Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 12/05/06 Uresent: Peter Runyon Tom Stone Am Menconi Bruce Baumgartner Bryan Treu Robert Mortis Teak Simonton Kathy Scriver PUBLIC HEARING December 5, 2006 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Administrator County Attorney Assistant County Attorney Clerk to the Board Deputy Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing, the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: GENERAL FUND 21ST CENTURY PHOTO SUPPLY ABBOTT LABORATORIES ABC LEGAL SERVICES INC AFFILJA TED CREDIT SERVICE AHLERS AND ASSOCIATES ALICIA LANDA ALLEN BURKI ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY ALpINE V ALLEY SERVICES AMERICAN JAIL ASSOCIATION AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMEIUCINN LODGE & SUITES AMERIGAS AMY BERENS ANDERSON & KEIL ANTLERS HILTON APEX SOFTWARE API FUND FOR PAYROLL ED APS ARN MENCONI ASTRA RADIO COMMUNICATION A V TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVON CENTER AT BEAVER CK AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS B&D MAINTENANCE INC B&H SPORTS BALCOMB AND GREEN BEN GALLOWAY MD BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER BERTHOD MOTORS _ BETH MILTON BETHANY VAN WYK BILL HEICHER BOYD COFFEE COMPANY BRC/l-IARRIS INC 1RUCE BAUMGARTNER SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 1 12/5/06 81.75 176.33 30.00 35.60 12,100.00 13.77 242.85 189.43 4,454.84 36.00 397.00 84.90 49.35 23230 27.80 273.00 1,980.00 1,157.00 99.51 85.00 196.50 1,/42.80 2,075.50 2,155.36 2,841.50 327.50 2,572.53 1,580.00 75.00 748.37 242.85 57.24 100.00 1,106.17 3,395.00 36.50 BUNDLE BANDS BUSCH PROFESSIONAL CORP CAPITOL ADV ANT AGE PUB. CARMEN LOZOYONELEZ CARTER & SANDS P.C. CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CATBYKEIL CATHY ZEEB CENTRAL DISTR.rBU'rfNG CENTURYTEL CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE COM APPLIED SECURITY CBARLES D JONES CO, INC. CHARM TEX CHEF DE CUISINE EPICUREAN CHEMATOX INC. CHER.YL THOMAS CrNGULAR. WIRELESS CLEAN DESIGNS CLIFF SIMONTON CLIFFORD D ZINDA CLOSET FACTORY CO ASSESSOR ASSOCIATION CO DEPT AGRICULTURE CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND COASTAL BUSINESS COLBY RUSSELL COLORADO COUNTIES iNC COLORADO DEPT REVENVE COLORADO FOUNDATION FOR COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COLORADO STATESMAN COLORADO WATERWISE COLORADO WEED MANAGEMENT COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH COMMSYSTECHNOLOGY CORP CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COWBOY CATERING CRISTINA GAIR DAN CORCORAN PLS DAVID A BAUER DELL INC DENVER CHECK WRITER, INC. DEVENEI D BALL DEX MEDIA EAST LLC DIEBOLD ELECTION SYSTEMS DOCTORS ON CALL DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP DON OLSEN SERVICE REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE , SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 72.85 30.00 50.85 240.57 55.85 9.43 242.85 1,272.00 1,088.70 13,136.84 3,035.46 228.99 85.32 119.60 15,343.00 180.00 141.35 445.64 289.65 21.68 148.50 2,775.00 225.00 100.00 122.00 1,835.00 590.00 203.00 521.20 1,174.47 175.00 15,443.06 66.90 84.00 100.00 260.00 140.00 305.26 1,841.39 6,044.45 289.08 2,929.45 390.00 2,040.00 85.80 99.95 67.60 30.00 41.31 944.00 260.00 192.76 7.76 2 12/5/06 DOREEN CONSTANINE DOUG RUSSELL DuFFORD W ALD'ECK & MILBURN EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL ;AGLECdUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE EMBROIDERY INC EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLERNERWATERAND EAGLE RIVER YOUTfI COAL. EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE VALLEY PET HOSPITAL EAGLE V ALLEY PRINTING ED GRANGE EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER EDWARDS STATION LLC ELECTION CENtER EMC2 EMPIRE GAS EMPlOYERS COUNCIL SERVICE ERIC LOVGREN ESRI EVANCHO PAiNTING EVERETT FAMILY FUNERAL EXTENSION PROGRAM FUND FAiRFIELD INN FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FARNUM HOLT FUNERAL HOM'E ARRELL & SELDiN F AS LLC FEA THER PETROLEUM CO FEDERAL ExPRESS FFF ENTERPRISES FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES FIRKINS GARAGE DOORS FISHER CONSULTiNG GROuP FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY FLORIDA MICRO FOURPOtNTSSBERATON FRANK J BALL FRANKtiN COVEY FSH COMMONICA TIONS LLC GABRIELA VELASCO GALLS INCORPORATED GIV GLENDA WENTWORTH GLENN PADGETT GLENWOOD SPRINGS POST GOODMAN & WALLACE LLP GOVCONNECTION, INC GOVERNING MAGAZINE GOVERNMENT CONTRACT SALES JRAINGER INCORPORATED REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE REFUND REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 176.51 7.94 700.56 12,358.23 15,500.00 336.00 467.91 1,326'96 1,077.44 20.00 181.74 20.00 3,579.00 72.00 8.96 300.00 250.00 231. 68 43.70 225.00 37.03 20,000.00 2,450.00 750.00 1,806.05 99.00 2,332.30 160.00 51.70 15.00 27.00 696.51 1,231.78 662.83 731.00 3,600.00 10.00 7,600.93 477.00 30.00 297.66 65.00 42.53 9,291.15 16,800.60 16.20 75.00 150.00 46.00 607.45 16.00 2,811.82 1,457.60 3 12/5/06 GRAND JUNctioN PIPE AND GREAT AMEIUCAN LEASING HART INTERCrvrC HEALTB iNSURANCE FUND HEART OFTHE WEST COUNSEL HELLO DIRECT INC HEWLETT P ACKARb HIGH COUNTRY NEWS HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HOWARD RISK HV AC SUPPLY IAAO IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS IMPERIAL HEAD WEAR, INC. iNTERNALREVENuESERV~E INTERNAP NETWoRK. SYSTEMS ISA.RMA ISABEL LaY A J.P.COOKE Co JACKIE CRUMB JAMES H THERRELL IV JAMES PUBLISBING COMPANY JAMIE BUMPHREY JAN 0 WESTMAN JANICE SCOFIELD JBr'S CUSTOM SILK JEANNA D BAITON JEFF LAYMAN JEFFERSON COUNTY JENNIE W AHRER JEROME EVANS PH.D JERRY CHICOINE JILL HUNSAKER JOES W ALLBAORD & SUPPLY JOHN G MARTIN JUDEAN GLASSIER KARA BETTIS, CORONER KAY VINCENT KELLY MILLER KIMBALL INTERNATIONAL KINDER MORGAN INC KINETICO WATER PROS KRIS WHITTAKER KYMBERLEIGH SEMMENS KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAF ARGE CORPORATION LANCE SCHOBER LASER JUNCTION LEATRICE V AS TEN LEXISNEXIS COURTLINK 1NC LINDA MAGGIORE LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR LITTLER MENDELSON SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE 26.03 1,255.00 1,245.16 15,662.86 150.00 581.72 1,138.00 14.95 18,869.74 9.45 20.76 175.00 13.00 80.00 200.00 2,427:40 155.00 400.00 207 .30 169.29 30.00 133.88 68.00 30.00 159.11 130.00 30.00 368.51 150.00 427.28 900.00 114.90 143.78 133.00 242.85 60.00 89.19 463.83 21.70 1,666.94 15,467.21 317.18 377.23 32.40 1,700.00 613.20 80.02 636.00 22.98 1,449.50 266.49 79.22 245.00 4 12/5/06 LORIE CRAWFORD LORRAINE VASQUEZ M CECILIA ZALINGER MACHOL & JOHANNES \.1AIN AUTO PARTS MARKLE AUSTIN MARKS PLUMBiNG PARTS MARY SEPP ALE MASONS&VETERANS TOY DRIVE MAXIMUM COMFORT POOL SPA MBIA MEADOW MOUNTAIN PLUMBING MEDIMMUNE DISTRIBUTION MELISSA ZINTSMASTER MERCK ATL METRO PATH MiCHAEL L BLAKE P C MICRO PLASTICS INC MICROSOFT SERVICES MID V ALLEY METROPOLITAN MIKE KERST MIKE ROEPER MILLER & COHEN MOFFET CONSULTING MONQUEESCHA WALKER MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES 1m MESA SPORt INC MURRAY DAHL MWI VETERNIARY SVI'PL Y CO NANCY scHURR, NP NATIONAL 4I-I SuPPLY NATIONAL ANIMAL CONTROL NATURAL HOME NEHA ENVIRONMETAL HEALTH NICOLA RICHIE NICOLETTI FLATER ASSOC NRC BROADCASTING, INC. OC TANNER OES ELECTRICAL OLGA WILKINS ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO OSM DELIVERY LLC OTTALIE FABER-CARLIN P SCOTT LOWERY PACIFIC RIM PADDYWACKS DIST., LLC PAINT BUCKET THE PAPER WISE PARK COUNTY SHERIFF OFF. PAT NOLAN A YFLEX SYSTEMS USA INC REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 175.77 275.70 14.58 24.44 51.87 622.37 281.17 34.70 2,000.00 125.00 5,036.73 1,439.52 985.00 5.67 2,022.23 126.00 30.00 31.53 59,159.00 417.78 350.24 60.75 9.80 11,869.96 385.16 475.00 159,567.10 1,549.38 714.98 3,783.73 1,713.44 184.32 77.00 495.00 19.00 95.00 30.00 1,180.00 1,500.00 154.88 50.40 192.30 979.20 459.59 20.40 54.40 320.38 813.40 212.67 2,636.00 13,320.00 149.41 883.38 5 12/5/06 PEGGY GRAYBEAL PITNEY BOWES POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PRCA PROFESSIONAL ROOFING PROSHINE SALES & SERVICE PSS,INC PURCHASE POWER QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QWEST QWEST INTERPRISE NETWRKNG R & S NORTHEAST LLC RANDALL WB PURVIS RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURING RDJ SPECIALTIES INC RDM EXCA VA TING RICK ULLOM RIFLE JET CENTER LLC RITARBOSSOW ROSI BURKI ROY BURK! RSC RUTH A SHARP RYKOMANUFACTURtNG CO S &SWORLDWIDE S CORPORATION INC SAM COLLiNS SARAH SCHIPPER SCAN AIR OF COLORADO INC SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP SCHMIDT POLYGRAPH SCOTT FLEMING SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SECURITY TRANSPORT SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHAINHOLTZ TODD B DDS SI-lAPINS ASSOCIATES SHEAFFER KAREN SHERI MINTZ SIMON PROPERTY SERVICES SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SIR! NELSON SMILE MAKERS SNOWHITE LINEN SOCIETY HUMAN RESOURCE MG SOFTWARE SPECTRUM SPECIALTIES INCORPORATED SPRONK WATER ENGINEERS STERICYCLE INC STERN & NEWTON STEVES DOG & CAT REPAIR SUPERIOR DRYWALL SUPPORT PAYMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICE REFUND 180.00 153.00 1,000.00 1,300.00 183.50 1,352.78 1,065.61 17,073.68 518.00 7,657.33 659.41 101.20 27.20 454.85 367.24 1,120.00 22.28 509.74 85.82 242.85 242.85 252.34 29.92 308.26 119.75 9,683.13 151.42 87.17 194.72 300 .56 405.00 746.01 11.65 2,019.40 4,264.00 603.00 7,630.66 173.99 435.07 760.00 956.05 152.35 63.45 181.46 145.00 615.34 264.50 1,687.85 743.82 30.00 900.00 614.00 363.00 6 12/5/06 SUSAN NARDUZZl SUSPENSE FUND TAMMI MATTHEWS .ERRIE FISCHER HE FLOWER CART THE OLD GYPSUM PRINTER THOMAS F FARRELL THOMSON WEST GROUP TIM DOOLEY TIMOTHY S GIBSON TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TOWN OF EAGLE TOWN OF GYPSUM TRI COUNTY FIRE TYLER tECHNOLOGIES mC ULRICB BURKI UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNItED RENTALS UNITED SITE SERVICES uNItED STATES TREASURY UNN OF COLORADO HOSPITAL URBAN LAND INStITUTE US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS liS FOODSERVICE mC VAIL DAILY THE VAIL ELECTRONICS V AIL LOCK AND KEY VAIL MOUNTAIN COFFEE 'AIL POLICE DEPARTMENT VAIL RESORTS INC VAIL RESORTS MANAGEMENT V AIL VALLEY MEDICAL V AIL V ALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VALLEY ELECTRIC SUPPLY VALLEY LUMBER V ALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY VERIFICATIONS INC VERIZON WIRELESS, VISA CARD SERVICES VOGELMAN WEST ASSOCIATES VOTEC CORPORATION W ALZ POSTAL SOLUTIONS INC WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN SLOPE BAR WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES WOLPOFF AND ABRAMSON WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XCEL ENERGY XEROX CORPORATION Y AMP A V ALLEY ELECTRIC A YROLL FOR NOVEMBER REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL 23 &24 90.00 108,061.67 85.41 248.37 716.97 35.00 88.60 425.75 160.13 11.00 148.11 2,716.67 699.81 130.00 4,689.00 242.85 424.55 2,556.24 99.51 933.70 362.00 350.00 18,622.87 6,873.43 8,400.58 13,601.71 6.00 188.50 19,151.00 29,015.00 312.50 600.00 2,262.07 25.85 297.53 2,406.36 3,277.10 53.70 3,259.66 58,478.39 3,016.68 5,000.00 168.36 1,543.81 333,716.95 246.42 359.22 60.00 50.95 366.25 6,355.61 29.86 784,462.35 7 12/5/06 2,068,660.54 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND BAND B EXCAVATING B&H SPORTS BILL BOCELA W A TZ BRUSH CREEK LANDSCAPiNG CHARLIE COOPER COLORADO LTAP COPY PLUS EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO ENVlROTECH FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND HEALTH iNSURANCE FUND HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IMPERIAL HEADWEAR, INC. INTERWEST SAFETY SVI'pL Y KEMP AND COMPANY INC KERRY O'NEILL KiNDER MORGAN INC LAFARGE CORPORATION M & M AUTO PARTS MOTOR POOL FUND NAPA AUTO PARTS ROCKVILLE CHEMICAL INC SAFETy & CONSTRUCTION SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF GYPSUM UNITED COMPANIES MESA CO US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE ZIPPY TECH INC PAYROLL FOR NOVEMBER SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL 23 & 24 130,487.29 268.95 75.00 1,836.00 75.00 200.00 124.88 101.79 1,915.65 13,990.95 401.88 512.43 1,623.13 445.00 575.55 1,336.43 851.12 417.20 75.00 1,375.95 235.28 8.84 136,531.92 128.20 466.93 1,251.46 7,037.32 239.85 5,061.03 640.19 165.07 40.42 27,681.97 47.75 226.65 56.71 225.00 63,750.68 400,484.47 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND ADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS ANDREWS FOODSERVICE CENTURYTEL CHRIS MORTON CORPORATE EXPRESS DEBORAH LONG DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP DOTSERO MOBILE HOME PARK EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 1,500.00 70.11 96.93 885.00 134.46 75.00 79.00 362.24 5,473.59 8 12/5/06 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLECOUNTYSHE~FFSOFF EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE V ALLEY PRINTING 'ARLY CHILDHOOD PARTNERS GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF HART iNTERCIVIC BEAL TH INSURANCE FUND fIOL YCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC KYLE MCINTYRE KYMBERLEIGH SEMMENS LABORATORY CORPORATION OF LARA "HEATHER" LA WDERMILK LEXISNEXIS COURTLINK INC LG PRINTING COMPANY LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY LINDA PEREZ LYONS KATHLEEN NICHOLAS J HOEGER ORKIN EXTERMINA TiNa CO QUILL CORPORATION SILVER LEAF SUITES SOLARA LLC SUSPENSE FUND SYLVIA SALAZAR THE PARENTS HANDBook VAIL HONEYWAGON LTD VERIZON WIRELESS, IRGINIA AVILA VISA CAR.DSERvr'CES WELLS FARGO WILLIAM TARALLO WYNNE MORGAN XEROX CORPORATION PAYROLL FOR NOVEMBER SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE PAYROLLEXPD SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE PAYROLL 23 &24 165.70 25.20 2,000.00 306.00 5,144.67 26.80 38.69 1,623.03 305.00 370.75 17.17 138.00 134.79 113.85 86.50 1,600.00 985.80 38.88 468.11 57.75 92.60 135.96 13,037.93 8,393.66 174.56 1,100.00 33.50 487.22 318.33 1,450.67 26,154.42 365.00 202.75 368.16 58,795.80 133,433.58 RETIREMENT FUND SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 92,025.23 92,025.23 OFFSITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG SERVICE 28,181.95 28,181.95 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND BAND B EXCA VA TING CDW COMFORT INN EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER HEWLETT PACKARD 1P ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS AFARGE CORPORATION SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 537.00 1,165.00 719.92 1,423.77 1,718.00 830.50 417.93 9 12/5/06 MORTER ARCHITECTS NEW WORLD SYSTEMS RIPPy CONTRACTORS INC SCHMUESER GORDoN MEYER SOPR.IS ARCHITECTURE VALLEY LUMBER VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE 29,786.01 23,859.58 5,384.92 1,090.00 8,697.70 47.46 831.03 76,508.82 SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. A & E TIRE INC Al AUTO ELECTRIC COMPANY ADbRA MEYERS BILLINGS KAR KOLOR INC BufFALO RIDGE AFFORDABLE CtNGULAR WIRELESS COLLEITS COLORADO DOORWAYS COLORADO PRINTING COMPANY COLUMBINE MARKET COPY COpy cOPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DAVID JOHNSON DoCTORS ON CALL DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EAGLE VALLEY TEMPS FEDERAL EXPRESS GARY NEStOR GFIGENFARE GILLIG CORPORATION GLEN WOOD SPRINGS FORD HASLER INC HA VENERS TRUCKING TOWING HEAL TB INSURANCE FUND HIGH COUNTRY SHIRTWORKS HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS INSTA-CHAIN INC KINDER MORGAN INC KINETICO WATER PROS KIPLINGERS PERSONAL KKCH RADIO KSKE-NRC BROADCASTING KTUN-NRC BROADCASTING KW CONSTRUCTION KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAWSON PRODUCTS M & M AUTO PARTS SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 6,030.04 4,381.45 80.33 49.25 7,800.00 295.95 1,140.09 209.00 4,928.28 69.63 1,532.00 59.88 469.01 5,874.23 67.23 555.00 7,685.55 46,304.95 7.95 347.50 110.50 15.96 19.44 1,482.19 1,614.29 149.76 17.00 437.50 2,912.30 10.00 2,015.43 93.86 2,344.44 4,818.28 93.18 14.97 250.00 250.00 300.00 1,900.00 333.00 402.94 363.77 10 12/5/06 MAIN AUTO PARTS MILLENNIUM TOWING MoTOR POOL FUND NEW PIG CORPORATION 'OWERSHIFT INC QUILL CORPORATION QWEST SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF GYPSUM TRANSWEST TRUCKS UNITED STATES WELDING US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS VAIL NET V ALLEY VIEW HOSPiTAL VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLs FARGO WESTERN SLOPE BAR WYLACO SUppLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAyROLL FOR NOVEMBER SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL 23 7 24 26.07 450.00 15,284.38 541.27 10,212.68 872.89 165.97 13,334.92 414.14 437.35 329.85 29.60 2,241.82 11.95 80.00 3,264.72 141.55 65,558.79 8.50 12.80 510.90 144.62 145,174.87 367,085.77 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS ALPINE ENGINEERING ARCHIBEQUE LAND CONSULTIN EAUTY BEYOND BELIEF BICYCLE COLORADO Cb DEPT OF HEALTH COLORADO PRECAST CONCRETE EAGLE AUTO RECYCLING & FEDERAL EXPRESS HEAL 1A INSURANCE FUND IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS KEMp AND COMPANY INC KRM CONSULTANTS LEAGUE OF AMERICA, THE LEAVENWORTH AND KARP RFTAJMID-V ALLEY TRAILS SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER SUSPENSE FUND UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV VISA CARD SERVICES WELLS FARGO WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY YEH & ASSOCIA TES INC SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SERVICE 1,687.50 1,175.00 137.83 150.00 270.00 28,350.00 1,050.00 175.12 10.72 108.00 1,650.00 420.00 35.00 43.91 36,000.00 28,225.96 164.40 600.00 44.22 952.39 148.42 287.75 101,686.22 AIRPORT FUND ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY MERICAN PROTECTION SUPPLIES SERVICE 81.60 2,152.50 11 12/5/06 ASMI BALCOMB AND GREEN CARTER & BURGESS, INC CENTURYTEL CHIEF SUPPLY CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTB AND COLLETTS COLORADO PAINT COMPANY CORPORATE EXPRESS DISH NETWORK DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE EMBROIDERY INC ELIZABETH WILT FIRKINS GARAGE DOORS GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GYPSUM TOWN OF HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS JAY MAX SALES KINDER MORGAN INC UGBTNING SERVICES MAIN AUTO PARTS MCI WORLDCOM METEORLOGIX MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC MOTOR POOL FUND MULTI ELECTRIC MFG INC NEXTEL OJ WATSON COMPANY INC PINYON MESA AUTOMATICS SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SKYLINE MECHANICAL SUMMlTEX, LLC SUSPENSE FUND TAYLOR FENCE COMPANY UNITED PARCEL SERVICE US CUSTOMS SERVICE WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN SLOPE BAR WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR NOVEMBER SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLLEXPD SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL 23 &24 188,738.00 141.64 51,256.50 3,476.53 37.91 232.00 2,541.50 303.57 14.24 66.97 29.76 467.95 46.35 1,189.99 2,780.00 60.92 431.05 1,430.69 3,912.15 461.40 187.00 12.54 90.00 160.24 12.70 477.00 25,400.00 5,418.68 589.63 723.82 367,697.00 992.80 1,944.00 420.50 127.89 4,529.79 1,440.00 131.09 223.27 867.1 0 18,023.96 282.43 615.47 95.58 274.96 37,798.08 728,388.75 900 MHZ FUND BUCHHOLZ FAMILY CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 12,000.00 92.96 3,492.38 37,259.00 12 12/5/06 MCI WORLDCOM QWEST SERVICE SERVICE 6,567.04 2,134.93 61,546.31 MC-COPD~BT s~RvlcE FUND US BANK SERVICE 996,907.04 996,907.04 HOUSING FUND CORPORATE EXPRESS HEALTH INSURANCE FUND SOFTWARE SPECTRUM STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT SUSPENSE FUND VISA CARD SERVICES WELLS FARGO PAYROLL FOR NOVEMBER SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD PAYROLL 23 &24 842.26 66.08 382.00 350.00 1,330.54 325.01 567.66 1,465.31 5,328.86 HAZARDOUSMATEIDALFUND JJ KELLER AND ASSOCIATES REIS ENVIRONMENTAL INC SERVICE SERVICE 186.D3 524.00 710.03 OPEN SPACE FUND WRiGHT WATER ENGiNEERS SERVICE 1,647.46 1,647.46 ANDFILL FOND 1ST CENTURY SEEDERS INC A CUT ABOVE FORESTRY AMERlGAS CAROLINA SOFTWARE CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CORPORATE EXPRESS DOWN VALLEY SEPTIC EAGLE V ALLEY ALLIANCE HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IMPERIAL BEAD WEAR, iNc. KRW CONSULTING INC LAF ARGE CORPORATION MAiN AUTO PARTS MARVIN LAMAN JR MOTOR POOL FUND SUSPENSE FUND US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS VISA CAW SERVICES WELLS FARGO WESTERN SLOPE BAR PAYROLL FOR NOVEMBER SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLLEXPD SERVICE PAYROLL 23 &24 44.17 11.24 2,182.88 433.90 718.63 123.25 615.00 1,100.00 743.95 307.57 400.00 2,918.71 3,569.23 7.49 34.97 64,880.69 2,377.20 750.48 184.28 7,366.09 72.62 20,649.19 109,491.54 13 12/5/06 MOTOR POOL FUND AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INt BERTHOD MOTORS BURT CHEVROLET, iNC CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE COLLETTS COpy PLUS G & K SERVICES GLENWOOD SPRiNGS CHRYSLER GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND HEALTH iNSURANCE FUND HENSLEY BATTERY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HONNEN EQUIPMENT IMPERIAL HEADWEAR, INC. KINDER MORGAN INt LAWSON PRODUCTS LIGHTHOUSE, INC., THE M & M AUTO PARTS MCMASTER CARR MOTOR POOL FUND NICHOLAS J HOEGER POWER EQUIPMENT COMPANY PREMIER TIRE TERMINAL SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF GYPSUM US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS VEEDER-ROOT COMPANY WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN COLORADO WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY PAYROLL FOR NOVEMBER SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL 23 & 24 39.90 172.45 93.30 526.17 85,385.96 173.53 568.30 149.60 111.92 818.02 1,349.80 1,488.02 923.50 270.00 3,557.39 407.85 514.89 1,355.25 103.99 4,340.38 57.29 39.86 816.92 2,183.87 322.90 1,655.16 189.24 764.42 104.50 7,328.00 72.87 5,837.55 16,588.33 138,311.13 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY JEFFERSON PILOT FINANCIAL MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. MUTUAL OF OMAHA UNITED STATES LIFE INS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 1,050.00 4,132.31 42,108.52 3,786.17 1,122.50 52,199.50 ENHANCED E911 FUND CENTURYTEL LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES NOMAD TECHNOLOGIES QWEST TOWN OF VAIL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 183.98 1,224.72 850.00 13,276.86 224,969.50 240,505.06 5,603,102.26 14 12/5/06 2006 Bronze Hard Hat Award from Colorado Construction for the Miller Ranch Child Care and Community Center project Eagle County and R.A. Nelson received the 2006 Bronze Hat Award for the Miller Ranch Childcare and COmlTlunity Center project. Chairman Runyon presented awards to Rita Woods, Peter Fralick, Dave Kekar, David Kopp and Clark Shivley. Eagle River Watershed Council Award Carolyn Bradford, Eagle River Watershed Council Bill Heicher, Member of the Board of Directors spoke. He introduced other members of the board and project director present. He presented the Eagle River Watershed Council award to Steven Elzinga, Eagle county Weed and pest Coordinator fot his work in helping to eradicate tamarisk in the county. Executive Session It was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed to go into Executive Session for the purpose of receiving legal advice regarding Vail Valley Taxi suspension issues which is an appropriate topic for discussion pursuant to C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b), Colorado Revised Statutes. At the close of the discussion, it was moved, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn from Executive Session. onsentAgenda Chairman Runyon stated the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of bill paying for the week of December 4,2006 (subject to review by the Finance Director) Finance Department Representative B. Approval of payroll for December 7, 2006 (subject to review by the Finance Director) Finance Department Representative c. Approval of the Minutes of the Eagle Board of County Commissioners Meetings for September 19, September 26 and October 3, 2006 Teak Simonton, Clerk & Recorder D. Final Settlement of Agreement between Eagle County and Patriot Highway Markings County Attorney's OfficeIRoad & Bridge Representative Eo Holy Cross Energy underground right-of-way easement Engineering Department Representative F. Contract for professional services between Eagle County and Rocky Mountain Accounting Services, Inc. Finance Department Representative Resolution 2006-111 regarding appointments to the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission County Attorney's Office Representative 15 12/5/06 H. Resolution 2006-112 regarding an appointment to the Basalt Regional Library District Board of Trustees County Attorney's Office Representative I. Renewal of2007 Animal Service Intergovernmental Agreement with the Town of Eagle Animal Services Representative J. Human Resources / Payroll software conversion independent contractor agreement Nota Fryklund, Human Resources K. Second Amendment to Master Agreement for Professional Consulting Services between Eagle County and Carter & Burgess, Inc. Airport Representative L. Joint Funding Agreement for Water Resources Investigation between Eagle County and the U.S. Geological Survey Ray Merry, Environmental Health M. mtetgovemmental Agreement between Eagle County and the Town of Avon for Animal Services Animal Services Representative N. Resolution 2006-116 of Changes to the Colorado Department of Housing Fuhd Revolving Loans Policies Housing Department Representative o. Resolution for the creation of the Eagle County Renewab1es and Efficiency Fund Advisory Board Adam Palmer, Community Development P. 5MB-00404 - Village Walk ~ Phase I; A re-subdivision of lot 4, Eighth Amendment - Beaver Creek Subdivision - Fourth Filing, Tract M, Lots 1 and 2: Are-subdivision of Lot 2 Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Community Development Q, 5MB-00405 ~ Third amendment, Beaver Creek Hotel A Condominium - to re-subdivide Hotel Unit H-l into fifteen fractional, residential condominium units as well as commOn elements Terri Johnson, Community Development Chairman Runyon asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Bryan Treu, County Attorney stated that there were no changes to the consent agenda. Commissioner Stone requested that Item 0 be removed from the consent agenda to be considered separately. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items A-Q, omitting item O. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Resolution 2006-113 for the creation of the Eagle County Renewables and Efficiency Fund Advisory Board Adam Palmer, Community Development Commissioner Stone stated that he would not be voting on this item. He doesn't believe that it is a legal 16 12/5/06 funding mechanism. The fee in-lieu is a tax or impact fee. If it were a tax, it did not go before the voters. If it were an impact fee, there should have been a Nexus Study. Cortllnissioner Mel1col1i moved to approve the Resolution 2006-112 for the creation ofthe Eagle County el1ewablesand Efficiel1cy Fund Advisory Board. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of two to one with Commissioner Stone votil1g agail1st. Citizen Input Butch Mazzuca spoke. He requested il1formation about the Early Childhood Development program funding. His understanding regardil1g the funds for early childhood development was that $344,000 would have been Spel1t by the end of this year. He wOl1dered if that dollar amount was accurate. Bruce Baumgartner stated that it was correct. Mr. Mazzuca stated that he supports the ECD program but does not support the vehicle used to fund it. He would like to mow what the Board specifically has in mind for next year, how much the program is going to cost and where the money would cOme from. He asked Commissioner Menconi if it was his intel1t to use money from the audit. Commissioner Menconi asked Mr. Mazzuca what he didn't like about the vehicle used to support the Early Childhood Developmel1t Program. Mr. Mazzuca stated that he didn't like the original vehicle which was referendum lA. Had it passed he believed there would have been a lot of money available and no clear plan. He asked for Commissiol1er Menconi's plans [or 2007. Commissioner Menconi stated that it was his goal to find funding for Early Childhood Development through existing county dolla.rs. He stated that all three Commissioners voted to support a ol1e-year countyWide assess'ment. He predicted that there would be a proposal to the Board of County Commissioners for programs and ervices that were deemed the highest priority out of the assessment. Mr. MazZuca wondered what those programs and services might be and cost. Commissioner Menconi stated that there is a draft document that he hopes will be presented in January. He believes that it's important that people understand that as a government we support health and human services programs currently. The dollars may be found in the audit, revenues exceeding project revenues or out of reserves. He believes it's unconscionable for the county to spend county dollars for an assessment of need and not offer solutions to the needs. Mr. Mazzuca stated that the number given to him by Kate Forinash was $343,995.00 total dollars that the county spent last year. . Commissioner Menconi stated that that money was matched by nearly $1,000,000 of federal and state money. Mr. Mazzuca stated that he believes that lA was reflective of the voter's feelings. Chairman Runyon suggested that Mr. Mazzuca meet with Commissioner Menconi a.t a later date. Commissioner Menconi stated that he was unclear about Mr. Mazzuca's questioning. He wondered ifMr. Mazzuca wa.s interested in finding ways to help children in need through county dollars or does he think lA is an indication of how people feel about spending tax payers dollars for early childhood development. Mr. MazZuca stated that both were accurate. CC)1nmissioner Menconi stated that he'd enjoy their follow-up discussion because he thinks there is a big distinction between the two. Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and re-convene as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 17 12/5/06 Eagle County Liquor License Authority Kathy Scriver, Clerk and Recorder's Office APPLICANT: DBA: REPRESENTATIVE: LOCATION: STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: CONCERNS / ISSUES: Larkburger, LLC Larkburger Adam Baker, Managing Partner 105 Edwards Village Blvd., Unit-B 103 Kathy Scriver None DESCRIPTION: This is an application for a new Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License. This establishment will be located in the Edwards Village Center in Edwards and will operate as a quick service restaurant and offer beer and wine to its customers. Larkburger may consider a full service bar in the future. STAFF REPORT AND FINDINGS: ESTABLISIDNG THE NEIGHBORHOOD The first order ofbllsiness is to establish the neighborhood. Staffrecomrnends the following neighborhood: A two-mile radius including but not llinit~d to the Homestead subdivision, South 40 Subdivision, Edwards Village Center, Riverfront Subdivision and Old Edwards Estates. MOTION" : COnufiissioner Stone moved that the Board establish the neighborhood to include the area within a two- mile radius including but not limited to the Homestead subdivision, South 40 Subdivision, Edwards Village Center, Riverfront Subdivision and Old Edwards Estates. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. NEEDS AND DESIRES OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD 1. All members of the Board have been provided with copies of the petition submitted by the applicant. The Boa.rd will consider the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood, the desires of the adult inhabitants of the neighborhood and whether the existing licenses are adequate to meet these needs and desires, per the Colorado Liquor Code, Section 12-347-301 (2) (a). 2. There are currently 16 Hotel and Restaurant liquor licenses issued near the proposed location. However, there are no provisions in the Colorado Liquor Code for denial based upon undue concentration. 3. This application is in order, all application requirements have been met, all necessary documents have been received, and all fees have been paid. 4. Public notice has been given by the posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the premises, November 22,2006, and by publishing in the Eagle Valley Enterprise on November 23,2006 and 30th, 2006. 5. The premises are not within 500 feet of a location for which, within 2 years preceding the application, a license of the same class was denied for the reason that the reasonable requirements of the neighborhood and the desires of the adult inhabitants were satisfied by existing outlets. 18 12/5/06 6. The premises are not within 500 feet of any public or parochial school or the campus of any college, university, or seminary. 7. These findings have been made known, in writing, to the applicant and other interested parties, five (5) days prior to this hearing. 8. Larkburger, LLC has submitted an Alcohol Management Plan, required by the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority. 9. Mr. Baker is over 21 years of age, has been server trained and reported to be of good moral character based on Sheriff and CEI background checks. 10. No concerns regarding this application have been received from of the following Eagle County Departments: Sheriff, Community Development, Environmental Health, Building, Road & Bridge, and Eagle County Treasurer. STAFF RECOMMENJ)ATION: All findings are positive and staff recommends approval. DISCUSSION: Ms. Scriver presented the file. Adam Baker, managing partner was present for the hearing. Chairman Runyon thanked Mr. Baker for coming to the meeting. He asked about the specific location of the proposed restaurant. Mr. Baker clarified that the location is in the Edwards Village Center between Moontime Cyclery and Steve's Dog and Cat repair Commissioner Stone asked for Mr. Baker's background. Mr. Baker indicated that he had 15 years management experience and is currently the manager at the arksput restaurant in Vail and is a certified TIPS trainer. The new venture is a spin-off of a popular item at the Larkspur restaurant. The restaurant will offer counter service only. Only beer and wine will be offered. All ingredients a.te organic and na.tural and they would be open for lunch and dinner. MOTION: Commissioner Menconi moved the Board find that there is a reasonable requirement and desire for the issuance of this license; therefore approve a Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License for Larkburger, LLC d/b/a Larkburger based on the testimony, petitions, and evidence submitted today and incorporating the staff findings. Such license is to be issued upon the written findings and decision of this Board and upon a final inspection of the premises by our Clerk and Recorder to determine that the applicant has complied with the site information provided today and as may be required by the Colorado Liquor Code. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority and re-convene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Public Hearing - Set Mill Levy and Adopt 2007 Budget Bruce Baumgartner, Administration; Cindy Prey tis, Finance Department Director Ms. Preytis distributed the current budget figures and budget resolution to the Board. Mr. Baumgartner stated that the revenue numbers had been updated based on the certified assessed value 19 12/5/06 for the county reVenue numbers that are derived from the assessed evaluation of property tax numbers. The revenue numbers for the general fund, road and bridge and social services fund had been adjusted based on the now certified m:i11levy. The total budget for the county for 2007 is $98,410,152. There are a number offUllds, the largest of which is the general fund with proj ected budgeted expenditures of $39,435,388. Road and Bridge budgeted expenditures $8,075,976. The Social Services fund $3,004,460. The guidelines used in preparing the budget are to continue the cote business at a high level of quality. Keep revenue forecasts at conservative levels. At the request of Conni1issioner Stone, the impact of Costco was looked at and the sales tax revenues were increased. He concluded with the guidelines, economic indicators, overall budget highlights and revenue assumptions. Chairtnan Runyon stated that the numbers look good and very conservative. Chairtnan Runyon opened public comment. There was none. Public comment was closed Resolution 2006-114 Matter of the Adoption of the Budget and the Making of Appropriations for the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, for Fiscal Year 2007 COnni1issioner Menconi moved to adopt the 2007 budget as presented. Col.11thissioner MenConi thanked Ms. Preytis for jumping in and finding some distinctions that were important to the budget. He thanked all the Directors, Staff and Elected Officials for their extra work on the oudget. Be believes that as the county grows in population the county has continued to be a leader in services and programs using the taxpayer's dollars diligently and providing the best for the citizens of Eagle County. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of two to one with Commissioner Stone voting against. ReSolution 2006...115 Fiscal Budget MillLevy Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the 2007 Fiscal Budget Mill Levy. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of two to one with Col.11thissioner Stone voting against. Planning Files LUR..0063 - Geolmdc Hazards and Hillside Development Bob Narfacci, Planning Department NOTE: ACTION: Request to table to 2/6/07 Amendment ofthe Eagle County Land Use Regulation to protect the property and quality of life of present and future residents by regulating development on steep valleys - side slopes. LOCATION: N/A STAFF. RECOMMENDATION: Table DISCUSSION: Mr. Narracci stated that the Eagle County Planning Commission had heard the file and although they are in 20 12/5/06 gerteral favor, there are still issues he needs to address. The Roaring Fork Planning Commission will hear the file as well. Commissioner Stone moved that the Board of County Commissioners table File No. LUR-0063, Geologic azards and Hillside Developrnent until February 6,2007. Conitllissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDS..O()()49 The West.EndPUD lena Skinner-Markowitz, Planning Department NOTE: ACTION: Tabled from 8/15, 9/5, 10/10/06 & 10/24/06 Proposal for mixed-use development planned unit development, which includes multi-family residential dwelling units; employee housing units; and commercial uses including office, restaurant and retail-oriented business units. tITLE: FILKNO./PROCESS: LOCATION: the West End PUD PDS..00049 / PUD Sketch Plan 34019 H wy 6, Edwards (Formally known as the Havener Parcel); west of the Edwards Spur Rd/Highway 6 intersection. Urban Legends, LLC OWl1er Sid Fox, Fox and Company OWNER: APPLICANT: R:E:rRESENTATIVE: stAFF.RECOMlVIENDAt:(ON: Approval with Conditions L PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: The applicant wishes to create a mixed use PUD which is comprised of between 55-65 free-market residences with an additional 8-12, onsite local residents/employees housing units. As part of the PUb Guide, the residential dwelling units/uses may include: apartments and/or condominiums/townhomes; condominium hotel/time-share/fractional fee condo units; bed and breakfast; and boutique hotel. All new residential units (as proposed per current site plan) are proposed above commercial space, with private parking areas provided beneath the structures. Il1 addition to the reSidential component ofthis PUD, the applicant is currently proposing an approximate, 40,000 sq ft of commercial retail/office space, with a potential 9,000 sq ft more of either commercial or residential square footage by use of 'flex' space. Some of the proposed commercial uses include: restaurants; drive-thru business; common retail establishments; office and professional services; health- related services; and service oriented establishments such as a tailor, photography studio or dry-cleaning facility (pick-up only). The West Bnd development project is a proposed redevelopment of the Havener property located off of Highway 6 in the commercial core of Edwards, co. Currently, the property hosts a variety of uses including: a small mobile home park; trucking operation; a 'defunct' refueling site; a construction materials storage yard; and a masonry storage and delivery yard. The mobile home park is in very poor condition with many homes over 25 years old. Il1 addition to the variety of uses on the property, there are several 'out' buildings that are old and decrepit. According to the applicant, the current Sketch Plan has been designed and oriented according to, "...a pedestrian scale". Further,"... the project will consist of lively streets with appealing storefronts, ample sidewalks, street furniture, landscaping and on- street parking that will create a vibrant and convenient 21 12/5/06 place for residents and visitors to interact, work, dine and shop." The West End is also directly adjacent to Eagle River Preserve Open Space parcel. As such, the applicant is willing to incorporate necessary buffering and/or improvements between the West End and the Eagle Rive Preserve Open Space parcel; to more effectively manage the current topography which includes a drop in elevation from the West End property, to a significantly lower grade on the Open Space parcel (12 feet in certain portions of the property edge). B. CHRONOLOGY: 1969- Havener purcha.sed the subject property 1974- RSL zoning was placed on the properties when Eagle County introduced zoning in September, 1974 C. SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning: East: Commercial: Kemp / Unplatted / CO West: Commercial: Vogelman / Unplatted / CG North: Eagle River Preserve Open Space Parcel/Resource South: Highway 6 EXisting Zoning: RSL Total Area: 3.28 acres (142, 876.8 sq ft) Water: Public- as proposed Sewer: Public- as proposed Access: Direct from Hwy 6 D. PLANNINGCOMMISSIONHEARINGS/DELIBERA TIONS: The applicants of the West End participated in two (2) Planning Commission hearings. At the second and final hearing, the following commentslideas/concerns were shared by the Planning Commission: . The architecture was well received by the Planning Commission; however, there were concerns regarding the massing of the buildings along the property edge shared by the Eagle River Preserve . The minimal side setbacks, especially on the western side of the property was a concern . Planning for the entire corner and connection to adjacent property, and not just the West End property was appreciated . Smaller studios or one-bedroom condos should be considered in the mix of housing options; people may not want roommates . Design guidelines will be an important consideration; especially if the County adopts design guidelines through the sub-area plan or by some other means . Current plan does not offer any "communication" with the Eagle River Preserve and abruptly stops at the property line . Needs to be more pedestrian and mass-transit oriented . (Anticipated) Market study will be important to show the need of the proposed uses . The proposal offer good public benefit; however, the final housing plan is critical A motion to approve the file with Staff and additional conditions was made with the understanding that this application still needs "work" and that the applicant should incorporate Planning Commission concerns regarding massing and setbacks as part of the Preliminary Plan application. E. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Motion: [4: 1] The Planning Commission recommended to approve file PDS-00049 incorporating Staff findings and conditions, and with the understanding that the applicant will incorporate Planning Commission concerns regarding massing and setbacks. 22 12/5/06 2. STAFF REPORT REFERRAL RESPONSES: (see attached) Environmental Health Department, telephone conversation, July 12th, 2006: . A 1 041 may be necessary if the applicants cannot show sufficient evidence that the water and wastewater generation for the West End is less than or equal to the previously approved 1041 for the Havener mobile home park. . It is reco'r11h1ended that ill.compatibilities between lall.d uses internal to the project and issues that may arise regarding compliance with the Commercial and Industrial Performance Stall.dards outlined in the Eagle County Land Use Regulations be the responsibility of the Property Owners Association. . The property remains subject to our Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards as it involves off-site impacts. Engineering Memo, dated July 71\ 2006: . The proposed access plan to Highway 6 is inconsistent with the guidance provided by the "US 6 Corridor Feasibility Study" for this area. . The proposed maill. ell.trance is in compliance with the guidance in the Corridor Study, but the existing access at the west end of the property is idell.tified for closure. . This access should be closed and a shared access provided to the property to the west with the development of this site. . The proposal does not address improvements required for Highway 6 outlined in the Corridor Study. . This section of Highway 6 is identified for additional lanes, paved shoulder and bike path, curb and gutter, and attached sidewalk with a total ROW width of 110'. . This full section may not be required for construction by this developer, but the development proposal must accomnlodate the ROW required and not prevent these future improvemell.ts. . The proposed maill. entrance to the site appears to be problematic in providing the necessary stacking distance for cars ex.itill.g the site, and ll.ecessary separation from conflicting movements for cars entering the site. . Similar access configurations in the River Walk development have had operational problems. . The proposed grading from the site onto the open space property is very significant (15' vertical +/ -), a.nd would impact the use of the open space property. . This appears problematic and alternatives should be considered. . The proposed grading at the east and west property lines of the site includes significant retaining walls. . These retaining walls could be difficult to construct, and pose drainage conflicts in later phases of design. . Based on a review of the overall utility plan, there appear to be nUlllerous challenging conditions that will need tobe addressed with the preliminary plan for this site. . These iSsues ill.clude site drainage (especially overland conveyance of runoff in the event that inlets are plugged), detention and storm water quality, and sanitary seWer routing across the open space parcel. . Based on the comments cited above, the Engineering Department feels that significant revisions to the proposed site plan are justified. . Ifrevisions to the proposal are made, please refer the revised plans to this department for additional review and comment. ECO Trails, email dated July 6th, 2006: . A 10' trail should be provided on this property per the US Highway 6 Corridor Plan that anticipates pedestrian/bike facilities on both sides of Highway 6 in the core of Edwards. . The 2003 Access Plan details a more precise vision than the 2001 Eagle Valley Regional Trails Plan for the highway 6 corridor circulation in Edwards, includill.g routes vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians. 23 12/5/06 . The trail should be constructed by the development on the private property per CDOT's preference and to allow for future expansion of the highway. . As an example, the trail across the highway on the Edwards Village Center property is located on an easement obtained from the private property owner, not on CDOT right-of-way. . Development should provide a connection to the adjacent open space lands which are often cited in th proposal as a project asset . A paved 8 foot spur trail, built to county standards is recommended unless the Eagle River Preserve planning and managing entity prefers otherwise . A corridor for the trail connection and responsibility for construction should be described in the final project approval language Eta Trattsit.email dated July 6th, 2006: . We continue to search for a site for a transfer center in Edwards, similar to Avon Center, where we can provide efficient access to Edwards from 1-70. . This may be our chance, but there are many challenges. . I understand they are considering structured parking. . Great idea for a small site with intensive use. . Perhaps a level of underground parking could incorporate a turnaround area for buses. This would make the site attractiVe for shoppers and employees who take the bus and a small underground transit center would be visually unobtrusive. . However, I'm sure it would be very expensive. . We do not have a lot of money to contribute to such a project. . Another issue is access: I think we would need some sort of dedicated or semi-dedicated lane directly to Edwards Access Road, but it would have to cut through private, developed property to the East. . If we travel Highway 6 to the Access Road, all the turning movements (particularly left-hand) and signalization will cause travel time delays. . It would be difficult to justify the cost of an underground facility without having efficient access. Colorado Geological Survey, memo dated July 6th, 2006: . The proposal is a redevelopment of a mobile home park into a mixed use development with multi-family, retail and office; the site is approximately 3 acres with an average slope of 5% . Reports regarding geotechnical constraints or geologic hazards were not submitted with this application; existing hazard mapping indicates that there are no hazards that would preclude development. . Soil survey information indicates that soils on the site may have properties that could impact the design of structures, roads and utilities (e.g.) soil-induced chemical action may corrode steel or that basements may be difficult to construct due to rock. . The site's soils also appear to be underlain by evaporate bedrock that may be susceptible to subsidence. . The County should require that a geotechnical report be submitted before approval of final layout and construction plans. Colorado Division of Wildlife, telephone response, July 7th, 2006: . The DOW does not have any comments for this file. Eagle County School District, memo dated June 10th, 2004 . The Sketch Plan is proposing 55-65 multi-family units. The units would result in the dedication requirement as follows: 55 Multi-family Units X .0025 acres per unit = 0.1375 acres or 65 Multi-family Units X .0025 acres per unit = 0.1625 acres . As the land dedication acreage is minimal, the District will accept cash in lieu of land for this Subdivision Sketch Plan. . Per the recently revised County School Land Dedication Standards, the value of this cash payment will 24 12/5/06 be determined by an appraisal of land provided by the developer with the application for Final Plat. Eagle Rivet Water and Sanitation District, memo dated June 28th, 2006: . The application refers to the ERWSD (District) as the water provider; the water provider is the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority. . Engineered construction drawings must be submitted to the District Construction Review Team for review of the water and sewer infrastructure prior to the beginning of construction . BecauSe this POO constitutes an up-zoning of the existing development area dedication of water rights may be required. . Construction drawings will not be approved until water rights issues have been resolved and an Ability to Serve letter has been issued. . Following the Ability to Serve process, connection to the District and Authority system may be made once the applicable fees have been paid. . The development site is located in the ERWSD for sanitary sewer service. . An Ability to Serve letter from the District and payment of fees is required prior to connection. . The applicant has been in contact with the District and the Authority concerning water rights issues and the process is currently underway. Additional Referrals were sent to the following agencies and Homeowner's Associations: . Eagle County Attorney, Assessor, Housing, Road and Bridge, School District (Transportation), Sheriff S Office . CDOT . Ambulahce District . Edwards Metro District, Eagle River Fire Protection District . Eagle County Historical Society, Eagle Valley Land Trust, Postmaster for Edwards . Homestead HOA, Riverwalk HOA, Edwards Village Center POA, Old Edwards Estates HOA, Singletree HOA South Forty HOA, Lake Creek HOA, Heritage Park HOA /'1 STAFF DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS: PurSuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F.3.e Standards for the review of a Sketch Plan for PUD: STANDARD: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] - The title to all land that is part of a PUD shall be owned or controlled by one (1) person. A person shall be considered to control all lands in the PUD either through ownership or by written consent of all ownets of the land that they will be subject to the conditions and standards of the PUD. The Applicanthas demonstrated that the entire area affected by thisPUD Sketch Plan is in single ownership. [+1 FINDING: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] The title to all land that is part of this PUD IS owned or controlled by one (1) person and/or entity. STANDARD: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] - The uses that may be developed in the PUD shall be those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule", or Table 3-320, "Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule, "for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these use designations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3j, Variations Authorized. 25 12/5/06 The subject property was zoned RSL (Residential Suburban Low Density) when zoning was applied to unincorporated Eagle County, in 1974. This proposal contemplates 55-65 free-market residences; and 8-12 local resident housing units. In addition, a variety of commercial uses are also proposed. Of the proposed forms of residential uses, residential dwelling urtits are the 'uses by right'. In additiol1 to residential dwelling units, there are a few residential-type uses pefInitted via Limited Review including: bed and breakfast and home business. Hotel, or 'boutique hotel', is not a residential use pursuant to the Eagle County Land Use Regulations; and is permitted via Special Use Permit pursuant to the proposed West End PUD guide. Most of the proposed uses are currently permitted in the RSL zoning; however, time-share/fractional-fee and hotel uses are not. Pursuant to the Edwards Community Master Plan, this area is slated for "mixed use" development. Uses may include, ".. .coml11.ercial, residential high-density, dffice recreation, among others," in this area of Edwards. The majority ofthe proposed residential and commercial uses are found within a typical residential/mixed- use neighborhood; however, as the West End PUD offers a multitude of uses for this property, it is imperative that the applicant continue to examine the PUD guide to ensUre that the site would be able to accommodate all of the proposed Uses in any configuration, and at any time. It is not constructive to simp1.., pelitlit certain uses as 'Special Uses' and transfer the site review analysis to Staff to investigate if that use would be acceptable and be able to function on the site after final designs and approvals are obtained from the Board of County Commissioners. Without the benefit of a full use analysis at Preliminary Plan, subsequent use approvals, not considered at Preliminary Plan may have an affect on local resident/employee housing needs and transportation infrastructure. The PUD guide must be clear and concise, and provide understanding in how to administer the variety of uses throughout the project. Where extreme caution should be taken is in how the proposed uses would be able to function together, all at the same time; there is nothing in the PUD guide limiting the number of uses at anyone time (aside from the amount of available square footage), or where the uses would be located to ensure that the shared parking areas would be evenhanded. This PUD offers so many uses, that it is difficult to understand how this Sketch Plan PUD would function if approved at this time. Fortunately, the applicant is utilizing a multi~ step process. At this concept-level phase, Staff and applicant can continue to work on analyzing the types and functionality of the proposed uses. Staffs biggest concern at this point, is to ensure that the stated intent of this Sketch Plan is maintained; that this project is both a residential and commercial project. Staff recommends that the PUD be pared down/amended to the following uses: (mandatory) residential dwelling units; hotel as a commercial use- not residential; commercial uses including but not limited to: service oriented uses such as tailor, salon, photography studio, veterinary, and banks; retail establishments; office, business and professional uses; drive-thru establishment in Building 2 only; and a limited number of restaurants. This site is not a very large property, and would have difficulty in supporting the number and types of uses proposed with this development. Based on the submitted site plan, proposed uses like' grocery store', would have difficultly 26 12/5/06 setting up without being implemented from the onset of the planning process (loading docks would be necessary), like the proposed drive-thru has been. As such, it is recommended that for the Preliminary Plan the applicant look at potentially tying uses to buildings or creating planning nodes to further control the organization of uses on the site. None ofthe commercial uses, as proposed, are currently permitted in the RSL zone district. Many of the proposed residential uses are pennitted in the RSL zone district as uses by right, Limited Review or via Special Use Pennit; however, some of the uses are also not permitted in this Zone district. Uses not currently petihitted in RSL, but are permitted in the proposed PUD guide, will require a Variation to be approved by the Board of County Commissioner prior to the approval of the Preliminary Plan. (See condition 4) [+/~] FINDING: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] AS CONDITIONED The uses that may be developed in the PUD ARE uses that are designated as lises that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in either Table 3-320, "Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule" or Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule"; however, many of the commercial uses ARE NOT currently permitted in the underlying zone district. This finding may be found positive assuming approval of the Variations by the' Board of County Commissioners at Preliminary Plan. stANDARD: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)]- The dirnensionallimitations that shall apply to the PUD shall be those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for the zone districtdesignalion in effect for the property at the time of the application forPUD. Variations of these dimensional limitations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3f" Variations Authorized. provided variations shall leave adequate distance between buildings for necessary access and fire protection, and ensure proper ventilation, light, air and snowmelt between buildings. The following Variations will be also be requested by the applicant in the Preliminary Plan application: 1. Maximl.lIl1lot, floor area and impervious coverages. 2. Setbacks. 3. Heights. The applicants are proposing development on the majority of this property. Given the necessary infrastructure needs for parking and commercial road layout and design, the applicants are proposing minimal side and rear setbacks; less than what is currently permitted in either the underlying zoning, or as required in standard commercial zoning. In response to the current site plan, the Planning Commission provided direction to the applicants to revisit their design and proposed layout focusing On functionality and architecture; with a recommendation to 'step or terrace' the buildings away from the property lines to ensure that the proposed buildings do not act as a wall between neighboring properties (buildings are currently massed along the west and north property lines, using minimal setbacks). A complete list of possible Variations must be submitted by the applicant as part of the Preliminary Plan. More Variations, than identified in this application, could be requested. (See condition 14) [+/-) FINDING: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] AS CONDITIONED The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD ARE NOT those specified in the existing Planned Unit Development Guide for these properties; however, this finding may be found positive assuming approval of the Variations by the Board of Coun Commissioners at Preliminar Plan. STANDARD: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] - Off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. A reduction in these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that: (a) ShatedParking. Because of shared parking arrangements among uses within the PUD that do not 27 12/5/06 require peak parking for those uses to occur at the same time, the parking needs of residents, guests and employees of the project will be met; or (b) Actual Needs. The actual needs of the project's residents, guests and employees will be less than those set by Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parkinf! and Loading Standards. The applicant may commit to provide specialized transportation services for these persons (such as vans, subsidized bus passes, or similar services) as a means of complying with this standard. With the nature of this proposal, and the design of the buildings for the multiple uses, a site specific parking plan will have to be developed and submitted as part of Preliminary Plan. The parking plan must adequately address loading areas, residential, employee, visitor and commercial patron parking. The maximum number and viability of any shared-use parking spaces must also be addressed in the parking plan. . At this time, Staff is most concerned with the implementation of a hotel; business necessitating loading dockslbays; and garbage removal using the current parking and/or circulation plan as proposed. Further, based on the comments from the Engineering Department, potential access modifications may affect the proposed parking and/or site plan. Staff is also concerned with the amount of surface parking shown on the proposed plan. Although theplan apparently reflects the proposed uses, this current site appears to be designed for the automobile, and dOes not necessarily incorporate pedestrian design throughout the site. Currently, sidewalks and pedestrian crossings are not shown as considerations from the West End shopping district to either of the future east and west connections to neighboring properties; nor are there designated crosswalks coming into the site from the bike trail on the south property line. Given that this is a Sketch Plan, however, the applicant has ample time to incorporate these considerations for Preliminary Plan. (See conditions 4 & 6) [+} FINDING: Off Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] AS CONDITIONED Given the Sketch Plan level detail of the development plan, it is likely that the applicants WILL be able to demonstrate that off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD CAN comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards, without a necessity for a reduction in the standards, at Preliminary Plan. STANDARD: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] - Landscaping provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards. Variations from these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that the proposed landscaping provides sufficient buffering of uses from each other (both within the PUD and between the PUD and surrounding uses) to minimize noise, glare and other adverse impacts, creates attractive streetscapes and parking areas and is consistent with the character of the area. A detailed landscaping plan is required to be submitted as part of the Preliminary Plan. That plan should detail all types and location of landscape materials to be utilized as part of this development. A cost estimate will also be necessary for collateralization purposes. Site lighting and illumination standards must also be satisfactorily addressed with the Preliminary Plan. (See conditions 7 & 8) [+] FINDING: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] AS CONDITIONED It WILL be demonstrated that landscaping provided in the PUD can comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards. Illumination standards must be considered as part of Preliminary Plan. STANDARD: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (6)] - The sign standards applicable to the PUD shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations. unless, as provided in Section 4-340 D., Signs Allowed in a Planned Unit Develovment (PUD), the applicant submits a comprehensive sign plan for the PUD that is determined to be suitable for the PUD and provides the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to and within the PUD. The applicant has made statements that a Comprehensive Sign Plan will be included with the Preliminary Plan application. Signs should be focused at the pedestrian level, and at a scale that would attract persons 28 12/5/06 from greater distances, off the West End site. (See condition 5) l+] FINDING: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e(6)] AS.CONDITIONED The sign standards applicable to the POO ARE as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sig;n Regulations. The PUD guide properly references that signs shall be as allowed pursuant to the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. A Comprehensive I Sign Plan is required to be submitted With the Preliminary Plan application. STANDARD: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] - The applicant shall demonstrate that the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. Existing facilities such as electricity (telephone, gas, cable, etc.), and fire protection currently service the residents living on the proposed property. Solid waste removal areas should be designated on the Preliminary Plan; waste receptacles should be wildlife-proof containers. In regards to water and wastewater service, it may be necessary for the.Applicant to apply for 1041 approval. The applicants have provided the required "Ability to Serve" letter from the appropriate entities. In addition to the submittal of a 1041 pennit (if warranted), all materials, as required in Section5-240.F.3 Preliminary PlanforPUD must be subrrtitted as part of the Preliminary Plan. This also includes detailed infortnation regarding water and sewer service. The applicants have shown preliminary road layouts on their Sketch Plan which provide internal cOhnections to future developments to both the east and west. All Eagle County roa.d standards must be adhered to, unless a Variation or a Deviation from those standards is approved with the Preliminary Plan. In addition to adherence to Eagle County road standards, the applicants will also need to apply for and obtain a Highway 6 Access Pennit from CDOT. Pursuant to the Engineering memo dated July 7th, 2006, the applicants have been advised to revise their current site plan to adequately anticipate these improvements to, specifically, Hwy 6, among other things. Currently, they do not have detailed designs of this aspect as of yet. It is imperative that all road designs and access/Hwy 6 improvements be recognized and incorporated as part ofthe Preliminary Plan application. (See conditions 3 & 4) [+/-] FINDING: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] AS CONDITIONED The Applicant HAS NOT clearly demonstrated that the development proposed in this Sketch Plan for POO will be provided adequate access and feasible, internal roads. The applicant HAS clearly demonstrated that the development proposed in the Sketch Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable water and sewage disposal, and HAS also demonstrated that the proposed PUD will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police, fire protection, and emergency medica.l services. STANDARD: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] - The improvements standards applicable to the development shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards. Provided, however, the development may deviate from the County's road standards, so the development achieves greater efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts, when the following minimum design principles are followed: (a) Safe, EffiCient Access. The circulation system is designed to provide safe, convenient access to all areas of the proposed development using the minimum practical roadway length. Access shall be by a public right-of-way, private vehicular or pedestrian way or a commonly owned easement. No roadway alignment, either horizontal or vertical, shall be allowed that compromises one (1) or more of the minimum design standards of the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) for that functional classification of roadway. (b) Internal Pathways. Internal pathways shall be provided to form a logical, safe and convenient system for pedestrian access to dwelling units and common areas, with appropriate linkages Q/f- 29 12/5/06 site. (c) Emergency Vehicles. Roadways shall be designed to permit access by emergency vehicles to all lots or units. An access easement shall be granted for emergency vehicles and utility vehicles, as applicable, to use private roadways in the development for the purpose of providing emergenc services and for installation, maintenance and repair of utilities. (d) Principal Access Points. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to provide for smooth traffic flow, minimizing hazards to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. Where a PUD abuts a major collector, arterial road or highway, direct access to such road or highway from individual lots, units or buildings shall not be permitted. Minor roads within the PUD shall not be directly connected with roads outside of the PUD, unless the County determines such connections are necessary to maintain the County's road network. (e) Snow Storage. Adequate areas shall be provided to store snow removed from the internal street network and from off-street parking areas. This development will have to meet all minimum County and/or Colorado Division of Transportation standards regarding road designs (including access entrance and highway 6 improvements), unless a Variation from Eagle County standards is granted by the Board of County Commissioners during the Preliminary Plan process. A new Highway 6 access permit must be received prior to the approval of the Preliminary Plan. Pursuant to the Engineering memo dated July ih, 2006, the applicants have been advised to revise their current site plan to adequately anticipate future improvements to Hwy 6 and access, among other things. Staff is also concerned with the site design and the number of uses proposed in the PUD guide. There is not enough information within this Sketch Plan to effectively ascertain whether the access is adequate. Although this is a Sketch Plan application, leaving the full analysis to Preliminary Plan may result in significant modifications to this plan. As such, the Preliminary Plan could not go forwatd, and the Sketch Plan would have to be arnended/re-evaluated. Currently, sidewalks and pedestria.n crossings are not shown from the West End shopping district to eith of the future east and west connections to neighboring properties; nor are there designated crosswalks coming into the site from the bike trail on the south property line. Given that this is a Sketch Plan, however, the applicant has ample time to incorporate these considerations for Preliminary Plan (See conditions 3, 10 & 13) [-I FINDING: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] AS CONDITIONED It HAS NOT been clearly demonstrated that the improvements standards applicable to the development will be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards regarding: (a) Safe, Efficient Access. (b) Internal Pathways. (c) Emergency Vehicles (d) Principal AcceSs Points. (e Snow Stora e. STANDARD: Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] - The development proposed for the PUD shall be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. Currently, the underlying, residential property is compatible with the character of the lands surrounding it. Both the proposed residential and commercial uses are uses which could benefit the Edwards area for both residents and visitors; the Edwards Area Community Plan recognizes this property as suited for mixed use development. This development, if properly executed, will be compatible with the entirety of the Edwards core. [+1 FINDING: Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] The development proposed for the PUD IS com atible with the character of surroundin land uses. 30 12/5/06 STANDARD: ConsiStency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e(10)] - The PUD shall be consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to,. the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The consideration of the relevant master plans during sketch plan review is on a broad conceptual level, i. e, how a proposal compares to basic planning principles. As a development proposal moves from sketch plan to preliminary plan review, its conformance or lack thereof to aspects of the master plans may flot necessarily remain static. THE MASTER PLAN ANALYSES BELOW CONSIDER THE PROPOSAL AS SUBMITTED. .~ '" ::s o ::t1 ~ .~ E..u u.,..-I ~ ~ ",tIJ ~-o .s 8 x x x x x x x X General Governance - Conforms with the policies of this Section of the Comprehensive Plan. Development - The residential component of this development is currently pentritted in the underlying zone district, albeit, not all dwelling types are permitted as a use by right (timeshare/fractional-fee units, and hotel uses te prohibited in RSL zoning). The proposed uses must be thoroughly evaluated to ensure true compatibility 'etween the residential and c6mniercial uses, and mitigation must be implemented to ensure that this compatibility IS feasible. Rotel, as a residential use, is also a concern. Currently, hotel is solely permitted in commercial zone districts, and should not be able to replace true residential dwelling units. Mixed use developments have been development in Edwards as part of the Riverwalk and Homestead subdivisions. The existing site (and neighboring site) is unplatted and may contain "grandfathered" uses or uses which may now requite a greater level of detail/review than previously permitted through past regulations. This proposal will potentially eliminate the grandfathered uses, ensuring that the site is analyzed and properly developed. Significant policies in this Section of the Comprehensive Plan relate to preserving quality of life attributes, maintaining or enhancing community character, and limiting economic development to a scale and type that is consistent with local character. This is an extremely important aspect of this analysis; Eagle County has hired a consultant to analyze this site, and the majority of the Edwards core to ensure proper planning and functional developments are implemented as part of the core area. This property is one of the last, undeveloped properties of the Edwards area. Economic Resources ~ The proposed commercial uses would tend to support and enhance the regional economic structure and local economic drivers. In addition, the proposed development would not significantly detract from economic activities that depend on healthy natural environments and ecosystems. With commitments to satisfy the recommendations of the Housing Guidelines, local residents, currently traveling elsewhere for employment, would have the opportunity to travelless and work closer to their homes. Housing - The applicant, from the onset of this application, is proposing 8-12 units oflocal workforce housing to e provided onsite for employees, in the event that an employee may need a place to reside. There currently is not lough information to formulate an opinion to how many units will be actually necessary, given the number and 31 12/5/06 type of uses proposed in the PUD guide; Comments from the Housing Department qualifying this amount of housing have not been received. Infrastructure and Services - Highway 6 has been improved and is sufficient for the needs of this proposal; however, pursuant to the Engineering memo dated July ih, 2006, additional review and modifications to the proposed plan require further review and modification, which may affect the design of the site. Water Resources - It appears that ground and surface water sources would be protected with respect to negative impacts from sediment transport, nutrients, dissolved metals or other contaminants; negative impacts due to extended periods oflow flows; or negative impacts on aquatic habitats or riparian areas. Wildlife Resources - The development would not directly negatively impact the quality of wildlife habitat or species of lesser economic importance. Sensitive Lands - As little or no vegetation exists on this property, the applicant will re-introduce needed "gteenspaces" around the development, wherever possible. 'EnvironmentalOuality ~ The proposed development will not impede diurnal (down-valley) air flows. Generated noise would not likely diminish the enj oyment of the general area, but may affect onsite residential properties without proper mitigation. The proposal encourages walking or biking by contributing to the construction of a Sidewalk north ofHwy 6; however, the proposed pedestrian pathway may not be sufficient to replicate what is required for a trail. This business is also located near a mass transit stop, allowing customers to utilize ECD Transit. Future Land Use Map (FLUM) ~ The site of the proposed development is in the designated Edwards Area COl11munity Plan. That particular plan designates this property as "mixed use." The West End is not located in a recognized unique landform area of the county, nor is it located in a natural hazard area. EAGLE RIvER WATERSHED PLAN x x x x x 32 12/5/06 he West End is currently is in the "District" for water and wastewater service. An 'Ability to Serve' by the District IS required, and has been provided to Staff. Most likely the applicant will be able to provide cash in lieu of water rights the District and purchase water from sources in the Eagle River basin and Colorado River systems. If deemed necessary, 1041 approval must be obtained prior to Preliminary Plan approval to ensure efficient utilization of water and wasteWater. It is not anticipated that the proposed development will compromise either the Eagle River watershed or the EagleRiver. EAGLECOVNTYCO~REHEN~VEHOU~NGPLAN VISION STATEMENT: Housing for local residents is a major priority of Eagle County. There should be a wide variety of housing to fulfill the needs of all its residents, including families, senior citizens, and those who work here. Elements of Eagle County's vision for housing are: . Housing is a cOrhrnunity-wide issue. . Housing should be located in close proximity to existing cOrhrnunity centers, as defined in the Eagle County master plan. . Development of local residents housing should be encouraged on existing tran.sit routes. . Housing is primarily a private sector activity [but] without the active participation of government, there will be only limited success. . It is important to preserve existing local residents housing. . Persons who work in Eagle County should have adequate housing opportunities within the county for other infrastructure needs. . Development applications that will result in an increased need for local residents housing should be evaluated as to whether they adequately provide for this additional need, the same way as they are evaluated. OLICIES: ITEM 1. Eagle County will collaborate With the private sector & nonprofit organizations to develop housing for local residents 2. Housing for local residents is an issue which Eagle County needs to address in collaboration with the municipalities. . . x 3. Steps should be taken to facilitate increased home ownership by local residents and workers in Eagle County Xl 4. Additional rental opportunities for permanent local residents should be brought on line. Some. . . should be for households with an income equivalent to or less than one average wage job X2 5. Seasonal housing is part of the problem & needs to be further addressed. It is primarily the responsibility of. . . employers. . . X 6. New residential subdivisions will provide a percentage of their units for local residents X3 7. Commercial, industrial, institutional, and public developments generating increased employment will provide local residents housing. The first preference will be for units on-site where feasible, or ifnot feasible, in the nearest existing community center. . . X 8. The County will seek to make land available for local residents housing in proximity to community centers 33 12/5/06 ITEM YES NO N/A 9. Mixed USe developments in appropriate locations are encouraged x 10. Factory-built housing is an important part of Eagle County=s housing stock x 11. There is a need to segment a portion of the housing market to protect local residents from having to compete with second home buyers. Where public assistance or subsidies ate provided for housing, there should generally be limits on price appreciation, as well as residency requirements x 12. Eagle County recognizes that housing for local residents is an ongoing issue Xl- Local resident housing is proposed with this development. X2- The proposed employee housing units will most likely be rental units. X3- See XI. EOW ARDS AREA COMMUNITY PLAN Conformance Non-Cortformance Mixed Conformance Not Applicable ... Land Use X Housing X Ttllllspottation X Open Space X Potable Water and Wastewater X Services and Facilities X Environmental Quality X Economic Development X Recreation and Tourism X Bistoric Preservation X Implementation X Future Land Use Map X Land Use - The stated goal is, "The location and type ofland uses balance the physical, social, cultural, environmental and econom:ic needs of the current and future resident (& tourist) population. Land uses are located in a manner that protects and improves the quality of the natural and man made environment, ensures the timely, cost-effective provision of public facilities and services, and retains the unique variety of lifestyles and quality of life found in Edwards". This proposal does serve to balance the physical, social, cultural, environmental and economic needs of the entire Edwards Community. Housing - "Affordable" housing is anticipated in the current application; however, at this point, there is no indication of what rental or sales prices will be for the housing unit component of this application, or ifthe amount of units being offered is sufficient for the number and type of proposed uses. Transportation - The applicant needs to work with the Eagle County Engineering Department and the Colorado Department of Transportation to secure appropriate access permits. A bus stop is anticipated in or near the entrance 34 12/5/06 of this development. Open Space - "Open Space preservation is promoted within the Edwards Planning Area through coordination with land owners, developers and other agencies and organizations". This proposal does not represent a coordinated {fort to preserve any of the subject site as Open Space which, in turn, helps to define a buffer between :ve1opments; however, landscaping will be found throughout the development, and as this property is contiguous with the Open Space parcel, it may be found moot to preserve additional, onsite open space areas. Potable Water and Wastewater - Public potable water and sanitary sewer service is anticipated to be made available to serve the proposed development, however, according to the ERWSD, the applicant will have to pay cash in lieu to the District before service Will be provided. An ability to serve letter has been provided to the applicant. Services and :Facilities - this element of the Edwards Area Community Plan pertains to the management of solid and hazardous wastes and the support of public schools, occupational training and higher education. These particular goals do not apply to this development; however, educational space is a proposed use by right in this development. Environmental Quality -This proposal does not necessitate the creation of any new wastewater or water supply facilities and it addresses stormwater runoff related issues; however, as proposed, stormwater is anticipated to be discharged onto the Open Space parcel. To date, no indication has been provided to Staff verifying that this is acceptable. This issue will have to be addressed in more detailed drainage plans to be submitted with the Preliminary Plan and possibly, the 1041 application. Economic Development - The proposal attempts to promote a balanced mix of land uses in the Edwards cornm.unity to encourage a diverse economy. The applicant has stated that a "market study" has been developed; however, this study has not been provided to Staff. :Recreation and Tourism - The stated goal is, "Parks, river access, recreational facilities and open space are provided to meet current and future needs of the residents of Edwards and Eagle County. These are designed in such a way as to ensure increased accessibility and provide a more even distribution to the Edwards Planning Area's parks and open space system". This application does not offer any cOmrhunity recreational or open space amenities; however, other pedestrian-friendly provisions have been provided throughout the development. Historic Preservation ~ No historic resources were identified on the subject property. At the time of this writing, neither the Eagle County Historical Society had provided comment. tplementation - If approved, the proposed development will be required to efficiently utilize public infrastructure. ':ompliance with the Hwy 6 Access Control Plan is strongly recommended as well, with highway improvements most likely to be constructed by the applicant, or at a minimum, accommodated with the site plan. According to the applicant, Water and wasteWater services will be provided, although an 'Ability to Serve' letter has not been received from the District. < Future Land Use Map (FLUM) -The proposed commercial site is identified on the FLlJM as an area appropriate for mixed use development;. the plan does not offer site-specific goals or guiding statements. [+/-] FINDING: Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed Sketch IS NOT entirely consistent with all stated purposes, goals, objectives and policies of applicable master plans; however, more information will be provided at Preliminary Plan which may accomplish compliance with the Comprehensive Plan (i.e. final housing plan; final infrastructure plans and design) STANDARD: Phasing [Section 5-240.F.3.e (11)] - The Preliminary Plan for PUD shall include a phasing plan for the development. If development of the PUD is proposed to occur in phases, then guarantees shall be provided for public improvements and amenities that are necessary and desirable for residents of the project, or that are of benefit to the entire County. Such public improvements shall be constructed with the first phase of the project, or, if this is not possible, then as early in the project as is reasonable. The current phasing plan has development slated for one phase; however, this needs to be verified with the Preliminary Plan. STANDARD: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)]- 35 12/5/06 The PUD shall comply with the following common recreation and open space standards. (a) Minimum Area. It is recommended that a minimum of 25% of the total PUD area shall be devoted to open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi-public. In addition, the PUD shall provide a minimum of ten (JO) acres of common recreation and usable open space lands fo every one thousand (1,000) persons who are residents of the PUD. In order to calculate t. number of residents of the PUD, the number of proposed dwelling units shall be multiplied by two and sixty-three hundredths (2.63), which is the average number of persons that occupy each dwelling unit in Eagle County, as determined in the Eagle County Master Plan. (b) Areas that Do Not Count as Open Space. Parking and loading areas, street right-of-ways, and areas with slopes greater than thirty (30) percent shall not count toward usable open space. (c) Areas that Count as Open Space. Water bodies, lands within critical wildlife habitat areas, riparian areas, and one hundred (100) year floodplains, as defined in these Land Use Regulations, that are preserved as open space shall count towards this minimum standard, even when they are not usable by or accessible to the residents of the PUD. All other open space lands shall be conveniently accessible from all occupied structures within the PUD. (d) Improvements Required. All common open space and recreational facilities shall be shown on the Preliminary Plan for PUD and shall be constructed and fully improved according to the development schedule established for each development phase of the PUD. (e) Continuing Use and MainteJlance. All privately owned common open space shall continue to conform to its intended use, as specified on the Preliminary Plan for PUD. To ensure that all the common open space identified in the PUD will be used as common open space, restrictions and/or covenants shall be placed in each deed to ensure their maintenance and to prohibit the division of any common open space. (f) Organization. If commOn open space is proposed to be maintained through an association or nonprofit corporation, such organization shall manage all common open space and recreational and cultural facilities that are not dedicated to the public, and shall provide for the maintenance, administration and operation of such land and any other land within the PUD not publicly owned, and secure adequate liability insurance on the land. The association or nonprofit corporation shall be established prior to the sale of any lots or units within the PUD. Membership in the association or nonprofit corporation shall be mandatory for all landowners within the PUD. As quoted above, the Eagle County Land Use Regulations only recommend that 25% of the total PUD area be utilized as open space. The total acreage of the West end is approximately 3.28 acres. Development will occur On the majority of property, with minimal area left as useable open space. Landscaping will fill in any lands not covered by asphalt or buildings, with the exception of a small courtyard and potential rooftop patio. The West End does not plan to reserve areas for parks or reserved recreation areas at this point; development of the site will be maximized. Where this project is unique is that the north property line is adjacent to the Eagle River Preserve Open Space parcel. The Board of County Commissioners may find that 25% common open space would not further benefit this project. Information regarding maintenance responsibilities has been provided as part of the PUD guide. The PUD guide submitted with the Preliminary Plan application should more specifically explain that maintenance includes items such as landscaping, roads, snow removal for parking lots, etc. [+/-] FINDING: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] The PUD HAS NOT demonstrated that the proposed development will comply with the common recreation and open space standards with respect to: (a) Minimum area; (b) Improvements required; (c) Continuing use and maintenance; or (d) Organization. STANDARD: Natural Resource Protection. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (13)] - The PUD shall consider the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendations of referral 36 12/5/06 agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards. Pursuant to the memo dated July 6t\ 2006 from the Colorado Geological Survey, a geotechnical analysis must be submitted with the Preliminary Plan. As the stortllwater drainage proposes to collect onsite runoff, which discharges onto the Open Space Parcel, agreements supporting this proposal must be received prior to Preliminary Plan. (See condition 10 & 16) [+] FINDING: Natural Resource Protection. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (13)] AS CONDITIONED The PUD DOES demonstrate that the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents available at the time the application was submitted, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural ReSource Protection Standards, have been considered. OTBERAPPLICABLE STANDARDS: The finding from the Eagle County Land Use Regulations is as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-240.F.2.a.(15).(a): (15) Any or all of the following requirements, as determined by the Community Development Director, based on the complexity of the proposal: (a) Supporting data to justify any proposed commercial and industrial elements in an area not so zoned; To date, no justification of the cOh1mercial uses has been provided for this project; although the applicant has stated at Planning COm1Ilission that a "market study" was underway. ISCUSSION: Ms. Skinner-Markowitz explained the updated information. She stated that the applicant had updated the Traffic/Improvements Plan, the Site Plan and Housing Plan. She reviewed the applicant's housing plan. She asked that the Board discount B & B under the inclusionary requirement noted on the applicant's letter dated November 27, and further stated that they would continue to discuss the Fox Hollow onsite units. She explained the inc1usionary requirements, residential linkage, cOm1Ilerciallinkage, replacement units and density bonus. Currently there are long standing mobile homes on the site, which have been rented out over the years. The comprehensive plan recoh1mends that those hbmes be replaced. The applicant is proposing to offer a 1 % transfer fee paid to the County upon each sale ofl11arket rate units. For the replacement units this transfer fee would be waived. Chaiffi1an Runyon wondered hbw the Fox Hollow units could be equivalent to on-site units. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated it was to the benefit of having the Fox Hollow units in the mix that those wb1.l.1d qualify as using an onsite calculation and would be equivalent to onsite units. Siri Nelsbn, Engineering Department spoke. She explained the traffic signal option. CDOT does not suppbrt this bption. The U- Turnaround option was discussed. CDOT generally supports this idea, however would prefer confoffi1ance with the Corridor Feasibility Study. The Corridor Feasibility Study calls for a roundabout with a street connection to the south. CDOT believes that it would be more advantageous to direct the funds that would be used to build the U-turnarbund towards a roundabout. If a roundabout were pursued, CDOT would permit the West End PUD to have a fullll10vement access until a roundabout was constructed. This option would most likely require a public/private par1nership to be constructed. She explained the benefits of the roundabout option. Mr. V ogelman, neighboring property owner supports the roundabout option. The Engineering Department believes that the money for the V-turnaround would be better used towards a roundabout. Sid Fox on behalf ofthe applicant spoke. He stated that since the last meeting the applicant had addressed c e housing and access concerns ofthe Board. Brian Bair, Midtown Group spoke. He stated that along with the issues mention by Mr. Fox the applicant 37 12/5/06 would also like to address the conditions. Although they would prefer the roundabout option, they focused on the V-turnaround at the Eagle River Preserve entrance. There would be improvements to Highway 6 in front of the site. The West End would pay for the cost of the improvements. The Highway 6 improvements would benefit the adjacent property owners. He explained the proposed housing plan. Chairman Runyon wondered how many jobs would be created. Ms. SkiIlner-Markowitz stated that it's premature to have an actual number on how many employees would be generated withdut knowing the uses of the commercial space. ChairiIlan Runyon asked for clarification on the inclusionary requirement, and whether it should be 20% of m.arket rate units. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that they would have to offer 25% if they went with offsite units. Chairman Runyon wondered about the cOI11111erciallinkage requirement. Mr. Bair stated that once the uses and square footage uses are detennined in preliminary plan, a formula would be used to determine the number of employees created and that would determine the num.ber of units required. The applicant agrees to the county's housing guideline requirements. Mr. Fox stated that the commercial linkage would be a function of the employee generation. The mitigation is 20%, which would result in a number of units. Chainnan Runyon requested an explanation of the 1 % transfer fee. He wondered if the transfer fee would run with the property forever and be paid in each time real estate would transfer. Mr. Bair stated that each time the property changes hands the 1 % transfer fee would go to the county. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that it's a very effective program and helps to moderated the actual market price of each unit. Chairman RunyOn asked if there had been any agreements made with the surrounding property ovvners. Mr. Bair stated that they continue to make progress with the B & B and Kemp properties. He's reviewed the conditions and there was some confusion regarding the second part of condition 13 but, after further review and discusSion they have a clearer understanding and are fine with it. Condition 17 would radically change the Whole site and takeout the plaza area and they requested it be removed. In summary, the applicant believes they have satisfied the Board's concerns. Chairman Runyon opened public comment. There was none. Public comment was closed. Commissioner Menconi wondered what was unique about their housing plan. Mr. Bair stated that he believes they have provided much more detail to their relocation plan and would provide relocation assistance for those not wanting to relocate to the West End. They have also introduced a density bonus plan. Commissioner Menconi wondered about the commercial linkage. The formula used for the trailer park is unclear. Mr. Fox stated that the 20% would be 20% of the total employees generated by the commercial use. Mr. Bair stated that they would be required to replace up to 10 units. They would approach the current tenants and gain a commitment from them. If they didn't want a unit, they wouldn't have to provide a unit for them. Commissioner Menconi wondered if affordability was taken into consideration. Mr. Bair stated that the prices would be capped on the replacement units. Commissioner Menconi wondered about the anticipated return of investment. Mr. Bair stated that he could not answer that now. Chairman Runyon wondered if any or all the existing owners decided not to move to the West End whether they'd be off the hook to provide replacement housing. Mr. Bair stated that that could happen or they could take the opportunity to buy a unit that is not restricted ifthey wanted to sell it later. The units are only restricted on one sale. In any case, they would have the first option to buy. Chairman Runyon stated that the relocation plan needs some major tweaking. He believes that most people stay in a home for 5-7 years. Once those homes go back into the free market they would no longer be affordable. He would like a more global look at the issue. He wondered whether the plaza was a good place for parking. Mr. Bair stated that the additional parking in the plaza area was needed. Some parking had been removed 38 12/5/06 to increase the viewing area and make it pedestrian freindly. Commissioner Stone stated that Board had required the applicant go much further than most at the sketch plan level. He is ready to move forward and willing to approve the file. He was somewhat concerned with the olutions being offered on the housing and traffic issues and there is still much more definition that would be eeded in the preliminary plan phase. He encouraged the applicant to consider public meeting space and find the plaza parking somewhere else. He wondered about the conditions and was unclear with condition number 13 because there is no building number four. He thought with regards to condition 17, it would be nice to have a transfer center but he believes it would be problematic with the turnaround. Buses would not be able to clear the roundabout. Mr. Bair stated that building number four was actually building number two. He suggested rewriting the condition to read as follows. The internal roads within the West End PUD shall be designed to accommodate bus service from US Hwy 6 through the West End to the eastern property line. Parking between building one and building two and along the south side of building two shall be changed to 45 degrees to facilitate unobstructed access for buses. There was no discussion about condition number 17. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that the applicant had proposed some flexibility with regards to housing and it most likely will be a phased program. Mr. Bair stated that it was suggested that if the applicant were to go with a payment in-lieu it would allow some flexibility. This would all be detailed in the housing plan. Chairman Runyon asked for clarification on the roundabout funding. Mr. Bair stated that they would commit to funding the U-turn or put thOse funds towards the roundabout. Chairman Runyon stated that he has a problem with surrounding land use. He wonders if it's compatible with the surrounding area. He would like to see how it would all fit together. He believes the overall look could impact the open space. He would not approve it the way it stands now. Commissioner Menconi asked Chairman Runyon to clarify his concerns for compatibility. Chairman Runyon stated that he is concerned with affordable housing and traffic flow. He believes there could be a better traffic plan that would encompass all the surrounding properties. Commissioner Menconi stated that he'd like to move forward but he doesn't believe the housing plan is any different than what the county would get if it was 30 units. He would like more public parking. He believes that ie cOrl1Inunity benefits are limited. He disagrees with KT Gazunis's housing calculation. He likes the idea of Fox follow for Ohsite consideration but he would like to see a more aggressive housing plan. He approves of the landSca.ping buffet. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that a condition could be added with regards to landscaping buffer. CommiSsioner Menconi stated that he would like the homes to be obtainable. The housing framework plan is hot enough. He believes that the design and quality of the development is of value to the area and will set a higher standard for whatever goes on next to it. He would like to see the housing increased to 40%. Mr. Bair stated that they followed KT's recommendations. The increase would be a big change. He wondered if the guidelines were being revised. Commissioner Menconi stated that the guidelines are applied to a certain standard, in this case the sub area master plan. Because the applicant is proposing an increase in density, the housing should reflect the increase. He asked Mr. Bair to list the community benefits. Mr. Bair stated that the proposed housing is a positive community benefit. The habitat for humanity housing is very attractive. The 1 % transfer fee means ongoing revenue for the county. Redevelopment on the area would mean raising the bar for architecture in the area. Chairman Runyon stated that in the last meeting he expressed concerns with the housing as well. He looked at the existing base guidelines as a basement. He would like to see a higher level of commitment to housing. Mr. Fox stated that the community plan was created prior to the open space being dedicated. The growth patterns in the community plan were premised on that area being developed. Much of the growth potential is being forced into a smaller area. He believes that the county needs to recognize this when reviewing projects within the Edwards conununity core. Mr. Bair agrees that they need to work on the housing plan and understands that it's a critical part of the preliminary plan approval. Commissioner Menconi stated that the county invested in open space with taxpayer's dollars and has now 39 12/5/06 created a higher value to the surrounding properties. If at 30 units the requirement were 20%, which is the lowest end ofthe guideline, increasing the units to 60 would equal 40 housing units. He wondered ifthere would be a way to add a condition using a similar equation. Mr. Morris stated that a condition could be added that the housing would be addressed thoroughly and meeting the current guidelines would not necessarily be viewed as sufficient when the application comes up for Preliminary Plan approval. The question of how much housing, where and at what price would be provided and will be addressed in the preliminary plan in a matter satisfactory to the Board. Commissioner Menconi wondered if the money that would be allocated to a turnaround would not be spent and allocated to a future roundabout. Ms. Nelson stated that CDOT questioned putting money into a turnaround ifthe corridor feasibility study called for a roundabout. It did't make sense to use the money on something that would be tom out in a few years. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that the goal is to save the money and eventually build a roundabout. Commissioner Menconi stated that he would be willing to move forward. Commissioner Menconi moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve file no. PDS-00049 The West End PUD incorporating all Staff findings and the following conditions 1-12 and 14-16 would read as presented in the December 5,2006 memo. Including the modification of 13, omitting condition 17 and adding condition 18: 1. Except as otherwise modified by this Permit, all material representations made by the Applicant in this application and in public meeting shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. 2. The buildings should utilize finish materials and colors designed to "blend" in with the surrounding landscape, prohibiting bright finish colors. 3. Any outstanding comments pursuant to the Engineering Memo, dated July i\ 2006 must be adhered to with comments addressed and provided prior to Preliminary Plan submittal. 4. Applicant shall review the proposed uses in the PUD Guide to ensure that they are reasonable; that they all may coexist simultaneously especially- with regards to shared parking needs; can be comprehended/administered easily by Staff and public; and that the site can accommodate the needs of each of the proposed uses. 5. A Comprehensive Sign Plan shall be developed and submitted as part of the Preliminary Plan applicatioh. 6. A site specific parking plan shall be developed and submitted as part of the Preliminary Plan application. 7. A detailed landscaping plan is required to be submitted as part of the Preliminary Plan application. Further, information regarding maintenance of common areas must also be submitted with the Preliminary Plan application. 8. Comprehensive lighting and illumination standards shall be established in the PUD guide submitted with the Preliminary Plan application. 9. A detailed geotechnical report shall be submitted with the Preliminary Plan application. 10. A trail shall be provided on this property per the US Highway 6 Corridor Plan that anticipates pedestrianlbike facilities on this side of US Highway 6. The trail design must be approved by ECO Trails prior to Preliminary Plan approval. 11. The West End PUD shall be designed anticipating a potential paved spur trail, built to County standards, to be connected to the adjacent open space lands. 40 12/5/06 12. this property must accommodate through-connections to both the east and west sides of the development, in anticipation ofredeveloprnent on both the adjacent Kemp and Vogelman properties. Through connections should include both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. 13. The internal roads within the West End PUD shall be designed to accommodate bus service ftom US Highway 6 through the West End to the eastern property line. Parking between Bllilding#l and Building #2 and along the south side of Building #2 shall be challgedto 45-degree to facilitate unobstructed access for buses. 14. A complete list of Variations and/or deviations must be submitted as part ofthe Preliminary Plan application. 15. The applicant must obtain permission from the land owner of the Eagle River Preserve to install any drainage structures, and/or any other structures as proposed on the neighboring open space parcel. 16. A lIighway 6 AccessPenn.it must be obtained prior to Preliminary Plan submittal. 17. The area between Building # 1 and Building #3 shall incorporate a transfer centerlbus turnaround to accommodate the boarding, access and egress of a minimum of three 40- foot transit coaches. 18. The application for Preliminary Plan approval shall demonstrate in detail that it is substantially consistent with the Ea.gle County Dousing Guidelines in effect at the time of submission. If the Guidelines ate revised thereafter, but before approval of a Prelimina.ry Plan, the Pla.n will be made substantially consistent with the amended GUidelines as a condition of approval of the Plan. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. Chairman Runyon suggested that the applicant consider making the west end plaza a public space. He believes that the potential benefits to the community would be huge. Commissioner Menconi wondered if the buffer zone had been addressed in the conditions. Commissioner Stone stated that it had not been addressed in the form of a condition however; the first condition 1 covets the intent. the motion passed by a vote of the motion passed by a vote of two to one with Chairman Runyon voting against. ZS-00146 __ CampI(9 Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Planning Department ACTION: As a requirement of the previous Special Use Permit (ZS-00108), the Special Use was terminated with the expiration of the lease. The lease has been extended; however, a change of ownership of the business has occurred and as a result, the lease has been renewed under a new owner. To comply with the previous condition, the new owner is re-applying for a similar Special Use Permit to continue this use (kennel). LOCATION: Dowd Business Park - 41199 Highway 6, Eagle-Vail .TAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve 41 12/5/06 FILENO./PROCESS: OWNER: ZS-00146/ Special Use Permit State Board of Land Commissioners, under lease to Dowd Development Company to 2013, renewable for an additionallO years. Camp K-9 Resort, Inc. c/o Wendy Drake Owner APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: This is a new Special Use Permit application for a dog daycare, grooming and overnight boarding facility. The subject property is zoned Commercial General. Kennels are allowed by Special Use Review in the Commercial General zone district. Pursuant to the approved/existing Special Use Permit for Camp-K9, the actual Special Use Permit ran with the lease of the facility, not with the land. Recently, Sonja Roeder, the original owner of Camp K-9 and tenant for the Camp K-9 lease, sold the business to the current owner. The new owner, Wendy Drake, has received a new lease from the property owner. This Special Use Permit is necessary to recognize the new owner/lease for the facility. the operation of the business remains consistent with the original approval as proposed in the preVious Special Use Permit ZS-OO 1 08 including the utilization of required noise mitigation measures; sanitation methodologies and uses. B. CHRONOLOGY: 1973 ~ Site leased by State Board of Land Commissioners to Dowd Development Company for commercial use. 1977 - Dowd Business Park constructed. 2003 ~ Original owner receives approval for Camp K-9 2006 ~ New owner required to "amend" Special Use Permit as lease for business has been modified. C. SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning: East: Commercial/Commercial General (CG) West: Commercial/Commercial General (CG) North: Eagle River, undeveloped land / Resource (R) South: US Highway 6, Commercial/Commercial General (CG) Existing Zoning: Total Area: Water: Sewer: Access: Commercial General (CG) 4.72 acres Public Public U.S. Highway 6 D. PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINGS/DELIBERATIONS: The Planning Commission had no concerns with this application. E. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Motion: [5 :0] The Planning Commission recommended to approve file ZS-00146 incorporating Staff findings and conditions. 2. STAFF REPORT 42 12/5/06 F. REFERRAL RESPONSES: Eagle COllnty Engineering . No comments. Division of Wildlife . No comments. Referrals Were also sent to the following agencies: $ Eagle County Animal Services, Assessors, Attorney, Environmental Health G. STAFF DISCUSSION I F1NDINGS Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-250.B Standards for the review of a Special Use Permit: STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.l Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Special Use shall be appropriate for its proposed location and be consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the Master Plan and the FLUM of the Comprehensive Plan, including standards for building and structural intensities and densities, and intensities of use. The plan matrixes that follow analyze the proposal as submitted. EAGLE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN .S' '" ;::l o ::r: Of/l B 8 U 'E .E ll) ~C/l ~"O I:: I:: ~ ~...; '" ll) U ... 1-i ::;$ 2:~ <"Ill) ~~ x x x x x x x x x General Governance - Conforms with the policies of this Section of the Comprehensive Plan. Development - Significant policies in this Section of the Comprehensive Plan relate to preserving quality of life attributes, maintaining or enhancing community character, and limiting economic development to a scale and type that is consistent with local character. Camp K -9 has been a successful business that has operated without incident since 2003. Based On discussions with the new owner, Camp K-9 has created and maintained significant number of clientele and continues to improve services for patrons. Economic Resources - The proposed Special Use Permit would further support and enhance the regional economic structure and local economic drivers. This is an excellent example of entrepreneurialism in Eagle County. Housing - The applicant is not proposing any affordable housing with this application as Camp K-9 is an existing business; the lease area or business requiring this "amended" Special Use Permit is not being expanded. Infrastructure and Services ~ The existing infrastructure is sufficient for the needs of this Special Use. ater Resources - The existing infrastructure is sufficient for the needs of this Special Use. 43 12/5/06 Wildlife Resources - The development would not directly negatively impact the quality of wildlife habitat. Sensitive Lands - There are no sensitive lands affected by this Special Use Permit. Environmental Quality - The existing business has not diminished the enjoylIlent of the general area. Future Land lJseMap (FLUM) The site of the proposed development is in the designated "Existing Approved Development" which encapsulates most of Eagle- Vail. This business has not generated any complaints with the Environmental Health Department; intensive commercial activities in this area have been long established. EAGLE COUNTY OPEN SI> ACE PLAN Land Use Open. Space Unique Char. Visual Development u n"n~..l~ Wilrllifp , Cooperation ProVision Preservation Quality Patterns .. ..,. .... Conformance X X X X X X ,.. Non Conformance Mixed Conformance Not X Applicable The Eagle County Open Space Plan contains a mix of concerns and policies, used to guide development in Eagle County. This pa.rticular area of the County is not within an area of unique character. [+] FINDING: Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Special Use Permit HAS BEEN shown to be appropriate for its proposed location and be consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and FLUM, including standards for building and structural intensities and densities, and intensities of use. ST ANDA.RD: Section 5-250.B.2 Compatibility. The proposed Special Use shall be appropriate for its proposed location and compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. As this SpeciallJse Permit is a requirement of a previous condition of approval; necessitated only by a change in lease, compatibility should be consistent with the previous approval. In addition, traffic levels should also remain consistent. The facility also remains subject to licensing and inspection by the Colorado Department of Agriculture; and the walls and ceiling have been insulated to reduce noise impacts on adjacent uses and the floors have been sealed and are sanitized daily. (See conditions 2 and 3) Dogs will be walked to and along a narrow grass strip at the north boundary of the site, which is adjacent to the Eagle River. Waste will be picked up after each "incident" and deposited in Camp K-9 garbage cans. Dogs boarded overnight will be kept in the sound-insulated portion of the facility. Given the nature of the facility, other uses in the immediate vicinity, a lack of complaints regarding any aspect of this business, and representations of the Applicant regarding the existing operation, Staff finds that the dog boarding facility remains appropriate and compatible with surrounding land uses. [+] FINDING: Compatibility. The proposed Special Use IS appropriate for its proposed location and IS compatible with the character of surroundin land uses. STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.3 Zone District Standards. The proposed Special Use shall comply with 44 12/5/06 ! the standards of the zone district in which it is located and any standards applicable to the particular use, as identified in Section 3-310, Review Standards Avvlicable to Particular Residential, Agricultural and Resource Uses and Section 3-330, Review Standards Avvlicable to Particular Commercial and Industrial Uses. A kennel is defined in the Land Use Regulations as "any lot, premises or establishment in which four (4) or more dogs, cats or domesticated animals are housed, groomed, bred, boarded, trained or sold, all for a fee or compensation." A kennel is a use allowed by special use permit in the Commercial General (CG) zone district. There are nO special requirements provided for a kennel in Section 3-330, Review Standards Applicable to Particular Commercial and Industrial Uses, ofthe Land Use Regulations. The proposed use will comply with the applicable zone district standards and these criteria applicable to Special Uses. [+] FINDING: Zone District Standards. The proposed Special Use DOES comply with the standards ofthe zone district in which it is located and the standards applicable to the particular use, as identified in Section 3-310, Review Standards Avvlicable to Particular Residential A ricultural and Resource Uses STANDARI>: Section 5-250.B.4 Design Minimizes Adverse Impact The design of the proposed Special Use shall minimize adverse impacts, including visual impact of the proposed use on adjacent lands; furthermore, the proposed Special Use shall avoid significant adverse impact on surrounding lands regarding trash, traffic, service delivery, parking, and shall not create a nuisance. The Applicant has included provisions in the original application that were intended to minimize adverse impacts, including sealed floors to prevent odors from lingering, sound insulation, and picking up after dogs when they are walked outside. To ensure these measures will continue to minimizing adverse impacts on adjacent tenants and property owners, the original conditions of approval (Conditions 2 and 3 of this report) shall remain in effect for this Permit as well. The conditions ate as follows: 2 (a). Noise generated by this use shall conform to the commercial and industrial standards set forth in the applicable Section of the Land Use Regulations. Noise levels shall be measured along the walls of the adjacent uses and no more than 50 feet from the front of the building. 2 (b). All animal refuse shall immediately be placed in metal or plastic trash containers, with plastic liners and air-tight lids. 3. A copy of all Department of Agriculture inspection reports shall be provided to Eagle County Department of Community Development. [+] FINDING: Design Minimizes Adverse Impact. AS CONDITIONED The design of the proposed Special Use DOES adequately minimize adverse impacts, including visual impact ofthe proposed use on adjacent lands; furtheffilore, while the proposed Special Use CAN avoid significant adverse impact on surrounding lands regarding trash, service delivery, parking and loading, odors, glare, and vibration, it CAN avoid adverse impact on surrounding lands regarding noise and traffic, and WILL NOT create a nuisance. STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.5 Design Minimizes Environmental Impact. The proposed Special Use shall minimize environmental impacts and shall not cause significant deterioration of water and air resources, wildlife habitat, scenic resources, and other natural resources. The Applicant has previously represented and maintains that when dogs are walked outside the facility, they will be kept on a leash at all times. Further, dogs will be walked from the facility to a narrow grassy area along the north property line and as the dogs relieve themselves, the staff immediately picks up after them and the deposits the waste in garbage cans. The previous conditions as stated above shall remain valid for this Special Use as well. As such, any adverse environmental impacts shall continue to be minimized. [+] FINDING: Design Miifimizes Environmental Impact. The proposed Special Use WILL be able to fully minimize environmental im acts based on the information rovided within this a lication. 45 12/5/06 STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.6 Impact on Public Facilities. The proposed Special Use shall be adequately served by public facilities and services, including roads, pedestrian paths, potable water and wastewater facilities, parks, schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. The site is adequately served by public facilities. [+] FINDING: Impact on Public Facilities. The proposed Special Use IS adequately served by public facilities and services such as roads, pedestrian paths, potable water and waste water facilities, parks, schools, police and fire protection, and emer enc. medical services. STANDARD:. Section 5-250.B.7 Site Development Standards. The proposed Special Use shall comply with the appropriate standards in Article 4, Site Develovment Standards. Article 4, Site Development Standards [+] Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1) [+] Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2) [+] Sign Regulations (Division 4-3) [+] Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410) [+] Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420) [+] Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430) en/a] Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) en/a] Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450) [+] Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460) [+] Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5) [+] Noise and Vibration (Section 4-520) Noise levels should remain constant to what is currently generated with existing operations; no complaints have been received for this business. (See Condition 2) [+] Smoke and Particulates (Section 4-530) [+] Heat, Glare, Radiation and Electrical Interference (Section 4-540) [+] Storage of Hazardous and Non-hazardous Materials (Section 4-550) [+] Water Quality Standards (Section 4-560) [+] Roadway Standards (Section 4-620) [+] Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630) [+] Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640) [+] Drainage Standards (Section 4-650) [+] Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660) [+] Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670) Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680) [+] Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690) [+] Impact Fees a.nd Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7). Standards in this section do not apply. [+] FINDING: Site Development Standards. AS CONDITIONED It is anticipated that the proposed Special Use WILL fully comply with all applicable standards in Article 4, Site Development Standards. STANDARD: Section 5-250.B.8 Other Provisions. The proposed Special Use shall comply with all standards imposed on it by all other applicable provisions of these Land Use Regulationsfor use, layout, and general development characteristics. No other provisions of the Land Use Regulations are applicable to this proposal for a Special Use Permit. [+] FINDING: The proposed Special Use DOES comply with all standards imposed on it by all other applicable provisions of these Land Use Re ulations for use, la out, and eneral develo ment characteristics 46 12/5/06 ISCUSSION: The presentation was waived by the Applicant and Staff. Chairtnan Runyon opened public comment. There was none. Public comment was closed. Commissioner Stone moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve File No. ZS-00146, incorporating all Staff findings, and the following conditions: 1. Except as otherwise modified by this Permit, all material representations made by the Applicant in this application and in public meeting shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. 2. The following requirements shall remain applicable: a. Noise generated by this use shall conform to the commercial and industrial standards set forth in the applicable Section of the Land Use Regulations. Noise levels shall be measured along the walls of the adjacent uses and no more than 50 feet from the front of the building. b. All animal refuse shall immediately be placed in metal or plastic trash containers, with plastIc liners and air-tight lids. 3. A copy of all Department of Agriculture inspection reports shall be provided to Eagle County Department of Community Development. 4. The COIl1munity Development Department must be provided a current copy of the applicable lease for this business, in its current location. If this business is sold or transferred to another operator, this infortnation must be provided to the Community Development Department immediately. Further, this SpeCial Use Permit shall continue to run with a lease for this business, in its current location only. Any change in use; major change of operations; or location will necessitate a new Special Use Pertnit. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned until December 19,2006. Clerk to the Boa b,-,..l __HL- Chairman Attest: 47 12/5/06