Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout284 Escalante - 239127206008 - 1968-00ISINDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631 Telephone: (970) 328-8755 COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1968-00 BP NO.l 31 18 OWNER: BILL & JEAN DEEM PHONE: 760-321-4823 MAILING ADDRESS: 69850 HIGHWAY 111, #36, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 APPLICANT: STEVE NEAL PHONE: 970-963-8693 SYSTEM LOCATION: 284 ESCALANTE, CARBONDALE, CO TAX PARCEL NO 2391-272-06-008 LICENSED INSTALLER: HUGHES EXCAVATING, RANDY HUGHES LICENSE NO. 13-00 PHONE: 970-963-2004 DESIGN ENGINEER: PHONE NO. INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A 4 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 1250 GALLON SEPTIC TANK, 1500 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA, IF CHAMBERS ARE USED, 49 ARE NEEDED. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL IN SERIAL DISTRIBUTION IN TRENCHES WITH A CLEANOUT BETWEEN THE TANK AND THE HOUSE AND IN- SPECTION PORTALS IN EACH TRENCH. BE SURE TO INSTALL THE LEACH FIELD ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY FACING ESCALANTE DRIVE RAKE ALL TRENCH SURFACES TO PREVENT THE SMEARING OF SOILS AND DO NOT INSTALL IN WET WEATHER. CALL EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRON- MENTAL HEALTH FOR FINAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO BACK FILLING ANY PART OF THE INSTALLATION OR WITH ANY QUESTIONS REGARD- ING THE INSTALLATION. THE BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE SEPTIC SYSTEM HAS BEEN IN- SPECTED AND APPROVED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: /Q �J�/ DATE: APRIL 18, 2000 CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO, OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT, AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 1519 SQUAREFEET(VIA 49 EQ 36 INFTL.TRATnR TTNTTS ) INSTALLED CONCRETE SEPTIC TANK: 1250 GALLONS IS LOCATED 243 DEGREES AND 41 FEET INCHES FROM THE CLEANOUT ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE HOUSE. COMMENTS: FINAL INSPECTION WAS DONE BY RAY MERRY ON JULY 12, 2000 THIS SYSTEM TS LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE A FOUR BEDROOM RESIDENCE A VAPOR VENT PIPE IS BURIED IN THE SAME TRENCH AS THE BUILDING SEWER LINE TO DAYLIGHT VENT TP GASSFS ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE C0gW-c P FF RINAL PPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL ..1�%_ z5_77 ��- �-"'DATE: JULY 13, 2000 InuOMPlete'Applications Will NOT Be Accepted (s'te flan MUST be attached) ISDS Permit if l q b -vie Building Permit I APPLICATION FORINDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE.— EAGLE COUNTY P. O. BOX 179 ` EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823 (Basalt) *+.r+k*�k�k*ak*�kak*+k�k�k�k*+kdlr�kakk#�ekakie�k*�kdtie�k�k�k:- �'4�rak�r*ak�kdrtkktk�k�kieir�kkik�k*ak�kik�k�lr�k�ledkdr�kak�kir�k*k�k * PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE.$200.00 * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE'.TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER'! PROPERTY OWNER: MAILING ADDRESS: i HONE:�1��2 APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: �"P�C' ACG I PHONE: q LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: Gr, A J IA min eS PHONE: --O ZZC COMPANY/ DBA : wed p e v , o ADDRESS: Lo l 1,�h Sty -1 1?61 0 + R IL 2- 3 PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: (p NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Legal Description: LA, �1 � �i, htw 2 A 5nT �n � PS C, Tax Parcel Number: 2-o toC? ® 8 Lot Size: C__. Physical Address: C Q 8 167 13 BUILDING TYPE:. (Check applicable category) (� Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms L_ (.) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category) ( ) Well ( ) Spring ( ) qurface (4p Public Name of Supplier: Ll 5DwA PA e *These systems require design by a Registered Professional - Engineer SIGNATURE: Date: AMOUNT PAID: d ® RECEIPT 1 : DATE: CHECK #: CASHIER: Steve, Kathy `M ScotLyn Neal 61 John Street El J". W 816 Community Development Department (970)328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com July 13, 2000 Bill and Jean Deem 69850 Highway 111, #36 Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Final of ISDS Permit #1968-00, Tax Parcel #2391-272-06-008. Property location: 284 Escalante, Carbondale, CO. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Deem: This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at (970) 328-8755. Sincerely, Janet Kohl Environmental Health Department Eagle County Community Development ENCL: Informational Brochure Final ISDS Permit cc: files Community Development Department (970) 328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com DATE: - April 18, 2000 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO TO: Hughes Excavating FROM: Environmental Health Division Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit #1968-00, Tax Parcel #2391-272-06-008. Property.Location: 284 Escalante Drive, Carbondale, CO., Deem residence. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1968-00. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. If you have not been contracted to install this system please contact Eagle County Environmental Health. Also enclosed is the ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form. The items on this form need to be completed before you call for your final inspection. Also, please note any special conditions which may have been placed on the permit. Do not back fill any part of.the installation until it has been inspected. If all items are not completed, a reinspection fee of $42.50 must be paid before a reinspection is made. Please call our office well in advance to allow for scheduling of final inspection. Your building permit TCO will not be. issued until final approval has been given for the ISDS Permit. Permit'specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files Enclosures: ISDS permit 9 1968-00; ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form OT OT OS OT S OT OS WPM OT OT Sz OS OT Oz Sz OOT PTM uT,eaa ][uej, Aaa axvq AgzadOzd asnOH aTgEgod : TTSK SXoEq:jes xsr"y NOLLOY •paasabbne a=ats. quetaano=dMT so; suoTq'epuauaaoaas ;T WET; s jsaTTegeuT. oq uuo; AdoO � _ a� s�aasr uoT-4aadsul 7- F/ �pTVat;/ 1�1 5 �j r" -?fflu -'W-V/l uoEsT ' l7£ arks autl aaAss buipITnq zo; peon adTd ;o ecUl (-ale 'segouaaq mo-73 panouiaz sxooz 'paTTEgsuT ATasdozd sagETd pus 'pagojEj saagmvgO) •ouoTjvaT;Toads szazngoE;nusm zad se paTTEgsuT ATzadozd szagmvgO j, •sxoEggas oq abuele-tp aedozd .._gouazq gaps ;o pus agq qE sTEgzod uoTgoadsui ' peXva ea-e;zaqu r T.Tos � - .. • q h L -pTaT3 3 o Iq q a .$TaTJ Oti-,b szTp anTgETaz pup ague Tp azngea -asnog agq oa gsasoTo ggTM equamgzsduioa.:; or!►q •oqa gaxsEb iaggnx ..adE '• Eq ggTM paTEas �T gaTgno Pue -xuel Gq:I ;O IaTgno pup gaTuT sqq uT sagouT i,T uAop saob gEgl u.Lu 'e sT azagy/—i— -(g300T/T +)asnog pup xuEq ueaAlsq uT paTTEgsuT sT gnoue9T:) AboTougoas '1; TEau,T sgTun zq3 /_V PTOT; ;o oz. - epvaB pagsTuTj ;o us uTggTM aPTT Xuesf - TanaT qas NEmI —L— s; saasbap pup •I;—pageaoT.ST XMI Gesasep� pue •q;'"'j' - pageooT sT xues TEisagEW XuEs • Tteb OT Xue: ��/` sweQ # -4iuuiad SQSI VA alva Ae 03)433HO =IIVU onvinowo =10 'ON 133HS Pfsor T59T8 00 'UqOVS 6LT XOq 'O"cl HlqVaH ' _ A 5) . 'MMM.Wfa+Y••.mN1A.iwNhx'.vwr.4w+i•iLwM•ey.ofMrfNAI"•.rR1MM�M4� 1' 1CA STATES A P At# V 01' SECTION PI. tl?ti RB?W, 61" pM. EAGLE COUNTY, CUL6RA00 • 4 • MAP•. .• . '� .�iiu •. • .' w �, L, •L 1, r ,�.`• ,1' t, 2 • yid 4 alvj�..�.—[.-..b.jile! 1., 3 1P. 01/1 • r • •. \ .�„� 't,�,,.1 II /r : , - ut a -- � ►1 •��M `ll`i'', � Via• �� r j%i' ' // �''ty' to of 22 ,• • jo I �.� ��� - "� -•s: � �"71u4•Jx' ...,.. _PI NON •' �i��ll'� :,_.•- ���1 / 2342 �• 14 44 45 /i •� ��, 4I 43 11 .� {o'v `��,•y ~` �� Lr�r 39 11 -�•.� ' 49 4 -^ ( r11u1'..�LN.:�;'� iI, 1 ,1• i 30� • 8 • •:fir. I 1 10 do it 82 54 53 A of ISDS PERMIT # � gR 2- q q PERCOLATION TEST EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEATLH OWNER: -PHSYSICAL ADDRESS: ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: S MAILING ADDRESS: TYPE OF DWELLING: NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: TEST HOLES PRE-SOAKED: YES'-} NO SOIL TIME WATER DEPTH INCHES OF FALL RATE PROFILE n, 1 mmmmomommm mmoll . mmmmommmmimm �� mmr-MAM mmm m Ed mmm mom mm-mommommm mmmmmmmmm TIME TO DROP LAST INCH: PERC RATE: MINIMUM LEACH FIELD SIZE:t WfINIMUM SEPTIC TANK SIZE: 6 al) r... _ _ , , I , L l,. . ,_ _ . it +- I e th n_t Izo _o z l�n4� r 3 i C I H Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 G o te c h Phone:970-945-7988 Fax:970-945-8454 liathy'? �oty,,,,hWhpgeotech.com Steve, 1JJ''++�� February 15, 2000 61 John Street El Jebel. CO 81 W3 Steve Neal 64John Street El Jebel, Colorado 81623 Job No. 100 158 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed Residence, Lot 17, Aspen Mesa Estates, Escalante Drive, Eagle County, Colorado Dear Mr. Neal: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for design of foundations at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated January 31, 2000. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure over a crawlspace located approximately on the site as shown on Fig. 1. The attached garage floor will be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 4 to 6 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The site was vacant and covered with about 1 foot of snow at the time of our field work. The ground surface in the building area is gently rolling with a moderate slope down to the west. There is about 4 feet of elevation difference across the building area. To the east of the proposed building area the lot slopes moderately steep down to the east. Vegetation consists of scattered scruboak and juniper trees, sagebrush, grass and weeds. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 foot of topsoil and 3 feet of stiff to very stiff sandy clay, consist of relatively dense basalt fragments up to boulder size in a calcareous silt and sand matrix. Results of swell - consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the clay, presented on Fig. 3, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading and a minor expansion potential when wetted. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of the silt and sand matrix (minus 5 inch fraction) obtained from Steve Neal February 15, 2000 Page 2 Steve, Kathy �Q Scotlyn Neal 61 John Street El Jebel, CO 81625 the site are presented on Fig. 4. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf for support of the proposed residence. There could be some post - construction foundation movement if the bearing soils become wetted. The settlement could be differential between footings bearing on the more granular soils and footings bearing on the clay. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on -site soil as backfill. Floor Slabs: The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on -site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area and where clay soils are present that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and crawlspace areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. A crawlspace shallower than about 3 feet should not need an underdrain provided a positive slope away from the building is maintained and exterior wall backfill is well compacted. H-P GEOTECH Steve Neal February 15, 2000 Page 3 Steve, Kathy`d? Scotlyn Neal 61 John Street F1 Jeb . C0 816M If installed, the drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free - draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2 % passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/2 feet deep. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on -site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 5 feet from the building. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1 and to the depths shown on Fig. 2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during H-P GEOTECH Steve Neal February 15, 2000 Page 4 Steve, Kathy ld2 Scotlyn Neal 61 John Street El Jebel. CO 6162Z construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GE , INC. Jordy Z. Adamson Jr. g 4U ®�fr%,4, ^ Reviewed By: � !! '�� O. A /i _! `?`tVAL Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. JZA/ksm attachments H-P GEOTECH APPROXIMATE SCALE 1"=50' LOT 16 I PIT 12 ESCALANTE DRIVE LOT 21 Steve, Kathy % &otlyn Neal 61 John Street ]a Jebd. co 81 U3 LOT 18 1 100 158 1 GEOTECHNICALWNC I LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 1 PIT 1 PIT 2 0 0 a� WC=10.6 WC=11.8 ' DD=95 DD=93 1 5 ¢ -200=83 4 5 WC=13.9 +4=28 o -200=35 10 10 _ LEGEND: TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, organic, firm, moist, dark brown. CLAY (CL); sandy, stiff to very stiff, moist, reddish brown. 4: •• .o BASALT FRAGMENTS (GM); slightly moist, light brown up to boulder size in to white, a silt and sand matrix, slightly clayey, dense, calcareous. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. Disturbed bulk sample. _J NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on February 1, 2000 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and logs of exploratory pits are drawn to depth. Pit 1 is about 3 feet higher than Pit 2. 4. The exploratory pit locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve Steve, Kathy I? Scotlyn Neal 61 John Street El Jebel. CO 816 a'S 100 158 I HEPWORTH — PAWLAK LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 I GEOTECHNICAL, INC. b\ 0 0 N c 0 Q x w 1 I c o_ m 2 P 0- E coy 3 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 1 0 c 0 c 0 tT Q 1 x w I c 2 0 N m Q 3 E 0 U 4 5 0.1 1.0 10 100 .APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 158 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 3 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Moisture Content = 10.6 percent Dry Density = 95 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 1 at 3 Feet Expansion upon wetting Moisture Content = 11.8 percent Dry Density = 93 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 2 at 3 Feet Expansion upon wetting 00 LO r 0 0 r Z m 0 7 W J m Q f" U) U) LU CC LU I— } 0L 1— Q 0 m J LL 0 } Q x W IL L co a F CC G O 0a U) 0 w m cc co U) Q U U -0 0 > > c U c' C c c 4 cn cn in LU W > 2 F 0 a ¢ Na � Z N U F U X Q 0 0 Z - � a W s 0 d � o J J o W N > M LA w ¢ y a a Z 00 M (M z 0 w 0 0 J Lu > °e 00 N J — a O w a Ln 0-) M cr) Z LU CL W W W V J y H o_ o O T- Z U o 2 _ W m CM M Lid 0 < a — 0 0 W a � a y a N Decic dale G©LYtvl L►, 1�1 C'L V e r c. 'c e 5W e G r CA V\ d e r e t 1 B-) z -9 5 ?leci5e (-A cf- 0 JA, i Per m J Y1 L,,m Ley' �uc Q�Ycc, jI (0V%l Pij perc. �esP 5- Steve, Kathy `& Scotlyn Neal 61 John Street ElJ".CO816W �iY1�C'�PI� S+eue � ec 1968-00 Tax #2391-272-06-008 Lot #17, Filing 2 DEEM JOB NAME Aspen Mesa Estates JOB NO. . LOGA7 ION BILL TO DATE � TA//RT�ED DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED n YjQ rIt JOB COST SUMMARY TOTAL SELLING PRICE TOTAL MATERIAL TOTAL LABOR INSURANCE SALES TAX MISC. COSTS TOTAL JOB COST GROSS PROFIT LESS OVERHEAD COSTS % OF SELLING PRICE NET PROFIT JUC hVI.UtH FrOdUCt 277 JOB FOLDER Printed in U.SA lyl -00 ?//-9-%