The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 09/07/04 PUBLIC MEETING SEPTEMBER 7, 2004 Present: Tom Stone Michael Gallagher Am Menconi Jack Ingstad Diane Mauriello Teak J. Simonton Don DuBois Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Administrator County Attorney Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing, the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: GENltRAL FUND 21 ST CENTURY PHOTO SUPPLY A I COLLECTION AGENCY ABBOTT LABORATORIES ABELMAN LAW OFFICES ADAMS, LYNCH & LOFTIN PC AFFLECK PHOTOGRAPHY AFFORDABLE PORTABLE ALL PRO FORMS INC ALLIANT FOOD SERVICE, INC ALPHA INTERACTIVE GROUP ALPHA PUBLICATIONS ALPINE COFFEE SERVICE,LLC ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY ALPINE MEADOWS ANIMAL ALTERNATIVE REVENUE AMANDA DAVIS AMERICAN JAIL ASSOCIATION AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ANGELA EVELETH ANN MUNCASTER APPRAISAL FOUNDATION SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE AI'S SERVICE ARTHUR AND PERLMUTTER ARTWORKS, THE ASPEN BASE OPERA TON ASPEN PUBLISHERS INC AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES AURORA ENTERPRISES INC AVON CENTER A T BEAVER CK AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS B & H SPORTS BAILEY FUNERAL HOME BAILEYS BALCOMB AND GREEN BALLARD KING BARNES & NOBLE BASALT HIGH SCHOOL BASALT SANITATION DIST BATTLE MTN HS CHEERLEADER REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 9/7/2004 1 72.67 3.10 839.02 55.64 30.00 1,825.00 93.00 648.00 4,647.90 100.00 47.95 555.10 789.35 10.00 11.20 29.30 36.00 1,895.00 200.00 54.60 60.00 855.00 28.60 1,7I'efbo 99.83 179.00 1,500.79 30.00 3,716.10 3,535.56 637.50 360.00 189.00 5,602.45 4,321.57 164.42 1,800.00 135.00 1,340.00 BATTLE MTN HS FOOTBALL TM BATTLE MTN HS SOCCER TEAM BATTLE MTN HS SPEECH TEAM BEAVER RUN RESORT BERENBAUM WEINSHIENK BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS BLANCO CAMPOS BLOOM MURR & ACCOMAZZA BOB MONTOYA BOSTON MARRIOTT COPLEY PL BRAD A KNIFONG BRAMMER LAW OFFICE BRANDI FLOHR BRICK 1 BRITTANY BAKER BRITTON NIESLANIC BRONN EXCA VA TING INC BRUCE D GIESE C & H DISTRIBUTORS INC CARMEN LOZOYO-VELEZ CAROL MCNEAL CASFM CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CEHA CENTRAL CREDIT CORP CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTRAL INC. CENTURYTEL CFWE CGAIT CHAD MURNIN CHARLES B DARRAH CHEMA TOX INC. CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERIES CHRIS GUNION CLAIRISSA MARTINEZ CLE INTERNATIONAL CLIFFORD D ZINIDA CLINTON MEHL CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION CO DEPT AGRICULTURE CO DEPT OF HEALTH CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND CO STATE TREASURER COLLEEN WIRTH COLDRADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING CONTRACTPHARMACYSERV~E COpy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING CPHA SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE . SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE 91712004 2 2,880.00 4,240.00 800.00 406.85 55.00 54.57 30.00 4.30 144.74 1,141.36 540.00 55.00 75.00 2,750.00 6.22 75.00 11.20 22.80 1,177.27 151.80 125.00 290.00 2,960.75 375.00 9.80 3,014.81 13.17 19,894.02 62.70 200.00 350.00 30.00 80.00 15.00 60.00 450.00 595.00 90.00 72.00 25.00 100.00 469.50 . 119.25 15,129.60 50.00 55.00 11,023.82 16,678.70 1,353.60 444.25 2,089.5\ 548.94 4,862.11 2,762.75 620.00 . CRABTREES PHOTO WORKS DAN CORCORAN PLS DAN HANSON DAN LOY A DAN SPARKMAN DAN STANEK DARf,DEVIL DARLINGS DAVE MOTT DAVID A BAUER DAVID GUINNEE, DVM DAVID MIGLIACCCIO DAY TIMERS INCORPORATED DEANNA TULEY DEBORAH CHURCHILL DECATUR ELECTRONICS DEEP ROCK WEST DEFENSE FINANCE/ ACCOUNTNG DELL INC DENNIS WILLEY DENVER COMMUNITY FEDERAL DIANA JOHNSON DIANE FINCH SMITH DIANNE FINCH-SMITH DIEBOLD ELCECTION SYSTEMS DOCTORS ON CALL DODSON ENGINEERED DONALD DUBOIS DONNA FASI DONNA M BARNES DOSIA LAEYENDECKER DOUBLETREE WORLD ARENA DOUG WINTERS DUSTY BOOT EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY CRIME EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE EMBROIDERY INC EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RNER VILLAGE EAGLERNER WATER AND EAGLE V ALLEY CHAMBER COMM EAGLE V ALLEY ENTERPRISE EAGLE V ALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE V ALLEY LAND TRUST EAGLE V ALLEY PRINTING EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER ELECTRICAL OUTFITTERS ELLEN MATLOCK ELSEVIER EMC2 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCT EXECUTIVE TOWERS INN EXTENSION PROGRAM FUND FACTORY SURPLUS SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 91712004 3 2,175.00 6,740.00 19.12 165.00 151.38 70.00 3,600.00 90.00 30.00 2,100.00 100.00 53.44 106.76 183.34 307.00 537.40 147.74 4,142.36 27.10 502.94 60.00 225.00 50.00 82.00 1,305.00 348.27 263.95 75.00 161.39 71.40 158.00 78.97 3,437.50 3,991.00 6,208.00 2,000.00 922.51 29.76 637.55 2.80 107.73 15,000.00 20.00 72.00 75.00 4,975.00 8.51 100.00 90.00 253.61 231.68 216.01 89.00 232.76 147.92 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FEDERAL EXPRESS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC FIRKINS GARAGE DOORS FIRST BANK OF VAIL FIRST BANKS FLORIDA MICRO FLYING COLORS HORSE SUPPL FOODS OF V AIL, HOME FRANKLIN COVEY FRED PRYOR SEMINARS FREDRlCK SANMARTIN GALLS INCORPORATED GARFINKELS GECAPITAL GEORGETOWN LOOP RAILROAD GIRL SCOUT TROOP 292 GLENDA WENTWORTH GLENWOOD SHOE SERVICE GLENWOOD SPRINGS PARKS GOLDEN EAGLE SENIORS GRAINGER INCOItl'ORA TED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GREAT DIVIDE LODGE, THE GREENBERG & ASSOCIATES GYPSUM V ALLEY FEED HALL AND EVANS HALL KYLE HART INTERCIVIC HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HEALTHBRIDGE ALLIANCE HELEN M LINDOW HERMAN MILLER INC. HERTA VON OHLSEN HEWLETT PACKARD HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HILL EDWARDS AND HILLCARA LLC HOGAN & HARTSON HOLLY MINTZ HOLLY REED HOLY CROSS ELECTRlC ASSOC HV AC SUPPLY LD. EDGE INC IAAO ICC ICMA IMAGINIT EMBROIDERY IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS INTEGRAL RECOVERIES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION IRIS FRANKLIN REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE 9/7/2004 4 2,187.76 143.85 6,056.44 35.73 90.00 444.26 18,196.33 15,796.00 2,546.06 681.25 67.33 797.00 121.44 301.53 88.00 159.99 99.00 1,860.00 65.00 440.00 80.00 800.00 62.87 389.73 474.00 90.00 262.50 11.90 19.24 10,875.59 72.40 8,344.50 360.00 146.34 464.\ 0 24.00 201.00 582.45 4.20 10,000.00 1,257.50 75.00 125.00 27,036.36 .27.85 93.32 165.00 100.00 595.00 36.00 35.00 215.00 200.00 1,100.00 100.00 JACKSON COUNTY EXTENSION JAMES J STANDLEY JAMES MARTIN HATFIELD JAMIE HUMPHREY JANE FORD JANET CONNORS JEAN WOOD JEFFERSON COUNTY JENA SKINNER-MARKOWITZ JENNIE W AHRER JENNY WOOD JEPPESEN SANDERSON JERRY CHICOINE JERRY SIBLEY PLUMBING JIM DUKE JIM DUNLAP JIMMIE ANDERSON JOBS AVAILABLE JOE SCHMITT JOHANNA JENSEN JOHN BADE JOHN LONGHILL JOHN LOWERY JOHN M LASSALETTE JOHN RICE JONES & KELLER JULIE INTERLANDI K & K LUMBER K-D FLAGS KAPLAN COMPANIES, INC KARA BETTIS, CORONER KATHERlNEPETERSON KATHLEEN SCHMITT KATHY RUNIA KENNETH E DAVIDSON KESSLER MARY J KINDER MORGAN INC KKCH RADIO KLEINSMITH & ASSOCIATES KRISTEN MELSON KRISTIN DIEDRICH KSKE-NRC BROADCASTING KTUN-FM RADIO KUTNER MILLER, P.C. KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAB SAFETY SUPPLY LABELS DIRECT INC LAFARGE CORPORATION LANDS END INCORPORATED LARA "HEATHER" LA WDERMILK LARRY LEWIS LASER JUNCTION LDS CHURCH LEDERHAUSE EDITH LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 917/2004 5 20.00 30.00 3,000.00 19.84 1,250.00 72. 60 100.00 80.00 6.06 654.43 333.82 1,013.00 90.00 12.60 8.40 10.80 85.80 625.60 90.00 10.00 88.20 75.00 156.34 84.30 25.00 4.20 13.80 900.00 663.50 7,408.00 1,277.12 90.00 43.20 75.00 14.60 485.10 2,255.78 249.90 32.60 75.00 115.00 830.00 912.50 1,592.00 700.00 110.25 403.00 89.85 47.60 20.01 700.00 469.00 2,012.00 185.00 3,114.18 LEO V JIMENEZ LEON HANHART LESLIE KEHMEIER LINDA LONG LONE STAR SECURITY AND LORENA FERNANDEZ LORIE CRAWFORD LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES LUKE A BRENNAN LUZFORD LYNN CHAMBERS M LEE SMITH PUBLISHERS MACHOL & JOHANNES MAIN AUTO PARTS MARC SLA TKOFF MARIA ANJIER MARKS PLUMBING PARTS MARLENE MC CAFFERTY MBIA MCI WORLDCOM MCMASTER CARR MEDI BADGE, INC. MEDICAL ARTS PRESS MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MEGAN HAMMER MELANIE ROCK MELISSA ZINTSMASTER MERCK A TL MICHAEL D Y ACCINO MICRO PLASTICS MICRO PLASTICS INC MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN MIKE GALLAGHER MIKE KERST MILLENNIUM HARVEST HOUSE MILLER & COHEN MOBILE VISION MODESTA JOSE LOPEZ MOORE BUSINESS MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN COMMUNICA TIONS MOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE MOUNTAIN MOBILE VETERINAR MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES MOUNTAIN VIEW AUTOMOTIVE NALBOH NATIONAL4H SUPPLY NA TIONAL EDUCATIONAL NATIONAL IMPRINT CORPORA T NEILEY & ALDER NEVES UNIFORMS NITA NAUGLE NITTY GRITTY CLEANING REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 91712004 6 95.56 75.00 361.46 75.00 2,846.00 31.90 161.83 1,674.00 30.00 39.37 64.55 424.00 208.62 79.74 304.84 37.05 104.47 230.12 10,014.72 2,256.71 45.23 94.95 12.78 146.00 100.00 150.00 51.06 3,081.55 41.20 25.68 38.95 850.43 212.49 160.35 178.00 16.80 43.50 2.80 973.93 450.90 24,183.69 45.00 9,356.01 10.00 100.00 1,791.59 9.80 120.00 250.71 .747.05 1,014.26 30.00 200.00 75.00 2.80 NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORTHWEST COLORADO NW EDUCATION LOAN ASSOC. OLSON PROPERTY OSM DELIVERY LLC OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP PADGETT THOMPSON PAINT BUCKET THE PARAMOUNT DISTRIBUTORS PAT MAGDZIUK PEGGY GRAYBEAL PET FOOD LTD PETTY CASH PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PHILIP KLASS PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED PLASTOCON PRCA PRECISION RlFLE WORKSHOP PRIMEDIA WORKPLACE PROFESSIONAL FINANCE PSS, INC PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER PURCHASE POWER QDOBA MEXICAN GRILL QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION QUINLAN PUBLISHING COMPAN QUIRT HUNT QWEST RANDALL WB PURVIS RANDY JAEGER RDJ SPECIALTIES INC READYS ICE REALIGENT RED BLUFF BUCKLES REGALIA MANUFACTURING CO RENA OLSEN RENEE DUBUISSON REV A FRINK RHONDA LAWSON RlCHARD L JOHNSON RlCHARD LEE STAMPP RNER OAKS COMMUNICA nONS ROBERT KURTZMAN DO ROB WEN INC ROBYN LANDRY ROCKHURSTCOLLEGE ROCKY MOUNTAIN POISON DRU ROCKYNET.COM INC ROGER MOORE ROSA HERNANDEZ RSC RURAL HOUSING NOW, INe. S & S WORLDWIDE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 91712004 7 3,048.34 30.00 247.80 3,080.00 395.00 541.40 169.00 204.92 144.58 44.74 140.00 913.19 63.05 911.38 30.00 111.00 388.40 150.00 150.00 388.00 9.80 545.80 89.97 10,263.20 474.00 218.50 50.99 136.81 2,000.00 6,226.31 25.00 75.00 525.72 345.00 159.90 2,100.00 199.14 75.00 59.34 125.00 2,058.00 3.30 60.00 5,705.73 700.00 308.56 25.00 300.00 10.00 150.00 66.00 350.00 265.50 350.00 205.28 SANBORN COLORADO LLC SARA JARAMILLO SCHW AAB SECRETARY OF STATE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHAINHOLTZ TODD H DDS SHAREE WETTSTEIN SHEAFFER KAREN SHEILA L SEWELL SHIVELY & HOLST SIGNATURE SIGNS SILVIA LORENA DELGADO SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SNOWHITE LINEN SOFTWARE SPECTRUM SOUTH FLORIDA CHAPTER A-I SPEAKOUTV AIL INCORP. SPECIALTIES INCORPORATED SPECTRUM BRANDS SPRINGMAN BRADEN WILSON SPRONK WATER ENGINEERS STERICYCLE INC STERN & NEWTON STRAWBERRY PATCH SUE FRANCIOSE SUE MOTT SUREFIRE LLC SUSAN BROTMAN SUSPENSE FUND SWUG 2004 TAMMY LOUISE NAGEL TANNER MACHADO TCC CONTRACTORS TEAK SIMONTON TECH MEDICAL INC TED EICHHOLZ TELMAR NETWORK TECHNOLOGY TBNIB CHICOINE THE FLOWER CART THE GOURMET COWBOY THE MIRAGE THOMAS C BARRETT THOMAS D SILVERMAN THOMAS F FARRELL THOMAS W METCALF THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF BASALT-WATER FUND TOWN OF EAGLE TOWN OF VAIL TOWNEPLACE SUITES BY TOX TRAPS INCORPORATED TRANE COMPANY TRAVORAMEN SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 4,000.00 18.63 30.55 10.00 35,579.38 363.00 139.38 401.00 10.50 19.84 140.50 81.19 500.86 193.74 743.04 1,075.00 675.00 433.50 3,750.00 13.10 843.45 512.10 21.00 129.50 479.34 90.00 892.73 30.00 80,275.46 700.00 1.40 150.00 830.00 23.10 257.64 7.80 1,186.07 90.00 50.00 1,600.00 396.00 9.52 55.00 110.20 9.80 395.00 903.94 2,500.00 97.94 6,816.60 193,635.61 178.00 388.86 2,345.04 150.00 91712004 8 TRB COMMITEE ADA030 TROY FREDERICK TSNINCORPORA TED UNIFORM KINGDOM UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED REPROGRAPHIC UNITED RESOURCE SYSTEMS UNIVERSITY EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO UNIVERSITY OF UTAH URISA V ACCESS AMERICA, INC VAIL ASSOCIATES VAIL BOARD OF REALTORS VAIL CHRISTIAN HS HONOR S VAIL ELECTRONICS VAIL MOUNTAIN COFFEE VAIL V ALLEY EMERGENCY V AIL V ALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VAIL V ALLEY PONY CLUB V AILNET INC VALERIE KESLER V ALLEY LUMBER VALLEY SIGNS V ALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VERIZON WIRELESS, VICTORIA DAVIS VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS VISA CARD SERVICES VIVIAN CHRISTENSEN VOSS SIGNS W ALZ POSTAL SOLUTIONS INC WELLS FARGO WEST GROUP WEST V AIL SHELL WESTERN BUILDING CENTER WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY WESTERN SLDPE WESTERN SLOPE BAR WESTWORLD/SIL VERADO WIND RIVER TREES WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS WRS GROUP LTD WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY WYN T TAYLOR XCELENERGY XELCO COLLECTION SERVICE XEROX CORPORATION XEROX OMNIFAX Y AMP A V ALLEY ELECTRIC YAMPAH SPA & VAPOR CAVES ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY PAYROLL FOR AUGUST SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLLEXPD SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL 16& 17 91712004 9 150.00 95.56 6,321.15 2,189.85 324.57 323.16 81.00 795.00 30.00 75.00 539.00 1,802.10 46.75 15.00 1,960.00 93.75 39.75 1,170.00 1,617.75 340.00 67.80 157.17 239.86 23.15 165.00 5,588.34 14.00 98.90 5,309.40 450.00 47.20 228.28 279,876.28 1,186.58 229.00 3.50 1,100.00 6,799.00 3,226.50 1,975.00 1,995.94 1,120.89 29.95' 808.10 33.50 37.98 7.00 6,412.93 828.09 28.59 198.00 152.23 1,280.28 659,848.13 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND APW A CONFERENCE BAND B EXCA V A TING CHRIS OR HEATHER MARNER COLORADO ASPHALT PAVEMENT COLORADO PUBLIC UTILITIES DAVID OR CYNTHIA INGLIS DEEP ROCK WEST DOLAN CONSTRUCTION INC EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE V ALLEY MEDICAL EAGLE-VAIL TOWNHOUSE ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES FRONTIER PAVING INC GLENN MONTGOMERY GMCO CORPORATION GYPSUM CREEK RANCH HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HILL BROTHERS CHEMICAL CO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HOMESTEAD OWNERS ASSOC. IDEAL FENCING CORP J&S CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO KEITH KELLY KINDER MORGAN INC METEORLOGIX MOTOR POOL FUND MUSTANG DEVELOPMENT PADGETT THOMPSON PROPERTY IMAGING, LLC ROCKY MOUNTAIN CUSTOMS ROD CARTER SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SUPER 8 MOTEL SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF GYPSUM VALLEY LUMBER VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY WEIMERS HEATING WELLS FARGO WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR AUGUST SOCIAL SERVICES FUND ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFF BRENDA CAREY SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL 16 & 17 SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 9/7/2004 10 1,799,312.11 75.00 I7,II6.88 100.00 200.00 10.00 100.00 30.31 4,000.00 46.62 79.00 100.00 571.20 168.00 63,810.07 250.00 57,606.19 2,000.00 672.19 17,615.25 924.36 100.00 61,335.56 251.25 150.00 64.03 1,428.00 130,699.92 300.00 395.00 1,235.00 100.00 75.00 89.87 913.05 300.00 5,936.61 479.70 148.48 6,607.45 175.00 27,524.69 85.15 .50.80 63,609.54 467,529.17 19.00 242.36 CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CNTR SERVICE 100.00 COLUMBINE MARKET SERVICE 24.38 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 1,132.37 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES 250.67 EAGLE COUNTY SHERlFFS OFF SERVICE 46.90 EAGLE PHARMACY SERVICE 7.00 F AMIL Y LEARNING CENTER SERVICE 1,454.00 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY REIMBURSEMENT 1,020.00 FARNUM HOLT FUNERAL HOME SERVICE 1,000.00 GARFINKELS SERVICE 72. 00 GEORGETOWN LOOP RAILROAD SERVICE 81.00 HART INTERCIVIC SERVICE 127.04 HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES SERVICE 4.33 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 798.18 HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS SUPPLIES 67.50 HOLLY KASPER REIMBURSEMENT 182.32 JERRl ISRAEL REIMBURSEMENT 133.17 JOHN C COLLINS PC SERVICE 3,244.00 JOSE BANUELOS SERVICE 317.30 KATHY REED REIMBURSEMENT 264.62 LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICE 30.00 LAKE CREEK VILLAGE SERVICE 660.00 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES SERVICE 359.00 LONG BEACH GENETICS INC SERVICE 150.00 MAIN AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 56.94 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 1,315.54 PARK PLAZA SERVICE 138.00 PUEBLO COUNTY SHERIFF OFF SERVICE 37.40 SERENA DE LEON REIMBURSEMENT 30.00 SHERI MINTZ REIMBURSEMENT 46.64 SIGNATURE SIGNS SERVICE 4.50 STACIE BOOK SERVICE 64.00 SUBURBAN LODGE OF EAGLE SERVICE 253.90 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 5,656.24 TARA KANE REIMBURSEMENT 47.50 TENNYSON CENTER SERVICE 1,069.26 TERRl ALLENDER SERVICE 455.00 TOWN OF EAGLE SERVICE 103.75 VAIL ASSOCIATES SERVICE 38.25 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 258.73 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 17,773.69 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 471.75 Y AMP AH SPA & VAPOR CAVES SERVICE 162.00 PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 37,705.13 77,475.36 WRAP FUND CHRlS MORTON SERVICE 195.00 WALMART AVON SERVICE 75.00 YOUTH ZONE SERVICE 280.00 550.00 RETIREMENT FUND 91712004 11 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 68,260.97 68,260.97 INSURANCE RESERVE FUND ALPINE COLLISION INC SERVICE 750.20 COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICE 668.70 EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL SERVICE 602.89 PREMIER ELECTRIC CO INC SERVICE 2,505.00 4,526.79 OFFSITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG SERVICE 1,105.23 1,105.23 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND AMERICAN CIVIL CONSTRUCTR SERVICE 271,107.50 ARCHITERRA SERVICE 27,733.42 BAND B EXCA V A TING SERVICE 217,669.73 BLUE SKY LIGHTING AND SERVICE 35,536.00 CO DEPT TRANSPORTATION SERVICE 195,077.83 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 374.35 EAGLE COUNTY CONFISCATED SERVICE 35,650.00 EAGLERNER WATERSHEDCNL SERVICE 35,000.00 ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO SERVICE 23,411.80 HDR INC SERVICE 5,005.39 HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI SERVICE 3,294.00 HI CRANES INC SERVICE 275.00 HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 61,660.46 HYDROSYSTEMS INC SERVICE 935.00 IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICE 552.50 LEFTHAND NETWORKS SERVICE 22,871.00 MCGRAW HILL COMPANY SERVICE 312.80 METRON INC SERVICE 916.00 P-LOGlC SYSTEMS SERVICE 8,010.00 PEAK CIVIL ENGINEERING IN SERVICE 10,115.00 PETER BERGH SERVICE 6,500.00 RSC SERVICE 2,074.55 STRATEGIC FENCE & WALL CO SERVICE 6,510.61 TOWN OF VAIL SERVICE 366,510.00 TRANE COMPANY SERVICE 57,941.54 VOGELMAN WEST ASSOCIATES SERVICE 12,044.58 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS SERVICE 12,780.21 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES SERVICE 216.00 1,420,085.27 SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. A & E TIRE INC Al AUTO ELECTRIC COMPANY ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS ANDREA VESQUE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 6,613.32 515.13 29.99 8.57 9/7/2004 12 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES BIG STEVES TOWING BILLINGS KAR KOLOR INC CARTER & ALTERMAN CASTA COLLETTS COLORADO DEPT REVENUE COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLUMBINE MARKET CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DAVID B LOSH DEEP ROCK WEST DEPT OF REVENUE DOCTORS ON CALL DRNE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE COUNTY FAIR EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE V ALLEY GLASS AND FEDERAL EXPRESS G & K SERVICES GE CAPITAL GILLIG CORPORATION GUSTY KANAKIS HCA.HEALTHONE LLC HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HVH TRANSPORTATION INC IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS JANET FIELD JAY MAX SALES KINDER MORGAN INC KINETICO WATER PROS KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAWSON PRODUCTS LIGHTS ON BROADWAY LUMINATOR M & M AUTO PARTS MAIN AUTO PARTS MID WEST TRUCK MOTOR POOL FUND NEW PIG CORPORATION POWERSHIFT INC QWEST ROCKY MOUNTAIN FLEET RON E BECK RONALD F. GANN SAFETY KLEEN (WHICITA) SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SNAP ON TOOLS SUSPENSE FUND T H D PRODUCTIONS TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 917/2004 13 316.55 1,325.00 41.89 6,702.65 55.00 1,220.11 170.55 640.75 175.00 33.36 2,340.97 28.50 7.45 90.20 295.00 8,886.53 1,500.00 82,402.18 3.49 664.00 98.80 435.44 269.16 1,657.91 445.17 360.60 1,186.55 3,236.90 86.55 10.00 17.13 37.50 224.21 35.00 333.00 821.72 180.00 260.00 7.62 29.38 1,000.00 4,584.06 429.14 1,159.62 388.90 135.00 1,700.00 345.00 127.30 46.07 3,197.28 27.38 10,168.92 500.00 1,021.24 TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF GYPSUM TOWN OF VAIL UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV UNITED STATES WELDING VAIL VALLEY COMMUNITY VISION CHEMICAL SYSTEMS WEIMERS HEATING WELLS FARGO WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XCEL ENERGY ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLLEXPD SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16& 17 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS AGNES WOOTERS ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY BP RECLAMATION INC COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO PRINTING COMPANY COLUMBINE MARKET COpy CORPORATE EXPRESS ELLIE CARYL GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GRAND RIVER CONSTRUCTION HEALTH INSURANCE FUND IMP ACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS J&S CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO MOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE NEXGEN CONSTRUCTORS QUILL CORPORATION ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SUSPENSE FUND UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV WELLS FARGO WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES AIRPORT FUND AAAE ADVANCE TEC AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC ALPHA MIRROR & GLASS INC AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT BALCOMB AND GREEN BERTHOD MOTORS BOWMONK BRENT SERVICES BRIAN SCHOFIELD BRONN TRUCKING INC SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 91712004 14 93.26 1,679.86 950.00 525.00 27.54 100.00 3,531.56 900.00 49,057.37 216.13 42.64 64.96 116,973.19 322,790.25 23.46 25.51 5,450.00 1,098.04 1,386.19 99.69 5.79 75.39 70.13 192.00 750.00 5.36 44.00 674.03 150.00 153,530.35 268.06 5,000.00 147.76 575.00 851.62 9.00 170,431.38 1,190.00 26.26 18.87 210.20 85.00 187.50 233.01 362.00 124.00 516.00 50.00 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION CARTER & BURGESS, INC CED-CONSOLIDA TED ELECTRIC CENTURYTEL CHRIS ANDERSON COLLETTS COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLUMBINE MARKET COPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS DANGRA INC DEEP ROCK WEST DISH NETWORK DIVISION OF FIRE SAFETY DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE COUNTY AIR TERMINAL ELIZABETH WILT EMBASSY SUITES ESTES TRUCKING FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS INC GARYS TRUCKING GATEKEEPER SYSTEMS GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE GYPSUM TOWN OF HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HEALTH SYTLES FItNESS HOGAN & HARTSON HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS JAY MAX SALES KEISER CORPORATION KINDER MORGAN INC KSKE-NRC BROADCASTING KTUN-FM RADIO KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAWSON PRODUCTS M & M AUTO PARTS M & M TIRE COMPANY MAIN AUTO PARTS MCI WORLDCOM MHC KENWORTII-DENVER MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN V ALLEY MULTI ELECTRIC MFG INC NASCO LLC NA TIVE TRUCKING ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP PLIMUS INC REVERE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 91712004 15 507.46 1I,661.58 117.00 5,321.92 13.80 277.38 48.29 2,571.59 544.68 3.25 379.09 134.00 268.50 59.21 40.00 271.77 109.04 547.65 41.75 678.30 50.00 952.22 100.00 2,420.00 633.66 86.80 472.96 528.00 106.25 2,380.07 456.75 86.78 2,240.00 271.72 330.00 1,912.50 700.00 380.00 81.10 30.00 162.31 142.47 48.75 51,516.00 597.96 200.00 739.97 9,321.50 50.00 3,098.18 804.33 275.10 458.40 1,302.95 669.31 SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICE 2,348.00 SETCOM SERVICE 177.69 SPRONK WATER ENGINEERS SERVICE 480.00 SUMMITEX, LLC SERVICE 111.20 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 2,392.38 THOMPSON-LANGFORD CORP SERVICE 300.00 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE SERVICE 50.81 URS CORPORATION SERVICE 30,901.23 US CUSTOMS SERVICE SERVICE 2,285.59 V AIL RACING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICE 5,000.00 V AIL V ALLEY JET CENTER SERVICE 200.00 V ALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 8.08 VERlZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 58.85 VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE 1,203.03 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SUPPLIES 26.98 WALSH ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE 35,315.77 WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 445.02 WELLS FARGO PAYROLLEXPD 14,117.39 WESTERN IMPLEMENTS SERVICE 627.26 WILLIAM E PAYNE & ASSOC SERVICE 2,660.00 WILLIAM E PAYNE & ASSOC SERVICE 2,886.35 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 348.00 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY SUPPLIES 98.30 PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16& 17 34,227.13 246,474.20 MICROWAVE MAINTENANCE FUND CENTURYTEL SERVICE 113.25 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 2,917.27 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE 19,225.50 QWEST SERVICE 933.22 23,189.24 JMC-COP DEBT SERVICE FUND US BANK TRUST NA SERVICE 2,839.00 2,839.00 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND WESTERN SLOPE SERVICE 724.90 724.90 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND AMAZON. COM CASCO INDUSTRIES INC CUSTOM ENVIRONMENTAL SVS FISHER SCIENTIFIC PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING VISA CARD SERVICES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 1,044.68 708.00 5,000.00 21,592.52 11.13 342.67 28,699.00 9/7/2004 16 LANDFILL FUND COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 104.1 0 DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICE 104.30 DOWN V ALLEY SEPTIC SERVICE 405.00 EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES 159.88 G & S ENTERPRISES SERVICE 3,336.00 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 383.12 KRW CONSULTING INC SERVICE 21,142.04 LAF ARGE CORPORATION SERVICE 1,325.10 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 37,131.54 SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICE 1,936.81 STORMS MOBILE HOME SERVICE 1,965.00 STRATEGIC FENCE & WALL CO SERVICE 7,790.00 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 1,778.82 SW ANA SERVICE 141.00 VAUGHN CONSTRUCTION SERVICE 22,399.59 WELLS FARGO PAYROLLEXPD 5,822.29 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 125.70 PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 12,882.14 118,932.43 MOTOR POOL FUND AL-JON INC SERVICE 246.60 ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY SUPPLIES 75.48 APW A CONFERENCE SERVICE 75.00 BERTHOD MOTORS SERVICE 498,61 BRODY CHEMICAL SUPPLIES 111.93 CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 601.17 CCG SYSTEMS SERVICE 2,500.00 CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING SUPPLIES 86.32 COLLETfS SUPPLIES 64,977.65 COLORADO DEPT REVENUE REIMBURSEMENT 170.55 COLORADO MOTOR PARTS SUPPLIES 1,591.15 COPY PLUS SERVICE 84.77 DRNE TRAIN INDUSTRIES SERVICE 81.74 EAGLE COUNTY CLERK SERVICE 56.34 EAGLE V ALLEY MEDICAL SERVICE 79.00 EATON SALES & SERVICE SERVICE 4,892.70 G & K SERVICES SUPPLIES 565.58 GLENWOOD RADIATOR REPAIR SERVICE 190.00 GLENWOODSPRlNGSFORD SERVICE 163.61 GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE SERVICE 4,084.08 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 316.75 HENSLEY BATTERY SERVICE 109.95 HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 2,389.84 HONNEN EQUIPMENT SERVICE 36,444.50 JOHN LOWERY REIMBURSEMENT 45.92 KINDER MORGAN INC SERVICE 165.54 KRISTINA WARNER REIMBURSEMENT 6.48 LAUREL POTTS REIMBURSEMENT 33.23 LAWSON PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 882.16 M &M AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 1,192.23 91712004 17 MACDONALD EQUIPMENT CO SUPPLIES 210.34 MAIN AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES 84.78 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 4,232.84 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 1,336.07 NOVUS AUTOGLASS SERVICE 1,480.00 POWER MOTIVE SERVICE 609.01 REY MOTORS INCORPORATED SERVICE 1,223.60 SAFETY KLEEN (WHICITA) SERVICE 144.60 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE REIMBURSEMENT 46.09 SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICE 2,360.58 SNAP ON TOOLS SUPPLIES 851.25 SUPER 8 MOTEL SERVICE 300.00 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 1,491.03 TARA KANE REIMBURSEMENT 30.02 TIRE DISTRlBUTION SYSTEMS SERVICE 2,204.00 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 1,240.26 TWO RIVERS CHEVROLET SERVICE 536.75 UNITED STATES WELDING SERVICE 301.11 UNITED TRUCK & EQUIPMENT SERVICE 234.60 VEEDER-ROOT COMPANY SERVICE 198.00 WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SUPPLIES 806.78 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPD 8,349.33 WESTERN SLOPE PAINT SUPPLIES 1,533.03 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 957.89 PAYROLL FOR AUGUST PAYROLL 16 & 17 22,502.88 175,983.72 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 1,050.00 GENERAL FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 3,070.15 MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 35,941.81 PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 4,172.02 UNITED STATES LIFE INS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 4,744.40 48,978.38 ENHANCED E911 FUND LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES SERVICE 3.61 QWEST SERVICE 2,408.79 2,412.40 4,980,299.80 Consent Agenda A. Approval of Bill Paying for the Week of September 6, 2004 (Subject to Review by the County Administrator) Mike Roeper, Finance Department B. Agreement between Eagle County and Olga Wilkins Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services 9/712004 18 C. Agreement between Eagle County and Heart of the West Counseling, LLC Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services D. Tract C Berry Creek 5th Recreation Parcel Pond Construction Change Order with American Civil Contractors ("ACC") Rich Cwmingham, Facilities Management E. Resolution 2004-098 for Final Release of Collateral and Termination of the Warranty Period for Cordillera Filing 37, Phase 2, ARe-subdivision of Lots 1 & 2 and Tracts M-l & M-2, Cordillera Subdivision Filing No. 37 County Attorney's Office Representative F. Resolution 2004-099 for Final Release of Collateral and Termination of the Warranty Period for Cordillera Filing 37, Phase I, aRe-subdivision of Lots 1 & 2 and Tracts A, M, N & P, Cordillera Filing No. 37 County Attorney's Office Representative G. Encroachment Agreement between Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority and Eagle County County Attorney's Office Representative H. Intergovernmental Agreement between Eagle County and the Gypsum Fire Protection District Dan Stanek, Community Development Chairman Stone asked the Attorney if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Diane Mauriello, County Attorney stated that there were none. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve the Consent Agenda for September 7, 2004, items A-H. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Plat and Resolution Signing There were no plats or resolutions to be signed at this meeting. Other The commissioners were invited to attend a press release at 12:30 pm by the Vail Valley Foundation involving 72 acres of the Eaton Ranch in Edwards being preserved as permanent open space. They will be in attendance. Planning Files ZS-OOl10 Gabriel Foundation Cliff Simonton, Planner, Community Development NOTE: File Withdrawn by Applicant AFP-00194 Robin Ann Geon!e Residence Cliff Simonton, Community Development ACTION: Request approval to move existing building envelope approximately 10 feet to the east (downhill) and modify the shape of the envelope to match the footprint of the proposed residence LOCATION: 0095 Borders Road, Beaver Creek Subdivision TITLE: Beaver Creek Subdivision, Lot 7, Tract H, Block 2 9/7/2004 19 FILE NO./PROCESS: LOCATION: OWNER/APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: AFP-00194! Amended Final Plat 0095 Borders Road in Beaver Creek Robin Ann George Revocable Trust Richard Travers of Wear, Travers and Perkins Approval PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An Amended Final Plat, the purpose of which is to reconfigure the existing building envelope to accommodate the footprint of a proposed home, including all exterior decks and patios. The size of the envelope will remain the same. This building envelope reconfiguration will result in the residence being moved approximately 10 feet downhill to the east). As a result, the home will be provided a better view of Beaver Creek Village and mountain (to the southeast), and additional room will be created for driveway and parking areas on the street side of the lot (please note the attached Application Summary) SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses! Zoning: East: West: North: South: Existing Zoning: Total Area: Residential! PUD Residential / PUD Residential /PUD Residential / PUD PUD 0.684 acres NOTIFICATION! ADJACENT OWNER RESPONSE: Notice of this application has been provided in accordance with Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-21 O.E, Notice of Public Hearings. Related provisions of the Beaver Creek PUD Guide, which require a full 30 day notice to all adjacent property owners, have also been met. Several adjacent property owners have voiced concern, and at least two remain opposed to the amendment. Letters regarding this proposal have been received as follows (please see attached): Mr. Tim Kelly, letter of April 20, 2004. Mr. Kelly, who owns Lot I directly across the street to the west from the subject property, approves of the proposed envelope adjustment Mr. Barry Sanders, (represented by Mr. Burton Levin) letters of February 26,2004, June 24, June 27, and June 28, 2004, and August 27,2004, the last including a letter from Mr. Rick Pylman, AICP, who has also been retained to represent Mr. Sanders. Mr. Sanders owns Lot 6, which is directly east of and below the subject property. He is opposed to the envelope change, and has indicated that he will be present on September 7th. Mr. John Cooke, letters of January 16,2004 (to the Beaver Creek DRB), June 25, 2004 and June 28, 2004. Mr. Cooke owns Lot 4 which is kitty-comer to the north and east. He is opposed to the envelope change. Mr. Cooke faxed a copy of his June 25th letter to staff again on August 26th. His letter of June 28th indicated that he would be also present at the public hearing on September 7. Mr. Jeffery Chircus, two letters dated June 24, 2004 and a third dated June 28. Mr. Chircus owns Lot 5 which is north of the proposed residence. Originally opposed to the plan to move the home 20 feet to the east, Mr. Chircus has met with the George family and has accepted the most recent proposal, which is to move the house 10 feet to the east, and reduce a gable roof section on the east side of the house from a 12 foot overhang to a 6 foot overhang. As a part of their application, the Georges delivered copies of letters indicating approval from all other adjacent property owners (see attached). STAFF FINDINGS: Pursuant to the Beaver Creek PUD Guide, Section XII, Building Envelope Amendments, Subsection B, Public Meeting, "The Building Envelope Amendment will be approved by the Eagle County Commissioners if the Eagle County Commissioners find that the Building Envelope Amendment: (i) Does not substantially impact in an adverse manner the view corridor of any property ownel'_~C!}tJ~(}t/1-_~()i~~~____ 9/7/2004 20 of the proposed building envelope amendment has been sent. "Substantial impact on a view corridor" for the purpose of evaluating conformance to this standard is not derIDed by the PUD Guide nor is it defined by Eagle County Land Use Regulations. An evaluation is therefore somewhat subjective, but would logically include the spatial orientation of any existing and potentially impacted house, the interior spaces and window positions of that home, its exterior occupied spaces like decks and patios and the corresponding features of the surrounding countryside. Based on the orientation of homes and windows features that already exist in this area of Beaver Creek, primary views are to the south toward the Beaver Creek village and ski mountain, and to the east toward the golf course and eastern hillside of the Beaver Creek valley. As such, and if this is indeed true, the greatest potential for a view corridor impact from this proposed amendment would be to the Chircus residence to the north. While Mr. Chircus was originally against the envelope amendment, he has since reached an agreement with the Georges and is no longer opposed (reference his letter of June 28, 2004) Based on the relative positions and orientations of the homes owned by Mr. Cooke to the northeast and Mr. Sanders to the east, a "substantially adverse impact" to their view corridors is not readily apparent. No doubt, the views "up the hill" for both the Sanders residence and the Cooke's residence will be impacted by a home constructed on the subject property, even ifit is constructed in the currently platted envelope. Any "view corridor infringement" created by moving the home 10 feet to the east, however, would seem nominal when compared to the overall view attributes provided to these two homes. The proposed amendment will allow a home on Lot 7 to be built closer to Mr. Sander's out-door hot tub, which is located on the west side of his house. (ii) Is required by geologic or other hazard considerations. The proposed envelope amendment was not prompted by any identified geologic or other hazard. Cliff Simonton of Community Development presented this file. He stated that the envelope will actually move further than 10 feet to the east as previously mentioned, however, the building will only move 10 feet further east. This will provide more room for parking and improve views. There was no land use application that pre-dates this proposal. He showed various satellite images of the property. This house would be the final one constructed in the neighborhood. He pointed out where the various neighbors lived, as some were in attendance. The building plan is still the same as the original proposal, and there is a deed restriction that will be presented with this plat that will prevent any further building to the east. Chairman Stone asked for clarification about some of the slides, and whether anything would be built beyond a line shown. Mr. Simonton stated that an outdoor deck and lower patio would be built along with other amenities. By approving the envelope, the applicant will not have to go through the Minor Modification to a POO procedures as required through the Beaver Creed PUD Guide. The entire house, including the decks, has been shifted back i 0 feet to the west from what is shown in the proposal. Commissioner Gallagher asked if the deck is not required by Eagle County Regulations, but by the Beaver Creek Regulations, to be within the building envelope. Mr. Simonton stated that all improvements must be within a building envelope according to the Beaver Creek POO Guide. He stated that Eagle County POO Guides trumps Beaver Creek Land Use Regulations when it has specific language to aspecific topic. The language of the Eagle County PUD is hazy with regards to this matter. Commissioner Gallagher asked for a legal opinion about this matter. He then asked for the distance between the old building envelope and what is planned for construction. Mr. Simonton stated that there would be 18 feet of improvements as opposed to the original 28 feet proposed. The applicant has marked out the footprint of the home in blue ribbon for the Board to see. The property drops off quite steeply, about 25-28% beyond the envelope. Commissioner Gallagher asked if the blue ribbons represented the 20 foot or 10 foot movement. Rick Travers and Bob Lindell representing the applicant were present to answer questions. They stated that orange ribbons have replaced blue ribbons, but that the blue ribbons had represented the 20 foot offset. The orange ribbons show the current footprint with the 10 foot offset, not the 20 foot. Mr. Simonton showed various photos and stated that letters from property owners had been received concerning the application. Mr. Chircus had originally opposed the proposal, but has since indicated his agreement to the 917/2004 21 negotiated proposal. Mr. Simonton told the commissioners where to find these letters in their packets, and he gave the standards for the Board to consider when deciding whether or not to approve this proposal. It stated, "The commissioners will approve the envelope adjustment if they find that the adjustment does not substantially impact in an adverse manner the view corridor of any adjacent property." Staff made positive findings and recommended approval. Mr. Gary George, the owner of the property, spoke to the board. His comments indicated that they have tried to work out their differences with all parties before coming to this meeting, and this was their last resort. The proposal would not harm the other property owners and it would enhance the neighborhood. He agreed with a portion of Burt Levin's letter of August 24th, which stated, "The Eagle County Board of Commissioners will approve the building envelope ifit doesn't substantially impact a view corridor on any adjacent property owner." He doesn't believe that this proposal substantially impacts any views. He also stated that the letter's reference to "a view of light and air" is not found anywhere in the regulations. This process was started 11 months ago. The previous owner of Mr. Chircus' home had given written consent to move the George's house 20 feet to the east. Mr. Chircus, after buying that property, asked to move the house only 10 feet and to reduce a gable to 6 feet, from 12 feet, and the applicants agreed to that. In January, they offered to plant additional trees, at their own expense, and asked for any other possible solutions to resolve this matter with the other neighbors. Most of the houses had already screened off their view corridors with trees, and the view corridors look to the East, anyway. The house is only moving 10 feet from the original envelope. The change to the building envelope was part of a catch-22 and came after discussions with Eagle County Staff. They have a deed restriction that will not allow any subsequent owner to build upon the property. He then pointed out the distances between houses of the various lot owners. His house would be 141' 7" from a Mr. Sanders' house, and Mr. Spector's house, a three-story house, is 120' 9" from Mr. Sanders' house, after the proposed adjustment. Mr. Chircus' house is almost 100' closer to Mr. Cooks' house than the George residence would be. Homes are allowed to be three stories tall, but they are not going to do that. Their front door will be 71' from the road; other neighbors' doors are 80' and 70', so their house would conform to the setbacks of others in the area. The height of the house would actually drop 2', if the proposal would be approved, and would enhance the neighbors on Borders Road. Additional landscaping and more maneuverability for cars would also result from approval. Two impartial staffs have looked over this proposal and have given their approval. Bob Lindell, the architect, then spoke about the proposal. He told the Board members that this is a reinstatement of a project from about 3 years ago called the Lomax House, with slight alterations. The deck and lower patio are identical. The 10' change will allow for cars to turn around and gives room for planting. There is an upper deck and a patio down below to give some views. They have twisted the building back to not encroach on the total views. The roof overhangs and decks are considered minor encroachments, which are allowed outside of the envelope. The existing square footage js less than the original envelope. Rick Travers stated that these plans, including those outside of the envelope, were previously approved by the Beaver Creek Design Review Board, as this is regularly done. They re-shifted the envelope so they wouldn't have to come before the Board two times, but only once. There is a restriction in place to keep these exterior spaCes as exterior spaces only, so no future owner could put livable space in that area. Mr. Lindell spoke again how the most affected neighbor, Mr. Chircus, had given his consent to the proposal. Mr. Travers reviewed the standard, yet again, that there must be no substantial impact of an adverse manner of a view corridor for denial. Mr. Lindell stated that the proposed house will be 2 stories, looking from the behind, 1 Y2 stories looking from the road. The neighbors have 3 stories. From a massing standpoint, the applicants are allowed 35 feet and they have planned 25 feet. Commissioner Menconi asked what the square footage of the proposed home will be. Mr. Lindell stated that it would be about 10,000 square feet, or a little less. Mr. Travers showed more photos and views from various property owners' homes. These photos gave the distances between homes and the elevation changes. He clarified that the architectural design, shown with blueprints and windows, of Mr. Sanders' home are not facing the George residence. The view corridors are not of the George residence. Most homes are well down slope of the proposed home. They believe that the only home impacted by this proposal is the Chircus' residence, and the Chircus' are in support. He then addressed a letter from Mr. Levin, the Sanders' attorney, stating that the envelope is moving 28 feet, as not being true. The Sanders' themselves, have encroachments outside of the building envelope as well. He next addressed the 2nd argument about how the opposition has relied on these building envelopes. The opposition, Mr. Travers pointed out, have also modified their envelopes and they do not have a rectangular envelopes, either. Commissioner Gallagher asked if this building envelope had been previously approved for the Lomax home. Mr. Lindell stated that it fit within the original envelope and did not need the modifications. The minor 9/7 /2004 22 encroachments of the deck, etc. were still outside of the envelope, though. Chairman Stone opened public comment. Burt Levin, attorney for the Sanders, spoke. He stated that the building envelope application would result in the envelope moving 28' closer to the Sanders' home, not 18'. The Sanders are looking for fairness and consistency and don't want their investment jeopardized. The assumption in the neighborhood is that the buildings comply with the existing envelopes. Allowing this modification would upset that balance. There are multiple views from the Sanders' residence, not only the one view that Mr. Travers spoke of. There is more to "views" than from inside of the house, such as being in the yard. He believes the impact is substantial, not trivial. They used to own Mr. Cook's Lot 4, but they bought the vacant Lot 6 with an understanding that the views would not be compromised, and they followed the building envelopes. The fact that a previous owner did not object is not significant, as regulations allow for all interested parties to be present. Mr. Chircus is not in favor of this amendment; rather, he is neutral, based on the wording of his letter. All houses closer as a result of the amended building envelope oppose this, while all houses that move further away because of the amended building envelope approve it. If the commissioners don't approve the change, the Georges get what they paid for, if approved, the Sanders will be harmed. Rick Pylman spoke on behalf of the Sanders. He has great experience with building envelope designs, and their function is to come up with the best design for the neighborhood, as a whole. Building envelope amendments are common and most are for a minor encroachment of an architectural design. This is not that; this is an entire shifting of a building envelope. This envelope, for Lot 7 (George Residence), was not placed there by accident; it was well thought out, though it is somewhat close to the road. The current envelope gives great views, protects views of other residences, and allows for great spatial arrangement between homes, as pointed out on a slide. Chairman Stone asked if the slide shows the platted envelopes, rather than how the houses were actually built. He stated that all homes seemed to have some adjustment made outside of their envelopes. Mr. Pylman stated that the proposed patio encroachment would not be bothersome, but the upper deck would encroach 28' from the original envelope. The existing grade is 16%, which is relatively flat in Beaver Creek terms. With the adjustment, the grade becomes 24-36%, which is very steep. The deck and roof overhang, as proposed, will create a sense of "looming over" for the Sanders' residence, and it does impact the Sanders' views in a major way. He encouraged denial of the application, especially since there was an original architect plan that fit within the envelope. Barry and Nancy Sanders, opposed to the application, spoke to the Commissioners. They felt this proposal would be a substantial change, not a trivial one. They like the Georges and welcome them as neighbors, but don't like the proposal. The house is for 11,012 square feet, not the 10,000 as originally stated. They bought their current home with full awareness of the existing building envelopes and setbacks. They knew a house would be built on the George's lot, but they figured it would be built 28' further back. The items to be built "at grade" will require the building of a retaining wall, which will impact their views. They bought a new house and moved it to maximize separation between houses. Their own envelope has a "funny" shape because the County created it as a result of an unopposed application filed by the Sanders. Where there is no view, they have a hot tub area, at grade, and a circular seating area. Though cottonwood trees have been planted, their leaves will be disappearing, eliminating the privacy. Nancy Sanders spoke to the Board and reiterated what her husband had said. The skylight in her bathroom will now allow the Georges to look directly into it, specifically into the bathtub. Commissioner Menconi asked what the impact is specifically. Mr. Sanders stated that the retaining wall and deck will loom over their house and will be the background to their house, invading their privacy. Commissioner Menconi asked about the amenities in place. Mr. Sanders stated that the hot tub and sitting area are located there. Commissioner Menconi asked ifthere was any room for negotiation or whether they only want the building within the existing envelope. Mr. Sanders stated he wants it within building envelope. Commissioner Menconi asked if the Georges could get approval from the Beaver Creek DRB if the house was built within the original envelope. Mr. Simonton stated that the proposal would probably come back before the Board of County Commissioners agam. Commissioner Menconi asked if any decks are outside of the envelope. Mr. Simonton stated that the Chircus' deck is outside the envelope. Mr. Sanders stated that some of his decks are at grade and outside of the envelope. John Cook, property owner, spoke to the Board. He lives in the Sanders' original home and purchased it from them 10 years ago. Before he purchased his home, many negotiations were held with various property owners in the area regarding envelopes, heights, and architecture, and compromises were made. When he purchased, it was done so 9/7/2004 23 upon reliance of the building envelopes that existed. This proposal represents a 28 foot extension from the original envelope. The views and spaces are in all directions and should not be confined to one direction. Chairman Stone then closed public comment. Mr. Lindell stated that most of the arguments are subjective and the data is not correct. He submitted a comparison ofthe new proposal with the old Lomax proposal to the commissioners. Chairman Stone asked if the maximum distance between the platted building envelope and the amended building envelope was 28 feet, consisting of the building and the deck. Mr. Travers stated yes, but the actual building would only be moved 10 feet based on the original plans. The other 18 feet comes from plans that were already approved in a prior application. Mr. Lindell stated that the George's patio and deck are the same ones approved by the Lomax plan. The retaining wall will only be 4 feet tall. The overhangs will only be two feet and there is one partial covering that will come out 6 feet. Chairman Stone read from the applicant's submitted book that will be part of the official record. He then asked about support columns for the deck. Mr. Lindell stated there would be 3 foot stone columns that would support the deck. They go three feet above the deck and would have metal railings between them. Mr. Travers pointed out that the original platting did not consider the view up the steep hill; otherwise other homes would have had their envelopes pushed back, as well. They had tried to meet with the Sanders about their concerns, but the Sanders rebuffed all attempts. This meeting represents the first time the applicants have met with them. No one from the objecting parties has mentioned the specific standards for denial in their arguments. Mr. Lindell stated that the livable square footage for the George's will be 9800 feet, the deck will only be 8 feet wide, and the patio is only 20 feet wide. Mr. Chircus' called him on his cell phone and gave his full support and was not neutral as stated by the opposition. Mr. George submitted and read an e-mail addressed to Mr. Levin, Mr. Pylman, Mr. Cook and the Sanders. There was no response from any of these parties. He read from the letter about assuming the expense of planting some additional spruce trees and coming to a binding agreement. Mr. Chircus' response to the e-mail was, "Perfect". They already have one house in Beaver Creek that will not meet the needs for his entire family and grandkids. He stated that Mr. Pylman mentioned that the George residence is "somewhat close to Borders Road." The Georges are trying to conform to Borders Road by proposing the amendment to the envelope. There was a letter from the Sanders that objected to the Lomax house in 1999. Chairman Stone commented the building envelope changes are the most contentious arguments the Board must face and consider. He read from a letter submitted by Mr. Levin, "The building envelope amendment will be approved by the Eagle County Commissioners, if they find that the building envelope does not substantially impact in an adverse manner the view corridor of any property owner to whom notice of the proposed building envelope amendment has been sent or is required by geologic or hazard considerations." What applies at this hearing is the opposition from neighbors; the consideration does not address to the privacy of the adjacent property owners and that seems to be the main point of contention of the opposing parties. Both parties should have submitted the views of a building built within the building envelope and the building built based upon the proposed modification. He surmised that there would not be a significant change as it is not a primary view couidor. Almost every single building envelope in the neighborhood has been changed in some manner. Building envelopes are used as a guide for building with the primary view corridors in mind. Commissioner Menconi had no comments. Commissioner Gallagher generally agreed with Chairman Stone's comments. He expressed surprise that size of the house is being mentioned as a concern. Commissioner Menconi wanted clarification about the wording of the regulations and wondered if the Board could ever prevent movement of a building envelope, if no one objected to the amendment. Ms. Mauriello stated that the board will approve an amendment to the building envelope if it doesn't substantially impact in an adverse manner the view corridor, and the board could not prevent movement, ifno one objected. If the POO falls silent on an issue and Land Use Regulation's are not, the Land Use Regulation's are controlling. If the POO conflicts with LUR's, the POO will rule. She confirmed that the standard that everyone had previously mentioned is the standard that the Board must apply when making a ruling. Commissioner Menconi asked how the Board can define "view corridor". Ms. Mauriello stated it would be up to the Board to define it. Mr. Simonton stated that view corridors are quite subjective and up to the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Menconi asked about "reliance" of the building envelopes when making a purchase. 9/712004 24 Ms. Mauriello replied that prospective purchasers look at plats and building envelopes when deciding whether or not to purchase the property. Commissioner Menconi asked Mr. Simonton why he recommended approval for this amendment. Mr. Simonton stated that the judgment was based upon whether or not moving the envelope further down would create the "looming in the sky". They were unable to determine whether a 2-story building 10 feet closer as opposed to a 3-story building 10 feet further back would create a significant difference. The main level deck was within the massing of the building and is lower than what the roof would have been. Commissioner Gallagher asked to see the plat before making a motion. Chairman Stone made comments about "reliance" on building envelopes when making a purchase. He believes that, if this truly were the case, no amendments to building envelopes should ever be allowed. Commissioner Gallagher is inclined to approve this plat with conditions. He asked the attorney to make an appropriate condition and then he would be prepared to make a motion. Commissioner Gallagher moved the Board approve File No. AFP-00194 with the following conditions, and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat. 1. Except as otherwise modified by these conditions all material representations of the applicant in this application and in all public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. 2. Such plat shall not be recorded until such time as a restrictive covenant in a form to be approved by the County Attorney may also be recorded which includes an exhibit of non-living space similar to that shown on a Peak Land Consultant drawing showing hatched area where no habitable living space will be constructed. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PR-00025 Berrv Creek Recreation Tract Phase III Joe Forinash, Planner Development This file was tabled from 6/29, 7/27 & 8/17 . Approval of site specific review for a skateboard park, playground, building pad for future buildings and sub-grade and stabilized road base for parking and road areas. Tract C of Berry Creek Miller Ranch PUD; south ofI-70-east of Edwards 1-70 Spur Road NOTE: ACTION: LOCATION: TITLE: FILE NOJPROCESS: LOCATION: Berry Creek Miller Ranch Recreation Fields - Phase In PR-00025 / Planning Review Tract C, Berry Creek Miller Ranch POO; located generally south of Interstate 70; east of the 1-70 Edwards Spur Road; Eagle County Eagle County Rich Cunningham, Eagle County Director of Facilities Management OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions (7-0) PLANNING COMMISSION DELIBERATIONS: . Proposed barrier between the skate park and the softball fields. . Responsibility for maintenance of the improvements. . Visibility of a skate park from the bike path. . Phasing and timing of improvements, especially the building pad. . Timing for paving of parking lot. . Number of stalls in restroom. . Liability exposure, especially regarding the skate board park . Hours of operation and proposed night lighting for skate park. . Timing for construction traffic circle at entrance to recreation tract. . Availability of raw water for irrigation. 9/7 /2004 25 . Phasing and preparation of building pads and potential to become "wastelands". . Desirability of using local and natural landscaping. . Need to be conscious of weed and dust control. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY: Proposal for the third phase of the Recreation Tract improvements which include: [1] a skateboard park; [2] a playground; [3] a building pad for future buildings; [4] proposed parking sub-grade preparation and stabilized road base, as well as grading and drainage; [5] a grassed berm along the west side of the existing synthetic soccer field; [6] sub~grade preparation and stabilized road base for roadways around the future building pad, including storm drainage facilities; and [7] sod and seeding and an irrigation system around the pond. The only new structure which is included in this review is a restroom facility adjacent to the playground. Otherwise, this site specific review does not include building footprints or design. Other buildings proposed for the site will be the subject of subsequent site specific reviews. CHRONOLOGY: 1999 - The Eagle County Recreation Authority (whose interests were later to be transferred to Eagle County) and the Eagle County School District (RE-50J) entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement to develop the Berry Creek / Miller Ranch site on a joint basis. 2000 - A PUD Sketch Plan was approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 2002 - A Combined PUD Sketch / Preliminary Plan for the Berry Creek / Miller Ranch PUD was approved by the Board of County Commissioners in March. The final plat for the Berry Creek / Miller Ranch POO was approved in May. 2002 - Site Specific Development Plan approved for Phase I improvements on Tract C which included [1] three multi-purpose athletic fields; [2] a passive park area to include a picnic shelter, seating and playground apparatus; [3] landscaping, including a berm along Miller Ranch Road; and [4] drainage and detention improvements. 2003 - Site Specific Development Plan approved for a multi-purpose pond on Tract C to provide storm water detention, water supply for irrigation (including operational storage), recreation and aesthetics. 2003 - Site Specific Development Plan approved for Phase II of recreation field improvements, including: [1] a natural grass softball field with a 200 foot foul line and backstop; [2] a natural grass softball field with a 300 foot foul line and backstop; [3] a natural grass multi-purpose field (partially overlapping the two softball fields); [4] an irrigation system to support the fields and open space in between; [5] a path from recreation fields to the adjacent residential neighborhood; [6] eighty additional parking spaces (gravel); and [7] a 20 by 30 foot maintenance building SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning: East: Miller Ranch (residential) / PUD West: Colorado Mountain College / PUD North: Miller Ranch Road; school site / PUD South: Union Pacific Railroad ROW; residential / RSM Existing Zoning: POO Proposed No. of Dwelling Units: Total Area: Percent Usable Open Space: Water: Sewer: Access: None 35.6 acres 1 00 percent No potable water None (portable facilities only) Miller Ranch Road STAFF REPORT 9/712004 26 REFERRAL RESPONSES: Eagle County Engineering Department . The plans submitted are adequate for the preliminary plan level of detail required for this Site Specific Development Review. However, certain items will need to be addressed prior to final approval ofthe construction drawings. Eagle County Sheriff's Office . Advantages . More activities for the youth in the community . Disadvantages . Possible graffiti problems . Having to keep area clean of litter and other debris . Possible N (juvenile violence?) problems . Possible sexual prowlers in area and hiding in trees and bushes . Recommendations . Good lighting around playground and skate park . Fenced around skate park . Open and closing hours possibly . Plenty of signs of rules and regulations . Enforcing rules and regulations . Playground and skate park being a good distance apart . Avoid good hiding places for possible offenders and prowlers, e.g., big trees . Plenty of restroom options Eagle County Regional Transportation Authority (ECO Trails) . The area near the tool shed that they are moving the trash enclosure to could become the storage/junk/miscellaneous area that is in a way necessary, but it is also in the plain view of the regional trail users, whose view and experience is definitely being altered every which way along the trail all the way out to Miller Ranch . Maybe the tool shed area could be fenced. Eagle County Regional Transportation Authority (ECO Transit) . ECO currently uses the parking area to the west of the proposed skate park as a park-n-ride and a bus turnaround. . It would be helpful if the buses did not have to go all the way down to the south side of the lot to turn around. Rather ECO would like to be able to turn around on the north end of the parking lot. It appears that there is some space near the first row of parking, butit may be tight. Additional Referral Agencies: Eagle County Attorney, Eagle County Road & Bridge Department, Eagle County Weed & Pest, Eagle County School District, Partnership for Education, Colorado Mountain College, Berry Creek Metro District, Eagle River Water and Sanitation District. DISCUSSION: Approval of this phase of improvements to the Berry Creek Recreation Tract may occur after consideration by the Planning Commission and the Board that the development is consistent with the PUD Guide, the PUD Preliminary Plan, the Master Circulation Plan, and the Master Drainage Plan for the PUD. Consistency with the PUD Guide The PUD Guide establishes that the purpose for this Tract is to "provide sites for indoor and outdoor recreation, including active and passive recreation areas, parking facilities, and other community-oriented 9/712004 27 facilities." Permitted uses, specifically as they relate to this planning review file, include, among other things: Sports fields; recreation and community centers; ball fields and hard court areas; skate parks; parks and playgrounds; picnic areas; trails; childcare facilities; other similar indoor and outdoor recreation facilities; and utility facilities. All of the uses proposed or contemplated in this application are uses permitted by the PUD Guide. The number and design of on-site parking spaces is to be established through this site specific development review. Phase I recreation field improvements, which included three soccer fields, included parking for 128 vehicles. The rationale was to provide spaces for 30 vehicles for participants on each of the three fields, plus 38 additional spaces for transition times between games. A limited amount of this parking was also required to accommodate visitors to the multi-purpose pond at the west end of the Recreation Tract. Phase II improvements have included 80 additional spaces. The total number of parking spaces provided prior to these Phase III improvements is 208. Phase III improvements include sub-grade preparation and stabilized road base for an expanded parking area and internal roadways that will provide approximately 365 parking spaces total, inclusive of the pre- existing 208 parking spaces. A recreation center and child care facility is contemplated for this site, but the size of these facilities has yet to be determined. The recreation center and child care facilities, including required parking, will be the subject of subsequent reviews. Parking is adequate for the improvements completed to date. All of the proposed uses fall well within the dimensional limitations prescribed in the PUD Guide as it relates to minimum setbacks (20 feet from perimeter), maximum lot coverage (buildings: 50%; all impervious materials: 80%), and building height (45 feet). [+] FINDING: Consistency with the PUD Guide [PUD Guide, Section B.3.] The development occurring on this Tract IS consistent with the PUD Guide. Consistency with the PUD Preliminary Plan The Preliminary Plan approved for the Berry Creek / Miller Ranch PUD contemplates the development of this Tract as a recreation site. An overall landscape plan for the Berry Creek / Miller Ranch PUD, which was approved with the PUD Preliminary Plan, includes a streetscape/landscape plan for the Miller Ranch Road right-of-way. Landscaping detail was shown along that part of Miller Ranch Road immediately east of its intersection with the Edwards Spur Road, in the vicinity of the Housing Tract D, and in the vicinity of the Berry Creek Middle School. Irrigation is proposed to be primarily by use of non-potable water. The overall landscape plan for the Berry Creek / Miller Ranch PUD provided that landscaping and irrigation of individual sites are to be reviewed during the site specific development review for each site. No additional landscaping along Miller Ranch Road is proposed with the development of this Phase. A landscape plan for the playground and skate board park is included in the application. In addition, landscaping and irrigation is proposed for the area around the pond. Other landscaping proposed as part of Phase III consists of planting, with temporary irrigation, of natural grasses in the area of the building pads. The landscape plan submitted for this phase Of the recreation site development is consistent with the overall landscape plan. A permanent restroom facility is proposed immediately adjacent to the proposed playground. Infrastructure is proposed for a second restroom facility adjacent to the skate park. Existing portable toilets are shown near the southeast comer of the parking area, and an additional portable toilet is located south of the amphitheater area adjacent to the pond. [+] FINDING: Consistency with the PUD Preliminary Plan [PUD Guide, Section B.3.] The development occurring on this Tract IS consistent with the PUD Preliminary Plan. Consistency with the Master Circulation Plan The Master Circulation Plan approved as part of the PUD Preliminary Plan provides a primary access point into the Recreation Tract near the location currently being used to access the existing parking lot. This access point is 9/7/2004 28 intended to serve both the Recreation Tract to the south of Miller Ranch Road and the proposed High School Tract to the north of Miller Ranch Road. Ultimately a single lane traffic circle is contemplated to serve both Tracts. A traffic study was provided for the Phase I recreation field improvements reflecting aT-intersection where the access to the parking area for this site enters Miller Ranch Road. The traffic study indicated that the T-intersection is sufficient to handle the traffic generated by the three recreation fields of Phase I at an "A" level of service. Phase II improvements included additional recreation fields consisting of either two softbal1Jbaseball fields or a fourth soccer field (depending on the configuration), and 80 additional parking spaces. The additional traffic . generated by Phase II was not expected to generate enough traffic to warrant a traffic circle. Similarly, the additional traffic generated as a result of Phase III is not expected to warrant construction of the traffic circle at this time. The Land Use Regulations require that road impact fees be collected prior to development of new traffic generating development. Even though Eagle County is both the developer of the site and the "collector" of the road impact fees, it is necessary to transfer the calculated fee to the appropriate road impact fee account. Road impact fees were not paid prior to development of the multi-purpose pond, so the calculation of fees payable at this time should reflect both the pond area and the Phase III improvements. As a condition of approval, an appropriate road impact fee for the pond area and the Phase III improvements should be paid prior to the time Phase III improvements are initiated. [+] FINDING: Consistency with the Master Circ,ulation Plan [PUD Guide, Section B.3.] The development occurring on this Tract IS consistent with the Master Circulation Plan. Consistency with the Master Drainage Plan The drainage improvements for Phase III are designed be consistent with earlier Phases, with run-off from the site being directed to the multi-purpose pond near the west end of the Recreation Tract. The Engineering Department has not noted any concerns with respect to the drainage plans which have been provided. The County Engineering Department has reviewed the construction plans, and has determined that the plans provide adequate preliminary plan level of detail that is required for this Site Specific Development Review. Certain items identified by the County Engineer will need to be addressed and incorporated in the construction plans. Final construction plans will need to be approved prior to issuing grading and/or building permits for the proposed improvements. [+] FINDING: Consistency with the Master Drainage Plan [PUD Guide, Section B.3.] The development occurring on this Tract IS consistent with the Master Drainage Plan. Joe Forinash presented this file and gave a brief chronology of it. He showed several slides of the property for the Board, stating that the application is for site specific development review for Phase III of Recreation Tract improvements which adds: a skateboard park, playground, restroom facility, and other amenities outlined in the Staff Report. Staff findings are all positive, and staff recommends approval with conditions. Rich Cunningham, represented the applicant, and agreed with Mr. Forinash's comments. Chairman Stone opened and closed public comment, as there was none. Commissioner Menconi had no comments. Commissioner Gallagher was concerned about the vegetation on the playground potentially providing concealment and preventing visual parental control. He would like to see it changed to allow for more safety. Mr. Cunningham said it is specified to be a tree and the plan may be mislabeled. Chairman Stone asked about minimizing dust from the Recreation Center and the parking layout. Mr. Cunningham stated that they will be seeding, mulching, and sodding it before winter and will re-seed it in the spring. They will be changing the layout of the parking, as well. Chairman Stone asked about plowing the lot in the winter, as it is a park and ride lot. Mr. Cunningham showed the proposed route that ECO Transit will follow, and what Road and Bridge will probably plow. Chairman Stone asked about the timetable for the playground and the skate park. 9/7/2004 29 Mr. Cunningham stated that construction had begun and it would take about six months to construct. Adding in winter shutdown, the playground should be completed in July of 2005. The skate park is following the same timetable as the playground, as this is all one contract with one contractor. Commissioner Menconi moved the Board approve File No. PR-00025, incorporating the staff findings, and with the following conditions: 1. An appropriate road impact fee for the pond area and the Phase III improvements shall be paid prior to the time Phase III improvements are initiated. 2. Except as otherwise modified by these conditions, all material representations of the Applicant in this application and in all public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. He then asked if there is a need for a condition based upon engmeenng concerns. Mr. Forinash stated that engineering is satisfied and believe the plan will work. Peter Sulmeisters of the Engineering Department spoke and stated that the items in the memo are relatively minor, more like dotting I's and crossing T's. Chairman Stone stated for the record that all findings given in the staff report were positive. The vote was declared unanimous. AFP-OOI81 Cordillera Lots 6& 12 Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Planner, Community Development ACTION: LOCATION: To modify the shared property line between Lots 6 & 12 0320 and 0200 EI Mirador (Lots 6 & 12), Cordillera Filing 32 TITLE: FILE NO./PROCESS: LOCATION: OWNERS: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF. RECOMMENDATION: Lots 6 and 12, Cordillera Subdivision Filing 32 AFP-00181; Amended Pinal Plat 0320 and 0200 EI Mirador (Lots 6 & 12), Cordillera Piling 32, Edwards Howard and Loring Byers; Keith Tucker Howard and Loring Byers; Keith Tucker James Stovall Approval PROJECT DESCRIPTION The intent of this project is to modify a small portion of the shared property line between Lots 6 & 12, Cordillera Filing 32 in order to resolve a driveway encroachment. Currently, the driveway for Lot 12 is encroaching into Lot 6. Prior to the submittal of this Amended Final Plat, the owners of both Lots 6 and 12 agreed to modify the common lot line to ensure that the encroaching driveway is entirely situated upon Lot 12. The typical 20' drainage easement, which follows the existing lot line, will not be amended or altered in anyway with this modification; there are no related improvements associated with this amendment. SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning: East: West: North: South: Existing Zoning: Total Area: ROW: EI Mirader'1 Cqrdillera Subdivision POD Residential / C~tdiiler-aS~bdivision PUD Residential / Conlillenl Sabdivision PUD Residential/Cordillera Subdivision PUD Cordillera Subdivision PUD 4.00 acres 9/7/2004 30 Water: Sewer: Access: Public Public For Lot 12 via a platted, 30' access easement through Lot 5. Lot 6 achieves access from E1 Mirador. STAFF FINDINGS: Pursuant to Section 5-290.G.3. Standards for Amended Final Plat: a. Adjacent property. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the proposed amendment DOES NOT have an adverse effect on adjacent property owners. All adjacent property owners were notified for this file. No responses were received from the following adjacent property owners, as supplied by the applicant: David Budrow, Mr. and Mrs. Harvey McLain, Mr. and Mrs. Bill Wallace, Mr. and Mrs. Richard Silver, Mr. and Mrs. Joe Rzepiejewski, Kensington Partners and Mr. and Mrs. Bruce Quade. b. Final Plat Consistency. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the proposed amendment IS NOT inconsistent with the intent of the Final Plat. Originally platted in August of 1998, the intent of the original plat was to create Cordillera Filing 32 consisting of 12 residential lots, open space, etc. The residential intent of this plat has not changed; the owners have decided to slightly modifY the shared lot line to alleviate the driveway encroachment on Lot 6. The portion of the lot line to be modified is slight. c. Conformance with Final Plat Requirements. Review of the Amended Final Plat has determined that the proposed amendment DOES conform to the Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies and guidelines. d. Improvement Agreement. DOES NOT apply. e. Restrictive Plat Note Alteration. DOES NOT apply. Commissioner Menconi was not present for this file. Jenna Skinner-Markowitz presented this file and stated that this plat will modify a small portion of the property line between two lots in Cordillera, 6 and 12, to resolve a driveway encroachment from Lot 12 onto Lot 6. The modification will not change any easements, just the property line. All findings are positive and staff recommends approval. Jim Stovall representing the applicant concurred with Ms. Skinner-Markowitz's description. Chairman Stone opened and closed public comment, as there was none. Commissioner Gallagher asked if this modification would affect the square footage and put any of the lots out of compliance. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that it would not. Chairman Stone reviewed the findings in the staff report, and stated that they were all positive. Commissioner Gallagher moved the Board of County Commissioners approve File No. AFP-00181 incorporating the Staff findings and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat. Chairman Stone seconded the motion. Of the two commissioners present, the vote was declared unammous.