No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 08/03/04 Present: PUBLIC MEETING AUGUST 3, 2004 Tom Stone Michael Gallagher Am Menconi Jack Ingstad Diane Mauriello TeakJ. Simonton Don DuBois Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Administrator County Attorney Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public HeariI1g, the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: GENERAL FUND A 1 COLLECTION AGENCY ABC SCHOOL SUPPLY ACTION TARGET INC AFFORDABLE PORTABLE ALICIA J REED ALL ABOUT BOOKS ALLEN CHRISTENSEN ALLEN L WEAVER ALLIANT FOOD SERVICE, INC ALMA VARELA ALPHA INTERACTIVE GROUP ALPINE COFFEE SERVICE,LLC ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY AMADEO GONZALES AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMERICAN PROCESS SERVER AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH AS AMERIGAS ANDIE WILKERSON ANDRIA L COLLINS ANGELA HOLM ANN LOPER API SYSTEMS GROUP APS ARMY & FACTORY SURPLUS ARTWORKS, THE ASPEN BASE OPERATON ASPEN BOARD OF REALTORS ASPEN PUBLISHERS INC ASTROPHYSICS LLC AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES AV TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS B & H SPORTS BAJA BOOKS BALCOMB AND GREEN BALLARD KING BARBARA BRUNDIN REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 8/3/2004 - 1 - 24.52 619.21 1,060.00 93.00 12.42 212.75 12.42 18.80 3,479.17 55.55 200.00 844.34 55.56 16.80 312.00 30.00 108.90 391.92 235.75 348.45 75.90 90.00 685.00 205.00 100.00 3,280.00 174.84 6.52 707.94 750.00 5,798.72 336.80 304.45 669.20 29.70 7,721.90 6,310.72 40.37 BASALT CLINIC PHARMACY BASALT GIRLS BASKETBALL BATTLE MOUNTAIN HS BEEP WEST RADIO PAGING BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS BEYOND PLAY LLC BOB BARKER COMPANY BRAMMER LAW OFFICE BROOKES PUBLISHING BRUCE 0 GIESE BUILDING PERMITS LAW CATA CABELAS CARMEN LOZOYO-VELEZ COW CENTRAL BAG AND BURLAP CO CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CENTURYTEL CHADWICK, STEINKIRCHNER CHARLES B DARRAH CHARLES H WILLMAN CHOICE MAIL CHRIS JUERGENS CITY OF LOUISVILLE CLAUDIA MONTES CLIFFORD DZINIDA CLINTON MEHL CMCA CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND COBRA SOLUTIONS INC COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO NAFTO COLORADO POST COLORADO STATE PATROL COLORADO WEST MENTAL HL TH CONFERENCE MGMNT SOLUTION CONNIE STUMP CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING CONSTRUCTIVE PLAYTHINGS CONTINENTAL DIVIDE CONTRACT PHARMACY SERVICE COpy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPbRATE EXPRESS IMAGING DAN CORCORAN PLS DAN SEIBEL DAN SPARKMAN DAREDEVIL DARLINGS DAVE MOTT DAVID A BAUER DAVID BARTHOLOMEW SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 343.91 900.00 580.00 50.00 4,314.77 876.96 749.69 55.00 44.95 9.00 88.78 790.00 100.00 136.62 2,761.32 845.99 3,122.96 352.65 2,834.74 4,066.61 25.00 45.30 3,564.00 13.80 25.50 261.17 90.00 90.00 75:00 65.00 471.50 623.51 375.00 3,726.00 11,734.39 580.00 250.00 350.00 1,160.00 150.00 57.50 111.60 205.60 20.00 3,673.87 1,067.01 2,810.75 1,397.96 1,300.00 82.80 278.77 4,000.00 90.00 25.00 15.56 8/312004 - 2 - DAVID GUINNEE, DVM DAVIDSONS DEEP ROCK WEST DEFENSE FINANCE/ACCOUNTNG DENNIS WILLEY DENVER COMMUNITY FEDERAL DENVER NEWSPAPER AGENCY DIANA JOHNSON DIANE MILLIGAN DIEBOLD ELCECTION SYSTEMS DON OLSEN DONALD SALEM DOSIA LAEYENDECKER DOUBLETREE HOTEL DOUG WINTERS EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY CONFISCATED EAGLE COUNTY FAIR EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE DIRECT INC EAGLE EMBROIDERY INC EAGLE PARK RESERVOIR COMP EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE RIVER YOUTH COAL. EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL EAGLE VALLEY HS BAND EAGLE VALLEY LEO CLUB EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EAGLE WINDOW CLEANING EASTER OWENS ELECTRIC CO EDWARDS & TAYLOR LLC EDWARDS STATIQN LLC EEF PRODUCTIONS LLC ELISA ACOSTA ELLEN MATLOCK EMC2 EPS DESIGN AND PRINT ESI, ELEVATORSERVICE,INC EVANS MENDEL ALLISON EVELYN PINNEY-LEVINE FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FANCY LAW FIRM FEDERAL EXPRESS FELSBURG HOL T'& ULLEVIG FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC FIRST BANK OF VAIL FIRST BANKS FIRST DESCENTS FLORiDA MICRO FRANK J BALL GAIL CAMERON-BRITT GALLS INCORPORATED SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE ; SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 1,710.00 18.90 351.86 177.62 140.00 502.94 3,411.58 42.00 13.80 1,062.00 9.90 13.80 87.00 178.00 42.63 3,457.00 7,348.00 5,000.00 298.50 964.85 425.29 2,216.74 516.48 583.80 283.54 108.75 1,304.97 20.00 1,780.00 480.00 640.00 7,733.50 5,180.00 240.00 7.00 200.00 218.00 144.90 81.00 231.68 . 4,036.70 180.00 500.00 67.28 2,187.76 30.00 522.49 2,955.72 29.99 444.26 21,265.63 1,384.00 5,423.50 23.64 47.40 614.16 8/3/2004 - 3 - GE CAPITAL GEMPLERS INC GIRL SCOUT TROOP #265 GLENDA WENTWORTH GLENWOOD MEDICAL ASSOC GLENWOOD SPRINGS POST GORE RANGE NATURAL GRACE FINNEY GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAN FARNUM PRINTING GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GYPSUM VALLEY FEED HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS HASLER INC HAWTHORN SUITES HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HEATH MOSNESS HELEN MIGCHELBRINK HELLO DIRECT INC HERMAN MILLER INC. HERTA VON OHLSEN HEWLETT PACKARD HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HIGH COUNTRY SHIRTWORKS HILL & COMPANY HILLCARALLC HOLIDAY INN DENVER WEST HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HOME DEPOT SUPPLY HV AC SUPPLY ICMA IMAGINIT EMBROIDERY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION JAMIE HUMPHREY JANET CONNORS JBT'S JEFFERSON COUNTY JENNIE WAHRER JENNY WOOD JEROME EVANS PH.D JERRY CHICOINE JIM WAHLSTROM JOBS AVAILABLE JOE SCHMITT JOHN KING JONATHAN L LEVINE JOSEPH L FORINASH KAPLAN COMPANIES, INC KARA BETTIS, CORONER KATHERINE PETERSON KATHLEEN SCHMITT KATO COUNSELING SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT . SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 159.99 93.40 1,040.00 67.93 231.00 120.00 3,575.00 70.20 116.97 328.00 782.95 20.00 18.94 204.00 316.00 19,091.13 182.47 8,480.40 34.19 36.93 1,399.95 566.88 42.00 3,507.00 1,481.50 1,450.00 6,769.50 5,000.00 474.00 525.30 17,665.37 1,084.34 29.06 545.00 162.00 200.00 1,140.00 75.90 196.00 1,225.00 50.00 1,270.15 45.00 1,975.00 73.80 15.18 358.80 58.80 49.68 14.00 13.50 8,131.29 330.01 63.00 1.20 260.00 8/3/2004 - 4- KAY VINCENT KEMP AND COMPANY INC KEN NEUBECKER KEN WILSON KENNETH E DAVIDSON KERRY WALLACE KESSLER MARY J KIM JOHNSON KIMBERLY SPAHMER KINDER MORGAN INC KRISTINA WARNER KSKE-NRC BROADCASTING KTUN-FM RADIO KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LA QUINTA 0972 PUEBLO LAB SAFETY SUPPLY LANDS END INCORPORATED LARASA LASER JUNCTION LAUREL POTTS LAW ENFORCEMENT RESOURCE LEARNING PROPS, LLC. LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LESLIE KEHMEIER LINCOLN GRADUATE CENTER LINDA MAGGIORE LIZ MAYER LONE STAR SECURITY AND LORIE CRAWFORD LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES LUZ FORD MACHOL&JOHANNES MAGNETIC CONCEPTS CORP MAIN STREET GALLERY AND MARIA ANJIER MARILYN MENNS MARKS PLUMBING PARTS MARSLAND LABORATORIES MARY HOLLEY MATTHEW BENDER MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MCCOLLUM PATRICIA MCI WORLDCOM MCN MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MESA PD SWAT TEAM MICHAEL MCCLINTON MICRO PLASTICS MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN MIKE KERST MIKES CAMERA INC. MILLENNIUM HARVEST HOUSE MONICA JACOX MOORE BUSINESS MOORE MEDICAL CORP REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE 175.95 11.46 41.40 467.26 14.60 31.05 95.45 6.90 1,333.89 3,651.27 247.25 840.00 1,050.00 1,400.00 360.00 1,234.35 456.25 2,000.00 99.95 16.13 586.00 37.50 2,432.96 328.20 810.00 50.69 23.13 1,863.00 80.04 1,345.00 238.68 29.22 22.50 117.90 13.86 44.40 62.12 149.99 2.07 49.55 24.55 143.98 2,210.37 89.85 1,949.00 350.00 41.40 36.02 399.70 219.00 659.84 198.00 57.50 129.96 906.07 8/3/2004 - 5 - MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS MOUNTAIN MOBILE VETERINAR MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES MOUNTAIN TOPPERS NAPA AUTO PARTS-CARBONDLE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON NEBS BUSINESS FORMS NETTIE REYNOLDS NEVES UNIFORMS NICOLETTI FLATER ASSOC NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORDIC REFRIGERATION NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT NORTHWEST COLORADO NW EDUCATION LOAN ASSOC. OLSON PROPERTY OMNIFAX ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO OSM DELIVERY LLC OTTERTAIL OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP P-LOGIC SYSTEMS PALIN EQUIPMENT, CORP. PAPER WISE PARAMOUNT DISTRIBUTORS PAT NOLAN PATRICIA HAMMON PEGGY GRAYBEAL PEPPERBALL TECHNOLOGIES PEPPERDINE'S MARKET PETTY CASH PINYON MESA AUTOMATICS PIONEER PRODUCTS PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PRCA PREMIER ELECTRIC CO INC PRIME RX PRIMEDIA BUSINESS BOOK DI PRIMEDIA WORKPLACE PROFESSIONAL FINANCE PROTECTORS L TD PSS, INC PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER PUBLIC SAFETY WAREHOUSE PURCHASE POWER QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION QUINLAN PUBLISHING COMPAN QWEST RAYMOND P MERRY RAYMONDS OFFICE MACHINES REGiONAL HAZ MAT ASSOCIAT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE 44,009.19 2,250.00 250.00 461.15 525.00 10.00 146.90 222.93 99.00 2,713.50 80.00 2,420.82 326.46 1,472.38 30.00 247.80 4,025.00 595.04 7,727.51 399.00 77,000.00 150.00 390.40 4,185.00 1,630.00 2,076.00 144.58 68.31 62.10 180.00 80.99 523.75 45.76 802.00 249.90 92.25 3,637.60 25,000.00 948.44 66.50 246.86 776.00 29.50 175.00 476.65 547.27 96.45 317.06 110.95 119.96 134.97 6,201.77 45.00 205.90 27,503.00 8/312004 - 6- RENEE DOROUX FAMILY TRUST RENTAL SERVICE CORP RHONDA LAWSON ROARING FORK KENNEL CLUB ROBERT KURTZMAN DO ROSIE MORENO ROTOLE JAUNARAJS RSC S & S FIRE APPARATUS SANDRA L SKILES SANDYS OFFICE SUPPLY SARA JARAMILLO SARAH SCHIPPER SAWAYA AND ROSE SAYNOMORE PROMOTIONS SCHAEFER OUTFITTERS SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SECRETARY OF STATE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SETINA MANUFACTURING CO SHAINHOL TZ TODD H DDS SHEAFFER KAREN SHIVELY & HOLST SIGNATURE SIGNS SILVERTHORNE MOTORS SILVIA LORENA DELGADO SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SMITH AND WESSON SMITH EDWARD SNOWH/TE LINEN SOF~ARESPECTRUM SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY SPEAKOUTVAIL INCORP. SPECIAL PROTECTION INC STATE OF COLORADO STEPHENS NURSERY STEVEN J GOLDSTEIN STEVENS HOME CARE INC STRAWBERRY PATCH SUE FRANCIOSE SUE MOTT SUMMIT COUNTY SENIORS SUSPENSE FUND SYDNEY PITTMAN TAYLORWYNT TEAK SIMONTON TECH MEDICAL INC TENIE CHICOINE THE CLOCK SHOP THE OLD GYPSUM PRINTER THIMGAN & ASSOCIATES THOMAS F FARRELL TONY VANCAMPEN TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATI TOWN OF EAGLE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE 500.00 1,028.00 849.10 500.00 356.88 77.42 54.65 92.00 1,998.70 75.90 17.94 89.70 512.22 30.00 1,280.98 1,323.95 262.94 10.00 39,600.39 1,195.29 470.00 48.66 19.84 624.50 16,769.00 105.57 679.58 146.80 37.95 190.96 464.04 1,320.00 900.00 780.00 945.12 150.75 13.30 37.00 118.00 316.64 90.00 5,692.00 82,665.97 48.00 30.00 20.70 99.76 90.00 40.00 485.63 1,200.00 84.50 1,620.00 203.75 251.64 11,392.55 8/3/2004 - 7 - TRENDS WEST INC TRI STAR AVIATION UNIFORM KINGDOM UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED REPROGRAPHIC UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO URISA UTAH CHAPTER OF THE VAIL CHRISTIAN HS HONOR S VAIL ELECTRONICS VAIL LOCK AND KEY VAIL MOUNTAIN COFFEE VAIL MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROU VAIL POLICE DEPARTMENT VAIL VALLEY EMERGENCY VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VAILNET INC VALLEY ELECTRIC SUPPLY VALLEY LUMBER VALLEY PARTNERSHIP VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VAX SERVE TM VERBAL JUDO INSTITUTE VERIZON WIRELESS, VILLAGE AT BRECKENRIDGE VIRGINIA CERISE VISA CARD SERVICES VISUAL INFORMATION INC WASTE MANAGEMENT WECMRD WELLS FARGO WELLS FARGO BANK WENDY JO HASKINS WEST GROUP WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY WHITE RIVER COUNSELING WIDEBAND COMMUNICATIONS WILLIAMS SATELLITE WIND RIVER TREES WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS WRS GROUP L TD WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XCELENERGY XEROX CORPORATION YAREK GORA Z DELlINC ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES ZAPPETTINI SHERBAKOFF AND ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR JULY REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES 4,530.77 1,455.00 4,768.05 255.47 265.26 330.00 150.00 625.00 720.00 1,252.25 37.70 39.75 67.25 16,594.68 1,530.00 725.83 18,823.58 67.80 20.30 10.49 500.00 2,610.00 5,567.28 725.00 9,744.80 2,080.35 45.60 3,420.05 58,662.63 1,357.43 1,865.50 281,419.51 6,650.00 51.75 1,639.35 405.00 315.00 1,067.25 105.00 2,282.48 291.75 85.83 44.08 68.51 4,721.90 4.20 53.60 72.75 30.00 598.75 PAYROLL 14 & 15 638,298.00 1,782,098.04 8/3/2004 - 8 - ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND A PEAK, INC. ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY 8 AND B EXCAVATING CAMELlAJO CENTRAL SERVICES/EC D JENSEN ELECTRIC INC. DANIEL ERICKSON OR DARRELL OR VALERIE HAY DEEP ROCK WEST ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO GRAND RIVER CONSTRUCTION GYPSUM CREEK RANCH HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HIGGINS BRAD HILL BROTHERS CHEMICAL CO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY JAKE J STULL JOE 0 SAYRE JP TRUCKING, INC. KINDER MORGAN INC LAFARGE CORPORATION MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE NEXGENCONSTRUCTORS ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO PADGETT THOMPSON PAVING ACCENTS PITKIN COUNTY TREASURER POCA TELLO SUPPLY DEPOT RAC TRANSPORT CO INC RHONDA E GUENTHER INC SAFETY & CONSTRUCTION SAN ISABEL TELECOM INC SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SNAP ON TOOLS SOPRIS VILLAGE SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF GYPSUM VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY WASTE MANAGEMENT WECMRD WELLS FARGO WILD WILD WEST DEVELOPMNT WOOD PRODUCT SIGNS WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC PAYROLL FOR JULY REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPO REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 100.00 7.72 250.00 274.66 263.38 312.50 100.00 250.00 37.77 3,129.20 169.68 250.00 672.20 143.87 21,871.85 449.59 2,109.29 75.00 100.00 121,168.30 76.16 429.92 126,121.79 489.00 9,900.00 178.81 395.00 2,304.00 19,907.55 2,806.91 88.99 100.00 291.26 2,200.00 913.05 80.89 552.00 5,922.35 239.85 11,277.56 35.24 387.50 25,723.92 250.00 11,875.00 112.96 162.00 250.00 PAYROLL 14 & 15 60,482.29 8/312004 - 9 - SOCIAL SERVICES FUND ARLlSS SIMS CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, M.A. CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CHAFFEE COUNTY SHERIFFS CHRIS MORTON COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH CORPORATE EXPRESS CRAIG SMITH EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY GAIL CAMERON-BRITT GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HOLLY KASPER JANN C. ENGLEMAN JERRI ISRAEL JOHN C COLLINS PC JOSE BANUELOS KATHY REED LA QUINTA INN & SUITES LISA GRIGGS LORRAINE VALLADARES LYONS KATHLEEN MARIA CASTILLO MARIAN MCDONOUGH MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN FAMILY NOLA SMITH SLEEP INN SUSPENSE FUND SYDNEY R HAYS THE OLD GYPSUM PRINTER TINA EZELL VERIZON WIRELESS, VIRGINIA AVILA WELLS FARGO XEROX CORPORATION PAYROLL FOR JULY RETIREMENT FUND 435,289.01 REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT PAYROLL EXPO SERVICE 22.39 605.45 1,761.96 19.50 130.00 20,420.19 639.12 57.30 109.30 1,066.50 81.90 38.79 17.44 97.40 798.18 67.50 44.85 607.30 179.06 3,244.00 871.10 402.17 256.00 248.70 135.53 102.98 350.00 227.40 999.13 102.00 96.80 108.00 5,675.17 2,470.22 9.52 81.50 298.43 124.89 19,979.37 313.99 PAYROLL 14 & 15 41,054.46 103,915,49 8/3/2004 - 10- SUSPENSE FUND INSURANCE RESERVE FUND ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN OFFSITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND AMERICAN CIVIL CONSTRUCTR AMERICAN RENT A FENCE AMERICINN LODGE & SUITES ASTROPHYSICS LLC GT ALLIANCE INC INTUIT INFORMATION JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC LOUPE'S FINE. WOODWORKING METRON INC PETER BERGH PITNEY BOWES RAZORS EDGE INC STRATEGIC FENCE & WALL CO TRANE COMPANY TRILEMETRY INC VISA CARD SERVICES SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. A & E TIRE INC Ai AUTO ELECTRIC COMPANY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 68,752.47 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 68,752.47 1 ,536.22 1,536.22 43,943.42 43,943.42 154,666.39 11,675.02 134.00 17,556.00 16,363.62 5,000.00 4,281.25 13,950.00 530.00 9,125.00 13,433.00 3,263.00 16,890.00 9,349.98 712.50 349.84 277,279.60 5,018.45 560.46 8/3/2004 - 11 - ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES B & H SPORTS BILLINGS KAR KOLOR INC CARTER & ALTERMAN CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING COLLETTS COLORADO DEPT REVENUE COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COLORADO MOUNTAIN MEDICAL COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN o JENSEN ELECTRIC INC. DAVID JOHNSON DEEP ROCK WEST DOCTORS ON CALL DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE PHARMACY FEDERAL EXPRESS FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES G & K SERVICES GE CAPITAL GILLIG CORPORATION HANSON EQUIPMENT HASLERINC HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HIGH COUNTRY CUSTOM HIGH COUNTRY SHIRTWORKS HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC INSTA-CHAIN INC J J KELLER JAY MAX SALES JIM PARIS TIRE COMPANY KINDER MORGAN INC KINETICO WATER PROS KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAMINATION SERVICE INC LAWSON PRODUCTS MAIN AUTO PARTS MOTOR POOL FUND ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO PALIN EQUIPMENT, CORP. PRECISION COMPLIANCE INC QUILL CORPORATION QWEST RAC TRANSPORT CO INC RICHARD HOPKINS RONALD F. GANN SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERVICE MASTER CLEAN STEWART & STEVENSON POWER SUSPENSE FUND SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE 413.82 302.05 245.48 614.84 2,625.00 1,195.46 216.91 1,398.91 300.00 1,115.68 45.00 175.00 58.41 510.99 3,089.48 312.50 198.59 14.90 220.00 7,268.23 2.29 60.95 6,520.00 425.44 269.16 2,427.88 73.46 187.00 1,165.80 15.00 518.75 1,574.35 571.62 36.59 106.95 997.64 266.69 111.50 333.00 5,927.95 1,121.90 8.58 5,924.76 626.13 1,220.50 75.00 209.58 388.27 88.99 4.18 745.91 46.06 3,197.28 707.40 11,281.12 8/3/2004 - 12 - TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF GYPSUM TOWN OF VAIL TRAFFIC CONTROL UNITED STATES WELDING VAIL VALLEY COMMUNITY WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WHITEALLS ALPINE WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XCELENERGY XEROX CORPORATION ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY PAYROLL FOR JULY SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS ALPINE ENGINEERING BP RECLAMATION INC COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS ELLIE CARYL GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND HEALTH INSURANCE FUND IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS JOHNIES GARDEN KEMP AND COMPANY INC NEXGEN CONSTRUCTORS SUSPENSE FUND TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TOWN OF GYPSUM WELLS FARGO YEH & ASSOCIATES INC SALES TAX R.F.V. TRANSP. ROARING FORK SALES TAX R.F.V.TRAlLS SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES 27.00 441.15 839.93 ' 200.00 386.50 71.67 320.46 123.39 53,061.85 42.50 42.27 163.79 530.55 83.68 PAYROLL 14 & 15 124,236.57 253,709.15 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE 9,927.50 3,300.00 1,401.46 11.06 118.55 160.50 131.20 5.36 193.50 75.95 2.75 396,510.48 150.76 14.14 2,062.00 873.20 11,971.57 426,909;98 SERVICE 62,511.70 62,511.70 8/3/2004 - 13- ROARING FORK AIRPORT FUND AIRGAS INTERMOUNTAIN INC AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT ASMI BALCOMB AND GREEN BARNES DISTRIBUTING BENCHMARK ENGINEERING BERTHOD MOTORS BRIAN SCHOFIELD CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CENTURYTEL CHRIS ANDERSON COLUMBINE MARKET CORPORATE EXPRESS D JENSEN ELECTRIC INC. DEEP ROCK WEST DISH NETWORK DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP EAGLE COUNTY AIR TERMINAL ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO ELIZABETH WILT GATEKEEPER SYSTEMS GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GYPSUM TOWN OF HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HILL & COMPANY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC JAY MAX SALES KINDER MORGAN INC L.N. CURTIS & SONS LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE LAWSON PRODUCTS MAIN AUTO PARTS MCGRAW HILL COMPANY MCI WORLDCOM MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC MOTOR POOL FUND NEXTEL ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP REVERE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SUMMITEX, LLC SUSPENSE FUND TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED URS CORPORATION US CUSTOMS SERVICE SERVICE 6,945.75 6,945.75 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE 933.78 415.00 9,105.00 2,477.59 269.98 976.28 124.11 456.00 348.52 2,596.36 33.12 17.60 235.94 60.25 126.85 6.99 451.54 110,214.00 649,143.70 26.57 3,375.00 79.60 775.30 472.96 23,042.20 2,520.77 77.60 209.03 323.28 4,050.00 149.84 15.44 608.85 278.23 25,758.00 642.60 1,661.84 122.97 491.20 231.59 2,418.00 139.00 2,392.38 106.78 48,981.24 654.34 8/3/2004 - 14- VALLEY LUMBER VERIZON WIRELESS, VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN IMPLEMENTS WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY PAYROLL FOR JULY MICROWAVE MAINTENANCE FUND CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE EBY CREEK RD MAINTENANCE HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC QWEST CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND WIOEBAND COMMUNICATIONS HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND ARISTA TEK INC CUMMfNSROCkVMOUNfAIN IBM NAPA AUTO PARTS - VAIL REfS ENVIRONMENTAL INC VISA CARD SERVICES LANDFILL FUND 21ST CENTURY SEEDERS INC SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PAYROLL 14 & 15 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 196.66 42.58 755.28 445.02 14,899.11 985.53 21.77 217.95 336.13 310.93 36,702.50 952,510.68 286.83 1,200.00 2,917 .27 933.22 5,337.32 19,674.00 19,674.00 2,151.00 58.50 4,399.98 13.50 241.97 118.01 6,982.96 13,363.42 8/312004 - 15 - ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY CAROLINA SOFTWARE CENTRAL SERVICES/EC CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CORPORATE EXPRESS DEEP ROCK WEST DOWN VALLEY SEPTIC GOULD CONSTRUCTION GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND HEALTH INSURANCE FUND KRW CONSULTING INC LAFARGE CORPORATION MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SUSPENSE FUND WELLS FARGO XEROX CORPORATION YARGER SERVICES LLC PAYROLL FOR JULY MOTOR POOL FUND AL-JON INC ALLIED MACHINE SHOP ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY BERTHOD MOTORS CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE CCG SYSTEMS CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING COLLETTS COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COLUMBINE MARKET CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DAVID JOHNSON EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL ELMERS GLASS FARIS MACHINERY CO G & K SERVICES GLENDA WENTWORTH GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE HANSON EQUIPMENT HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HENSLEY BATTERY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HONNEN EQUIPMENT KINDER MORGAN INC LAWSON PRODUCTS M & M AUTO PARTS MACDONALD EQUIPMENT CO MAIN AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPO SERVICE SERVICE 14.48 300.00 189.96 16,354.45 115.98 89.40 485.00 3,588.15 92.45 388.48 9,197.31 3,945.94 45,701.87 1,744.93 1,789.05 6,106.88 123.00 875.00 PAYROLL 14 & 15 13,566.54 118,032.29 SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE ! SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 1,891.28 149.00 118.91 222.00 893.15 500.00 312.39 65,338.03 522.32 203.32 166.82 13.67 79.00 206.00 283.80 328.89 33.00 3,059.24 104.42 316.76 482.10 1,162.36 232.24 196.90 529.62 958.34 2,025.68 41.27 8/3/2004 - 16- MESA MACK SALES & SERVICE MOTOR POOL FUND ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO POWER EQUIPMENT COMPANY POWER MOTIVE REY MOTORS INCORPORATED RIFLE AUTO PARTS AND ROBERT BEAN SAFETY KLEEN (WHICITA) SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SNAP ON TOOLS SUSPENSE FUND TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS TOWN OF GYPSUM UNITED STATES WELDING VEEDER-ROOT COMPANY VISA CARD SERVICES WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN IMPLEMENTS WESTERN SLOPE PAINT WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY PAYROLL FOR JULY HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DENMAN GREYAND COMPANY EAGLE COUNTY HEALTH AND EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL GENERAL FUND MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND UNITED STATES LIFE INS ENHANCED E911 FUND CENTURYTEL LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES QWEST SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPO SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 66.47 6,865.72 462.26 65.39 85.11 787.20 96.08 35.73 234.87 46.10 2,360.58 971.17 1 ,482.48 85.00 620.13 336.41 99.00 20.73 2,196.86 91.09 8,117.62 1,505.57 363.56 276.93 PAYROLL 14 & 15 22,031.27 129,673.84 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 1,050.00 1,143.69 694.04 3,057.31 36,255.61 4,174.27 2,325.01 4,845.70 53,545.63 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 183.35 49.75 17,085.33 17,318.43 8/3/2004 - 17 - 4,765,965.98 Consent Agenda Chairman Stone stated the next item for the Board's consideration was the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of Bill Paying for the Weeks of August 2, and August 9,2004 (Subject to Review by the County Administrator) Mike Roeper, Finance Department B. Approval of Payroll for August 5,2004 (Subject to Review by the County Administrator) Mike Roeper, Finance Department C. Change Order Number Five to the Contract for the Eagle-Vail Pedestrian Trail Improvements Peter Sulmeisters, Engineering D. Change Order Number Two and Number Three by Elam Construction for Revisions to AIP Project Number 3-08-0020-35 for the Eagle County Regional Airport Taxiway "A" Connector Taxiways in Gypsum, Colorado Rich Cunningham, Facilities Management E. Grant Agreement between Eagle County and The State Board of the Great Outdoors Trust Fund for the Freedom Park Skate Park in Edwards, Colorado Rich Cunningham, Facilities Management F. Agreement between Professional Building Movers, Inc. and the 4-H Red Barn at the Fairgrounds in Eagle, Colorado Rich Cunningham, Facilities Management G. Agreement between Peter Bergh and Eagle County to provide Professional Landscape Architectural Design Services for the Recreation Site at Tract C, Berry Creek/Miller Ranch in Edwards, Colorado Rich Cunningham, Facilities Management H. Lease Agreement between Bill and DeAnn Lammert and Eagle County for Neilson Ditch Water Rights in Eagle, County Rich Cunningham, Facilities Management I. Agreement between Eagle County and Jann C. Engleman, LCSW, PhD. Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services J. Agreement between Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment and Eagle County regarding the Women, Infant and Children's nutrition program (WIC) Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services K. Memorandum of Understanding between Eagle County and the Colorado Department of Hurnan Services for the Implementation of the Colorado WORKS Program in Eagle County Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services L. Quality Improvement Application to the US Department of the Health & Human Services for the Eagle County Early Head Start Program Kathleen Forinash, Health & Human Services M. Drainage EasementDeed and Vacation between Eagle County and Berry Creek Ltd. Liab. Co. County Attorney's Office Representative 8/3/2004 - 18 - Chairman Stont': asked the Attorney if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Diane Mauriello, County Attorney stated that there were none. Commissioner Gallagher had a question about Item D and where the money is coming from. Rich Cunningham stated these funds are coming from AlP 2004 Grant. A couple of things will be pending, such as being able to award Schedule 3 for the taxiway, and whether the County will be able to change order in the LED Lights that were requested by the airport. Jack Ingstad stated that this project is already under way and the County really has no choice but to proceed with the change order. Chairman Stone asked about Item F, questioning that it is open-ended as to the location. Mr. Cunningham stated that it is, but they agreed to move it to wherever we wanted, as long it is on the Fairgrounds. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the Consent Agenda for August 3, 2004, items A-M. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Plat and Resolution Signing Cliff Simonton, Community Development presented the following files: 5MB-00340, Homestead Filing 2, Block 16, Lot 14. A Minor Type B subdivision, the purpose of which is to subdivide Lot 14, Block 16 of the Homestead Subdivision Filing 2 into two (2) Y2 duplex lots, Lot 14A and Lot 14B. All findings are positive and staffrecommends approval. Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve plat to be signed for file 5MB-00340, Homestead Filing 2, Block 16, Lot 14. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. AFP-00196, Cordillera Subdivision, Filing 11, Lots 22 and 23. An Amended Final Plat, the purpose of which is to vacate the building envelope on Lot 23 and vacate the lot line between Lot 22 and Lot 23, creating one larger lot, hereto after referred to as Lot 22, Filing 11, Cordillera Subdivision. All fmdings are positive and staff recommends approval Commissioner Menconi moved to approve file AFP-00196, Cordillera Subdivision, Filing 11, Lots 22 and 23. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Final Settlement - Agreement between Eagle County, Colorado and Elam Construction, Inc., for Eagle Vail Pedestrian Trail Improvements County Attorney's Office Representative Engineering Commissioner Gallagher moved to approve the Final Settlement Agreement between Eagle County, Colorado and Elam Construction, Inc., for Eagle Vail Pedestrian Trail Improvements. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn as Board of County Commissioners and re-convene as Eagle County Board of Equalization. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Resolution 2004-083 Regarding Petitions to the Eagle County Board of Equalization County Attorney's Office Representative Ms. Faber went over the resolution. There were 67 appeals placed on a spreadsheet for the C6fi11fiissioners t<Head. Exhibit A lists the petitioner,.the.decision (adjustrnent,.denial,or stipulation), and the 8/3/2004 - 19- notice of determination land value, the improvement value, total, and recommended adjustment by the hearing officer, which is the adjusted land value, adjusted improvement, and total adjustment. Chairman Stone asked about adjustments on the first two pages and whether the Total column reflects that. He asked if page 3 only showed denials and stipulations. Ms. Faber concurred with his statements, stating that the bottom of Page 2 actually had two denials on it, as well. Commissioner Menconi moved the Board of Equalization approve Resolution 2004-083 Regarding Petitions to the Eagle County Board of Equalization. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn as County Board of Equalization and reconvene as Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Ms. Mauriello stated that the Board did need to make a motion authorizing the Chairman to execute the application prepared by the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District for domestic water service through the mid-Valley. Commissioner Gallagher moved to authorize the Chairman to execute the application prepared by the Crown Mountain Park and Recreation District for domestic water service through the mid-Valley. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Other , Chairman Stone gave short background of the 2004 Achievement Awards. Commissioner Gallagher emphasized that these are national awards, not local, state, or regional awards. Commissioner Menconi also issued his thanks. 2004 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES (NACo) AWARDS TO EAGLE COUNTY Deborah Churchill, Administration ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS Wildfire Hazard Mitigation Community Development, led by Bob Naracci. Category: Planning Introduced by Commissioner Gallagher Eagle County Summer Activities Fair Health & Human Services, led by Jennifer Worchester Category: Children and Youth Introduced by Commissioner Menconi A Partnership for Pedestrian Safety . Engineering, led by Helen Migchelbrink Category: Criminal Justice and Public Safety Introduced by Chairman Stone Cemetery Bridge Replacement: Out with the Old-In with the New Engineering, led by Helen Migchelbrink Category: Transportation Introduced by Commissioner Gallagher Fly Vail Summer Program 2003 Airport Administration, led by Deborah Churchill Category: Marketing Introduced by Commissioner Menconi New EagleCouuty Airport Air Terminal Control Tower Facilities Management, led by Rich Cunningham 8/3/2004 - 20- Category: Transportation Introduced by Chairman Stone Planning Files PDS-00038 Red Sky Ranch Joe Forinash, Planner, Community Development, presented file PDS-00038, Red Sky Ranch. He stated the ,purpose ofthe file is to add 210 acres and 30 homesites to the Red Sky Ranch PUD Development. This file had been tabled from 3/9/2004,5/25/2004 and 7/27/2004. Red Sky Ranch PUD Expansion Eagle County File Nos. PDS-00038 Planning Commission Hearing Date: 18 February 2004, tabled to 5 May and 2 June 2004 Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date: 9 March 2004, tabled to 18 May and 27 July 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions PLANNING COMMISSION DELIBERATION: . Issues raised by State Division of Water Resources - whether they have been resolved. . Status of agreement with the Bellyache Metropolitan District. . Benefits to Bellyache Metropolitan District of approval of this expansion, including waiver of certain costs, reduced water service costs, and elimination of potential wells on the 210 acre parcel. . Status of 855 acres subject to a proposed conservation easement. . Reasons why conservation easement has not already been executed. . Whether the 855 acres subject to the proposed conservation easement can and/or should be part of this PUD application. . Alternative means to incorporate the additional 855 acres into the proposal. . Nature of potentially adverse impacts on critical wildlife habitat and proposed wildlife mitigation. . Potential of proposed development to re-activate landslides in the area. . Proposed septic systems, i.e., use of clustered "de-nitrification systems". . Impact of lighting in the proposed expansion area. . Inclusion of a noxious weed control plan. . Nature of the affordable housing that will be provided asa part of this development. . Extension of Setting Sun to provide a through roadway through the new development . Appropriate density in this expanded portion of the Red Sky Ranch development. SUMMARY: An application for approval, at a sketch plan level of review, of an additional 210 acres ofland and 30 single family residential lots to the existing Red Sky Ranch PUD which currently consists of 87 dwelling units, plus 40 accessory dwelling units, two on-site employee housing units, and two 18-hole golf courses on 780 acres of land. The application indicates that upon approval of the expansion of the Red Sky Ranch PUD, the Applicant will cause the placement of a deed restriction precluding development on 840 acresofland adjacent to the expanded PUD, although the guarantee for such an action has not been finalized. Further, the adjacent 840 acres is not a part of the PUD. As such, Eagle County has no leverage to require and/or enforce such an arrangement. CHRONOLOGY: 1998 - The Board of County Commissioners approved a Special Use Permit for the Jouflas Ranch Golf Course to include an 18-hole golf course and a club facility. 2000 - The Board approved the Sketch Plan for the Red Sky Ranch Planned Unit Development. 2000 - The Board approved the Preliminary Plan for the Red Sky Ranch Planned Unit Development, replacing and superseding the Jouflas Ranch Golf Course Special Use Permit. 2001 - The Board approved the Final Plat for the Red Sky Ranch Planned Unit Development. 2002 - The Board approved an amendment to the Red Sky Ranch PUD which relocated the two employee housing units, revised the design of a golf hole, and relocated two of the residential lots. SITE DATA: Sutrounding Land Uses I Zoning: East: Residential and golf course 1 PUD West: Agricultural/Resource 8/3/2004 - 21 - North: South: Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Proposed No. of Dwelling Units: Total Area: Gross Density: Minimum Lot Area: Maximum Lot Area: Percent Usable Open Space: Water: Sewer: Access: REFERRAL RESPONSES: Eagle County Engineering . The proposed access to the development will need to be improved to meet Eagle County road standards. . The additional development has only one access point. A second access will need to be provided or a variance from improvement standards granted by the Board of County Commissioners. · The proposed development wjl1 need to meet all the requirements ofthe Land Use Regulations regarding drainage improvements. . The proposed development proposes two long cul-de-sacs. It is proposed that the Applicant consider connecting the two cul-de-sacs to form a continuous looped road. . If the road system is not modified, the cul-de-sacs are too long and will need to be provided with emergency vehicle turnaround areas at lOOO foot intervals. . The Traffic Impact Study dated October 15, 2003, should be revised to reflect a build-out year of 2025. Documentation is also required to support the "75% occupancy" rate for the proposed development. Eagle County Environmental Health (Notes based on verbal comments of 24 March 2004) · Clustering of proposed septic systems is not apparent based on the information provided. The initial Red Sky Ranch development proposal showed certain homes served by clustered septic systems in specific locations. Environmental Health would like to see, based on site reconnaissance, specific homes on specific lots served by septic systems in specific locations. · Ground Water. Monitoring Reports required per 1041 Permit for the initial phase of the Red Sky Ranch development have not been provided to the County. Environmental Health would like to receive copies of these reports. . Environmental Health defers to Colorado Division of Wildlife regarding homes proposed in critical wildlife habitat areas. . The application initially did not demonstrate that adequate water will be provided. Information subsequently provided by the Applicant has resolved this concern to the satisfaction of the Colorado Division of Water Resources. Eagle County Housing Letter dated 3 December 2003 to Rick MacCutcheon (Vail Resorts Development Company) · In response to a suggestion that VRDC be allowed to purchase four units in the proposed Arden Development across Highway 6 from Hillcrest Drive to satisfy the affordable housing requirement of the 2000/2001 Red Sky Ranch PUD, a sketch plan application for the Arden Development plan has not yet been submitted for approval. In addition, it can not be determined whether any units in the Arden Development would qualify to meet the Red Sky Ranch PUDamendments. Further, it is highly unlikely that these units will be approved, built and ready for sale by I January 2005. Memo dated 6 February 2004 to ClijJSimonton (Planning Division) · The Eagle County Housing Department has reviewed the proposed Red Sky Ranch Expansion Sketch Plan. According to the Housing Guidelines now used by Eagle County, the development of these 30 Agricultural/Resource Agricultural, residential/Resource, Agricultural Residential Resource Planned Unit Development (PUD) 30 210 acres 7.0 acres per unit 1.943 acres 13.289 acres 19 percent Red Sky Metro District Individual and/or clustered sewage disposal systems Bellyache Ridge Road and Red Sky Road 8/3/2004 - 22- additional homes would require Vail Resorts Development Company to provide four housing units, or pay a sum of approximately $219,154.08 in lieu of providing these units. Letter dated 6 February2004 to Rick MacCutcheon (Vail Resorts Development) . Transmittal of Memo dated 6 February 2004 to Cliff Simonton (Planning Division). . Transmittal Miller Ranch Guidelines to demonstrate rationale for recommended cap of 10% on capital improvements. Memo dated 9 February 2004 to Cliff Simonton (Planning Division) . The Eagle County Housing Department has reviewed the proposal from Vail Resorts Development Company regarding the Red Sky Ranch PUD requirement letter recorded 6 June 2003. This proposal meets the intent of providing affordable housing in conjunction with this PUD requirement. . It is agreed that the targeted maximum price can be increased to $225,000, given the increase in Annual Median (household) Income for Eagle County in 2004. . In addition to a deed restriction limiting re-sale prices to appreciation rates based on the Consumer Price Index, it is recommended that the deed restrictions require the purchaser to be employed in Eagle County at least 30 hours a week, or have worked in Eagle County for the past five years for 30 hours a week prior to retirement. The deed restriction should also state that the home must be the primary residence of the buyer. . The Miller Ranch Guidelines, specifically Exhibit A, should be used to help calculate permitted capital improvements for the purpose of detemrining a maximum re-sale price for homes. . These homes will need to have a Certificate of Occupancy before I January 2005 to be in compliance with the PUD requirement letter. Eagle River Fire Protection District . Road widths, grades, pullouts and cul-de-sacs need to be defined so emergency vehicle access can be reviewed. It appears that the proposed road will mirror the existing system, which is approved. . The extension of the existing water system as opposed to individual wells provides a more reliable fire fighting water supply. . The issues identified in item 3.11, Fire Protection, have been presented to and discussed with the Board of Directors of the District. It is the District's intention to proceed along those lines. [NOTE: Items discussed in Item 3.11 of the application include (a) pursuing a contract for service provision by Eagle River Fire Protection District with the Greater Eagle Fire Protection District for service outside ofthe former district's boundaries, and (b) a financial commitment from the applicant that will allow the Eagle River Fire Protection District to accelerate the time frame for construction of a fire station in the Wolcott area.] Eagle County School District (RE50J) . The 30 additional single-family units would result in a dedication requirement of 0.4530 acreS (30 single-family units x .0151 acres per unit = 0.4530 acres). . As the land dedication is minimal, the district will accept the cash in lieu of land for this subdivision sketch plan. Bellyache Ridge Metropolitan District Letter dated 27 January 2004 . The District objects strongly to the recent request by Vail Resorts Development Company to add 210 acres and 30 homes to the Red Sky Ranch PUD, based on the failure ofVRDC to fmalize an initial 1998 agreement with the Bellyache Ridge Metro District made contingent by Eagle County to the original PUD approval granted Red Sky Ranch. . The District has been unable to consider its right to connect to the Red Sky Ranch water system because VRDC continues to change the amount requested for "upsizing". VRDC has not acted in timely good faith negotiation to settle many other critical issues linked to the possible future connection of the two water systems such as: the final interconnect point and route, interest rates, cost of water, management, repair, responsibilities, and other important matters. . The District recommends that the Red Sky Ranch 2003 PUD Amendment be denied until: o The construction details of the Red Sky Ranch water delivery system are professionally analyzed to insure it can adequately serve the requested additional 30 home sites and possible other expansion scenarios while still honoring the previous commitment to the 87 owners within the Bellyache Ridge Metro District. 8/3/2004 - 23 - . VRDC takes the immediate lead as previously promised in finalizing an acceptable contract with the Bellyache Ridge Metro District, resolving the "upsize" issue and all other outstanding matters within an acceptable timeframe. Letter dated 3 May 2004 . Since January 2004, Vail Resorts Development Company has been actively working with the Bellyache Metro District to resolve all outstanding issues with respect the 1998 agreement for an inter-connect with the Red Sky Ranch water system. . As a result, the Bellyache Metro District is now in full support of the Red Sky Ranch Pun Amendment before the County . The District firmly believes that the requested addition of 21 0 acres with 30 home sites has been sensitively planned to the needs of the neighborhood and will not have any negative impacts on the Bellyache Metro District. Bellyache Ridge HOA Letter dated 19 January 2004 . The HOA has many important concerns, many of which were voiced during the initial hearings for Red Sky and are still valid today. This new application makes these concerns even more crucial. · Bellyache Ridge Road was never designed as a heavy traffic road. It has dangerous blind turns and steep descents leading down from the entrance to Red Sky. Additional homes in this area will lead to even more traffic on a hazardous segment of the road. · Bellyache Ridge has been designed and maintained as a rural, country-like setting and night lighting ruins the ambiance as well as creates a hazardous situation for wildlife. This addition to the Red Sky PUD will add even more intrusive lighting. · The reduced density approved for the Red Sky Ranch PUD was a great improvement. Adding more homes now is an insult to the planning process accomplished for this area. More homes in this resource zoned area create more roads, more infrastructure, more lights, more fences and more development on important wild lands in the county. . The north-west slopes and drainages of Bellyache Ridge are well known for their wildlife habitat. The original Red Sky development has already compromised the winter range of major elk and mule deer herds, as well as bear habitat. This proposal puts homesites right next to and directly in this critical habitat. Hopefully, now that sheep grazing no longer occurs in this area, the elk and deer will return to historical use of the area. · The HOA acknowledges the dedication of open space in the application, however, this is land that would not be developable, is extremely critical wildlife habitat and needs to left in open space anyway. · Bellyache Ridge is in a Wildfire Critical Hazard Area - as established by the County. Putting more development into this area increases hazard to persons and homes. · Another major concern is the water supply for the existing housing developments on Bellyache Ridge Road. The Planning Commission eventually approved the new development (much down-sized) with the understanding that the Subdivision's water supply would not be compromised and that there could even be a water supply system that could be mutually beneficial. After 5 years, these negotiations have still not been completed and the Bellyache Ridge Subdivision is in great fear of losing their water to development lower on the mountain. . The HOA urges the Planning Commission to listen to the surrounding neighbors, the concerned citizens of Eagle County and deny this application. Letter dated 5 May 2004 · Although Bellyache Ridge Road was never designed as a heavy traffic road, the acceleration/deceleration lanes have helped pull Red Sky traffic off the roadway quite effectively. · Bellyache Ridge has been designed and maintained a rural, country-like setting and Red Sky has maintained that feel. To date they are being good neighbors. · Thirty homes on 210 acres is not high density. The HOA also very much likes the 800 acres dedicated to a conservation easement. · The HOA is saddened by this increased loss of habitat, but rejoice in the 800 acres being put in a conservation easement. · Bellyache Ridge is in a Wildlife Critical Hazard Area. The HOA would hope that steps will be taken by Vail Resorts to mitigate those hazards that occur on this property. 8/3/2004 - 24- . An agreement has been reached between Bellyache Metropolitan District, Bellyache Ridge Homeowners Association, Vail Resorts Development Company and the Holland Creek Metropolitan District. The HOA's water issues have been resolved at this time. Northwest Colorado Council of Governments . The applicant will need to get a CPDES (Colorado Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) discharge permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment for the stormwater control on a construction site. It is suggested that the County may want to require as a condition of approval that the applicant obtain and comply with this permit so that the County is in a position of enforcement should the applicant fail to meet the requirements ofthe CPDES permit. . The applicant indicates that they will need a CPDES discharge permit for the proposed on-site wastewater treatment systems, and that on-going inspection, monitoring and maintenance of these systems is necessary and will be addressed by the Metropolitan District. It is suggested that Eagle County requires an agreement with the Metropolitan District which specifies regular monitoring and maintenance. . The application indicates that drainage will be addressed primarily in unlined ditches. This is a preferred approach because it allows for infiltration. However, vegetation should be established in the ditches to minimize erosion from concentrated flows. . NWCCOG understands that a portion of the drainage will be directed to a detention pond that also 'serves as a golf course pond. These golf course ponds that also act as detention ponds may get some noxious algae growth. This can be addressed in a variety of ways from aeration to chemicals, but it may make sense to have some contingency in place in case this occurs. . The application addresses the need to prevent noxious weeks that often occur when soil is exposed. What are the plans for controlling weeds on the home sites during construction? . The plan for controlling erosion during construction should minimize erosion during construction of roads, infrastructure and home sites. . The topic of protecting water quality on golf courses should be considered in greater detail at the preliminary plan stage. Colorado State Forest Service . The Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) has given the Red Sky Ranch a wildfire hazard rating of high. The combination of shrub fuel types and topography contribute to this high wildfire hazard rating level. This rating means that structures on the property will be threatened by average wildfIre activity. . Dual access, along with maintaining a minimum defensible space buffer of at least 40 feet in diameter around all structures will help to lower fire danger. As another precautionary measure the CSFS also recommends that noncombustible roofmg materials be used on all structures. Colorado Geological Survey . The proposal is to add 210 acres and subdivide the additional land into 30 residential lots. Lot sizes range from 2 to 13 acres and slope gradients range from approximately 10 to 20 percent. Locations of individual or clustered individual sewage disposal systems were not included in the plans. . According to the preliminary geotechnical and geologic report by Golder and Associates dated 27 December 2003, the site is located within a large, old landslide which appears to be inactive. However, the report indicates that conditions may exist or develop, due to natural changes or as a result of development, which could cause renewed landslide movement. . In addition, the report indicates that parts of the proposed expansion may contain local landslides that developed within the larger landslide mass and may be prone to renewed slope instability as a result of natural increases in ground-water levels or due to development. Borehole data also shows that portions of the site may have a history of slope instability. . In the fall of 2002, slope-movement and ground-water monitoring instrumentation was installed in the expansion area; however, monitoring data from the instrumentation was not provided. The geotechnical report for the expansion area did not model or calculate the risks due to existing slope instability caused by development. Without this information, it cannot be determined if potential geologic hazards can be mitigated for the proposed use and density. . The geotechnical report contains many recommendations/restrictions on grading and where building, septic systems and other structures should be located to avoid potential hazards. Adherence to these recommendations is important; building envelopes, septic system locations, and grading restrictions, 8/3/2004 - 25 - which conform to the recommendations of the geological report, should be developed and adopted in any development approvals. . If the exact number of lots, lot configuration, building envelopes and grading restrictions should be determined during preliminary plan, the county should ensure that development activities, such as the construction of roads and utilities, do not occur until preliminary plan approval or are evaluated for slope stability impacts before the start of construction. Colorado Division of Water Resources Letter dated 20 January 2004 · A total of325.15 acre-feet of water is available to augment the consumptive use of this development. The consumptive use for an average year and dry year is estimated at 292 acre-feet and 329 acre-feet, respectively. As such, the plan is still sufficient to augment the projected water demands. . Certain water court cases appear to be limited to providing for only 425 acres ofland for the applicant, and alJother pending case will add only 210 acres, for a total of 635 acres. This is 355 acres short of the 990 acres proposed for this development. · All wells in the development must either be included in an augmentation plan or plugged and abandoned. · Due to a lack of a water-court approved augmentation plan to supply the land which is the subject of the proposed development, the State Engineer finds that the proposed water supply will cause material injury to decreed water rights and is inadequate. Letter dated 2 March 2004 · The Division (DWR) has reviewed additional information regarding this proposal. The additional information which responds to issues concerning the area included in the plan for augmentation. DWR accepts the interpretation that the 297 acre golf course expansion was included in a previous case, but it does not appear reasonable that the Wolcott Parcels were included in another case. DWR suggests that the plan for augmentation be modified to include these parcels. · DWR also accepts the interpretation regarding the status ofa certain Well Permit. This issue is considered resolved, since the Well Abandonment Report indicates that this well has been plugged and abandoned. · Since the plan for augmentation is sufficient to augment the projected water demands of the proposed development, the State Engineer finds that the proposed water supply will not cause material injury to decreed water rights and is adequate. Colorado Division of Wildlife Letter dated 1 j January 2004 · Although the inclusion of the 840 acres west of this project would have been a significant contribution for wildlife habitat, CDOW understands that this acreage will not be included in this project, mainly due to the involvement of a separate third party who is not a party to this project. · Although significant, the arrangement regarding the 840 acres to the west would also have posed several questions about on-site mitigation obligations ofthe development and CDOW agrees that it should not be considered as a part of this project. However, CDOW would like to bring to the attention of the County the importance of the adjacent property with future development in mind. As properties become developed, open space, movement corridors, and habitat concerns become increasingly important. · Elk Calving Habitat - The southern half of the proposed development lies entirely within the CDOW's WRIS Maps Defined Calving Habitat, which is defined as critical habitat. While the Applicant's surveys have shown that this habitat maybe minimal, CDOW maintains that its WRIS mapping is accurate and a contributing factor for their assessment may be primarily due to over grazing from sheep herds. This habitat could be critical in future years, especially since Phase 1 of Red Sky Ranch was permitted in a portion of this calving area. CDOW recommendations include: · Remove the southern half of the 210 acres to allow for a buffer between the development and this possible critical habitat; or · Allow two stages of development, approving development of the northern lots while the southern area could be studied after sheep grazing is gone to evaluate the habitat (minimum of five years to allow for habitat restoration); or · Remove development from the southern half and move eight to ten home sites to the northern portion of the 210 acres with smaller lot sizes. 8/3/2004 - 26- . Calving and Rearing Habitat on West Side - The proposed development of Lots 9-14 and 30 have west borders to the WRIS elk calving and rearing habitat. The large size of these seven lots could have negative effects on the rearing of young elk. Human noise as well as exposure to humans and pets could disrupt this vital stage in elk calving and rearing. CDOW recommendations include: . Reduce lot size to create a buffer area between the lots and this habitat, that is, a reduction from the northwest comer of Lot 14 to the southwest comer of Lot 30; or . Leave lot sizes as proposed, but create stipulations on the back portions of these lots such as the seasonal closures on open space, and building closures. . Open Space, Trails, and Seasonal Closures - Trails are proposed within the development, but their nature or location has not been specified. Therefore, CDOW is unable to make an assessment. However, placing trails very near critical calving and rearing habitat could be a detrimental component of this proposal. CDOW recommendations include: . Exclude the development of trails within and near the outlined calving and rearing areas as specified on CDOW WTIS maps; or . Require seasonal closures to these trails and open space as already provided in the Wildlife Management and Enhancement for the existing Red Sky Ranch PUD (that is, 20 November through 15 May), with closures of trails within the calving and rearing areas extended to 30 June. Letter dated 24 May 2004 . The Division still maintains that this property has wildlife values that should be protected and the creation of a conservation easement may do that. . However, the certainty of this entire issue is unknown, draft language that hasn't yet been reviewed by the Division to assure wildlife protections are included, a final signed easement is not in place, the overall role it should have in this project is undecided, and the easement may be removed as a condition of approval. . Consequently, the Division conditionally supports this proposal at this time until these items are further understood and agreed upon. . The Division also wants to ensure that on-site mitigation remains a part of this project in which impacts, to the extent possible, are addressed on~site before looking to an adjacent or off-site location for mitigation. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers . The Red Sky Ranch PUD - Expansion has been reviewed in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act under which the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulates the discharge of dredge and fill material in waters of the U.S., including wetlands. Based upon the information provided to this office for review, it appears the project will not involve such discharges. Therefore, a Department of the Army Permit will not be required for the above-mentioned work. Natural Resource Conservation Service (USDA) . No comment. Additional Referral Agencies: Eagle County Attorney, Eagle County Animal Control, Eagle County Ambulance District, Red Sky Ranch Metropolitan District, Colorado Department of Transportation, CenturyTel, KN Energy, Holy Cross Energy, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Red Sky Ranch HOA, Diamond Star Ranch HOA. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F.3.e Standards for the review of a Sketch and Preliminary Plan for a PUD: STANDARD: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (I)] - The title to all land that is part of a PUD shall be owned or controlled by one (1) person. A person shall be considered to control all lands in the PUD either through ownership or by written consent of all owners of the land that they will be subject to the conditions and standards of the PUD. The Vail Corporation is both the Applicant and the owner of the land that is to be a part of the Planned Unit Development. +] FINDING: Uni led ownershi or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e I 8/3/2004 - 27- I The title to all land that is part of a PUD IS owned or controlled by one (1) person. STANDARD: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] -The uses that may be developed in the PUD shall be those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule'~ or Table 3- 320, "Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule'~for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the applicationfor PUD. Variations of these use designations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3f, Variations Authorized. The uses proposed for this PUD are uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule", including single-family residential uses. No variations are required. [+] FINDING: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] The uses that may be developed in the POO ARE those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule" for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. STANDARD: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5;.240.F.3.e (3)] - The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD shall be those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these dimensional limitations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3f, Variations Authorized. provided variations shall leave adequate distance between buildings for necessary access and fire protection, and ensure proper ventilation, light, air and snowmelt between buildings. A variation from the dimensional limitations in effect for the Resource zone district will be required for lots smaller than the 35 acre minimum lot for the Resource zone district. The Applicant notes that the proposed 30 residential units is equal to the number of 35 acre lots that could be created, without subdivision review, out of the 210 acres that are apart of this sketch plan, plus 840 acres which are part of the adjacent Diamond S Ranch [(210 acres + 840 acres) 1 35 acres per unit]. The 840 acres of the Diamond S Ranch are not a part of this PUD. vet the Applicant is proposing to designate it as open space and subiect to development restrictions in a manner that would benefit the proposed Red Sky Ranch PUD Expansion. As of this writing, it has not been demonstrated that the additional 840 acres will, in fact, be made subject to development restrictions in a manner that would permit its consideration in conjunction with this application, although a letter from the attorneys for the Diamond S Ranch has been received indicating an intent to grant an easement on the 840 acres, but only after the County has given final approval to this proposed expansion ofthe Red Sky Ranch PUD, including all zoning and subdivision approvals. Further, the nature of such restrictions has not been detailed. However, in discussions with the Applicant, Staff understands that a draft easement agreement is under consideration by the Applicant and the Eagle Valley Land Trust (EVLT) and, once executed, will be held by EVL T "in escrow" until approval of the PUD Preliminary Plan. As a condition of approval, the Preliminary Plan should clearly demonstrate the manner in which the 840 acres which are a part of the Diamond S Ranch and proposed as open space benefiting this development will be restricted from further development, and the nature of any proposed development restrictions. [Condition # 1] [+/-] FINDING: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD ARE NOT those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule ofDimension~1 Limitations", for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. But, the Board MAY grant a variation from these 8/312004 - 28- dimensional limitations pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3.f., Variations Authorized. STANDARD: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] -Off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. A reduction in these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that: a) Shared Parking. Because of shared parking arrangements among uses within the PUD that do not require peak parking for those uses to occur at the same time, the parking needs of residents, guests and employees of the project will be met; or b) Actual Needs. The actual needs of the project's residents, guests and employees will be less than those set by Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. The applicant may commit to provide specialized transportation services for these persons (such as vans, subsidized bus passes, or similar services) as a means of complying with this standard. The Applicant notes that all portions of Red Sky Ranch, including the proposed amendments, will comply with the parking and loading requirements of the Land Use Regulations. [+] FINDING: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] It HAS been demonstrated that off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD complies with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards, without a necessity for a reduction in the standards. STANDARD: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] -Landscaping provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaoing and Rlumination Standards. Variations from these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that the proposed landscaping provides sufficient buffering of uses from each other (both within the PUD and between the PUD and surrounding uses) to minimize noise, glare and other adverse impacts, creates attractive streetscapes and parking areas and is consistent with the character of the area. The Applicant indicates that landscaping within the PUD will comply with the standards outlined in the Land Use Regulations with the exception of the requirement for a suburban style treatment of street tree planting. The only common area landscaping proposed within the 210 acre expansion area is to be the re-vegetation of the road right of way areas disturbed by road construction, which will be planted with a natural seed mix specifically designed for Red Sky Ranch. Other than the detail repeated above, no conceptual landscape plan has been provided. It appears that the requirements ofthis Section can be met at Preliminary Plan review. Pursuant to Section 4-220.C., Detailed Landscape Plan, ofthe Land Use Regulations, a Detailed Landscape Plan will be reauired with the PUD Preliminary Plan application. [+] FINDING: Landscaping. [Section 5-240;F.3.e (5)] It HAS been demonstrated that the landscaping proposed for the PUD MAY comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and TIlumination Standards. STANDARD: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (6)] - The sign standards applicable to the PUD shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations. unless, as provided in Section 4-340 D., Signs Allowed in a Planned Unit Development (PUD). the applicant submits a comprehensive sign plan for the PUD that is determined to be suitable for the PUD and provides the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to and within the PUD. The existing Red Sky Ranch PUD Guide includes a comprehensive sign plan. The same comprehensive sign plan will be applicable to the expanded portion ofthe PUD. 8/3/2004 - 29- [+] FINDING: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e(6)] The signs within the PUD WILL conform to the comprehensive sign plan approved for the existing Red Sky Ranch PUD. STANDARD: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] - The applicant shall demonstrate that the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. [+/-] Potable water supplv. - The Applicant indicates that potable water is proposed to be provided by an expanded Red Sky Ranch Metropolitan District, which currently serves the existing Red Sky Ranch development. The Applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Colorado Division of Water Resources that the plan for augmentation is sufficient to meet the projected water demands of the proposed development. The State Engineer finds that the proposed water supply will not cause material injury to decreed water rights and is adequate. The Bellyache Ridge Metropolitan District has provided a referral response to this PUD Sketch Plan application dated 27 January 2004. The objection of the District is based on the failure of Vail Resorts Development Company (VRDe) to fmalize an initial 1998 agreement with the Bellyache Ridge Metropolitan District regarding an option to connect to the Red Sky Ranch water system. Issues between VRDC and the District which have not been settled include, among others, [a] the final interconnect point and route, [b] interest rates, [c] cost of water, and [d] management and repair responsibilities. The District requests that the Sketch Plan be denied until [1] the construction details of the Red Sky Ranch water delivery system are professionally analyzed to insure that it can adequately serve the requested additional 30 home sites and possible other expansion scenarios while still honoring the previous commitment to the 87 owners within the Bellyache Ridge Metro District, and [2] VRDC takes the immediate lead as previously promised in finalizing an acceptable contract with the Bellyache Ridge Metro District, resolving the "up size" issue and all other outstanding matters within an acceptable timeframe. II1 a telephone conversation on 24 March 2004, Jan Eric Strauch, President of the Bellyache Ridge Metro District, reported that discussions have been underway between VRDC and the District since the referral response was written in January and that progress has been made. While Mr. Strauch expressed optimism that a satisfactory contract would be developed, Staff has not been informed that a successful resolution of the matter has been reached. The Applicant has provided a letter from its attorneys, Glenn Porzak ofPorzak Browning & Bushong LLP, to the attorney for Bellyache Metropolitan District, John Goodman of Goodman & Wallace LLP, which attempts to clarify this situation and gives the Bellyache Metropolitan District until Friday, 30 April 2004, to accept the Applicant's offer. Nonetheless, pending resolution of this dispute and as a condition of approval, the Preliminary Plan should demonstrate clearly how the Applicant has or intends to respond to the concerns raised by the Bellyache Ridge Metropolitan District in its letter dated January 27, 2004. [Condition # 2] [+1-] Sewage disposal. - Wastewater treatment services are proposed to be provided individual or clustered sewage disposal systems. Development and maintenance of shared septic systems will be provided by the Red Sky Ranch Metropolitan District. II1 Staff conversations with Ray Merry, Director of the Eagle County Department of Environmental Health, it has been noted that any clustering of proposed septic systems is not shown in the application materials. The PUD Preliminary Plan for the initial phase of Red Sky Ranch indicated, based on site reconnaissance, the specific location of clustered septic systems and the location of the specific dwellings to be served by each. Similar information is necessary for thlS proposed development. As a condition of approval, the PUD Preliminary Plan application should include detailed information, based on 8/3/2004 - 30- site reconnaissance, of the specific location of individual and/or clustered septic systems and the specific location of dwellings to be served by each. [Condition # 3] Mr. Merry has also noted that certain Annual Water Quality Monitoring Reports for the initial phase of the Red Sky Ranch PUD have not been provided as required pursuant to the initial I 041 Permit. As a condition of approval, prior to or concurrent with submission of a PUD Preliminary Plan application for this Red Sky Ranch PUD Expansion, the Applicant should submit all Annual Water Quality Monitoring Reports which are or have been due to date. [Condition # 4] [+] Solid waste disposal. - Solid waste disposal services are generally available in the area. [+] Electrical supplv. - Electrical service will be provided by Holy Cross Energy. The Applicant will be required to demonstrate in the Preliminary Plan application that electrical service will be available. [+] Fire protection. - This site is within the service area ofthe Eagle River Fire Protection District (ERFPD). ERFPD has indicated that road widths, grades, pullouts and cul-de-sacs need to be defined so emergency vehicle access can be reviewed. ERFPD has noted that the extension of the existing water system serving Red Sky Ranch, as opposed to individual wells, provides a more reliable fire fighting water supply. The application points out that the Holland CreeklRed Sky Ranch Metropolitan District service plan included a cominitment for a capital funding contribution to the Eagle River Fire Protection District (ERFPD) to be made when the ERFPD determined to build a fire station in the Wolcott area. The application goes on to make a commitment on the part of Vail Resorts Development Company (VRDC) (or VRDC will cause Holland Creek Metropolitan District) to offer the ERFPD an up front loan of up to $500,000 to accelerate the time frame for construction ofa fire station in Wolcott. The proposed loan is contingent on establishing a satisfactory repayment plan with the ERFPD and approval of this 30 lot expansion ofthe Red Sky Ranch PUD. [+1_] Roads. - The Engineering Department notes that the proposed access to the development through the Setting Sun private drive will need to be improved to meet the Eagle County Road Standards. In addition, the proposed development plan proposes two long cul-de-sacs which are separated by approximately 600 feet at the end of the respective cul-de-sacs. The Engineering Department requests that the two cul-de-sacs be connected to form a continuous looped road. If the two cul-de-sacs are not modified, the proposed cul-de-sacs are sufficiently long that- emergency vehicle turnaround areas would be required at 1,000 foot intervals. As a condition of approval, the proposed road system should be modified to conform to applicable requirements of Article 4, Site Development Standards, of the Land Use Regulations, or an application for appropriate Variances from Improvement Standards, pursuantto Section 5-260.G., Variance From Improvement Standards, of the Land Use Regulations, be submitted prior to or as part of _ the Preliminary Plan application. [Condition # 5] In addition, the development has only one access point, that being Red Sky Road. A variance from improvement standards was granted for less than two routes of entrance and exit to portions of the existing Red Sky Ranch development. It is appropriate to further consider access to the expanded Red Sky Ranch development within the context of the length of the proposed roads, fire hazard rating, number of units proposed, topography and the recommendation of the Local Fire Authority Having Jurisdiction. As a condition of approval, a variance from improvement standards to expand the development served by less than two routes of entrance and exit should be required prior to or as a part of the Preliminary Plan application, pursuant to Section 5-260.G., Variance From Improvement Standards, of the Land Use Regulations. [Condition # 6] [+] Proximity to Schools - Public elementary and IDiddleschools currently exist in the Edwards area. A public high school currently exists in Eagle-Vail. Schools are in reasonable proximity of the site. 8/3/2004 - 31 - [+] Proximitv to Police and Fire Protection. and Emergencv Medical Services. - Public safety services would he provided by the Eagle County Sheriffs Office, Eagle River Fire Protection District and Eagle County Ambulance District. The proposed PUD is in reasonable proximity to these emergency services. [+1-) FINDING: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] With the recommended conditions of approval, it HAS been demonstrated that the development proposed in the PUD Sketch!Preliminary Plan will be provided adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, ftre protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and ftre protection, and emergency medical ServIces. STANDARD: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] - The improvements standards applicable to the development shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards. Provided, however, the development may deviatefrom the County's road standards, so the development achieves greater efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts, when the following minimum design principles are followed: (a) Safe. Efficient Access. The circulation system is designed to provide safe, convenient access to all areas of the proposed development using the minimum practical roadway length. Access shall be by a public right-of-way, private vehicular or pedestrian way or a commonly owned easement. No roadway alignment, either horizontal or vertical, shall be allowed that compromisf!$ one (1) or more of the minimum design standards of the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) for that functional classification of roadway. (b) Internal Pathwavs. Internal pathways shall be provided to form a logical, safe and convenient system for pedestrian access to dwelling units and common areas, with appropriate linkages off- site. (c) EmerfZency Vehicles. Roadways shall be designed to permit access by emergency vehicles to all lots or units. An access easement shall be grantedfor emergency vehicles and utility vehicles, as applicable, to use private roadways in the development for the purpose of providing emergency services and for installation, maintenance and repair of utilities. (d) Principal Access Points. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to provide for smooth traffic flow, minimizing hazards to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. Where a PUD abuts a major collector, arterial road or highway, direct access to such road or highway from individual lots, units or buildings shall not be permitted. Minor roads within the PUD shall not be directly connected with roads outside of the PUD, unless the County determines such connections are necessary to maintain the County's road network. (e) Snow Storafe. Adequate areas shall be provided to store snow removed from the internal street network and from off-street parking areas. The Engineering Department notes that the proposed access to the development through the Setting Sun private drive willueed to be improved to meet the Eagle County Road Standards. In addition, the proposed development plan proposes two long cul-de-sacs which are separated by approximately 600 feet at the end of the respective cul-de-sacs. The Engineering Department suggests that the two cul-de-sacs be connected to form a continuous looped road. If the two cul- de-sacs are not modified, the proposed cul-de-sacs are sufficiently long that emergency vehicle turnaround areas would be required at 1,000 foot intervals. As a condition of approval, the proposed road system should be modified to conform to applicable requirements of Article 4, Site Development Standards, of the Land Use Regulations, or an application for appropriate Variances from Improvement Standards, pursuant to Section 5-260.G., Variance From Improvement Standards, ofthe Land Use Regulations, be submitted prior to or as part ofthe Preliminary Plan application. [Condition # 5] 8/3/2004 - 32- In addition, the development has only one access point, that being Red Sky Road. A variance from improvement standards was granted for less than two routes of entrance and exit to portions of the existing Red Sky Ranch development. It is appropriate to further consider the expansion of the Red Sky Ranch development within the context of the length of the proposed roads, fIre hazard rating, number of units proposed, topography and the recommendation of the LocalFire . Authority Having Jurisdiction. As a condition of approval, a variance from improvement standards to expand the development served by less than two routes of entrance and exit should be required prior to or as a part of the Preliminary Plan application, pursuant to Section 5-260.G., Variance From Improvement Standards, of the Land Use Regulations. [Condition # 6] [+/_] FINDING: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] - With the recommended condition, it HAS NOT been clearly demonstrated that the improvements standards applicable to the development will be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards regarding: (a) safe, efficient access, (b) internal pathways, (c) emergency vehicles, (d) principal access points, and (e) snow storage. However, it MAY be possible to so demonstrate in the PUD Preliminary Plan. STANDARD: Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] - The development proposedfor the PUD shall be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. Surrounding land uses include primarily residential and golf course uses and, as noted by the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW), certain critical wildlife habitat. CDOW has noted that potential impacts of the proposed development on areas of critical wildlife habitat have notbeen adequately avoided or mitigated. However, CDOW has made a number of recommendations which would protect critical wildlife habitat and maintain the presence of wildlife in the Wolcott area. It may be possible to revise the proposed development to reflect in the Preliminary Plan application adequate avoidance or mitigation. . [+/_] FINDING: Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] The development proposed for the PUD MAY NOT be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. However, it MAY be possible to demonstrate in the PUD Preliminary Plan that the proposed development is compatible with the surrounding land uses. STANDARD: Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] - The PUD shall be consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). x1 _ The Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) has raised several significant concerns with respect to elk calving and rearing habitat within the proposed development site. With the recommended conditions of approval, it may be demonstrated in the PUD Preliminary Plan that adequate avoidance or mitigation of impacts on critical wildlife habitat will be provided. 8/3/2004 - 33 - x? - The open space proposed as a part of this development, in conjunction with the open space which is a part of the existing Red Sky Ranch PUD will provide sufficient open space for the combined development. x3 - The proposed development may contribute to a more diverse economic base. Some concerns have been raised by the Colorado Division Wildlife (CDOW) regarding potential impacts on elk calving and rearing habitat within the proposed development site. With the recommended conditions of approval, it may be demonstrated in the PUD Preliminary Plan that adequate avoidance or mitigation of impacts on critical wildlife habitat will be provided. x4 - The application notes that the original approval of the Red Sky Ranch PUD included a housing plan that included both on-site and off-site housing commitments. The Applicant indicates that it will review this housing plan prior to preliminary plan application and, if appropriate, will propose amendments to the housing plan to address the additional density request. x5 - Roads will be of a rural character, neither over-designed nor under-designed. x6 - The existing Red Sky Ranch development has been determined to be consistent with the Future Land Use Map. The proposed expansion is consistent with the earlier determination. X 1 -, The proposed development would tend to maintain the rural/mountain residential character of the area, is enhanced by open space and recreational amenities, is in balance with the provision of appropriate and timely public services. x2 - The Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) has noted that potential impacts of the proposed development on areas of critical wildlife habitat have not been adequately avoided or mitigated. However, CDOW has made a number of recommendations which would protect critical wildlife habitat and maintain the presence of wildlife in the Wolcott area. Itmay be possible to revise the proposed development to reflect in the Preliminary Plan application adequate avoidance or mitigation. ~ - The proposed development would tend to maintain the existing character of the Wolcott Area. However, as noted above in the discussion regarding "Wildlife", the proposed development may not adequately protect ecologically sensitive areas. Certain unspecified trails are proposed that are expected to be detailed in the Preliminary Plan application. x4 - The quality and quantity of potable water will be maintained. It appears that proper sewage disposal will be provided but that is required to be demonstrated in the PUD Preliminary Plan. x!' - Certain geologic hazards have been identified in the technical reports provided as part of the Sketch Plan. It may be demonstrated in the Preliminary Plan that adequate avoidance and/or mitigation of hazards has been accomplished. x6 - No harmful effects of air pollution, excessive noise or noxious odors are likely as a result of this proposed development. x7 - Any necessary road improvements will be identified as part of the review of the PUD Preliminary Plan. x8 - No important historic or archaeological resources have been identified at the site of the proposed development. EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED PLAN 8/3/2004 - 34- Xl X2 X3 X4 X X 1 - The technical reports indicate that water quantity will not be adversely impacted by the proposed development. x?- - The technical reports indicate that water quality will not be adversely impacted by the proposed development. x3 _ The Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) has noted that potential impacts of the proposed development on areas of critical wildlife habitat have not been adequately avoided or mitigated. However, CDOW has made a nUlllber of recortlrr1endations which would protect critical wildlife habitat and maintain the presence of wildlife in the Wolcott area. It may be possible to revise the proposed development to reflect in the . Preliminary Plan application adequate avoidance or mitigation. x4 _ As noted above in the discuSsion regarding "Wildlife", the proposed development may not adequately protect ecologically sensitive areas. Certain unspecified trails are proposed that are expected to be detailed in the Preliminary Plan application x1 _ x?-- -K- 0- x5_ The open space proposed as a part of this development, in conjunction with the open space which is a part of the existing Red Sky Ranch PUD, will provide sufficient open space for the combined development. It may be shown that the development is compatible with preservation of the high visual quality of the County. The development occurs adjacent to the existing community and tends to .enhance open space values in the outlying areas. Development is not proposed to occur on slopes greater than 40 percent. It may be possible to mitigate natural hazards present on site. The Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) has raised several significant concerns with respect to elk calving and rearing habitat within the proposed development site. With the recommended conditions of approval, it may be demonstrated in the PUD Preliminary Plan that adequate avoidance or mitigation of impacts on critical wildlife habitat will be provided. EAGLE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING PLAN VISION STATEMENT: Housing for local residents is a major priority of Eagle County. There should be a wide variety of housing to fulfill the needs of all its residents, including families, senior citizens, and those who work here. Elements of Eagle County's vision for housing are: . Housing is a community-wide issue 8/3/2004 - 35 - . Housing should be located in close proximity to existing community centers, as defined in the Eagle County master plan. . . . Development of local residents housing should be encouraged on existing. . . transit routes . Housing is primarily a private sector activity [but] . . . without the active participation of government, there will be only limited success . It is important to preserve existing local residents housing . Persons who work in Eagle County should have adequate housing opportunities within the county . Development applications that will result in an increased need for local residents housing should be evaluated as to whether they adequately provide for this additional need,fue same way as they are evaluated for other infrastructure needs POLICIES: ITEM 1. Eagle County will collaborate With the private sector & nonprofit organizations to develop housing for local residents 2. Housing for local residents is an issue which Eagle County needs to address in collaboration With the municipalities . . . x 3. x &teps should be taken to facilitate increased home ownership by local residents and workers in Eagle County 4. Additional rental opportunities for permanent local residents should be brought on line. Some... should be for households With an income equivalent to or less than one average wage job x 5. Seasonal housing is part of the problem & needs to be further addressed. It is primarily the responsibility of . . . employers. . . x 6. Xl New residential subdivisions Will provide a percentage of their units for local residents 7. Commercial, industrial, institutional, and public developments generating increased employment Will provide local residents housing. The first preference will be for units on-site where feasible, or if not feasible, in the nearest existing community center. . . x 8. The County Will seek to make land available for local residents housing in proximity to community centers 9. Mixed use developments In appropriate locations are encouraged X 10. Factory-built housing is an important part of Eagle Coun~s housing stock X 11. There is a need to segment a portion of the housing market to protect local residents from having to compete With second home buyers. Where public assistance or subsidies are provided for housing, there should generally be limits on price appreciation, as well as residency requirements 12. Eagle County recognizes that housing for local residents is an ongoing issue X X 1 - The application notes that the original approval of the Red Sky Ranch Pun included a housing plan that included both on-site and off-site housing commitments. The Applicant indicates that it will review this housing plan prior to preliminary plan application and, if appropriate, will propose amendments to the housing plan to address the additional density request. [+] FINDING: Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] The PUD IS consistent with the Master Plan, and IS consistent with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). 8/312004 - 36- STANDARD: Phasing [Section 5-240.F.3.e (II)] - The Preliminary Planfor PUD shall include a phasing plan for the development. If development of the PUD is proposed to occur in phases, then guarantees shall be provided for public improvements and amenities that are necessary and desirable for residents of the project, or that are of benefit to the entire County. Such public improvements shall be constructed with the first phase of the project, or, if this is not possible, then as early in the project as is reasonable. It is anticipated by the Applicant that the 210 acre parcel will be developed in one phase. As such, a phasing plan would not be required. [+] FINDING: Phasing Section 5-240.F.3.e (II) A phasing plan is NOT REQUIRED for this development. STANDARD: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] - The PUD shall comply with the following common recreation and open space standards. (a) Minimum Area. It is recommended that a minimum of25% of the total PUD area shall be devoted to open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi-public. In addition, the PUD shall provide a minimum often (J 0) acres of common recreation and usable open space landsfor every one thousand (1,000) persons who are residents of the PUD. In order to calculate the number of residents of the PUD, the number of proposed dwelling units shall be multiplied by two and sixty-three hundredths (2.63), which is the average"number of persons that occupy each dwelling unit in Eagle County, as determined in the Eagle County Master Plan. i Areas that Do Not Count as Open Space. Parking and loading areas, street right-of- ways, and areas with slopes greater than thirty (30) percent shall not count toward usable open space. ii Areas that Count as Oven Space. Water bodies, lands within critical wildlife habitat areas, riparian areas, and one hundred (J 00) year floodplains, as defined in these Land Use Regulations, that are preserved as open space shall count towards this minimum standard, even when they are not usable by or accessible to the residents of the PUD. All other open space lands shall be conveniently accessible from all occupied structures within the PUD. (b) Improvements Required. All common open space and recreational facilities shall be shown on the Preliminary Plan for PUD and shall be constructedandfully improved according to the development schedule established for each development phase of the PUD. (c) Continuing Use and Maintenance. All privately owned common open space shall continue to conform to its intended use, as specified on the Preliminary Plan for PUD. To ensure that all the common open space identified in the PUD will be used as common open Space, restrictions and/or covenants shall be placed in each deed to ensure their maintenance and to prohibit the division of any common open space. (d) Organization. If common open space is proposed to be maintained through an association or nonprofit corporation, such organization shall manage all common open space and recreational and cultural facilities that are not dedicated to the public, and shall provide for the maintenance, administration and operation of such land and any other land within the PUD not publicly owned, and secure adequate liability insurance on the land. The association or nonprofit corporation shall be established prior to the sale of any lots or units within the PUD. Membership in the association or nonprofit corporation shall be mandatory for all landowners within the PUD. Based on 25 percent of a development being common recreation and open space, 53.3 acres [(210 acres x .25) + (30 dwellings x 2.63 people per dwelling) x (10 acres! 1000 people)] is necessary to meet this standard. Of this 210 acre parcel, 40 acres are proposed as common open space, representing 19 percent of the PUD expansion area. However, this development is intended to be an expansion of the existing Red Sky Ranch PUD, which consists of 780 acres, of which 360 acres is golf course and which the Land' Use Regulations include in the definition of open space. When the expanded PUD area is considered, 8/3/2004 - 37- the total area would be 990 acres [780 acres in the existing PUD plus 210 acres in this expansion]. The total common recreation and open space would a minimum of 400 acres, representing 40 percent of the PUD area. It should be noted that the application indicates that, in addition to the 210 acres which are a part of this application, the Applicant has secured a commitment that an additional 840 acres owned by the Diamond S Ranch, adjacent to the 210 acres, will be protected as open space. The 840 acres is to remain under ownership of Diamond S Ranch but will be subject to a deed restriction that will restrict further development. As of this writing, it has not been demonstrated that the additional 840 acres will, in fact, be made subject to development restrictions in a manner that would permit its consideration in conjunction with this application, although a letter from the attorneys for the Diamond S Ranch has been received indicating an intent to grant an easement on the 840 acres, but oI1lv after the County has given final approval to this proposed expansion of the Red Sky Ranch PUD, including all zoning and subdivision approvals. Further, the nature of such restrictions has not been detailed. However, in discussions with the Applicant, Staff understands that a draft easement agreement is under consideration by the Applicant and the Eagle Valley Land Trust (EVL1) and, once executed, will be held by EVL T "in escrow" until approval of the PUD Preliminary Plan. [+1-] FINDING: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] The applicant HAS demonstrated that the PUD MAY comply with the common recreation and open space standards with respect to: (a) minimum area; (b) improvements required; (c) continuing use and maintenance; or (d) organization. STANDARD: Natural Resource Protection. [Section 5~240.F.3.e (13)] - The PUD shall consider the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards. The Colorado Geological Survey (CGS) notes that the preliminary geotechnical and geologic report provided by the Applicant indicates that the site is located within a large, old landslide which appears to be inactive. However, the report also indicates that conditions may exist or develop, due to natural changes or as a result of development, which could cause renewed landslide movement. In addition, the report indicates that parts of the proposed expansion area may be prone to renewed slope instability as a result of natural increases in ground~water levels or due to development. Recommendations for avoidance and/or mitigation have been provided by the Applicant's geotechnical engineer. CGS goes on to note that the geotechnical report contains many recommendations and/or restrictions on grading and where building, septic systems and other structures should be located to avoid potential hazards. Adherence to these recommendations is important, and building envelopes, septic system locations, and grading restrictions which conform to the recommendations of the geotechnical report should be developed and adopted in any development approvals. It may be possible to demonstrate in the Preliminary Plan that these ,recommendations and/or restrictions have been adequately incorporated into the design ofthe development. In addition, the Applicant has provided a detailed "Critical Wildlife Analysis and Draft Wildlife Enhancement and Mitigation Plan" for the proposed development prepared by Richard Thompson of Western Ecosystems, Inc. However, the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) has noted that potential impacts of the proposed development on areas of critical wildlife habitat have not been adequately avoided or mitigated. CDOW has made a number of recommendations which would further protect critical wildlife habitat and maintain the presence of wildlife in the Wolcott area. 8/3/2004 - 38 - CDOW prefaces its comments in its referral response dated 15 January 2004 by saying that, even if the adjacent 840 acres is eventually restricted from development in some manner, the "arrangement would [pose] several questions about on site mitigation obligations". CDOW then goes on to comment on the proposed development without consideration of any benefits or other impacts of development restrictions on the adjacent 840 acres. It may be possible to revise the proposed development to reflect in the Preliminary Plan application adequate avoidance or mitigation. [+1_] FINDING: Natural Resource Protection. [ Section 5-240.F.3.e (13)] The Pun DOES demonstrate that the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents available at the time the application was submitted have been considered. HOWEVER, it WILL BE necessary to give consideration in the Preliminary to the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section5-280.B.3.e. Standards for the review of a . Sketch and Preliminary Plan for a Subdivision: STANDARD: Consistent with Master Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (1)] - The proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the FLUM of the Master Plan. See discussion above, Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)]. [+] FINDING: Consistent with Master Plan. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (I)] The PUD IS consistent with the Master Plan, and IS consistent with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). .' STANDARD: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)] - The proposed subdivision shall comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts. and Artide 4, Site Development Standards. Article 3, Zone Districts Except as modified under the provisions of a Pun and with the recommended conditions [see discussions above], the proposed development complies with all of the standards and provisions of the Land Use Regulations, including Article 3, Zone Districts. Article 4, Site Development Standards [+] Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1) The application indicates that the proposed subdivision will comply with the requirements of this Division. [+] Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2) The application indicates that the landscaping within the Pun will comply with the standards in the Land Use Regulations with the exception of suburban style treatment of street tree planting. The only common tree landscaping within the development will be the re-vegetation of road right-of-way areas disturbed by road construction. A Detailed Landscape Plan, as described in Section 4-220.C., Detailed Landscape Plan, of the Land Use Regulations will be required as a part of the Preliminary Plan application. 8/3/2004 - 39- [+] Sign Regulations (Division 4-3) This proposed expansion of the Red Sky Ranch PUD will be subject to the Comprehensive Sign Plan approved for the existing Red Sky Ranch PUD. No change to the Comprehensive Sign Plan is proposed. [+/-] Natural Resource Protection Standards (Division 4A) [+1-] Wildlife Protection (Section 4AlO) - The Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) responded in its referral response that, although the'inclusion of the 840 acres west of this project would have been a significant contribution for wildlife habitat, CDOW has based its response in its understanding that this acreage will not be included in this project, mainly due to the involvement of a separate third party who is not a party to this project. While significant, the arrangement regarding the 840 acres to the west would also have posed several questions about on-site mitigation obligations of the development and CDOW believes that it should not be considered as a part ofthis project. However, CDOW brings to the attention of the County the importance of the adjacent property with future development in mind. As properties become developed, open space, movement corridors, and habitat concerns become increasingly important. With respect to elk calvin!! habitat, CDOW notes that the southern half of the proposed development lies entirely within the CDOW's WRIS Maps Defined Calving Habitat, which is defined as critical habitat. While the Applicant's surveys have shown that this habitat may be minimal, CDOW maintains that its WRIS mapping is accurate and a contributing factor for the Applicant's assessment may be primarily due to over grazing from sheep herds. This habitat could be critical in future years, especially since Phase 1 of Red Sky Ranch was pennitted in a portion of this calving area. CDOW recommendations include: . Remove the southern half of the 210 acres to allow for a buffer between the development and this possible critical habitat; or . Allow two stages of development, approving development of the northern lots while the southern area could be studied after sheep grazing is gone to evaluate the habitat (minimum of five years to allow for habitat restoration); or · Remove development from the southern half and move eight to ten home sites to the northern portion of the 210 acres with smaller lot sizes. With respect to calvin!! and rearing habitat on west side, CDOW notes that the proposed development of Lots 9-14 and Lot 30 have west borders to the WRIS elk calving and rearing habitat. The large size of these seven lots could have negative effects on the rearing of young elk. Human noise as well as exposure to humans and pets could disrupt this vital stage in elk calving and rearing. CDOW recommendations include: · Reduce lot size to create a buffer area between the lots and this habitat, that is, a reduction from the northwest comer of Lot 14 to the southwest comer of Lot 30; or . Leave lot size as proposed, but create stipulations on the back portions of these lots such as the seasonal closures on open space, and building closures. With respect to open space. trails. and seasonal closures, CDOT notes that trails are proposed within the development, but their nature or location has not been specified. Therefore, CDOW is unable to make an assessment. However, placing trails very near critical calving and rearing habitat could be a detrimental component of this proposal. CDOW recommendations include: · Exclude the development of trails within and near the outlined calving and rearing areas as specified on CDOW WTIS maps; or · Require seasonal closures to these trails and open space as already provided in the Wildlife Management and Enhancement for the existing Red Sky Ranch Pun (that 8/3/2004 - 40- is, 20 November through 15 May), with closures of trails within the calving and rearing areas extended to 30 June. The Applicant and the Division of Wildlife have had subsequent discussions intended to address theDivision's concerns outlined above, but Staffhas not been advised of any agreements which may have been reached. As a condition of approval, the Preliminary Plan should demonstrate clearly how the Applicant has responded to the concerns raised by the Colorado Division of Wildlife in its letter dated January 15,2004, and/or any additional concerns that may arise asa result of proposed development restrictions on the adjacent 840 acres owned by Diamond S Ranch. [Condition # 7] [+] Geologic Hazards (Section 4-420) - The Colorado Geological Survey (CGS) notes that the preliminary geotechnical and geologic report provided by the Applicant indicates that the site is located within a large, old landslide which appears to be inactive. However, the report also indicates that conditions may exist or develop, due to natural changes or as a result of development, which could cause renewed landslide movement. II1 addition, the report indicates that parts of the proposed expansion area may be prone to renewed slope instability as a result of natural increases in ground,.water levels or due to development. CGS further notes that, in the fall of 2002, slope-movement and ground-water monitoring instrumentation was installed in the expansion area; however, monitoring data from the instrumentation was not provided. The geotechnical report for the expansion area did not model or calculate the risks due to existing slope instability or instability caused by development. Without this information, it cannot be determined if potential geologic hazards can be mitigated for the proposed use and density. As a condition of approval, the PUD Preliminary Plan should include monitoring data from the slope-movement and ground-water monitoring instrumentation installed in this area in 2002. [Condition # 8] CGS goes on to note that the geotechnical report contains many recommendations/restrictions on grading and where building, septic systems and other structures should be located to avoid potential hazards. Adherence to these recommendations is important, and building envelopes, septic system locations, and grading restrictions which conform to the recommendations of the geotechnical report should be developed and adopted in any development approvals. As a condition of approval, the PUD Preliminary Plan should adequately reflect the recommendations and restrictions presented in the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Engineering Geology Study prepared by Golder Associates, Inc., and dated December 27, 2002. [Condition # 9] The Eagle CountY Environmental Health Department has also noted that a condition of approval of the 1041 Permit for the existing Red Sky Ranch development was that ground water monitoring reports were to be submitted annually to the Department of Community Development as long as the septic systems are in use. The required reports have not been received. As a condition of approval, ground water monitoring reports previously required to be submitted annually to the Department of Community Development as a condition ofthe 1041 Permit for the existing Red Sky Ranch PUD (see Board Resolution No. 2001-011) should be submitted prior to or concurrently with the 1041 Permit application which accompanies the PUD Preliminary Plan for this Red Sky Ranch Expansion. [Condition # 10] [+] Wildfire Protection (Section 4A30) - The Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) has given the development a wildfire hazard rating of high. The combination of shrub fuel types and topography contribute to this high wildfire hazard rating. CSFS recommends dual access which, along with maintaining a minimum defensible space buffer of at least 40 feet in diameter around all structures, will help to lower fire danger. The use of 8/312004 - 41 - noncombustible roofing materials on all structures is also recommended as another precautionary measure. -As a condition of approval, the PUD Preliminary Plan should demonstrate clearly the manner in which the recommendations of the Colorado State Forest Service, in its letter dated February 4,2004, have been considered in the design of the development. [Condition # 11] The Eagle County Engineering Department also notes that the proposed development has only one access point, and that the Applicant will be required to either demonstrate how the requirement for dual access will be met or obtain a Variance from Improvement Standards. [+] Wood Burning Controls (Section 4-440) - The proposed PUD Guide is silent with respect to wood burning controls. The proposed development will be required to conform to the applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations. [+] Ridgeline Protection (Section 4A50) - The application indicates that the 210 acre site is not visible from 1-70. However, it appears that significant portions of the site is within the "areas of possible ridgeline impacts" designated on the Ridgeline Protection Map. The PUD Preliminary Plan application will be required to comply with the requirements of this Section. [+] Environmental Imoact Reoort (Section 4A60) - An adequate environmental impact report has been provided. [+] Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards (Division 4-5) The provisions of this Division are not applicable. [+] Improvement Standards (Division 4-6) [+/-] Roadwav Standards (Section 4-620) - The Engineering Department notes that the proposed access to the development through the Setting Sun private drive will need to be improved to meet the Eagle County Road Standards. In addition, the proposed development plan proposes two long cul-de-sacs which are separated by approximately 600 feet at the end of the respective cul-de- sacs. The Engineering Department requests that the two cul-de-sacs be connected to form a continuous looped road. If the two cul-de-sacs are not modified, the proposed cul-de-sacs are sufficiently long that emergency vehicle turnaround areas would be required at 1,000 foot intervals. As a condition of approval, the proposed road system should be modified to conform to applicable requirements of Article 4, Site Development Standards, of the Land Use Regulations, or an application for appropriate Variances from Improvement Standards, pursuant to Section 5- 260.G., Variance From Improvement Standards, of the Land Use Regulations, should be submitted prior to or as part of the Preliminary Plan application [Condition # 5] In addition, the development has only one access, that being Red Sky Road. A variance from improvement standards was granted for less than two routes of entrance and exit to portions of the existing Red Sky Ranch development. It is appropriate to further consider the expansion of the Red Sky Ranch development within the context of the length of the proposed roads, fire hazard rating, number of units proposed, topography and the recommendation of the Local Fire Authority Having Jurisdiction. As a condition of approval, a variance from improvement standards to expand the development served by less than two routes of entrance and exit should be required prior to or as a part of the Preliminary Plan application, pursuant to Section 5-260.G., Variance From Improvement Standards, of the Land Use Regulations. [Condition # 6] The Eagle County Engineering Department also notes that the Traffic Impact Study dated 15 October, 2003, which is based on a "build out year of 20 I 0, rather than 2025, is not acceptable and should be revised. Engineering also notes that the Traffjc Impact Study is based on a 75 8/3/2004 - 42- percent occupancy rate of the proposed development. Additional support documentation should be provided for this occupancy rate or an occupancy rate of 100 percent should be used. As a condition of approval, the Traffic Impact Study submitted with the Preliminary Plan should respond to the comments of the Eagle County Engineering Department in its memo dated January 20, 2004, in a manner satisfactory to the County Engineer. [Condition # 12] [+] Sidewalk and Trail Standards (Section 4-630) - The Applicant notes that the existing residential area of the Red Sky Ranch PUD is served by a pedestrian trail system that provides for several recreational walking loops of varying length. A similarly designed trail is proposed to serve the additional homes in the expanded development. If necessary due to wildlife considerations, use ofthe trail may be subject to seasonal restrictions. More detail on the proposed trails will be required as part of the Preliminary Plan application. [+] Irrigation System Standards (Section 4-640) - If irrigation water is to be made available in this development, the provisions of this Section will be reauired to be met. [+/_] Drainage Standards (Section 4-650) - The application indicates that runoff from the proposed lots and roads will flow to either the Holland Creek golf course pond or the detention pond at the intersection of Red Sky Road and Saddle Rock using historic drainage patterns to the extent practical. The Eagle County Engineering Department notes that if the requirements of this Section can not be met as outlined in the application, new drainage facilities will need to be designed and constructed. The Northwest Colorado Council of Governments (NWCCOG) notes that the use of unlined ditches is a preferable approach, but also recommends that vegetation be established in the ditches to minimize erosion from concentrated flows. NWCCOG also points out that the use of golf course ponds as detention ponds may get some noxious algae growth. This can be addressed in several ways from aeration to chemicals, but that a contingency should be in place in the event this occurs. As a condition of approval, the PUD Preliminary Plan should demonstrate clearly the manner in which the concerns and recommendations of the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments, in its letter dated January 12, 2004, have been considered in the design of the development. [Condition # 13] [+1_] Excavation and Grading Standards (Section 4-660) - The Applicant will be required to conform to the provisions of this Section. Northwest Colorado Council of Governments (NWCCOG) has pointed out that plans are needed for controlling weeds on home sites during construction. As a condition of approval, the PUD Preliminary Plan should demonstrate clearly the manner in which the concerns and recommendations of the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments in its letter dated January 12, 2004, have been considered in the design of the development. [Condition # 13] [+] Erosion Control Standards (Section 4-665) - An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan will be required as part of the PUD Preliminary Plan. [+] Utility and Lighting Standards (Section 4-670) - The Applicant will be reauired to conform to the provisions of this Section. [+] Water Supply Standards (Section 4-680) - Potable water is proposed to be provided by the Red Sky Ranch Metropolitan District, which is intended to be expanded to incorporate this development. The Colorado Division of Water Resources has reviewed the proposed water source and has determined that the plan for augmentation is sufficient to augment the projected water demands of the proposed development. Consequently, the State Engineer has found that the proposed water supply will not cause material injury to decreed water rights and is adequate [+1-] Sanitary Sewage Disposal Standards (Section 4-690) - Wastewater treatment services are proposed to be provided by individual and/or clustered sewage disposal systems, similar to the systems currently installed at Red Sky Ranch. Additional information will be required as part of the Preliminary Plan application. Development and maintenance of shared septic systems will be provided by the Red Sky Ranch Metropolitan District. In Staff conversations with Ray Merry, Director of the Eagle 8/3/2004 - 43 - County Department of Environmental Health, it has been noted that any clustering of proposed septic systems is not shown in the application materials. The PUD Preliminary Plan for the initial phase of Red Sky Ranch indicated, based on site reconnaissance, the specific location of clustered septic systems and the specific location of the dwellings to be served by each. Similar information is necessary for this proposed development. As a condition of approval, the PUD Preliminary Plan application should include detailed information, based on site reconnaissance, of the specific location of individual and/or clustered septic systems and the specific location of dwellings to be served by each. [Condition # 3] [+] Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7) [+] School Land Dedication Standards (Section 4-700) - The land dedication requirement for a 30 single family lot development is 0.453 acres (30 units x 0.0151 acres/unit). The Applicant intends to make a payment of cash in lieu of a school land dedication. The Eagle County School District (RE50J) has indicated that a payment of cash in lieu is preferable. Pursuant to a recent amendment to Section 4-700.C., Cash-in-Lieu of Land Dedication, an appraisal of the per-acre value of the site will be required at the time the final plat is submitted to determine the amount of the cash-in-lieu payment. [+] Road Impact Fees (Section 4-710) - Payment of road impact fees will be required pursuant to this Section at the time building permits are issued. [+1-] FINDING: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (2)] Due to potential impacts on critical wildlife habitat, it HAS NOT been demonstrated that the proposed subdivision complies with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards. However, it MAY BE possible to demonstrate consistency with the Land Use Regulations in the PUD Preliminary Plan. STANDARD: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)] - The proposed subdivision shall be located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (a) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road extensions shall be consistent with the Ea$lle County Road Capital Improvements Plan. (2) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (3) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Generally, utility extensions shall only be allowed when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area. No inefficiencies have been identified with respect to this development. [+] FINDING: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (3)] The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. STANDARD: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)] -The property proposed to be subdivided shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natura/or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. 8/3/2004 - 44- See the discussions above, especially with respect to geologic hazards (Section 4A20), wildlife protection (Section 4AIO), and sanitary sewage disposal standards (Section 4-690). With the recommended conditions, the Applicant may be able to demonstrate in the Preliminary Plan that the property is suitable for development. [+1-] FINDING: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (4)] With the recommended conditions, the Applicant MAY be able to demonstrate in the Preliminary Plan that the property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development ofthe property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. STANDARD: Compatible with Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)] - The proposed subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Surrounding land uses include primarily residential and golf course uses and, as noted by the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW), certain critical wildlife habitat. CDOW has noted that potential impacts of . the proposed development on areas of critical wildlife habitat have not been adequately avoided or mitigated. However, CDOW has made a number of recommendations which would protect critical wildlife habitat and maintain the presence of wildlife in the Wolcott area. It may be possible to revise the proposed development to reflect in the Preliminary Plan application adequate avoidance or mitigation. [+1_] FINDING: Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-280.B.3.e (5)] The proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and SHALL NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. ADDITIONAL FINDINGS: Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section S-240.F.2.a.(8) Initiation: Applicant shall submit thefollowing: A Proposed PUD guide settingforth the proposed land use restrictions. This requirement has been satisfied. [+] FINDING: Initiation [Section 5-240.F.2.a.(8)] I The Applicant HAS submitted a PUD Guide that demonstrates that the requirements of this Section have been fully met. Requirements for a Zone Chan2e. In Section 5-230.D., Standards, the Eagle County Land Use Regulations provide that "the wisdom of amending the. . . Official Zone District Map or any other map incorporated in these Regulations is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the Board of County Commissioners and is not controlled by anyone factor." It has been recommended by the Eagle County Attorney that these considerations be reviewed at PUD Sketch Plan, even though zone changes are neither granted for a PUD at Sketch Plan nor are they "formal" findings. It is almost impossible to avoid confronting these requirements at this stage since they are fundamental to the locational appropriateness of the proposed land use in the first place, and must be found at Preliminary Plan. Staff, therefore offers the following preliminary analysis, without discussion, pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-230.D., Standards. for amendment to the Official Zone District Map: (1) [+] Consistency with Master Plan. The proposed PUD IS consistent with the purposes, goals, policies and FLUM of the Master Plan; (2) [+1-] Compatible with surrounding uses. The proposed amendment IS compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land, and, with the proposed 8/3/2004 - 45- development, it IS an appropriate zone district for the land, considering its consistency with the purpose and standards of the proposed zone district; (3) [+1 Changed conditions. There ARE changed conditions that require an amendment to modify the present zone district and/or its density/intensity; (4) [+/-] Effect on natural environment. The proposed amendment WILL NOT result in significantly adverse impacts on the natural environment [beyond those resulting from development under current zoning], including but not limited to water, air, noise, stormwater management, wildlife habitat, vegetation, and wetlands. (5) [+] Community need. It HAS been demonstrated that the proposed amendment meets a community need. (6) [+] Development patterns. The proposed amendment WILL result in a logical and orderly development pattern, WILL NOT constitute spot zoning, and WILL logically be provided with necessary public facilities and services. (7) [+] Public interest. The area to which the proposed amendment would apply HAS changed or IS changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage a new use or density in the area. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Housine: Guidelines. - On April 13, 2004, the Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution No. 2004-048 adopting Housing Guidelines to establish aframeworkfor discussion and negotiation of applicable housing criteria. The application notes that the original approval of the Red Sky Ranch PUD included a housing plan that included both on-site and off-site housing commitments. The Applicant indicates that it will review this housing plan prior to preliminary plan application and, if appropriate, will propose amendments to the housing plan to address the additional density request. The Eagle County Housing Department reviewed the proposal and noted that the Housing Guidelines suggest that the Applicant provide either four affordable housing units or payment of cash-in-lieu in the amount of $219,154.08, the latter being subject to adjustment using current data available at the time the PUD Preliminary Plan is approved. Mr. Forinash gave a background ofthe file, which can be found in these minutes, and showed slides to the board. He stated the Development Restricted Area shown on map is not part of the PUD. It is owned by Diamond S Ranch. It has been referred to as 840 acres and 855 acres; the 855 acres is the most accurate representation of the area. There has been no mechanism to guarantee the development of a conservation easement and tie it in to a PUD. He showed a topographical map of the proposed development, the existing Red Sky Ranch with access off of Red Sky Ranch Road, and two cul-de-sacs that would be connected. Water would be through an expansion ofthe Red Sky Ranch Metro District. Wastewater would be handled through clustered septic systems. There are wildlife constraints for the proposed development, with elk calving and rearing areas outlined. There is a difference of opinion as to whether the area is currently being used as a calving area. The recommendations assume no conservation easement. He showed pictures of various vantage points to the commissioners. The only outstanding issue is the status of the 855 acre of restricted development. Findings are positive from staff and planning commissions and have conditions attached to approval. Condition 2 has been satisfied already due to an agreement reached by the two parties. Condition 14 dealing with employee housing should have the numbers provided disregarded by the Board of County Commissioners. Staff recommended the revision so that the cash lieu amount be determined at the time of the final plat, rather than the amount given. Commissioner Gallagher asked Mr. Forinash about a PowerPoint slide and a connecting road South of the cul-de-sac. Mr. Forinash stated that there is an existing road that is up to standard. Chairman Stone asked for clarification about the area related to the Division of Wildlife's desire fonion- development. Mr. Forinash pointed it out on the map to the Chairman's satisfaction. 8/3/2004 - 46- Rick Pylman made a presentation to the board. He gave a slide presentation, as well. This is the sketch plan level of a PUD Amendment, the first of three steps in the approval process. He gave a background of the development and the proposed amendment to the PUD. The original property was purchased from the Jouflas family and they are working with Diamond S Ranch, the current owners of the additional 210 acres. He showed the 855 acres of restricted development that will remain property of Diamond S Ranch. The 210 acres contain clustered lots that are already impacted by development and protect other areas that have not been impacted. Positives include: Density equates to existing zoning; Clustering of homes in non-impact areas; No impact to Bellyache Ridge aquifer; Potentially accelerates fire department presence in neighborhood. Mr. Pylman sat down with both owners, Diamond S Ranch and Red Sky, and came up with a sensible, sensitive development plan. They would cluster 30 lots in 210 acres and preserve 855 acres as permanent open space to protect the wildlife habitat, such as elk rearing and calving. The additional development would be part of the Red Sky Ranch Water System which is drawn from the Eagle River, and not the Bellyache Ridge Aquifer. Red Sky has tried to speed up the potential construction of a fire station. By adding density they have increased their capital facility contribution to the Metro District. Compatible uses are emphasized by bringing development into Red Sky Ranch, the lots are subject to: declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions, design review regulations all of the existing wildlife mitigation agreements and they are maintaining the rural density. They have thought "out of the box" to preserve and conserve sensitive land and make the project work for the county and neighbors. The application meets the aspects of the Eagle County Master Plan. Sketch Plan was submitted in October. They are in agreement with the staffs recommendations and approvals, and they have worked with Bellyache Ridge and are in agreement. The Wildlife recommendations were addressed and it was concluded that they would go away with approval of the Conservation Easement. The staff has written a condition of approval to address these concerns, as well. Commissioner Gallagher asked if Red Sky was offering land for the fire station construction. Mr. Pylman stated the Fire District was not interested in land, but they are looking for cash for their budget. Commissioner Gallagher expressed concerns about water tanks and a water storage facility. Deb Decrausaz with Vail Resorts pointed out where the existing water taI1k was, and stated that it should serve all of the lots based on its elevation. Chairman Stone opened up Public Comment. Mary Ann Metternick of Bellyache Ridge spoke in favor of the proposed development. The Bellyache HOA has signed agreements with Vail Resorts to share the water system. She felt it would be great for the neighborhood. Rich Ember, resident of Bellyache Ridge, and member of the Metro District Board of Directors. They also favor it as all concerns have been resolved and they withdraw all objections to this development. Chairman Stone then closed Public Comment Chairman Stone expressed concern about the development not having unified ownership and control. Mr. Pylman believed that if there were separate owners, they both needed to sign the application. He gave a past example to the board. They have the existing Red Sky Ranch PUD and 210 acres that have been purchased and, technically, they meet the requirements. They are not proposing the 855 acres be part ofthe PUD. Chairman Stone then read the land use statute, "If the applicant is not the owner of the land or is a contract purchaser of the land the applicant shall submit a letter signed by the owner consenting to the submission of the application." He asked if the applicant had that. Mr. Pylmanstated they have the letter. Chairman Stone noted the conflicts of the 855 acres not being part of the PUD but wanting it be considered as part of the PUD for mitigation purposes. Mr. Pylman wanted the Board to consider that there will be a Conservation Easement on those 855 ~cres when they evaluate the adequacy of the PUD. Tom Raginetti, lawyer for Vail Resorts, then spoke on behalf of the applicant. He told the Board that the 855 acres is not part of the PUD. It is being offered as a solution to a planning problem to the 210 acres of development affecting the PUD. He gave examples 'of off-site contingencies to approvals that the county sometimes requires, such as building off-site housing. For this PUD to be approved, the conservation easement must also be approved. Diamond S Ranch has signed the conservation easement and is willing to put it in escrow or give the easement, whichever works best. \ Chairman Stone asked who the conservation easement is with and how permanent is it. 8/3/2004 - 47- Mr. Raginetti stated that it is between Diamond S Ranch and Eagle Valley Land Trust and the form of that easement will have to be acceptable to the county and it cannot be altered or terminated without the consent ofthe county. Chairman Stone asked why not donate to the Open Space Fund. Mr. Raginetti stated that the donors want the tax benefit of a charitable donation of the conservation easement and the county can't give it. Commissioner Gallagher asked about a letter from the owner about committing to establishing an easement. Mr. Forinash stated that there is no letter from the owner of Diamond S Ranch consenting to the application but there is one committing to creation of the easement. Mr. Raginetti believes that I10 letter is necessary unless the land is part of the PUD. Chairman Stone mentioned his concerns about unintended consequences for future files. He believes the presentation is somewhat misleading about owning all of the land, when the reality is different. Mr. Raginetti asked about the County's risk in proceeding in the applicant's intended manner. The county's concern about form of easement is valid and can be addressed satisfactorily. Chairman Stone expressed concern about future applicants using this as basis for their applications. Future applicants may look for off-site solutions to problems facing them. Mr. Raginetti spoke about off-site conditions for approval that are sometimes required, such as wetlands establishment. He reiterated that they don't have approval unless they perform as promised. Commissioner Gallagher asked why there is a reluctance of Diamond S.folks to be part of the application. Mr. Raginetti stated that they didn't see a need for it and the applicants agreed. Commissioner Gallagher asked the County Attorney about the ability to draft language of a PUD and establishing easements. He is looking to protecting the county the way a PUD amendment does. Ms. Mauriello stated she would work with Vail Resorts Counsel to establish the easement, give the County some control 'over it, and would help to rectify the unified ownership question. Commissioner Gallagher stated he would like to protect Eagle County Residents as a PUD would and maintain tax benefits of Diamond Star Ranch, if possible. Chairman Stone had questions about Diamond Star's ability to grant a conservation easement, from Page 115 ofthe Staff Report. Mr. Forinash attempted to clear it up. He believes the statement on Page 115 may be referring to property that is in the vicinity of the property that would be subject to the easement. Mr. Raginetti agreed with Mr. Forinash's statements that it is referring to adjacent property. He again offered potential provisions to the conservation easements to allow protection to the county. The applicant can make the county a third party beneficiary; they can require any change or termination to the agreement not be effective unlessluntil the Board of Commissioners gave written approval. Commissioner Gallagher appreciated Mr. Raginetti's comments. Chairman Stone asked that the file be talked about in a manner such that the 855 acres are not part of the PUD, but it is taking care of the wildlife concern. Commissioner Gallagher had a follow up question about the water and where is it coming from. He wondered if they are they using Bellyache Ridge water? Glen Porzak spoke of the water issue. The original agreement was be oversized lines from Eagle River that would be augmented with Eagle .Park Reservoir water. The new agreement takes into account the Bellyache Ridge Metro District (BRMD) and the connection point of the two. BRMD has secured its own water rights using Eagle Park Water: Both parties have their own water rights but in a shared connection point and separately accounted for. Bellyache will be getting water through Red Sky's facilities, rather than the other way around. Mr. Ember ofBRMD spoke about this again. The intention is to hook up with Red Sky in the future and use their water system. Commissioner Menconi then spoke. He believes this an offering by the applicant to extend an amenity to help the project. He doesn't see why it must always be tied to the PUD. Ms. Mauriello reiterated that the only land for discussion is 210 acres and the additional acreage conservation easement is between third parties, of which Red Sky is not. Eagle County doesn't have transfer development right regulations and it doesn't have a ready mechanism in its regulations to account for that. It is appropriate to attach conditions to a file, but to also make sure these conditions are tied to the file and the file alone. Commissioner Menconi had question about accessibility to the 855 acres for the public. Mr. Pylman stated that there would be no public access to the land. 8/312004 - 48- Commissioner Menconi asked if Red Sky would have access rights to the property. Mr. Pylman stated that there would be no access rights. . Commissioner Menconi asked about flexibility of future access to the 855 acres. Could Red Sky prohibit public access if it is part of the PUD? Is it possible to put in the Conservation easement to allow future access to this property? Rick Thompson wildlife biologist representing the applicant then spoke. The reason to protect this parcel as a conservation easement is because of the calving periods and winter range periods. The purpose ofthis easement is to keep people out because of sensitive wild life concerns. Commissioner Menconi asked about Diamond Star Ranch and its easements. Is the property being developed in 35 acre parcels? Mr. Forinashteplied that there are two easements covering 1600 acres. They don't know where the easements exist and what restraints may exist. Mr. Raginetti replied that Diamond Star has cut it down into various-sized tracts. Diamond Star could very well cut it down into 35 acre parcels. Commissioner Menconi asked what types of representations were made during the application period. Mr. Raginetti replied that Diamond S has no PUD' s, but has a set of agreements among the owners as to how things would be used. Commissioner Menconi asked if the Affordable Housing requirement has been fulfilled. Mr. Forinash said that as of now it has not been, but the developer has a schedule to comply and is currently meeting this schedule. Commissioner Menconi withdrew his interest in public access to the easement after hearing Rick Thompson's statements. Commissioner Gallagher asked counsel to begin work on a condition that would incorporate all the discussion about the 840/855 acre parcel that would require the county to permit and approve any amendments or revocation of the conservation easement. He would like the conservation easement to go through the Open Space Committee and come to the Board for advice and would have same chain as a PUD amendment. He desires the same coverage as if there was a PUD. Ms. Mauriello discussed approving as is and put in all the items and representations made here today rather than draft a specific condition. Commissioner Gallagher wanted the applicant to be fully aware of what is going on here today. Chairman Stone addressed the specifics of Condition 1 and stated it for the record. He suggested that if not part ofPUD, that it address the following conditions: County be party to Conservation easement or have some kind of notification requirement that changes would have to go through regular channels. Commissioner Menconi asked the benefit of having it reviewed by the Open Space Committee. Commissioner Gallagher stated that they are the County's advisor to these matters of Open space and Conservation. Commissioner Menconi believes they are advisors for Open Space purchases of the Open Space Tax Fund. Commissioner Gallagher stated that is one of their duties, but they also have a role here as advisors. Ms. Mauriello asked if the goal was to establish a proper review mechanism for modification to the conservation easement. Commissioner Gallagher spoke of his desires to have a proper review mechanism to start with. He is speaking of both amendments to the conservation easement and the original conservation easement and the county should be party to both. Ms. Mauriello spoke of her concerns about sending stuffto the Open Space Committee when they have no formal parameters to review a conservation easement in this context. Commissioner Gallagher asked the applicant about compensation to the Diamond S folks for their role in the PUD and the compensation easement. Mr. Pylman replied that there is some compensation from Red Sky planned to Diamond S Commissioner Menconi asked about Condition 2 and its satisfaction. Mr. Pylman replied that it has been satisfied. Chairman Stone started going over thefmdings that are part of the staff report. He explained them and stated that they were positive or +/-. Finding #1 talks about unified ownership of210 acres and was positive. Finding #2 deals with uses and was positive. Finding #3 speaks of dimensional limitations and had +/- findings. 8/312004 - 49- Joe Forinash replied this has to deal with the minimum lot size of 35 acres for resource zone district as opposed to what might ultimately result. This is also where the 855 acres discussion fits in. Finding #4 about off-street parking and loading was positive. Finding #5 about Landscaping was positive, as was finding #6 about signs. Finding #7 about adequate facilities was +1-. Mr. Forinash mentioned that the -portion of the +/- fmdings are designed to raise awareness to a condition that could erase the -, if the applicant agrees to the changes. Most of the mixed conformance reviews are subject to wildlife concerns. Common recreation will probably be a positive finding when taken in total context of the development. Improvements was a +/- finding that has to do with roads, but has been addressed. The compatibility with the Master Plan, Open Space Plan, and Wolcott Area Community Plan has +1- that has to deal with the 855 acres and wildlife concerns. The phasing standard is positive as is the common open and recreation space. The natural resource protection fmding was +1-. Mr. Forinash stated it had to do with the wildlife concerns and partly with the Colorado Geological Survey raising questions that can be addressed with conditions. All other findings were either positive or would be met through conditions imposed. ChaiqnaTI Stone wanted further clarification of the loan for the ftre station. Jim Thompson of Vail Resorts said they offered $500,000 loan to construct a ftre station. The teI1nS have not been worked out, but it is not a source of contention. This loan is because the fire protection district is in need of cash in order to build the station. Commissioner Gallagher had a question about the Colorado Geological survey concerns. Mr. Forinash indicated that the survey did not raise very serious concerns, but just wanted to raise the level of awareness of the applicant. Mr. Pylman stated the appropriate geological survey has been done for this level of approval. Chairman Stone asked the record to reflect that his acceptance of the conservation easement with the proper safeguards is largely based on the adjacency ofthe conservation easement and it not being far away, like with wetlands. Ms. Mauriello spoke of the changes made to Condition I. It now reads: The Preliminary Plan shall clearly demonstrate the manner in which the 855 acres which are a part of the Diamond S Ranch shall be part ofthe Pun or other legal form which satisfies the Land Use Regulations and is acceptable to the County Attorney and the Applicant. If the manner is a legal form other than making the 855 acres part ofthe pun, then such form shall include, at a minimum: That the form must be reviewed and approved by the County as part of the Preliminary Plan process; and That the County will be a party or third party beneficiary, where no change to or termination of the form originally approved by the County may occur without approval of the County in a process equivalent to the preliminary plan process. The easement shall address the purposes for which the easement is created; The Board of County Commissioners shall have the authority to send any proposed easement and any proposed modification thereof to referral agencies as it deems necessary for review and comment. Further the easement shall include such matters as the county attorney requires to protect and safeguard Eagle County and conform with applicable laws including but not limited to consideration of escrow. Tom Raginetti agreed with Ms. Mauriello's statements. SUGGESTED MOTION: Commissioner Menconi moved to approve File No. PDP-0003 incorporating these findings, and with the following conditions: 1. The Preliminary Plan shall clearly demonstrate the manner in which the 855 acres which are a part of the Diamond S Ranch shall be part of the pun or other legal form which satisfies the Land Use Regulations and is acceptable to the County Attorney and the Applicant. The Preliminary 8/3/2004 - 50- Plan shall clearly demonstrate the manner in which the 855 acres which are a part ofthe Diamond S Ranch shall be part of the PUD or other legal form which satisfies the Land Use Regulations and is acceptable to the County Attorney and the Applicant. If the manner is a legal form other than making the 855 acres part of the PUD, then such form shall include, at a minimum: That the form must be reviewed and approved by the County as part of the Preliminary Plan process; and That the County will be a party or third party beneficiary, where no change to or termination of the form originally approved by the County may occur without approval of the County in a process equivalent to the preliminary plan process. The easement shall address the purposes for which the easement is created; The Board of County Commissioners shall have the authority to send any proposed easement and any proposed modification thereof to referral agencies as it deems necessary for review and comment. Further the easement shall include such matters as the county attorney requires to protect and safeguard Eagle County and conform with applicable laws including but not limited to consideration of escrow. 2. The PUD Preliminary Plan application shall include detailed information, based on site reconnaissance, of the specific location of individual and/or clustered septic systems and the specific location of dwellings to be served by each. 3. Prior to or concurrent with submission of a PUD Preliminary Plan application for this Red Sky Ranch PUD Expansion, the Applicant shall submit all Annual Water Quality Monitoring Reports which are or have been due to date. 4. The proposed road system shall be modified to conform to applicable requirements of Article 4, Site Development Standards, of the Land Use Regulations, or an application for appropriate Variances from Improvement Standards, pursuant to Section 5-260.G., Variance From Improvement Standards, of the Land Use Regulations, shall be submitted prior to or as part of the Preliminary Plan application. 5. A variance from improvement standards to expand the development served by less than two routes of entrance and exit shall be required prior to or as a part of the Preliminary Plan application, pursuant to Section 5-260.G., Variance From Improvement Standards, of the Land Use Regulations. 6. The Preliminary Plan should demonstrate clearly how the Applicant has responded to the concerns raised by the Colorado Division of Wildlife in its letter dated January 15, 2004, and/or any additional concerns that may ,arise as a result of proposed development restrictions on the adjacent 855 acres owned by Diamond S Ranch, as evidenced by a. letter from the Colorado Division of Wildlife. 7. The PUD Preliminary Plan shall include monitoring data from the slope-movement and ground- water monitoring instrllmentation installed in this area in 2002. 8. The PUD Preliminary Plan shall adequately reflect the recommendations and restrictions presented in the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Engineering Geology Study prepared by Golder Associates, Inc., and dated December 27,2002. 9. Ground water monitoring reports previously required to be submitted annually to the Department of Community Development as a condition of the 1041 Permit for the existing Red Sky Ranch PUD (see Board Resolution No. 2001-011) shall be submitted prior to or concurrently with the 1041 Permit application which accompanies the PUD Preliminary Plan for this Red Sky Ranch Expansion. 10. The PUD Preliminary Plan shall demonstrate clearly the manner in which the recommendations of the Colorado State Forest Service, in its letter dated February 4,2004, have been considered in the design of the development. 11. The Traffic Impact Study submitted with the Preliminary Plan shall respond to the comments of the Eagle County Engineering Department, in its memo dated January 20, 2004, in a manner satisfactory to the County Engineer. 8/3/2004 - 51 - 12. The PUD Preliminary Plan shall demonstrate clearly the manner in which the concerns and recommendations of the Northwest Colorado Council of Governments, in its letter dated January 12,2004, have been considered in the design of the development. 13. The employeelaffordable housing requirement should be satisfied with a payment in lieu of an amount to be determined at the time of approval of the final plat. [NOTE: The Planning Commission has recommended that payment of a specific amount be made in lieu of a dedication of land. Staff proposes a revision of the condition recommended by the Planning Commission to delete the specific amount of a payment in lieu of a land dedication in favor of an amount to be determined pursuant to Section 4-700, School Land Dedication Standards.] 14. Except as otherwise modified by these conditions, all material representations ofthe Applicant in this application and all public meetings shall be adhered to and be considered conditions of approval. ' Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. G-00017 Jax Equestrian Easement Vacation Phillip Bowman, Engineering Development presented file number G-00017, Jax Equestrian Easement Vacation. This file represents a request for vacation of an equestrian easement on Lot 7 of the Refiling of Lots 25 through 29, Aspen Mesa Estates, First Filing. NOTE: This file was tabled from 7/13/04 ACTION: Vacation of an equestrian easement on Lot 7 of the Re-filing of Lots 25 through 29, Aspen Mesa Estates, First Filing. LOCATION: Lot 7, Re-filing of Lots 25 through 29, Aspen Mesa Estates, First Filing Commissioner Gallagher moved to table, at the applicant's request, File G-OOO 17, Jax Equestrian Easement Vacation until August 17, 2004. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. AFP-00190 Aspen Mesa Lot 7 Joe Forinash, Planner Development, presented file AFP-00190. This is an amended final plat which would reflect the vacation of an equestrian easement pursuant to File No. G-00017 to allow construction of a dwelling in the existiI1g easement. Commissioner Menconi moved to table file AFP-00190 Aspen Mesa Lot 7 until August 17,2004, at the applicant's request. . Commissioner Gallagher seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDS-00039 Willits Bend Joe Forinash, Planner, Planning Development NOTE: ACTION: This file was tabled from June 1 to July 13 to August 3. To be tabled to 9/14 PUD Sketch Plan for a flexible space, mixed use development consisting of 38,000 s.f. of fabrication & trades, 16,500 s.f. of office, 7,500 s.f. of retail/restaurant and 30,543 s.f. of residential 1712 Willits Lane (east of Park Avenue and the Oak Grove TowI1houses) LOCATION: Commissioner Gallagher moved to table PDS-00039 Willits Bend, at the applicant's request until September 14, 2004 Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. There be ingn,.o,.' furt,. her bus.iness to di~CU. ss th~. .~' GL ~. djoumed. ~,.:; P\'" ---- i ~~:J ~ ~ ",'~" . c . , <.n j - -'". .' -'-. * /'~ ~ Attest:G . d'~ y.~.~ ~,J-'- _ Clerk to the Boa/d (,~~ Chairman 8/3/2004 - 52-