Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout203 Jouflas Ranch Rd - 194127403001INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631 Telephone: (970) 328-8755 COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE: PERMIT NO. 1717-97 BP NO. 11373 OWNER: ROBERT AND SUE ESREY PHONE: _(816)531-8100 MAILING ADDRESS: 2401 W. 70TH ST.. SHAWNEE, KS 66208 APPLICANT: B.B. ANDERSON, P.O. BOX 130, WOLCOTT, CO 81655 PHONE: (970) 926-6021 SYSTEM LOCATION: 0203 JOUFLAS RANCH RD., WOLCOTT, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 1941-274-03-001 LICENSED INSTALLER: LONG'S EXCAVATING, JERRY MCART14UR LICENSE NO. 1-97 DESIGN ENGINEER: INTER -MOUNTAIN ENGINEERING RICHARD RICKS PHONE NO. _ (970) 949-5072 INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: 1250 GALLON SEPTIC TANK WITH AN EFFLUENT FILTER IN THE SECOND COMPARTMENT, 2000 SQUARE FEET OF TRENCHABSORPTION . AREA VIA 64 INFILTRATOR UNITS AS PER DESIGN. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN DATED 8/1/97. FIELD CONFIRM FOUR (4) FOOT SEPARATION TO BED- ROCK, AND DON'T INSTALL LAST TRENCH DIRECTLY OVER TEST PIT LOCATION. ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL INSPECTION OF INSTALLATION. BUILDING C.O. WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT ENGINEER CERTIFICATION OF SEPTIC SYSTEM. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS, CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 2000 SQUARE FEET (VIA 64 INFILTRATOR UNITS ) INSTALLED CONCRETE TANK: 1250 GALLONS IS LOCATED DEGREES AND FEET FROM SEE ENGTNEF.R I S AS—RTTTT.TS FOR SYSTEM COMPONENT T.00ATTONS COMMENTS: ENGINEER FINAL APPROVAL RECEIVED 11-20-98 ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 1998 (Site Plan MUST be attached) ISDS Permit # - APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ` ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823 (El Jebel) ************************************************************************** * PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00 * * * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" PROPERTY OWNER: Robert and Sue Esrey PHONE: (816) 531-8100 MAILING ADDRESS: 2401 W. 70th St. Shawnee, Kansas 66208 APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: B.B Anderson PHONE: (970) 926-6021 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 130 Wolcott, Colorado 81655 LICENSED ISDS CONTRACTOR: Longs Excavating PHONE: (970)949-4682 COMPANY/DBA: ADDRESS:77 Metcalf Rd- Avon,Colorado 8162 PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: ( New Installation ( ) Alteration ( ) Repair ************************************************************************** LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: 1 /1 73 Building Permit.# (if known) Legal Description: Subdivision: Travis Creek Filing:�Block: Lot No. 1 Tax Parcel Number: _L 9-2 _7 1 -_a n 1 Lot Size: 10.16 acre Street Address: o203 Jouflas Ranch Road BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category) (x) Residential/Single Family ( ) Residential/Multi-Family* ( ) Commercial/Industrial* TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category) ('x) Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface ( ) Public Name of Supplier: Number Number Type _ of Bedrooms 4 of Bedrooms *These systems require 4esign by a Registered Professional Engineer SIGNATURE: ��'Date : ************ ************ *********************** ************ *********** TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COUNTY ^� AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT #: / DATE: � 4"l, fd _ eca77 CHECK #: a6n x CASHIER: Community Development Department (970) 328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO November 20, 1998 Robert and Sue Esrey 2401 W. 70th Street Shawnee, KS 66208 Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Final of ISDS Permit #1717-97, Tax Parcel #1941-274-03-001. Property location: 0203 Jouflas Ranch Rd., Wolcott, CO. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Esrey: This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at (970) 328-8755. Sincerely, Janet Kohl Environmental Health Department Eagle County Community Development ENCL:Informational Brochure Final ISDS Permit cc: files Community Development Department (970)328-8730 Fax: (970)328-7185 TDD: (970) 328-8797 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Date: August 8, 1997 Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle. Colorado 81631-0179 TO: Long's Excavating FROM: Environmental Health Division RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1717-97. Tax Parcel # 1941-274-03-001. Property Location: 0203 Jouflas Ranch Rd., Wolcott, CO., Esrey residence. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1717-97. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Systems designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County does not perform final inspections on engineer designed systems. Your TCO will not be issued until our office receives this certification. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files Inter -Mountain Egineering, Richard Ricks A -Mountain iFgineering Ltd. SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK SUBDIVISION EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO PREPARED FOR: BB ANDERSEN PROJECT NO.97-0209G JULY 28, 1997 i� t 77 Metcalf Road, #201 • Box 978 • Avon, Colorado 81620 • Phone: 970-949-5072 • From Denver Direct: 893-1531 1420 Vance Street • Lakewood, Colorado 80215 • Phone: 303-232-0158 Soil & Foundation Investigation BB Andersen Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision Page 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The project consists of the construction of a single family residence on Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision in Eagle County, Colorado. We anticipate that the proposed residence will consist of a two story wood frame residence with a basement. The site can be described as an undeveloped lot consisting of approximately 10.16 acres. The lot is wooded and slopes toward the north at gradients ranging from 7 to 15 percent. The proposed building envelope is a 32,400 square foot rectangular parcel located approximately 430 feet north of the road. Underlying a three (3) foot layer of grass root mat and organic laden topsoil, a 1 foot layer of sandy CLAY was encountered (from 3. to 4.5 feet). The clay layer was underlain by a silty, clayey, SAND which contained angular gravel. - The foundation for the proposed residence may be designed as conventional spread footings. A bearing pressure of 2000 psf is recommended for footings bearing in the sandy CLAY or clay SAND. SCOPE This report presents the results. of a Soil and Foundation Investigation for the proposed residence to be constructed on Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision, in Eagle. County, Colorado. The purpose of this foundation exploration is to evaluate the soil conditions respective to foundation support, and the engineering characteristics of the anticipated foundation bearing materials, and to provide criteria from a geotechnical perspective for use by the client in preparing a foundation design, a grading design, and drainage plans. The investigation was performed by advancing soil test pits, obtaining soil samples for laboratory testing, and an analysis of the data. .STYE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION - The site is an undeveloped lot located at Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision near Wolcott, Colorado. The site can be described as an undeveloped lot. The site slopes toward the northeast at Soil & Foundation Investigation BB Andersen ` Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision Page 4 gradients estimated to ranged from`-10 to 20 percent. The site is bounded by wooded residential. lots and open areas. SITE INVESTIGATION TEST PITS The subsurface exploration included a site reconnaissance by an Inter -Mountain Engineering personnel and the excavation of one soil test pit to observe the soil profile and obtain soil samples for laboratory testing. The test pit was excavated using a rubber tire backhoe to the depths indicated in the Summary of Test Pit. The test pit location was established in the field by estimating right angles and pacing distances from site features. The approximate location of the test pit is illustrated on the Site Plan in the Appendix, refer to Drawing No. 1. The Appendix also contains Summary of Test Pit presenting the information which was obtained in the subsurface exploration, a key to the terms used in the Summary of Test Pit, and a brief description of the procedures used. PERCOLATION TESTING The percolation tests were performed on February 16, 1996 in the vicinity of the proposed absorption field, refer to site plan. Three 6-inch diameter percolation test holes were drilled using a 6-inch diameter auger to depths of approximately 30 inches. The approximate locations for the percolation test holes are shown on the site plan,. refer to Figure No. 1. The test holes were filled with water 24 hours prior to the' actual testing to allow the soils to inundate. The water levels were measured to a relative _constant rate. The percolation rates varied from approximately l6lo 35 mimuteS° inch Although the percolation test holes and profile pits were dug to obtain a reasonable accurate determination of the absorption field conditions, variations in the subsurface conditions are also possible. Variations that exist beneath the absorption field may become evident during Soil & Foundation Investigation BB Andersen Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision Page S the excavation. A representative from our office should observe the completed excavation to confirm that the soils encountered are as indicated by the soils profile hole. SUBSURFACE AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS The generalized soil stratigraphy is. presented below. The stratum symbols and solid lines which are used to illustrate the break between various strata breaks on the Boring Log are approximate as the transitions between soil types may occur suddenly or relatively gradually. Underlying a three (3) foot; layer of grass root mat an­_orgalue laden 4,opsoil, a. l foot'aayer' of x by a silty, clay,.,., No measurable groundwater .was:present ia the time the test borings were performed Noy long term groundwater observatloris were nude. The �inderlyu g bedrock smapped asjh ,.Benton Shale; 3 he Benton Shale is described on the Charles S. Robinson in 1975 maps as a dark grey shale with inter -bedded fine grained, brownish -grey, clayey SANDSTONE and thin beds of white clay. The Robinson map(s) described the area around the Travis Creek Area as being susceptible to landslides, slope failure complexes, and accelerated soil creep behavior (refer to Appendix for definitions). A subsequent study by W.T. Cohan, P.E. -and Dr. R.G. Young titled Geologic Hazards Study of Travis Creek Subdivision No. 2, Wolcott Springs Area, Eagle County, Colorado dated November 25, 1993, described the superficial -soil mantle as an ancient Pleistocene solifluction complex. More detail description of a solifluction complex is included in the Appendix. The Cohan and Young study also discusses the landslide geologic hazards of the Travis Creek Subdivision and the study indicates that there are evidence(s) to the fact that there is ground stability in the Travis Creek Subdivision, refer to reference. Soil & Foundation Investigation BB Andersen Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision Page 6 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION We anticipate that the proposed construction for this site will consists of a single family residence. The residence is anticipated to be of wood frame construction with concrete slab -on -grade construction for the ground floor. We also anticipate that the residence will be a two-story structure with. a walk out basement. Foundation wall loadings are anticipated to range from 1 to 5 kips per linear foot and isolated column loadings are anticipated to range from approximately 5 to 25 kips. FOUNDATION RECOM MNDATIONS Based upon the results of the field exploration and the laboratory testing we recommend that conventional spread footing foundation system be used. The foundations may be designed for a bearing pressure of 2000 psf for footings bearing on undisturbed sandy CLAY and silty SAND, and/or approved fill materials compacted to the recommendations provided herein. At this pressure, settlements are anticipated to be within tolerable limits for wood frame construction, provided any improvements in the bearing soils as discussed herein will be performed. f The footing excavations should be relatively smooth, free of debris, organics, loose soil, frost, and standing water. Any over -excavations should be backfilled_ and compacted to 100 percent within 2 percent of optimum moisture as determined by a Standard Proctor Test (ASTM D-698). A representative of this office should be contacted to inspect the foundation excavation to verify that the soil conditions are the same as those anticipated in this report. After all of the final grading is completed, the bottom of the footings should be covered with a minimum of 48 inches of backfill for frost protection. Soil & Foundation Investigation BB Andersen Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision Page 7 Voids left by the removal of cobbles in the bottom of the footing excavation should be filled with lean concrete or a granular soil with a maximum particle size of 3 inches compacted to 100 percent of Standard Proctor Density (ASTM D-698) within 2 percent of optimum moisture. At this pressure, settlements are anticipated to be within tolerable limits for wood frame construction, provided the improvements in the foundation soils are made as discussed herein. The footing excavations should be relatively smooth and free of debris, organics, loose soil, frost, and standing water. Any over -excavations should be backfilled and compacted to 95 percent within 2 percent of optimum moisture as -determined by a Standard Proctor Method of Test (ASTM D-698). A representative of this office should be contacted to perform an inspection of the open foundation excavation to verify that the soil conditions are as same as anticipated in this report. After all of the final grading is completed, the bottom of the footings should be covered with a minimum of 48 inches of backfill for frost protection. Voids left by the removal of cobbles in the bottom of the footing excavation should be filled with lean concrete or a granular soil with a maximum particle size of 3 inches compacted to 95 percent of Standard Proctor Method of Test (ASTM.D-698) and within 2 percent of optimum moisture. SLAB CONSTRUCTION The on -site soils, exclusive of Topsoil and Organics, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. All excavations made for the foundations under proposed slab -on - grade areas must be properly backfilled with suitable material compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum Standard Proctor Density (ASTM D-698). Backfill placed beneath slab - on -grade floors should be installed at ±2 percent of optimum moisture content. The on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil and organics, are suitable for use as backfill. Before the backfill is placed, all water and loose debris should be removed from the excavations. Prior to the construction of concrete floors, the undisturbed subgrade, free from topsoil and organics, should be proof rolled with a loaded rubber -tired loader or similar equipment to Soil & Foundation Investigation BB Andersen Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision Page 8 densify the near surface soils and outline soft areas. To reduce the chance of damage to shallow utilities, special care should be taken in areas where underground utilities are present. , The floor slabs should be reinforced, and joints should be provided at the junctions of the slab and the foundation walls, so that independent movement can occur without causing damage. All columns should be isolated from concrete slabs -on -grade to allow for slab movement. GROUNDWATER AND DRAIN SYSTEM While no groundwater was reported in the soil test pit at the time the field investigation was conducted, it is possible that seasonal variations will cause fluctuations, or for a water table to be present in the upper soils during the spring months, or after prolonged periods of rain. A foundation perimeter drain as detailed on Figure No. 5 is recommended to reduce the risk of surface water infiltrating to the foundation bearing soils and accumulating at the foundation level. The foundation perimeter drain should daylight to a down gradient point. If a down gradient discharge is not possible, then a sump pit and pump may be necessary. EXCAVATION The superficial soils at the site should be easily excavated with conventional backhoe- . trackhoe equipment. In areas where the excavation extends into the shallow bedrock formation or fingers and boulders of the Benton Shale, additional excavation effort such as pneumatic jack hammering or light blasting may be required, particularly in narrow trenches, such as for utilities. Soil & Foundation Investigation BB Andersen Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision Page 9 REINFORCING The foundation should be well reinforced and rigid enough to withstand differential settlements. Walls retaining earth should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid pressure of 38 pcf for an "active" case assuming a level drained backfill condition. For "at rest" conditions such as basement walls, an equivalent fluid pressure value of 55 pcf may be used. CRAWL SPACE COVER When moist soils are encountered in the excavation, the ground surface in crawl space areas should be covered with an impervious moisture barrier sealed against the footings. This will help to reduce humidity in the crawl space area. BACREML AND SURFACE DRAINAGE We recommend that foundation soils encountered in portions of the site be prevented from being wetted after construction. The backfill placed around the foundation walls should be methodically compacted to help reduce settlement after completion of construction. The top one foot of the backfill material must be relatively impervious. The on -site soils, exclusive of Topsoil and Organics are suitable for use as backfill. Care must be taken in using any large rock material as backfill. The material should be less than six inches in diameter and mixed with finer grained soils to prevent void spaces. Foundation wall backfillshould be moistened or dried to near to within 0 to +4 percent Of its optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum Standard Proctor Density. Structural backfill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the Standard Proctor Method of Test (ASTM D 698). Soil & Foundation Investigation BB Andersen Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision Page 10 Surface water running toward the structure from up slope areas should be diverted around and away from the building by means of lined drainage swales or other similar measures. The final grade should have a positive slope away from the foundation walls on all sides. A minimum of 12 inches in the first 10 feet is recommended. Down spouts and sill cocks should discharge into splash blocks that extend beyond the limits of the backfill or a minimum distance of at least 5 feet from the foundation wall. The use of long downspout extensions in place of splash blocks is advisable. LAWN IRRIGATION We do not recommend sprinkler systems be installed next to foundation.walls, porches or patio slabs. If sprinkler systems are installed, the sprinkler heads be aligned so that the spray from the heads, under full pressure, does not fall within five feet of foundation walls, porches, or patio slabs. Lawn irrigation must be controlled and no flooding or ponding of water should be allowed. If the future owners desire to plant next to foundation walls, porches or patio slabs, and are willing to assume the risk of structural damage, etc., then it is advisable to plant only flowers and shrubbery (no lawn) of varieties that require very little moisture. These flowers and shrubs should only be hand watered. SEPTIC SYSTEMS - - - -- An individual waste disposal systems will be necessary at the site. Based upon the information obtained during this investigation, a conventional system may be selected provided a=4 fodf separatlon between the bottom of the bed, and bedrock caI% be maintained. I We recommend at percolation rate of 40 be selected for the design of the system. The tests performed at the site indicated that some clayer materials are much less permeable, slower percolation rates. Very clayey soils should be avoided when encountered during the installation of the absorbtion fields. Soil & Foundation Investigation BB Andersen Lot 1, Travis Creek Subdivision Page i l MISCELLANEOUS The recommendations provided herein are based on experience in the area and the on -site field exploration. The information obtained from the field exploration and laboratory testing reflects subsurface conditions only at the specific locations at the particular times designated. Subsurface conditions at other locations and times may differ from the conditions at these locations. The extent of any variations between the soil test borings may not be evident uritil the foundation excavation is performed. However, only minor variations are expected. If during construction conditions appear to be different, this office should be advised so reevaluation of the recommendations may be made. This document was prepared for the exclusive use of B.B. Andersen. The use of this document or the information contained herein by any other person or entity is not authorized. In the event any .other person or entity desires to use this document for the information contained herein for any purpose, they must first contact Inter -Mountain Engineering for written authorization. The findings and recommendations of this report have been prepared in accordance with locally accepted professional engineering standards for similar conditions at this time. There is no other warranty, either expressed or implied. Inter -Mountain Engineering is pleased to have worked with you on this project. Should you have any questions regarding the information contained herein, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Sincerely, LTD. Richard O. Ricks, Pt. Geotechnical Engineer I • j �_.• �: :_ice'..=.=`' ::7i'w.s ..7•i.:.r ta....t.� �y «� �.-- __ _ ilk>r-�•. .� i�.�:•`�..:_' _'..=. ='-' .., ,. _J:ilrsh..ln �..r.?,�"`+..•,��i'-,;-�' -'. �� . -�N f0•oo•_ -'S.ib•� —_ -'- l• - ..� .�Orieoo-S ' " ..290.00.• 285.00----- - - ,� 'fir= -_ _ r` .M1 ��`'�--•`-. -....-.-._�». _ m015LOT /e. -eye _•—__ _ -"sc -�3 _ _ ca ' -: 1]6J70 sc..Irw /tet `-_._ $ •• -.._.. -� - LalO�{YL=^ - - -•.... 1 _.IV Val lOt'V413 ..� ..a'•!Q:_4 - H 0" _. -. •• -w ' L - !!0� r^ l S RiZp71-! . : _ _ -.. 4 .. -• ^» � i ~'11J2 � � SI• v- t w..I: •• ~... ._ � ui y . - .—. . _ - -_ a _ •i7iiD'i/Af $42 .__ Feswcr.mcp. •. _ .to'.IlenaW Fo--t F.W Aw. S/NN� - 'traur lerwMf 3 " - i J-•. Y � A `• h ati�w � f Woo — 63USVA3 I4I►4S40:e :Y! ® PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT �Xric�c-2Kov�naizi LOT 1 TRAVIS CREEK SUBDIVISION Er: gizxe erzxs g Ltd. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G FIGURE NO. 1 ® PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE �2xxtcx- ?Koux�i LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK SUBDIVISION EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G FIGURE NO. 2 PIT NO. TP-1 DATE DRILLED: 7/22/97 ELEVATION: FIGURE NO.: 2 DEPTH IN FEET a a m DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL REMARKS N N 0 JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ TOPSOIL , 2 JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ i JJJJ JJJJ CLAY, silty, brown 4 CLAY, cobbly, silty, w/angular gravel, red brown 6 Total Depth of Test Pit 6 feet No Measurable Groundwater Encountered s 10 12 - - - - - 14 SUMMARY OF TEST PITS nInter Mountain PROPOSED RESIDENCE T;ngneer agLtd. LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO [PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G PIT NO. TP-2 DATE DRILLED: 7/22/97 ELEVATION: FIGURE NO.: 3 DEPTH W a J m IN FEET a } DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL REMARKS (n N 0 JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ TOPSOIL JJJJ JJJJ , M .� 'ilty,. brown 2 4 obbly, silty, w/angular ffl"~' gWrdred brown 6 Total Depth of Test Pit 6 feet No Measurable Groundwater Encountered a 10 12 14 SUMMARY OF TEST PITS Mo`DENCE SICREEK WEnjine=LtgL OT 1, TRAYSED EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G KEY TO SYMBOLS Symbol Description Strata symbols J JJJ Topsoil JJJJ ® Low plasticity clay Clayey sand Notes• 1. Exploratory Test Pits were excavated on 7/22/97 using a Rubber Tire back -hoe. 2. No free water was encountered at the time of excavation. 3. Pit locations were taped from existing features. 4. These logs are subject to the limitations, conclusions, and recommendatios provided in this report. BORING NO TP-1 DEPTH 3.5' J J W 3: 1 N ) Z 2 0 a 3 J _ 0 N Z 0 4- 0 0.1 1.0 LOAD (KSF) 10 100 SAMPLE OFCLAY, * SILTY, sandy, ,brown NAT. MOISTURE CONTENT 19. 0 % % SWELL/CONSOL SAMPLE FLOODED AT,1.0 KSF NAT. DRY DENSITY 102. 2 PCF l" i u• 1.0 LOAD (KSF) 10 100 SAMPLE OF NAT. MOISTURE CONTENT °6 `% SWELL/CONSOL. SAMPLE FLOODED AT KSF NAT. DRY DENSITY PCF SWELL - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS • PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK SUBDIVISION ..EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NO 9_7-0209G FIGURE NO "4' Foundation Wall TOP 1' of bac:rR// should be ' re%five/y i%rperv/ous till. d •d Slope awry fr*ln bui7a1!n9, 4 d .. 11- - I 1 1- - 1 11- -III- - 11 1-•- I '4 - -111--I11--III1- 1111--111-- - • 1 1_ _ I 1 1_ _ I 1 I_ - - _1__111�_111__I I d ♦ -� -- 1 I I. _ i I I_._ 1 I I_ _ I 1 1: .. ♦ ` I- - 1 11- _ 1..� 1_ III- • ',d `� ♦ -- — "�--t • � ♦ ♦ ` ♦ Cronu/ar Fi7/ e ` ` ♦ ♦ ♦ Moisture 8crrier ( Black Sprayed onto Foundation WO// d V ♦ ♦ ` ♦ t:eotextde( AI%rar 1401V or equivalent %` ` ` APp/y with 8' to 11' overlap d • Q , • .. V�l V�� yVyV � yVy yl.���,VWt� - y�`(bw��;S4� Minimum of 6' of 3/4 Inch gram, VL aA ,a d 4' d/ameter perforated rw pipe _-- -- x1coed a minimum of 1/8' per — - foot to sewer /oterrt/ subdrain, sump Pump of dowighted. Details of Peripheral Drain System For Footing Type Foundation. ® PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE �Zafcx--Mo,rsataizz LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK SUBDIVISION Exsg�cn�eerznr gua. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G DRAWING N0.5 GEOLOGIC DEFINITIONS Robinson - Definitions from 1975 Charles S. Robinson Maps Accelerated Soils Creep - Areas of colluvial slope that is moving downslope at a relatively rapid rate. Landslides - Mass movements where there is a distinct surface of rupture or zone of weakness. Subtypes identified and described below. Slope Failure Complex - Large areas of failure of surficial and bedrock units. May consist of a combination of slope failure types. Symbol enclosed in parenthesis indicates unit involved. Subscript number indicates relative age; number 1 is youngest. Cohan -London Complex - Pleistocene solifluction complex, From Geologic. Hazards Study of Travis Creek Subdivision No. 2, Wolcott Springs Area, Eagle County, Colorado, water from melting ice is prevented from downward percolation by the presence of frozen ground at shallow depts. Here the water oozes to the surface and acts like rainwash by carrying finer soil particles downslope by this major translocation process (vonEngeln, 1942). "In the periglacial environment at the margins of ice caps of ice sheets, repeated freezing and thawing of surficial materials produces what is called"patterned ground", a variety of soil configurations that are indicative of the nature of the surface on which they form and the materials of they are composed (Thornbury, 1954). The most simple form is the "soil polygon", a large mudcrack-shaped, multi -sided structure up to 30 feet in diameter, separated from adjacent polygons by small bounding ridges and open fractures and composed of fine materials. It forms on relatively flat surfaces, as does the "stone polygon" or "stone net", a similar form found where surficial materials are mostly stones. Here, frost wedging causes the stones to work outward from the interior to the margins of the polygon, where they form raised stone borders. Where moderate slopes are present, some downslope movement occurs to produce "stone garlands". On still steeper slopes, the nets become more distorted to form " stone stripes" or "soil stripes", long ridges of soil and rock subparallel to the surface contours, like those seen on Travis Creek subdivision Filing No. 2. Thus, the series of stone - soil stripes mapped Lhere do not represent successive waves of solifluction materials moving downslope, but rather a series of soil stripes working slowly downslope, simultaneously, about 12,500 years ago." c.\msofcelwinword\imeVorms\geodefin.doc October 6, 1998 BB Andersen P.O. Box 130 Wolcott, CO 81655 RE: Septic System Inspection Lot 1, Travis Creek Project No. 97-0209G Inter -Mountain Engineering Ltd. (IME) has reviewed the installation of the septic system at Lot 1, Travis Creek. Based upon our review, it appears that the septic system was installed in substantial compliance with the design by IME. Per the request of Eagle County Environmental Health Department, attached is a sketch of the approximate location of the cleanout and septic tank in relation to the house. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely Martha L. Enclosure G:\engineer\soils\letters\97-0209 septic 8392 Continental Divide Road, Suite #107 • Littleton, Colorado 80127 • Phone: 303/948-6220 • Fax: 303/948-6526 77 Metcalf Road, #200 • Box 978 9 Avon, Colorado 81620 • Phone: 970/949-5072 • From Denver Direct: 893-1531 .• lix gineeringLw. November 19, 1998 Eagle County Environmental Health Department P.O. Box 179 Eagle, CO 81631 RE: Septic System Inspection Lot 1, Travis Creek Project No. 97-0209G Dear Laura, RECEIVED NOV 2 0 1998 EAGLE COUN' y COMMUNITY DEVEL'Op0W Per your request, Inter -Mountain Engineering Ltd. (MM) has illustrated the location of the septic leach field for the Esrey residence on the attached Site Plan. Also requested was verification of the depth of bedrock beneath the leach field. On the attached Site Plan, two test pit locations, which were excavated during a subsurface exploration by IlVIE, are indicated. Both text pits were six feet deep and bedrock was not encountered in either test pit. Since the infiltrators are 1 foot deep and 1 foot of cover is required, it's assumed that 4-feet exists between the bottom of the leach field and bedrock. We hope this addresses all of the County's concerns. If not, please contact me at 949- 5072. Enclosure G:\engineer\soils\letters\97-0209 septic-2 8392 Continental Divide Road, Suite #107 • Littleton, Colorado 80127 • Phone: 303/948-6220 • Fax: 303/948-6526 77 Metcalf Road, #200 9 Box 978 • Avon, Colorado 81620 • Phone: 970/949-5072 • From Denver Direct: 893-1531 ® PROJECT: PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK SUBDIVISION �ngizxeex'zz�gLta. EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G FIGURE NO. 2 • PIT NO. TP-1 DATE DRILLED: 7/22/97 ELEVATION: FIGURE NO.: 2 DEPTH IN FEET W CL a -j m DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL REMARKS t 0 JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ l JJJ JJJJ JJJJ TOPSOIL 2 JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ CLAY, silty, brown 4 CLAY, cobbly, silty, w/angular gravel, red brown s Total Depth of Test Pit 6 feet No Measurable Groundwater Encountered s 10 12 14 SUMMARY OF TEST PITS Mountain PROPOSED RESIDENCE jogineeringWI. LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G PIT NO. TP-2 DATE DRILLED: 7/22/97 ELEVATION: FIGURE NO.: 3 DEPTH IN FEET W a -j m � DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL REMARKS 0 JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ JJJJ TOPSOIL JJJJ JJJJ CLAY, silty, brown 2 4 CLAY, cobbly, silty, w/angular gravel, red brown 6 Total Depth of Test Pit 6 feet No Measurable Groundwater Encountered 8 10 12 14 SUMMARY OF PITS ;TEST MInter-Mountain PROPOSED RESIDENCE Englneermi ff d, LOT 1, TRAVIS CREEK EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NO.: 97-0209G KEY TO SYMBOLS 'Symbol Description Strata symbols JJJJ Topsoil JJJJ JJJJ Low plasticity clay Clayey sand Notes: 1. Exploratory Test Pits were excavated on 7/22/97 using a Rubber Tire back -hoe. 2. No free water was encountered at the time of excavation. 3. Pit locations were taped from existing features. 4. These logs are subject to the limitations, conclusions, and recommendatios provided in this report. 1/1/-7/ 1d.X1f 17'Fl—L/4—V3—VVl ��xs, Lot#1, Filing 2 ESREY JOB NAME Travis Creek Subdivision 0203 Jouflas Ranch Rd. g; JOB O. 3 `� JOB LOCATION BILL TO DATE STARTED n DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED I -�Zz/hIF - ; r � gyp, JOB COST SUMMARY _-% - 00 — TOTAL SELLING PRICE _ 'TOTAL MATERIAL TOTAL LABOR INSURANCE �� �� l _���•� SALES TAX MISC. COSTS TOTAL JOB COST GROSS PROFIT LESS OVERHEAD COSTS % OF SELLING PRICE NET PROFIT JOB FOLDER Product 278 ®® NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC., GROTON, MA 01471 JOB FOLDER Printed in U.S.A t - - �