Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/04/07
Present:
Am Menconi
Sara Fisher
Peter RunyOn
Bruce Baumgartner
Bryan Treu
Robert Morris
Kathy Scriver
PUBLIC HEARING
June 4, 2007
Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
County Manager
County Attorney
Deputy County Attorney
Deputy Clerk to the Board
This being a scheduled Public Hearing, the following items were presented to the Board of County
Coinmissioners for their consideration:
GENERAL FUND
21ST CENTURY PHOTO SUPPLY
360 TRAINING
A 1 BAlL BONDS
ABBOTT LABORATORIES
ACCESS ROARING FORK
ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
ADV ANTAGENETWORK SYSTEMS
AED EVERYWHERE
AFFILIATED CREDIT SERVICE
ALAMOSA COUNTY
ALL PRO FORMS INC
ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY.
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC
AMERICAN SOLUTIONS
AMERIGAS
AMY BERENS
ANN LOPER
ANN MUNCASTER
ANTLERS VETERINARY
APPLIANCE DOCTORS INC
APWA CONFERENCE
ARCHITECTURAL COMPUTER
ARMY & FACTORY SURPLUS
ARTCRAFT SIGNS
ARTWORKS, THE
ASPEN GLOBAL CHANGE
A V TECH ELECTRONICS INC.
AVON CENTER ATBEA VER CK
AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS
B & H SPORTS
BJROWE
BAILEYS
BALCOMB AND GREEN
BASALT QUICK LUBE
BASALT SANITATION DIST
BC INTERIORS
BENTLEY SYSTEMS INC
BERGLUND RUlH
BERNICE WHITE
BERTHOD MOTORS
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REFUND
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND
SERVICE
REFUND
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
1
06/04/07
161.15
25.00
35.10
202.10
5,000.00
1,250.00
234.47
178.00
617.95
37.10
1,186.34
36.93
748.00
124.10
2,261.03
319.90
78.00
15.00
25.00
80.00
150.00
1,460.00
5.98
16.00
2,233.00
745.00
42,985.65
4,406.21
5,317.22
24.50
37.26
132.00
4,781.43
45.25
139.50
1,632.00
120.00
113.00
14.70
2,952.84
BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS
BETHANY VAN WYK
BMHS PROJECT GRADUATION
BONNIE VOOT
BOYD COFFEE COMPANY
BRA VOl VAIL VALLEY MUSIC
BRUCE BAUMGARTNER
CAACO
CALmRE PRESS INC
CARDINAL HEALTH
CARLIN OODGE
CARMEN WZOY0-VELEZ
CASA OF THE CONTINENTAL
CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY
CATHY ZEEB
CDAC
CDW
CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING
CENTURYTEL
CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE
CGAIT
CHARM TEX
CHEMATOX INC.
CHERYL THOMAS
CHERYLE A WOOLSEY
CIMA
CINGULAR WIRELESS
CLEAN OESIGNS
CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION
CO DEPT AGRICULTURE
CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH &
CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND
CO SECRETARY OF STATE
CO STATE TREASURER
COLLEEN WIRTH .
COWRADO CHAPTER OF ICC
COWRADO CORRECTIONAL
COWRADO COUNTIES INC
COWRADO GUN SERVICE
COWRADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS
COLORADO PROFESSIONALS IN
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH
COLUMBINE MARKET
COMFORT INN
CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING
CONTRACT PHARMACY SERVICE
COPY PLUS
CORPORATE EXPRESS
CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING
COWBOY CATERING
CUMMINS ALLISON CORP
OAL Y PROPERTY SERVICES
DAN CORCORAN PLS
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
847.21
89.91
1,000.00
20.25
729.26
5,000.00
44.78
540.00
796.00
1,177.20
19,246.00
142.56
2,000.00
279.46
194.00
346.50
44.99
3,302.97
11,578.48
3,177.24
500.00
1,120.44
80.00
160.97
8.36
2,265.QO
444.19
355.91
150.00
365.00
640.00
954.25
30.00
3,817.00
30.94
70.00
204.00
670.00
1,218.96
560.00
22,455.89
180.00
14,318.68
11,926.40
22.97
562.00
2,418.63
5,000.81
33.99
5,917.39
122.66
4,690.20
1,012.68
6,899.76
1,380.00
2
06/04/07
DAVID KEKAR
DEBBIE RODRIQUEZ
DENVER CHECKWRITER, INC.
DENVER PARTS DEPOT
DEPARTMENT OF LAW
DICK BOURRET
DL T SOLUTIONS, INC.
DOCTORS ON CALL
DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP
DON OLSEN
DOREEN CONSTANINE
DOROTHY KENLON
DUFFORD WALDECK & MILBURN
E-S PRESS/PMB #233
EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC
EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL
EAGLE EMBROIDERY INC
EAGLE PHARMACY
EAGLERJVER WATER AND
EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED CNL
EAGLE RIVER YOUTH COAL.
EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE
EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING
EAGLE XM
EARLINE BRONN
EASYCHAlR MAGAZINE
ECONOMIC COUNCIL OF EAGLE
ED GRANGE
EDWARADS ROTARY
EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER
EDWARDS STATION LLC
EMC2
EMPLOYERS COUNCIL SERVICE
EPS DESIGN AND PRINT
ERIC LOVGREN
ERIN DOWD
ESRI
EVERETT FAMILY FUNERAL
EVHS PROJECT GRADUATION
FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY
FEATHER PETROLEUM CO
FEDERAL EXPRESS
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC
FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES
FIRST INDEMNITY OF AMER.
FLAT TOPS ELECTRIC
FLORIDA MICRO
FORINASH KATHLEEN
FRAN PAGE
FSH COMMUNICA nONS LLC
FURNITURE LEISURE
G JCT CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE
GALLS INCORPORATED
GEORGIE C ZINDA
OIRSH AND ROTTMAN
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND
79.19
14.00
5,725.00
570.46
100.00
32.40
5,892.61
105.00
96.38
I 1.27
12.00
4.80
3,050.00
3,900.00
17,021.00
2,933,19
575.27
299.91
571.85
150,000.00
20,000.00
1,125.00
3,310.00
1,720.00
21.00
17,000.00
37,500.00
144.00
500.00
13.49
300.00
231.68
4,075.00
502.60
242.36
224.78
1,425.00
540.00
1,000.00
3,058.18
4.50
630.53
33.53
720.70
1,128.95
266.40
14,736.00
75.68
20.00
70.00
1,649.68
18,347.00
13,129.50
313.50
34.20
3
06/04/07
GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY
GRACE FINNEY
GRAINGER INCORPORATED
GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND
HAL BURNS
HANSEN STEVE R
HART INTERCIVIC
HAZELLE GONTER
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
HELP DESK TECHNOLOGY
HENRY SCHEIN
HEWLETT PACKARD
HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS
HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES
HILL TOP INN
HOGAN & HARTSON
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
HOPKlNSMEDlCAL PRODUCTS
HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
HUMAN RESOURCE PLUS INC
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE US
HV AC SUPPLY
IACREOT
ICC
IDENTIX
IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS
INTERGRAPH CORPORATION
INTERIOR PLANTSCAPES
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
INTERNAP NETWORK SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION
JACK KENT MOTORS
JACKIE CRUMB
JAN 0 WESTMAN
JARA DIVERSIFIED SERVICES
mT'S CUSTOM SILK
JENNY WOOD
JILL HUNSAKER
JIM DUKE
JOES W ALLBAORD & SUPPLY
JOHN BADE
JOSIE SCHULTZ
mSTIN FINESTONE
KARA BETIIS, CORONER
KAREN HOEGER
KATHY BARTA
KATHY CALTON
KAY VINCENT
KELLY MILLER
KENNEDY INDUSTRIES INC
KESSLER MARY J
KIMBALL INTERNATIONAL
KINDER MORGAN INC
KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC
LASER JUNCTION
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
'y
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
125.00
112.20
346.60
127.24
5,000.00
738.96
10,365.00
28.80
84.04
686.31
300.14.
3,567.00
362.45
28.95
198.00
4,706.25
26,319.88
430.03
25.65
3,750.00
22.95
15.84
790.00
28.00
1,887.00
175.00
895.00
100.00
200.00
2,427.40
275.00
480.00
96.39
25.20
100.92
65.00
219.75
381.14
21.60
339.15
12.00
6.30
121.00
138.25
24.89
90.00
236.95
215.25
4.21
351.84
30.45
1,468.73
13,496.96
2,700.00
219.90
4
06/04/07
LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC
LEONA PERKINS
LIANA CARLSON MOORE
LmERTY ACQUlSmONS
LIGHTNING SERVICES
LINDA JOHNSON
LINDBLOOM PHOTOGRAPHY INC
LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR
LORI SIEFERS
LORIE CRAWFORD
LORRAINE VASQUEZ
LUCY BARKER
M CECILIA ZALINGER
MAIN AUTO PARTS
MARIA ANJIER
MARKS PLUMBING PARTS
MARLENE MC CAFFERTY
MARTHA SUTHERLAND
MBIA
MCCAULLEY REBECCA T
MEADOW MOUNTAIN PLUMBING
MEDI BADGE, INC.
MEET THE WILDERNESS
METROPOLITAN PATHOLOGISTS
MICAELA MENDOZA
MICHAEL MCCLINTON
MICRO PLASTICS
MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP
MID V ALLEY METROPOLITAN
MIKE BAIR
MOBILE VISION
MONUMENT PHARMACY
MOORE
MOORE MEDICAL CORP
MOTOSAT
MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS
MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT
MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS
MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES
MTN VALLEY DEVELOPENTAL
MURRAY DAHL
MWI VETERNJARY SUPPLY CO
NATIONAL ANIMAL CONTROL
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
NELSON LABORATORIES
NEVES UNIFORMS
NORDIC REFRIGERATION
NORTHWEST COLORADO LEGAL
NRA
NRC BROADCASTING, INC.
NU CARE PHARMACUETICALS
OC TANNER
OFFICE DEPOT
OMNI DISTRIBUTION INC
OSM DELIVERY LLC
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
1,301.50
784.26
45.36
30.00
50.00
14.40
600.00
242.12
64.50
136.08
98.00
145.20
21.47
8.71
103.20
158.19
81.90
18.00
5,251.19
45.74
1,749.84
57.45
500.00
108.00
51.70
16.20
18.74
79.00
373.14
89.10
484.95
41.00
11,715.00
784.54
1,133.60
279.00
285.98
595.00
1,629.37
10,000.00
8,268.22
417.06
990.00
1,580.00
359.40
229.s0
786.62
4,000.00
525.00
4,936.00
39.88
3,304.70
165.56
2,249.00
484.32
5
06/04/07
PAINT BUCKET THE
PAPER WISE
PARK COUNTY SHERIFF OFF.
PAT NOLAN
PATRICIA HAMMON
PET PICK UPS
PETER FREIDRICH
PF COMAC
PHYLISS ROUNDS
PHYLLIS.KELLY
PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED
POCA TELLO SUPPLY DEPOT
PORTER AUTO BODY INC
POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH
PRICE DIGESTS
PRlNTRITE
PRO FORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT
PROGRESSIVE METHODS INC
PRO} GRADUATION BASALT HS
PROSHINE SALES & SERVICE
PSS,INC
PURCHASE POWER
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS
QUILL CORPORATION
QWEST
R & S NORTHEAST LLC
REBECCA WHEELERSBURG
RED CANYON HIGH SCHOOL
RED RIBBON PROJECT
REEFARRELL
REGALIA MANUFACTURING CO
REGIONAL HAZ MAT ASSOCIAT
REGISTER TAPES UNLIMITED
RENEE DUBUISSON
RESOURCE CEN'f1ER OF EAGLE
RESOURCES
REYNA TRUJILLO
ROARING FORK F AMIL Y
ROBERT B EMERSON, PC
ROBERTA E ARNDT
ROBIN COCK
ROCKY MOUNTAIN FOOD
ROCKY MOUNTAIN RECORDS
ROCKY MOUNTAIN REPROGRAPH
RODOLFO REVELES ATTORNEY
ROLLY ROUNDS
RON WOLFE
ROEDl WATER & POWER
RYAN SANDS
S CORPORATION INC
SALVATION ARMY
SARA CROSS
SARA J FISHER
SA YNOMORE PROMOTIONS
SCAN AIR OF COLORADO INC
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE.
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REFUND
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
13.58
1,998.00
26,685.00
106.27
48.60
1,338.38
27.72
395.00
24.00
30.88
4,612.00
4,519.07
1,380.60
437.85
119.95
367.45
469.55
279.00
1,009.00
1,219.00
857.65
6,963.26
747.54
450.16
6,172.23
113,98
148.42
3,500.00
1,000.00
39.73
116.93
35,923.48
750.00
120:04
15,000.00
28,738.57
214.51
8,500.00
114.00
902.91
16.24
135.00
189.50
3,023.99
9.80
41.40
44.55
10,000.00
209.99
10,959.43
10,000.00
181.96
514.97
1,692.26
1,761.56
6
06/04/07
SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP
SCHUTZMAN COMPANY, INC.
SCHW AAB
SECURITY TRANSPORT
SERVICEMASTER CLEAN
SHAMROCK FOODS CORP
SHAPINS ASSOCIATES
SHAREE WETTSTEIN
SHEAFFER KAREN
SHERI MINTZ
SHESHUNOFF ~FORMATION
SIGNATURE SIGNS
SILVER LEAF SUITES
SINTON DAIRY COMPANY
SJRCHlE FINGERPRINT
SMALL CHAMPIONS
SNOWBOARO OUTREACH SCTY
SNOWHlTE LINEN
SOFTWARE SPECTRUM
SOUTHERN POLICE INSTITUTE
SPRINGMAN & BRADEN
SPSS
SQUAD FITTERS
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT
STATE OF COLORADO
STEAMMASTER
STEPHANIE GLENWRIGHT
STEPHEN ELLSPERMAN
STERICYCLE INC
SUE MOTT
SUPERIOR ALARM
SUPPORT PAYMENT
SUSPENSE FUND
SYDNEY PITTMAN
TAD DEGAN
TAMMI MATTHEWS
TASER INTERNATIONAL
TCC CONTRACTORS
TERRI JOHNSON
THE BUODY PROGRAM
THE FLOWER CART
THOMAS COLE
THOMAS F FARRELL
THOMSON WEST GROUP
TIM LOSA
TOTAL ACCESS GROUP
TOWN OF BASALT
TOwN OF EAGLE
TRANECOMPANY
TRI COUNTY FIRE
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC
UC REGENTS CASHIER OFFICE
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
UNITED SITE SERVICES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REFUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REFUND
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
164.82
338.3 I
22.73
16,470.81
2,991.00
5,234.71
3,711.32
32.40
29.26
275.31
465.00
190.00
259.62
1,051.05
152.87
5,000.00
5,000.00
175.58
2,081.34
1,300.00
21.10
2,199.00
69.00
700.001472.56
2,887.50
180.00
43.34
1,024.78
87.00
639.00
363.00
217,098.17
7.20
91.90
292.59
900.00
708.00
123.25
5,000.00
214.00
74.52
~15.60
4,385.71
55.89
239.50
122.58
2,690.65
1,226.00
2,353.00
9,662.00
663.76
31,946.58
481.51
107.51
7
06/04/07
UNITED STATES POLICE
UNITED WAY OF EAGLE
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINATTI
UNlVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC
US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS
US FOODSERVICE INC
VAlL DAlLY THE
VAlL ELECTRONICS
VAlL LOCK AND KEY
VAIL MOUNTAIN COFFEE
VAlL RESORTS MANAGEMENT
VAlL VALLEY CHAARITABLE
. VAlL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR
VAlL VALLEY PARTNERSHIP
VALLEY LUMBER
VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL
VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY
VERIFICATIONS INC
VERIZON WIRELESS,
VIRGINIA BAlR
VISA CARD SERVICES
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS
WECMRD
WELLS FARGO
WEST V AlL SHELL
WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY
WESTERN LAND GROUP INC
WESTERN SLOPE BAR
WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES
WILLIAM G HORLBECK PC
WILLIAM LOPER
WORKPLACE RESOURCE OF CO
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY
WYNTTAYLOR
XCEL ENERGY
XEROX CORPORATION
XEROX OMNIFAX
Y AMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC
YOUR PERSONAL CHEF
ZASTROW DENTISTRY LLC
PAYROLL FOR APRIL
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
PAYROLL EXPEND
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
REFUND
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
PAYROLL 8 &9
190.00
20.00
648.00
709.00
21,768.44
7,02226
2,207.20
2,655.20
316.22
82.00
343.75
5,000.00
211.20
150,000.00
455.53
1,456.25
1,980.75
2,680.35
4,055.33
165.60
41,481.34
1,325.98
1,206.30
10,700.00
574,597.86
262.00
2,190.00
362.94
203.85
466.07
4,841.00
9.00
155.13
43.80
29.80
624.79
8,780.02
529.56
99.10
799.00
500.00
821,212.62
2,907,355.58
ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND
AMERIGAS
CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING
CENTRAL SERVICESIEC
COLORADO L T AP
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS
COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC
COPY PLUS
OOUBLETREE HOTEL
EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING
EAGLE PHARMACY
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
1,096.47
260.68
120.16
300.00
719.59
236.00
71.97
531.12
37.25
42.76
8
06/04/07
FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG
FRED PRYOR SEMINARS
GRANO JUNCTION PIPE AND
HEWLETT PACKARD
HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
INTERMOUNTAIN SWEEPER
INTERWESTSAFETYSUPPLY
JAKE J STULL
KERRY O'NEILL
KINDER MORGAN INC
NAPA AUTO PARTS-CARBONDLE
ROARING FORK VALLEY COOP
SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION
THERESA LADENBURGER
TOWN OF GYPSUM
TRI COUNTY FIRE
US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS
VAlL ELECTRONICS
VISA CARD SERVICES
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES
WHITI AKER LANDSCAPING
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY
XEROX CORPORATION
Y AMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
PAYROLL FOR APRIL
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
PAYROLL 8 &9
31,681.77
256.00
50.25
2,507,00
581.65
7,900.00
231.52
75.00
24.00
753.83
18.50
46.55
2,936.34
32.44
495.07
138.70
726.56
371.09
412.02
45.46
33.70
505.00
531.04
605.51
159.56
53.92
76,279.77
130,868.25
SOCIAL SERVICES FUND
AMY DAVIS
ANGELICA DUQUE
BETHANIE LINDAL
BLANCA SANCHEZ
CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, M.A.
CENTRAL SERVICES/EC
CENTURYTEL
CHARLENE WHITNEY
CO DEPT OF HUMAN SERVICES
COLORADO COUNTIES INC
COMFORT INN
CYNTHIA AGUILAR
DARLENE MONTANO
DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP
DOREEN CONST ANINE
EAGLE CONVENIENCE STORE
EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING
EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DlST
EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF
EAGLE PHARMACY
EAGLE RIVER WATER AND
EARLY CHILDHOOD PARTNERS
FLORIDA MICRO
FORINASH KATHLEEN
GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
186.69
861.94
300.00
I 1.96
600.00
929.05
98.66
198.70
225.00
27.78
113.90
191.36
102.06
79.00
38.07
24.21
633.83
12,500.00
25.20
9.99
2,115.79
13,456.18
560.00
84.60
34.60
9
06/04/07
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES SERVICE 39.16
HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS SERVICE 44~55
HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 873.44
JAN GOVREAU REIMBURSEMENT 28.69
JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFFS SERVICE 23..37
JOHN C COLLINS PC SERVICE 12,138.00
KIDS FIRST SERVICE 4,378.00
KIM HILDERBRAND REIMBURSEMENT 509.02
LA QUINT A INN & SUITES SERVICE 124.00
LARA "HEATHER" LAWDERMILK REIMBURSEMENT 35.81
LEXlSNEXlS COURTLINK INC SERVICE 48.45
LYONS KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 43.26
MERCEDES GARCIA REIMBURSEMENT 42.93
MICHELLE ARANA REIMBURSEMENT 22.40
NCSEA SERVICE 300.00
\
ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO SERVICE 60.64
PARENTS HANDBOOK SERVICE 1,100.00
QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 236.65
RACHAEL BORRE REIMBURSEMENT 558.87
RHODE ISLAND DEPT OF SERVICE 15.00
RITA WOODS REIMBURSEMENT 219.09
SHERI MINTZ REIMBURSEMENT 143.37
SOLARA LLC SERVICE 12,000.00
SST ABS SERVICE 5.00
SSTABSCONFERENCE SERVICE 295.00
SYLVIA SALAZAR REIMBURSEMENT 104.49
VAIL HONEYW AGON LID SERVICE 67.00
VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 571.33
VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 2,487.64
WELD COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICE 23.50
WYNNE MORGAN REIMBURSEMENT 383.86
XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 1,016.79
PAYROLL FOR APRIL PAYiWLL8&9 76,309.37
147,657.25
WRAP FUND
EARLY CHILDHOOD PARTNERS SERVICE 3,053.94
3,053.94
INSURANCE RESERVE FUND
-
COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICE 12,723.07
12.723.07
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
ANITA SCOTT SERVICE 7,987.50
CHFA SERVICE 6,182.00
CHICAGO BULLET PROOF SERVICE 5,475.00
COLORADO COMMERCIAL SERVICE 10,043.18
DAVID KEKAR REIMBURSEMENT 806.69
GATEWAY CONSTRUCTION CORP SERVICE 3,183.39
IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICE 395.25
KENNEY & ASSOCIATES SERVICE 245.10
LAFARGE CORPORATION SERVICE 7,844.00
MORTER ARCHITECTS SERVICE 4,110.43
NATIVE ELECTRIC INC SERVICE 4,243.75
10
06/04/07
NEW WORLD SYSTEMS
PEAK LAND SURVEYING INC
PRIEFERT MFG COINC
QWEST INTERPRISE NETWRKNG
REL YCO SALES INC
SHEPHERD RESOURCES, INC.
SPRONKWATER ENGINEERS
VAIL DAlLY THE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
6,000.00
840.00
14,405.45
21,689.71
4,757.00
741.09
3,186.00
1,519.78
103,655.32
SALESTAXE.V. TRANSP.
AMERICAN SALES INCENTIVES
ANITA PERCIFIELD
ARMANDO SCHAFFINO
BILLINGS KAR KOLOR INC
CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING
CINGULAR WIRELESS
COLLETTS
COLORADO DEPT REVENUE
COLORADO MOUNTAIN MEDICAL
COLUMBINE MARKET
CORPORATE EXPRESS
DOCTORS ON CALL
EAGLE PHARMACY
EVERYDAY OUTFITTERS
GLENWOODMEDICAL ASSOC
HASLER INC
HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS
JEFF WETZEL
KINDER MORGAN INC
KINETICO WATER PROS
KZYR-CooL RADIO LLC
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC
LUMINATOR
M&MAUTOPARTS
MAIN AUTO PARTS
MILLENNIUM TOWING
QWEST
SNAP-oN INDUSTRIAL
TIM MINAROVICH
TOWN OF AVON
TOWN OF GYPSUM
TRANSWEST TRUCKS
TRI COUNTY FIRE
UNITED STATES WELDING
US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS
VAlL ELECTRONICS
VAlL NET
VERlZON WIRELESS,
VISA CARD SERVICES
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WESTERN SLOPE BAR
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
2,460;00
100.04
18.21
37.26
483.84
251.37
1,100.30
350.00
105.00
18.14 .
1,073.27
310.00
3.74
4,349.00
83.00
189.00
2,036.82
34.32
321.91
2,639.74
35.00
333.00
559.88
25.43
177.42
327.70
12.98
1,850.00
162.16
721.63
118.74
1,010.00
1,733.64
244.17
485.70
29.60
2,544.28
1,299.48
11.95
349.87
1,340.24
159.21
16.85
13.70
11
06/04/07
XCEL ENERGY SERVICE 436.60
XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 75055
ZEE MEDICAL SERVlCE SUPPLIES 126.83
PAYROLL FOR APRIL PAYROLL 8 & 9 165,016.80
195,858.37
SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS
COLUMBINE MARKET SERVICE 24.83
COPY PLUS SERVICE 5.00
FEDERAL EXPRESS SERVICE 35.64
GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SERVICE 3,239.36
IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICE 302.50
KEMP AND COMPANY INC SERVICE 1,984.20
SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER SERVICE 5,122.50
VALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 8.98
VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 1,310.73
12,033.74
AIRPORT FUND
ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY SUPPLIES 832.90
AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT SERVICE 1,225.00
ASMI SERVICE 9,270.00
BALCOMB AND GREEN SERVICE 188.00
CENTRAL SERVICESIEC &ERVICE 7855
CENTURYTEL SERVICE 3,106.76
CHIEF SUPPLY SUPPLIES 11.99
CHRIS ANDERSON REIMBURSEMENT 59.13
COLLETTS SERVICE 1,540.02
COLORADO MOUNTAlN EXPRESS SERVICE 48,000.00
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 1,753.48
COOPER CROUSE HINDS SERVICE 199.36
CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 173.29
DAVIS AUDIOVISUAL SERVICE 335.00
DISH NETWORK SERVICE 11.98
DIVISION OF FIRE SAFETY SERVICE 20.00
DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES SERVICE 97.96
ELIZABETH WILT REIMBURSEMENT 52.65
FLORIDA MICRO SERVICE 2,530.00
GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SUPPLIES 60.30
GYPSUM TOWN OF SERVICE 431.05
HEWLETT PACKARD SERVICE 2,438.00
HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 3,380.37
IMAGINIT EMBROIDERY SERVICE 567.32
JAY MAX SALES SERVICE 49.05
KATHY LAWN REIMBURSEMENT 140.49
LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 256.95
LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE 4,360.50
MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE 36,324.50
MOES SOUTHWEST GRILL SERVICE 539.75
RLM SOFTWARE INC SERVICE 6,000.00
RON RAMSEY SERVICE 200.00
SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICE 1,994.00
SIGNATURE SIGNS SERVICE 174.00
SKYLINE MECHANICAL SERVICE 971.00
STEWART AND STEVENSON SERVICE 2,380.01
12
06/04/07
SUMMITEX, LLC SERVICE 42.63
TAYLOR FENCE COMPANY SERVICE 9,800.00
TIRE DlSTRmUTION SYSTEMS SERVICE 1,026.00
US CUSTOMS SERVICE SERVICE 39,839.75
VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 3,780.13
WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 125.66
WAGNER RENTS SERVICE 51.39
WORKRITE SERVICE 185.76
WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS SERVICE 440.67
WYLACO SUPPLY.JCOMPANY SUPPLIES 3,570.76
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 209.14
ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY SERVICE 151.37
PAYROLL FOR APRIL PAYROLL 8 & 9 61,124.75
250,101.37
800 MHZ FUND
LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE 19,724.28
MCI WORLDCOM SERVICE 3,245.51
QWEST SERVICE 1,989.08
24,958.87
HOUSING FUND
CENTURYTEL SERVICE 44.18
COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 402.00
RRC ASSOCIATES SERVICE 7,478.75
SLIFER MANAGEMENT SERVICE 200.86
VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 103.82
VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 117.56
PAYROLL FOR APRIL PAYROLL 8&9 2,195.30
10,542.47
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND
JJ KELLER AND ASSOCIATES SERVICE 526.65
REIS ENVIRONMENTAL INC SERVICE 448.55
STEVE CARVER SERVICE 1,200.00
VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 248.29
2,423.49
OPEN SPACE FUND
ARCHffiEQUE LAND CONSULTIN SERVICE 1,375.00
SHAPINS ASSOCIATES SERVICE 95.00
1,470.00
LANDFILL FUND
ACZ LABORATORY INC SERVICE 514.00
AIR CYCLE CORPORATION SERVICE 555.00
ALPINE DESIGN AND SERVICE 500.00
AMERIGAS SERVICE 1,327.79
BARBARA HENDRICK REIMBURSEMENT 49.94
CAROLINA SOFTWARE SERVICE 300.00
CENTRAL SERVICESIEC SERVICE 74.22
CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & SERVICE 12,677.35
DOWN V ALLEY SEPTIC SERVICE 790.00
EAGLE V ALLEY ALLIANCE SERVICE 50,000.00
FRONT RANGE TIRE RECYCLE SERVICE 12,017.80
13
06/04/07
GRANT WRITING USA
HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
KELLY L BERRY
KRW CONSULTING INC
LBA ASSOCIATES
QWEST INTERPRlSE NETWRKNG
RONALD RASNIC
TRlCOUNTYFIRE
US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS
VAlL DAlLY THE
VISA CARD SERVICES
WASTE NEWS
WESTERN SLOPE BAR
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
PAYROLL FOR APRIL
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
PAYROLL 8 & 9
425.00
549.05
18.13
4,331.87
2,987.03
5,417.13
42.11
391.00
810.00
693.60
21.43
64.00
155.95
193.10
12.93
19,840.91
114,759.34
MOTOR POOL FUND
A& E TIREINC
AJRGAS INTERMOUNT AIN.INC
BERTHOD MOTORS
BOBCAT OF THE ROCKIES
BURT CHEVROLET, INC
CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE
CENTRAL SERVICES/EC
CENTURYTEL
COLLETTS
CORPORATE EXPRESS
CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN
DELLENBACH MOTORS
EAGLE COUNTY CLERK
EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL
EVERYOA Y OUTFITTERS
FARIS MACHINERY CO
FORCE AMERICA
G & K SERVICES
GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE
GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND
HANSON EQUIPMENT
HENSLEY BATTERY
HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC
INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY
KINDER MORGAN INC
LAWSON PRODUCTS
LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC
M&MAUTOPARTS
MAIN AUTO PARTS .
OJ WATSON COMPANY INC
POWER MOTIVE
PREMIER TIRE TERMINAL
SIGNATURE SIGNS
STEVINSON CHEVROLET
TOWN OF GYPSUM
TRI COUNTY FIRE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
1,324.05
87.36
208.80
226.94
599.67
323.49
98.01
75.03
99,505.68
342.84
69.61
60,798.00
209.20
89.83
3,965.00
1,487.70
281.73
453.48
253.00
101.32
99,718.18
630.20
1,503.81
292.00
1,948.96
2,063.09
584.96
1,803.65
15.37
1,343.35
907.84
1,197.88
1,923.00
34,862.83
1,279.97
358.60
14
06/04/07
TWO RIVERS CHEVROLET
US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS
VAlL DAlLY THE
VAlL ELECTRONICS
VANWORKS INC
. VISA CARD SERVICES
WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WEAR PARTS EQUIPMENT
WESTERN COLORADO
WESTERN IMPLEMENTS
WESTERN SLOPE PAINT
WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY
WYNNE MORGAN
XEROX CORPORATION
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
PAYROLL FOR APRIL
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
PAYROLL 8&9
293.80
1,878.48
2,394.00
959.43
329.98
255.72
1,433.99
II 7.54
1,134.80
505.34
758.03
983.47
9,939.86
7.60
174.00
80.73
19,633.42
361,81~.62
HEALTH INSURANCE FUND
AFLAC ATIN:RPS
JEFFERSON PILOT FINANCIAL
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
3,147.62
4,270.85
7,418.47
ENHANCED E911 FUND
CENTURYTEL
LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES
NOMAD TECHNOLOGIES
QWEST
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
178.45
395.02
850.00
11,262.89
12$86.36
4,299,380.51
Executive Session
It was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed to go into Executive Session for the purpose of receiving
legal advice and discussing matters that are subject to negotiations regarding the on the Colorado State Parks water
lease which is an appropriate topic for discussion pursua.qt to C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b) and (e) Colorado Revised
Statutes. It was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn from Executive Session.
Consent Agenda
Chairman Menconi stated the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows:
A. Approval of bill paying for the week of June 4,2007 (subject to review by the Finance Director)
Finance Department Representative
B. Approval of the payroll for June 7, 2007(subject to review by the Finance Director)
Finance Department Representative
C. Lease Agreement between Eagle County and Claude L. and Penny L. Clough for Neilson South Ditch No.
102,276 water rights
Facilities Management Representative
15
06/04/07
D. Amendment # I of Energy and Mineral Impact Assistance Program Grant between the Colorado
Department of Local Affairs and.Eagle County
Attorney's Office RepreSentative
E. Resolution 2007-064 concerning the appointment of Thomas Henderson oftheTown of Red Cliff as
Representative for the Open Space Advisory Committee
Lisa de Graaf, Community Development
F. To subdivide Lot 11, creating two Y2 duplex lots each containing .8943 acres for a total of 1.7886 acres
Terri Johnson, Community Development
Chairman Menconi asked the Attorney's Office ifthere were any changes to the Consent Agenda.
Bryan Treu, County Attorney stated that there were no concerns.
Commissioner Runyon moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items A-F.
Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Citizen Input
There was none
Commissioner Fisher moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and re-convene as the
Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority.
Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Eagle County Liquor License Authority
Kathy Scriver, Clerk and Recorder's Office
Consent Ae:enda
Renewals
A. Ore House Edwards, LLC. d/b/a Game Creek Club
This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License in Edwards. There have been no
complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. An Alcohol
Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided.
B. 131 Smokehouse, LLC d/b/a 131 Smokehouse
This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License in Bond. There have been no complaints or
disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. An Alcohol Management Plan is on
file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided.
C. Our dish! d/b/a dish!
This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License in Edwards. There have been no
complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. An Alcohol
Management Plan is on file in the Clerk's Office and proof of server training has been provided.
Commissioner Runyon moved that the Board approve the Liquor Consent Agenda for June 4, 2007,
consisting ofItems A-C.
Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
16
06/04/07
Other Liquor
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REPRESENTATIVE:
Flexible Restaurants, Ine.d/b/a Vista at Arrowhead
676 Sawatch Drive in Edwards, CO
Janine and Michael Glennon, Owners
Shawn and Gary Boris, Owners
Transfer of Ownership
Kathy Scriver
REQUEST:
STAFF REPRESENTATIVE:
DESCRIPTION:
The applicant has requested to Transfer a Hotel and Restaurant License with (1) Optional Premises.
Flexible Restaurants, Inc. d/b/a Vista at Arrowhead has applied for a Transfer of Ownership from CMLRestaurant
Management Company d/b/a Falling Creek. The applicant is currently operating under a Temporary license issued
by the Local Licensing Authority on April 16, 2007.
ESTABLISH NEIGHBORHOOD.:
As a Transfer of Ownership, this step is not required of the applicant.
ESTABLISH NEEDS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD:
As a Transfer of Ownership, this step is not required of the applicant.
STAFF FINDINGS:
~ This appHcationis in order, all application requirements have been met, all the proper forms have been
filed, and all fees have been paid.
~ The premises where the alcoholic beverages will be sold has been previously licensed by the state and local
licensing authorities and was valid as of the date of receiving the application.
~ The applicants. are reported to be of good moral character based on CBI and Sheriff reports filed in the
Clerk's Office.
> Proof of Server training has been submitted.
> The statement that all accounts for alcohol beverages sold to the applicant are paid has been received.
> The applicants are over 21, fingerprints are on file and Personal History forms are on file.
POSTING AND PUBLICATION
Public notice has been given by the posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the premises at least May
24,2007, 10 days prior to the hearing. Publication of the notice is not required for a transfer of ownership.
CONCERNS / ISSUES:
None
MOTION:
Commissioner Fisher moved that the Local Liquor Licensing Authority, incorporating stafffmdings,
approve the Transfer of the Hotel and Restaurant liquor license from CML Restaurant Management Company
d/b/a Falling Creek to Flexible Restaurants, Inc. d/b/a Vista at Arrowhead.
Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
17
06/04/07
Commissioner Runyon moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority and re-convene
as the Board of County Commissioners.
Commissioner Fisher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
Planning Files
PDF- 00095 Arrowhead River Ranch Final Plat
Joe Forinash, Planning Department
ACTION:
A fmal plat to re-subdivide Tract C of Arrowhead River Ranch PUD to create a residential lot (Lot
2) and the remainder of Tract C.
LOCATION: North ofHwy 6, east of Miller Ranch Road, Arrowhead River Ranch (Edwards)
TITLE:
FILE NOJPROCESS:
OWNER:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Arrowhead River Ranch - A Fourth Resubdivision of Tract C
PDF-00095/ Planned Unit Development Final Plat
Arrowhead Valley Developers, LLC
Arrowhead Valley Developers, LLC
n/a
Approval
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. SUMMARY: A final plat to re-subdivide Tract C of Arrowhead River RanchPUD to create a residential
lot (Lot 2) and the remainder of Tract C.
2. STAFF REPORT
A. REFERRAL RESPONSES: All referral responses have been satisfactorily addressed.
B. MAJOR CONCERNS AND ISSUES: None
C. STAFF FINDINGS:
Pursuant to Section 5-280. B.S.b(3). Final Plat for Subdivision - Action bv the Board of County
Commissioners. of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the following finding is made:
The Final Plat DOES conform to the approved Preliminary Plan for Subdivision for the Arrowhead River
Ranch. Planned Unit Development, and
Pursuant to Section 5-280.B.3.e, Subdivision Standards, ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the
following fmdings are made:
(1) Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed subdivision IS consistent with the Eagle County
Comprehensive Plan and the FLUM ofthe Comprehensive Plan;
(2) Consistent with Land Use Regulations. The proposed subdivision DOES comply with all of the
standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including but not
limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development
Standards;
(3) Spatial Patterns Shall Be Efficient. The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid
creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require
18
06/04/07
duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of
development.
(a) Utility and Road Extensions~ Proposed utility extensions ARE consistent with the utility's
setvice plan. Proposed road extensions ARE consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital
Improvements Plan.
(b) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility -lines ARE sized to setve the planned ultimate population
of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines.
(c) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions ARE allowed only when the
entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a
single service into an otherwise un-served area.
(4) Suitability for Development. The property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for
development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-mad,e
hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future
public improvements to the area.
(5) Compatible with Surrounding Uses. The proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character
of existing land uses in the area and WILL NOT adversely affect the future development of the
surrounding area.
Pursuant to Section 4-700, School Land Dedication Standards, of the Eagle County Land Use
Regulations, the following findings are made:
This site has previously been subdivided. Neither a dedication of land for schools nor a payment of
cash in lieu is necessary.
DISCUSSION:
Mr. Forinash presented a PowerPoint presentation. The presentation included a.vicinity map, approved
PUDpreliminary Plan, site plan, plat and photos of the lot looking from Miller Ranch road and west of lot 2. The
applicant wishes to approve a PUD final plat to subdivide Tract C in Arrowhead River Ranch to create a new
residential lot (lot 2) and the remainder ofLoJ C. He indicated that there were no outstanding issues, stafffindings
were positive and staff recommended approval.
Commissioner Runyon asked how track C was represented in the original PUD.
Mr. Forinash stated that track C was originally intended for 2 homes. The balance of track C would
become common area in the new PUD.
Chairman Menconi opened and closed public comment, as there wa~none.
Commissioner Fisher moved that the Board approve File No. PDF-00095, incorporating the Stafffll1dings,
and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat.
Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous.
PDA-00067Cordillera Valley Club West End Noise Miti2ation and Landscapin2IBermin2
Lisa de Graaf, Planning Department
NOTE:
Tabled from 5/01/07 & 5/22/07
ACTION:
Interstate 1-70 Noise Mitigation including a combination of landscaping, berms and barriers along
the entire CVC frontage.
19
06/04/07
LOCATION: North side ofl-70, extending the boundary of the Cordillera Valley Club
FILE NO./PROCESS:
PROJECT NAME:
LOCATION:
OWNER:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
STAFF PLANNER:
PDA-00067 / Planned Unit Development Amendment
Cordillera Valley Club Sound Mitigation & Landscaping Project
Edwards, Colorado
Cordillera Valley Club Metropolitan District
Same as Owner
V Ag, Inc. Architects and Planners
Lisa de Graaf
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The Cordillera Valley Club Metropolitan District is proposing to build a noise mitigation barrier. The
purpose of the barrier is to reduce the noise levels from 1-70 vehicle traffic that is perceived as a nuisance
and negatively impacts the quality oflife of Cordillera Valley Club's residents and visitors. The proposed
barrier would be l~ated along the southern edge of an existing service road on the Cordillera Valley Club
(CVC, hereafter) golf course parcel near the southern property line adjacent to the 1-70 right-of-way.
The CVC is pursuing an Easement which is to be granted by Valley GolfLLC, thegolfcourse operator and
owner of the land upon which the proposed improvements will be made, to CVC for the purpose of the
project. In addition, a Location and Extent application, LEA-00057 is also being reviewed. concurrently.
This PUD amendment amends the most current CVC PUD Guide, which was last amended March 29,
1999. It is necessary to revise. language in the Guide that currently prohibits the installation of large
landscape berms and noise mitigation barriers.
\
The construction ofthe sound and visual mitigation is a combination of earthen berms an4 fencing, which
would vary in height. The length of the project is approximately 7,500 linear feet; the entire cve 1-70
frontage. A Holy Cross Utility Easement also generally parallels the property line in this area.
B. SITE DATA:
South:
ROW: 1-70
USFS
Lake Creek Apts/
Brett Ranch PUD
PUD
East:
UnplattedlResidential
UnplattedlResidential
Resource
Cordillera Valley Club PUD
N/A
Residential, golf related recreation
Cordillera Metro District
Project = 7,500 LF
22.5%
20
06/04/07
C. CHRONOLOGYIBACKGROUND:
1991- PUDSketch Plan was approved for this development which was initially referred to as Cottonwood.
1992 - The PUD Preliminary Plan and zone change to PUD was approved which allowed 848 dwelling
units, a golf course and associated amenities, a "lodge" and 10,000 square feet of "convenience"
commercial space.
1994 - An amendment to the PUDwas approved which (a) reduced the density from 848 to 445 dwelling
units and "allocated" 240 dwelling units to Lake Creek Affordable Housing,.(b) transferred 30. acres from
the development tracts to the golf course, (c) and eliminated a "lodge site" and the 1 0,000 square feet of
commercial space.
1995 - The initial fmal plats were approved under the sl}.bdivision name of Wild horse.
1995- By resolution, the name of the subdivision was dhangedto Cordillera Valley Club..Subsequent fmal
plats were approved under this subdivision name.
1997 - The PUD was amended to designate certain tracts as "single family" and to provide clarification to
certain provisions of the PUD Guide.
1999 - The PUD Guide was.amended.
2001 - The PUD was amended for westerly access.
\
D. PLANNING COMMISSION DELmERATION SUMMARY & MOTION:
On April 18, 2007 the Planning Commission heard a presentation fora noise mitigation project
from staff and the consultant representing the Cordillera Valley Club.
Early cOlnmentslfeedback in the deliberation from the Commission focused on how the applicant
'listened' to former comments on design and landscape elements and that they did a better job in the
current application. Additionally, Commission members commended the applicant/consultant on a
good and improved submittal. The Commission also made comments regarding concerns of
creating a tulinel effect on
1-70, which is a precedent that is not desired.
The following are specific issues that were discussed and/or suggested.
. If the precedent of berming was to be set forth with this application, then doing it well is
important.
. Use west access into CVC for dirt trucks during construction.
. No jake-brakes allowed either access routes during construction and hours should be limited
to 8 to 5 and Monday - Friday only.
. Mitigation to any and all roads into evc post construction.
. The easement agreement between the Metro District and Valley Golf LLC shall be in place.
. A landscape guarantee and agreement be provided including standal'tis.
. Revisit the site to ensure the landscape plan and guarantee have been followed, during
construction and after two (2) years time.
. The 2:1 slope is implemented on the south side ofthe noise barrier and berms.
. Use other, more natural types of landscaping in addition to current plan, including, but not
limited to rock outcroppings.
. Water rights for landscaping concerns.
. Possibly building project between the fairway and the houses, to lessen the visual impact
when seen from 1-70.
. If the duration is longer than the anticipated three (3) months, use west access only. (This
option uses east access within the first three (3) months).
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend to deny application
PDA- 00067.
21
06/04/07
The recommendation to deny the File was not based on Regulatory Findings.
2. STAFF REPORT
A. NECESSARY FINDINGS:
PROCES&1NTENT
ECLUR Section:
5-240.F 3.m Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD
Section Purpose:
No substantial modification, removal, or release of the provisions of the plan shall
be permitted except upon a finding by the County, following a public hearing
called and held in accordance with the provisions of section 24-67-104(I)(e)
Colorado Revised Statutes.
Standards:
Sections 5-240.F .3.e., Standards.5-280.B.3.e Standards and 5-240.F.3.m.
Amendment toPreliminarv Plan for PUD are used to evaluate a PUD
Amendment.
ST ANDARDS:5-240.F.3.e
STANDARD: Unified ownership or controL [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] - The title to alfland that is part of
a PUD shall be uwned or controlled by one (1) person. A per~on shall be considered to control all lands in
the PUD either through ownership or) by written consent of at/owners of the land that they wil/be subject
to the conditions and standards of the PUD.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS .
MEEW TIlE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM.. STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)J - The uses that may be developed in the pun shall be those
uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in
Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule", or Table 3-320,
"Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule", for the zone district designation in effect for the
property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these use designations may only be
authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3f., Variations Authorized
Amendment exceeds allowed len
Amendment exceeds allowed height
The primary uses allowed in the PUD will not be changed.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X ME. ETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
22
06/04/07
STANDARD: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] - The dimensional limitations . that
shall apply to the PUD shall be those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for
the zone district designation in effectfor the property at the time of the applicationfor PUD. Variations of
these dimensional limitations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3!, Variations
Authorized provided variationS shall leave adequate distance between buildings for necessary access. and
fire protection, and ensure proper ventilation, light, air and snowmelt between buildings.
x
Section 5-240.F.3.f., Variations Authorized. provides that in order for a variation to be granted, it must be
found that the granting of the variation is necessary for the purpose to be achieved, and that the Sketch Plan
for PUD achieves one or more of the following purposes:
Obtains. desired desi ualities;
Avoids environmental resources and natural resources;
Provides incentives for water au entation;
Provides incentives for trails;
Provides incentives for affordable housin ;
Provides incentives for riblic facilities.
'\
No variation is being proposed.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
This PUD Amendment application does not affect standards specified in the formerly approved PUD,
other than relative to height and length of berms and noise mitigation barriers.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
. MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
23
06/04/07
STANDARD: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] - Off-street parking and
loading provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking
and Loading Standards. A reduction in these standards. may be authorized where the applicant
demonstrates that:
(a) Shared Parking. Because of shared parking arrangements among uses within the.PUD that do not
require peak parking for those uses to occur at the same time, the parking needs of re$idents,
guests and employees of the project willbe met; or
(b) Actual Needs. . The actual needs of the project's residents, guests and employeeswill be less than
those set by Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. The applicant may
commit to provide specialized transportation services for these persons (such as vans, subsidized
bus passes, or similar services) as a means of complying with this standard.
EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
This PUD Amendment does not affect parking in the formerly approved PUD.
STANDARD: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] - Landscaping provided in the PUD shall comply
with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Rlumination Standards. Variations from these
standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that the proposed landscaping provides
sufficient buffering of uses from each other (both within the PUD and between the PUD and surrounding
uses) to minimize noise, glare and other adverse impacts, creates attractive streetscapes and parking areas.
and is consistent with the character of the area.
x
x
x
X
x X n/a n/a n/a
n/a
X
X
Comments/Description:
24
06/04/07
The CVC must amend the language in the PUD Guide that was last amended in 2001.
The applicant. proposes to add sub-section under Section ID. Land Use Desi2nationF.. Golf Course
~. Permitted Uses. ID.F.2.D., which reads: "Landscaping, sound, and visual mitigation features to
include construction and installation of tree and shrub plant material, irrigation systems, visual screen
fences, sound barriers, earthen berms, andwalls pursuantto approval from Eagle County".
See also condition #1.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS THEMAJORJTY OF MIN. ~ ST. ANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Signs. (Section 5-240.F.3.e(6)] - The sign standards applicable to the PUD shall be as
specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations, unless, as provided in Section 4-340 D., Signs Allowed
in a Planned Unit Development (PUD). the applicqnt submits a comprehensive sign plan for the PUD that
is determined to be suitablefor the PUD and provides the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to
and within the PUD.'
Comprehensive Sign Plan Provided? N/A
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEElS mE MAJORITY OF.MINIMUM S. TANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
This PUD Amendment application does not affect standards specifiedin the formerly approvedPUD.
STANDARD: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] - The applicant shall demonstrate that the
development proposed in the (Sketch). Preliminary Plan for P UD will be provided adequate facilities fgr
potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads
andwill be conveniently located in relation to schools, police andfire protection, and emergency medical
services.
X
X
X
X
X
X
In proximity to schools, police & fire protection, & emergency medical
services
Yes
No
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS THE MAJORJTYOF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
25
06/04/07
STANDARD: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] - The improvement standards applicable to the
development shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards. Provided, however,
the development may deviate from the County's road standards, so the development achieves greater
efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or
achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts, when the following minimum design principles are
followed:
(a) Safe, EffICient Access. The circulation system is designed to provide safe, convenient access to all
areas of the proposed development using the minimum practical roadway length. Access shall be
by a public right-o.fway,private vehicular or pedestrian way or a commonly owned easement. No
roadway alignment, either horizontal or vertical, shall be allowed that compromises one (1) or
more of the minimum design standards of the American Association of State Highway Officials
(AASHTO) for thatfunctional classification of roadway.
(b) Internal Pathways.. Internal pathways shall be provided to form a logical, safe and convenient
system for pedestrian access. to dwelling units and common areas, with appropriate linkages off-
site.
(c) Emergency Vehicles. Roadways shall be designed to permit access by emergency vehicles to all
lots or units. An access easement shall be granted for e11Jergency vehicles and utility vehicles, as
applicable, to use private roadways in the developmentfor the purpose. of providing emergency
services andfor installation, maintenance and repair of utilities.
(d) Principal Access Points. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to providefor smooth
trafficflow, minimizing hazards tovehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. Where a PUDabuts a
major collector, arterial road or highway, direct access to such road or highway from individual
lots, units or buildings shall not be permitted Minorroads within the PUD shall not be directly
connected with roads outside of the P UD, unless the County determines such connections are
necessary to maintain the County's road network.
(e) Snow Storage. Adequate areas shall be provided to store snowremovedfrom the internal street
network and from off-street parking areas.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
.. MEETS TIlE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] - The development
proposed for the P UD shall be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses.
26
06/04/07
Unplatted X
ROW: 1-70 X
East: UnplattedlResidential Resourc X
e
West: UnplattedlResidential Resourc X
e
Discussion
This PUD Amendmentapplication does not affect standards Specified in the fonnerly approved PUD,
depending on one's perspective and individual sensibilities. The proposed benningand noise
mitigation.barrier, when viewed frOIb the Soutll may be considered.incompatible.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
XMEEri THE MAJORITY OF MlWMUM. . S. TANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] - ThePUDshallbe
consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The
consideration of the relevan/master plans during sketch plan review is on a broad conceptual level, i.e,
how aproposal compares to basic planning principles. As a development proposal moves from sketch plan
to preliminary plan review, its conformance or lackthereof to aspects of the master plans may not
necessarily remain static.
EAGLE COUNTY COMWREHENSWE PLAN
EDWARDS AREA COMMUNITY PLAN
27
06/04/07
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
This PUD Amendment application does not affect standards specified in the formerly approved PUD.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
. MIlE. TS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Phasing. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (11)] - The Preliminary Plan for PUD shall include a
phasing plan for the development. If development of the PUD is proposed to occur in phases, then
guarantees shall be provided for public improvements and amenities that are necessary and desirable for
residents of the project, or that are of benefit to the entire County. Such public improvements shall be
constructed with the first phase of the project, or, if this is not possible, then as early in the project as is
reasonable.
III Phasing Plan Provided?
o Yes...[KJE]
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Common Recreation and Open Space. {Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)]-: The PUD shall comply
with the following common recreation and open space standards.
(a) MinimumArea. It is recommended that a minimum of25% of the total PUD area shall be devoted
to open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi-public. In addition, thePUD
shall provide a minimum of ten (10) acres of common recreation and usable open space lands for
every one thousand (1,000) persons who are residents of the PUD. In order to calculate the
number of residents of the PUD, the number of proposed dwelling units shall be multiplied by two
and sixty-three hundredths (2.63), which is the average number of persons that occupy each
dwelling Wlit in Eagle COWlty, as determined in the Eagle County Master Plan.
(b) Areas that Do Not Count as Open Space. Parking and loading areas, street right-ol-ways, and
areas with slopes greater than thirty (30) percent shall not count toward usable open space.
(c) Areas that Count as Open Space. Water bodies, lands within critical wildlife habitat areas,
riparian areas, and one hundred (100) yearfloodplains, as defined in these Land Use Regulations,
that are preserved as open space shall count towards this minimum standard, even when they are
not usable by or accessible to the residents of the PUD. All other open space lands shall be
conveniently accessible from all occupied structures within the PUD.
(d) Improvements Required. All common open space and recreational facilities shall be 'shown on the
Preliminary Plan for PUD and shall be constructed and fully improved according to the
development schedule establishedfor each development phase of the PUD.
(e) Continuing Use and Maintenance. All privately owned common open space shall continue to
conform to its intended use, as specified on the Preliminary Plan for PUD. To ensure that all the
common open space identified in the PUD will be used as common open space, restrictions and/or
28
06/04/07
(f)
covenants shall be placed in each deed to ensure their maintenance. and to prohibit the division of
any common open space,
Organization. If common open. space. is proposed to be maintained through an. association or
nonprofit corporation, such organization shall manage all common open space and recreational
and cultural facilities that are not dedicated to the public, and shall providefor.the maintenance,
administration and operation of such land and any other land within the PUD not publicly owned,
and secure adequate liability. insurance. on the land The association or nonprofit corporation
shall be established prior to the sale oIanylots or units within the PUD,Membership in the
association or nonprofit corporation shall be mandatory for .alllandowners within the P UD,
Square feet
Square feet
Square feet
Square feet
%
%
%
This PUD Amendment application does not affect standards specified in the formerly approved PUD.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X. MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS .
MEE~ THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Natural Resource Protection. [Section 5-2~O.F3.e (13)] - The PUD shall consider the
recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendations of referral
agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards.
Xl- According to the Division of Wildlife, the project is located adjacent to a mule deer and elk
highway crossing area. They suggest any berm construction should be planned to provide for deer
fencing and escape ra~p construction - the base of the berm should be of sufficient distance from
any deer fence to prevent the deer from using the berm to jump over the fence. Accumulation of fill
against the fencing should be avoided and all fill on previous berm construction should be removed
and any damage to fencing should be repaired.
29
06/04/07
The now applauds the use of native plants but cllutions that it should be understood that mule deer
and elk may utilize some to the more palatable plants, and that some of these species may actually
draw wildlife to the landscaping and increase the risk of wildlife getting on to 1-70. They recommend
that landscaping trees and shrubs be selected for their low palatability to big game. It may be
necessary to fence the new vegetation to prevent wildlife from. damaging the plants.
. See Condition #2.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS mE MAJORITY OFMINIMVM STAtIDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARDS: 5-280.B.3.e
STANDARD: Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (1)] B The proposed
subdivision shall be consistent with the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan and the FLUM of the
Comprehensive Plan.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
ยท MEETS mE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
,STANDARD: Consistent with Land Use. Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)J B The proposed
subdivision shall comply with all of the standards of this Section and all otherprovisions of these Land Use
Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article
4, Site Development Standards.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1)
Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2)
Sign Regulations (Division 4-3)
Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410)
Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420)
Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430)
Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440)
Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450)
Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460)
Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5)
Noise and Vibration (Section 4-520)
Smoke and Particulates (Section 4-530)
1
2
30
06/04/07
Heat, Glare, Radiation and Electrical Interference (Section 4-540)
Storage of Hazardous and Non-hazardous Materials (Section 4-550)
Water Quality Standards (Section 4-560)
Roadway Standards (Section 4-620)
Sidewalk and Trail Standards.(Section 4-630)
X Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640) 3
X Drainage Standards (Section 4-650)
X Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660) 4
X Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670)
X Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680)
X Sanitary Sewage Disposal-Standards (Section 4-690)
X Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7)
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
. X MEETS THE MAJORTIY OF .MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS .
STANDARD: SpatiiiI Pattern Shall Be Efficient. {Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)}- The proposed subdivision
shall be located and designed to avoidereating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of
public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog"
pattern of development.
(1) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's service
plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road
extensions shall be consistent with the Eallle Countv Road CaDital lmorovements Plan.
(2) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the
service area to avoid.future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines.
(3) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed when the entire
range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into
an otherwise un-served area
31
06/04/07
x
x
x
x
x
This PUD Amendment application does not affect standards specified in the formerly approved PUD.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
ME.. ETS THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Suitability Jor Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)}- The property proposed to be
subdivided shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and
natural or man-made. hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and .existing and
probable future public improvements to the area.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
. MEEJ;S THE MAJORlTYOF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)]- The proposed subdivision
shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely affect the
future development of the surrounding area.
See prior discussion on Page 9 of this report.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X MEETS THE MAJ. oRlTY OF MINIMUM.. STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
STANDARD: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)] The applicant shall demonstrate that the
development proposed in the Sketch or Preliminary Plan will be provided adequate facilities for potable
water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection androads and will be
conveniently located in relation to schools, police andfire protection, and emergency medical services.
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
. X MEEJ;S THE MAJORITY OF MINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
5-240.F .3.m. Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD
Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD. No substantial modification, removal, or release of the
provisions of the plan shall be permitted except upon a finding by the County, following a public hearing
called and held in accordance with the provisions of section 24-67-104(IXe) Colorado Revised Statutes
that;
(1) Modification. The modification, removal, or release is consistent with the efficient development
and preservation of the entire Planned Unit Developments;
(2) Adjacent Properties. The PUD Amendment does not effect, in a substantially adverse manner,
either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the Planned Unit Development or
the public interest;
(3) Benefit. The PUD Amendment is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person.
32
06/04/07
~ EXCEEDS MINIMUM STANDARDS
MEETS MINIMUM STANDARDS
X. MEETS THEMAJORIn'. OFMINIMUM STANDARDS
DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS
2. REFERRAL RESPONSES:
Eagle County Engineering Department - Please refer to attachment dated April 2, 2007.
I. Acceptance from all utilities that are affected by the proposed work must be included with this application.
Please provide written approvals from aU utilities.
2. The limit of disturbanc~ is shown for the golf course side of the berm, but there is no limit of disturbance
shown on the CDOTII-70 side of the berm. Please include on future plans the limit of disturbance on all
sides of the berm.
3. A grading permit or permits will be necessary prior to commencing any dirt work including the stockpiling
of any additional material that is brought in. Any stockpiles must be contained by acceptable best
management practices (BMP).
4. Astorm water management plan (SWMP.required for disturbance of areas greater than one acre) must be
completed in accordance with the Clean Water Act as administered by the Colorado Discharge Permit
System. This must accompany the grading permit application.
5. Sections of the berms are shown with a 1.5: I slope. This is steeper than the steepest allowable slope as
defmed by the International Building Code (2: 1) (Appendix J). Fill slopes steeper than 2: 1 shall be .
justified by a soils report prepared and sealed by a licensed engineer. Provide an explanation of how
landscaping and maintenance will be accomplished on slopes this steep.
6. Our inspection of the site plans suggest that there will be .berms or combinations of berm and fence in
excess of the eight (8) feet allowed by regulation, in some areas reaching nearly 30 feet. According to
Eagle County Land Use Regulations (ECLUR 3-340.<:.4), any fence, hedge, wall, berm, or any
combination offences, walls and berms shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height (as measured from natural
grade at any point on the side ofthe berm that faces an adjacent property). Please provide an explanation
for the extent of this proposal's deviation from height limitations set forth in the ECLUR and include
this in the list of deviations as described at the end of this memo.
7. The proposed berms vary in length with the longest being around 1,100 feetlong. The ECLUR (3..;340.C.4)
states that any fence, hedge, wall, berm, or any combination of fences, walls and berms shall not exceed
150 feet in length. Please provide an explanation of the deviation from ECLUR for berm lengths that
this project is proposing and include this in the list of deviations as described below.
8. At station 15+00, the landscaping encroaches on COOT ROW. Written app~val from CDOTis
required to allow any encroachment into tbe ROW.
9. There was no irrigation plan provided for any of the landscaping to the west of station 41 +00 (from 0+00
through 41 +00). Please provide more details explaining how the landscaping in this section will be
irrigated and maintained.
10. The proposed landscaping easement was not shown onthe plans. This must be shown to illustrate that the
proposed easement is adequate for the desired improvements.
11. The proposed easement is not defined as such on the exhibit to be recorded. In addition to the amendment
to the PUD, the Easement Exhibit must spell out the purpose and allowable uses for the easement.
12. As was requested at the first completeness check, the title commitment is still missing from this
application. As such, we cannot complete our review of this file until the title commitment is
provided.
After reviewing this file, we realized tbatthis application was never completed and are still waiting for
the title commitment and approvals frOIll the owners of any easements that will be affected by this
proposal. Until these items are provided to the Engineering Department, we are unable to complete our
review.
33
06/04/07
All of these issues shall be addressed prior to this application moving forward. Please feel free to meet
with uS to discuss any of these comments. Any approvals that must be acquired shall be provided to the
Engineering Department to complete this file. We must also receive updated drawings for any changes that
are made to address these comments, including grading, landscape, bennlfence, and easement changes.
With regards to deviations that you are seeking from the ECLUR, please provide a list with the following
information for each deviation - the governing regulation, requested deviation, and reason for the deviation.
The grading issues do not meet standards in the International Building Code (mC). The mc defines the
steepest allowable slopes as a 2: I slope. This is the standard to which we review grading plans, and we
require a sealed soils report from a licensed engineer stating that the proposed slope is stable. Slopes
steeper than 2:1 are generally considered a safety hazard due to the risk of the slope sliding.
. See Condition No.1 and No.3
Staff note: The.bulk of comments from Engineering have been satisfied.
DOW - Please refer to attachment dated March 27, 2007
The project is located adjacent to a mule deer and elk highway crossing area.
. FENCING: It is unclear if the proposed berm and fencing will abut the current 8 foot high wildlife
fencing on the east end of the property. Any gaps in the fencing could result in increased
wildlife/vehicle accidents as wildlife is funneled to these locations. Any berm construction
should be planned to provide for the construction of deer fencing and escape ramps. The base of
the berm should be sufficient distance from any deer fence to prevent wildlife from using the
berm in an effort to jump over the fencing. The fencing should be protected duing construction
and to prevent fill from accumulating against the fencing. There are several areas where the
previous berm construction has resulted in fill accumulating against the fencing. This fill should
be removed and any damage to the fence repaired.
. PLANTS: The use of native plants is applauded but is should be understood thatmule deer and elk
may utilize some of the more palatable plant. The list of evergreen/deciduous shrubs have
several highly palatable species (i.e. mountain mahogany, serviceberry, chokecherry). These
species may actually draw wildlife to the landscaping increasing the risk of wildlife gettmg on to
1-70. The OOW would suggest that landscaping trees and shrubs be selected for their low
palatability to big game. It may be necessary to fence the new vegetation to prevent wildlife
from damaging the plants.
See Condition No.2
CDOT - Please refer to attachment dated March 27, 2007.
As I discussed with you our concern with this project is the slopes adjacent to the 1-70 right of way. Our
experience with slopes 1 V:2H and steeper have shown difficulty in establishing vegetation in this area. The
lack of vegetation may result in sediment runoff into the 1-70 ROWand subsequent maintenance issue for
COOT.
Please note this comment is from the COOT Eagle Residency not the Regional Grand Junction office
which may have more comments.
See Condition No.3
Eagle County Environmental Health - Please refer to attachment dated March 27, 2007.
A Dust Suppression Plan and Erosion Control! Storm Water Management Plan shall be included with the
grading permit and contain detail sufficient to evaluate conformance to the Site DevelopmentStandards
and Industrial & Commercial Performance Standards. Said Plans shall include contact information for the
person available at all times and responsible to immediately address public complaints or compliance
issues. No grading permit will be issued without these plans having been approved by Eagle County
Environmental Health and Engineering Departments. The approved Plans must be kept on-site, and
implemented at all times. Failure to adhere to the implementation of these plans shall result in cessation of
work until compliance has been restored.
34
06/04/07
. See Condition No.3 and No.4
Additional Referral Agencies - This proposal was referred to the following agencies with no response
received as of this writing:
. Eagle Cowzty: Attorney's Office
. Colorado State: CDOT (Grand Jwzction Office)
. Federal: Holy Cross Electric
C. SUMMARY ANALYSIS:
Benefits: The proposed project benefits the property owners within the Cordillera Valley Club.
Furthermore it may also be construed that the substantial landscaping being proposed on the south side of
the berm and the noise mitigation barriers would conceivably benefit the greater Edwards vicinity.
Disadvantages: The proposed project primarily benefits the property owners within the Cordillera Valley
Club. The visual impacts ofthe project will impact the 1-70 corridor and those viewing from the south. In
addition, the trucks that will transport a substantial amount of earth for the berms have the potential to
create a negative impact on Beard Creek Road and the neighborhood in general.
D. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OPTIONS:
1. Approve the [PUD AMENDMENT] request without conditions if it is determined that the petition
will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare and the proposed use is attuned with the
immediately adjacent and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance
with both the Eagle County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County
Comprehensive Plan (and/or other applicable master plans).
2. Deny the [PUD AMENDMENT] request if itis determined that the petition will adversely affect the
public health, safety, and welfare and/or the proposed use is not attuned with the immediately adjacent
and nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is not in compliance with both the Eagle
County Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan
(and/or other applicable master plans).
3. Table the [PUD AMENDMENT] request if additional information is required to fully evaluate the
petition. Give specific direction to the petitioner and staff.
4. Approve the [PUD AMENDMENT] request with conditions and/or performance standards if it is
determined that certain conditions and/or performance standards are necessary to ensure public, health,
safety, and welfare and/or enhances the attunement of the use with the immediately adjacent and
nearby neighborhood properties and uses and the proposal is in compliance with both the Eagle County
Land Use Regulations and with the guidelines of the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan (and/or other
applicable master plans).
DISCUSSION:
Chairman Menconi opened the discussion.
Ms. De Graaf stated that the applicant was present and would be presenting a recap of the proposal and
project revisions.
Pedro Campos, Landscape Architect, VAG, Inc. presented a PowerPoint presentation. He explained the
approach of the project as a public benefit. The applicant believes the project sets a positive precedent in
addressing 1-70 impacts while balancing public and private interest. The applicant seeks to establish the regulatory
framework that would allow the project to proceed with final design, grading permit applications, engineering
review and fmalization of easement agreements with the golf course owner. He presented aerial view slides of the
vicinity and surrounding land uses. He explained the existing conditions and site constraints. The revised proposal
proposes 850 LF of 8' fencing (66% reduction). The applicant believes that placing 8-foot fences atop berms
would help achieve maximum screening objectives, still below original engineered wall scenarios. Fences would
35
06/04/07
remain in the areas that no berms are possible. Cost of deleted fencing would be applied toward additional
landscaping. Fencing material would be environmentally friendly building products. The applicants believe the
remaining fencing is required to meet the CVC's objectives. No single segment would exceed more than 150 feet
in length. In areas 8 and 9 two ISO' fence panels would remain. He presented the 17 conditions proposed by the
applicant.
Chairman Menconi asked that staff chime in during the reading of the conditions. if there were any issues.
Commissioner Runyon wondered about the slope gradients of 1:5 verses 2: I in staffs recommended
condition.
Mr. Campos stated that the difference in slope would be considered in areas were fencingwas deleted such
as areas 8 and 6. .
Ms. De Graaf apologized to the board and stated that she hadn't seen the applicants proposed conditions
and wasn't able to bring them together in a language that made more sense.
Chairman Menconi wondered if they should refer to the staff recommended conditions.
Ms. De Graaf stated that the applicant had incorporated staff's recommended conditions with their own.
Chairman Menconi stated that condition 4 seemed. a bit cQnfusing and wondered if the language was
adequate.
Mr. Morris stated that the language was ambiguous.
Chairman Menconi stated that he would like the maintenance plan be accepted by the Director of the
Community Development Department.
Mr. Campos stated that any maintenance plan would have to conform to the CVC's design review board.
Commissioner Fisher wondered if there would be a break in the fencing in area 1.
Mr. Campos stated that there would not be a break in the fencing but there would be alternating stepping of
the vertical elements of the fence.
Commissioner Runyon' asked if the reduction of fencing included area 1.
Mr. Campos stated that it did not include area I. Area 1 is truly a noise mitigation area and was designed
to absorb and achieve a certain standard.
Chairman Menconi stated that after reviewing the applicant's 18 conditions there seems to be some editing
to staffs conditions 1, 4 and 8.
Chairman Menconi opened and closed public comment, as there was none.
Commissioner Runyon wondered about the applicant's condition 12 regarding the CVCIMETRO funding
of $20,000 dollars toward the design of the bike path.
Mr. Campos stated that the path would cost a lot more than $20,000 dollars and would need to be
coordinated with the appropriate entities. He does however foresee drainage issues with CDQ-T.
Rick Pirog, President of the CVC Metropolitan District spoke. He stated that they would support the bike
path but they don't believe it should be their burden to build it. They would be willing to make a contribution to
design and facilitate the project.
Wally Carey, President of the Property Owners Association spoke. He agrees with Mr. Pirog's earlier
statements. He stated that they are in favor of the bike path but he doesn't know the cost. He believes the path is a
great public benefit and something that would improve the golf course. They willsupport and do everything they
can to make it happen short of making a commitment that they would totally fund the effort.
Chairman Menconi wondered about the benefit of a trail that dead ends after 1.5 miles.
Mr. Compos stated that a trail would provide a safe route to the medical center for the residents of Lake
Creek Village and others living along hwy 6.
Mr. Carey stated that he believed there were plans in place for the ECO trail to continue on the north side
of the Eagle River along the property that Cordillera controls for the fishing rights.
Ms. De Graaf stated that the trail would provide a connection not just for pedestrians but bikers that
currently use Hwy 6.
Mr. Morris stated that he is concerned with the enforceability of a condition, which simply calls for
support. Condition number 9 appears to be appropriate because it references the standards for trail construction set
out in the Eagle County land use regulations. When he hears that there is a contribution of $20,000.00 he has no
idea ifit's a meaningful contribution or a dropin the bucket. In addition, there is no mention of what the trail
would be like once constructed.
36
06/04/07
Ms. De Graaf stated that staff believes condition 8 is a reasonable condition and disagrees with the
applicant saying they couldn't facilitate the easement.
Mr. Campos stated that the condition 8 did not include CDOT.
Chairman Menconi stated that the development of a trail goes beyond his original request. Doing a trail
could mean hundreds of thousands of dollars. It is not what he anticipated in terms of a fair trade. Trying to get
secured easement by several different parties is not something he had considered. '
Mr. Pirog stated that if the County can secure the area needed for the bike path, they would support it if the
County could secure the other requirements to implement the trail. He doesn't think it's appropriate to place the
burden on them to secure an agreement from Holy Cross.
Commissioner Runyon stated that he has no trouble with the berms and landscaping but he does not want to
approve 1,700 feet offence. Heunderstands the applicant's desire but he doesn't want to set a precedent. It is
against the spirit of open space and the recreational community:
Chainnan Menconi stated that he'd like to work out a balance to compromise.
Commissioner Fisher stated that she agrees with Commissioner Runyon. She's not keen on the fence. She
wondered if the interstate noise would be thrown up and over the fence to reach at a higher level of the Cordillera
Valley Club.
Mr. Pirog stated that the fencing material that will.be used to build the barrier in Area 1 has some
absorptive qualities. When they took a vote on the project, the people in the highlands of the Valley Club were just
as much in favor as the people closer to the improvements.
Commissioner Fisher stated thatshe appreciates the applicant's effort to collaborate for the bike path. She
suggested that if a path were not successful that she'd like to see the $20,000 dollars be converted into the ECO
trails program to be used elsewhere in the Edwards area that would border or have. some affect to the Cordillera
Valley Club.
Mr. Pirog stated that the reallocation of path funding would have to be approved.
Commissioner Fisher stated that she appreciates the highway cleanup and would like to see it continue.
She would like the cleanup on the north side of the interstate to take place at least twice a year. She has concerns
with condition 7 that addresses tree replacement. She would like all dead trees replaced indefinitely on both sides
of the barrier. She suggested that construction traffic be restricted to Monday through Friday, 8 to 4. This is a first
step and she is willing to move forward if it can add some ambiance to the overall quality of the Cordillera Valley
Club and be done in a way that is tasteful. She would like there to be more discussion regarding. fence color. She
appreciates the reduction in fencing along the ridge line and hopes that the berm and the heights will be able to
accomplish their goals. She would . like it to be an attractive amenity rather than an eye sore.
Chairman Menconi stated that he is in favor of moving forward. He believes the Cordillera Metro District
has done a very goodjob in the detail and aspects of the project. He has weighed the benefits to the community and
that's why he's in favor of the project. He would like to make sure condition I to include engineering approval
above 2: 1 as recommended. He would like condition 4 to include that a maintenance plan must be fully developed
prior to a grading permit application and approved by the director of the County's Community Development
Department. He further stated that cgndition 7 should be changed to address Commissioner Fisher's concerns for
replacement of dead trees and that replacement is done indefinitely and it would be incorporated in the maintenance
plan. A trail would be an amenity but he would like condition 13 to emphasize the support by the CVC, POA and
Metro District for a regional bike path and that the money be used towards the bike path or applied to the Eagle
River Preserve Trail Fund. Commissioner Fisher suggested that greater defmition be added to Condition 15
regarding days and hours of operation. . He believes that the condition suggested by the Community Development
Department and provided in a memo from Ms. De Graaf requiring the applicant to install a paved bicycle trail is
erroneous and would be too costly.
Commissioner Fisher wondered if there were any plans to spruce up the current landscaping.
Mr. Campos stated that 16 acres of new seed is planned. The plants currently in neglect will be spruced up
and maintained by the new irrigation system.
Chairman Menconi asked Mr. Pirog and Carey if they had any questions or comments with regards to the
17 conditions.
Mr. Pirog stated that the ,conditions appear to be well thought out and they are ready to move forward.
Mr. Carey stated that the conditions are doable and fair.
Chairman Menconi stated that he appreciated their cooperation.
37
06/04/07
Commissioner Fisher moved that the Board approve File No. PDA-00067 Cordillera Vall~y Club West
End Noise Mitigation and LandscapinglBerming project, incorporating the Staff fmdings, and conditions 1-17 as
outlined and with the understanding that the final information will be presented in a resolution for review and
approval.
Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 2 to 1 with Commissioner
Runyon voting against.
Commissioner Runyon stated that he was totally in favor of the berming but fears that their will be more
people requesting the same type of noise mitigation as the interstate traffic increases. He is disturbed that others
don't see the correlation.
SUGGESTED CONDITIONS:
1. All slopes greater than 2: 1 shall receive appropriate erosion control blankets / and/or other treatment or
devices adequate to control erosion. For such slopes, CVC must provide the County Engineer with a
sealed soils report from a professionally licensed geotechnical engineer stating such grading is possible and
what mitigation measures are recommended. Such report and CVC's choice of recommended measures
must be approved by the County Engineer.
2. All site work, including fence, wall or berm construction and landscaping, must adhere to now
recommendations for type of plants and. fencing.
3. An Irrigation Plan must be fully developed by CVGand approved by the County Engineer prior to grading
permit application, and water for such irrigation must be from a non-potable water source. The Irrigation
Plan must include a temporary system for all seeded areas, and a permanent system for all trees / shrubs.
4. A Maintenance Plan must be fully developed prior to grading permit application. The maintenance plan
must be developed to a level that meets the approval of the Community Development Director. .The
Maintenance Plan must address replacement of dead plant material adequately and for the perpetuity of the
project.
S. Per Eagle County Department of Environmental Health a Dust Suppression plan and Erosion Control. and
Storm Water Management Plan must be provided prior to the grading permit application. The said plans
shall contain contact information that will respond immediately to address public complaints/concerns and
compliance issues. No grading permit will be issued without these places having been approved by the
Eagle County Environmental Health and Engineering departments. The approved plans must be kept on-
site.
6. The PUD Guide shall be amended to reflect the landscaping in Section III. Land Use Designation F. Golf
Course 2). Permitted Uses III. F .2.0.
7. Prior to the grading permit application a Landscape Guarantee shall be in place per LUR Section 5-240
h(3)(a). The initial landscape guarantee from the contractor shall call for replacement of all dead trees for a
minimum period of three years from the project acceptance by the County. All dead material beyond three
years will be the responsibility of CVC per the maintenance plan approved by Eagle County Community
Development.
8. The easement from Valley GolfLLC to theCVC Metro District shall be completed, approved by the Eagle
County Attorney and recorded prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit from Eagle County.
38
06/04/07
9. The Noise Barrier will be located exclusively. at the far west end of the project at Area. I and be heavily
landscaped facing 1-70. The minimum amount of length will be used to achieve the desired screening,
anticipated to be 800 to 900 LF. Heavily landscaped shall mean (14) 14' tall spruce trees planted every
100' lineal feet in front of. the noise barrier facing interstate 70, in addition to plant material already
identified for area 1 in preliminary design documents submitted by CVC as part of its application to the
County.
10. The use of Visual Screen Fences shall be limited to a total of 850 LF, and a maximum 8' tall. No single
segment offence shall exceed ISO' in width without a break of30' minimum between fence segments; The
total 850' LF offence must be located in Areas 6, 7, 8, or 9.
11. All wood to be used in the noise mitigation project shall be Certified wood.
12. 25% of newly created berms are to receive a wildflower seed mix, facing the interstate 70.
13. CVC POA and CVC Metropolitan District will provide the County with a letter of written support for a
future Eagle County regional bike path and associated easement along the .south side of the newly created
berm. CVC POA and CVC Metropolitan District will place $20,000 into a fund for the exclusive purpose
for the design of the path, or to be used as part of the Eagle River Preserve trails fund in the event that eve
not. expend such funds for such purpose within a period of (l) one year from the date of the approved
BoCC Resolution.
14. The project will be in complete compliance and consistency with the County's Landscape Standards, and
the project is to be designed as a model large scale xeriscape landscape.
15. The Construction of the project is anticipated to occur over a 6 month period, with the earthwork activities
to be restricted to a 90 day period, beginning at the time of grading permit issuance. Traffic Control will be
provided at Beard Creek Road in the vicinity of the Shaw Cancer Center. Construction would need to
adhere to evc Metro I DRB Regulations and monitored and controlled by Lone Star Security.
16. CVC will provide a financial match for an interpretive display at the CDOT scenic overlook and will adopt
two miles of highway clean up.
17. Except as otherwise modified by this development permit, all material representation made by the applicant
in this application and in public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval.
Attest:
There being no further business before
a liourned until June 19,2007.
39
06/04/07