HomeMy WebLinkAbout2158 Upper Cattle Creek Rd - 239127105001 - 1730-97ISINDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, CO 81631
Telephone: (970) 328-8755
COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. PERMIT NO. 1730-97 BP NO. 11492
OWNER: STEFAN FRONKA PHONE: (970) 963-2122
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1614, BASALT, CO 81621
APPLICANT: SAME PHONE:
SYSTEM LOCATION: 2158 UPPER CATTLE CREEK RD., CARBONDALE TAX PARCEL NO. 2391-271-05-001
LICENSED INSTALLER: ASPEN EARTHMOVERS, RICHARD STEVENS LICENSE NO. 36-97 PHONE: 970-963-0377
DESIGN ENGINEER: PHONE NO.
INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING:
1250 GALLON 2 COMPARTMENT SEPTIC TANK SQUARE FEET OF ABSORPTION AREA VIA 24 INFILTRATOR UNITS AS REQUESTED.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: INSTALL IN SERIAL DISTRIBUTION IN TRENCHES, WITH A CLEANOUT BETWEEN THE TANK AND THE HOUSE,
AND INSPECTION PORTS IN EACH TRENCH. BE SURE TO MAINTAIN 100 FOOT SET BACK TO WELL. CALL THE COUNTY FOR FINAL IN-
SPECTION PRIOR TO BACK FILLING ANY PART OF THE INSTALLATION, OR WITH ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING INSTALLATION.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1997
CONDITIONS:
1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS,
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25-10-104, 1973, AS AMENDED.
2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING
REQUIREMENTS, CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS
SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT.
3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO
BE LICENSED.
FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR):
NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL
THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM.
INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 750 SQUARE FEET (VIA _ 2 4. i n f i 1 t r n t n r n n i t .c )
INSTALLED septic TANK: 1250 GALLONS IS LOCATED 45 DEGREES AND 7 7 FEET FROM
the west end of the foundation.
COMMENTS:
ANY ITEM NOT MEETING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE CORRECTED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN
WORK IS COMPLETED.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL / DATE: October 9, 1997
(Site Plan MUST be attached)
ISDS Permit # 6- 1 r
APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
` ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 179
EAGLE, CO 81631
328-8755/927-3823 (El Jebel)
* PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00
* *
* MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER"
PROPERTY OWNER: � 1 � � 12VA- ) PHONE: 7 10 g�S� �o'r
MAILING ADDRESS: e 0,y 76 72,2 107 ZL co .?l
APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON: PHONE: ( )
MAILING ADDRESS:
LICENSED ISDS CONTRACTOR: �'�i /3%�/PI� �if`L°�i j/ht//11�� PHONE: ( 970) 7W313.9-0
COMPANY/DBA: ADDRESS: %ep/U.m L�
PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: (,V)- New Installation ( ) Alteration ( ) Repair
**************************************************************************
LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
Building Permit #
Legal Description:
Tax Parcel Number:
Street Address:
( i f known)
2%,10�" / 1CA00 fJ 009mlw
Subdivision: Filing: Block: Lot No./o
Lot Size: _ ,
�� CIS/ T�,c��k�-e
BUILDING.TYPE: (Check applicable category)
(kf Residential/Single Family
( ) Residential/Multi-Family*
( ) Commercial/Industrial*
TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category)
Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface
( ) Public Name of Supplier:
Number
Number
Type _
of Bedrooms
of Bedrooms
*These systems require desi n by a egistered Professional Engineer
SIGNATURE: Date: 62 7-
TO BE COMPLETFIDIBY THE COUNTY -�
AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT RECEIPT #: U' 1I ,%` - DATE: j !'
CHECK #: 7J CASHIER: Gt;U .ter'
Community Development Department
(970) 328-8730
Fax: (970) 328-7185
TDD: (970) 328-8797
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
October 9, 1997
Stefan Fronka
P.O. Box 1614
Basalt, CO 81621
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
RE: Final of ISDS Permit No. 1730-97, Tax
Parcel CO 81623-271 05-001. Property location:
2158 Upper Cattle Creek Rd., Carbondale,
Dear Mr. Fronka:
S Permit has been inspected and
This letter is to inform you that the above referenced records.DThis permit does not indicate compliancefinalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for you
with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of
your septic system.
Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic
system.
If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental
Health Division at (970) 328-8755.
Sincerely,
r`
Janet Kohl
Environmental Health Department
Eagle County Community Development
ENCL:Informational Brochure
Final ISDS Permit
cc: files
ISDS Permit # 1130 - r Date
ISDS Final Inspection
Completeness Form
Tank is f y-t• gal. Tank Material
✓ mrank is located _ft. and degrees from Weal- 41d e7� 1�-
(permanent landmark)
Tank is located ft. and degrees from
(permanent landmark)
✓ Tank set level. _Tank lids within S" of finished grade.
✓ Size of field `Q ft' units lineal ft.
Technology 1
Cleanout is installed in between tank and house(+ 1/100ft).
There is a "T" that goes down 14 inches in the inlet and
outlet of the tank.
V_ Inlet and outlet is sealed with tar tape rubber gas etc.
Tank has two compartments with the larger compartment closest to the
house.
Measure distance and relative direction to field.
✓ Depth of field 3 ft. DI -'-
Soil interface raked.
Inspection portals at the end of each trench.
Proper distance to setbacks. / "j" h *i- _
Lef—Chambers properly installed as per manufacturers specifications.
(Chambers latched, nd lates properly installed, rocks removed from
trenches, etc.') -G(L - /h- 10k /s
✓ Type of pipe used fo buildin sewer line 5DX43) leach field-5VK3.5�
Other
Inspection meets requirements.
Copy form to installer's file if recommendations for improvement were
suggested.
ACTION TAKEN:
Setbacks
Well Potable House Property Lake Dry Tank Drain
Water Lines line Stream Gulch
Field 100 25 20 10 50 25 10 10
Tank 50 10 5 10 50 10 * 10
Community Development Department
(970) 328-8730
Fax: (970) 328-7185
TDD: (970) 328-8797
DATE: September 24, 1997
TO: Aspen Eartbmovers, LLC
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
FROM: Environmental Health Division
RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1730-97, Tax Parcel
#2391-271-05-001. Property Location: 2158 Upper Cattle Creek Rd.,
Carbondale, CO., Fronka residence.
Enclosed is your ISMS Permit No. 1730-97, It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the
permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates
the permit unless otherwise approved.
Also enclosed is the ISMS Final Inspection Completeness Form. The items on this form need
to be completed before you call for your final inspection. Also, please note any special conditions
which may have been placed on the permit. If all items are not completed, a reinspection fee
of $42.50 must be paid before a reinspection is made.
Due to weather constraints, all permits issued before November 14, 1997 must be completed
by November 26, 1997 for final inspection. Please call our office well in advance to allow for
scheduling of final inspection. Your building permit CO will not be issued until final approval
has been given for the ISDS Permit.
Permit specifications are miniml4m requirements only, and should be brought to the property
ownerfs attention.
This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328-
8755.
cc: files
Enclosure: ISMS Final Inspection Completeness Form
EAGLE,COUNTY
BUILDING DIVISION
P.O. Box 179
Phone: 328-8730
t? A Te t S O-S
COP/
INSPECTION REQUEST
/ —7,-
BUILDING PERMIT NO.
DATE: pp
Joel
3
NAME:
TIME f 0 AM
CALLER:
RECEIVED: t rI 0 PM
0 OTHER: LOCATION:
0 PARTIAL Cr",
Ready for inspection: 0 MONDAY 0 TUESDAY ).CWEDNESDAY 0 THURSDAY 0 FRIDAY Al�:Am
COMMENTS: �^
7771
4v
i, /2"0 ae 0
F,
,APPROVED 0 DISAPPROVED 0 REINSPECT
,AUpon the Following, Corrections:
DATE: TIME*
L7 INSPECTOR
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 5020 Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax 970 945-8454
September 10, 1997 Phone 970 945-7988
Stefan Fronka
P.O. Box 1614
Basalt, Colorado 81621 Job No. 197 534
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed
Residence, Lot 10, Filing 1, Mountain Meadow Ranch, 2158 Upper
Cattle Creek Road, Missouri Heights, Eagle County, Colorado
Dear Mr. Fronka:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and
percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study
was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services
to you dated August 25, 1997. The data obtained and our recommendations based on
the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this
report. We previously provided an interim report to you dated September 8, 1997
Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame
structure with an attached garage built into the south facing hillside. Ground floors are
proposed to be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to up to about 8 feet.
Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and
typical of the proposed type of construction. The septic disposal system is proposed to
be located about 100 feet south-southwest of the residence.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Site Conditions: The site was vacant at the time of our field work. The ground
surface on the lot is gently rolling with a slight slope down to the west. A relatively
level gravel parking area is located in the northern portion of the lot. There is a
moderate slope between the parking area and the southern part of the lot. The lot is
vegetated with grass and weeds with grove of scrub oak west of Pit 1. Trash scattered
on the ground surface south of the parking area was being cleaned up at the time of our
site visit.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
excavating two exploratory pits in the building area and one profile pit in the septic
disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are
presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 foot of topsoil, generally
consist of basalt gravel, cobbles and boulders in a sandy silt and clay matrix. Results
of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of the gravel and matrix (minus 3 inch
fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Fig. 3. No free water was observed in
Stefan Fronka
September 10, 1997
Page 2
the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the
exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread
footings placed on the undisturbed granular soils designed for an allowable soil bearing
pressure of 3,000 psf for support of the proposed residence. Footings should be a
minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and
disturbed soils and existing fill encountered at the foundation bearing level within the
excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the
undisturbed gravels. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above
their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 42 inches
below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls
should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an
unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures
should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit
weight of at least 45 pcf for the on -site soil as backfill, exclusive of topsoil and
oversized rock.
Floor Slabs: The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support
lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential
movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with
expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints
should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint
spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on
experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel
should be placed beneath slabs -on -grade to facilitate drainage. This material should
consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less
than 2 % passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill
can consist of the on -site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
Because of the oversized rock it may be more practical to import granular soil, such as
road base, for use as structural backfill.
Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration,
it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop
during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring
runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such
as retaining walls and below grade areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic
pressure buildup by an underdrain system.
H-P GEOTECH
Stefan Fronka
September 10, 1997
Page 3
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain
should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent
finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining
granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2 % passing the
No. 200 sieve, less than 50 % passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of
2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/z feet deep.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90 % of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be
capped with about 2 feet of the on -site, finer graded soils to reduce
surface water infiltration.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement
and walkway areas.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of
all backfill.
Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on August 27, 1997 to evaluate
the feasibility cif an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and
three percolation holes were du tions shown on Fig. 1. The test holes
(nominal 12 inch diameter b 12 inch dee were hand dug at the bottom of shallow
backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in
+1}4dy C(t the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig. 2 and
b a consist of 1 foot of topsoil and 11/z feet of silty sandy clay overlyiug basall gravel ink
- sandy clay matrix. The percolation test results are presented in Table I1. A percolation
rate of 12 minutes per inch was indicated from the tests. Based on the subsurface
-"?1 conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be
suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
H-P GEOTECH
Stefan Fronka
September 10, 1997
Page 4
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at
the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience
in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions
may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered
during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be
notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes.
We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As
the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant
design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the
recommendations presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations
and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the
geotechnical engineer.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
Jordy Z. Ims
n, r. , P.E.
Reviewed
�S
Daniel E. Hardin, P. E.
JZA/kw
attachments
H-P GEOTECH
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1"=100'
TELEPHONE EASEMENT \
LOT 10 \ �`
PROFILE PIT �♦ \
P-2 00 P-1 i
n A i GRAVEL; o \
P-3 ® ; PAD ;
PIT 2 ■ << y \
yTie PIT 1
LOT 11
1 197 534 ( GEOTECHNICA LNINC I AND APIERCOLATION OTEST HOLES S I Fig. 1 I
PIT 1
PIT 2
PROFILE PIT
0
0
00
1a-.
cdp
i
5
, , o
Bpi
wc=1.9
+4=37
(()),,�� 5
no
200=24
LL=43
it
s
a
Q
a - - NP
o
o�
10
10
LEGEND:
TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, organic, stiff, slightly moist, dark brown.
CLAY (CL); silty, sandy, stiff
to very stiff, slightly moist, reddish brown, low
to medium plasticity.
BASALT GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GO); in a sandy silt and clay matrix, scattered
o`
to frequent boulders up to 4
feet in size, dense to very dense, slightly moist,
brownish white, highly calcareous.
BASALT GRAVEL (GC—CL); in
a sandy clay matrix, scattered cobbles, occasional
boulders, very dense to stiff,
slightly moist, brownish white, highly calcareous.
Disturbed Bulk Sample.
Practical backhoe refusal
NOTES:
1. Exploratory pits were excavated on August 26, 1997 with a backhoe.
2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features
on the site plan provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and logs of exploratory pits are drawn to depth.
4. The exploratory pit locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the
method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate
boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free yrater was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating,
Fluctuations in water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = water Content ( % ) LL = Liquid Limit ( % )
+4 = Percent retained on No, 4 sieve NP = Non —Plastic
—200 = Percent {gassing No, 20.0 sieve
L 197 534 1 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK I LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS I
IFig. 2
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE I
VtKL;ULH I IUN I t5 I
HtSUL 15 JOB NO. 197 534
HOLE NO.
HOLE DEPTH
(INCHES)
LENGTH OF
INTERVAL
(MIN)
WATER DEPTH
AT START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
WATER DEPTH
AT END OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
DROP IN
WATER
LEVEL
(INCHES)
AVERAGE
PERCOLATION
RATE
(MIN./INCH)
P-1
46'A
/
10
water added
11'14
9'/2
2
1-0
) 0
t3
13
I v
13
13 12
9'/2
8'/2
1
8'/2
7'/4
1
7'/4
6'/4
1
11
10
1
10
9'/4
3/4
9'/4
8'h
'/4
81/2
7 v2
1
7'h
6'/1
'/4
6'/4
6
'/4
P-2
47'/4
i
10
water added
103 /4
9
1 '/4
ry
(�
13
10
13
13
1 D
)3
13 12
9
8
1
8
7
1
7
6'/4
3/4
11'/4
10'/4
1
10 '/4
9'/2
'/4
9'/2
8'/4
'/4
8 3/4
7'/4
1
7%
7
%
7
s v4
'i4
P-3
t
46
3,9,
10
water added
11 3/4
9'/4
2'/2
/0
/D
) 3
/D
) 3
/ d
13 12
9'/4
8
/4
8
7
1
7
6
1
6
5 Y4
%
9'/4
8'/4
1
8'/4
7'/2
3/4
7'/2
6'/2
1
6'/2
5 3/4
3/4
5
'/,
NOTE: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on August 26, 1997. Percolation tests were conducted
on August 27, 1997.
EAGLE COUNTY ENV. HEALTH
P.O. BOX 179
EAGLE, Co 81631
PP0%7 7^--1 : e yeers, F5-1 Paacm LAB — inc Grwon Kass : TOLL FREE 1.800-224-638,
JOB
SHEET NO.
CALCULATED BY
CHECKED BY—
OF —
DATE
DATE
�i qa
i
A
16
• .. ._ .. , _ :,ems
:t
I-v
/Al)�,Qo�✓E��FNr LOCARON CER7;F;cArE
OT %0, MO UIV TA W MEADOWS RA NCH,, FIRS T FIL ING
COUN7-K OF EAGLE, SATEOF COLORADO
III
38'
lool
i
'SCAT/a,✓ A'r!
r )�cp J'
/� ;J8-211 ELL
PHONE FSLL T /1 /V: �
' M
4.13 ACRa
MIAV OUNf ASV
... Aa ,.,w
/VUd .tM%W AND
Aw CAP
R." All 110Aa
PROPERTY DMWMV
Lor to mwNTAw mE1Do#s "vcH. msr RLMM.,
ACCORDW O 110 THE PUT R£CORMW OCTOWN 34 1978
BV BOOK 177 AT PAC£ 410 AS RrcipwN NO. 17wa
CVWTY OF E/GL.& SUTE OF COLORADO
n,a moor
W,N PAP
NOTE.• ME BASS OF SEARriV FOR nWS SURVEY 15 S18•1331',Y
BC7W££N THE "TRUST CaV CR AW THE SWrATA4ST DOMWW OF
ME PARCEL AS S'fO*N HTBEOM
Imrav
, AoMw CzWWY ,MIr nos &FROMMOW L004aw aoarrw,r aws AIM"m or
? 6 Aor A LAAO softtY Aw aR aM�1MllOI/ SLwr AAr AND Ww ? 4 Aw9r 10
BE MEUM ~ RI! W ESLM &"W or root[ ALKaW LN OQrOf P&flL f
RwgowoUa Lf"
, furpQ calm Imr we •wowwm ov Nt ABOIC LYSC7mw AW= aN on
o+/[ ALQrSr n, ,pl. ORi?t un,1r COM[r,ICMs AW MYSIMY MOM arr
POf/�Cwt6 ar 1hi AVRxt D1L�T As PQPW nwr AUK Ali AV VW0I*4CA%dWS IMgY
DC OCSOMM AKIN= BY ,Y ON ANY 40"a . AftmaCL 4Ck=W AS
00d M OW VMW ANY AW A"S u 1
OWN Np V VY4XW,
MAW Anw AM
,.,a
ego
_y Op
.�"A\O Y ■ �`��
x�0 fry � 6gQ�t��
26950
L��ISeEr�fI7F:�f�iZ=�FL'sL CLmff L �f2►'i
Leif}'JC�tti7C'CSF� F_� xs
AOIKL' AMCr+O M GrMnwb Am fw -mw aMa -m ov *Or - 1, Won
W
aw aYA,e, w ML ..+�• .a. w.. «. ~ Yw OW aww.r ^a* �r�ee
A. M war( Iw •Y Iw'.at Miw Ia aaaraw w wqw
Mar I" /MAN w A/M 0 rwA kmpwA am~— Arw
-z7-s7
NOf.I:�jU 7
3snoy
\-'A
f�
�y
1/i