HomeMy WebLinkAbout1890 Hooks Spur Rd - 246503200023 - 1645-96ISINDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, Colorado 81631
Telephone:328-8755 BP- 10790
YELLOW COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 16 4 5
Please call for final inspection before covering any portion of installed system.
OWNER: Sally Cole PHONE: (970) 9 7-47 1
MAILINGADDRESS: 1900 Hook Spur Lane city: ---R-as.altState: CO zip: 81621
APPLICANT: Hans Raaflaub PHONE:(970) 963-8639
s,
SYSTEMLOCATION: 1900 HookSpur, RaR 1 -, CO TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 2 65-0-12-00)- 00,?)
LICENSED INSTALLER: DOr&ln +_ & AA QTM_7 13I I-L IX1 CK5 LICENSE NO: lP r �ZP
DESIGN ENGINEER OF SYSTEM:0j)tAn:ftqt✓
INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING:
1250 GALLON SEPTIC TANK 1000 gallon dosing tank
ABSORPTION AREA REQUIREMENTS: 950 sq. ft. gravel base area; 1125 sq. ft. sand base area
SQUARE FEET OF SEEPAGE BED SQUARE FEET OF TRENCH BOTTOM.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: Scarify the ground surface before placing the two feet of sand. Install per
Eng design 9/23/96. During revegitaion do not use tap root plants, a grass seed mix is
recommended. Engineer is responsible for final inspection.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: A DATE: ''O
41
CONDMONS:
1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25- 10. 104. 1973, AS AMENDED.
2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION
TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A
REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT AND CAUSE FOR BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT.
3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED.
FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM: (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR):
NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED
PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM.
INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 4368 SQUARE FEET. of basal area for the mound, and 1440 sq' of bed ar
INSTALLED SEPTIC TANK: 1250 GALLON DEGREES FEET FROM —Ree si t2 plan for locations
SEPTIC TANK ACCESS TO WITHIN 8" OF FINAL GRADE AND
PROPER MATERIAL AND ASSEMBLY X YES NO
COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY / STATE REQUIREMENTS: X YES NO
ANY ITEM CHECKED NO REQUIRES CORRECTION BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A REANSPECTION WHEN WORK IS CORRECTED.
COMMENTS: This system lgo: contains a 1000 gallon dosing tank
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: a - DATE: _luly 25, 1997
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE:
(RE -INSPECTION IF NECESSARY)
RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS
APPLICANT / AGENT:
OWNER:
PERMIT FEE PERCOLATION TEST FEE RECEIPT# CHECK#
(Site Plan MUST be attached)
ISDS Permit #
APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 179
EAGLE, CO 81631
328-8755/927-3823 (El Jebel)
**************************************************************************
* PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00
* *
* MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER"
PROPERTY OWNER:
MAILING ADDRESS:
APPLICANT/CONTACT P
MAILING ADDRESS: C%
PHONE: (i7& )q27 -472 1
PHONE: R7&)q(3
LICENSED ISDS CONTRACTOR: MR GOAVRAL 60 PHONE: )9b-3 84N9
COMPANY/DBA: r ��''f�i"��M WILL E3, ADDRESS: `% �-i� 1/� i=1
SM&4 6i A we-E445,1E0
***************************************************************************
PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: DO New Installation ( ) Alteration ( ) Repair
LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
Building Permit # U j 0 ( if known) MAP
L Z �
Legal Description: Subdivision: G171�FC>F ling: —Block: Lot No.
Tax Parcel Number: - V Z -(� -_ _ _ Lot Size: ,2,6,ttA+ *E5
Street Address: Reoy-S �s .
***************************************************************************
BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category)
Residential/Single Family
( ) Residential/Multi-Family*
( ) Commercial/Industrial*
TYPE OF
O
WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category)
Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface
Public Name of Supplier:
*These syste
SIGNATURE:
************
Number
Number
Type _
of Bedrooms
of Bedrooms
9gau'v
3
a gistered Professional Engineer
Date:
**********************************************
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COUNTY
AMOUNT PAID: -�%S RECEIPT # : �161 DATE: q G 17G
CHECK #: 15!!Ey'0`7 CASHIER:
C
Community Development Department
(970) 328-8730
Fax: (970) 328-7185
TDD: (970) 328-8797
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
July 25, 1997
Sally Cole
1900 Hook Spur Lane
Basalt, CO 81621
RE: Final of ISDS Permit No. 1645-96, Tax Parcel 42465-032-00-023.
Property location:1900 Hook Spur Lane, Basalt, CO.
Dear Ms. Cole:
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and
finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance
with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of
your septic system.
Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic
system.
If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental
Health Division at (970) 328-8755.
Sincerely,
Janet Kohl
Environmental Health Department
Eagle County Community Development
ENCL:Information Brochure
Final ISDS Permit
cc: files
Community Development Department
(970) 328-8730
Fax: (970) 328-7185
TDD: (970) 328-8797
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
Date: October 10, 1996
TO: Bill Dorais
FROM: Environmental Health Division
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1645-96. Tax
Parcel # 2465-032. Property Location: 1900 Hook Spur Lane, Basalt, CO
Cole residence.
Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1645-96. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the
permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications
invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved.
Systems designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer
indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County does not perform final
inspections on engineer designed systems. Your TCO will not be issued until our office
receives this certification.
Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property
owner's attention.
This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328-
8755.
cc: files
High Country Engineering, Inc., Tim Beck
eElov-;
NG/NE£R/N�
1
i
June 6, 1997
Eagle County Environmental Health Department
Attn: Ray Merry
P. O. Box 179
Eagle, CO 81631
Re: ISDS-for Cole Residence, 1906 Hook's Spur Lane, Eagle County,
HCE File Number 96004.32
Dear Mr. Merry:
On June 5, 1997, High Country Engineering, Inc. personnel observed the final construction of the
individual sewage disposal system for the Cole Residence. The construction was based on our
design drawing dated January 27, 1997. The two tanks were in place, along with the connections to
the building and the mound. The mound had just been covered with topsoil. We observed the
functioning of the pump.
We have included "as constructed" measurements on the record drawing enclosed with this .letter.
It appears that the system meets the intent of the design. However, the electrical junction box for
the pump was installed inside the last tank riser above the pump. We strongly recommend that if
this junction box remains in this location, it should be changed to gas tight, or the so called
"explosion proof" grade of box and connections. This would mitigate the effects of the corrosive
hydrogen sulfide gas which will accumulate ' in this location.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us.
Sincerely,
HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC.
Ti ofh �_ Beck, P.E.
Pri cipal Engineer.
TPB/soe
enc.
cc w/encl.: Hans Raaflab, B & H General Contractors
923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO.81601
Telephone: (970) 945-8676 FAX: (970) 945-2555
Community Development Department
(970) 328-8730
Fax: (970) 328-7185
TDD: (970) 328-8797
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
June 13, 1997
Sally Cole
1900 Hook Spur Lane
Basalt, CO 81621
re: ISDS permit #1645-96
Dear Ms. Cole,
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broad:vav
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
According to a letter dated June 6, 1997 from Timothy Beck, P.E., your individual sewage
disposal system has been installed, and we have received the "as constructed" design. In Mr.
Beck's letter he "strongly recommend(s)" that the junction box for the pump be changed. Please
be aware that the Environmental Health division will not issue final approval of your ISDS permit
91645-96 until we receive information stating that the necessary changes have been performed to
the approval of Mr. Beck. I have enclosed a copy of Mr. Beck's letter for your files.
If you have any additional questions please contact our office at (970) 328-8755.
Sincerely,
Missie Trujillo
Environmental Health Specialist
enc
cc: ISDS file #1645-96
Timothy Beck, High County Engineering
Hans Raaflab, B&H General Contractors
Bill Dorais, Dorais Excavating
ZGff
0,"rRY
NG/NEER/NG --.
J el
Mom-
JV
July 22, 1997
Eagle County Environmental Health Department
Attn: Ray Merry
P. O. Box 179
Eagle, CO 81631
Re: ISDS for Cole Residence, 1900 Hook's Spur Lane, Eagle County
HCE File Number 96004.32
Dear Mr. Merry:
In accordance with our letter of June 6, 1997,- the contractor changed the junction box located within
the riser of, the pumping chamber. On July 21, 1997, High Country Engineering, Inc. personnel
observed that the junction box had been changed to a corrosion resistant type. This should finalize
this ISDS.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us.
Sincerely,
HIG COUNTRY EN VEERING," INC.
T.
Principal Engineer
T�IB/soe 4
V
cc: Hans Raaflab, B & H General Contractors
923 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • FAX: (970) 945-2555
�e
SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGAM014
COLE RESIDENCE
HOOKS SPUR LANE
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
Prepared For:
Ms. Sally Cole
Studio B Architects
555 North Mill Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Attention: Mr. Scott Lindenau
Job No. GS-1663
October 12, 1995
CTUTHOMPSON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
234 CENTER DRIVE 0 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 0 (970) 945-2809
TABLE OF CONTENT
SCOPE 1
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1
SITE CONDITIONS 1
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2
SITE EARTHWORK 3
FOUNDATION 3
FLOOR SLABS AND EXTERIOR CONCRETE 4
SURFACE DRAINAGE 5
LIMITATIONS 6
FIGURE 1 - LOCATIONS OF TEST HOLES
FIGURE 2 - SUMMARY LOGS OF TEST HOLES
FIGURES 3 AND 4 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS
MS. SALLY COLE
CTL/T GS-1663
SCOPE
This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for
the planned Cole Residence adjacent to Hooks Spur Lane in Eagle County,
Colorado. We explored the subsurface conditions at the site to provide foundation
recommendations for the proposed building. This report includes a description of
the subsurface conditions found in our test holes, a recommended foundation
system and geotechnical criteria for it and construction criteria for details influenced
by the subsoils. Our report was prepared from data developed during our field
exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analyses, and our experience. A
summary of our conclusions is presented below.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
1. Our test holes penetrated organic. clays with ciravels above sandy to
silty gravels with cobbles . Free groundwater was found
at s a ow depths in our test holes the day of drilling.
2. We recommend founding the building with footings on the undisturbed
natural gravels.
3. Slab -on -grade floors can be placed on densely compacted granular
structural fill.
4. A ground surface slope away from the building should be maintained
at all times to reduce wetting of soils below foundations.
SITE CONDITIONS
The Cole property is located adjacent to the east of Hooks Spur Lane in Eagle
Cou-ily, Colorado. 'rho Roaring, Fork Rivor in to the� oast. 'Tlio Rock L'o
Subdivision is to the north. Land that has not been built on is to the south and
across Hooks Spur Lane to the west. Access to the site is from Highway 82 to
Willits Lane to Emma Road to Hooks Spur Lane to an access drive.
MS. SALLY COLE
CTL/T GS-1W3 1
i
�. Ground surfaces at the site are comparatively flat and level. Some gentle
undulations from abandoned stream meanders are on the site. A small stream
approximately 1 foot deep is in a channel approximately 3 feet deep and 10 to 15
feet wide immediately to the east of the planned building footprint. Vegetation
consists of linear groups of deciduous trees separated by meadows with grasses
and weeds.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
A one story, wood frame building is to be built. The building footprint will be
approximately 4,200 square feet. Living area floors may be slabs -on -grade on
granular structural fill or floors may be structurally supported with a crawlspace
below. We recommend the finished floor elevation be established at a minimum of
24 Inches above the existing ground surface. Groundwater was within 2.5 feet of the
ground surface the day of drilling and will likely rise in the spring. The floor
elevation should be raised to mitigate the chance of moist or wet floors. Foundation
loads we assumed for our analysis were between 1,000 and 2,000 pounds per lineal
foot along bearing walls and maximum interior column loads of 12 kips. We should
be informed if the actual construction or loads are different than described above
to allow re-evaluation of criteria recommended herein.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Our engineering geologist viewed test holes drilled at the approximate
locations shown on Figure 1 and obtained soil samples for testing in our laboratory.
Summary logs of our test holes are shown on Figure 2. Results of laboratory testing
are shown on Figures 3 and 4.
Our test holes penetrated 1 to 2.5 feet of organic, sandy clays with gravels
above dense to very dense, moist to wet , sandy to silty gravels with cobbles and
boulders. Drill rig refusal was at 5.5 to 10 feet on cobbles or boulders. Free
groundwater was found at 2.5 to 3 feet in our test holes the day of drilling.
MS. SALLY COLE
CTL/r GS-W-1 2
C L-
SITE EARTHWORK
Fill will be required below the building to raise the finished floor grade to
above probable groundwater elevation. We are not aware If the building footprint is
located within the 100 year flood plain. Areas to receive fill should be stripped of
organic soils prior to fill placement. The resulting subgrade surface should then be
proof rolled to check for soft areas. Soils in soft areas should be removed to more
competent material or stabilized. A granular structural fill consisting of the on site
or similar gravels with a maximum diameter of 4 inches is appropriate for structural
fill below the building and exterior slabs -on -grade. "Common" fill placement for
landscaping purposes may also be required. Fill should be free of vegetation,
organics or other deleterious material. Structural fill and common fill should be
placed in 8 inch maximum loose lifts at 2 percent below to 2 percent above optimum
moisture content and compacted. Structural fill should be compacted to at least 98
percent of the standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). "Common" fill
should be compacted to at least 90 percent of ASTM D 698.
Free groundwater was found at 2.5 to 3 feet below the existing ground
surface in our test holes the day of drilling. Depending upon cut depths and the time
of year water may be present and enter the footing excavations. If free groundwater
is encountered, we recommend excavations be sloped to sumps where water can
be removed by pumping. Excavations will tend to flatten to 2 to 1 (horizontal to
vertical) or flatter below the water table.
FOUNDATION
The building can be founded with footings bearing on the natural gravels.
Footings placed on the natural gravels may experience 1-inch total settlement and
differential settlement of about 1 /2 of the actual total settlement. Due to the granular
nature of the soils, settlements due to dead load will occur during construction and
those due to live loads upon first application of live loads. Footings for the building
can be designed and constructed with the following criteria:
MS. SALLY COLE
CTUr GS-1W3 3
1. Footings bearing on the natural gravels can be designed for a
maximum soil bearing pressure of 5,000 psf. Material loosened during
the excavation or forming process should be removed from footing
areas or compacted prior to placing concrete;
2. Foundation walls for continuous footings should be reinforced top and
bottom to span undisclosed loose soil pockets. We recommend steel
reinforcement equivalent to that required for a simple span of 10 feet.
Reinforcement should be designed by a qualified structural engineer;
3. Minimum footing sizes are desirable. We recommend a minimum
width of 14 inches for continuous footings and at least 2 feet by 2 feet
for isolated column footings. Larger sizes may be required based on
the structural loads;
4. The soils beneath exterior footings should be protected from freezing.
We recommend footings be at least 42 inches below finished exterior
grades. The local building department should be contacted to verify
required frost protection depth.
5. Foundation wall backfill should be moisture treated to 2 percent below
to 2 percent above optimum moisture content and compacted to at
least 90 percent of ASTM D 698.
FLOOR SLABS AND EXTERIOR CONCRETE
Living area floors may be slabs -on -grade on structural fill or may be
structurally supported by the foundation with a crawlspace below. A structurally
supported floor Is an excellent choice from a geotechnical viewpoint. We would
anticipate slabs -on -grade floors on properly built structural fill to also provide
excellent performance. We anticipate excavation at this site will expose up to 2 feet
of organic, sandy clays. These organic soils are not suitable to support garage
slabs -on -grades or exterior concrete flatwork. We recommend removing the organic
clays to the gravels and replacement with granular structural fill below areas of
slabs -on -grade (see "Site Grading"). We recommend the following design and
construction criteria for slabs -on -grade floors:
1. Slabs -on -grade floors should be placed on the granular structural fill
constructed as discussed under "Site Grading";
MS. SALLY COLE
CTL/r GS•1683
4
2. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing
members with a joint to provide for free movement. Trench backfill
should be moisture treated and compacted to at least 98 percent of
standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698);
3. Plumbing and utilities below slabs should be pressure tested prior to
concrete placement and isolated from the slabs with sleeves;
4. Frequent control joints should be provided. We suggest using the
recommendations outlined by the American Concrete Institute (ACI).
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Performance of foundations and concrete flatwork is influenced by moisture
conditions within the subsoils. Surface grading should cause rapid run-off of surface
water away from'the building in all directions. The following precautions should be
observed during construction and maintained at all times after construction is
completed:
1. Wetting or drying of the open excavation should be avoided;
2. Water should not be allowed to pond adjacent to the building. The
ground surface surrounding the building exterior should be sloped to
cause rapid run-off of surface water away from the building. We
recommend a finished ground surface slope of at least 12 inches in
the first 10 feet
3. Plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface
Immediately surrounding the building. These membranes tend to trap
moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile
fabric such as Mirafi or Typar can be used on the ground surface
immediately surrounding the building for weed growth control while
allowing evaporation to occur;
4. Roof downspouts, drains and other water collection systems should
discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash blocks or
extensions should be provided at all discharge locations.
MS. SALLY COLE
CTL/r GS•1653
5
LIMITATIONS
Our test holes were spaced to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of the
subsurface conditions. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by our
test holes will occur. We should observe the completed footing excavations to
confirm the soils are as we anticipated from our test holes. Placement and
compaction of fill and backfill should be observed and tested during construction.
.. Our report is based on conditions disclosed by our test holes, results of
laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our experience. Criteria presented
reflects the proposed building as we understand it. We should be advised if the final
design differs from our assumptions to permit us to re-evaluate our conclusions and
recommendations.
This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of
care and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing
under similar conditions In the locality of this project. No other warranty, express
or implied, is made.
If we can be :of'fyrther service or if you have questions regarding this report,
please call.
CTL/TH
hn n °'
J
sent)
MS. SALLY COLE
CTL/r GS-1563
COLE RESIDENCE
HOOKS SPUR LANE
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
LOCATIONS OF TEST HOLES
JOB NO. GS-1663 FIG. 1
15
LEGEND:
TH -1
r
0 ell
50/9
TH-2
TH-3
0
0 :vo
50/12 Q 50/9 5
NOTES:
N Organic sandy clays or organic
fill (OL).
:ego Gravel, silty to sandy with cobbles
and boulders, dense to very dense,
moist to wet, brown (GM,GP).
Drive sample. The symbol 50/9
indicates that 50 blows of a 140
pound hammer falling 30 inches
were required to drive a 2.0 inch
O.D. sampler 3 inches.
Indicates free water level. Numeral
indicates number of days after drilling
that measurement was taken.
Indicates practical drill rig refusal.
10
15
I. Test holes were drilled on October
3, 1995 with a 4 inch diameter
continuous flight power auger.
2. These test holes are sub-
ject to the explanations,
limitations and conclusions
as contained in this report.
STTMMARY LOGS OF TEST HOLES
Job No. GS-1663
Fig. 2
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS
25 HR. 7 HR TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
45 MN. 15MN. 60 MIN. 19 MN. 4 MN. 1 MN. '200 100 •50 •40'30 16 '10'8 •4 3/8' 3/4' 1%v" 3' 5"6' 8"
100 r
-0
90 ..... t ..... r...._....
sor
f
1
I t
t
! r
7-777
ram......_
W W1 .
I f ; 60
+ f ;.
CL
30
-7170
20[ ...... ...
80
10 a
_i _� ....1 ! ,
90
.. ' ...L:..__. ...1LS:I:111L �._i. L.U. , �...4` __.a._.._.L.. _11'.1 2_1 �.:::�100
001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .W .297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 WA 36.1 76.2 427 200
0.42 152
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE N MILLIMETERS
Sample of sAND AND GRAY I , S I� Ts Y (SM , Gp) GRAVEL 37 % SAND 54 %
From TH—1 AT 4 FFFT SILT &CLAY S% LIQUID LIMIT -- %
PLASTICITY INDEX -- %
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
SIEVE
ANALYSIS
25 HR.
7 HR
TIME READINGS
U.S. STANDARD SERIES
CLEAR SQUARE OPENNGS
45 MN.
00: ,
15 MN.
,
60 MIN. 19 MN. 4 MN.
1 MN. '200 '.100.-
;
'w .,M _30 ' 16 ' 10'8
-i
'4 318" 314" 1%" 3' S'4. 9'
80'
.20
70
30
O
t
t
I
60.•
I
o
;40 W
i I
a
Z.._L
_.....:.._...:.__....
.... I 1._
! .
t �..: . 50
(]W
}
.60
30
.... ...
.. .....1 ...... 1
.}
.. ..
... i 70
20
t
,
._ _. . .80
I ,
10
i
90
...h...1..Jl J.L:1t_t! 1100
.001
.002
.005 .009 .019
.037 .074 A49
.297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38
416 9.52 WA 36.1 76.2 127 200
0.42
152
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE N MILLIMETERS
Sample of GRAVEL, SLIGHTLY SILTY (GP) GRAVEL 58 % SAND 36 %
From _ TH-2 AT 4 FEET SILT& CLAY6 % LIQUID LIMIT -- %
PLASTICITY INDEX -- %
Gradation
Test Results
.Inr3 nIn c; S— T F � � � . _
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS
25 HR. 7 HR TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
45 MN. 15 MINI. 60 MIN, 19 MN. 4 MIN. 1 MN. '200 •100 50 '40'30 16 ' 10'8. -4 3/8" 3/4' t 3' 5'6" 8"
100: I { _
i
0
90i - .
10
i
80,' .. 1 l
�. I. 1 ..
,
,
__.30
. 1y
(7777
60
; 1 - -- - ,40 z
I 1 I 1 i = W
t1{1 L a
30, ! 70
t
I I } 20
, I _
1UI -- - i
-_
L__ __.
I __ il_. I
0 - ._ ._.L L"L.:._..:U_ .T.::. L.I '.J f.1:1.:...: .... . ... . 1i11.. ___._..l.a. J. .C_sl.i_Ll .. ___1. L1.1 1.i_ .' . iloo
.001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .W .297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 127 200
0.42 152
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETFRS
Sample of GRAVFI SLIGIiT, Y SII TY LGP3 GRAVEL 53 % SAND 41 %
From TH-3 AT 4 FEET SILT&CLAY 6 % LIQUIDLIMIT ---%
PLASTICITY INDEX -- %
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
SIEVE
ANALYSIS
25 HR.
7 HR TIME READINGS
U.S. STANDARD SERIES
CLEAR SQUARE OPENNGS
45MN.15aMN. 60MIN.19MN.4MN.
1MN. '200 •100. •50.40.,
"IA •10'8
-4
3/8' 3/4' 1%' 3"
5"4" -
}
I
i
90'
I
.
10
Bo
i I
1 -- _�_
20
t1
...
.. .. i..._.-..�. �. _
..
__._. ....._
.• 30
Z .
60�.
....... ' ..
}
_
At
l
50.-
Z..
i
I
._.. ---•- .._. ..
j
.. 1....._ _..1. �. _..... I
...
,
_ _{.
_ .f_._. _.. ..
50 c
40;
ff
r
W
a
I-•
60
i
i
I
•
+ �f I
f
I
}
10 '
t
90
0,1
:100
.001
.002 .005 .009 .019
.037 .074 A49 .297 .590
1.19 2.0 2.38
4.76
9.52 19.1 36A 76.2
127 200
0.42
152
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE N MILLIMETERS
Sample of
From
GRAVEL —%
SILT & CLAY —%
PLASTICITY INDEX
SAND
LIQUID LIMIT
JOB NO. GS-1663
Gradation
Test Results FIG.4
CTUThompson, Inc.
1971 West 12th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80204
(303) 825-0777
Commercial Testing Laboratories, Inc.
22 Lipan Street
Denver, Colorado 80223
(303) 825-3207
CTL/Thompson, Inc.
5240 Mark Dabling Blvd.
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80918
(719) 528-8300
CTUThompson, Inc.
234 Center Dr.
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-2809
1643 96 Tax# 2465-032-00-0a3
JOB NAME 1800 Hook Spur Ln. COLE
Basalt, CO
JOB NO. 10 16
B LOCATION
BILL TO
DATE STARTED
DATE COMPLETED
DATE BILLED
Zz l
7
6dVoo_lr�
101$la
AS COST SUMMARY
a�VLA
Ire✓ I +0 .A r cn-s bboc. u m
TOTAL SELLING PRICE
TOTAL MATERIAL
TOTAL LABOR
•
WA/W LA- AAAd---'
INSURANCE.
SALES TAX
MISC. COSTS
TOTAL JOB COST
GROSS PROFIT
LESS OVERHEAD COSTS
% OF SELLING PRICE
NET PROFIT
JOB FOLDER Product 278 �p NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC., GROTON, MA 01471 JOB FOLDER Printed in U.S.A.
DISTRIBUTION PIPE
FOR 4" x 4" x 4"
D BOTTOM O PERFORATED PIPE PVC WYE
OR BED
on
0 - O�
-