No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/04/07 Present: Am Menconi Sara Fisher Peter RunyOn Bruce Baumgartner Bryan Treu Robert Morris Kathy Scriver PUBLIC HEARING June 4, 2007 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Manager County Attorney Deputy County Attorney Deputy Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing, the following items were presented to the Board of County Coinmissioners for their consideration: GENERAL FUND 21ST CENTURY PHOTO SUPPLY 360 TRAINING A 1 BAlL BONDS ABBOTT LABORATORIES ACCESS ROARING FORK ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY ADV ANTAGENETWORK SYSTEMS AED EVERYWHERE AFFILIATED CREDIT SERVICE ALAMOSA COUNTY ALL PRO FORMS INC ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY. AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMERICAN SOLUTIONS AMERIGAS AMY BERENS ANN LOPER ANN MUNCASTER ANTLERS VETERINARY APPLIANCE DOCTORS INC APWA CONFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL COMPUTER ARMY & FACTORY SURPLUS ARTCRAFT SIGNS ARTWORKS, THE ASPEN GLOBAL CHANGE A V TECH ELECTRONICS INC. AVON CENTER ATBEA VER CK AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS B & H SPORTS BJROWE BAILEYS BALCOMB AND GREEN BASALT QUICK LUBE BASALT SANITATION DIST BC INTERIORS BENTLEY SYSTEMS INC BERGLUND RUlH BERNICE WHITE BERTHOD MOTORS SUPPLIES SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 1 06/04/07 161.15 25.00 35.10 202.10 5,000.00 1,250.00 234.47 178.00 617.95 37.10 1,186.34 36.93 748.00 124.10 2,261.03 319.90 78.00 15.00 25.00 80.00 150.00 1,460.00 5.98 16.00 2,233.00 745.00 42,985.65 4,406.21 5,317.22 24.50 37.26 132.00 4,781.43 45.25 139.50 1,632.00 120.00 113.00 14.70 2,952.84 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS BETHANY VAN WYK BMHS PROJECT GRADUATION BONNIE VOOT BOYD COFFEE COMPANY BRA VOl VAIL VALLEY MUSIC BRUCE BAUMGARTNER CAACO CALmRE PRESS INC CARDINAL HEALTH CARLIN OODGE CARMEN WZOY0-VELEZ CASA OF THE CONTINENTAL CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CATHY ZEEB CDAC CDW CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTURYTEL CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE CGAIT CHARM TEX CHEMATOX INC. CHERYL THOMAS CHERYLE A WOOLSEY CIMA CINGULAR WIRELESS CLEAN OESIGNS CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION CO DEPT AGRICULTURE CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND CO SECRETARY OF STATE CO STATE TREASURER COLLEEN WIRTH . COWRADO CHAPTER OF ICC COWRADO CORRECTIONAL COWRADO COUNTIES INC COWRADO GUN SERVICE COWRADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO PROFESSIONALS IN COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH COLUMBINE MARKET COMFORT INN CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING CONTRACT PHARMACY SERVICE COPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COWBOY CATERING CUMMINS ALLISON CORP OAL Y PROPERTY SERVICES DAN CORCORAN PLS SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 847.21 89.91 1,000.00 20.25 729.26 5,000.00 44.78 540.00 796.00 1,177.20 19,246.00 142.56 2,000.00 279.46 194.00 346.50 44.99 3,302.97 11,578.48 3,177.24 500.00 1,120.44 80.00 160.97 8.36 2,265.QO 444.19 355.91 150.00 365.00 640.00 954.25 30.00 3,817.00 30.94 70.00 204.00 670.00 1,218.96 560.00 22,455.89 180.00 14,318.68 11,926.40 22.97 562.00 2,418.63 5,000.81 33.99 5,917.39 122.66 4,690.20 1,012.68 6,899.76 1,380.00 2 06/04/07 DAVID KEKAR DEBBIE RODRIQUEZ DENVER CHECKWRITER, INC. DENVER PARTS DEPOT DEPARTMENT OF LAW DICK BOURRET DL T SOLUTIONS, INC. DOCTORS ON CALL DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP DON OLSEN DOREEN CONSTANINE DOROTHY KENLON DUFFORD WALDECK & MILBURN E-S PRESS/PMB #233 EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE EMBROIDERY INC EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLERJVER WATER AND EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED CNL EAGLE RIVER YOUTH COAL. EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EAGLE XM EARLINE BRONN EASYCHAlR MAGAZINE ECONOMIC COUNCIL OF EAGLE ED GRANGE EDWARADS ROTARY EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER EDWARDS STATION LLC EMC2 EMPLOYERS COUNCIL SERVICE EPS DESIGN AND PRINT ERIC LOVGREN ERIN DOWD ESRI EVERETT FAMILY FUNERAL EVHS PROJECT GRADUATION FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FEATHER PETROLEUM CO FEDERAL EXPRESS FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMER. FLAT TOPS ELECTRIC FLORIDA MICRO FORINASH KATHLEEN FRAN PAGE FSH COMMUNICA nONS LLC FURNITURE LEISURE G JCT CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE GALLS INCORPORATED GEORGIE C ZINDA OIRSH AND ROTTMAN REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND 79.19 14.00 5,725.00 570.46 100.00 32.40 5,892.61 105.00 96.38 I 1.27 12.00 4.80 3,050.00 3,900.00 17,021.00 2,933,19 575.27 299.91 571.85 150,000.00 20,000.00 1,125.00 3,310.00 1,720.00 21.00 17,000.00 37,500.00 144.00 500.00 13.49 300.00 231.68 4,075.00 502.60 242.36 224.78 1,425.00 540.00 1,000.00 3,058.18 4.50 630.53 33.53 720.70 1,128.95 266.40 14,736.00 75.68 20.00 70.00 1,649.68 18,347.00 13,129.50 313.50 34.20 3 06/04/07 GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY GRACE FINNEY GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND HAL BURNS HANSEN STEVE R HART INTERCIVIC HAZELLE GONTER HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES HELP DESK TECHNOLOGY HENRY SCHEIN HEWLETT PACKARD HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES HILL TOP INN HOGAN & HARTSON HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HOPKlNSMEDlCAL PRODUCTS HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS HUMAN RESOURCE PLUS INC HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US HV AC SUPPLY IACREOT ICC IDENTIX IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS INTERGRAPH CORPORATION INTERIOR PLANTSCAPES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAP NETWORK SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION JACK KENT MOTORS JACKIE CRUMB JAN 0 WESTMAN JARA DIVERSIFIED SERVICES mT'S CUSTOM SILK JENNY WOOD JILL HUNSAKER JIM DUKE JOES W ALLBAORD & SUPPLY JOHN BADE JOSIE SCHULTZ mSTIN FINESTONE KARA BETIIS, CORONER KAREN HOEGER KATHY BARTA KATHY CALTON KAY VINCENT KELLY MILLER KENNEDY INDUSTRIES INC KESSLER MARY J KIMBALL INTERNATIONAL KINDER MORGAN INC KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LASER JUNCTION SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 'y SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 125.00 112.20 346.60 127.24 5,000.00 738.96 10,365.00 28.80 84.04 686.31 300.14. 3,567.00 362.45 28.95 198.00 4,706.25 26,319.88 430.03 25.65 3,750.00 22.95 15.84 790.00 28.00 1,887.00 175.00 895.00 100.00 200.00 2,427.40 275.00 480.00 96.39 25.20 100.92 65.00 219.75 381.14 21.60 339.15 12.00 6.30 121.00 138.25 24.89 90.00 236.95 215.25 4.21 351.84 30.45 1,468.73 13,496.96 2,700.00 219.90 4 06/04/07 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LEONA PERKINS LIANA CARLSON MOORE LmERTY ACQUlSmONS LIGHTNING SERVICES LINDA JOHNSON LINDBLOOM PHOTOGRAPHY INC LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR LORI SIEFERS LORIE CRAWFORD LORRAINE VASQUEZ LUCY BARKER M CECILIA ZALINGER MAIN AUTO PARTS MARIA ANJIER MARKS PLUMBING PARTS MARLENE MC CAFFERTY MARTHA SUTHERLAND MBIA MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MEADOW MOUNTAIN PLUMBING MEDI BADGE, INC. MEET THE WILDERNESS METROPOLITAN PATHOLOGISTS MICAELA MENDOZA MICHAEL MCCLINTON MICRO PLASTICS MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP MID V ALLEY METROPOLITAN MIKE BAIR MOBILE VISION MONUMENT PHARMACY MOORE MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOTOSAT MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES MTN VALLEY DEVELOPENTAL MURRAY DAHL MWI VETERNJARY SUPPLY CO NATIONAL ANIMAL CONTROL NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NELSON LABORATORIES NEVES UNIFORMS NORDIC REFRIGERATION NORTHWEST COLORADO LEGAL NRA NRC BROADCASTING, INC. NU CARE PHARMACUETICALS OC TANNER OFFICE DEPOT OMNI DISTRIBUTION INC OSM DELIVERY LLC SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE 1,301.50 784.26 45.36 30.00 50.00 14.40 600.00 242.12 64.50 136.08 98.00 145.20 21.47 8.71 103.20 158.19 81.90 18.00 5,251.19 45.74 1,749.84 57.45 500.00 108.00 51.70 16.20 18.74 79.00 373.14 89.10 484.95 41.00 11,715.00 784.54 1,133.60 279.00 285.98 595.00 1,629.37 10,000.00 8,268.22 417.06 990.00 1,580.00 359.40 229.s0 786.62 4,000.00 525.00 4,936.00 39.88 3,304.70 165.56 2,249.00 484.32 5 06/04/07 PAINT BUCKET THE PAPER WISE PARK COUNTY SHERIFF OFF. PAT NOLAN PATRICIA HAMMON PET PICK UPS PETER FREIDRICH PF COMAC PHYLISS ROUNDS PHYLLIS.KELLY PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED POCA TELLO SUPPLY DEPOT PORTER AUTO BODY INC POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PRICE DIGESTS PRlNTRITE PRO FORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRESSIVE METHODS INC PRO} GRADUATION BASALT HS PROSHINE SALES & SERVICE PSS,INC PURCHASE POWER QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION QWEST R & S NORTHEAST LLC REBECCA WHEELERSBURG RED CANYON HIGH SCHOOL RED RIBBON PROJECT REEFARRELL REGALIA MANUFACTURING CO REGIONAL HAZ MAT ASSOCIAT REGISTER TAPES UNLIMITED RENEE DUBUISSON RESOURCE CEN'f1ER OF EAGLE RESOURCES REYNA TRUJILLO ROARING FORK F AMIL Y ROBERT B EMERSON, PC ROBERTA E ARNDT ROBIN COCK ROCKY MOUNTAIN FOOD ROCKY MOUNTAIN RECORDS ROCKY MOUNTAIN REPROGRAPH RODOLFO REVELES ATTORNEY ROLLY ROUNDS RON WOLFE ROEDl WATER & POWER RYAN SANDS S CORPORATION INC SALVATION ARMY SARA CROSS SARA J FISHER SA YNOMORE PROMOTIONS SCAN AIR OF COLORADO INC SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE. SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES 13.58 1,998.00 26,685.00 106.27 48.60 1,338.38 27.72 395.00 24.00 30.88 4,612.00 4,519.07 1,380.60 437.85 119.95 367.45 469.55 279.00 1,009.00 1,219.00 857.65 6,963.26 747.54 450.16 6,172.23 113,98 148.42 3,500.00 1,000.00 39.73 116.93 35,923.48 750.00 120:04 15,000.00 28,738.57 214.51 8,500.00 114.00 902.91 16.24 135.00 189.50 3,023.99 9.80 41.40 44.55 10,000.00 209.99 10,959.43 10,000.00 181.96 514.97 1,692.26 1,761.56 6 06/04/07 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP SCHUTZMAN COMPANY, INC. SCHW AAB SECURITY TRANSPORT SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHAMROCK FOODS CORP SHAPINS ASSOCIATES SHAREE WETTSTEIN SHEAFFER KAREN SHERI MINTZ SHESHUNOFF ~FORMATION SIGNATURE SIGNS SILVER LEAF SUITES SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SJRCHlE FINGERPRINT SMALL CHAMPIONS SNOWBOARO OUTREACH SCTY SNOWHlTE LINEN SOFTWARE SPECTRUM SOUTHERN POLICE INSTITUTE SPRINGMAN & BRADEN SPSS SQUAD FITTERS STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT STATE OF COLORADO STEAMMASTER STEPHANIE GLENWRIGHT STEPHEN ELLSPERMAN STERICYCLE INC SUE MOTT SUPERIOR ALARM SUPPORT PAYMENT SUSPENSE FUND SYDNEY PITTMAN TAD DEGAN TAMMI MATTHEWS TASER INTERNATIONAL TCC CONTRACTORS TERRI JOHNSON THE BUODY PROGRAM THE FLOWER CART THOMAS COLE THOMAS F FARRELL THOMSON WEST GROUP TIM LOSA TOTAL ACCESS GROUP TOWN OF BASALT TOwN OF EAGLE TRANECOMPANY TRI COUNTY FIRE TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC UC REGENTS CASHIER OFFICE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED SITE SERVICES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 164.82 338.3 I 22.73 16,470.81 2,991.00 5,234.71 3,711.32 32.40 29.26 275.31 465.00 190.00 259.62 1,051.05 152.87 5,000.00 5,000.00 175.58 2,081.34 1,300.00 21.10 2,199.00 69.00 700.001472.56 2,887.50 180.00 43.34 1,024.78 87.00 639.00 363.00 217,098.17 7.20 91.90 292.59 900.00 708.00 123.25 5,000.00 214.00 74.52 ~15.60 4,385.71 55.89 239.50 122.58 2,690.65 1,226.00 2,353.00 9,662.00 663.76 31,946.58 481.51 107.51 7 06/04/07 UNITED STATES POLICE UNITED WAY OF EAGLE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINATTI UNlVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS US FOODSERVICE INC VAlL DAlLY THE VAlL ELECTRONICS VAlL LOCK AND KEY VAIL MOUNTAIN COFFEE VAlL RESORTS MANAGEMENT VAlL VALLEY CHAARITABLE . VAlL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VAlL VALLEY PARTNERSHIP VALLEY LUMBER VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY VERIFICATIONS INC VERIZON WIRELESS, VIRGINIA BAlR VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS WECMRD WELLS FARGO WEST V AlL SHELL WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY WESTERN LAND GROUP INC WESTERN SLOPE BAR WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES WILLIAM G HORLBECK PC WILLIAM LOPER WORKPLACE RESOURCE OF CO WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY WYNTTAYLOR XCEL ENERGY XEROX CORPORATION XEROX OMNIFAX Y AMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC YOUR PERSONAL CHEF ZASTROW DENTISTRY LLC PAYROLL FOR APRIL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPEND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL 8 &9 190.00 20.00 648.00 709.00 21,768.44 7,02226 2,207.20 2,655.20 316.22 82.00 343.75 5,000.00 211.20 150,000.00 455.53 1,456.25 1,980.75 2,680.35 4,055.33 165.60 41,481.34 1,325.98 1,206.30 10,700.00 574,597.86 262.00 2,190.00 362.94 203.85 466.07 4,841.00 9.00 155.13 43.80 29.80 624.79 8,780.02 529.56 99.10 799.00 500.00 821,212.62 2,907,355.58 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND AMERIGAS CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTRAL SERVICESIEC COLORADO L T AP COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC COPY PLUS OOUBLETREE HOTEL EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE PHARMACY SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE 1,096.47 260.68 120.16 300.00 719.59 236.00 71.97 531.12 37.25 42.76 8 06/04/07 FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG FRED PRYOR SEMINARS GRANO JUNCTION PIPE AND HEWLETT PACKARD HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC INTERMOUNTAIN SWEEPER INTERWESTSAFETYSUPPLY JAKE J STULL KERRY O'NEILL KINDER MORGAN INC NAPA AUTO PARTS-CARBONDLE ROARING FORK VALLEY COOP SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION THERESA LADENBURGER TOWN OF GYPSUM TRI COUNTY FIRE US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS VAlL ELECTRONICS VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES WHITI AKER LANDSCAPING WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION Y AMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR APRIL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL 8 &9 31,681.77 256.00 50.25 2,507,00 581.65 7,900.00 231.52 75.00 24.00 753.83 18.50 46.55 2,936.34 32.44 495.07 138.70 726.56 371.09 412.02 45.46 33.70 505.00 531.04 605.51 159.56 53.92 76,279.77 130,868.25 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND AMY DAVIS ANGELICA DUQUE BETHANIE LINDAL BLANCA SANCHEZ CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, M.A. CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CENTURYTEL CHARLENE WHITNEY CO DEPT OF HUMAN SERVICES COLORADO COUNTIES INC COMFORT INN CYNTHIA AGUILAR DARLENE MONTANO DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP DOREEN CONST ANINE EAGLE CONVENIENCE STORE EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DlST EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EARLY CHILDHOOD PARTNERS FLORIDA MICRO FORINASH KATHLEEN GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 186.69 861.94 300.00 I 1.96 600.00 929.05 98.66 198.70 225.00 27.78 113.90 191.36 102.06 79.00 38.07 24.21 633.83 12,500.00 25.20 9.99 2,115.79 13,456.18 560.00 84.60 34.60 9 06/04/07 HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES SERVICE 39.16 HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS SERVICE 44~55 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 873.44 JAN GOVREAU REIMBURSEMENT 28.69 JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFFS SERVICE 23..37 JOHN C COLLINS PC SERVICE 12,138.00 KIDS FIRST SERVICE 4,378.00 KIM HILDERBRAND REIMBURSEMENT 509.02 LA QUINT A INN & SUITES SERVICE 124.00 LARA "HEATHER" LAWDERMILK REIMBURSEMENT 35.81 LEXlSNEXlS COURTLINK INC SERVICE 48.45 LYONS KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 43.26 MERCEDES GARCIA REIMBURSEMENT 42.93 MICHELLE ARANA REIMBURSEMENT 22.40 NCSEA SERVICE 300.00 \ ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO SERVICE 60.64 PARENTS HANDBOOK SERVICE 1,100.00 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 236.65 RACHAEL BORRE REIMBURSEMENT 558.87 RHODE ISLAND DEPT OF SERVICE 15.00 RITA WOODS REIMBURSEMENT 219.09 SHERI MINTZ REIMBURSEMENT 143.37 SOLARA LLC SERVICE 12,000.00 SST ABS SERVICE 5.00 SSTABSCONFERENCE SERVICE 295.00 SYLVIA SALAZAR REIMBURSEMENT 104.49 VAIL HONEYW AGON LID SERVICE 67.00 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 571.33 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 2,487.64 WELD COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICE 23.50 WYNNE MORGAN REIMBURSEMENT 383.86 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 1,016.79 PAYROLL FOR APRIL PAYiWLL8&9 76,309.37 147,657.25 WRAP FUND EARLY CHILDHOOD PARTNERS SERVICE 3,053.94 3,053.94 INSURANCE RESERVE FUND - COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICE 12,723.07 12.723.07 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND ANITA SCOTT SERVICE 7,987.50 CHFA SERVICE 6,182.00 CHICAGO BULLET PROOF SERVICE 5,475.00 COLORADO COMMERCIAL SERVICE 10,043.18 DAVID KEKAR REIMBURSEMENT 806.69 GATEWAY CONSTRUCTION CORP SERVICE 3,183.39 IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICE 395.25 KENNEY & ASSOCIATES SERVICE 245.10 LAFARGE CORPORATION SERVICE 7,844.00 MORTER ARCHITECTS SERVICE 4,110.43 NATIVE ELECTRIC INC SERVICE 4,243.75 10 06/04/07 NEW WORLD SYSTEMS PEAK LAND SURVEYING INC PRIEFERT MFG COINC QWEST INTERPRISE NETWRKNG REL YCO SALES INC SHEPHERD RESOURCES, INC. SPRONKWATER ENGINEERS VAIL DAlLY THE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 6,000.00 840.00 14,405.45 21,689.71 4,757.00 741.09 3,186.00 1,519.78 103,655.32 SALESTAXE.V. TRANSP. AMERICAN SALES INCENTIVES ANITA PERCIFIELD ARMANDO SCHAFFINO BILLINGS KAR KOLOR INC CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CINGULAR WIRELESS COLLETTS COLORADO DEPT REVENUE COLORADO MOUNTAIN MEDICAL COLUMBINE MARKET CORPORATE EXPRESS DOCTORS ON CALL EAGLE PHARMACY EVERYDAY OUTFITTERS GLENWOODMEDICAL ASSOC HASLER INC HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS JEFF WETZEL KINDER MORGAN INC KINETICO WATER PROS KZYR-CooL RADIO LLC LAWSON PRODUCTS LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LUMINATOR M&MAUTOPARTS MAIN AUTO PARTS MILLENNIUM TOWING QWEST SNAP-oN INDUSTRIAL TIM MINAROVICH TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF GYPSUM TRANSWEST TRUCKS TRI COUNTY FIRE UNITED STATES WELDING US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS VAlL ELECTRONICS VAlL NET VERlZON WIRELESS, VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WESTERN SLOPE BAR WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 2,460;00 100.04 18.21 37.26 483.84 251.37 1,100.30 350.00 105.00 18.14 . 1,073.27 310.00 3.74 4,349.00 83.00 189.00 2,036.82 34.32 321.91 2,639.74 35.00 333.00 559.88 25.43 177.42 327.70 12.98 1,850.00 162.16 721.63 118.74 1,010.00 1,733.64 244.17 485.70 29.60 2,544.28 1,299.48 11.95 349.87 1,340.24 159.21 16.85 13.70 11 06/04/07 XCEL ENERGY SERVICE 436.60 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 75055 ZEE MEDICAL SERVlCE SUPPLIES 126.83 PAYROLL FOR APRIL PAYROLL 8 & 9 165,016.80 195,858.37 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS COLUMBINE MARKET SERVICE 24.83 COPY PLUS SERVICE 5.00 FEDERAL EXPRESS SERVICE 35.64 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SERVICE 3,239.36 IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICE 302.50 KEMP AND COMPANY INC SERVICE 1,984.20 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER SERVICE 5,122.50 VALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 8.98 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 1,310.73 12,033.74 AIRPORT FUND ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY SUPPLIES 832.90 AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT SERVICE 1,225.00 ASMI SERVICE 9,270.00 BALCOMB AND GREEN SERVICE 188.00 CENTRAL SERVICESIEC &ERVICE 7855 CENTURYTEL SERVICE 3,106.76 CHIEF SUPPLY SUPPLIES 11.99 CHRIS ANDERSON REIMBURSEMENT 59.13 COLLETTS SERVICE 1,540.02 COLORADO MOUNTAlN EXPRESS SERVICE 48,000.00 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 1,753.48 COOPER CROUSE HINDS SERVICE 199.36 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 173.29 DAVIS AUDIOVISUAL SERVICE 335.00 DISH NETWORK SERVICE 11.98 DIVISION OF FIRE SAFETY SERVICE 20.00 DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES SERVICE 97.96 ELIZABETH WILT REIMBURSEMENT 52.65 FLORIDA MICRO SERVICE 2,530.00 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SUPPLIES 60.30 GYPSUM TOWN OF SERVICE 431.05 HEWLETT PACKARD SERVICE 2,438.00 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 3,380.37 IMAGINIT EMBROIDERY SERVICE 567.32 JAY MAX SALES SERVICE 49.05 KATHY LAWN REIMBURSEMENT 140.49 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 256.95 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE 4,360.50 MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE 36,324.50 MOES SOUTHWEST GRILL SERVICE 539.75 RLM SOFTWARE INC SERVICE 6,000.00 RON RAMSEY SERVICE 200.00 SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICE 1,994.00 SIGNATURE SIGNS SERVICE 174.00 SKYLINE MECHANICAL SERVICE 971.00 STEWART AND STEVENSON SERVICE 2,380.01 12 06/04/07 SUMMITEX, LLC SERVICE 42.63 TAYLOR FENCE COMPANY SERVICE 9,800.00 TIRE DlSTRmUTION SYSTEMS SERVICE 1,026.00 US CUSTOMS SERVICE SERVICE 39,839.75 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 3,780.13 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 125.66 WAGNER RENTS SERVICE 51.39 WORKRITE SERVICE 185.76 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS SERVICE 440.67 WYLACO SUPPLY.JCOMPANY SUPPLIES 3,570.76 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 209.14 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY SERVICE 151.37 PAYROLL FOR APRIL PAYROLL 8 & 9 61,124.75 250,101.37 800 MHZ FUND LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE 19,724.28 MCI WORLDCOM SERVICE 3,245.51 QWEST SERVICE 1,989.08 24,958.87 HOUSING FUND CENTURYTEL SERVICE 44.18 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 402.00 RRC ASSOCIATES SERVICE 7,478.75 SLIFER MANAGEMENT SERVICE 200.86 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 103.82 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 117.56 PAYROLL FOR APRIL PAYROLL 8&9 2,195.30 10,542.47 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND JJ KELLER AND ASSOCIATES SERVICE 526.65 REIS ENVIRONMENTAL INC SERVICE 448.55 STEVE CARVER SERVICE 1,200.00 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 248.29 2,423.49 OPEN SPACE FUND ARCHffiEQUE LAND CONSULTIN SERVICE 1,375.00 SHAPINS ASSOCIATES SERVICE 95.00 1,470.00 LANDFILL FUND ACZ LABORATORY INC SERVICE 514.00 AIR CYCLE CORPORATION SERVICE 555.00 ALPINE DESIGN AND SERVICE 500.00 AMERIGAS SERVICE 1,327.79 BARBARA HENDRICK REIMBURSEMENT 49.94 CAROLINA SOFTWARE SERVICE 300.00 CENTRAL SERVICESIEC SERVICE 74.22 CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & SERVICE 12,677.35 DOWN V ALLEY SEPTIC SERVICE 790.00 EAGLE V ALLEY ALLIANCE SERVICE 50,000.00 FRONT RANGE TIRE RECYCLE SERVICE 12,017.80 13 06/04/07 GRANT WRITING USA HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC KELLY L BERRY KRW CONSULTING INC LBA ASSOCIATES QWEST INTERPRlSE NETWRKNG RONALD RASNIC TRlCOUNTYFIRE US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS VAlL DAlLY THE VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE NEWS WESTERN SLOPE BAR WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR APRIL SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL 8 & 9 425.00 549.05 18.13 4,331.87 2,987.03 5,417.13 42.11 391.00 810.00 693.60 21.43 64.00 155.95 193.10 12.93 19,840.91 114,759.34 MOTOR POOL FUND A& E TIREINC AJRGAS INTERMOUNT AIN.INC BERTHOD MOTORS BOBCAT OF THE ROCKIES BURT CHEVROLET, INC CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CENTURYTEL COLLETTS CORPORATE EXPRESS CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DELLENBACH MOTORS EAGLE COUNTY CLERK EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL EVERYOA Y OUTFITTERS FARIS MACHINERY CO FORCE AMERICA G & K SERVICES GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND HANSON EQUIPMENT HENSLEY BATTERY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY KINDER MORGAN INC LAWSON PRODUCTS LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC M&MAUTOPARTS MAIN AUTO PARTS . OJ WATSON COMPANY INC POWER MOTIVE PREMIER TIRE TERMINAL SIGNATURE SIGNS STEVINSON CHEVROLET TOWN OF GYPSUM TRI COUNTY FIRE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 1,324.05 87.36 208.80 226.94 599.67 323.49 98.01 75.03 99,505.68 342.84 69.61 60,798.00 209.20 89.83 3,965.00 1,487.70 281.73 453.48 253.00 101.32 99,718.18 630.20 1,503.81 292.00 1,948.96 2,063.09 584.96 1,803.65 15.37 1,343.35 907.84 1,197.88 1,923.00 34,862.83 1,279.97 358.60 14 06/04/07 TWO RIVERS CHEVROLET US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS VAlL DAlLY THE VAlL ELECTRONICS VANWORKS INC . VISA CARD SERVICES WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY WASTE MANAGEMENT WEAR PARTS EQUIPMENT WESTERN COLORADO WESTERN IMPLEMENTS WESTERN SLOPE PAINT WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY WYNNE MORGAN XEROX CORPORATION ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR APRIL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL 8&9 293.80 1,878.48 2,394.00 959.43 329.98 255.72 1,433.99 II 7.54 1,134.80 505.34 758.03 983.47 9,939.86 7.60 174.00 80.73 19,633.42 361,81~.62 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND AFLAC ATIN:RPS JEFFERSON PILOT FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 3,147.62 4,270.85 7,418.47 ENHANCED E911 FUND CENTURYTEL LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES NOMAD TECHNOLOGIES QWEST SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 178.45 395.02 850.00 11,262.89 12$86.36 4,299,380.51 Executive Session It was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed to go into Executive Session for the purpose of receiving legal advice and discussing matters that are subject to negotiations regarding the on the Colorado State Parks water lease which is an appropriate topic for discussion pursua.qt to C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b) and (e) Colorado Revised Statutes. It was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn from Executive Session. Consent Agenda Chairman Menconi stated the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of bill paying for the week of June 4,2007 (subject to review by the Finance Director) Finance Department Representative B. Approval of the payroll for June 7, 2007(subject to review by the Finance Director) Finance Department Representative C. Lease Agreement between Eagle County and Claude L. and Penny L. Clough for Neilson South Ditch No. 102,276 water rights Facilities Management Representative 15 06/04/07 D. Amendment # I of Energy and Mineral Impact Assistance Program Grant between the Colorado Department of Local Affairs and.Eagle County Attorney's Office RepreSentative E. Resolution 2007-064 concerning the appointment of Thomas Henderson oftheTown of Red Cliff as Representative for the Open Space Advisory Committee Lisa de Graaf, Community Development F. To subdivide Lot 11, creating two Y2 duplex lots each containing .8943 acres for a total of 1.7886 acres Terri Johnson, Community Development Chairman Menconi asked the Attorney's Office ifthere were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Bryan Treu, County Attorney stated that there were no concerns. Commissioner Runyon moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items A-F. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Citizen Input There was none Commissioner Fisher moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and re-convene as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Eagle County Liquor License Authority Kathy Scriver, Clerk and Recorder's Office Consent Ae:enda Renewals A. Ore House Edwards, LLC. d/b/a Game Creek Club This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License in Edwards. There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. An Alcohol Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided. B. 131 Smokehouse, LLC d/b/a 131 Smokehouse This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License in Bond. There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. An Alcohol Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided. C. Our dish! d/b/a dish! This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License in Edwards. There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. An Alcohol Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided. Commissioner Runyon moved that the Board approve the Liquor Consent Agenda for June 4, 2007, consisting ofItems A-C. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 16 06/04/07 Other Liquor APPLICANT: LOCATION: REPRESENTATIVE: Flexible Restaurants, Ine.d/b/a Vista at Arrowhead 676 Sawatch Drive in Edwards, CO Janine and Michael Glennon, Owners Shawn and Gary Boris, Owners Transfer of Ownership Kathy Scriver REQUEST: STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: DESCRIPTION: The applicant has requested to Transfer a Hotel and Restaurant License with (1) Optional Premises. Flexible Restaurants, Inc. d/b/a Vista at Arrowhead has applied for a Transfer of Ownership from CMLRestaurant Management Company d/b/a Falling Creek. The applicant is currently operating under a Temporary license issued by the Local Licensing Authority on April 16, 2007. ESTABLISH NEIGHBORHOOD.: As a Transfer of Ownership, this step is not required of the applicant. ESTABLISH NEEDS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD: As a Transfer of Ownership, this step is not required of the applicant. STAFF FINDINGS: ~ This appHcationis in order, all application requirements have been met, all the proper forms have been filed, and all fees have been paid. ~ The premises where the alcoholic beverages will be sold has been previously licensed by the state and local licensing authorities and was valid as of the date of receiving the application. ~ The applicants. are reported to be of good moral character based on CBI and Sheriff reports filed in the Clerk's Office. > Proof of Server training has been submitted. > The statement that all accounts for alcohol beverages sold to the applicant are paid has been received. > The applicants are over 21, fingerprints are on file and Personal History forms are on file. POSTING AND PUBLICATION Public notice has been given by the posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the premises at least May 24,2007, 10 days prior to the hearing. Publication of the notice is not required for a transfer of ownership. CONCERNS / ISSUES: None MOTION: Commissioner Fisher moved that the Local Liquor Licensing Authority, incorporating stafffmdings, approve the Transfer of the Hotel and Restaurant liquor license from CML Restaurant Management Company d/b/a Falling Creek to Flexible Restaurants, Inc. d/b/a Vista at Arrowhead. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 17 06/04/07 Commissioner Runyon moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority and re-convene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Planning Files PDF- 00095 Arrowhead River Ranch Final Plat Joe Forinash, Planning Department ACTION: A fmal plat to re-subdivide Tract C of Arrowhead River Ranch PUD to create a residential lot (Lot 2) and the remainder of Tract C. LOCATION: North ofHwy 6, east of Miller Ranch Road, Arrowhead River Ranch (Edwards) TITLE: FILE NOJPROCESS: OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Arrowhead River Ranch - A Fourth Resubdivision of Tract C PDF-00095/ Planned Unit Development Final Plat Arrowhead Valley Developers, LLC Arrowhead Valley Developers, LLC n/a Approval 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: A final plat to re-subdivide Tract C of Arrowhead River RanchPUD to create a residential lot (Lot 2) and the remainder of Tract C. 2. STAFF REPORT A. REFERRAL RESPONSES: All referral responses have been satisfactorily addressed. B. MAJOR CONCERNS AND ISSUES: None C. STAFF FINDINGS: Pursuant to Section 5-280. B.S.b(3). Final Plat for Subdivision - Action bv the Board of County Commissioners. of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the following finding is made: The Final Plat DOES conform to the approved Preliminary Plan for Subdivision for the Arrowhead River Ranch. Planned Unit Development, and Pursuant to Section 5-280.B.3.e, Subdivision Standards, ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the following fmdings are made: (1) Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed subdivision IS consistent with the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan and the FLUM ofthe Comprehensive Plan; (2) Consistent with Land Use Regulations. The proposed subdivision DOES comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards; (3) Spatial Patterns Shall Be Efficient. The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require 18 06/04/07 duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (a) Utility and Road Extensions~ Proposed utility extensions ARE consistent with the utility's setvice plan. Proposed road extensions ARE consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital Improvements Plan. (b) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility -lines ARE sized to setve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (c) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions ARE allowed only when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area. (4) Suitability for Development. The property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-mad,e hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. (5) Compatible with Surrounding Uses. The proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and WILL NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Pursuant to Section 4-700, School Land Dedication Standards, of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the following findings are made: This site has previously been subdivided. Neither a dedication of land for schools nor a payment of cash in lieu is necessary. DISCUSSION: Mr. Forinash presented a PowerPoint presentation. The presentation included a.vicinity map, approved PUDpreliminary Plan, site plan, plat and photos of the lot looking from Miller Ranch road and west of lot 2. The applicant wishes to approve a PUD final plat to subdivide Tract C in Arrowhead River Ranch to create a new residential lot (lot 2) and the remainder ofLoJ C. He indicated that there were no outstanding issues, stafffindings were positive and staff recommended approval. Commissioner Runyon asked how track C was represented in the original PUD. Mr. Forinash stated that track C was originally intended for 2 homes. The balance of track C would become common area in the new PUD. Chairman Menconi opened and closed public comment, as there wa~none. Commissioner Fisher moved that the Board approve File No. PDF-00095, incorporating the Stafffll1dings, and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDA-00067Cordillera Valley Club West End Noise Miti2ation and Landscapin2IBermin2 Lisa de Graaf, Planning Department NOTE: Tabled from 5/01/07 & 5/22/07 ACTION: Interstate 1-70 Noise Mitigation including a combination of landscaping, berms and barriers along the entire CVC frontage. 19 06/04/07 LOCATION: North side ofl-70, extending the boundary of the Cordillera Valley Club FILE NO./PROCESS: PROJECT NAME: LOCATION: OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF PLANNER: PDA-00067 / Planned Unit Development Amendment Cordillera Valley Club Sound Mitigation & Landscaping Project Edwards, Colorado Cordillera Valley Club Metropolitan District Same as Owner V Ag, Inc. Architects and Planners Lisa de Graaf 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The Cordillera Valley Club Metropolitan District is proposing to build a noise mitigation barrier. The purpose of the barrier is to reduce the noise levels from 1-70 vehicle traffic that is perceived as a nuisance and negatively impacts the quality oflife of Cordillera Valley Club's residents and visitors. The proposed barrier would be l~ated along the southern edge of an existing service road on the Cordillera Valley Club (CVC, hereafter) golf course parcel near the southern property line adjacent to the 1-70 right-of-way. The CVC is pursuing an Easement which is to be granted by Valley GolfLLC, thegolfcourse operator and owner of the land upon which the proposed improvements will be made, to CVC for the purpose of the project. In addition, a Location and Extent application, LEA-00057 is also being reviewed. concurrently. This PUD amendment amends the most current CVC PUD Guide, which was last amended March 29, 1999. It is necessary to revise. language in the Guide that currently prohibits the installation of large landscape berms and noise mitigation barriers. \ The construction ofthe sound and visual mitigation is a combination of earthen berms an4 fencing, which would vary in height. The length of the project is approximately 7,500 linear feet; the entire cve 1-70 frontage. A Holy Cross Utility Easement also generally parallels the property line in this area. B. SITE DATA: South: ROW: 1-70 USFS Lake Creek Apts/ Brett Ranch PUD PUD East: UnplattedlResidential UnplattedlResidential Resource Cordillera Valley Club PUD N/A Residential, golf related recreation Cordillera Metro District Project = 7,500 LF 22.5% 20 06/04/07 C. CHRONOLOGYIBACKGROUND: 1991- PUDSketch Plan was approved for this development which was initially referred to as Cottonwood. 1992 - The PUD Preliminary Plan and zone change to PUD was approved which allowed 848 dwelling units, a golf course and associated amenities, a "lodge" and 10,000 square feet of "convenience" commercial space. 1994 - An amendment to the PUDwas approved which (a) reduced the density from 848 to 445 dwelling units and "allocated" 240 dwelling units to Lake Creek Affordable Housing,.(b) transferred 30. acres from the development tracts to the golf course, (c) and eliminated a "lodge site" and the 1 0,000 square feet of commercial space. 1995 - The initial fmal plats were approved under the sl}.bdivision name of Wild horse. 1995- By resolution, the name of the subdivision was dhangedto Cordillera Valley Club..Subsequent fmal plats were approved under this subdivision name. 1997 - The PUD was amended to designate certain tracts as "single family" and to provide clarification to certain provisions of the PUD Guide. 1999 - The PUD Guide was.amended. 2001 - The PUD was amended for westerly access. \ D. PLANNING COMMISSION DELmERATION SUMMARY & MOTION: On April 18, 2007 the Planning Commission heard a presentation fora noise mitigation project from staff and the consultant representing the Cordillera Valley Club. Early cOlnmentslfeedback in the deliberation from the Commission focused on how the applicant 'listened' to former comments on design and landscape elements and that they did a better job in the current application. Additionally, Commission members commended the applicant/consultant on a good and improved submittal. The Commission also made comments regarding concerns of creating a tulinel effect on 1-70, which is a precedent that is not desired. The following are specific issues that were discussed and/or suggested. . If the precedent of berming was to be set forth with this application, then doing it well is important. . Use west access into CVC for dirt trucks during construction. . No jake-brakes allowed either access routes during construction and hours should be limited to 8 to 5 and Monday - Friday only. . Mitigation to any and all roads into evc post construction. . The easement agreement between the Metro District and Valley Golf LLC shall be in place. . A landscape guarantee and agreement be provided including standal'tis. . Revisit the site to ensure the landscape plan and guarantee have been followed, during construction and after two (2) years time. . The 2:1 slope is implemented on the south side ofthe noise barrier and berms. . Use other, more natural types of landscaping in addition to current plan, including, but not limited to rock outcroppings. . Water rights for landscaping concerns. . Possibly building project between the fairway and the houses, to lessen the visual impact when seen from 1-70. . If the duration is longer than the anticipated three (3) months, use west access only. (This option uses east access within the first three (3) months). The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend to deny application PDA- 00067. 21 06/04/07 The recommendation to deny the File was not based on Regulatory Findings. 2. STAFF REPORT A. NECESSARY FINDINGS: PROCES&1NTENT ECLUR Section: 5-240.F 3.m Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD Section Purpose: No substantial modification, removal, or release of the provisions of the plan shall be permitted except upon a finding by the County, following a public hearing called and held in accordance with the provisions of section 24-67-104(I)(e) Colorado Revised Statutes. Standards: Sections 5-240.F .3.e., Standards.5-280.B.3.e Standards and 5-240.F.3.m. Amendment toPreliminarv Plan for PUD are used to evaluate a PUD Amendment. ST ANDARDS:5-240.F.3.e STANDARD: Unified ownership or controL [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] - The title to alfland that is part of a PUD shall be uwned or controlled by one (1) person. A per~on shall be considered to control all lands in the PUD either through ownership or) by written consent of at/owners of the land that they wil/be subject to the conditions and standards of the PUD. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS . MEEW TIlE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM.. STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)J - The uses that may be developed in the pun shall be those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule", or Table 3-320, "Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule", for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these use designations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3f., Variations Authorized Amendment exceeds allowed len Amendment exceeds allowed height The primary uses allowed in the PUD will not be changed. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS X ME. ETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS 22 06/04/07 STANDARD: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] - The dimensional limitations . that shall apply to the PUD shall be those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for the zone district designation in effectfor the property at the time of the applicationfor PUD. Variations of these dimensional limitations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3!, Variations Authorized provided variationS shall leave adequate distance between buildings for necessary access. and fire protection, and ensure proper ventilation, light, air and snowmelt between buildings. x Section 5-240.F.3.f., Variations Authorized. provides that in order for a variation to be granted, it must be found that the granting of the variation is necessary for the purpose to be achieved, and that the Sketch Plan for PUD achieves one or more of the following purposes: Obtains. desired desi ualities; Avoids environmental resources and natural resources; Provides incentives for water au entation; Provides incentives for trails; Provides incentives for affordable housin ; Provides incentives for riblic facilities. '\ No variation is being proposed. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A This PUD Amendment application does not affect standards specified in the formerly approved PUD, other than relative to height and length of berms and noise mitigation barriers. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS . MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS 23 06/04/07 STANDARD: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] - Off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. A reduction in these standards. may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that: (a) Shared Parking. Because of shared parking arrangements among uses within the.PUD that do not require peak parking for those uses to occur at the same time, the parking needs of re$idents, guests and employees of the project willbe met; or (b) Actual Needs. . The actual needs of the project's residents, guests and employeeswill be less than those set by Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. The applicant may commit to provide specialized transportation services for these persons (such as vans, subsidized bus passes, or similar services) as a means of complying with this standard. EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS This PUD Amendment does not affect parking in the formerly approved PUD. STANDARD: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] - Landscaping provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Rlumination Standards. Variations from these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that the proposed landscaping provides sufficient buffering of uses from each other (both within the PUD and between the PUD and surrounding uses) to minimize noise, glare and other adverse impacts, creates attractive streetscapes and parking areas. and is consistent with the character of the area. x x x X x X n/a n/a n/a n/a X X Comments/Description: 24 06/04/07 The CVC must amend the language in the PUD Guide that was last amended in 2001. The applicant. proposes to add sub-section under Section ID. Land Use Desi2nationF.. Golf Course ~. Permitted Uses. ID.F.2.D., which reads: "Landscaping, sound, and visual mitigation features to include construction and installation of tree and shrub plant material, irrigation systems, visual screen fences, sound barriers, earthen berms, andwalls pursuantto approval from Eagle County". See also condition #1. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS THEMAJORJTY OF MIN. ~ ST. ANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Signs. (Section 5-240.F.3.e(6)] - The sign standards applicable to the PUD shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations, unless, as provided in Section 4-340 D., Signs Allowed in a Planned Unit Development (PUD). the applicqnt submits a comprehensive sign plan for the PUD that is determined to be suitablefor the PUD and provides the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to and within the PUD.' Comprehensive Sign Plan Provided? N/A ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEElS mE MAJORITY OF.MINIMUM S. TANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS This PUD Amendment application does not affect standards specifiedin the formerly approvedPUD. STANDARD: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] - The applicant shall demonstrate that the development proposed in the (Sketch). Preliminary Plan for P UD will be provided adequate facilities fgr potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads andwill be conveniently located in relation to schools, police andfire protection, and emergency medical services. X X X X X X In proximity to schools, police & fire protection, & emergency medical services Yes No ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORJTYOF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS 25 06/04/07 STANDARD: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] - The improvement standards applicable to the development shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards. Provided, however, the development may deviate from the County's road standards, so the development achieves greater efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts, when the following minimum design principles are followed: (a) Safe, EffICient Access. The circulation system is designed to provide safe, convenient access to all areas of the proposed development using the minimum practical roadway length. Access shall be by a public right-o.fway,private vehicular or pedestrian way or a commonly owned easement. No roadway alignment, either horizontal or vertical, shall be allowed that compromises one (1) or more of the minimum design standards of the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) for thatfunctional classification of roadway. (b) Internal Pathways.. Internal pathways shall be provided to form a logical, safe and convenient system for pedestrian access. to dwelling units and common areas, with appropriate linkages off- site. (c) Emergency Vehicles. Roadways shall be designed to permit access by emergency vehicles to all lots or units. An access easement shall be granted for e11Jergency vehicles and utility vehicles, as applicable, to use private roadways in the developmentfor the purpose. of providing emergency services andfor installation, maintenance and repair of utilities. (d) Principal Access Points. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to providefor smooth trafficflow, minimizing hazards tovehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. Where a PUDabuts a major collector, arterial road or highway, direct access to such road or highway from individual lots, units or buildings shall not be permitted Minorroads within the PUD shall not be directly connected with roads outside of the P UD, unless the County determines such connections are necessary to maintain the County's road network. (e) Snow Storage. Adequate areas shall be provided to store snowremovedfrom the internal street network and from off-street parking areas. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS .. MEETS TIlE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] - The development proposed for the P UD shall be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. 26 06/04/07 Unplatted X ROW: 1-70 X East: UnplattedlResidential Resourc X e West: UnplattedlResidential Resourc X e Discussion This PUD Amendmentapplication does not affect standards Specified in the fonnerly approved PUD, depending on one's perspective and individual sensibilities. The proposed benningand noise mitigation.barrier, when viewed frOIb the Soutll may be considered.incompatible. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS XMEEri THE MAJORITY OF MlWMUM. . S. TANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] - ThePUDshallbe consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The consideration of the relevan/master plans during sketch plan review is on a broad conceptual level, i.e, how aproposal compares to basic planning principles. As a development proposal moves from sketch plan to preliminary plan review, its conformance or lackthereof to aspects of the master plans may not necessarily remain static. EAGLE COUNTY COMWREHENSWE PLAN EDWARDS AREA COMMUNITY PLAN 27 06/04/07 x x x x x x x x x x x x This PUD Amendment application does not affect standards specified in the formerly approved PUD. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS . MIlE. TS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Phasing. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (11)] - The Preliminary Plan for PUD shall include a phasing plan for the development. If development of the PUD is proposed to occur in phases, then guarantees shall be provided for public improvements and amenities that are necessary and desirable for residents of the project, or that are of benefit to the entire County. Such public improvements shall be constructed with the first phase of the project, or, if this is not possible, then as early in the project as is reasonable. III Phasing Plan Provided? o Yes...[KJE] ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Common Recreation and Open Space. {Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)]-: The PUD shall comply with the following common recreation and open space standards. (a) MinimumArea. It is recommended that a minimum of25% of the total PUD area shall be devoted to open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi-public. In addition, thePUD shall provide a minimum of ten (10) acres of common recreation and usable open space lands for every one thousand (1,000) persons who are residents of the PUD. In order to calculate the number of residents of the PUD, the number of proposed dwelling units shall be multiplied by two and sixty-three hundredths (2.63), which is the average number of persons that occupy each dwelling Wlit in Eagle COWlty, as determined in the Eagle County Master Plan. (b) Areas that Do Not Count as Open Space. Parking and loading areas, street right-ol-ways, and areas with slopes greater than thirty (30) percent shall not count toward usable open space. (c) Areas that Count as Open Space. Water bodies, lands within critical wildlife habitat areas, riparian areas, and one hundred (100) yearfloodplains, as defined in these Land Use Regulations, that are preserved as open space shall count towards this minimum standard, even when they are not usable by or accessible to the residents of the PUD. All other open space lands shall be conveniently accessible from all occupied structures within the PUD. (d) Improvements Required. All common open space and recreational facilities shall be 'shown on the Preliminary Plan for PUD and shall be constructed and fully improved according to the development schedule establishedfor each development phase of the PUD. (e) Continuing Use and Maintenance. All privately owned common open space shall continue to conform to its intended use, as specified on the Preliminary Plan for PUD. To ensure that all the common open space identified in the PUD will be used as common open space, restrictions and/or 28 06/04/07 (f) covenants shall be placed in each deed to ensure their maintenance. and to prohibit the division of any common open space, Organization. If common open. space. is proposed to be maintained through an. association or nonprofit corporation, such organization shall manage all common open space and recreational and cultural facilities that are not dedicated to the public, and shall providefor.the maintenance, administration and operation of such land and any other land within the PUD not publicly owned, and secure adequate liability. insurance. on the land The association or nonprofit corporation shall be established prior to the sale oIanylots or units within the PUD,Membership in the association or nonprofit corporation shall be mandatory for .alllandowners within the P UD, Square feet Square feet Square feet Square feet % % % This PUD Amendment application does not affect standards specified in the formerly approved PUD. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X. MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS . MEE~ THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Natural Resource Protection. [Section 5-2~O.F3.e (13)] - The PUD shall consider the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards. Xl- According to the Division of Wildlife, the project is located adjacent to a mule deer and elk highway crossing area. They suggest any berm construction should be planned to provide for deer fencing and escape ra~p construction - the base of the berm should be of sufficient distance from any deer fence to prevent the deer from using the berm to jump over the fence. Accumulation of fill against the fencing should be avoided and all fill on previous berm construction should be removed and any damage to fencing should be repaired. 29 06/04/07 The now applauds the use of native plants but cllutions that it should be understood that mule deer and elk may utilize some to the more palatable plants, and that some of these species may actually draw wildlife to the landscaping and increase the risk of wildlife getting on to 1-70. They recommend that landscaping trees and shrubs be selected for their low palatability to big game. It may be necessary to fence the new vegetation to prevent wildlife from. damaging the plants. . See Condition #2. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS mE MAJORITY OFMINIMVM STAtIDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARDS: 5-280.B.3.e STANDARD: Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (1)] B The proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan and the FLUM of the Comprehensive Plan. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS ยท MEETS mE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS ,STANDARD: Consistent with Land Use. Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)J B The proposed subdivision shall comply with all of the standards of this Section and all otherprovisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards. X X X X X X X X X X X X Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1) Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2) Sign Regulations (Division 4-3) Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410) Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420) Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430) Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450) Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460) Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5) Noise and Vibration (Section 4-520) Smoke and Particulates (Section 4-530) 1 2 30 06/04/07 Heat, Glare, Radiation and Electrical Interference (Section 4-540) Storage of Hazardous and Non-hazardous Materials (Section 4-550) Water Quality Standards (Section 4-560) Roadway Standards (Section 4-620) Sidewalk and Trail Standards.(Section 4-630) X Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640) 3 X Drainage Standards (Section 4-650) X Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660) 4 X Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670) X Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680) X Sanitary Sewage Disposal-Standards (Section 4-690) X Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7) ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS . X MEETS THE MAJORTIY OF .MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS . STANDARD: SpatiiiI Pattern Shall Be Efficient. {Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)}- The proposed subdivision shall be located and designed to avoidereating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (1) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road extensions shall be consistent with the Eallle Countv Road CaDital lmorovements Plan. (2) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid.future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (3) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area 31 06/04/07 x x x x x This PUD Amendment application does not affect standards specified in the formerly approved PUD. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS ME.. ETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Suitability Jor Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)}- The property proposed to be subdivided shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-made. hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and .existing and probable future public improvements to the area. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS . MEEJ;S THE MAJORlTYOF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)]- The proposed subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. See prior discussion on Page 9 of this report. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS X MEETS THE MAJ. oRlTY OF MINIMUM.. STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS STANDARD: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)] The applicant shall demonstrate that the development proposed in the Sketch or Preliminary Plan will be provided adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection androads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police andfire protection, and emergency medical services. ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS . X MEEJ;S THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS 5-240.F .3.m. Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD. No substantial modification, removal, or release of the provisions of the plan shall be permitted except upon a finding by the County, following a public hearing called and held in accordance with the provisions of section 24-67-104(IXe) Colorado Revised Statutes that; (1) Modification. The modification, removal, or release is consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire Planned Unit Developments; (2) Adjacent Properties. The PUD Amendment does not effect, in a substantially adverse manner, either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the Planned Unit Development or the public interest; (3) Benefit. The PUD Amendment is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person. 32 06/04/07 ~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS X. MEETS THEMAJORIn'. OFMINIMUM STANDARDS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS 2. REFERRAL RESPONSES: Eagle County Engineering Department - Please refer to attachment dated April 2, 2007. I. Acceptance from all utilities that are affected by the proposed work must be included with this application. Please provide written approvals from aU utilities. 2. The limit of disturbanc~ is shown for the golf course side of the berm, but there is no limit of disturbance shown on the CDOTII-70 side of the berm. Please include on future plans the limit of disturbance on all sides of the berm. 3. A grading permit or permits will be necessary prior to commencing any dirt work including the stockpiling of any additional material that is brought in. Any stockpiles must be contained by acceptable best management practices (BMP). 4. Astorm water management plan (SWMP.required for disturbance of areas greater than one acre) must be completed in accordance with the Clean Water Act as administered by the Colorado Discharge Permit System. This must accompany the grading permit application. 5. Sections of the berms are shown with a 1.5: I slope. This is steeper than the steepest allowable slope as defmed by the International Building Code (2: 1) (Appendix J). Fill slopes steeper than 2: 1 shall be . justified by a soils report prepared and sealed by a licensed engineer. Provide an explanation of how landscaping and maintenance will be accomplished on slopes this steep. 6. Our inspection of the site plans suggest that there will be .berms or combinations of berm and fence in excess of the eight (8) feet allowed by regulation, in some areas reaching nearly 30 feet. According to Eagle County Land Use Regulations (ECLUR 3-340.<:.4), any fence, hedge, wall, berm, or any combination offences, walls and berms shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height (as measured from natural grade at any point on the side ofthe berm that faces an adjacent property). Please provide an explanation for the extent of this proposal's deviation from height limitations set forth in the ECLUR and include this in the list of deviations as described at the end of this memo. 7. The proposed berms vary in length with the longest being around 1,100 feetlong. The ECLUR (3..;340.C.4) states that any fence, hedge, wall, berm, or any combination of fences, walls and berms shall not exceed 150 feet in length. Please provide an explanation of the deviation from ECLUR for berm lengths that this project is proposing and include this in the list of deviations as described below. 8. At station 15+00, the landscaping encroaches on COOT ROW. Written app~val from CDOTis required to allow any encroachment into tbe ROW. 9. There was no irrigation plan provided for any of the landscaping to the west of station 41 +00 (from 0+00 through 41 +00). Please provide more details explaining how the landscaping in this section will be irrigated and maintained. 10. The proposed landscaping easement was not shown onthe plans. This must be shown to illustrate that the proposed easement is adequate for the desired improvements. 11. The proposed easement is not defined as such on the exhibit to be recorded. In addition to the amendment to the PUD, the Easement Exhibit must spell out the purpose and allowable uses for the easement. 12. As was requested at the first completeness check, the title commitment is still missing from this application. As such, we cannot complete our review of this file until the title commitment is provided. After reviewing this file, we realized tbatthis application was never completed and are still waiting for the title commitment and approvals frOIll the owners of any easements that will be affected by this proposal. Until these items are provided to the Engineering Department, we are unable to complete our review. 33 06/04/07 All of these issues shall be addressed prior to this application moving forward. Please feel free to meet with uS to discuss any of these comments. Any approvals that must be acquired shall be provided to the Engineering Department to complete this file. We must also receive updated drawings for any changes that are made to address these comments, including grading, landscape, bennlfence, and easement changes. With regards to deviations that you are seeking from the ECLUR, please provide a list with the following information for each deviation - the governing regulation, requested deviation, and reason for the deviation. The grading issues do not meet standards in the International Building Code (mC). The mc defines the steepest allowable slopes as a 2: I slope. This is the standard to which we review grading plans, and we require a sealed soils report from a licensed engineer stating that the proposed slope is stable. Slopes steeper than 2:1 are generally considered a safety hazard due to the risk of the slope sliding. . See Condition No.1 and No.3 Staff note: The.bulk of comments from Engineering have been satisfied. DOW - Please refer to attachment dated March 27, 2007 The project is located adjacent to a mule deer and elk highway crossing area. . FENCING: It is unclear if the proposed berm and fencing will abut the current 8 foot high wildlife fencing on the east end of the property. Any gaps in the fencing could result in increased wildlife/vehicle accidents as wildlife is funneled to these locations. Any berm construction should be planned to provide for the construction of deer fencing and escape ramps. The base of the berm should be sufficient distance from any deer fence to prevent wildlife from using the berm in an effort to jump over the fencing. The fencing should be protected duing construction and to prevent fill from accumulating against the fencing. There are several areas where the previous berm construction has resulted in fill accumulating against the fencing. This fill should be removed and any damage to the fence repaired. . PLANTS: The use of native plants is applauded but is should be understood thatmule deer and elk may utilize some of the more palatable plant. The list of evergreen/deciduous shrubs have several highly palatable species (i.e. mountain mahogany, serviceberry, chokecherry). These species may actually draw wildlife to the landscaping increasing the risk of wildlife gettmg on to 1-70. The OOW would suggest that landscaping trees and shrubs be selected for their low palatability to big game. It may be necessary to fence the new vegetation to prevent wildlife from damaging the plants. See Condition No.2 CDOT - Please refer to attachment dated March 27, 2007. As I discussed with you our concern with this project is the slopes adjacent to the 1-70 right of way. Our experience with slopes 1 V:2H and steeper have shown difficulty in establishing vegetation in this area. The lack of vegetation may result in sediment runoff into the 1-70 ROWand subsequent maintenance issue for COOT. Please note this comment is from the COOT Eagle Residency not the Regional Grand Junction office which may have more comments. See Condition No.3 Eagle County Environmental Health - Please refer to attachment dated March 27, 2007. A Dust Suppression Plan and Erosion Control! Storm Water Management Plan shall be included with the grading permit and contain detail sufficient to evaluate conformance to the Site DevelopmentStandards and Industrial & Commercial Performance Standards. Said Plans shall include contact information for the person available at all times and responsible to immediately address public complaints or compliance issues. No grading permit will be issued without these plans having been approved by Eagle County Environmental Health and Engineering Departments. The approved Plans must be kept on-site, and implemented at all times. Failure to adhere to the implementation of these plans shall result in cessation of work until compliance has been restored. 34 06/04/07 . See Condition No.3 and No.4 Additional Referral Agencies - This proposal was referred to the following agencies with no response received as of this writing: . Eagle Cowzty: Attorney's Office . Colorado State: CDOT (Grand Jwzction Office) . Federal: Holy Cross Electric C. SUMMARY ANALYSIS: Benefits: The proposed project benefits the property owners within the Cordillera Valley Club. Furthermore it may also be construed that the substantial landscaping being proposed on the south side of the berm and the noise mitigation barriers would conceivably benefit the greater Edwards vicinity. Disadvantages: The proposed project primarily benefits the property owners within the Cordillera Valley Club. The visual impacts ofthe project will impact the 1-70 corridor and those viewing from the south. In addition, the trucks that will transport a substantial amount of earth for the berms have the potential to create a negative impact on Beard Creek Road and the neighborhood in general. D. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OPTIONS: 1. Approve the [PUD AMENDMENT] request without conditions if it is determined that the petition will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and the proposed use is attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 2. Deny the [PUD AMENDMENT] request if itis determined that the petition will adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and/or the proposed use is not attuned with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is not in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). 3. Table the [PUD AMENDMENT] request if additional information is required to fully evaluate the petition. Give specific direction to the petitioner and staff. 4. Approve the [PUD AMENDMENT] request with conditions and/or performance standards if it is determined that certain conditions and/or performance standards are necessary to ensure public, health, safety, and welfare and/or enhances the attunement of the use with the immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans). DISCUSSION: Chairman Menconi opened the discussion. Ms. De Graaf stated that the applicant was present and would be presenting a recap of the proposal and project revisions. Pedro Campos, Landscape Architect, VAG, Inc. presented a PowerPoint presentation. He explained the approach of the project as a public benefit. The applicant believes the project sets a positive precedent in addressing 1-70 impacts while balancing public and private interest. The applicant seeks to establish the regulatory framework that would allow the project to proceed with final design, grading permit applications, engineering review and fmalization of easement agreements with the golf course owner. He presented aerial view slides of the vicinity and surrounding land uses. He explained the existing conditions and site constraints. The revised proposal proposes 850 LF of 8' fencing (66% reduction). The applicant believes that placing 8-foot fences atop berms would help achieve maximum screening objectives, still below original engineered wall scenarios. Fences would 35 06/04/07 remain in the areas that no berms are possible. Cost of deleted fencing would be applied toward additional landscaping. Fencing material would be environmentally friendly building products. The applicants believe the remaining fencing is required to meet the CVC's objectives. No single segment would exceed more than 150 feet in length. In areas 8 and 9 two ISO' fence panels would remain. He presented the 17 conditions proposed by the applicant. Chairman Menconi asked that staff chime in during the reading of the conditions. if there were any issues. Commissioner Runyon wondered about the slope gradients of 1:5 verses 2: I in staffs recommended condition. Mr. Campos stated that the difference in slope would be considered in areas were fencingwas deleted such as areas 8 and 6. . Ms. De Graaf apologized to the board and stated that she hadn't seen the applicants proposed conditions and wasn't able to bring them together in a language that made more sense. Chairman Menconi wondered if they should refer to the staff recommended conditions. Ms. De Graaf stated that the applicant had incorporated staff's recommended conditions with their own. Chairman Menconi stated that condition 4 seemed. a bit cQnfusing and wondered if the language was adequate. Mr. Morris stated that the language was ambiguous. Chairman Menconi stated that he would like the maintenance plan be accepted by the Director of the Community Development Department. Mr. Campos stated that any maintenance plan would have to conform to the CVC's design review board. Commissioner Fisher wondered if there would be a break in the fencing in area 1. Mr. Campos stated that there would not be a break in the fencing but there would be alternating stepping of the vertical elements of the fence. Commissioner Runyon' asked if the reduction of fencing included area 1. Mr. Campos stated that it did not include area I. Area 1 is truly a noise mitigation area and was designed to absorb and achieve a certain standard. Chairman Menconi stated that after reviewing the applicant's 18 conditions there seems to be some editing to staffs conditions 1, 4 and 8. Chairman Menconi opened and closed public comment, as there was none. Commissioner Runyon wondered about the applicant's condition 12 regarding the CVCIMETRO funding of $20,000 dollars toward the design of the bike path. Mr. Campos stated that the path would cost a lot more than $20,000 dollars and would need to be coordinated with the appropriate entities. He does however foresee drainage issues with CDQ-T. Rick Pirog, President of the CVC Metropolitan District spoke. He stated that they would support the bike path but they don't believe it should be their burden to build it. They would be willing to make a contribution to design and facilitate the project. Wally Carey, President of the Property Owners Association spoke. He agrees with Mr. Pirog's earlier statements. He stated that they are in favor of the bike path but he doesn't know the cost. He believes the path is a great public benefit and something that would improve the golf course. They willsupport and do everything they can to make it happen short of making a commitment that they would totally fund the effort. Chairman Menconi wondered about the benefit of a trail that dead ends after 1.5 miles. Mr. Compos stated that a trail would provide a safe route to the medical center for the residents of Lake Creek Village and others living along hwy 6. Mr. Carey stated that he believed there were plans in place for the ECO trail to continue on the north side of the Eagle River along the property that Cordillera controls for the fishing rights. Ms. De Graaf stated that the trail would provide a connection not just for pedestrians but bikers that currently use Hwy 6. Mr. Morris stated that he is concerned with the enforceability of a condition, which simply calls for support. Condition number 9 appears to be appropriate because it references the standards for trail construction set out in the Eagle County land use regulations. When he hears that there is a contribution of $20,000.00 he has no idea ifit's a meaningful contribution or a dropin the bucket. In addition, there is no mention of what the trail would be like once constructed. 36 06/04/07 Ms. De Graaf stated that staff believes condition 8 is a reasonable condition and disagrees with the applicant saying they couldn't facilitate the easement. Mr. Campos stated that the condition 8 did not include CDOT. Chairman Menconi stated that the development of a trail goes beyond his original request. Doing a trail could mean hundreds of thousands of dollars. It is not what he anticipated in terms of a fair trade. Trying to get secured easement by several different parties is not something he had considered. ' Mr. Pirog stated that if the County can secure the area needed for the bike path, they would support it if the County could secure the other requirements to implement the trail. He doesn't think it's appropriate to place the burden on them to secure an agreement from Holy Cross. Commissioner Runyon stated that he has no trouble with the berms and landscaping but he does not want to approve 1,700 feet offence. Heunderstands the applicant's desire but he doesn't want to set a precedent. It is against the spirit of open space and the recreational community: Chainnan Menconi stated that he'd like to work out a balance to compromise. Commissioner Fisher stated that she agrees with Commissioner Runyon. She's not keen on the fence. She wondered if the interstate noise would be thrown up and over the fence to reach at a higher level of the Cordillera Valley Club. Mr. Pirog stated that the fencing material that will.be used to build the barrier in Area 1 has some absorptive qualities. When they took a vote on the project, the people in the highlands of the Valley Club were just as much in favor as the people closer to the improvements. Commissioner Fisher stated thatshe appreciates the applicant's effort to collaborate for the bike path. She suggested that if a path were not successful that she'd like to see the $20,000 dollars be converted into the ECO trails program to be used elsewhere in the Edwards area that would border or have. some affect to the Cordillera Valley Club. Mr. Pirog stated that the reallocation of path funding would have to be approved. Commissioner Fisher stated that she appreciates the highway cleanup and would like to see it continue. She would like the cleanup on the north side of the interstate to take place at least twice a year. She has concerns with condition 7 that addresses tree replacement. She would like all dead trees replaced indefinitely on both sides of the barrier. She suggested that construction traffic be restricted to Monday through Friday, 8 to 4. This is a first step and she is willing to move forward if it can add some ambiance to the overall quality of the Cordillera Valley Club and be done in a way that is tasteful. She would like there to be more discussion regarding. fence color. She appreciates the reduction in fencing along the ridge line and hopes that the berm and the heights will be able to accomplish their goals. She would . like it to be an attractive amenity rather than an eye sore. Chairman Menconi stated that he is in favor of moving forward. He believes the Cordillera Metro District has done a very goodjob in the detail and aspects of the project. He has weighed the benefits to the community and that's why he's in favor of the project. He would like to make sure condition I to include engineering approval above 2: 1 as recommended. He would like condition 4 to include that a maintenance plan must be fully developed prior to a grading permit application and approved by the director of the County's Community Development Department. He further stated that cgndition 7 should be changed to address Commissioner Fisher's concerns for replacement of dead trees and that replacement is done indefinitely and it would be incorporated in the maintenance plan. A trail would be an amenity but he would like condition 13 to emphasize the support by the CVC, POA and Metro District for a regional bike path and that the money be used towards the bike path or applied to the Eagle River Preserve Trail Fund. Commissioner Fisher suggested that greater defmition be added to Condition 15 regarding days and hours of operation. . He believes that the condition suggested by the Community Development Department and provided in a memo from Ms. De Graaf requiring the applicant to install a paved bicycle trail is erroneous and would be too costly. Commissioner Fisher wondered if there were any plans to spruce up the current landscaping. Mr. Campos stated that 16 acres of new seed is planned. The plants currently in neglect will be spruced up and maintained by the new irrigation system. Chairman Menconi asked Mr. Pirog and Carey if they had any questions or comments with regards to the 17 conditions. Mr. Pirog stated that the ,conditions appear to be well thought out and they are ready to move forward. Mr. Carey stated that the conditions are doable and fair. Chairman Menconi stated that he appreciated their cooperation. 37 06/04/07 Commissioner Fisher moved that the Board approve File No. PDA-00067 Cordillera Vall~y Club West End Noise Mitigation and LandscapinglBerming project, incorporating the Staff fmdings, and conditions 1-17 as outlined and with the understanding that the final information will be presented in a resolution for review and approval. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 2 to 1 with Commissioner Runyon voting against. Commissioner Runyon stated that he was totally in favor of the berming but fears that their will be more people requesting the same type of noise mitigation as the interstate traffic increases. He is disturbed that others don't see the correlation. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS: 1. All slopes greater than 2: 1 shall receive appropriate erosion control blankets / and/or other treatment or devices adequate to control erosion. For such slopes, CVC must provide the County Engineer with a sealed soils report from a professionally licensed geotechnical engineer stating such grading is possible and what mitigation measures are recommended. Such report and CVC's choice of recommended measures must be approved by the County Engineer. 2. All site work, including fence, wall or berm construction and landscaping, must adhere to now recommendations for type of plants and. fencing. 3. An Irrigation Plan must be fully developed by CVGand approved by the County Engineer prior to grading permit application, and water for such irrigation must be from a non-potable water source. The Irrigation Plan must include a temporary system for all seeded areas, and a permanent system for all trees / shrubs. 4. A Maintenance Plan must be fully developed prior to grading permit application. The maintenance plan must be developed to a level that meets the approval of the Community Development Director. .The Maintenance Plan must address replacement of dead plant material adequately and for the perpetuity of the project. S. Per Eagle County Department of Environmental Health a Dust Suppression plan and Erosion Control. and Storm Water Management Plan must be provided prior to the grading permit application. The said plans shall contain contact information that will respond immediately to address public complaints/concerns and compliance issues. No grading permit will be issued without these places having been approved by the Eagle County Environmental Health and Engineering departments. The approved plans must be kept on- site. 6. The PUD Guide shall be amended to reflect the landscaping in Section III. Land Use Designation F. Golf Course 2). Permitted Uses III. F .2.0. 7. Prior to the grading permit application a Landscape Guarantee shall be in place per LUR Section 5-240 h(3)(a). The initial landscape guarantee from the contractor shall call for replacement of all dead trees for a minimum period of three years from the project acceptance by the County. All dead material beyond three years will be the responsibility of CVC per the maintenance plan approved by Eagle County Community Development. 8. The easement from Valley GolfLLC to theCVC Metro District shall be completed, approved by the Eagle County Attorney and recorded prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit from Eagle County. 38 06/04/07 9. The Noise Barrier will be located exclusively. at the far west end of the project at Area. I and be heavily landscaped facing 1-70. The minimum amount of length will be used to achieve the desired screening, anticipated to be 800 to 900 LF. Heavily landscaped shall mean (14) 14' tall spruce trees planted every 100' lineal feet in front of. the noise barrier facing interstate 70, in addition to plant material already identified for area 1 in preliminary design documents submitted by CVC as part of its application to the County. 10. The use of Visual Screen Fences shall be limited to a total of 850 LF, and a maximum 8' tall. No single segment offence shall exceed ISO' in width without a break of30' minimum between fence segments; The total 850' LF offence must be located in Areas 6, 7, 8, or 9. 11. All wood to be used in the noise mitigation project shall be Certified wood. 12. 25% of newly created berms are to receive a wildflower seed mix, facing the interstate 70. 13. CVC POA and CVC Metropolitan District will provide the County with a letter of written support for a future Eagle County regional bike path and associated easement along the .south side of the newly created berm. CVC POA and CVC Metropolitan District will place $20,000 into a fund for the exclusive purpose for the design of the path, or to be used as part of the Eagle River Preserve trails fund in the event that eve not. expend such funds for such purpose within a period of (l) one year from the date of the approved BoCC Resolution. 14. The project will be in complete compliance and consistency with the County's Landscape Standards, and the project is to be designed as a model large scale xeriscape landscape. 15. The Construction of the project is anticipated to occur over a 6 month period, with the earthwork activities to be restricted to a 90 day period, beginning at the time of grading permit issuance. Traffic Control will be provided at Beard Creek Road in the vicinity of the Shaw Cancer Center. Construction would need to adhere to evc Metro I DRB Regulations and monitored and controlled by Lone Star Security. 16. CVC will provide a financial match for an interpretive display at the CDOT scenic overlook and will adopt two miles of highway clean up. 17. Except as otherwise modified by this development permit, all material representation made by the applicant in this application and in public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. Attest: There being no further business before a liourned until June 19,2007. 39 06/04/07