ni _ a c _ h- g:i r r >v rim -,v IP ynm91 �om ^a gi g g Av �o g� m N'', aal­ m a� m s am 9m A= �£ m$� m— a c o i8 ��g g> 8 Ny$.1n m 22 gy mz� �So mg 2 'A 'm 8 ;-2 p> �N2 o o o y- o�g" ,I m z. o m m Io 0 0 I I I op N"• g �A 5 I 1' Q o 9=5 4 Z. $t - o �g Tp 22 g9 AA gA m m ^X l / r m Z O c m D Vz KC g (' T rJj r ` . 26 LL LL VLT N0. DATE REVISION BY o m o EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO — "DES.DJW Q.INDMDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM 9M COOPER AVENUE oASPEN MOUNTAIN VIEW SUBDMSION .m, �� , LOT 13. OAKRDGE I 1877-99 Tax# 2391-223-01-001 Lot #13, Oak Ridge 1 LEVEY P-P JOB- NAME 391 Mountain View Rd. JOB NOOI Carbondale DATE WARTED.• DATE MILLED 2M1.4.5a�, I. Ms L'. � .t _! I m4 ill i / W/f, � L • COST -SUMMARY TOTAL SELLING PRICE WE Of Zz �A 61-1 0, 00, TOTAL LABOR INSURANCE -■ =11111110 ZWA�"A­W __W'100. , M�­W'4 I lij� W/ I FIN low IRA MISC. COSTS TOTAL JOB COST GROSS PROFIT COSTSAIM LESS OVERHEAD % OF SELLING - NET PROFIT JOB FOLDER Printed in U.S.A. t i l t " E � l I L=276.gg' --- EXI-STING-- - %' —VEGETATION ' 0 Z O V) w fr VICINITY MAP T7S, R87W, 6TH PM SCALE: 1" = 1 00, r RECEIVED cm _ _ I AUG 1 8 1999 w - IN I mzk LL GENERAL NOTES EAGLE COUNV W W COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT >_ Co I- ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BEAN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY N AND COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF, HEALTH (CDOH) REGULATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL U aD SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, EVEN THOUGH ALL SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT O SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUCH SPECIFIC DETAILS AS ARE REFERRED TO IN ^ THE ABOVE —MENTIONED REGULATIONS. O 2. FLOW: 5 BEDROOMS *2 PERSONS/BEDROOM -75 GALLONS/PERSON/DAY IS = .. 750 GPD = AVERAGE DAILY FLOW. MAXIMUM = 1.5* AVERAGE = 1125 GPD SEPTIC TANK: MINIMUM PRE -CAST CONCRETE TANK SIZE ACCORDING TO REGULATIONS IS 1.250 GALLONS. RECOMMEND 1500 GALLONS. *FIELD SIZE: PER CDOH EQUATIONS: A = Nt Q = MAXIMUM FLOW 5 t = PERCOLATION RATE = 35 _ A = 1125 * N135 = 1332�SQ.FT 5 PER CDOH REGS FOR USE OF 'INFILTRATOR' -H-10* TRENCH SYSTEMS — ALLOW 40% REDUCTION INIAREA FOR USE OF INFILTRATORS: 1332 S.F. * 0.6 * 15.5 S.F./UNIT = 51.57 UNITS (( MINIMUM 52 UNITS. 3. TOPSOIL: SOIL EXCAVATED FROM SITE ACCEPTABLE IF NO CLAY IS PRESENT. 4. VEHICULAR TRAFFIC IS PROHIBITED ON -THE FIE-LO AREA: 5. CLEANOUTS ARE REQUIRED AT ALL BENDS AND AT LEAST EVERY 100 FEET ALONG THE HOUSE SEWER. 6. INSTALL RISERS AS NECESSARYTO BRING ALL ACCESS POINTS TO WITHIN 1/2-FOOT OF FINAL GRADE. 7. LOCATIONS OF ALL COMPONENTS' Z MAY BE VARIED AS NECESSARY`AS LONG 1 AS ALL MINIMUM DISTANCES AND SLOPES MEET THOSE REQUIRED. 0 �' CC 8. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM AREA C 1 USING DRAINAGE SWALES AS NECESSARY. J i Q m 9. PERCOLATION RATE BASED ON TESTING BY HP GEOTECH ON JANUARY 22, 1999, ! JOB NUMBER 199 102. �O 0 cn 10. THIS DRAWING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ISDS PERMIT. PERMITLLJ w o Cn W Q MUST BE OBTAINED FROM APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY OFFIC ENGINEER MUSI OBSERVE CONSTRUCTED SYSTEM BEFORE BACKFII �ALS. J W AND PROVIDE REPORT TO COUNTY.; Q Z W Z �-- f 11. THIS SYSTEM IS SIZED FOR TYPICAL DOMESTIC WASTES ONLY BACKWASH OR U O Q Q � FLUSHING FLOWS FOR REVERSE OSMOSIS UNITS OR WATER SOFTENERS OR U FILTERS SHOULD NOT BE INTRODUCED INTO THIS SYSTEM. w W I m (j0 (n w_jQ , i D W GENERAL ABSORPTION TRENCH NOTES W 1. TRENCH LENGTH SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 FEET. 0 Q Z 2. THE BOTTOM OF EACH TRENCH SHALL BE LEVEL. 3. DRAINAGE DITCHES ARE TO BE PROVIDED ABOVE AND AROUND TRENCHES, AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT SURFACE RUNOFF FROM ENTERING ABSORPTION AREA. 4. TRENCHES SHALL FOLLOW CONTOURS. 5. INSTALL INFILTRATOR IN ACCORDANICE WITH MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS. j _ E i\ ` EXISTING VEGETATION 0 \^ P$oPOSED Z EVERGREENS (TYP-) txi urn- r -� —s 4 45' SWEEP BEND - VEGETATION 4" SEWER LINE PROPos FA Ld COUPLINGall k PROPERTY LINE__ 4 0 PVC SEWER O -� —Z _ _ - ■� - t 4" 0 PERFORATED PIPE WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC ' — INSPECTION I r- !--� -- WELZ`f TYPP SOLID CAP FOR SUPPORT ON - _ _ BOTTOM OF TRENCH OR BED. •� - , .• - r . 'r •, t _ _ 3 3 z M > n p 0 � � W J O cV w of Y LLJ Q -J 0 -- - I : 11111 - - 1 I - 1 - - - - - - t- / -1 1■ I I - - \ \ 1- - - - _ - - - - - _ _ - �i -. - - 1 1111 -