Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 02/01/05 Present: Am Menconi Tom Stone Peter Runyon Jack Ingstad Diane Mauriello DOh DuBois PUBLIC HEARING February 1, 2005 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Administrator County Attorney Deputy Clerk to the Board This being a. scheduled Public Hearing, the following items were presented to the BOard ofCouhty Commissioners for their consideration: GENERAL FOND 800 MHZ A CUT ABOVE FORESTRY A.C.E.O. MAASEPTIC PUMPING ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS ACE.KAUFMAN STAMP & SEAL ACTIVECOMMUNICA TIONS AFRICA CALDERIA AGENCY OF CREDIT CONTROL AHIV1A AIMS MtJUMEDIA AIR MAINtENANCE ALlTHEA DOYLE ALL PHASE ELECTRIC SUPPLY. \NT FOOD SERVICE, INC ciA INTERACTIVE GROUP ALPINAIRE HEALTHCARE ALPINE AREA AGENCY AGING ALPINE BANK ALPINE COFFEE SERVICE;LLC ALPINELUIV1BER COMPANY ALPINE PARTY RENTALS AMADEO GONZALES AMERICAN SANK NOTE CO AMERICAN MANAGEMENT AMERICAN SOCIETY CIVIL AMERIGAS ANDERSON & KEIL ANGELICA HERNANDEZ ANGELICA RODRIGUEZ ANN LOPER API SySTEMS GROUP AQUA TEC SYSTEMS ARAPAHOE COUNTY SHERIFF ASPEN BASE OPERATON ASPEN CrR FOR WOMENS HL TH ASPEN GIVEN FOUNDATION I' "'J HEALTH & HARMONY ;IA TION FOR VOLUNTEER AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 44,700.00 2,255.00 35.00 450.00 90.00 67.65 19.95 50.00 30.00 300.00 149.95 7,012.80 60.00 112.45 2,862.10 71.00 190.00 5,259.58 200,00 573.80 3.69 190.00 97.20 152.22 2,095.00 220.00 4,605.85 8.56 126.00 206.00 136.50 700.00 1,582.50 2,400.00 1,964.61 2,125.00 250.00 168.00 85.00 215.81 1 2/1/2005 I AT!) AMERICAN COMPANY AV TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVID IDENTIFICATION B &H PHOTO vIDeo BAILEY FUNERAL HOIV1E BALCOMB AND GREEN BANKIMAGE.COM BARACKFERRAzzANO BARBARA BRUNDIN BASALT CLINIC-PHARMACY BASALT HIGH SCHOOL BASALT SANITATION DIST BAUGHAN PRODuCTIONS INC BEN GALLOWAY MD BENTLEY SYSTEMs INC ElERLlTZ LANGUAGE CENTER ElETHANYVAN WYK BETTER ROADS MAGAZINE BLUEGRACE BOB BARKER COIV1PANY BOULDER COUNTY SHERIFF BRAVO! VAIL VALLEYMUSIC BRICK 1 BRYAN TREU BUILDING PERMiTS LAW BUSCH PROFESSIONAL CORp CANYON INSURANCE-EAGLE CAPrtALBUSINESS SYSTEMS CAREERTRACK CARMEN LOZOYa-VELEZ CARSE - CASTLE MEINHOLD & CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CEHA CELIA SALCEDO CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CENTURYTEL CHADWICK, STEINKIRCHNER CHARLES B DARRAH CHARNSTROM CHEMATOXINC. CHERYL CRANE CHSA CLlFFdRD 0 ZINIDA CLUB TWENTY CO ASSOC FAIRS & SHOWS CO CHAPTERAPWA CO CORONERS ASSOCIATION CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND CO RURAL DEVELOPMENT CO STATE ASSOC CLERK AND COLORADO BIG COUNTRY RC&D COLORADO CHAPTER OF ICC SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 701.05 161.10 768.75 181.10 1,010.00 2,944.47 1,140.00 11.90 99.36 224.63 1,000.00 135.00 200.00 715.00 995.00 200.00 86.94 24.00 300.00 2,388.88 25.00 15,000.00 783.07 296.54 88.78 30.00 444.00 2,626.65 516.00 129.03 150.00 60.00 37.82 75.00 50.00 1,993.65 468.83 9,361.99 10,000.00 30.00 91.19 140.00 43.13 150.00 41.52 2,900.00 50.00 30.00 1,200.00 280.00 558.25 75.00 1,265.00 25.00 980.00 2 2/1/2005 COLORADO COUNTIES INC COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE COLORADO RURAL jLOAADO SEARcH RESCUE JlORADO STATElJNIVERSITY COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH CONSERVE A WAtt LIGHTING CONTRACT PHARMACY SERVICE COPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS . CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COUNTY SHERIFFS COLORADO COURTNEY SDIEHL DVM CTSI VOLUNTEER INSURANCE CuSTOM HOWSE CONSTRUCTiON CUSTOMER SERVICE EXPERTS D:H.L. WORLDWIDE EXPRESS DAN CORCORAN PLS DAN SEIBEL DAN SPARKMAN DASH MEDICAL GLOVES DAVE MOTT DAVID GUINNEE,DVM DAVIDSof\JS DEBORAH CHURCHILL DEBRA BROWN DEEP ROCK WATER CO ',LINC _ORES GOMEZ DENVER COMMUNITY FEDERAL DENVER DOWNTOWN DEPT OF LOCAL AfFAIRS (;)IEBdLD ELCECTION SYSTEMS DOCTORS ON CALL DON OLSEN DONALD LEMON DONNA M BARNES DOSIA LAEYENDECKER DOUBLETREE. HOTEL EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COMpUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE DIRECT EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE RIVER YOlJTH COAL. EAGLE VALLEY PET HOSPITAL EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EASTER OWENS ELECTRIC CO ECO LAB EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER 'lARDS PLAZA LLC .CTION CENTER ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIIV1BURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REilV1BURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 22,667.00 4,551.10 30.00 50.00 40.00 1,045.00 2,011.40 773.70 1,380.44 511.00 8,224.43 1,144.30 5,191.74 354.75 252,748.00 11,019.00 1,500.00 98.72 1,600.00 27.60 472.45 359.20 66.00 1,455.00 530.95 49.73 13.98 529.11 7,189.68 206.00 505.07 438.18 75.00 8,789.18 255.00 24.42 32.43 300.00 16.80 534.32 27,836.66 2,904.00 709.45 2,358.40 129.70 217.17 32,000.00 1,442.64 11,434.25 1,740.00 93.14 220.26 39,285.96 1,227.00 69.00 3 2/1/2005 ENTENMANN ROVIN COMPANY EVANGELlNA MARTINEZ EWING TRUCKING CONSTRUCTI FAIRFIELD INN FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FARNUM HOLT FUNERAL HOME FEDERAL EXPRESS FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC FINANCIAL EQUIPMENT CaMpA FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES FIRKINS GARAGE DOORS FIRST BANKS FISHER SCIENTIFIC FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANy FLORIDAMICRO FOODS OF VAIL, HOME FRED PRYOR SEMINARS GABRIEL CARRIZALES GALLS iNCORPORATED GATEWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS GEIV1PLERS INC GFOA GLADYS PETIT GLENDAWENTWORTH GLENDA'S CATERING GLENWOOD SHOE SERVICE GOLDEN OVEN PIZZERIA GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GREAT AMERICAN LEASING GREELEY POLICE DEPARTMENT GYPSUM PRINTING HART INTERCIVIC HASLERINC HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HEALTHER CHAUSSINGHAND HEART OF THE WEST COUNSEL HELEN MIGCHELBRINK HERMAN MILLER INC. HEWLETT PACKARD HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HILL & COMPANY HILTON ALBUQUERQUE HOBBS EXCAVATING HODGES BADGE COMPANY HOGAN & HARTSON HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HUGHES SUPPLY, INC. IMAGINIT EMBROIDERY INTEGRAL RECOVERIES INTEGRATING GIS & CMA INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNAP NETWORK SYSTEMS SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SEFMCE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFit SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 111.00 219.65 2,540.00 320.00 2,187.76 640.00 317.89 42.86 369.00 750.00 1,522.82 11,298.91 22,856.65 10.00 7,434,96 1,428.00 585.00 206.00 1,256.63 318.02 82.00 315.00 1,074.99 14.18 305.00 100.00 68.52 309.32 189.83 250.00 350.00 317.75 246.14 178.50 175.49 F- I 14,542.96 50.00 360.00 461.62 1,119.73 6,656.00 2,566.95 50.00 690.32 360.00 32.40 531.25 16,524.20 392.51 346.08 18.80 520.00 200.00 2,489.58 ~ ~.---- I 4 2/1/2005 INTERNATiONAL ASSOCIATION INTUIT INFORMATION ISLAND BUSINESS GROUP INC IVYL YN SCOTT \MAR TECHNOLOGIES INC NE A ST JEAN JANET CONNORS JAZMINE HERMOSILLO JEANETTE HURSEY JEANNE MCQUEENEY JEFFERSON COUNTY JENNIE WAHRER JENNY WOOD JERRY CHICOINE JILL HUNSAKER JOHN E REID & ASSOCIATES JOHN KING JOHN LOWERY JOHNSTONE SUPPLY JOYCE MACK KARA BEttiS, CORONER KAREN LEAVITT KARLAGA YTON KATOCOUNSEUNG KAUFMAN BILL KAY VINCENT KEN NEUBECKER KERRY WALLACE '1 ERICKSON ,DERMORGAN INc KfRKHANSEN KVSINFORMATION SYSTEMS I LA QUINTA LAFARGECORPORATION LANbs END INCORPORATED LASER JUNCTION LAURELPOfTS LEATRICE VASTEN LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LEXISNEXIS LEXISNEXIS COURTLlNK INC LINDA MAGGIORE LINDA pEREZ LIZ MAYER LORIE CRAWFORD LORRAINE VALLADARES LUCILA RODRIGUEZ MACHOL & JOHANNES MARIA ANJIER MARIA SAMUDIO MARILYN MENNS MARIO OJEDA , RIO QUEZADA ~KS PLUMBING PARTS MBIA SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIIV1BURSEIV1ENT SERVICE REIMBURSEIV1ENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIIV1BURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REI MBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REI MBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 150.00 2,575.00 400.00 89.10 145.60 343.00 229.00 50.00 290.00 600.00 50.00 845.57 103.37 42.60 261.78 1,100.00 49.68 139.11 77.26 37.52 39.30 25.80 50.00 65.00 6.44 138.00 51.75 20.70 11.88 19,264.68 124.20 17,649.00 133.86 479.32 100.00 207.74 145.40 22.96 28.68 183.30 14.50 33.47 36.09 110.25 38.64 46.30 206.00 96.88 82.14 126.00 30.00 206.00 50.00 122.54 4,817 .61 5 2/1/2005 MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MCI WORLDCOM MCNAMARA & MARTINEZ LLP MEADow MOUNTAIN PLUMBING MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MEGAN GEORGE MELISSA ZINTSMASTER MERCKATL IV1ICHAEL MCCLINTON MICRO PLASTICS MICRO PLASTICS INC MICROWAVE MAINT FUND IV1ID VALLEY METROPOLITAN MIKE GALLAGHER MIKE KERST MILLER & COHEN MONROE & NEWELL MOTOR POOL FUND 1V10UNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS MOuNTAIN DIRECT MARKETING MOUNTAIN 1V10BlLE VETERINAR MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES N)I;CO NAHRO NAR'SVPD INC NAT'L HS HISPANIC INST. NATIONAL 4ASUPPLY NAtiONAL EVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION NAtiONAL SOCIETY OF NEBS BUSINESS FORMS NETTIE REYNOLDS NFPA NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORTHAMERICAN WEED NW EDUCATION LOAN ASSOC. NWCCOG OLGA WILKINS ON TARGET MARKETING INC OSM DELIVERY LLC P-LOGIC SYSTEMS PAINT BUCKET THE PAPER DIRECT PAPER WISE PARAMOUNT DISTRIBUTORS PEAK PERFORMANCE COPIER & PEGGY GRAYBEAL PETER R BORNSTEIN PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PHILLIP BOWMAN PINYON MESA AUTOMATICS PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED PLSC PONDEROSA WINDOW INC POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBuRSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIIV1BURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 72.70 1,871.03 56.40 55.00 373.00 28.00 12.42 1,846.30 55.20 14.34 10.19 600.00 376.43 28.39 396.60 54.00 465.00 37,948.97 879.00 6,666.00 10.00 948.96 456.00 140.42 75.00 700.00 33.21 170.00 135.00 200.00 765.20 145.20 135.00 2,062.13 65.00 265.68 81,211.00 45.00 329.67 370.50 7,447.50 25.83 30.81 155.70 172.25 69.00 120.00 5.00 485.64 40.00 1,824.00 97.25 95.00 30.00 3,643.45 /- 6 2/1/2005 PREMIER ELECTRIC CO INC PRI NTRITE PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATES PROFESSIONAL TREE & TURF OGRESSIVE BUSINESS . OMOTIONAL SOURCE PTS OF AMERICA, LLC PUBLIC TRUSTEES ASSOC PURCHASE POWER QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION QUINLAN PUBLISHING COM PAN QVV'EST RICHARD A KESLER ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN ROBERT KURTZMAN DO ROBERTA E ARNDT ROCKHURST COLLEGE ROGER CARDOZA RON GRUBER DVM - ROSS PRODUCTS DIVISION RUIV1MELELECTRIC RUTH LENz SAMARITAN CNTR OF ROCKIES SANBORN MAP COMPANY INC SARAH SCHIPPER SAWAYA AND ROSE ~CHUYLER & LALOR LLC JTT FLEMING ~...;OTT THOMpSON SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SECURITY TRANSPORT SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHEAFFER. KAREN SHERATON DENVER TECH SILT CO-OP SILVER & DEBOSKEY SIMON PEREZ SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SNOWHITE LINEN SOFTWARE SPECTRUM SPRONK WATER ENGINEERS STATE OF COLORADO STATUTES UNLIMITED STEPHANIE GLENWRIGHT StRAWBERRY PATCH SUE FRANCIOSE SUE MOTT SUMMIT COUNTY SENIORS SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO SUSPENSE FUND TEAK SIMONTON JIE CHICOINE ENCE J QUINN ATTY AT L SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 338.40 1,133.10 146.60 78.05 299.00 912.04 1,220.00 350.00 10,050.00 718.34 50.99 281.80 5,946.28 8,146.61 39.16 2,157.70 549.94 368.00 40.00 10.00 194.22 614.83 18.00 195.00 88,385.00 592.52 28.50 30.00 189.75 150.00 148.70 1,827.75 35,766.42 223.73 944.00 384.85 78.40 50.00 456.98 230.82 1,350.00 4,837.58 472.56 195.00 13.50 163.50 606.92 90.00 6,133.00 780.00 85,181.76 305.25 90.00 120.00 7 2/112005 THE FLOWER CART THOMSON WEST GROUP TIM LOSA TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF BASALT-WATER FUND TOWN OF EAGLE TOWN OF VAIL TRANE COMPANY TRANSOFT SOLUTIONS, INC. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED. REPROGRAPHIC UNrTED STATES POLICE UNitED WAY OF EAGLE UPPER IMAGE EMBROIDERY US FUND FOR UNICEF VAIL CHAIV1BER & BUSINESS VAIL ELECTRONICS VAIL VALLEY CHAMBER AND VAIL VALLEY EMERGENCY VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VAILNEYINC VALLEY LUMBER vALLEY PARTNERSHIP VALLEY PINES HOMEOWNERS VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VERIZON WIRELESS, VICKIE BURROWS VICTIMS ASSISTANCE FUND VIOLA HERMOSILLO VISA CARD SERVICES VOLUNTEER CONNECTiPM VOLUNTEER SOFTWARE WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WENDY JO HASKINS WESTERN STATES SHERIFFS WESTERN WEEDS FLORAL WILLIAM LOPER WILLITS GENERAL STORE WIND RIVER TREES WINSTEAD TRUCKING WOMEN OFFICIALS IN NACO ( WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XCELENERGY XEROX CORPORATION XERO?< OMNIFAX YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC YESENIA MARTINEZ YOUR PERSONAL CHEF ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR JANUARY ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPO REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL 1 & 2 41.00 1,607.13 63.48 195.99 600.00 99.38 3,433.90 6,000.00 848.60 320.00 331.23 241.34 40.00 20.00 203.72 37.25 10,000.00 4,315.50 20,000.00 1,890.00 630.60 67.80 423.90 2,797.81 1,484.06 31.80 3,449.25 1,380.00 2,340.00 45.54 4,066.46 123.00 250.00 1,409.47 288,205.19 17.25 100.00 245.00 73.20 56.00 637.50 105.00 25.00 286.98 342.16 7,763.64 156.00 121.35 50.00 1,211.75 234.83 780.00 645,398.69 2,194,835.12 8 2/1/2005 MAA SEPTIC PUMPING B ANbs EXCAVATING CARSE CENTRAL SERVICES/EC LORADO ASPHALT PAVEMENT LORADO CONTRACTORS . 'SN COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COpy PLUS COUNTRY INN & SUITES CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE DEEP ROCK WATER co EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING ENVIROTECH FRONTIER PAVING INC GRAND JUNCTION HOtEL HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HILL BROTHERS CHEMICAL CO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC rNTERWEST SAFETY suppLY JPTRUCKING, INC. KINDER MORGAN INC M & M AUTO PARTS MOTOR POOL FUND MOuNTAIN MAINTENANCE pALIN-EQUIPMENT, - CORP. 1NDA PARKER AD AND BRIDGE FUND SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SUSPENSE FUND TIMBERLINE STEEL TOWN OF GypSuM VAIL ELECTRONICS VISA CARD SERVICES WARNING UTES & EQUiPMENT WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN PAGING WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC. WYLACOSUPPL Y COMPANY XEROX CORPORATiON PAYROLL FOR JANUARY SOCIAL SERVICES FUND ASPEN MOBILE HOME PARK CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, M.A. CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE CHP + MATERIAL ORDERS CHRIS MORTON ORADO WEST MENTAL HL TH PORA TE EXPRESS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEIV1ENT SERVICE SERVICE SE'RVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL 1 & 2 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 900.00 845.00 180.00 3.78 400.00 185.00 21.49 194.48 150.00 38.50 160.00 112,489.00 15.55 29.45 3,028.20 15,202.78 132.00 1,211.03 6,522.62 52.92 692.15 13,525.52 1,506.05 10.98 191,925.95 225.00 35.28 7.42 20.42 936.79 6,386.90 48.92 239.85 46.57 38.43 2,451.73 35.23 29,967.10 300.00 20,000.00 116.35 274.99 68,552.56 479,105.99 674.60 205.00 1,904.79 27.71 216.00 65.00 195.00 290.33 9 2/1/2005 CRICKEr PYLMAN CTSI VOLUNTEER JNSURANCE CUSTOM HOUSE CONSTRUCTION EAGLE CONVENIENCE StORE EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DIST EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE j EAGLE VALLEY pRINTING ELIzABETH MCGILLVRAY FAMILY LEARNING CENTER FAMILY SUPPORT REGiSTRY FOSTER CARE SUPPORT GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF HEALTH INSURANCE: FUND HEART OF THE WEST cOUNSEL HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS JEANNE MCQUEENEY JENNIE WAHRER JENNIFER WORCESTER JERRI ISRAEL JOHN GCOLLlNS PC JULIA KOZUSKO KAREN LAJOY SMitH MA LPG KATt> COUNSELING KIDS FIRST KRISTI GREMS LAURIE BECKEL LISA GRIGGS LITERACY PROJECT, THE LOAF N JUG LONG BEACH GENETICS INC MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MOTOR POOL FuND OLGA WILKINS ORKIN ExtERMINATING CO SERVICE MASTER CLEAN SHERI MINTZ STATE FORMS CENTER SUSPENSE FUND TINA FLEISHMAN VAIL HONEYWAGON LTD VAIL RECREATION DISTRICT VANASK WAREHOUSE COMPANY VERIZON WIRELESS, WELLS FARGO XEROX CORPORATION YOUR PERSONAL CHEF PAYROLL FOR JANUARY WRAP FUND YOUTH ZONE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMElURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL 1 & 2 SERVICE 107.59 11,362.00 5,378.85 21.79 195.71 7,240.50 62.50 1,000.00 3,846.15 340.00 250.00 1,028.00 213.64 134.00 15.72 1,510.05 845.06 651.55 318.42 1,229.10 100.00 69.00 128.69 309.12 1,368.98 325.00 195.00 1,500.00 729.32 326.32 266.25 6,386.20 22.50 150,00 22.50 1,198.37 1,006.61 55.00 392.00 242.19 642.00 6,388.55 260.00 57.00 8,500.00 710.84 529.09 17,989.39 623.42 435.50 38,214.71 128,472.61 835.00 10 2/1/2005 RETIREMENT FUND SUSPENSE FUND r:URANCERESERVE FUND UNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES OFFslTE ROAD IMpROVEMENTS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND AIV1ERICAN CIVIL CONSTRUCTR ARCHITERRA BAND B EXcAVATING BALGOMB AND GREEN BIG TOYS, INC. COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS MAIN STREET GALLERY' AND MIRACLE RECREATIONEQU/P NOMAD TECHNOLOGIES PAUSSAPHOTOGRAPHY PEAK LAND SURVEYING INC PEttY CAsH ACCOUNTING QWEST INTERPRISE NETWRKNG RESOURCE ENGINEERING SHEPHERD RESOURCES, INC. TCC CONTRACTORS TRI PHASE ELECTRIC TGHT WATER ENGINEERS SALES TAx E.V. tRANSP. A1 AUtOELECTRrC COMPANY AMASEPTIC PUMPING ALLYSON SCHWARTZ ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY AMERICAN SALES INCENTIVES AT & TWIRELESSSERVICES BIG STEVES TOWING BRODY CHEMICAL BUFFALO RIDGE AFFORDABLE CASTLE PEAK AUT0lV10TIVE CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING COLLETTS COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLUMBINE MARKET COMPLIANCE ALLIANCE INC CORPORATE EXPRESS COUNTRY INN CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DAVID B LOSH A RUE CASH SYSTEMS TORS ON CALL DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERViCE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERViCE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 835.00 70,727.42 70,727.42 86,291.71 86,291.71 54,515.86 54,515.86 141,465.52 3,223.70 8,410.45 1,764.50 103,175.00 46.90 748.16 7,061.12 60,000.00 2,440.00 4,417.50 17.12 1,320.00 2,610.50 77,085.07 9,500.00 12,875.00 529.70 436,690.24 547.00 450.00 80.04 25.88 3,080.00 270.45 700.00 174.56 5,516.00 100.00 66.23 642.35 526.07 46.61 62.19 584.00 396.28 89.98 124,437.00 316.36 74.95 346.00 105.00 8,168.72 11 2/1/2005 EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE VALLEY TEMPS FEDERAL EXPRESS G & K SERVICES GE CAPITAL GEORGE K BAUM & COMPANY GiLLIG CORPORATION GYPSUM VALLEY FEED HASLERINC HCA-HEAL THONE LLC HEALTH I NSLlRANCE FUND HICRAI'JESINC HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC JAY MAx SALES KINDER MORGAN INC KINETICO WATER PROS KIPL!NGERS PERSONAL KZYR.COOL RADIO LLC LAMINATION SERVICE INC LAWSON PRODUCTS LIGHTS ON BROADWAY M & MAUTO PARTS MICROwAVEMAINt FUND MOTOR POOL FUND PALIN EQUIPMENT, CORP. QUILL CORpORATION QWEST ROCKY MOUNTAIN FLEET RON EBECK SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERCK SERVICES INC SERVICE MASTER CLEAN STEWARt AND STEVENSON SUSPENSE FUND TlIV1 MINAROVICH TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF GYPSUM tOWN OF VAIL UNITED STATES WELDING VAIL CONOCO SERvICE VAIL ELECTRONICS VAIL NET VAIL RESORTS INC VERIZON WIRELESS, WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR JANUARY SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIIV1BURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL 1 & 2 29,853.33 262.64 171.00 133.80 547.80 269.16 1,500.00 4,698.07 314.00 187.00 540.16 2,285.28 295.00 261.74 49.39 5,273.83 70.00 10.00 333.00 7,961.36 1,142.19 255.00 32.63 12,300.00 6,305.29 123.54 218.62 157.32 235.00 1,800.00 46.08 1,498.95 3,280.40 177.25 10,981.35 41.49 1,204.00 55,819.67 839.93 200.00 27.54 66.00 163.06 11.95 150.00 105.91 123.39 61,240.57 274.83 511.49 110.67 140,721.15 501,987.50 12 2/112005 ALPINE ENGINEERING COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLUMBINE MARKET COpy PLUS TSI VOLUNTEER INSURANCE . EAL TH INSURANCE FUND KEMP AND COMPANY INC NOBLE WELDING SUSPENSE FUND WELLS FARGO WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SALES TAXR.F.V. TRAN5P. ROARING FORK SALES TAX R.F.V. TRAILS ROARING FORK AIRPORT FOND AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT AMERICAN LINEN ASMI AVIATiON PRODUCTS BALCOMB AND GREEN BRENT SERVICES BRIAN SCHOFIELD CENTRAL SERVICES/EC ... .NTURYEQUIPMENT COIV1PANY . NtURYfEL CHRIS ANDERSON CLS tRANSPORTATIoN-ASPEN co bEPT OF LABCR& EMPLMT COLLEtTS COLUMBINE MARKET COPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CROUSE HINDS AIRPORT CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANCE DEEP ROCK WATER GO DISH NETWORK DIVISION MINERALS GEOLOGY DIVISIONOFFIRE SAFETY DOCTORS ON CALL DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO ELIZABETH WILT FARIS MACHINERY CO FIREHOUSE FLORIDA MICRO GALLS INCORPORATED ATEKEEPER SYSTEMS _ENWOOD AUTO ELECTRIC GRAHAM,DIETZ & ASSOCIATES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD , SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 876.25 349.49 18.25 11.88 538.00 10.72 210.80 4,184.90 147.74 845.24 15.70 7,208.97 74,102.82 74,102.82 8,234.23 8,234.23 1,275.00 384.80 10,791.25 447.93 1,084.04 104.75 304.00 38.12 453.72 6,547.09 15.53 300.00 35.00 8,805.71 51.04 150.00 565.11 1,664.24 39,967.00 141.85 219.74 281.00 20.00 500.00 543.54 473.75 234,384.25 18.98 2,818.00 30.00 337.00 339.95 1,875.00 443.70 2,750.40 13 2/1/2005 GRAINGER INCORPORATED SERVICE 2,971.80 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SERVICE 316.00 GYPSUM TOWN OF SERVICE 431.05 EMPLOYEE HEALTH INSURANCE FUND BENEFIT 882.80 HIGH COUNTRY SHIRlWORKS SERVICE 20.00 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 6,751.76 JAY MAX SALES SERvICE 132.52 JOHN TUSCHMAN REIMBURSEMENT 130.00 JUDY CLOCK SERVICE 100.00 KATIE MELANEY SERVICE 100.00 KINDERMORGAN INC SERVICE 5,936.30 L.N. CURTIS & SONS SERVICE 6,911.64 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 179.52 M & M AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 160.67 MAIN AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 323.65 MCI WORLDCOM SERVICE 33.62 MIDWEST AIR. tRAFFIC SERVICE 32,758.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 1,103.76 NEXTEL SERVICE 615.96 OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION SERVICE 252.76 PAT MONAHAN SERVICE 100.00 RoAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICE 36,049.86 RON BATES SERVICE 100.00 SERVICEMASTERCLEAN SERVICE 2;348.00 SIGNATURE SIGNS SERVICE 471.50 SUSPENSE F'UN-D SERVICE 3,053.49 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE SERVICE 10.00 US CUSTOMS SERVICE SERVICE 40,281.57 VAIL DAILY THE SERVICE 581.58 VAIL ELECTRONICS SERVICE 204.40 VISACARD SERVICES SERVICE 1 ,422.39 WAGNER EQUiPMENT COMPANY SERVICE 284.94 WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 903.39 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 22,944.85 WESTERN IMPLEMENTS SERVICE 90.80 WILLIAM E PAYNE & ASSOC SERVICE 2,755.00 WORKRITE SERVICE 87.59 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 67.28 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 87.55 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 231.50 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY SUPPLIES 568.15 PAYROLL FOR JANUARY PAYROLL 1 & 2 54,466.16 545,383.30 MICROWAVE MAINTENANCE FUND CENTURYTEL SERVICE 113.25 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 2,334.59 QWEST SERVICE 948.64 3,396.48 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND QWEST INTERPRISE NETWRKNG SERVICE 2,644.69 2,644.69 HOUSING FUND GARFIELD COUNTY HOUSING SERVICE 1,953:60 . MOUNTAIN REGIONAL SERVICE 5,000.00 14 2/1/2005 HAZARDOOS MATERIAL FUND COLE-PARMER COLORADO STATE FOREST ONT RANGE FIRE FF BOOCK JOSH NAGLE MICROWAVE MAl NT FUND NASCO LLC PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING RAE SYSTEMS INC VISA CARD SERVICES LANDFILL FUND ALAMOSACOUNTY CAROLINA SOFTWARE CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CbRPbRATEEXPRESS CTSIVOLUNTEERINSURANcE DEEP ROCK WATER CO DOWN VALLEY SEPTIC EAGLECbUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE VALLEY ALLIANCE -HEALTH INSURANcEFUND JJP COMPANIES KRW CONSULTING INC AINAUTO PARTS JTOR pOOL FuND . .OADAND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SER.VICEiV1ASTER CLEAN SUSPENSE FUND SWANA VAIL DAILY THE VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WASTE NEWS WELLS FARGO WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX OMNIFAx PAYROLL FOR JANUARy MOTOR pQOLFUND ALLDA T A LLC ASSOCIATION OF EQUIPMENT CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING' CO DEPT OF LABOR & EMPLMT CO DEPT PUBLIC HL TH/ENVIR COLLETTS COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COpy PLUS .TSI VOLUNTEER INSURANCE &M WIRE ROPE INC DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL 1 & 2 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 6,953.60 3,593.94 9.58 6.42 200.00 200.00 600.00 513.25 371.64 2,746.00 140.82 8,381.65 7,500.00 796.31 163.23 15,445.09 78.04 28,030.00 89.40 375.00 63.36 20,000.00 611.43 112.49 1,753.66 19.08 99,625.23 49,160.63 1,987.17 1,902.04 141.00 424.76 648.78 136.90 99.00 6,338.27 12.78 180.00 14,360.86 250,054.51 1,500.00 1,010.00 15.32 210.00 20.00 44,975.66 1,162.31 25.47 22,047.00 1,178.27 717.06 15 2/1/2005 EATON SALES & SERVICE FORCE AMERICA G 8. K SERVICES GLENWOOD RADIATOR REPAIR GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE HANSON EQUIPMENT HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HENSLEY BATTERY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HONNEN EQUIPMENT JEANETTE HURSEY JIM PARIS TIRE COMPANY KEMP AND COMPANY INC KINDER MORGAN INC LAURA FAWCETT LAUREL POTTS LAWSON PRODUCTS M & M AUTO PARTS MAIN AUTO PARTS MOTOR POOL FUND NAPA AUTO PARTS.CARBONDLE NOVUS AUTOGLASS PALIN EQUIPIV1ENT, CORP. PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING REY MOTORS INCORPORATED RHONDAPARKER ROAD AND BRIDGE FuND ROCKY MOuNTAIN FLEET SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SILVERTHOR.NE MOTORS SUSPENSE FUND TIMBERLINE STEEL TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS TOWN OF GYPSUM UNiTED STATES WELDING VAIL ELECtRONICS VEEDER-ROOT COMPANY WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY X.ERGON PAYROLL FOR JANUARY HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY JEFFERSON PILOT FINANCIAL MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. UNITED STATES LIFE INS ENHANCED E911 FUND CENTURYTEL SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERViCE REIIV1BURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPO SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL 1 & 2 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE 6,595.25 294.79 621.12 491.04 6,558.26 1,724.07 476.12 492.40 136.84 80.21 17.27 208.22 21.70 3,893.74 6.00 37.06 1,200.19 358.71 59.98 11,876.56 87.90 553.00 91.18 34.69 1,503.64 14.84 48.06 200.00 46.08 2,421.96 50,497.00 1,912.01 101.57 1,416.20 620.13 494.81 120.37 198.00 595.49 91.10 9,241.76 473.84 322.47 24,431.92 203,528.64 1,984.95 3,653.31 9,832.43 1,041.70 16,512.39 183.86 16 2/1/2005 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES QWEST SERVICE SERVICE 25.05 17,177.10 17,386.01 5,097,248.74 ecutive Session Commissioner Stone moved that the Board go into Executive Session for the purpose of receiving legal advice 011 pending litigation and a requ.est to join an amicus briefin an Eagle Park Reservoir Company Water case, for the purpose of receiving legal adVice concerning Bolt's Lake, for the purpose of receiVing legal adVice on a request from Balcomb & Green to represent a developer, and to receive legal advice on a personnel matter concerning the long range planning positioll, all of which are appropriate topics for discussion pursuant to CRS 24-6-402(4)(b). Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion Which passed unanimously. At the close of the discussion, Commissioner Stone moved to adjourIl from Executive Session. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Runyon and passed unanimously. Atthe close of the morning session, CoIhmissioner Stone moved that the Board go into Executive Session for the purpose of discussing a personnel matter pursuant to CRS 24..6-402(4)( f), concerning a long range planning position. The motion was seconded by Co1hIl1issi6nerRunyonand passed unanimously. At the close of the discussion, Commissioner Stone moved to adjollth from Executive Session. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion and it passed Ullanimol.lsly. CofiseI1tAgenda Chaitman Menconi stated the first item before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of Bill Pa.ying for the Week of January 31, 2005 (Subject to review by the County Administrator) Mike Roeper, Finance Department ri Approval ofthe payroll for February 3,2005 (Subject to Review bY,the County Administrator) Mike Roeper, Finance Department C. Approval ofthe Minutes of the Eagle Board of County Commissioners Meetings for January 11 and January 14, 2005 Teak Simonton, County Clerk and Recorder D. First Amendment to the Agreement between County of Eagle, State of Colorado and Alternative Recycle, LLC Ron Rasnic, Landfill K Agreement Between the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, and Snowy River Enterprises for Scrap Tire Shreds at Eagle COllnty Landfill Ron Rasnic,. Landfill F. Agreement hetweenEagle County and Samaritan Center of the Rockies for Family and Child Services Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services G. Agreement between Eagle County and Michael Claussner for Family and Child Services Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services ' H. Agreementbetween Eagle County and Karen LaJoy Smith for Family and Child Services Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services 1. Agreement between Eagle County and Joel Karr for Family and Child Services Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services Application for CSBG Funds for Early Childhood Services Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services 17 2/1/2005 K. Agreement between Eagle County and Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment fOf Children with Special Needs Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services L. Resolution 2005-009 First Supplemental and Restated Annual Appointments Resolution County Attorney's Office Representative M. Resolution 2005-010 Concerning Appointments to the Juvenile Service Planning Committee County Attorney's Office Representative N. Emergency Fund Contract Agreement for Forest and Watershed Fire Control: Amendment II Emergency Management/Sheriff s Department O. Intergovernmental Agreement between Eagle County and Pitkin County for the 2005-2007 Season of Snow Removal in the Frying Pan Valley Brad Higgins, Road & Bridge P. llesollltion 2005-0i 1 Concerning Designation of Official Eagle County NeWspaper Deborah Churchill, Administration ChaitrhanMenconi asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Diane Mauriello, County Attorney stated there were no changes. CommissionerSt<me moved to approve the Consent Agenda for February 1,2005, consisting ofItems A-P. Cotnmissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PlannilJ.gand Land Use Resolution Consent Agenda Cliff Simonton, Cotnmunity Development There were nO reSOlutions for the Board's consideration this week Minor Subdivision Plat Signing Cliff Simonton, Community Development / There were no minor subdivision plats for the Board's consideration this week Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as the Eagle County Service and Support Corporation Board of Directors. Cotnmissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Eagle County Service & Support Corporation Board of Directors Meeting CouhtyAttorney's Office Representative Debbie Faber of the Attorney's Office handled these proceedings and gave a background of the corporation. She stated thatthis meeting's purpose is to approve the minutes of the annual meeting and elect officers. Chairman Menconi asked if Commissioner Runyon could approve the minutes without first being made an officer. Ms. Faber stated that Commissioner Runyon should first be added as an officer, but that he did not have to be formally appointed. Chairman Menconi recognized that Commissioner Runyon was replacing Commissioner Gallagher on Eagle County Service and Support Corporation Board. Chairman Menconi and Cotnmissioner Stone agreed that Cotnmissioner Runyon should be the President, and the other positions should be left as they were. I 1. Approval of Minutes 18 2/1/2005 Vice President Menconi moved to approve the minutes of the previous Board meeting. Secretary Stone seconded the motion. The vote Was declared unanimous. Election of' Officers Secretary Stone moved to approve Commissioner Runyon as President, Am Menconi as Vice President, andTom Stone as Secretary/Treasl.lrer. Mr. Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 3. New Business There was no new business to discuss. 4. Adjourn Vice President Menconi moved to adjourn as the Eagle County Service and Support Corporation and reconvene as the BoatdofCounty Commissioners. Secretary Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner R1.Inyon moved to adjourn as the Board of County Cormnissioners and reconvene as the Eagle County Air Terminal Corporation. Corhmissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. EagleCofinty Air TerminalCorporation Meeting County Aftofney'sOffice Representative 1. Approval of minutes of November 9,2004 meeting Mike Roeper moved to approve the minutes of the November 9, 2004 meeting. Secretary Stone seconded, The vote was declared unanimous. 2. Election of Officers Ms. Mauriello went over the clirtent officers. They were: President: Am Menconi; Vice-President: Jack IIlgstad; Secretary: Tom Stone; and TreasUrer: Mike Roeper. COmIllissioner Gallagher served ex officio a.s a director, so COrhmissioner Runyon would automatically take his position. Mr. Runyon moved to reta.inthe officers as they were for the previous year. Secretary Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 3. Ratification of signagea:t the airport; Chris Anderson Chris Anderson of the Eagle County Airport stated that the signage is currently different from the signage given in the Cormnissioners' packets. He submitted the new signage and detailed the change that was made. President Menconi asked what the siZe and make up of the signs were. Mr. Anderson gave the dimensions of 2' x 8' and stated they were made of aluminum. Secretary Stone moved to approve the signage as presented to the Board. Mr. Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 4. Considera.tion and approval of 2005 Supplemental Budget in the amount of $35,000 for the Information Center a.t the Airport; Michael Roeper Mr. Roeper gave the details of this proposal and stated that it came about from the budget discussions in .:ember. He gave a rough breakdown as to how the $35,000 would be spent. 19 2/1/2005 PresidenfMenconi asked if the funds could be released as needed and not in one lump sum. He wanted to see if the County was getting a return on its investment before releasing all the funds. Tim Cochrane of the Eagle Valley Chamber of Commerce was present and spoke to the Board. He handed out copies of a report to the Board and gave a background of the Information Center. He stated that they have moved the Inforniation Center to a more centralized, visible location with new signage. As a result, business has picked up dramatically. The center is staffed 7 days a week, they are hooked into the terminal internet, and new Uhiforins are due. this Week. He asked that the international "I" for information sign be put up to help draw in more people to the center. fIe Would like to add a 30-inch monitor so customers could view flight infOrination, weather information, or any other inforination. He believes that this is an apportioned budget and didn't expect the full $35,000 right aWay. Mr. Stone asked that the center continue to keep the log sheet that it had started and transmit the inforination monthly to the Commissioners so they could see what is occurring at the center. Mr, Cochrane stated that he would pass that information along to Mr. Anderson and Mr. Ingstad so they could forward it to the Cominissioners. He stated that cases of magazines and pamphlets were being taken from the center,a:nd that was very encouraging. President Menconi asked if people were asking for any hotel information at all, such as where to stay and What the rates were. Mr. Cochrane stated that neatly 100% of the customers already have their lodging needs met when they arrive. Most questions about lodging usually involve directions and transportation to the hotels and if the customer had made a good choice. The only time people ask about specific lodging is when the airport closes and emergency accommodations are needed. Mr. Anderson stated that the Customer Service Program enhances the guest experiences inside of the terminal, and doesn't really ovetlap with the Information Center. President Menconi asked if there is a distinction between the Eagle County Ambassador and the Information Ceriter,and wondered whether the Ambassador should be an extension oftbat booth and work out of it. Mr. Anderson stated that they had discussed that possibility, but the ambassador is constantly on the go throughout the airport terminal tending to various other tasks, such as wheelchair assistance, terminal clean-up arid administering the Lost and Found. It would be impossible to keep the Ambassador in anyone place for longer than 15 minutes. Mr. Cochrane stated that the Ambassador's job is to "put out the fires"that exist at the airport, such as retrievin baggage locked in a room. He Views the Infonilation Center as evolving into a concierge-type service for people to l.lSe. He is hopeful to be able to add services such as dinner reservation booking, in the near future. Secretary Stone stated that he would like to see the center evolve in a manner similarto President .Menconi's vision, but he knows it will take time. Mr. Cochrane said that he is in discussions with Mr. Anderson about having the same uniform for all employees at the.. airport. Secretary Stone moved to approve the 2005 Supplemental Budget in the amount of $35,000 for the Information Center at the Airport. Mr. Roeper seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 5. ConsideratiOn of Agreement between Eagle County Air Terminal Corporation and Eagle Valley Chamber of Commerce for Operation of Visitor Information Desk Mr. Roeper moved to approve the Agreement between Eagle County Air Terininal Corporation and Eagle Valley Chamber of Commerce for Operation of Visitor Information Desk. Mr. Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 6. Consideration of Amendment to the Concessions International Storage Room Lease; Chris Anderson Mr. Anderson gave a background behind this amendment. He stated that the airport originally charged Concessions International Storage the rate of $4 per square foot per month. After doing a survey, they decided to up it to $14 per square foot per year to be more in line with other airports. Mr. Roeper asked ifthe total dollar amount collected would be $4,200. Mr. Anderson confirmed this. Mr. Roeper moved to approve the Amendment to the Concessions International Storage Room Lease. Vice President Ingstad seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 20 2/1/2005 7. Consideration of Agreement of Sublease between American Airlines, Inc. and US Airways, Ine; Chris Anderson Ms. Mauriello explained the agreement to the Board. She stated that U.S. Airways is utilizing part of American lines space while they operate a flight out of the airport. Vice President Ingstad asked iftJS Airways had discussed getting their own counter space. Ms. Mallriellostated that she had not heard it. Secretary Stone moved to approve the Agreement of Sublease between American Airlines, Inc. and US Airways, Inc. Mr. Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 8. Discussion of baggage handling Ovid Siefers discussed this matter with the Board. He stated that this is a problem at airports throughout the nation, and itbecomes a problem when several flights arrive within minutes of each other. Each baggage carousel can only handle one flight at a time, Which can lead to long waits. There is a problem with the anlountof space that exists at the baggage carousels, Which limits the speed at which baggage can be unloaded. He stated that United Express has received several complaints about slow service. The average wait for the industry is 22 minutes. Ranges for Eagle County go from 6-8 minutes up to 31 minutes. United Express contributes to the problem by not unloading the bags right away from the trains until they first UPload the aircraft, so it can take off on time. He felt United Express could shave time ifthey reversed this policy. President Menconi asked if this was a general report of baggage, or was this leading to a request for changes. Mr. Siefers stated that easier accessibility to the baggage claim are would allow for the baggage trains to get in and out easier and quicker. He also stated that United Express could add an additional person to help speed their process up. When the new IIS system gets installed, that should help alleviate the problem, as well. Vice President lrigstad stated that this matter was brought to the Board's attention because ofthenumberof complaints and they would be willing to take direction for any possible solutions. Secretary Stone stated that it sounds like they ate doing everything they can at the airport, and that the problems 1 from the fact that it is not a long walk from the plane to the baggage carousel, unlike other airports. He believes the major problem is just a matter of the customers' perspective. _ Mr. Runycm stated that they would need to look to the future, when more flights would be added. This problem will continue, and they may need to look at expansion of the baggage carousel area in the future. . President Menconi commended Mr. Siefers and his staff for the outstanding job they did, especially over the holiday season. Vice President Ingstad stated that he had done a couple of spot visits and came away very impressed, especially with the cleanliness of the facility. Mr. Runyon asked if Mr. Siefers plan to discuss the Gypsum Plant "fog" issue with the plant's manager. Mr. Siefers stated that was his intention, as it does have.an adverse affect on flights and would continue to impact flights after the ILS was installed. - Mr. Runyon Wondered if condensers could be installed on the stacks to mitigate this problem. Secretary Stone stated there were already condensers installed and suggested that a tour of the plant should be taken by the Commissioners. He stated that this is a weather-related matter, and there may not be much that could be done to solve it. Mr. Runyon asked if there could be a cost-benefit analysis to see if it would be cost effective for the County to fuhd an extra condenser for the plant. Mr. Siefers stated that a condenser might prove to be very expensive and not worth the expense. President Menconi asked that Mr. Siefers give the Board an update of this matter at the next meeting. 9. New Business Mr. Roeper moved to add the Board of Commissioners as eligible check signers for the corporation in the case of emergency and either of the two authorized signers was not available. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 21 2/1/2005 10. Adjourn Mr. Roeper moved to adjoUTIl as the Eagle County Air Terminal Corporation and reconvene as the Eagle County Board of County Commissioners. Mr. Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Mi. Sopris Tree Farm Site Visit Present for this visit were: Chairman Menconi, Commissioner Ruhyon, Commissioner Stone, Ms. Mauriello, Mr. Ingstad, Peter Sulmeisters of Eagle County Engineering, and Walter Mathews, Eagle County Deputy Attorney. They were shown around the property by Mark Fuller of the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District and his aSsociates. Mr. Fuller pointed out where the various items listed on the map were physically located. He also showed a building and explained a proposal they had for rehabbing it, assuming it could be made part of a proposed lease expansion with the CoUnty. Commissioner Runyon asked about ownership ofthe river corridor. Mr. Fuller stated that it was owned by the Forest Service. Commissioner Runyon asked if the ponds shown on the map currently existed. Mr. Fuller said they did not, but would be added in the future. Commissioner Runyon asked if the high density of trees shown on the map Was intended to be a type of forest. Mi". Fuller stated that the map was deceiving and that area is intended to be used for overflow parking. The trees would provide an overhead canopy for the vehicles. He then showed the Board where the new roundabout would be located and where the temporary access points would be located during its construction. 'launing Files PDA-00055;... Mt. Sopris Tree Farm PUD Amendment Crown Mountain Park Joseph Forinash, C01nmunity Development NOTE: ACTION: LOCATION: This file was tabled from January 4, 2005 To amend PUD Preliminary Plan to revise site plan for recreation improvements EI Jebel, south of Valley Road and west of Sopris Village Subdivision, generally southwest of the intersection ofEI lebelRoad and U.S. Highway 82 Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions Approval with conditions (5-1) PLANNINGCOMMISSIONDELIB:ERATION: . Roundabout . Size, adequacy and landscape treatment and drop-off location. . Discqutage use of irrigation boom - visibility and native plants and flowers more appropriate. . Should be genetOl.lS with space provided for drop-offs near roundabout. . Pond . Whether it will be full year-round. . Whether it will be fenced for safety in the winter. . Certainty that the pond will be lined. . Whether water flow is sufficient for the proposed ponds. . Lots of negatives associated with pond. . Location and intent of wading area. . Lined pond with a wading area could be very slippery and dangerous. . Important to keep dogs out of the pond. . Sports fields . Intention regarding spectator areas, including seats and scoreboards. 22 2/1/2005 . AnticiPated level of use for competitive sports. . Outfield fencing of ball fields. . Anticipated completion date for Phase I and for all improvements. . Source of additional funding for improvements beyond what initial bond issue will cover. Location of secondary access for emergency vehicles. Internal- circulation . Which pedestrian trails are induded in Phase I? Can more be incorporated, especially south of the ball fields? . Nature oflooped paths north of internal road may be more formal than necessary. . Location and surface of internal access routes for emergency vehicles. . Consider pedestrian safety measures, including textured walkways an traffic calming measures. . Landscaping . Reconciliation of size of evergreens (4 feet) with cost ($800). . Austrian pine and Scotch pine may be subject to extensive loss to deer. . Greater use of native trees, such as pinion pine, may be more appropriate. . Plant choice may Warrant additional consideration. . What height ranges of trees will be. . Clarification of landscaping in the vicinity of the ditch. . Whether park will be separated by fence Or landscaping from pocket park in Sopris Village to the east. . Pedestri~n access from the Willits area to the east. . How has use of fruit trees and the related potential problems been resolved? . Which playgrounds to be included in Phase I? . Skateboard park . Reasons for relocation. . Sculpture of skateboard park, e.g.,abovelbelow ground. . Tress should be used to buffer from adjacent uses. . Good to have skateboard parkcloser to the building - greater visibility. Proposed park furnishings ~ appearance, materials, amphitheater seating. Pedestrian crossings need to be safe fot park users. Lighting · Lighting shOuld be cast doWnward and not go overboard. · Whether motion detector street lighting is available. . Rules for park shOuld include a dog park.. . Water · Situation needs to be cleared up and reconciled. · Intention for Water in 30 years if purchased water from Mid Valley Metro is not renewed. · Uncertainty is not a good situation. . Parking · Overflow parking should not be heavily planted, especially with trees being used as parking delineators. Trees on the perimeter are OK. . Park meets the needs ofthe Valley. . Trail connections are great; more trails are better. . Faster the park is completed the better. · Pedestrian safety is important. . Overall wonderful job. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY: A PUD amendment that would amend the Mt. Sopris Tree Farm Pun Preliminary Plan to revise the location and design of the recreation and park features and amenities from those approved ill the site plan as part of the PUD Preliminary Plan. In addition to the features and amenities shown on the currently approved site plan, the revised design also includes a larger surface-level water feature (series of connected ponds), use of an existing storage building ~rown Mountain Park and Recreation District equipment and materials, and three horseshoe pits. 23 2/1/2005 It should be noted that the proposed improvements extend beyond the area currently leased by the Park and Recreation District. The Applicant acknowledges that an expansion of the lease area is necessary to implement the proposed site plan, and that a formal request for an expansion ofthe lease area will be submitted separately by the District. CHRONOLOGY: 1998 - The Mt. Sopris Tree Farm Community Park Master Plan was prepared by the Town of Basalt providing a Community Plan representing a vision for the use of the site. 2()OO ~ Mt. Sopris Tree Farm pun Sketch Plan for the proposed development was approved. 2001 - Mt. Sopris Tree Farm PUD Preliminary Plan and zone change approved. 200t ~ Final plat for the Mt. Sopris Tree Farm PUD approved. SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning: East: Residential; Commercial / RSM; Resource; Town of Basalt West: Rural; USFS Employee Housing / Resource North: Residential; Commercial / RSM; CG South: Residential; RoariIlgFork River / RR; Resource Existing Zoning: Resource Proposed No. of Dwelling Units: Total Area: Water: Sewer: Access: None 124.31 acres Mid Valley Metropolitan District Mid Valley Metropolitan District Valley Road STAFF REPORT REF:FjRRAL RESPONSES: Eagle County Engineer [Memo dated 18 November 2004] . Vatioustechnical comments. [See attached memo dated 18 November 2004.] [Memo dateq 21 January 2005] . The plans appear to be satisfactory for this level ofdetail. . Final construction level of detail will be required prior to approval of the final plat. Eagle County EnVironmental Health [Verbal comme1'ltsfrom Ray Merry on 1 November 2004] . Environmental Health requests that it be advised prior to chemical applications on the site, e.g., fertilizer, pesticides. Eagle County Wildfire Mitigation Specialist . Due to the nature of the project, well maintained irrigated areas will cover a majority of the site, and produce an urban-like environment. . Though the hazard ratings appear to be very low, it is suggested that various Firewise plants and landscaping techniques be used to provide a showcase of a "fire-resistant" area. Eagle County Weed & Pest . Crown Mountain park & Recreation District agrees to meet the maintenance requirements for the leased property including: . Noxious weed mitigation measures consistent with the Colorado Noxious Weed Act and the Eagle County Weed Management Plan. . An Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program(s) for any pest species determined to adversely affect or potentially affect human health and safety or detrimental to the site use objectives (e.g., Wyoming grOt squirrels, mosquitoes). 24 2/1/2005 . It is requested that the seed mix, by species, for the proposed "native grass" areas be included as described in the landscape plan. . All the plant species listed in Appendix 11 are in compliance with the Colorado Nursery Act and include no listed nox.ious weed species. ;le County Sheriff's Office [Memo dated 12 November 2004 from Dave Lawson to Ken Wilson, UndersherifJ] . The site hast() haVe additional lights. . A concern is whether the bike paths are wide enough to acconnhodate emergency vehicles, such as an ambulance. If an injury occurs in the proposed open space, would an ambulance be able to travel to the site of the injury? A wider bike path would also benefit the Sheriffs Office for night patrols. . Art additional concern is the locked gates: Will they restrict only cars? Are the gates going to be electrically operated, which would help in night patrol, or will they be padlocked on a chain? Who will be responsible for locking and unlocking the gates at morning and night? . What codes will be enforced in regards to park rules? There are no County otdinancescovering hours, glass bOttles, loud music or signage describing these items. [Letter dated 12 November 2004 from Ken Wilson, UndersherifJ] . The Sheriff's Office has cOncerns about the lack ofIighting around the proposed project. This is a large project to have only three lights. . It is understood that the road will be gated and locked at night except for special events. However, this will not control foot and bike traffic through the area. Even the neighbors have objected to lighted sports fields, low level lighting for security must be considered. [E~mail dated 28 December 2004 from Deputy Dave Lawson to Ken Wilson, UndersherifJ] . Deputy Lawson met with Ross Stepp, Director of Crown Mountain Park, to go over concerns regarding the lightirig at the park. . The issue of lighting has been addressed. It has been agreed as folloWS: . Limit lighting to address neighbor's concerns while illuminating key areas in parking lots and on the pedestrian/bike path near Valley Road. . The light in one of the parking areas will also assist with illumination near the dog park. . Lighting is not necessary in the main playing area of the park as it would "invite" the use of that area. . A gate to close the park and limit access to the park is not planned. Signage will be provided which indicates rules and hours of operation. . All paths in the park will be accessible to emergency vehicles and iri some cases are also emergency evacuation paths. . ECSO and the Park District have agreed to continue meeting through the process to address any other concerns or ideas that may arise. The parties have started discussions regarding what can be enforced by LaW Enforcement and what needs to be done to get enforcement powers started in other aspects of park rules and regulations. . The Distric:thas addressed ECSO"concerns and has shown an eagerness to work together in the future. Town of Basalt Planning and ZoningCoIllmission . The Basalt Recreation made the following observations: . Fruit trees attract bears. Perhaps another type of tree" for this area should be considered. . The Park District may wantto rethink the exclusion oflive music or stereos at the Skateboard Park. Competition events for younger skateboarders provide a natural venue for boom box music or for local musicians to play. The Town has found that music adds to the festive atmosphere at its local bi-annual events for young skateboarders. . There are no further comments from the Planning or Public Works Departments. . The Planning and Zoning Commission concurs with the comments of the Basalt Recreation Coordinator. . The Town and the community would like to see the Crown Mountain Park construction begin as soon as possible. The Town supports this PUD Amendment. 25 2/1/2005 Basalt.& Rural Fire Protection District . The road access and emergency path comply with the appropriate section of the 2003 International Fire Code. . The fire hydrants are placed as needed to cover the concessions and storage buildings and meet the appropriate section of the 2003 International Fire Code. . This park will be a nice amenity for this side of Eagle County. Mid Valley Metropolitan District [Letter dated 19 November 2004 from Leavenworth &Karp, P. c., attorneys representing the District] . The District has the capacity in its water and sewer treatment plant and can and will serve the new facilities under the proposed PUD Amendment with water and sewer services, subject to a number of conditions, including the following: . The Applicant shall pay all applicable Water and sewer tap fees to the District prior to receiving a building pertrrit frorn Eagle County and prior to physical cOhhection to the District's lines. . The Applicant shall dedicate water rights to the District or shall pay the District's fees in lieu of water rights dedication. . The Applicant shall enter into a Line Extension Agreement or a Line Connection Agreemertt with the District, as applicable, regarding the requirements for extending and/or expanding Districtwatet and seWer services to the property. . Eagle County, as pr<>petty owner, a.hd the Applicant, as lessee, shall dedicate to the Districfarty and all easements necessary for the provision of District services to the development, which easements shall be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. . The Applicant shall prepare and submit engineering designs for the construction and installation of :District water artd sewer serVices to thedeveloprnent subject to review and approval ofthe District's engineer. . According to the Application, the Applicant has or leases raw water sufficient in quantity to supply irrigation water to the project. Except as authorized by the District Board of Directors, when a raw water irrigation systern exists, no outside irrigation shall occur on the property using water fromthe District's potable water system. . In accordance with the District's Rules and Regulations, the Applicant shall install signs notifying the public that non-potable water is being used for irrigation and is not safe for human consumption. . Pursuant to the District's Rules and Regulations, the Applicant shall reimburse the Districtfot all costs incurred by the District regarding this project, including, but not limited to legal and engineering review. . These cortnnehtsare intended to supplement the District's letter dated AugUst 31, 2004, regarding the provision of District serVices to the property, which letter is attached as Appendix 8 to the Application. Northwest Colorado Council of Governments . The Applicant recognizes the need to get a CDPES discharge permit for stormwater control on the construction site. The CDPES permit application requires a Stormwater Management Plan be developed and maintained on site. Eagle County may want to review a copy of the Storrnwater Plan since this application indicates that rneasures to minimize erosion and sedimentation will be outlined therein. . The application discusses a shallow pond system for the development. Depending on flow and aeration in the pond system it is very possible that significant algae could form, making for a visual eyesore. Eagle County may want to discuss a management plan with the Applicant in case this occUrs. . The drainage plan contemplates the use of drywells. The Town of BasaIt has notified NWCCOG that they are having problems with maintenance of drywells because they fill with sediment and muck and do not drain effectively. This might be a bigger problem in this location if they are installed before the soil is stabilized. At a minimum, the drop inlets should be protected from sediment until the surrounding area is stabilized. . It appears that the plan calls for surrounding the site with silt fence, which would make access impossible. Vehicle mud tracking control practices should be required at the construction entrance. Colorado Department of Transportation [Referral form returned with notes added.] . The development may require a State Highway Access Permit. . A traffic study is necessary to make a detertrrination. 26 2/1/2005 [E-mailfrom Daniel Roussin dated 6 December 2004.] . CDOT has reviewed its files and determIned that an access permit has been approved and all issues are covered by the permit. . If the Crown Mountain Park development does not exceed the permitted volumes, then no additional permit is required. Colorado State Forest Servite [Letter dated 9 January 2000 in respOnse to initial PUD Preliminary Plan TJroTJosall . The Mt. Sopris Tree Farm PUD has a low wildfire rating. The only concern regarding wildfire hazard is adequate emergency vehicle turn-around areas. . Cul-'de-sac roads and driveways should be a maximum of750 feet. Any cul-de-sac road or driveway exceeding 750 feet should have vehicular turnarounds every 750 feet. All cul-de-sac turnaround pads should have a minimum right-of-way of a 45 foot radius. Dead-end streets should not be permitted. . From a tree health point of view, it is recommended to plant evergreens 20 feet from the building, as they will eventually grow within the recOnttnended 10 foot distance. Deciduous trees, such as aspen, may be planted at the 10 foot distance. Colorado Geological Survey [Letter dated 17 January 2001 in response to initial PUD Preliminary Plan lJrolJOsa{J . Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a geologic site assessment in 2000. CGS concurs with their assessment of the geological hazards present at this property. . Deformation due to solution-induced subsidence in the underlying Eagle Valley Evaporite is a concern in the area of existing ground depressions, but the depressions are located in proposed open-space areas on the preliminary plans. H-P Gedtech notes that "The risk of ground deformations in areas away from the existing depressions is considered to be low and not greater than that present in other parts of northwestern Colorado where the evaporate is near the surface;'. . cas obserVed no damage (cracks, other evidence of subsidence) in the existing concrete block st:rUctllres at the northeast corner ofthe property. Nonetheless, CGS reconunends a site-specific geotechnical investigation, with subsurface explorations, at the location of the proposed government office building, and at any other planned structures (other than picnic shelters and restrooms). . H-P Geotech's report adequately addresses the hazard of sinkholes, and measures that maybe taken to mitigate the hazard. Again, careful subsurface investigations will provide useful information on alluvium thickness and the extent of solution cavities in the area. Other:R.eferrals have been made to Eagle County Animal Control, Eagle COuhty Assessor, Eagle County Attorney, Eagle County Road & Bridge, KN Energy, Mid Valley Trails Committee, Roaring Fork Transportation Authority, Sopris Village HOA, Sunttnit Vista HOA, River Run HOA, Glassier Acres BOA, Blue Lake HOA. FINDINGS: Pursuant to Eagle County Ltmd Use Regulations Section 5-240.F.3.e Standards for the review of a PUD Preliminary Plan: STANDARD: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] - The title to all land that is part of a PUD shall be owned or controlled by one (1) person. A person shall be considered to control all lands in the PUD either through ownership or by written consent of all owners of the land that they will be subject to the conditions and standards of the PUD. The Applicant has demonstrated that Eagle County is the sole owner of the site of the Mt. Sopris Tree Farm PUD. A letter authorizing the Crown Mountain Park & Recreation District to submit this PUD Amendment a lication is on file. [+] FINDING: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] The title to all land that is part of this PUD IS owned or controlled by one (1) person. 27 2/1/2005 STANDARD: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] - The uses that may be developed in the PUD shall be those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule", or Table 3-320, "Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule"Jor the zone district designation in efJect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these use designations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3f, Variations Authorized. It has previously been demonstrated when the PUD Preliminary Plan was approved, all approved uses were allowed uses. The additional uses include a surface-level water feature, a storage building for Park District equipment and materials, and three horseshoe pits. These uses are all allowed in the zone district in effect for the property at the time the PUD prelirrtinary Plan was initially approved, although the latter two are covered under a use listed as "all other recreation and govethmentuses deemed consistent with the Preliminary Plan and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. No variances are necessary. [+] FINDING: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] All of the proposed additional uses that may be developed in the PUD ARE uses that ate designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in the planned Unit Development Guide in effect for the property at the time of the application for the PUD Amendment. STANDARI>: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] - The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD shall be those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for the zone district designation in efJectfor the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these dimensional limitations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3f, Variations Authorized, provided variations shall leave adequate distance between buildings for necessary access and fire protection, and ensure proper ventilation, light, air and snowmelt between buildings. No changes in dimensional limitations are ro osed as part of this PUD Amendment. [+] FINDING: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] The ditnensionallimitations that shall apply to the Pun ARE those specified in the Planned Unit Development Guide in effect for the property at the time of the application for the PUD Amendment. STANDARD: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] -. Off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. A reduction in these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that: (a) Shared Parking. Because of shared parking arrangements among uses within the PUD that do not require peak parkingfor those uses to occur at the same time, the parking needs of residents, guests and employees of the project will be met; or (Ii) Actual Needs. The actual needs of the project's residents, guests and employees will be less than those set by Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. The applicant may commit to provide specialized transportation services for these persons (such as vans, subsidized bus passes, or similar services) as a means of complying with this standard. At the time the pun Preliminary Plan was approved, it was determined that, based on the information provided, 363 parkif.lg spaces was a reasonable minimum number. The number provided was 412, all in paved parking areas. Of these, 60 spaces were allocated to the Community Center building. The total number of proposed spaces available in this revised site plan for recreation patrons includes 46 in the existing paved parking area near the Community Center, 187 in new paved lots, 44 in a new gravel lot, 44 in a future gravel lot, and 285 in grass "overflow parking areas". Parking spaces immediately available in either paved or gravel areas would total 277, with another 285 in overflow parking areas for special events estimated to occur 1-2 times per year. The location of the parking areas are proposed to differ from that initially approved. The current site plan provides for "double-loaded" parking areas to the south of much of Eagle County Drive, the Park's internal road. The proposed 28 2/1/2005 parking tends to be more dispersed into specific areas. Nonetheless, the proposed parking appears to be sufficient for the contemplated uses,_with res ect to both numbers of parkin spaces and their distribution thtough~ut the Park. [+J FINDING: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] It HAS previously been found at the time that the Preliminary Plan for the PUD was approved that adequate, safe and convenient parking and loading was being provided. The off-street parking and loading provided in the revised PUD DOES comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. STANDARD: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] - Landscaping provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards. Varzations from these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that the proposed landscaping provides sufficient buffering of uses from each other (both within the PUD and between the PUD and surrounding uses) to minimize noise, glare and other adverse impacts, . creates attractive streets capes and parking areas and is consistent with the character of the area. A revised landscaping plan has been provided with this application. The phasing plan indicates that the landscaping improvements will be completed in conjunction with other Phase I improvements. The proposed landscaping plan is consistent with the letter and intent of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards. TheToWll of Basalt Planning andZoning Commission have provided several cortlments, one of which relates to the use of fruit trees. Fruit trees attract beats, and it is suggested that non-fruit bearing trees be considered. The Wildlife Analysis Report submitted withthePUD Preliminary Plan application and recorded as an exhibit to the Board Resolution approving the Preliminary Plan, along with the PUD Guide, notes that range of black bears increases during periods of scarce food and that mernbers of the bear population that reside on the Crown area southWest of the Tree Fartn property (approximately 2~3rniles) come down to the valley floor near EI Jebel in search of food. The Wildlife Analysis Report includes a Wildlife Management and Enhancement Program which includes an objective of reducing the attractiveness of the property for black bears. A recorhr11ended action is to "choose plants during the landscaping phase that are not attractive to bears" and which goes on to say that "bears are especially attracted to plants that produce nuts, berries ahd fruits. Asa condition of approval, no landscape materials should be used which are likely to be attractive to bears, udingthose th~tproducenuts, berries and/or fruits. [Condition # 1] The Eagle Courtty Weed and Pest Coordinator have commented on potential noxious weed and pest problems on the site. As a condition of approval, the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District should be required to implement noxious Weed mitigation measures consistent With the Colorado Noxious Weed Act and the Eagle County Weed Managernent Plan, and to prornptly develop and implement an Integrated Pest Management (!PM) program(s) for any pest species determined by the Eagle County W eedand Pest Coordinator to adversely affect or potentially affect human health and safety or be detrimental to the site use objectives (e.g., Wyoming ground squirrels, mosquitoes). [Condition # 2] The Coordinator has also noted that all the plant species listed in Appendix 11 are in compliance with the Colorado Nursery Act and include no listed noxious week species. However, detail of the types of seeds in the seed mix for the proposed "native grass'~ areas is not provided. As a condition of approval, the composition of the seed mix, by species, for the proposed "native grass" areas should be provided to the Eagle County Weed and Pest Coordinator prior to making any landscape improvements on the site. [Condition # 3] When the PUD was originally considered and approved in 2000, the Colorado State Forest Service indicated that the site had a Low wildfire rating. The Eagle County Wildfire Mitigation Specialist has recently indicated that the site has a Verv Low wildfire hazard rating. He does suggest, however, the use of various fire-wise plants and landscaping techniques to provide a showcase of a "fire-resistant" area. [+] FINDING: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] Landscaping provided in the PUD DOES comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards. \NDARD: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (6)] - The sign standards applicable to the PUD shall be as specified in ide 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations, unless, as provided in Section 4-340 D.! Signs Allowed in a Planned Unit 29 2/1/2005 Development (PUD), the applicant submits a comprehensive sign plan for the PUD that is determined to be suitable for the PUD and provides the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to and within the PUD. A sign plan has been provided which deals mostly with information and directional signs; although a sign consisting of 18 inch letters for "Crown Mountain Park" on a wall in the center of the roundabout at the entrance is also ro osed. [+] FINDING: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e(6)] The Applicant has submitted a comprehensive sign plan for the PUD which IS suitable for the Pun and DOES provide the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to and within the PUD. STANDARD: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] - The applicant shall demonstrate that the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fite protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. At the time the Preliminary Plan for the PUD was approved, it was determined that adequate facilities were to be provided. The Basalt & Rural Fire Protection District has reviewed the proposed site plan and has indicated that the road access and emergency path comply with the applicable section of the International Fire Code. The proposed PuDAfuendment will not have an adverse effect on the adequacy of facilities for potable water supPly, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, or electrical supply, nor will it affect the location in relation to schools, and police protection. The COUhty Engineer has determined that sufficient construction plans have been provided with a Prelirtrinary Plan level of detail. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of the initial grading permit or building permit, the Applicant shall provide complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition # 4] The EagleCoUhty Sheriffs Office (ECSO) raised several questions regarding public safety access to all areas of the site including a.dequacy of the pedestrian paths for patrol and emergency vehicles, the nature of the locks on the gates and i implications for night patrol access. In a subsequent meeting between a Deputy Lawson and Ron Stepp of the Crown Mountain District, it was determined that all of ECSO have been addressed to the satisfaction of ECSO. Included in the security provisions is a lirtrited amount of lighting at the entrance, at the paved and gravel parking lots, near the pathal()ng Valley Road, and on the concession/restroom building and the amphitheater. It should be noted that the pun Guide includes certain illumination standards which are intended to prevent intense flare of illumination that would create a nuisance which detracts from the use or enjoyment of adjoining property. As a condition of approval, prior to installirtg any lighting, the Applicant should demonstrate that all proposed lighting conforms to Section D., Illumination Standards, of the MtSopris Tree Farm Planned UnitDevelo ment Guide dated March 27,2001. Condition# 5 [+lFINDING: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] With the recommended condition of approval, it HAS been demonstrated that the development proposed in the PUD SketchlPreliminary Plan will be provided adequa.te facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical seMces. STANDARD: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] - The improvements standards applicable to the development shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards. Provided, however, the development may deviate from the County's road standards, so the development achieves greater efficiency ofinfrastrncture design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts, when the following minimum design principles are followed: (a) Safe, Efficient Access. The circulation system is designed to provide safe, convenient access to all areas of the proposed development using the minimum practical roadway length. Access shall be by a public right-of way, private vehicular or pedestrian way or a commonly owned easement. No roadway alignment, either horizontal or vertical, shall be allowed that compromises one (1) or more of the minimum design standard.: the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) for that functional classification of roadwa'y' 30 2/1/2005 (b) Internal Pathways. Internal pathways shall be provided to form a logical, safe and convenient system for pedestrian accesS to dwelling units and common areas, with appropriate linkages off-site. (c) Emergency. Vehicles. Roadways shall be designed to permit access by emergency vehicles to all lots or units. An access easement shall be granted for emergency vehicles and utility vehicles, as applicable, to use private roadways in thedevelopmentfor the purpose of providing emergency services andfor installation, maintenance and repair of utilities. (d) Principal Access Points. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to provide for smooth traffic flow, minimizing hazards to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. Where a PUD abuts a major collector, arterial road or highway, direct access to such road or highway from individual lots, units or buildings shall not be permitted. Minor roads within the PUD shall not be directly connected with toads outside of the PUD, unless the County determines such connections are necessary to maintain the County's road network. (e) Snow Storage. Adequate areas shall be provided to store snow removedfrom the internal street network and from off-streetparking areas. The CotihtyEngineer has determined that sufficient construction plans have been provided with the required Preliminary Plan level of detail. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of the initial grading permit or building permit, the Applicant shall provide complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition # 4] As a further condition of approval, prior to issuance ofthe initial grading permit or building permit, the Applicant should provide a public improvements guarantee in a form satisfactory to the County Attorney and in an amount satisfactory to the County Engineer. Condition # 6 [+]FlNDING: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e(8)] With the recommended condition, it HAS been clearly demonstrated that the improvements standards applicable to the development will be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, ImprovementS Standards regarding: (a) safe, efficient access, (b) internal pathways, (c) emergency vehicles, (d) principal access points, and (e) snow storage. ,NDARD: Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)]- The development proposedfor the ) shall be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. The Preliminary Plan approved for the PUD was determined to be compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed revisions to the site plan and the proposed improvements are consistent with the currently approved site plan and continue to be compatible with surrounding land uses. The currently approved site plan shows a line labeled "Limits of Active Recreation Land Use" south of which the area was to be "restored to native vegetation". A portion of the proposed improvements, including a pedestrian trail and emergency access route, surface water features (including a ditch and ponds) and some landscaped areas, extend somewhat beyond the "Limits of Active Recreation Land Use". The Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners will want to determine the appropriatehess of these improvements. The Eagle County Sheriffs Office (ECSO) has raised an issue regarding park rules, such as for hours of operation, glass bottles, loud Ihusic or signage, and notes that there are currently no County regulations or ordinances sufficient for this purpose. As a condition of approval, within six months of approval of this pun Amendment, the Applicant should be required to develop a comprehensive set of park rules which are satisfactory to the County Attorney. [Condition # 7] [+] FINDING: Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] The development proposed for the PUD HAS been determined to be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. The proposed PUD Amendment WILL continue to be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. STANDARD: Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] - The PUD shall be consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). 31 2/1/2005 The PUD was previously determined to be consistent with the Master Plan including, but not limited to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The following analysis with respect to the Master Plan and the FLUM applies the amended Pun Preliminary Plan, subject to the recommended conditions of approval. Ell'[!le. Cotliltv Master Plan. The proposed development generally conforms to all applicable Guiding Policies of the Eagle County Master Plan. EileleColliltvOoen SoatePlail. The proposed development generally conforms to the Policies of the Eagle County Open Space Plan. MID. VALLEY .COMM1JNITY PLAN x x x x ~ x MT. SOPRIS TREE FARM MASTER PLAN Mid. Vallev Communitv Plan. The proposed development generally conforms to all applicable Policies of the Mid Valley Community Master Plan. 32 2/1/2005 Mt.S()1JrisTree Farm MasterPlan. A nUinber ofPla.nning Objectives were established for the Mt. Sopris Tree Farm Master Plan, including the following: 1. . Provide area for a governmental service facility for County depa:rtmental use. 2. Provide space for needed Mid-Valley community uses as determined by County and Town staffs and local residents as allowed by regulations of the Act [authorizing tra.nsfer of the site from the U.S. Forest Service to EagleCounty and Pitkin County]. 3. Provide substaiitial buffer areas, maximize open space and pr6tectfroI11 fufuredevelopment. 4. Provide adequate access, circulation and parking while minimizing impact to adjacent residential areas and Valley Road. 5. Provide and maintain public river access. 6. Maintain and protect riparian area from proposed land uses. 7. Develop site Master Plan for use as a guide for site planning and building reuse. n,'e MasterPlan provided two goals, along with a number of Planning Objectives for each. The Government Services I is to "provide interior and exterior spaces for government services as defined." Several planning objectives are set which include minimizing visual impacts or other impacts on existing and proposed land Uses and certain other planning activities. The Community Services Goal is to ''provide area(s) for future implementation of active and passive recreation facilities while protecting oPen space and agricultural uses." Planning objectives are in the areas of active recreation; passive recreation; agriculture/open space; and open space. the pun Preliminary Plan isin conformance with the goals and applicable planning objectives of the Mt. Sopris Tree Fatm Master Plan. MT..SOPRIS TREE FARM.COMMUNITY PARK MASTER PLAN (BRA MasterPlan). A Community Plan for theMt. Sopris Tree Farm site came out ofthis planning effort which "represents the joint vision of valley residents and provides for at least a portion of the numerous interest groups needs in a compromise plan that maintains the park with a moderate level of active recreation while also incorporating a variety of other community spaces." The Community Plan includes a list of key park elements and a site plan. The revised PUD Preliminary Plan generally conforms to the Community Plan developed as part of this planning effort. It has previously been found that the PUD is in conformance with the Master Plan. The proposed PUD Amendment is not sufficiently different in character or magnitude to alter conformance with either the Master Plan or the Future Land Use Map. [+] FINDING: Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] The PUD IS consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The proposed PUD Amendment WILL NOT adversely affect the consistency with the Master Plan. 33 2/1/2005 STANDARD: Phasing [Section 5-240.F.3.e (11)] - The Preliminary Plan for PUD shall include a phasing pltmfor the development. If development of the PUD is proposed to occur in phases, then guarantees shall be provided for public improvements and amenities that are necessary and desirable for residents of the project, or that are of benefit to the entire County. Such public improvements shall be constructed with the first phase of the project, or, if this is not possi then as early in the project as is reasonable. When the PUD Ptelimin.ary Plan was initially approved, it was to be developed in at least two phases. The first included the Community Center, associated parking and the internal road to the existing buildings near the northwest comer of the site. The recreation portion of the site constitutes the second and subsequent development phase. The CroWn Mountain Park and Recreation District proposes to further phase what .was initially designated the second phase. The discussion of phasing of recreation improvements in this PUD amendment application is all within this second phase ofthe overall Pun development. Detail of the several phases of the recreation improvements is included in the "Addendum" to the application, specifically in a memorandum dated 13 October 2004. Phase I all infrastructure improvements plus landscaping, concession/restroom building, site furniture, basketball court, tennis courts (2), dog park, playground, volleyball court, ball field #2, and the park equipment storage building. Phase II improvements will include, among other things; a pond and a skate park. Construction plans have been provided for Phase I improvements but not for all Phase II improvements. As a condition of approVal, the construction plans for any improvements which have not previously been approved by the County Engineer should be subject to review and approval by the COUhty Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit for those improvements. [Condition # 8] It should also be noted that a series of several ponds are proposed along the southwest property, only a portion of which fall within the proposed expanded lease area. Final construction plans for the ponds have not been provided. Fina1layout of the ponds may differ frOm that proposed in the application. As a condition of approval, an alternative layout of the proposed ponds may be approved by the COUhty Attorney and the County Engineer. [Condition # 9] [+] FINDING: Phasing, Section 5-240.F.3.e (11) A phasing plan HAS been provided fOr this PUD Amendment. STANDARD: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] - The PUD shall comply with the following common recreation and open space standards. (a) Minimum Area. It is recommended that a minimum of 25% of the total pun area shall be devoted to open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi-public. In addition, the PUD shall provide a minimum of ten (10) acres of common recreation and usable open space lands for every one thousand (1,000) persons who are residents of the PUD. In order to calculate the number of residents of the PUD, the number of proposed dwelling units shall be multiplied by two and sixty-three hundredths (2.63), which is the average number of persons that occupy each dwelling unit in Eagle County, as determined in the Eagle County Master Plan. i. Areas thatDo Not Couht as Open Space. Parking and loading areas, street right-of-ways, and areas with slopes greater than thirty (30) percent shall not count toward usable open space. ii. Areas that Count as Open Space. Water bodies, lands within critical wildlife habitat areas, riparian areas, and one hundred (100) year floodplains, as defined in these Land Use Regulations, that are preserved as open space shall count towards this minimum standard, even when they are not usable by or accessible to the residents of the PUD. All other open space lands shall be conveniently accessible from all occupied structures within the PUD. (b) Improvements Required. All common open space and recreationalfacilities shall be shown on the Preliminary Plan for PUD and shall be constructed and fully improved according to the development schedule established for each development phase of the PUD. (c) Continuing Use and Maintenance. All privately owned common open space shall continue to conform to its intended use, as specified on the Preliminary Plan for PUD. To ensure that all the common open space identified in the PUD will be used as common open space, restrictions and/or covenants shall be placed ;, each deed to ensure their maintenance and to prohibit the division of any common open space. 34 2/1/2005 (d) ()rganization. If common open space is proposed to be maintained through an association or nonprofit corporation, such organization shall manage all common open space and recreational and cultural facilities that are not dedicated to the public, and shall provide for the maintenance, administration and operation of such land and any other land within the PUD not publicly owned, and seCUre adequate liability insurance on the land. The association or nonprofit corporation shall be established prior to the sale of any lots or units within the PUD. Membership in the association or nonprofit corporation shall be mandatory for all landowners within the PUD. Atthe time the Prelitninary Plan for the pun was approved, it was determined that adequate common recreation and open space were to be provided. The proposed pun Amendment will not have an adverse effect on the adequacy of the open space. [+] FINDING: C(J1IllfliJn Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] Ithaspreviously been determined that the development])OES comply with the corillnon recreation and open space standards applicable at the time of approval of the Prelilllina.ry Plan for the POO. . The proposed PUD Amendment WILL NOT adversely affect common recreation and open space within the PUD with respect to (a) minimum area; (b) improvements required; (c) continuing use and maintenance; or (d) organization. STANDARD: Natllra/Resource Protection. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (13)] - the PUD shall consider the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, NaturalResourceProtettion Standards. A.t tlretltne the Prelimina.ryPlan for the PUD was approved, it was detetmined that adequate protection .of natural resources were to be provided. For the most part, the proposed pUb atnendrtientwould not be detrimental to natural resoutees. ( The Eagle CoOhty Weed and Pest Coordinator have commented on potential noxious weed and pest problems on the site. . condition of appr.oval, the District should be required to implement noxious weed lllitigation measures consistent tthe Colorado Noxious Weed Act and the Eagle County Weed Management Plan, ahd topromptly develop and implement an Integrated Pest Management (!PM) program( s) for any pest species detennined by the Eagle County Weed and Pest Coordinator to adversely affect or potentially affect human health and safety or be detrimental to the site use objectives (e.g., Wyoming ground squilTels,mosquitoes). [Condition # 2] The Coordinator has also noted that all the plant species listed in Appendix 11 are in compliance with the Colorado Nursery Act and include no listed noxious week species. However, detail of the types of seeds in the seed mix for the proposed "native grass" areas is not provided. As a condition of approval, the composition of the seed mix, by species, for the proposed "native grass" areas should be provided to the Eagle County Weed and Pest Coordinator prior to making any landscape improvements on the site. [Condition # 3] [+] FINDING: Natural Resource Protection. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (13)] It lIAS previously been determined that applicable analysis documents were adequately considered prior to approval of the Preliminary Plan for the PUD. The proposed PUD amendment WILL NOT adversely affect natural resources. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-280.B.3.e. Standards for the review of a Sketch Plan for Subdivision: STANDARD: Consistent with Master Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (1)] B The proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the FLUM of the Master Plan. See discussion above, Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] [+] FINDING: Consistent with Master Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (1)] The PUDIS consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use 35 2/1/2005 Map (FLUM). The proposed PUD Amendment WILL NOT adversely affect the consistency with the Master Plan. STANDARD: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)] - The proposed subdivision shall com~lv with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not Umi to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards. Article 3, Zone Districts When the Prelitninary Plan for the PUD was approved, findings were made to warrant the zone district change to PUD based on the applicable Land Use Regulations. The proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with the provisions of Article 3, Zone Districts, of the current Land Use Regulations. Article 4, Site Development Standards [+] Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1) As discussed under Off-Street Parking and Loading [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)], above, the proposed parking tends to be more dispersed into specific areas. Nonetheless, the proposed parking appears to be sufficient for the contemplated uses, with respect to both nutnbers of parking spaces and their distribution throughout the Park. [+] Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2) A revised landscaPing pla.n has been provided with this application. The phasing plan indicates that the la.ndscaping improvements will be completed in conjunction with other Phase I recreation improvements. The proposed landscaping plan is consistent with the letter and intent of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and TIIutnination Standards. However, certain conditions of approval are suggested in the discussion above under Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)]. The Eagle Cou.nty Sheriff's Office (ECSO) raised several questions regarding public safety access to all areas of the si including adequacy of the pedestrian paths for patrol and emergency vehicles, the nature of the locks on the gates and i implications for night patrol access. In a subsequent meeting between a Deputy Lawson and Ron Stepp of the Crown Mountain District, it was determined that all of ECSO have been addressed to the satisfaction of ECSO. Included in the security provisions is a limited amount oflighting atthe entrance, at the paved and gravel parking lots, near the path along Valley Road, and on the concession/restroom building and the amphitheater. It should be noted that the PUD Guide includes certain illumination standards which are intended to prevent intense flare of illumination that would create a nuisa.nce which detracts from the use or enjoyment of adjoining property. As a condition of approval, prior to installing any lighting, the Applicant should demonstrate that all proposed lighting conforms to Section D., Illumination Sta.ndards, ofthe Mt. Sopris Tree Farm Planned Unit Development Guide dated March 27,2001. [Condition # 5] [+] Sign Regulations (Division 4-3) A sign plan has been provided which deals mostly with information and directional signs, although a sign consisting of 18 inch letters for "Crown Mountain Park" on a wall in the center of the roundabout at the entrance is also proposed. [+] Natural Resource Protection Standards (Division 4-4) [+] Wildlife Protection (Section 4-410) - No critical wildlife habitat is located on the site, although the area south of the site, near the Roaring Fork River, is home to a number of amphibian, bird, mammal and reptilian species. As a condition of approval, the District should be required to not undertake any improvement nor implement any activity that is contrary to the Wildlife Management and Enhancement Program which is part of the Wildlife Analysis Report dated October 16, 2000, and recorded at Reception No. 754139. [Condition # 10] [+] Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420) - Certain limited geologic hazards were identified during consideration of t PUD Preliminary Plan. Concerns relate primarily to occupied buildings exclusive of shelters and the like. A Prelimina _ 36 2/1/2005 Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical has been provided with this application. Certain recommendations are provided which should be adhered to during construction of improvements. [+] Wildfire Protection (Section 4-430) - The Basalt and Rural Fire Protection District has indicated that the road ess and emergency path comply the applicable section of the International Fire Code. l + ] Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) - Wood burning devices are neither contemplated nor proposed. All uses of wood burning devices in the PUD will be required to conform to the requirements of this Section. [hla] Ridgeline Protection (Section 4-450) - This site is not included on lands designated on the Ridgeline Protection Map. Given the vaHey floor location of the site, ridgeline impacts are not a factor. The Applicant is not required to provide a ridgeline analysis. Consequently, this Section is not applicable to this application. [hla] Environmental Impact Report (Section 4-460) - An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is not required. [hla] CommerciaLand Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5) . There are no significant commercial or industrial operations on the proposed site which would subject this application to the provisions of this Division. [+] Improvement Standards (Division 4-6) [+] Roadway Standards (Section 4-620) - The County Engineer has determined that sufficient construction plans have been provided with a Preliminary Plan level of detail. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of the initial grading permitdrbuilding permit, the Applicant shall provide complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition # 4] [+] Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630) ~ The County Engineer has detennined that sufficient construction ns have been provided with a Preliminary Plan level of detail. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of the initial ding pefIIlit or building permit, the Applicant shall provide complete engineering a.hd construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition # 4] [+] Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640) - It appears that this standard wiUbe met. However, additional engineering detail is required before the construction plans can be approved. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of the initial grading permit or building pennit, the Applicant should provide complete engineering and construction dra:wihgs and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition # 4] The Parkand Recreation District proposes two sources of Water for irrigation purposes, in addition to the potable water to be provided by the Mid Valley Metro District. The Park and Recreation District has entered into an agreement with the Mid Valley Metro District for 1 cfs of raw water to be delivered to the site from May through October by way of the Robinson Ditch. In addition, the Park and Recreation District intends to use water from the on-site wells. As a condition of approval, it should be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the County Attorney prior to issuance of the initial grading permit or building permit, or at some other time deemed appropriate by the County Attorney, that the proposed soUrces of irrigation water is sufficient and consistent with existing and future leases between Eagle County and the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District. [Condition # 11] In addition, Northwest Colorado Council of Governments (NWCCOG) the potential for significant algae forming in the shallow pond system, creating a visual eyesore. NWCCOG has suggested the need for an appropriate management plan. As a condition of approval, it should be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the County Engineer prior to issuance of the initial grading permit or building permit, or at some other time deemed appropriate by the County Engineer, that an appropriate pond management plan addressing issues such as algae growth has been developed and wilI be properly . plemented. [Condition # 12] 37 2/1/2005 [+] Drainage Standards (Section 4-650) - The County Engineer has determined that sufficient constniction plans have been provided with a Preliminary Plan level of detail. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of the initial grading permit or building permit, the Applicant shall provide complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition # 4] Northwest Colorado Council of Governments (NWCCOG) has raised several issues regarding drainage, including prio review of the stormwater management plan and the use of drywells on the site. As a condition of approval, it should be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the County Engineer prior to the issuance of the initial grading permit or building permit for this site that the issues set forth in the letter from the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments dated November 12,2004, have been or will be adequately satisfied. [Condition # 13] [+] Grading and Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-660) - The County Engineer has determined that sufficient construction plans have been provided with a Preliminary Plan level of detail. As a condition of approval, prior to issuance of the initial grading permit or building permit, the Applicant shall provide complete engineering and construction drawings and other engineering detail which are satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition # 4] Northwest Colorado Council of Governments (NWCCOG) has raised several issues regarding erosion control, including adequate vehicle thud tracking control practices on the site. As a condition of aPtJroval, it should be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the County Engineer prior to the issuance of the initial grading permit or building permit for this site that the issues set forth in the letter from the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments dated November 12,2004, have beehor will be adequately satisfied. [Condition # 13] [+] Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670) - It appears that the standards of this Section will be satisfied. [+] Water Supply Standards (Section 4~680) - It appears that the standards of this Section will be satisfied. However, the Mid Valley Metro District has set forth several conditions to its "can and will serve letter" for water treatn1ent services. As a condition of approval, it should be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the COUIl.ty Engineer prior to the issuance ofthe initial grading pennit or building permit for this site, or at some other time deemed appropriate by the County Engineer, that an of the conditions set forth by the Mid Valley Metropolitan District in its letter dated November 19,2004, have been or will be duly satisfied. [Condition # 14] [+] Sttnitdty Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690) - It appears that the standards of this Section will be satisfied. HOWever, the Mid Valley Metro District has set forth several conditions to its "ca.n and will serve letter" for wastewater treatment services. As a condition of approval, it should be demonstrated to the County Engineer prior to the issuance of the initial grading permit or building permit for this site, or at some other time deemed appropriate by the County Engineer, that all of the conditions set forth by the Mid Valley Metropolitan District in its letter dated November 19,2004, have been or win be duly satisfied. [Condition # 14] [+1 Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7) [+] School Land Dedication Standards (Section 4-700) - No residential units are proposed on the site. No school land dedication is required. [+]Road Impact Fees (Section 4~7l0) - Road impact fees will be payable prior to issuance of any grading permit or building permit for the proposed improvements. Other Standards in the Land Use Regulations Other Standards - It appears that all other standards of the Land Use Regulations will be met, except as discussed elsewhere in this Staff Report. [+] FINDING: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)] With the recommended condition, the Applicant HAS demonstrated that the proposed subdivision complies with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards. 38 2/1/2005 STANDARD: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)] - The proposed subdivision shall be located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or ptemature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (a) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road extensiqns shall be consistent with the Ea~le County Road Capital Improvements Plan. (b) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (c) Coordinate. Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area. When the Preliminary Plan forthePUD wa.s approved, it was found that the development would have an efficient spatial pattern. The proposed plJb Amendment will not alter the spatial pattern in any way that causes inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. [+] FINDING: Spatial PaUern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)] It HAS previously been found that the Preliminary Plan for the pUD satisfied the requirements of the Land Use Regulations in effect at the time with respect to efficient spatial patterns. The proposed PUDAmendment DOES NOT adversely affect the spatial patterns in the area. STANDARD: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)] - The property proposed to be subdivided shall be suitablefordeveloptnent, considering its topography, environmentaltesoutces and natural or man~madehazardsthat may affect thepotential development of the property, and existing and pf'dbable future public improvements to theatea. When the Preliminary Plan for the PUD was approved, it was found that the area was suitable for development as anproved. [+) FINDING: Suitability for Development. [Section 5..280.B.3.e (4)] It HAS previously been determined that the site was suitable for development. STANDA1UJ: Compatible with Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.:B.3.e (5)] - the proposed subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall nOt adversely affect the future development of the surtoundfng area. When the Prelirninary Plan for the PUD was approved, it was found that thePUD is compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and would not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. The alllendedPUD would continue to be compatible with the surrounding land uses. [+) FINDING: Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)] It RASpreviously been determined that the development is compatible with other development in the area. With the recommended condition, the proposed PUD Amendment wILL NOT adversely affect the compatibility of the resulting development with surrounding uses within the PUD. ADDITIONAL FINDINGS: Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations [Section 5-240.F.2.a.(8} Initiation): "Applicant shall submit the follOWing: "Proposed PUD guide settingforth the proposed land use restrictions. JJ The proposed amendment to the PUD does not warrant any revisions to the approved PUD Guide. [+) FINDING: Initiation [Section 5-240.F.2.a.(8)] A PUD Guide WAS previously approved for this PUD. NO REVISIONS to the approved PUD Guide are necessitated by this PUD amendment 39 2/1/2005 Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F. 3.m., Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD: STANbARD: Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD [Section 5-240.F.3.m.] - No substantial modification, removal, ot release of the provisions of the plan shall be permitted except upon afinding by the County. . . that (1) the modification, temoval, or release is consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire Planned u Development, (2) does not affect in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a streetfrom the planned unit development or the public interest, and (3) is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person. The proposed POO amendment satisfies this standard. [+] FINDING: Amendment to Preliminary Plan for PUD [Section 5-240.F.3.m .] The proposed PUD Amendment (l) IS consistent with the efficient development and preservation ofthe entire Planned Unit Development, and (2) DOES NOT affect in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment ofland abutting upon or across a street from the planned unit development or the public interest, and (3) IS NOT granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person. Chairman Menconi stated that, at this hearing, there would be a presentation from staff and the applicant ahd public COrhment, but no decision would be reached this evening. Joe Forinash of Community Development presented this file to the Board. Utilizing a PowerPoint presentation, he gave. the background and history of the parcel. He stated that this property 'Yas sold to the County by the Forest Service in the 90's. He showed various slides detailing the property and the proposed changes to it. There currently exists one basebalIdiamondand one soccer field on the site. There is a passive area that separates the park from the residential uses, to minirhize its impact on those residents. The proposed changes would expand the applicant's lease area in order to implementthe improvements. The applicant proposes adding a surface water addition in the form of a river and ponds. A rotlhdabout will beincluded with these changes, and the "sledding hill" would be modified to allow for more active uses such as picnic shelters, horseshoe pits, and volleyball courts. The skateboard park's location has been changed, along. the direction of otie ofthe baseball diamonds. The parking areas would no longer be linear in arrangement, but would have several paved lots and some gravel-covered lots. The applicant has proposed overflow parking areas on some grassy areas, also. Additional lighting for the park has been included as a result of the proposed changes. These improvements would be implemented throughout several phases. There would be temporary access to the Community Center during the construction of the roundabout. Staff and Planning Commission have made positive findings, and both recommend approval of the file with conditions. There are some outstanding issues for the applicant, including: the timing of when engineering detail and construction plans are required; the financial guarantee ne'cessary for public improvements; and demonstration ofadequa.te water for irrigation. There will be continued discussion to alleviate these outstanding issues prior to the next Board meeting. He did include a letter from the Blue Lake Owners' Association for the Commissioners that was not part of the Commissioner's packet. Mark Fuller, representing the applicant, spoke to the Board. He thanked the Board for coming to El Jebel for this hearing, as it was a great convenience for the applicant. He gave a background of the Crown Mountain Park District, stating that it was established in 2002 and that they have been working on this proj ect since then. There is a $5.1 million bond that is dedicated to constructing the proposed facilities. There are only three elements of the revised plan that are neW: horseshoe pits, water, and the tool storage building. He stated that the roundabout should elirhinate access problems to the park and the Community Center. The skate park was moved to make it more visible, more accessible, and more easily policed, if necessary. The ball diamond was re-oriented based on public comment, and the pond has been expanded. He reiterated Mr. Forinash's parking statements, and stated that it would significantly increase the parking capacity. He detailed a phasing plan to show the Board how the park would be developed. He stated that the project has been scaled back to meet the budget constraints. They will try to seek additional funding to meet the rest of their goals. The skate park costs about $400,000 and is not part ofthe initial phasing, but is high on the priority list for when the additional funding comes in. Chairman Menconi opened Public Comment. Ross Stepp, Director of Crown Mountain, spoke to the Board and thanked them for their visit, also. He stated t there has been tremendous amount of public interest and excitement to getting the site developed. He spoke about the benefit of being able to recycle the existing building on site, rather than having to build a new one. 40 2/1/2005 Steve Martin, past president of the local Little League, spoke about the inadequacy of baseball fields in the area and how it is preventing a softball program from being started. Laurie Soliday of Crown Mountain spoke in support of the plan and how the community has rallied behind it She spoke about working with CDOT to get the access issues resolved. John Fitzpatrick of Crown Mountain spoke to the Board about this being a park for everybody, and not just for etics. Leroy Duroux, Mayor of Basalt, talked about the lengthy process that this has been and how the public is wanting for this approval to be reached so that construction can be started. Mark Munger of the Crown Mountain Board urged the Board to approve this amendment to help out the entire community, including the senior citizens. Chairman Menconi closed Public Comment Commissioner Stone expressed his excitement over this project His only concern was the limitation ofthe maximum allowable overall building footprint square footage. He asked how much square footage would be used by the concession stand, as it would go against the maxinmm allowable footage. Mr. Fuller stated that the concession stand would be 1,500 square feet and would include bathrooms. The covered shelters do hOt count against the square footage, and the storage building would be included in the available square footage. Ms. Maurielloconcutted with that statement Commissioner Stone would like to amend the lease area to not include the storage building, but to have a shott- terth lease with the County for the building, so as not to count it against the building footprint maximum. Mr. Fuller stated that this building will be needed. He didn't care how that goal was achieved, and he could live witha.hy decision that was made. Commissioner Stone stated that a Master Plan for the park would be good to help direct how construction could take place. It could be amended as different needs arise. Commissioner Runyon stated that he thinks it will be a great facility. Commissioner Stone asked if the applicant agreed with the recommended conditions set forth by staff. Mr. Fuller stated that he could come to agreement with the conditions set forth. He spoke about the conditions that required the detailed construction drawings prior to excavation permits being approved. He stated that they are ready .ave a.head with an excavation pertrrit now and doesn't want it to be held hostage by plans that aren't needed for ral months. He talked of the modifications to the condition that he and the Plahhing Department spoke about Conunissioner Stone reiterated that the applicant wanted Conditions 4, 12,.13, and 14 amended to alIow for grading pennitsprior to specific plans being submitted and asked if these conditions need to be re-written. Mr. Forinash clarified this for the Board and the applicant. He stated that they would allow for the grading permit prior to the time complete construction plans for the other improvements are completed. Before anything other than the grading is permitted; the pla.hs would need to be submitted to Engineering. He stated that all of the conditions could be re- written to reflect this. Commissioner Stone asked Mr. Fuller his thoughts about the financial guarantee that may be required. Mr. Fuller stated that financial advisors thought that bonding would cause a real financial burden for them. He gave their philosophy that, as a government entity, they are obliged to spend the money available on improvements that are outlined in their plans, and they should not be looked at like a private developer. They would like to see an alternative to the financial guarantee, if possible, in order to keep their budget in tact Ms. MaurielIo stated that there were alternatives available to the Board, and the Commissioners can allow for c01ll1llitrnents other than financial. Commissioner Stone stated that he would like to come up with an alternative that doesn't provide a financial burden. He agreed with Mr. Fuller's assessment of them being a public entity. Ms. Mauriello stated she would put together a menu of alternatives for the Board. Commissioner Stone asked about the water rights concern. Mr. Fuller stated that they have the ability to use the County's well rights. The same well rights were used by the Forest Service previously and covered a much larger area of land, and these well rights are protected from being called. He acknowledged that the water rights situation on the property is a little muddy, but they are proceeding with the assumption that there will be adequate water available. Ms. Mauriello stated that the water attorney has been looking at this matter and is still studying the situation. Chairman Menconi also shared his feelings about the project and how it has come a long way in a relatively short unt of time. He asked the applicant to explain how the district came together to make this proposal. 41 2/112005 Mr. Fuller stated that this was the result of the Town of Basalt wanting to follow through with its early 90's planning. When it became evident that neither Basalt nor Eagle County wanted to take on developing this property, the momentum started to develop for forming this district. Chairman Menconi asked how far out this plan would take the district, based on the $5.1 million available. Mr. Fuller stated that there was no firm decision on how to get additional funding to complete the project. He. believes that the district may go out for more bond money in the future, in addition to getting grants, local fund raising, and services-in-kind. Their energy is focused on getting in place, now, the ideas they can afford. Chairman Menconi believed that infrastructure is being emphasized in Phase lover the recreational facilities and asked how that decision was made. Mr. Fuller stated that it was concluded that it made sense to do all the infrastructure work at once because of the economies of scale and to avoid future disruptions. It would make future development easier. Chairman Menconi asked what was the next phase being discussed. Mr. Fuller stated that they have prioritized what they want to get completed next: the pond, the skate park, the amphitheater, and the second baseball diamond. He believes that some of these items are excellent candidates to receive grant funding. Mr. Stepp gave some cost estimates for the various amenities. He stated that Phase I comes to about $4.5 million and covers everything butthe four items previously listed. The other four items for Phase II would cost about $1 million, so they ate only about $500,000 short for total completion of this project. They have been conservative in their budgeting to ensure that they have enough funds available. Chairman Menconi also clarified that there is a difference between the pun and the lease arrangements, but that they are linked together and are both needed for this proposal to work. Mr. Fuller concurred. Chairman Menconi asked who would maintain the property and the roads. Mr. Fuller stated that Crown Mountain would. Chairman Menconi asked if the all the parking would be built out in Phase I. Mr. Fuller stated that not an the parking would be built and showed what would be part of Phase I. Chairman Menconi asked what the property would look like when it is completed, from a landscaping point of VIew. Mr. Fuller admitted that there has been a tradeoff between quality and qua.ntity. He stated that this is a flat site and they intend to modify that to make it more visually pleasing. They are planning to bring in trees ofva.rious sizes. Dave Carpenter, landscaper for the project, spoke about wanting to make it a quality project. Mr. Fuller stated that this would be a high quality project, from a landscaping view. They are willing to supply more details to the Comrnissionersto help alleviate their concerns. Chairman Menconi stated that the building designs will be a future concern. Commissioner Stone asked if the next meeting would be held next week. Chairman Menconi stated that it would. Commissioner Stone moved to table File No. PDA-00055, at the applicant's request, until February 8, 2005. Commissioner Runyon seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. There being no further business to be ~~\e the Bo~ard' the meeting was adjourned until February 8, ;., fl · .# - .cr Chairman 2005. Attest: 42 2/1/2005 BLL] LAKE OWNERS ASSOC~)ION December 13, 2004 RECEIVED Eagle County Community Development PO Box 179 Eagle, CO 81631 DEe 1 4 2004 Eagle County Community Development Dear Eagle County Commissioners: We write this letter to support the Crown Mountain Park & Recreation District PUD Amendment ("PUD Amendment"). It is our understanding that local voters approved an increase in the mill levy and issuance of bonds in 2002 to provide a mid-valley park facility ("Park"). Thereafter, the District Board solicited local public opinion and incorporated local input into the final Park design. The design conforms to local needs and wishes. The Blue Lake Owners Association supports the Park and final Park design. We look forward to completion of the Park. We respectfully request that the Eagle County Commissioners approve the PUD Amendment. Very truly yours, , . ~ (1,0. I J orne R. Evans, Ph.D. President, Blue Lake Owners Association Cc: Mark Fuller, Crown Mountain Park & Recreation District BOARD OF DIRECTORS · 0189 J W DRIVE · CARBONDALE, CO 81623 · 970-963-1300 Jerry Evans, President · Scott Wirkler, Vice President Gretta McKenney, Treasurer. Eric Musselman, Secretary September 27, 2004 BASALT Eagle County Board of Commissioners PO Box 850 Eagle, CO 81631 RE: Crown Mountain Park & Recreation District PUD Amendment Dear Tom, Arn and Michael: The Basalt Town Cour'\cil wishes to express its support for the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District PUD Amendment, and our hopes for a speedy approval. In November of 2002 local voters overwhelmingly voted in favor of a mill levy increase and the issuance of bonds for the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District. The District Board has worked diligently since then to solicit community input for the final design, which is consistent with local needs and wishes. And we are c.onfident that the District Board will continue to be responsive to neighborhood needs and concerns as construction moves forward. The community is looking forward to the completion of this park facility, and we genuinely appreciate the assistance of Eagle County to help make ita reality. We ask for your consideration and approval of this amendment as quickly as possible so the construction can begin. It would be exciting and very meaningful to the community to have some park facilities available for use as early as next summer. We'll appreciate your help to make this so. Sincerely, ~.~ Leroy Duroux Mayor cc: Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District Basalt Town Council 101 MIDLAND AVE. · BASAl!, CO 81621 · 970-927-4701 · FAX 970-927-4703 Shellene Hanan Michael Schwartz 99 Arapahoe Carbondale, CO 81623 September 20, 2004 Dear Eagle County Commissioners; We are writing to express our support for the Crown Mountain Park & Recreation District PUD Amendment that was recently submitted to Eagle County. In November, 2002, local voters overwhelmingly approved an increase in the mill levy and the issuance of bonds to provide a much needed park facility for the mid-valley area. Since then, the District Board bas been diligently soliciting lie opinion and incorporating local input into the fin81 design. The park design is consistent with local needs and wishes and has our full support. Weare confident that the District Board will continue to be responsive to neighborhood needs and concerns as construction moves forward. The community is looking forward to the completion of this park facility. We appreciate the assistance that Eagle County has already provided in making the park a reality. We now ask for your consideration and approval of this amendment as quickly as possible so that construction can begin. It would be ~xciting and valuable to have some park facilities available for use as early as next summer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely . rJrAt 4Jcf ;'J ;i/~ rlJO(u / September 27, 2004 BASALT Eagle County Board of Commissioners PO Box 850 Eagle, CO 81631 RE: Crown Mountain Park & Recreation District PUD Amendment Dear Tom, Arn and Michael: The Basalt Town Council wishes to express its support for the Crown Mountain" Park and Recreation District PUD Amendment, and our hopes for a speedy approval. In November of 2002 local voters overwhelmingly voted in favor of a mill levy increase and the issuance of bonds for the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District. The District Board has worked diligently since then to solicit community input for the final design, which is consistent with local needs and wishes. And we are confident that the District Board will continue to be responsive to neighborhood needs and concerns as construction moves forward. The community is looking forward to the completion of this park facility, and we genuinely appreciate the assistance of Eagle County to help make it a reality. We ask for your consideration and approval of this amendment as quickly as possible so the construction can begin. It would be exciting and very meaningful to the community to have some park facilities available for use as early as next summer. We'll appreciate your help to make this so. Sincerely, ~~ Leroy Duroux Mayor cc: Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District Basalt Town Council 101 MIDLAND AVE. · BASAIJ', CO 81621 · 970-927-4701 · FAX 970-927-4703 Basalt Recreation Department 101 Midland Ave. Basalt, CO 81621 970,927,8214 BASALT September 30, 2004 "I - Dear Eagle County Commissioners; Weare writing to express our support for the Crown Mountain Park &:: Recreation District PUD Amendment that was recently submitted to Eagle County. In November, 2002, local voters overwhelmingly approved an increase in the mill levy and the issuance of bonds to provide a much needed park facility for the mid, valley area. Since then, the District Board has been diligently soliciting public opinion and incorpQraring local input into the final design. The park design is consistent with local needs and wishes and has our full support. We are confident that the District Board will continue to be responsive to neighborhood needs and concerns as construction moves forward. The community is- looking forward to the completion of the park facility. Weappreciate the assistance that Eagle County has already provided in making the park a reality. We .z:. now ask for your consideration and approval of this amendment as quickly as possible so that construction...can begin. The summer programs in the Basalt Recreation Departmel}t are expanding and our need of more park facilities is ~owing with them. It would be . exciting and vf1uable to have these available for use as early as next summer. Thank you for your time and consideration. sm;z, li/ow~ ~=~!~l:r Basalt Recreation Department \ ( " 101 MIDLAND AVE. · BASALT, CO 81621 -"970-927-4701 · FAX 970-927-4703 \ .~/' / . September 20, 2004 Dear Eagle County Commissioners; Weare writing to express our support for the Crown Mountain Park & Recreation District PUD Amendment that was recently submitted to Eagle County. In November, 2002, local voters overwhelmingly approved an increase in the mill levy and the issuance of bonds to provide a much needed park facility for the mid-valley area. Since then, the District Board has been diligently soliciting blic opinion and incorporating local input into the fmal design. The park design is consistent with local needs and wishes and has our full support. Weare confident that the District Board will continue to be responsive to neighborhood needs and concerns as construction moves forward. The community is looking forward to the completion of this park facility . We appreciate the assistance that Eagle County has already provided in making the park a reality. We now ask for your consideration and approval of this amendment as quickly as possible so that construction can begin. It would be exciting and valuable to have some park facilities available for use as early as next summer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely . ~ /) U~7- ~~ 4> 6 JtWJv0~~ f!..e ~ I Ct.J 8'1 (p 23 (97D) 1b:5 - (000 u fv.~ ~. -Ik. ~~A)/~ J --;--w -FF. ~~~, ~~~~.... -IoU1~ l!~ ! C!- ~~ September 20, 2004 Dear Eagle County Commissioners; We are writing to express our support for the Crown MotUltain Park & Recreation District PUD Amendment that was recently submitted to Eagle County. In November, 2002, local voters overwhelmingly approved an increase in the mill levy and the issuance of bonds to provide a much needed park facility for the mid-valley area. Since then, the District Board has been diligently soliciting blic opinion and incorporating local input into the final design. The park design is consistent with local needs and wishes and has our full support. We are confident that the District Board will continue to be responsive to neighborhood needs and concerns as construction moves forward. The community is looking forward to the completion of this park facility. We appreciate the assistance that Eagle County has already provided in making the park a reality . We now ask for your consideration and approval of this amendment as quickly as possible so that construction can begin. It would be exciting and valuable to have some park facilities available for use as early as next summer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely (Jth~ ~ ~ ~ WIND RIVER TREES October I, 2004 Dear Eagle County Commissioners; We are writing to express our support for the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District PUD Amendment that was recently submitted to Eagle County. I remember that a few years ago local voters overwhelmingly approved an increase in mill levy and the issuance of bonds to provide for this much needed park district. The mid-valley community would greatly benefit from such facility. The park design is consistent with local needs and wishes and has my full support. I am specifically looking forward to the construction of a BMX track. We are confident that the District Board will continue to be responsive to neighborhood needs and concerns as construction moves forward. The mid-valley community is looking forward to the completion of this park facility. We appreciate the assistance that Eagle County has already provided in making the park a reality. We now ask for your consideration and approval of this amendment as quickly as possible so that construction can begin. It would be exciting and valuable to have more park facilities available for use as soon as possible. The existing soccer field is an enjoyable addition to our community. Th(lnk you for your time and considerations. I SincerelYJ -ll yan W. Smith WRT Project Manager 19351 HIGHWAY 82, CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 . PH 970.963.0744 . FAX 970.963.9833 .- October 8, 2004 Dear Eagle County Commissioners, We are writing to express our support for the Crown Mountain Park & Recreation District PUD Amendment that was recently submitted to Eagle County. In November, 2002, local voters overwhelmingly approved an increase in the mill levy and the issuance of bonds to provide a much needed park facility for the mid-valley area. Since then, the District Board has been diligently soliciting public opinion and incorporating local input into the final design. The park design is consistent with local needs and wishes and has our full support. We are confident that the District Board will continue to be responsive to neighborhood needs and concerns as construction moves forward. The community is looking forward to the completion of this park facility. We appreciate the assistance that Eagle County has already provided in making the park a reality. We now ask for your consideration and approval of this amendment as quickly as possible so that construction can begin. It would be exciting and valuable to have some park facilities available for use as early as next summer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Kathleen a d Howard Berg ~.~~