No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 03/01/05 tresent ArnMenconi Tom Stone Peter Runyon Jack Ingstad Diane Mauriello Teak Simonton PUBLIC HEARING March 1, 2005 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Administrator County Attorney Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing, the following items were presented to the Board of CoilIlty Commissioners for their consideration: Executive SeSSion Commissioner Stone moved that the Board of County Commissioners go into Executive Session for the purpose of receiving legal advice, for the purpose of discussing negotiations in connection with a pre-annexation! intergovernmental agreement with the Town of Gypsum and a lease agreement with Crown Mountain, for the purpose of receiving legal 'advice concerning anne:xation of property and water issues with the Town of Minturn, and for the purpose of receiving legal advice on a United Airlines air service agreement, all of which are appropriate topics for discussion pursuant to 24~6-402(4)(a)(b) and (e) c.R.S. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. At the close of the discussion, Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn from Executive Session and Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. GENERAL FliND 21ST CENTURY PHOTO SUPPLY 3CMA 300 MHz A ,& H GRAPHICS A 1 COLLECTION AGENCY AAAA SEPTIC PUMPING AASHfo ACSM.CLSA.NALS-WFPS ADAMS MARK HOTEL DENVER AFFILIATED CREDIT SERVICE AFFLECK PHOTOGRAPHY AlA FULFILLMENT AILI FOSS ALAN PATtERSON ALBERT NASTASI ALEXANDER CLARK GRAP~ICS I ALL KIDS DENTAL ALL-PRO FORMS INC ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE; INC ALPHA INTERACTIVE GROUP ALPINE COFFEE SERVICE,LLC ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY AMERICAN PUBLIC HUMAN AMERICAN PUBLIC WRKS ASSC AMERICINN LODGE & SUITES AMERIGAS ANN MUNCASTER APEX II APS SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERViCE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE 440.72 170.00 3,000.00 90.00 24.80 750.00 100.00 350.00 127.00 30.00 775.00 70.00 7.56 282.39 5.00 1,093.42 286.00 397.50 4,507.29 159.98 1,449.70 8.69 115.00 20.00 94.11 5,328.91 39.60 1,740.00 190.45 1 3/1/05 ARACELI CLARK ARMOR HOLDINGS FORENSICS ARN MENCONI ARON LANGLEY ASHIA BARELA ASPEN BASE OPERATON ASPEN BOARD OF REALTORS ASPEN CTR FOR WOMENS HL TH AT & T WiRELESS SERVICES AUBURN HOTEL AV TECH ELECTRONICS INC BAILEY FUNERAL HOME BALCOMB AND GREEN BASALT CLINIC PHARMACY BCPH BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER BERTHOD MOTORS BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS BEST WESTERN EAGLE LODGE BETHANY VAN WYK BLUEGRACE BRC/HARRIS INC BRENT BIGGS BRIAN BISHOP BRICK 1 BRIDGESTONE WINTER C & S PRODUCTIONS CAACO CABRAL LAW FIRM CAE4HA CAPITAL BUSINESS SySTEMS CARMEN LOZOYO-VELEZ CASFM CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CCCMA COW CEAFCS CENTURYTEL CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE CHADWICKS OF BOSTON CHEMATOX INC. CHERYL CRANE CIVIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE CLEAN DESIGNS CLERK RECORDER AVON ANNEX CLIFF SIMONTON CO ASSOC TAX APPRAISERS CO COUNTY ATTORNEY ASSOC CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND CO ST ASSOC COUNTY CLERK CO STATE TREASURER COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE COLORADO PROFESSIONALS IN COLORADO STATE ARCHIVES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 264.40 101.80 85.00 322.20 250.00 547.84 6.52 1,625.00 441.77 440.00 9,320.58 715.00 2,488.95 293.72 80.00 600.00 884.90 477.36 450.00 227.55 300.00 1,086.80 10.00 429.37 87.88 2,280.00 115.00 150.00 20.00 145.00 109.74 151.80 60.00 370.00 65.00 1,771.00 30.00 8,990.27 113.29 100.00 160.00 15.53 299.50 283.70 78.55 50.00 375.00 350.00 89.25 25.00 5,013.73 4,852.17 675.00 80.00 13.40 2 3/1/05 COLORADO STATE FOREST COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH COLUMBINE MARKET CONTRACT PHARMACY SERVICE CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COUNTY SHERIFFS COLORADO COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT COVA CZ INCORPORATED D.H.L. WORLDWIDE EXPRESS DAN CORCORAN PLS DAY TIMERS INCORPORATED DEEP ROCK WATER CO DELL INC DENNIS WiLLEY DENVER COMMUNITY FEDERAL DENVER NEWSPAPER AGENCY DEX MEDIA EAST LLC DIANA KAFKA DISCOVERY EDUCATION DON-OLSEN DONALD DUBOIS DOSIA LAEYENDECKER EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COMpUTER SySTEMS EAGLE COUNTY CLERK EAGLE COUNTY CONFISCATED EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER EAGLE DIRECT EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE VAIL ANIMAL HOSPITA EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE VALLEY HUMANE ASSOC EAGLE VALLEY PET HOSPITAL EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EASTER OWENS ELECTRIC CO ECO LAB EDWARDS STATION LLC ELECTION CENTER ELISA ACOSTA EMBASSY SUITES DENVER EMG2 EMERGENCY VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING COMPUTER ESRI EWING TRUCKING CONSTRUCTI EXTENSION PROGRAM FUND FABIAN LOPEZ FALCON ASSOCIATES INC FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FEDERAL EXPRESS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 23,005;05 . 15,059.25 1,930.00 40.48 747.20 6,472.55 1,540.24 285.00 174.00 100.00 2,650.00 5.00 1,340.00 22.98 510.18 1,552.47 48.00 513.52 1,797.13 79.55 85.56 125.00 10.00 55.89 24.60 10,208.00 9,708.00 175.00 7,095.00 701.82 13.40 8,913.35 1,191.32 1,720.03 20.00 264.03 350.00 2,455.76 3,572.50 710.00 875.40 600.00 1,248.00 159.39 178.00 1,439.64 3,027.42 4,965.00 10,350.00 , 140.00 759.75 7.00 90.00 2,187.76 467.81 3 3/1/05 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC FINANCIAL EQUIPMENT COMPA FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES FIRKINS GARAGE DOORS FIRST BANKS FLORIDA MICRO FORENSIC LABORATORIES INC FRANKLIN COVEY FRED PRYOR SEMINARS FRONT RANGE GREASE GALLS INCORPORATED GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF GEMPLERS INC GEORGENE BURTON GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY GILMORE SHELLENBERG GLADYS PETit GLENDA WENlWORTH GLENWOOD MEDICAL ASSOC GLENWOOD SHOE SERVICE GLENWOOD SPRINGS POLICE GOLDEN EAGLE ELDERLY GOLDEN EAGLE SENIORS GOvCONNECTION, INC GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND MESA MEDICAL SUPPLY GREAT AMERICAN LEASING HALL KYLE HAMPTON INN AND SUITES HARSHMAN AND MCBEE HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELEN M LINDOW HELEN MIGCHELBRINK HELLERSTEIN & SHORE PC HERMAN MILLER INC. HEWLETT PACKARD HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HILL & COMPANY HODGES BADGE COMPANY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL HVAC SUPPLY rAEI ICMA IDENTIX IMS COLORADO INSTITUTE OF CONTINUING INTERMOUNTAIN SWEEPER INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAP NETWORK SYSTEMS JAN 0 WESTMAN JANE A ST JEAN JANE MCRACRAFT CLI, CCDI JEANETTE HURSEY SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 37.49 295.00 2,780.00 75.00 13,701.31 2,150.00 10.00 88.08 257.00 20.00 231.89 1,000.00 863.56 6.30 135.00 24.44 875.39 56.09 159.00 50.00 175.00 51,000.00 32.71 124.39 190.30 124.93 2,760.00 19.88 59.33 60.80 126.60 15,065.63 228.00 1,008.17 80.00 443.04 303.00 1,861.71 300.00 1,202.77 2,929.04 199.00 8.20 175.00 54.50 5,640.00 36.75 90.00 49.49 200.00 2,427.40 60.00 354.00 1,228.00 75.90 4 3/1/05 JENNY WOOD JERRY CHICOINE JILL HUNSAKER JIM WAHLSTROM JOHN LOWERY JOHN PLANO JOHNSON AND HELD L TD JUNIPER VALLEY PRODUCTS KARA BETTIS, CORONER KATHY WARREN KESSLER MARY J KIM JOHNSON LANDS END INCORPORATED LARA "HEATHER" LAWDERMILK LAUREL POTTS LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LETN LEXISNEXIS COURTLlNK INC LIZ MAYER LK SURVEY INSTRUMENTS LORIE CRAWFORD LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES LORRAINE VALLADARES LUCIANA AL VOS MACHOL&JOHANNES MARCH OF DIMES MARIA ANJIER MARILYN MENNS MARKS PLUMBING PARTS MARLENE MC CAFFERTY MARRIOTt HOTEL MARSHALL SWIFT MATTHEW BENDER MBIA MCI WORLDCOM MEADOW MOUNTAIN PLUMBING MEDICAL ARTS PRESS MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MICHELLE HARMON MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN MIKE KERST MILLER & COHEN MOBILE VISION MONICA JACOX MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS MOUNTAIN DIRECT MARKETING MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS NANCY FOSTER NATIONAL 4H SUPPLY NATIONAL BUSINESS NATIONAL COMMISSION ON NEBS BUSINESS FORMS NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT . REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 35.58 51.00 271.39 22.77 160.19 11.30 458.00 18.75 111.49 75.00 48.52 13.80 100.00 151.80 98.24 705.41 776.00 19.00 73.77 363.70 64.38 897.00 173.49 64.40 68.96 98.28 71.37 30.00 200.73 43.54 560.00 180.95 149.25 4,906.11 2,050.19 453.00 46.36 82.00 10.00 374.21 165.53 60.06 169;50 113.85 860.57 36,217.39 1,293.50 4,368.00 1,948.00 24.00 115.45 888.00 918.00 293.32 1,375.00 5 3/1/05 NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NW EDUCATION LOAN ASSOC. OMNIINTERLOCKEN RESORT OSMDELIVERY LLC OTHER PRODUCTS LLC P-LOGIC SYSTEMS PAPER DIRECT PAPER WISE PAULINE NG PEAK PERFORMANCE COPIER & PEGGY GRAYBEAL PEPPERDINE'$ MARKET PES I PETTY CASH PHNAC % JO LYNN IDLER PHYSICIANS SOLUTIONS PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED PLANNING COMMISSIONERS POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PRARIE MOON MOTEL PREMIER ELECTRIC CO INC PRINTRITE PSS, INC PUBLIC SAFETY WAREHOUSE QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION QUINLAN PUBLISHING COMPAN QWEST RAMADA INN RAZORS EDGE INC RED HILL ANIMAL HEALTH REIS ENVIRONMENTAL INC RICHARD HOWARD & COMPANY RITA R BOSSOW RITA WOODS ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN ROBERT BUSCH PROFESSIONAL ROBERTA E ARNDT ROCKHURST COLLEGE ROGER MOORE RSC RUMMEL ELECTRIC SARAH BRELSFORD SAWAYA AND ROSE SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP SCOTT FLEMING SECURITY TRANSPORT SERV1CEMASTER CLEAN SHAINHOL TZ TODD H DDS SHAWN R METZGER SHEAFFER KAREN SHIVELY & HOLST SIGNATURE SIGNS SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES 3.752.03 273.35 696.00 389.50 107.45 7,942.50 44.73 2,396.00 27.37 188.00 120.00 271.00 1,145.00 41.41 475.00 124.00 105.21 245.00 1,450.00 915.00 368.55 314.50 758.38 64.95 451.74 54.99 261.88 6,421.62 138.00 632.00 20.00 62,500.00 40.00 40.55 156.25 385.44 9.60 113.65 680.00 29.60 411.75 228.00 519.63 44.35 2,364.75 189.75 2,612.30 35,517.45 601.00 30.00 114.24 34.64 17.60 629.68 6 3/1/05 SKltLPATH SEMINAR SMITH EDWARD SNOWHITE LINEN SOFtwARE SPECTRUM SPECIALTIES INCORPORATED SPRONK WATER ENGINEERS STATE OF COLORADO STEPHANIE GLENWRIGHT STRAWBERRY PATCH SUREFIRE LLC SUSPENSE FUND TED HESS PC TENIE CHICOINE TGCI THE FLOWER MART THOMAS D SILVERMAN THOMSON WEST GROUP TOM EHReNBERG TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TORFINO ENTERPRISES . TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATI TOWN OF EAGLE TRANE COMPANY TRB/ROUNDABOUT TRI COUNTY STeAM CLEANING UN/TED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED REPROGRAPHIC UNITeD RESOURCE SYSTEMS UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV UNITED WAY OF EAGLE UNIVERSTIY PHYSICIANS INC UPPER IMAGE EMBROIDERY us DEPT OF EDUCATION US. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY VACCESS AMERICA, INC VAIL BOARD OF REALTORS VAIL ELECTRONICS VAIL LOCK AND KEY VAIL MOUNTAIN COFFEE VAIL POLICE DEPARTMENT VAIL VALLEY EAR NOSE AND VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VAILNET INC VALAS KAREN VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY VERIZON WIRELESS, VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS VIRINIA COMMUNITY VISA CARD SERVICES WARWICK HOTEL ~WASTE MANAGEMENT '''WCAEHO WElL PUBLISHING SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 1,095; 00 38.00 153.88 989.28 1,111.00 488.30 472.56 52.80 447.00 1 ,232.66 81,731.56 18.20 90.00 825.00 56.00 35.60 1 ,466.99 109.19 12.50 98.50 1 ,838.99 3,675.35 64.16 885.00 600.00 484.83 254.62 60.00 1,000.00 20.00 142.00 81.00 51.29 8,330.00 758.72 150.00 2;543.00 119.22 79.50 750.00 528:00 610.05 67.80 138.51 934.38 2,809.80 5,133.03 51.60 199.82 4,994.68 112.00 941.42 30.00 865.00 7 3/1/05 WELlS FARGO WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY WILLIAM VANNICE WILLITS GENERAL STORE WIND RIVER TREES WOODLAND & JOHNSON WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY WYN CONSULTING XCELENERGY XEROX CORPORATION XEROX OMNIFAX YOUR PERSONAL CHEF Z"LAW SOFTWARD INC PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY ROAD AND SRIDGEFUND ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY BERRY CREEK METROPOLITAN BLAKE MARTIN CARSE COLORADO CONTRACTORS ASSN COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC DOCTORS ON CALL FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES GYPSUMVALLEY FEED HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE PETTY CASH ROAD & BRIDGE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF GYPSUM VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN SLOPE AGGREGATE WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY SOCIAL SERVICES FUND 2RIVERS VIDEO PRODUCTION B & H PHOTO VIDEO CALM RIVER DEMOGRAPHICS CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, MA COLUMBINE MARKET CORPORATE EXPRESS COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT CRICKET PYLMAN EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER ELIZABETH MCGILLVRAY PA'(ROLLEXPD SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL 3 & 4 285,541.39 1,050.00 20.70 104.00 925.00 4.90 29.84 732.66 790.81 9,763.65 579.00 375.00 191.90 650,819.68 1,594,646.62 SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL 3 & 4 176.38 100.00 71.11 30.00 185.00 224.00 90.00 365.45 1,664.90 1,205.72 491.96 116,065.31 150.00 56.13 936.79 6,277.83 239.85 39.88 35.24 26,556.74 6,038.52 345.30 28.47 62,707.44 224,082.02 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE 300.00 2,034.30 735.00 842.40 29.77 188.13 336.00 383.20 20.80 2,295.86 4,250.00 20.86 493.75 8 3/1/05 FAMIL YSUPPORT REGISTRY HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HEART OF THE WEST COUNSEL HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC JEANNE MCQUEENEY JEROME EVANS PH.D JERRI ISRAEL JOAN BONSAL JOYCE HOLMAN JULIA KOZUSKO KAREN LAJOY SMITH MA LPC KATHY REED KRISTI GREMS LARA "HEATHER" LAWDERMILK LYONS KATHLEEN MONQUEESGHA WALKER MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES NOLA SMITH OLGA WILKINS ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO RITA WOODS SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHERI MINTZ SIGNATURE SIGNS ')ST ABS SUSPENSE FUND THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION TOWN OF EAGLE VAIL HONEYWAGON LTD VAIL LOCK AND KEY WELLS FARGO XEROX CORPORATION XEROX OMNIFAX PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARy RETIREMENT FUND SUSPENSE FUND OFFSITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED CNL IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS KENNEY & ASSOCIATES KOMPAN, INC. R A NELSON & ASSOCIATES RAZORS EDGE INC 3HEPHERD RESOURCES, INC. WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL 3 & 4 7.40 56.54 21,391.60 1,477.72 227.25 848.40 1,162.22 1,575.00 75.22 296.00 51.00 2,413.06 350.00 560.19 837.10 118.50 290.21 75.90 1,133.58 86.63 176.06 2,206.78 55.00 72.97 1,099.97 392.00 92.81 14.40 40.00 6,561.32 1,220.00 36.25 28.50 4.50 19,957.26 244.32 81.00 42,182.07 119,428.80 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 71,746.14 71,746.14 SERVICE 1 ,454.25 1,454.25 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 36,000.00 126.00 850.00 17,396.00 5,700.00 7,008.00 1,174.79 232.96 68,487.75 9 3/1/05 SAlES TME;V. TRANSP. A1 AUTO ELECTRIC COMPANY ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY APEX SECURITY AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES BRODY CHEMICAL BUFFALO RIDGE AFFORDABLE CASTA CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING COLLETTS COLORADO L TAP COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COLUMBINE MARKEr COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC CORPORATE EXPRESS CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DAVfDMILLER DEEP ROCK WATER CO DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE PHARMACY FEDERAL EXPRESS FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES FIREBUSTER SOLUTIONS FLEET TIRE SERVICE FLORIDA MICRO i G & K SERVICES GE CAPITAL GILLIG CORPORATION GUSTY KANAKIS HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IMS COLORADO INSTA-CHAIN INC JAY MAX SALES KINETICO WATER PROS KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAWSON PRODUCTS MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MOTOR POOL FUND PERRY SWEENEY QWEST RAC TRANSPORT CO INC RON E BECK SAFETY KLEEN (WHICITA) SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN . STEWART AND STEVENSON SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF GYPSUM TOWN OF VAIL UNITED STATES WELDING SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 2,266.94 617.64 14.48 499.20 270.45 5.85 5,516.00 5,638.00 129.54 257.88 694.65 75.00 257.66 26.85 354.00 353.91 467.30 149.22 7.45 5,841.35 30,919.33 29.52 99.42 1,279.72 31.35 2,465.00 1,395.00 440.05 269.16 9,403.47 35.50 2,308.49 1,826.92 235.00 1,683.00 176.65 35.00 333.00 1,317.12 70.30 5,889.36 140.45 164.86 445.91 1,800.00 92.82 46.07 3,280.40 3,082.46 12,601.77 57,239.00 839.93 200.00 27.54 10 3/1/05 VAIL NET VALLEY SIGNS VERIZON WIRELESS, WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO - WESTSTAR BANK WHITEALLS ALPINE WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XCEL ENERGY XEROX CORPORATION YELLOW BOOK USA . ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS A CUT ABOVE FORESTRY FEDERAL EXPRESS HEALTH INSURANCE FUND SUSPENSE FUND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO WELLS FARGO AIRPORT FUND AFFO~DABLE FIRE AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC AMBER DROEGEMEIER AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT AMERICAN AVIONICS INC AMERICAN LINEN BLUEGLOBES INC BRENT SERVICES BRIGHT PROSPECTS CAROL RICHARDSON CENTURYTEL CO AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSN CONTRACT LIGHTING COpy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CROUSE HINDS AIRPORT CRYOTECH DEICING TECH DEEP ROCK WATER CO DISH NETWORK EAGLE COUNTY AIR TERMINAL ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO ELIZABETH WILT FAAS SYSTEMS INC FRONTIER RADIO GLENWOOD RADIATOR REPAIR GRAINGER INCORPORATED GYPSUM TOWN OF H & H HYDRAULICS INC. HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HILL & COMPANY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL 3 & 4 H.95 15.54 270.47 123.39 59,069.06 571.15 25.20 10.92 985.21 239.10 11.36 168.57 178.92 141,494.29 366,822.07 SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD 100.00 14.12 10.72 149.80 20,819.53 860.08 21,954.25 SERVICE SER~ICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE 1,500.00 96.33 100.00 2,220.00 2,196.00 307.84 3,656.00 903.60 731.73 100.00 3,613.90 400.00 815.70 31.26 238.61 1,450.96 27,089.66 201.45 282.73 1,956.00 150.00 30.53 167.15 332.00 50.00 120.10 431.05 610.99 882.80 980.50 6,024.44 11 3/1/05 IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS JAMES Y ANTZER JANENE SCHWAN JAY MAX SALES JEPPESEN DATAPLAN INC JUAN AGUIRRE KATIE MELANEY KINDER MORGAN INC KLAM AMERICA CORP INC KRISTINA STECHER LAFARGE CORPORATION LAWSON PRODUCTS M & M AUTO PARTS MACDONALD EQUIPMENT CO MAIN AUTO PARTS MARRIOTT UNIVERSITY PARK MCI WORLDCOM MIDWESTAIR TRAFFIC MOTOR POOL FUND MY$UK INC NExrEL NOBLE WELDING OJ WATSON COMPANY INC OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY PEGGY LEBLANC PROTECTION SERVICES SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SEVERSON SUPPLY CO., INC. SUSPENSE FUND TCI TIRE CENTERS INC US CUSTOMS SERVICE VAIL DAILY THE VAIL ELECTRONICS VERIZON WIRELESS, VISA CARD SERVICES WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY .. WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN IMPLEMENTS WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY MICROWAVE MAINTENANCE FUND CENTURYTEL CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC MCI WORLDCOM QWEST CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL 3 & 4 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 367.00 304.00 100.00 62.50 24,000.00 50.00 100.00 4,597.69 6,069.16 100.00 2,384.39 550.65 68.99 896.70 169.01 434.85 167.16 32,758.00 798.50 10,420.14 621.79 1,210.50 3,034.90 350.89 206.00 100.00 3,019.25 2,348.00 14,191.81 3,829.01 611.99 2,408.20 845.98 40.00 58.21 819.11 1,154.91 916.74 19,406.73 923.07 28.95 87.55 48,969.48 247,253.14 12,292.27 115.12 2,334.59 3,291.02 501.45 18,534.45 150,000.00 150,000.00 12 3/1/05 DANIEL VALDEZ VISA CARD SERVICES LANDFILL FUND AIR CYCLE CORPORATION DEEP ROCK WATER CO DOWN VALLEY SEPTIC EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GYPSUM VALLEY FEED HEALTH INSURANCE FUND KRW CONSULTING INC LEE RIPPY CONSTRUCTION MOTOR POOL FUND RONALD RASNIC SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SUSPENSE FUND VAIL DAILY THE WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY MOTOR POOL FUND ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY AL-JOI':lINC AMERICAN VAN EQUIPMENT BERTHOD MOTORS CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE CLEVELAND PUNCH AND DIE COLLETTS COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS DELTA KITS DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EDDIE VELASQUES FARIS MACHINERY CO FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES FORCE AMERICA G & K SERVICES GLENWOOD RADIATOR REPAIR GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE GYPSUM VALLEY FEED HANSON EQUIPMENT HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELEN MIGCHELBRINK HENSLEY BATTERY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC INTERMOUNTAIN SWEEPER JAY MAX SALES JENNY WOOD M & M AUTO PARTS MAIN AUTO PARTS vlARIAN MCDONOUGH MCCANDLESS INTERNATIONAL MOTOR POOL FUND REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 952;66 159.44 1,112.10 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD PAYROLL 3 & 4 3,056.99 85.01 562.50 85.00 393.73 485.94 627.44 1,247.40 166.73 43,908.43 80.40 1,987.17 1,936.38 424.76 1,775.06 6,583.78 14,784.16 78,190.88 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE 455.98 210.76 1,562.88 80.45 213.73 326.39 108,665.18 1,111.44 193.86 181.79 266.75 75.00 73.73 944.83 253.82 513.99 274.92 1,665.72 496.60 1,157.24 476.13 25.65 598.00 1,271.90 60.57 11.89 20.10 323.05 15.50 2.01 260.53 6,087.27 13 3/1/05 NOVUSAtJTOGI:ASS POWER EQUIPMENT COMPANY REY MOTORS INCORPORATED SAFETY KLEEN SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SNAP ON TOOLS SUSPENSE FUND TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS TOWN OF GYPSUM TWO RIVERS CHEVROLET uNITED STATES WELDING WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN SLOPE PAINT WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY PAYROLL FOR FEBRUARY HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY JEFFERSON PILOT FINANCIAL MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. MUTUAL OF OMAHA UNITED STATES LIFE INS ENHANCED E911 FUNO QWEST Consent Agenda . . SERVIGE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL 3 & 4 842.00 43.92 205.28 92.83 46.09 2,421.96 2,105.80 1,961.23 3,112.50 620.13 68.54 439.47 4,377. 75 91.09 8,896.12 886.13 111.72 57.37 55.74 24,038.88 178,352.21 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 1,050.00 3,713.51 36,216.83 3,198.06 1,027.00 45,205.40 SERVICE 17,644.34 17,644.34 3;204,914.42 Chairman Menconi stated the first item before the Board WllS the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of Bill Paying for the Weeks of February 28 and March 7, 2005 (Subject to review by the Count)' Administrator) Mike Roeper, Finance Department B. Approval of the Payroll for March 3,2005 (Subject to Review by the County Administrator) Mike Roeper, Finance Department C. Resolution 2005-023 Authorizing Eagle County To Apply And Submit A Grant Request To The State Board Of Great Outdoors Colorado For Receiving A Grant Award To Assist In The Acquisition Of Eaton Ranch I County Attorney's Office Representative D. Resolution 2005-024 NotifYing The State Treasurer To Distribute Federal Mineral LeasingFunds In Accordance With The Provisions Of S 34-63-102, C.R.S. Treasurer's Office Representative Chairman Menconi asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Diane Mauriello, County Attorney stated that there were no revisions or additions to the agenda. 14 3/1/05 Commissioner Stone asked to discuss Item C. Chairman Menconi agreed. Commissioner Runyon stated that he understood that this was the appropriate mechanism for making this pplication; He supports this fund raising effort to get the appropriate amount of money to make the purchase happen. Ceil Folz, Vail Valley Foundation stated that GOCO provides funding for open space purchases and the Vail Valley Foundation is attempting to get the grant monies available for the purchase of the Eaton Ranch parcel. She clarified that the GOCO representatives requested that their request include the river parcel and undisturbed sections of the property. She doesn't expect any re-drawing of property lines. She gave details of the split in the acreage. Commissioner Stone stated that he didn't understand why the Vail Valley Foundation wasn't going after funding for the whole piece, but understood it better after Ms. Folz's explanation. He asked about the Eagle Valley Land Trust and understood that this group was concerned that the County was trying to get involved in conservation easements. He believed that GOCO would rather have an entity other than Eagle COuIlty be the applicant. Ms. Folz stated that GOCO had indicated the County or the Eagle Valley Land Trust would be acceptable applicants. She believes that GOCO has 10-12 applicants, and the deadline for applications is March 2,2005. The total requests for GOCO funds are for around $20,000,000.00. Commissioner Runyon moved to approve the Consent Agenda for March 1,2005, Items A-D. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Planning and Land Use Resolution Consent Agenda Cliff Simonton, Community Development A. Resolution 2005...025 to Approve an Amendment to the Eagle-Vail Planned Unit Development (Eagle County File No. PDA-00053). The Board approved this amendment on February 15,2005. B. Resolution 2005-026 in the Matter of Amending Chapter II, Appendix B, Eagle-Vail:PlJD Guide of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, November 1998 (Eagle County File No. LUR-00050). The Board approved this amendment on February 15,2005. Commissioner Stone moved to approve the Planning and Land Use Resolution Consent Agenda for Match 1,2005, consisting ofItems A and B. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote waS declared unanimous. Minor SubdiviSion Plat Signing Cliff Simonton, Community Development There were nO minor subdivision plats for the Board's consideration this week. Schedule a Hearing Regarding Amended Service Plan for Cordillera Metropolitan District and Squaw Creek Metropolitan District Bob Narracci, Community Development Mr. Narracci stated that the two Metro districts are proposing to consolidate their service plans to one plan and eventually dissolve the Squaw Creek Metro District. The proposed date for the hearing is March 29,2005. Commissioner Runyon moved to schedule File SD-0030, Amended Service Plan for Cordillera Metro District and Squaw Creek Metro Districtfor hearing on March 29,2005. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 15 3/1/05 Presentation of Proceeds ofthe€ommunityTsunami ReliefEffo-r-t~SuperBoWl-of Caring Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services Chairman Menconi provided some background on this tragedy and the need for this effort. All proceeds were garnered for immediate relief through the Red Cross efforts. Volunteers contributed time and money towards the effort. This unparalleled effort raised in excess of $13,000 towards relief. The primary sponsors were honored: Betsy Howling, Vail Valley Chamber and Tourism Bureau Tim Cochrane, Director of the Eagle Valley Chamber of Commerce Linda Mariner, Membership Director of the Eagle Valley Chamber of Commerce Don Rogers, Editor of the Vail Daily Gail Cameron Britt, Eagle County Volunteer Coordinator Cheryl Crane, Eagle County Volunteer Staff Member Joe Cervantes, Westar Bank Netty Reynolds accepted the check on behalf of the Red Cross. The commissioners expressed their thanks for the generosity and hard work of everyone involved. Other Ms. Mauriello stated that there had been a request from the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District. They have asked that the Chairman be authorized to sign the lease agreement as well as a grading permit, upon receipt of documents that are acceptable to the County Attorney's office. Commissioner Stone moved to authorize the Chairman to sign the lease agreement and gradingperthit, upon receipt of documents that are acceptable to the County Attorney's office. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Planning Files ZS..00122 - Peace Ranch Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Planner with Community Development, asked the commissioners to table the item to March 22, 2005 NOTE: ACTION: LOCATION: Request to table to March 22, 2005 To create a pond on the Peace Ranch, near Basalt. Pond will be approximately 3.3 surface acres with a depth of 12-15 feet, approximately 0.5 acres of the pond will be emergent and transitional wetlands. Section 30, Township 7S, Range 85W, approximately 5 miles up the Frying Pan Road, northeast of the Town of Basalt. Commissioner Stone moved to table File ZS-00122~-Peace Ranch, at the applicant's request, until March 22,2005. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDP-00028 & ZC-00070 - Siloam Springs PUD Clifford Simonton, Planner, Community Development NOTE: This file was tabled from 8/17/04, 9/21, 12/7, 1/4/05 & 2/15/05, Request to table to 3/29/05 ACTION: PUD for 5 lots on the Eagle River in Dotsero LOCATION: 002412 Hwy 6, Dotsero Cliff Simonton, Planner with Community Development, stated that the applicant is again requesting a tabling ofthe issue. The Planning Commission has not had sufficient time to review the file and is asking for the tabling. 16 3/1/05 T om Boni spoke to the Boardandinformedthem thaUhe. reason for theJ::ontinue_dtabling.is,relatedtQ delays beyond their control. He stated that they have received an access permit from the state. The file is currently available to the Planning Commission, and they have questions related to the Planned Unit Development. Commissioner Runyon moved to table Files PDP-00028 and ZC-00070~Siloam Springs PUD, at the pplicant's request, until March 29,2005. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDF-00088 Arrowhead River Ranch PUD Clifford Simonton, Planner, Community Development ACTION: Request for final approval of a subdivision plat that would reconfigure Tract B and Tract C of the Arrowhead River Ranch PUD creating 5 new lots. LOCATION: 35635 US Highway 6 TITLE: FILE NO./PROCESS: OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Arrowhead River Ranch PUD, a Resubdivision of Tract Band TractC PDF-00088 / Planned Unit Development Final Plat Arrowhead Valley Developers, LLC Same Mr. lohn Boe Approval PROJECT DESCRIPTION suMMARY: The Applicant is requesting final approval of a subdivision Plat that would reconfigure Tract Band Tract C of the Arrowhead River Ranch PUD, creating 5 new lots. Each lot closely resembles the building footprint for each home on this property, which will eventually contain 20 single family dwelling units. The layout proposed is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plan for Arrowhead River Ranch. he development site is located 1.3 miles east ofthe intersection of US Highway 6 and the Edwards SpliT Road, immediately adjacent to and north of US Highway 6. C!mONOLOGY: . The Preliminary Plan for the Donovan Parcel PUD (now the Arrowhead River Ranch POO) was approved on July 30, 2002. . The companion 1041 file (1041-0043) was approved on the same day. . The final plat for the Arrowhead River Ranch PUD (file PDF-00074) was approved on October 22,2002. . FilePDF-00082 created the first 7 home sites, and was approved in November of2003. . Six more lots were memorialized with file PDF-00083, which was approved in July of 2004. Upon approval and recording of this plat, two lots/home-sites will remain to be platted within the Arrowhead River Ranch PUD. SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning: East: Open Space / PUD West: Residential / PUD (Logan Park) North: Eagle River Corridor / PUD (Berry CreekIMiller Ranch) South: US Highway 6 ROW, Open Space / PUD (Arrowhead) Existing Zoning: PUD . Tater: Arrowhead Metropolitan District ewer: Eagle River Water and Sanitation District Access: Via US Highway 6 STAFF REPORT 17 3/1/05 STAFF FINDINGS: This plat is the fourth plat for Arrowhead River Ranch PUD, and is the third that establishes single family home sites. All development for this plat was contemplated by, and is consistent with, the approved Arrowhead River Ranch PUD Pteliminary Plan and the Arrowhead River Ranch PUD Guide. Pursuant to Section 5-280.B.5.b (3), final Plat for Subdivision - Action bv the Board of County Commissioners of the Eagle COilIlty Land Use Regulations: . This final plat DOES conform to the approved Preliminary Plan for subdivision. . Required improvements ARE adequate. . Areas dedicated for public use and easements ARE acceptable and; Pursuant to Sections 5-280.B.3.e., Standards of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: (1) Consistent with the Master plan. It has previously been determined that the proposed subdivision IS consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the Future Land Use Map of the Master Plan. (2) Consistent with Land Use Regulations. It has previously been fOUIld that the proposed subdivision DOES comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including but not limited to the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4 Site Development Standards. (3) Spatial PilUer1l Shall Be Efficient. It has previously been determined that the proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies.in the delivery of public services, require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (a) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions ARE consistent with the utili . service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the Service plan. Proposed road extensions ARE consistent with the Eagle County Road Capitallrt1provemenl-S Plan. (b) Serve lJItimate Population. Utility lines ARE sized to serve the planned ultimate population ofthe service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (c) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Utility extensions DO provide the entire range of necessary facilities. (4) Suitability for Development. It has previously been ,determined that the property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resourceS and natural, or human..made hazards that may affect the potential development ofthe property, as well as existing and probable future public improvements to the area. (5) Compatible with Surrounding Uses. It has previously been determined that the proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and DOES NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Mr. Simonton explained the request and showed a PowerPoint presentation showing the proposal and details. The total for the development as proposed would be 18 sites, with two yet to be developed. He stated that all fmdings are positive and the final plat is in conformance. Staff does recommend approval. Commissioner Stone asked for the reason for this request. Mr. Simonton stated that these were stand-alone condominiums with joint ownership. Commissioner Runyon asked about the process. Commissioner Stone explained that, in Condominium Associations, the building has to be in place prior to final plat. This can't be done until the units are built. These owners had received approval from the Board to buill the units. This is the final stage to identify what exactly has been built and where. 18 3/1/05 Mr. Simonton stated that because of the technical nature of this plat, it needed to be presented in a formal process according to law. Chairman Menconi opened and closed public comment. There was none. Commissioner Runyon moved the Board approve File No. PDF-00088, incorporating Staff findings, and authorized the Chairman to sign the Plat. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDA..00057 - Edwards Medical Center - Shaw Caring House Joseph Forinash, Planner, Community Development NOTE: ACTION: This file was tabled from February 22, 2005 To amend the PUD to allow the construction of a short-term residential facility fOr patients receiving cancer treatments at the Shaw Cancer Center and their care givers and to shift additional employee housing to a later phase. Edwards Medical Center PUD, 320-344 Beard Creek Road, Edwards LOCATION: TITLE: FILE NO./PROCESS: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: Edwards Medical Cen.ter PUD / Shaw Caring House PDA-00057 / PUD Amendment Vail Clinic, Inc Knight PlanIling Services, Inc. (Terrill Knight) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions (7-0) PLANNING COMMISSION DELIBERATION: . Clarification of "employee spaces" vs. "employee units". Number of housing units curtei1tly being provided by Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC). . Nature of ownership interest at The Tames. . When could VVMC be in a position to build employee housing? . If the employee housing is propo'sed to be optional, what would be the basis for deciding to proceed? . Housing Department response refers to need for housing for the community as a whole. . Ir1terest in not ignoring employee housing, but not slowing Shaw Caring House. . Want to look forward to housing needs in the future and a compromise that satisfies future needs. . Housing is a private Sector function. . Seeking an alternative to housing merely as an option. . Basisfor determining the need for 16 units in the Shaw Caring House PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: A PUD amendment that would allow the construction of a short-term residential facility for patients receiving cancer treatments at the Shaw Cancer Center and their caregivers, and to designate additional employee housing as optional and shift it to a later phase. B. CHRONOLOGY: 1995 - POO Preliminary Plan and zone change approved. 1996 - Final plat approved. 1997 - POO amendment approved which revised the approved site design and phasing plan, and re-named the development from Eagle Valley Health Center to Edwards Medical Center. 1999 - POO amendment approved which revised the approved site design, increased the maximum building height, added certain allowed uses, and revised the manner in which the employee housing requirement is to be satisfied. 19 3/1/05 2003 ~PUD amendment approved to allow an additional sign on the south facing side of the Shaw Regional . Cancer Building. Co SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses 1 Zoning: East: Residential 1 RSM West: 1.;.70, Beard Creek Road 1 Resource North: Church, residential 1 Resource, RSM South: I~ 70, residential 1 RSM EXisting Zoning: PUD Total Area: 8.74 acres Water: Edwards Metro District Sewer: Eagle River Water and Sanitation District Access: Beard Creek Road STAFF REPORT A. REFERRAL RESPONSES: Eagle County Engineer . A site plan needs to be submitted that includes the existing and proposed grades, and the top and bottom of retaining wall elevations. . Calculations for the storm sewer need to be submitted, including inlet sizing and the hydraulic grade line. . Construction drawings of the storm sewer need to be submitted, including plan and profile. . The angle between a storm sewer pipe entering and exiting a manhole is less than 90 degrees. It is recommended that the design be modified to be larger than 90 degrees. . The installation of an inlet south of Beard Creek Road may be required near desigrt point 9. It. appears that the stormwater in that area runs off and erodes the soil in this area and will likely cause problems for the proposed retaining wall and structure. . The drawings indicate that a large retaining wall may be required between the parking area and Beard Creek Road. A separate building permit will be required with drawings designed bya professional Engineer registered in the State of Colorado. . A guard rail and curb and gutter will be required between Beard Creek Road and the retaining wall because of the steep drop off and the close proximity of the retaining wall to Beard Creek. Also, additional improvements may be required when a design is submitted along Beard Creek Road. . The applicant has stated that they do not wish to design the project until this file is approved and a fund raising drive for the project is completed. Typically drainage improvements, improvements to Beard Creek Road, and large retaining walls are considered public improvements and are collateralized with a public improvements agreement. The construction drawings will have to be submitted and approved by the County Engineer and a Public Improvements Agreement for these improvements will have to be approved by the Board of County Commissioners before any permits are issued for this project. . The retaining wall, reinforcement, tiebacks and footers can not encroach into the Beard Creek Road right-of-way. . Any improvements located within the right-of-way will require a separate permit to construct within the right-of-way. Eagle County Wildfire Mitigation Specialist . The site will have a Low wildfire hazard rating. . The residential portion of the project appears to be on a dead-end driveway. This could pose problems for emergency response vehicles. The applicant should design turnarounds for large fire apparatus. It appears to have been addressed, but the site plans were not sufficiently clear. Eagle County Housing Department 20 3/1/05 . The Housing Department agrees that the 110,000 square feet of offices in Edwards requires 14 units of housing, but the applicant's housing plan refers to "beds" and "bedrooms" at the Tames, not housing units. . The Housing Guidelines state, "The Local Resident Housing Guidelines' goal is directed at helping to establish a supply of housing that is affordable to those who live and/or work in Eagle County. This goal is to be accomplished by requiring new residential and nonresidential development to provide local resident housing based on established rates and/or determined number of jobs to be generated as a result of the development." (Chapter 1 - Background and Purpose, page 3.) . The Housing Department feels that the current housing provides for the needs of seasonal workers at the Medical Center, but does not adequately address the long term goal of providing stable workforce housing for residents of Eagle County. The Edwards Medical Center PUD Guide, which includes a provision for employee housing, states that employee housing will be provided on site between 2001 and 2005. This time frame needs to be adjusted accordingly and workforce housing for peima:i1ent residents of Eagle County needs to be provided. Eagle River Fire Protection District . Water supply in the area is adequate. Hydrant locations will need to be reviewed for adequate coverage. . Access to the facility appears adequate with the hammerhead located on the western side of the parking lot. This will need to be verified based on the turning analysis data for the Pierce Quantum equipment. . With the additional employee housing units proposed further west, access is no longer adequate due to the length of the driveway and a lack of a turn around. Other Referrals have been made to Eagle County Attorney, Eagle County Environmental Health, Eagle County Weed and Pest Coordinator, Eagle County Ambulance District, Holy Cross Electric, Edwards Metro District, KN Energy, CenturyTel, Eagle River Water and Sanitation District. B. F1ND1NGS: ursuartt to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F.3.e Standards for the review of a PlJI) Preliminary Plan: stANDARD: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] - The title to all land that is part ofa pub shall be owned or controlled by one (1) person. A person shall be considered to control all lands in the PUD either through ownership or by written consent of all owners of the land that they will be subject to the conditions and standards of the PUD. The Applicant has demonstrated that it is the sole owner of the site ofthe Edwards Medical Center PUD. [+] FINDING: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] The title to all land that is part of this PUD IS owned or controlled by one (1) person. STANDARD: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] - The uses that may be developed in the PUD shall be those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule", or Table 3-320, "Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule", for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these use designations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3f., Variations Authorized. The Edwards Medical Center PUD is currently structured in six phases. Phases 1, 3 and 5 include medical and related services. Phases 2, 4 and 6 include employee housing. The Shaw Regional Cancer Center, representing Phase 3, is the most recently completed phase. fhe Phase 2 employee housing requirement was satisfied through an arrangement to provide off-site housing at The Tarnes, a multi-family employee housing development located in Beaver Creek. The Phase 4 employee housing 21 3/1/05 requirement, as presently structured, is to be completed by providing on-site employee housing spaces for 42 employees in an 18,000 square feet facility. The Phase 6 employee housing requirement is optional and would include an on-site facility of an additional 18,000 square feet. The Applicant has provided an analysis indicating that, given recent experience and the availability of hOllsing in the market at large, providing additional employee housing is not required nor would it be prudent. Consequently, in addition to revising Phase 4, which was to be employee housing, to permit the Shaw Caring House, the PUD amendment would also make any additional employee housing (Phase 4 and Phase 6) optional at the discretion of the Applicant. The Eagle County Director of Housing has reviewed the proposed amendment and has determined that "the current housing provides for the needs of seasonal workers at the Medical Center, but does not adequately address the long term goal of providing stable workforce housing for residents of Eagle County." [+H FINDING: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] All of the proposed additional uses that may be developed in the PUD ARE NOT uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed asa limited use in the Planned Unit Development Guide in effect for the property at the time of the application for the PUD Amendment. HOWEVER, Variations of these use designations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3.f., Variations Authorized. The Board must determine whether or not it is appropriate to designate any additional employee housing as "optional". StANDARD: DimeltsionalLi11litations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] - The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD shall be those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations",jor the zOne district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for pun. Variations of these dimensional limitdtions may only be authOrized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3j, Variations Authorized, provided variations shall leave adequate distance between buildings for necessary access and fire protection, and ensure proper ventilation, light, air and snowmelt between buildings. No changes in dimensional limitations are proposed as part of this PUD Amendment. [+] FINDING: Dimensional Limitatio1l.s. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD ARE those specified in the Planned Unit Development Guide in effect for the property at the time of the application for the PUD Amendment. STANDARD: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] - Off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parkinfland Loading Standards. A reduction in these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that: (a) Shared Parking. Because of shared parking arrangements among uses within the pun that do not require peak parking for those uses to occur at the same time, the parking needs of residents, guests and employees of the project will be met; or (b) Actual Needs. The actualneeds of the project's residents, guests and employees will be less than those set by Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standard. The applicant may commit to provide specialized transportation services for these persons (such as vans, subsidized bus passes, or similar services) as a means of complying with this standard. A maximum of 16 units is proposed for the Shaw Caring House, plus one efficiency unit for an on-site caretaker. Sixteen parking spaces are proposed. The Land Use Regulations require one parking space per room per short-term lodging unit. There appears to be sufficient excess parking spaces in the currently developed portion of the site to accommodate parking for the on-site caretaker. 22 3/1/05 [+] FINDING: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] It HAS previously been found at the time that the Preliminary Plan forthe PUD was approved that adequate, safe and convenient parking and loading was being provided. Adequate, safe and convenient parking; WILL BE provided for the additional development. STANDARD: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] - Landscaping provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards. Variations from these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that the proposed landscaping provides sufficient buffering of uses from each other (both within the PUD and between the'Ptffhmd :mf t uundin15uses-tto-minimize7toise;--gb:tre-and----h~-' other adverse impacts, creates attractive streetscapes and parking areas and is consistent with the character of the area. The application includes a Conceptual Landscape Plan without the level of detail which is normally required for a preliminary plan level review. As a condition of approval, the Applicant should be required to install landscaping as shown in the Conceptual Landscape Plan. [Condition # 1] [+] FINDING: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] Landscaping provided in the approved PUD Preliminary Plan HAS been determined to have complied with the standards in effect at the time the Preliminary Plan was approved. STANDARD: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (6)] - The sign standards applicable to the PUD shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Si!Jfl Regulations, unless, as provided in Section 4-340 D., Signs Allowed in a Planned Unit Development (PUD), the applicant submits a comprehensive sign plan for the PUD that is determined to be suitable for the PUD and provides the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to and within the PUD. A 64 square foot sign is proposed to identify the Cancer Caring House, but which does not appear to be pr~vided for in the Comprehensive Sign Plan included in the POO Guide. As a condition of approval, an appropriate revision ) the Comprehensive Sign Plan satisfactory to the Director of Community Development should be required as part fthe amended POO Guide. [Condition # 2] [+] FINDING: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e(6)] The proposed amendment to the comprehensive sign plan for the PUD IS suitable for the POO. and DOES provide the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to and within the POO. STANDARD: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] - The applicant shall demonsttate that the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. At the time the Preliminary Plan for the PUD was approved, it was determined that adequate facilities were to be provided. The Eagle River Water and Sanitation District had previously indicated that it will provide water and wastewater treatment services to this development. The Eagle River Fire Protection District (ERFPD) notes that emergency access to the new facility appears to be adequate with the hammerhead located at the Western end ofthe parking area. However, it will be necessary to verify this based on the turning analysis data for the Pierce Quantum, the equipment standard used by the ERFPD. In addition, the Fire District notes that there would not be adequate driveway length or vehicle turnaround to accommodate the additional employee housing units shown further to the west. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, it should be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the County Engineer that adequate access for emergency vehicles will be provided. [Condition # 3] ltherwise, the proposed PUD Amendment will not have an adverse effect on the adequacy of facilities for _ otable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, or electrical supply, nor will it affect the location in relation to schools, and police and fire protection, and emergency services. 23 3/1/05 [+] FINDING: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] As conditioned, it HAS previously been determined that adequate facilities were to be provided based on the Land Use Regulations in effect at the time of approval of the Preliminary Plan for t PUD. The proposed PUD Amendment WILL NOT adversely affect the provision of adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, and electrical supply, fire protection, and roads; and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. STANDARD: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] - The improvements standards applicable to the development shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards. Provided, however, the development may deviate from the County's road standards, so the development achieves greater efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts, when the follOWing minimum design principles are followed: (a) Safe, Efficient Access. The circulation system is designed to provide safe, convenient access to all areas of the proposed development using the minimum practical roadway length. Access shall be by a public right-of- way, private vehicular or pedestrian way or a commonly owned easement. No roadway alignment, either horizontal or vertical, shall be allowed that compromises one (1) or more of the minimum design standards of the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) for that functional classification of roadway. (b) Internal Pathways. Internal pathways shall be provided to form a logical, safe and convenieflt system for pedestrian access to dwelling units and common areas, with appropriate linkages off-site. (c) Emergency Vehicles. Roadways shall be designed to permit access by emergency vehicles to all lots or units. An access easement shall be granted for emergency vehicles and utility vehicles, as applicable, to use private roadways in the development for the purpose of providing emergency services and for installation, maintenance and repair of utilities. (d) Principal Access Points. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to provide for smooth traffic flow, minimizing hazards to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. Where a PUD abuts a major collector,arteril road or highway, direct access to such road or highway from individual lots, units or buildings shall not be permitted. Minor roads within the PUD shall not be directly connected with roads outside of the PUD, unless the County determines such connections are necessary to maintain the County's road network. ' (e) Snow Storage. Adequate areas shall be provided to store snow removed from the internal street network and from off-street parking areas. At the time the Preliminary Plan for the FUD was approved, it was determined that adequate improvements Were to be made. The Eagle River Fire Protection District (ERFPD) notes that emergency access to the new facility appears to be adequate with the hammerhead located at the western end of the parking area. However, this will be necessary to verify based on the turning analysis data for the Pierce Quantum, the equipment standard used by the ERFPD. In addition, the Fire District notes that there would not be adequate driveway length or vehicle turnaround to accommodate the additional employee housing units shown further to the west. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of any grading or building permit for the either the Shaw Caring House or the employee housing, it should be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the County Engineer that adequate access for emergehcy vehicles will be provided. [Condition # 3] [+] FINDING: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] As conditioned, it HAS previously been determined that adequate improvements were to be provided based on the Land Use Regulations in effect at the time of approval of the Preliminary Plan for the PUD. The proposed PUD Amendment WILL NOT adversely affect improvements regarding: safe, efficient access; internal pathways; principal access points; and snow storage. STANDARD: Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] - The development proposed for the PUD shall be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. The Preliminary Plan approved for the PUD was determined to be compatible with surrounding land uses. Additional uses permitted by this PUD amendment will continue to be compatible with surrounding land uses. 24 3/1/05 [+J FINDING: Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] The development proposed for the POO HAS been determined to be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. The proposed POO Amendment WILL permit additional uses that ARE compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. stANDARD: Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] - The PUD shall be consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The PUb was previously determined to be consistent with the Master Plan including, but not limited to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The following analysis with respect to the Master Plan and the FLUM applies only to the changes proposed in the POO Amendment, subject to the recommended conditions of approval. Xl ~ The proposed pUb amendment would support/encourage the diversity of the economic base. 2 ~ The PUD resulting from this POO amendment continues to include employee housing, but which would be moved to the final phase and designated as optional. X3 ~ The proposed development continues to be consistent with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The proposed PUD amendment does not adversely affect conformance ofthe PUD with the Eagle County Master Plan. EDWARDS AREA COMMUNITY PLAN I I I Conformance Non-Conformance Mixed Conformance Not Applicable Land Use Xl .- Housing X2 Transportation x Open Space x Potable Water and Wastewater x Services and Facilities x Environmental Quality X3 Economic Development X4 Recreation and Tourism x Historic Preservation x Implementation x Future Land Use Map X5 25 3/1/05 Xl ~ The location and type of proposed land uses balances the physical, social, cultural, environmental, and economic needs of the current and future population, and supports balanced growth in the Edwards area. X2 - The PUD resulting from this PUD amendment continues to include employee housing, but which would be moved to the [mal phase and designated as optional. X3 ~ The site is located in an area designated as having possible ridgeline impacts. No visual analysis has been included in the application. X4 ~ The proposed development contributes to a balanced mix of land uses which encourages a diverse economy. X5 ~ The site is in an area designated for public services and facilities. The proposed development is consistent with the Future Land Use Map. The proposed POO amendment does not adversely affect conformance of the PUD with the Edwards Area Commtlhity Plan. EAGLE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PLAN Xl X2 X3 x4 x x Xl ~ The PVD was previously detetthined to be sensitive to open space valueS. x2 ~ The POO was previously detetthined to be compatible with preservation ofthe high visual quality of the County. x3 _ The eXisting and proposed development is adjacent to the existing community. x4 ~ Development will not occur on slopes greater than 40 percent or which present natural hazards. x5 - The development does not occur in areas of critical wildlife habitat. EAGLERIVERWATERSHE]) PLAN x x x X x The proposed PUD amendment does not adversely affect conformance of the PUD with the Eagle River Watershed Plan. EAGLE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING PLAN 26 3/1/05 VISION STATEMENT: Housing for local residents is a major priority of Eagle County. There should be a-wide variety of housing to fulfill the needs of all its residents, including families, senior citizens, and those who work here. Elements of Eagle County's vision for housing are: . Housing is a community-wide issue . Housing should be located in close proximity to existing community centers, as defined in the Eagle County master plan. . . . Development of local residents housing should be encouraged on existing . . . transit routes . Housing is primarily a private sector activity [but] . . . without the active participation of government, there will be only limited success . It is important to preserve existing local residents housing . Perso~s who work in Eagle County should have adequate housing opportunities within the COUIlty . Development applications that will result in an increased need for local residents housing should be evaluated as to whether they adequately provide for this additional need, the same way as they are evaluated for other infrastructure needs POLICIES: ITEM 1. Eagle County will collaborate with the private sector & nonprofit organizations to develop housing for local residents 2. Housing for local residents is an issue which Eagle County needs to address in collaboration with the municipalities. . . x x 3. Steps should be taken to facilitate increased home ownership by local residents arid workers in Eagle County 4. Additional rental opportunities for permanent local residents should be brought on line. Some. . . should be for households with an income equivalent to or less than one average wage job x 5. Seasonal housing is part of the problem & needs to be further addressed. It is primarily the responsibility of. . . employers. . . x 6. New residential subdivisions will provide a percentage oftheir units for local residents x 7. Commercial, industrial, institutional, and public developments generating increased employment will provide local residents housing. The first preference will be for units on- site where feasible, or if not feasible, in the nearest existing community center. . . x 8. The County will seek to make land available for local residents housing in proximity to community centers x 9. Mixed use developments in appropriate locations are encouraged 10. Factory-built housing is an important part of Eagle County's housing stock x 11. There is a need to segment a portion of the housing market to protect local residents from having to compete with second home buyers. Where public assistance or subsidies are provided for housing, there should generally be limits on price appreciation, as well as residency requirements x 12. Eagle County recognizes that housing for local residents is an ongoing issue The PUD resulting from this PUD amendment continues to include employee housing, but which would be moved to the final phase and designated as optional. It has previously been found that the PUD is in conformance with the Master Plan. With the possible exception of the optional housing issue, the proposed PUD Amendment may not sufficiently different in character or magnitude I alter conformance with either the Master Plan or the Future Land Use Map. 27 3/1/05 The Board must determine whether or not it is appropriate to designate any additional employee housing as "optional" . [+1-) FINDING: Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] It was previously determined that the PUD IS consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The proposed PUD Amendment MAY NOT adversely affect the consistency with the Master Plan. StANDARD: Phasing [Section 5-240.F.3.e (11)] - The Preliminary Planfor PUD shall include a phasingplan for the development. If development of the PUD is proposed to occur in phases, then guarantees shall be provided for public improvements and amenities that are necessary and desirable for residents of the prOject, or that are of benefit to the entire County. Such public improvements shall be constructed with the first phase of the project, or, if this is not possible, then as early in the project as is reasonable. The ~~wards Medical C~nter IJUD is a phased. d~:elopm~nt. A pu?li~ improv~ments agreement will requir~d. As a condItlOn of approval, pnor to Issuance of the InItIal gradmg or buIldmg permIt, a complete set of constructIon plans and engineering detail should be provided which are satisfactory to the County Engineer, and a public improvements agreement should required to be completed. [Condition # 4] [+) FINDING: Phasing. Section 5-240.F.3.e (11) As conditioned, the Edwards Medical Center PUD IS a phased development; HOWEVER, n.o additional public improvements are required. STANDARD: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] - The PUD shall comply with the following common recreation and open space standards. (a) Minimum Atea. It is recommended that a minimum of 25% of the total PUD area shall be devoted to open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi-public. In addition, the PUD shall provide a minimum often (10) acres of common recreation and usable open space lands for every one thousand (1,000) persons who are residents of the PUD. In order to calculate the number of residents of the PUD, the number of proposed dwelling units shall be multiplied by two and sixty-three hundredths (2.63), which is the average number of persons that occupy each dwelling unit in Eagle County, as determined in the Eagle County Master Plan. i. Areas that Do Not Count as Open Space. Parking and loading areas, street right-of-ways, and areas with slopes greater than thirty (30) percent shall not count toward usable open space, ii. Areas that Count as Open Space. Water bodies, lands within critical wildlife habitat areas, ripariilh areas, and one hundred (100) year floodplains, as defined in these Land Use Regulations, that are preserved as open space shall count towards this minimum standard, even when they are not usable by or accessible to the residents of the PUD. All other open space lands shall be conveniently accessible from all occupied structures within the PUD. (b) ImpfOvements Required. All common open space and recreational facilities shall be shown on the Preliminary Plan for PUD and shall be constructed andfully improved according to the development schedule establishedfor each development phase of the PUD. (c) Continuing Use and Maintenance. All privately owned common open space shall continue to conform to its intended use, as specified on the Preliminary Plan for PUD. To ensure that all the common open space identified in the PUD will be used as common open space, restrictions and/or covenants shall be placed in each deed to ensure their maintenance and to prohibit the division of any common open space. (d) Organization. If common open space is proposed to be maintained through an association or nonprofit corporation, such organization shall manage all common open space and recreational and cultural facilities that are not dedicated to the public, and shall provide for the maintenance, administration and operation of such land and any other land within the PUD not publicly owned, and secure adequate liability insurance on the land. The association or nonprofit corporation shall be established prior to the sale of any lots or units within the PUD. Membership in the association or nonprofit corporation shall be mandatory for all landowners within the PUD. At the time the Preliminary Plan for the pun was approved, it was determined that adequate common recreation and open space were to be provided. The proposed PUD Amendment will not have an adverse effect on the adequacy of the open space. 28 3/1/05 [+] FINDING: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] It has previously been determined that the development DOES comply with the common recreation and open space standards applicable at the time of approval of the Preliminary Plan for the PUD. The proposed Pun Amendment WILL NOT adversely affect common recreation and open space within the PUD with respect to (a) minimum area; (b) improvements required; (c) continuing use and maintenance; or (d) organization. STANDARD: Natural Resource Protection. [Section 5-240.FJ.e (13)] - The PUD shall consider the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards. At the time the Preliminary Plan for the PUD was approved, it was deterrtlined that adequate protectioll of natural resources were to be provided. The proposed Pun amendment would not be detrimental to natural resources. [+] FINDING: Natural Resource Protection. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (13)] It HAS previously been determined that applicable analysis documents were adequately considered prior to approval of the Preliminary Plan for the PUD. The proposed PUD amendment WILL NOT adversely affect natural resources. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-280.B.3.e. Standards for the review of a Sketch Plan for Subdivision: STANDARD: Consistent with Master Plan. [Section5-280.B.3.e (1)] B The proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the FLUM of the Master Plan. See discussion above, Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] t has previously been found that the PUD is in confortrumce with the Master Plan. With the possible exceptioll of the optional housing issue, the proposed PUD Amendment may not sufficiently different in character or magnitude to alter conformance with either the Master Plan or the Future Land Use Map. The Board must determine whether or not it is appropriate to designate any additional employee housing as "optional". [+/-] FINDING: Consistent with Master Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (1)] It was previously determined that the PUD IS consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The proposed PUD Amendment MAY NOT adversely affect the consistency with the Master Plan. STANDARD: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)] - The proposed subdivision shall comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards. Article 3, Zone Districts When the Preliminary Plan for the Pun was approved, findings were made to warrant the zone district change to PUD based on the applicable Land Use Regulations. Article 4, Site Development Standards Division 4-2 - Landscape and lllumination Standards ne application includes a Conceptual Landscape Plan without the level of detail which is normally required for a reliminary plan level review. As a condition of approval, the Applicant should be required to install landscaping as shown in the Conceptual Landscape Plan. [Condition # 1] 29 3/1/05 Division 4-3 - Sign Regulations A 64 square foot sign is proposed to identify the Cancer Caring House, but which does not appear to be provided for in the Comprehensive Sign Plan included in the PUD Guide. As a condition of approval, an appropriate revisio to the Comprehensive Sign Plan satisfactory to the Director of Community Development should be required as part of the amended PUD Guide. [Condition # 2] Division 4..4 - Natural Resource Protection Standards Section 4~430 - Development in Areas Subject to Wildfire Hazards The Eagle County Wildfire Mitigation Specialist has determined that the sitewill have a Low wildfire hazard rating. However, the Eagle River Fire Protection District (ERFPD) notes that emergency access to the new facility appears to be adequate with the hammerhead located at the western end of the parking area. However, this will be necesSary to verified based on the turning analysis data for the Pierce Quantum, the equipment standard used by the ERFPD. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of arty grading or building permit, it should be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the County Engineer that adequate access for emergency vehicles will be provided. [Condition # 3] Section 4..450 - Ridgeline Protection The site is located in an area designated as having possible ridgeline impacts. No visual analysis has been included in the application. Division 4..6--,- Improvements Standards Section 4-650 - Drainage Standards The County Engineer has identified a number of potential drainage issues that have not been resolved, including the requirement for a public improvements agreement. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of the initial grading or building permit, acomplete set of construction plans and engineering detail should be provided which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition # 4] Section 4- 660.. Excavation and Grading Standards The County Engineer has identified a number of potential excavation and grading issues that have not been resolved. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of the initial grading or building permit, a complete set of construction plans and engineering detail should be provided which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition # 4] Section 4-665 - Erosion Control Standards The County Engineer has identified a number of potential erosion control issues that have not been resolved. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of the initial grading or building permit, a complete set of construction plans and engineering detail should be provided which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition # 4] Otherwise, the proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with the provisions of Article 4, Site Development Standards, of the current Land Use Regulations. [+] FINDING: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)] As conditioned, it HAS previously been found that the development complied with the regulations, policies and guidelines of the Land Use Regulations applicable at the time of approval of the Preliminary Plan for the PUD. With the recommended conditions, the PUD amendment WILL continue to be consistent with the Land Use Regulations. 30 3/1/05 stANDARD: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)] - The proposed subdivision shall be located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (a) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's service plan Or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road extensions shall be consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital Improvements Plan. (b) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoidfuture land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (c) Coordinate Utility Extensions. - Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un- served area. When the Preliminary Plan for the POD was approved, it was found that the development would have an efficient spatial pattern. The proposed PUD Amendment will not alter the spatial pattern in any way that causes inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. [+] FINDING: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-280.B.3.e(3)] It HAS previously been found that the Preliminary Plan for the PUD satisfied the requirements of the Land Use Regulations in effect at the time with respect to efficient spatial patterns. The proposed PUD Amendment DOES NOT adversely affect the spatial patterns in the area. STANDARD: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)] - The property proposed to be subdivided shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man '-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public 'tnprovements to the area. When the Preliminary Plan for the PUD was approved, it was fOilIld that the area was suitable for development as approved. [+] FINDING: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)] It BAS previously been determined that the site was suitable for development. STANDARD: Compatible with Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)] - The proposed subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. When the Preliminary Plan for the PUD was approved, it was found that the PUD is compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and would not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. The PUD amendment would continue to be compatible with the surrounding land uses. [+] FINDING: Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)] It HAS previously been determined that the development is compatible with other development in the area. The proposed POO Amendment WILL NOT adversely affect the compatibility of the resulting development with surrounding uses within the PUD. ADDITIONAL FINDINGS: Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations [Section5-240.F.2.a.(8) Initiation]: <<Applicant shall submit the ~?llowing: "Proposed PUD guide settingforth the proposed land use restrictions. " 31 3/1/05 Certain revisions to the PUD Guide have been proposed, however, a complete, revised PUD Guide has not been provided. As a condition of approval, the Applicant should be required to submit, within 14 days of the approval of this PUD amendment, a revised PUD Guide which incorporates the approved amendments in a manner satisfactory to the Director of Community Development. [Condition # 5] [+] FINDING: Initiation [Section 5-240.F.2.a.(8)] Applicant IS required to submit a PUD Guide which incorporates the necessary revisions to effect the proposed PUD Amendment. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F. 3.m., Amendment toPreliminatv Planfor PUD: STANDARD: Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD [Section 5-240.F.3.fi1.]:a No substantial modification, removal, or release of the provisions of the plan shall be permitted except upon afinding by the County. . . that (1) the modification, removal, or release is consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire Planned Unit Development, (2) does not affect in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the planned unit development or the public interest, and (3) is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person. This Standard will be satisfied. [+] FINDING: Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD [Section 5-240.F.3.m .] The proposed PUD Amendment (1) IS consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire Planned Unit Development, and (2) DOES NOT affect in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment ofland abutting upon or across a street from the planned unit development or the public interest, and (3) IS NOT granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person. MLForinash presented the background on the file using a Power Point presentation. He highlighted the housing requirements evolution related to this project. ill 1995, the number of units requited to satisfy the requirements was deemed to be 34, with 42 beds. In the preliminary plan, Phase 3 was to be employee housing and Phase 6 was to be an additional 35 tlllits. The number of phases Was reduced from 6 to 5 in 1997, and the Phase 3 employee hOUsing was shifted to Phase 2. The 35 housing units planned for Phase 6 were shifted to Phase 4. He reviewed all of the amendments to the PUD. In 1999 the phases were increased from 5 back to 6. He highlighted the new phases: 4 through 6. Both Staff and Planning Commission recommend approval with conditions and all findings are positive. Stan Anderson, Senior Vice President with Vail Valley Medical Center (VVMC), spoke to the Board. In 2001 the V ail Valley Medical Center established the Shaw Regional Cancer Center. Since this time, the Center has treated hundreds of individuals. Patients who travel from outlying areas are in need of continuous treatments, and this has been problematic in terms of finding affordable housing during their stays. A group of volunteers proposed a caring house which would be available at no cost to the patients and their families. Employee housing is important to the VVMC, and the Rousing Department retains 42 beds between Edwards and Vail. The only need that is not being met is housing assistance for actual patients. Community support has been overwhelming, with 60% of the needed funds having already been committed. Terrill Knight, Knight Planning Services, informed the Board that they had put the PUD together. The Shaw outreach group has done a good job in his estimation. The concept for a caring house required a change to the PUD' The original plan from 10 years ago has been conformed to. They have held neighborhood meetings and concerns have been addressed. Appropriate adjustments have been made and view corridors were respected. Every subdivision standard and zoning regulation has been met. The caring house has been deemed to be less impacting to the neighborhood than employee housing would be. This request is consistent with the general goals of the PUD. He showed the Commissioners the property using maps and photos. The proposed building will be of high quality and consistent with surrounding architecture. He showed the architect's view of the sight in the form of a sketch and artist's conceptions. Commissioner Stone asked Mr. Forinash about the financial impact. He wondered if the applicant would be paying the $49,000 fees. 32 3/1/05 Mr. Forinash stated that there had been no discussion about fee in lieu. Mr. Knight stated that the staff had recommended conditions for approval which were acceptable to the applicant. He also pointed out that the facility will not create a need for housing. The housing director from the VVMC was present and made a brief presentation. Tom Gorman spoke to the Board. He addressed the issue of affordable housing and the fact that the VVMC meets and exceeds the regulations. They don't use a factor for the rooms in the units; they plan on one bedroom for one person. The VVMC is and has been a consistent provider of affordable housing, and they have master-leased and subsidized housing for their staff. They have 22 units and 52 beds with 4 units in Vail, 14 in Avon, and 14 units in Edwards. The need is no longer as high as it once was. They have a lot of returning seasonal employees who arrange for their own housing. He distributed some data related to seasonal housing needs. They also keep housing inventory available for contract services. Financial resources committed by the VVMC are anywhere from $350,000 to $500,000 per year for employee housing. He spoke about their gross vacancy rate of 40%. Chairman Menconi asked what the applicant's preference was for Condition 7. Ed O'Brien, Chairman of the Board of the Vail Valley Medical Center, spoke to the Board. Be stated that the center Was created in the back of a bar, and today is a very professional organization with 7 locations. LaSt year they admitted over 3,100 patients. They treated over 51,800 outpatient patients. They contributed free or reduced- price services valued at over $3,000,000. There is no tax support for this facility and he thanked Mrs. Forinash for a recent $50,000 contribution from the courtty. The hospital employs 740 people and is a very large and fully integrated hospital system. Today, they treatJOO new cancer cases each year, and approximately 150 are designated for radiation therapy. About 50% of the cases come from outside of Eagle Courtty and they need overnight accommodations. They have become a comprehensive central point of service for cancer patients. The Shaw outreach team came together to see what could be done to achieve the original goal of be co tIling a well- known cancer treatment center. Be had an issue with Condition 7 which recommends that the Edwards Medical Facility build employee housing. They don't believe that employee housing should be requited for this small addition. Condition 7 says that four duplex housing units need to be built no later than 20 1 5. He believes that they have been a leader in providing affordable housing. He stated that they had always exceeded what is required by the government and what has been needed for employee housing. The Board of Directors will only allow the -::aring House building to be built, provided it does not require the building of employee housing. They are well aware and accepting of the requirement to build employee housing when they go forward with Phase 5, the additiona.llO,OOO square foot office facility. Ite suggested going back to what is already written in the PUD amendment, deleting the word "optional". Chairman Menconi asked if the applicant has a modification to the 7th condition. Dr. Jack Eck, Internal Medicine Specialist, spoke to the Board. He stated that, in seeing the community mature, there are a lot more cancer patients than would meet similar demographics in other areas. They hadno idea of how this need would have developed. The growth will expand beyond the County. When someone is going through this, they are very sick, and even a 20 minute bus ride is difficult. This facility would make this very difficult time much more comfortable. He believes that with the growth of this cancer center, there will be benefits to the County. There is currently a shortage of qualified ancillary services personnel. He is aware that a lot of cancer center haves these facilities but many do not. Having this facility available will allow the Shaw Cancer Center to stand apart. The facility will be available on a donation basis only. Commissioner Stone stated that he has a conflict of interest on this file, as Dr. Eck is his personal doctor, but stated that he would be voting on this file. Mr. Knight concluded his presentation. Chairman Menconi opened public comment. Patty Hartenberg, a radiation oncologist at the Shaw Cancer Center, was present as the voice of her patients. She underscored the need for the Caring House and emphasized that radiation is a daily treatment for 6-8 weeks. Many times chemotherapy is required at the same time. Cancer is a very painful diagnosis. The most striking problem is the inconvenience to the patient and family member. The treatment itself can cause other health difficulties. In a caring house the common room is very important, as families can gather together and gain strength. Joetta Gray, resident of Eagle County, informed the Board that both of her parents have cancer. She related 'lat this type of facility would have been very important to her family. Agnew Meek, resident of Beaver Creek, supports the caring house as a cancer survivor, major donor, and patient of Dr. Hartenberg, and Executive Director of the caring house. He chose Shaw because of their approach to 33 3/1/05 this disease. He is totally supportive of the facility and let the Board know that there is a $1,000,000 endowment in the bank. As a patient he has seen a lot of sick people coping with fear and hoping for hope. Mary Randall, resident of Edwards and treasurer of the Shaw Outreach Team, spoke to the Boatd. This group carne together to make this project more successful. She asked for approval to build the cancer caring house on this site with the six conditions listed by Staff, and eliminate Condition #7. Without approval, they will have t, return $2,000,000 to donors for this purpose. Chairman Menconi closed public comment. Commissioner Runyon asked Mr. Forinash to elaborate on Condition #7. Mr. Forinash said he would have to speculate on the Planning Commission regarding this condition. It is his belief that the .Planning Commission was adhering to the existing PUD requirements regarding housing. KT Gazunis of Eagle County housing department stated that Staff did not recommend Condition 7. She stated that they are just asking for the Housing Plan dates to be modified to a future date. She agreed with Mr. O'Brien's suggestion to delete the word "optional" from the housing requirements. Commissioner Stone stated the decision on this is an easy one. There are communities in the State of Colorado who would love to have the community hospital we have in Eagle County. He said another reason this proposal makes sense is the traffic reduction that would result by having on-site housing. He stated he would like to remOve impediments and would ask the other Commissioners to join him in approving a waiver ofthe application fees. He asked for the other Commissioners' consideration of removal of Condition #7 and giving the applicant housing credit from Miller Ranch. , <. '" Chairman Menconi stated this is a fascinating and valuable undertaking. He spoke of his personal positive experience at the hospital. To expedite this process, he stated he would like to remove Condition 7. He asked for a motion to approve this file. Commissioner Stone rnoved the Board approve File No. PDA-00057, incorporating the staff findings and with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall install landscaping as shown in the Conceptual Landscape Plan. 2. An appropriate revision to the Comptehensive Sign Plan satisfactory to the Director ofCommUIlity Development shall be provided as part of the amended PUD Guide. 3. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit for the either the Shaw Caring HOliseor the employee housing, it shall be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the County Engineer that adequate access for emergency vehicles will be provided. 4. Prior to iSsuance of the initial grading or building permit, a complete set of construction plans and engineering detail shall be provided which are satisfactory to the County Engineer, and a public improvements agreement shall be completed. 5. The Applicant shall submit, within 14 days of the approval of this PUD arnendment, a revised PUD Guide which incorporates the approved amendments in a manner satisfactory to the Director of Community Development. 6. ,Except as otherwise modified by these conditions, all material representations of the Applicant in this application and all public meetings shall be adhered to and be considered conditions of approval. 7. Remove any current or future housing requirements associated with affordable housing. 8. Refund any application fees associated with this file. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned until March 15, 2005. . ~~ A~. Rlerk ~o At~ Bo~rd . LC:~~IDeM 34 3/1/05