Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout298 Red Rock Dr - 246510101001EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway - Eagle, Colorado 81631 Telephone: 328-8755 YELLOW COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE. Please call for final inspection before covering any portion of installed system. U PERMIT NO. 1542 OWNER: Carter Holmes PHONE: (619) 941-9779 MAILINGADDRESS: 1151 Wild Canary Lane —City: Encinitas —state: CA_ zip: 92024_ APPLICANT: Carter Holmes PHONE: (619) 941-9779 SYSTEMLOCATION: 0298 Red Rock Rd. , Basalt, CO TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 2449-1n1-01-001 LICENSED INSTALLER: Dreager Construction, 4,d­4)t-e-av_=h&1AtVJ-b"SENO: 24�0(q7n) 927-34'11 G-4 DESIGN ENGINEER OF SYSTEM: IrY_)l 'Ca':,n INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING: 1750 -GALLON SEPTIC TANK ABSORPTION AREA REQUIREMENTS: SQUARE FEET OF SEEPAGE BED ---1 134— SQUARE FEET OF TRENCH BOTTOM. via 63 infiltrator units as per design. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: -J-u-gl:all —as--4iE-r--xje-v-is J driveway, and install a cleanout every 100' minimum. Divert surface irrigation practices --iw-ay- from n'hqnrption area. M intnin pjeZnTnPf­er to -allow -for --- gria-und water q1,-vnt_Jr)n,_ veri f i rq f- i n-n - Fnainppr rprtifirntirtn nppdpd fnr Tcn- A Lq ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: — CONDITIONS: 1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25- 10- 10C 1973, AS AMENDED. 2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT AND CAUSE FOR BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. 3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED. FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM: (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR): NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM, INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: ---JJ34—, SQUARE FEET. via 63 infiltrators as per design. INSTALLED SEPTIC TANK: 17 50 GALLON DEGREES FEET FROM SEPTIC TANK ACCESS TO WITHIN 8" OF FINAL GRADE AND PROPER MATERIAL AND ASSEMBLY X YES NO COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY / STATE REQUIREMENTS: X YES NO ANY ITEM CHECKED NO REQUIRES CORRECTION BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS CORRECTED. COMMENTS: Engineer Lg-r1ifi-ca -12- ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATIEA���. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE: (RE-INSPECTWNT� NEGE;97ARY) RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS APPLICANT/ AGENT: OWNER: PERMIT FEE PERCOLATION TEST RECEIPT# CHECK# (Site Plan�MUST be attached) ISDS Permit # I� -1'1 APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE - EAGLE COUNTY P. O. BOX 179 EAGLE, CO 816319u 328-8755/927-3823 (El Jebel) ArN J 07� ************************************************************************** * PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00 * * * MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER" APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON; PHONE: (fie)N3-�77717 MAILING ADDRESS: _ LICENSED ISDS CONTRACTOR: eA P1110NE : 70 ) - COMPANY/DBA: sW7` ADDRESS: e,- *************************************************************************** PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: () New Installation ( ) Alteration ( } Repair *************************************************************************** LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM: Building Permit # (if known) PYF-T) Legal Description: Subdivision: C-Filing:_Block• Lot No. Tax Parcel Number: - - Lot Size., Street Address BUILDING TYPE: (Check applicable category) Residential/Single Family Number of Bedrooms ( ) Residential/Multi-Family* Number of Bedrooms ( ) Commercial/Industrial* Type TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (Check applicable category) Well ( ) Spring ( ) Surface ( ) Public Name of Supplier: *These systems re� uire esign by a Registered Professional Engineer SIGNATURE: Vy ********************** Date: ( 0 --,95 ************************************************** TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COUNTY q AMOUNT PAID: °j Or( RECEIPT #: / DATE: e� `J CHECK #: 65-9 ` O CASHIER: �� C.cmimunav Development Department (970)328-8730 Fax: !970i 328- 155 TDD 97o 28-a7()7 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO Date: April 26, 1996 TO: Dreager Excavating, LLC FROM: Environmental Health Division E" 500 Eal=dc. Colorado RE: Issuance of Individual Sewage Disposal System Permit No. 1542-95. Property Location: 0298 Red Rock Rd., Basalt, CO., Holmes residence. Enclosed is your ISDS Permit No. 1542-95. It is valid for 120 days. The enclosed copy of the permit must be posted at the installation site. Any changes in plans or specifications invalidates the permit unless otherwise approved. Systems designed by a Registered Professional Engineer must be certified by the Engineer indicating that the system was installed as specified. Eagle County does not perform final inspections on engineer designed systems. Your TCO will not be issued until our office receives this certification. Permit specifications are minimum requirements only, and should be brought to the property owner's attention. This permit does not indicate conformance with other Eagle County requirements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Environmental Health Division at 328- 8755. cc: files Scmueser, Gordon, Meyer; Dan Cokley R.P.E. SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. 118 W. 6th St. Suite 200 P.O. Box 2155 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Aspen, CO 81612 (303) 945-1004 (303) 925.6727 TO l%y i iLYTVIEn @[F lonnA HQ3101ULTUAI. DATE JOB L f 1- [ ATTENTION 1 5 RE: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via a ❑ Shop drawings I Tints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 7, -- THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: or approval ❑ ❑ For your use ❑ ❑ As requested ❑ a ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FORBIDS DUE REMARKS Approved as submitted Approved as noted Returned for corrections 19 ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO RECYCLED PAPER: Contents: 40% Pre -Consumer - 10% Post -Consumer SIGN Ce ENGINEERS SURVEYORS "--SGM-- SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 118 West 6th, Suite 200 r-17JAI-14 --- 'asAL-y-roll February 22, 1996 Eagle County Environmental Health Attention: Missy PO Box 179 Eagle CO 81631 Dear Missy: This memo is a confirmation of our conversation this week regarding the Holmes residence ISDS located in Red Rock Ranch, Eagle County, Colorado. As we discussed, the pipe to be hung inside of the infiltrator units shall be 4" PVC ASTM 2729 perforated pipe. Sincerely, SCHMILIESER GORDR, INC. Dan Cokley DC:st\95141A cc: Carter Holmes == August 9, 1996 ENGINEERS SG SURVEYORS SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER Mr. Ray Merry Eagle County Environmental Health P.O. Box 179 Eagle, CO 81631 RE: Carter Holmes - ISDS Dear Ray: i West 6th, Suite 200 •!#�i�1�f) i •f The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the final inspection report for the Carter Holmes ISDS located in Lot 1 of Red Rock Ranch, Eagle County, Colorado. This system was installed during the months of May and June of this year, at which time I made several site visits during the progress of the work. The system was installed as per the approved SGM plans of February 16, 1996. The sewage exits the house on the west half of the building and proceeds down the t--skie of the driveway to the field as located on the plans. Both the septic tank and t dosing tank�uere installed as per the plans. A 4" gravity line was installed to the field where it was teed off into a 4" header pipe. From the 4" header pipe, 2" PVC pipe was hung through the infiltrator units. The 2" PVC was drilled with A" holes at 30" on center located to spray to the top of the infiltrator unit. Weep holes were provided at each end of the line. At the time of my last visit, there were no surface irrigation practices occurring on the property. It is noted here that no surface irrigation shall occur near the absorption area. In addition, the piezometer needs to be maintained to allow for groundwater measurement. This letter certifies that the Holmes ISDS was installed as per the plans and specifications prepared by SGM as well as the ISDS permit issued by Eagle County. Please call should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. Sincerely, SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. Dan Cokley, P.E. DC:lc/95141 A cc: Carter Holmes Glenn Meehan, Dreager Excavating Community Development Department (970)328-8730 Fax: (970) 328-7185 TDD: (970) 328-8797 EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO August 13, 1996 Carter Holmes 1151 Wild Canary Lane Encinitas, CA 92024 RE: Final of ISDS Permit No. 1542-95 Parcel #2465-101-01-001. Property location: 0298 Red Rock Rd., Basalt, CO. Dear Mr. Holmes: Eagle County Building P.O. Box 179 500 Broadway Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179 This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to retain for your records. This permit does not indicate compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system. Be aware that later changes to your building may require appropriate alterations of your septic system. If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at 328-8755. Sincerely, Janet Kohl Environmental Health Department Eagle County Community Development ENCL:Information Brochure Final ISDS Permit cc: files DEC 06 '95 12:03 PM Page I FROM: CARTER HOLMES 1151 WILD CANARY LN OLIVENHAIN, CA 92024 # PAGES:— -including this cover page DATE: 12, If You have any trouble receiving or reading this transmission please call immediately and we will send you another copy of the page that you need. 7 7*- 570/,(,5 7;7r ��� you � y�y� �f, �� /.� �"�a DEC 06 "95 12:04 PM P a 9 1! HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTrc,t)NICAL, iNC. November 20, 1 q95 -502014aad 154 Glenwoue Spring', co SnA31 P,1 ti 97U 945-84 ;4 Phunc 970 845-7988 Carter Holmes 1151 Wild Canary Lane Encinitas, California 92024 Job No. 195 505 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed Residence, Lot #1, Red Rock Ranch Subdivision, Near Hooks Lane, Eagle County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Holmes: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotcehnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and percolation testing for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The subsoil study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotectillical engineering services to you dated October 30, 1995. The percolation test was verbally requested by you on November 13, 1995. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure over a basement level located within the building envelope shown on Fig. 1. Basement and garage floors will be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 8 to 10 feet, Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be, notified to reevaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The lot is located on a relatively flat alluvial terrace previously used to grow field grass. A steep slope down to the northeast along the north side of the lot separates the alluvial terrace from a lower bench There is approximately 12 feet of elevation differencebetweenthe terraces. The lot is vegetated with grass and wads, Numerous cobbles and small boulders are exposed on the ground surrace. Abandoned irrigation ditches cross the lot. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating one exploratory pit in the building envelope and one profile pit in the septic disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1/2 foot of topsoil, consist of silty��n-oy--gravel with cobbles and bouldersppto 3 fget in sirs- Results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of sandy gravel (minus 5-inch fraction) obtained from the site, are presented on Fig. 4. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. Slatted PVC pipe was placed in each pit so that potential groundwater development during the spring or summer irrigation can be monitored. [a DEC 08 '95 12:04 PM Page Carter Holmes November 20, 1995 Page 2 Foundation Recommendations: Considering the, subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural gravel soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf for support of the proposed residence. Footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils or the loosened soils moistened and compacted. The bearing surface may be fine graded with compacted on -site sand and gravel. Concrete should not be placed on frozen ground, Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection, Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for the on -site soil as backfill, exclusive of topsoil and rocks larger than about 8 inches. Floor Slabs: The natural on -site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly to moderately loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4-inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate. drainage. This material should consist of minus 2-inch aggregate with less than .50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2 % passing the No. 200 sieve. The underslab gravel should be connected to the underdrain system, All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required -fill can consist of the tan -site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Under rain System. Although free water was not encountered during ng, our exploration, it has been our experience in area that the groundwater level can rise due to nearby irritation and tc cal etched oundwater Gran de el _du_ring_tJmes of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spri4-r-unoffca-�nTr6ate a H-PGEOTECH DEC 08 '95 12:05 PM Page Carter Holmes November 20, 1995 Page 3 Perched condition. We recommend below grade construction, such as basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a infilimum I % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 1/2 feet deep. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the, residence has been cornpleteA: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas, Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on -site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Percolation Testing: The results of percolation tests conducted at the site are. presented in Table 1. The test locations are shown on Fig. 1 and the log of the profile pit is shown on Fig. 2. The percolation rates varied between 7 and 20 minutes per inch with an average rate of about 12 minutes per inch. Based on our experience, we expect a conventional infiltration disposal system will be feasible at this site. The slotted PVC casing should be monitored for free water development. 0- H-P GEOTECH H DEC 08 '95 12;06 PM Poge Carter Holmes November 20, 1995 Page 4 Limitations: This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no other warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig, 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes, We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of Our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation aM field services during C construction to review and monitor the implementation of our re o . mendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on -site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the soil engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HNICAL, INC. =a Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. JZA/kmk Attachments H-P GEOTECH 0 DEC 09 '95 12:06 PM pcgE? DEC 08 '95 12:07 PM Pa3e D DEC 09 195 12:07 PM Page a brown.TOPSOIL; organic silty sand, slightly clayey, slightly moist to moist, dark 1-- GRAVEL AND COBBLES P' sandy,Pr d scattered boulders dense • �/ #` a yellowish. brown. Subrounded to rounded river rock - Disturbed Bulk Sample. Indicates slotted PVC pipe installed in Pit to depth shown. NOTES., 1- Exploratory Pits were excavated on November 3,1995 with a John Deere 4102 2. Locations of exploratory pits wore measured approximately - features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations Of exploratory Pits wore obtained by ifterpolauon between contoums on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the t • used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory Pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be 6. Nofree water wasencountered the pits at the time of Fluctuations occur t;. 7. Laboratory Testing +4=Percent retained on • . 4 sieve passing No. 200 =Mmgamammi Legends K # Notes _ • 0EC 08 '95 12: 0 9 Pro Page 9 0 K z w ffi F­MeTeR ANALYSIS 24 1 fut, I mn. I W JfEAUWQ:i 41 MIN ts kklm40 MIM tq MIN, 4 MIN I MIN. *71ml U.S: V AMJWIlf)�SLMZ� 'im 1%" *40 *10 is -4 CLEAll L;(JUAHC- UVf!NING� %1 r I- or, A" EMS= tftm ra "Now MRS.=,. DIAMETER Or- PAWK-,Le IN MILLINIFTERS SIANO I WIAVC-L CLAY TO 310 FlNe MEI)IUM iCOA115E [_ _fINE I CCIAllfr GnAVEL 69 SAND �8 % SILT AND ct-Ay 3 % LIOU10 LIMIT PLASTICITY IHOZ:,X SAMPLE OV Sandy Gravel with cobbles FROM Pit 1 q 5 to 7 Feet m M.P." *Wm IWO mm�w' DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS CLAY 70 GIL'r SAND WAVE PINE I MEDIUM t,pAMae GSAVEI- SAND % SILT AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPILFE OF FROM GRADATION TEST RESULTS I DEC 08 195 12:08 PM Pugs 10 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH LENGTH OF WATER DEPTH WATER DEPTH DROP IN AVERAGE (INCHES) INTERVAL AT START OF AT END OF WATER PERCOLATION {MIN) INTERVAL INTERVAL LEVEL RATE (INCHES) (INCITES) (INCHES) (MIN./INCH) P-1 50 1/2 5 7 112 6 1 112 refill 71/2 6112 1 refill 7 1 /2 7 112 refill 7 1 /2 7 112 refill 7 112 7 112 14 P-2 551/2 5 6112 6114 114 refill 6 1 /2 6 114 114 refill 6 112 6 114 114 refill 61112 6114 114 20 P_3 53 114 5 7 114 4 3/4 2 112 refill 7 1 /4 5 1 /2 1 3/4 refill 7 114 6 1 114 refill 7 1 /4 6 112 3/4 refill 7 114 6 1 /2 314 refill 7 114 6 1 /2 314 7 Notes: Percolation test boles were hand dug and soaked by others. Percolation tests were conducted on November 13, 1955. 1 � > g N � jj r J A. w C) 'n- 0 a d z O n WIN 1 MENNEN � 1 1 - 1 � 11 • • ill I� • i e ' 4 I, r�