HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/06/07 Present: Am Menconi Sara Fisher Peter Runyon Bruce Baumgartner Bryan Treu Robert Morris Kathy Scriver PUBLIC HEARING November 6, 2007 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Manager County Attorney Deputy County A:ttomey Deputy Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing, the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: ,i" GENERAL FUND ADVANTAGE NETWORK SYSTEMS AFFILIATED CREDIT SERVICE AHLERS AND ASSOCIATES ALL STATE COMMUNICATIONS ALL-PRO FORMS INC ALLEN BEST ALLEN W STOKES ALMA VARELA ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY ALPINE V ALLEY SERVICES ) AMADEO GONZALES AMERIGAS ANDREE KIM ANIMAL HEALTH ANN NELSON ANNE ROBINSON AQUATICS ASSOCIATES INC ARMY & FACTORY SURPLUS ARN MENCONI ARTHUR AND PERLMUTTER ARTWORKS, THE ASPEN BOARD OF REALTORS AT ANDT AV TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVON CENTER AT BEAVER CK AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS BJROWE BARBARA WHITFORD BARRACUDA NETWORKS INC BECKNER ACHZIGER MCGINNIS BENJAMIN GERDES BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER BERT FONTE BETHANY VAN WYK BONNIE VOGT BOYD COFFEE COMPANY BRENDA STORY BRIGADE QUARTERMASTER BRUCE BAUMGARTNER BUSINESS PLANS INC SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIE~ . REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE I 11/06/07 / 300.00 633.76 1,100.00 4,651.44 1,383.11 45.00 13.52 456.84 323.83 3,671.25 18.00 267.53 427.66 152.31 141.75 206.19 3,398.42 125.96 85.00 60.00 . 40.00 10.05 117.74 352.00 2,170.07 2,658.61 35.64 21.60 5,145.00 30.00 1,186.25 225.00 550.00 78.17 60.75 1,029.04 26.06 92.99 45.41 2,000.00 C AND S SECURITY INN CA STATE DISBURSEMENT CARDIAC SCIENCE CARDINAL HEALTH CARMEN LOZOYO-VELEZ CAROLYN P MAST CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CATHY ZEEB CC MOUNTAIN CLASSICS LLC CCT A EASTERN DIVISION CECIL LOGGING INC CED-CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTURYTEL CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE CHARLES B DARRAH CHEF DE CUISINE EPICUREAN CHEMATOXINC. CHERYL THOMAS CHERYLE A WOOLSEY CHOLPON LORD CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH CHRISTINA MOSES CINDY PREYTIS CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CO DEPT PuBLIC HEALTH AND COLORADo COUNTIES INC COLORADO DOORWAYS COLORADO GUN SERVICE COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH COLUMBINE MARKET CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING COORS DISTRIBUTING COPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COUNTY SHERIFFS OF CO COWBOY CATEl~~G CRL ASSOCIATES INC D&D TOWING & AUTO REPAIR DAN CORCORAN PLS DAN SEIBEL DAN SPARKMAN DAVE MOTT DAVID A BAUER DAVID KEKAR DAY TIMERS INCORPORATED DENVER NEWSPAPER AGENCY DENVER WESTWORD LLC DIANA JOHNSON DICK BOURRET DIXIE KOZINSKI SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES 'SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE RECRUITMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 1,305.29 278.76 4,513.77 2,036.55 178.20 150.00 99.84 140.00 350.00 100.00 120,001.J.00 413.47 1,628.11 16,462.32 6,028.42 41.20 2,345.00 80.00 88.70 22.14 790.94 30.95 197.24 878.46 75.00 120.00 881.25 1,005.00 494.00 65.00 6,649.13 17,781.00 6,594.13 176.97 294.57 6,432.03 3,240.50 8,287.95 439.29 120.00 2,577JO 1,137.50 365.00 1,280.00 129.60 384.25 150.00 30.00 140.03 265.67 3,230.62 7,240 00 13.50 3:!.40 ('0.00 2 11/06/07 DOCTORS SUPPLY DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP DON OLSEN DONALD J LAUGHLIN DOREEN CONSTANINE DOROTHY KENLON DUFFORD WALDECK & MILBURN EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COUNTY CLERK EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE INDUSTRIES UNLIMITED EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RANCH FITNESS CLUB EAGLE RIVER WATER/SANITATION EAGLE TOWN OF EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EAGLE XM EASTER OWENS ELECTRIC CO ECO TRANSIT ECOLAB ED GRANGE EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER ELLEN EATON EMC2 EMPLOYERS COUNCIL SERVICE ERIN DOWD ESRI EVA WILSON FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FARRELL & SELDIN FEATHER PETROLEUM CO FEDERAL EXPRESS FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMER. FLORIDA MICRO FORENZACONTRACTING FORINASH KATHLEEN FRANKLIN COVEY FREDERIC LEE MARTENS FSH COMMUNICATIONS LLC G & S TOOL CLINIC LLC GALLS INCORPORATED GAMBER JOHNSON GEORGIE C ZINDA GIRSH AND ROTTMAN GIV GLENWooD SPRINGS PARKS GOOD AND ASSOCIATES GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GREAT AMERICAN LEASING GREG SCHROEDER GYPSUM CREEK SHEET METAL SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT CHILD SUPPORT REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND 204.00 192.76 6.99 46.50 12.00 2.70 188.00 15,000.00 2,973.00 1,444.26 126.10 88.23 1,900.00 704.33 50.00 40,000.00 2,870.00 5,780.00 25.00 777.00 100.00 48.00 75.74 97.20 725.38 7,600.00 169.29 1,425.00 220.45 3,439.18 2.10 9.00 731.57 26.64 964.30 7,930.00 458.29 67.10 26.94 56.01 70.00 529.99 904.99 207.77 361.00 28.00 5,863.49 580.00 99.50 725.00 1,032.35 40.00 1,423.71 119.88 14.12 3 11/06/07 GYPSUM RECREATION CENTER HAMPTON INN HD SUPPL Y FACILITIES HEART OF THE WEST COUNSEL HEWLETT pACKARD HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HP EXPRESS SERVICES HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS HV AC SUPPLY IACREOT ICC ICI IDENTIX INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE INTERIOR PLANTSCAPES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAP NETWORK SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION IRVIN BORENSTEIN JACK KENT MOTORS JANET CONNORS JARA DIVERSIFIED SERVICES JAYNE BORDEN JEFFERSON COUNTY JENA SKINNER.MARKOWITZ JENNIE W AHRER JENNIFER CUEVAS JENNY WOOD JERRY CHICOINE JILL HUNSAKER JIM DUKE JJP COMPANIES JOHN BADE JOHN E REID & ASSOCIATES JOHN KING JOHN LEWIS JOHNNETTE PHILLIPS JOM PHARMACEUTICALS JORGE VIRAMONTES SERNA K-D FLAGS KARA BETTIS, CORONER KARLA HERRIDGE KATHERINE A TOMBL YN KELLEY BLUE BOOK KEN SEXTON KENNEDY FAMILY REVOCABLE KESSLER MARY J KINETICO WATER PROS KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LANDS END INCORPORATED LASER JUNCTION LIANA CARLSON MOORE LILLIAN & LUCAS MEMORIAL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE JULY & SEPT CONSULTANT SERVICE DRUM FOR3RD FLOOR FAX SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUNb REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBVRSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 1,700.00 162.00 59.98 487.50 3,254.00 72.05 165.26 15,019.23 2,749.00 750.35 9.63 150.00 12.00 328.35 1,887.00 4,750.00 100.00 350.00 2,427.40 800.00 101.44 90.00 92.40 78.45 5.17 310.00 5.60 30.00 28.35 527.47 49.50 162.71 6.00 312.00 116.80 790.00 38.88 520.47 81.00 1,440.00 15.00 1,077.90 107.34 29.16 30.00 112.00 237.97 850.00 181.83 151.28 2,384.00 78.55 398.90 113.40 250.00 4 11/06/07 LINDA C~ LINDA MAGGIORE LINEBARGER GOOGAN BLAIR LINESCAPE STRIPING SERV LISA DE GRAAF LIVEPERSON INC LORI SIEFERS LORRAINE VASQUEZ LUCY BARKER LYNDA SAMPSON MAIN AUTO PARTS MARGERY STONE MARl RENZELMAN MARION F LAUGHLIN MARKS PLUMBING PARTS MARY JANE HESS MARYLAND CHILD SUPPORT MBIA MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MCMAHAN & ASSOCIATES LLC MEADOW MOUNTAIN PLUMBING MEET THE WILDERNESS MENENDEZ ARCHITECTS PC . METRO PATHOLOGISTS MICHAEL BARCA MICRO PLASTICS MICRO PLASTICS INC MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN MIKE BAIR MINTURN ONE LLC MOBILE VISION MOFFET CONSULTING MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY CO NANCY SCHURR, NP NATIONAL 4H SUPPLY NATIVE ELECTRIC INC NEDBO CONSTRUCTION NELSON LABORATORIES NETTIE -REYNOLDS NEVES UNIFORMS NORDIC REFRIGERATION NORMAN L NUNN NORTH AMERICAN JET OC TANNER OHIO CHILD SUPPORT OSM DELIVERY LLC P SCOTT LOWERY PAINT BUCKET THE PAPER WISE PAT NOLAN PATHOLOGY GROUP PATRICIA HAMMON PAULA A PALMATEER PEARL TAYLOR REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SE~VICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 5.10 68.04 49.35 1,413.31 243.23 990.00 18.99 223.70 127.50 150.00 124.19 16.15 265.42 39.00 40.77 326.01 461.54 6,129.84 41.31 12,250.00 2,707.00 2,660.00 143.75 72.00 48.75 18.99 26.61 311.21 89.10 60.00 736.20 11,793.38 408.00 1,786.46 32.40 607.44 2,25335 723.00 258.00 107.00 320.50 390.00 107.15 500.83 387.43 451.94 456.00 46.10 67.98 4,892.70 71.59 943.10 121.50 30.00 90.00 5 11/06/07 / PECZUH PRINTING COMPANY PETER FREIDRlCH PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PHYLISS ROUNDS PITNEY BOWES PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PRCA MOUNTAIN STATES PRECINCT POLICE PRODUCTS PREMIER ELECTION PRO FORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT PRO SHINE LLC ( PROSHINE SALES & SERVICE PSS, INC PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER PUEBLO COUNTY SHERIFF OFF PURCHASE POWER QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION QWEST R & S NORTHEAST LLC RAUL R MACIA RAZORS EDGE INC REBECCA LARSON RED BLUFF BUCKLES RED CANYON CAFE RED LION DENVER CENTRAL RESEARCH AND POLLING INC RICHARD COWELL RITA WOODS ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY ROARING FORK VALLEY COOP ROBERT NARRACCI ROBIN COCK . ROCKY MOUNTAIN BUSINESS ROCKY MTN TACTICAL TRNG ROLLY ROUNDS RON WOLFE RSC RYAN SANDS S CORPORATION INC SAFETY GLASSES USA SARA J FISHER SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP SCHMIDT POLYGRAPH SCHNEIDER MAURER SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SECURITY TRANSPORT SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHAINHOLTZ TODD H DDS SHAMROCK FOODS CORP SHAPINS ASSOCIATES SHARON BALIUS SHEAFFER KAREN SHERI MINTZ SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SER:VICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT ~ SERVICE SUPpLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 168.00 3.84 638.71 9.00 3,576.30 1,106.20 331.00 1,000.00 1,599.76 200.00 1,931.25 414.65 2,653.64 1,149.86 688.50 99.00 11,496.09 228.67 125.70 8,027.78 185.5.6 375.00 268.00 11. 75 1,600.00 77.00 115.95 323.91 63.00 10l.58 2,000.00 13.07 190.46 134.42 10.80 1,575.00 45.00 44.55 2,719.75 140.22 10,445.00 216.00 678.60 2,669.55 400.00 18.40 23.95 743.60 2,991.00 1,052.00 5,320.74 3,805.50 115.94 364.48 126.96 6 11/06/07 SIGNATURE SIGNS SILVERMAN LAW FIRM SINTON DAIRY COMPANY, SNOWBOARD OUTREACH SCTY SNOWHITE LINEN SOFTWARESPECTR~INSIGHT SOPHIA MARTINEZ SOURCE GAS SPECIAL PROTECTION INC SPECIALTIES INCO~ORATED STANLEY N SLOWIK. INC' STATE OF COLORADO STATE OF FLORIDA STEPHANIE GLENWRIGHT STEPHEN ELLSPERMAN STERICYCLE INC STREICHERS SUE MOTT SUPPORT PAYMENT SUSAN NARDUZZI SUSPENSE FUND TAMMI MATTHEWS TECH MEDICAL INC TEMPLE GLASSIER TENIE CHICOINE TERRIE FISCHER THE ARTISTS MERCANTILE THE FLOWER CART THE NORMANDY GROUP LLC THE PARENTS HANDBOOK THKASSOCIATES INC THOMAS COLE THOMSON WEST GROUP TIM DOOLEY TIM LOSA TIMBERWOLF INDUSTRIES TODD BONATTI TONI BERNS TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TOTAL ACCESS GROUP TOWN OF EAGLE TOWN OF GYPSUM TOWN OF REDCLIFF TRANE COMPANY TRI TECH INC TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED SITE SERVICES INC UNITED WAY OF EAGLE US CLEANING PROFESSIONAl-S US FOODSERVICE INC VAG INCORPORATED VAIL DAILY THE VAIL ELECTRONICS VAIL HONEYW AGON L TD '[ SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SElWICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 632.25 49.88 710.22 1,140.00 96.06 23.00 53.51 1,278.88 525.00 264.50 325.00 945.12 1,003.68 90.00 43.34 756.57 2,380.00 180.00 363.00 90.00 275,505.45 113.40 1,451.50 10,735.00 78.00 138.77 86.95 85.00 8,175.08 600.00 15,124.05 149.04 192.22 159.72 55.89 51,700.00 46.16 83.70 10.34 121.00 7,404.15 437.35 .37,679.38 6,57H7 309.83 3,505.00 262.1 1 326.40 20.00 22,020.44 3,504.12 7,592.52 2,980.56 4,746.64 10.31 7 11/06/07 V AIL MOUNTAIN COFFEE .. VAIL MOUNMIN SCHOOL V AIL RESORTS MANAGEMENT VAIL SYMPOSIUM V AIL V ALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VAIL VALLEY SURGERY LLC V AILNET INC V ALLEY LUMBER V ALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VERIFICATIONS INC VERIZON WIRELESS, VISA CARD SERVICE VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY C WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WEST EAGLE COUNTY SEARCH WESTERN SLOPE BAR WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES ! WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XCELENERGY XEROX CORPORATION YOUR NAME HERE INC ZEE MEDICAL SERVIC~ ZOBEYDA ARGELIA REYES PAYROLL FOR OCTOBER 2007 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND ADAMs RIB RECREATIONAL ALPINE V ALLEY SERVICES BAND B EXCAVATING BASALT SANITATION DIST BENNY RIVERA BIG R MANUFACTURING BILL BOCELAWATZ CENTRAL SERVICESIEC COLORADO COUNTIES INC COLORADO MOUNTAIN MEDICAL COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC COPY PLUS COVERALL SPACE COMPANY CRAWFORD PROPERTIES CROWNE PLAzA HOTEL EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE V ALLEY MEDICAL ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO ENVIROTECH FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE LOCKNUT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE 40.50 3,980.00 1,562.50 625.00 832.3 I 431.00 11.95 163.92 396.00 2,139.40 13,874.1 5 46,680.82 106.73 4,600.00 1,701.29 559,568.29 5,067.46 130.60 317.32 3,533.10 986.87 172.59 7,211.33 2,110.25 88.17 200.00 PAYROLL 21 & 22 1,301,341.40 2:J77,742.79 REFUND SERVICE REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICEj SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 2,250.00 96.30 200.00 147.88 75.00 7,076.16 75.00 17.39 335.00 105.00 33.26 432.00 3.99 891.00 7,000.00 152.00 22.21 182.00 546,087.66 22,201.74 25,243.00 8 11/06/07 GLENWOOD MEDICAL ASSOC GORDON ADAMS HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HOWARD KAKLOW IDEAL FENCING CORP INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY JAKE STONER KEMP AND COMPANY INC KNUPPLLC LAF ARGE CORPORA nON LONCO INC MARIE DIACHOK MATT JARAMILLO MODESTO SANCHEZ MONTAIGNE PARTNERSHIP PAPER WISE PETER PENDERGAST RICHARD STAMPP RICK ETTLES ROD CARTER RUDD CONSTRUCTION SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION SOURCE GAS THERESA LADENBURGER TOWN OF BASALT TOWN OF EAGLE TOWN OF GYPSUM US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS VALLEY LUMBER VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL WESTERN SLOPE AGGREGATE WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION ZDENEK BAUER OCTOBER 2007 PAYROLL EARLY CHILDHOOD FUND CORPORATE EXPRESS FORINASH KATHLEEN THE PARENTS HANDBOOK VERIZON WIRELESS, VILAR CENTER FOR THE ARTS VISA CARD SERVICES SOCIAL SERVICES FUND AIDAN FLEMING AMY DAVIS CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, M.A. CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CENTURYTEL CHARLENE WHITNEY SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SUP.PLIES DOT PHYSICAL - NYE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REFUND PAYROLL 21 & 22 78.00 75.00 250.00 389.45 100.00 79,769.84 41.63 100.00 5.58 1,710.00 4,026.19 55,848.01 2,000.00 184.61 36.37 2,000.00 46.14 250.00 2,000.00 75.00 126.22 250.00 864.00 113.18 47.81 78.10 2,000.00 253.79 726.56 171.39 80.00 9,191.85 41.95 611.80 606.74 2,000.00 105490.28 884,266.08 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 22.00 215.46 1,200.00 243.00 320.10 87.07 2,087.63 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 215.47 85.46 300.00 2,073.96 193.74 439.58 9 11/06/07 COpy PLUS SUPPLIES 130.80 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 335.05 DARLENE MONTANO REIMBURSEMENT 264.87 DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP SERVICE 79.00 DOREEN CONST ANINE REIMBURSEMENT 66.02 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING REIMBURSEMENT 578.39 EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF SERVICE 22.80 EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SERVICE 4,419.47 EAGLE V ALLEY PRINTING SUPPLIES 540.00 EARLY CHILDHOOD PARTNERS SERVICE 5,068.18 FORINASH KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 21.00 GARFIELD CO DEPT SOC SERV SERVICE 20.00 HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS SUPPLIES 58:95 HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 129.82 ICI SERVICE 268.65 JOHN C COLLINS PC SERVICE 8,092.00 KIDS FIRST SERVICE 4,378.00 KIM HILDERBRAND REIMBuRSEMENT 192.78 LABORATORY CORPORATION OF SERVICE 46.00 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES SERVICE 13 1.24 LEXISNEXIS SERVICE 213.61 LEXISNEXIS COURTLINK INC SERVICE 111.00 LG PRINTING COMPANY SERVICE 88.00 LYONS KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 200.59 MEEGAN MOORE REIMBURSEMENT 218.71 NICHOLAS J HOEGER REIMBURSEMENT 28257 NICOLE SISNEROS REIMBURSEMENT 116.83 PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING SERVICE 0.00 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 49.64 REBECCA LARSON REIMBURSEMENT 9.61 RITA WOODS REIMBURSEMENT 93.10 SHERI MINTZ REIMBURSEMENT 143.54 SILVER LEAF SUITES SERVICE 565.38 STATE FORMS PUBLICATIONS SUPPLIES II.52 SUSAN ARBANEY SERVICE 1,000.00 SWEEP STAKES UNLIMITED SERVICE 35.00 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 609.78 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 3,130.05 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 537.58 OCTOBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 21 & 22 110,810.97 146378.71 HEAL THY BABIES OCTOBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 21 &22 9276.80 9276.80 WRAP FUND TOWN OF AVON SERVICE 1l0.00 YOUTH ZONE SERVICE 165.00 275.00 INSURANCE RESERVE FUND COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICE 14965.04 RED CANYON AUTOBODY SERVICE 683.26 15648.30 10 11/06/07 OFFSITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND BAND B EXCAVATING CARTER & BURGESS, INC CORNERSTONE MASONRY GOVCONNECTION, INC HAMMOND CUSTOM BUILDERS. HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI 1M. ELECTRIC KENNEY & ASSOCIATES MARCIN ENGINEERING INC MITY -LITE, INC. NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT NEW WORLD SYSTEMS RELIANCE FOUNDRY CO LTD USA SAHDEANDFABRIC USABLUEBOOK VALLEY ELECTRIC SUPPLY VALLEY LUMBER VISA CARD SERVICES WESTERN SLOPE SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. A& E TIREINC ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY ALPINE VALLEY SERVICES AMERICAN FURNITURE AMERICAN SALES INCENTIVES AT AND T BUFFALO RIDGE AFFORDABLE CASTA CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING COLLETTS COLORADO DEPT REVENuE COLUMBINE MARKET CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DANA GAINEY DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING FEDERAL EXPRESS GEORGE KUERSTEN GEORGIE C ZINDA GILLIG CORPORATION HASLER INC HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE SERVICE 11,998.02 3,338.00 15,336.02 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES. SERVICE SERVICE v 295.40 48,723.00 60,498.00 258.85 12,895.77 800.00 3,840.00 85.00 4,303.75 10,705.20 6,000.00 30,959.26 1,029.50 2,211.00 159.61 57.09 5,886.00 1,998.50 19,768.00 210,473.99 SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE 1,955.14 29.95 160.96 337.22 5,126.00 1;090.00 272.70 7,830.00 250.00 198.82 8,696.84 85.80 95~64 52.36 325.00 2,844.37 48,318.07 4.68 46.74 8.72 560.00 2,545.44 189.00 1,363.77 11 11/06/07 IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SUPPLIES 222.48 J J KELLER SERVICE 138.07 JANET FIELD REIMBURSEMENT 137.46 JAY MAX SALES SUPPLIES 568.23 JEFF WETZEL SERVICE 13 1.59 KINETICO WATER PROS SERVICE 128.18 KIPLINGER LETTER SERVICE 89.00 KSKE-NRC BROADCASTING SERVICE 500.00 KW CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 2,200.00 KZYR-CooL RADIO LLC SERVICE 333.00 NATE IVIE REIMBURSEMENT 19Q.63 PAPER WISE SUPPLIES 161.57 PErry CASH ACCOUNTING REIMBURSEMENT 10 1.45 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 1,096.41 QWES1 SERVICE 162.59 REGAL PIEDMONT PLASTICS SUPPLIES 1,683.48 ( SAM COLLINS REIMBURSEMENT 240.54 SOURGE GAS SERVICE 396.33 TIM MINAROVICH SERVICE 19.09 TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 150.00 TOWN OF AVON SERVICE 1,287.65 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 451.38 UNITED STATES WELDING SERVICE 28.91 US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS SERVICE 2,544.28 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 120.68 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 4,973,20 WESTERN SLOPE BAR SUPPLIES 25.65 XCELENERGY SERVICE 75.22 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 768.11 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 129.61 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY SUPPLIES 107.96 OCTOBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYRolL 21 &22 198,~97.71 299947.68 . SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY SUPPLIES 787.45 CENTRAL SERVICESIEC REIMBURSEMENT 4.68 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 823.55 COLUMBINE MARKET SUPPLIES 98.12 COpy PLUS SERVICE 8.85 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 201.32 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 3,160.40 LAF ARGE CORPORATION SERVICE 3,979.27 PSI CRANE & RIGGING INC SERVICE 10,376.22 RAILROAD SPECIALTIES INC SERVICE 16,560.00 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICE 65,818.19 SIGNATURE SIGNS SUPPLIES 315.00 TAYLOR FENCE COMPANY SERVICE 9,366.85 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 178.64 WYLACOSUPPLYCOMPANY" SUPPLIES 1,027.77 YEH & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE 2,812.00 lIS,SI8.31 SALES TAX R.F.V. TRANSP. ROARING FORK TRANSIT AGENCY SERVICE 99,321.31 12 11/06/07 SALES TAX R.F.V. TRAILS ROARING FORK TRANSITAGEN TRANSPORTATION NEHICLE REPLACEMENT INTERMOUNTAIN COACH AIRPORT FUND A & E TIRE INC ACCESS LOCK & KEY INC AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT ARCHIBEQUE LAND CONSULTING BUREAU OF RECLAMATION CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CENTURYTEL COLLETTS COLORADO PAINT COMPANY COOPER CROUSE HINDS CORPORATE EXPRESS COULTER AVIATION DISH NETWORK DIVISION OF FIRE SAFETY DOLPHIN CPJ>ITAL CORP DRIVE TRAIN INDUStRIES EAGLE EMBROIDERY INC EAGLE V ALLEX MEDICAL ECMS INCORPORATED ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO ENDEAVOR MECHANICAL SYSTE ENERGY ABSORPTION SYSTEMS FIRKINS GARAGE DOORS GATEKEEPER SYSTEMS GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAN FARNUM PRINTING GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GRANT MILLER INCORPORATED H & H HYDRAULICS INC. HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC lMAGINIT EMBROIDERY JAY MAX SALES JBT'S CUSTOM SILK LAF ARGE CORPORATION MAIN AUTO PARTS MAVERICK FLOORING MCI WORLDCOM MCNEILUS TRUCK AND MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC MYSLIK INC NEXTEL SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES / SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 99,321.31 11,035.70 11,035.70 188,836.00 188,836.00 8,963.82 84.00 16.14 1,719.86 95.00 33,704.00 28.19 192.31 6,851.35 2,247.97 658.60 5,085.63 120.68 1,270.80 75.96 40.00 8 I 7.45 993.64 285.98 1,223.00 1,822.28 25,444.00 260.00 3,436.90 200.00 1,980.00 774.00 45.02 11.73 7,510.60 1,247.13 1,406.39 1,612.20 229.20 660.00 111.44 23.18 4,188.00 23.61 148.3 I 29,662.50 60,038.00 649.50 13 11/06/07 OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP SERVICE 1,531.85- p'AINT BUCKET THE SUPPLIES 7.46 PEAKS MAGAZINE SERVICE 6,500.00 PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING SERVICE 35.46 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPT SERVICE 3,01I.36 ROBERN RUSS REIMBURSEMENT 35.64 SERVICEMASTER CLFAN SERVICE 1,994.00 SOURCE GAS SERVICE 278.89 STATE OF COLORADO SERVICE 323.00 STEWART & STEVENSON POWER SUPPLIES 853.10 SUMMITEX, LLC SUPPLIES 184.90 TERRI MARTINEZ JOHNSON REIMBURSEMENT 12.15 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 455.05 US CUSTOMS AND BORDER SERVICE 31,445.01 US CUSTOMS SERVICE SERVICE 234.20 VAIL VALLEY PARTNERSHIP SERVICE 8,000.00 V ALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 23.41 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 8,477.01 \..., WAGNER -EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 1,669.10 WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 34.71 WESTERN IMPLEMENTS SERVICE 1,839.22 WESTERN SLOPE BAR SERVICE 400.59 WORKRITE SUPPLIES 185.76 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 338.49 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 689.63 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY SUPPLIES 43.30 OCTOBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 21 & 22 89,149.61 363,711.27 800 MHZ FUND . BUCHHOLZ F AMIL Y SERVICE 12,600.00 CENTUR YTEL OF EAGLE SERVICE 94.58 HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 1,710.83 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE 39,448.56 MCI WORLDCOM SERVICE 3,254.84 QWIfsT SERVICE 3,193.60 60,302.41 HOUSING FUND CENTURYTEL DEPT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT SERVICE 163.34 FUNDING PARTNERS FOR SERVICE 230.00 GARFIELD COUNTY HOUSING SERVICE 26,627.00 GOLDEN EAGLE ELDERLY SERVICE 1,254.00 KA TRINA COOPER SERVICE 30,000.00 KIM BELL WILLIAMS REIMBURSEMENT 55.49 VISA CARD SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT 455.82 SERVICE 211.61 OcrOBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 21 & 22 5,902.00 64899.26 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND ARIST A TEK INC SERVICE 500.00 DIVISION OF FIRE SAFETY SERVICE 20.00 14 11106/07 BURT CHEVROLET, INC SERVICE 818.79 BURT FORD ON ARAPAHOE INC SUPPLIES 338.60 BURT SUBARU SUPPLIES 79.98 BURT -DODGE,CHRYSLER,JEEP SERVICE 362.21 CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 16.77 CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE SERVICE 151.76 COLLETTS SUPPLIES 144,008.83 COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC SERVICE 108.00 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 448.36 DOCTORS ON CALL SERVICE 66.00 DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES 717.10 HENSLEY BATTERY SERVICE 720.97 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 1,006.89 JAY MAX SALES SUPPLIES 237.88 KEN SEXTON SUPPLIES 10.00 M & M AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 1,233.53 MN HUNTER SYSTEMS INC SERVICE 127.50 MSC INDUSTRiAL SUPPLY SUPPLiES 38.27 NICHOLAS J HOEGER SUPPLIES 78.58 NOVUS AUTOGLASS SERVICE 995.00 PAPER WISE SUPPLIES 119.29 \ PETTY CASH MOTOR POOL SUPPLIES 169.05 POWER MOTIVE SUPPLIES 333.16 PREMIER TIRE TERMINAL SUPPLIES 8,733.49 PST ENTERPRISES INC SUPPLIES 798.76 ROBERT JOHNSON REIMBURSEMENT 40.00 SAFETY KLEEN SUPPLIES 207.40 SOURCE GAS SUPPLIES 292.62 TIMBERLINE STEEL SUPPLIES 66.95 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 656.15 US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS SERVICE 1,878.48 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 486.46 ~ WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 1,264.52 WESTERN COLORADO SUPPLIES 508.20 WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 66.85 WHITEHALL'S ALPINE SERVICE 382.80 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 2,708.00 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 467.52 OCTOBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 21 & 22 62,045.05 234,030.28 HEALm INSURANCE FUND AFLAC ATTN:RPS SERVICE 3,123.94 DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY SERVICE 2,300.00 HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES SUPPLIES 135.00 MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. SERVICE 51,902.46 MUTUAL OF OMAHA SERVICE 4,071.42 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 209..73 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE SERVICE 4,814.10 UNITED STATES LIFE INS SERVICE 1,382.60 67939.25 ENHANCED E911 FUND LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES SERVICE 1,190.45 QWEST SERVICE 121.11 16 11/06/07 TOWN OF VAIL SERVICE REPORT TOTAL 14,135.00 15,446.56 6,023,510.71 Executive Session It was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed to go into Executive Session for the purpose of receiving legal advice and discussing matters that may be subject to negotiation regarding potential open space acquisitions which is appropriate pursuant to C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b) and (e) Colorado Revised Statutes. It was moved,.. seconded, and unanimously agreed to adjourn from Executive Session. Consent Agenda Chairman Pro- Tem Fisher stated the Chairman Menconi would not be present for the first portion of the meeting and the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of bill paying for the week of November 5, 2007 (subject to review by the Finance Director) Finance Department Representative B. Approval of the payroll for November 8,2007 ((subject to review by the Finance Director) Finance Department Representative C. Agreement between Eagle County Health & Human Services and the Literacy Project Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services D. Application for additional funds to participate in Office of Head Start Region VIII Governance Institute for Early Head Start Program Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services E. Final Settlement of Agreement between Grant Miller and Eagle County for Airport de-icing project Rick Ullom, Facilities Management F. Final Settlement of Agreement between Eagle County and Ideal Fencing Corporation for the 2007 guardrail project County Attorney's Office Representative G. Agreement between Eagle County and Valley Events Inc. for Il\arketing of events services Fair & Rodeo Office Representative H. Agreement between Eagle County and Pitkin County for 2007-2009 Snow removal Road & Bridge Department Representative I. Grant of an easementto CenturyTel for utilities alongside Cooley Mesa Road at Eagle County Regional Airport County Attorney's Office Representative J. Property Line Agreement between Eagle County and BCP-Midtown Investments IT, LLC and Quit Claim Deeds regarding Kemp/Eaton Ranch Parcel A County Attorney's Office Representative K. Agreement of Goals and Roles of Eagle County and Eagle Valley Humane Society Animal Services/County Attorney's Office Representatives 17 11/06/07 L. Lease Agreement between Eagle County and Eagle Valley Humane Society Animal ServiCes/County Attorney's Office Representatives Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. . Bryan Treu, County Attorney stated that the agenda was appropriate for approval. He stated that the Attorney's Office had received a verified notice of claim for Item E, the agreement between Grant Miller and Eagle County for Airport de-icing project. Commissioner Fisher spoke about Item K; the operating agreement between Eagle County and Eagle Valley Humane Society. She stated that the agreement was drafted to support a healthy working relationship between the Animal Services functions and the Humane Society functions as they take place in the shared facility. Commissioner Runyon echoed the comments stated by Commissioner Fisher. Commissioner Runyon moved to approve the Consent Agenda consisting ofItems A-L. Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. Citizen Input Stephanie Samuelson, Board member for the Eagle Valley Humane Society spoke. She thanked the board for their support and bringing about the lease agreement into working order S9 that efforts could continue on behalf 6fthe animals of Eagle County. Approval of the 2008 Office Supply B,d Finance Department Representative Mr. Lewis. stated that the costs were not expected to increase dramatically. They looked at the least expensive and the company that would provided the best service. Corporate Express won the bid for all general office supplies, Corporate Express Imaging for all printing toners and cartridges, and Paperwise for all paper supplie~. Commissioner Runyon move to approve the 2008 Office Supply Bid. Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Runyon moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and re-conveneas the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority. . Chairman Pro- Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared unammous. Eagle County Liquor License Authority Kathy Scriver, Clerk and Recorder's Office ESTABLISHMENT: REPRESENTATIVE: LOCATION: YEAR LICENSE ISSUED: LICENSE EXPIRATION: STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Terrance S. Marcum dIbIa Shop and Hop #3 Terrance Marcum, Owner 15 Eagle-Vail Road, Eagle-Vail November 1997 November 5, 2008 Kathy Scriver 18 11/06/07 DESCRIPTION: Show Cause Hearin~ stemming from the following events: . / . On August 22, 2007 at approximately 5:55 p.m., an employee of the establishment sold an alcoholic beverage to a minor during an underage compliance check performed by the Eagle County Sheriff's Office. (Sheriffs report attached) The License holder has stipulated to a violation of the Colorado Liquor Code, specifically: Colorado Revised Statutes Section 12-47-901 (1)( a.5) which makes it unlawful to sell, serve, give away, dispose of, exchange, or deliver or permit the sale, serving, giving, or procuring of any alcohol beverage to or for any person under the age of twenty-one years. (Copy of stipulation attached) Accordingly, this matter is before the Board for the sentencing portion of the Show Cause Hearing Eagle County's Resolution 2007-072 Concerning Eagle County beer and liquor licensing policies and procedures states that in determining the appropriate sentence or sanction to be imposed for a violation, the Authority shall consider all mitigating and aggravating circumstances surrounding the violation. The following factors shall be considered: 1. Seriousness of the violation: · This violation involves the sale of alcohol to a minor, which is considered a serious violation. 2. Prior violations and OffeJlses at the licensed premises '; · On both January 6, 1998 and September 5, 2002, the establishment reportedly violated Colorado f. . i Revised Statutes 12-47'-901(a.5)(1) which provides that it is illegal to sell any alcoholic beverage to a person under the age of twenty one year.s. 3. Whether violation constitutes a repeated course of conduct or was an isolated event · Records indicate that this was an isolated event as the prior violations occurred almost 10 and 5 years ago. 4. Corrective a~tions taken (if any) · Information may b~ provided by the license holder 5. Likelihood of recurrence · No information available 6. Willfulness of the violaiion(s) . The violation occurred as a result of an underage compliance check performed by the Eagle County Sheriffs Office and did not appear to be willful. 7. Length of time the license has been held by this licensee · 10 years 8. Previous sanctions imposed against the licensee . Clerk's records indicate that in 2002 their license was suspended for 10 days, 8 day helq in abeyance for one year. In 1998, their license was suspended for two days, with two days held in abeyance f()r a period of one year. 9. Completeness and adequacy of Alcohol Management Plan and Server Training Information provided by Licensee to the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office. · No current alcohol management plan has been provided. · Clerk's records indicate that the establishment has been responsible in providing recent server training information. 10. Whether the Licensee may be considered a responsible vendor pursuant to C.R.S. ~ 12-47-1002. 19 11/06/07 . This Licensee has complied with the Eagle County Liquor License Authority requirements concerning alcohol training for its servers. 11. Any other factors making the situation with respect to licensee or premises unique. . Total of3 violations over 10 years of business, each violation involved a sale to a minor. . This establishment has had no violations within the last 5 years. HISTORICAL ACTIONS: This is the licensee's third violation within 10 years. For a second violation within 2 years, the board has previously issued a 14-day suspension requiring the licensee to serve 5 days of active suspension and holding 9 days in abeyance for one year. DISCUSSION: Ms. Scriver stated that.an employee of the establishment sold to an underage individual during a compliance check performed by the Eagle County Sherriff's Office. The owner stipulated to the violation. The matter is' before the board for the sentencing portion of the show cause hearing. The board shall consider all mitigating and aggravating factors as presented in the staff report. Chairman Pro-TefIl Fisher asked Mr. Marcum if he had any concerns with the Sherriff's report. Mr. Marcum stated that everything happened as presented in the report. It was a busy night, there were people lined up, and the employee was overwhelmed. He believes that the sting occurred during their busiest hour of the whole week. He is surprised that it happened. Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher asked when the last qocumented SherrifPs visit occurred. Detective Doug Winters stated that the visits are annual. Chairman Pro- Tem Fisher stated that she noticed that no alcohol management plan was On file in the Clerk's Office. Mr. Marcum stated that he had provided an alcohol management plan was provided in 2002." . Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher suggested that Mr. Marcum find a copy and make sure that everything is still in effect and provide to the Clerk's Office. Mr. Marcum stated that his manager has been with him for ten years. Mr. Hayes trains the each person individually. Chairman Pro-Tem fisher asked if the employee that sold the alcohol was terminated. Mr. Marcum stated that it was a mutual agreement. Mark Haynes, store manager spoke. He does not make excuses for his employee. He believes that the employee was ashamed of him self. Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher asked if the employee had gone to court. Mr. Winters stated that he would have had a first appearance. Depending on his past he would have probably get a fine. Mr. Winters stated that Detective Brandon Beaudette was present. Mr. Beaudette wrote the situation. Chairman Pro-Tem Fisherstated that the fact that a sting hasn't produced a sale to a minor!n 5 years says a lot for the operation. It's unfortunate that the establishment had an employee that sold to a minor. There are no exceptions to the statutes for being busy. The alcohol management plan does not require that you terminate an employee if they sell to a minor. She believes there are mitigating circumstances in that regard although, employees need to have a clear understanding of what the ultimate consequence may be. She suggested the board suspend the license for 14 days, holding 11 in abeyance. Commissioner Runyon moved that the Local Licensing Authority suspend the liquor license of Terrance S. Marcum d/b/a Shop and Hop #3 for 14 days, holding 11 days in abeyance for a period of one (1) year. If Shop and Hop #3 violates the Colorado Liquor Code within the year, all days will be served in addition to any other penalty that may be imposed by the Authority. The 3 days of active suspension must be served within the next 60 days with at least two (1) ofthose days being a Saturday. No days served shall be on a Sunday or a legal holiday. Chairman Pro- Tem fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. 20 11/06/07 Commissioner Runyon moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority and re-convene as the Board 'of County Board of Social Services. Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. Board of Social Services Kate Forinash, Health & Human Services Ms. FQrinash stated that once a quarter her department presents to the commissioners information regarding the client benefit payrolls in the Department of Health and Human Services programs. These client,benefits include things like cash benefits to folks who are disabled, elderly, families. It may be payment for the cost of childcare through the Colorado Childcare Assistance Program, food stamps, payments for therapists, and etc. At the recommendation of the auditor, they present the actual payrolls that were distributed through the electronic client benefit system for approval. Commissioner Runyon asked about the isol~ted numbers without any annual comparisons have very little meaning. He suggested that the numbers be graphed for more clarification. Ms. Forinash stated that the numbers could be graphed in the future. She stated that the total amount of payrolls in the 3rd quarter of this year was $348,816.94. The total amount in the same 3rd quarter in 2006 was $383,843.45 so there is a minimum variation from one year to the other. Commissioner Runyon asked how many years back are records available. Ms. Forinash stated as far back as 1992. Commissioner Runyon moved that the Board of Social Services accept and certify the payrolls thAt have been transmitted through ~lectronic fund transfer. . Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. . Runyon moved to adjourn as the Board of Social Services andre-convene as the Board of County Commissioners. Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting Cotnmissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. Other Mr. Treu requested that Commissioner Runyon move to rescind his previous motion to approve the consent agenda and re-move to approve the consent agenda and authorize the Chairman to sign the approved agreements. Commissioner Runyon moved to rescind his previous motion to approve the consent agenda and re-moved to approve the consent agenda A-L and authorize the Chairman to sign the approved agreements. Chairman Pro- Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. Planning Files PDF-00098 Vines at Vail Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Planning Department ACTION: A final plat, mixed use PUD approxiInately 39 acres. LOCATION: Wolcott north of the Eagle River and the Union Pacific Railroad 21 11/06/07 FILE NOJPROCESS: PROJECT NAME: OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PDF-00098; Final Plat Vines at Vail PUD Final Plat Kiwa Associates, LLC Owner Owner I 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY OF REOUEST: The intent of this plat is to create three (3) Tracts (C, E, F- private right of way, utilities, drainage); 14 lots (A, B 1, B2, B4, Dl and D2- mixed use; CI-C7- single family home lots); common area; and easements. The Vines at Vail PUD was approved in 2006. The project includes a working winery complete with tasting room (the focal aspect of the proposal); a lodge with a limited number of independent suites for guests; a community pavilion; residential units including live-work residential units above a pedestrian oriented plaza; single family residences; employee housing units; office space; recreational, agricultural, and landscape features; educational spaces; a library; medical offices; galleries; restaurants; arts and crafts studios; private clubs spaces; retail shop spaces; resort support services; and conference facilities. Subsequent condominium plats will follow construction of the mixed-use development. B. BLM/Unplatted South: Railroad ROW East: BLM/Unplatted Private lands/Unplatted Resource 22 11/06/07 Via Hwy 131 C. CHRONOLOGYIBACKGROUND: 2004- The property was purchased from Holy Cross Electric, by the applicant. 2005- The applicants receive approval for the Vines at Vail PUD Sketch Plan. 2005- This property (along with surrounding properties) is included in the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District after Wolcott area property owners vote to be included in the District; the . applicant was now obligated to work in conjunction with the District for water and wastewater services. 2006- The ERWSD water storage tank Location and Extent application, a component of the overall District/Vines of V ail water/wastewater system receives approval by the Planning Commission for its location on the adjacent Bureau of Land Managementproperty. The water tank is part of the ERWSD regional water system. 2006- Vines at Vail PUD Preliminary Plan, Zone Change and associated 1041 Permit were approved. I 2. STAFF REPORT ( A. NECESSARY FINDINGS: PROCESS INTENT ECLUR Section: 5-280.B.5 Subdivision Final plat Section Purpose: At the meeting on the Final Plat for Subdivision, the Board of County Commissioners shall review the Final Plat, the submittal materials, provide both County staff and the applicant an opportunity to . comment, and approve or disapprove the Final Plat for Subdivision based. on whether it conforms to the approval given to the Preliminary. Plan for Subdivision and the standards in Section 5-280.B.3.e., Standards., considering specifically the adequacy of required improvements and the acceptance of areas dedicated for public use and easements. , Stand~rds: 5-280.B.5.b (3) and 5-280.B.3.e Pursuant to Section 5-280.B.5.b (3), oftheEagle County Land Use Regulations, it has been found ili~ / (1) This final plat conforms to, and is consistent with the intentions, representations and conditions as approved with the Preliminary Plan for the subdivisionIPUD. (2) Required improvements are adequate including roadways, pedestrian and recreation pathways, and infrastructure. (3) Areas dedicated for public use and all anticipated easements are as approved in the Preliminary Plan and are acceptable as presented in the Final Plat application. STANDARD: Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-290.G.1.a] - The proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan and the FLUM of the Comprehensive Plan. COMPREHENSiVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map defers to the community-specific Wolcott Area Community Plan. WOLCOTT AREA COMMUNITY PLAN . 23 11/06/07 Activity Center/Area Outside Activity Center x x Xl x X x x x x X21X3 X3- A Wildlife Enhancement and Mitigation Plan was considered lJRd incorporated as part of the Preliminary Plan application. X2- The majority of the commercial retail, etc. space is clustered at the western end of the development in the - 'Activity Center' where the more intenSive activity is to occur. According to the Wolcott Area Community '.- Plan, "Types of uses proposed include co~ercial, light industrial, warehousing; agricultural activity and small residential. Any use which utilizes haiardous materials should be located in this area." X3- The eastern area of the proposed development is inline with the intent for areas outside of the activity center. ) According to the Wolcott Area Community Plan uses like Inns, lodges, restaurants, dude ranches, and recreational, educational or cultural oriented operations are recommended and appropriate. ' EAGLE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PLAN x x x x Xl x X Xl- The Vines at Vail was not located in a recognized unique landform area of the county; however it was determined that an area near the single family home lots was affected by potential rockfall. As such, rockfall mitigation was approved with the application and is reflected on the Plat. 24 11/06/07 ( . \. x x x x Through the application for 1041, it has been determined that the Vines at Vail will not be detrimental to the watershed ofthe Eagle River. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Consistent with Land Use RegulationS. [Section 5-290.G.1.b] The proposed subdivision shallcomply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts. and Article 4, Site Development Standards. X X X X X X X X X X' X X X X X X X X X Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1) Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2) ! Sign Regulations (Division 4-3) Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410) Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420) Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430) Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450) Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460) Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5) Noise and Vibration (Section 4-520) Smoke and Particulates (Section 4-530) Heat, Glare, Radiation and Electrical Interference (Section 4-540) Storage of Hazardous and Non-hazardous Materials (Section 4-550) Water QUality Standards (Section 4-560) Roadway Standards (Section 4-620) Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630) Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640) Drainage Standards (Section 4-650) 25 11/06/07 x x x x x Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660) Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670) Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680) Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690) Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7) -'-.. , . Applicable ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEETMThmMUM STANDARDS ' STANDARD: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-290.G.l.c] The proposed subdivision shall be located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns .that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (1) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment\kJ the service plan. Proposed road extensions shall be consistent with the Eaf!leCountv Road CaDitaI lmorovements Plan. (2) Serve Ultimate P9pulation. Vtility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population ojthe service areoto avoidfuture land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. . (3) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed wh'en the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANnARD: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-290.G.l.d] The property proposed to be subdivided shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or human-miMe hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future improvements to the area. The areas subject to construction are developable. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-290.G.l.e] - The proposed subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. 26 11/06/07 The findings for the Preliminary Plan and Zone Change for the Vines a~-V ail PUD effectively demonstrated that this project is sufficiently compatible for development in this area of Wolcott. Approval of this Final Plat does not modify this previous finding. ' ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS . MEETS TIlE MAJORITY OF MINIMuM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Improvements Agreements. [Section 5-290.G.1.f] - The adequacy of the proposed Improvements Agreement, where applicable. Certain improvements are necessary and are collateralized through a Subdivision Improvements Agreement. Improvements include pedestrian paths, roadways and trails. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS TIlE. MArORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Conformance with Final Plat Requirements. [Section 5-290.G.1.g] - Its conformance with the FinalPlat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM/STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM'ST. ANDARDS DOES NOTMEETMnrrMUM STANDARDS D. BQARDOF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OPTIONS: 1. Approve the [PDF -00098] request without conditions if it is determined that the petition will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and the proposed use is attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land UseRegulations and with"the guidelines ofthe Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 2. Deny the [PDF -00098J request if it is determined that the petition will adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and/or the proposed use is not attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties. and uses and the proposal is not in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (andlorother applicable master plans). 3. Table the [PDF-00098J request if additional information is required to fully evaluate the petition. Give specific direction to the petitioner and staff. . 4. Approve the [PDF -00098J request with conditions and/or performance standards if it is determined that certain conditions and/or performance standards are necessary to ensure public, health, safety, and welfare and/or enhances the attunement of the use with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 27 11/06/07 DISCUSSION: Ms. Skinner-Markowitz presented the highlights of the request. She stated that the intent of the plat is to create three tracts, 14 lots, common area and easements. The vines at Vail, approve in 2006, proposes to createa commercial/residential, mixed-use PUD on approximately 39 acres. S~e listed the proposed uses approve for the project. She provided the background on the property as provided in the staff report. She provided photos of the site and vicinity map of the area and current Uses. She indicated that the applicant had satisfied all of the minimum standards required for final plat. Sid Fox spoke on behalf ofthe applicant. He stated that Patrick Chirchillo was present on behalf ofKiwa Associates. He stated that there was an error on the plat. He further stated that they had reviewed the staff report and findings and had nO comments other than to suggest that the board consider approval without conditions. . Chairman Menconi opened public comment. There was none. He closed public comment. Commissioner Fisher stated that she had not heard the file previously. She asked if all the permits had been granted and ifstaff recommended any conditions. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that staff was not recommending any specific conditions. The applicant had received all their approvals from Eagle County. Commissioner Runyon asked about the section to the east, which would be dedicated open space. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that there were two different open space tracts, one is restricted, and one is recreational. Commissioner Runyon asked Mr. Chirchillo to come down to the microhpone and explain his plans in tenns of timing. ~ Mr. Chirchillo stated that things were moving along. He was waiting for the final plat to move forward and they hoped to break ground by springtime. Commissioner Runyon wondered about the access issues related to the blind spot On Hwy 131. Mr. Chirchillo stated that he has joint access with the waste management and they will do what they have to do to provide the best site distance. It was part of the CDOT access permit process. Both the County and CDOT did an analysis and came up with a safe plan. Commissioner Runyon stated that he had previously voted against the original plan but on staff's recommendation that the applicant has fulfilled their prior commitment, he is now in favor of the file moving forward. . Commissioner Fisher moved to approve file no. PDF-00098 Vines at Vail PUD Final Plat incorporating staff's findings and without conditions. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. LUR- 0073 - Conservation Subdivision Joe Forinash, Planning Department ACTION: Amendment of the Eagle County Land Use Regulation to add a new Section 5-295 Conservation Subdivision, and make other related amendments to provide additional incentives and limitations for cluster development. LOCATION: N/A APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: Amendment to Chapter D: Articles 2, 3, 5 and 6 LUR-0073/ Amendment to Land Use Regulations Regarding Conservation Subdivision (Cluster Development) Eagle County Department of Community Development Eagle County Department of Community Development TITLE: FILE NO./PROCESS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval EAGLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval (4-0) 28 11/06/07 ROARING FORK VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:' Approval with conditions (3-0) PLANNING COMMISSION DELIBERATION: Eagle County Planning Commission Commissioners asked whether workforce housing would be a requirement. Given that a large conservation subdivision inightbe proposed, the impact on workforce housing could be significant. It was also noted that joint venture arrangements might be used within conservation subdivisions, in a manner similar to the early years in Beaver Creek, to effectively convey accessory dwelling units (ADUs) without subdivision. A question was raised as to whether it would be advisable to include Resource Preservation (RP) as a ZOne district in which Conservation Subdivisions are allowed. Finally, one of the illustrations in the staff presentation showed a trail along the water way and within the wetland area. Such an alignment should be avoided as the conservation subdivision provisions are implemented. The Eagle County Planning Commission recommends approval of the LUR amendment. Roaring Fork Vallev Regional Planning Commission Commissioners asked about the history and impetus for the proposed amendment and whether it was initiated in response to citizen requests. They also asked for clarification of the benefit to a property owner of using these provisions and whether the 67% or more left undeveloped could continue to be used for agricultural purposes. A mechanism would be necessary to make sure these conservation! agricultural land tracts are properly managed. These tracts might be owned by a property owners association. The size of the resulting lots, especially if 85% of a parcel in the Agricultural Limited (AL) were designated a conservation!agriculturalland tract was also discussed with a concern that the lots might be too small. Commissioners also asked whether the maximWll size of the dwelling units is in the e~isting cluster development provisions in the regulations. The concern expressed was that 5,000 square feet might be too restrictive and might limit the use of the proposed provisions. Commissioners asked about provisions tp prevent property owners from subdividing a parcel and selling off the water rights On the approval, thereby opening up the possibility of a "weed patch". Could water rights be made inalienable? Finally, the Commissioners asked about how staffhad responded to the referral rdsponses. The Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission recommends approval of the LUR amendment with the conditions that: [1] house sizes not be limited, and [2] water rights on the conservation! agricultural land tracts be made inalienable. 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: This application proposes to amend the Eagle County Land Use Regulations in the following manner: Description of Proposed Amendment There are provisions in the Land Use Regulations which allow cluster subdivisions and provide certain density bonuses. However, the current provisions have rarely if ever been utilized. Consequently, the existing provisions would be eliminated by this amendment and new provisions would be added which are intended to [1] provide greater incentives to cluster residential lots under what is now being referred to as conservation subdivisions, [2] require the permanent setting aside of conservation!agriculturallands tracts with limited, relatively low impact uses in exchange for density bonuses, and [3] provide sufficient design criteria and review standards to ensure that the proposed conservation subdivisions meet the intent of these regulations. Conservation subdivisions would be allowed only in Resource (minimWll lot size 35 acres), Resource Limited (minimum 20 acres), Agricultural Residential (minimWll 10 acres) and Agricultural Limited (minimWll 5 acres) zone districts. Density bonuses would be allowed on a sliding scale based on the 29 11/06/07 . amount ofland that is set aside in conservationlagriculturallands tracts. For example, the allowed residential density in the Resource zone district without a density bonus is 1 unit per 35 acres. Under the proposed provisions, the allowed density would increase to 1 unit per 25 acres if at least 67 percent of the site is set aside in a conservationl agriculturallands tract, and the allowed density would increase incrementally to as much as 1 unit per 17.5 acres if at least 85 percent of the site is set aside in a conservationlagriculturallands tract. Similar density bonuses would be allowed in the other zone districts as wetl. In the event that at least 85 percent of the site is set aside in a conservationlagriculturallands tract, the maximum resulting density would be twice that which would otherwise be allowed without a density bonus. Related Amendments to the Land Use Regulations There are several related amendments to the Land Use Regulations which also must be made to provide consistency with the amendment described above. They are as follows: 1. Section 2-110, Definitions, specifically the definition of Cluster Development, which would be amended to reflect the proposed Conservation Subdivision. See the revised text which is attached to this staff report. 2. Section 3-210.D., Rural Residential (RR), which describes the purpose of the Rural Residential zone district, must be revised to delete the reference to clustered development since. conservation subdivision would not be a pennitted use in this zone district. The phrase and reference to "clusteted deveiopment" is also proposed to be changed to "conservation subdivision in each of Secti~n 3.21 O.E., Agricultural Limited (AU; Section 3.210.F., Agricultural Residential (AR); Section 3.210'.0., Resource Limited (RL); and Section 3.210.H., Resource (R). See the revised text which is attached to this staff report. 3. Table 3-300, Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule, must be revised to delete the Cluster Development Option A and Cluster Development Option B uses, which are no longer applicable, and to add the Conservation Subdivision use and indicate that it ispermftted by special review in the AL, AR, RL and R zone districts and not permitted in all other zone districts. See the r:evised porti~n of Table 3-300 which is attached to this staff report. '-- 4. Section 3-310.B., Cluster Development. must be revised to reflect the somewhat different approach reflected in the proposed conservation subdivision amendmeht. See the revised text which is attached to this staff report. 5. Article 5. Table of Contents. Must be revised to add a line for the proposed new Section 5-295, Conservation Subdivision. 6. Certain exemptions to the subdivision requirements of the Land Use Regulations are set forth in Section 5-280.B.2., Exemptions. One particular reference to the current Section 3-310.B.2.a., Cluster Development Option A, must be revised to reflect the new Section 5-295, Conservation Subdivision. See the revised text which is attached to this staff report. 7. The definitions of Type A Subdivision and Type B Subdivision must be revised to allow subdivision to more than three lots when these procedures are used in conjunction with conservation subdivisions. See the revised text for Section 5-290.B.l., Type A Subdivision, and Section 5-290.B.2., Type B Subdivision, which are attached to this staff report. 8. The procedure for a Type A or Type B Subdivision (Section 5-290.C., Procedure) must be clarified to reflect that the procedures for these types of subdivisions follows those set forth in the amendment creating conservation subdivisions (5-295) rather than those that would be used for a conventional Type A or Type B Subdivision. 30 11/06/07 9. Finally, it is contemplated that certain of the lots created under the provisions of Section 5-295, Conservation Subdivision, will be smaller than the minimum lot size for the ZOne district in which they occur. Consequently, that part of Section 6-120, Nonconforming Lots of Record. (specifically Section 6-120.A., General) must be revised to acknowledge the non-conformity of these lots. See the revised text which is attached to this staff report. r / \ Staff Analysis Trade-offs These proposed regulations represent a compromise between competing values. On the one hand, the Comprehensive Plan encourages development to be located near existing towns and community centers. Such a development pattern tends to make the most efficient use of public infrastructure, favor transit use over automobile use to access employment and shopping, and preserve lands further away from the towns and community centers for agricultural and other open lands purposes. i- On the other hand, statutes allow property owners to subdivide land into parcels of35 acres or more without submittingJo County subdivision requirements. The result is that large parcels have sometimes been subdivided to allow single family dwellings spread out on a number of35 acre parcels, tending to break up what would otherwise be open, agricultural lands. These proposed regulations would provide incentives in the form of density bonuses t<? group such dwellings on smaller lots and preserve a large portion of the parceJs, including the more productive agricultural and environmentally sensitive lands, in conservationlagriculturallands tracts. Conservation easements - who would hold them? It is expected that each conservation subdivision would be implemented through the use of conservation easement agreement which would permanently protect the resulting conservationlagriculturallands tracts from development. In some, or perhaps most instances, the privat~ land trusts which operate in Eagle County may not be willing to hold the resulting conservation easements and assume the responsibility for the monitoring of the use of the land and the legal defense of the easement. An alternative is to involve the Eagle County Land Trust which h~ been created but does not currently hold any conservation easements. The private land trusts typically require a payment by the landowner of an amount that will provide a perpetual source of revenue for monitoring the use of conservation easements under its resportsibility. A similar requirement could be relied upon with respect to conservationlagriculturallands tracts created pursuant to these regulations. Yet another alternative (which would require some modification of the proposed text) would be to rely on plat note restrictions and/or covenants, amendments of which would be subject to County approval. Under this alternative, monitoring the uses of the conservationlagriculturallands tracts would most likely be addressed by the County's code enforcement procedures and policies. Adiudicated water rights A requirement of the building code for any dwelling is adequate water for domestic purposes. When water is not provided by a metro district or other public source, well permits are subject to statutory and regulatory provisions administered by the State Engineer through the Division of Water Resources. Since residential lots would be created under County subdivision regulations rather than through a subdivision exemption process, it is likely that any property owner taking advantage of the provisions of these proposed regulations would be required by the State to have an adjudicated source of water. Such a requirement would tend to be a disincentive to the use of these provisions. Response to comments 31 11/06/07 Staffhas received several referral comments regarding the proposed regulations as noted below. As a result, a number of revisions have been incorporated in the draft. Please refer to the attached revised draft. 2. STAFF REPORT B. REFERRAL RESPONSES: Environmental Health . Section 5-295.e., Shared Septic Systems, includes the phrases "encouraged to the extent practicable" and "adequate maintenahce program" which seem somewhat vague. Maybe it would be better to have "as determined by the Environmental Health Department after each of those phrases". . ECO Transit . Why allow one residential building site outside the grouped lots? . If the residences are ctustered, why limit the density to 1/25 to 1 / 2.5? It seems that a developer m~y not find value in this density and may choose not to cluster-while a higher density bonus may provide that incentive. In addition, if the clustering should occur closer to the town center and particularly near a transit stop, it may be appropriate to have a higher density. Colorado Division of Wildlife . The DOW supports this amendment to the Eagle County Land Use Regulations to provide incentives and limitations for clustered development Currently loss of wildlife habitat is the largest issue facing theDOW in managing wildlife populations. . . Regarding Section 5-295.E.12., Access to the Conservation/Agricultural Lands Tracts. is the intent of this section to protect growirig crops, livestock or sen~itive wildlife habitats? The DOWsupports these protections but cautions that developments adjacent to other public . lands can have significant impacts from dispersed recreation. . Regarding Section 5-295.G.5., Preservation:ofLands of Significant Conservation Value. is there a defmition of these values? . Regarding Section 5-295.G.5.a., Uses Allowed. the allowed uses should include seasonal closures to protect growing crops, livestock, sensitive wildlife habitat and sensitive habitat types (riparian, wetlands, etc.). Any dispersed recreation trails should have a program to provide sufficient maintenance to prevent erosion and noxious weeds. Dominic Mauriello, Mauriello Planning Group . Section 5-295C., Uses. states that "lots created through this process will be considered legal non- conforming lots". We cannot understand why the County would create a regulation that promotes and creates nonconformities. It seems to us that you would structure the regulation to result in conforming parcels which might mean amending other provisions of the code. Sid Fox, Fox & Company . Regarding 5-295.D.5., Process. if you can only Special Use and either a Type A or Type B Minor Subdivision, how could you do a Conservation Subdivision of more than 3 lots? Referral Agencies: Various Eagle County departments, private planning firms that work in Eagle County, engineering firms and surveyors that work in Eagle County, Colorado state agencies, Federal agencies, ambulance and fire districts, utility providers and special districts, other agencies including the Cattleman's Association, various home owners associations and design review boards, all towns in Eagle County, Open Space Advisory Committee. C. STAFF DISCUSSION: 32 11/06/07 1. Pursuant to Chapter 1, Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 1.15.04 Referrals. the proposed amendments HA VE been referred to the appropriate agencies, including all towns within Eagle County, and to the Colorado Division of Local Affairs; 2. Pursuant to Chapter 1, Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 1.15.05 Public Notice, Public notice HAS been given; 3. PursuanttoChapter 2, Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-230.B.2 Text Amendment: a. The proposed amendments AMEND ONLY THE TEXT of Chapter II, Articles 2, 3, 5 and 6, and DO NOT amend the Official Zone District Map. b. Precise wording ()f the proposed changes HAS been provided (please see attached). 4. Pursuant .to Chapter 2, Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-230.D., Standards for the review of Amendments to the Text of the Land Use Regulations, as applicable: STANDARD: Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-230.D.l.]. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, policies and FLUM (Future Land Use Map) of the Comprehensive Plan. EAGLE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN x x x x General Governance - tonforms to the policies of this section of the Comprehensive Plan; specifically, with the core values. Development- Residential uses inthe rural part of the County would be clustered, reducing infrastructure costs and preserving open areas. The resulting development could be approved only if it is sustainable in nature and would not exceed the capacity of physical, environmental or social resources. The viability for ~gricultural uses would be supported or enhanced and agriculturally productive lands would be preserved to a high extent. However, the resulting development may compromise the goal of retaining open, undeveloped corridors between towns and community centers nor does it necessarily foster the creation of,high density transit oriented community centers. Economic Resources - The resulting development may have the effect of preserving agriculturally productive lands and supporting or enhancing the viability of agricultural uses in Eagle County. Housing - The resulting development may result in an improved diversity of dwelling types and sizes in the County and result in the number of accessory dwelling units. However, it would not cause attainable work force housing to necessarily be located near local work centers. Infrastructure and SerVices - The potential exists to ensure that road specifications are adequate but not over designed, that the clustered conservation subdivisions will not be adequately served by all community services, 33 11/06107 although local private water and septic systems may suffice. Emergency services may be less adequate than if the dwelrJing units were to be located within a community center. Water Resources - The opportunity will exist to ensure that both .ground and surface water source areas will be protected and that proof of legal and adequate water will be provided. , I Wildlife Resources - The opportunity will exist to ensure that wildlife habitat will not be negatively affected or enhanced, the cumulative impacts on wildlife will be considered, buffers will be provided to separate wildlife habitat from development, wildlife friendly measures will be incorporated into the design of individual home sites, and that adequate measures will be in effect to control impacts to wildlife from domestic dogs. Sensitive Lands - The opportunity will exist to avoid areas of significant natural hazard, protect the integrity of the natural environment and the area's visual quality, preserve lands of high conservation value, and enSure that the conservation/agricultural lands will be well managed for the longterm. Environmental Ouality - The opportunity will exist to ensure that there will be nO undue impacts on environmental quality . Future Land Use Map (FLUM) - The proposed development would be consistent with the Future Land Use Map except that the densities resulting from the density bonuses would exceed, in certain cases, the densities contemplated in the FLUM. The policies listed above generally support the intention of these amendments. [+1_) FINDING: Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-230.D.1.] Although the fmdings with respect to the Comprehensive Plan are mixed, the proposed regulation aniendment IS generally in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. STANDARD: Compatible with surrounding uses. [Section 5-230.D.2.] Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land, and is the appropriate zone district for the land, considering its consistency with the purpose and standards of the proposed zone district. The issue of compatibility does not pertain directly to this proposal; however, it could be interpreted that/ limited residential development with a substantial amount of preserved open space would be compatible with adjacent residential and Undeveloped areas. [n/a) FINDING: Compatible with surrounding uses. [Section 5-230.D.2.] - The issue of compatibility in its intended context IS NOT applicable to this proposed amendment. STANDARD: Changed conditions. [Section 5-230.D.3.] Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment to modify the use or density/intensity. Conditions have changed such that the proposed amendments are necessitated. Pressure to subdivide tracts of land, either with or without the benefit of County subdivision review, will continue to increase. Conservation subdivisions will allow alternative development in appropriate circUmstances and provide incentives to protect a substantial amount of the site as conservation/agricultural land tracts which will remain undeveloped. [+) FINDING: Changed conditions. [Section 5-230.D.3.] There ARE changed conditions that require this amendment. 34 11/06/07 STANDARD: Effect on natural environment. [Section 5-230.DA.] Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significantly adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water, air, noise, stormwaier management, wildlife habitat, vegetation, and wetlands. This amendment will not result in adverse impacts on the natural environment. On the contrary, these amendments are expected to have a positive effect on the environment by providing incentives to concentrate development in certain areas and protecting mQre environmentally sensitive land from development. i [+} FINDING: Effect on natural environment. [SectiQn5-230.DA;] - The prQPQsed amendment WILL NOT result in significantly adverse impacts onthe natural environment~ including but not l~mited to water, air, noise, stormwater management, wildlife habitat, vegetation, and wetlands. STANDARD: Community need [Section 5-230.D.5.] Whether and the extent to which theproposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need It has become increasingly important that sensitive areas within unincorporated Eagle County be preserved for future generations. The proposed regulations will encourage compact development while permanently preserving more environmentally sensitive land. [+} FINDING: Community need. [Section 5-230.D.5.] - It HAS BEEN demonstratedthat the proposed amendment addresses a community need. STANDARD: Development patterns. [Section 5-230.D.6.] - Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly development pattern, and not constitute spot zoning, and whether the resulting development can logically be provided with necessary public facilities and services. Zone changes will not be necessary to implement the conservation subdivisiQn provisions, although the potential does exist fQr a zone change application from R to RL, AR or AL to accompany a conservation subdivision application. In many if not most cases, it is expected that water and wastewater treatment will occur on-site with private systems. In those instances in which conservation subdivisions are. proposed adjacent to or in close proximity to existing cQmmunity centers; there will be an opportunity to consider the inefficiency of any proposed extension of public facilities and services. The conservatiQn subdivision provisions will tend to encourage the creation of more residentiallots in outlying portions of Eagle County than would be the case under existing zoning. However, this may be offset by the preservation of more environmentally sensitive lands in the conservationlagriculturallands tracts which would comprise ofa minimum of 67 percent of the site of the conservation subdivision. To the extent this is so, the resulting development pattern may be regarded as logical and .orderly. [+/-] FINDING: Development patterns. [Section'5-230.D.6.] - The proposed amendment WILL NOT constitute SPQt zQning, MAY result in a logical and orderly development pattern, and, when appropriate, the resulting development MAY logically be provided with necessary public facilities and services. STANDARD: Public interest. [Section 5-230.D.7.] - Whether and the extent to which the area to which the proposed amendment would apply has changed or is changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage a new use or density in the area. Although residential uses are permitted in all zone districts in which conservation subdivisions are allowed, the proposed amendment would allow greater residential density in exchange fQr the preservation of conservation/agricultural land tracts. The trade-off between greater density, on the one hand, and the 35 11/06/07 permanent preservation of conservation/agricultural land tracts, on the other, may well ser,ve the public interest. [+/_] FINDING: Public interest. [Section 5-230.D.7.] - The area to which the proposed amendment would apply has changed or is changing to such a degree that it MAY BE is in the public interest to amend the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. . DISCUSSION: Mr. Forinash presented the draft revision to the Land Use Regulations, which would change provisions regarding cluster development, noW referred to as conservation subdivision. The amendment would provide some additional incentives for individuals to cluster development in more ruml areas of the county. The benefits of cluster type development would minimize impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. The draft has been revised based on referral response and planning commission comments, and continued staff discussions. The conservation . subdivision would be a use allowed by special review. There are four zone districts, Resource (R.), Resource Limited (RL), Agricultural Residential (AR), and Agricultural Limited (AL). The minimum land area in the zone districts is twice the minimum lot size fee each zone. There are a number of requirements, which include a special use permit requirement, final plat requirement, 72% of parcel would have to be conserved, proof of adequate water and wastewater treatment, disclosure of ownership interest in adjacent properties and Conservation/Agricultural lands management plan. The key provision is the density bonus. The bonus would vary for each zone district depending upon the amount of the land being set aside. The proposed regulations includes certain design criteria affecting efficient layout, road and infrastructure alignments, resource protection, shared septic systems, maximum si~e of dwelling units, residential building sites not in a cluster, maximum number of dwelling units per cluster, minimum residential lot size, accessory dwelling units, dimensional limitations, access to conservation/agricultural lands tract, landscaping, lighting, fencing, and signage. Several related amendments are proposed to Article 3, 5 and 6 to be consistent with the new provisions. The Eagle County Planning Commission recommended approval without conditions. The Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission recommended approval with two conditions. One condition was limiting house sizes ~d the second condition was that water rights are made inalienable. Commissioner Runyon wondered how staff came up with the percentages and what the previous bonus densities were. MrtForinash stated that the density bonuses provided now are very limited. The proposed numbers are statute driven; they simply filled in the blanks. Commissioner Runyon wondered if there would be any advantages to doing a study in the building community. The 40% is higher than he antll;:ipated. .. Mr. Forinash stated that it would take a significant amount of surveying because it is not only the development community but also relates to property owners in rural parts of the county. The numbers could be reworked if necessary. Commissioner Runyon stated that he believes it is important to get the right number and provided some flexibility. Commissioner Fisher stated that the flexibly is listed under the design criteria. The fact that they would have to come in for a special use permit and the approval then becomes board based. Mr. Forinash stated that it may be possible to adjust the wording so the maximum density bonuses sound less like a sure thing. Commissioner Runyon wondered if anyone could ask for a variance on land use regulations. Mr. Montag stated that it would difficult to demonstmte the hardship on something like this. Chairman Menconi requested that the board review and accept the comments on Pg. 6 of 10 of the staff report. He stated that the board needed to acknowledge the referrals, public notice, the text amendment, and the standards for the review ofd1e amendments. He stated that all had been dealt with appropriately. Commissioner Fisher and Commissioner Runyon concurred. Chairman Menconi stated that he was prepared to vote in favor of the amendment as proposed by Mr. Forinash. Commissioner Runyon suggested an amendment to modify the wording to indicate that the amendment is a start point of discussion. '-...- 36 11/06/07 Chairman Menconi wondered if there would be a way to accommodate Commissioner Runyon's request without making it too flexible. Mr. Morris stated that he would be more inclined to call it similar to a PUD but a very limited form of a PUD in a sense that you could achieve greater density but would have to meet certain guidelines, in this case, there is a cap on the amount density that one could achieve. He stated that E-7 states that the maximum number of home sites shall be dependent on the subject property's physical characteristics and the degree to which the proposal conforms to the design criteria. Commissioner Runyon stated that he just wanted some flexibility to go in both directions. He didn't want to lose the possibility of some clustered development because the guidelines are too rigorous either. Mr. Morris stated that that was not a legal question, that's a policy issue. Mr. Montag stated that it is easy to set the maximum and go lower ifneeded. It's a little more difficult to go ab\1lve what the maximum is in the land use regulations. He believes the 40% bonus is a pretty good incentive. He suggested that the board give it a try and see if they bould get developers and land owners to utilize the process based on the 40% bonus. He suggested leaving the amendment where it is now and if it needs tweaking later, they can do that. Co~missioner Runyon moved that the Board approve File No. LUR-0073 to add a new Section 5-295, Conservation Subdivision, to Chapter II, Article 5, and to amend the Chapter II, Article 2, Defmitions; Article 3, Section 3-210, Residential. Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts; Article 3, Section 3-300, Residential. Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Table; Article 3, Section 3-310, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Residential Agricultural and Resource Uses; Article 5: Table of Contents; Article 5, Section 5-280, Subdivision; Article 5, Section 5-290, Minor Subdivision. and Article 6, Section 5-290, Minor Subdivision. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Chairman Menconi asked Mr. Forinash if this would be his last major land use regulation. Mr. Forinash stated that it appeared to be the case. Mr. Montag stated that Mr. Forinash is currently working on the TOR program. They will be getting as niuch work out of him as 1heycan before December 14. \ Chairman Menconi stated that he appreciated Mr. Forinash's efforts. Mr. Montag thanked Mr. Forinash for his time and effort on the conservation subdivision and all his hard work and dedication. Commissioner Runyon added his thanks. Attest: ~ the m~~ adjourned until November 13, 2007. C an 37 11/06/07