HomeMy WebLinkAbout203 Jouflas Ranch Rd - 194127403001INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631
Telephone: (970) 328-8755
COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE: PERMIT NO. 1717-97 BP NO. 11373
OWNER: ROBERT AND SUE ESREY PHONE: _(816)531-8100
MAILING ADDRESS: 2401 W. 70TH ST.. SHAWNEE, KS 66208
APPLICANT: B.B. ANDERSON, P.O. BOX 130, WOLCOTT, CO 81655 PHONE: (970) 926-6021
SYSTEM LOCATION: 0203 JOUFLAS RANCH RD., WOLCOTT, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 1941-274-03-001
LICENSED INSTALLER: LONG'S EXCAVATING, JERRY MCART14UR LICENSE NO. 1-97
DESIGN ENGINEER: INTER -MOUNTAIN ENGINEERING RICHARD RICKS PHONE NO. _ (970) 949-5072
INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING:
1250 GALLON SEPTIC TANK WITH AN EFFLUENT FILTER IN THE SECOND COMPARTMENT, 2000 SQUARE FEET OF TRENCHABSORPTION .
AREA VIA 64 INFILTRATOR UNITS AS PER DESIGN.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN DATED 8/1/97. FIELD CONFIRM FOUR (4) FOOT SEPARATION TO BED-
ROCK, AND DON'T INSTALL LAST TRENCH DIRECTLY OVER TEST PIT LOCATION. ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL INSPECTION
OF INSTALLATION. BUILDING C.O. WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT ENGINEER CERTIFICATION OF SEPTIC SYSTEM.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL:
DATE:
CONDITIONS:
1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS,
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED.
2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING
REQUIREMENTS, CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS
SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT.
3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO
BE LICENSED.
FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR):
NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL
THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM.
INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 2000 SQUARE FEET (VIA 64 INFILTRATOR UNITS )
INSTALLED CONCRETE TANK: 1250 GALLONS IS LOCATED DEGREES AND FEET FROM
SEE ENGTNEF.R I S AS—RTTTT.TS FOR SYSTEM COMPONENT T.00ATTONS
COMMENTS: ENGINEER FINAL APPROVAL RECEIVED 11-20-98
ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN
WORK IS COMPLETED.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 1998
(Site Plan MUST be attached)
ISDS Permit # -
APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
` ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 179
EAGLE, CO 81631
328-8755/927-3823 (El Jebel)
**************************************************************************
* PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00
* *
* MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER"
PROPERTY OWNER: Robert and Sue Esrey PHONE: (816) 531-8100
MAILING ADDRESS: 2401 W. 70th St. Shawnee, Kansas 66208
APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: B.B Anderson PHONE: (970) 926-6021
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 130 Wolcott, Colorado 81655
LICENSED ISDS CONTRACTOR: Longs Excavating PHONE: (970)949-4682
COMPANY/DBA: ADDRESS:77 Metcalf Rd- Avon,Colorado 8162
PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: ( New Installation ( ) Alteration ( ) Repair
**************************************************************************
LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
1 /1 73
Building Permit.# (if known)
Legal Description: Subdivision: Travis Creek Filing:�Block: Lot No. 1
Tax Parcel Number: _L 9-2 _7 1 -_a n 1 Lot Size: 10.16 acre
Street Address: o203 Jouflas Ranch Road
BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category)
(x) Residential/Single Family
( ) Residential/Multi-Family*
( ) Commercial/Industrial*
TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category)
('x) Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface
( ) Public Name of Supplier:
Number
Number
Type _
of Bedrooms 4
of Bedrooms
*These systems require 4esign by a Registered Professional Engineer
SIGNATURE: ��'Date :
************ ************ *********************** ************ ***********
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COUNTY ^�
AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT #: / DATE: � 4"l, fd
_ eca77
CHECK #: a6n x CASHIER:
Community Development Department
(970) 328-8730
FAX (970) 328-7185
TDD (970) 328-8797
Email: eccmdeva@vail.net
http: //www.eagle-county.com
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
November 20, 1998
Robert and Sue Esrey
2401 W. 70th Street
Shawnee, KS 66208
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
RE: Final of ISDS Permit #1717-97, Tax Parcel #1941-274-03-001. Property location: 0203
Jouflas Ranch Rd., Wolcott, CO.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Esrey:
This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and
finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate
compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding
the care of your septic system.
Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic
system.
If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental
Health Division at (970) 328-8755.
Sincerely,
Janet Kohl
Environmental Health Department
Eagle County Community Development
ENCL:Informational Brochure
Final ISDS Permit
cc: files
Community Development Department
(970)328-8730
Fax: (970)328-7185
TDD: (970) 328-8797
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
Date: August 8, 1997
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle. Colorado 81631-0179
TO: Long's Excavating
FROM: Environmental Health Division
RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1717-97. Tax
Parcel # 1941-274-03-001. Property Location: 0203 Jouflas Ranch Rd.,
Wolcott, CO., Esrey residence.
Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1717-97. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the
permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications
invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved.
Systems designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer
indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County does not perform final
inspections on engineer designed systems. Your TCO will not be issued until our office
receives this certification.
Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property
owner's attention.
This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328-
8755.
cc: files
Inter -Mountain Egineering, Richard Ricks
A
-Mountain
iFgineering Ltd.
SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
FOR
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK SUBDIVISION
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PREPARED FOR:
BB ANDERSEN
PROJECT NO.97-0209G
JULY 28, 1997
i� t
77 Metcalf Road, #201 • Box 978 • Avon, Colorado 81620 • Phone: 970-949-5072 • From Denver Direct: 893-1531
1420 Vance Street • Lakewood, Colorado 80215 • Phone: 303-232-0158
Soil & Foundation Investigation
BB Andersen
Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision
Page 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The project consists of the construction of a single family residence on Lot 1, Travis Creek
Subdivision in Eagle County, Colorado. We anticipate that the proposed residence will consist of a
two story wood frame residence with a basement.
The site can be described as an undeveloped lot consisting of approximately 10.16 acres. The
lot is wooded and slopes toward the north at gradients ranging from 7 to 15 percent. The proposed
building envelope is a 32,400 square foot rectangular parcel located approximately 430 feet north of
the road.
Underlying a three (3) foot layer of grass root mat and organic laden topsoil, a 1 foot layer of
sandy CLAY was encountered (from 3. to 4.5 feet). The clay layer was underlain by a silty, clayey,
SAND which contained angular gravel. -
The foundation for the proposed residence may be designed as conventional spread footings.
A bearing pressure of 2000 psf is recommended for footings bearing in the sandy CLAY or clay
SAND.
SCOPE
This report presents the results. of a Soil and Foundation Investigation for the proposed
residence to be constructed on Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision, in Eagle. County, Colorado.
The purpose of this foundation exploration is to evaluate the soil conditions respective to
foundation support, and the engineering characteristics of the anticipated foundation bearing materials,
and to provide criteria from a geotechnical perspective for use by the client in preparing a foundation
design, a grading design, and drainage plans. The investigation was performed by advancing soil test
pits, obtaining soil samples for laboratory testing, and an analysis of the data.
.STYE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION -
The site is an undeveloped lot located at Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision near Wolcott,
Colorado. The site can be described as an undeveloped lot. The site slopes toward the northeast at
Soil & Foundation Investigation
BB Andersen `
Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision
Page 4
gradients estimated to ranged from`-10 to 20 percent. The site is bounded by wooded residential. lots
and open areas.
SITE INVESTIGATION
TEST PITS
The subsurface exploration included a site reconnaissance by an Inter -Mountain Engineering
personnel and the excavation of one soil test pit to observe the soil profile and obtain soil samples for
laboratory testing. The test pit was excavated using a rubber tire backhoe to the depths indicated in the
Summary of Test Pit. The test pit location was established in the field by estimating right angles and
pacing distances from site features. The approximate location of the test pit is illustrated on the Site
Plan in the Appendix, refer to Drawing No. 1. The Appendix also contains Summary of Test Pit
presenting the information which was obtained in the subsurface exploration, a key to the terms used in
the Summary of Test Pit, and a brief description of the procedures used.
PERCOLATION TESTING
The percolation tests were performed on February 16, 1996 in the vicinity of the proposed
absorption field, refer to site plan. Three 6-inch diameter percolation test holes were drilled
using a 6-inch diameter auger to depths of approximately 30 inches. The approximate locations
for the percolation test holes are shown on the site plan,. refer to Figure No. 1. The test holes
were filled with water 24 hours prior to the' actual testing to allow the soils to inundate. The
water levels were measured to a relative _constant rate. The percolation rates varied from
approximately l6lo 35 mimuteS° inch
Although the percolation test holes and profile pits were dug to obtain a reasonable
accurate determination of the absorption field conditions, variations in the subsurface conditions
are also possible. Variations that exist beneath the absorption field may become evident during
Soil & Foundation Investigation
BB Andersen
Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision
Page S
the excavation. A representative from our office should observe the completed excavation to
confirm that the soils encountered are as indicated by the soils profile hole.
SUBSURFACE AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
The generalized soil stratigraphy is. presented below. The stratum symbols and solid lines
which are used to illustrate the break between various strata breaks on the Boring Log are approximate
as the transitions between soil types may occur suddenly or relatively gradually.
Underlying a three (3) foot; layer of grass root mat an_orgalue laden 4,opsoil, a. l foot'aayer' of
x
by a silty, clay,.,.,
No measurable groundwater .was:present ia the time the test borings were performed Noy
long term groundwater observatloris were nude.
The �inderlyu g bedrock smapped asjh ,.Benton Shale; 3 he Benton Shale is described
on the Charles S. Robinson in 1975 maps as a dark grey shale with inter -bedded fine grained,
brownish -grey, clayey SANDSTONE and thin beds of white clay. The Robinson map(s)
described the area around the Travis Creek Area as being susceptible to landslides, slope failure
complexes, and accelerated soil creep behavior (refer to Appendix for definitions).
A subsequent study by W.T. Cohan, P.E. -and Dr. R.G. Young titled Geologic Hazards
Study of Travis Creek Subdivision No. 2, Wolcott Springs Area, Eagle County, Colorado dated
November 25, 1993, described the superficial -soil mantle as an ancient Pleistocene solifluction
complex. More detail description of a solifluction complex is included in the Appendix.
The Cohan and Young study also discusses the landslide geologic hazards of the Travis
Creek Subdivision and the study indicates that there are evidence(s) to the fact that there is
ground stability in the Travis Creek Subdivision, refer to reference.
Soil & Foundation Investigation
BB Andersen
Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision
Page 6
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We anticipate that the proposed construction for this site will consists of a single family
residence. The residence is anticipated to be of wood frame construction with concrete slab -on -grade
construction for the ground floor. We also anticipate that the residence will be a two-story structure
with. a walk out basement. Foundation wall loadings are anticipated to range from 1 to 5 kips per
linear foot and isolated column loadings are anticipated to range from approximately 5 to 25 kips.
FOUNDATION RECOM MNDATIONS
Based upon the results of the field exploration and the laboratory testing we recommend
that conventional spread footing foundation system be used. The foundations may be designed
for a bearing pressure of 2000 psf for footings bearing on undisturbed sandy CLAY and silty
SAND, and/or approved fill materials compacted to the recommendations provided herein.
At this pressure, settlements are anticipated to be within tolerable limits for wood frame
construction, provided any improvements in the bearing soils as discussed herein will be
performed.
f The footing excavations should be relatively smooth, free of debris, organics, loose soil,
frost, and standing water. Any over -excavations should be backfilled_ and compacted to 100
percent within 2 percent of optimum moisture as determined by a Standard Proctor Test (ASTM
D-698). A representative of this office should be contacted to inspect the foundation excavation
to verify that the soil conditions are the same as those anticipated in this report.
After all of the final grading is completed, the bottom of the footings should be covered
with a minimum of 48 inches of backfill for frost protection.
Soil & Foundation Investigation
BB Andersen
Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision
Page 7
Voids left by the removal of cobbles in the bottom of the footing excavation should be
filled with lean concrete or a granular soil with a maximum particle size of 3 inches compacted to
100 percent of Standard Proctor Density (ASTM D-698) within 2 percent of optimum moisture.
At this pressure, settlements are anticipated to be within tolerable limits for wood frame
construction, provided the improvements in the foundation soils are made as discussed herein. The
footing excavations should be relatively smooth and free of debris, organics, loose soil, frost, and
standing water. Any over -excavations should be backfilled and compacted to 95 percent within 2
percent of optimum moisture as -determined by a Standard Proctor Method of Test (ASTM D-698). A
representative of this office should be contacted to perform an inspection of the open foundation
excavation to verify that the soil conditions are as same as anticipated in this report.
After all of the final grading is completed, the bottom of the footings should be covered with a
minimum of 48 inches of backfill for frost protection.
Voids left by the removal of cobbles in the bottom of the footing excavation should be filled
with lean concrete or a granular soil with a maximum particle size of 3 inches compacted to 95 percent
of Standard Proctor Method of Test (ASTM.D-698) and within 2 percent of optimum moisture.
SLAB CONSTRUCTION
The on -site soils, exclusive of Topsoil and Organics, are suitable to support lightly loaded
slab -on -grade construction. All excavations made for the foundations under proposed slab -on -
grade areas must be properly backfilled with suitable material compacted to a minimum of 95
percent of the maximum Standard Proctor Density (ASTM D-698). Backfill placed beneath slab -
on -grade floors should be installed at ±2 percent of optimum moisture content. The on -site soils,
exclusive of topsoil and organics, are suitable for use as backfill. Before the backfill is placed, all
water and loose debris should be removed from the excavations.
Prior to the construction of concrete floors, the undisturbed subgrade, free from topsoil
and organics, should be proof rolled with a loaded rubber -tired loader or similar equipment to
Soil & Foundation Investigation
BB Andersen
Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision
Page 8
densify the near surface soils and outline soft areas. To reduce the chance of damage to shallow
utilities, special care should be taken in areas where underground utilities are present. ,
The floor slabs should be reinforced, and joints should be provided at the junctions of the slab
and the foundation walls, so that independent movement can occur without causing damage. All
columns should be isolated from concrete slabs -on -grade to allow for slab movement.
GROUNDWATER AND DRAIN SYSTEM
While no groundwater was reported in the soil test pit at the time the field investigation was
conducted, it is possible that seasonal variations will cause fluctuations, or for a water table to be
present in the upper soils during the spring months, or after prolonged periods of rain. A foundation
perimeter drain as detailed on Figure No. 5 is recommended to reduce the risk of surface water
infiltrating to the foundation bearing soils and accumulating at the foundation level. The foundation
perimeter drain should daylight to a down gradient point. If a down gradient discharge is not possible,
then a sump pit and pump may be necessary.
EXCAVATION
The superficial soils at the site should be easily excavated with conventional backhoe- .
trackhoe equipment. In areas where the excavation extends into the shallow bedrock formation
or fingers and boulders of the Benton Shale, additional excavation effort such as pneumatic jack
hammering or light blasting may be required, particularly in narrow trenches, such as for utilities.
Soil & Foundation Investigation
BB Andersen
Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision
Page 9
REINFORCING
The foundation should be well reinforced and rigid enough to withstand differential
settlements. Walls retaining earth should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid pressure of 38 pcf
for an "active" case assuming a level drained backfill condition. For "at rest" conditions such as
basement walls, an equivalent fluid pressure value of 55 pcf may be used.
CRAWL SPACE COVER
When moist soils are encountered in the excavation, the ground surface in crawl space areas
should be covered with an impervious moisture barrier sealed against the footings. This will help to
reduce humidity in the crawl space area.
BACREML AND SURFACE DRAINAGE
We recommend that foundation soils encountered in portions of the site be prevented from
being wetted after construction. The backfill placed around the foundation walls should be
methodically compacted to help reduce settlement after completion of construction. The top one foot
of the backfill material must be relatively impervious. The on -site soils, exclusive of Topsoil and
Organics are suitable for use as backfill. Care must be taken in using any large rock material as backfill.
The material should be less than six inches in diameter and mixed with finer grained soils to prevent
void spaces. Foundation wall backfillshould be moistened or dried to near to within 0 to +4 percent
Of its optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum Standard
Proctor Density. Structural backfill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry
density as determined by the Standard Proctor Method of Test (ASTM D 698).
Soil & Foundation Investigation
BB Andersen
Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision
Page 10
Surface water running toward the structure from up slope areas should be diverted around and
away from the building by means of lined drainage swales or other similar measures.
The final grade should have a positive slope away from the foundation walls on all sides. A
minimum of 12 inches in the first 10 feet is recommended. Down spouts and sill cocks should
discharge into splash blocks that extend beyond the limits of the backfill or a minimum distance of at
least 5 feet from the foundation wall. The use of long downspout extensions in place of splash blocks
is advisable.
LAWN IRRIGATION
We do not recommend sprinkler systems be installed next to foundation.walls, porches or patio
slabs. If sprinkler systems are installed, the sprinkler heads be aligned so that the spray from the heads,
under full pressure, does not fall within five feet of foundation walls, porches, or patio slabs. Lawn
irrigation must be controlled and no flooding or ponding of water should be allowed.
If the future owners desire to plant next to foundation walls, porches or patio slabs, and are
willing to assume the risk of structural damage, etc., then it is advisable to plant only flowers and
shrubbery (no lawn) of varieties that require very little moisture. These flowers and shrubs should only
be hand watered.
SEPTIC SYSTEMS - - - --
An individual waste disposal systems will be necessary at the site. Based upon the information
obtained during this investigation, a conventional system may be selected provided a=4 fodf separatlon
between the bottom of the bed, and bedrock caI% be maintained. I We recommend at percolation rate of
40 be selected for the design of the system. The tests performed at the site indicated that some clayer
materials are much less permeable, slower percolation rates. Very clayey soils should be avoided
when encountered during the installation of the absorbtion fields.
Soil & Foundation Investigation
BB Andersen
Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision
Page i l
MISCELLANEOUS
The recommendations provided herein are based on experience in the area and the on -site field
exploration. The information obtained from the field exploration and laboratory testing reflects
subsurface conditions only at the specific locations at the particular times designated. Subsurface
conditions at other locations and times may differ from the conditions at these locations. The extent of
any variations between the soil test borings may not be evident uritil the foundation excavation is
performed. However, only minor variations are expected. If during construction conditions appear to
be different, this office should be advised so reevaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This document was prepared for the exclusive use of B.B. Andersen. The use of this
document or the information contained herein by any other person or entity is not authorized. In the
event any .other person or entity desires to use this document for the information contained herein for
any purpose, they must first contact Inter -Mountain Engineering for written authorization.
The findings and recommendations of this report have been prepared in accordance with locally
accepted professional engineering standards for similar conditions at this time. There is no other
warranty, either expressed or implied.
Inter -Mountain Engineering is pleased to have worked with you on this project. Should you
have any questions regarding the information contained herein, please do not hesitate to contact the
undersigned.
Sincerely,
LTD.
Richard O. Ricks, Pt.
Geotechnical Engineer
I
• j �_.• �: :_ice'..=.=`' ::7i'w.s ..7•i.:.r ta....t.� �y «� �.-- __ _
ilk>r-�•. .� i�.�:•`�..:_' _'..=. ='-' .., ,. _J:ilrsh..ln �..r.?,�"`+..•,��i'-,;-�' -'. �� .
-�N f0•oo•_ -'S.ib•� —_ -'- l• - ..� .�Orieoo-S ' "
..290.00.• 285.00----- -
-
,� 'fir= -_ _ r` .M1 ��`'�--•`-. -....-.-._�». _
m015LOT
/e. -eye _•—__ _ -"sc -�3 _ _
ca
' -: 1]6J70 sc..Irw /tet `-_._ $ •• -.._.. -� - LalO�{YL=^ - - -•....
1 _.IV Val
lOt'V413 ..� ..a'•!Q:_4 - H 0" _. -. •• -w ' L - !!0�
r^ l S RiZp71-! . : _ _ -.. 4 .. -• ^» � i ~'11J2
� � SI• v- t w..I: •• ~... ._ � ui y . - .—. . _ - -_ a _ •i7iiD'i/Af
$42
.__ Feswcr.mcp. •. _ .to'.IlenaW
Fo--t F.W Aw. S/NN� - 'traur lerwMf 3 " - i J-•.
Y � A `• h ati�w � f
Woo —
63USVA3 I4I►4S40:e :Y!
® PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT
�Xric�c-2Kov�naizi LOT 1 TRAVIS CREEK SUBDIVISION
Er: gizxe erzxs g Ltd. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G FIGURE NO. 1
® PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE
�2xxtcx- ?Koux�i LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK SUBDIVISION
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G FIGURE NO. 2
PIT NO. TP-1
DATE DRILLED: 7/22/97
ELEVATION: FIGURE NO.: 2
DEPTH
IN FEET
a
a
m
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
REMARKS
N
N
0
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
TOPSOIL
,
2
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
i
JJJJ
JJJJ
CLAY, silty, brown
4
CLAY, cobbly, silty, w/angular
gravel, red brown
6
Total Depth of Test Pit 6 feet
No Measurable Groundwater
Encountered
s
10
12
- - - -
-
14
SUMMARY OF TEST PITS
nInter Mountain
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
T;ngneer agLtd.
LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
[PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G
PIT NO. TP-2
DATE DRILLED: 7/22/97
ELEVATION: FIGURE NO.: 3
DEPTH
W
a
J
m
IN FEET
a
}
DESCRIPTION OF
MATERIAL
REMARKS
(n
N
0
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
TOPSOIL
JJJJ
JJJJ
,
M .� 'ilty,. brown
2
4
obbly, silty, w/angular
ffl"~'
gWrdred brown
6
Total Depth of Test Pit 6 feet
No Measurable Groundwater
Encountered
a
10
12
14
SUMMARY OF TEST PITS
Mo`DENCE
SICREEK
WEnjine=LtgL
OT 1, TRAYSED
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G
KEY TO SYMBOLS
Symbol Description
Strata symbols
J JJJ Topsoil
JJJJ
® Low plasticity
clay
Clayey sand
Notes•
1. Exploratory Test Pits were excavated on 7/22/97 using a
Rubber Tire back -hoe.
2. No free water was encountered at the time of excavation.
3. Pit locations were taped from existing features.
4. These logs are subject to the limitations, conclusions, and
recommendatios provided in this report.
BORING NO TP-1
DEPTH 3.5'
J
J
W
3: 1
N
)
Z 2
0
a
3
J _
0
N
Z
0 4-
0
0.1 1.0 LOAD (KSF) 10 100
SAMPLE OFCLAY, * SILTY, sandy, ,brown NAT. MOISTURE CONTENT 19. 0 %
% SWELL/CONSOL SAMPLE FLOODED AT,1.0 KSF NAT. DRY DENSITY 102. 2 PCF
l"
i
u• 1.0 LOAD (KSF) 10 100
SAMPLE OF NAT. MOISTURE CONTENT °6
`% SWELL/CONSOL. SAMPLE FLOODED AT KSF NAT. DRY DENSITY PCF
SWELL - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS •
PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK SUBDIVISION
..EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO 9_7-0209G
FIGURE NO "4'
Foundation Wall
TOP 1' of bac:rR// should be
' re%five/y i%rperv/ous till.
d •d Slope awry fr*ln bui7a1!n9,
4
d
.. 11- - I 1 1- - 1 11- -III- - 11 1-•- I
'4
-
-111--I11--III1- 1111--111-- -
• 1 1_ _ I 1 1_ _ I 1 I_ -
- _1__111�_111__I I
d ♦ -� -- 1 I I. _ i I I_._ 1 I I_ _ I 1 1:
.. ♦ ` I- - 1 11- _ 1..� 1_ III-
• ',d `� ♦ -- — "�--t
• � ♦ ♦ ` ♦ Cronu/ar Fi7/
e `
` ♦ ♦ ♦ Moisture 8crrier ( Black
Sprayed onto Foundation WO//
d
V ♦ ♦ ` ♦ t:eotextde( AI%rar 1401V or equivalent
%` ` ` APp/y with 8' to 11' overlap
d
• Q , • .. V�l V�� yVyV � yVy yl.���,VWt� -
y�`(bw��;S4� Minimum of 6' of 3/4 Inch gram,
VL
aA ,a d
4' d/ameter perforated rw pipe _-- --
x1coed a minimum of 1/8' per — -
foot to sewer /oterrt/ subdrain,
sump Pump of dowighted.
Details of Peripheral Drain System
For Footing Type Foundation.
® PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE
�Zafcx--Mo,rsataizz LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK SUBDIVISION
Exsg�cn�eerznr gua. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G DRAWING N0.5
GEOLOGIC DEFINITIONS
Robinson - Definitions from 1975 Charles S. Robinson Maps
Accelerated Soils Creep - Areas of colluvial slope that is moving downslope at a
relatively rapid rate.
Landslides - Mass movements where there is a distinct surface of rupture or
zone of weakness. Subtypes identified and described below.
Slope Failure Complex - Large areas of failure of surficial and bedrock units.
May consist of a combination of slope failure types. Symbol enclosed in
parenthesis indicates unit involved. Subscript number indicates relative age;
number 1 is youngest.
Cohan -London
Complex - Pleistocene solifluction complex, From Geologic. Hazards Study of
Travis Creek Subdivision No. 2, Wolcott Springs Area, Eagle County, Colorado,
water from melting ice is prevented from downward percolation by the presence
of frozen ground at shallow depts. Here the water oozes to the surface and acts
like rainwash by carrying finer soil particles downslope by this major
translocation process (vonEngeln, 1942).
"In the periglacial environment at the margins of ice caps of ice sheets, repeated
freezing and thawing of surficial materials produces what is called"patterned
ground", a variety of soil configurations that are indicative of the nature of the
surface on which they form and the materials of they are composed (Thornbury,
1954). The most simple form is the "soil polygon", a large mudcrack-shaped,
multi -sided structure up to 30 feet in diameter, separated from adjacent polygons
by small bounding ridges and open fractures and composed of fine materials. It
forms on relatively flat surfaces, as does the "stone polygon" or "stone net", a
similar form found where surficial materials are mostly stones. Here, frost
wedging causes the stones to work outward from the interior to the margins of
the polygon, where they form raised stone borders. Where moderate slopes are
present, some downslope movement occurs to produce "stone garlands". On
still steeper slopes, the nets become more distorted to form " stone stripes" or
"soil stripes", long ridges of soil and rock subparallel to the surface contours, like
those seen on Travis Creek subdivision Filing No. 2. Thus, the series of stone -
soil stripes mapped Lhere do not represent successive waves of solifluction
materials moving downslope, but rather a series of soil stripes working slowly
downslope, simultaneously, about 12,500 years ago."
c.\msofcelwinword\imeVorms\geodefin.doc
October 6, 1998
BB Andersen
P.O. Box 130
Wolcott, CO 81655
RE: Septic System Inspection
Lot 1, Travis Creek
Project No. 97-0209G
Inter -Mountain Engineering Ltd. (IME) has reviewed the installation of the septic system
at Lot 1, Travis Creek. Based upon our review, it appears that the septic system was
installed in substantial compliance with the design by IME.
Per the request of Eagle County Environmental Health Department, attached is a sketch
of the approximate location of the cleanout and septic tank in relation to the house.
If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely
Martha L.
Enclosure
G:\engineer\soils\letters\97-0209 septic
8392 Continental Divide Road, Suite #107 • Littleton, Colorado 80127 • Phone: 303/948-6220 • Fax: 303/948-6526
77 Metcalf Road, #200 • Box 978 9 Avon, Colorado 81620 • Phone: 970/949-5072 • From Denver Direct: 893-1531
.•
lix
gineeringLw.
November 19, 1998
Eagle County Environmental Health Department
P.O. Box 179
Eagle, CO 81631
RE: Septic System Inspection
Lot 1, Travis Creek
Project No. 97-0209G
Dear Laura,
RECEIVED
NOV 2 0 1998
EAGLE COUN' y
COMMUNITY DEVEL'Op0W
Per your request, Inter -Mountain Engineering Ltd. (MM) has illustrated the location of
the septic leach field for the Esrey residence on the attached Site Plan.
Also requested was verification of the depth of bedrock beneath the leach field. On the
attached Site Plan, two test pit locations, which were excavated during a subsurface
exploration by IlVIE, are indicated. Both text pits were six feet deep and bedrock was not
encountered in either test pit. Since the infiltrators are 1 foot deep and 1 foot of cover is
required, it's assumed that 4-feet exists between the bottom of the leach field and
bedrock.
We hope this addresses all of the County's concerns. If not, please contact me at 949-
5072.
Enclosure
G:\engineer\soils\letters\97-0209 septic-2
8392 Continental Divide Road, Suite #107 • Littleton, Colorado 80127 • Phone: 303/948-6220 • Fax: 303/948-6526
77 Metcalf Road, #200 9 Box 978 • Avon, Colorado 81620 • Phone: 970/949-5072 • From Denver Direct: 893-1531
® PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK SUBDIVISION
�ngizxeex'zz�gLta. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G FIGURE NO. 2
• PIT NO. TP-1
DATE DRILLED: 7/22/97
ELEVATION: FIGURE NO.: 2
DEPTH
IN FEET
W
CL
a
-j
m
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
REMARKS t
0
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
l JJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
TOPSOIL
2
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
CLAY, silty, brown
4
CLAY, cobbly, silty, w/angular
gravel, red brown
s
Total Depth of Test Pit 6 feet
No Measurable Groundwater
Encountered
s
10
12
14
SUMMARY OF TEST PITS
Mountain
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
jogineeringWI.
LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G
PIT NO. TP-2
DATE DRILLED: 7/22/97
ELEVATION: FIGURE NO.: 3
DEPTH
IN FEET
W
a
-j
m
�
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
REMARKS
0
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
JJJJ
TOPSOIL
JJJJ
JJJJ
CLAY, silty, brown
2
4
CLAY, cobbly, silty, w/angular
gravel, red brown
6
Total Depth of Test Pit 6 feet
No Measurable Groundwater
Encountered
8
10
12
14
SUMMARY OF PITS
;TEST
MInter-Mountain
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
Englneermi ff d,
LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G
KEY TO SYMBOLS
'Symbol Description
Strata symbols
JJJJ Topsoil
JJJJ
JJJJ
Low plasticity
clay
Clayey sand
Notes:
1. Exploratory Test Pits were excavated on 7/22/97 using a
Rubber Tire back -hoe.
2. No free water was encountered at the time of excavation.
3. Pit locations were taped from existing features.
4. These logs are subject to the limitations, conclusions, and
recommendatios provided in this report.
1/1/-7/ 1d.X1f 17'Fl—L/4—V3—VVl
��xs,
Lot#1, Filing 2 ESREY
JOB NAME Travis Creek Subdivision
0203 Jouflas Ranch Rd.
g;
JOB O. 3 `�
JOB LOCATION
BILL TO
DATE STARTED n
DATE COMPLETED
DATE BILLED
I -�Zz/hIF
-
;
r �
gyp,
JOB COST SUMMARY
_-%
-
00
—
TOTAL SELLING PRICE
_
'TOTAL MATERIAL
TOTAL LABOR
INSURANCE
�� �� l _���•�
SALES TAX
MISC. COSTS
TOTAL JOB COST
GROSS PROFIT
LESS OVERHEAD COSTS
% OF SELLING PRICE
NET PROFIT
JOB FOLDER Product 278 ®® NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC., GROTON, MA 01471 JOB FOLDER Printed in U.S.A
t
-
- �