No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 10/03/06 resent: Peter Runyon Tom Stone Am Menconi Bruce Baumgartner Bryan Treu Robert Morris Kathy Scriver PUBLIC HEARING October 3, 2006. Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Administrator County Attorney Assistant County Attorney Deputy Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing, the following items were presented to the Board of County COtr1missioners for their consideration: GENERAL FUND 2151 CENltiR.Y PHOTO SUPPLY ABBOTT LABORATORIES ACl\1EALARM COMPANY AFFILiAtED CREDIT SERVICE ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY Al\tIADEO GONZALES AMANDA BAY AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMERIGAS ANDIE NOAKES ANiMALCAREEQVWMENTAND ANN LOPER ,NN MVNcAStER ANSELLHEALTHCARE ARN MENCONI ARNOLD AND ARNOLD ARtWORKS; tHE ASPEN CTR FOR WOMENS HLTH ASPEN FUBLISHERS mc A v TECH ELECTRONICS mc A VONCENTER AT BEAVER CK AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS B&H SPORTs BARBARA LOUDON BARBARA McDOUGALL BASALT QUICKLUBE Be SERVICES INC BENTLEY SYSTEMS INC BERGLUND RUTH BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER BERNICE WHITE BERTHOD MOTORS BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS BETHANY VAN WYK BOARD REAL ESTATE APPRAIS BOXER.NORTHWEST CO, .BOYD COFFEE COMPANY BRIAN J REICHEL BRUCE BAUMGARTNER BURT HOLLOWAY SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT ItEIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE REFUND REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 374.77 160.30 180.00 5.60 126.32 28,80 285.61 373.00 87.23 148.00 359.60 180.00 69.00 114.00 85.00 44.70 800.00 4,125.00 106.31 9,495.24 4,151.00 10,349.72 715.35 350.00 22.80 45.05 55.00 13.20 148.00 150.00 48.60 107.77 3,092.03 58.32 100.00 75.30 307.03 30.00 250.00 900.00 1 10/3/06 BYEW A Y BOOKS INC CARMEN LOZOYO-VELEZ CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CATA CATAWBA COUNTY NC CATHY ZEEB CEb-CONSOLIDA TED ELECTRIC CENTENNIAL CREDIT CORP CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTURYTEL CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE CFAWA CHARLESB DARRAH CHARMTEX CHEMICALS UNLIMITED ClMAkRON VAIL CINGUtAR WIRELESS CIRCUIT MEDIA; LLC CIVIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE CLIFFORD D ZINDA CLINTON MEHL CO DEPT PuBLIC HEALTH & CO DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S COALflRE SYSTMES, INC. COLLECTION CO OF AMERICA COLLEEN WIRTH COLORADO COUNTIES INC COLORAOO FOUNDATION FOR COLORADO MOUNTAIN MEDICAL COLORAOO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO NAFTO COLORADO STATE UNNERSITY COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH COMFORT INN COMMSYS TECHNOLOGY CORP COMPENDIUM COMPUMASTER CONTRACT PHARMACY SERVICE COpy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COWBOY CATERING CSU COOPERA TNE EXTENSION DAN CORCORAN PLS bAN SEIBEL DANIEL GLICKMAN DAVE MOTT DA VlD A BAUER DA VlDSONS DEBBIE RODRIQUEZ DECATUR ELECTRONICS DENNIS WILLEY DIANA JOHNSON DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE DIXIE KOZINSKI SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 2 10/3/06 75.00 182.45 109.82 130.00 2,200.00 1,235.00 638.86 69.90 1,103.85 41,346.51 3,060.84 60.00 54.60 40339 1,815.00 386.04 257.70 1,050.00 249.50 26.70 162.00 25.00 231.00 9,074.50 100.26 75.00 670.00 175.00 157.00 6,064.66 150.00 101.11 1,906.67 180.00 289.07 102.00 399.00 1,583.22 1,454.40 5,575.34 766.00 6,359.80 54.90 DON OLSEN DONALD J LAUGHLIN DONNA M BARNES DOREEN CONSTANINE DOTSERO MOBILE HOME PARK DOUG RUSSELL DUFFORD WALDECK & MILBURN DUSTY BOOT EAGLE AMOCO EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY CHARTER EAGLE COUNTY CONFISCATED EAGLE COUNTY CRIME EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE POTTERY INC EAGLE RNER WATER AND EAGLE V ALLEY GLASS AND BAGLEV ALLEY HIGH SCHOOL EAGLE V ALLEY PRINTING EAGLE XM EARLINE BRONN ECOLAB EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER EDWARDS STATION LLC ELLEN MATLOCK ELLEN TAYLOR ~MC2 EPS DESIGN AND PRINT ESTHER MEHL EVERETT F Al\tIIL Y FUNERAL EVIDENT CRIME SCENE EXTENSION PROGRAM FUND FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FARRELL & SELDIN FEATHER PETROLEUM CO FEDERAL EXPRESS FIRKINS GARAGE DOORS FLO HABENICHT FLORIDA MICRO FORINASH KATHLEEN FRANKLIN D AZAR FRED PRYOR SEMINARS FSH COMMUNICA nONS LLC G & S ENTERPRISES G.A. THOMPSON GAIL GEDDES GALLS INCORPORATED GARTON VIDEO PRODUCTIONS GEORGIE C ZINDA GLADYS PETIT JLENWOOD ORAL SURGERY GLENWOODSPRlNGSPARKS GRACE FINNEY REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE. SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBUMEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 8.24 180.00 158.10 129.12 34.90 20.90 496.93 9,000.00 16.25 10,625.00 4,689.00 4,800.00 998.00 95.00 12,095.65 344.96 13.08 115.76 307.09 2,360.00 3,760.00 4,672.08 42,00 146.96 8.26 300.00 180.00 14.45 482.58 1,581.05 138.00 380.00 136.00 971.43 2,332.30 35.60 40.50 957.04 190.00 207.00 342.00 95.58 5.60 99.00 65.00 128.00 170.00 26.40 9,592.75 220.00 512.90 1,040.00 245.00 525.00 102.00 3 10/3/06 GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAN FARNUM PRINTING GRCC PPL JOINT VENTURE GREAT AMERICAN LEASING GREG SCHROEDER GREGORY SCHROEDER HALL KYLE HARROP MEDIA HART INTERCNIC HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HEWLETT PACKARD HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HIGHLANDS GROUP, INC HOGAN & HARTSON HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS HV AC SUPPLY ICC IMPAcT GRAPHICS & SIGNS INGENIX INNOCOJU> LTD INTELLIGENT BIOMETRIC INTERIOR PLANTSCAPES INTBRNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAP NETWORK SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION ISC INC JACKIE CRUMB JACKSON HIRCH lNC JAMES H bRIVER JAMES H THERRELL N JAMIE HUMPHREY JASON KERKHOVE 18 T'S JENNY WOOD JEPPESEN SANDERSON JERRY CHICOINE JILL HUNSAKER JIM DUKE JIMMIE ANDERSON JOANNE CERMAK JOE SCHMITT JOHN E REID & ASSOCIATES JOHN EKELMAN JOHN KING JOHN W DUNN ASSOCIATE LLC JOHNSON AND HELD LTD KARA BETTIS, CORONER KARA HEIDE KASEY WOOD KA THERINE PETERSON KATHLEEN SCHMITT KEMP AND COMPANY INC KENNETH FIFIELD KERRY WALLACE KESSLER MARY J SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 4 10/3/06 818.68 655.00 41.20 2,038.00 70.80 86.98 32.47 500.00 1,837.08 63,797.25 4,606.00 1,345.00 12,725.00 607.50 20,415.03 19.34 20.78 130.50 45.00 87.70 18,121.71 716.00 125.00 1,361.20 4,854.80 300.00 3,457.50 387.00 125.00 61.20 30.00 3,148.00 350.00 188.62 40.00 1,192.00 180.00 129.60 44.40 90.00 90.00 174.00 1,100.00 1,400.00 48.60 133.50 3,065.00 113.87 24.30 54.20 180.00 100.80 39.17 235.02 24.30 148.00 KEYPER SYSTEMS KINDER MORGAN INC KRISTINA WARNER KRYSTA BRUBAKER KZYR FM L3 COMMUNICATION MOBILE LA QUINTA LAMECO LLC LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES LEA TRICE V AS TEN LEDERHAUSE EDITH LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LEIF A NELSON LEXISNEXIS LEXISNEXIS COURTLINK INC LIANA CARLSON MOORE LIBERTY ACQUISITIONS LINDA MAGGIORE LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR LORI SIEFERS LUKE J DANIELSON LUZ AVILA LYNDA GUSTAFSON MACHOL & JOHANNES MARGARET BABEL MARIA ANJIER MAIUA GUADALuPE SALINAS ~~ARION F LAUGHLIN ~~ARK HISS MARKS PLUMBING PARTS MARLENE MC CAFFERTY MARtHA SUTHERLAND MATTHEW BENDER ANb CO INC MBIA MCCOLLUM PATRICIA MCMAHAN & ASSOCIATES LLC METRON INC MICHAEL BARCA MICHAEL MCCLINTON MICRO PLASTICS MICRO PLASTICS INC MID V ALLEY METROPOLITAN MILLER & COHEN MITCHELL AND COMPANY MONUMENT PHARMACY MOTOR POOL FUND MOTOROLA MOUNTAIN COMMUNICA TIONS MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES MURRAY DAHL . NATHAN M TWEDT mBS NEHA ENVIRONMET AL HEALTH NEVES UNIFORMS NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 5 10/3/06 335.00 2,614.74 214.00 150.00 1,700.00 260.00 585.00 1,136.51 11.77 219.78 31.80 183.00 30.00 65.90 72.00 90.72 180.94 151.47 24.52 74.19 30.00 48.49 150.00 123.54 90.00 15.48 29.80 180.00 36.75 37.31 97.19 10830 329.14 5,366.24 57.92 10,000.00 595.00 522.50 64.80 29.24 174.99 453.31 30.00 4,083.75 41.00 88,328.16 7,716.20 156.00 715.00 2,210.75 6,145.47 7.32 508.25 279.00 108.1 0 308.55 NORDIC REFRIGERATION NORTHERN SAFECO INC NORTHWEST COLORADO OC TANNER OFFICE DEPOT ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO ORV HAUGEN P SCOTT LOWERY P-LOGIC SYSTEMS PADDYWACKS DIST., LLC PAINT BUCKET THE P MER WISE PARK COUNTY SHERIFF OFF. PAT HAMMON PAT NOLAN PAULA A PALMATEER PEARL TAYLOR PETER RUNYON PHILIP KLASS PHYLISS ROUNDS PITNEY BOWES PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED PLASTEX PROTECTIVE PLASTOCON PORTABLE COMPUTER PORTER AUTO BODY INC PRCA PROFESSIONAL FINANCE PROFORMA PROSHINE SALES & SERVICE PTL ELECTRIC PUBLIC SAFETY WAREHOUSE QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QWEST R & S NORTHEAST LLC RAZORS EDGE INC REBECCA LARSON REBECCA WHEELERSBURG ROBINSON TEXTILES ROCKHURSTCOLLEGE ROLLY ROUNDS RRMA RUTH LENZ RUTH TERRAZAS RYKO MANUFACTURING CO SANDRA L SKILES SAWAYA AND ROSE SCHERING PLOUGH ANIMAL SCHMIDT POLYGRAPH SCHUTZMAN COMPANY, INC. SCOTT FLEMING SCOLL YS ART OFFICE AND SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHAINHOLTZ TODD H DDS SHAPINS ASSOCIATES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND REFUND SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 6 10/3/06 325.96 137.07 850.00 341.34 1,782.39 178.20 200.00 30.00 2,461.25 427.74 974.42 3,954.00 6,120.00 72.90 758.15 68.40 91.74 14.60 30.00 12.00 3,360.00 106.47 335.20 91.85 59.00 1,400.10 495.00 6.30 491.87 872.86 590.08 648.00 218.80 7,025.92 55.69 349.00 248.26 10.53 421.12 249.00 60.00 700.00 15.00 300.00 1,193.14 148.00 30.00 584.88 360.00 270.06 135.00 24.75 3,635.00 378.00 14,925.35 sHAREE WETTSTEIN SHEAFFER KAREN SHEILA VIGIL SHERI MINTZ SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SIRI NELSON SMITH EDWARD SNOWHITE LINEN SPIEGEL MCDIARMID SSDTTF STARBUCK SURVEYORS & ENOl STEPHANIE GLENWRIGHT STEPHENS NURSERY STERICYCLE INC StUDENT MOvERS SUE LICKUS SUE MOTT SUNNY COMMUNICATIONS INC SUPPORT PAYMENT SUSAN NARDUZZI SUSAN YANDLE SUSPENSE FUND SYDNEY PITTMAN SYLVIA SALAZAR TAD DEGAN T AMMI MATTHEWS TAMRA BLACKARD TAYLOR RYAN .TENIECHICOINE TERRY W SCOBY tHE FLOWER CART THE OLD GYPSUM PRINTER THOMAS COLE THOMAS F FARRELL THOMSON WEST GROUP TIM COMROE TIM DOOLEY TIM LOSA TONI BERNS TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TOWN OF EAGLE TRI COUNTY FIRE ULTIMATE OFFICE ULTRAMAX UNITEDP ARCEL SERVICE UNITED REPROGRAPHIC UNNERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC URBAN LAND INSTITUTE US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS US FOODSERVICE INC V AIL DAILY THE VAIL EAGLE VALLEY ROTARY I AIL ELECTRONICS V AIL LOCK AND KEY VAIL MOUNTAIN COFFEE VAIL MOUNTAIN SCHOOL REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE 7 10/3/06 129.83 302.34 148.00 271.59 687.31 117.45 148.00 128.73 532.50 1,580.00 300.00 90.00 192.40 162.06 900.00 72.00 180.00 2,880.00 363.00 180.00 30.00 105,280.84 34.80 33.07 306.61 303.35 392.39 52.00 180.00 35.60 118.00 1,425.00 130.41 53.35 2,291.60 22.92 176.33 55.89 168.60 536.34 10,914.15 1,190.00 237.19 97.80 381.34 87.30 364.00 450.00 19,931.84 13,301.29 1,343.74 265.00 1,328.30 36.39 203.50 3,240.00 V AIL RESORTS MANAGEMENT VAIL SYMPOSIUM VAIL VALLEYMEDICALCENTR VALLEY LUMBER VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY VERIFICA TlONSINC VERIZON WIRELESS, VI BROWN VIRGINIA BAIR VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WECMRD WELLS FARGO WESTERN SAFETY PRODUCT WESTERN SLOPE BAR WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES WILLIAM LOPER WOLPOFF AND ABRAMSON WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY WYOMING TRANSPORT XCELENERGY XEROX CORPORATION YAl\tIP A V ALLEY ELECTRIC YESENIA ESTRADA YOUR ~ERSONAL CHEF ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLLEXPD SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REFUND SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL 19 & 20 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND ACTNE COMMUNICA nONS ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS lNC AMERIGAS COLORADO MOUNTAIN MEDICAL COpy PLUS EATON SALES & SERVICE ENVIROTECH FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FAULHABER CONSTRUCTION G M ROAD MARKING LLC GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY KINDER MORGAN INC LAF ARGE CORPORATION LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS lNC MOTOR POOL FUND PATRIOT HIGHWAY STRIPING PAUL MOSES SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION SUSPENSE FUND THERESALADENBURGER TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE REFUND SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REFUND REFUND REFUND SERVICE SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 8 10/3/06 2,783.52 250.00 560.65 23.62 210.00 872.40 1,657.10 7,521.79 315.00 64.18 44,374.64 4,651.33 9,572.25 336,827.44 70.85 318.90 81.41 36.00 93.40 1,613.81 210.67 275.00 78 .54 5,762.18 158.53 30.01 663.75 554.29 754,396.08 2,194,407.72 138.00 20,047.85 420.64 100.00 67.50 360.25 21,269.70 401.88 250.00 680.00 205.21 1,622.30 1,115.95 1,725.35 96.59 235.28 65.40 82,216.67 5,147.95 57.58 211.54 7,224.21 23.99 330.60 US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS V ALLEY LUMBER VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WECMRD WELLS FARGO WESTERN SLOPE AGGREGATE WESTERN SLOPE SUPPLIES WHITTAKER LANDSCAJ>ING WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLLEXPD SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL 19 & 20 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND ANDREW TURNER ANDREWS FOODSERVICE BETHANIE LINDAL BLANCA SANCHEZ CAROL PRATER CAROLINE GONZALES CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, M.A. CENTVRYTEL CHRIS MORTON COLORADO COUNTIES INC COLORADO STATE FOSTER copy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS )OLPHIN CAPITAL CORP EAGLE COuNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLECOUNTYSHEmFFSOFF EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND ELIZABETH MCGILL VRA Y FORINASH KA THLEEN HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HEART OF THE WEST COuNSEL HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC ISABEL SANCHEZ JEANNE MCQUEENEY JESSICA LUCAS JULIA KOZUSKO KRISTI GREMS KYMBERLEIGH SEMMENS LA QUINTA INN & SUITES LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES LARA "HEATHER" LA WDERMILK LEXISNEXIS COURTLINK INC LYONS KATHLEEN MESA COUNTY SHERIFF NATALIE SWANSON NOLA NICHOLSON -IWA OLGA WILKINS ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 9 10/3/06 640.18 22.54 248.46 41.05 1,925.00 27,996.06 13,045.27 23.75 875.00 96.77 55.91 65,030.79 254,015.22 183.06 40.37 75.00 338.92 20.76 263.78 300.00 97.92 592.00 335.00 100.00 218.00 98.11 79.00 2,410.94 88.20 4.59 2,000.00 298.80 405.37 22,823.93 330.00 92.17 132.66 295.52 72.90 372.67 195.00 17.98 62.00 9.63 230.18 151.40 358.40 36.08 73.60 110.25 1,200.00 365.00 57.75 RITA WOODS SCHMIDT POLYGRAPH SUSPENSE FUND VAIL HONEYW AGON L TD VERIZON WIRELESS, VIRGINIA AVILA VISA CARD SERVICES WELLS FARGO XEROX CORPORATION PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER WRAP FUND VISA CARD SERVICES RETIREMENT FUND SUSPENSE FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND AMERICAN CNIL CONSTRUCTR CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS HART INTERCNIC JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC KENNEY & ASSOCIATES LIGHTNING SERVICES MCLAUGHLIN RINCON LID MITY-LlTE, INC. MORTER ARCflITECTS P.W. ESPRESS CONTRACTING SHEPHERD RESOURCES, INC. TOWN OF GYPSUM TRI COUNTY FIRE TURTLE VIDA VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION WESTERN SLOPE FENCING SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. A & E TIRE INC Al AUTO ELECTRIC COMPANY ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY BUFFALO RIDGE AFFORDABLE CENtRAL DISTRIBUTING CINGULAR WIRELESS COLLETTS COLORADO DEPT REVENUE COLUMBINE MARKET COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC CORPORATE EXPRESS D.H.L. WORLDWIDE EXPRESS DRNE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE PHARMACY REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE PAYROLL 19 &20 SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVIC3E SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE 10 10/3/06 266.60 225.00 7,947.68 33.50 456.70 318.33 5,23!.l5 24,164.42 489.85 53,438.83 127,509.00 260.00 260.00 91,757.00 91,757.00 21,742.80 1,237.54 1,935.04 326,075.00 2,905.00 135.00 57.50 3,305.25 184.50 26,576.43 200.00 2,673.10 250,000.00 1,155.00 6,157.50 249,280.14 5,594.00 899,213.80 3,722.79 2,474.64 482.92 6,080.00 89.60 285.69 1,278.80 105.60 49.41 48.00 330.68 35.06 6,634.72 57,147.28 10.65 FEDERAL EXPRESS GEORGE KUERSTEN GFIGENFARE GILLIG CORPORATION JLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD GUSTY KANAKIS HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS JANET FIELD JEFF WETZEL KINDER MORGAN INC KTuN-FM RADIO KW CONSTRUCTION KZYRcCOOL RADIO LLC LAWSON PRODUCTS LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC M&MAUTOPARTS MAIN AUTO PARTS MILLENNIUM TOWING MOTOR POOL FUND QWEST REGAL PIEDMONT PLASTICS RTD SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF GYPSUM .RANSWEST TRUCKS JNITED STATES WELDING US CLl3.ANING PROFESSIONALS VAIL NET VISA CAR!) SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN SLOPE BAR WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS FEDERAL EXPRESS GARY THORNTON HEALTH INSURANCE FUND METCALF ARCHAELOGICAL SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER SUSPENSE FUND JNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO WELLS FARGO SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLLEXPD SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL 19&20 SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD 11 10/3/06 19.72 45.29 241.30 7,603.08 1,274.05 269.40 2,912.29 3,907.79 26.50 67.59 495.87 338.23 400.00 1,900.00 333.00 285.95 234.00 195.92 9,81 1,000.00 7,727.62 168.71 4,489.28 450.00 12,769.71 1,106.70 1,157.71 321.36 29.60 2,241.82 11. 95 4,760.25 143.74 56,012.08 15.25 21.96 510.90 203.03 129,192.50 321,669.80 57.83 718.11 395.94 641.1 0 123.02 47.38 10.72 602.40 10,880.00 164.42 6,915.68 952.48 21,509.08 AIRPORT FUND ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY ASMI CARTER & BURGESS, INC CHRIS ANDERSON CORPORATE EXPRESS COWBOY CATERING DISH NETWORK ELIZABETH WILT FIRKINS GARAGE DOORS FRONTIER RADIO G &. S TOOL CLINIC LLC GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GYPSUM AUTO BODY GYPSUM TOWN OF HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC KELLEY TRUCKING INC LN. CURTIS & sONS LAFARGE CORPORATION LAWSON PRODUCTS MAIN AUTO PARTS MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN POWERSPORTS NAPA AUTO PARTS - VAIL NEXTEL NORTHWEST COLORADO ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION SAFETY KLEEN SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHERWIN INDUSTRIES INC STANDARD SIGNS INC STEWART & STEVENSON POWER SUMMITEX, LLC SUSPENSE FUND TAYLOR FENCE COMPANY US CUSTOMS SERVICE VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN IMPLEMENTS WESTERN SLOPE BAR WINGATE INN WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER MICROWAVE MAINTENANCE FUND CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC MCI WORLDCOM QWEST SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL 19 & 20 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 12 10/3/06 351.13 20,457.00 201,533.30 17.82 55.20 1,300.00 5.99 59.40 190.00 1,296.00 32.15 543.79 2,582.20 431.05 1,418.20 581.80 3,358,119.58 95.00 1,026.00 111.99 63.90 2,709.34 453.22 262.96 670.76 170.00 2,856.15 703.83 150.00 1,944.00 545.00 173.62 5,276.80 127.89 4,441.43 1,440.00 2,001.58 2,761.93 427.14 18,335.40 881.00 108.90 1,155.60 201.84 95.58 37,961.70 3,676,127.17 94.15 3,497.38 39,448.56 6,326.43 2,385.61 51,752.13 HOUSING FUND COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 402.00 }ARFIELD COUNTY HOUSING SERVICE 1,102.00 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 10,904.00 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 49.27 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 150.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 125.64 PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER 709.02 13,441.93 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC SERVICE 80.10 ARlSTA TEK INC SERVICE 390.00 CAS CO INDUSTRIES INC SERVICE 168.85 DANIEL VALDEZ SERVICE 225.00 LUDLUM MEASUREMENTS INC SERVICE 109.13 REIS ENVIRONMENTAL INC SERVICE 2,355.81 SHAWN MOORE SERVICE 225.00 TICI SERVICE 5,596.00 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 958.22 10,108.11 LANDFILL FUND 21ST CENTURY SEEDERS INC SERVICE 69.44 ACZ LABORATORY INC SERVICE 2,745.00 BARNES DISTRIBUTING SUPPLIES 63.69 ~OLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 996.86 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 32.84 DOWN V ALLEY SEPTIC SERVICE 550.00 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 744.78 KRW CONSULTING INC SERVICE 29,202.20 LAF ARGE CORPORATION SERVICE 14,580.27 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 64,718.02 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEP ARTMEN SERVICE 102,641.74 SPECIAL PROTECTION INC SERVICE 5,050.00 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 2,379.62 TED SEIPEL CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 12,912.00 TIRE BROKER, INC. SERVICE 28,800.00 US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS SERVICE 750.48 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 44.30 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 7,303.13 YARGER SERVICES LLC SERVICE 550.00 PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER PAYROLL 19 & 20 20,488.56 294,622.93 MOTOR POOL FUND ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE [38.00 AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC SERVICE 1 77. 72 APW A WESTERN SNOW & ICE SERVICE 370.00 BERTHOD MOTORS SERVICE 334.80 OYZ TOYZ & SONZ SUPPLIES 48.50 CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTNE SERVICE 485.21 CCG SYSTEMS SERVICE 4,500.00 13 10/3/06 COLLETTS COLORADO MOUNTAIN MEDICAL COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS DRNE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE V ALLEY MEDICAL EAGLE V ALLEY PRINTING EATON SALES & SERVICE FARIS MACHINERY CO G & K SERVICES GLENWOOD SPRINGS CHRYSLER HANSON EQUIPMENT HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HENSLEY BATTERY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HaNNEN EQUIPMENT KINDER MORGAN INC LAWSON PRODUCTS LIGHTHOUSE, INC., THE M&MAUTOPARTS MAIN AUTO PARTS MOTOR POOL FUND NovDs AUTOGLASS POWER MOTNE PREMIER TIRE TERMINAL RAC TRANSPORT CO INC SAFETY KLEEN (WHICITA) SUSPENSE FUND TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED tOWN OF GYPSUM TWO RIVERS CHEVROLET UNITED TRUcK & EQVIPMENT US CLEANING PROFESSIONALS VEEDER-ROOT COMPANY VISA CARD SERVICES WAGNER EQuIpMENT COMPANY WASTE MANAGEMENT WEAR PARTS EQUIPMENT WELLS FARGO WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLLEXPD SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL 19&20 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND AFLAC ATTN:RPS DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. UNITED STATES LIFE INS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ENHANCED E911 FUND CENTURYTEL LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES NOMAD TECHNOLOGIES QWEST ROAM SECURE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 14 10/3/06 98, I 06.06 200.00 201.96 145.02 80.00 150.00 259.00 46.83 485.90 70.28 86.38 818.03 1,039.00 2,885.16 551.58 249.72 382.88 167.20 2,054.96 47.21 15,538.53 314.54 3,526.32 5,800.50 466.39 201.95 2,213.97 76.30 854.75 309.18 54.00 1,655.16 189.24 482.16 1,433.36 106.12 266.88 7,332.86 131.24 98.27 16,664.57 171,797.69 2,822.90 1,050.00 39,617.09 2,316.00 45,805.99 185.42 928.15 850.00 46.13 22,300.00 24,309.70 8,198,307.27 Executive Session There was none. Consent Agenda Chairman Runyon stated the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of bill paying for the week of October 2, 2006 (subject to review by the Finance Director) Mike Roeper, Finance B. Approval of the minutes of the Eagle County Board of Commissioners meeting for August 1, August 8 and August 15,2006 Teak Simonton, Clerk & Recorder c. Assignment of Certificate of Deposit from Contractone, Inc. to Eagle County for Permit to Construct within the Public Way No. 3536 Engineering Department Representative D. Software License Agreement between Roam Secure, Inc. and Eagle County Barry Smith, Emergency Management E. Modified Facilities Management Leasing Agreement Tom Johnson, Facilities Management Lease Agreement between Eagle County and the Eagle Valley Humane Society County Attorney's Office Representative G. Town of Eagle, Colorado Extraterritorial Water Service and Wastewater Collection and Treatment Service Agreement to the Eagle County Fairgrounds Multi-Use Pavilion (Eagle River Center) and Eagle County Animal Services Facility County Attorney's Office Representative H. Professional Services Contract Agreement between Eagle County and Sopris Architecture for design services, El Jebel Road and Bridge Facility Rick Ullom, Facilities Management I. 5MB-00394, Berry Creek Ranch, Filing No.1, Lot 24. The purpose of this Plat is to subdivide Lot 24, Berry Creek Ranch, Filing 1 to create two (2) Y2 duplex lots to be known as 24E and 24W Bob Narracci, Community Development Chairman Runyon asked the Attorney's Office ifthere were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Bryan Treu, County Attorney stated requested that Item D and G be pulled. Commissioner Stone moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items A-I, omitting Items D and G. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. ~itizen Input 15 10/3/06 Bill Loper, Eagle Valley Humane Society president spoke. He stated that he understands the need for mOre space. There are a number of ongoing programs, which involve Eagle County Animal services and the Eagle County Humane Society. He believes that removing them from thier space that they currently occupy is not a step towards a solution. Chair111an Runyon stated that he had no knowledge that the lease agreement would preclude the Eagle Valley Humane Society from their space neither now or in the future. Mr. Loper stated that the lease agreement referenced an unusual number of times that if the County needs the space, EVHS would have to find other space. He stated that the EVHS would like to be a part of any ongoing effort to get more space. Resolution 2006-101 Third Supplementary Budget Mike Roeper, Finance Cindy Preytis, Deputy Finance Director presented the highlights of the third supplemental budget report. She stated that the largest items were the Eagle to Gypsum Trail and Hybrid vehicle acquisitions. Commissioner Menconi wondered if the amount needed was anticipated or estimated and wondered what the next step would be. Ms. Pteytis stated if the dollar amount were less optimistic, the money would have to come from somewhere else or be asked for in another supplemental. Mr. Baumgartner stated that the supplemental budget being presented is the total cost and not necessarily, the net cost. Ms. Preytis stated that the Motor Pool fund had been short on dollars. There were a lot of unexpected costs that absorbed the fund balance. Mr. Baumgartner stated that statutes and fund accounting requires that a supplemental be done ifthe budget amount exceeds what was originally approved by the Board of County Commissioners Ms. Preytis stated that each year stands on its own. Chairman Runyon wondered if money was being saved towards vehicle replacements. Ms. Preytis stated that she wasn't clear on the Hybrid replacement. That would be a question for Mr. Roeper. Commissioner Menconi approved the Third Supplementary Appropriation to 2006 budget. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of two to one with Commissioner Stone voting against. Planning Files SMA-00027 Belle Terre Minor Subdivision Joe Forinash, Planning Department NOTE: Tabled from 7/25, 8/1, 8/29 and 9/12/06 ACTION: Subdivide 3.1 acre site into 3 lots for subsequent development of6 single family, duplex and a triplex dwellings on the lots. LOCATION: 34965 Hwy 6 (North ofHwy 6, west of Reserve Road) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions FILE NO./PROCESS: OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: SMA-00027 / Type A Minor Subdivision Raining Sun Enterprises, Inc. Raining Sun Enterprises, Inc. Raining Sun Enterprises, Inc. (Jim Gilbert) 16 10/3/06 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions The proposed development has been significantly re-designed to satisfactorily reduce development within the 50 foot live stream setback and thereby minimizing potentially adverse impacts to the aquatic habitat and the riparian reas associated with the Eagle River. 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: Subdivision of a 3.1 acre site into 3 residential. It is intended that these lots subsequently will be further subdivided into 6 lots for development of single family, duplex and triplex dwellings on the lots, 6 dwellings. Access would be from Reserve Road, north of Highway 6. Water and wastewater treatment services would be provided by the Edwards Metro District and the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District, respectively. B. CHRONOLOGY: June 2006 - A permit was issued for the demolition of 2 residential structures and 6 out-buildings on the site. C. SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning: Ea.st: Residential (Ranch House PUD) / PUD (Planned Unit Development) West: Eagle River; Residential (The Reserve) / RSM (Residential Suburban Medium Density) North: Eagle River; Residential (The Reserve) / RSM South: Arrowhead at Vail / PUD Existing Zoning: Residential Suburban LoW Density (RSL) Proposed No. of Dwelling Units: 3 residential lots are initially proposed; Applicant intends to submit subsequent Minor Type B subdivision applications to create lots for a total of 6 residential units Total Area: Water: Sewer: Access: 3.1 acres Edwards Metro District Eagle River Water and Sanitation District The Reserve Road, north of Highway 6 2. STAFF REPORT A. REFERRAL RESPONSES: Eagle County Engineering Department [Memos dated 17 February 2006, 27 March 2006 and 4 May 2006] . Various technical comments. [Memo dated 24 July 2006] . The Engineering Department requests: . Calculations for the proposed detention pond showing the pond is large enough to handle flood events to County standards. . Information stating whether the sewer and water lines on the property will be under a private or pubic maintenance schedule. . Information regarding who will be the licensed operator for the proposed lift station on the site. . Lift station details. . A permit for working in the right-of-way under Highway 6 will be needed. If a permit has been applied for or received, provide a copy of the permit. [Verbal comments as of 5 September 2006] . The Engineering Department reports that, with minor exceptions that can be addressed as the construction plans are finalized, the drawings and other information provided to date are satisfactory. 17 10/3/06 Eagle County Surveyor . Various technical comments. Eagle County Wildfire Mitigation Specialist . After looking at the slope, fuel types, access and surrounding terrain, the Belle Terre site warrants a wildfire hazard rating of LOW. A low rating means that structures on the property will most likely not be threatened by average wildfire activity. · Proximity to riparian zones, as well as low growing fuels, absence of slope, and access all contribute to this low rating. Even with a low rating, noncombustible roofing materials are suggested. Eagle County Housing Department . Based on the Housing Guidelines, on-site mitigation would result in 2 local resident housing units being provided, 0.28 units for employment linkage related mitigation (low income) and 1.20 units for inclusionary mitigation (moderate income). The calculated total of 1.48 units would be rounded up to 2 units. . Also based on the Housing Guidelines, mitigation by payment in lieu would result in a payment of $116,484.08, a combination of $36,909.68 for employment linkage related mitigation (low income units) and $79,574.40 for inclusionary mitigation (moderate income units). ECO Trails [Verbal response on 22 June2006.] . It is recommended that a sidewalk along Highway 6 be constructed as provided in the Highway 6 Access Control Plan. Eagle River Fire Protection District . The proposed new hydrant and existing hydrant appear to be adequate for fire fighting purposes. The line extending to the new hydrant is labeled 6". The minimum allowed by Eagle River Water & Sanitation District may be 8", so this will need to be verified. . Turning movements submitted for the project confirm adequate emergency access. Eagle River Water & Sanitation District . The Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority has determined that additional water rights will not be required for this development. . The Edwards Metropolitan District portfolio includes water rights for this development through the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority. However, a Water/Sewer Plant Investment Fee and a Treated Water Storage Pee will be due when digital floor plans for the project have been e-mailed to the District, reviewed and fees have been calculated. Eagle County School District (RE50J) . This minor subdivision is proposing 1 single-family, 2 duplexes and 3 multi-family units. These units would result in a 0.0276 acre dedication requirement. . . As the land dedication acreage is minimal, the District will accept the cash in lieu of land for this minor subdivision. Per the County School Land Dedication Standards, the value of this cash payment will be determined by an appraisal of the land provided by the developer with the application for final plat. Colorado Division of Wildlife . The majority of the upland portion of this site has been heavily impacted from pervious uses and has little overall wildlife values, however, the riparian area is in good condition and still provides excellent wildlife habitat. . The project proposes a fifty foot (50') setback from riparian areas with a driveway and removal of some trees within the fifty foot (50') setback. It is the Division's recommendation that a seventy five foot (75') setback from all riparian habitats along the Eagle River be implemented. This setback shoul be maintained in natural vegetation and not be manicured within the seventy five foot (75') setback. 18 10/3/06 . Riparian ecosystems constitute one of the most limited yet species rich ecosystems in Colorado. Protecting and enhancing the riparian ~abitat along the Eagle River benefits both terrestrial and aquatic wildlife species. . Some of the limiting factors the Eagle River faces include low water flows and high water temperatures. The reduction in riparian habitats impacts the amount of shade on the stream which in turn increases the water temperature and evaporation and consequently negatively impacts the health of the fishery. Colorado Geological Survey . Floodplain . Structures for the new development are set back 50 feet from the "Eagle River High Water Line". It would be useful to have the reference that documents this high water line. . The CGS Geologist visiting the site did not observe signs of bank erosion from the top of the slope. The morphology of the river suggests erosion would be more likely on the north side of the river. . Slope . The differing scales of the construction diagrams and the absence of labeling of contours on some of the diagrams made it difficult to evaluate the proposed construction in relation to the existing topography, but development should be set back a minimum of 20 feet from the break in slope to the river to limit erosion and prevent potential slope instability. . Any retaining walls over 4 feet in height should be engineered. . Drainage . A drainage report was not included in the referral to CGS, but information should be provided that discusses the management and discharge of on-site flows. The discussion should state how the property would be affected by runoff from Highway 6, including any sheet-flows from slopes south of the highway. Outfalls should be designed for erosion control. . The detention pond would probably not contain a significant volume of water for any length of time, otherwise lining of the pond might be considered to limit impact to the slope. . If snow storage is found to be necessary, the designated area should be incorporated into the overall drainage plan of the site and should not pose a problem if rapid snoW1nelt occurs. . Soil . The soil at the site is probably a combination of slopewash from outcrops south of Highway 6, which is mapped as Eagle Valley Evaporite, and alluvium of the Eagle River. Cobbles greater than 4 inches in diameter should be removed from building footprints and driveways because of the potential for differential compaction. . The foundation excavations should be evaluated by a geotechnical engineer to determine if problematic soils are present, including soils with collapse potential or soluble constituents that could cause post-construction settlement. . Samples from the building footprint(s) should be tested for geotechnical properties so that foundations and floors could be designed accordingly. . Summary . There are no geological conditions that would preclude the subdivision, but the comments listed above should be considered in development. Colorado Division of Water Resources . The water supply is to be provided by the Edwards Metropolitan District and sewage disposal is to be provided by the Eagle River Water and Sanitation district. No letters of commitment were provided. Water estimates were not provided. . Pursuant to Section 30-28-136(1)(h)(1l), c.R.S., a municipality or quasi-municipality is required to file a report with Eagle County and the State Engineer documenting the amount of water which can be supplied to the proposed development without causing injury to existing water rights. A report of this nature was not included in the submittal materials. Therefore, the Division is unable to comment on the proposed water supply. . Since insufficient information was provided, the Division is unable to provide comments pursuant to Section 30-28-136(1 )(h)(ll), C.R.S. 19 10/3/06 Colorado State Forest Service . The Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) has given the Belle Terre site a wildfire hazard rating of Low. A low rating means that structures on the property will most likely not be threatened by average. wildfire activity. · After development of this small parcel, the majority of the remaining fuels will be very discontinuous. River access, lack of slope, and well-maintained road access also help keep fire danger low. . Even with this low rating, CSFS suggests that dual access be considered and noncombustible roofing material be used. Additional Referral Agencies: Eagle County Attorney, ECO Transit, Eagle County Environmental Health, Eagle County Road & Bridge Department, Eagle County Weed and Pest, Eagle County School District (Transportation), Eagle County Weed and Pest Control, Eagle County Ambulance District, Upper Eagle Water & Sanitation District, Colorado Department of Transportation (Local and Grand Junction Offices), US Natural Resource Conservation Service (USDA), US Army Corps of Engineers, Holy Cross Energy, KN Energy, CenturyTel, The Reserve HOA, Arrowhead at Vail HOA, Millers Creek HOA. B. STAFF DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-290.G.1. Standards for the review of a Type A Minor Subdivision: STANDARD: Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-290.G.l.a.] - the proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan and the FLUM of the Comprehensive Plan. EAGLE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CIl ~. W CIl ..J E- ~ Cl ~ w ffi E-CIJ ~ ffi u UW 0 Z CIl ;:JS:l CIJ CIJ ..J ::8 uw gj WW w ::8 ..: ~ ~i;J ~ ~~ ::J~ ~ z>- ~ 0 ..J O;:J CIlW ~ t: OE- ;;;iCll W ~- W W Zo CIl ClO CIl _..J ~ ;> iii ;:J E- ~~ OCll ><.Cl ~ ..JCIl a'l 0 &jgj 0 25~ ~gj ..J " Cl ::r: CIl wCl ><. CONFORMS x x x x x x x x x x DOES NOT CONFORM MIXED CONFORMANCE NA Remarks: Se'e below. Governance. Eagle County's Core Values have been appropriately communicated to the applicant through the planning process. The community at large is aware of the proposal, and has been provided adequate opportunity to be involved with the decision making process. Development. Development would be clustered, preserving open space areas, except a portion of the riparian area near the Eagle River. The development is located in the immediate vicinity of existing community centers and contributes to a logical development pattern. With recent revisions to the site plan, the proposed development represents a reasonable balance between economic, social, and environmental needs. 20 10/3/06 Economic Resources. With recent revisions to the site plan, the proposed development is sensitive to the riparian area and would not adversely affect Eagle County's position as a world class tourist destination. Housing. Staff understands that it is the intent of the Applicant to make an appropriate payment of cash in lieu. -.1lfrastructure and Services. The proposed development, with the recommended conditions of approval, would contribute to the sidewalk/trail system along Highway 6. New infrastructure costs would be fairly and equitably shared. However, the proposal would not foster integration nor enhance socio-economic equity in the County. Water Resources. With recent revisions to the site plan, the proposed development is sensitive to the aquatic habitat and the riparian area and would adequately protect water quality in the Eagle River. Wildlife Resources. With recent revisions to the site plan, the proposed development is sensitive to wildlife resources, Sensitive Lands. No areas of significant natural hazard have been identified, nor are landscapes that include visual, historic or archeological likely to be compromised. Enviromnental Quality. This Section deals primarily with air quality, ambient noise levels arid the quality of the night sky. No significaritpotentially adverse impacts have been identified. Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The FLUM of the Comprehensive Plan defers to that of the Edwards Area Community Plan, which provides for net residential density on this site of no more than 4 unit per acre and a gross density of no more than 6 units per acre. The proposed development is within these density parameters. EDWARDS AREA COMMUNITY PLAN . Conformance Non-Conformance Mixed Conformance Not Applicable , Land Use x Housin'g x Transportation x Open Space x Potable Water and Wastewater x SerVices and Facilities x Environmental QuaJity x Economic Development x Recreation and Tourism x Historic Preser\i'ation x Implementation x Future Land Use Map x Land Use. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the timely, cost-effective provision of public services. With recent revisions to the site plan, the proposed subdivision is consistent with the timely, cost-effective rovision of public services, and does balance the environmental needs of the current and future population with hysical, social, cultural, and economic needs. Housing. Staff understands that it is the intent of the Applicant to make an appropriate payment of cash in lieu. 21 10/3/06 Transportation. The development would be located adjacent to a transit route and, pursuant to a recommended condition of approval, the developer would contribute to the sidewalk/path along Highway 6. Open Space. No open space is required to be provided in conjunction with this development. Potable Water and Wastewater. With recent revisions to the site plan, the proposed subdivision, the Eagle River will be protected from environmental degradation. Services and Facilities. It appears that solid wastes will be handled in an environmentally sound manner. Environmental Quality. With recent revisions to the site plan, the proposed subdivision is sensitive to the environmental quality of the site and adjacent lands. Economic Development. This Section is not applicable. Recreation and Tourism. This Section is not applicable. Historic Preservation. This Section is not applicable. Implementation. This Section is not applicable. Future Land Use Map. The FLUM of the Edwards Area Community Plan provides for net residential density on this site of no more than 4 units per acre and a gross density of no more than 6 units per acre. The proposed development is within these density parameters. EAGLE COUNTY OPENSPACE PLAN x x x x x x x Land Use Cooperation. This Section is not applicable. Open Space Provision. Development is restricted from areas along the Eagle River and so these areas will be preserved in a natural condition. The design is sensitive to open space values. Unique Character Preservation. This Section is not applicable. Visual Quality. The proposed subdivision would not adversely affect visual quality. Development Patterns. The proposed subdivision would be in an existing community. Hazards. This Section is not applicable. Wildlife. With recent revisions to the site plan, the proposed subdivision is sensitive to aquatic habitat and the riparian areas within the site and on adjacent lands. 22 10/3/06 Water Quantity. The proposed development would not directly affect water quantity of the Eagle River. Water Quality. With recent revisions to the site plan, the proposed subdivision will not adversely impact the water quality ofthe Eagle River. Wildlife. With recent revisions to the site plan, the proposed subdivision is sensitive to aquatic habitat and the riparian areas within the site and on adjacent lands. Recreation. This Section is not applicable. Land Use. With recent revisions to the site plan, the proposed subdivision is sensitive to aquatic habitat and the riparian areas within the site and on adjacent lands. EAGLE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING PLAN VISION STATEMENT: Housing for local residents is a major priority of Eagle County. There should be a wide variety of houSing to fulfill the needs of all its residents, including families, senior citizens, and those who work here. Elements of Eagle County's vision for housing are: . Housing is a community-wide issue . Housing should be located in close proximity to existing community centers, as defined in the Eagle County master plan. . . . Development of local residents housing should be encouraged on existing . . . transit routes . Housing is primarily a private sector activity [but] . . . without the active participation of govemment~ there will be only limited success . It is important to preserve existing local residents housing . Persons who work in Eagle County should have adequate housing opportunities within the county . Development applications that will result in an increased need for local residents housing should be evaluated as to whether they adequately provide for this additional need, the same way as they are evaluated for other infrastructure needs POLICIES: ITEM 1. Eagle County will collaborate with the private sector & nonprofit organizations to develop housing for local residents 2. Housing for local residents is an issue which Eagle County needs to address in collaboration with the municipalities. . . x 3. Steps should be taken to facilitate increased home ownership by local residents and workers in Eagle County x 4. Additional rental opportunities for permanent local residents should be brought on line. 23 10/3/06 ITEM YES NO N/A Some. . . should be for households with an income equivalent to or less than one average wage job x 5. Seasonal housing is part of the problem & needs to be further addressed. It is primarily the responsibility of. . . employers. . . x 6. New residential subdivisions will provide a percentage of their units for local residents Xl 7. Commercial, industrial, institutional, and public developments generating increased ernployment will provide local residents housing. The first preference will be for units on- site where feasible, or if not feasible, in the nearest existing community center. . . X 8. The County will seek to make land available for local residents hOusing in proximity to community centers 9. Mixed use developments in appropriate locations are encouraged X 10. Factory-built housing is an important part of Eagle County=s housing stock X 11. There is a need to segment a portion ofthe housing market to protect local residents from having to compete with second home buyers. Where public assistance or subsidies are provided for housing, there should generally be limits on price appreciation, as well as residency requirements X 12. Eagle County recognizes that housing for local residents is an ongoing issue X I - Staff understa.nds that it is the intent of the Applicant to make an appropriate payment of cash in lieu. Overall, the proposed development generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. [+] FINDING: Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-290.G.I.a.] The PUD IS consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, however it IS consistent with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). STANDARD: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-290.G.1.b.] - The proposed subdivision shall comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts. and Article 4, Site Develovment Standards. Article 3, Zone Districts The site is currently zoned Residential Suburban Low Density (RSL). As such, the zoning allows one dwelling unit per 15,000 square feet of developable area. With 2.074 acres of developable land, six dwelling units area allowed [(2.074 acres X 43,560 s.f./acre) /15,000 s.f./unit = 6.02 units). The proposed development complies with most of the standards and provisions of the Land Use Regulations, including Article 3, Zone Districts. However, the Land Use Regulations provide that the area within the 50 foot live stream setback from the Eagle River is to be protected in its natural state with certain exceptions, including footpaths, bridges, fences, irrigation structures and erosion protection devices. The revised site plan now removes virtually all problematic improvements from the 50 foot live stream setback. The standards of Article 3, Zone Districts are now satisfied. Article 4, Site Development Standards [+] Off-StreetParking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1) 24 10/3/06 Three parking spaces are required for each single family and duplex dwelling unit. As many as 3 are required for each multi-family unit, including triplexes, depending on the number of bedrooms. Although this subdivision would create only three lots on the site, two of these are intended to subsequently be subdivided into a duplex and a triplex lot, respectively. The proposed site plan would allow for a minimum of three parking lots per unit. The Applicant/developer will be required to demonstrate the adequate parking exists prior to issuance of each building permit. [+] Landscaping and lllumination Standards (Division 4-2) The entire parcel would eventually consist of private lots with easements to provide access throughout. There are no common areas to be landscaped and the buildable portion of the lots has previously had most of the vegetation removed. Landscaping of individual lots is not within the intended scope of this Section. No infonrtation is provided regarding proposed lighting and illumination. Lighting and illumination subsequently proposed for the development will be required to comply with Section 4-250, lllumination Standards, ofthe Land Use Regulations. [+] Sigh Regulations (Division 4-3) The development will be required to conform to the standards of this Section. [+] Natural Resource Protection Standards (Division 4-4) [+] Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410) - The revised site plan removed all problematic improvements from the 50 foot live stream setback. Aquatic habitat and the riparian area along this stretch of the Eagle River will be adequately protected. [+] Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420) - Colorado Geological Survey (CGS) has provided a number of recommendations based on its review of the site, including the following: . Documentation of the high water line which establishes the 50 foot setback from the Eagle River should be provided. . Development should be setback a minimum of 20 feet from the break in slope to the river to limit erosion and prevent erosion and prevent potential slope instability. . Retaining walls over 4 feet in height should be engineered. . Certain specific design considerations should be incorporated with respect to drainage. . Soils should be properly tested and evaluated and large cobbles removed because of the potential for differential compaction. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, prior to approval of the final plat, the recommendations of the Colorado Geological Survey in its letter dated June 16, 2006, should be fully implemented in the design of the site to the satisfaction of the County Engineer. [Condition #1] [+] Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430) - Both the Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) and the Eagle County Wildfire Mitigation Specialist give the site a wildfire hazard rating of Low, which means that structures on the property will most likely not be threatened by average wildfire activity. However, both recommend that noncombustible roofing materials be used. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, noncombustible roofing materials should be required on all structures and a note to that effect should be included on the final plat. [Condition #2] The Eagle River Fire Protection District notes that the line extending to the new fire hydrant is labeled 6" in diameter, and that the minimum allowed by Eagle River Water & 25 10/3/06 Sanitation District may be 8". If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, the Applicant should provide, prior to approval of the final plat for the development, complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition #3] [+] Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) - The development will be required to conform to the standards of this Section. [nla] Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450) - This application was accepted prior to approval of the recent amendment to the Land Use Regulations regarding ridge line protection, and so is subject to the earlier standards. This site is not located on land previously designated on the Ridgeline Protection Map. [nla] Environmental Impact RelJOrt (Section 4-460) - An Environmental Impact Report is not required for this proposed development. [nla] Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5) No commercial or industrial uses are proposed. This section is not applicable. [+] Improvement Standards (Division 4-6) [+ J Roadwav Standards (Section 4-620) - If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, the Applicant should provide, prior to approval of the final plat for the development, complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition #3] In addition, Eagle County Engineering has determined that the proposed development would involve a certain amount of public improvements. Therefore, a Subdivision Improvements Agreement would be required. It should be noted that the review process for a Type A Minor Subdivision is somewhat unique among subdivision processes in that it results in the approval of what is essentially a subdivision preliminary plan and a subdivision final plat. Certain documents, such as an improvements agreement, are required prior to approval of the final plat, but may not be in final form and executed by the Applicant until after the hearing on the application. In addition, approval of the proposed subdivision may affect the plat itself and the extent of the public improvements addressed in the improvements agreement. While that is the case with respect to this application, there is no reason to believe that an adequate improvements agreement cannot be finalized fairly quickly. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, a satisfactory improvements agreement and other required documents and payments necessary for final plat approval should be presented for final approval to the Board of County Commissioners on the Consent Agenda at the first available regular Board meeting after which the documents, plat and payments are available. [Condition #4] [+] Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630) - The Highway 6 Access Control Plan calls for a sidewalk along the north side of Highway 6 in the vicinity of this site. The Access Control Plan specifies a 10-foot wide, separated sidewalk/path for the segment of Highway 6 from Bull Run Road (east of the traffic light at Edwards Village Boulevard) to the Arrowhead area. In this particular stretch, separation of the sidewalk from the vehicul< travel lanes of Highway 6 may not be possible along the entire frontage of this site. Construction of similar sidewalks segments has been required in other areas along Highway 6. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, the Applicant should 26 10/3/06 construct a sidewalk near the south property line consistent with the standards for this segment of Highway 6 as shown in the Highway 6 Access Control Plan, on-site if possible or otherwise in the Highway 6 right-of-way, to standards and in an alignment satisfactory to the Eagle County Engineer in consultation with the Colorado Department of Transportation and ECO Trails. [Condition #5] [n/a] Irrigation Svstem Standards (Section 4-640) - There are no identified surface water rights appurtenant to this site, nor is irrigation water to be made available in the proposed development. [+] Drainage Standards (Section 4-650) - The revised site plan removed all problematic improvements from the 50 foot live stream setback. The drainage standards of this Section can be satisfied. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, the Applicant should provide, prior to approval of the final plat for the development, complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition #3] In addition, Eagle County Engineering has determined that the proposed development would involve a certain amount of public improvements. Therefore, a Subdivision Improvements Agreement would be required. It should be noted that the review process for a Type A Minor Subdivision is somewhat unique among subdivision processes in that it results in the approval of what is essentially a subdivision preliminary plan and a subdivision final plat, both at once. Certain documents, such as an improvements agreement, are required prior to approval of the final plat, but may not be in final form and executed by the Applicant until after the hearing on the application. In addition, approval of the proposed subdivision may affect the plat itself and the extent of the public improvements addressed in the improvements agreement. While that is the case with respect to this application, there is no reason to believe that an adequate improvements agreement cannot be finalized fairly quickly. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, a satisfactory improvements agreement and other required documents and payments necessary for final plat approval should be presented for final approval to the Board of County Commissioners on the Consent Agenda at the first available regular Board meeting after which the documents, plat and payments are available. [Condition #4] [+] Excavation and Grading Standards (Section 4-660) - The development will be required to conform to the standards of this Section. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, the Applicant should provide, prior to approval of the final plat for the development, complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition #3] [+] Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-665) - The revised site plan removed all problematic improvements from the 50 foot live stream setback. The erosion standards of this Section may be satisfied. The Director of Environmental Health notes that it would be important erosion control is adequately addressed. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, the Applicant should provide, prior to any site disturbance, a detailed site plan showing construction staging area(s) and a Dust Suppression Plan which have been approved by the Director of Environmental Health. Failure to adhere to these plans should, at the discretion of the Director of Environmental Health, result in a Stop Work Order. [Condition # 6] 27 10/3/06 The development will be required to conform to the standards of this Section. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, the Applicant should provide, prior to approval of the final plat for the development, complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition #3] [+] Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670) - The development will be required to conform to the standards of this Section. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, the Applicant should provide, prior to approval of the final plat for the development, complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition #3J [+] Water SUlmlv Standards (Section 4-680)- Water for this development would be provided by tapping into a water main located in The Reserve Road easement immediately to the east. The Engineering Department has requested that information be provided regarding whether the water lines on the property will be subject to a public or private maintenance schedule. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, the Applicant should provide, prior to approval of the final plat for the development, complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition #3] As a condition of approval, it should be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development prior to final approval of this subdivision that the covenants include a provision, and a note added to the final plat, to the effect that maintenance of the private portions of the water distribution system will be the responsibility of the property owners. [Condition #7] [+] Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690) - The closest sewer main is located on the south side of Highway 6. A permit will be required from the Colorado Department of Transportation to bore under the highWay. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, the Applicant should provide, prior to approval of the fmal plat for the development, evidence satisfactory to the County Engineer that all necessary permit(s) have been obtained from the Colorado Department of Transportation for construction activities within the Highway 6 right-of-way. [Condition #8] The proposed sewer plan requires the use of a lift station. The Engineering Department has noted that it has not been clearly shown whether the lift station would be publicly or privately maintained and what the proposed maintenance program would consist of. Maintenance of the lift station should be the responsibility of a licensed operator. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, the Applicant should, in a manner satisfactory to the County Engineer, demonstrate that on-going maintenance of the lift station will be the responsibility of a licensed operator. [Condition #9] The Applicant has not demonstrated that the lift station will be maintained by an appropriate metro district. It should be clearly demonstrated that the responsibility for maintenance should rest on the homeowners. As a condition of approval, it should be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development prior to final approval of this subdivision that the covenants include a provision, and a note added to the final plat, to the effect that maintenance of the private portions of the wastewater collection system, including maintenance of the lift station, will be the responsibility of the property owners. [Condition #7] In addition, Eagle County Engineering has determined that the proposed development would involve a certain amount of public improvements. Therefore, a Subdivision Improvements Agreement would be required. 28 10/3/06 It should be noted that the review process for a Type A Minor Subdivision is somewhat unique among subdivision processes in that it results in the approval of what is essentially a subdivision preliminary plan and a subdivision final plat. Certain documents, such as an improvements agreement, are required prior to approval of the final plat, but may not be in final form and executed by the Applicant until after the hearing on the application. In addition, approval of the proposed subdivision may affect the plat itself and the extent of the public improvements addressed in the improvements agreement. While that is the case with respect to this application, there is no reason to believe that an adequate improvements agreement cannot be finalized fairly quickly. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, a satisfactory improvements agreement and other required documents and payments necessary for final plat approval should be presented for final approval to the Board of County Commissioners on the Consent Agenda at the first available regular Board meeting after which the documents, plat and payments are available. [Condition #4] The Engineering Department has requested that information be provided regarding whether the sewer lines on the property will be subject to a public or private maintenance schedule. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, the Applicant should provide, prior to approval of the final plat for the development, complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition #3] [+] Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7) [+] School Land Dedication Standards (Section 4-700) - The Eagle County School District (RE50J) has indicated that it will accept payment of cash-in-lieu of land dedication. In this case, the school land dedication for the one single family and five multi-family dwellings (two duplex units and three triplex units) in this subdivision is 0.0276 acres [(0.0151 units/acre x 1 units) + (0.0025 units/acre x 5 units)]. The Applicant has provided a Summary Appraisal Report which satisfies the requirements of Section 4-700.C., Cash-in- Lieu of Land Dedication. The total value of the 3.2 acre site is established at $2,150,000, a per acre value of$67l,875. The resulting payment of cash in lieu of school land dedication is $18,543.75 [$671,875 per acre x 0.0276 acres], payment ofwmch is due prior to the time the final plat is approved by the Board of County Commissioners. [+] Road Impact Fees (Section 4-710) - The Applicant will be required to conform to the standards of this Section at the time that building permits are issued. [+] FINDING: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-290.G.I.b.] Due to the lack of a demdnstrated potable water source, it HAS NOT been demonstrated that the proposed subdivision complies with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards. STANDARD: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-290.G.1.c.] - The proposed subdivision shall be located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (1) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road extensions shall be consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital Improvements Plan. (2) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area in order to both avoid future land disruption, and the necessity of upgrading under-sized lines. 29 10/3/06 The proposed development does not create inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, nor does it result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. [+) FINDING: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-290.G.I.c.] The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial pattems that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. STANDARD: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-290.G, l.d.] -The property proposed to be subdivided shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. With the revised site plan, the proposed development is appropriate for the site. [+] FINDING: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-290.G.I.d.] the property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for the proposed development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. STANDARD: Compatible with Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-290.G.l.e] - The proposed subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the atea and shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. SUITotlIiding uses are primarily residential, but include the Eagle River and some open space. I [+] FINDING: Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-290,G.l.e.] The proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and SHALL NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. I STANDARD: ,Improvemeilts Agreement. [Section 5-290.G.1.f.] - The adequacy of the proposed Improvements Agreement, where applicable. Certain public improvements related to roads and drainage necessitate a Subdivision Improvements Agreement. It should be noted that the review process for a Type A Minor SubdiVision is somewhat unique among subdivision processes in that it results in the approval of what is essentially a subdivision preliminary plan and a subdivision final plat. Certain documents, such as an improvements agreement, are required prior to approval of the final plat, but may not be in final form and executed by the Applicant until after the hearing on the application. In addition, approval of the proposed subdivision may affect the plat itself and the extent of the public improvements addressed in the improvements agreement. While that is the case with respect to this application, there is no reason to believe that an adequate improvements agreement cannot be finalized fairly quickly. If this application is approved, as a condition of approval, a satisfactory improvements agreement and other required documents and payments necessary for final plat approval should be presented for final approval to the Board of County Commissioners on the Consent Agenda at the first available regular Board meeting after which the documents, plat and payments are available. [Condition #4] I [+] FINDING: Improvements Agreement. [Section 5-290.G.l.f.] - An Improvements Agreement IS required. STANDARD: Conformance with Final Plat Requirements. [Section 5-290.G.1.g.] - Its conformance with the Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines. 30 10/3/06 As noted above, the review process for a Type A Minor Subdivision is somewhat tlIiique among subdivision processes in that results in the approval of what is essentially a subdivision preliminary plan and a subdivision final plat. A final plat is nearly ready for Board consideration, but may need to be revised based on conditions approved by the Board. At the time a final plat is in final form and presented to the Board for approval, it is necessary to also present to the Board an improvements agreement and payment in lieu of school land dedication, and demonstrate that all conditions of approval required to be incorporated in the final plat or in conjunction with its approval have been satisfied. If this application is approved, as a condition of a?proval, a satisfactory final plat, improvements agreement and other required documents and payments necessary for final plat approval should be presented for final approval to the Board of County Commissioners on the Consent Agenda at the first available regular Board meeting after which the documents, plat and payments are available. [Condition #4] (+) FINDING: Conformance with Final Plat Requirements. [Section 5-290.G.l.g.] - The Final Plat DOES conform with the Final Plat re uirements and other a. licable re ulations, olicies, standards and uidelines. c. otHER-CONSIDERATIONS Housin2GuideIines. - On April 13, 2004, the Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution No. 2004-048 adopting Housing Guidelines to establish a framework for discussion and 11.egotiation of applicable housing criteria. The Housing Guidelines were subsequently amended on July 12, 2005, by Board Resolution 2005-90. Both the employee-linkage and the inc1usionary housing provisions of the Housing Guidelines are applicable in a residential development of four or more units. However, the Applicant has not offered to provide mitigation for any local resident housing impacts either through housing on-site or off-site or by a payment in lieu of such housing. The Director of Housing has determined that if mitigation were provided based on the Housing Guidelines, on-site mitigation at a rate of 20% would be 2 units (rounded up from 1.48 units calculated), and that mitigation by payment in lieu at 30% would result in a payment of $116,484.08. Nonetheless, if this application is approved, as a condition of approval, if the Applicant and the Board of County Commissioners agree to any payments in lieu of providing local resident housing, such payments in lieu to mitigate local resident housing impacts should be paid prior to the time that building permits are issued for the respective lots and should be based on the income and housing cost data cUrrent and available at the time, and the final plat should include a note which reads as follows: "Payments in lieu to mitigate local resident housing impacts shall be made pursuant to the conditions of approval adopted in File Number SMA-00027". [Condition #10] Proposed Conditions: 1. The site should be re-designed in a manner satisfactory to the County Engineer to eliminate all retaining walls and driveways from the 50 foot live stream setback and, to the extent feasible, relocate the detention pond and drainage swale from the 50 foot live stream setback from the Eagle River. 2. Prior to approval of the final plat, the recommendations of the Colorado Geological Survey in its letter dated June 16, 2006, shall be fully implemented in the design of the site to the satisfaction of the County Engineer. 3. Noncombustible roofing materials shall be required on all structures and a note to that effect shall be included on the final plat. 31 10/3/06 4. The Applicant shall provide, prior to approval of the final plat for the development, complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. 5. A satisfactory final plat, improvements agreement and other required documents and payments necessary for final plat approval shall be presented for final approval to the Board of County Commissioners on the Consent Agenda at the first available regular Board meeting after which the documents, plat and payments are available. 6. The Applicant shall construct a sidewalk near the south property line consistent with the standards for this segment of Highway 6 as shown in the Highway 6 Access Control Plan, on-site if possible or otherwise in the Highway 6 right-of-way, to standards and in an alignment satisfactory to the Eagle County Engineer in consultation with the Colorado Department of Transportation and ECO Trails. 7. The Applicant shall provide, prior to any site disturbance, a detailed site plan showing construction staging area( s) and a Dust Suppression Plan which have been approved by the Director of Environmental Health. Failure to adhere to these plans shall, at the discretion of the Director of Environmental Health, result in a Stop Work Order. 8. It shall be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development prior to final approval of this subdivision that the covenants include a provision, and a note added to the final plat, to the effect that maintenance of the private portions of the water distribution artd wastewater collection systems, including maintenance of the lift station, will be the responsibility of the property owners. 9. The Applicant shall provide, prior to approval of the final plat fOr the development, evidence satisfactory to the County Engineer that all necessary permit(s) have been obtained from the Colorado Department of Transportation for construction activities within the Highway 6 right-of-; way. 10. The Applicant shall, in a manner satisfactory to the County Engineer, provide design detail ofthe proposed lift station and demonstrate that on-going maintenance of the lift station will be the responsibility of a licensed operator. 11. If the Applicant and the Board of County Commissioners agree to any payments in lieu of providing local resident housing, such payments in lieu to mitigate local resident housing impacts shall be paid prior to the time that building permits are issued for the respective lots and shall be based on the income and housing cost data current and available at the time, and the final plat shall include a note which reads as follows: "Payments in lieu to mitigate local resident housing impacts shall be made pursuant to the conditions of approval adopted in File Number SMA-00027". 12. Except as otherwise modified by these conditions, all material representations of the Applicant in this application and all public meetings shall be adhered to and be considered conditions of approval. DISCUSSION: Mr. Forinash presented a PowerPoint presentation. The presentation included the applicant's request, vicinity map, site plan, visual simulation and an outline of the outstanding issues. The applicant's request is the approval of a minor subdivision to create 3 residential lots from a 3 . I-acre parcel. The intent is that the 3 lots be further subdivided to create lots for a total of 6 dwellings, I single-family, 2 duplex and 3 multi-family units. Access would be from Reserve Road. Water and wastewater treatment services would be provided y Edwards Metro District and Eagle River Water and Sanitation. The visual simulation illustrated the views from Hwy 6 and 32 10/3/06 included landscaping, surrounding vegetation. Local resident housing was one of the outstanding issues. The applicanthas offered to make a payment in lieu of$116,484.08, preferably to by credits at Fox Hollow. Staffno longer believes that a trail is appropriate and suggested that condition 6 be deleted. CDOW has expressed no concerns with the access easement to Eagle River. Kelly Miller, County Engineer presented file VIS-0030, Variance from Improvements Standards. He explained the applicant's request for a variance from the dual access requirements. He stated the applicant's reasons for therequest and indicated that all staff findings were positive. James Gilbert, owner/applicant spoke. He believes that they would be the least dense in the neighborhood. He also believes there is plenty of internal room and they've done a great job on the proposed landscaping. He stated that they are in favor of the proposal that keeps the duplex and single-family unit. Chairman Runyon wondered if the gross footprint was considered. Mr. Forinash stated that he compared the gross density. The net density is about 2+ acres that are available for development. Chairman Runyon opened public comment. There was none. He closed public comment. Commissioner Menconi stated that he believes the density fits with the surrounding properties. lIe wondered it the river access would be a public amenity. Mr. Morris stated that the public would have the right to fish and float on the river. Commissioner Menconi stated that he is comfortable with the number of units but wondered about the square footage of the units. Mr. Gilbert stated that the single-family unit would be 5,000-6,000 ft. and the duplexes would be 11,000 ft total. The project would be a total of 30,000 ft. Commissioner Stone stated that he believes that the project should comply with the 75 ft stream setback, which would also cause the removal of Lot 1. He is satisfied with everything else including the variance from improvement standards. Chairman Runyon stated that he would have preferred more affordable housing. He is in favor of removing tot 1 as well, leaving five homes along the river. He concured with Commissioner Stone's recomendation for a 75 t. stream setback. Mr. Gilbert stated that they were trying to create a little neighborhood. She believes Lot 1 is crucial to the look and intimacy of the neighborhood. Chairman Runyon stated that he believes that same sense of intimacy could he created with proper landscaping. Mr. Miller stated that moving the homes up 25 ft, moves the access closer to the Hwy 6. This mayor may not create stacking. Commissioner Stone stated that he considerated that point, and due to the number of homes, he doesn't believe stacking would be an issue. Commissioner Menconi wondered if the applicant had considered reducing the number of units or building a townhome project. Mr. Gilbert stated that they would prefer not being a strip of buildings along the river. If they have to change the site, they would prefer tabling the file to consider their options. Chairman Runyon wondered if they would consider eliminating Lot 1 and staying with the 50 ft setback. Mr. Gilbert stated tha.t they might want to change the lot lines for the three lots. Chairman Runyon stated that density is not a problem for him. He believes it is less dense than the neighboring properties. He is concerned with Lot 1 being a visual hazard. Commissioner Stone stated that he believes it would be in the applicant's best interest to go back and study the numbers or design aspects. Mr. Gilbert stated that he would prefer to table the file than have it be denied. Commissioner Stone moved that the Board table File No. SMA-00027 and VIS-00030, Belle Terre Minor Subdivision, at the applicant's request until October 24, 2006 at a time to be determined. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. VIS-0030 Belle Terre Minor Subdivision 33 10/3/06 Kelly Miller - Engineering Department NOTE: ACTION: Tabled from 7/25, 8/1, 8/29 and 9/12/2006 Approve a variance from the Improvement Standards for the requirement of two points of access. LOCATION: 34965 Hwy 6 (North ofHwy 6, west of Reserve Road) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff suggests file be tabled. FILE NO: RELATED FILE NOS: OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF CONTACT: VIS-00030, Variance from Improvement Standards SMA-00027 Raining Sun Enterprises, Inc. Raining Sun Enterprises, Inc. Raining Sun Enterprises, Inc. (Jim Gilbert) Kelly Miller, Engineering Department 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: The applicant is seeking a variance from the Dual Access requirement (ECLUR 4-620.J.l.h). The proposed development consists of one single-family home site, one duplex and one triplex multi family home on a 3.096 acre parcel ofland. Much of the site consists of an existing home site overlooking the Eagle River. The multi-family home sites are clustered along the upper bank of the river while the single family home site is positioned in the Southeast Comer of the property. The subdivision road is not over lOOO feet in length. The property is shaped like a right triangle with the Southern portion of the property positioned along US Hwy 6. The Easterly portion ofthe property is positioned along Reserve Road creating the right triangle. The property length along US Hwy 6 (NRA-in project area) is under 600 feet which is not favorable to having two accesses within one-half mile of each other per State Highway Access Code. The access to Hwy 6 along the South side does not have favorable topography to access Hwy 6. Dual access is not favorable according to the US 6 and 1-70 G (Edwards Spur Road) corridor feasibility study. (SEE ATTACHMENT) B. CHRONOLOGY: June 2006 - A permit was issued for the demolition of 2 residential structures and 6 out-buildings on the site. C. SITE DATA: Surround in East: West: North: South: Existin Zonin : Pro osedZonin : Proposed No. of Dwelling Uuits: Total Area: Minimum Lot Area: Maximum Lot Area: Land Uses / Zonin Residential / PUD Residential Suburban Medium Densi Residential Suburban Medium Density Residential / PUD Residential Suburban Low Density No change in zonin is proposed 6 3.096 acres 0.498acres 1.566 acres 34 10/3/06 Wa.ter: SeWer: Access: Eagle River Water and Sanitation Ea Ie River Water and Sanitation Reserve Road 2. STAFF REPORT A. REFERRAL RESPONSES Colorado State Forest Service . The Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) has given the Belle Terre site a wildfire hazard rating of Low. A low rating means that structures on the property will most likely not be threatened by average wildfire activity. . After development of this small parcel, the majority of the remaining fuels will be very discontinuous. River access, lack of slope, and well-maintained road access also help keep fire danger low. Even with this low rating, CSFS suggests that dual access be considered and noncombustible roofing material be used. Ea2:leRiver Fire Protection District . The proposed new hydrant and existing hydrant appear to be adequate for fire fighting purposes. . Turning movements submitted for the project confirm adequate emergency access. Ea2le River Water & Sanitation District . The Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority has determined that additional water rights will not be required for this development. . The Edwards Metropolitan District portfolio includes water rights for this development through the Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority. However, a Water/Sewer Plant Investment Fee and a Treated Water Storage Fee will be due when digital floor plans for the project have been e-mailed to the District, reviewed and fees have been calculated. Colorado Division of Wildlife . The majority of the upland portion of this site has been heavily impacted from previous uses and has little overall wildlife values, however, the riparian area is in good condition and still provides excellent wildlife habitat. . The project proposes a fifty foot (50') setback from riparian areas with a driveway and removal of some trees within the fifty foot (50') setback. It is the Division's recommendation that a seventy five foot (75') setback from all riparian habitats along the Eagle River be implemented. This setback should be maintained in natural vegetation and not be manicured within the seventy five foot (75') setback. . Riparian ecosystems constitute one of the most limited yet species rich ecosystems in Colorado. Protecting and enhancing the riparian habitat along the Eagle River benefits both terrestrial and aquatic wildlife species. . Some of the limiting factors the Eagle River faces include low water flows and high water temperatures. The reduction in riparian habitats impacts the amount of shade on the stream which in turn increases the water temperature and evaporation and consequently negatively impacts the health of the fishery. Colorado Geological Survey . Floodplain . Structures for the new development are set back 50 feet from the "Eagle River High Water Line". It would be useful to have the reference that documents this high water line. 35 10/3/06 . The CGS Geologist visiting the site did not observe signs of bank erosion from the top of the slope. The morphology of the river suggests erosion would be more likely on the north side of the river. . Slope . The differing scales of the construction diagrams and the absence of labeling of contours on some of the diagrams made it difficult to evaluate the proposed construction in relation to the existing topography, but development should be set back a minimum of20 feet from the break in slope to the river to limit erosion and prevent potential slope instability. . Any retaining walls over 4 feet in height should be engineered. . Drainage . A drainage report was not included in the referral to CGS, but information should be provided that discusses the management and discharge of on-site flows. The discussion should state how the property would be affected by runoff from Highway 6, including any sheet-flows from slopes south of the highway. Outfalls should be designed for erosion control. . The detention pond would probably not contain a significant volume of water for any length of time, otherwise lining of the pond might be considered to limit impact to the slope. . If snow storage is found to be necessary, the designated area should be incorporated into the overall drainage plan of the site and should not pose a problem if rapid snowmelt occurs. Note: The referrals shown above are the only referrals that are relevant to this Variance file. Please see the associated SMA-00027 file for a complete listing of all referrals. B. STAFF.DISCDSSIQN: ThIs parcel is located at 34965 Hwy 6, and presently has one existing access to Reserve Road on the East side ofthe property which then accesses Hwy 6. The proposed East access, (creating "Rue Riviere") is located along the common lot line of Lots 1 and 3, and runs east-west providing access to all three lots. Variance Request - Dual Access (ECLUR 4-620.J.1.h) The applicant seeks a variance from the Dual Access requirement (ECLUR 4-620.J.l.h). Specifically, the section reads as follows: Dual Access. The applicant shall provide two (2) points of access from the proposed development to the public roadway system, unless prevented by topography or other physical conditions. In any event there shall be a usable and unobstructed (with the exception of breakaway barriers) secondary emergency point of ingress/egress for all new development or redevelopment capable of accommodating emergency response vehicles commonly operated by the Local Fire Authority Having Jurisdiction. All dwellings and other structures shall be accessible by emergency and service vehicles. Depending upon the length of the road, fire hazard rating, number of units proposed, topography and the recommendation of the Local Fire Authority Having Jurisdiction, the Board of County Commissioners may, at their discretion, grant a variance from the required improvement standard. (am 12/17/02) Reference 4-620.J1.h: The applicant shall provide two (2) points of access from the proposed development to the public roadway system, unless prevented by topography or other physical conditions. The Colorado State Forest Service has given the development a wildfire hazard rating oflow. They would suggest that dual access be considered and noncombustible roofing material be used. Furthermore, Eagle River Fire Protection District (ERFPD) has commented that for the low density proposed, they do not believe that the dual access requirement is applicable. 36 10/3/06 E. STAFF FINDINGS: Criteria for Evaluation bv the County Enl!:ineer The County Engineer's responsibility in a variance application is described in Section 4-610 A.2. of the ECLUR. It states, in part, "The County Engineer's evaluation shall consider whether the alternative will provide for an equivalent level of public safety and whether the alternative will be equally durable so that the normally anticipated user and maintenance costs will not be increased." The County Engineer may also reco1i1rtl.end approval of an alternative "If an alternate design, procedure, or material can be shown to provide performance and/or environmental sensitivity that reflect community values equal or better than that established by these standards..." For this evaluation, Staff interpreted the standards in the ECLUR to represent the minimum acceptable level of "community values," since the ECLUR were adopted after extensive work and comments by the community. Criteria forEvaluationbv the Board of Count v Commissioners The Board OfCOUIity Commissioner's responsibility in a variance application is described in Section 5-260 G.2. of the ECLUR. It states in part: "The Board of County CortImissioners shall balance the hardships to the petitioner of not granting the variance against the adverse impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the persons affected, and the adverse impact on the lands affected." The Board may consider a hardship to be caused when the petitioner will be deprived of some or all of his right to use the land if the ECLUR is strictly followed. Staff Findin1!s The applicant must demonstrate that the hardship of conforming to county standards exceeds the adverse impact to the affected lands and on the health, safety, and welfare of the persons affected if a variance from these standards is granted. Variance Request - Two Points of Access The ERFPD has stated that the proposed new hydrant and existing hydrant appear to be adequate for fire fighting purposes. It further states that turning movements submitted for the project confirm adequate emergency access, with this and the unfavorable grades and access point location along Hwy 6 show hardship. The access control diagram for the US Hwy 6 corridor only shows an access point at Reserve Road and Bull Run Road. No other access points are proposed at this time. Staff finds that the discussion from the local fire authority will provide for an acceptable level of safety throughout the neighborhood. Staff finds that granting the Variance from Improvement Standards for the two points of access will provide for a design that will perform well and reflect the community values established by these standards. Board of County Commissioners Findinl!:s The Board of County Commissioners must make the following findings in order to approve this file: (ECLUR 5-260.G.2) Findings for Variance Request - Two Points of Access 37 10/3/06 The Board of County Commissioners shall balance the hardships to the applicant of not granting the Variance against the adverse impact on the health, safety, and welfare of persons affected, and the adverse impact on the lands affected. I move that the Board of County Commissioners approve variance request for the requirement of two points of access with the following conditions: 1. Except as otherwise modified by these conditions, all material representations of the applicant in this application and all public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. PDF-00096 Siloam Sprin2S pun Final Plat and Subdivision Improvements A2reement and Maintenance A2reements Bob Nartacci, Planning Department ACTION: A final plat to subdivide the subject 35.185 acre Siloam Springs PUD property into five single- family residential building sites and a private Open Space tract. LOCATION: South side of Interstate 70 spanning the Eagle River. The site is located approximately 1/3 mile due west of the Two Rivers Village development. FILE NO. I PROCESS: PDF-00096I Planned Unit Development Final Plat located approximately 1/3 mile due west of the Two Rivers Village development. Richard and Luanne Mayne Owner Terrill Knight, Knight Planning Services Inc. OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY: A final plat to subdivide the subject 35.185 acre Siloam Springs PUD property into five single-family residential building sites and a private Open Space tract. Lot 1 - 5.027 acres Lot 2 ~ 3.105 acres Lot 3 - 2.836 acres Lot 4 - 2.956 acres Lot 5 - 4.332 acres Open Space Tract - 16.9 acres Access to the site is via a box culvert underneath Interstate-70 from U.S. Highway 6. Maintenance agreements pertaining to safety lighting for the existing box culvert have been executed by the Colorado Department of Transportation and the applicant. The County will enter into an agreement with CDOT for maintenance and, in turn through an agreement with the applicant, place responsibility for maintenance upon the applicant. 2. STAFF REPORT A. STAFF FINDINGS: Pursuant to Section 5-280. B.5.b(3), Final Plat for Subdivision - Action bv the Board of Countv Commissioners. of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the following finding is made: The Final Plat DOES conform to the approved PUD Preliminary Plan for the Siloam Springs Planned Unit Development, and 38 10/3/06 Pursuant to Section 5-280.B.3.e, Subdivision Standards, of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, the following findings are made: (1) Consistent with Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision IS consistept with the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan and the FLUM of the Comprehensive Plan; (2) Consistent with Land Use Regulations. The proposed subdivision DOES comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions ofthese Land Use Regulations, including but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards; (3) Spatial Patterns Shall Be Efficient. The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities. (a) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions ARE consistent with the utility's service plan. Road extensions ARE not necessary to serve the development. (b) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines ARE sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (c) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions ARE allowed only when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single serVice into an otherwise un-served area. (4) Suitability for Development. The property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for developmeht, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. (5) Compatible with Surrounding Uses. As previously found with the PUD Sketch Plan and PUD Preliminary Plan; this proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and WILL NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. (6) Adequate Facilities. The applicant HAS demonstrated that the development will be provided adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. Cash in lieu of School Land Dedication is required in the amount of$16,987.50. DISCUSSION: Mr. Narracci presented a PowerPoint presentation. The presentation included several photos of the property and the box culvert that would provide access to the site. He indicated that staff recommended approval. Tom Boni, Knight Planning Services spoke. He stated that a State Highway Access permit had been granted and the applicant had agreed that a guardrail and light be added to the CDOT right of way. Chairman Runyon opened public comment. There was none. Public comment was closed. Commissioner Stone moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve File No. PDF-00096, incorporating the Staff findings, and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat, subdivision improvements agreement nd highway maintenance agreements. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 39 10/3/06 Attest: 40 10/3/06 Chairman f,ag\e. VaUe.1 t\umane. ~o"iet't 11.0. e.o.,. 41o? f,aglt" UJ. SI(,31. (110) 32.~--pf,T'5 . fa.,. - 32.S-13S1 October 39 2086 Pm. UBI Loper president of tile Eagle VaHey H1DIUUIe Soeiety. , We _derStaDd the COUDty'S' aeed for a lease. We appreciate die refereaees to die future Deed for m.ore space aud believe them to be a wake DP caB for aD eoueenaed with tile welfare of the ..ilmtls ill Deed iD the COWIty. With tile D..ber of ODgOiDg Pr0p'81DS wllidl involve Eagle CODDty ADilDal Serriees aDCI die Eagle COUDty H.....e Soeiety we believe that ~ 8S from. tile 8 X 12 space we oeeupy is really DOt a step towanl a solutio.. As we did ill pIamIiDg tile shelter 9 yean ago we should get together aDd work OD tile aDlOUIlt of spaee Deeded the eoufigDntioD aud the timing. w~t~ /bU ~k