Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
216 Wapiti Wy - 247106303004
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway - Eagle, Colorado 81631 Telephone: 328-8755 BUILDIN YELLOW COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. P�� O PERMIT O. IU 0 I r `F' Please call for final inspection before covering any portion of installed system. RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS APPLICANT / AGENT: PERMIT PERCOLATION TEST FEE OWNER: RECEIPT # CHECKS _ (:Site Plan MUST be attached) ISDS Permit # 1 6 v I _ �& APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823 (El Jebel) * •PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00, PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00 * * * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER". PROPERTY OWNER: _ L � PHONE: )LA MAILING ADDRESS: VB __X �C % �,�lAMI ,b,��� th,, 1 ,� f1 -M ,� 4 APPLICANT/ CONTACT PERSON; J C.©r r i wy4f_PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS: PC iY z ti ^, i-- LICENSED ISDS CONTRACTOR: n r=7Z O-PHONE: COMPANY/DBA: ( ADDRESS: *************************************************************************** PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: ( New Installation ( ) Alteration ( ) Repair *************************************************************************** LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVI'JDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Building Permit # . -I ( if known) Legal Description: Subdivision: Filing:Block: Lot No.61 Tax Parcel Number:-_�_ �'� Lot Size: Street Address: BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicablE. category) p4 Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms ( ) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check appl=cable category) Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface (�Q Public Name of Supplier: -� *These systems. e,IV 1design by egistered Professional Engineer SIGNATURE: ��� iJi Date: -� TO -BE COMPLETEQ BY TjiE COUNTY . AMOUNT PAID: .RECEIPT # : DATE. CHECK #: i CASHIER. Community Development Department (970)328-8730 Fax: (970)328-7185 TDD: 970) 328-8797 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO DATE: June 20, 1996 TO: Welch Excavating FROM: Environmental Health Division Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle.. Colorado 8 163 1 -0179 RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1601-96, Tax Parcel #2471-063-03-004. Property Location: 216 Elk Run, Basalt, CO., Cook residence. Enclosed is your. ISDS Permit No. 1601-96. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Please call our office well in advance for the final inspection. Also enclosed is the ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form. The items on this form need to be completed before you call for your final inspection. Also, please note any special conditions which may have been placed on the permit. If all items are not completed, a reinspection fee of $42.50 must be paid before a reinspection is made. Your building permit CO will not be issued until final approval has been given for the ISDS Permit. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files IJEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNTCAL, INC. 5020 Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 June 12, 1996 Fax 970 445-8454 Phone 970 945.7988 Manuppella Construction Attn: Scott Manuppella P.O. Box 28387 M Jebel, Colorado 91628 Job No. 196 289 Subject: Observation of Excavation and Percolation Testing, Proposed Cook Residence, Lot 29, Filing 2, Reudi Shores, 0216 Elk Run, Eagle County, Colorado. Dear Scott: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak GeotechWcal, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on June 6, 1996 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our work and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. The work was done in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you, dated June 6, 1996. The proposed residence will consist of a one story log structure over a crawl space area with an attached slab -on -grade garage. QQ` 'Aar. Ca[28 At the time of our visit to the sit', foundation a vation had been cut in multiple levels from typically 3 t eet below the jacent ground surface and was stepped similar to the ground surface slope. The lowest level daylighted from the south side. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of red gravel and cobble to �1 mall ulder size rock fragments in a sandy silt and clay matrix. The results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of the matrix soil (minus 3 inch fraction) 5� obtained from the excavation are presented on Fig. 1. No free water was encountered e in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. A small amount of loose material was observed in the southern part of the excavation base. z 5-t,y Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation and the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for anU allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf should be adequate for support of the proposed residence. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils or existing fill from site grading encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footings extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pef for oft -site soil as backtill. A perimeter foundation drain should be provided to prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the walls and prevent wetting of the crawl space levels. Structural fill placed within floor slab areas can consist of the on -site soils Manuppella Constructic it June 12, 1996 Page 2 compacted to at least 95 % of standard I'roctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill placed around the :Iructure should be compacted and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at lea -it 10 feet of the building. Oversized rock, topsoil and vegetation should not he included in the backfill. Three percolation test Fits had been duty approximately 25 feet south of the southeast �9¢ % building corner. Hand excavated holey were dug approximately 12 inches deep in the p 1996 by us. Percolation testing was bottom of the its and :,ttakt:d nrt lone r:�, conducted on rune 7, 1996. The test results are summarized on Table I and indicate an average percolation rate of about 50 minutes per inch. The tested area appears suitable p� for an infiltration septic: disposal area provided there is adequate soil depth below the constructed system. The recommendations :.ubmitted in this, letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foultdatic>n.excavation and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the leaded depth of foundation influence. This study is based on the assumption ,hat soils beneath the footings have equal or better support than those. exposed. The: risk of foundations movement may be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation, drilling would be required. ft is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change tho recommendations contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if we may he of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GE0T1=,.t"IUIICAL, INC. 6©' d 60:9T S6, eT Nnr /t Steven L. Pawlal SLPIro attachment H-P GEOTECH 71a1J CM-OT e^-G MT Lind' HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE I PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 196 289 HOLE NO, HOLE DEPTH LENGTH OF WATER DEPTH/ WATFR DEPTH DROP IN AVERAGE (INCHES) INTERVAL AT START OF AT END OF WATER PERCOLATION (MIN) INTERVAL INTERVAL LEVEL RATE (INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES) (MIN./INCH) P-1 80 20 7.25 6.75 0.5 `9 (North) q 0 6.75 6.5 0.25 refill to 8.0 7.75 0.26 30 7.75 7.25 0.5 7.25 7.0 0.25 `'D 80 P-2 44 V2 20 7.5 6.75 0.75 21 (East) 4-0 6.75 6.25 0.5 8.75 8.25 0.6 refill 0 8.25 7.75 0.6 30 D 7.75 7.0 0.75 4() 48 P-3 50 20 7.0 6.26 0.75 rwean 6.26 5.5 0.75 21 refill AD 7.5 7.0 0.5 30 40 7.0 6.26 0.75 refill 7.5 6.5 1.0 Note: Percolation hales were dug and soaked on June E, 1996 and the percolation tests were performed on June 7, 1996. r�� �C)n �� ISDS Permit # / /o 0 / Date / / �� ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form Tank is V gal. Tank Material Tank is located ft. and degrees from (permanent landmark) Tank is located L jt . and BOO 6 degrees from ; PLC (permanent landmark) Tank set level. Tank lids within 8" of finished grade. Size of field ft2 3 units lineal ft. Technology i4 S 1� Cleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1/100ft). v� There is a "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and outlet of the tank. 0_ Inlet and outlet is sealed with tar tape, rubber gasket et-j-�J6. ,-( V-e-Y J-.7 Tank has two compartments with the larger compartment closest to the house. Measure distance and relative direction to field. Depth of field 3- ft. - Soil interface raked. Inspection portals at the end of each trench. _V Proper distance to setbacks. Chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications. (Chambers latched, end plates properly installed, rocks removed from trenches, etc.) Other 10i 4,—ee S �� S 'i G� l j(r G�� S d- Zr Inspection meets requirements. Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement were suggested. ACTION TAKEN: Setbacks Well Potable House Property Lake Dry Tank Drain - Water Lines line Stream Gulch Field 100 25 20 10 50 25 10 10 Tank 50 10 5 10 50 10 * 10 SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE -QPAI 9: ;,ieis. 2^5-; ^maaa! nc . GrDlon. Mass 01471 T^ Orcer PHONE TOL FRE 1-600-22-EMI 1601-96 Tax# 2471-063-00-004 JOB NAME Lot#29,Filing#2 COOK — Reudi Shores 216 Elk Run JOB IVO. V it, 5-7 `I JOB LOCATION BILL TO DATE START11 "J DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED a. _r�� Z'q�, I a F C — ! % of vL Gtlx' �t {�! 6-4ie Cl3ltiYu (/ J32 b 7� 'G�'a lhO,C7 1 ' _ JOB COST SUMMARY TOTAL SELLING PRICE TOTAL MATERIAL TOTAL LABOR INSURANCE SALES TAX MISC. COSTS TOTAL JOB COST GROSS PROFIT LESS OVERHEAD COSTS % OF SELLING PRICE NET PROFIT JOB FOLDER Product 278 ®8 NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC., GROTON, MA 01471 JOB FOLDER I .. .. iiiFFF �` , a,\ 1 r T Printed in U.S.A