Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout90 Vaquero Rd - 239128405002 - 1707-97ISINDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631
Telephone: (970) 328-8755
COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1707-97 BP NO. 11339
OWNER: BRANDT BERGER PHONE: 970-927-4542
MAILING ADDRESS: C/O MIKE CONNNERS CONSTRUCTION. INC.. P.O. BOX 1639, BASALT, CO 81621
APPLICANT: MIKE CONNERS PHONE: 970-963-4542
SYSTEM LOCATION: 0090 VAQUERO, CARBONDALE, CO TAX PARCEL NO. 2391-284-05-002
LICENSED INSTALLER: DORAIS EXCAVATING, BILL DORAIS LICENSE NO. 4-97
DESIGN ENGINEER: SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, DAN COKELY PHONE NO. 970-925-6727
INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING:
1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK 775.5 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION TRENCH VIA 25 INFILTRATOR UNITS AS PER ENGINEER'S DESIGN
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL AS PER ENGINEER'D DESIGN DATED 7/7/97, WITH REVISIONS STATED IN LETTER DATED 7/11/97
WHICH INCLUDES A FLUID DINAMICS 175 GALLON DOSING SIPHON AT THE OUTLET END OF THE SEPTIC TANK CONFIRM FOUR (4) FOOT
SEPARATION TO BEDROCK AT INSTALLATION. ENGINEER TO PROVIDE AS BUILT DRAWINGS FOR FINAL APPROVAL BUILDING CO WILL
NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT SEPTIC CERTIFICATION.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: A DATE: JULY 17, 1997
CONDITIONS:
1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS,
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED.
2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING
REQUIREMENTS, CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS
SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT.
3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO
BE LICENSED.
FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR):
NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL
THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM.
INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 7 7 5 S SQUARE FEET (VIA 25 i n f i l t r a t o r i i n i t c as n o r
INSTALLED concrete TANK: 1250 GALLONS IS LOCATED DEGREES AND 38 FEET FROM
the claannnt_
COMMENTS: Engineer certification rpepived 1 —19-97
ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN
WORK IS COMPLETED.
----------
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE: January Z, 1998
esign
(;Site Plan MUST be attached)
ISDS Permit
--C'--�
APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 179
EAGLE, CO 81631
328-8755/927-3823 (El Jebel)
**************************************************************************
* PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00
* *
* MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER"
PROPERTY OWNER:
MAILING ADDRESS:
APPLICANT/CONTACT
MAILING ADDRESS:
LICENSED ISE
COMPANY/DBA:
ADDRESS:
AhnIl l ASz
PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: ( ) New Installation ( ) Alteration ( ) Repair
***************************************************************************
LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
Building Permit # (if known)
Legal Description: Subdivision: 4—
0- L
Filing: _Block: Lot No.
Tax Parcel Number: 3- j L -1 -� -� Lot Size: f 2" g�a
Street Address: 00
BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category)
(,mil Residential/Single Family
( ) Residential/Multi-Family*
( ) Commercial/Industrial*
Number
Number
Type _
21?
of Bedrooms
of Bedrooms
TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category)
Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface
( ) Public Name of Supplier: t1Pcx� e-1 d�
*These systeris equir .design by a Registered Professional E gin er
SIGNATURE: Date:
*********************************************************** ** ***********
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COUNTY
AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT
CHECK #:
# : q-3 DATE: 2(a
9-7uK CASHIER:
Community Development Department
(970) 328-8730
Fax: (970) 328-7185
TDD: (970) 328-8797
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
January 5, 1998
Brandt Berger
C/O Mike Conners Construction, Inc.
P.O. Box 1639
Basalt, CO 81621
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
RE: Final of ISDS Permit No. #1707-97, Tax Parcel #2391-284-05-002. Property location:
0090 Vaquero, Carbondale, CO.
Dear Mr. Berger:
This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and
z._ finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance
with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of
your septic system.
Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic
system.
If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental
Health Division at (970) 328-8755.
Sincerely,
n�
Janet Kohl
Environmental Health Department
Eagle County Community Development
ENCL:Informational Brochure
Final ISDS Permit
cc: files
Community Deveiopment Department
(970) 328-8730
Fax: (970) 328- 1185
TDD: (970) 328-8797
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
Date: July 17, 1997
TO: Dorais Excavating
FROM: Environmental Health Division
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadwav
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1707-97. Tax
Parcel # 2391-284-05-002. Property Location: 0090 Vaquero , Carbodale,
CO., Berger residence.
Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 17075-97. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the
permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications
invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved.
Systems designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer
indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County does not perform final
inspections on engineer designed systems. Your TCO will not be issued until our office
receives this certification.
Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property
owner's attention.
This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328-
8755.
cc: files
Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Dan Cokley
(970) 945-1004
FAX (970) 945-5948
December 19, 1997
Eagle County Environmental Health
P.O. Box 179
Eagle CO 81631
Attn: Missy Trujillo
RE: Berger ISDS
Dear Missy:
ENGINEERS
SG SURVEYORS
M
SCHMUESER
GORDON MEYER
118 West 6th, Suite 200
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
The purpose of this letter is to provide you certification that the Berger ISDS at 0090
Vaquero, Carbondale, Colorado, was installed per the plans and specs prepared by SGM dated
July 7, 1997. The ISDS was completed the week of November 17, and I made three visits
during that week on the 17, 19, and 21. During these visits, I observed the excavation of the
trenches, installation of infiltrator units, backfilling of the infiltrator units, installation of the
level header pipe, installation of the dosing siphon and installation of the septic tank. The
system was installed by Dorais Excavating.
Please call should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC.
C-1
Dan Cokley, P.E.
DC:lc/97070A -o t
cc: Mike ConnersC�•..,12�
BillDorais •�''••..°,,.....••';��
Brandt Berger„�0:.-`�
Dorais Excavatina Inc.
Bill Dorais
RO Box391
Carbondale, CO 81623
Eagle County Environmental Health Division 12-29-97
PO Box 179
Eagle, CO 81631
Dear Janet Kohl:
Telephone (970) 963-2670
Fax (970) 963-2670
Enclosed are as built drawings of the Berger ISDS and a copy of the letter
from Schmueser, Gordon, Meyer Inc., certifying that the Berger ISDS System
was installed a per the plans and specs dated July 7, 1997.
We would also request a renewal paper/ and or test to renew our license
for the 1998 year. Please send renewal information to Dorais Excavating,
PO Box 391, Carbondale, CO 81623
Sincerely
Bill Dorais
Encl: 2
HEPWORTII-i'AWLAK GGOTGcilN1CAL, INC.
(:Ir•nn�r�<ul �r,rin}S5, LO R I GO I
June 1, 1994
"IMIC .11l•l
.Iilll Steinmetz
P.O. Box 666 �° (�✓
Basalt, Colorado 81621
Job No, 194 225
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lot 13, Cook
Subdivision, Adjacent to Aspen Mesa Estates, Vaquero Road, Cagle County,
Colorado.
Dear Mr. Steinmetz:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechtlical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for
design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with out' agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated April 25, 1994. "The
data obtained and our recotnlnendations based oil the proposed construction and
subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report.
Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a one story wood frame
structure over a partial crawl space and partial walkout basement located on the site as
shown on Fig. 1. Basement and garage floors will be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are
expected to range between about 3 to 7 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of
construction are assured to be relatively light.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Site Conditions: The site was vacant at the time of our field work. The proposed
building area is located at the transition between a moderately to steeply sloping
forested hillside down to the south end a strongly sloping overgrown meadow (the
topographic survey area shown on rig. 1). The vegetation in the building area consists
of pinion and juniper trees, sage and rabbit brush, cactus and weeds. Many basalt
cobbles and boulders were observed on the ground surface.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
excavating two exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Pig. 1. The logs
Of the pits are presented on Pig. 2. "I'llc subsoils encountered, below about 1 1/2 feet
of topsoil, consist of basalt cobbles and boulders in a silty sand and gravel matrix.
Results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of the silty san an gravel
matrix (minus 3-inch fraction) obtained front the site are presented on Pig. 3. No free
water was observed in the pits at the tillle of excavation and the soils were slightly
lllolst to Illolst.
Jim Steinmetz
June 1, 1994
Page 2
Foundation Reconunendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered ill the
exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread
footings placed on tine undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing
pressure of 2,500 psf for support of the proposed residence. I ootings should be a
minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and
disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should
be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural
soils. Holes created by boulder removal should be backfilled with lean concrete or
compacted road base gravel. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover
above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 42
inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation
walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming
an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining
structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent
fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for tine on -site soil as backfill.
Floor Slabs: The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support
lightly to moderately loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some
differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and
columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab
control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. 'file
requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the
designer based on experience and the intended slab use. /1 rrninitnum 4-inch layer of
free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage.
This material should consist of minus 2-inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the
No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill
can consist of the on -site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Due to
the large amount of oversized rock, it may be nnore practical to import road base
material as fill under slabs.
Underdraiu System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration,
it has been our experience in nnountainous areas that local perched groundwater nnay
develop during tinnes of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during
Spring runoff can create a perched condition. We reconnnrend below grade
H-P Grorrc:ii
Jill) Steinmetz
.tune 1, 1994
Page 3
construction, such as retaining walls, crawl space and basement areas, be protected
from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system.
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. Tire drain
should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent
finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining
granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the
No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of
2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 1/2 feet deep.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided
during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to
at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab
areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape
areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the
on -site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to
drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimull,
slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of
3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill.
Percolation Test: Percolation testing was performed in ire e shallows )its' cavated
south of the residence. The percolation test holes were soaked oil n it 27, 1994 and
the percolation tests were perfoored on April 28, 1994. The percolation test results are
shown on Table I. The percolation rate ranged from 30 to 40 minutes per inch,
indicating the area is suitable for a conventional leach field septic systeni.
Limitations: This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
1-1-P G[OTFCII
Jim Steinmetz
June 1, 1994
Page 4
other warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and reconunendations
submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits
excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and out -
experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the
subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations it, the subsurface
conditions may riot become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions
encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we
should be notified at.once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes.
We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As
the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field set -vices during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the soil engineer.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please call our office.
Sincerely,
I-IEPWORTII - PAWL AK GEOTECIINICAL, INC.
Daniel E. Hardin,
Reviewed By:
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E.
SLP/ro
Attachments
cc: Pat Stuckey
Ernie P. Kollar
H-P GEOTECH
Approximate Scale
1 " = 60'
Lot A
m
0
cc
0
L
Cr
m
194 225 114 PWORTH-PAWLAK Location of Exploratory Pits
GEOTECHNICAL, INC. and Percolation Test Holeq
Fig. 1
Pit I Pit 2
Elev=90 feet ± Elev-
-95 feet: ±
iV 0+11-14
.
Q .� a°• ----200=28 5
C� ^,
1
10
LEGEND: 10' _
TOPSOIL; organic sandy clayey silt with basalt cobbles and boulders, roots,
loose to medium dense, moist, dark brown.
BASALT COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GM); in silty sand andgravel
O°.O�
boulders up to 3 feet in diameter, dense, slightly moist, light b own I ghtl
calcareous. y
Disturbed bulk sample.
�P�ractic�alba�ckhoe�refu�sal.
NOTES:
1. Exploratory pits were excavated on April 27, 1994 with a caterpillar 41
rubber -tired backhoe. 6
2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured a
building corners staked in the field. approximately by pacing from
3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and logs of exploratory
Pits ar
drawn to depth. Elevations of pits were estimated from contours on siteplane
4. The exploratory pit locations should be considered accurate only to the de r
implied by the method used. gee
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the
approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavation.
Fluctuations in water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
+ 4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve
-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
194 225 IHEPWORTH-PAWI_AKE: EL0G:S:0:F7E)XPLORATORY PITSGEOTECHNICAL, INC.Fig 2
4-
LL
I
L
4_j
Q
0
V
y
n
a
I-
z
U
¢
w
O.
J
HYDROMFTER ANALYSIS
SIEVE ANALYSIS
1..
TIME FiEAUINUS U.S. $iANUARO SEI11 F_$ 24 c FIR I:L t•1R S�]UAR
t r . ..... __ .._. __ _ _ E UPENIN(i$ f
IV!_t IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY TO SILT SANO (iiiAvEL
F1NE `.1EpIUM C�nRSE I =1NE I COna$E COBBLES
GRAVEL 44 % SAND 28 °e SILT ANO CLAY 23 .5
LIQUID LIMIT % 4S
PLASTICITY INO
SAMPLE OF silty sand and gravel FROM Pit 1 @ 5 to 6 feet
matrix
1-IYORCr.IETER ANALYSIS
I
SIEVEANALYSIS
TIME READINGS2e Hq I�q U.S. STANOARU SERIES
CLAY TO SILr
GRAVEL,
LIOUIO LIMIT
SAMPLE OF
.42 2.0'.' Ja.1 i5.2 127' 200
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS 152
SnNO �NE
vELCCARSEI FCOARSE COBBLES
SAND % SILT AND CLL\Y ?�
".6
PLASTICITY INDF:(
FROM
Q
f-
_!
CC
w`
U
S
w
a
194 225 I HEPWORTH - PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, Inc GRAD ATION TEST RESULT +Fig. 3
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE
PERCOLATION
TEST
RESULTS JOB NO. 194 225
FHOLEO.
HOLE DEPTH
(INCHES)
32
LENGTH OF
INTERVAL
(MIN)
30
WATER DEPTH
AT START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
11
WATER DEPTH DROP INAVERAGE
AT END OF WATER PERCOLATION
INTERVAL LEVEL RATE
(INCHES) (INCHES) (MINJINCH)
9 1/2 1 1/2
9 1/2
8 3/4 3/4
8 3/4
8 1/4 1/2
8 114
7 1/2 3/4 40
P-2
48
30
10 1/2
8 1/2 2
8 112
7 1/2 1
7 1/2
6 1/4 1 1/4
refill
7
6 1 30
P-3
52
30
10 1/2
9
1 1/2
9
7 3/4
1 1/4
Ej 3/4
6 1/4
1 1/2
refill
30
Note: Test holes were soaked on April 27, 1994. Percolation tests were performed on
April 28, 1994. Soil profile of leach field area similar to Pit 1.
ENGINEERS
SURVEYORS
SG SURVEYORS
(970) 945-1004 SCHMUESER
FAX (970) 945-5948 GORDON MEYER
July 11, 1997
Missy Trujillo
Eagle County Environmental Health
Eagle, Colorado 81631
RE: The Berger ISDS.
Dear Missy:
118 West 6th, Suite 200
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
VIA FAX: (970) 328-7185
Per our conversation on July 10, 1997, 1 am sending this letter to revise the approved SGM
plan dated July 8, 1997.
The infiltrator trenches should not be located directly on the test pit location. The trench
bottom should be excavated in native soil as opposed to a filled -in test pit.
The design should be revised to add a dosing siphon at the outlet end of the septic tank.
The dosing siphon shall be capable of a 175 gallon dose, Fluid Dynamics model number
413 or equal. 3 _ 1+ do5c�eA" cL
I hope this letter serves its intended purpose, please do not hesitate to call should you have
any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC.
Dal- C08
Dan Cokley, P. E.
cc: Mike Conners
Brandt Berger, with enclosures
Caudill Gustafson
DC:lg
�e
tp
Vi
N
o
�uS(:O:L
�g
D
n�
Z
�
0
1707-97 Tax# 2391-284-05-002
Lot B, Cook Sub. BERGER4.
JOB NAME.. 0090 Vaquero JOB NO.
Carbondale
'.'l_=r.Tw.Wrr.-T.T
BILL TO
DATE START D/q
/ /I r
DATE COMPLETED
DATE BILLED
'l 3 ��elv
5cv� d
q q e, I
b T
wj 15TQ V Q"
'711 A-1 &zzmJ zi�
U
64,
JOB COST SUMMARY
/ sf�
TOTAL SELLING PRICE
TOTAL MATERIALo
TOTAL LABOR
INSURANCE
SALES TAX
MISC. COSTS
TOTAL JOB COST
GROSS PROFIT
LESS OVERHEAD COSTS
% OF SELLING PRICE
NET PROFIT
Lo/
JOB FOLDER Product 278 ®p NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC., GROTON, MA 01471 JOB FOLDER Printed in U.S.A.
f
4
--------------
41
fit
PVC ASTM 2729 ©MIN_ 1/ " PER T o
4" PVC ASTIbf 2729
HEADER PIPE, PLACED LEVEL
_-
- 1250 GALLON CONCRETE SE C ANK _
PC ASU 2729 ®fN.4/FT.
GENERAL! .NOTES.
I w
/1 A materials, installation practices, setback
P RCOLA RON TEST HOLE
requirements, etc., shall comply with the Eagle County -
Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations..
INr'7L TRA TOR TRENCHES Z. The absorption trench shall be constructed so that the
IN
bottom level t/ 0.1 inches. Place trench in natural ground
25 UNITS, 2 TRENCH M/N. no portion of the trench shall be placed in fill Provide
I
" I positive drainage away from and around the trench- =
J The location of the trench may be field adjusted to better fit
the site, provided all setbacks ore met, and i-!eo/th Officer and
f Engineer are notified and field is located in perco/ation test area. j
4. Pj;oinq to system shall be 4'' ASTM 2729 PVC pipe. Use ASTM JOj4
PVC under traffic arecs. _
5. The area disturbed by construction steall be reseeded with
I \ O DESIGN CALCULATIONS native grasses and vegetation. BERGER I_S.D.S_
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO 6. Use risers as needed to bring: septic tank access hatch
within 6" of finished arade-
R�LEVANT SFFACX-5 TO AfA/NTA/N: %%�� L� /� 1. DESIGN PERCOLATION RATE (NATIVE) = 33 MINUTES/INCH
SITE [� 1 BY HEr�VJORTH PAbti�AK GEOTECH, 6/1 /9Y, #19 225 * -
_ �, 7. ASTV 3034 PVC pipe or pipe of equal strength or other p;re
POTA&I- WA TER LINE = 2� SCALE.- 1 " = 40
_ properly supported to prevent failure by settling shall extend
OWELLiNv = 20' 3 BEDROOM HOUSE DESIGN- from tank fora distance of at least five feet: (') from
r�ROPERTY L/NE = 1�?' 2 PERSONS PER BEDROOFr1 `
TCH
DR WATER COURSE = 50' 71 GALLONS PER PERSON DA f
the '-inlet and out/et ends.
IRR/GA TION .DI
' R The Contractor and Owner shall take whatever measures �
WELL = 100' r 3 GETERMiNE AVERAGE DAILI FLOW:
are "necessary to assure that a) the septic tank and
G sewer lines are completely water tight to prevent k E
C f io
0 = (3)(2'(75) 450 GALLONS PER DAY nfiltratn ogroundwater into the system, and
4 " TEE (REMOVE FOR ,NSPECT�ON) ig y
P,_q�� AT EjiJ �• T b), the system is installed to prevent freezin; a,` .
j } tACr. TRENCH 4. DESIGN FLOW AT 150% PEAKING FACTOR: gravity sewer /roes_
j Q = 450 1.5 = 675 GALLONS PER DAY e"
_ ( ) 9. The County Health Officer and En�or"Weer shaft be notified when _
construction commences and kept abreast of the . construct;or,
XIST/NG FIN/SHED GRADE F progress so that sufficientinspection co., e performed o
5. SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY: p ffb p t E
4 P✓ assure conformance with these plans. _
30 HOURS DETENTION (675 GALLONS PER DAY) = 844 GALLONS -
NATIVE EA,YFI�L 24 HOURS PER DAY 10. It is the Contractor's responsbility to verify all
locations of utilities that may affect locctr'on of
USE 1000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY PER CODE M'N:MUM facilities drawn. Verification �s to be made with the
Owner and the affected utility company.
I 4 " ,NO �UE COUPLING 6_ SiZE ABSORPTION AREA:
MIN COVER 11. Substitution of materials i.e. ; e, tanks, etc.. is
" PVC (ASTM 2729) CAPPED AT END A (NATIVE) _ (0)(SORT(T)) WHERE:Q PEAK DESIGN FLOW acceptable provided verification and acceptance by the
5 A= ABSORPTION AREA Engineer and the Environmental Health Officer is made.
I ! T= PERCOLAT►C"J RATE = -
�— Pcuu- _ -- -_ ----_ — - - - - I 12. The location and elevation of the house is schematic-
_ -_ - = 775.5 SQ.FT. (DESIGN .IONTROL _ _ f
A (NATIVE) _ (675(SQPT(33); ( ) ,t is paramount that verification- o; sewer %ine tocation--- --_ _
N TOrr S.HEL� 5 and elevation be checked with building plans prior to
NOTE.- INSTALL iNF,•'LTRATOFr ' construction.
- NOTE.CLEANOUT TO BE LOCH TED A T 45 PVC PER MANUFACTURERS
A SAND = 675 = 562.5 SOFT_ z
ALL; HORZ/VERT CHANGES IN D/RECRON i REOUIREMENTS AND/OR 24 SAND (SEE NOTE 13� (SAND) 1.1 Sand shall be Concrete sand.
RECOMMENDA TIONS _ (1.20) _
Sieve Size AST, f Soec.
/ PRO VIDE MIN. OF
I THE ABOVE ABSORPTION AREA REPRESENTS THE AREA NECESSARY 9 "4 5 —100 6 SEPARA 77ON BETWEEN
�5 r N FOR A TRENCH TYPE SYSTEM. 8 80 — 100
s� oyc TRENCHES (S/DEWALL TO
SIDEWAL76 50 — 85
wrE vR _ _
4- PVC Etevw ALLOW 50� REDUCTION AREA FOR INFILTRATOR UNIT USE = 387.75 S.F. 30 25 60
L) IN-
^-- 90Ti OM OFTRENCH
� 50 10-30
�. FOR USE Or TRENCH TYPE SY,TcEM: 140 2 — 10
k
r L cJIVY
— f f FL GAf �l��� 775.5 L. (15.5 S. F. PER /NF/L TRA TOR UNI T = 50 /NFIL TRA TOR UNI TS 200 O — 3
INSTALL �225� INF/L TRA TOR UNI TS (50% REDUCTION)
4 J.
0.
EFFECTIVE AREA = 387. 5 S.F. 'UNIFORMITY COEFFICIENT = 4'
The engineer may require that o gradation an be
Cperfooecifl'cction.rmedLEAN—OUT DETAIL
t o certify that proposed material meets thl:) _
lNFIL TRA TOR SECTION
14. Site plan and topography provid Gustafson &Assoc.
�p.RfG�s
o•
Ir F
C 9 F
�.�`•••'•{. I� I { •'`.^ice
g � � ,NUM—
z I REVISION BY - Jo No.
_ i LOT B COOK SUBDIVISION BER } DATE _ _ b 97070A
ENGINEERS I SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. - - _ = -
f - SURVEYORS � � I �� - �
- - - - - , ��� = INDI VID UAL ,SEIVA G�' O Dec Y
118 W. 6th STREET, SUITE 200BER GER RESIDENCE y
GLENWOOD SPRINGS COLOR4DO 81601 --- 7/7/97
� T n � Dote.' +�
(303) 945-1004 (FAX.) 945-5948- DISPOSAL OAL SYSTEMtAppr. _ s
SCHMUESER - ASPEN, COLORADO (303) 925-6727 - - �-------� - -------=-- = --
GORDON MEYER . EA GLB CO UNTY 5 _ _ � COL ORADO - -- - _ _- ! _ - _ -- File: 9707oss �` OF
e-