HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/06/07
Present:
Am Menconi
Sara Fisher
Peter Runyon
Bruce Baumgartner
Bryan Treu
Robert Morris
Kathy Scriver
PUBLIC HEARING
November 6, 2007
Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
County Manager
County Attorney
Deputy County A:ttomey
Deputy Clerk to the Board
This being a scheduled Public Hearing, the following items were presented to the Board of County
Commissioners for their consideration:
,i"
GENERAL FUND
ADVANTAGE NETWORK SYSTEMS
AFFILIATED CREDIT SERVICE
AHLERS AND ASSOCIATES
ALL STATE COMMUNICATIONS
ALL-PRO FORMS INC
ALLEN BEST
ALLEN W STOKES
ALMA VARELA
ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY
ALPINE V ALLEY SERVICES
) AMADEO GONZALES
AMERIGAS
ANDREE KIM
ANIMAL HEALTH
ANN NELSON
ANNE ROBINSON
AQUATICS ASSOCIATES INC
ARMY & FACTORY SURPLUS
ARN MENCONI
ARTHUR AND PERLMUTTER
ARTWORKS, THE
ASPEN BOARD OF REALTORS
AT ANDT
AV TECH ELECTRONICS INC
AVON CENTER AT BEAVER CK
AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS
BJROWE
BARBARA WHITFORD
BARRACUDA NETWORKS INC
BECKNER ACHZIGER MCGINNIS
BENJAMIN GERDES
BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER
BERT FONTE
BETHANY VAN WYK
BONNIE VOGT
BOYD COFFEE COMPANY
BRENDA STORY
BRIGADE QUARTERMASTER
BRUCE BAUMGARTNER
BUSINESS PLANS INC
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REFUND
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIE~ .
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REFUND
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
I
11/06/07
/
300.00
633.76
1,100.00
4,651.44
1,383.11
45.00
13.52
456.84
323.83
3,671.25
18.00
267.53
427.66
152.31
141.75
206.19
3,398.42
125.96
85.00
60.00 .
40.00
10.05
117.74
352.00
2,170.07
2,658.61
35.64
21.60
5,145.00
30.00
1,186.25
225.00
550.00
78.17
60.75
1,029.04
26.06
92.99
45.41
2,000.00
C AND S SECURITY INN
CA STATE DISBURSEMENT
CARDIAC SCIENCE
CARDINAL HEALTH
CARMEN LOZOYO-VELEZ
CAROLYN P MAST
CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY
CATHY ZEEB
CC MOUNTAIN CLASSICS LLC
CCT A EASTERN DIVISION
CECIL LOGGING INC
CED-CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC
CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING
CENTURYTEL
CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE
CHARLES B DARRAH
CHEF DE CUISINE EPICUREAN
CHEMATOXINC.
CHERYL THOMAS
CHERYLE A WOOLSEY
CHOLPON LORD
CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH
CHRISTINA MOSES
CINDY PREYTIS
CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION
CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH &
CO DEPT PuBLIC HEALTH AND
COLORADo COUNTIES INC
COLORADO DOORWAYS
COLORADO GUN SERVICE
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH
COLUMBINE MARKET
CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING
COORS DISTRIBUTING
COPY PLUS
CORPORATE EXPRESS
CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING
COUNTY SHERIFFS OF CO
COWBOY CATEl~~G
CRL ASSOCIATES INC
D&D TOWING & AUTO REPAIR
DAN CORCORAN PLS
DAN SEIBEL
DAN SPARKMAN
DAVE MOTT
DAVID A BAUER
DAVID KEKAR
DAY TIMERS INCORPORATED
DENVER NEWSPAPER AGENCY
DENVER WESTWORD LLC
DIANA JOHNSON
DICK BOURRET
DIXIE KOZINSKI
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
'SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
REFUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
RECRUITMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
1,305.29
278.76
4,513.77
2,036.55
178.20
150.00
99.84
140.00
350.00
100.00
120,001.J.00
413.47
1,628.11
16,462.32
6,028.42
41.20
2,345.00
80.00
88.70
22.14
790.94
30.95
197.24
878.46
75.00
120.00
881.25
1,005.00
494.00
65.00
6,649.13
17,781.00
6,594.13
176.97
294.57
6,432.03
3,240.50
8,287.95
439.29
120.00
2,577JO
1,137.50
365.00
1,280.00
129.60
384.25
150.00
30.00
140.03
265.67
3,230.62
7,240 00
13.50
3:!.40
('0.00
2
11/06/07
DOCTORS SUPPLY
DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP
DON OLSEN
DONALD J LAUGHLIN
DOREEN CONSTANINE
DOROTHY KENLON
DUFFORD WALDECK & MILBURN
EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC
EAGLE COUNTY CLERK
EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL
EAGLE INDUSTRIES UNLIMITED
EAGLE PHARMACY
EAGLE RANCH FITNESS CLUB
EAGLE RIVER WATER/SANITATION
EAGLE TOWN OF
EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE
EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING
EAGLE XM
EASTER OWENS ELECTRIC CO
ECO TRANSIT
ECOLAB
ED GRANGE
EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER
ELLEN EATON
EMC2
EMPLOYERS COUNCIL SERVICE
ERIN DOWD
ESRI
EVA WILSON
FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY
FARRELL & SELDIN
FEATHER PETROLEUM CO
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMER.
FLORIDA MICRO
FORENZACONTRACTING
FORINASH KATHLEEN
FRANKLIN COVEY
FREDERIC LEE MARTENS
FSH COMMUNICATIONS LLC
G & S TOOL CLINIC LLC
GALLS INCORPORATED
GAMBER JOHNSON
GEORGIE C ZINDA
GIRSH AND ROTTMAN
GIV
GLENWooD SPRINGS PARKS
GOOD AND ASSOCIATES
GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY
GRAINGER INCORPORATED
GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND
GREAT AMERICAN LEASING
GREG SCHROEDER
GYPSUM CREEK SHEET METAL
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
CHILD SUPPORT
REFUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
204.00
192.76
6.99
46.50
12.00
2.70
188.00
15,000.00
2,973.00
1,444.26
126.10
88.23
1,900.00
704.33
50.00
40,000.00
2,870.00
5,780.00
25.00
777.00
100.00
48.00
75.74
97.20
725.38
7,600.00
169.29
1,425.00
220.45
3,439.18
2.10
9.00
731.57
26.64
964.30
7,930.00
458.29
67.10
26.94
56.01
70.00
529.99
904.99
207.77
361.00
28.00
5,863.49
580.00
99.50
725.00
1,032.35
40.00
1,423.71
119.88
14.12
3
11/06/07
GYPSUM RECREATION CENTER
HAMPTON INN
HD SUPPL Y FACILITIES
HEART OF THE WEST COUNSEL
HEWLETT pACKARD
HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS
HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES
HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
HP EXPRESS SERVICES
HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
HV AC SUPPLY
IACREOT
ICC
ICI
IDENTIX
INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE
INTERIOR PLANTSCAPES
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
INTERNAP NETWORK SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION
IRVIN BORENSTEIN
JACK KENT MOTORS
JANET CONNORS
JARA DIVERSIFIED SERVICES
JAYNE BORDEN
JEFFERSON COUNTY
JENA SKINNER.MARKOWITZ
JENNIE W AHRER
JENNIFER CUEVAS
JENNY WOOD
JERRY CHICOINE
JILL HUNSAKER
JIM DUKE
JJP COMPANIES
JOHN BADE
JOHN E REID & ASSOCIATES
JOHN KING
JOHN LEWIS
JOHNNETTE PHILLIPS
JOM PHARMACEUTICALS
JORGE VIRAMONTES SERNA
K-D FLAGS
KARA BETTIS, CORONER
KARLA HERRIDGE
KATHERINE A TOMBL YN
KELLEY BLUE BOOK
KEN SEXTON
KENNEDY FAMILY REVOCABLE
KESSLER MARY J
KINETICO WATER PROS
KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC
LANDS END INCORPORATED
LASER JUNCTION
LIANA CARLSON MOORE
LILLIAN & LUCAS MEMORIAL
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
JULY & SEPT CONSULTANT
SERVICE
DRUM FOR3RD FLOOR FAX
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUNb
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REFUND
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
REIMBVRSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
1,700.00
162.00
59.98
487.50
3,254.00
72.05
165.26
15,019.23
2,749.00
750.35
9.63
150.00
12.00
328.35
1,887.00
4,750.00
100.00
350.00
2,427.40
800.00
101.44
90.00
92.40
78.45
5.17
310.00
5.60
30.00
28.35
527.47
49.50
162.71
6.00
312.00
116.80
790.00
38.88
520.47
81.00
1,440.00
15.00
1,077.90
107.34
29.16
30.00
112.00
237.97
850.00
181.83
151.28
2,384.00
78.55
398.90
113.40
250.00
4
11/06/07
LINDA C~
LINDA MAGGIORE
LINEBARGER GOOGAN BLAIR
LINESCAPE STRIPING SERV
LISA DE GRAAF
LIVEPERSON INC
LORI SIEFERS
LORRAINE VASQUEZ
LUCY BARKER
LYNDA SAMPSON
MAIN AUTO PARTS
MARGERY STONE
MARl RENZELMAN
MARION F LAUGHLIN
MARKS PLUMBING PARTS
MARY JANE HESS
MARYLAND CHILD SUPPORT
MBIA
MCCAULLEY REBECCA T
MCMAHAN & ASSOCIATES LLC
MEADOW MOUNTAIN PLUMBING
MEET THE WILDERNESS
MENENDEZ ARCHITECTS PC
. METRO PATHOLOGISTS
MICHAEL BARCA
MICRO PLASTICS
MICRO PLASTICS INC
MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN
MIKE BAIR
MINTURN ONE LLC
MOBILE VISION
MOFFET CONSULTING
MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS
MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY CO
NANCY SCHURR, NP
NATIONAL 4H SUPPLY
NATIVE ELECTRIC INC
NEDBO CONSTRUCTION
NELSON LABORATORIES
NETTIE -REYNOLDS
NEVES UNIFORMS
NORDIC REFRIGERATION
NORMAN L NUNN
NORTH AMERICAN JET
OC TANNER
OHIO CHILD SUPPORT
OSM DELIVERY LLC
P SCOTT LOWERY
PAINT BUCKET THE
PAPER WISE
PAT NOLAN
PATHOLOGY GROUP
PATRICIA HAMMON
PAULA A PALMATEER
PEARL TAYLOR
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SE~VICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REFUND
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
5.10
68.04
49.35
1,413.31
243.23
990.00
18.99
223.70
127.50
150.00
124.19
16.15
265.42
39.00
40.77
326.01
461.54
6,129.84
41.31
12,250.00
2,707.00
2,660.00
143.75
72.00
48.75
18.99
26.61
311.21
89.10
60.00
736.20
11,793.38
408.00
1,786.46
32.40
607.44
2,25335
723.00
258.00
107.00
320.50
390.00
107.15
500.83
387.43
451.94
456.00
46.10
67.98
4,892.70
71.59
943.10
121.50
30.00
90.00
5
11/06/07
/
PECZUH PRINTING COMPANY
PETER FREIDRlCH
PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING
PHYLISS ROUNDS
PITNEY BOWES
PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED
POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH
PRCA MOUNTAIN STATES
PRECINCT POLICE PRODUCTS
PREMIER ELECTION
PRO FORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT
PRO SHINE LLC (
PROSHINE SALES & SERVICE
PSS, INC
PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER
PUEBLO COUNTY SHERIFF OFF
PURCHASE POWER
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS
QUILL CORPORATION
QWEST
R & S NORTHEAST LLC
RAUL R MACIA
RAZORS EDGE INC
REBECCA LARSON
RED BLUFF BUCKLES
RED CANYON CAFE
RED LION DENVER CENTRAL
RESEARCH AND POLLING INC
RICHARD COWELL
RITA WOODS
ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY
ROARING FORK VALLEY COOP
ROBERT NARRACCI
ROBIN COCK .
ROCKY MOUNTAIN BUSINESS
ROCKY MTN TACTICAL TRNG
ROLLY ROUNDS
RON WOLFE
RSC
RYAN SANDS
S CORPORATION INC
SAFETY GLASSES USA
SARA J FISHER
SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP
SCHMIDT POLYGRAPH
SCHNEIDER MAURER
SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND
SECURITY TRANSPORT
SERVICEMASTER CLEAN
SHAINHOLTZ TODD H DDS
SHAMROCK FOODS CORP
SHAPINS ASSOCIATES
SHARON BALIUS
SHEAFFER KAREN
SHERI MINTZ
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SER:VICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
~ SERVICE
SUPpLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
168.00
3.84
638.71
9.00
3,576.30
1,106.20
331.00
1,000.00
1,599.76
200.00
1,931.25
414.65
2,653.64
1,149.86
688.50
99.00
11,496.09
228.67
125.70
8,027.78
185.5.6
375.00
268.00
11. 75
1,600.00
77.00
115.95
323.91
63.00
10l.58
2,000.00
13.07
190.46
134.42
10.80
1,575.00
45.00
44.55
2,719.75
140.22
10,445.00
216.00
678.60
2,669.55
400.00
18.40
23.95
743.60
2,991.00
1,052.00
5,320.74
3,805.50
115.94
364.48
126.96
6
11/06/07
SIGNATURE SIGNS
SILVERMAN LAW FIRM
SINTON DAIRY COMPANY,
SNOWBOARD OUTREACH SCTY
SNOWHITE LINEN
SOFTWARESPECTR~INSIGHT
SOPHIA MARTINEZ
SOURCE GAS
SPECIAL PROTECTION INC
SPECIALTIES INCO~ORATED
STANLEY N SLOWIK. INC'
STATE OF COLORADO
STATE OF FLORIDA
STEPHANIE GLENWRIGHT
STEPHEN ELLSPERMAN
STERICYCLE INC
STREICHERS
SUE MOTT
SUPPORT PAYMENT
SUSAN NARDUZZI
SUSPENSE FUND
TAMMI MATTHEWS
TECH MEDICAL INC
TEMPLE GLASSIER
TENIE CHICOINE
TERRIE FISCHER
THE ARTISTS MERCANTILE
THE FLOWER CART
THE NORMANDY GROUP LLC
THE PARENTS HANDBOOK
THKASSOCIATES INC
THOMAS COLE
THOMSON WEST GROUP
TIM DOOLEY
TIM LOSA
TIMBERWOLF INDUSTRIES
TODD BONATTI
TONI BERNS
TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED
TOTAL ACCESS GROUP
TOWN OF EAGLE
TOWN OF GYPSUM
TOWN OF REDCLIFF
TRANE COMPANY
TRI TECH INC
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
UNITED SITE SERVICES INC
UNITED WAY OF EAGLE
US CLEANING PROFESSIONAl-S
US FOODSERVICE INC
VAG INCORPORATED
VAIL DAILY THE
VAIL ELECTRONICS
VAIL HONEYW AGON L TD
'[
SUPPLIES
REFUND
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REFUND
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SElWICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
632.25
49.88
710.22
1,140.00
96.06
23.00
53.51
1,278.88
525.00
264.50
325.00
945.12
1,003.68
90.00
43.34
756.57
2,380.00
180.00
363.00
90.00
275,505.45
113.40
1,451.50
10,735.00
78.00
138.77
86.95
85.00
8,175.08
600.00
15,124.05
149.04
192.22
159.72
55.89
51,700.00
46.16
83.70
10.34
121.00
7,404.15
437.35
.37,679.38
6,57H7
309.83
3,505.00
262.1 1
326.40
20.00
22,020.44
3,504.12
7,592.52
2,980.56
4,746.64
10.31
7
11/06/07
V AIL MOUNTAIN COFFEE
.. VAIL MOUNMIN SCHOOL
V AIL RESORTS MANAGEMENT
VAIL SYMPOSIUM
V AIL V ALLEY MEDICAL CENTR
VAIL VALLEY SURGERY LLC
V AILNET INC
V ALLEY LUMBER
V ALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL
VERIFICATIONS INC
VERIZON WIRELESS,
VISA CARD SERVICE
VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY C
WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WELLS FARGO
WEST EAGLE COUNTY SEARCH
WESTERN SLOPE BAR
WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES
!
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY
XCELENERGY
XEROX CORPORATION
YOUR NAME HERE INC
ZEE MEDICAL SERVIC~
ZOBEYDA ARGELIA REYES
PAYROLL FOR OCTOBER 2007
ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND
ADAMs RIB RECREATIONAL
ALPINE V ALLEY SERVICES
BAND B EXCAVATING
BASALT SANITATION DIST
BENNY RIVERA
BIG R MANUFACTURING
BILL BOCELAWATZ
CENTRAL SERVICESIEC
COLORADO COUNTIES INC
COLORADO MOUNTAIN MEDICAL
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS
COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC
COPY PLUS
COVERALL SPACE COMPANY
CRAWFORD PROPERTIES
CROWNE PLAzA HOTEL
EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING
EAGLE V ALLEY MEDICAL
ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO
ENVIROTECH
FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
LOCKNUT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
40.50
3,980.00
1,562.50
625.00
832.3 I
431.00
11.95
163.92
396.00
2,139.40
13,874.1 5
46,680.82
106.73
4,600.00
1,701.29
559,568.29
5,067.46
130.60
317.32
3,533.10
986.87
172.59
7,211.33
2,110.25
88.17
200.00
PAYROLL 21 & 22
1,301,341.40
2:J77,742.79
REFUND
SERVICE
REFUND
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICEj
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
2,250.00
96.30
200.00
147.88
75.00
7,076.16
75.00
17.39
335.00
105.00
33.26
432.00
3.99
891.00
7,000.00
152.00
22.21
182.00
546,087.66
22,201.74
25,243.00
8
11/06/07
GLENWOOD MEDICAL ASSOC
GORDON ADAMS
HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI
HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
HOWARD KAKLOW
IDEAL FENCING CORP
INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY
JAKE STONER
KEMP AND COMPANY INC
KNUPPLLC
LAF ARGE CORPORA nON
LONCO INC
MARIE DIACHOK
MATT JARAMILLO
MODESTO SANCHEZ
MONTAIGNE PARTNERSHIP
PAPER WISE
PETER PENDERGAST
RICHARD STAMPP
RICK ETTLES
ROD CARTER
RUDD CONSTRUCTION
SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION
SOURCE GAS
THERESA LADENBURGER
TOWN OF BASALT
TOWN OF EAGLE
TOWN OF GYPSUM
US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS
VALLEY LUMBER
VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL
WESTERN SLOPE AGGREGATE
WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY
XEROX CORPORATION
ZDENEK BAUER
OCTOBER 2007 PAYROLL
EARLY CHILDHOOD FUND
CORPORATE EXPRESS
FORINASH KATHLEEN
THE PARENTS HANDBOOK
VERIZON WIRELESS,
VILAR CENTER FOR THE ARTS
VISA CARD SERVICES
SOCIAL SERVICES FUND
AIDAN FLEMING
AMY DAVIS
CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, M.A.
CENTRAL SERVICES/EC
CENTURYTEL
CHARLENE WHITNEY
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
SERVICE
REFUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REFUND
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
SUPPLIES
REFUND
REFUND
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REFUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUP.PLIES
DOT PHYSICAL - NYE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REFUND
PAYROLL 21 & 22
78.00
75.00
250.00
389.45
100.00
79,769.84
41.63
100.00
5.58
1,710.00
4,026.19
55,848.01
2,000.00
184.61
36.37
2,000.00
46.14
250.00
2,000.00
75.00
126.22
250.00
864.00
113.18
47.81
78.10
2,000.00
253.79
726.56
171.39
80.00
9,191.85
41.95
611.80
606.74
2,000.00
105490.28
884,266.08
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
22.00
215.46
1,200.00
243.00
320.10
87.07
2,087.63
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
215.47
85.46
300.00
2,073.96
193.74
439.58
9
11/06/07
COpy PLUS SUPPLIES 130.80
CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 335.05
DARLENE MONTANO REIMBURSEMENT 264.87
DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP SERVICE 79.00
DOREEN CONST ANINE REIMBURSEMENT 66.02
EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING REIMBURSEMENT 578.39
EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF SERVICE 22.80
EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SERVICE 4,419.47
EAGLE V ALLEY PRINTING SUPPLIES 540.00
EARLY CHILDHOOD PARTNERS SERVICE 5,068.18
FORINASH KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 21.00
GARFIELD CO DEPT SOC SERV SERVICE 20.00
HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS SUPPLIES 58:95
HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 129.82
ICI SERVICE 268.65
JOHN C COLLINS PC SERVICE 8,092.00
KIDS FIRST SERVICE 4,378.00
KIM HILDERBRAND REIMBuRSEMENT 192.78
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF SERVICE 46.00
LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES SERVICE 13 1.24
LEXISNEXIS SERVICE 213.61
LEXISNEXIS COURTLINK INC SERVICE 111.00
LG PRINTING COMPANY SERVICE 88.00
LYONS KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 200.59
MEEGAN MOORE REIMBURSEMENT 218.71
NICHOLAS J HOEGER REIMBURSEMENT 28257
NICOLE SISNEROS REIMBURSEMENT 116.83
PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING SERVICE 0.00
QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 49.64
REBECCA LARSON REIMBURSEMENT 9.61
RITA WOODS REIMBURSEMENT 93.10
SHERI MINTZ REIMBURSEMENT 143.54
SILVER LEAF SUITES SERVICE 565.38
STATE FORMS PUBLICATIONS SUPPLIES II.52
SUSAN ARBANEY SERVICE 1,000.00
SWEEP STAKES UNLIMITED SERVICE 35.00
VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 609.78
VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 3,130.05
XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 537.58
OCTOBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 21 & 22 110,810.97
146378.71
HEAL THY BABIES
OCTOBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 21 &22 9276.80
9276.80
WRAP FUND
TOWN OF AVON SERVICE 1l0.00
YOUTH ZONE SERVICE 165.00
275.00
INSURANCE RESERVE FUND
COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICE 14965.04
RED CANYON AUTOBODY SERVICE 683.26
15648.30
10
11/06/07
OFFSITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG
HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
BAND B EXCAVATING
CARTER & BURGESS, INC
CORNERSTONE MASONRY
GOVCONNECTION, INC
HAMMOND CUSTOM BUILDERS.
HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI
1M. ELECTRIC
KENNEY & ASSOCIATES
MARCIN ENGINEERING INC
MITY -LITE, INC.
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
NEW WORLD SYSTEMS
RELIANCE FOUNDRY CO LTD
USA SAHDEANDFABRIC
USABLUEBOOK
VALLEY ELECTRIC SUPPLY
VALLEY LUMBER
VISA CARD SERVICES
WESTERN SLOPE
SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP.
A& E TIREINC
ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS
ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY
ALPINE VALLEY SERVICES
AMERICAN FURNITURE
AMERICAN SALES INCENTIVES
AT AND T
BUFFALO RIDGE AFFORDABLE
CASTA
CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING
COLLETTS
COLORADO DEPT REVENuE
COLUMBINE MARKET
CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN
DANA GAINEY
DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES
EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL
EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING
FEDERAL EXPRESS
GEORGE KUERSTEN
GEORGIE C ZINDA
GILLIG CORPORATION
HASLER INC
HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
SERVICE
SERVICE
11,998.02
3,338.00
15,336.02
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES.
SERVICE
SERVICE
v
295.40
48,723.00
60,498.00
258.85
12,895.77
800.00
3,840.00
85.00
4,303.75
10,705.20
6,000.00
30,959.26
1,029.50
2,211.00
159.61
57.09
5,886.00
1,998.50
19,768.00
210,473.99
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
1,955.14
29.95
160.96
337.22
5,126.00
1;090.00
272.70
7,830.00
250.00
198.82
8,696.84
85.80
95~64
52.36
325.00
2,844.37
48,318.07
4.68
46.74
8.72
560.00
2,545.44
189.00
1,363.77
11
11/06/07
IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SUPPLIES 222.48
J J KELLER SERVICE 138.07
JANET FIELD REIMBURSEMENT 137.46
JAY MAX SALES SUPPLIES 568.23
JEFF WETZEL SERVICE 13 1.59
KINETICO WATER PROS SERVICE 128.18
KIPLINGER LETTER SERVICE 89.00
KSKE-NRC BROADCASTING SERVICE 500.00
KW CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 2,200.00
KZYR-CooL RADIO LLC SERVICE 333.00
NATE IVIE REIMBURSEMENT 19Q.63
PAPER WISE SUPPLIES 161.57
PErry CASH ACCOUNTING REIMBURSEMENT 10 1.45
QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 1,096.41
QWES1 SERVICE 162.59
REGAL PIEDMONT PLASTICS SUPPLIES 1,683.48 (
SAM COLLINS REIMBURSEMENT 240.54
SOURGE GAS SERVICE 396.33
TIM MINAROVICH SERVICE 19.09
TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 150.00
TOWN OF AVON SERVICE 1,287.65
TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 451.38
UNITED STATES WELDING SERVICE 28.91
US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS SERVICE 2,544.28
VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 120.68
VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 4,973,20
WESTERN SLOPE BAR SUPPLIES 25.65
XCELENERGY SERVICE 75.22
XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 768.11
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 129.61
ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY SUPPLIES 107.96
OCTOBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYRolL 21 &22 198,~97.71
299947.68 .
SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS
ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY SUPPLIES 787.45
CENTRAL SERVICESIEC REIMBURSEMENT 4.68
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 823.55
COLUMBINE MARKET SUPPLIES 98.12
COpy PLUS SERVICE 8.85
CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 201.32
HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 3,160.40
LAF ARGE CORPORATION SERVICE 3,979.27
PSI CRANE & RIGGING INC SERVICE 10,376.22
RAILROAD SPECIALTIES INC SERVICE 16,560.00
ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICE 65,818.19
SIGNATURE SIGNS SUPPLIES 315.00
TAYLOR FENCE COMPANY SERVICE 9,366.85
VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 178.64
WYLACOSUPPLYCOMPANY" SUPPLIES 1,027.77
YEH & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE 2,812.00
lIS,SI8.31
SALES TAX R.F.V. TRANSP.
ROARING FORK TRANSIT AGENCY SERVICE 99,321.31
12
11/06/07
SALES TAX R.F.V. TRAILS
ROARING FORK TRANSITAGEN
TRANSPORTATION NEHICLE
REPLACEMENT
INTERMOUNTAIN COACH
AIRPORT FUND
A & E TIRE INC
ACCESS LOCK & KEY INC
AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC
ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY
AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT
ARCHIBEQUE LAND CONSULTING
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
CENTRAL SERVICES/EC
CENTURYTEL
COLLETTS
COLORADO PAINT COMPANY
COOPER CROUSE HINDS
CORPORATE EXPRESS
COULTER AVIATION
DISH NETWORK
DIVISION OF FIRE SAFETY
DOLPHIN CPJ>ITAL CORP
DRIVE TRAIN INDUStRIES
EAGLE EMBROIDERY INC
EAGLE V ALLEX MEDICAL
ECMS INCORPORATED
ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO
ENDEAVOR MECHANICAL SYSTE
ENERGY ABSORPTION SYSTEMS
FIRKINS GARAGE DOORS
GATEKEEPER SYSTEMS
GRAINGER INCORPORATED
GRAN FARNUM PRINTING
GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND
GRANT MILLER INCORPORATED
H & H HYDRAULICS INC.
HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
lMAGINIT EMBROIDERY
JAY MAX SALES
JBT'S CUSTOM SILK
LAF ARGE CORPORATION
MAIN AUTO PARTS
MAVERICK FLOORING
MCI WORLDCOM
MCNEILUS TRUCK AND
MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC
MYSLIK INC
NEXTEL
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
/
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
99,321.31
11,035.70
11,035.70
188,836.00
188,836.00
8,963.82
84.00
16.14
1,719.86
95.00
33,704.00
28.19
192.31
6,851.35
2,247.97
658.60
5,085.63
120.68
1,270.80
75.96
40.00
8 I 7.45
993.64
285.98
1,223.00
1,822.28
25,444.00
260.00
3,436.90
200.00
1,980.00
774.00
45.02
11.73
7,510.60
1,247.13
1,406.39
1,612.20
229.20
660.00
111.44
23.18
4,188.00
23.61
148.3 I
29,662.50
60,038.00
649.50
13
11/06/07
OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP SERVICE 1,531.85-
p'AINT BUCKET THE SUPPLIES 7.46
PEAKS MAGAZINE SERVICE 6,500.00
PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING SERVICE 35.46
ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPT SERVICE 3,01I.36
ROBERN RUSS REIMBURSEMENT 35.64
SERVICEMASTER CLFAN SERVICE 1,994.00
SOURCE GAS SERVICE 278.89
STATE OF COLORADO SERVICE 323.00
STEWART & STEVENSON POWER SUPPLIES 853.10
SUMMITEX, LLC SUPPLIES 184.90
TERRI MARTINEZ JOHNSON REIMBURSEMENT 12.15
TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 455.05
US CUSTOMS AND BORDER SERVICE 31,445.01
US CUSTOMS SERVICE SERVICE 234.20
VAIL VALLEY PARTNERSHIP SERVICE 8,000.00
V ALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 23.41
VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 8,477.01 \...,
WAGNER -EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 1,669.10
WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 34.71
WESTERN IMPLEMENTS SERVICE 1,839.22
WESTERN SLOPE BAR SERVICE 400.59
WORKRITE SUPPLIES 185.76
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 338.49
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 689.63
ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY SUPPLIES 43.30
OCTOBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 21 & 22 89,149.61
363,711.27
800 MHZ FUND .
BUCHHOLZ F AMIL Y SERVICE 12,600.00
CENTUR YTEL OF EAGLE SERVICE 94.58
HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 1,710.83
LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE 39,448.56
MCI WORLDCOM SERVICE 3,254.84
QWIfsT SERVICE 3,193.60
60,302.41
HOUSING FUND
CENTURYTEL
DEPT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT SERVICE 163.34
FUNDING PARTNERS FOR SERVICE 230.00
GARFIELD COUNTY HOUSING SERVICE 26,627.00
GOLDEN EAGLE ELDERLY SERVICE 1,254.00
KA TRINA COOPER SERVICE 30,000.00
KIM BELL WILLIAMS REIMBURSEMENT 55.49
VISA CARD SERVICES REIMBURSEMENT 455.82
SERVICE 211.61
OcrOBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 21 & 22 5,902.00
64899.26
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND
ARIST A TEK INC SERVICE 500.00
DIVISION OF FIRE SAFETY SERVICE 20.00
14
11106/07
BURT CHEVROLET, INC SERVICE 818.79
BURT FORD ON ARAPAHOE INC SUPPLIES 338.60
BURT SUBARU SUPPLIES 79.98
BURT -DODGE,CHRYSLER,JEEP SERVICE 362.21
CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 16.77
CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE SERVICE 151.76
COLLETTS SUPPLIES 144,008.83
COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC SERVICE 108.00
CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 448.36
DOCTORS ON CALL SERVICE 66.00
DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES 717.10
HENSLEY BATTERY SERVICE 720.97
HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 1,006.89
JAY MAX SALES SUPPLIES 237.88
KEN SEXTON SUPPLIES 10.00
M & M AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 1,233.53
MN HUNTER SYSTEMS INC SERVICE 127.50
MSC INDUSTRiAL SUPPLY SUPPLiES 38.27
NICHOLAS J HOEGER SUPPLIES 78.58
NOVUS AUTOGLASS SERVICE 995.00
PAPER WISE SUPPLIES 119.29 \
PETTY CASH MOTOR POOL SUPPLIES 169.05
POWER MOTIVE SUPPLIES 333.16
PREMIER TIRE TERMINAL SUPPLIES 8,733.49
PST ENTERPRISES INC SUPPLIES 798.76
ROBERT JOHNSON REIMBURSEMENT 40.00
SAFETY KLEEN SUPPLIES 207.40
SOURCE GAS SUPPLIES 292.62
TIMBERLINE STEEL SUPPLIES 66.95
TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 656.15
US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS SERVICE 1,878.48
VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 486.46 ~
WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 1,264.52
WESTERN COLORADO SUPPLIES 508.20
WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 66.85
WHITEHALL'S ALPINE SERVICE 382.80
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 2,708.00
XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 467.52
OCTOBER 2007 PAYROLL PAYROLL 21 & 22 62,045.05
234,030.28
HEALm INSURANCE FUND
AFLAC ATTN:RPS SERVICE 3,123.94
DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY SERVICE 2,300.00
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES SUPPLIES 135.00
MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. SERVICE 51,902.46
MUTUAL OF OMAHA SERVICE 4,071.42
SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 209..73
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE SERVICE 4,814.10
UNITED STATES LIFE INS SERVICE 1,382.60
67939.25
ENHANCED E911 FUND
LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES SERVICE 1,190.45
QWEST SERVICE 121.11
16
11/06/07
TOWN OF VAIL
SERVICE
REPORT TOTAL
14,135.00
15,446.56
6,023,510.71
Executive Session
It was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed to go into Executive Session for the purpose of receiving
legal advice and discussing matters that may be subject to negotiation regarding potential open space acquisitions
which is appropriate pursuant to C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b) and (e) Colorado Revised Statutes. It was moved,..
seconded, and unanimously agreed to adjourn from Executive Session.
Consent Agenda
Chairman Pro- Tem Fisher stated the Chairman Menconi would not be present for the first portion of the
meeting and the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows:
A. Approval of bill paying for the week of November 5, 2007 (subject to review by the Finance Director)
Finance Department Representative
B. Approval of the payroll for November 8,2007 ((subject to review by the Finance Director)
Finance Department Representative
C. Agreement between Eagle County Health & Human Services and the Literacy Project
Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services
D. Application for additional funds to participate in Office of Head Start Region VIII Governance Institute for
Early Head Start Program
Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services
E. Final Settlement of Agreement between Grant Miller and Eagle County for Airport de-icing project
Rick Ullom, Facilities Management
F. Final Settlement of Agreement between Eagle County and Ideal Fencing Corporation for the 2007 guardrail
project
County Attorney's Office Representative
G. Agreement between Eagle County and Valley Events Inc. for Il\arketing of events services
Fair & Rodeo Office Representative
H. Agreement between Eagle County and Pitkin County for 2007-2009 Snow removal
Road & Bridge Department Representative
I. Grant of an easementto CenturyTel for utilities alongside Cooley Mesa Road at Eagle County Regional
Airport
County Attorney's Office Representative
J. Property Line Agreement between Eagle County and BCP-Midtown Investments IT, LLC and Quit Claim
Deeds regarding Kemp/Eaton Ranch Parcel A
County Attorney's Office Representative
K. Agreement of Goals and Roles of Eagle County and Eagle Valley Humane Society
Animal Services/County Attorney's Office Representatives
17
11/06/07
L. Lease Agreement between Eagle County and Eagle Valley Humane Society
Animal ServiCes/County Attorney's Office Representatives
Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. .
Bryan Treu, County Attorney stated that the agenda was appropriate for approval. He stated that the
Attorney's Office had received a verified notice of claim for Item E, the agreement between Grant Miller and Eagle
County for Airport de-icing project.
Commissioner Fisher spoke about Item K; the operating agreement between Eagle County and Eagle
Valley Humane Society. She stated that the agreement was drafted to support a healthy working relationship
between the Animal Services functions and the Humane Society functions as they take place in the shared facility.
Commissioner Runyon echoed the comments stated by Commissioner Fisher.
Commissioner Runyon moved to approve the Consent Agenda consisting ofItems A-L.
Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared
unanimous.
Citizen Input
Stephanie Samuelson, Board member for the Eagle Valley Humane Society spoke. She thanked the board
for their support and bringing about the lease agreement into working order S9 that efforts could continue on behalf
6fthe animals of Eagle County.
Approval of the 2008 Office Supply B,d
Finance Department Representative
Mr. Lewis. stated that the costs were not expected to increase dramatically. They looked at the least
expensive and the company that would provided the best service. Corporate Express won the bid for all general
office supplies, Corporate Express Imaging for all printing toners and cartridges, and Paperwise for all paper
supplie~.
Commissioner Runyon move to approve the 2008 Office Supply Bid.
Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared
unanimous.
Commissioner Runyon moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and re-conveneas the
Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority. .
Chairman Pro- Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared
unammous.
Eagle County Liquor License Authority
Kathy Scriver, Clerk and Recorder's Office
ESTABLISHMENT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
LOCATION:
YEAR LICENSE ISSUED:
LICENSE EXPIRATION:
STAFF REPRESENTATIVE:
Terrance S. Marcum dIbIa Shop and Hop #3
Terrance Marcum, Owner
15 Eagle-Vail Road, Eagle-Vail
November 1997
November 5, 2008
Kathy Scriver
18
11/06/07
DESCRIPTION:
Show Cause Hearin~ stemming from the following events: .
/ .
On August 22, 2007 at approximately 5:55 p.m., an employee of the establishment sold an alcoholic
beverage to a minor during an underage compliance check performed by the Eagle County Sheriff's Office.
(Sheriffs report attached) The License holder has stipulated to a violation of the Colorado Liquor Code,
specifically: Colorado Revised Statutes Section 12-47-901 (1)( a.5) which makes it unlawful to sell, serve, give
away, dispose of, exchange, or deliver or permit the sale, serving, giving, or procuring of any alcohol beverage to or
for any person under the age of twenty-one years. (Copy of stipulation attached) Accordingly, this matter is before
the Board for the sentencing portion of the Show Cause Hearing
Eagle County's Resolution 2007-072 Concerning Eagle County beer and liquor licensing policies and
procedures states that in determining the appropriate sentence or sanction to be imposed for a violation, the
Authority shall consider all mitigating and aggravating circumstances surrounding the violation. The following
factors shall be considered:
1. Seriousness of the violation:
· This violation involves the sale of alcohol to a minor, which is considered a serious violation.
2. Prior violations and OffeJlses at the licensed premises ';
· On both January 6, 1998 and September 5, 2002, the establishment reportedly violated Colorado
f. . i
Revised Statutes 12-47'-901(a.5)(1) which provides that it is illegal to sell any alcoholic beverage to a
person under the age of twenty one year.s.
3. Whether violation constitutes a repeated course of conduct or was an isolated event
· Records indicate that this was an isolated event as the prior violations occurred almost 10 and 5 years
ago.
4. Corrective a~tions taken (if any)
· Information may b~ provided by the license holder
5. Likelihood of recurrence
· No information available
6. Willfulness of the violaiion(s)
. The violation occurred as a result of an underage compliance check performed by the Eagle County
Sheriffs Office and did not appear to be willful.
7. Length of time the license has been held by this licensee
· 10 years
8. Previous sanctions imposed against the licensee
. Clerk's records indicate that in 2002 their license was suspended for 10 days, 8 day helq in abeyance
for one year. In 1998, their license was suspended for two days, with two days held in abeyance f()r a
period of one year.
9. Completeness and adequacy of Alcohol Management Plan and Server Training Information
provided by Licensee to the Eagle County Clerk and Recorder's Office.
· No current alcohol management plan has been provided.
· Clerk's records indicate that the establishment has been responsible in providing recent server training
information.
10. Whether the Licensee may be considered a responsible vendor pursuant to C.R.S. ~ 12-47-1002.
19
11/06/07
.
This Licensee has complied with the Eagle County Liquor License Authority requirements concerning
alcohol training for its servers.
11. Any other factors making the situation with respect to licensee or premises unique.
. Total of3 violations over 10 years of business, each violation involved a sale to a minor.
. This establishment has had no violations within the last 5 years.
HISTORICAL ACTIONS:
This is the licensee's third violation within 10 years. For a second violation within 2 years, the board has
previously issued a 14-day suspension requiring the licensee to serve 5 days of active suspension and holding 9
days in abeyance for one year.
DISCUSSION:
Ms. Scriver stated that.an employee of the establishment sold to an underage individual during a
compliance check performed by the Eagle County Sherriff's Office. The owner stipulated to the violation. The
matter is' before the board for the sentencing portion of the show cause hearing. The board shall consider all
mitigating and aggravating factors as presented in the staff report.
Chairman Pro-TefIl Fisher asked Mr. Marcum if he had any concerns with the Sherriff's report.
Mr. Marcum stated that everything happened as presented in the report. It was a busy night, there were
people lined up, and the employee was overwhelmed. He believes that the sting occurred during their busiest hour
of the whole week. He is surprised that it happened.
Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher asked when the last qocumented SherrifPs visit occurred.
Detective Doug Winters stated that the visits are annual.
Chairman Pro- Tem Fisher stated that she noticed that no alcohol management plan was On file in the
Clerk's Office.
Mr. Marcum stated that he had provided an alcohol management plan was provided in 2002." .
Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher suggested that Mr. Marcum find a copy and make sure that everything is still in
effect and provide to the Clerk's Office.
Mr. Marcum stated that his manager has been with him for ten years. Mr. Hayes trains the each person
individually.
Chairman Pro-Tem fisher asked if the employee that sold the alcohol was terminated.
Mr. Marcum stated that it was a mutual agreement.
Mark Haynes, store manager spoke. He does not make excuses for his employee. He believes that the
employee was ashamed of him self.
Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher asked if the employee had gone to court.
Mr. Winters stated that he would have had a first appearance. Depending on his past he would have
probably get a fine.
Mr. Winters stated that Detective Brandon Beaudette was present. Mr. Beaudette wrote the situation.
Chairman Pro-Tem Fisherstated that the fact that a sting hasn't produced a sale to a minor!n 5 years says a
lot for the operation. It's unfortunate that the establishment had an employee that sold to a minor. There are no
exceptions to the statutes for being busy. The alcohol management plan does not require that you terminate an
employee if they sell to a minor. She believes there are mitigating circumstances in that regard although,
employees need to have a clear understanding of what the ultimate consequence may be. She suggested the board
suspend the license for 14 days, holding 11 in abeyance.
Commissioner Runyon moved that the Local Licensing Authority suspend the liquor license of Terrance S.
Marcum d/b/a Shop and Hop #3 for 14 days, holding 11 days in abeyance for a period of one (1) year. If Shop
and Hop #3 violates the Colorado Liquor Code within the year, all days will be served in addition to any other
penalty that may be imposed by the Authority. The 3 days of active suspension must be served within the next 60
days with at least two (1) ofthose days being a Saturday. No days served shall be on a Sunday or a legal holiday.
Chairman Pro- Tem fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared
unanimous.
20
11/06/07
Commissioner Runyon moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority and re-convene
as the Board 'of County Board of Social Services.
Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared
unanimous.
Board of Social Services
Kate Forinash, Health & Human Services
Ms. FQrinash stated that once a quarter her department presents to the commissioners information regarding
the client benefit payrolls in the Department of Health and Human Services programs. These client,benefits include
things like cash benefits to folks who are disabled, elderly, families. It may be payment for the cost of childcare
through the Colorado Childcare Assistance Program, food stamps, payments for therapists, and etc. At the
recommendation of the auditor, they present the actual payrolls that were distributed through the electronic client
benefit system for approval.
Commissioner Runyon asked about the isol~ted numbers without any annual comparisons have very little
meaning. He suggested that the numbers be graphed for more clarification.
Ms. Forinash stated that the numbers could be graphed in the future. She stated that the total amount of
payrolls in the 3rd quarter of this year was $348,816.94. The total amount in the same 3rd quarter in 2006 was
$383,843.45 so there is a minimum variation from one year to the other.
Commissioner Runyon asked how many years back are records available.
Ms. Forinash stated as far back as 1992.
Commissioner Runyon moved that the Board of Social Services accept and certify the payrolls thAt have
been transmitted through ~lectronic fund transfer.
. Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners, the vote was declared
unanimous. .
Runyon moved to adjourn as the Board of Social Services andre-convene as the Board of County
Commissioners.
Chairman Pro-Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting Cotnmissioners, the vote was declared
unanimous.
Other
Mr. Treu requested that Commissioner Runyon move to rescind his previous motion to approve the consent
agenda and re-move to approve the consent agenda and authorize the Chairman to sign the approved agreements.
Commissioner Runyon moved to rescind his previous motion to approve the consent agenda and re-moved
to approve the consent agenda A-L and authorize the Chairman to sign the approved agreements.
Chairman Pro- Tem Fisher seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners, the vote was declared
unanimous.
Planning Files
PDF-00098 Vines at Vail
Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Planning Department
ACTION: A final plat, mixed use PUD approxiInately 39 acres.
LOCATION: Wolcott north of the Eagle River and the Union Pacific Railroad
21
11/06/07
FILE NOJPROCESS:
PROJECT NAME:
OWNER:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PDF-00098; Final Plat
Vines at Vail PUD Final Plat
Kiwa Associates, LLC
Owner
Owner
I
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. SUMMARY OF REOUEST:
The intent of this plat is to create three (3)
Tracts (C, E, F- private right of way,
utilities, drainage); 14 lots (A, B 1, B2, B4,
Dl and D2- mixed use; CI-C7- single
family home lots); common area; and
easements.
The Vines at Vail PUD was approved in
2006. The project includes a working
winery complete with tasting room (the
focal aspect of the proposal); a lodge with a
limited number of independent suites for
guests; a community pavilion; residential
units including live-work residential units
above a pedestrian oriented plaza; single
family residences; employee housing units;
office space; recreational, agricultural, and
landscape features; educational spaces; a library; medical offices; galleries; restaurants; arts and crafts
studios; private clubs spaces; retail shop spaces; resort support services; and conference facilities.
Subsequent condominium plats will follow construction of the mixed-use development.
B.
BLM/Unplatted
South: Railroad ROW
East: BLM/Unplatted
Private lands/Unplatted
Resource
22
11/06/07
Via Hwy 131
C. CHRONOLOGYIBACKGROUND:
2004- The property was purchased from Holy Cross Electric, by the applicant.
2005- The applicants receive approval for the Vines at Vail PUD Sketch Plan.
2005- This property (along with surrounding properties) is included in the Eagle River Water and
Sanitation District after Wolcott area property owners vote to be included in the District; the
. applicant was now obligated to work in conjunction with the District for water and wastewater
services.
2006- The ERWSD water storage tank Location and Extent application, a component of the overall
District/Vines of V ail water/wastewater system receives approval by the Planning Commission for
its location on the adjacent Bureau of Land Managementproperty. The water tank is part of the
ERWSD regional water system.
2006- Vines at Vail PUD Preliminary Plan, Zone Change and associated 1041 Permit were approved.
I
2. STAFF REPORT
(
A. NECESSARY FINDINGS:
PROCESS INTENT
ECLUR Section:
5-280.B.5 Subdivision Final plat
Section Purpose:
At the meeting on the Final Plat for Subdivision, the Board of County
Commissioners shall review the Final Plat, the submittal materials, provide both
County staff and the applicant an opportunity to . comment, and approve or
disapprove the Final Plat for Subdivision based. on whether it conforms to the
approval given to the Preliminary. Plan for Subdivision and the standards in
Section 5-280.B.3.e., Standards., considering specifically the adequacy of required
improvements and the acceptance of areas dedicated for public use and easements.
,
Stand~rds:
5-280.B.5.b (3) and 5-280.B.3.e
Pursuant to Section 5-280.B.5.b (3), oftheEagle County Land Use Regulations, it has been found
ili~ /
(1) This final plat conforms to, and is consistent with the intentions, representations and conditions as
approved with the Preliminary Plan for the subdivisionIPUD.
(2) Required improvements are adequate including roadways, pedestrian and recreation pathways, and
infrastructure.
(3) Areas dedicated for public use and all anticipated easements are as approved in the Preliminary Plan
and are acceptable as presented in the Final Plat application.
STANDARD: Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-290.G.1.a] - The proposed subdivision
shall be consistent with the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan and the FLUM of the Comprehensive Plan.
COMPREHENSiVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map defers to the community-specific Wolcott Area Community Plan.
WOLCOTT AREA COMMUNITY PLAN
.
23
11/06/07
Activity Center/Area
Outside Activity
Center
x
x
Xl
x
X
x
x
x
x
X21X3
X3- A Wildlife Enhancement and Mitigation Plan was considered lJRd incorporated as part of the Preliminary Plan
application.
X2- The majority of the commercial retail, etc. space is clustered at the western end of the development in the
- 'Activity Center' where the more intenSive activity is to occur. According to the Wolcott Area Community
'.- Plan, "Types of uses proposed include co~ercial, light industrial, warehousing; agricultural activity and
small residential. Any use which utilizes haiardous materials should be located in this area."
X3- The eastern area of the proposed development is inline with the intent for areas outside of the activity center.
) According to the Wolcott Area Community Plan uses like Inns, lodges, restaurants, dude ranches, and
recreational, educational or cultural oriented operations are recommended and appropriate. '
EAGLE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PLAN
x
x
x
x
Xl
x
X
Xl- The Vines at Vail was not located in a recognized unique landform area of the county; however it was
determined that an area near the single family home lots was affected by potential rockfall. As such, rockfall
mitigation was approved with the application and is reflected on the Plat.
24
11/06/07
( .
\.
x
x
x
x
Through the application for 1041, it has been determined that the Vines at Vail will not be detrimental to the
watershed ofthe Eagle River.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Consistent with Land Use RegulationS. [Section 5-290.G.1.b] The proposed subdivision
shallcomply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use
Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts. and Article
4, Site Development Standards.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X'
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1)
Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2) !
Sign Regulations (Division 4-3)
Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410)
Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420)
Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430)
Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440)
Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450)
Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460)
Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5)
Noise and Vibration (Section 4-520)
Smoke and Particulates (Section 4-530)
Heat, Glare, Radiation and Electrical Interference (Section 4-540)
Storage of Hazardous and Non-hazardous Materials (Section 4-550)
Water QUality Standards (Section 4-560)
Roadway Standards (Section 4-620)
Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630)
Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640)
Drainage Standards (Section 4-650)
25
11/06/07
x
x
x
x
x
Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660)
Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670)
Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680)
Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690)
Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7)
-'-..
, . Applicable
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEETMThmMUM STANDARDS '
STANDARD: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-290.G.l.c] The proposed subdivision shall
be located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns .that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public
services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern
of development.
(1) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's service
plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment\kJ the service plan. Proposed road
extensions shall be consistent with the Eaf!leCountv Road CaDitaI lmorovements Plan.
(2) Serve Ultimate P9pulation. Vtility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population ojthe
service areoto avoidfuture land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. .
(3) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed wh'en the entire
range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into
an otherwise un-served area.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANnARD: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-290.G.l.d] The property proposed to be subdivided
shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or
human-miMe hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable
future improvements to the area.
The areas subject to construction are developable.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-290.G.l.e] - The proposed
subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely
affect the future development of the surrounding area.
26
11/06/07
The findings for the Preliminary Plan and Zone Change for the Vines a~-V ail PUD effectively demonstrated
that this project is sufficiently compatible for development in this area of Wolcott. Approval of this Final
Plat does not modify this previous finding. '
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
. MEETS TIlE MAJORITY OF MINIMuM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Improvements Agreements. [Section 5-290.G.1.f] - The adequacy of the proposed
Improvements Agreement, where applicable.
Certain improvements are necessary and are collateralized through a Subdivision Improvements
Agreement. Improvements include pedestrian paths, roadways and trails.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS TIlE. MArORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Conformance with Final Plat Requirements. [Section 5-290.G.1.g] - Its conformance
with the FinalPlat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM/STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM'ST. ANDARDS
DOES NOTMEETMnrrMUM STANDARDS
D. BQARDOF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OPTIONS:
1. Approve the [PDF -00098] request without conditions if it is determined that the petition will not
adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and the proposed use is attuned with the
immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance
with both the Eagle County Land UseRegulations and with"the guidelines ofthe Eagle County
Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans).
2. Deny the [PDF -00098J request if it is determined that the petition will adversely affect the public
health, safety, and welfare and/or the proposed use is not attuned with the immediately adjacent and
nearby neighborhood properties. and uses and the proposal is not in compliance with both the Eagle
County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan
(andlorother applicable master plans).
3. Table the [PDF-00098J request if additional information is required to fully evaluate the petition.
Give specific direction to the petitioner and staff. .
4. Approve the [PDF -00098J request with conditions and/or performance standards if it is
determined that certain conditions and/or performance standards are necessary to ensure public, health,
safety, and welfare and/or enhances the attunement of the use with the immediately adjacent and
nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County
Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other
applicable master plans).
27
11/06/07
DISCUSSION:
Ms. Skinner-Markowitz presented the highlights of the request. She stated that the intent of the
plat is to create three tracts, 14 lots, common area and easements. The vines at Vail, approve in 2006,
proposes to createa commercial/residential, mixed-use PUD on approximately 39 acres. S~e listed the
proposed uses approve for the project. She provided the background on the property as provided in the
staff report. She provided photos of the site and vicinity map of the area and current Uses. She indicated
that the applicant had satisfied all of the minimum standards required for final plat.
Sid Fox spoke on behalf ofthe applicant. He stated that Patrick Chirchillo was present on behalf
ofKiwa Associates. He stated that there was an error on the plat. He further stated that they had
reviewed the staff report and findings and had nO comments other than to suggest that the board consider
approval without conditions.
. Chairman Menconi opened public comment. There was none. He closed public comment.
Commissioner Fisher stated that she had not heard the file previously. She asked if all the permits
had been granted and ifstaff recommended any conditions.
Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that staff was not recommending any specific conditions. The
applicant had received all their approvals from Eagle County.
Commissioner Runyon asked about the section to the east, which would be dedicated open space.
Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that there were two different open space tracts, one is restricted,
and one is recreational.
Commissioner Runyon asked Mr. Chirchillo to come down to the microhpone and explain his
plans in tenns of timing. ~
Mr. Chirchillo stated that things were moving along. He was waiting for the final plat to move
forward and they hoped to break ground by springtime.
Commissioner Runyon wondered about the access issues related to the blind spot On Hwy 131.
Mr. Chirchillo stated that he has joint access with the waste management and they will do what
they have to do to provide the best site distance. It was part of the CDOT access permit process. Both the
County and CDOT did an analysis and came up with a safe plan.
Commissioner Runyon stated that he had previously voted against the original plan but on staff's
recommendation that the applicant has fulfilled their prior commitment, he is now in favor of the file
moving forward. .
Commissioner Fisher moved to approve file no. PDF-00098 Vines at Vail PUD Final Plat
incorporating staff's findings and without conditions.
Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
LUR- 0073 - Conservation Subdivision
Joe Forinash, Planning Department
ACTION:
Amendment of the Eagle County Land Use Regulation to add a new Section 5-295 Conservation
Subdivision, and make other related amendments to provide additional incentives and limitations
for cluster development.
LOCATION: N/A
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
Amendment to Chapter D: Articles 2, 3, 5 and 6
LUR-0073/ Amendment to Land Use Regulations
Regarding Conservation Subdivision (Cluster Development)
Eagle County Department of Community Development
Eagle County Department of Community Development
TITLE:
FILE NO./PROCESS:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
EAGLE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval (4-0)
28
11/06/07
ROARING FORK VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:' Approval
with conditions (3-0)
PLANNING COMMISSION DELIBERATION:
Eagle County Planning Commission
Commissioners asked whether workforce housing would be a requirement. Given that a large conservation
subdivision inightbe proposed, the impact on workforce housing could be significant. It was also noted that joint
venture arrangements might be used within conservation subdivisions, in a manner similar to the early years in
Beaver Creek, to effectively convey accessory dwelling units (ADUs) without subdivision. A question was raised
as to whether it would be advisable to include Resource Preservation (RP) as a ZOne district in which Conservation
Subdivisions are allowed. Finally, one of the illustrations in the staff presentation showed a trail along the water
way and within the wetland area. Such an alignment should be avoided as the conservation subdivision provisions
are implemented.
The Eagle County Planning Commission recommends approval of the LUR amendment.
Roaring Fork Vallev Regional Planning Commission
Commissioners asked about the history and impetus for the proposed amendment and whether it was initiated in
response to citizen requests. They also asked for clarification of the benefit to a property owner of using these
provisions and whether the 67% or more left undeveloped could continue to be used for agricultural purposes. A
mechanism would be necessary to make sure these conservation! agricultural land tracts are properly managed.
These tracts might be owned by a property owners association. The size of the resulting lots, especially if 85% of a
parcel in the Agricultural Limited (AL) were designated a conservation!agriculturalland tract was also discussed
with a concern that the lots might be too small. Commissioners also asked whether the maximWll size of the
dwelling units is in the e~isting cluster development provisions in the regulations. The concern expressed was that
5,000 square feet might be too restrictive and might limit the use of the proposed provisions. Commissioners asked
about provisions tp prevent property owners from subdividing a parcel and selling off the water rights On the
approval, thereby opening up the possibility of a "weed patch". Could water rights be made inalienable? Finally,
the Commissioners asked about how staffhad responded to the referral rdsponses.
The Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission recommends approval of the LUR amendment with the
conditions that: [1] house sizes not be limited, and [2] water rights on the conservation! agricultural land tracts be
made inalienable.
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. SUMMARY: This application proposes to amend the Eagle County Land Use Regulations in the
following manner:
Description of Proposed Amendment
There are provisions in the Land Use Regulations which allow cluster subdivisions and provide certain
density bonuses. However, the current provisions have rarely if ever been utilized. Consequently, the
existing provisions would be eliminated by this amendment and new provisions would be added which are
intended to [1] provide greater incentives to cluster residential lots under what is now being referred to as
conservation subdivisions, [2] require the permanent setting aside of conservation!agriculturallands tracts
with limited, relatively low impact uses in exchange for density bonuses, and [3] provide sufficient design
criteria and review standards to ensure that the proposed conservation subdivisions meet the intent of these
regulations.
Conservation subdivisions would be allowed only in Resource (minimWll lot size 35 acres), Resource
Limited (minimum 20 acres), Agricultural Residential (minimWll 10 acres) and Agricultural Limited
(minimWll 5 acres) zone districts. Density bonuses would be allowed on a sliding scale based on the
29
11/06/07
. amount ofland that is set aside in conservationlagriculturallands tracts. For example, the allowed
residential density in the Resource zone district without a density bonus is 1 unit per 35 acres. Under the
proposed provisions, the allowed density would increase to 1 unit per 25 acres if at least 67 percent of the
site is set aside in a conservationl agriculturallands tract, and the allowed density would increase
incrementally to as much as 1 unit per 17.5 acres if at least 85 percent of the site is set aside in a
conservationlagriculturallands tract. Similar density bonuses would be allowed in the other zone districts
as wetl. In the event that at least 85 percent of the site is set aside in a conservationlagriculturallands tract,
the maximum resulting density would be twice that which would otherwise be allowed without a density
bonus.
Related Amendments to the Land Use Regulations
There are several related amendments to the Land Use Regulations which also must be made to provide
consistency with the amendment described above. They are as follows:
1. Section 2-110, Definitions, specifically the definition of Cluster Development, which would be
amended to reflect the proposed Conservation Subdivision. See the revised text which is attached to
this staff report.
2. Section 3-210.D., Rural Residential (RR), which describes the purpose of the Rural Residential zone
district, must be revised to delete the reference to clustered development since. conservation subdivision
would not be a pennitted use in this zone district. The phrase and reference to "clusteted deveiopment"
is also proposed to be changed to "conservation subdivision in each of Secti~n 3.21 O.E., Agricultural
Limited (AU; Section 3.210.F., Agricultural Residential (AR); Section 3.210'.0., Resource Limited
(RL); and Section 3.210.H., Resource (R). See the revised text which is attached to this staff report.
3. Table 3-300, Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule, must be revised to
delete the Cluster Development Option A and Cluster Development Option B uses, which are no longer
applicable, and to add the Conservation Subdivision use and indicate that it ispermftted by special
review in the AL, AR, RL and R zone districts and not permitted in all other zone districts. See the
r:evised porti~n of Table 3-300 which is attached to this staff report. '--
4. Section 3-310.B., Cluster Development. must be revised to reflect the somewhat different approach
reflected in the proposed conservation subdivision amendmeht. See the revised text which is attached
to this staff report.
5. Article 5. Table of Contents. Must be revised to add a line for the proposed new Section 5-295,
Conservation Subdivision.
6. Certain exemptions to the subdivision requirements of the Land Use Regulations are set forth in
Section 5-280.B.2., Exemptions. One particular reference to the current Section 3-310.B.2.a., Cluster
Development Option A, must be revised to reflect the new Section 5-295, Conservation Subdivision.
See the revised text which is attached to this staff report.
7. The definitions of Type A Subdivision and Type B Subdivision must be revised to allow subdivision to
more than three lots when these procedures are used in conjunction with conservation subdivisions. See
the revised text for Section 5-290.B.l., Type A Subdivision, and Section 5-290.B.2., Type B
Subdivision, which are attached to this staff report.
8. The procedure for a Type A or Type B Subdivision (Section 5-290.C., Procedure) must be clarified to
reflect that the procedures for these types of subdivisions follows those set forth in the amendment
creating conservation subdivisions (5-295) rather than those that would be used for a conventional
Type A or Type B Subdivision.
30
11/06/07
9. Finally, it is contemplated that certain of the lots created under the provisions of Section 5-295,
Conservation Subdivision, will be smaller than the minimum lot size for the ZOne district in which they
occur. Consequently, that part of Section 6-120, Nonconforming Lots of Record. (specifically Section
6-120.A., General) must be revised to acknowledge the non-conformity of these lots. See the revised
text which is attached to this staff report. r
/
\
Staff Analysis
Trade-offs
These proposed regulations represent a compromise between competing values. On the one hand, the
Comprehensive Plan encourages development to be located near existing towns and community centers.
Such a development pattern tends to make the most efficient use of public infrastructure, favor transit use
over automobile use to access employment and shopping, and preserve lands further away from the towns
and community centers for agricultural and other open lands purposes. i-
On the other hand, statutes allow property owners to subdivide land into parcels of35 acres or more
without submittingJo County subdivision requirements. The result is that large parcels have sometimes
been subdivided to allow single family dwellings spread out on a number of35 acre parcels, tending to
break up what would otherwise be open, agricultural lands. These proposed regulations would provide
incentives in the form of density bonuses t<? group such dwellings on smaller lots and preserve a large
portion of the parceJs, including the more productive agricultural and environmentally sensitive lands, in
conservationlagriculturallands tracts.
Conservation easements - who would hold them?
It is expected that each conservation subdivision would be implemented through the use of conservation
easement agreement which would permanently protect the resulting conservationlagriculturallands tracts
from development. In some, or perhaps most instances, the privat~ land trusts which operate in Eagle
County may not be willing to hold the resulting conservation easements and assume the responsibility for
the monitoring of the use of the land and the legal defense of the easement.
An alternative is to involve the Eagle County Land Trust which h~ been created but does not currently
hold any conservation easements. The private land trusts typically require a payment by the landowner of
an amount that will provide a perpetual source of revenue for monitoring the use of conservation easements
under its resportsibility. A similar requirement could be relied upon with respect to
conservationlagriculturallands tracts created pursuant to these regulations.
Yet another alternative (which would require some modification of the proposed text) would be to rely on
plat note restrictions and/or covenants, amendments of which would be subject to County approval. Under
this alternative, monitoring the uses of the conservationlagriculturallands tracts would most likely be
addressed by the County's code enforcement procedures and policies.
Adiudicated water rights
A requirement of the building code for any dwelling is adequate water for domestic purposes. When water
is not provided by a metro district or other public source, well permits are subject to statutory and
regulatory provisions administered by the State Engineer through the Division of Water Resources. Since
residential lots would be created under County subdivision regulations rather than through a subdivision
exemption process, it is likely that any property owner taking advantage of the provisions of these proposed
regulations would be required by the State to have an adjudicated source of water. Such a requirement
would tend to be a disincentive to the use of these provisions.
Response to comments
31
11/06/07
Staffhas received several referral comments regarding the proposed regulations as noted below. As a
result, a number of revisions have been incorporated in the draft. Please refer to the attached revised draft.
2. STAFF REPORT
B. REFERRAL RESPONSES:
Environmental Health
. Section 5-295.e., Shared Septic Systems, includes the phrases "encouraged to the extent practicable"
and "adequate maintenahce program" which seem somewhat vague. Maybe it would be better to have
"as determined by the Environmental Health Department after each of those phrases". .
ECO Transit
. Why allow one residential building site outside the grouped lots?
. If the residences are ctustered, why limit the density to 1/25 to 1 / 2.5? It seems that a developer m~y
not find value in this density and may choose not to cluster-while a higher density bonus may provide
that incentive. In addition, if the clustering should occur closer to the town center and particularly near
a transit stop, it may be appropriate to have a higher density.
Colorado Division of Wildlife
. The DOW supports this amendment to the Eagle County Land Use Regulations to provide incentives
and limitations for clustered development Currently loss of wildlife habitat is the largest issue facing
theDOW in managing wildlife populations. .
. Regarding Section 5-295.E.12., Access to the Conservation/Agricultural Lands Tracts. is the intent of
this section to protect growirig crops, livestock or sen~itive wildlife habitats? The DOWsupports these
protections but cautions that developments adjacent to other public . lands can have significant impacts
from dispersed recreation.
. Regarding Section 5-295.G.5., Preservation:ofLands of Significant Conservation Value. is there a
defmition of these values?
. Regarding Section 5-295.G.5.a., Uses Allowed. the allowed uses should include seasonal closures to
protect growing crops, livestock, sensitive wildlife habitat and sensitive habitat types (riparian,
wetlands, etc.). Any dispersed recreation trails should have a program to provide sufficient
maintenance to prevent erosion and noxious weeds.
Dominic Mauriello, Mauriello Planning Group
. Section 5-295C., Uses. states that "lots created through this process will be considered legal non-
conforming lots". We cannot understand why the County would create a regulation that promotes and
creates nonconformities. It seems to us that you would structure the regulation to result in conforming
parcels which might mean amending other provisions of the code.
Sid Fox, Fox & Company
. Regarding 5-295.D.5., Process. if you can only Special Use and either a Type A or Type B Minor
Subdivision, how could you do a Conservation Subdivision of more than 3 lots?
Referral Agencies: Various Eagle County departments, private planning firms that work in Eagle County,
engineering firms and surveyors that work in Eagle County, Colorado state agencies, Federal agencies,
ambulance and fire districts, utility providers and special districts, other agencies including the Cattleman's
Association, various home owners associations and design review boards, all towns in Eagle County, Open
Space Advisory Committee.
C. STAFF DISCUSSION:
32
11/06/07
1. Pursuant to Chapter 1, Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 1.15.04 Referrals. the
proposed amendments HA VE been referred to the appropriate agencies, including all towns within
Eagle County, and to the Colorado Division of Local Affairs;
2. Pursuant to Chapter 1, Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 1.15.05 Public Notice, Public
notice HAS been given;
3. PursuanttoChapter 2, Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-230.B.2 Text Amendment:
a. The proposed amendments AMEND ONLY THE TEXT of Chapter II, Articles 2, 3, 5 and 6, and
DO NOT amend the Official Zone District Map.
b. Precise wording ()f the proposed changes HAS been provided (please see attached).
4. Pursuant .to Chapter 2, Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-230.D., Standards for the
review of Amendments to the Text of the Land Use Regulations, as applicable:
STANDARD: Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-230.D.l.]. Whether and the extent to
which the proposed amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, policies and FLUM (Future
Land Use Map) of the Comprehensive Plan.
EAGLE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
x
x
x
x
General Governance - tonforms to the policies of this section of the Comprehensive Plan; specifically, with the
core values.
Development- Residential uses inthe rural part of the County would be clustered, reducing infrastructure costs and
preserving open areas. The resulting development could be approved only if it is sustainable in nature and would
not exceed the capacity of physical, environmental or social resources. The viability for ~gricultural uses would be
supported or enhanced and agriculturally productive lands would be preserved to a high extent. However, the
resulting development may compromise the goal of retaining open, undeveloped corridors between towns and
community centers nor does it necessarily foster the creation of,high density transit oriented community centers.
Economic Resources - The resulting development may have the effect of preserving agriculturally productive lands
and supporting or enhancing the viability of agricultural uses in Eagle County.
Housing - The resulting development may result in an improved diversity of dwelling types and sizes in the County
and result in the number of accessory dwelling units. However, it would not cause attainable work force housing to
necessarily be located near local work centers.
Infrastructure and SerVices - The potential exists to ensure that road specifications are adequate but not over
designed, that the clustered conservation subdivisions will not be adequately served by all community services,
33
11/06107
although local private water and septic systems may suffice. Emergency services may be less adequate than if the
dwelrJing units were to be located within a community center.
Water Resources - The opportunity will exist to ensure that both .ground and surface water source areas will be
protected and that proof of legal and adequate water will be provided.
,
I
Wildlife Resources - The opportunity will exist to ensure that wildlife habitat will not be negatively affected or
enhanced, the cumulative impacts on wildlife will be considered, buffers will be provided to separate wildlife
habitat from development, wildlife friendly measures will be incorporated into the design of individual home sites,
and that adequate measures will be in effect to control impacts to wildlife from domestic dogs.
Sensitive Lands - The opportunity will exist to avoid areas of significant natural hazard, protect the integrity of the
natural environment and the area's visual quality, preserve lands of high conservation value, and enSure that the
conservation/agricultural lands will be well managed for the longterm.
Environmental Ouality - The opportunity will exist to ensure that there will be nO undue impacts on environmental
quality .
Future Land Use Map (FLUM) - The proposed development would be consistent with the Future Land Use Map
except that the densities resulting from the density bonuses would exceed, in certain cases, the densities
contemplated in the FLUM.
The policies listed above generally support the intention of these amendments.
[+1_) FINDING: Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-230.D.1.] Although the fmdings
with respect to the Comprehensive Plan are mixed, the proposed regulation aniendment IS generally in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
STANDARD: Compatible with surrounding uses. [Section 5-230.D.2.] Whether and the extent to which
the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land, and
is the appropriate zone district for the land, considering its consistency with the purpose and standards of
the proposed zone district.
The issue of compatibility does not pertain directly to this proposal; however, it could be interpreted that/
limited residential development with a substantial amount of preserved open space would be compatible
with adjacent residential and Undeveloped areas.
[n/a) FINDING: Compatible with surrounding uses. [Section 5-230.D.2.] - The issue of compatibility
in its intended context IS NOT applicable to this proposed amendment.
STANDARD: Changed conditions. [Section 5-230.D.3.] Whether and the extent to which there are
changed conditions that require an amendment to modify the use or density/intensity.
Conditions have changed such that the proposed amendments are necessitated. Pressure to subdivide tracts
of land, either with or without the benefit of County subdivision review, will continue to increase.
Conservation subdivisions will allow alternative development in appropriate circUmstances and provide
incentives to protect a substantial amount of the site as conservation/agricultural land tracts which will
remain undeveloped.
[+) FINDING: Changed conditions. [Section 5-230.D.3.] There ARE changed conditions that require
this amendment.
34
11/06/07
STANDARD: Effect on natural environment. [Section 5-230.DA.] Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment would result in significantly adverse impacts on the natural environment, including
but not limited to water, air, noise, stormwaier management, wildlife habitat, vegetation, and wetlands.
This amendment will not result in adverse impacts on the natural environment. On the contrary, these
amendments are expected to have a positive effect on the environment by providing incentives to
concentrate development in certain areas and protecting mQre environmentally sensitive land from
development.
i
[+} FINDING: Effect on natural environment. [SectiQn5-230.DA;] - The prQPQsed amendment
WILL NOT result in significantly adverse impacts onthe natural environment~ including but not
l~mited to water, air, noise, stormwater management, wildlife habitat, vegetation, and wetlands.
STANDARD: Community need [Section 5-230.D.5.] Whether and the extent to which theproposed
amendment addresses a demonstrated community need
It has become increasingly important that sensitive areas within unincorporated Eagle County be preserved
for future generations. The proposed regulations will encourage compact development while permanently
preserving more environmentally sensitive land.
[+} FINDING: Community need. [Section 5-230.D.5.] - It HAS BEEN demonstratedthat the
proposed amendment addresses a community need.
STANDARD: Development patterns. [Section 5-230.D.6.] - Whether and the extent to which the
proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly development pattern, and not constitute spot
zoning, and whether the resulting development can logically be provided with necessary public facilities
and services.
Zone changes will not be necessary to implement the conservation subdivisiQn provisions, although the
potential does exist fQr a zone change application from R to RL, AR or AL to accompany a conservation
subdivision application. In many if not most cases, it is expected that water and wastewater treatment will
occur on-site with private systems. In those instances in which conservation subdivisions are. proposed
adjacent to or in close proximity to existing cQmmunity centers; there will be an opportunity to consider the
inefficiency of any proposed extension of public facilities and services.
The conservatiQn subdivision provisions will tend to encourage the creation of more residentiallots in
outlying portions of Eagle County than would be the case under existing zoning. However, this may be
offset by the preservation of more environmentally sensitive lands in the conservationlagriculturallands
tracts which would comprise ofa minimum of 67 percent of the site of the conservation subdivision. To the
extent this is so, the resulting development pattern may be regarded as logical and .orderly.
[+/-] FINDING: Development patterns. [Section'5-230.D.6.] - The proposed amendment WILL NOT
constitute SPQt zQning, MAY result in a logical and orderly development pattern, and, when
appropriate, the resulting development MAY logically be provided with necessary public facilities and
services.
STANDARD: Public interest. [Section 5-230.D.7.] - Whether and the extent to which the area to which
the proposed amendment would apply has changed or is changing to such a degree that it is in the public
interest to encourage a new use or density in the area.
Although residential uses are permitted in all zone districts in which conservation subdivisions are allowed,
the proposed amendment would allow greater residential density in exchange fQr the preservation of
conservation/agricultural land tracts. The trade-off between greater density, on the one hand, and the
35
11/06/07
permanent preservation of conservation/agricultural land tracts, on the other, may well ser,ve the public
interest.
[+/_] FINDING: Public interest. [Section 5-230.D.7.] - The area to which the proposed amendment
would apply has changed or is changing to such a degree that it MAY BE is in the public interest to
amend the Eagle County Land Use Regulations.
.
DISCUSSION:
Mr. Forinash presented the draft revision to the Land Use Regulations, which would change provisions
regarding cluster development, noW referred to as conservation subdivision. The amendment would provide some
additional incentives for individuals to cluster development in more ruml areas of the county. The benefits of
cluster type development would minimize impacts to environmentally sensitive areas. The draft has been revised
based on referral response and planning commission comments, and continued staff discussions. The conservation
. subdivision would be a use allowed by special review. There are four zone districts, Resource (R.), Resource
Limited (RL), Agricultural Residential (AR), and Agricultural Limited (AL). The minimum land area in the zone
districts is twice the minimum lot size fee each zone. There are a number of requirements, which include a special
use permit requirement, final plat requirement, 72% of parcel would have to be conserved, proof of adequate water
and wastewater treatment, disclosure of ownership interest in adjacent properties and Conservation/Agricultural
lands management plan. The key provision is the density bonus. The bonus would vary for each zone district
depending upon the amount of the land being set aside. The proposed regulations includes certain design criteria
affecting efficient layout, road and infrastructure alignments, resource protection, shared septic systems, maximum
si~e of dwelling units, residential building sites not in a cluster, maximum number of dwelling units per cluster,
minimum residential lot size, accessory dwelling units, dimensional limitations, access to conservation/agricultural
lands tract, landscaping, lighting, fencing, and signage. Several related amendments are proposed to Article 3, 5
and 6 to be consistent with the new provisions. The Eagle County Planning Commission recommended approval
without conditions. The Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission recommended approval with two
conditions. One condition was limiting house sizes ~d the second condition was that water rights are made
inalienable.
Commissioner Runyon wondered how staff came up with the percentages and what the previous bonus
densities were.
MrtForinash stated that the density bonuses provided now are very limited. The proposed numbers are
statute driven; they simply filled in the blanks.
Commissioner Runyon wondered if there would be any advantages to doing a study in the building
community. The 40% is higher than he antll;:ipated. ..
Mr. Forinash stated that it would take a significant amount of surveying because it is not only the
development community but also relates to property owners in rural parts of the county. The numbers could be
reworked if necessary.
Commissioner Runyon stated that he believes it is important to get the right number and provided some
flexibility.
Commissioner Fisher stated that the flexibly is listed under the design criteria. The fact that they would
have to come in for a special use permit and the approval then becomes board based.
Mr. Forinash stated that it may be possible to adjust the wording so the maximum density bonuses sound
less like a sure thing.
Commissioner Runyon wondered if anyone could ask for a variance on land use regulations.
Mr. Montag stated that it would difficult to demonstmte the hardship on something like this.
Chairman Menconi requested that the board review and accept the comments on Pg. 6 of 10 of the staff
report. He stated that the board needed to acknowledge the referrals, public notice, the text amendment, and the
standards for the review ofd1e amendments. He stated that all had been dealt with appropriately.
Commissioner Fisher and Commissioner Runyon concurred.
Chairman Menconi stated that he was prepared to vote in favor of the amendment as proposed by Mr.
Forinash.
Commissioner Runyon suggested an amendment to modify the wording to indicate that the amendment is a
start point of discussion.
'-...-
36
11/06/07
Chairman Menconi wondered if there would be a way to accommodate Commissioner Runyon's request
without making it too flexible.
Mr. Morris stated that he would be more inclined to call it similar to a PUD but a very limited form of a
PUD in a sense that you could achieve greater density but would have to meet certain guidelines, in this case, there
is a cap on the amount density that one could achieve. He stated that E-7 states that the maximum number of home
sites shall be dependent on the subject property's physical characteristics and the degree to which the proposal
conforms to the design criteria.
Commissioner Runyon stated that he just wanted some flexibility to go in both directions. He didn't want
to lose the possibility of some clustered development because the guidelines are too rigorous either.
Mr. Morris stated that that was not a legal question, that's a policy issue.
Mr. Montag stated that it is easy to set the maximum and go lower ifneeded. It's a little more difficult to
go ab\1lve what the maximum is in the land use regulations. He believes the 40% bonus is a pretty good incentive.
He suggested that the board give it a try and see if they bould get developers and land owners to utilize the process
based on the 40% bonus. He suggested leaving the amendment where it is now and if it needs tweaking later, they
can do that.
Co~missioner Runyon moved that the Board approve File No. LUR-0073 to add a new Section 5-295,
Conservation Subdivision, to Chapter II, Article 5, and to amend the Chapter II, Article 2, Defmitions; Article 3,
Section 3-210, Residential. Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts; Article 3, Section 3-300, Residential.
Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Table; Article 3, Section 3-310, Review Standards Applicable to
Particular Residential Agricultural and Resource Uses; Article 5: Table of Contents; Article 5, Section 5-280,
Subdivision; Article 5, Section 5-290, Minor Subdivision. and Article 6, Section 5-290, Minor Subdivision.
Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Chairman Menconi asked Mr. Forinash if this would be his last major land use regulation.
Mr. Forinash stated that it appeared to be the case.
Mr. Montag stated that Mr. Forinash is currently working on the TOR program. They will be getting as
niuch work out of him as 1heycan before December 14. \
Chairman Menconi stated that he appreciated Mr. Forinash's efforts.
Mr. Montag thanked Mr. Forinash for his time and effort on the conservation subdivision and all his hard
work and dedication.
Commissioner Runyon added his thanks.
Attest:
~ the m~~ adjourned until November 13, 2007.
C an
37
11/06/07