No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 12/04/07 Present: Am Menconi Sara Fisher Peter Runyon Bruce Baumgartner Bryan Treu Robert Morris Teak Simonton Kathy Scriver PUBLIC HEARING December 4, 2007 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Manager County Attorney Deputy County Attorney Clerk to the Board Deputy Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing, the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: GENERAL FUND 3T SYSTEMS A 1 COLLECTION AGENCY ABBIE RlTTMlLLER ABBOTT LABORATORIES ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY ADVANTAGE NETWORK SYSTEMS AED EVERYWHERE AFFILIATED CREDIT SERVICE ALL PRO FORMS INC ALL VALLEY WOMENS CARE ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY ALPINE PAINTING & AMANDA BAY AMERlCAN BANK NOTE CO AMERlCAN BAR ASSOCIATION AMERlCINN LODGE & SUITES AMERlGAS AMY BERENS ANDREA R. HAIGH ANDREE KIM ANTLERS HILTON APPRAISAL OFFICE ASPEN L T ARMY & FACTORY SURPLUS ARNOLD BUTLER ARTHUR AND PERLMUTTER AT ANDT ATTORNEY REGISTRATION A V TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVON CENTER AT BEAVER CK AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS B&H SPORTS BALCOMB AND GREEN BARBARA WHITFORD BAUGHAN PRODUCTIONS INC BC SERVICES INC BEN GALLOWAY MD BEN GERDES BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 1 12/04/07 6,397.77 36.70 14.18 202.70 1,250.00 365.00 146.00 736.84 792.27 3,554.00 288.40 335.00 10.93 105.35 467.33 91.86 1,061.47 49.15 30.00 219.86 1,116.00 2,630.00 153.93 225.00 60.00 511.98 105.00 711.60 2,170.07 3,064.71 2,140.70 8,270.24 21.60 2,000.00 16.80 1,730.00 54.27 300.00 BERTHOD MOTORS BERYL BUNIGER BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS BIG STEVES TOWING BOB BARKER COMPANY BON APPETIT BONNIE EMBRY BOYD COFFEE COMPANY BRUCE BAUMGARTNER C & H DISTRIBUTORS INC C STAN HALVORSOM CA STATE DISBURSEMENT CARDINAL HEALTH CARMEN LOZOYO-VELEZ CARTER & ALTERMAN CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CATAMOUNT SPRAYING CO CATHOLIC HEALTH CATHY ZEEB CECIL LOGGIING INC CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTURYTEL CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE CHARLES B DARRAH CHARM TEX CHEMATOX INC. CHERYL THOMAS CHRISTINE L MOTT CLEVEREX SYSTEMS INC CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION CO DEPT AGRICULTURE CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND CO STATE TREASURER COFFMAN REPORTING, INC. COLORADO COMMERCIAL COLORADO JAIL ASSOCIATION COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO RIVER WATER COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COLORADO STATESMAN COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH COLUMBINE MARKET COMMSYS TECHNOLOGY CORP CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING COOKING LIGHT COpy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING CORRAL WEST RANCHWEAR CRL ASSOCIATES INC CULINARY TRANSLATIONS CWMA DALY PROPERTY SERVICES DAN CORCORAN PLS SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 918.24 13.77 897.25 145.00 918.56 26.97184.00 758.92 45.37 1,038.44 4,328.09 278.76 1,221.93 196.02 3,120.00 34.91 1,000.00 650.00 120.00 279,000.00 3,123.14 9,577.50 2,751.92 75.90 695.83 985.00 25.52 60.00 1,985.14 725.00 100.00 50.00 1,222.50 6,686.81 885.32 4,251.66 30.00 12,677.68 2,817.83 588.00 44.00 1,377.35 297.03 278.00 368.00 18.00 90.56 3,661.50 1,410.54 80.00 5,693.22 120.00 130.00 765.00 980.00 2 12/04/07 DAN STANEK DARLING BERGSTROM MILLGAN DAVID A BAUER DECATUR ELECTRONICS DENVER CHECKWRlTER, INC. DIANNA L FAHRMEYER DIGITAL SYSTEMS DISCO PRINT WHOLESALE DIXIE KOZINSKI DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP DON OLSEN DONALD J LAUGHLIN DOREEN CONSTANINE DR RICHARD DIAL DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES DUDLEY ROOD DUFFORD WALDECK & MILBURN EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COUNTY AVIATION EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE EMBROIDERY INC EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EARLINE BRONN ECO TRANSIT ECOLAB EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER EDWARDS METROPOLITAN DIST EMC2 EMPLOYERS COUNCIL SERVICE. EVA WILSON EVERETT FAMILY FUNERAL EVERYTHING FOR OFFICES FALCON ASSOCIATES INC FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FARNUM HOLT FUNERAL HOME FARRELL & SELDIN FEDERAL EXPRESS FELIPEMATA FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMER. FITTJE BROS PRINTING INC FORINASH KATHLEEN FRANK J BALL FRANKLIN COVEY FREDY ANDRADE FSH COMMUNICATIONS LLC G & S TOOL CLINIC LLC GALLS INCORPORATED GEORGIE C ZINDA REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REFUND SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 15.00 30.00 43.52 70.00 135.00 360.00 142.50 2,412.00 135.68 96.36 12.75 44.10 6.00 345.25 314.23 1,793.34 47.00 9,375.00 239.40 4,269.17 216.00 143.45 1,342.42 6,193.50 26.50 968.75 1,212.85 52.50 777.00 26.52 71.54 14,030.83 231.68 3,050.00 388.12 1,570.00 5,379.01 150.00 3,439.18 600.00 30.00 592.29 300.00 505.94 180.00 964.30 3,454.95 40.50 33.50 227.44 59.64 70.00 298.69 3,222.48 146.50 3 12/04/07 GIRSH AND ROTTMAN GLENN HAGEN ESQ GLENWOOD SPRINGS POST GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GREENBERG & ASSOCIATES GUADAGNOLI PROCESS SERVo HAWKINS & E-Z MESSENGER HAZELLE GONTER HEART OF THE WEST COUNSEL HELP DESK TECHNOLOGY HENRY SCHEIN HEWLETT PACKARD HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES HILTON FORT COLLINS HOGAN & HARTSON HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS IACREOT IMAGE BASE LLC IMPERIAL HEADWEAR, INC. INTEGRAL RECOVERIES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAP NETWORK SYSTEMS J & G TREE SERVICE JAMES PUBLISHING COMPANY JAN 0 WESTMAN JANET CONNORS JARA DIVERSIFIED SERVICES JAY HARTMAN JEFFERSON COUNTY JEFFERSON COUNTY SOCIAL JENNIFER CUEVAS JENNIFER MCCORKLE JENNY WOOD JILL HUNSAKER JOANNE CERMAK JOES W ALLBAORD & SUPPLY JONATHAN STEINER JUSTIN CLARK KARA BETTIS, CORONER KEN SEXTON KESSLER MARY J KINETICO WATER PROS KUTAK ROCK LLP KZYR-CooL RADIO LLC LAQUINTA LA QUINTA PROMENADE LAFARGE CORPORATION LASER JUNCTION LAURA HORSEY LEONA PERKINS LEWAN AND ASSOCIATES REFUND REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REFUND SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES 55.42 9.80 150.00 375.00 249.42 9.69 99.00 44.70 30.00 19.80 569.55 2,917.18 416.17 834.00 456.28 318.00 2,625.78 15,733.58 2,375.92 234.07 145.00 530.00 80.00 30.00 200.00 2,427.40 3,900.00 66.94 30.00 52.80 102.69 1,155.70 42.00 43.30 17.01 141.60 1,372.46 59.13 18.00 210.00 45.22 94.71 174.14 135.00 180.00 317.18 53.60 1,700.00 140.10 231.00 30.08 75.00 148.83 157.19 90,000.00 4 12/04/07 LEXISNEXIS COURTLINK INC LINDA MAGGIORE LORI SIEFERS LORIE CRAWFORD LUCY BARKER MAIN AUTO PARTS MAKYLA MOODY MARIA ANJIER MARION F LAUGHLIN MARKS PLUMBING PARTS MARLENE MC CAFFERTY MARYLAND CHILD SUPPORT MATTHEW BENDER AND CO INC MAURI NOTTINGHAM MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MCCOLLUM PATRICIA MEADOW MOUNTAIN PLUMBING MELISSA ZINTSMASTER MERCKATL METRO PATHOLOGISTS MICRO PLASTICS MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN MIKE KERST MOBILE VISION MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS MOUNTAIN RECYCLES MWI VETERNIARY SUPPLY CO MX LOGIC, INC NATIONAL DISTRIBUTING INC NICOLE SISNEROS NITTY GRITTY CLEANING NRC BROADCASTING, INC. NU CARE PHARMACUETICALS O'DELL&SILBURN,LLC OC TANNER OCCASIONALLY KEEGAN OHIO CHILD SUPPORT OLSON PROPERTY ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO OSM DELIVERY LLC P SCOTT LOWERY PAINT BUCKET THE PAPER DIRECT PAPER WISE PARK COUNTY SHERIFF OFF. PAT NOLAN PATHOLOGY GROUP PAULA A PALMATEER PEAK DENTISTRY PEARL TAYLOR PEGGY GRAYBEAL PETERSON DYMOND & REAGOR PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REFUND SERVICE 250.95 98.01 63.54 45.36 26.40 131.44 26.50 21.90 21.00 587.65 10.20 230.77 1,337.75 154.80 128.79 51.03 683.57 45.36 2,748.92 278.00 165.58 343.00 379.79 1,268.89 87.00 155.48 27.00 93.00 451.75 1,074.20 3,932.41 31.59 375.00 5,000.00 32.74 14.00 132.47 20,879.00 451.94 3,100.00 685.90 528.00 60.00 222.67 104.37 4,874.05 29,295.00 87.41 3,065.20 37.20 75.00 40.50 60.00 110.00 325.15 5 12/04/07 PHYLISS ROUNDS PIlNEY BOWES INCORPORATED POLICE BOBIT PUBLISHING PSS,INC PUEBLO COUNTY SHERIFF OFF PYRAMID PRINTING QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QWEST RANGER JOES INTERNATIONAL REGION 8 HSA RENEE DUBUISSON RENEE RUMVILL, DVM. RESOURCE CENTER REYNA TRUJILLO ROBERT SHELTON ROLLY ROUNDS RON GRUBER DVM ROSALIE HARRISON ROSIE MORENO ROY BUTTERMORE ROY HOWELL RSC RYAN SANDS SAN ISABEL TELECOM INC SARAH SCHIPPER SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP SCHUTZMAN COMPANY, INC. SECRETARY OF STATE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHAlNHOLTZ TODD H DDS SHAMROCK FOODS CORP SHANNON CORDINGL Y SHAREE WETTSTEIN SHERI MINTZ SIMON PROPERTY SERVICES SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SMITH EDWARD SNOWHITE LINEN SOURCE GAS SPRONK WATER ENGINEERS STATE OF FLORIDA STEPHANIE GLENWRIGHT STERICYCLE INC STEVE JOHNSON SUPPORT PAYMENT SUREFIRE LLC SUSPENSE FUND SYDNEY PITTMAN TAMMI MATTHEWS TCC CONTRACTORS TEAK SIMONTON TEMPLE GLASSIER THE BROWN PALACE THE FLOWER CART THE GALLERY COLLECTION REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 21.00 102.97 84.00 1,949.02 95.00 797.00 568.27 7,477.89 755.65 67.50 168.89 3,600.00 13,600.00 200.07 30.00 90.00 10.00 21.00 170.10 15.00 3,225.00 1,102.99 26.33 117.42 348.71 1,804.20 333.26 10.00 2,991.00 1,058.00 6,086.69 219.11 78.73 273.47 1,135.00 993.37 199.00 96.06 537.42 2,512.53 1,003.68 86.40 1,869.73 410.50 363.00 114.47 279,107.74 5.40 93.96 9,544.00 74.35 8,590.00 616.00 71.50 507.38 6 12/04/07 THE NORMANDY GROUP LLC THE OLD GYPSUM PRINTER THE VETERAN JOURNAL INC THOMAS F FARRELL THOMSON WEST GROUP TIM DOOLEY TIMBERWOLF INDUSTRIES TM SERVICE COMPANY TODD BONATTI TOP AR TRAILER SALES INC TOWN OF DEER TRAIL TOWN OF EAGLE TRANE COMPANY TRANSOFT SOLUTIONS, INC. TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED RENTALS UNITED SITE SERVICES INC UNITED WAY OF EAGLE UNIVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC URBAN LAND INSTITUTE US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS US FooDSERVICE INC VAG INCORPORATED VAlL BOARD OF REALTORS VAIL DAILY THE VAIL ELECTRONICS VAIL HONEYW AGON LID VAIL LOCK AND KEY VAIL MOUNTAIN COFFEE VAIL MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROU VAIL NET VAIL POLICE DEPARTMENT VAIL RESORTS INC VAIL SIGN CORPORATION VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VALLEY LUMBER VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY VERIFICATIONS INC VERlZON WIRELESS, VISA CARD SERVICES WALL STREET JOURNAL W ALZ POSTAL SOLUTIONS INC WASTE MANAGEMENT WEATHERSURE SYSTEMS INC WECMRD WELLS FARGO WEST BROWN HUNTLEY WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES WESTERN TIMBER MANAGEMENT WILLIAM G HORLBECK PC WILLITS GENERAL STORE WINZENBURG,LEFF,PURVIS WOLPOFF AND ABRAMSON SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND 15,177.74 150.58 295.00 68.12 3,273.81 249.77 36,260.00 6,904.06 144.50 3,995.00 9.10 3,546.03 3,199.55 320.00 3,505.00 328.81 377.84 163.20 20.00 129.00 350.00 33,030.66 7,318.00 466.20 25.00 8,966.65 1,053.00 48.32 95.10 40.50 356.92 11.95 9,059.00 34,760.00 79.50 15,389.09 204.35 180.00 157.50 370.70 3,988.55 93,845.37 99.00 168.36 1,573.56 4,675.00 12,382.07 556,443.35 6.30 408.32 30,750.00 7,316.95 92.00 30.00 54.40 7 12/04/07 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY WYNTTAYLOR XCEL ENERGY XEROX CORPORATION Y AMP A VALLEY ELECTRIC YOUR PERSONAL CHEF ZOBEYDA ARGELIA REYES NOVEMBER 2007 PAYROLL SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL 23 & 24 1,341.00 28.00 32.80 161.14 7,663.34 131.59 320.00 200.00 1,300,276.76 3,254,477.11 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND BAND B EXCAVATING B&H SPORTS BIG R MANUFACTURING BRATTON ENTERPRISE, INC. COPY PLUS CORRAL WEST RANCHWEAR COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO ENVIROTECH FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG GMCO CORPORATION GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND IDEAL FENCING CORP IMPERIAL HEADWEAR, INC. INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY J&S CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO JOSEPH CHACON JP TRUCKING, INC. LAFARGE CORPORATION LONCO INC M&MAUTOPARTS MCCARTHY INDUSTRIES MOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE NAPA AUTO PARTS-CARBONDLE OLSON PROPERTY Pf\pER WISE PAVEMENT REPAIR SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION SOPRIS ARCHITECTURE TOWN OF GYPSUM US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS VAIL DAILY THE VALLEY LUMBER VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WECMRD WESTERN SLOPE AGGREGATE WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 229.80 3,759.25 320.00 992.70 48.87 2,267.63 865.88 3.87 171.00 17,392.05 25,002.77 57,082.37 4,560.94 281.52 4,198.41 1,581.67 1,774.92 1,448.00 2,600.00 34,480.33 1,237.15 6,533.75 4.48 4,980.00 2,374.44 68.75 3,146.75 46.14 999.50 164.40 10,562.00 360.34 1,089.84 32.56 165.12 80.00 60.43 194.85 1,225.00 367.67 46.45 797.09 592.51 8 12/04/07 Y AMP A V ALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICE 135.23 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 51.92 NOVEMBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 23 &24 109,028.82 303,407.17 EARLY CHILDHOOD FUND BLUE LAKE PRESCHOOL SERVICE 15,000.00 CAMP CHIP-A- TOOTH SERVICE 1,000.00 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY SERVICE 687.00 EAGLE V ALLEY CHILD CARE SERVICE 27,500.00 FORINASH KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 150.00 KRlS SNA YD REIMBURSEMENT 15.98 MARIA ELIZALDE REIMBURSEMENT 40.50 PRATER LANE SERVICE 23,000.00 V AIL RECREATION DISTRICT SERVICE 17,500.00 VERlZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 29.98 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 666.24 85,589.70 HEALTHY BABIES NOVEMBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 23 &24 9,760.28 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND AIDAN FLEMING REIMBURSEMENT 278.80 AMERICAN PUBLIC HUMAN SERVICE 149.00 ANGELICA DUQUE REIMBURSEMENT 421.20 CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, MA SERVICE 75.00 CENTURYTEL SERVICE 96.85 CHARLENE WHITNEY REIMBURSEMENT 303.90 CO WEST MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE 150.00 COLORADO COUNTIES INC SERVICE 1,005.00 COMMERCIAL SPECIALISTS SERVICE 300.00 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 433.90 COWBOY CATERING SERVICE 115.50 CYNTHIA AGUILAR REIMBURSEMENT 71.28 DARLENE MONTANO REIMBURSEMENT 98.01 DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP SERVICE 79.00 DOREEN CONSTANINE REIMBURSEMENT 80.19 EAGLE CONVENIENCE STORE SUPPLIES 99.99 EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF SERVICE 37.00 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER SERVICE 957.95 EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SERVICE 2,000.00 EAGLE RIVER YOUTH COAL. SERVICE 2,000.00 EAGLE V ALLEY PRINTING SERVICE 145.00 EARLY CHILDHOOD PARTNERS SERVICE 19,826.75 FLORIDA MICRO SERVICE 354.00 FORINASH KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 15.39 GARFIELD CO DEPT sac SERV SERVICE 5,197.00 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 360.88 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS SERVICE 238.95 INVEST IN KIDS SERVICE 4,633.16 ISABEL SANCHEZ REIMBURSEMENT 141.19 JOHN FAY REIMBURSEMENT 103.87 KRlSTIE WILLIAMSON REIMBURSEMENT 403.66 KYLE MCINTYRE REIMBURSEMENT 34.59 9 12/04/07 AT AND T SERVICE 208.04 AUDRA MEYERS REIMBURSEMENT 34.02 BEAVER CREEK RESORT CO SUPPLIES 1,500.00 BRIAN NOBLE SERVICE 40.00 BUFFALO RIDGE AFFORDABLE SERVICE 7,615.00 CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING SUPPLIES 670.82 COLLETTS SUPPLIES 2,762.84 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 417.69 COLORADO PRINTING COMPANY SERVICE 5,356.70 COLUMBINE MARKET SUPPLIES 3.98 COpy COPY SERVICE 1,031.25 CORNERSTONE MASONRY SERVICE 13,900.00 COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICE 1,298.82 DOCTORS ON CALL SERVICE 812.00 DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES 6,902.25 EAGLE V ALLEY PRINTING SERVICE 175.00 ERMOLD PARK RECREATION SUPPLIES 714.00 FLORIDA MICRO SUPPLIES 454.00 G H DANIELS III & ASSOC SERVICE 2,972.08 GFI GENF ARE SERVICE 1,000.00 GILLIG CORPORATION SUPPLIES 3,984.57 GLENWooD SPRINGS FORD SUPPLIES 151.69 JANET FIELD REIMBURSEMENT 73.70 JAY MAX SALES SUPPLIES 653.79 KATINA RENZELMAN REIMBURSEMENT 95.36 KSKE-NRC BROADCASTING SERVICE 500.00 KTUN-FM RADIO SERVICE 500.00 KW CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 2,200.00 KZYR-CooL RADIO LLC SERVICE 333.00 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE 16.25 LINESCAPE STRIPING SERV SERVICE 961.92 M&MAUTOPARTS SUPPLIES 63.00 MAIN AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 29.34 MILLENNIUM TOWING SERVICE 550.00 MTECH SERVICE 1,626.04 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL SERVICE 315.00 NEW DIMENSION CLEANING SERVICE 987.60 NEW PIG CORPORATION SUPPLIES 340.17 OLSON PROPERTY SERVICE 513.86 PAPER WISE SUPPLIES 161.57 PST ENTERPRISES INC SUPPLIES 1,629.02 QWEST SERVICE 163.17 REGAL PIEDMONT PLASTICS SERVICE 1,964.06 RID SERVICE 150.00 STEWART TITLE SERVICE 143,000.00 - TIM MlNAROVICH SUPPLIES 65.79 TOWN OF AVON SERVICE 1,455.84 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 1,261.85 UNITED STATES WELDING SERVICE 29.60 US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS SERVICE 3,816.42 V ALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 18.45 VERlZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 164.34 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 6,214.54 WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 435.96 WESTERN SLOPE BAR SUPPLIES 17.60 11 12/04/07 41 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 49.44 XCEL ENERGY SERVICE 96.27 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 572.63 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 94.89 NOVEMBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 23 &24 253,039.14 485,450.26 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY SUPPLIES 41.76 BAND B EXCAVATING SUPPLIES 68,411.93 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 1,015.86 COLUMBINE MARKET SUPPLIES 75.79 COPY PLUS SERVICE 33.82 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 113.97 CRUZ CONSTRUCTION INC SERVICE 1,260.00 ELLIE CARYL REIMBURSEMENT 138.67 IMBA SERVICE 30.00 IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SUPPLIES 961.40 PAINT BUCKET THE SUPPLIES 219.68 SEEDING THE ROCKIES INC SERVICE 8,750.00 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO SERVICE 6,127.74 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 1,669.35 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 103.00 88,952.97 TRANSPORTA. VEmCLE RPLCMT GILLIG CORPORATION SUPPLIES 1,823,815.00 AIRPORT FUND A&ETIREINC SUPPLIES 440.00 AFFORDABLE FIRE SERVICE 3,987.00 AIRCRAFT RESCUE SERVICE 195.00 ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY SERVICE 533.36 ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC SERVICE 33.05 AMERICAN AIRLINES SERVICE 12,000.00 AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT SERVICE 1,050.00 ASPEN PEAK MAGAZINE LLC SERVICE 6,000.00 ASPHALT SPECIALIST AND SERVICE 436.05 BALCOMB AND GREEN SERVICE 96.50 CARTER & BURGESS, INC . SERVICE 80,208.76 CHARLES PATTERSON REIMBURSEMENT 320.76 CHlEFSUPPLY SUPPLIES 92.95 COLLETTS SUPPLIES 3,821.38 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 4,093.37 COOPER CROUSE HINDS SERVICE 1,244.38 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 12.90 COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICE 1,010.19 DISH NETWORK SERVICE 57.99 DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES 142.44 ECMS INCORPORATED SUPPLIES 382.11 ELIZABETH WILT REIMBURSEMENT 18.63 EVERYTHING FOR OFFICES SUPPLIES 9,800.00 GRAINGER INCORPORATED SUPPLIES 644.19 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SUPPLIES 2,145.71 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,719.28 12 12/04/07 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS SUPPLIES 197.63 JJ KELLER AND ASSOCIATES SERVICE 387.99 KELLEY TRUCKING INC SERVICE 726,565.32 KZYR-CooL RADIO LLC SERVICE 200.00 L.N. CURTIS & SONS SUPPLIES 223.96 LEffiOWITZ & HORTON SERVICE 11,475.00 MARK LANG REIMBURSEMENT 247.05 MCNEILUS TRUCK AND SUPPLIES 398.66 METEORLOGIX SERVICE 477.00 MIKE KELLY REIMBURSEMENT 80.00 NEXTEL SERVICE 667.38 NOBLE WELDING SERVICE 378.00 ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO SERVICE 1,416.15 OROGRAPHIC ENTERPRISES SERVICE 2,500.00 PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING SUPPLIES 50.00 PINYON MESA AUTOMATICS SUPPLIES 4,796.52 ROBERN RUSS REIMBURSEMENT 90.31 SAFETY VISION LP SUPPLIES 3,028.63 SERVICE MASTER 24/7 SERVICE 4,086.50 SUMMITEX, LLC SUPPLIES 234.44 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 455.05 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE SERVICE 17.23 V AIL ELECTRONICS SERVICE 187.50 VAIL HONEYWAGON LID SERVICE 50.00 VAIL VALLEY PARTNERSHIP SERVICE 324.99 V ALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 4.65 VERlZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 48.69 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 21,301.19 WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 533.00 WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 446.69 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 781.17 XEROX CORPORATION SUPPLIES 275.93 NOVEMBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 23 & 24 93,487.10 1,005,899.73 800 MHZ FUND CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE SERVICE 94.58 EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER SERVICE 1,759.73 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 3,669.90 MCI WORLDCOM SERVICE 3,254.84 MOTOROLA SERVICE 381,983.00 QWEST SERVICE 1,743.60 392,505.65 JMC-COP DEBT SERVICE FUND US BANK TRUSTNA SERVICE 1,016,651.88 HOUSING FUND AVID ONLINE DESIGNS SERVICE 30.50 CENTURYTEL SERVICE 494.81 FUNDING PARTNERS FOR SERVICE 74.68 KATRINA COOPER REIMBURSEMENT 96.80 KIM BELL WILLIAMS REIMBURSEMENT 65.00 VAIL DAILY THE SERVICE 155.50 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 2,208.78 13 12/04/07 NOVEMBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 23 &24 5,601.00 8,727.07 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND ASSOCIATED BAG COMPANY SUPPLIES 500.32 . DMSION OF FIRE SAFETY SERVICE 20.00 GRAINGER INCORPORATED SUPPLIES 811.15 L.N. CURTIS & SONS SUPPLIES 488.06 REIS ENVIRONMENTAL INC SUPPLIES 1,481.98 TTCI SERVICE 9,540.00 V ALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 580.66 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 683.27 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 491.78 14,597.22 OPEN SPACE FUND AMERICAN CIVIL CONSTRUCTR SERVICE 110,035.34 EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER SUPPLIES 61.27 RSC SUPPLIES 87.00 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 175.62 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 771.20 111,130.43 LANDFILL FUND ACZ LABORATORY INC SERVICE 2,178.00 AMERIGAS SERVICE 1,635.60 B&H SPORTS SUPPLIES 1,668.10 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 315.02 COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICE 1,298.81 EAGLE V ALLEY ALLIANCE SERVICE 50,000.00 FEDERAL EXPRESS SERVICE 4.96 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SUPPLIES 764.14 GREAT AMERICAN LEASING SERVICE 101.21 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 557.54 KRW CONSULTING INC SERVICE 4,650.81 POWER MOTIVE SERVICE 5,212.56 TUSCA II, INC SERVICE 40,500.00 US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS SERVICE 1,215.00 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 214.63 WESTERN SLOPE BAR SUPPLIES 61.95 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 2,371.92 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 20.00 NOVEMBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 23 & 24 36,309.74 149,079.99 MOTOR POOL FUND AIDAN FLEMING REIMBURSEMENT 45.49 A1RGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC SERVICE 43.61 AUTO GLASS SPECIALISTS SERVICE 424.00 BURT CHEVROLET, INC SERVICE 366.33 BURT FORD ON ARAPAHOE INC SUPPLIES 73.18 BURT-OODGE,CHRYSLER,JEEP SERVICE 321.75 COLLETTS SUPPLIES 123,381.78 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 138.84 COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICE 1,443.13 14 12/04/07 DIXIE KOZINSKI DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE EMBROIDERY INC FARIS MACHINERY CO GLENWOOD NATIONAL GLENWOOD SPRINGS CHRYSLER GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE HENSLEY BATTERY JAY MAX SALES JOHN FAY M&MAUTOPARTS MEEGAN MOORE NOVUS AUTOGLASS OLSON PROPERTY PAPER WISE POWER EQUIPMENT COMPANY PREMIER TIRE TERMINAL PST ENTERPRISES INC TIMBERLINE STEEL TOWN OF GYPSUM US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS VISA CARD SERVICES WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY WASTE MANAGEMENT WESTERN COLORADO WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES WHITEHALL'S ALPINE XEROX CORPORATION NOVEMBER 2007 PAYROLL REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL 23 & 24 23.25 86.92 42.50 182.37 3,017.38 71.96 5,922.44 1,175.20 2,238.55 12.99 1,709.50 36.51 582.00 379.39 119.29 198.29 2,959.06 606.61 35.92 931.63 2,817.72 717.18 5,213.49 117.54 255.29 146.50 33.14 100.68 64,446.16 220,417.57 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND AFLAC ATTN:RPS MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. MUTUAL OF OMAHA SUSPENSE FUND THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE UNITED STATES LIFE INS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 3,174.84 53,465.30 3,991.18 126.98 4,799.96 29.00 65,587.26 ENHANCED E911 FUND CENTURYTEL LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES NOMAD TECHNOLOGIES QWEST SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 534.72 850.98 1,700.00 4,657.44 7,743.14 TOTAL 9.448.096.39 Executive Session It was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed to go into Executive Session for the purpose of receiving legal advice on (1) ballooning operations at Freedom Park; (2) sidewalk matters in private subdivisions; (3) foreclosures at Miller Ranch; and (4) Lafarge fairgrounds lease all of which are appropriate topics for discussion pursuant to C.R.S. 24-6-402( 4Xb) Colorado Revised Statutes. 15 12/04/07 It was moved, seconded, and unanimously agreed to adjourn from Executive Session. Resolution 2007-119 Recognizing United Way of Eagle River Valley Sheri Mintz, Eagle County Adult Services Manager Commissioner Runyon read the resolution for the record. The United Way has put more than $1,000,000 back into our community since its inception in 1998. In 2007 the United Way created "Stronger Together" grants. The board declared the organization to be a valuable community asset. Commissioner Runyon moved to approve Resolution 2007-119 Recognizing United Way of Eagle River Valley. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Ms. Mintz spoke to the board and thanked them. In 2008 the organization will celebrate their 10th anniversary and w:e a wonderful partner to Eagle County. Laura Ciapetta, Chairman of the organization spoke. She stated that they are happy to have supported the community with over $1,000,000. Their board is 14 people; all volunteers and they employ one part time paid administrative assistant. Commissioner Fisher thanked them for their presence in the community and their hard work. Chairman Menconi spoke about the growth of the organization and the fact that he was on the fIrst board in 1998. Ms. Ciapetta stated that they are hoping to encourage payroll deductions with matching dollars from the county towards donations to this organization. They believe the county's cooperation is critical to their success and strength. She offered to help educate county employees. Colorado Department of Revenue alternative fuel tax rebate for Toyota Prius purchase Gusty Kanakis, Motor Pool Chairman Menconi commended Mr. Kanakis for finding this rebate. Commissioner Fisher stated that the hybrids make up half of the county fleet and have been getting approximately 60 miles per gallon. To date the county has saved more than $45,000 in fuel costs. Based on expected life of these vehicles fuel savings will be approximately half of regular vehicles. She thanked Gusty Kanakis for looking into this rebate. Commissioner Runyon also thanked Mr. Kanakis. The entire economy in Eagle County is based on the environment. The board knew that these vehicles would cost approximately $3000 more per vehicle, and the beauty of the grant is that it basically paid this additional cost back. Bruce Baumgartner congratulated Mr. Kanakis and shared that this represents an example of positive cultural change to the county operation. The environment and cost effectiveness are stated goals and staff is encouraged to take initiative and deliver on these goals. The goal is to have 500 employees thinking about these goals every day. Chairman Menconi stated that the savings between these vehicles and the standard vehicles will be4approximately $120,000 not to mention the savings on our carbon footprint. He wondered ifmore cars would be replaced in 2008. Mr. Kanakis stated that this was not likely for 2008, but more likely for 2009. He felt that our timing was perfect with the cost of oil. 16 12/04/07 Consent Agenda Chairman Menconi stated the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of bill paying for the week of December 3, 2007 (subject to review by the Finance Director) Finance Department Representative B. Approval of payroll for December 6, 2007 (subject to review by the P'inance Director) Finance Department Representative c. Approval of the minutes of the Eagle County Board of Commissioners meetings for October 23 and October 30, 2007 Teak Simonton, Clerk & Recorder D. Resolution 2007-120 Establishing regular public meeting days for the Eagle County Board of Commissioners for fiscal year 2008 and establishing days and office hours for county offices to transact county business for fiscal year 2008 and designating legal holidays for fiscal year 2008 and establishing the bi-weekly payroll schedule for 2008 County Attorney's Office Representative E. Agreement between Eagle County and the Family Learning Center for infant - toddler quality and affordability Kate Forinash, Health & Human Services F. Agreement between Eagle County and Blue Lake Preschool for infant - toddler quality and affordability Kate Forinash, Health & Human Services G. Agreement between Eagle County and Blue Lake Preschool for Child Care Center facility improvement Kate Forinash, Health & Human Services H. Agreement between Eagle County and Eagle Valley Child Care Association for infant - toddler quality and affordability Kate Forinash, Health & Human Services I. Addendum to the Agreement between Eagle County and the Eagle Valley Child Care Association to extend period for modifications to outdoor playground Kate Forinash, Health & Human Services J. Agreement between Eagle County and Vail Recreation District for after school care quality and affordability Kate Forinash, Health & Human Services K. Agreement between Eagle County and Camp Chip-a- Tooth for after school care quality and affordability Kate Forinash, Health & Human Services L. Agreement between Eagle County and Mary Ezequelle to provide mental health and family parenting services Kate Forinash, Health & Human Services M. Task Order between Eagle County and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment for the Public Health Family Planning Program Kate Forinash, Health & Human Services N. Edwards Annex Lease Agreement between Eagle County and Eagle River Water and Sanitation District Kate Forinash, Health & Human Services 17 12/04/07 o. Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO) Grant Documentation for Funds Disbursement Freedom Spray Park Valerie Hays, Facilities Management P. Master Professional Services Agreement between Eagle County and CH2M Hill IT Department Representative Q. Resolution 2007-121 Authorizing Kathleen M. Lyons to execute child care fiscal agreements on behalf of Eagle County; and Marian McDonough to execute child placement agreements on behalf of Eagle County County Attorney's Office Representative R. Final Settlement of Agreement between Eagle County and Elam Construction County Attorney's Office Representative s. Resolution 2007-122 Authorizing Final Release of Collateral and Termination of the Warranty Period for Brett Ranch PUD Tract F Cattail Flats. File No. ZS-OO 121 County Attorney's Office Representative T. Lease Agreement between Eagle County and WSR Rental, DBA National Car Rental and Alamo Rent A Car for parking and storing of overflow rental motor vehicles County Attorney's Office Representative u. Lease Agreement between Eagle County and Frontier Rental for parking and storing of overflow rental motor vehicles County Attorney's Office Representative V. Lease Agreement between Eagle County and Hertz Corporation for parking and storing of rental motor vehicles County Attorney's Office Representative W. Lease Agreement between Eagle County and Avis Budget Car Rental for parking and storage of overflow rental motor vehicles County Attorney's Office Representative x. Lease Agreement between Eagle County and WSF-PTS, LLC, DBA Worldwide Flight Services ground lease for storage of two trailers for use as office, storage and break room space for employees County Attorney's Office Representative Y. Resolution 2007-123 Approving Amendments to and Restatement of the Eagle County Regional Airport Rules and Regulations for Commercial Ground Transportation County Attorney's Office Representative z. Resolution 2007-124 Adopting Eagle County Regional Airport aircraft deicing rules and regulations County Attorney's Office Representative AA. Resolutions 2007-125 Authorizing Harry Taylor to serve as signatory for closing of real property located in Leadville, Colorado, to be purchased by Eagle County for the purposes of constructing a "bus barn" facility County Attorney's Office Representative BB. Receipt of proposed Service Plan for the Ruedi Shores Metropolitan District and referral of same to the Roaring Fork Planning Commission for consideration at its December 20, 2007 scheduled meeting County Attorney's Office Representative cc. Town of Eagle, Colorado Extraterritorial Water Service and Wastewater Collection and Treatment Service Agreement 18 12/04/07 County Attorney's Office Representative DD. Colorado Department of Transportation Memorandum of Agreement for land for airport interchange County Attorney's Office Representative EE. Resolution 2007-126 Concerning Appointments to the Citizens' Open Space Advisory Committee Lisa de Graaf, Community Development FF. Resolution 2007-127 Matter of Amending the Eagle County Land Use Regulations to create a new section 5-295 in Article 5, Chapter II, entitled "Conservation Subdivision" and to make other related amendments to portions of Chapter II, including Article 2, Zone Districts; Article 5, Administration; and Article 6, Nonconformities (Eagle County File No. LUR-0073) Joe Forinash, Community Development GG. Resolution 2007-128 Matter of Amending the Eagle County Land Use Regulations to Update the Floodplain Overlay Zone District to recognize revised floodplain mapping Greg Schroeder, Engineering Chairman Menconi asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Bryan Treu, County Attorney stated that there were no changes or revisions. Commissioner Fisher thanked Valene Hays for her efforts with the Freedom Park spray park. Great Outdoors Colorado has contributed to the project. Commissioner Fisher moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items A-GG. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Citizen Input Lone Russell from Eagle spoke to the board. She is trying to garner support for the River Park. Right along the fairgrounds strip near the visitor center is a perfect area for this type of park. She believes that the rafting community, fishing and kayaking community would benefit from this type of park. This area is slated for a recreational corridor. She would like a whitewater park. The last time she presented this idea there were some horrendous figures for completion. She indicated that the Town of Reno spent $20 million dollars, but they recouped this cost in the first five years. She feels that with a small budget it could be cleaned up and made into a beautiful entry point for the county. Communities which have done this type of project have seen incredible returns on their investment due to increased sales tax dollars. Chairman Menconi informed Ms. Russell that there were some hurdles for this proposal. The board has looked into this possibility, but there are some property ownership issues which have not been possible to overcome. A water park would be an encroachment. The board learned that part of the property is owned by another partnership. In order to create a water park, and there is a high interest on the part of the board to do so, it's more of an access issue. Finally, going forward, the board has had conversations with the facilities director about possibilities prior to next spring's runoff. He suggested that Ms. Russell meet with Tom Johnson to discuss the property ownership issues. Ms. Russell stated that the county could improve the ditch and make it safe in terms of the drop structure. Commissioner Fisher thanked her for coming in. She is interested in enhancing the entire fairgrounds area as well. Next summer they intend to make some positive changes to the truck parking area and continue to work on the other property ownership issues. Ms. Russell spoke about assisted living care facilities. She owns a piece of property in Gypsum. The property is just to the west oftheTown of Gypsum and would lend itself to a low density assisted living center. She wants to investigate a potential partnership to create this type of facility. Commissioner Fisher suggested an initial conversation with Tom Johnson and Alex Potente about this possibility. 19 12/04/07 Commissioner Runyon added that the board shares Ms. Russell's concern for that part of the river. This park is not off the board's radar screen. Chairman Menconi spoke about the history of Ms. Russell's request. The fairground focus has changed to open space emphasis. He told Ms. Russell that she has made a difference. He asked her to remain the squeaky wheel and work with Tom Johnson to make this area a bit safer sooner than later. He thanked her for her consistent efforts at getting a lot of work done. Commissioner Runyon expressed concern that the correction to the ditch made the area more dangerous. Planning Files L UR-0056 Landscape Irrie:ation Standards Bob Narracci, Planning Department NOTE: Tabled from 11120/07. To be tabled until 12/11/07 ACTION: The purpose of this amendment of the Eagle County Land Use Regulation is to encourage water conservation in landscaping. LOCATION: N/A Commissioner Fisher moved to table File No. LUR-0056, Landscape Irrigation Standards until December 11,2007. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. ZS-00161 Eae:le Countv Emere:encv Services Telecommunications Facility Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Planning Department NOTE: Tabled from 11120/07 ACTION: The purpose of this Special Use Permit is to co-locate Eagle County Emergency services radio telecommunications at the previously approved Union Pacific Railroad telecommunications facility located up the Colorado River Road. The additional equipment shall consist of equipment pad/shelter as well as antennas/microwave dish/radio equipment on the existing tower. LOCATION: Union Pacific Communications Tower located in SE y.. SE y.. of Section 21, Township 4S, Range 86 W; on BLM Land near Dotsero ZS-OOI61 / Special Use Permit Eagle County Emergency Management at the Union Pacific "Blowout" Telecommunications Facility In between Dotsero and Gypsum Section 21, T4S, R86W BLM (Land); Union Pacific- Telecom Site Eagle County Government Barry Smith, EC Emergency Management FILE NO./PROCESS: PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 20 12/04/07 A. SUMMARY: The applicant desires to install, operate, and maintain new, Low Power Telecommunications equipment on the existing Union Pacific "Blowout" towerlTelecommunication Facility, on BLM lands. Emergency Management proposes to install additional equipment for public safety radio communications. The existing facility was originally approved in 2002 and permitted Union Pacific to construct a tower (with a maximum height of 110') to be used for communication and signaling along its tracks up the Colorado River Road. Originally using solar energy, electricity will be established for the site. According to the applicant, these telecommunication improvements are necessary in this area in order to fill gaps in public safety radio communications up the Colorado River Road and along the western 1-70 corridor. This Special Use Permit will supersede the original Special Use Permit approved in 2002 (ZS-00097). Typically, Special Use Permits are valid for three (3) years before use implementation. With the onset of the approved use, Special Use Permits remain valid for perpetuity thereafter; unless an expiration date or exception has been placed upon the permit by the Board of County Commissioners. The previous Special Use Permit did not include a conditional expiration date. B. SITE DATA: South: East: BLM / Unplatted BLM / Unplatted BLM / Unplatted Resource Resource ROW: Colorado River Road Telecommunications Facility Special Use Permit Remote location on BLM lands containing significant sized trees. 3,500 sq ft (facility area) N/A N/A N/A N/A 21 12/04/07 Via access road through BLM from Gypsum C. CHRONOLOGYIBACKGROUND: · 2002- Union Pacific receives approval for a height Variance in order to build a 110' tall Telecommunication Facility . 2002- Union Pacific receives a Special Use Permit for the Telecommunication Facility. D. PLANNING COMMISSION DELmERATION SUMMARY & MOTION: The Eagle County Planning Commission carefully considered this application on November 7th, 2007. The main topic of discussion during the hearing pertained to the elimination of solar panels as electricity is being brought in from Holy Cross. Discussion: The Planning Commission had no objection to the nature of the "amended" Special Use Permit to allow for the co-location of Eagle County Emergency Services public safety telecommunications equipment on the existing UPR site; however, some of the Commission was concerned about the loss of an alternative energy source (solar panels). It was explained by Barry Smith, Emergency Management Coordinator that the BLM was in support of the modification, including the elimination of the panels due to the glare that they are currently causing (which can be seen along the nearby transportation routes). In addition, Holy Cross has obtained necessary approvals from the BLM for the power line, and has undergone major environmental studies as part of the approval to ensure there would be nominal impact to bring in electricity. It was also explained that the power generation needs are too great for current solar technologies; it would require a multitude of additional panels to satisfy the needs for this facility. Ultimately, the Planning Commission approved the application with staff conditions. Motion to approve with conditions was unanimous [4:0] 2. STAFF REPORT A. NECESSARY FINDINGS: PROCESS INTENT ECLUR Section: 5-250 Special Use Permits Section Purpose: Special Uses are those uses that are not necessarily compatible with the other uses allowed in a zone district, but which may be determined compatible with the other uses allowed in the zone district based upon individual review of their location, design, configuration, density and intensity of use, and the imposition of appropriate conditions to ensure the compatibility of the use at a particular location with surrounding land uses. All Special Uses shall meet the standards set forth in this Section. Standards: Section 5-250.B. The issuance of a Special Use Permit shall be dependent upon fmdings that there is competent evidence that the proposed use as conditioned, fully complies with all the standards of this Section, this Division, this Article, and these Land Use Regulations. The Planning Commission may recommend and the Board of County Commissioners may attach any conditions deemed appropriate to ensure compliance with the following standards, including conformity to a specific site plan, requirements to improve public facilities necessary to serve the Special Use, and limitations on the operating characteristics of the use, or the location or duration of the Special Use Permit 22 12/04/07 STANDARD: Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-250.B.l] The proposed Special Use shall be appropriate for its proposed location and be consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the FLUM of the Comprehensive Plan, including standards for building and structural intensities and densities, and intensities of use. EAGLE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN x x x x x x x Public Lands x x The Comprehensive Plan encourages co-location of telecommunication facilities. EAGLE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PLAN x x x x x x X The Eagle County Open Space Plan contains a mix of concerns and policies, used to guide development in Eagle County. This particular area of the County is not within an area of unique character. Telecommunications facilities, as a specific use, are not discussed as part of this plan. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS 23 12/04/07 STANDARD: Compatibility. [Section 5-250.B.2] The proposed Special Use shall be appropriatefor its proposed location and compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. BLM/Unplatted South: BLM/Unplatted Resource East: BLM/Unplatted Resource West: BLM/Unplatted Resource ROW: Colorado X River Rd This land use is appropriate for a telecommunications facility and is compatible with surrounding zoning and existing uses. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Zone District Standards. [Section 5-250.B.3] The proposed Special Use shall comply with the standards of the zone district in which it is located and any standards applicable to the particular use, as identified in Section 3-310, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Residential. AfJricultural and Resource Uses and Section 3-330, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Commercial and Industrial Uses. The "expanded" Telecommunication Facility is located in the Resource zone district. There are no specific standards for these types of uses found in Section 3-310. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Design Minimizes Adverse Impact. [Section 5-250.B.4] The design of the proposed Special Use shall minimize adverse impacts, including visual impact of the proposed use on adjacent lands; furthermore, the proposed Special Use shall avoid significant adverse impact on surrounding lands regarding trash, traffic, service delivery, parking and loading, odors, noise, glare, and vibration, and shall not create a nuisance. This particular telecommunications structure is presently sufficient to accommodate a co-location. At this time, Eagle County will be placing two (2) microwave dishes on the tower, and installing a 120 sq ft equipment shelter to house radio equipment; a propane generator will also be installed as a back-up power supply. A condition has been created requiring only an administrative review for any further installations/alterations to the facility. This facility will not emit any significant odors, noise, glare or vibrations. 24 12/04/07 ~ EXCEEDS MlNIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MlNIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MlNIMUM STANDARDS DOESNOTMEETMlNIMUMSTANDARDS STANDARD: Design Minimizes Environmental Impact. [Section 5-250.B.5] The proposed Special Use shall minimize environmental impacts and shall not cause significant deterioration of water and air resources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources, and other natural resources. This facility shall not emit any significant odors, noise, glare or vibrations. Due to the tower location, visual impacts are minimal, as it can only be seen from more remote locations, predominantly along the train tracks along the Colorado River Road. The impacts with the addition of a second user are nominal. In order to bring in electricity to the site, Holy Cross Electric underwent a major environmental impact study to ensure that wildlife habitat would not be affected with the installation of power poles/lines. Their application was subsequently approved by BLM. ~ EXCEEDS MlNIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MlNIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MlNIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Impact on Public Facilities. [Section 5-250.B.6] The proposed Special Use shall be adequately served by public facilities and services, including roads, pedestrian paths, potable water and wastewater facilities, parks, schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. 25 12/04/07 The proposed facility is not staffed. Power is currently available at this site. The existing road/trail used to access the site is adequate, as traffic to this facility is minimal. This installation shall greatly enhance emergency radio services along the Colorado River Road, 1-70 and Gypsum Creek. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Site Development Standards. [Section 5-250.B.7J The proposed Special Use shall comply with the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site Development Standards. X X Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1) Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2) X Sign Regulations (Division 4-3) Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410) Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420) Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430) X Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450) Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460) X Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5) X Noise and Vibration (Section 4-520) X Smoke and Particulates (Section 4-530) X Heat, Glare, Radiation and Electrical Interference (Section 4-540) X Storage of Hazardous and Non-hazardous Materials (Section 4-550) X Water Quality Standards (Section 4-560) 26 12/04/07 6 X X X X X 7 X Roadway Standards (Section 4-620) X Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630) X Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640) X Drainage Standards (Section 4-650) X Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660) X Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670) 6 X Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680) X Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690) X Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7) ARE NOT APPLICABLE ~ EXCEEDS MINlMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINlMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Other Provisions. [Section 5-250.B.8] The proposed Special Use shall comply with all standards imposed on it by all other applicable provisions of these Land Use Regulations for use, layout, and general development characteristics. ~ EXCEEDS MINlMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINlMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINlMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS B. REFERRAL RESPONSES: Additional Refe"al Agencies - This proposal was refe"ed to the following agencies with no response received as of this writing: · Eagle County: Attorney's Office; Assessor; Engineering; Environmental Health; Sheriff's Office . Bureau of Land Management . Ambulance and applicable fire district C. SUMMARY ANALYSIS: Benefits/Disadvantages. There are not many disadvantages to this file. Benefits: This facility will greatly enhance public safety radio communications in an area, currently limitedly serviced by wireless telecommunication providers. This is an existing facility, and consolidates multiple users. Disadvantages: There will be minor visual impacts from limited points along the railroad line/Colorado River Road; however, there are no residences in close proximity that will be affected by this proposal. This facility will utilize electricity instead of solar energy. * * The addition of EC Emergency radio equipment is not the sole reason for the switch to electricity. Other reasons exist for the modification. . 27 12/04/07 D. PLANNING COMMISSION / BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OPTIONS: 1. Approve the [SPECIAL USE PERMIT] request without conditions if it is determined that the petition will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and the proposed use is attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 2. Deny the [SPECIAL USE PERMIT] request if it is determined that the petition will adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and/or the proposed use is not attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is not in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 3. Table the [SPECIAL USE PERMIT] request if additional information is required to fully evaluate the petition. Give specific direction to the petitioner and staff. 4. Approve the [SPECIAL USE PERMIT] request with conditions and/or performance standards if it is determined that certain conditions and/or performance standards are necessary to ensure public, health, safety, and welfare and/or enhances the attunement of the use with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other appiicable master plans). DISCUSSION: Ms. Skinner - Markowitz explained the file using a PowerPoint presentation. She showed several maps and photos of the property. All fmdings are positive. Chairman Menconi opened and closed public comment, as there was none. Commissioner Fisher asked about the ultimate goal and advantages. Barry Smith stated that half a mile up the Colorado River Road coverage is lost. There are also some areas going into Glenwood Canyon that do not have radio coverage, but this site would cover some of these dead zones. He indicated that this coverage would meet up with existing tower coverage on the Colorado River Road. . Commissioner Fisher wondered about the height of the building. Mr. Smith indicated it was about 12 feet high. Commissioner Fisher asked about the glare. Ms. Skinner - Markowitz stated that there are times of the day when there is glare on 1-70 from the solar panels. The BLM is working with the electric company to provide electric service to eliminate this problem. Commissioner Runyon moved to approve File No. ZS-00161, Eagle County Emergency Telecommunications Facility incOlporating staff's findings and with the following conditions: 1. Except as otherwise modified by this Permit, all material representations made by the Applicant in this application and in public meeting shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. 2. Height of the facility may not exceed that allowed by the original Variance (Eagle County File No. ZV- 00021). Height limitation is 110' maximum, and includes any antenna, lightening rod, etc. which is attached to the top of the tower itself. 28 12/04/07 3. The applicant must provide the Community Development Department with any updated or new agreements, including but not limited to lease agreements, patents and/or easements from the facility/property owners: Union Pacific (lease area, tower) and BLM (underlying land). 4. Union Pacific Railroad or Eagle County Emergency Management shall notify the Community Development Director when altering or modifying equipment on the Telecommunications Facility. Notification shall include both a written description and detailed plans showing new and/or altered equipment on the structures as well as any modifications to the equipment shelter. 5. If additional users wish to install equipment on the tower, the co-locator must notify the Community Development Director prior to the initial installation, and any subsequent alterations or modifications oftheir equipment in the Telecommunications Facility thereafter. Notification shall include both a written description and detailed plans showing equipment on the outside of the tower, as well as any modifications to the equipment shelter. Any increase in the height of the tower, or expansion of the 3,500 sq ft facility/existing lease area, will necessitate a new Special Use Permit. 6. This tower shall not be illuminated unless required by the FAA. Further, exterior lighting on shelters is limited to flush mounted, down-cast, motion sensor lighting. 7. Buildings and/or equipment shall utilize non-reflective, natural finish materials and colors designed to "blend" in with the surrounding landscape. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. AFP-00266 Pile:rim Downs Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Planning Department ACTION: The purpose of this Amended Final Plat is to modify the common lot line between an equestrian lot and an open space lot in order to create an agricultural building site. LOCATION: Pilgrim Downs PUD; 1515 West Lake Creek Road; Edwards FILE NO./PROCESS: PROJECT NAME: AFP-00266 / Amended Final Plat Pilgrim Downs Filing No. 6- Equestrian Center and Pilgrim Downs Filing No. 7- Open Space Pilgrim Downs Homeowners Association Pilgrim Downs Homeowners Association Tim Devlin, Wear, Travers and Perkins, P.C. OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: The intent of this plat is to modify the existing, common lot line between the Equestrian Center parcel of Pilgrim Downs Filing No.6, and an Open Space Parcel, Pilgrim Downs Filing No.7. The main purpose of this endeavor is to expand the Equestrian Center parcel in order to accommodate a new agricultural building (barn). Both of the subject properties are owned by the Pilgrim Downs Homeowners Association, the applicant for this application. According to the applicants, there are several reasons for this amendment. Those reasons include the following: (1) Based on the view corridors of all adjacent property owners, this location is more suitable for the proposed structure; (2) The new area for barn allows the HOA to maximize the limited area available for equestrian uses; (3) The proposed location of the new structure allows service vehicles to quickly travel between West Lake Creek Road and the barn without having the necessity to access the main gate for Pilgrim Downs. 29 12/04/07 B. CHRONOLOGY: $ 1985- Pilgrim Downs Filing No.6 was platted and creates the Equestrian Center. $ 1986- Pilgrim Downs PUD (guide) was amended relocating the single-family homesite for Lot 16 which was to become additional Open Space for Pilgrim Downs- no reason was provided why things were shifted around in the PUD. In addition, other changes included the reduction of the rear setback line; adding language in the PUD guide for lot 18.1; and clarifying that the Equestrian Center lot was for the benefit of Pilgrim Downs and not the public. The PUD Amendment was implemented by the property owners. $ 1986- Pilgrim Downs Filing No.7 was platted. As part of this filing, the underlying plat for Pilgrim Downs Filing No.7 (Filing No.6) was amended, eliminating a previously approved single- family homesite (Lot 16), reclassifying the area as 'Open Space'. Neither the plat nor the Pilgrim Downs Planned Unit Development Guide provides language regarding what is permitted within open space areas, etc. $ 2007- Application for an amended plat submitted. C. SITE DATA: Unplatted North: Residential/Agricultura I arcel South: ROW: Private Access ROW: West Lake Creek Road Resource Pilgrim Downs PUD Residential Pilgrim Downs PUD East: Residential Resource 782,424.72 sq ft Yes ISDS Via Pilgrim Drive or West Lake Creek Road D. NECESSARY FINDINGS: Pursuant to Section 5-290.G.3. Standards for Amended Final Plat: a. Adjacent property. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the proposed amendment DOES NOT have an adverse effect on adjacent property owners. All adjacent property owners were notified for this file as required pursuant to Section 5-210. No responses were received from any of the adjacent property owners; neighboring property owners are in support of this amendment. The location for the new barn, which results from this lot line modification, was prompted by the Pilgrim Downs HOA. b. Final Plat Consistency. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the proposed amendment IS consistent with the intent of the Final Plat. 30 12/04/07 This amendment seeks to primarily modify the Equestrian Center parcel in order to situate a new agricultural building. Currently, both the Equestrian Center parcel and the Open Space parcel are utilizedfor agricultural uses. With no provisions, definitions or recognition of the Open Space parcel in the Pilgrim Downs PUD or restricted on the plat which created it (other than the legal description),. and with the support of the immediate beneficiaries of both the Open Space parcel and the Equestrian Center lot, coupled with the nominal loss of open space footprint (0.275 acres or 12,000 sq ft) which maintains agricultural/rural uses,' this plat may be considered to be consistent with the underlying plat. c. Conformance with Final Plat Requirements. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the proposed amendment DOES conform to the Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies and guidelines. d. Improvement Agreement. DOES NOT apply. e. Restrictive Plat Note Alteration. DOES NOT apply. There are no notes which restrict, discuss or reserve the Open Space lot on the plat, other than the lot designation (legal description) itself. E. SUMMARY ANALYSIS: Benefits/Disadvantages. Benefits include: The beneficiaries of the Open Space and Equestrian Center lots (pilgrim Downs Homeowners Association) are proposing this amendment; Creates opportunity for a new agricultural building without interrupting existing view corridors of the surrounding property owners, both in Pilgrim Downs and outside of the subdivision; New area of the Equestrian Center will be for a barn and maintains the intent of the lot designation to be used for agricultural purposes; By off setting the lot line and creating a new area for the barn, the beneficiaries of the Equestrian Center will still be able to maximize the rectangular shape of the previously existing lot for equestrian purposes; , The proposed location of the new structure allows service vehicles to quickly travel between West Lake Creek Road and the bam without having the necessity to access the main gate and roadway through Pilgrim Downs. Disadvantages: There will be a nominal loss of the Open Space lot as there is no trade of land in order to maintain the existing acreage of open space; however, the HOA is proposing to utilize the two lots as has been used previously: for agricultural purposes. F. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OPTIONS: 5. Approve the [AMENDED FINAL PLAT] request without conditions if it is determined that the petition will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and the proposed use is attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses. 6. Deny the [AMENDED FINAL PLAT] request if it is determined that the petition will adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and/or the proposed use is not attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses 31 12/04/07 7. Table the [AMENDED FINAL PLAT] request if additional information is required to fully evaluate the petition. Give specific direction to the petitioner and staff. 8. Approve the [AMENDED FINAL PLAT] request with conditions and/or performance standards if it is determined that certain conditions and/or performance standards are necessary to ensure public, health, safety, and welfare and/or enhances the attunement of the use with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses. DISCUSSION: Ms. Skinner - Markowitz presented the file. The intent is to modify an existing common lot line in Pilgrim Downs. She stated that both properties were owned by the Pilgrim Downs homeowner's association. She presented the background of the request. Jim Childers was present as representative for the applicant. Chairman Menconi opened and closed public comment, as there was none. Commissioner Runyon wondered if all neighbors had been consulted and were in favor. Mr. Childers indicated that the homeowners were 100% in favor of this change at a recent homeowner's meeting. Ms. Skinner - Markowitz stated that other neighbors had not objected. Commissioner Fisher asked about the size of the barn. Mr. Childers stated that the barn size would be 40' by 60'. The bam would house hay and equipment. Commissioner Fisher moved to approve File No. AFP-00266, Pilgrim Downs incorporating staff's fmdings, with the following conditions Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. SUF-00022 Emma Farms lena Skinner-Markowitz, Planning Department ACTION: The purpose of this Final Plat is to create five (5) residential lots; two (2) agricultural open space parcels and easements. Emma Farms obtained Preliminary Plan approval in 2006. FILE NO./PROCESS: LOCATION: SUF-00022; Final Plat West of Hooks Lane, 2.75 miles west of Basalt straddling the Eagle/Pitkin County line (106.215 acres in Eagle County, 28.8 acres in Pitkin County) Emma Farms LLC and SW Enterprises, LLC Owners The Land Studio, Douglas Pratte OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY OF REOUEST: The intent of this plat is to create five (5) residential lots; two (2) Open Space parcels (A and B); easements; and right of way (South Acre Lane). The proposed development was approved in 2006 and is a cluster subdivision consisting of five homesites ranging in size from 6 acres to 14 acres, situated around approximately 50.4 acres of agricultural open space. The total area of the Emma Farms in Eagle County is 106.215 acres. B. SITE DATA: 32 12/04/07 AFR-IO Pitkin Co.) Agricultural Limited Agricultural/Residential Rural Residential Agricultural Residential (AR) N/A C. CIIRONOLOGYIBACKGROUND: 2005- The applicants receive approval for the Emma Farms Sketch Plan. 2006- The applicants receive approval for the Emma farms Preliminary Plan and Zone Change. 2006- The applicants receive approval for a Variance from Improvements application for dual access. 2. STAFF REPORT A. NECESSARY FINDINGS: PROCESS INTENT ECLUR Section: 5-280.B.5 Subdivision Final plat Section Purpose: At the meeting on the Final Plat for Subdivision, the Board of County Commissioners shall review the Final Plat, the submittal materials, provide both County staff and the applicant an opportunity to comment, and approve or disapprove the Final Plat for Subdivision based on whether it conforms to the approval given to the Preliminary Plan for Subdivision and the standards in Section 5-280.B.3.e., Standards., considering specifically the adequacy of required improvements and the acceptance of areas dedicated for public use and easements. Standards: 5-280.B.5.b (3) and 5-280.B.3.e Pursuant to Section 5-280.B.5.b (3), of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, it has been found that: (1) This final plat conforms to, and is consistent with the intentions, representations and conditions as approved with the Preliminary Plan for the subdivisionIPUD. 33 12/04/07 (2) Required improvements are adequate including roadways, pedestrian and recreation pathways, and infrastructure. (3) Areas dedicated for public use and all anticipated easements are as approved in the Preliminary Plan and are acceptable as presented in the Final Plat application. Section 5-280.B.3.e: STANDARD: Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (1)] - The proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan and the FLUM of the Comprehensive Plan. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map defers to the community-specific Mid Valley Community Master Plan. MID VALLEY COMMUNITY MASTER PLAN XI- Payments in lieu of local resident housing was accepted for this project. x x x x Xl x X XI- Emma Farms was not located in a recognized unique landform area of the county. 34 12/04/07 ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)] The proposed subdivision shall comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts. and Article 4, Site Development Standards. Any conditions as applied through the Preliminary Plan application remain in effect for this file. The resolution for Emma Farms, which memorializes certain conditions, was recorded at reception no. 200628167. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MlNIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)] The proposed subdivision shall be located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (1) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road extensions shall be consistent with the Eallle Countv Road Cavual Imvrovements Plan. (2) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (3) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MlNIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Suitability/or Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)] The property proposed to be subdivided shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or human-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future improvements to the area. The areas subject to construction are developable. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MlNIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Compatibility with Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)] - The proposed subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area 35 12/04/07 The findings for the Preliminary Plan and Zone Change for the Emma Farms Subdivision effectively demonstrated that this project is sufficiently compatible for development in this area of Eagle County. Approval of this Final Plat does not modify this previous rmding. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Adequate FacDities. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (6)] - The applicant shall demonstrate that the development proposed in the Sketch or Preliminary Plan will be provided adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services Certain improvements are necessary and are collateralized through a Subdivision Improvements Agreement. Improvements include pedestrian paths, roadways and trails. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS B. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OPTIONS: 9. Approve the [SUF -00022] request without conditions if it is determined that the petition will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and the proposed use is attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 10. Deny the [SUF-00022] request if it is determined that the petition will adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and/or the proposed use is not attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is not in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 11. Table the [SUF -00022] request if additional information is required to fully evaluate the petition. Give specific direction to the petitioner and staff. 12. Approve the [SUF -00022] request with conditions and/or performance standards if it is determined that certain conditions and/or performance standards are necessary to ensure public, health, safety, and welfare and/or enhances the attunement of the use with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). DISCUSSION: Ms. Skinner - Markowitz presented the file. She showed maps and photos of the property and provided the background of the file. Doug Pratte, Tom Walbeck; owner and Dave Myler were present. He stated that they do not have a signature on the conservation easement but will provide a copy once it is received. Dave Myler asked that the board consider extended vested rights for this project. State statute contemplates this accommodation due to the establishment of the conservation easement. This request is consistent with the 36 12/04/07 desire to continue to operate the property for agricultural purposes for as long as possible. They are asking for 30 years and the property would not be subject to changes in the zoning during that period. Chairman Menconi opened and closed public comment, as there was none. Bob Morris addressed the applicant's request. He stated that this is allowed by Colorado Law and extends the vesting from 3 years to whatever date the board deems appropriate. This power is limited by a requirement that would give consideration that the extension is warranted in light of all existing circumstances. It does not specifically mention the conservation easement, but he believes this is a reasonable circumstance. Chairman Menconi asked if the applicant was asking for vested rights for 30 years. Mr. Myler confirmed this. The vesting would allow them to continue to rely on current zoning provisions for an extended period of time and thus delay the development and sale of lots. Chairman Menconi asked if there was anything in the business strategy that would leave lots for sale for an extended period. He felt that 30 years is a very long time. Tom Walbeck explained that they are trying to maintain the agricultural operation for as long as possible without needing to develop the lots. They are establishing a conservation easement in order to continue to hay and graze and to be able to do this with the five lots that are established. Chairman Menconi asked if they would immediately try to sell the lots. Mr. Walbeck stated that it depends on their finances. They are trying desperately not to sell any. He stated that all of the lots in question are part of one large agricultural area. Chairman Menconi asked about the reason for subdividing. Mr. Walbeck stated that the intent was to establish the value of the property and open up the option of selling one or more of these lots. Ms. Skinner - Markowitz clarified that the approval of a fmal plat lasts for 5 years and after that time an extension would need to be requested. Chairman Menconi wondered what triggers the vested rights. Mr. Myler clarified that under this act the approval of a site-specific development plan establishes a vested right. As such, the property would not be subject to changes in the zoning during the vesting period. This doesn't affect the owner's ability to sell. They are trying to protect both types of regulations, subdivision, and zoning. He stated that the rights to develop homes on the lots would require building permits and the expenditure of investment. The only thing protected with improvements is the plat, but not the underlying zoning. Mr. Morris concurred with Mr. Myler. He stated that state statutes and our land use regulations define the vesting as commencing with the approval of a site-specific development plan. Chairman Menconi stated that they are trying to create an incentive to keep the land agricultural and yet preserve the right to sell the lots in the future. He didn't understand why the applicant desired to subdivide the property in the frrst place. Mr. Morris stated that he believes the applicant is trying to preserve their right to sell the lots down the road if they have to do so. Mr. Walbeck stated that they subdivided because they want the option of selling a minimum amount of land. Ms. Skinner - Markowitz stated that she believes it would be more appropriate to extend the preliminary plan itself. She is concerned that the vesting will go on but the plat will expire. Things could change in the interim. She suggested having it coincide with the five-year deadline. Mr. Myler agreed that the approval is what is set forth in the preliminary approval. He understands that this vesting works independently of the final plat issues. Should standards change they would still be required to uphold these standards. The vesting protects building height changes, usage changes etc. They suggested 30 years because they had had success in other counties with this length of time. Commissioner Runyon asked whether Pitkin County had approved in this type of situation. Mr. Myler indicated that they had approved 15 years of vesting. Commissioner Runyon wondered if there were currently restrictions on size of dwelling units. Mr. Walbeck stated that the limit is currently 8250 square feet including all garages and barns. Commissioner Runyon stated that he doesn't want to restrict the needs of future boards, but based on his goals of maintaining agricultural use he is struggling with why he would not support this. Mr. Walbeck stated that their business plans had changed and they are currently raising Japanese cattle, which produce Colman beef. They found that the best use of the land was to intensify the quality of the beef. 37 12/04/07 Commissioner Runyon wondered about vacating the south road. He also recalled discussion about trying to get the neighbors to agree to add land to the conservation easement. Mr. Walbeck stated that Rory Cerise was not willing to put a conservation easement on adjacent properties. Commissioner Runyon wondered if this implied any possihility.ofup zoning. Mr. Morris stated that he did not see any legal downside. The board has discretion to do this. Commissioner Runyon stated that future boards could choose to up-zone. Mr. Myler stated that they would not be able to change the conservation easement easily. Commissioner Runyon stated that in 25 years, future boards of commissioners could allow significant up zoning. Commissioner Fisher asked how many acres are in Pitkin County. Mr. Walbeck stated 30 acres of which 10 acres will go into an extension of the conservation easement that is in Eagle County. Ms. Skinner - Markowitz stated that there is no retroactive land use regulations to properties confmed within a building envelope because of vesting reasons. There is automatically a vested right. Commissioner Fisher wondered about the improvements that may be required for sustainability and how these would be circumvented. Ms. Skinner - Markowitz stated that building requirements would have to be adhered to. Commissioner Fisher stated that the only down side is the administrative management so that this vesting doesn't impede the county processes or isn't clearly defined. Commissioner Runyon wondered about restricting up zoning on the five lots, which have been approved by using a conservation easement on the five lots. Mr. Morris stated that state law does not allow restriction of a more intense use of a property. He stated that a conservation easement could extend to the entire property and limit the building as such. His sense is that the Eagle Valley Land Trust is not excited about accepting these types of conservation easements. Chairman Menconi suggested reducing this vesting to 20 years because land use is evolving and getting better. Commissioner Runyon moved to approve File No. SUF-0002 Emma Farms, incorporating staff's fmdings and with the following conditions: 1. Conditioned upon subsequent entry into an amendment of the SIA or a separate agreement as deemed appropriate by Community Development, County Attorney's Office and the applicant reflecting the extended vesting up to a maximum of 20 years rather than the state statutory 3 years. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The first motion was withdrawn. Chairman Menconi wondered if the motion covered the fact that the conservation easement had not been executed yet. Ms. Skinner - Markowitz stated that staff had agreed to not record the fmal plat until such time all signed documents are received for the conservation easement. Commissioner Runyon moved to approve file no. SUF-0002 Emma Farms, incorporating staff's fmdings and with the following conditions: 1. The vesting period will be extended from 3 to 20 years from the date of approval of the final plat. 2. The fmal plat will not be recorded until such time as the conservation easement on the portion of the subdivision that is to go under a conservation easement is signed by all parties and in the hands of the Community Development Department. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Menconi excused himself from the meeting. 38 12/04/07 AFP-00265 Zinna Residence Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Planning Department ACTION: The purpose of this Amended Final Plat is to reconfigure the existing building envelope on Lot 11, Cordillera Subdivision Filing 34, Block 5. LOCATION: 0889 Granite Springs Trail, Edwards FILE NO./PROCESS: PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: AFP-00265 / Amended Final Plat Cordillera Subdivision Filing 34, Lot 11, Block 0889 Granite Springs Trail; Edwards Zinna Family Trust Owner Scott Turnipseed 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: The intent of this plat is to modify the existing building envelope on Lot 11 to "relocate" 363 square feet of building envelope from one area to another (see attached). According to the applicant and Cordillera Design Review Board, in order to enclose mechanical equipment (snowmelt) used for the driveway ofthe new residence, it was necessary to modify the existing building envelope. Cordillera Subdivision Filing 34 was first platted in 1999 and created several single family homesites. B. CHRONOLOGY: $ 1999- Cordillera Subdivision Filing 34 was platted. $ 1999- Original plat amended $ 2006- Building permit for the Zinna Residence approved $ 2007- Application for an amended plat submitted C. SITE DATA: Cordillera Subdivision PUD Cordillera Subdivision PUD Cordillera Subdivision PUD Cordillera Subdivision PUD Residential Cordillera Subdivision PUD PUD (Cordillera Subdivision) Existing Residential lot The majority of the property in within a wildlife corridor. Vegetation consists of mature trees and sses. 14.742 ac (BE change: 363 s ft) 642,161.52 sq ft No ISDS 39 12/04/07 D. NECESSARY FINDINGS: This plat is not undertaking the administrative process as permitted via the Cordillera PUD guide. As such, all the Amended Final Platfindings asfoundwithin the Eagle COW'lty Land Use Regulations are solely applicable. Pursuant to Section 5-290.G.3. Standards for Amended Final Plat: a. Adjacent property. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the proposed amendment DOES NOT have an adverse effect on adjacent property owners. All adjacent property owners were notified for this file as required pursuant to Section 5-210. No responses were receivedfrom any of the adjacent property owners. The relocation of the envelope (363 sq fl) is to accommodate a snowmelt enclosure that is less than six (6) feet off grade, adjacent to the existing garage. The enclosure was required by the Cordillera DRB. b. Final Plat Consistency. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the proposed amendment IS consistent with the intent of the Final Plat. As this project seeks to relocate an existing envelope for a mechanical equipment (snowmelt) enclosure, the intent of this plat IS consistent with the previous approval creating single family homwsites. c. Conformance with Final Plat Requirements. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the proposed amendment DOES conform to the Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies and guidelines. ' d. Improvement Agreement. DOES NOT apply. e. Restrictive Plat Note Alteration. DOES NOT apply. E. SUMMARY ANALYSIS: Benefits/Disadvantages. When considering this proposal, the benefits of modifying the building envelope outweigh the disadvantages. Benefits include: Satisfies the requirements of the Cordillera Design Review Board; Shields mechanical equipment from neighbors and passers by; Does not encroach upon platted wildlife corridor; Removes unused portion of existing building envelope Disadvantages: Allows the residents to utilize snowmelt for their driveway pursuant to Cordillera Design review Board (Note: the residents have received a mechanical permit for the installation of the mechanical equipment and have paid the necessary ECOBuild fees for the snowmelt, as the enclosure is a DRB requirement, not a County requirement). F. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OPTIONS: 40 12/04/07 13. Approve the [AMENDED FINAL PLAT) request without conditions if it is determined that the petition will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and the proposed use is attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses. 14. Deny the [AMENDED FINAL PLAT) request if it is determined that the petition will adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and/or the proposed use is not attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses 15. Table the [AMENDED FINAL PLAT) request if additional information is required to fully evaluate the petition. Give specific direction to the petitioner and staff. 16. Approve the [AMENDED FINAL PLAT) request with conditions and/or performance standards if it is determined that certain conditions and/or performance standards are necessary to ensure public, health, safety, and welfare and/or enhances the attunement of the use with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses. DISCUSSION: Ms. Skinner - Markowitz presented the highlights of the file. Chairman Pro- Tem Fisher opened and closed public comment, as there was none. Dave Madow representative for the applicant stated that only 4 feet would be above grade and the structure would be landscaped as well. The structure will also obscure some air conditioning units. Commissioner Runyon moved to approve File No. AFP-00265 Zinna Residence, Amended Final Plat incorporating staff s findings and with the following conditions? Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners the vote was declared unanimous. ZS-00162 CME Eae:le-Vail Satellite Transit Lot Lisa de Graaf, Planning Department ACTION: The purpose of this Special Use Permit is to allow for a satellite parking area and office for Colorado Mountain Express operations. LOCATION: 41462 Hwy 6, Eagle-Vail FILE NO./PROCESS: PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: ZS-00162 / Special Use Permit Colorado Mountain Express (CME) - Eagle-Vail Satellite Lot Eagle-Vail on Highway 6th (next to Lakota Guides) State of Colorado (Land Board) CME Sid Fox 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to utilize the site for transportation services as a "satellite facility" for parking vehicles used by CME. The Special Use will include office, dispatch, parking, storage, light vehicle maintenance and similar support services for the CME headquarters in Edwards. The Eagle-Vail facility will replace existing parking at the Metcalf Road site and will be utilized primarily for the "premier/private vehicle" services. Please see attached site map. 41 12/04/07 Site development will consist of removing three (3) small out-buildings and improving the existing main building. In addition, old fencing will be removed and new landscaping will be installed. The owner of the property is the State Land Board, which has a current lease with Mr. Glen Miller; the applicant will be sub- leasing the parcel from the Miller's until September 2009, at which time they will contract directly with the State for a lease for approximately 2 years. The total time frame for this Special Use is estimated to be 3 years. B. Vacated retail rental business Flat, paved parcel with rundown buildings and decaying fencing 24,471 C. CHRONOLOGYIBACKGROUND: 1996 - A Lease for the site between the State Land Board and Glen and Elizabeth Miller is signed and the Millers begin a rental business. It has been vacant for approximately 2 years. D. PLANNING COMMISSION DELmERATION SUMMARY & MOTION: The Planning Commission met on November 21,2007 and heard this file. The discussion included concerns about . potential glare mitigation and complaint legitimacy; . the turn lane recommended by the County Engineer department and a revised traffic study that will have been reviewed by Engineering staff prior to the BoCC hearing; . landscaping; . an expiration date for the Special Use permit The ECPC unanimously recommended approval. All concerns are addressed through the recommended conditions. 42 12/04/07 2. STAFF REPORT A. NECESSARY FINDINGS: PROCESS INTENT ECLUR Section: Section Purpose: Standards: 5-250 Special Use Permits Special Uses are those uses that are not necessarily compatible with the other uses allowed in a zone district, but which may be determined compatible with the other uses allowed in the zone district based upon individual review of their location, design, configuration, density and intensity of use, and the imposition of appropriate conditions to ensure the compatibility of the use at a particular location with surrounding land uses. All Special Uses shall meet the standards set forth in this Section. Section 5-250.B. The issuance of a Special Use Permit shall be dependent upon fmdings that there is competent evidence that the proposed use as conditioned, fully complies with all the standards of this Section, this Division, this Article, and these Land Use Regulations. The Planning Commission may recommend and the Board of County Commissioners may attach any conditions deemed appropriate to ensure compliance with the following standards, including conformity to a specific site plan, requirements to improve public facilities necessary to serve the Special Use, and limitations on the operating characteristics of the use, or the location or duration of the Special Use Permit STANDARD: Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-250.B.J] The proposed Special Use shall be appropriate for its proposed location and be consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the FLUM of the Comprehensive Plan, including standards for building and structural intensities and densities, and intensities of use. EAGLECOUNTYCO~REHENSWEPLAN x x x x x Xl x x x XI- No new employees will be generated by this proposal. The applicant claims to subsidize their employees over $300,000 annually and controls over 235 housing beds in the markets they serve. EAGLE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PLAN 43 12/04/07 ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Compatibility. [Section 5-250.B.2] The proposed Special Use shall be appropriatefor its proposed location and compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. North: Commercial CG Existing Users) Zoning X South: 1-70 ROW Resource X East: Commercial CG X West: Commercial CG X ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Zone District Standards. [Section 5-250.B.3] The proposed Special Use shall comply with the standards of the zone district in which it is located and any standards applicable to the particular use, as identified in Section 3-310, Review Standards ADplicable to Particular Residential. Agricultural and Resource Uses and Section 3-330, Review Standards ADplicable to Particular Commercial and Industrial Uses. - There are no specific standards for Transportation Services or Vehicle, Aircraft and Pleasure Boat Sales, Storage, Service or Repair. However this use is allowed with a Special Use Permit for both. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X . MEETSMINIMUMSTANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS 44 12/04/07 STANDARD: Design Minimizes Adverse Impact [Section 5-250.B.4] The design of the proposed Special Use shall minimize adverse impacts, including visual impact of the proposed use on adjacent lands; furthermore, the proposed Special Use shall avoid significant adverse impact on surrounding lands regarding trash, traffic, service delivery, parking and loading, odors, noise, glare, and vibration, and shall not create a nuisance. x Xl X2 X X3 X X X4 X X XI- The applicant must follow the CDOT State Highway Access Code section 2.3(4)(e) X2- The applicant must confirm directional Trip Distribution X3- Striping is required on paved surface parking per Section 4-140, A. X4- The possibility of glare from the parked vehicles was discussed with the applicant; if there are any complaints from citizens driving on 1-70 or Highway 6, or neighbors pertaining to glare, the applicant will need to make adjustments immediately. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Design Minimizes Environmental Impact. [Section 5-250.B.5] The proposed Special Use shall minimize environmental impacts and shall not cause significant deterioration of water and air resources, wildli e habitat, scenic resources, and other natural resources. X X X X X X X ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS 45 12/04/07 STANDARD: Impact on Public Facilities. [Section 5-250.B.6J The proposed Special Use shall be adequately served by public facilities and services, including roads, pedestrian paths, potable water and wastewater facilities, parks, schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. Xl- The applicant must follow the CDOT State Highway Access Code section 2.3(4)(e) Xl - The llighway 6 Corridor Feasibility Study dated March 2004 requires sidewalks for new development; however this is not new development and the applicant is not the land owner and the use is temporary. Staffwill ask for the sidewalk if the use is extended or the land is sold. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Site Development Standards. [Section 5-250.B.7J The proposed Special Use shall comply with the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site Development Standards. X Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1) Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2) Sign Regulations (Division 4-3) Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410) X Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420) Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430) X Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) X Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450) Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460) Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5) Noise and Vibration (Section 4-520) X Smoke and Particulates (Section 4-530) 4,5 X X X X X X X 46 12/04/07 . X Heat, Glare, Radiation and Electrical Interference (Section 4-540) 1 X Storage of Hazardous and Non-hazardous Materials (Section 4-550) X Water Quality Standards (Section 4-560) X Roadway Standards (Section 4-620) 2,3,7,9 X Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630) , 12 X Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640) X Drainage Standards (Section 4-650) X Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660) X Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670) X Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680) X Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690) X Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7) ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Other Provisions. [Section 5-250.B.8] The proposed Special Use shall comply with all standards imposed on it by all other applicable provisions of these Land Use Regulations for use, layout, and general development characteristics. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS B. REFERRAL RESPONSES: Eagle County Engineering Department - Please refer to attachment dated October 31, 2007. 1. The applicant has submitted an access permit application as required by this department and the Colorado Department of Transportatiol1'. For category NR-B highways at 45 mph: a left turn deceleration lane is required when the projected peak hour left ingress turning volume is greater than 10 vehicles per hour. According to the applicant's traffic study, the ingress volume is projected to be 9 vehicles per hour. A left turn deceleration lane is beneficial to highway capacity and safety and needs to be further reviewed. Please address the following related comments: . According to the State Highway Access Code section 2.3(4)(e), passenger car equivalents must be considered for busses, trucks and recreational vehicles. The traffic study needs to account for this stipulation. . The special use application has estimated the directional flow generated from this site to be 80% eastbound and 20% westbound. The applicant's traffic study has indicated that the directional distribution will be 50% ea:stbound and 50% westbound. I would like the applicant to provide information on directional traffic distribution (eastbound vs. westbound) based on their existing satellite facility on Metcalf Road, for comparison. 47 12/04/07 2. According to the US 6 Corridor Feasibility Study dated March 2004, the vision for the commercial area in Eagle- Vail requires sidewalks along Highway 6. Following this vision, this department recommends that a sidewalk be installed as described in the study. 3. The existing metal culvert located at the driveway apron needs to be cleaned so that water flows through this culvert as originally intended. In addition, with nearly 200 vehicle trips anticipated every day, this department recommends that the access and parking lot be re-surfaced for improved durability and ride quality. . See Conditions No. 2,3,7,9 Eagle County Dept. Environmental Health - Please refer to attachment dated October 29,2007. · The proposed use potentially creates significant glare originating from sunlight reflection off dormant vehicles, especially in the summer months. Dormant vehicles should be oriented so that they do not create glare issues for the neighborhood. · Existing buildings are being proposed for removal. Appropriate demolition permits must be obtained along with asbestos-free certification prior to removal. · The applicant should also demonstrate that the current storm water system is sufficient to handle the additional runoff that may be created by increasing the impermeable surfaces on the property. Storm water should be managed in such a way as to allow 100% of surface runoff to travel through Best Management Practices (BMPs) designed to remove particulates and pollutants from surface runoff. . . See Conditions No.1 Holy Cross Energy - Please refer to attachment dated October 15,2007. Holy cross energy will be able to serve electric power to the site. We are now serving the building. CME will have to contact us about there load, so we can size the transformer to fit there needs. Eagle River Water & Sanitation District - Please refer to attachment dated October 17, 2007 The Eagle River Water & Sanitation District as wll as the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority have reviewed this proposal and we believe that there are no water issues and the proposed sewer usage will be taken care of through tap fees and inspection prior to their connection. EcoTrails - email dated October 29, 2007 Are they (engineering) going to request the sidewalk on Highway 6 per the Access Plan? CDOT- email dated October 30, 2007 They have no comments. Additional Referral Agencies - This proposal was referred to the following agencies with no response received as of this writing: . Eagle County: Attorney's Office; Assessor; Airport; Road and Bridge Department;Eco Transit; Housing . Colorado State: CDaT . Federal: BLM . Service Districts; Eagle River Fire; Metro District . Homeowners: Eagle-Vail HOA . Towns: Avon C. SUMMARY ANALYSIS: 48 12/04/07 The benefits of this proposal include that CME is a part of the transportation infrastructure in Eagle County and provides a valuable service to its residents and visitors. The location of this parking lot will allow better service. In addition, this location is a compatible site for this use. The disadvantages may involve traffic patterns that will be problematic to Highway 6. Monitoring will help to determine this in the future. Glare may also be an issue. D. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OPTIONS: 17. Approve the CME Special Use Permit request without conditions if it is determined that the petition will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and the proposed use is attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other ~pplicable master plans). 18. Deny the CME Special Use Permit request if it is determined that the petition will adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and/or the proposed use is not attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is not in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 19. Table the CME Special Use Permit request if additional information is required to fully evaluate the petition. Give specific direction to the petitioner and staff. 20. Approve the CME Special Use Permit request with conditions and/or performance standards if it is determined that certain conditions and/or performance standards are necessary to ensure public, health, safety, and welfare and/or enhances the attunement of the use with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). DISCUSSION: Ms. De Graff presented a PowerPoint presentation that highlighted the details of the file: The satellite facility would be used for parking vehicles used by CME. The Eagle-Vail facility will replace existing parking at the Metcalf Road site. Site development would consist of removing three small outbuildings and improving the existing main building. The owner of the property is the State Land Board. The total time for the special use is estimated to be about 3 years. The county Engineering Department had recommended reconfiguration of the parking so that cars are not parked along the access road. The applicant has provided a revised site plan reflecting the adjustment. The applicant has been working with the Engineering Department regarding the necessity to provide a left turn deceleration lane. Suggested conditions have been provided. She indicated that the Planning Commission approved the file with the conditions recommended by staff with two additions. Peter Fralick stated that Eagle County is the issuing authority for access permits on Hwy 6. The applicant has submitted a traffic study that concluded that a turn lane would be required. The Engineering Department believes it is an important thing to include because it maintains the highway functionality and the safety of the highway on that corridor. They also requested sidewalks on Highway 6, which is a result of a Highway 6 feasibility study. Sid Foxx spoke on behalf of the applicant. Jay Ufer, CEO of Colorado Mountain Express was present. He spoke about the site ownership and stated that the applicant had been working with the state land board on details specific to the proposal. The site was previously used as a retrial rental operation. The peak activity would be during the ski season, December through April. The CME premiere vehicle operation is proposed for this location replacing the Eagle-Vail facility. The facility would improve operational efficiency. The applicant is proposing to improve the site with landscaping. The applicant is seeking approval for parking of 44 CME premier vehicles. There will be no maintenance, oil changes, or preventative maintenance on site. There will be no new employees added; this is primarily a relocation of the Metcalf site. In order to minimize trip generation there will be an employee shuttle. The applicant is requesting a temporary use from a couple perspectives. The current lease .,~I) r ? /1' :',j 1 expires on September 1, 2009. If the board does grant this special use, the owner would attempt to expand the current lease. Staff has suggested a December 31, 2010 limitation and the applicant is willing to accept the temporary nature of the use. The applicant is concerned with the recommendation of a left decal lane on Hwy 6 by the Engineering Department. This is a very onerous financial burden on this temporary use. The applicant believes there are a lot of assumptions made in the trip generation and they are caring the burden of the existing uses on the site. They believe they can come up with a safe acceptable solution. The applicant is also concerned with condition number 12, requiring sidewalks along U.S. Hwy 6 if a special use permit is requested beyond December 31,2010. Chairman Menconi opened public comment. There was none. He closed public comment. Commissioner Runyon wondered about the applicants concern with condition 9 that required a revised traffic study. Mr. Fralick stated that the applicant had come back with a revised traffic study and the study did indicate that a left turn deceleration lane would be required. He stated that the condition had been changed and now requires installation of the decal lane on US hwy 6 to accommodate the proposed use. Lee Wittington, Arroyo Engineering spoke. He prepared the traffic study. The study indicated that the existing Lakota Guides property exceeded the amount that triggers the need for any deceleration lane. The CME project, which would operate in the winter and has little use in the summer, would generate very little traffic. During winter months when CME is in full operation, they do not trigger the need for decal lane. The deceleration lane was already triggered by Lakota Guides. Mr. Fralick stated that the applicant had provided a very responsible and accurate study. He believes it's a safety and functionality type of issue. He stated that CDOT supports the county's request. Mr. Wittington stated that one of CDOTs comments was that Lakota Guides is an existing non-conforming issue and there is nothing CDOT can do to require that Lakota Guides put in a turn lane. He doesn't believe it's COOT requiring the turn lane but CDOT would stand behind the county. The applicant believes the numbers will go down because Lakota Guides is operating at this time. If CME moves into the site Lakota guides will have to alter their use of the property because they will no longer have access to all the parking. Commissioner Runyon wondered about the proposed vegetation. Mr. Fox stated that there would be mostly cottonwood trees and some serviceberry planted. Commissioner Runyon wondered about the required repaving of the access road. Mr. Wittington stated that only a small are of the road would need to be repaved in spring. Commissioner Runyon wondered if the applicant had been looking at other locations. Mr. Ufer stated that he continues to look at land he can acquire. He has some options that are currently in negotiation but to early to talk about. This is why he needs to lease a property for temporary use. Mr. Morris wondered if Lakota Guides was operating under a special use permit. Ms De Graff stated that to her knowledge it is not currently a non-conforming use. Chairman Menconi stated that that the state should be notified if Lakota Guides is encroaching on someone else's property and triggering a traffic issue. Commissioner Runyon wondered what the cost would be of a left turn lane. Mr. Wittington stated the cost might be a quarter of a million dollars. It would require approximately 550 feet of road improvements, which seems a little excessive for a temporaryspeeial use permit. . Mr. Fralick stated that the corridor feasibility study does show this area being a five-lane section in the future. Part of the advantage of a deceleration lane is that it does add value to the site, which is a great attribute for any land use. Commissioner Fisher asked if the vehicles would be stored on site in the summer months. Mr. Ufer stated that 1/3 of the fleet would be rotated. In the summer, they try to consolidate the useable fleet onto the Edwards site because it simplifies their operations. Commissioner Fisher wondered if a right turn in and right turn out only would resolve the decal lane issues. Mr. Ufer stated that he could instruct his drivers to do this but he could not control other company drivers. Mr. Fralick stated that the right in, right out is a good idea but it's not really the vision for the corridor. Chairman Menconi stated that his temporary vision is that the Eagle-Vail area goes through a sub area master plan to try to create a greater sense of mix use. He is not in favor of light industrial strip malls. He would like to see less invested financially because he would only approve this with the understanding that it would be a short-term use. Mr. Ufer stated that that this was acceptable. 50 12/04/07 Mr. Fralick stated that he is strongly for a turn lane and CDOT is supportive of that. This is a code requirement. Chairman Menconi would like staff and the state land board to review Lakota's use of their site. He is in favor of approving the file. Commissioner Runyon asked Mr. Fralick if it was worth pursuing the right in and out only option. It seems an onerous obligation for CME to come up with a quarter of a million dollars for a 3-year lease. A less expensive solution would be worth pursuing. Mr. Fralick stated that he understands Commissioner Runyon's statement but population growth on the highway must be considered. The right in and right out option is an interesting solution but it would have to be researched further. It's not something that could be approved now. Mr. Foxx suggested that the right in, right out be a condition of the access permit. They would like to move forward and work it out the details with Engineering. Commissioner Fisher wondered it the board was to approve the file the final approval would depend on the access permit. The state land board should be part of the discussion as far as the investment and longer term solution because they may put up something different in the future. She recommended a voluntary right in and right out for CME employees only. Eva Wilson, County Engineer stated that they empathize with the applicant. Unfortunately, it is their application that triggers the access application. The access code process does not allow any variances. She is not sure of the cost but she would be willing to take another look at the traffic study. The right in, right out is a great suggestion but she believes this may limit that access which may not be a good thing for the property. The traffic study did not look into the growth of the area. CDOT and the county could not recommend approval of this file without the access permit approval. Mr. Wittington disagreed. CDOT specifically mentioned that CME was not triggering the requirements. Chairman Menconi stated that this is a temporary permit. It's a seasonal business. He would like to move forward. Mr. Wittington stated that CDOT and the county have the ability to allow a temporary access permit. He wondered since the applicant is applying for a temporary special use permit if they could also apply for a temporary access permit that would expire the same day. Commissioner Fisher suggested tabling the file for further review. Mr. Foxx stated that their issue is timing because of the start of the season. Mr. Ufer stated that he has been working on this for months. Commissioner Runyon stated that he is in favor of approving the file subject to CDOT approval because it is temporary. Lakota isn't going to have that number of vehicles any more and it should not fall to the renter to do the improvements. Commissioner Runyon moved to approve File No. ZS-00162 CME Eagle-Vail Satellite Transit Lot including staff's :fmdings and with the following conditions: Except that condition number 9 is subject to CDOT approval or otherwise. 1. If any justified complaints. are reported to the County and con:fmned by staff due to reflected sun glare off of the parked CME vehicles, adjustments must be made immediately to mitigate the nUIsance. 2. The applicant must con:fmn directional Trip Distribution and receive approval from the County Engineer Department. 3. According to the State Highway Access Code Section 2.3(4)( e) passenger car equivalents must be considered for busses, trucks and recreational vehicles. The traffic study needs to account for this stipulation. 4. The applicant must provide a permit from CDOT to plant trees and shrubs within the U.S. 6 right-of-way, which is identified in the landscape plan. If a permit cannot be obtained, the applicant shall immediately submit a revised landscape plan to the County for review and approval by the Eagle County Planning Commission. 51 12/04/07 5. The applicant must follow the Installation and Maintenance Requirements in the ECLUR Section 4-240, which includes a letter of credit/guarantee/cash bond for 125 percent of the required landscaping in the approved landscape plan; prior to BoCC Resolution. 6. Parked vehicles cannot exceed forty-three (44) spaces. 7. Applicant shall resurface entrance/apron in spring of2008. 8. Except as otherwise modified by this development permit, all material representations made by the Applicant in this application and in public meeting shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. 9. Prior to the Board of County Commissioners hearing on this Special Use Permit application, the applicant must provide the engineering department with a revised traffic study, prepared by a registered engineer, which demonstrated that a left: turn decellane on U.S. Highway 6 in not necessary. Otherwise, a condition of approval will be included with the final approval requiring installation of the left: turn decelland U.S. Highway 6 to accommodate the proposed use. 10. That this Special Use Permit shall expire on December 31 st, 2010 unless otherwise extended by the Board of County Commissioners. 11. If on-site snow storage displaces vehicle parking spaces, the number of vehicles displaced will be stored off-site. 12. If a new Special Use Permit is requested beyond December 31 st, 2010, sidewalks along U.S. Highway 6 will be required. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Atte adjourned until December 11,2007. I DU VI'" 52 12/04/07