No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 10/04/05 PUBLIC HEARING October 4, 2005 'resent: Am Menconi Peter Runyon Tom Stone Keith Montag Bryan Treu Teak Simonton Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Acting County Administrator County Attorney Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing, the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: GENERAL FUND 21ST CENTURY PHOTO SUPPLY A & H GRAPHICS A I GROUP ADAMS COUNTY AFRICA CALDERIA ALADDIN TEMP-RITE ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE, INC ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY ALPINE MEADOWS ANIMAL AMADEO GONZALES AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER AMERICINN LODGE & SUITES AMERIGAS ANIMAL HEALTH ANN MUNCASTER APS ARMOR HOLDINGS FORENSICS ARMY & FACTORY SURPLUS ARTWORKS, THE ASPEN CTR FOR WOMENS HLTH A V TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVON CENTER A T BEAVER CK AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS B & H SPORTS BAILEY FUNERAL HOME . BENGALLOWAYMD BERNICE WHITE BERTHOD MOTORS BEST WESTERN UNIVERSITY M BETHANY V AN WYK BOB BARKER COMPANY BOXER-NORTHWEST CO, BROWNELLS INC BRYAN TREU CATA CAPITAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS CAREERTRACK :.":ARMEN LOZOYO-VELEZ CARTER & ALTERMAN SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE I 10/4/05 245.18 70.00 100.00 25.00 320.00 176.93 8,564.67 71.94 10.00 58.50 67.03 148.00 58.76 754.94 10.80 98.58 467.00 82.08 3,200.00 2,650.00 8,645.24 2,000.82 2,089.30 690.00 530.00 790.00 61.80 446.35 258.00 80.39 1,477.57 33.71 104.00 22.43 55.00 102.42 14900 133.17 3,920.00 CASTLE INDUSTRIES, INC. SERVICE 198.39 CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY SERVICE 107.99 CDPHE C/O ANNE CROUSE SERVICE 50.00 CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 275.00 CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING SUPPLIES 510.15 CENTURYTEL SERVICE 10,278.90 CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE SERVICE 653.54 CFWE SERVICE 50.00 CGM APPLIED SECURITY SERVICE 248.90 CHANNING L BETE CO, INC SERVICE 2,214.90 CHEMATOX INC. SERVICE 80.00 CHERYL CRANE REIMBURSEMENT 79.01 CHRISTINE L MOTT REIMBURSEMENT 41.82 CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICE 138.90 CLAUDIA MONTES REIMBURSEMENT 19.32 CLE INTERNATIONAL SERVICE 990.00 CLERK OF THE GARFIELD REIMBURSEMENT 225.00 CLINTON MEHL REIMBURSEMENT 24.00 CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SERVICE 869.75 COLORADO FASTENERS SERVICE 126.00 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 7,546.86 COLORADO STATE FOREST SERVICE 41.87 COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH SERVICE 1,477.20 COLUMBINE MARKET SERVICE 5.00 CONNIE STUMP REIMBURSEMENT 189.75 CONTRACT PHARMACY SERVICE SERVICE 1,654.29 COORS DISTRIBUTING SERVICE 77.72 COPY PLUS SERVICE 254.35 CORBIN SUPPLY COMPANY SERVICE 354.64 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 4,648.21 CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING SUPPLIES 2,258.19 CORY HIGGINS REIMBURSEMENT 151.61 COUNTY SHERIFFS COLORADO SERVICE 75.00 COURY DITCH REIMBURSEMENT 21.39 CPHA SERVICE 170.00 CSU COOP ERA TIVE EXTENSION SERVICE 718.00 D & D TOWING AUTO REPAIR SERVICE 91.00 DAISY GALLEGOS REIMBURSEMENT 500.00 DAN CORCORAN PLS SERVICE 1,040.00 DAN SPARKMAN REIMBURSEMENT 187.30 DAVE MOTT REIMBURSEMENT 90.00 DAY TIMERS INCORPORATED SERVICE 31.99 DEB KLEINMAN SERVICE 450.00 DEEP ROCK WATER CO SERVICE 832.50 DELL INC SERVICE 674.10 DENNIS WILLEY REIMBURSEMENT 90.00 DEX MEDIA EAST LLC SERVICE 52.16 DIANA JOHNSON REIMBURSEMENT 78.00 DIANA KAFKA REIMBURSEMENT 29.98 DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE SERVICE 244,412.75 DOCTORS ON CALL SERVICE 965.00 DON OLSEN REIMBURSEMENT 8.63 DONOV AN PAVILION SERVICE 415.25 E.F. JOHNSON COMPANY SERVICE 6,558.00 EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS SERVICE 6,971.00 2 10/4/05 EAGLE COUNTY CHARTER EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE V AIL ANIMAL HOSPIT A EAGLE V ALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL EAGLE V ALLEY HUMANE ASSOC EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL EAGLE VALLEY MIDDLE EAGLE V ALLEY PET HOSPITAL EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER EK EKCESSORIES EKTRON INC ELECTION CENTER ELIZABETH CRAWFORD ELIZABETH HIMMES ELLEN MATLOCK EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL EMC2 ERIKA LARA ESTHER MEHL EVANS CHAFFEE FALCON ASSOCIATES INC FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FEDERAL EXPRESS FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC FIRST BANKS FLORIDA MICRO GAIL CAMERON-BRITT GAIL GEDDES GENERAL REVENUE CORP. GEORGIE C ZINDA GIV GLADYS PETIT GLENDA WENTWORTH GLENWOOD ORAL SURGERY GLENWOOD SPRINGS PARKS GOVCONNECTION, INC GRAINGER INCORPORATED GREAT AMERICAN LEASING HAMPTON INN HAWTHORN SUITES HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELEN M LINDOW HERMAN MILLER INC. HERTA VON OHLSEN HEWLETT PACKARD HIGHLANDS GROUP, INC HOLIDAY INN HOME DEPOT SUPPLY HV AC SUPPLY IAAO ICC ID EDGE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT 2,660.00 738.00 146.74 30.00 3.25 1,220.00 1,512.00 258.00 2,500.00 1,316.10 2,052.50 12.63 139.24 4,440.00 250.00 48.00 19.20 90.00 318.00 482.58 30.00 180.00 2,000.00 45.00 2,558.21 ,618.94 38.59 11,132.37 6,286.00 36.65 90.00 402.84 364,60 862.00 987.00 160.91 300.00 735.00 693.00 43.20 2,038.00 625.00 1,335.00 21,447.66 22.43 SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 13,441.61 90.00 2,609.00 3,887.50 132.75 10.59 45.32 175.00 382.50 64 .44 3 10/4/05 IMAGE BASE LLC IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS IMPERIAL HEAD WEAR, INC. INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE INTERIOR PLANTSCAPES INTERMOUNTAIN LOCK INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAP NETWORK SYSTEMS JAMES BECSEY JAMIE HUMPHREY JANE A ST JEAN JANICE SCOFIELD JASON KERKHOVE JASON R. HASENBERG JENNIE W AHRER JENNIFER CUEVAS JENNY WOOD JEROME EVANS PH.D JILL HUNSAKER JOBS AVAILABLE JOHNNETTE PHILLIPS KARA BETTIS, CORONER KATHERINE PETERSON KATHLEEN BULL KATHY SCRIVER KAY VINCENT KELLEY BLUE BOOK KESSLER MARY J KIMBALL INTERNATIONAL KRISTINA WARNER LAB SAFETY SUPPLY LANDS END INCORPORATED LASER JUNCTION LAUREL POTTS LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LEXIS NEXIS MATTHEW LEXISNEXIS LIETZMAN NEHLS LINDA NESTOR LINDA P ANKUCH LIZ MAYER LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES LORRAINE VASQUEZ LOUISE H INGALLS DVM MACHOL & JOHANNES MARCIN ENGINEERING INC MARIA ANJIER MARILYN MENNS MARLENE MC CAFFERTY MATTHEW BENDER MBIA MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MCI WORLDCOM MEADOW MOUNTAIN PLUMBING MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 40,744.08 17.31 80.00 3,600.00 125.00 340.86 300.00 2,427.40 247.64 266.00 402.00 25.36 250.00 382.50 1,020.00 5.52 99.18 387.50 264.02 29.95 42.00 74.84 90.00 189.75 14.00 170.77 112.00 131.1 0 1,555.60 19.55 1,133.88 100.00 75.00 136.45 6,777.36 51.76 50.30 14.70E10.00 10.39 44.37 329.00 59.25 430.00 23.32 3,069.00 5.16 21.00 90.00 178.85 5,737.79 116.43 2,242.60 768.50 428.00 4 10/4/05 MERCK A TL MICHAEL FREILINGER MICRO PLASTICS MIUOCO CORPORATION MOES ORIGINAL BBQ MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN MOBILE VETERINAR MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES MWI VETERNIARY SUPPLY CO NATIONAL IMP ACT FEE NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY NEBS NELSON LABORATORIES NETTIE REYNOLDS NICOLETTI FLATER ASSOC NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORTHWEST COLORADO OLGA WILKINS OLSON PROPERTY OSM DELIVERY LLC OTTERTAIL OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMp P SCOTT LOWERY PADDYWACKS DIST.; LLC PAPER WISE PARENTI F ALK W AAS PARK CITY MARRIOTT PARK COUNTY SHERIFF OFF. PAT NOLAN PAULA A PALMATEER PEGGY GRAYBEAL PEPPERDINE'S MARKET PETER FRALICK PETTY CASH PRCA PROFESSIONAL TREE & TURF PSS, INC PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER PURCHASE POWER QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QWEST RADISSON HOTEL DENVER RA YMONDS OFFICE MACHINES RAYMUNDO W GARZA RENAISSANCE BOULDER SUITE RETIREMENT FUND ROBERT KURTZMAN DO ROCKHURST COLLEGE ROCKY MOUNTAIN RECORDS RON PHILLIPS RURAL RESORT REGION RUTH LENZ SANDRA SUTHER SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT .5 10/4/05 370.00 793.07 35.26 408.00 472.50 804.17 27,975.79 1,101.53 280.00 651.75 384.43 220.00 790.00 114.03 193.50 100.20 2,250.00 1,346.27 680.00 315.00 4,350.00 462.00 13,300.00 758.69 50.00 410.35 1,871.88 31.50 348.72 15,690.00 49.91 26.40 160.00 87.90 125.20 145.12 890.00 59.19 . 856.15 282.43 15,080.23 316.95 4,831.88 119.00 284.00 17.40448.00 77,571.76 700.00 231.46 62.50 179.05 1,200.00 18.00 36.75 SARAH SCHIPPER SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITY TRANSPORT SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHAINHOLTZ TODD H DDS SHAMROCK FOODS CORP SHAREE WETTSTEIN SHA V ANO CONSERVATION DlST SHC NURSERY AND SHEILA VIGIL SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SIRCHIE FINGERPRINT SNOWHITE LINEN SOFTWARE SPECTRUM SPRONK WATER ENGINEERS STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT STATE OF COLORADO STEPHANIE GLENWRIGHT STEPHENS NURSERY STERICYCLE INC STEVE TONGUE STOFFEL SEALS CORPORATION SUE MOTT SUSAN PURDY SUSPENSE FUND SUZANNE LICKUS SYDNEY PITTMAN TEAKSIMONTON TENIECHICOINE TERRY SCHIESSL THE FLOWER CART THE MIRAGE THE OW GYPSUM PRINTER THIMGAN & ASSOCIATES THOMSON WEST GROUP TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TOWN & COUNTRY VETERINARY TOWN OF GYPSUM TOWN OF VAIL TRANE COMPANY TRI COUNTY STEAM CLEANING TWIST FLOWERS AND ART UNIFORM KINGDOM UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED REPROGRAPHIC UNIV OF COLORADO HOSPITAL UNIVERSITY OF CINCINA TTI UNIVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC UPPER EAGLE REGIONAL WATE US DEPT OF EDUCATION US GOVT PRINTING OFFICE VAIL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE VAIL DAILY THE VAIL ELECTRONICS VAIL MOUNTAIN COFFEE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE . SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 265.31 875.00 678.15 35,603.43 146.00 3,072.59 79.35 30.00 575.37 189.75 806.83 156.74 118.05 1,871.62 395.79 415.38 472.56 90.00 400.00 1.14 771.81 630.02 90.00 36.44 109,961.21 45.00 36.00 26.97 90.00 90.00 136.00 1,724.96 1,055.16 800.00 77.50 354.20 59.00 50,000.00 224,128.70 900.00 650.00 75.00 2,692.80 361.51 899.79 570.00 612.00 224.00 1,800.00 224.88 19.00 180.00 1,257.90 684.50 188.50 6 10/4/05 SHC NURSERY AND SERVICE 1,386.00 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 10,076.66 TOM HARRIS REIMBURSEMENT 75.00 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 239.85 TRI COUNTY FIRE SERVICE 408.00 VERlZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 302.49 VOGELMAN ASSOCIATES REIMBURSEMENT 100.00 WAGNER RENTS SERVICE 861.26 WELLS FARGO PAYROLLEXPD 39,541.99 WESTERN SLOPE AGGREGATE SERVICE 1,748.78 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 1,677.44 PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER PAYROLL 1819 & 20 92,047.89 521,132.10 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND ARAPAHOE COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICE 7.00 ARLISS SIMS REIMBURSEMENT 95.21 ASIY AT KHURANOV A REIMBURSEMENT 28.98 BETHANIE LINDAL SERVICE 280.00 CAROL PRATER REIMBURSEMENT 23.61 CAROLINE GONZALES REIMBURSEMENT 265.38 CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, M.A. SERVICE 894.57 CHRIS MORTON SERVICE 350.00 COLORADO STATE FOSTER SERVICE 142.50 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 30.95 DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP SERVICE 79.00 DONOVAN PAVILION SERVICE 339.75 EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF SERVICE 5.40 EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SERVICE 2,000.00 EAGLE V ALLEY CHILD CARE SERVICE 13,013.00 EBERT CHILDRENS CLINIC SERVICE 115.00 F AMIL Y LEARNING CENTER SERVICE 4,750.00 F AMIL Y SUPPORT REGISTRY REIMBURSEMENT 100.00 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 2,432.46 HEART OF THE WEST COUNSEL SERVICE 1,654.23 HEATHER MATHEWS SERVICE 500.00 HOLLY KASPER REIMBURSEMENT 34.16 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 109.19 ISABEL SANCHEZ REIMBURSEMENT 15.84 JEANNE MCQUEENEY SERVICE 1,349.16 JULIA KOZUSKO SERVICE 2,661.20 KAPLAN COMPANIES, INC SERVICE 344.48 KARLA HERRIDGE REIMBURSEMENT 63.00 KATHY REED REIMBURSEMENT 156.77 KRISTI GREMS SERVICE 121.72 LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICE 30.00 LARA "HEATHER" LA WDERMILK REIMBURSEMENT 55.20 LONG BEACH GENETICS INC SERVICE 150.00 MOTOR !,OOL FUND SERVICE 353.02 MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS SERVICE 165.00 NOLA SMITH REIMBURSEMENT 188.50 OLGA WILKINS SERVICE 415.52 ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO SERVICE 55.00 8 10/4/05 RETIREMENT FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 3,982.26 SAMANTHA D LUDWIKOWSKI SERVICE 1,738.11 SAMARITAN CNTR OF ROCKIES SERVICE 140.00 SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICE 392.00 SHERI MINTZ REIMBURSEMENT 325.47 STATE FORMS CENTER SERVICE 90.37 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 8,497.53 VAIL HONEYWAGON LTD SERVICE 28.50 V ANASK WAREHOUSE COMPANY SERVICE 313.01 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 1,348.Q2 WARWICK HOTEL SERVICE 124.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLLEXPD 29,395.48 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 244.99 YOUR PERSONAL CHEF SERVICE 397.25 PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER PAYROLL 1819&20 66,415.97 146,807.76 RETIREMENT FUND SUSPENSE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 104,430.42 104,430.42 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY SUPPLIES 545.66 AMERICAN CIVIL CONSTRUCTR SERVICE 73,800.47 CRAWFORD CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 19,950.00 EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED CNL SERVICE 100,000.00 EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER SERVICE 233.11 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SUPPLIES 6.80 IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICE 95.00 KEMP AND COMPANY INC SUPPLIES 29.00 LAFARGECORPORATION SERVICE 382.Q7 MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES SERVICE 1,641.75 NATIVE ELECTRIC INC SUPPLIES 1,215.57 PAINT BUCKET THE SERVICE 55.76 R A NELSON & ASSOCIATES SERVICE 240,519.46 RAZORS EDGE INC SERVICE 1,800.00 RSC SERVICE 252.23 SHAW CONTRACT SERVICE 34,266.82 SHC NURSERY AND SERVICE 29.70 SUN RAY SERVICE 250.21 V AIL LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 150.00 V ALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 859.06 VAUGHN CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 158,000.00 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 38.11 WESTERN SLOPE SERVICE 1,162.00 635,282.78 ~ALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. . A&E TIREINC SERVICE 2,950.70 Al AUTO ELECTRIC COMPANY SUPPLIES 1,430.01 ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY SUPPLIES 625.00 9 10/4/05 B & H SPORTS BARNES DISTRIBUTING BILLINGS KAR KOLOR INC BUFFALO RIDGE AFFORDABLE CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CINGULAR WIRELESS COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COLUMBINE MARKET DEEP ROCK WATER CO DOCTORS ON CALL DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE V ALLEY GLASS AND FEDERAL EXPRESS FLEET TIRE SERVICE G & K SERVICES GE CAPITAL GILLIG CORPORATION HARRY TAYLOR HEALTH INSURANCE FUND IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS J J KELLER JANET FIELD KINETICO WATER PROS KSKE-NRC BROADCASTING KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LANDS END INCORPORATED LAWSON PRODUCTS LOSH TOOLS INCORPORATED LUMINATOR M & M AUTO PARTS MID WEST TRUCK MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT NEW PIG CORPORATION NOVUS AUTOGLASS POWERSHIFT INC QUILL CORPORATION QWEST REGAL PLASTIC SUPPLY RETIREMENT FUND RICHARD HOPKINS RON E BECK SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SUSPENSE FUND THE RELIZON COMPANY TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF GYPSUM TRANSWEET TRUCKS TRI COUNTY FIRE UNITED STATES WELDING VAIL NET V AIL RESORTS INC SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 1,116.90 411.21 27.40 10,413.00 147.11 1,538.94 269.60 499.79 18.63 15.50 310.00 8,630.91 35,508.07 216.00 138.06 609.00 481.07 269.16 2,641.17 8.00 3,535.74 94.00 347.26 93.55 35.00 250.00 543.00 682.25 1,073.92 15.87 154.59 103.17 1,120.00 3,195.18 13.80 312.87 415.00 2,110.92 409.44 160.68 850.00 11,604.44 32.24 1,900.00 3,280.40 15,031.15 583.80 3,932.08 500.00 839.93 4,724.89 408.00 28.81 11.95 200.00 10 10/4/05 V AIL V ALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICE 262.54 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 1,087.40 WELLS FARGO PAYROLLEXPD 76,144.06 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 12.47 XCEL ENERGY SERVICE 55.55 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 239.10 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY SUPPLIES 96.23 PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER PAYROLL 1819&20 181,986.31 386,752.82 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY SUPPLIES 21.75 COLUMBINE MARKET SERVICE 42.46 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 398.15 FEDERAL EXPRESS SERVICE 31.69 HEALTH INSURANCE F'UND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 16.08 IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICE 26.00 KEMP AND COMPANY INC SERVICE 107.10 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 227.82 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 1,316.18 PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER PAYROLL 18 19 & 20 22.20 2,209.43 AIRPORT FUND ALLPHASEELECTRlCSUPPLY SUPPLIES 2,280.44 ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY SUPPLIES 47.72 AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT SERVICE 150.00 ASMI SERVICE 10,470.00 B & H SPORTS SERVICE 805.70 BERTHOD MOTORS SERVICE 48.08 BLUEGLOBES INC SERVICE 322.40 CENTURYTEL SERVICE 5,507.04 CHRIS ANDERSON SERVICE 35.53 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 529.80 COLUMBINE MARKET SERVICE 50.29 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 300.21 CROUSE HINDS AIRPORT SERVICE 4,709.69 CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN SERVICE 1,842.81 CYBER COUNTRY SYSTEMS INC SERVICE 517.55 DISH NETWORK SERVICE 52.99 DIVISION OF FIRE SAFETY SERVICE 20.00 DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP SERVICE 271.77 EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL SERVICE 177.58 EAGLE PHARMACY SERVICE 2.19 ELIZABETH WILT SERVICE 43.00 FLIGHT JOURNAL SERVICE 30.95 GRAINGER INCORPORATED SERVICE 269.80 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SERVICE 80.53 GYPSUM TOWN OF SERVICE 429.30 rIEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 1,324.20 HILL & COMPANY SERVICE 528.58 11 10/4/05 HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 3,193.21 LAMINATION SERVICE INC SERVICE 486.07 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 227.16 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE 150.00 M &MAUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 94.06 MAIN AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 78.13 MCI WORLDCOM SERVICE 173.97 MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE 51,183.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 593.72 NEXTEL SERVICE 125.08 ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO SERVICE 686.40 OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION SERVICE 1,405.07 PAINT BUCKET THE SERVICE 40.98 RETIREMENT FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 4,763.11 RSC SERVICE 86.00 SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICE 2,348.00 SPRONK WATER ENGINEERS SERVICE 184.50 STANDARD SIGNS INC SERVICE 2,958.79 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 4,704.63 TAYLOR FENCE COMPANY SERVICE 360.00 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE SERVICE 9.92 US CUSTOMS SERVICE SERVICE 32,714.73 V AIL ELECTRONICS SERVICE 385.00 V ALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 101.57 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 63.59 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 1,749.63 WAGNER RENTS SERVICE 615.88 WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 458.37 WATERFORD CORPORATION SERVICE 809.80 WELLS FARGO PAYROLLEXPD 23,052.34 WILLIAM E PAYNE & ASSOC SERVICE 997.50 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 188.91 XEROX CORPORATION SUPPLIES 91.04 PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER PAYROLL 18 19 & 20 51,498.54 217,426.85 MICROWAVE MAINTENANCE FUND BUCHHOLZ F AMIL Y SERVICE 5,362.89 CARA ENTERPRISES INC SERVICE 2,350.00 CENTURYTELOFEAGLE SERVICE 114.60 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE 19,225.50 QWEST SERVICE 950.89 28,003.88 HOUSING FUND FUNDING PARTNERS FOR SERVICE 20,000.00 20,000.00 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND ARISTA TEK INC SERVICE 390.00 CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICE 51.23 12 10/4/05 EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL DIA SERVICE 540.50 FARIS MACHINERY CO SERVICE 204,578.47 G & K SERVICES SUPPLIES 567.98 GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE SERVICE 1,937.64 HANSON EQUIPMENT SERVICE 170,286.59 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 666.24 HENSLEY BATTERY SERVICE 180.70 HONNEN EQUIPMENT SERVICE 395.08 IMPERIAL HEADWEAR, INC. SERVICE 210.00 JOSE ENAMORADO REIMBURSEMENT 38.03 KOIS BROTHERS SERVICE 20.00 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 621.86 M & M AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 1,984.67 I MAIN AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 137.Q2 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 719.01 NAPA AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 505.59 NOVUS AUTOGLASS SERVICE 275.00 POWER MOTIVE SERVICE 232,310.56 RETIREMENT FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 2,540.10 SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICE 2,421.96 SIGNATURE SIGNS SERVICE 495.00 SILVERTHORNE MOTORS SERVICE 146.98 STEVINSON CHEVROLET SERVICE 15,499.35 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 2,744.10 TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS SERVICE 251.00 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 620.13 TRI COUNTY FIRE SERVICE 816.00 UNITED STATES WELDING SERVICE 330.56 VEEDER-ROOT COMPANY SERVICE 189.24 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 4,598.82 WEAR PARTS EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 180.52 WELLS FARGO PAYROLLEXPD 12,910.98 WESTERN COLORADO SERVICE 348.60 WESTERN IMPLEMENTS SERVICE 441.55 WESTERN SLOPE PAINT SUPPLIES 158.55 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 93.55 PAYROLL FOR SEPTEMBER PAYROLL 1819 &20 34,206.27 814,364.76 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 1,050.00 JEFFERSON PILOT FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 3,616.12 MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 36,867.33 MUTUAL OF OMAHA EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 3,284.40 UNITED STATES LIFE iNS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 1,053.50 45,871.35 ENHANCED E911 FUND 14 10/4/05 CENTURYTEL LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES QWEST SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 184.85 3.29 17,447.61 17,635.75 11,644,884.60 Executive Session Commissioner Stone moved the Board of County Commissioners to into Executive Session for the purpose of receiving legal advice and discussing potential negotiations relating to reclamation efforts at the Eagle River Preserve and potential grazing of the same, fairgrounds gravel lease with Lafarge, potential upcoming RICD legislation, and potential fairgrounds whitewater park which are appropriate topics for discussion pursuant to c.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b) and (e), Colorado Revised Statutes Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. At the close of the discussion, Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn from Executive Session which was seconded by Commissioner Runyon and unanimously approved. Consent Agenda Chairman Menconi stated the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of Bill Paying for the Week of October 3, 2005 (Subject to review by the County Administrator) Mike Roeper, Finance Department ~. Approval of the Minutes of the Eagle Board of County Commissioners Meetings for September 6 and 13, 2005 Teak Simonton, County Clerk and Recorder C. Project Agreement for Yeoman Parking Areas, East Brush Creek Roads between USDA Forest Service, White River National Forest and Eagle County, Colorado Brad Higgins, Road & Bridge D. Grant Contract between Colorado Department of Local Affairs and Eagle County for the Energy and Mineral Impact Assistant Program for Expansion of the 800 MHz Digital Trunk Radio (DRT) System Sheriff s Office Representative E. Resolutioll2005-120 Designating the National Incident Management System (NIMS) as the Basis for all Irtcident Management in the Unincorporated County of Eagle, State of Colorado Barry Smith, Emergency Management F. Bid Award 2005 Agreement for Supplying and Hauling Riprap to Eagle County Landfill, Lafarge West, Inc. P.O. Drawer 368, Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Ron Rasnic, Solid Waste Manager G. Acceptance of Purchase Order from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment for Public Health Emergency Preparedness Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services Memorandum of Understanding between the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment and the Retired Senior Volunteer Program Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services 15 10/4/05 I. Agreement between Eagle County and Aspen Center for Women's Health Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services J. Maintenance Services Agreement for Freedom Park (Berry Creek / Miller Ranch Recreational Site) Attorney's Office Representative K. Lease Agreement with Xerox Corporation for a W orkCentre Pro C2128 to Replace Color Copier in the Main Building Copy Room Finance Department Representative Chairman Menconi asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Bryan Treu, County Attorney stated that the agenda was appropriate as presented. Commissioner Stone moved to approve the Consent Agenda, Items A-K. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Planning and Land Use Resolution Consent Agenda Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Community Development There were no Planning or Land Use Resolutions for the Board's consideration this week. Minor SubdiviSion Plat Signing Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Community Development A. 5MB-00377; Miller Ranch Filing 2 Parcel 9A - Mill Lofts Phase 5. A final plat and condominium map which will create 20 residential condominium units and define certain Limited Conunon Elements and General Common Elements on Parcel9A of Miller Ranch B. 5MB-00353; Riverwalk Diamond Building Units C-l06E and C-l06W A final plat condominium map which will resubdivide unit C-1 06 and to create two (2) condominium units, C-l06E and C-1 06W c. 5MB-00376; McCoy Springs at Arrowhead Ski Lodge A final plat which will subdivide Tract F to create one (1) residential condominium unit as well as certain limited common elements and general common elements Commissioner Runyon moved to approve files 5MB-00377, 5MB-00353, and 5MB-00376 and authorize the Chairman to sign the plats. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and re-convene as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Eagle County Liquor License Authority Kathy Scriver, Clerk and Recorder's Office Consent Agenda Renewals 16 10/4/05 A. Pharos Group LLC Cordillera Mountain Club This is a renewal for a Tavern Liquor License, in Avon. There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. B. MRT Wines Inc Beaver Creek Fine Wines This "is a renewal for a Retail Liquor Store License, in Avon (Beaver Creek). There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. C. Rio Ranch LLC Rancho Del Rio Liquor This is a renewal for a Retail Liquor Store License, in Bond. There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. D. Vail Food Services Mid-Vail Restaurant This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License, in Vail. There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. E. Vail Food Services Eagles Nest Restaurant This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License, with Optional Premises, in Vail. There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. F. Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company Bachelor Gulch Operating Company, LLC Ritz-Carlton, Bachelor Gulch This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License, in Avon (Beaver Creek). There Mve been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. G. Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company Ritz-Carlton Development Company Ritz-Carlton Club, Bachelor Gulch This is a renewal for a Hotel and Restaurant Liquor License, in Avon (Beaver Creek). There have been no complaints or disturbances in the past year. All the necessary fees have been paid. Commissioner Stone moved that the Board approve the Liquor Consent Agenda for October 4, 2005, consisting ofItems A-G. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Liquor Licensing Authority and re-convene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Planning Files -,UR-0052 - Emer enc Service 1m act Fee Bob Narracci, Community Development 17 10/4/05 NOTE: To be tabled at applicant's request to October 17,2005 ACTION: The adoption of an emergency services impact fee program. LOCATION: Within each district's designated boundaries. Commissioner Runyon moved that the Board table file LUR-0052-Emergency Service Impact Fee, at the applicant's request to October 17,2005. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. SUS-00016 Emma.Farms Joe Forinash, Community Development NOTE: To be tabled at applicant's request to November 1,2005 for a BoCC site visit and subsequent hearing at the E1 Jebel Community Center ACTION: Sketch plan approval for a subdivision for 7 residential lots in Eagle County of from 6-10 acres each around agricultural open space. Two additional residential parcels are shown in Pitkin County which are not a part of this Sketch Plan application. LOCATION: West of Hooks Lane (south ofE1 Jebel) at the Eagle-Pitkin County Line (106.4 acres in Eagle County; 28.8 acres in Pitkin County). Commissioner Stone moved that the Board table file SDS-00016-Emma Farnis, at the applicant's request to November 1, 2005. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PR-00029 - Miller Ranch Child Care Center - Expanded PlavArea Joe Forinash, Community Development ACTION: Approval of an expanded play area associated with the Miller Ranch Child Care Center LOCATION: .Miller Ranch, Parcell; and Tract C (Recreation), Berry Creek Miller Ranch PUD FILE NO./PROCESS: LOCATION: OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PR...00029 / Planning Review Parcel 1, Miller Ranch; and Berry Creek Miller Ranch PUD Tract C (Recreation) Eagle County Eagle County Ryan Wolffe (Shepherd Resources, Inc.) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions PLANNING COMMISSION DELIBERATION: The Planning Commission primarily clarified certain particulars of the site and the proposed use, including that [1] both Parcell (Community Center / Child Care Facility) and the Recreation Tract are and will continue to be under common ownership, [2] a fence will be installed around the expanded play area, [3] the berm will be modified and retained, and [4] the expanded play area will not interfere with activities associated with the nearby soccer field. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 18 10/4/05 SUMMARY: A community facility on the northwest comer of the Miller Ranch housing tract is currently under construction which will include a 6,900 square foot child care facility on the main level to serve 80 children and 4,500 square feet of community meeting space and offices on the upper level. Associated with the building will be a play area which is required for the child care facility. The previously approved 3,066 square foot play area is to be adjacent to he west side of the building and extend to the property line adjacent to Tract C, the recreation site to the west. It has since been detennined that the height of the second-floor balcony above the initially approved play area. conflicted with the proposed play equipment. In addition, two different age groups will be in the child care center, requiring either staggered times in the play area or separate play areas. The expanded play area will provide separate play areas for each age group. Consequently, an additional 1,948 square foot play area is proposed which will extend 36.75 feet beyond the property line and include a play area with children's play equipment. Since the addition of an expanded play area represents an expansion of the development previously approved, this Site Specific Development Review is required. CHRONOLOGY: 2000 - PUD Sketch Plan for Berry Creek / Miller Ranch approved. 2002 - Combined PUD Sketch /Preliminary Plan for Berry Creek / Miller Ranch approved. 2002 - Final plat for the Berry Creek 1 Miller Ranch PUD approved. 2002 ~ Site specific development plan approved for Miller Ranch. 2002 - Final plat for Miller Ranch Filing 1 approved. 2003 - Final plat for Miller Ranch Filing 2 approved. 2004 - Amended final plat for Miller Ranch Filing 2 approved. 2005 - Site specific development plan approved for the development of a community facility and child care facility and associated parking and pedestrian improvements on Parcel 1 of Miller Ranch. SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses I Zoning: East: Residential (Miller Ranch Mill Lofts) / PUD West: Berty Creek Recreation Tract 1 PUD forth: Miller Ranch Road; School Site; 1-70/ PUD South: Residential (Miller Ranch (SF, duplex, TH) 1 PUD Existing Zoning: Total Area: PUD Total of 0.965 acres including 0.920 acres in Parcel 1 and 0.045 acres in Tract C (Recreation Tract) Mill Loft Access: STAFF REPORT REFERRAL RESPONSES: None Additional Referral Agencies: Eagle County Attorney, Eagle County Engineering Department; Eagle County Health and Human Services Department; Eagle County Weed and Pest; Eagle County School District (RES OJ); Miller Ranch HOA. STAFF DISCUSSION: Approval of the proposed revisions to the improvements to the Miller Ranch Housing Tract and the Berry Creek Miller Ranch Recreation Tract may occur after consideration by the Planning Commission and the Board that the resulting development is consistent with the PUD Guide, the PUD Preliminary Plan, the Master Circulation Plan, and the Master Drainage Plan for the PUD. Consistency with the PUD Guide When the PUD Preliminary Plan for the Berry Creek Miller Ranch PUD was approved in 2002, it established large .eVelopmenttracts for future development activities that had yet not been designed or detailed. In addition, the reliminary Plan provided for the development of Miller Ranch Road and conceptually showed where access was 19 10/4/05 to occur from the individual tracts. Since building designs, landscaping, and parking areas had not yet been developed for the individual tracts, the PUD Guide established a review process - the site specific development review - by which development applications on individual tracts is to be reviewed to ensure that development occurring on each of the tracts is consistent with the vision of the overall PUD and Preliminary Plan. Further, the PUD Guide provides that design guidelines for the Berry Creek Miller Ranch PUD would be established to encourage a harmony in the architecture and landscape design throughout the PUD. As provided in the PUD Guide, a Design Review Committee was established (consisting of appointees of Eagle County, the Eagle County School District) which in turn developed and adopted a comprehensive set of design guidelines which address site planning, landscape design and architectural considerations. Review by the Design Review Committee parallels and is in addition to site specific development review and/or approvals by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. In addition, the PUD Guide defmes the permitted uses and development standards for the Berry Creek Miller Ranch PUD,including uses, densities, building height and bulk, and other development standards and regulations. The Guide is intended to ensure that the site is attractive and desirable, anq provides adequate light, air and access for emergency vehicles. Nonetheless, the PUD Guide does specify that certain features of the development of certain of the tracts (including Tract D - Miller Ranch) are to be considered within the context of a site specific development plan. The improvements which are approved pursuant to the site specific development plan review constitute part of what is essentially the Preliminary Plan level review and approval for the respective tract. The PUD Guide specifies those uses which are permitted on each of the Tracts within the Berry Creek Miller Ranch PUD. Child care facilities are permitted on both Tract D (Miller Ranch) and Tract C (Recreation). Setbacks and other dimensional limitations for structures are also provided for both tracts. However, by their nature, the improvements proposed for the expanded play are not subject to these dimensiona1limitatiorts. Other than the expanded play area, no other changes will occur to approved development on either Parcel I of Miller Ranch or on the Recreation Tract. Nor will the size of the child care facility or the number of children served at the child care facility change. Consequently, no additional parking is(required for either the child care facility or the recreation facilities. [+] FINDING: COhsistehCY with the PUD Guide [PUD Guide, Section B.3.] The development occurring on this Tract IS consistent with the PUD Guide. Consistency with the PUD Preliminary Plan The PUD Preliminary Plan contemplates a cOl11111unity facility, including a child care center, within the Miller Ranch housing development. The expansion of the play area onto a small portion of the Recreation Tract is not inconsistent with the Preliminary Plan. [+] FINDING: COhsistency with the PUD Preliminary Plan [PUD Guide, Section B.3.] The development occurring on this Tract IS consistent with the PUD Preliminary Plan. Consistency with the Master Circulation Plan The proposed Child Care 1 Community Center Facility was previously determined to be consistent with the Master Circulation Plan for the Berry Creek Miller Ranch PUD. No additional traffic will occur as a result of the expanded play area. Since no other changes will occur to approved development on either Parcell of Miller Ranch or on the Recreation Tract, nor will the size of the child care facility or the number of children served at the child care facility change, the proposed development will continue to be consistent with the Master Circulation Plan for the PUD. 20 10/4/05 [+] FINDING: Consistency with the Master Circulation Plan [PUD Guide, Section B.3.] The development occurring on this Tract IS consistent with the Master Circulation Plan. Consistency with the Master Drainage Plan The proposed Child Care 1 Community Center Facility was previously determined to be consistent with the Master Drainage Plan for the Berry Creek Miller Ranch PUD. Some revisions to the drainage plan for this immediate area are required. A revised drainage plan has been provided with the application. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of the initial grading permit or building permit for the expanded play area, the Applicant should provide complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [+] FINDING: Consistency with the Master Drainage Plan [PUD Guide, Section B.3.] With the recommended condition, the development occurring on this Tract MAY BE found to be consistent with the Master Drainage Plan. DISCUSSION: Mr. Forinash showed a Power Point presentation related to the project; including the Miller Ranch PUD map and the parcel in question. He explained the requested change for the play area. After the original play area was approved it was discovered tha.t the existing balcony would prohibit the use of certain play equipment. The change will allow more than one age group to use the play area at the same time. Chairman Menconi asked if the shade structure was temporary. Ms. Forinash indicated that the metal poles are pennanent, but the canvas top comes down in the winter. Chairman Menconi asked ifthere were a better option available. He stated that the shade structure didn't seem sturdy enough. Ms. Forinash indicated that licensing agreements required sufficient shade. The other options that are available are much larger and visually intrusive. Commissioner Runyon asked about trees. Ms. Forinash stated that trees take a while to mature. Commissioner Runyon asked if the trees could be planted to eliminate the need for shade struCtures in the future. Commissioner Runyon asked about the separation from the soccer fields. He wondered if there was some potential danger to the children. Ryan Wolffe (Shepherd Resources, Inc.) stated that there is a four foot fence and he's comfortable with the distance. Ms. Forinash stated that the hours of usage would be different. Cotnmissioner Stone moved that the Board approve File No. PR-00029, incorporating the staff findings, and with the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of the initial grading permit or building permit for the expanded play area, the Applicant shall provide complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. 2. Except as otherwise modified by these conditions, all material representations of the Applicant in this application and in all public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Other: Chairman Menconi requested an update on the Childcare Facility and Community Center. Ryan W olffe stated that the project was on schedule. Chairman Menconi asked that Mr. Wolffe to provide information on the flooring. 21 10/4/05 Mr. Wolffe recommended the upper level bathrooms be tiled. Commissioner Stone requested numbers. Ms. Migchelbrink suggested that Mr. Wolffe provide a realistic cost sheet. Kathleen Forinash stated that they are very excited with the progress. Commissioner Stone suggested a site tour. Chairman Menconi asked about the widening of Highway 6 with the CDOT representatives. Ms. Migchelbrink stated that the costs would include 1.3 million in retaining walls. The tour had not indicated this need. The current cost for 5.6 miles is 4.3 million. The original stretch would have been 13 miles from Squaw Creek to Eagle. Chairman Menconi asked about her thoughts or ideas. Ms. Migche1brink recommended they re~examine the option of putting shoulders only where needed. She indicated that her costs were for the worst case scenario. Chairman Menconi stated that CDOT had been doing some patch repairs. He Was under the impression that when resurfacing, the widening would be scheduled at the same time. Ms. Migchelbrink explained the difference between incremental patching and an overlay. What they were doing now is maintenance patching not a resurfacing. Resolution 2005-121 Authorizing the Adoption of a Temporary Moratorium on all Zone Change Applications That Would Result in More Residential Dwelling Units Per Acre than the Present Governing Zone District Allows, and all Zone Change Applications that Would Result in Commercial or Industrial Uses-By-Right on Property that is Presently Zoned for Agricultural or Residential Uses Cliff Simonton, Senior Planner presented a PowerPoint slide show. This was presented two weeks ago for selected planning fIrms and the commissioners. It represented talking points relative to future growth in Eagle COUhty. He presented census fIgures for growth. Between 1990 and 2000 growth was close to 100%. Since 2000 there are another 9000 residents, a total population of 50,000. According to the state demographer, by 2030 the population may well be 80,000; however these are conservative estimates. By 2010 the population, 11 % of Eagle County residents will be above the age of 60. A smaller fraction of the population will be participating in the work force. Cost of living due to hOl,lsing is a concern locally. Eagle County is even with the Northwest Council of Governments standards of cities. Cost of housing in Eagle County is quite high which makes the cost of living as high as it is. The question is "what drives housing costs". The demand for jobs in 2005 is slightly greater than the supply. There are approximately 5000 people who commute into Eagle County each day for work. According to the state demographer in 2030 there would need to be 33,000 people commuting into Eagle County each day to work. Approximately 50% of homes in Eagle County are second homes, not primary residences. Many of these second homes will be occupied for greater lengths of time in the future as their owner's age. Second homes are the biggest driver of the economy with the winter visitors being the next. Second homes create a lot of lower end wage . level jobs. Supply and demand for the labor force in the future become very different with the jobs far outnumbering the available housing. If not carefully managed continued growth may impact the future of the county. He stated that changes in zoning are not a use by right. Amendments to the offIcial Eagle County zoning are solely at the discretion of the County Commissioners. Projects already in the planning process would not be impacted by this moratorium, nor would lands within incorporated towns. There is currently an inventory of about 12,000 approved but not yet developed lots. Some arguments made against the moratorium include the fact that the Board already has the power to deny zone change applications that do not demonstrate a community need and the County can do the work of revising the land use regulations without the moratorium. Walter Matthews provided some information. He indicated that the Resolution is a moratorium for 9 months which would affect applications for zone changes. One exception is that the moratorium would not affect processing of applications for development permits for the construction expansion or renovation of any development that is deed restricted and is intended to be low or moderate income housing as defIned by Eagle County housing regulations. There is also a hardship provision that the Board wanted included in the Moratorium Resolution. If a property owner or developer thinks that the approval ofthis moratorium would create a hardship for their project, an application could be submitted to the Community Development Department. There are certain 22 10/4/05 criteria that the Board wi11100k at if they decide to have a hearing on the hardship. One of those criteria will be the extent to which the applicant received Eagle County permits or approvals for the proposed development before the moratorium was in place. Another criteria is the extent in which the applicant made substantial expenditures of money or recourses in advance on permits or other approvals that the County has approved. Another criteria is contractual commitments that the land owner or developer has relied upon in receiving permits from the County. rhere were also some non exclusive criteria for the Board to look at which include the history of the property, history of any development of the property, history of the property's future land use map classification, history of the zoning surrounding that property, a change in development when the property ownership was changed, the present nature and size of the property and any other factors that the Board deems essential to make it a hardship exception for any applicant. Commissioner Stone asked Mr. Simonton about the data in the slide which stated that the strong high end market generally trumps private sector incentives to construct work force housing units. Mr. Simonton stated that there is no hard data, however Ms. Gazunis had information to support this statement. He is not aware of any incentives for affordable housing. Commissioner Stone stated that there are currently no incentives and as such it doesn't seem reasonable to make that statement about the high end market trumping private sector incentives. If approval were only available for work force units then the high end would not trump this. He asked about the statement that continued growth could negatively impact attributes valued by residents, second homeowners and visitors to Eagle County. Mr. Simonton stated that quality of life is a moving target. Those attributes which are valued today by residents may change over time. This might mean that attractiveness of the county may not be diminished. Commissioner Stone stated that although the quality of life is different than it was 30 years ago it hasn't stopped people from coming here. He asked about changes in zoning and the fact that they are not a right. Walter Matthews explained that at the full discretion of the County Commissioners means that there are standards that community development adopted that apply to any application fOr a zone change. The Board can initiate a zone change on its own if they so choose, or an applicant or owner of a property can ask for a zone change. These changes are at the full discretion of the Board. A zone change is not a use by right. Commissioner Stone asked what the value of having a moratorium such as this, that the Board is suggesting, and wondered whether there is anything that the moratorium adds that the Commissioners can't already o now. Mr. Matthews stated that a moratorium is usually used as a planning tool. It doesn't take away or add anything to the land use regulations, however this is a tool. Commissioner Stone asked how long the land use regulations took to adopt. Mr. Montag stated that the adoption ofthe Master Plan and the land use regulations took a total of 4-5 years. Commissioner Stone stated that it started many years ago, with a lot of public input and he believes it took a lot longer. The Board in its full discretion has very subjective reasons; including consistency with the Master Plan, compatibility with surrounding uses, changed conditions, effect on the natural environment, community need, development patterns and public interest. He submits that every single zone change could be turned down for one of these reasons. The land use regulations were written with the intent of allowing the commissioners to make those judgment calls. As times, needs and policy changes, the land use regulations were written well to give the Commissioners great leeway. The County planning commission is able to regulate zone districts as well. He doesn't feel that there is a need for the moratorium at this point in time. The County has hired a specialist named Barb Green to help work on the land use regulations in order to see through the vision of the commissioners. Ms. Green indicated that the moratorium is not necessary. His problem with the statement of imposing a nine month moratorium is that he believes that now's not the time to do it. Ms. Green is assembling a game plan of recommendations for potential changes to the land use regulations. The time for this moratorium would be after the Board has come up with the tactics they want to utilize in changing the land use regulations. He wonders if the first nine months will be used for planning. He asked about the statement "the moratorium would not affect the issuance of building permits". He stated that 75% of the 12,000 approved inventoried home sites are inside of incorporated towns. The County only controls 25% of the inventory. This moratorium may force annexations into the towns. He feels that the majority of the slides are focused on the second home study and providing housing for the workforce. He doesn't feel that regulations build homes, people build homes. He referred to Miller Ranch deed restricted housing. The political will of the Board of Commissioners built Miller Ranch. Changing or adding to Ir regulations will exacerbate the problem. Ms. Green had asked what the emergency was that would make this oratorium necessary. He recommends that a vision needs to be identified and then implement tactics to support 23 10/4/05 this vision. Chairman Menconi stated that the County Commissioners have had about 6 discussions about land use with the Community Development Department within the last eight months. They are attempting to shape the principles, policies and the zoning regulations that they're interested in looking towards. He stated that the benefits of a moratorium would include the possibility of implementing regulations that are being developed. Two weeks ago many local planners had the opportunity to ,see the presentation and discuss their opinions. Chairman Menconi opened public comment. Tom Boni stated that this is a huge decision, using a strong policy or legislation called the moratorium. He believes it is a very loud voice in an arena which doesn't need a loud voice. He doesn't remember a situation in the past where a moratorium was needed to reach a goal. The consequences of a moratorium include commercial development and light industrial development. The problem isn't too much commercial development, it is too little diversity. He doesn't believe it is a rational decision to make given the situation that exists in Eagle County today. Joe Hardy, founder of 84 Lumber spoke. He commends the Commissioners decision. Sham Bowmar, attorney for 84 lumber stated that they are a contracted purchaser on a piece of property in Dotsero. Since that time they have spent funds on the possible development. They are asking for consideration for applicants who have already met with the County. Jim Zucker stated that he had previously met with County staff about the proposed lumber yard in Dotsero. They were not told about the mOratorium in July when they began the process. Commissioner Runyon stated that the property in question would in likelihood qualify for the hardship situation. Karl Berger, owner ofa home in Eagle Vail spoke to the board. He is opposedto the moratorium as he feels the Board currently has the power they need to decline zone changes if they desire. He believes there will be a huge spike in prices in the area if this is approved. He feels there will be an artificial increase in market values. He questioned the amount of time allowed before a vote is taken on this moratorium. Chairman Menconi clarified that this is not a building moratorium, but a zoning moratorium. Mr. Berger stated that he agrees that there isn't sufficient affordable housing. Jim Turnipseed spoke to the Board. He is the president of the Local Homebuilders Association. He stated that he is hearing across the board that they want to be part of the solution. He is concerned about a couple of things - they were never contacted for their input. There are many members of his organization who are interested in being part of the solution. He feels that moratoriums tend to drive prices up for the affordable housing that they are trying to achieve. He wondered if the county staff level people needed a break. Chairman Menconi stated that the issues that were presented represent the issues of concern of the majority of the County Commissioners. The unintended consequences of building second homes are creating employees that they don't h~ve the housing for. The moratorium sends a signal that they are trying to preserve the environmental quality, the economic diversity and the housing abilities in the community. Mr. Turnipseed stated that his membership is opposed to this in all ways, but they really want to participate in solving the problem. Commissioner Stone apologized on behalf of the County. He feels there has been a lack of due process. Sid Fox spoke to the Board. He has been working with the Commissioners for 25 years. He wants the Board to understand how much time and effort is involved in the planning projects before they come to the County for formal application and review. He acknowledges that there are growth management issues in the County. There is an ongoing need for updates to the land use review system. He compliments the Board for their intentions. Additional growth management tools do not need to be handled by a moratorium. He believes the Board has adequate tools currently. He also feels that this is a sledgehammer, when a surgical tool would be much more appropriate. He stated that moratoriums are typically tools implemented as result to failure, but Eagle County has had many successes. Several good examples include the open space master plan and the eco trails plan. There are also road impact fees and pending emergency service fees. He agrees with Commissioner Stone's recommendation. He urges denial of the moratorium. Brian Bair spoke to the Board. He stated that they currently had several redevelopment proposals under contract. They are concerned with having the door shut or having to pursue a new process. They have based their projects on the community plan and it's frustrating that this may have to discontinue their projects. He believes tha this blanket moratorium doesn't fit. He urges reconsideration of this moratorium. Lee Whittington, small business owner spoke to the Board. He spoke about second home housing driving 24 10/4/05 the economy. He stated that a lot of people's jobs depend on growth. Jfhe has a decrease in opportunities to build there will be layoffs in his firm. The timing puts future building into April before some of the people can be put back to work. Steve Isom spoke. He appreciates the effort of the Board, but believes this is the wrong approach. He is concerned with the momentum. He spoke about the planning commission meetings and the fact that they have been abled or cancelled for lack of subjects to review. He thinks the County hasn't seen any big projects in the last year and a half. There is very little left in the County that the Board has jurisdiction over - the County is mostly built out. He doesn't think this approach will be helpful. Bob Rulon asked for reconsideration. He thinks a lot more public input would be advisable. This impacts all ofthe Eagle County residents. The economic driver in all ofthis is building. It appears the Board is stifling any possibility of another economic driver through this moratorium which will prohibit economic growth through commercialization. Randy Cloyd, Adams Rib, spoke to the Board. He stated that they started in May to proceed with their second phase. They have done a lot of work on a project, spent a lot of money and were not aware of this possible moratorium. Putting a sketch plan together takes a lot of time. He urges the Board to rethink the timeline. He wonders about the 12,000 units which are approved to be built. Mr. Simonton stated that the planning department assigned the single family equivalent to all vacant lots and some would likely be developed as duplexes. Trevor Timmons stated that he is opposed to the moratorium. It will eliminate needed development. He provides statistics for Eagle County. He believes the moratorium will drive up prices significantly. Pat Donovan, Vail Resorts Development Company spoke. He has had a lot of internal dialogue for the past couple of days. They are a real estate developer and the operating company that drives most of the resorts in the county. Their biggest concern is that any sort of perceived reduction in supply can drive prices up. He hopes this moratorium has been thoroughly thought through. Vail Resorts is willing to participate in the process in the future to address affordable housing needs. He would like more detail on the growth management strategies that are being developed. Don Cohen, Vail Valley Economic Counsel spoke to the Board. He stated that he was the only one who was speaking favorably for the moratorium. There is a lot of misinformation and misperceptions. Economies are ased upon faith in our financial system. He agrees this is tricky. It is a communicatiqn challenge. He believes he an guarantee that everyone in the room will continue to make money. He feels it is important to look towards the future. He has recently contracted with the University of Colorado to analyze the local economy. He realizes that historically all decisions have been land use driven. This effort starts an important political and economic discussion that needs to occur. A sledgehammer does get community attention. This represents a good opportunity to reach out. The general sense in the room is to kick the canfurther down the road. He believes that a balance will come from the moratorium. Rick Mueller, spoke to the Board. He would like to be part of the process. He is neither for nor against the moratorium. He would like to communicate, provide a plan and then implement. He would support a moratorium in that context. He is concerned with a decision being made with one one-hour meeting. He hopes that there would be a commitment from the Commissioners that nine months would be the limit. He referred to Aspen's two year extension. Rosie Shearwood, Brush Creek resident spoke. She believes that the turnout of the construction community indicates the heavy weighting ofthis industry. She stated that in the past few years approved developments have surprised all but the construction industry. She feels the sole pwpose of the moratorium should be to stop up-zoning for a period of time that could be used to put some regulations in place that would effect slowing growth, vital to preserving the values of Eagle County. Susan Byrd, Vail resident and small business owner spoke to the Board. She feels the moratorium's objective isn't clear. She wonders what the comprehensive reason is for this moratorium. She is opposed to the moratorium. She believes that growth is a positive thing. Chairman Menconi closed public comment. Commissioner Runyon stated that he finds one of the universal themes is that this isn't necessary. He wonders why everyone is here. He understands that there are hardships that would be considered. The price issue . a concern, but the building community is building no deed restricted housing units as part of the 12,000 units hich are currently approved. Most of the price increases are going to be there anyway and he doesn't feel that 25 10/4/05 nine months will make a difference. He is extremely concerned with the affordable housing element. Another issue that he recently became aware of is the fact that Routt County has had a 25 year zoning moratorium. They have encouraged building within the towns. He doesn't feel that nine months is too long. He urged all present to remember that there will be exceptions. He sees many present like mice in an enclosed jar with limited food. He is asking for a slowing o~the growth and.more planning for future growth. He d?~sn't see a threat to.th~ constructio.- industry because there IS so much that IS already planned. He also argues that It s a favor to the bU11dmg community. The moratorium sends a clear message rather than giving hope to a developer that something might happen that won't for a period of time. Commissioner Stone stated that he was grateful to everyone for turning up. He believes this is a fait accompli. Former County Commissioners have done an excellent job of implementing additional regulations. They are able to enact these things without regulations. He referred to Kensington Green. The Board made a decision to not allow ridgeline development and this was done without a regulation. This Board will not be able to come up with a one size fits all regulation. He believes that the County has a very responsible group of developers. He resents the insinuation that everyone who is against this moratorium is about money. Chairman Menconi thanked everyone for their comments. He stated that everyone has a little bit better understanding and different take on the issue. He feels very strongly that this will have very little consequences related to concerns of pricing, or comparisons to Boulder and Pitkin County's moratoriums. This is a short term solution. He believes he represents 45,000 people living in the community. He is interested in continuing the discussion with those who want to be a part of the solution. It's a complex issue. Elected representatives must look at issues facing the community. If one looks at the information presented it is clear that the second home economy or 38% of the economy is creating a problem in the future. There will be more jobs than there will be people to fill them. He has heard that there is agreement that the growth issues are of concern. He feels that the second home market is creating massive problems for the community. He referred to today's newspaper articles about the surging property values. He believes the acceleration of the market will be caused by people not being able to live and work in the same community. People are starting to use unincorporated Eagle County as a commodity, an investment, a place to put their money. He doesn't embrace those values. He indicated that Barbara Green indicated that a moratorium would be a political tool that the Board could use to send a message that helps shift the paradigm. When Miller Ranch was approved the room was packed with citizens opposing the project. The political will to provide affordable units to create community is diminishing. The document is a nine month commitment. This document will allow work to be done on issues like protecting the wildlife, affordable housing and the regulations mentioned earlier. He believes this is an opportunity to manage growth, not stop growth. This might affect the very high end market of the economy, but if ten thousand square foot homes continue to be approved, where will these employees come from. He explained that second homes are apart of our economy but are creating some ill effects. He stated that he is willing to work with anyone wanting to be part of the solution. Commissioner Runyon moved that the Board approve Resolution 2005-121. Authorizing the adoption of a temporary moratorium on all zone change applications that would result in more residential dwelling units per acre that the Present Governing Zone District Allows, and all Zone Change Applications that Would Result in commercial or industrial uses-by-right on property that is presently zoned for agricultural or residential us Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of two to one. Commissioner Stone voting against. There being no further business befo ~l..::;." i "J ; t..?1 "" .' ed until October 11, 2005. Attest: 26 10/4/05