Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout703 Kings Row Ave - 239121401003INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631 Telephone: (970) 328-8755 COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1953-00 BP NO. 13028 OWNER: PETER MAY & CAROL NIEUWENHUIZEN PHONE: 970-963-1164 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1943 CARBONDALE CO 81623 APPLICANT: SAME - PHONE: SYSTEM LOCATION: 703 KING'S ROW AVE., CARBONDALE, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 2391-214-01-003 LICENSED INSTALLER: ZAMORA EXCAVATING, JOE ZAMORA LICENSE NO. 29-00 PHONE: 970-963-1399 DESIGN ENGINEER: HEPWORTH-PAWLACK GEOTECHNICAL, SOIILS REPORT PHONE NO. 970-945-7988 INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A 3 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 1000 GALLON 2-COMPARTMENT SEPTIC TANK 844 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA, IF CHAMBERED UNITS ARE USED 28 ARE NEEDED. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL IN SERIAL DISTRIBUTION IN TRENCHES, WITH A CLEAN -OUT BETWEEN THE TANK AND THE HOUSE, AND IN- SPECTION PORTALS IN EACH TRENCH. RAKE ALL TRENCH SURFACES TO PREVENT THE SMEARING OF SOILS AND DO NOT INSTALL IN WET WEA- ER CALL EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FOR FINAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO BACK -FILLING ANY PART OF THE INSTALLATION, OR WITH ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INSTALLATION. BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE SEPTIC SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND APPR OVED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL4 auz DATE: APRIL 6, 2000 CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO, OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT, AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 844`; SQUAREFEET(VIA 28 Fn-16 TNFTTTRATQR TTNTTq ) INSTALLED CONCRETE SEPTTC TANK: 12 50"'GALLONS IS LOCATED 12R DEGREES AND . 29_ FEET 6 INCHES FROM THE CLEANOUT ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF THE HOUSE, COMMENTS: FINAL INSPECTION DONE BY HEATHER SAVALOX ON MAY 25, 2000- THE TANK IS LARGE ENOUGH FOR A 4 BEDROOMS RESIDENCE, 13UT THE TEACT4 FTFTD IS' "SIZED `FOR.3 BEDROOMS AS REQUESTED ON THE APPLICATION. ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL ga IYL k;(1 ATE! JUNE 7, 2000 Inuomplete'Applications Will NOT Be Accepted (Site Flan MUST be attached) ISDS Permit if 153 - CT-0 Building Permit # APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE.— EAGLE COUNTY P. O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823 (Basalt) * PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00 * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE'.TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" PROPERTY OWNER: PFT1=1z MAY C�9 Ie o L 11 E C t w• N H Lt l MAILING ADDRESS: P O. f3 0 1 4 3 . �'� �oND Lc CC PHONE: %6 3 -/ 1 6 4- 8'1 d, 3 APPLICANT/ CONTACT PERSON: �� >ro 1 n1 . u e n L U i e v1 PHONE: CQ 3 _ l I 4 LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: doe- PHONE: 9 `? COMPANY/DBA: E c '\ ADDRESS: Pd• Box -7,54_ Carb6ndo-(e. Co gl(,02: ********************************* ********************* *********** ******* PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: ()<) NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Lo-r 1A 9IniGs Pow 5u(3�IVISiON FiLING�uffx0 12a� f�ccovz�ir Legal Description: to t4,P -F r &e c ov,clerl Mar 6 1 Ti'a � 9 i v, (3onk a84 ni i�auc g� h eczgte• co,,t.v.� � recv v-d s Tax Parcel Number: a39 1 M4 © 1z0© 3 Lot Size: 4o, QT9 a_crPS Physical Address: 703 Kl/u &'s ROL,,, AuEAJO- _ CAP PONDPI+-C ., Ca S/ 62 3 BUILDING TYPE:. (Check applicable category) (�Q Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms_ (.) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category) (X) Well w�ti) Spring ( ) Surface ( ) Public Name of Supplier: *These systems require design by a Registered Professional -Engineer SIGNATURE: Date: 4,• i eOO AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT # : l/ 'i /L9 DATE: , o? - --/- ( CHECK #: 1d .2 CASHIER: . Community Development Department (970) 328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com June 7, 2000 EAGLE COUNTY. COLORADO Carol Nieuwenhuizen &Peter May P.O. Box 1943 Carbondale, CO 81623 Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Final of ISDS Permit #1953-00, Tax Parcel #2391-214-01-003. Property location: 703 King's Row Ave., Carbondale, CO. Dear Ms. Nieuwenhuizen & Mr. May: This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at (970) 328-8755. Sincerely, Janet Kohl Environmental Health Department Eagle County Community Development ENCL: Informational Brochure Final ISDS Permit cc: files Community Development Department (970)328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com DATE: April 6, 2000 EAGLE COUNTY. COLORADO TO: Zamora Excavating FROM: Environmental Health Division Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit #1953-00, Tax Parcel #2391-214-01-003. Property Location: 703 Kings Row Ave., Carbondale, May/ Nieuwenhuizen residence. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1953-00. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. If you have not been contracted to install this system please contact Eagle County Environmental Health. Also enclosed is the ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form. The items on this form need to be completed before you call for your final inspection. Also, please note any special conditions which may have been placed on the permit. Do not back fill any part of the installation until it has been inspected. If all items are not completed, a reinspection fee of $42.50 must be paid before a reinspection is made. Please call our office well in advance to allow for scheduling of final inspection. Your building permit TCO will not be issued until final approval has been given for the ISDS Permit. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files Enclosures: ISDS permit # 1953-00; ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form i i Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. %—j 5020 County Road 154 otech Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone:970-945-7985 (Go Fax:970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com September 21, 1999 Carol Nieuwenhuizen & Peter May P.O. Box 1943 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Job No. 199 691 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Testing, Proposed Residence, Lot 12, 703 Kings Row, Kings Row Subdivision, Eagle County, Colorado Dear Ms. Nieuwenhuizen & Peter May: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and percolation testing for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated August 30, 1999. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a 11/2 story log structure above a walkout basement level and located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. Ground floor is proposed to be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 4 to 10 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The septic disposal system is proposed to be located downhill and east of the building area. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: Lot 12 is located on the east side of Kings Row South. The ground surface in the building area is strongly sloping down to the east with grades of 10 % to 15%. The lot is vegetated with grass, weeds, brush and scruboak trees. The building area was staked in the field at the time of our site visit. Subsidence Potential: Kings Row -Subdivision is underlain by Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley.Evaporite bedrocks Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholesto develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. Sinkholes have Carol Nieuwhenhuizen & Peter May September 21, 1999 Page 2 been observed in the Missouri Heights area. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. The exploration pits were relatively shallow, ford :z foundation design only' Based on our I.present knowledge of the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. In our opinion, the risk of ground subsidence at Lot 12 is low but the owner should be aware of the potential for sinkhole development. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits in the building area and on, �p o �e pit �in the septic disposal area at the approximate locations shown on-&g=w 1. , The logs of the pits are presented onsFig2k The subsoils encountered, below about 1'h feevof'topsoil, consist of basalt gravel=_and� cobbles', in a -sandy silty clay matrixft Results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of clayey gravel (minus 6 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on, Fig,: - No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf for support of the proposed residence. The matrix soils tend to compress after wetting and there could be some post -construction foundation settlement. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose or disturbed soils from boulder removal encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils or the grade re-established with a compacted structural fill or concrete. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on -site soil as backfill. H-P GEOTECH Carol Nieuwhenhuizen & Peter May September 21, 1999 Page 3 Floor Slabs: The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly to moderately loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50 % passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2 % passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can .consist of the on -site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, deep crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/2 feet deep. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: H-P GEOTECH Carol Nieuwhenhuizen & Peter May September 21, 1999 Page 4 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on -site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. A swale may be needed uphill to direct surface runoff around the residence. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Percolation Testing: Percolation -tests were conducted on September 1,`-19991b evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes (nominal v12 inch diameter by"` 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig. 2 and consist of basalt: gravel and: cobbles,in a sandy claymatrim The percolation test results are presented in 'Fable In, Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. The: -,average-percolation rate was about 19 minutes pe7}rich Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory. pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface H-P GEOTECH Carol Nieuwhenhuizen & Peter May September 21, 1999 Page 5 conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Louis E. Eller Reviewed By: • �`l�jf, •• C 5 • 24443 • s • Daniel E. Hardin, P.EZ a • Vn .0o am r•• •0�4.; nN�iaaE' RnO LEE/ksm attachments H-P GEOTECH dal 70 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1"=50' KINGS ROW SOUTH LOT BOUNDARIES I ROUGH CUT { DRIVEWAY 80 { { { { { { { PIT 2 PROPOSED �- BUILDING AREA ■ PIT 1 P 2 P 1 � �� P 3 rr----.� r r PROFILE PIT 60 50 50-- - 90 - 80 70 60 199 691 I I HEPWORTH - PAWLAK I LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS I Fig 1 I GEOTECHNICAL, INC. AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES PIT 1 PIT 2 PIT 3 ELEV. = 66' ELEV. = 70' .ELEV. _ 60' 0 0 moo• . 5 .O�i 5 o. �o"• 1 • .a �o°• a N p o +4=62 —200=15 iy • ,00- p 10 10 LEGEND: NTOPSOIL; sandy silt and clay, firm, moist, brown. 4� BASALT GRAVEL (GC); with cobbles and boulders, in a sandy silty clayey matrix, medium dense to dense, moist, reddish brown, slightly calcareous. i Disturbed bulk sample. _J NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on August 31, 1999 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. The proposed building area was staked in the field. 3. Elevations of the exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. Logs ore drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 199 691 1 H E WOECH N I C PAWLA I LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS I Fig. 2 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. . TABLE I PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 199 691 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES). LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P-1 58 15 water added 8 1 /4 6 2 1 /4 6 4 3/4 1 174 4314 4 3/4 4 3 1 7 6 1 6 5 1 5 4 1 /4 3/4 4 1 /4 3 1 /4 11`6� P-2 50 15 water added 9 7 2 7 6 1 6 5 1 5 4 1 4 3 114 3/4 6 3/4 5 3/4 1 5 3/4 4 3/4 1 4 3/4 3 3/4 11� P-3 49 15 8 1 /2 7 1 1/2 7 6 1/4 3/4 6 1/4 5 3/4 112 5 3/4 5 1/4 1/2 5 1/4 4 112 314 4 112 4 1/2 4 3 1/4 3/4 3 1/4 2314 1/26" NOTE: Last three readings of each test were used to determine the average pecolation rate. Percolation tests were performed on September 1, 1999. ISDS Permit # d g53-00 Inspector Date S Z5 oQ ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form ✓� Tank is / gal. Tank Material G61? � v'� Tank is Iocate"ft. and /28 � degrees from (permanent landmark) Tank is located ft. and degrees from (permanent landmark) ✓Tank set level. ✓Tank lids within 8" of finished grade. Size of field -ft' Z-6 units lineal ft. Technology '17-LhLAhK S ✓Cleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1/100ft). "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and outlet of the tank. Effluent filter on outlet- Yes or No ✓ Inlet and outlet is sealed with tar tap , rubber gasei etcbw-/l J� Tank has two compartments with the larger compartment closest to the house. ✓ Measure distance and relative direction to field. 76 Depth of field 3 ft. ✓Soil interface raked. Inspection portals at the end of each trench. Proper distance to setbacks. v' Chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications. (Chambers latched, end plates properly installed, rocks removed from trenches, etc.) 02 ✓ Splash plate(s) installed at least in first trench inlet. ✓ Type of pipe used for building sewer lineSD,�'�s, leach field SUS 3S- Other Inspection meets requirements. Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement were suggested. ACTION TAKEN: Setbacks Well Potable Water Lines House Property line Lake Stream Dry Tank Drain Gulch Field 100 25 20 10 50 25 10 10 Tank 50 10 5 10 50 10 * 10 EA_G— T'-- /�TTTT -+NV _T EA TH lit1V �r��T!�. �— J.:�1V V .. RP�tiL 1 R P.O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 JOB SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY OF DATE DATE PHODUCT204-1(5Ingle Sheets) 205-1(Padded) LAte®Inc., GrOton,Mass. 01471. To Order PHONE TOLL FREE 1-800-225-6380 L 4—U I—UU.3 MAY / 4HUIZEN JOB NO. P `W , DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED Ch�C-GG7 �l l P -4- -- l v 0 o -ht�L 44212 7 S = ? S"— = l�� Zg d� JOB COST SUMMARY TOTAL SELLING PRICE TOTAL MATERIAL TOTAL LABOR INSURANCE SALES TAX MISC. COSTS TOTAL JOB COST GROSS PROFIT LESS OVERHEAD COSTS % OF SELLING PRICE NET PROFIT .JOB FOLDER Printed In U.S.A. 1 � _ 1 ,I �� r weer �iv6w.nY � . � �� � �� Vim` � o i ,,i�-� 11 �!}� � � e k 1� y� — � ICI Il II I I EK,��,.o � I I �{ �s �_�� Z- C- -r- 517-6 Secll-74W i � I /60 62�► ' r 0 EF El- rvl /2." *IZV65 IXZokv 15uo- #,Z 6^6P46 C--Oc-,kv7-x,, C-424-0. "702) Kirys , Re, OA ventAe ,Car 6ovNd & k C. 0 M >: 0 r M t v- oseDserr e nA Y f• J r-dL-�c- ceAi6 t �,�sZ ` ui Sef,-j a o L 0 0 CILII -rclp u o Po �•n� —. — _ _ _ _ _ 1 2.1 ev. koc-Od — 1 N°-- o a- , oR- At M D \ 80 rood the , 58803d vJ vJ.C• �vtA re6ce cap t y,o`�•3� r_ c \ a 00 50 j ca �cv �©;O • . o ^ cr "' ,till m:d7 = :rj cn �. I F. LINES IN SPACE SYDNEY LI NCI COME (L.S. l4 /l1 BOX 121 CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 303-' DATE: 4 ~I _ •.yvw