Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 10/02/07 Present: Am Menconi Sara Fisher Peter Runyon Bruce. Baumgartner Bryan Treu Robert Moms Teak Simonton Kathy Scriver PUBLIC BEARING October 2, 2007 Chaiiman Commissioner Commissioner County Manager County Attorney Deputy County Attorney Clerk to the Board Deputy Clerk to the Board This . being a . scheduled Public Hearing, the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: SEPtEMBER 2007 BILL PA ~G" PA YRQLL ~~RAL FUND 4 EAGLE RANCH AC.E.O. AARDVAC ABBOTT LABORATORIES ACME ALARM COMPANY ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFF ADVANTAGE NETWORK SYSTEMS AFFILIATED CREDIT SERVICE AIDAN FLEMING AIR COMPRESSOR SERVICE AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC ALAN BOSWORTH ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY ALPHAMEDICAL DISTRIBUTOR ALPINE LUMBER yOMPANY AMADEO GONZALES AMANDA MOODY, MS, OTR AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMERIGAS AMY BERENS AMY KEELEY ANDIE NOAKES ANDREW JESSEN ... ANIMAL HEALTH ANN LOPER ANN MUNCASTER APPLIED TRUST ENGINEERING ARMOR HOLDINGS FORENSICS ARMY & FACTORY SURPLUS ARTHUR AND PERLMUTfER ARTWORKS, THE AT ANDT A V TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVON CENTER AT BEA YER CK AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS BABETfE RUOFF BACK IN TIME CLOCK REPAIR SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVicE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES RE:MBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPUES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENTO SERVICE SERVICE SUPPUES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 500.00 35.00 81.S4 202.70 90.00 30.00 300.00 721.03 125.00 1,006.69 46.26 500.00 80.49 683.04 411.22 25.20 212.52 776.00 543.53 178.89 5,000.00 292.00 1,950.00 872.81 12.00 25.20 722.50 29.95 128.75 60.00 80.00 78.36 1,374.18 2,170.07 2,861.66 215.00 280.00 I 10/02/07 BAILEYS BALCOMB AND GREEN BARBARA WHITFORD BEN GALLOWAY MD BENJAMIN SWIG BERGLUND Rum BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER BERRY CREEK MIDDLE SCHOOL BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS BETHANY VAN WYK BIG STEVES TOWING BOB BARKER COMPANY BONNIE EMBRY BOYD COFFEE COMPANY BRANDON BEAUDETIE BRUCE BAUMGARTNER CA STATE DISBURSEMENT CANYON WATER RESOURCES LL CARBONDALE CENTER LLC __ CARMEN'LOZOY~VEI..&~ ____ _______~u CARTER" ALTERMAN CATA CDW CED-CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENnJRYTEL CENnJRYTEL OF EAGLE CHAD-PUGLlSE CHARLES G LEONARD CHARM TEX CHEMATOX INC. CHERYL THOMAS CHOLPON LORD CLIFFORD D ZINDA CLINTON MEHL CO COUNTY ATtORNEY ASSOC CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTII &:. CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTII-AND CO NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY COLORADO FOUNDATION FOR COLORADO MOUNTAIN MEDICAL COLORADO MOUNTAI NEWS COLORADO RIVER WATER COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COLORADO WEST MENTAL HL TII COLUMBINE MARKET COMFORT INN COMMANDER CONSERVE A WATILlGHTlNG CONTRACT PHARMACY SERVICE COpy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING CORRAL WEST RANCHWEAR COUNTY SHERWFS COLORADO SHIPPING SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMIlURSEMENt_ SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPUES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE 28.50 6,370.46 43.20 1,730.00 3,319.88 292.00 450.00 500.00 1,002.20 98.01 576.00 767.53 112.00 1,145.52 304.97 45.72 278.76 3,608.65 150.00 - . ..-196.02 3,120.00 335.00 1,550.57 115.42 2,351.34 12,669.55 3,131.40 107.42 55.00 847.92 495.00 15.39 86.82 245.70 90.00 400.00 140.00 632.25 136.25 175.00 258.00 20,835.72 1,546.73 891.00 48,092.35 84.70 14,902.65 3,000.00 1,385.30 4,071.53 504.70 7,641.49 31.82 1,548.72 165.00 2 10/02/07 COWBOY CATERING CRL ASSOCIATES INC CURTIS BELCHER PAN CORCORAN PLS DAN HANSON DAVID A BAUER DECATUR ELECTRONICS DEENA EZZELL DENNIS WILLEY DENVER NEWSPAPER AGENCY DIANA JOHNSON DISTRICT ATIORNEYS OFFICE DIXIE KOZINSKI DOCTORS ON CALL DON OLSEN DONALD J LAUGHLIN DOREEN CONSTANINE DOUBLE M ASPHALT COATINGS DUFFORD WALDECK & MILBURN EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COUNTY CHARTER EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL E^GLE COUNTY SHfgRlFFS-OFF EAGLE EMBROIDERY INC EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED CNL EAGLE RIVER YOU'l'H COAL. EAGLE SUMMIT REPORTING EAGLE TOWN OF EAGLE VAIL METRO DISTRICT EAGLE VALLEY ALLIANCE EAGLE VALLEY EVENTS EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND MIRROR EAqLEVALLEY LAND TRUST EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL 'EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EARLINE BRONN EASTER OWENS ELECTRIC CO ED GRANGE EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER ELISA ACOSTA ELLEN MATLOCK EMC2 ERIN DOWD ESTHER MEHL EVERETI' F AMIL Y FUNERAL FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FARNUM HOLT FUNERAL HOME FEDERAL EXPRESS FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC FIDLAR COMPANIES FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMER. FLO HABENICHT FLORIDA MICRO FOODS OF V AIL, HOME SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE 2,779.60 9,346.30 717.08 5,920.00 35.00 44..00 1,845.00 10.00 494.28 6,500.00 78.00 295,879.00 287.00 260.00 7.38 90.00 12.00 13,750.00 47.00 7,834,00 4,580.00 1,106.66 42.83 249.15 436.36 10,000.00 21,540,00 119.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 16,804.33 3,081.34 4,125.39 161.00 2,055.00 13.80 766.31 72.00 101.90 144.95 90.00 482.58 206.96 72.00 460.00 3,439.18 100.00 423.79 122.34 26,850.00 964.30 7650 3,988.21 559.05 3 10/02/07 FSH COMMUNICATIONS LLC G & S TOOL CLINIC LLC GALLS INCORPORATED GEORGIE C ZINDA mv GLENDA WENTWORTH GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GREAT AMERICAN LEASING GREENBERG & ASSOCIATES GREG VAN WYK HAMPTON INN HAZELLE GQNTER lID SUPPLY FACILITIES HELLO DIRECT INC HENRY SCHEIN HERE COMES THE JUDGE HERTA VONOHLSEN HEWLETT PACKARD mGH coUNtRy COPIERS mLLS PET NUTRITION SALES HINES PRODUCTS CORP. HOGAN & HARTSoN HOUDAY INN DENVER WEST HOLLY KASPER HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HR SERVICES OF VAIL HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS HUMAN RESOURCE PLUS INC INGENIX INN AT RlVERWALK INSIGHT INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE INTERIOR PLANTSCAPES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAPNETWORK SYSTEMS IPSWITCH INC IRVIN BORENSTEIN IVAN RAPCAN JAN 0 WESTMAN JANET CONNORS JARA DIVERSIFIED SERVICES JEFFERSON COUNTY JENA SKINNER-MARKOWITZ JERRY CmCOINE JILL HUNSAKER JILL SCHROCK JIM DUKE JIMMIE ANDERSON JOHN SCRUGGS JOSEPH SCHMITI JOYCE L REICHE KABEMA BEYA KARA BErns, CORONER SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPi>>LIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND REFUND REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 70.00 262.84 1,192.31 204.50 5,863.49 30UO 1,045.54 535.17 1,294.28 32.80 24.60 345.00 38.40 127.32 569.12 124.62 30.00 90.00 2,565.00 57.20 253.73 1,043.00 262.50 948.00 280.00 173.66 19,253.33 125.00 1,328.78 3,810.00 74.67 104.00 652.00 4,900.00 225.00 200.00 2,427.40 1,395.00 24.30 30.00 31.40 86.40 106.61 250.00 302.29 90.00 17.01 204.88 14.40 90.00 291.60 90.00 25.20 3,000.00 128.80 4 10/02/07 KAREN HOEGER KATHERINE PETERSON KATHLEEN SCHMITI' KATHY SCRIVER KESSLER MARY J KIDS SAFETY OF AMERICA KIMBERLY DEFRIES K.INETICO WATER PROS KlUSTIN DIEDRiCH KlUSTINA WARNER KYMBERLEIGH SEMMENS KZYR.cOOL RADIO LLC LAFARGE CORPORATION LANDS END INCORPORATED LASER JUNCTION LEFTHAND NETWORKS LEONA PERKINS LESLIE BETHEL LESLIE ROBEY ENTERPRISES' LEXISNEXIS COURTLINK INC LINDA BARTLETT LINDA JOHNSON LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR LISA DE GRAM LIVEPERSON lNC LORI SIEFERS LORlECRAWFORD MAIN AUTO PARTS MAKYLA MOODY MARGARET BABEL MARGERY STONE MARl RENZELMAN MARIA ANJIER MARIONF LAUGHLIN MARlYA TRIFONOVA MARLENE MC CAFFERTY MARSLAND LABORATORIES MARTHA SUTHERLAND MARY JANE HESS MARY MOE MARYLAND CHILD SUPPORT MATTHEW BENDER AND CO INC MBIA MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MCMASTER CARR MEADOW MOUNTAIN PLUMBING MEET THE WILDERNESS MERCK ATL METRO PATHOLOGISTS MICHAEL BARCA MICHAEL MCKINNON MICRO PLASTICS INC MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN MIKE KERST MILLER VISUAL ARTS REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 209.94 90.00 75.60 44.55 17.90 197.94 98.20 374.85 67.64 . 67.00 115.83 1,700.00 54.73 1,106.90 359.00 82,464.00 358.34 952.00 1,382.50 142.30 30.00 34.20 342.17 75.77 990.00 107.41 61.56 21.63 30.00 90.00 4.23 108.54 44.40 90.00 228.25 90.00 100.00 90.00 142.09 43.45 461.54 285.45 12,441.66 46.98 121.60 2,127.00 2,760.00 1,933.29 . 400.00 48.75 7.10 26.61 432.13 308.10 193.35 5 10/02/07 MOORE MEDICAL CORP MTN MESA SPORT !NC MTN VALLEY DEVELOPENTAL MWI VETERNlARY SUPPLY CO MYERS & COMPANY NACCTFCO TREASURER . NANCY SCHURR, NP NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NATIVE ELECTRIC !NC NEBS NEVES UNIFORMS NEW ELECTRIC INC NORTHWESTCOWRAOO NRC BROADCASTING,.INC. NUTRITION CONSULTANTS OC TANNER OHIO CHUD SUPPORT OLSON PROPERTY OSM DELIVERY LLC OTfALIE FABER-CARLIN P scorr WWERY PAINT BUCKET THE PAPER WISE PARK COUNTY SHERIFF OFF. PAT NOLAN PECZUH PRINTING COMPANY PEGGY BUCHANNAN PEGGY GRAYBEAL PETER FREIDRICH PHYLLIS KELLY PITNEY BOWES PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PRCA PROFESSIONAL FINANCE PSS,INC PURCHASE POWER QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION QWEST RED CANYON CAFE RENEE DUBUISSON RITA R BOSSOW ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN ROBERN RUSS ROBERT DIETER ROBERT NARRACCI ROBIN RUTAN RUTH LENZ SA-SO COMPANY SALVATION ARMY SAND CASTLE INVESTMENT SANDRA L SKILES SANDRA SUTHER SARAl:I SCHIPPER SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE I REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE' REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPL~ SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBuRSEMENT SERVICE REIMBuRSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 836.97 86.00 10,000.00 562.97 70.84 60.00 48.60 40.00 140.00 214.75 8.99 66.36 850.00 635.00 132.00 694.15 451.94 3,880.00 540.00 180.00 43.50 36.08 6~63.50 9,720.00 107.78 9,110.62 36.00 180.00 8.64 24.30 3,312.00 168.00 70.00 830.00 28.00 2,039.73 10,192.80 761.69 97.55 8,251.53 721.00 -----"19-.JI-------~~-~--~- 42.39 705.16 130.00 70.00 36.45 200.27 9.00 158.18 20,000.00 30.00 112.00 29.16 333.20 6 10/02107 SA YNOM.OREPROMOTIONS , SCHMIDT POLYGRAPH SCHNEIDER MAURER SCOTI A HAAS PA SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITY TRANSPORT SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHAMROCK FOODS CORP SHANNON CORDINGL Y SHANNON HURST SHAPINSASSOCIATES SHEAFFER KAREN SHEILA VIGIL SIGNATURE SIGNS SILVERMAN LAW FIRM SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SMITH EPW AIm SNOWHITE LINEN SOURCE GAS SOUTH POINT HOTEL CASINO STATE OF FLORIDA STEAMMASTER STEPHANIE OLENWRIGHT STEPHENS NURSERY STERlCYCLE INC . STEVE MRIPPY SuE LlCKUS SUNRAY SUPPORT PAYMENT SUSPENSE FUND SYDNEY PITrMAN TAMMI MAlTHEWS TASER INTERNATIONAL TCC CONlRACTORS TECH MEDICAL INC TENIE cmcolNE TERRIE FISCHER :TERRY M BRENNAN TIlE OLD GYPSUM PRINTER THERMOWORKS INC THIMGAN & ASSOCIATES THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP THOMSON WEST GROUP TILE WORK BY PAUL TIM DOOLEY TOM JOHNSON TONI BERNS TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TOWN OF EAGLE TOWN OF VAIL TRANE COMPANY TREMONT PLAZA SUITES TRILOGY INTEGRATED TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC UNITED PARCEL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE ' SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 221.20 100.00 270.00 30;00 20.00 885.50 5711.00 710.09 28.29 180.00 12,799.05 38.45 112.00 574.00 28.60 57856 112.00 239.01 1,204.15 327.00 1,003.6831,112.50 90.00 10.SO 791.09 417.96 72.00 1;300.61 363,00 ~. 273,855.44 41.40 45.36 900.00 773.00 1,907.75 90.00 179.04 81.25 722.00 155.86 12,000.00 418.50 2,155.64 1,592.73 158.10 56.10 89.70 30.23 8,007.32 234,483.53 2,1l6.@ 666.00 4,500.00 3,505.00 346.29 7 10/02/07 UNITED REPROGRAPIDC UNITED SITE SERVICES UNITED WAY OF EAGLE uNIVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS '1 US FOODSERVICE INC USDA FOREST SERVICE VAlLDAILYnIE VAIL ELECTRONICS VAIL ~NEYWAGON LID VAIL MOUNTAIN COFFEE VAIL NET VAIL SUMMIT ORTHOPAEDICS VAIL SYMPOSIUM VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR V ALARIE HAYS VALLEY LUMBER VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VERBAL moo INSTITUTE . VERIFICATIONS INC VERlZON WIRELESS, VIRGINIA BAIR WASTE MANAGEMENT WECMRD WELLS FARGO WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY WESTERN SLOPE BAR WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES WILLIAM LOPER WILLITS GENERAL STORE WOLPOFF AND ABRAMSON WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XCEL ENERGY XEROX CORPORATION Y AMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC YOUR PERSONAL CHEF ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE ZOBEYDA ARGELIA REYES PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER 2007 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL 19&20 162.95 163.20 20;00 484.00 34,305.66 4,637.96 370.50 489.84 1,382.40 5.99 490.00 1l.95 1,250.00 1,000.00 131.02 37.53 458.92 2,951.82 251;94 22$.35 8,954.27 14.40 1,996.98 800.00 555,029.40 1,000.00 123.30 540.64 12.00 88.00 150.00 311.06 66.59 6,521.63 31.80 1,213.65 556.21 200.00 1,301,316.13 3,395,718.39 . ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND ACE IRRIGATION MFG CO ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS APWA CONFERENCE BIG R MANUFACTURING BUD JACOX COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO PUBLIC UTILITIES COPY PLUS EAGLE V ALLEY MEDICAL ENVIROTECH FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVlG G & S TOOL CLINIC LLC G M ROAD MARKING LLC SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 6,04(i.55 276.00 30.00 1,050.00 75.00 33.26 10.00 119.48 171.00 18,230.65 37,292.16 1,329.95 2,297.88 8 10/02/07 GMCO CORPORATION GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY KNUPP LLC LAFARGE CORPORATION LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS mc NEIL HERRIDOE OLSON PROPERTY PAPER WISE PITKIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORK PROPERTY IMAGING, LLC RIFLE EQUIPMENT INC RSC SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION SOURCE GAS THERESA LADENBURGER TOWN OF BASALT TOWN OF GYPSUM UNITED SITE SERVICES INC US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY WASTE MANAGEMENT WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES WHITTAKER LANDSCAPING WYtACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER 2007 SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLffiS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL 19 &20 5,269.36 137.91 512.52 2,631.35 39,859.19 6,625.84 95.00 75.00 36.69 46.14 27,541.39 1,400.00 207.00 2,156,96 1,286.45 12.45 64.56 79.70 281.73 389.10 1,089.84 22,450.00 45.46 24.35 880.00 9Q.48 696.75 63.92 43.92 105,705.03 286,760.OZ Iq;ALTHY BABIES FUND PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER 2007 PAYROLL 19&20 7,961.60 EAJU-Y CHILDHOOD FUND CHERYL moMAS COLORAOO MOUNTAIN NEWS HEWLETT PACKARD MARIA ELIZALDE NEYRA DOMINQUEZ THE OLD GYPSUM PRINTER TRILOGY INTEGRATED REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE 102.06 1,233.90 1,675.00 72.90 105.30 1,100.00 4,500.00 8789.16 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND AIDAN FLEMING AMERIGAS ANGELICA DUQUE BLANCA SANCHEZ CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, MA COLUMBINE MARKET CORPORATE EXPRESS COWBOY CATERING CYNTHIA AGUILAR REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 227.28 202.46 631.80 58.00 375.00 63.09 140.48 224.35 73.60 9 10/02/07 OOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP OOREEN CONSTANINB OOUBLETREE HOTEL EAGLE CONVENIENCE STORE EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE RIVER YOUTHCOAL. EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EARLY CHILDHOOD PARTNERS EC SOCIAL SERVICES mGH COUNTRY COPffiRS HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC JAN OOVREAU JOHNF WOODS JOHN FAY KIM HILDERBRAND KYLE MCINTYRE LABORATORY CORPORATION OF LEXlSNEXlS COURTLINK INC LYONS KATHLEEN MARY MOE RACHAELBORRE SYLVIA SALAZAR VAIL HONEYWAOON LID VAIL RECREATION DISTRICT WYNNE MORGAN XEROX CORPORATION PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER 2007 SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUP,-LlES REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES PAYROLL 19&20 79.00 60.35 207.00 125.49 64.60 217.29 310.00 145.00 4,460,86 20.00 46.80 82.03 210.70 393.00 87.22 214.68 68.04 46.00 63.05 35.92 35.55 244.38 137.70 28.50 6,000.00 75.09 565.48 111,355.76 127,435.55 On'SITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FELSBURG HOLT &. ULLEVIG SERVICE 8,143.80 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND BAND B EXCAVATING CORNERSTONE MASONRY OOVERNMENT CONTRACT SALES GROUND ENGINEERING HEWLETI PACKARD JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC MARCIN ENGINEERING INC NEW WORLD SYSTEMS THOMAS MFG CO INC SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE' SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 8,376.56 32,490.00 806.86 240.00 1,811.00 3,047.00 11,772.75 7,210.10 1,137.00 66,89U7 SA!,.~TAXE.V. TRANSP. A&.ETlREINC ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY APEX SECURITY AT ANDT BUFFALO RIDGE AFFORDABLE CASTA CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING COLLETIS COWRADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE 3,771.22 2.73 275.00 232.83 7,385.00 650.00 235.31 837.00 443.62 10 10/02/07 COMPLIANCE ALUANCE INC CORPORATE EXPRESS COUNTRY INN & SUITES CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DOCTORS ON CALL DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAOLE EMBROIDERY INC GFI GENFARE GILLIG CORPORATION GREGORY BARRETT HANOI HUT INCORPORATED HOLY CROSS ELEClRIC ASSOC JANET FIELD JAY MAX SALES JEFF WETZEL KINETICO WATER PROS KWCONSTRUCTION KZYR..cOOL RADIO LLC LOUDEN OFFICE INTERIORS M& MAUTO PARTS MID WEST TRUCK MILLENNIUM TOWING OLSON PROPERTY PAPER WISE POSTMASTER GYPSUM BRANCH QWEST REGAL PIEDMONT PLASTICS SAM COLLINS SERCK SERVICES INC SOURCE GAS STEWART AND STEvENSON TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF GYPSUM UNITED STATES WELDING US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS VERlZON WIRELESS, WASTE MANAGEMENT WESTERN SLOPE BAR weSTON SOLUTIONS, INC. XCBL ENERGY .. XEROX CORPORATION ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER 2007 SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPUES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES. SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPUES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL 19&20 450.00 1,123.78 549.45 2,429.42 530.00 6,042.36 57,109.27 216.00 1,000.00 11,344.37 52.65 4,947.50 1,794.72 156,33 284.58 39.25 35.00 2,200.00 333.00 2,823.54 19.80 675.60 1,450.00 128.46 161.57 110.00 160098 1,253.00 280.78 916.00 43.58 11 O. 79 1,713.84 986.53 29.60 3,816.42 117.76 159.21 17.60 2,500.00 71.83 572.63 198.30 90.77 197,762.25 320,641.23 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY BAND B EXCAVATING BRYAN MILLER COMPANY COLORADo MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO PRECAST CONCRETE COpy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 167.36 166,943.74 6,450.12 85.36 17,000.61 25.99 412.16 11 10/02/07 CRUZ CONSTRUCTION INC GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GREAT DIVIDE CONSTRUCTION J&SCONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO KECI COLOROAOO INC LAFARGE CORPORATION PSI CRANE & RIGGING INC RAILROAD SPECIALTIES INC ROAD AND BRIOOEDEPARTMEN TRI PHASE ELECTRIC WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY YEH & ASSOCIATES INC SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE 11,340.00 8.72 929.29 733.93 12,991.15 793.77 4,050.00 116,529.97 50,625.73 828.48 8.50 1,691.00 391,615.88 AlRfORT~ AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC , ALPINE PARTY RENTALS AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT ASMI CARTER & BURGESS, INC CDW CHIEF SUPPLY CHRIS ANDERSON COLORADOPAlN'f COMPANY COOPER CROUSE HINDS DISH NETWORK DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE COUNTY AVIATION EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING ECMS INCORPORATED FRONTIER RADIO GATEKEEPER SYSTEMS GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND HALL EQUIPMENT CO INC HEALTH SYTLES FITNESS HILL & COMPANY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HSBC BUSINESS SOLlITIONS INDIAN SPRINGS SPECIALTY JAY M FREEMAN JAY MAX SALES JOHN BURK CONSTRUCTION KATHY LAWN KELLEY TRUCKING INC LIGHlNING SERVICES MCI WORLDCOM MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC NEXTEL NORTHWEST CO COUNCIL ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP SERVICEMASTER CLEAN STEWART & STEVENSON POWER SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 16.33 2,234.32 146.39 144.75 2,790.00 9,270.00 228,903.62 629.42 192.93 127.97 1063.56 471.87 13.99 78.12 3.998.00 85.00 1,992.97 588.00 1.980.00 262.38 88.50 3,923.74 2,460.00 2,643.22 555.03 2,430.65 73.20 143.50 5,067.86 127.92 1,251,588.92 378.00 11.82 29,662.50 1,047.57 170.00 872.29 524.80 1,994.00 260.09 12 10/02107 SUMMITEX, LLC SERVICE 184.90 THE PARENTS HANDBOOK SUPPLIES 600.00 TOLIN MECHANICAL SERVICE 1,086.00 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 455.05 UNITeD PARCEL SEll VICE SERVICE 79.56 US CUSTOMS SERVICE SERVICE 2,218.21 V AIL ELECTRONICS SERVICE 407.00 V AIL V ALLEY PARTNERSHIP SERVICE 1,637.00 VERlZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 48.73 WAGNER RENTS SERVICE 1,436.20 WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY SERVICE 550.00 WESTERN IMPLEMENTS SEllVICE I,SI8.13 WORKlUTE SERVICE 185.76 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 75.79 XEROX CORPORATION SUPPLIES 100.35 PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER 2007 PAYROLL 19&20 .79537.16 1649133.07 800 MHZ FUND CENTURYlEL OF EAGLE SERVICE 11,494.83 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE 19,724.28 MCI WORLOCOM SERVICE 3,254.84 QWEST SERVICE 297.33 34,711.28 HOUS~<i J'VND AVID ONLINE DESIGNS SERVICE 72.00 CENTURYTEL SERVICE 73.58 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 2,130.72 RRCASSOCIATES SERVICE 679.11 VAIL DAILY THE SERVICE 222.00 PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER 2007 PAYROLL 19&20 5,793.50 8,970.91 HAZARDOUl:! MA~R1AL~ AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT SERVICE 400.00 INDIAN SPRINGS SPECIALTY SUPPLIES 1,020.86 REIS ENVIRONMENTAL INC SUPPLIES 599.96 2,020.82 OP~~PACEFUND AMERICAN CML CONSTRUCTR SERVICE 90,496.93 ARCHIBEQUE LAND CONSULTIN SERVICE 750.00 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 23,500.00 KEMP AND COMPANY INC SERVICE 5,200.05 RlPPYS LOCATING SERVICE SERVICE 1,300.00 SPRONK WATER ENGINEERS SERVICE 4,115.00 125,361.98 LANDFILL FUND AMERlGAS SERVICE 889.32 CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & SERVICE 1,884.22 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 148.16 EVAS SUPPLIES 700.00 GREAT AMERICAN LEASING SERVICE 127.21 13 10/02/07 HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC JOHNSON AUTO PLAZA KRW CONSULTING INC LBA ASSOCIATES LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LOCKHART CONSTRUCTION SAN ISABEL TELECOM INC US CLEANING PROFESSIQNALS VAIL HONBYWAOON LID VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR XEROX CORPORATION PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER 2007 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL 19&20 4,320.84 31,103.00 6,627.29 850.00 746.00 29.89 117.42 1,215.00 493.54 425.00 20.00 34,898.28 85,195.17 MotOR POOL ~ AmGAS INTERMOUNTAININC BERTHOD MOTORS BURT CHEVROLET, INC BURT,;[)()OOE,CHRYSLER,JEEP CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE CCG SYSTEMS COLBY RUSSELL COLLETIS CORPORATE EXPRESS COWBOY CATERING CRAIG POFF DANIEL LONGBINE EDDIE VELASQUEZ GERALD ROMERO GRAND JUNCTION PETERBILT H2O POWER EQUIPMENT INC HANSON EQUIPMENT HENSLEYBATfERY HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HONNEN EQUIPMENT JOHN STRUBEL LAFARGE CORPORATION LIGHTIIOUSE, INC., THE M&MAUTOPARTS MAIN AUTO PARTS NOVUS AUTOGLASS OLSON PROPERTY PAPER WISE PREMIER TIRE TERMINAL SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL SOURCE GAS THERESA RENO THOMAS PACHECO TOWN OF GYPSUM US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY WASTE MANAGEMENT WESTERN COLORADO WESTERN SLOPE PAINT WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES WESTON SUPPUES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 70.29 770.13 504.14 32.51 201.69 3,052.00 31.10 100,910.28 127.94 488.40 7.53 25.02 25.11 66.76 308,696.00 19.94 618.99 2,486.74 1,325.06 192.61 61.99 80.00 20.81 2,004.37 28.10 910.00 94.85 119.29 882.80 77.25 32.18 36.31 34.99 728.36 2,817.72 2,093.16 117.54 530.16 59.45 75.80 2,000.00 l4 10/02/07 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY WYNNE MORGAN XEROX CORPORATION ZEEMEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER 2007 SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLmS SUPPLms PAYROLL 19&20 508.61 5.53 286.68 71.01 62,976.43 496,305.63 REALm INSURANQ; FUND MUTUAL OF OMAHA SUSPENSE FUND TIm LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE UNITED STATES LIFE INS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 3,986.42 215.86 4,734.72 4,034.80 12.'71.80 ENl!^NCED E911 FUNp CENTURYTEL EAGLE COUNTY HEALrn LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES NOMA)) TECHNOLOGIES QWEST TOWN OF VAIL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 178.21 20,000.00 1,091.39 850.00 21,321.02 293,202.00 336,642.62 7~~,18 Executive Session It was .moved, seconded and unanimously agreed to go into Executive Session for the . purpose of receiving legal advice and discussing matters that may be subject to negotiations regarding the Eagle Valley Humane Society, the Gates Ranch conservation easement acquisition, and the certification of electronic voting equipment, which are appropriate topics fordiscussion pursuant toC.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b) and (e) Colorado Revised Statutes. It was moved, seconded, and unanimously agreed to adjourn from Executive Session. . Consent Agenda Chairman Menconi stated the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of bill paying for the week of October I, 2007 (subject to review by the Finance . Director) Finance Department Representative B. Approval of the minutes of the Eagle County Board ofConunissioners meeting for August.14, August 21 and September 4, 2007 Teak Simonton, Clerk & Recorder c. Consulting Agreement between Eagle County and Felsburg Holt & Ullevig for On-call Transportation Engineering . Services Eva Wilson, County Engineer D. Agreement between Eagle County and Western Timber Management Eric Lovgren, Wildfire Mitigation E. Eagle County Airport runway extension - Phase III Project Rick Ullom, Project Management l5 10/02/07 F. Engagement Letter with Nonnandy Group for Professiona! Services County Attorney's Office Representative G. Minor Type B Subdivision I Berry Creek Ranch Filing No.4, are-subdivision of Lot 33, Block, (Eagle County File No. 5MB-00425) Bob Narracci, Community Development Chairman Menconi asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Bryan Treu, County Attorney stated that there were no problems with any items on the consent agenda. Commissioner Runyon moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items A-G. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Citizen Input Roaring Fork Transportation Authority Bus Rapid Transit project Jason White, assistant planner for the RFT A stated that with the support of Eagle, Pitkin, and Garfield County, they were able to hire a consulting team to move forward with the project. Ralph Trapani of the RFT A development team presented a PowerPoint presentation. He stated that a bus rapid transit sYstem would provide the efficiency and speed of a rail system and utilize advance technology and infrastructure. The buses would be a high tech bus of the future and use hybrid fuels. Like ECO,RAFTA's growth is up over4 million riders per year in 2006 and it's projected to exceed that in 2007. BRT will rerlueetravel time by developing a lot of service plans. He explained Dual Core, an enhanced service plan that would reduce travel time by eliminating stops and providing automated fare collection. Transit oriented development around the bus stops is a key component that requires working with the local staffs. The project kicked off in May and they have begun some public outreach in the last few months. They will be finishing their service concepts towar<is.the end of the. month. Eagle County has been a participant in the project. They are pursuing federal funding, local funding, taxes an(i public and private partnerships. Governor Ritter is currently working on a statewide revenue plan for 2008 so their hoping that there will be some money coming out of those revenues for transit. He thanked the .board for their time and stated that additional information was available on their website. Commissioner Fisher thanked the men for their time and stated that it's been her pleasure to serve on the RAFTA board. She further stated that the bus rapid transit system makes great sense. She wondered about the public's response. Mr. Trapani stated that there had been three public meetings and he has heard a high level of confidence in RAFT A and excitement around expanding the bus system. Commissioner Fisher asked when the BRT would be in full use. Mr. Trapani stated thatthe implementation plan for BRT is still yet to be detennined. RAFTA's vision is to have an express system by 2017. They still need to see the revenues and cost before a detailed implementation plan can occur. Commissioner Runyon stated that he appreciated what is being done. He wondered about increased rider ship per community. Mr. Trapani stated that based on his national experience RAFTA and ECO are the most successful bus rapid transit systems in rural America. The project development is looking at the travel demand models and how that's going to relate to increased ridership. The goal ofBRT is to improve congestion and control the growth of traffic. Chairman Menconi stated that the county currently supports two local transit systems, ECO and RAFT A. He asked the dollar amount being requested for 2007. Mr. White stated that they were asking $lOO,OOO. He spoke about future funding grants and current contributors. They were able to raise over $600,000 from partnerships. 16 10/02/07 Chainnan.Menconi stated that he would like to see a preliminary sketch request so that going into the 2008 budget they're cognizant of the fact that this will be another request. He thanked them for their presentation and hard work. Commissioner Runyon moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and re-convene as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Eagle County Liquor License Authority Kathy Scriver, Clerk and Recorder's Office. Consent Agenda Renewals A. Beaver Creek Food Serviees, Ine d/b/a Spruee Saddle Restaurant This is a renewal for a Botel and Restaurant Lieense with 3 Optional Premises in Avon (Beaver Creek). There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. . All the necessaryfees have been paid. . An Alcohol Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided. B. Beaver Creek Food Serviees, Ine d/b/a Trappers Cabin This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restaurant Lieense with 1 Optional Premises in Avon (Beaver Creek). There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. Allthe necessary feesbave been paid. An Alcohol Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided. C. Vall Food Serviees, Ine d/b/a Two Elk This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restaurant License with 1 Optional Premises on Vail Mountain. There have been no complaints ot disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. AD Alcohol Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Offic~ and proof of server trainirig has been provided. D. Beaver Creek Food Services, Ine, d/b/a Beano's This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restauraat License with 1 Optional Premises in Avon (Beaver Creek). There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. An Alcohol Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided. E. Beaver Creek Food Serviees, Ine d/bhl Allie's Cabin This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restaurant Lieense with 2 Optional Premises in Avon (Beaver Creek). There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees hav~ been paid. An Alcohol Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided. F. Beaver Creek Food Serviees, Ine d/b/a Arrowhead Alpine Club This is a renewal for a Private Hotel and Restaurant Lieense in Edwards (Arrowhead). There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. An Alcohol Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided. G. Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC d/b/a Ritz-Carlton Club, Baehelor Gulch This is a renewal for a Private Botel and Restaurant Lieense in Avon (Beaver Creek). There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. An Alcohol Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided. 17 10/02107 Other Consent H. Umami, Ine d/b/a Matthew's This is a request for a Temporary Permit. . Umami, Inc has applied for the transfet of a Hotel & Restaurant liquor license currently held by Ore House Edwards, LLC d/b/a Ore House Mustang Grill. The applicant seeks a temporary permit in order to continue liquor operations until the formal traDsfer is approved. The necessary forms have been submitted and appropriate fees paid. I. Terranee S. Marcum d/b/a Shop & Hop ##3 Issuance of Order to Appear and Show Cause and Notice of Hearing Commissioner Fisher moved that the Board approve the Liquor Consent Agenda for October 2 2007, consisting ofItems A-I. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. APPLICANT: EVENT: REPRESENTATIVE: LOCATION: STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Eagle River Youth Coalition Annual Fundraiser Becky Hughes, Event Manager Singletree Community Center Kathy Scriver DESCRIPTION: This is a special events permit application for the Eagle River Youth Coalition's annual fundraiser to beheld at the Singletree Community Center on October 18, 2007 from 4:00 p,m. to 11:00 p.m. STAFF FINDINGS: )- This application is in order, an application requirements have been met, all necessary documents have been received, and all fees have been paid. )- This is the fIrst year the event is being held in unincorporated Eagle County. )- Public notice has been given by the posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the premises on September 21, 2007, 10 days prior to the hearing. )- There have been no protests filed with the Clerk and Recorder's Office. CONCERNS / ISSUES: None STAFF RECOMMENDATION: All findings are positive and staff recommends approval. DISCUSSION: Christina Gait was present. She stated that this was their flfSt event and an opportunity to share their mission with the community. Commissioner Fisher moved that the Local Liquor Licensing Authority approve the Special Events Permit for the Eagle River Youth Coalition's fundraising event, October 18,2007 from 4:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Runyon moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority and re-convene as the Board of Social Services. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 18 10/02/07 Board of Social Services .. Consider provision of public assistance services for Pitkin County Kate Forinash, Health & Human Services Ms. Forinash introduced Nan Sundeen, Director of Health & Human Services of Pitkin County and Kathy Lyons who is the Self Sufficiency Manager in Eagle County. She stated that Pitkin and Eagle County have collaborated in plany different ways in the health and human services area.. Currently there is a shared child protection team, the county's work together on adult services planning, public health emergency preparedness, and pre-natal services. . In the public assistance area Eagle Cowityhas worked very closely over the years, from 2()()0- 2002, Pitkin County provided all the public assistance services for Eagle County residents in exchange for office space. Since May of this year, Eagle County has provided public assistance services to Pitkill County residents following the retirement of their public assistance worker. They are requesting consideration from the board for Eagle County to continue to provide these services for Pitkin County under a cost reimbursement program. Ms. Sundeen thariked the board and Eagle County Health and Human Services for partnering because it would have been difficult for them to maintain services. They believe. it is much better for their residents to have access to Eagle County public assistance with one techriician because it's difficult for them to do all the data entry, be. creative with case management, and stay up with rules and regulations.. Over the years, they have provided a gOOd service but Eagle County provides a very good service. Eagle County has a whole team. of people that can problem solve. By contnlcting, it helps Pitkin county residents have better access to the depth ofscrvices for which th~ are entitled. . Kathy Lyons stated that currently Eagle County has nine full time employees approved for its public assistanc~programswith one of the positions being phased out of the EI Jebel office. They are serving approximately 1400 households per month. In Pitkin County, their office bas maintained one full time position and their public assistance prognunservices approximately 150 households per month. There are nine programs being provided and in order to continue providing these services they will need an additional staff person in that ~ They envision two Roaring Fork staff members working as a team to provide services to both Eagle and Pitkin residents. Pitkin County would maintain the space for Eagle County. Ms. Forinash stated that they estimate the costin.2008 to provide these services is $107,272. If the board approves the services, Eagle County would enter into an agreement, which would be a cost reimbersument agreement so that Pitkin County would only be charged those costs talked about in the proposal. Commissioner Fisher stated that she has concerns with bringing on a new staff member if caseloads are not met and if demands exceed the contracted amounts for which funding is available. She thinks the PartDershipis marvelous butshe would like assurance that in the event the partnership should change Pitkin County would cover the costs. Commissioner Runyon stated that it makes sense to do things this way. He stated that 18% of Eagle County citizens live in the Roaring Fork Valley. He agrees with the partnership but there needs to be assurance that Pitkin County pays for the full fair portion. . Chairman Menconi stated that there is a lot of sharing and thanked Ms. Forinash for making sure there is a fIrewall between Eagle County taxpayer dollars and Pitkin County' s need for programs and services. / Ms. Forinash.statedthat amotion was not needed, th~ just wanted to get the board's sense about moving forward before Ms. Sundeen met with the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Fisher presented Ms. Forinash with flowers and wished her a Happy Birthday. Chairman Menconi stated that Ms. Forinash is one of Eagle County's best and longest serving employees. He wished her a Happy Birthday. Ms. Forinash stated that it has been great what she and the board have been able to do together. Commissioner Runyon moved to adjourn as the Board of Social Services and re-convene 8$ the Board of Health. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 19 10/02107 Board of Health - Community Health Assessment Presentation "Healthy Eagle County 2010" Jill Hunsaker, Health & Human Services Ms. Hunsak~r presented the findings of Healthy Eagle 2010. . She distributed a copy of the report. She stated that every 5 years all of the counties in Colorado are required to complete a community health assessment, which is requirement from the state Board of Health. The goals for Health Eagle County 2010 are to increase access to health care, reduce motor crash injuries and deaths, increase mental health and substance abuse treatment services, increase oral health resources, and reduce premature deaths from chronic disease. A recent study showed that currently 68% of Latino households do not have health insurance. 38% of Eagle County households report having problems accessing medical care. The emergency roomat Vail Valley Medical Center is seeing things such as ear infections,. sore throats, bronchitis, and other illnesses that are better seen and treated in a primary care office. The. survey also . indicated that 56% of households are affected by chronic diseases such as heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure,astbma, etc. This is significant because approximately 26% of our residents do DOt have health insurance. These diseases need constant monitoring by a health care provider and require medication so when people have these diseases and do not have access to healthcare it is likely that th~ are not being treated on aconsistantbasis. Eagle County is currently working with Vail Valley Medical Center to get a federal designation for a community health center. This would allow the county to access some state and federal dollars, which would help Eagle County providehealthcare for low-income people. Another option is a school-based health center. This type of clinic would provide some primary care in a school setting. The second goal is to reduce motor vehicle crash injuries and death. . Moter vehicle accidents are the third leading cause of death in Eagle County. After looking at crash data from the COOT they found that people are twice as likely to crash up-valley between Avon and twice as likely to have a fatality or rollover crash down-vally where the speed limit beComes 7S miles an hour. It was recommended that a seat belt ordinance be created which subsequently happened and has been a huge contribution to the county. They are also promoting the Graduated Driver'~ License Law, which is for teens 18 and under. The third goal is to reduce tooth decay and oral diseases. She presented some of the findings, which included that 48% of Eagle County households have problems accessing dental care, 25% of Eagle County third graders have untreated tooth decay, and 45% of Eagle County residents are not served by fluoride. Fluoride is nature's cavity fighter and occurs in water naturally but sometimes not at high enough levels. In Eagle County, several water systems are not treated with fluoride. Also in Eagle County, there are only three dental providers that accept medicaid. Chairman Menconi wondered if as local officials they should be looking at ways to provide fluoridated water. Ms. Hunsaker stated that there are other ways for children to get fluoride but she would recommend fmding a way to fluoridate public water systems. The public health department is going to begin providing fluoride varnish, dental sealants, and have a dental van available to provide screening and treatment forlow-income kids. The ultimate goal is to bring a dental clinic to Eagle County that would see people that do not have health insurance. She spoke about the goals for mental health and substance abuse services. The recommendations included providing supervised detox and follow up counseling. Th~ have set up a way that when law enforcement encounters someone who is intoxicated, they call Colorado West who will transport the person to a detox center in a neighboring county. After detox, a member of the recovering community will pick the person up give them information about the program, the Last Call program and encourage counseling. A long-term crisis stabilization unit and co-locating Colorado West in a community health center is desired. She explained the goals to reduce premature deaths from chronic disease. The good news is that Eagle County rates of death are much lower than the nation. . They focused on preventative screening by providing heath-screening programs, promoting community awareness and creating an environment that promotes physical activity for people. She acknowledged the many contributors including Lachie Thomas for the design of the document. The report will be available on the website or by calling the Health and Human Services Department. Commissioner Runyon thanked Ms. Hunsaker for the excellent document. He noticed that the auto accident rate was high and wondered about the other trauma. Ms. Hunsaker stated that the items under trauma include about 10 different categories such as ski accidents, bike accidents, falls, etc. Commissioner Fisher thanked Ms. Hunsaker for such a thorough presentation and she looks forward to working with her in the future to address the needs of the community. 20 10/02/07 Chairman Menconi wondered if there would be presentations to the Rotaries and School District. He would like to create solutions to a problem in Capital Improvement Program proposal next year. Ms. Forinash proposed that the county be~in to look at creating community centers that could provide health care service, child care services, adult.service and usual health. and human services plus community meeting space as part of sharing access to healthcare and form partnerships throughout Eagle County. The. proposal is for three centers, one in 2008, one in 2009, and one in 2010. Planning Files PDA-00068 Beaver Creek PUD Bob Narracci, Planning Department Note: To be tabled to 1/15/2008 . . PUD Amendment which would restrict timeshare, interval ownership and :fractional fee estate ownership on single-family lots within Beaver Creek. LOCATION: Beaver Creek PUD located south ofU. S.Highway 6 and the Town of Avon ACTION: Mr. Narracci stated that the Planning Commission had not rendered a recommendation. Commissioner Runyon moved to table file no. PDA-00068-Beaver Creek PUDuntil January 15,2008. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. LUR-0074 Amendments to Section 5-250 Special Use Permits Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Planning Department ACTION: To modify Section 5-250 in order to introduce a two (2) part Special Use Permit permitting a Concept (level) Special Use (part 1) and then a Final Special Use Permit application (para); while still offering the choice of a Consolidated, one-step Special Use Permit application. . LOCATION: N/A FILE NO./PROCESS: PRPJECT NAME: LOCATION: OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: LUR-0074/ Land Use Regulation Amendment Amendment to Chapter 2: Article 5, Section 5-250. Special Uses Not Applicable Not Applicable Staff Staff 1. PROJECT. DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: As a result of this amendment, the Special Use Permit process found in Article 5, Section 5-250 Special Uses will be modified in order to offer applicants either a two-step or a one-step Special Use Permit process. The two-step Special Use Permit is inspired by the procedures typically utilized for subdivision and mimics the intentions for the Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plan processes. The two-step process was recommended to Staff by public and allows the application of a concept-level approval for a proposed use via Special Use Permit (SUP), without necessitatingfinal design plans, reports, etc. Although the applicants would have to provide sufficient evidence that the proposed use would be feasible, the investment and amount of dollars spent in order to take a project before the Planning CommissionslBoard of County Commissioners for their consideration and sentiment would be considerably 21 10/02/07 reduced. If the Concept SUP is supported, the applicant would then return with a completed application for a Final SUP. The Final SUP grants vesting and the ability to implement the proposed use upon approval. The one~step process, as is currently the procedure for a Special Use Permit will be marketed as the Consolidated Special Use Permit and is remains available for those wishing to proceed at an increased risk. B. PLANNING COMMISSION DELmERATION SUMMARY & MOTION: . .. The Eagle County and the Roaring Fork Valley Reg~nal Planning Commissions considered this application at meetings held on the 19th and 20th ofS~tember. Understanding that the goal of this amendment package was to offer public an alternative process for obtaining a Special Use Permit; both Plallning Commissions approved the proposed file 8$ was presented. Deliberations: . Both of the Planning Commissions decided that reasonable fees should be applied to both. of the new . processes. Staff indicated that it was the goal of the Community Development Department to update the fee SChedule in 2008 which would include these new fees; . One of the Co~issioners on the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission felt that this 'process was not necessary and that having the new process available was ".. . more/additional bureaucracy... " The Eagle County Planning Commission approved the application [4:0]; The Roaring Fork Regional Planning Commission approved the application [5:1]. 2. STAFF REPORT A. NECESSARY FINDINGS: PROCESS INTENT ECLUR Section: 5-230 Amendments to the Text of These Land Use Regulations or Oftieial Zone Distrie. Map Section Purpose: The purpose of this Section is to provide a means for changing the boundaries of the OtiicialZone District Map or any other map incorporated in these Regulations by reference, and for changing the text of these. Land Use Regulations. It is not intended to relieve particularhardships~ or to confer special privileges or rights on any person, but only to make necessary adjustmen~ in light of changed conditions. Standards: Section 5-230.D. No change in zoning shall be allowed unle~s in the sole discretion of the Board of County Commissioners, the change is justified in that the advantages of the use requested substantil:tlly outweigh the disadvantages to the County and neighboring lands. In making such a determination, the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners shall consider the application submittal requirements and standards. There are no specific. standards directly applicable for changing the text of the Land Use Regulations. B. STAFF DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Chapter 1, Eagle County Land Use Regulations Seetion 1.15.04 Referrals, the proposed amendments HAVE been referred to the appropriate agencies, including all towns within Eagle County, and to the Colorado Division of Local Affairs; 22 10/02107 Pursuant to Chapter 1, Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section i.lS.0S Publie Notiee. Public notice HAS been given; Pursuant to Chapter 2, Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section S-230.B.2 Text Amendment: a. The proposed amendments AMEND ONLY THE TEXT of Chapter II, Article 5, Section 5..250 Special Use Permit of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and DO NOT amend the Official Zone District Map. b.Precise wording of the proposed changes HAS been provided (please see attached) Pursuant to Cl1apter 2, Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-230.D., Standards for the review or Amendments to the Text or the Land Use Regulations, as applicable. STANDARD: Consistency with the COlllprehensive Plan. [Section 5-230.D.l] Does the proposed amendment consider the pw-pose$ and intents of the Comprehensive Plan, all ancillary County adopted Speciolty and Community Plan documents, and is it consistent with aI/relevant goals, policies, implementation strategies and FutW'e Land Use Map designations including but not necessarily limited to the following: Section 3.2 Section 3.3 Section 3.4 Section 3.5 Section 3.6 Section 3.7 Section 3.8 Section 3.9 Seetion 3.10 Section 4 '- General Develonment Eeonomie Resources Housinl! Infrastructure and Services Water Resqurces Wildlife Resourees Sensitive Lands Environme~taI Oualitv Futu~ La,d Use Man Adooted.Area Community Plans Polieies a, e, e, r, g, h, i and k Polieies b, e, d, e, f, h, j,mand 0 . Polieies a, d, e, g and n Polieies a, e, g, i, j, k. m and 0 Policies a, b, e, d, e, f,g, h andi Polieies a, b, e, d, e, f and i Policies a, e, e and g Polides a, e and d Policy a AlI.relevlUlt goals, polieies aod FLUM designations Additionally, all relevant goals &)policies of the following plans or such equivalent plans and/or future plans, which may be in effect at the time of application for zone change: Eagle County Open SpaeePlan Eagle River Watershed Plan Eagle Valley Regional Trails Plan Eagle County Trails Plan (Roaring Fork) Eagle County Comprehensive Housing Plan Eagle County Airport Sub-Area Master Plan This amendment will not result in arty change to the Future Land Use Map or its application. EXCEEDSMlNIMUMSTANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS OOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS X NOT APPLICABLE STANDARD: Compatible with Su"ounding Uses. [Section 5-230.D.2] Does the proposal provide compatibility with the type, intensity, character and scale of existing and permissible land uses surrounding the subject property? Dimensional/imitations of the proposed zone district, when applied, should result in development that will be harmonious with the physical character of existing neighborhood(s) surrounding the subject property. 23 10/02107 The issue of compatibility does. not directly pertain to this proposal; however, once amended, applicants utilizing the proposed Conceptual Special Use Permit procedure would be able to ascertain if their proposal is compatible to neighboring uses (during the SUP process) without having to invest the potentially significant amount of monies, as per the current process. EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS X NOT APPLICABLE STANDARD: Public Benefit. [Section 5-230.D.3] Does the proposal address a demonstrated community need or otherwise result in'one or more particular public benefits that offset the impacts of the proposed uses requested, including but not limited to: Affordable local resident hOUSing; childcare facilities,' 1tIulti~ modal transportation, public recreational opportunities; infrastructure improvements,' preservation of agriculture/sensitive lands. EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS NOT APPLICABLE STANDARD: Change ofCirclUtlSta1lces. [Section 5-230.D.4] Does the proposal address or respond to a beneficia/material change that has occurred to the immediate neighborhood or to the greater Eagle County community? Conditions have changed such that the proposed amendments are necessitated. As development conditions and Regulations become more difficult and/or more stringent, the risk level and amount of infontlation necessary to prove feasibility of new development becomes increasingly more costly. This two-part SUP process should help in reducing costs for individuals who wish to explore the notion of a "basic" or bottom- line level of support from recommending/approval bodies. EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOBSNOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS X NOT APPLICABLE STANDARD: AdeqUllte Infrastructure. [Section 5-230.D.5] Is the property subject to the proposal served by adequate roads, water, sewer and other public use facilities? This amendment will not result in the need. for new infrastructure. EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS X NOT APPLICABLE B. REFERRAL RESPONSES: Engineering Department - Please refer to attachment dated August 20, 2007: . Section 5-250.D. - Please note that as of January 1, 2008, Colorado will recognize "Landscape 24 10/02/07 Architects" as a regulated profession. (See Senate Bill 07107) Also, please reword to avoid confusion as follows: ... the applicant shallobtain certification from a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer or Colorado Registered Landscape Architect,. whichever is appropriate, that the improvements have been constructed... · Section 5-250.E.I- Should this refer to <,lnly Final or Consolidated SUP's here, because a concept evaluation SUP has not actually authorized anything except the ability to file a Final SUP. Consider revising this. AdditionaJRefe"aJ Agencies - This proposal was refen-ed to thefollowing agencies with no response received as of this. writing: · Eagle County: Attomey~s Office; Animal Services; Assessor,' ECO Trails/Transit; E1I11ironmentQ/ Health,' Historical Society,' Housing Division,' Road and Bridge Department,' School District; Sheriff's Office,' Surveyor,' Weed and Pest,' Wildfire Mitigation Specialist,' .. . All private planningfirms in Bagle County,' . · All private engineering and surveyingfirms in Eagle County; · All listed private architectural and construction firms. in Eagle County and surrounding region; · Colorado State: CDOT,' Department of Local Affairs,' Division of Minerals and Geology,' Division of Water Resources; Colorado Division of Wildlife,' Forest Service,' GeologicalSurvey,' Water Conservation Board,' · Bureau of Land Management,' Natural resource Conservation Service (USDA),' US Army Corps of Engineers; US Forest Service,' · Ambulance District; Fire Districts,' Excel Energy; QwestlCentury/San Isabel Telecom; Special Districl$; · Basalt Water Conservancy,' CDHPE Air and Water Divisions,' Mid Valley Trails Committee,' Postmaster; Roaring Fore Transportation Authority; Home Builders Association,' AIA,' Cattleman's Association,' · Town of Avon, Town of Eagle, Town of Minturn, Town of Red Cliff, Town of Vail, Town of Basalt, Town of Gypsum . C. SlJ!\tMARY ANALYSIS: Benefits/Disadvantages There are not many disadvantages to this application. Benefits: This amendment would help mitigate the expenses arid risk necessary for persons seeking a Special Use Permit by giving the applicant a certain level of assurance of support by the Planning Commissions and Board of County Commissioners, prior to having to finalize. supporting documents; Both the Planning Commissions and Board of County Commissioners would gain the ability to apply recommendations and/or conditions on a Concept Special Use Permit prior to a Final Special Use Permit application; thereby potentially enhancing a proposed Final SUP application from the onset. Disadvantage: It may result in additional permit fees for applicants who choose the two-part process. Additional applications would be processed necessitating additional Staff resources. D. PLANNlNG COMMISSION 1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OPTIONS: 1. Approve the (ECLUR TEXT AMENDMENT) request without eonditions if it is determined that the petition will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and the proposed use is attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is 25 10/02/07 in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 2. Deny the (ECLUR TEXT AMENDMENT) request if it is determined that the petition will adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and/or the proposed use is not attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is not in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 3. Table the (ECLUR TEXT AMENDMENT) request if additional information is. required to fully . evaluate the petition. Give specific direction to the petitioner and staff. 4. Approve the (ECLUR TEXT AMENDMENT) request with conditions anclfor performanee standards if it is determined that certain conditions and/or performance standards are necessary to ensure public, health, safety, and welfare and/or enhances the attunement of the use with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is incompliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). (None) DISCUSSION: Ms. Skinner-Markowitz presented the details of the amendment. They are proposing to offer.applicants a two-step process with a one-step process remaining as an option. The two-step is inspired by the procedwes typically utilized for subdivision and mimics the intentions for the Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plan processes. The process was recommended to staff by both the public and board as an outcome of a previous file. This process allows the conc~t-1evel approval without necessitating final design plans. The applicants would have to supply sufficient evidence to show that their concept would be feasible. Tthey would not have to invest the dollars that would normally take for larger special use permits to have fmal design plans, final engineering, and things of that nature. They would have the benefit of knowing how the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners felt about their application before proceeding. If the applicants felt that their use would be acceptable to the Board and Planning Commission they would still have the option of 40ing a full-blown Special Use Permit, called a consolidated Special Use Permit, which would be processed the same way it is currently done. Eagle County Planning Commission and the Roaring.Fork Vall~ Regional Planning Commission considered this file and reI1dered an approval. Both Planning Commissions decided that reasonable fees should be applied to both of the new processes. Staff is contemplating an update to their fee schedule in January and the update would pickup the new fees. Chairman Menconi opened public comment. There was none. He closed public comment. Commissioner Runyon stated that it makes sense to let the applicant know. ahead of time. It offers more flexibility. He wondered if there was a down side to the process. , Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that the down side would be that it would take more time and additional fees could be required. Commissioner Runyon stated that applicants spend a lot of money on sketch plans, which wasn't the original intent of the sketch plan. He would like to maintain the original intent of the sketch plan and not extend the process. Commissioner Fisher explained her understanding of the process. She wondered about the need for additional time. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that the applicant would be able to discuss options early on. There mayor may not be additional time needed in some cases. Commissioner Fisher moved to approve LUR-0074 Amendments to Section 5-250 Special Use Permits. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 26 10/02/07 ZS-00163 EI Jebel Eaele County Road & Bridee Facility Bob Narracci, Planning Department ACTION: Special Use Permit for a Road & Bridge maintenance facility on a 3.73 acre parcel leased from the Crawford Properties, LLC LOCAT}ON: FILE NOJPROCESS: PROJECT NAME: OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: South. side of JW Drive and north of the Eagle Crest Nursery ZS-OO 163 Special Use Permit AND LEA-00059 Location & Extent El lebel County Road and Bridge Facility Crawford Properties, LLC Eagle County Government Brad Higgins, Director of Road & Bridge and Rick Ullom, Facilities Management 1. PROJEeT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: This Special Use Permit and Location & Extent application is to allow the existing Eagle County Road and Bridge Facility to be improved with a new 10,838 square foot maintenance facility, 8 paved 'guest parking spaces, an exterior vehicle wash bay, outdoor storage of vehicles and plows, covered sand storage and miscellaneous storage. It is proposed to extensively landscape. the perime~r of the site adjacent to JW Drive and the mobile home park with a variety of low water consumptive trees and shrubs. An eight foot chain link security fence will be installed around the perimeter of a majority of the property. Entry to the secured areawill be through electric controlled tilt-a-way gates. The guest parking and the main building entry will be outside of the fenced area and will be accessible to the public. The building floor plan consists of an office, conference / training room, storage and drive through vehicle service bays. The exterior of the building will consist of detailed concrete masomy block and the roof will be constructed of standing seam metal. Stucco and metal banding may be included. in the f~e of the building. The structure will be approximately 32 feet in height. Access to the site is via two, 24 foot wide access drives intersecting with l.W. Drive. The two3CCess drives will allow vehicles to enter and exit the maintenance facility with a one way traffic flow. A 6 foot concrete sidewalk will be located adjacent to the parking area, building entry ways and connecting to the pedestrian / bicycle path located on the south side of JW Drive. The storage and circulation areas will be surfaced with both compacted and non-compacted gravel which will be treated with a dllst suppressant. B. SITE DATA: South: Vacant RSM Eagle Crest Nurse RSM East: Mobile Home Park RSM Vacant RSM 27 10/02/07 Residential Suburban Medium Density (RSM) NA Eagle County Road & Bridge Facility wIno permanent improvements Relatively level with slight slope toward JW Drive. 3.73 acres 162, 478.80 square feet. Mid Valley Metro Mid Valley Metro Via JWDrive Possibly private Crawford System Possibly private Crawford System. C. CHRONOLOGYIBACKGROUND: 1987 <appL) Eagle County began utilizing the subject property as a Road & BridgcFacility D. PLANNING COMMISSION DELmERATION SUMMARY & MOTION: On September 20th, 2007the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission; following much discussion and deliberation, voted unanimously in favor of the proposal with conditions. Points of deliberation included: . The landscape buffer proposed is totally inadequate. Eliminate the proposed perimeter earthen berms and replace with dense, mature p1antings of trees and shrubs; . Inquiry whether or not snow removed from the Blue Lake Subdivision could be stored on the Road & Bridge site; . · Disagreement that this facility, located in the middle of a residentially zoned area, should be allowed via Special Use Pennit; . Standards for these types of uses, in residential and commercial areas~ need to be developed and incorporated into the Mid Valley Plan update process; . Eagle County needs to set the example for good development and should tie into the Mid Valley District's water and sanitation facilities; not the Crawford's system; . Overall, the Road & Bridge facility is a beneficial and necessary use; . The county needs to look at the overall zoning in this area and where industrial uses would be more appropriate. Ultimately, the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission approved the companion Location and Extent application and recommended approval of the Special Use Permit for the EI Jebel Road & Bridge Facility with the same conditions recommended by Staff and the following additional condition: 1) That the staff works with the applicant the Planning Commission, and the Board of County Commissioners to create development standards for industrial uses which includes this application in commercial and residential zoning districts. 2. STAFF REPORT C. NECESSARY FINDINGS: PROCESS INTENT 28 10/02/07 ECLUR Section: Section Purpose: Standards: 5-250 Special Use Permits Speci~l Uses ~ those uses that are not necessarily compatible with theotber uses allowed in a zone district, but. which may be determined compatible with the other uses allowed in the zone district based upon individual review of their location, design, configuration, density and intensity of use, and the imposition()f appropriate conditions to ensure the compatibility of the use at a particular location with surrounding land uses. All Special Uses shall meet the standards set. forth in this Section. Section 5-250.B. The issuance of a Special Use Permit shall be dependent upon findings that there is competent evidence that the proposed use as conditioned, fully compliers with all the standards of this Section, this Division, this Article, and these Land Use Regulations. The Planning Commission may recOmmend and the Board of County Commissioners may attach any conditions deernedappropriate to ensure compliance with the following standards, including conformity to a Specific site. plan, requirements to improve public facilities necessary to serve the Special Use, and limitations on the operating characteristics of the use, or the location or duration of the Special Use Permit STANDARD: Consistent with "Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5.250.B.l] The proposed Special Use shall be appropriate for its proposed loca/ion and be consistent with the purposes,. goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the FLUM of the Comprehensive Plan, including standards for building and structw'a/ intensities and densities, and intensities of use. . I EAGLE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Xl X2 X3 X4 XS X6 x x x XI- The. Plan states. that, 'Those attributes that support quality of life options unique to Eagle County today should be preserved for future generations'. One of those quality of life attributes are well maintained roads. The proposed new facilitywill enhance the County's ability to effectively and efficiently provide this service to EI Jebel and surrounding vicinity. X2 - The Plan states that, 'Exemplary emergency and community services should be available to all residents, visitors and second home owners'; AND 'The service and infrastructure needs of all socioeconomic, age and cultural groups present in Eagle County should be fully addressed'. Eagle County Road & Bridge strives to provide exemplary community service through timely, efficient road maintenance. The proposed Road& Bridge Facility improvements are necessary to maintain this quality of service. X3 - The Plan states, 'Protect the long term viability of both ground and surface water sources' , AND 'Surface and groundwater supplies should be protected from agricultural, industrial and development related impacts', AND 29 10/02/07 'Water conservation efforts by all water users in Eagle County should be implemented'. The improved Road & Bridge Facility will incorporate on-site storm water detention,. which does not currently exist, and will employ Best Management Practices to ensure that surface and groundwater supplies will not be compromised as a result o/tM Road & Bridge operations. Also, landscaping introduced to the site will consist o/xeric, low-water consumptive plant and tree materials. X4- The Colorado Division of Wildlife indicated that they have no concerns with the proposed Road & Bridge Facility improvements. X5 - The Plan states that, 'Development should avoid areas of significant natural hazard'. No natura/hazards. have been identified on the subject property. X6 - This chapter of the Plan speaks to minimizing undue ocular, auditory and olfactory impacts. Theproposed improvements to the El Jebel Road & Bridge Facility represent a vast improvement over existing conditions regarding visual impacts, lighting, odors and noise. Much of the maintenance cun'ently performed outside will MWl1e enclosed within the proposed maintenance building thereby minimizing potential noise. and odor impacts, dust suppressant will be regularly applied to the site to minimize fugitive dust and landscaping, bermingand fencing will l1e introduced; all o/which will assist in making the site more compatible with dissimilar surrounding land uses. .. . MID VALLEY COMMUNITY MASTER PLAN Xl X2 X3 x x x x XI- The Plan states that, 'The movement of people and goods shall be done in a safe and. energy efficient manner, minimize impact on agriculture, open space, wildlife and environmentally sensitive areas and provide access to public lands'. . The purpose of the Road & Bridge Facility and Department is to ensure that people and goOds can be accomp/ishedin a safe and energy efficient manner. Xl - The Plan states that, 'Community facilities and public services shall be designed to meet the needs of residents and. visitors to the area and should be aggregated so services can be provided in an efficient and economical fashion'. Given the growth which has occurred in this region of Eagk County over the last 20 years, it is imperative that the Road & Bridge facility expand accordingly to accomplish the goal of providing efficient and economical road maintenance services to the residents and visitors to the area. X3- The Plan states that, 'Expansion of community services and facilities shall be concentrated in and around EI Jebel and Basalt within 500 feet of existing facilities'. The proposed Road & Bridge Facility is located in the heart of El Jebel and in the same location where the Road & Bridge Department has been operating/or the previous 20 years. The Plan also states that, 'A 200 foot building and parking setback adjacent to Highway 82 where existing development does not preclude its application. This setback would be maintained as agriculture where it abuts 30 10/02/07 agricultural land or as a rccreationand trails corridor where it abuts development. Wherever possible, ditches would flow in or adjacent to the 200 foot setback, fostering the growth ot'trees to shade the pathwaYs and open space and to provide a developmentscreen from the roadway. No berming will be allowed for screening adjacent to agricultural lands '. The subject pfoperty is over 750 feet from the US Highway 82 right-ol-way at its closest point. Xl- This aspect of the plan discusses and provides direction for new development, in particuJar,new subdivisions. It does not discuss or acknowledge existing (or expanded), non-residential land uses. .. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS .. MEE~ THE MAJORITY OF MINlMUM.. .. STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Compatibility. [Section 5-250.B.2] The proposed Special Use shall he appropriate for its proposed location and compatible with the character of sur70lmding land uses. X X RSM X RSM X RSM X PUD X The subject property has been utilized as a Road & Bridge Facility for the past 20 years. The site, in its current condition, impacts the dissimilar neighboring land uses more so than will the improved facility, as proposed. 31 1 n/OZ/01 A xeric landscape screen win be introduced on the north and east sides of the subject property to assist in buffering the public view from 1W Drive and from the adjacent mobile home park. The subject property is situated over 840 feet due east from the Blue Lake Subdivision; the view into the site from the west and south will be obstructed by a proposed berm and dark-color chain link fence. Many of the activities occurring on the site over the past 20 years have been performed outside. The addition of the proposed building will.contain many of these activities out of public view. Also, any outdoor storage and gravel will be better organized on the site. Security lighting will be minimal and consist of downward cast lighting notto exceed 20 feet in height. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS.MINIMUM STANDARDS .. MEE~ TIlE MAJORITY OF MINJMlJM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Zone District Standards. [Section 5-250.B.3] The proposedSpecialUse shallcomply with the standards of the zone district in which it is located and any standards applicable to the particular.U$e. as identified in Section 3-310, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Residential. AgricUltural and Resource Uses anilSection 3-330, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Commercial and lndustrial , Uses. The proposed Road & Bridge Facility improvements are being proposed as a 'Community or Public , ,Building' as allowed under the RSM Zone District via Special Use Permit Review. The proposal satisfies . all other applicable standards of the Residential Suburban Medium Density zone district. , ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS .~~~=O~~~~ARDS STANDARD: Design Minimizes Adverse Impact [Section 5-250.B.4] The design of the proposed Special Use shall minimize adverse impacts, including visual impact of the proposed use on adjac~nt lands; furthermore, the. proposed Special Use shall avoid significant adverse impact on surrounding lands regarding trash, traffic. service delivery, parking and loading. odors, noise, glare, and vibration,..and shdl not create a nuisance. · The site is served by a local refuse management company. · Traffic is estimated to be approximately 72 vehicle trips per day which is consistent with the vehicular traffic already generated by the site. · The Road & Bridge Department will be able to provide more efficient delivery of services with the improved facility. 32 10/02107 · Parking and loading will be formalized with eight paved, designated public parking spaces. All equipment and employee parking will be contained within a secured yard. · Activities on the site are not anticipated to generate any undue odors, noises, glare or vibrations. · Potential nuisances on the site will be minimized to the greatest extent practicable and should be notably improved over current conditions. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS. X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS . .... MEETS TIIB.. . MAJORITY 0... FMINIMUM.. ST. ANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Design Minimizes Environmental Impaet. [Section 5-250.B.5} The proposed Special Use sha// minimize environmental impacts and shall not cause significant deterioration of water and air resources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources, and other natural resources. The proposed site modifications include on-site stormwater detention. Best Management Practices for stormWater management, visual buffers, enclosing certain on-site activities and overall enhancement of the subject property. The environmental impact shall be minimized and not cause significant deterioration of water and air resources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources or other natural resources. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS .. · MEE~ TIIB MAJORItY OF. MINIMUM. STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Impact on Publie Faeilities. [Section 5-250.B} The proposed Special Use Permit sho/lbe adequately served by public facilities and services, including roads; pedestrian paths, potable water and wastewater facilities, parks, schools, po/ice andfire protection, and emergency medical se1'Vices. 33 10/02/07 The subject property is adequately served by public facilities and services including roads, pedestrian paths, potable water and wastewater facilities, parks, schools, police and fire protection and emergency medical services. The Mid Valley Metropolitan District is the regional water and wastewater provider .in the Roaring Fork Valley. Mid V all~ has indicated that it is their preference that the County extends the water and sewer lines approximately 1,100 feet from the west (Blue Lake Subdivision) down JW Drive to ~rve the subject property versus the County utilizing the Crawford's private water and wastewater facilities. Thecost associated with running the water and wastewater lines down JW Drive plus the. cost ofresutfacing JW Drive after the lines have been extended will add significantly to the overall cost of the Road & Bridge FacilitY (Appx. $560,000.00). Whether the Road & Bridge Facility is tied into the Crawford's private water and wastewater system or the Mid Valley Metropolitan District's water and wastewater systems, the Eagle County Land Use Regulations will be satisfied. - Nevertheless, the Board will need to consider the following options relative to water and wastewater facilities: / 1) Allow connectiOn to the Crawford's private water and wastewater systems; 2) Allow connection to the Crawford's private water and wastewater systems with the condition that the Road & Bridge Facility be connected to the Mid Valley Metropolitan District water and wastewater systems in the future when connection becomes.practicable; 3) Require extension of and connection to the MidVaUey Metropolitan District lines now, with the understanding that the overall cost of the project will increase substantially; 4) At the time when the Mid Valley Metropolitan District has designed and is ready to extend the water and sewer lines to the east down JW Drive from the Blue Lake Subdivision and then south down EI Jebel Road to US Highway 82 where the lines will be tied into existing Mid Valley Metropolitan District lines, thereby completing a looped system, Eagle County will pay the costs associated with extending the water and wastewater lines 1,100 feet from the Blue Lake Subdivision up to the County Road & Bridge Facility~ ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS TIlE MAJOiU.TY OF MlNIMUM STANDARDS OOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Site Development Standards. [Section 5-250.B. 7J The proposed Special Use shall comply with the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site Deve/oDment Standards. x X Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1) Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2) 34 10/02/07 X Sign Regulations (Division 4-3) .. X . Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410) X Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420) X Wildf'rre Protection (Section 4-430) X Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) X Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450) X Commercial and InduStrial Performance Standards (Division 4~5) X Noise and. Vibration (Section 4-520) X Smoke and Particulates (Section 4-530) X Heat, Glare, Radiation and Electrical Iriterference (Section 4-540) X Storage of Hazardous and Non-hazardous Materials (Section 4-550) . X Water Quality Standards (Section 4-560) X Roadway Standards (Section 4-620) X Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630) .. X Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640) X Drainage Standards (Section 4-650) X Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660) X Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670) \ X Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680) . X 'Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690) X *Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7) *to be applied to new structures. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS ... MEE~ THE MAJ. ORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: OtherProvisioDS. [Section 5-250.B.8] The proposed Special Use shall comply with all standards imposed on it by all other applicable provisions of these Land Use Regulations for use, layout, and general development characteristics. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X =~ =~. O~=IMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS D. REFERRAL RESPONSES: Eae:le County Ene:ineerine: Department: Please reference the attached memorandum dated September 13, 2007. Three comments relative to the proposed storm drain have been provided. Eae:le County Department of Environmental Bealth: Please reference the attached memorandum dated September 13,2007. Seven comments were provided: 1 ) We recommend a Dust Suppression Plan be prepared and approved by Eagle County Environmental Health prior to any site disturbance. The approved Plan must be kept on-site and be 35 10/02/07 implemented at all times during construction in order to continue with grading activities. .. The Plan must identify a point of contact that is always available who can take. immediate action, to abate environmental impacts caused by these issues. Failure to conform to the Plans will result in cessation of work until compliance is obtained. 2) The project site plan shows the existing on-site fuel storage area. It is assumed that it isihtended to remain and as such, we recommend a Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures Plan (SPCC) be prepared and approved by Eagle County Environmental Health. The SPCC will include inventory monitoring, specify what actions will be taken by on-site personnel in case of a release~ what materials are available on site to effectively mitigate a spill and a training plan for an oil discharge response team. 3) We recommend that the facility design be reviewed by ourECO Build Coordinator to incorporate energy efficiency as outlined in Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification. The applicant should incorporate clean, renewable energy sources as an example to the community. 4) The facility is adjacent to a residential neighborhood and should conform to the Commercial and Industrial performance standards as outlined in Article 4, Division 4.5 of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, especially as. it relates to glare from the metal roof and noise. S) The applicant's discussion of site drainage and storm water management indicates infiltration of surface precipitation into underlying ground-water via a dry well and through the unpaved portions of the site. ..Since Mid Valley Metropolitan District has drinking water wells developed in the Roaring Fork alluvium nearby, it is recommended that site drainage and surfacing be re-engineered in such a way as to better mitigate adversarial ground-water quality impacts. 6) It is noted that water and sewer services will be provided by the Crawford's systems. It is important to know that the Mid V all~ Metropolitan District is considered the regional water and sewer provider in this part of the Roaring Fork River Valley and should be considered to provide these services. 7) The current sewer plan shows two sanitary sewer outlets from the building. The outlet on the south side appears to collect floor drain waStes frQm within the building which combine with the outdoor wash rack wastewater and travel through an oil/water separator and eventually into a holding tank wherein ~itary wastes'from the east side outlet commingle into an underground holding tank and are then pumped into the Crawford's sewer collection system. It will be necessary to obtain the . approval of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Division to allow the outdoor wash rack wastewater to enter the Crawford's limited capacity public sewer system. It is recommended that outdoor vehicle wash rack wastewater be handled and treated separately by the incorporation of Best Management Practices to obtain the highest quality wastewater from this source before entering Mid Valley's water supply. Sanitary sewers connected in this fashion can be vulnerable to allowing sewage backup onto the surface of the ground creating a public health nuisance. Basalt & Rural Fire Protection Distriet: Please reference the attached letter dated September 6~ 2007. The District has offered several recommendations regarding the supply of water to the site for fue' fighting purposes. Neither the Crawford system nor the Mid Valley Metro District water distribution systems have adequate fire flow pressure. Two options are presellted to resolve this issue: I) Extend the water line from Blue Lake Subdivision to a future installed hydrant near the front of the proposed building; The added flow produced by the two systems will meet the above criteria. The benefit is redundancy of two separate water- purveying systems available for fue suppression; 2) Sprinkler the building supplied by the Crawford's water system throughout with an automatic fire suppression system along with an installed hydrant near the building front. This will meet the intent of the fife code. Added benefits of this approach are tradeoffs allowed within the building code toward construction. Northwest Colorado Couneil of Governments: Please reference the attached e-mail dated September 12, 2007. . NWCCOG indicates that a stormwater discharge permit from the State Department of Public Health will be necessary. A stormwater management plan is an integral part of the stormwater discharge permit. 36 10/02/07 Final stabilization by vegetation or other means for disturbed areas should be completed within 14 days of final grading, and final stabilization is complete when vegetation reaches 70% of the adjoining undisturbed areas. These standards are different than what was provided with the application. C. SUMMARY ANALYSIS: Overall, no insurmountable issues have been identified which would preclude improvement of the El lebel Road and Bridge Facility as proposed. It will be necessary for each of the respective referral agency comments to be satisfactorily addressed prior to the issuance of either a grading permit or building permit. The Board of County Commissioners must consider the following options relative to water and.wastewater facilities: 1) Allow connection to the Crawford'sprivate water and wastewater systems; 2) Allow connection to the Crawford's private water and wastewater systems with the condition that the Road &, Bridge Facility be connected to the Mid Valley Metropolitan District water and wastewater systems in the future when connection becomes practicable; 3) Require extension of and connection to the Mid VaU~ Metropolitan District lines now, with the understanding that the overall/cost of the project will increase substantially; 4) At the time when the Mid Valley Metropolitan District has designed and is ready to extend the water and sewer lines to the east down JW Drive from the Blue Lake Subdivision and then south down EI lebel Road to US Highway 82 where the lines willbe tied into existing Mid Valley Metropolitan District lines, thereby completing a looped system, Eagle County will pay the costs 8$sociated with extending the water and wastewater lines 1,100 feet from the Blue Lake Subdivision up to the County Road & Bridge Facility. D. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OPTIONS: 5. Approve the [SPECIAL USE PERMIT) request without eonditions if itis determined that the petition will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and the proposed use is attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uSes and the proposaUs in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 6. Deny the (SPECIAL USE PERMIT) request ifit is determined that the petition will adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and/or the proposed. use is not attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is not in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 7. Table the [SPECIAL USE PERMIT) request if additional information is required to fully evaluate the petition. Give specific direction to the petitioner and staff. 8. Approve the (SPECIAL USE PERMIT] request with conditions andlorperformanee standards if it is determined that certain conditions and/or performance standards are necessary to ensure public, health, safety, and welfare and/or enhances the attunementofthe use with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). DISCUSSION: 37 10/02/07 Mr. Nameci presented a PowerPoint related to the details of the file. He explained the proposal and intent of the application. The proposal would allow for construction of a new 10,838 square foot maintenance facility, including eight paved guest parking spaces, exterior vehicle wash bay, outdoor storage for vehicles and plows, and a covered sand storage. area. The perimeter of the site would be landscaped and have an eight-foot chain. link security fence. The exterior of the building would consist of concrete masonry block and the roof would be constructed of standing seam metal. The building will be approximately 32 feet in height. The subject property has been utilized as a Road &. Bridge Facility for the past 20 years without a building structure. Staff believes that the site. in its current condition, affects the dissimilar neighboring land uses more so than the improved facility, as proposed. He presented the responses from the Engineering Department, Environmental Health Department, the Basalt & RuralFPD, the Northwest Colorado Council of Govemment, and Town of Basalt as presented in the slide presentation. He indicated that as conditioned, the proposed SpeciaHJse complies with all applicable Eagle County Land Use Regulations. He stated that there were additional considerations for the board to consider relative to water and wastewater: One is to allow a connection to the Crawford's private water and wastewater systems. The second is toallow the connection with the condition that the facility would be connected to the Mid Valley Metropolitan District water and wastewater systems in the future. The third wouldrequire a connection to Mid . Valley Metropolitan District lines now. And the fourth would be that when ~ has designed and is ready to extend their water and sewer lines to t!te east, Eagle County would pay the costs associated with extending the lines from Blue Lake Subdivision to the Road &; Bridge Facility. Chairman Menconi wondered if staff had a recommendation. Mr. Narracci. stated that .from a budget standpoint, number two would be ideal; from a cOoperative standpoint, Mid Valley Metro District would prefer number four. He presented the board's options and stated that there were 7 suggested conditions. He stated that all of the conditions tie into thereferral.resporises received with the exception of number seve~ which was added by Roaring Fork Planning Commission. However,' it is not staff's recommendation to add the condition because the standards referenced in the condition are not going to happen within the time frame that this facility is slated for. Chairman Menconi opened public comment. There was none. He closed public comment. Commissioner Runyon wondered if Pitkin County had shown any interest in collaborating. Mr. Narracci stated that they had not. Commissioner Runyon wondered if there was area enough under the existing design for Basalt to use some of the space.. Brad Higgins stated that the current design was considering all of Eagle County's equipment but they dido't consider additional space for a co-habitant. There were. several conversations with Pitkin County and they did not express an interest in the planning process or design of the new facility. The Town of Basalt conversations were geared towards what would happen to the old shop within the Basalt town limits when the new facility was built Commissioner Runyon wondered what would happen with the current building. Mr. Higgins stated that it had not been discussed at length. He believes it could bea deal with the Town of Basalt for acquisition of the property. The design of the new building lends itself to easily extend south in the . future if the county chooses to join forces with another entity. David Koenck, Sopris Architecture stated that as the site is designed all the space is utilized and he believes it's a bit tight to add housing or do additions for Basalt. There is room for the county to expand to the east and west for an administration area. There is the possibility of going up another floor for employee housing. Commissioner Runyon wondered if a biomass type-heating system was still being considered. Rick Ullom, County Construction Manager stated that the biomass heating system had not been designed in the mechanical system as it stands today but they did make accomodations within the mechanical room for additional space if needed in the future. A high efficiency boiler type heating system is in the preliminary design. The system is a conversion type system. . Conimissioner Runyon stated that there are very few commercial biomass operations that don't have a conventional power source back-up system. He wondered how the biomass heating system was taken off the radar screen. Mr. Ullom stated that originally, they focused on the biomass type heating system.but once they looked at the logistics and the transportation costs associated with getting pellets to E1 Jebel area it was not feasible. 38 10/02/07 Commissioner Runyon stated that he believes it is important both locally and nationally due. to . the pine beetle-problem to move towards more biomass type heating systems in the future. He asked about the landscaping, Mr. Narracci stated that the landscaping would be adequate and a marked improvement over what exists currently. Commissioner Fisher asked Mr. Koenck to explain the site plan and identify were the sand shed and equipment storage area would be located. Mr. Koenck presented a site plan and addressed Commissioner Fisher'squestions. Commissioner Fisher wondered about the Crawford water treatment facility and the areas it currently services. Mr~ Narracci stated that the Crawford system currently serves everything on Crawford owned property including the fire station, two mobile home parks and all of the commercial. development. located on the north and west comer ofHwy 82. / Commissioner Fisher wondered about the cost associated with extending the water and. wastewater lines from the blue lake subdivision to the county road and bridge facility. Mr. Ullom stated that the water and sewer lines would cost $240,000. Hard cost to the road might be $150,000. Additional soft costs may be $50,000-$100,000. The budget for the facility is $2,000,000.00 so itwould be.roughly a 25% increase in cost. Commissioner Fisher wondered about the long-term capacity is for the Crawford system~ Mr. Narracci stated that they don't know the capacity of the system. If the system were to fail, it would ultimately cost the Crawford family. Commissioner Fisher wondered if solar power had been discussed. Mr. Ullom stated that solar power had been discussed. There is a possibility for some solar on the south side of the building. They attempted to make the building as energy efficient as possible. Mr. Koenck read off a list of energy efficient items being considered. The listincluded.a drip irrigation system, no grass, low flow fixtures, low flow showerheads,future expansion for biomass system, programmable thermostats on the mechanical system, high energy boilers, on demand water heaters, . energy star appliances, motion detectors, radiant floor heating, premium roofing material, insulated hot water pipes, stonn drainage mitigation, no particle board, auto exhaust system, . insulated metal doors, natural ventilation, and etc. They plan.on incorporating additional items as they move forward. Commissioner Fisher stated that,?urrently the area seemed to be industrial but later down the road this may not be the case. She would like to consider the potential.gfowth in the area. She is concerned with the sidewalk on JW Drive. She asked about onsite housing. She believes there is potential to create additional jobs in the future and she would like to accommodate some workforce housing if possible. She would like the facility to represent Eagle County in a positive manner and be a contribution to the EI Jebel area. She would like to consider solar power in the future. She feels good about moving the project forward. Mr. Koenck stated that they had the full design development set. Mr. Ullom stated that there was still room for potential phasing. They are currently at a point of design development and there are certain things that are still on the table. Chairman Menconi asked if the cost would increase if there were additional conditions. He believes that phasing is possible. Mr. Ullom stated that the dollar amount would increase if conditions were added. Commissioner Runyon understands that adding two housing units on the second floor would require a major redesign. Mr. Ullom stated that housing could be worked in but additional dollars would be. required for solar systems. Chairman Menconi stated that given the dollar amount, need and the benefit of not having to relocate the facility to the EI Jebel tree farm site, this is a great opportunity that could not have existed without the Crawfords. He asked about the color and materials used in the building design. Mr. Koenck stated that it would bean all masonry building with a metal roof. No colors for the roof or building have been selected. Chairman Menconi stated that he was in favor of approving the special use file to move the project forward. He is in favor of the second option relative to water and wastewater. He is opposed to the seventh condition. Commissioner Fisher stated that she doesn't want to hold up the opportunity for the file to move forward but she believes there may be ways to better utilize the space and accommodate the housing component. She would like at some point to understand the dollar amount required for making those additional changes. 39 10/02/07 Commissioner Runyon stated that he agreed with Chairman Menconi's desire to remove condition 7 and water facility option 2. He would like more input on the landscaping, the color and exterior fmish of the building. Commissioner Fisher asked Mr. Ullom bow it would affect his schedule if the file were tabled. Mr. Ullom stated that they were hoping to break ground this fall and have the facility ready next summer. There is still time on the details and design to incorporate some of the concerns and wishes of the board. The county has a commitment with the Crawfords as a component of the lease agreement to. make sure there is something appealing on the frontage side of the building. They were trying to minimize cost on the backside since it is not viewed by the public. Chairman Menconi stated that this is a temporary building and. if there were additional cost to the project, he would be voting against it because of the other needs of other priorities inside of the county. He would like to move forward with the knowledge of staff knowing. that the board is interested in details on colors, landscaping, and solar panels. Iri terms .of housing and energy efficiency, he suggested it be considered at more permanent locations. Commissioner Runyon stated that since the county owns the building things could always be implemented later. Chairman Menconi wondered about the cost of looking at the housing. Mr. Ullom stated that time would be a component of the cost. Bob Morris, Deputy County Attorney stated that it is important for the. board to act the same way that they would if the applicant were not the county. He suggested adding a seventh condition. Commissioner Runyon moved to approve file no. ZS-00163, EI Jebe1lEagle County Road and Bridge facility with the suggested conditions 1-6 and a seventh condition as outlined by Mr. Morris, with the recommendation of option 2 on the water and wastewater facility. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion for discussion. She wondered iffile no. LEA-00059 Location & Extent needed to be a separate motion. Mr. Narracci stated that the location & extent file was a companion file and a.statutory requirement. The Planning Commission had already approved the file and it. is not something\ the board needs to add to. the special use. SUGGESTED CONDmONS: 1. Except as otherwise modified by this development permit, all material representations made by the Applicant in this application and in public meeting shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. 2. The Eagle County Engineering Department comments set forth in its memorandum dated S~tember 13, 2007 must be addressed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer prior tp issuance of either a grading permit or building permit; - 3. The Eagle County Department of Environmental Health comments set forth in its memorandum dated September 13, 2007 must be addressed to the satisfaction of the Eagle County Department of Environmental Health prior to issuance of either a grading permit or building permit; 4. The Basalt & Rural Fire Protection District comments set forth in its letter dated September 6, 2007 must be addressed to the satisfaction of the Basalt & Rural Fire Protection District prior to the issuance of either a grading permit or building permit. 5. The Northwest Colorado Council of Govemments comments set forth in its e-mail dated September 12,2007 must be addressed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer prior to issuance of either a grading permit or building permit. 6. The Town of Basalt comments set forth in its letter dated September 18,2007 must be addressed to the satisfaction of Eagle County prior to issuance of either a grading permit or building permit. 7. That exterior design finish, landscaping, and other faeets of the structure and use affecting visual impact on the neighborhood would be subject to review and approval by the Community 40 10/02/07 Development Department and. the Board of County Commissioners prior to recording a resolution of approvaL The vote was declared unanimous. Attest: as adjourned until October 9,2007. 41 10/02/07