The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About118 Red Rock Rd - 246510401004 - 1957-00ISINDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631 Telephone: (970) 328-8755 COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1957-00 BP NO. 13027 OWNER: DAN AND TAMI SCHERER PHONE: 970-963-1716 MAILING ADDRESS: 0254 DEER RUN CARBONDALE, CO. 81623 APPLICANT: GALEN SMITH LAMOCHATTEE CUSTOM BUILDERS INC PHONE: 970-379-1349 CELL / 970-876-5564 SYSTEM LOCATION: 0118 RED ROCK RD., BASALT, CO 81621 TAX PARCEL NO 2465 104 01 004 LICENSED INSTALLER: RANDY HUGHES / HUGHES EXCAVATING LICENSE NO. 13-00 PHONE: 970-963-2004 DESIGN ENGINEER: HP GEOTECH / SOILS REPORT ONLY PHONE NO. 970-945-7988 INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A 4 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 1250 GALLON CONCRETE, 2 COMPARTMENT TANK, 1500 SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA VIA 48 INFILTRATOR UNITS AS REQUESTED. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: ACCORDING TO FINAL PLAT NOTES REGARDING THIS SUBDIVISION ALL LEACH FIELDS ARE TO BE INSTALLED ON THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, AND A 200 FT SET BACK MUST BE MAINTAINED FROM ALL WELLS IN THE VICINITY INSTALL IN SERIAL DISTRIBUTION IN TRENCHES, WITH A CLEAN -OUT BETWEEN THE TANK AND THE HOUSE, AND INSPECTION PORTALS IN EACH TRENCH DO NOT INSTALL IN WET WEATHER, AND RAKE ALL TRENCH SURFACES TO PREVENT THE SMEARING OF SOILS CALL EAGLE COUNTY FOR FINAL IN- SPECTION PRIOR TO BACK -FILLING ANY PORTION OF THE INSTALLATION OR WITH ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INSTALLATION THE BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIT 1HE SEPTIC SYSTEM HAS RECEIVED FINAL APPROVAL. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: MAY 5, 2000 CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO, OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT, AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 1488 SQUARE FEET (VIA 48 INFILTRATOR UNITS, ) INSTALLED CONCRETE SF.PTTC TANK: 1 2 5(1GALLONS IS LOCATED 302_ DEGREES AND 27 FEET INCHES FRoM THE CLEAN OUT ON THE NORTH EAST SIDE OF THE HOUSE. COMMENTS: FTNAL TNSPF.CTTON OF TNF. TNSTAT T ACTON WAR T)ONF. RV HFATHFR 4A VAT OX ON JUNF 21 , 2000 THIS SYSTEM IS LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE A FOUR BEDROOM RESIDENCE. ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE: JUNE 27, 2000 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631 Telephone: (970) 328-8755 COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1957-00 BP NO. ] 3`6'27 OWNER: DAN AND TAMI SCHERER PHONE: 970-963- 6 MAILING ADDRESS: 0254 DEER RUN CARBONDALE, CO. 81623 APPLICANT: GALEN SMITH LAMOCHATTEE CUSTOM BUILDERS INC PHONE: A70-379-1349 CELL / 970-876-5564 SYSTEM LOCATION: 0118 RED ROCK RD., BASALT, CO 81621 TAX CEL NO 2465 104 01 004 LICENSED INSTALLER: RANDY HUGHES / HUGHES EXCAVATING L CENSE NO. 13-00 PHONE: 970-963-2004 DESIGN ENGINEER: HP GEOTECH / SOILS REPORT ONLY / PHONE NO. 970-945-7988 INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A 4 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 1250 GALLON CONCRETE, 2 COMPARTMENT TANK, 1500 SQUtjRE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA VIA 48 INFILTRATOR UNITS AS REQUESTED. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL IN SERIAL DISTRIBUTIION/N TRENCHES, WITH A CLEAN -OUT BETWEEN THE TANK AND THE HOUSE, AND INSPECTION PORTALS IN EACH TRENCH. DO NOT INSTALL. IN WET WEATHER, AND RAKE ALL TRENCH SURFACES TO PREVENT THE SMEARING OF 1 SOILS. CALL EAGLE COUNTY FOR FINAL INSPECTION PRIOR TO BACK -FILLING ANY PORTION OF THE INSTALLATION OR WITH ANY QUESTIONS. BUILDING CERTIFICATE OF OCC PANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE SEPTIC SYSTEM HAS RECEIVED FINAL APPROVAL. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: i� c �'/l�/ DATE: MARCH 21, 2000 i CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MU§T COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT T AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VAL ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. NNECTION TO, OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATIC Y BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT, AND WILL RESULT IN BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, CTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSE FINAL APPR AL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SY§39M SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYS IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM. INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: SQUARE FEET (VIA ) INSTALLED TANK: GALLONSISLOCATED DEGREES AND FEET INCHES FROM COMMENTS: ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL DATE: Int;ompl.ete' Applications Will NOT Be Acceptea (Site Plan MUST be attached) - ISDS Permit 1 l 1. S 7J 06' Building Permit I I. 0-2 1-7 APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE.— EAGLE COUNTY P. O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 81631 328-8755/927-3823 (Basalt) * PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE.$200.00 * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE*.TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" PROPERTY OWNER: Dan and Tami Scherer MAILING ADDRESS.- 0254 Deer Run, Carbondale CO 81623 PHONE: 963-1716 Galen Smith 379-1349 Cell APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: Lamochattee Custom Builders, Inc. PHONE: R7h_F,�64 i3_0o 3114_2501 LICENSED SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR: R, H es - Lic #1�-00 • PHONE: 963-2004 COMPANY/DBA • Hughes Excavating ADDRESS • P 0 Box 606; Carbondale CO 81623 *************************************************************************** PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: (X) NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Legal Description: 0118 Red Rock Road, Lot 4, Red Rock Ranch Subdivision, Basalt CO • 1 Tait Parcel Number: 2465 104 Ol o-N Lot Size: 2.683 Acres Physical Address: 0118 Red Rock Road, Lot 4, Basalt CO 81621 BUILDING TYPE:. (Check applicable category) • K Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms (.) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (X) Well ( ) ( .) Public Name *These systems (Check applicable category) Spring ( ) Surface of Supplier: deli n by a Registered Professional -Engineer SIGNATURE: Date: AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT #: qO1�, ) DATE: T CHECK 1: 119 a 0 CASHIER: Community Development Department (970)328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com June 27, 2000 Dan and Tami Scherer 0254 Deer Run Blvd. Carbondale, CO 81623 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Eagle County Building P,Q. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Final of ISDS Permit #1957-00, Tax Parcel #2465-104-01-004. Property location: 0118 Red Rock Rd., Basalt, CO. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Scherer: This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at (970) 328-8755. Sincerely, Janet Kohl Environmental Health Department Eagle County Community Development ENCL: Informational Brochure Final ISDS Permit cc: files Community Development Department (970)328-8730 FAX (970) 328-7185 TDD (970) 328-8797 Email: eccmdeva@vail.net http: //www.eagle-county.com DATE: March 21, 2000 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO TO: Hughes Excavating FROM: Environmental Health Division Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit #1957-00, Tax Parcel #2465-104-01-004. Property Location: 0118 Red Rock Rd, Basalt, CO., Scherer property. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1957-00. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved: If you have not been contracted to install this system please contact Eagle County Environmental Health. Also enclosed is the ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form. The items on this form need to be completed before you call for your final inspection. Also, please note any special conditions which may have been placed on the permit. Do not back fill any part of the installation until it has been inspected. If all items are not completed, a reinspection fee of $42.50 must be paid before a reinspection is made. Please call our office well in advance to allow for scheduling of final inspection. Your building permit TCO will not be issued until final approval has been given for the ISDS Permit. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files Enclosures: ISDS permit # 1957-00; ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form ISDS Permit # .5 - 6 Inspector ISDS Final Inspection Completeness Form Tank is 12!LJ gal. Tank Material GWCk Tank is located Zj ft. ancQOZLdegrees from (permanent landmark) Tank is located ft. and degrees from (permanent landmark) l� Tank set level. /Tank lids within 8" of finished grade. Size of field ft2 �& units lineal ft. Technology A 1 �r► UVS Cleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1/100ft). DateA ,` O _ /V "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and outlet of the tank. Effluent filter on outlet- Yes or No t/ Inlet and outlet is sealed with tar tape, rubber gas etc. o/ Tank has two compartments with the larger compartment closest to the house. Measure distance and relative direction to field. �( +� Depth of field q ft. L/ Soil interface raked. Inspection portals at the end of each trench. Proper distance to setbacks. Chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications. (Chambers latched, end plates properly installed, rocks removed from trenches, etc.) ✓Splash plate(s) installed at least in first trench inlet. Type of pipe used for building sewer lingWl, leach fief S V Other ✓Inspection meets requirements. Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement were suggested. ACTION TAKEN: Setbacks Well Potable House Property Lake Dry Tank Drain Water Lines line Stream Gulch Field 100 25 20 10 50 25 10 10 Tank 50 10 5 10 50 10 * 10 PRODUCT 204-1(Single Sheets) 2n5.1(Padded) ®® Inc., Groton, Mass. 01471. To Order PHONE TOIL FREE 1-800-225.6380 ULf 17! JUJU U7. 74 _t 1 U7.: f 04QU .u-i I Y,ll`J_. rra1.1t Q_ .. November 24, 1999 Ilan Scherer 0254 Deer :Stun Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Hepworth-Pawlak (:ttYtCd)nka1, Inc. 50,20 County Road 154 Glenwood 5prhtgs, Colorado 91501 Phone:970-945.7998 Fax:970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeot.ech.com Job NO, 199 861 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Testing, Proposed Residence, Lot 4, Red Rock Ranch, Eagle County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Scherer: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and percolation testing for foundation and septic disposal system designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreetnent for geotech ical engineering services to you dated November. 2, 1999. Die data obtained and our reC.olurnendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered axe presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two story structw e over a basement level located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. A barn may also he coar.strueted. Cut depths for the residence are expected to range between about 4 to 10 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. An on -site septic disposal system is planned to the north of the residence. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to reevaluate the -recommendations presented in this report; Site Conditions: The site is vacant and located along the southwest side of RFA Rock Road. The ground surface in the building area is relatively flat with a Might slope drown to the north-northwest becoming moderately steep down to the road. The lot is vegetated with grass and a few small aspens. The site was previously Irrigated pasture land. There are irrigation ditches in the area primarily along the northeast and southwest property boundaries_ The southwest ditch was flowing at the time of our field work. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by drilling 3 exploratory borings in the proposed building areas and a profile boring i.a the septic disposal area at'the approximate locations shown on Pig. 1.. The logs of the borings are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about % to I. foot of topsoil and Wl to about 31/2 feet of stiff sandy clay, com.sist.d of mostly gravel and cobbles in a silty sand matrix extending to the maximma depth investigated of 1.1 feet. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed sample of the sandy clay soil, presented on Fig- 4, indicate a high expansion potential when VL: 1:J! L.VUIJ GJ=. JY 71U7L7040r7 wcair�ira� r'FS�L" J3 Dan Scherer November 24, 1999 Page 2 wetted under a constant light load. No free water was encountered in the borings at the tirne of drilling or when checked 1 day later. The subsoils were slightly moist. Foundation Recommendations: Comidering the subsoil conditions encountered in the . exploratory boxiDgs and the naturc of the proposed constructica, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural gravel and cobble soils designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 3,OM psf for support of the proposed building. The clay soils are expansive and should be removed below all building areas. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches f�)T continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. All topsoil, clay and loose or disturbed soils encountered within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural gravel soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their beating elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 42 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pef for the on -site gravel soils as backfill. The expansive clay should not be used as wall backfill. Floor Slabs: The nawval on -site gravel soils, exclusive of clay and topsoil, are suitable to support lightly to Moderately loaded slab -on -grade construction. The clays are expansive and should be removed from below building slabs, To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on eitperlence and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture coutenf near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on -site gravels devoid of vegetation, topsoil, clay and oversized rocks. Uaderdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation, irrigation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can also create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and H-P GEOTECH QZ-1 d-UUU VZ. 14 j?UJ.4 140U Ul,"iK11V1-1 HAIV E U4 Dan Scherer November 24, 1999 Page 3 hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the v,all backfll surrounded above the invert level with free -{training granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at ;east 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum I % to a drywell or other suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least I /2 feet deep. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence and barn have been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation, excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior baafill shoul.(i be atlj�asteci iz� near opt.i_rttu:m rttc� ,,hire a►��i. compacted to at least 95 ib of the. maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard. Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a na immmn slope of 6 inches ir, the first 10 feet in unpaved areas Emd a minimr = slope of 3 Wghrs in ilia first 10 .feet in. pavemffa and walkway areas, 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backftli. Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on November 9, 19!-19 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. Ono prof -He boring and three percolation holes were drilled at the locations shown ou Fig. 1. The test holes drilled using a six inch diameter auger and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The percolation test holes were covered, with insulation overnight to prevent freezing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to thelse exposed in the Profile Boring shown oa Fig. 2 and consist of gravel and cobbles i1a a silty sand matrix with no free water encountered to the drilled depth of 9 feet. The percolation test results, presented in 'fable IT, indicate. percolation rates of,.1-011T minutes per inch. Based ou the subsurface conditions erkcouwered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. The system should be based in the gravel soils. Flood irrigation should be restricted from the seepage field area. H-P (3earrcH U7:'J4 Jf U'JZ 104bU WAIKINb PAGE 05 Dan Scherer November 24, 1999 Page 4 Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with E.enerally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices is this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied., The conclusions and recommendations submitled in this report are based upon the data obtained from, the exploratory borings drilled at tlae locations indicated on Fig, 1, the proposed type of constr°oction and our experience in the area. Om fwdings include interpolation and extrapolation. of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations inthe subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be uaade. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes, We arA- not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation ar.d field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that-tbt recommendations have been appropriately interpreted_ Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recomniendatiorns presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural till by a representative of the geotechrucal engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be. of further assistance, please let us k-,x►w. Sincerely, HEPWO. - P "J�,EOTECHNTCAL, INC. % David A. Yong . P.E. r p s 32-216 ? lA'.' Reviewed 13y,F `1.3u �i`�-1,4.� ON ►et telatt`, Daniel E. Har in., P.E. LIMA/sd/rso attachments M. JW Watkins Associates - Aaw John Watkins --�� H-P("iEO7ECH ►J1J 15J �E��t7 U7 ;: b4 '3 7by2784bkl WATKINS PAGE 6b 02/15/2030 09* 54 9709278460 WATKINS PAGE 07 LEGEND: Topsoil; ,silty sandy clay, with scattered gravel, stiff, slightly moist, dark brown, organic. Cloy ( CL ; windy, scattered gravel, stiff, slightly moist. dark brown to brown, medium to high ) plasticity. • ? Gravel and Cobbles (GP —GM); with acattered small boulders, in a slightly silty sand motrix, dense, slightly moist. brown, rocks are subrounded to rounded. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch I.D. California liner 3arnple. Drive sample; standard penetration test ( SPT ). 1 3/8--inch 1.0. split spoon sample. ASTM D — 1566. 22J12 Drive sample, blow count; indicates that 22 blows of o 140--pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 Inches. Practical drilling refusal. Where shown above bottom of log. indicates that muitiple attempts Twere made to advance the boring. `' Depth boring caved when measured on November 9, 1999. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on November 8, 1999 with u 3-Ankh diameter continuous flight power auger 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory bori!tgs were obtained by using a hind level. Boring i was us¢d as a benchmark with an assumed elevation of 100 feet. ;.ogs of exploratory tracings are drawn to dapth. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree irr,plied by the method used. 5. The lines t�atween materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 5. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 1 day later. F1t:ctuati6n in water level may occur with time. 7, Laboratory Testing Results: WC Water Content ( X } DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) —200 — Percent passing No. 200 sieve. LL = Liquid Limit ( % ) PI Plasticity Index (x ) 799 861 HEPWORI`H -' PAWLAK LEGEND AND NCYTESI F Fig. 3 GEOTECHNIGAL. INC Uzi 17/ zkJOU YJ=: 74 7 tulj.[ i b4bu WA I K.IfJ1D f-'A(iE UJ i 02i15(2000 09:54 9709278460 WATK.INS FADE 10 co O m Q (i Z J � J LU U� W i++ 0 �- 'uj v J m J LL t } M�M QCC txh G W S I 11 1"' 1111 -12r 15/200@ 09' 54 9709278460 W1ir I J'� PAGE 11 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE i1 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 1939 861 BOLE NO, HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES; DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MINANCH P-1 33 15 l 24 22 2 30 22t1 112 1 1 /2 20 112 19 1r2 1 19 112 18 112 18 112 17 3/4 314 17 3/4 17 314 17 16 112 112 16 112 16 112 P•2 P-3. 21 112 (caved and unable to remove Cobble from bottom! 35 314 15 15 12 112 30 30 9 8 1 8 7 I 7 6 114 3/4 6 114 5 112 314 5 1/2 4 3)4 314 4 3/4 4 114 112 4 11A 19 3 314 16 314 1/2 2 114 16 314 15 114 1 112 15 114 14 1142 314 14 112 13 112 1 13 112 12 112 1 12 1/2 11 X4 314 11 314 11 114 112 11 1/4 10 314 112 Note, Percolation test holes were drilled with a six inch dlameter auger and snaked on Novernber 8, 1999. The percolation test holes were protected from freezing overnight, Percolation tgrm performed on Now-mber 9, 1999 by Heovrorth- Pewlak Geotechnical, Inc. Percolation razes were obtained by averaging the last two readings at each teat site. D\ 0 o� ocim of \ D / / 0 DRIYBU Y CUT p/ LEAC14FIELo 0 BAR4 MeLon � ED - p � pBUILOMG EWELM / \ O ASftKT ORtA \ O PORC44O \- O\ PA 0 O �— o � 0 , \ 0 , � 0 , 0 , \ 0 , 0 , 0 , � O, 1957-00 Tax #2465-104-01-004 Lot #4, Red Rock Ranch SCHERER JOB NAME , 0118 Red Rock Rd., Basalt 12D- JOB NO. 3 0,5 17 B LOCATION BILL TO DATE STAR/TEED N/oz) DATE COMPLETED DATE BILLED 3/ps D 0 0, h i S 5 '4 hdY /H S Y S C a 1,1L '/v e-ic GO d,K�0 6 f z c e k cat ILe I'q 1 f ra lots se-r,'allsj 116 G ,JSS&t- le—lle ' zi /00 / JOB COST SUMMARY TOTAL SELLING PRICE 7 0 � r 4 \1 V, V� c JOB FOLDER Product 277 JOB rvt—ur—m � SD S lq s7 (W007 I-4- I SD5 l 9 S7