HomeMy WebLinkAbout1255 Castle Peak Rd - 193922101011IM'Pz s a 1 a
EAGLE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
P.O. Box 179 - 500 Broadway • Eagle, Colorado 81631
Telephone: 328-8755
YELLOW COPY OF PERMIT MUST BE POSTED AT INSTALLATION SITE.
Please call for final inspection before covering any portion of installed system.
PERMIT NO. 1 4 7 6
OWNER: Claus & Edith Fricke PHONE: 476-5622 Pxt - 308
MAILINGADDRESS: P. 0. Box 370 City: Vail state: CO zip: 81658
APPLICANT: Guy Parker PHONE: 926-2727
SYSTEM LOCATION: Lot 7, Castle Peak Ranch -Rule RD TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 1939-221-01-011
LICENSED INSTALLER: L-Quhir Excavating, Carson Reid LICENSE NO:6-95
DESIGN ENGINEER OF SYSTEM: _IntermOuntain Engineering, Tuiza PPtrnvGka
INSTALLATION HEREBY GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING:
1 OOO GALLON SEPTIC TANK
ABSORPTION AREA REQUIREMENTS:
XXX SQUARE FEET OF SEEPAGE BED 1102 SQUARE FEET OF TRENCH BOTTOM.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: Install as per engineer design, making sure that the bottom of each trench is
n0 deeper than 3' to insure a 4' Separation to weathered Shale bedrark Cover trenches wit]
a minimum of 1' tamped soil as per desi
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL:) DATE:
CONDITIONS:
1. ALL INSTALLATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS, ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN 25- 10- 104. 1973, AS AMENDED.
2. THIS PERMIT IS VALID ONLY FOR CONNECTION TO STRUCTURES WHICH HAVE FULLY COMPLIED WITH COUNTY ZONING AND BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. CONNECTION
TO OR USE WITH ANY DWELLING OR STRUCTURE NOT APPROVED BY THE ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY BE A VIOLATION OF A
REQUIREMENT OF THE PERMIT AND CAUSE FOR BOTH LEGAL ACTION AND REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT.
3. CHAPTER IV, SECTION 4.03.29 REQUIRES ANY PERSON WHO CONSTRUCTS, ALTERS OR INSTALLS AN INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TO BE LICENSED.
FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM: (TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR):
NO SYSTEM SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAGLE COUNTY INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM REGULATIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS APPROVED
PRIOR TO COVERING ANY PORTION OF THE SYSTEM.
INSTALLED ABSORPTION OR DISPERSAL AREA: 1102 SQUARE FEET.
INSTALLED SEPTIC TANK: 1000 GALLON DEGREES FEET FROM see site plan
SEPTIC TANK ACCESS TO WITHIN 8" OF FINAL GRADE AND
PROPER MATERIAL AND ASSEMBLY X YES —NO
COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY / STATE REQUIREMENTS: X YES NO
ANY ITEM CHECKED NO REQUIRES CORRECTION BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL OF SYSTEM IS MADE. ARRANGE A RE -INSPECTION WHEN WORK IS CORRECTED.
COMMENTS: Engineer Certification received 4/2/96.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: / DATE:7�
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVAL: DATE:
(RE -INSPECTION IF NECESSARY)
APPLICANT / AGENT:
RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS
L6P1TW►xA
PERMIT FEE PERCOLATION TEST FEE RECEIPT # CHECK #
155
ISDS Permit # N1 4' q5
Building Permit #
APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT
W;.YENV�:RONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICE- EAGLE COUNTY
IU
.�MTY GE� ��PMEN- P.O. BOX 179
EAGLE, CO 81631
328-8755/927-3823(Basalt)
PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $150.00 PERCOLATION TEST FEE $200.00
**************************************************************************
PROPERTY OWNER: C LA09-4- EmrrtjF R j
MAILING ADDRESS: P. ov 9v—iA be-0 CIO PHONE: 74- 4 ksoa
APPLICANT/CONTACT PERSON:
rWA7
ADDRESS: i . PHONE •
***************************************************************************
PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR: ( ) NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( } REPAIR
LOCATION OF PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM:
Legal Description: 0 660 G__
Parcel Number:
"�
1 � q 7 1- j jj/
Lot size: SS A6.
Physical Address:
�OT'
BUILDING TYPE: (Check
Residential /
( ) Residential /
( ) Commercial /
TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY:
applicable category)
Single Family Number
Multi -Family* Number
Industrial* Type_
of Bedrooms
of Bedrooms
Well(M Spring ( ) Surface ( )
Public ( ) Name of Supplier:
*These systems require design by a Registered Professional Engineer
NOTE: SITE PLAN MUST BE ATTACHED TO APPLICATION
MAKE ALL REMITTANCE PAYABLE TO: "EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER"
SIGNATURE: DATE:clr�./7,3/ 'y(-1JZ1---
AMOUNT PAID: RECEIPT# " _ DATE: _
CHECK # - `_ CASHIER •
Community Development Department
(970)328-8730
Fax: (970) 328-7185
TDD: (970) 328-8797
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
April 4, 1996
Eagle County Building
P.O. Box 179
500 Broadway
Eagle, Colorado 81631-0179
Claus & Edith Fricke
P.O. Box 370
Vail, CO 81658
RE: Final of ISDS Permit No. 1476-95 Parcel #1939-221-01-011.
Property location: Lot 7, Castle Peak Ranch, Rule Rd.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Fricke:
This letter is to inform you that the above referenced ISDS
Permit has been inspected and finalized. Enclosed is a copy to
retain for your records. This permit does not indicate
compliance with any other Eagle County requirements. Also
enclosed is a brochure regarding the care of your septic system.
Be aware that later changes to your building may require
appropriate alterations of your septic system.
If you have any questions regarding this permit, please contact
the Eagle County Environmental Health Division at 328-8755.
Sincerely,
Janet Kohl
Environmental Health Department
Eagle County Community Development
ENCL: Information Brochure
Final ISDS Permit
cc: files
�1 Inter -Mountain
Engineering Ltd.
SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
••
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT 7, HIGHLAND MEADOW ESTATES AT CASTLE PEAK RANCH
EAGLE COUNTY, COLORADO
PREPARED FOR:
CLAUS AND EDIE FRICKE
PROJECT NO.95-0119G
APRIL 18, 1995
REG�sl/,,�/
$ %% 9 V ET%3 `. Fy;
_c•S �•�=
• 29526 •
spa
E\\�1\0
���/IlpilU11 r%
77 Metcalf Road, #200 • Box 978 • Avon, Colorado 81620 • Phone: 949-5072 • From Denver Direct: 893-1531
1420 Vance Street • Lakewood, Colorado 80215 9 Phone: 232-0158
INDEX
CONCLUSIONS 2
SCOPE 2-3
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 3
SITE INVESTIGATION 3-4
SUBSURFACE AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS 4
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 5
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS 5-6
SLAB CONSTRUCTION 6-7
GROUNDWATER AND DRAIN SYSTEM 7
REINFORCING 7
CRAWL SPACE COVER 8
BACKFILL AND SURFACE DRAINAGE 8-9
LAWN IRRIGATION 9
MISCELLANEOUS 9-10
LOCATION OF TEST PITS DRAWING 1
SUMMARY OF TEST PITS FIGURE 1-5
SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 6
DETAIL OF PERIPHERAL DRAIN SYSTEM FIGURE 7
CONCLUSIONS
1. Subsoil conditions are fairly
uniform over the site with less than
1 foot of Topsoil over 1.5 feet of
weathered bedrock over 3 feet of
fractured to firm SILTSTONE and
SHALE Bedrock at the proposed
location for the main building and
1.5 feet of Topsoil over 4.5 to 5.5
feet of silty to clayey gravelly
SAND over weathered to firm SHALE
Bedrock at the location for the
proposed secondary building (Test
Pit no's 3 and 4).
2. The proposed main residence
should be founded on the undisturbed
firm bedrock with conventional
spread footings designed for a
maximum soil bearing pressure of
3000 psf. The proposed secondary
residence should be founded on the
undisturbed weathered to firm
bedrock with conventional spread
footings designed for a maximum
allowable soil bearing pressure of
2000 psf.
2
SCOPE
This report presents the results of a Soils and Foundation
Investigation for the proposed residence to be constructed on Lot
7, Highland Meadow Estates at Castle Peak Ranch, Eagle County,
Colorado. The investigation was prepared by means of test pits,
and laboratory testing of samples obtained from these pits.
The purpose of this foundation exploration was to determine
the various soil profile components and the engineering
characteristics of the foundation materials, and to provide
criteria from a geotechnical point of view, for use by the
structural engineers in preparing the foundation design, and the
design engineers and architects in preparing grading and drainage
3
plans.
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The site is 35 acres lot located in section 22, T4S, R84W of
the 6th P.M., Eagle County, Colorado. The site for the proposed
main residence is located on a small ridge with the sides of the
ridge sloping at a moderate to steep grade. The vegetation on the
ridge consisted of cedar trees. Drainage was to the east, west and
south. The site for the proposed secondary residence is located at
the base of the ridge on a relatively flat portion of the lot. The
vegetation on the flat area consisted of low grass. The drainage
was to the south and east. The lot is vacant.
SITE INVESTIGATION
The field investigation performed on March 23, 1995 consisted
of excavating, logging and sampling 5 test pits. The locations of
the test pits are shown on Drawing No. 1.
The test pits were excavated with a conventional backhoe.
Summaries of the test pits logs are detailed on Figure No.'s 1-5.
Laboratory samples were obtained at selected intervals by
driving a "California" hand sampler into undisturbed soil.
Granular soils were sampled by bulk sampling.
These samples were,returned to our laboratory, inspected and
classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification
System and the test pit logs were edited as necessary. To aid in
classifying the soils encountered, and to determine general soil
4
characteristics, selected laboratory test (moisture content, unit
weight, swell/consolidation), were performed on representative soil
samples. Summaries of the test results are shown on Figure No. 6.
SUBSURFACE AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS
Refer to the summary of test pits, Figure No's 1 and 2.
Subsurface conditions are fairly uniform. Test Pit No's 1 and 2
had 0.5 feet of Topsoil over 1.5 feet of weathered SILTSTONE and
SHALE Bedrock over fractured to firm bedrock with a practical
backhoe refusal on bedrock at 5 feet. Test Pit No's 3 and 4 had
1.5 feet of Topsoil over 4.5 to 5.5 feet of silty to clayey
gravelly SAND over 1 to 2 feet of weathered to firm SILTSTONE and
SHALE Bedrock. Additional test pit was excavated within the
proposed leach field area; however due to the soil profile
encountered (fractured bedrock) this site was abandoned and a
different site on the flat area of the lot was investigated as
possible leach field area.
We understand that no overlot grading has been done prior to
this investigation.
No groundwater was encountered in any of the test pits at the
time of excavation.
Indexes to Geological Mapping, Eagle County, Colorado,
prepared by Charles S. Robinson & Associates, INC., in 1975, states
that the underlying bedrock is Maroon Formation.
5
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
Based upon the information provided by Mr. Guy Parker it is
understood that the proposed residence will be 1 to 2 story
structure without a basement. If the proposed project differs
significantly from this understanding, a review should be made
after the plans are more complete.
Loads are anticipated to be light, typical of residential
construction.
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed main residence should be founded on undisturbed
firm bedrock with conventional spread footings designed for a
maximum soil bearing pressure of 3000 psf. The proposed secondary
residence should be founded on the undisturbed weathered to firm
bedrock with conventional spread footings designed for a maximum
allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 psf.
The footing excavations should be relatively smooth, free of
debris, organics, loose soil, frost, and standing water. Any over -
excavations should be backfilled and compacted to 100 percent
within 2 percent of optimum moisture as determined by a Standard
Proctor Test (ASTM D-698). A representative of this office should
be contacted to inspect the foundation excavation to verify that
the soil conditions are the same as those anticipated in this
report.
After all of the final grading is completed, the bottom of the
footings should be covered with a minimum of 48 inches of backfill
7
American Concrete Institute's recommendations to control cracking.
A granular mat (-3/4 inch gravel, with less than 5 percent
passing No. 200 sieve), should be provided below the floor slabs.
This should be a minimum of four inches in thickness. The purpose
of this granular mat is to provide a capillary break between the
subgrade and the slab.
GROUNDWATER AND DRAIN SYSTEM
While no ground water was encountered at the time the field
investigation was conducted, it is possible that seasonal
variations will cause fluctuations, or for a water table to be
present in the upper soils during the spring months, or after
prolonged periods of rain. A foundation perimeter drain as
detailed on Figure No. 7 is recommended to reduce the risk of
surface water infiltrating the footing subsoils.
REINFORCING
The foundation should be well reinforced and rigid enough to
withstand differential settlements. Walls retaining earth should
be designed to resist an equivalent fluid pressure of 70 pcf for an
"at -rest" case assuming a level drained backfill condition.
8
CRAWL SPACE COVER
When moist soils are encountered in the excavation, the ground
surface in crawl space areas should be covered with an impervious
moisture barrier sealed against the footings. This will help to
reduce humidity in the crawl space area. The crawl space should be
vented.
BACRFILL AND SURFACE DRAINAGE
The potentially highly hydroconsolidating (additional
settlement upon addition of water) foundation soils encountered in
portions of the site must be prevented from being wetted after
construction. The backfill placed around the foundation walls
should not settle excessively after completion of construction and
the top one foot of the backfill material must be relatively
impervious. The on -site soils, exclusive of Topsoil and Organics
are suitable for use as backfill. Due to the high content of
cobbles and boulders, it will be necessary to screen out larger
rocks prior to using this material as backfill.
Backfill should be moistened or dried to near its optimum
moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent of the
maximum Standard Proctor Density. Structural backfill should be
compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum Standard Proctor
Density.
Surface water running toward the structure from upslope areas
should be diverted around and away from the building by means of
9
lined drainage swales or other similar measures.
The final grade should have a positive slope away from the
foundation walls on all sides. A minimum of 12 inches in the first
10 feet is recommended. Downspouts and sill cocks should discharge
into splash blocks that extend beyond the limits of the backfill.
The use of long downspout extensions in place of splash blocks is
advisable.
LAWN IRRIGATION
Do not install sprinkler systems next to foundation walls,
porches or patio slabs. If sprinkler systems are installed, the
sprinkler heads should be placed so that the spray from the heads,
under full pressure, does not fall within five feet of foundation
walls, porches or patio slabs. Lawn irrigation must be controlled.
If the future owners desire to plant next to foundation walls,
porches or patio slabs, and are willing to assume the risk of
structural damage, etc., then it is advisable to plant only flowers
and shrubbery (no lawn) of varieties that require very little
moisture. These flowers and shrubs should be hand watered only.
MISCELLANEOUS
The recommendations provided herein are based on experience in
the area and from the on -site field exploration. The information
obtained form the field exploration and laboratory testing reflects
subsurface conditions only at the specific locations at the
particular times designated. Subsurface conditions at other
10
locations and times may differ from the conditions at these
locations. The extent of any variations between the test pits may
not appear evident until excavation is performed. However, only
minor variations are expected. If during construction conditions
appear to be different, this office should be advised so re-
evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Claus
and Edie Fricke for the specific application to the proposed
residence structure to be located on Lot 7, Highland Meadow Estates
at Castle Peak Ranch, Eagle County, Colorado.
The findings and recommendations of this report have been
prepared in accordance with locally accepted professional
engineering standards for similar conditions at this time. There
is no other warranty, either expressed or implied.
sincerely,
INTER -MOUNTAIN ENGINEERING, LTD.
�e'
�k6""
Luiza Petrovska, P.E.
Project Engineer
J
J
Uj
z
O
Q
J
0
0
z
O
U
°�` °'
-i III I III III �I III
111N� I I I I II '.L JIII
ic-
TI!III I li I IIIII
S A.F��,?LE CF silty SAND NAT. VOISTURE CONTENT 10.3
_
% SNELL/CONSOL. SAMPLE FLOODED AT1.0 KSF NAT DRY DENSITY 86.3 PCF
BORING N0. 4
DEPTH 8'
fim—
0.1 1.0 LOAD (KSF) 10 100
SAiJPLE OF Clayey SHALE I NAT. MiGISTURE CONTENT 19.8 %
%SWELL/CONSOL. SAMPLE FLOODED AT "0 KSF NAT. DRY DENSITY 97.5 PCF
SWELL - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
Lot 7, Highland Meadow Estates at Castle Peak Ranch
Eagle County, Colorado
Prepared for: Claus and Edie Frickie
PROJECT k0 95-0119G
r1GURE ,o 6
FOUNDATION
WALL
TOP ONE FOOT OF BACKFILL
SHOULD BE RELATIVELY
IMPERVIOUS FILL. SLOPE
AWAY FROM BUILDING.
M�RAF(l l� N OR
QUI VILANT�
POLYETHELENE Mi�E77
BARRIER GLUED WALL. MINUMUM OF 6�� OF
3/4 INCH. GRAVEL
,ETER PERFORAT .ID RIGID
PIPE SLOPED A MINIMUM OF I/g"
PER FOOT TO SEWER LATERAL SU13DRAIN
SUMP PUMP OR CAYLIGHTED.
DETAIL OF PERIPHERAL DRAIN SYSTEM
FOR FOOTING TYPE FOUNDATION
Figure : 6
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
Lot 7, Highland Meadow Estates at Castle Peak Ranch
Eagle County, Colorado
Prepared for: Claus.and Edie Fricke
August 2, 1995
(Reissue April 2, 1996)
Guy Parker
Post Office Box 1221
Vail, Colorado 81658
Re: Inspection of Septic Tank and Absorption Field
Lot 7, Highland Meadow Estates
Castle Peak Ranch
Project No. 95-0119G
Dear Guy
The undersigned visited the project site on August 1, 1995 to inspect the installation of the septic
system. The septic tank and the absorption field system were installed in substantial compliance
with the design documents.
Should you have any questions regarding the installation of the system, please do not hesitate to
contact the undersigned.
Thank you
Richard O. Ricks, i
® a
® /
.JL
MAL
77 Metcalf Road, #201 e Box 978 ® Avon, Colorado 81620 e Phone: 970-949-5072 ® From Denver Direct: 893-1531
1420 Vance Street ® Lakewood, Colorado 80215 o Phone: 303-232-0158
JOB NO�
JOB LOCATION
BILL TO
DATE STARTED
DATE COMPLETED
DATE BILLED
JOB COST SUMMARY
TOTAL SELLING PRICE
TOTAL MATERIAL
TOTAL LABOR
INSURANCE
SALES TAX
MISC. COSTS
TOTAL JOB COST
GROSS PROFIT
LESS OVERHEAD COSTS
% OF SELLINGPRICE
NET PROFIT
JOB FOLDER Product 278 ®0 NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERVICE, INC., GROTON, MA 01471 JO,1. FOLDER Printed in U.S.A.
. � :- _..
- - - - - -
��
..
t ,.
�-
.. .
-- �� _ � _
r
. - - - _
- - - - - - - - -- - s _ - _.
_- _ _. 3_ -� .:. .. - - - _
V _ _ - _ -
_.
_ - - _ -_ - _
::
— _, .. _, - _ _-z-- - - - _ _ - - -
". .-
-- - _ .. - ... f
• ..
- - -- - - -
__ ..
_. ,
_£
_.
,. .
. _.
... - -
- - - - - --
-- -• -
- -