Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 07/06/04 Present: Tom Stone Michael Gallagher Am Menconi Jack Ingstad Diane Mauriello -Pat Magdziuk PUBLIC HEARING July 6, 2004 Chairman Commissioner (absent) Commissioner County Administrator County Attorney Deputy Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration: GENERAL FUND 21ST CENTURY PHOTO SUPPLY 3CMA 800 MHZ A 1 COLLECTION AGENCY AARON VELDHEER ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS ACTION TARGET INC ADAM PALMER ADVANTAGENEnNORKSYSTEMS AFFORDABLE PORTABLE ALISSA EATON ALL PRO FORMS INC ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE, INC ALPHA INTERACTIVE GROUP ALPINE COFFEE SERVICE,LLC ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY ALPINE MEADOWS ANIMAL ALWAYS ENTERPRISES INC AMADEO GONZALES AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION AMERICAN EAGLE ATTORNEY AMERICAN MANAGEMENT AMERICAN SAFETY AMICH AND JENKS INCORPORA ANDREE KIM ANN LOPER APS ARMY & FACTORY SURPLUS ASPEN BASE OPERA TON ASPEN TIMES THE AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES AV TECH ELECTRONICS INC AVON CENTER AT BEAVER CK AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS B J ROWE BAILEY FUNERAL HOME BALCOMB AND GREEN SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE 59.00 950.00 900.00 4.30 122.98 30.00 690.00 234.22 50.00 186.00 650.00 4,968.00 3,939.35 100.00 638.35 301.04 10.00 35.00 67.10 262.50 10.42 5,485.00 15.00 360.00 66.00 207.00 900.00 75.00 425.74 34.00 7,781.38 39.01 1,858.05 2,217.78 42.78 600.00 4,336.63 BALLARD KING BASALT FAMILY RESOURCE BASALT SOCCER TEAM BECKNER ACHZIGER MCGINNIS BEEP WEST RADIO PAGING BENJAMIN F BENDELE BERLITZ LANGUAGE CENTER BLANCA SERNA BOB BARKER COMPANY BONNIE VOGT BRAD A KNIFONG BRC/HARRIS INC BRUCE 0 GIESE BRYAN TREU BUSHMASTER FIREARMS C & H DISTRIBUTORS INC CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CARMEN LOZOYO-VELEZ CATHOLIC CHARITIES CENTRAL CREDIT CORP CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTRAL INC. CENTURYTEL CHAD M HOMOLAR CHARLES B DARRAH CHEMATOX INC. CHICAGO O'HARE AIRPORT CHRISTIE BANOWETZ CHRISTINE L MOTT CHRISTINE MARIE MCKELVEY CIMA CLIFFORD D ZINIDA CO ASSESSOR ASSOCIATION CO ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION CO ASSOCIATION CO BAR ASSOCIATION CO DEPT AGRICULTURE CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND COLORADO COUNTIES INC COLORADO JAIL ASSOCIATION COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE COLORADO WEST MENTAL HLTH COMMANDER COMPUMASTER CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING COPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COTTRELL PRINTING COMPANY COUNTY SHERIFFS OF CO CRAIG VAN DERNOOT CSU COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 2,177.80 1,500.00 1,620.00 30.00 186.00 6,150.00 540.00 35.18 2,042.21 51.75 2,700.00 1,587.00 68.40 73.50 237.25 1,177.27 63,546.00 91.08 3,500.00 45.96 659.54 3,564.82 22,873.18 30.00 15.40 420.00 1,424.72 20.70 87.29 35.70 2,025.00 152.70 46.66 50.00 390.00 870.00 100.00 504.80 568.50 21.28 30.00 3,270.04 57.50 8,370.00 3,000.00 499.00 26.98 1,036.86 3,963.92 1,544.96 64.44 250.00 172.75 346.00 D DEAN EASTEPP DAILY SENTINEL THE DAN CORCORAN PLS DANIEL ZABEL DARELL WEGERT DARRELL DIEFENBACH DAVID A BAUER DAVID GUINNEE, DVM DAVID KEKAR DAY TIMERS INCORPORATED DEBBIE FABER DEENA EZZELL DEEP ROCK WEST DELL INC DENVER CHECKWRITER. INC. DENVER COMMUNITY FEDERAL DENVER CRESCO DIANA JOHNSON DICK BOURRET DISCOUNT POLICE SUPPLY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE DOCTORS ON CALL DOLORES PEREZ DON OLSEN DOUG MUNSELL EAGLE AMOCO EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY CONFISCATED EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE DIRECT EAGLE EYE PHOTO EAGLE FLIGHT DAYS EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE RIVER YOUTH COAL. EAGLE V ALLEY ENTERPRISE EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE VALLEY LIBRARY DIST EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EDWARDS STATION LLC ELAINE WOLF ELISA ACOSTA ELSEVIER ELWYN F SCHAEFER EMBLEM ENTERPRISE EMC2 ERNESTO LOPEZ LOZANO ESRI EVENFLO EVHS LINK CREW EZ MESSENGER ATTORNEY F & F FINANCIAL EQUIPMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 7.00 539.98 1,200.00 11.20 41.40 3,800.00 15.48 3,318,60 1,137.93 22.98 22.08 19.79 513.61 2,729.89 27.75 502.94 210.66 18.00 27~60 396.68 262,142.00 130.00 352.00 14.52 3,500.00 276.00 5,000.00 5,308.00 50.0.0 698.51 26.80 3.405.00 7.33 20.00 396.48 101.97 3,491.25 20.00 8.00 10.00 4,286.50 400.00 27.29 144.90 69.95 100.00 1,098.16 976.28 4.20 14,990.18 3,032.54 560.00 30.00 275.00 FALCON ASSOCIATES INC FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FARRELL & SELDIN FEDERAL EXPRESS FIRST BANK OF VAIL FIRST BANKS FITZSIMMONS MOTOR COMPANY FLORIDA MICRO FORINASH KATHLEEN FRANCY & HAMPTON FRANKLIN COVEY FRED PRYOR SEMINARS G SCOTT CLAYTON GALLS INCORPORATED GARY P SANBLOM GE CAPITAL GEMPLERS INC GFOA GIL MARCHAND GLENWOOD SPRINGS PARKS GOVERNMENT CONTRACT SALES GRACE FINNEY GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GUILLE OJEDA H20 POWER EQUIPMENT INC HAL BURNS HALL KYLE HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH CARE LOGISTICS HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELEN MIGCHELBRINK HERMAN MILLER INC. HEWLETT PACKARD HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HILL & COMPANY HILLCARA LLC HILTON HOTEL HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IAAO ICC IMAGINIT EMBROIDERY INTEGRAL RECOVERIES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE JANET CONNORS JEAN NUNN JENNIFER CUEVAS JENNY WOOD JILL BARON JIM DUKE JOBING.COM JOBS AVAILABLE JOHN LOWERY SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 340.00 1,910.84 4.20 530.61 444.26 16,219.81 30.00 187.00 220.30 6.80 127.12 687.00 34.20 153.76 5.60 159.99 42.45 150.00 41.40 80.00 64.41 75.30 514.24 1,169.64 341.55 96.19 20,830.00 19.24 117.89 48.50 8,455.04 3.25 973.44 116.00 797.97 5,023.10 5,000.00 1,646.20 695,80 370.58 660.00 1,454.40 892.89 75.00 200.00 83.40 95.70 14.49 44.57 1,320.00 11.40 249.00 717.60 221.09 JOHN O'SULLIVAN JOSE ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ JOYCE MACK KARA BETTIS, CORONER KATIE BRANDRUP KEMP AND COMPANY INC LA QUINTA LAB SAFETY SUPPLY LABELS DIRECT INC LARA "HEATHER" LAWDERMILK LAUREL POTTS LAWRENCE E BOOCO LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LES OHLHAUSER LIGHTNING SERVICES LINDA MAGGIORE LIZ MAYER L1ZANNELENNAN LLP MAYNES BRADFORD SHIPP LONE STAR SECURITY AND LORIE CRAWFORD LORRAINE VASQUEZ LUZ FORD MACHOL & JOHANNES MAJACKDEVELOPMENT MARIA ANJIER MARILYN MENNS MARKS PLUMBING PARTS MARLENE MC CAFFERTY MARMOT ELECTRIC MBIA MCI WORLDCOM MEDICAL ARTS PRESS MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MERCK A TL MICHAEL CLAUSSNER MICRO PLASTICS MICRO PLASTICS INC MICROWAVE MAINT FUND MIKE BAIR MILLER & COHEN MOBILE SPRAY SYSTEMS MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOTOR POOL FUND MOTOROLA INCORPORATED MOUNTAIN CHALET MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS MOUNTAIN MUSIC INC MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES MTN VALLEY DEVELOPENTAL MULTIMEDIA AUDIO VISUAL NAEYC NAPA AUTO PARTS REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT. REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES 1,320.00 30.00 134.89 91.04 20.00 63.18 375.00 54.51 404.00 24.00 13.21 74.20 1,070.20 4,000.00 145.00 51.41 32.90 48.22 30.00 3,795.00 115.92 6.60 227.01 74.37 1,385.48 108.15 28.20 299.51 .120.87 185.00 4,805.80 2,070.77 21.54 1,144.00 832.50 615.00 27.65 9.17 60,734.00 37.95 46.80 275.00 62.35 34,220.43 475.00 84.00 62.50 199.99 4,285.00 1,764.89 5,000.00 30.00 75.00 62.05 NASCO MODESTO NATIONAL FOREST NATIONAL NETWORK SERVICES NCADV NETTIE REYNOLDS NHSA NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NORMAN L NUNN NOTARY LAW INSTITUTE NW CO LEGAL SERVICE PROJ NW EDUCATION LOAN ASSOC. NWCCOG OLSON PROPERTY ORTEN & HINDMAN OSM DELIVERY LLC OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP P-LOGIC SYSTEMS PAPER WISE PAT MAGDZIUK PAT NOLAN PATRIOT SIGNAGE PATTERSON NUSS & SEYMOUR PEGGY GRAYBEAL PET FOOD L TO PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PITNEY BOWES PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED PLAK SMACKER CORPORATE HQ POCA TELLO SUPPLY DEPOT POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PRCA PRIMEDIA WORKPLACE PSS, INC PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING PURCHASE POWER QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QUILL CORPORATION QUINLAN PUBLISHING COMPAN QWEST R2 ANALYTICAL RAMON MONTOYA RAYMOND P MERRY RAZORS EDGE INC REBECCA WHEELERSBURG RED RIBBON PROJECT REIS ENVIRONMENTAL INC REMIGIO VELASCO ESCALERA RENEE DUBUISSON RENTAL SERVICE CORP RICHARD A KESLER RICHARD DAVID WHITE RIVER OAKS COMMUNICATIONS ROBERT G WHITE ROCKY MOUNTAIN POISON DRU SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 199.50 30,000.00 3,060.00 300.00 466.80 40.00 4,919.63 61.65 16.00 1,000.00 123.90 25.00 4,880.00 30.00 570.00 1,921.80 9,652.50 1,038.00 136.55 73.83 181.50 14.00 160.00 750.25 996.79 2,490.00 92.25 82.64 969.92 5,552.00 25,000.00 388.00 953.75 275.00 10,100.00 294.33 47.97 127.00 5,870.09 404.00 53.82 82.82 82.00 121.84 1,500.00 1,419.40 30.00 116.13 3,640.00 8,146.61 60.00 15,850.48 50.00 5.00 ROCKY MOUNTAIN REPROGRAPH ROCKYNET.COM INC RON WOLFE ROSALIE HARRISON RUTH LENZ SALVATION ARMY SANDRA DONNELLY SARA JARAMILLO SAWAYA AND ROSE SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP SEARS SERVICE MASTER CLEAN SHAINHOL TZ TODD HODS SHAREE WETTSTEIN SHEAFFER KAREN SHIVELY & HOLST SHRM SIBLEY PLUMBING SIGNATURE SIGNS SILT CO"OP SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SNOWBOARD OUTREACH SCTY SNOWHITE LINEN SOFnNARESPECTRUM SOMIX TECHNOLOGIES INC SPEAKOUTVAIL INCORP. SPECIALTIES INCORPORATED SPECTRUM BRANDS SPRINGMAN BRADEN WILSON ST VINCENTS CATHOLIC STATE OF COLORADO STATE OF UTAH STEPHANIE GLENWRIGHT STEPHEN ELLSPERMAN STEVE R MADRIGAL STEVENS HOME CARE INC STRAWBERRY PATCH SUE MOTT SUSAN NOTTINGHAM SUSAN SPEICHER SUSPENSE FUND SYLVIA SALAZAR TANNY MCGINNIS TANYA REZNECHECK TAYLOR WYN T TEAK SIMONTON TECH MEDICAL INC TENIE CHICOINE THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT THOMAS C BARRETT THOMAS F FARRELL THOMPSON ONEIL & TIMBERLINE STEEL TODD GRAY SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT 2.26 50.00 56.93 59.11 18.00 3,000.00 20.70 60.03 150.40 168.99 689.87 34,490.39 259.00 74.52 366.83 8.64 320.00 30.00 72.00 364.00 860.47 5,000.00 305.51 276.52 8,465.00 900.00 588.50 3,750.00 13.10 560.00 472.56 9.52 15.00 36.92 10.10 55.50 45.00 157.50 134.55 851.51 83,498.10 10.00 35.62 19.55 20.00 114.59 185.56 60.30 925.00 23.32 178.00 25.00 25.25 546.50 TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMA TI TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF GYPSUM TRANSCOR AMERICA INC TRILEMETRY INC TRILlTERAL UNIFORM KINGDOM UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED RESOURCE SYSTEMS UPPER ARKANSAS VALLEY VAIL DAILY THE VAIL ELECTRONICS VAIL VALLEY EMERGENCY VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR VAILNET INC VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY VERIZON WIRELESS, VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS VISA CARD SERVICES WAFAK K K-KANAM WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WEST CANYON TREE FARM,INC WEST GROUP WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY WESTERN SLOPE WHITE RIVER COUNSELING WILD WEST DAY WINDRIVER DEVELOPMENT LLC WOOD IRON WOOD FINISHES WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION XOCHITL HERNANDEZlCONTERA ZERO TO THREE PAYROLL FOR JUNE ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS DAY TIMERS INCORPORATED DEEP ROCK WEST DENVER ELECTRIC EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD . SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 2,164.80 235.80 6,570.00 30.00 1,024.94 1,496.25 20.50 2,024.15 522.27 5.10 960.00 31.10 1,495.00 1,080.00 1,500.00 2,724.45 67.80 180.00 19,904.84 3,619.47 28.84 1,314.98 30.00 153.38 284,345.49 312.00 382.00 3,115.00 518.00 390.00 800.00 727.48 14.00 98.23 1,096.05 85.56 12.50 PAYROLL 13 & 14 641,541.08 1,986,542.21 SERVUCE SERVUCE SERVUCE SERVUCE SERVUCE SERVUCE SUPPLIES 683.50 108.00 64.62 31.98 34.70 728.68 104.00 ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO FRONTIER PAVING INC GMCO CORPORATION HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HIGGINS BRAD HILL & COMPANY HILL BROTHERS CHEMICAL CO HOLYCROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY J&S CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO KEMP AND COMPANY INC MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT MOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SUSPENSE FUND WELLS FARGO WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY PAYROLL FOR JUNE SOCIAL SERVICES FUND AMERICINN LODGE & SUITES CAROLYN SLOAN BURTON CATHERINE ZAKOIAN, M.A. CHP + MATERIAL ORDERS CHRIS MORTON COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS CORPORATE EXPRESS CSSDA DARLENE T HOFFMAN EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DIST EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING ELLYN RIZZUTO FAMILY LEARNING CENTER FORINASH KATHLEEN GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HOLLY KASPER JANE WEST JENNIFER WORCESTER JERRI ISRAEL JOELKARR JOHN C COLLINS PC SERVUCE SERVUCE SERVUCE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVUCE SERVUCE SERVUCE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVUCE SERVUCE SERVUCE SERVUCE SERVUCE SERVUCE SERVUCE SERVUCE PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES 691.60 277,897.98 9,930.54 669.95 215.63 258.75 34,793.06 418.43 359.81 86.10 275.10 41.00 3,296.00 504.85 10,475.25 66.50 913.05 5,926.92 25,733.73 78.00 PAYROLL 13 & 14 60,104.25 434,491.98 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 268.00 300.00 939.60 96.00 65.00 262.90 60.04 100.00 390.00 53.30 282.10 67.50 130.50 135.00 903.50 222.96 37.60 747.97 30.36 1,950.00 483.04 144.90 55.20 3,579.28 JOSE GARCIA KATHY REED KATO COUNSELING KKCH RADIO LA QUINTA LABORATORY CORPORATION OF LITERACY PROJECT, THE MICHAEL CLAUSSNER MOTOR POOL FUND NOLA SMITH PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING PITKIN COUNTY SHERIFF SAMARITAN CNTR OF ROCKIES SUSPENSE FUND SYDNEY R HAYS SYLVIA SALAZAR TERRI ALLENDER VERIZON WIRELESS, WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO XEROX CORPORATION PAYROLL FOR JUNE WRAP FUND JOEL KARR RETIREMENT FUND SUSPENSE FUND INSURANCE RESERVE FUND AON AVIATION COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPO SERVICE 2,874.80 285.66 260.00 280.00 520.00 54.00 7,540.41 260.00 615.00 43.55 75.00 47.96 585.00 6,329.54 1,748.51 144.36 65.00 270.66 331.59 20,323.90 80.16 PAYROLL 13 & 14 41,093.11 95,132.96 SERVICE 85.70 85.70 SERVICE 69,314.83 69,314.83 SERVICE SERVICE 18,117.00 13,320.04 31,437.04 OFFSITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND AMERICAN CIVIL CONSTRUCTR ARCHITERRA BAND B EXCAVATING CDW COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS EAGLE COUNTY GOVERNMENT FLORIDA MICRO GT ALLIANCE INC HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS PEAK CIVIL ENGINEERING IN PEAK LAND SURVEYING INC PREMIER ELECTRIC CO INC QWEST COMMUNICATIONS SIEMENS BUSINESS SERVICES STRATEGIC FENCE & WALL CO TRILEMETRY INC VOGELMAN WEST ASSOCIATES SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. A& E TIRE INC A 1 AUTO ELECTRIC COMPANY ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY AMERICAN SALES INCENTIVES AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES AUDRA MEYERS B & H SPORTS BILLINGS KAR KOLOR INC CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING COLlETTS COLORADO MOTOR PARTS SERVICE 11,590.44 11,590.44 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 416,059.01 9,341.30 6,697.64 12,444.45 1,298.20 612.25 266.00 19,350.13 400.00 150.00 4,227.50 4,667.50 3,181.00 18,631.24 46,728.00 16,000.00 1,496.25 3,085.00 564,635.47 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 3,050.45 732.96 683.50 24.95 12.89 438.00 280.39 62.45 502.31 200.00 453.32 165.81 3,122.82 159.51 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLUMBINE MARKET COpy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEEP ROCK WEST DENVER ELECTRIC DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE PHARMACY FEDERAL EXPRESS FIREBUSTER SOLUTIONS G & K SERVICES GE CAPITAL GILLIG CORPORATION GLENWOOD RADIATOR REPAIR GLO GERM GUSTY KANAKIS HANSON EQUIPMENT HARRY TAYLOR HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HI CRANES INC HIGH COUNTRY CUSTOM HILL & COMPANY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS INNOVATIVE ENERGY JANET FIELD JAY MAX SALES JEFF WETZEL KINETICOWATER PROS LAWSON PRODUCTS M & M AUTO PARTS MID WEST TRUCK MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT MOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE NOVUS AUTO GLASS NWCCOG QUILL CORPORATION QWEST RON E BECK RONALDF. GANN SAFETY KLEEN (WHICITA) SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERCK SERVICES INC SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SUSPENSE FUND TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS TOWN OF AVON TOWN OF VAIL UNITED LABORATORIES UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV UNITED STATES WELDING VALLEY SIGNS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SE;RVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBWRSEMENT SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 175.00 83.98 37.50 275.50 2,544.98 20.90 728.68 8,800.53 3.49 205.85 373.75 476.44 296.08 2,187.67 16.5.00 57.95 5.37 321.98 300.00 1,176.52 325.00 26.00 4,500.00 1,465.23 5.00 945.00 4.93 116.95 300.00 35.00 408.90 4.52 2,000.00 3,847.52 230.70 9,986.00 278.00 60.00 168.56 379.88 3,400.00 602.54 557.03 46.06 1,729.00 3,197.28 11,234.42 588.00 330.36 200.00 688.23 1,000.00 27.54 8.80 VERIZON WIRELESS, WELLS FARGO WHITEALLS ALPINE WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PAYROLL FOR JUNE SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC BEAUTY BEYOND BELIEF BP RECLAMATION INC COLUMBINE MARKET ELLIE CARYL FEDERAL EXPRESS GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND HEALTH INSURANCE FUND IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS KEMP AND COMPANY INC LESLIE KEHMEIER NEXGEN CONSTRUCTORS SCULLYS ART OFFICE AND SUSPENSE FUND WELLS FARGO YEH & ASSOCIATES INC AIRPORT FUND MAE AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT AMERICAN LINEN AON AVIATION BALCOMB AND GREEN BEST WESTERN EOGEWATER BRIAN SCHOFIELD CEO-CONSOLIDATED ELECTRIC CENTURYTEL CIVIL AIR PATROL MAGAZINE CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND CO DEPT PUBLIC SAFETY COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES 78.78 51,297.22 100.50 209.75 478.20 165.51 PAYROLL 13 & 14 122,024.10 251,177.04 SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SERVICE 11.96 163.00 157.57 2,271.50 21.21 80.33 29.85 2,168.00 5.36 112.50 48.00 222.39 383,452.54 4.67 147.76 851.62 3,609.18 393,357.44 SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE R(:IMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 635.00 575.00 454.46 51,545.00 5,522.62 1,017.00 912.00 138.06 3,165.64 145.00 386.00 40.00 580.21 COLUMBINE MARKET CORPORATE EXPRESS D JENSEN ELECTRIC INC. DEEP ROCK WEST EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO ELIZABETH WILT FRONTIER RADIO GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GYPSUM TOWN OF H & H HYDRAULICS INC. HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HILL & COMPANY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC JEPPESEN DATAPLAN INC KINDER MORGAN INC KTUN-FM RADIO KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAMINATION SERVICE INC MAIN AUTO PARTS MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC MOTOR POOL FUND MULTI ELECTRIC MFG INC NASCO LLC NEXTEL NFPA ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP OVID SEIFERS SERVICEMASTER CLEAN STANDARD SIGNS INC SUMMITEX, LLC SUSPENSE FUND TIRE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE URS CORPORATION US CUSTOMS SERVICE US DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO WESTERN IMPLEMENTS WILLIAM E PAYNE & ASSOC WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY XEROX CORPORATION PAYROLL FOR JUNE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLlE~ SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE 21.46 130.56 165.00 202.07 250.00 1,816,139.00 94.88 382.00 177.04 431.05 740.42 472.96 31,822.76 1,883.10 3,144.94 428.29 240.00 1,200.00 3,623.30 15.85 51,516.00 678.60 260.49 641.50 823.03 135.00 100.00 1,832.20 241.86 2,348.00 942.17 111.20 1,792.93 166.50 74.90 11,296.50 35,266.22 500.00 2,500.00 404.29 314.00 13,501.72 448.13 3,230.00 741.45 134,60 85.00 PAYROLL 13 & 14 31,805.68 2,088,572.64 MICROWAVE MAINTENANCE FUND CENTURYTEL HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC MCI WORLDCOM QWEST SUNLIGHT PEAK USERS CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FUND AG GUTTERS EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS MORALES CUSTOM WOODWORK HOUSING FUND MOTOR POOL FUND HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FUND ALL METALS LUDLUM MEASUREMENTS INC NAPA AUTO PARTS - VAIL REIS ENVIRONMENTAL INC VISA CARD SERVICES OPEN SPACE FUND FIRST BANK OF COLORADO GENERAL FUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE TOTAL SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 286.83 2,917.27 19,225.50 6,582.04 1,260.66 150.00 30,422.30 230.00 6,360.49 630.00 7,220.49 150,000.00 150,000.00 8,242.00 96.75 35.04 3,445.00 444.92 12,263.71 2,000,000.00 8,600.00 2,008,600.00 LANDFILL FUND ACZ LABORATORY INC ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY BEAUDIN GANZE CONSULTING CLEAN HARBORS CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND DEEP ROCK WEST DENIOS INC DOWN VALLEY SEPTIC EAGLE COUNTY TREASURER GOULD CONSTRUCTION GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HOLLAND SIGNS INC INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY KRW CONSULTING INC LAFARGE CORPORATION MOTOR POOL FUND RONALD RASNIC SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SIGNATURE SIGNS STRATEGIC FENCE & WALL CO SUSPENSE FUND VAIL DAILY THE VAIL ELECTRONICS VISA CARD SERVICES WASTE MANAGEMENT WELLS FARGO PAYROLL FOR JUNE MOTOR POOL FUND ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS ADAM PALMER ALPINE LUMBER COMPANY BERTHOD MOTORS CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE COLLETTS DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE AMOCO EAGLE COUNTY PURCHASING EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL FARIS MACHINERY CO SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE LUNCH AND DRINKS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD 2,218.00 7.96 569.87 10,312.63 835.00 89.40 1,243.00 545.00 255.25 68,174.79 1,297.00 396.09 1,135.10 230.14 1,602.29 490.46 1,222.56 104.42 1,744.93 130.00 2,800.00 2,152.77 1,261.88 843.75 110.65 40,149.00 6,955.36 PAYROLL 13 & 14 15,217.24 162,094.54 SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE 92.85 77.12 28.64 677.69 17.82 68,016.27 28.75 68.00 12.36 79.00 983.87 G & K SERVICES G JCT CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE GAY JOHNSONS INC GLENDA WENTWORTH GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE HANSON EQUIPMENT HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELEN MIGCHELBRINK HENSLEY BATTERY HILL & COMPANY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC LAUREL POTTS LAWSON PRODUCTS M & M AUTO PARTS MACDONALD EQUIPMENT CO MAIN AUTO PARTS MOTOR POOL FUND NAPA AUTO PARTS NEW PIG CORPORATION NOVUS AUTOGLASS POWER MOTIVE REY MOTORS INCORPORATED SAFETY KLEEN SAFETY KLEEN (WHICITA) SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN STEVINSON CHEVROLET SUSPENSE FUND TWO RIVERS CHEVROLET UNITED STATES WELDING WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY WELLS FARGO WESTERN SLOPE PAINT WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY PAYROLL FOR JUNE HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN; PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT UNITED STATES LIFE INS ENHANCED E911 FUND SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BEN FIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE PAYROLL EXPD SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 535.63 75,862.52 944.00 16.50 367.56 732.59 276.14 27.22 87.50 2,950.60 1,081.80 19.29 224.85 564.51 1,505.20 82.60 1,937.80 2,347,20 373.71 449.00 607.78 441.52 254.19 478.71 46.10 2,360.58 54,278.78 1,548.26 218,794.00 301.11 16,705.01 8,486.15 850.91 7,839.51 PAYROLL 13 & 14 22,657.28 496,118.48 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 1,050.00 32,096.43 4,141.01 4,768.40 42,055.84 CENTURYTEL LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES QWEST SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 160.38 49.75 17,086.02 17 ,296.15 8,852,409.26 Consent Agenda A. Approval for bill paying for the week of July 5, 2004, subject to review by the County Administrator. B. Approval of payroll for July 8, 2004, subject to review by the County Administrator C. Approval of the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meeting of June 1,2004 D. First Amendment to the Agreement for addition, maintenance and removal of two temporary access points off of Miller Ranch Road and for installation ofpennanent curb and gutter E. Notice of award to B & B Excavating for the Lake Creek Pedestrian Path project F. Lease agreement between the American Red Cross and Eagle County Government at the El Jebel Community Center in El Jebel, Colorado G. Change Order No. 00680 from American Civil Constructors to complete parking lot and building pad grading at Tract C, Berry Creek/Miller Ranch PUD Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the consent agenda. Chairman Stone seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. Planning Files ZC-00067 and SMA 00021 Eaton Ranch Joe Forinash, Planner for Community Development, presented Files ZC-00067 and SMA 00021, Eaton Ranch. He gave a brief history ofthe parcel's uses and stated the file is a requestto make a zone change for 20 of the 91.9 acres. He pointed out on a map the location and layout of the parcel. Commissioner Stone asked Mr. Forinash to explain the difference between resource and resource limited. Mr. Forinash replied the minimum lot size is driving this, which is currently 35 acres in resource zone district, but the lot size in question is 20 acres. The Planning Commission has reviewed the zone change request and recommended approval. He showed photographs of the parcels. The file for the subdivision minor file is recommended for approval by Staff, and the Planning Commission made no recommendation because it is a minor subdivision. TITLE: Eaton Ranch Zone Change FILE NO./PROCESS: ZC-00067 / Zone Change LOCATION: Between 1-70 and Highway 6, west of the Edwards Spur Road OWNER: Bruce C. Eaton and Grimshaw-Edwards, LLC APPLICANT: Bruce C. Eaton and Grimshaw-Edwards, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: PJA Land Planning STAFF PLANNER: Joe Forinash STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval PLANNING COMMISSION DELmERATION: . Clarification of the term of the lease of the existing gravel mining operation. 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: Application to re-zone 20 acres (ofa 91.9 acre parcel) north of the Eagle River from Resource to Resource Limited so that, by an accompanying plat (File No. SMA-00021), the 91.9 acre parcel maybe subdivided into two parcels of 20 acres and 71.9 acres, respectively. B. CHRONOLOGY: 1981 - Special Use Permit approved to allow gravel mining on a portion of this site south of the Eagle River. 1984 - Special Use Permit was amended to increase the area ofthe gravel mining operation south of the Eagle River by 4.12 acres. C. SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning: East: West: North: South: Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Proposed No. of Dwelling Units: Total Area: Minimum Lot Area: Maximum Lot Area: Water: Sewer: Access: A. REFERRAL RESPONSES: Residential/Resource Agriculture / Resource Railroad corridor / Resource Agriculture and gravel mining / Resource Resource Resource Limited I 20 acres 20 acres 20 acres Private well ISDS Edwards Spur Road via County Road 2. STAFF REPORT Eagle County Engineering Department . Completeness comments regarding the accompanying plat. (See attached) Eagle County Wildfire Mitigation Specialist . The majority of the existing parcel is located in a Low Wildlife Hazard area with the exception of the northeast comer, which would be rated Moderate. . It appears that nothing will be added to the area which is rated Moderate, so mitigation would not be necessary. Eagle County Road & Bridge . No comment. Additional Referral Agencies: Eagle County Attorney, Eagle County Environmental Health, Eagle.County Housing Division, Eagle County Assessor, Eagle County Weed & Pest, ECO Trails, US Army Corps of Engineers, Singletree HOA, Homestead HOA, Brett Ranch HOA B. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-230.D., Standards for the review of Amendments to the Official Zone District Map are as follows: STANDARD: Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-230.D.1.] B Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, policies and FLUM (Future Land Use Map) afthe Master Plan. x - Contributes to a visually self-contained community land use pattern. x2- Site is located in an area designated as Community Center on the Future Land Use Map. EDWARDS AREA COMMUNITY PLAN Conformance Non-Conformance Mixed Conformance Not Applicable Land Use Xl Housing x Transportation x Open Space XZ Potable Water and Wastewater x Services and Facilities x Environmental Quality X3 Economic Development X' Recreation and Tourism x Historic Preservation x Implementation x Future Land Use Map X5 .1 . . x - Proposed subdIvISIOn protects the quahty of the natural and man made envlTonment, and retams the umque variety of lifestyle and quality of life found in Edwards. Natural resources and environmental systems are not impacted by this subdivision. x2 - The proposed subdivision will maintain the open space on the site. X3 _ Proposed subdivision will serve to maintain the visual quality of the environment. X4 - Proposed subdivision will allow continuation of existing agricultural uses on the site. X5 - The site is in areas designated as "Residential Medium Density" and "Mixed Use". The proposed subdivision will permit these uses to occur at an appropriate time. Xl x2 x3 x' x x x --' Proposed subdivision is sensitive to open space values. x2 - Proposed subdivision is compatible with the preservation of the visual quality of Eagle County. x3 - Proposed subdivision is in an existing community. x4 - Proposed subdivision does not encourage development on steep slopes or which present natural hazards. x5 - Proposed subdivision is compatible with critical wildlife habitat in the area. No additional development is proposed. The site is located in an area designated on the Future Land Use Ma as "Community Center". The smaller lots are a ro riate. [+] FINDING: Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-230.D.l.] - The proposed amendment IS consistent with the purposes, goals, policies and FLUM (Future Land Use Map) of the Master Plan. STANDARD: Compatible with surrounding uses. [Section 5-230.D.2.] Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land, and is the appropriate zone district for the land, considering its consistency with the purpose and standards of the proposed zone district. . Suburban density residential development occurs between the subject property and the Edwards Spur Road (Old Edwards Estates), and south across Highway 6 (Homestead). Immediately to the south is a 71.9 acre parcel zoned Resource with current uses being agriculture and gravel mining. 1-70 is immediately to the north. The property immediately to the west currently has agricultural uses. Uses permitted by right in the Resource Limited zone district are generally more restricted than in the Resource zone district. The proposed zone change on this parcel from Resource (minimum lot size of35 acres) to Resource Limited minimum lot size of 20 acres is com atible with the surroundin uses. (+] FINDING: Compatible with surrounding uses. [Section 5-230.D.2.] - The proposed amendment IS compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land, and IS an appropriate zone district for the land, considering its consistency with the purpose and standards of the proposed zone district. STANDARD: Changfd conditions. [Section 5-230.D.3.] Whether and the extent to which there ARE changed conditions that require an amendment to modifY the use or density/intensity. The Edwards area has continued to develop. The reduction in minimum lot size is in keeping with this trend. [+] FINDING: Changed conditions. [Section 5-230.D.3.] - There ARE changed conditions that require an amendment to modify the use or density/intensity. STANDARD: Effect on natural environment. [Section 5-230.DA.] Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significantly adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water, air, noise, stonnwater management, wildlife habitat, vegetation, and wetlands. No additional development is proposed at this time. Generally, the uses permitted in the Resource Limited zone district are more limited, or require more extensive level of review, than those in the Resource zoned district. The proposed zone change would not result in significantly adverse impacts on the natural envirorunent. (+] FINDING: Effect on natural environment. [Section 5-230.D.4.] - The proposed amendment WILL NOT result in significantly adverse impacts on the natural envirorunent, including but not limited to water, air, noise, stormwater management, wildlife habitat, vegetation, and wetlands. STANDARD: Community need. [Section 5-230.D.5.] Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need. Providing greater density in the Edwards area, albeit limited with respect to this proposed zone change, does begin to address a community need. [+] FINDING: Community need. [Section 5-230.D.5.] - It HAS been demonstrated that the proposed amendment addresses a community need. STANDARD: Development patterns. [Section 5-230.D.6.] Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly development pattern, and not constitute spot zoning, and whether the resulting development can logically be provided with necessary public facilities and services. Zoning and development in the immediate vicinity currently permits greater density than would be , permitted by this proposed change in zoning. The proposed zone change would not constitute spot zoning. Necessary public facilities and services exist nearby, and development on this site would be part of a logical and orderly pattern of development. [+] FINDING: Development patterns. [Section 5-230.D.6.] - The proposed amendment WILL result in a logical and orderly development pattern, WILL NOT constitute spot zoning, and WILL logically be provided with necessary public facilities and services. STANDARD: Public interest. [Section 5-230.D.7.] Whether and the extent to which the area to which the proposed amendment would apply has changed or is changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage a new use or density in the area. The Edwards area has continued to develop in recent years. It is in the public interest to encourage greater density in this area. [+] FINDING: Public interest. [Section 5-230.D.7.] - The area to which the proposed amendment would apply HAS changed or IS changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage a new use or density in the area. Rick Pylman, representing the applicant, reviewed the general area of the site in question and explained the area using photographs. He showed and gave a brief history of the Eaton property and stated the Eaton's are looking to get out of the ranching business and sell some of the property but keep a part of the property. He is proposing to subdivide the property into a 72 acre parcel and a 20 acre parcel, separated by the river, and change the 20 acre parcel from resource zoning to resource limited zoning, to meet the minimum lot size of resource limited zoning, which is 35 acres. There are no additional development rights or density granted by approving this zone change. He stated all the requirements have been met to change the zoning request. The first requirement was compliance with Master Plans for Eagle County and Edwards' area, which they met. He pointed out on a map the potential land uses of this site. They met the second criteria in that the uses will be compatible with surrounding use, still fl single family site on the 20 acre parcel. They meet the third criteria of changed conditions in the area, which is certainly the case as property has become part of a suburban/urban area. He spoke of access to the site and the Eatons having to drive through a residential area to continue their ranching operation. Mr. Pylman stated there is no effect on the natural environment, and there is no community need to be addressed for approval of this site because there is no change in conditions. They don't believe they are spot zoning, another criteria, and they believe the fmal criteria of public interest is not applicable, but that they are in compliance with that criteria. Mike Eaton, property owner, spoke to the Board to assure them this is not a request for development rights, but a request to change the zoning for the 20 acre parcel. The 72 acre parcel on the south side of the Eagle River will be sold. If this file is not approved, then the entire 92 acre parcel will be sold. Chairman Stone asked for public comment and there was none. Commissioner Menconi asked if there was an implication regarding a future land use request. Mr. Forinash replied there is no other file pending. Mr. Menconi asked Mr. Eaton to clarify Mr. Forinash's comments. Mr. Eaton stated there is a sale pending the ruling of the Commissioners, either the 72 acre parcel, or the 92 acre parcel. He stated a future sale is not dependent upon the decision of the Board, either way the property will be sold. Chairman Stone asked about a special use pennit on Parcel A. Mr. Forinash stated the term of the special use pennit runs for the life of the operation. He stated if a future application for development came forward, then a zone change request would have to be made and approved. Chairman Stone stated his concerns about incrementally subdividing parcels, and would rather Master Plan the entire area, the limited access of Parcel B (the 20 acre parcel) and potential increase of traffic through Old Edwards Estates with future subdivision of Parcel B, seeing only a small part of proposed development. He made comparisons between this request and Adam's Rib Ranch in Eagle about not seeing the entire development picture. Mr. Pylman responded that this can be viewed as incremental development, but can also be viewed as trying to hold back development. Chairman Stone suggested that maybe there should be no future subdivision of Parcel B to ensure no future development. Mr. Pylman stated he does not know what the future holds for Parcel B, and the only way to stop development is to place this property in a conservation easement, which is forever. Chairman Stone commented that it is not forever as both parties can agree to change the easement. Mr. Pylman stated the Eaton family is not the developer and has no desire to be the developer. He reviewed the options of the Eaton family: sell all 92 acres, or sell 57 acres and sell 35 acres without BOCC approval, or to retain 20 acres and have it zoned for a single family and sell the 72 acres. He could not guarantee that the 20 acre parcel would not be brought before the board at some time in the future for development. Chairman Stone commented that approving requests on a piecemeal basis is not the best way to approve development. He stated we should all strive to be responsible about developing the area. Commissioner Menconi stated he cannot guess what the future may hold are any area where development is concerned, and this is a way to preserve a section of the property. The file in question for today should be used for the decision made for this file. Mr. Eaton stated this plan before the Board today is the entire plan as far as the Eaton's are concerned. They have no desire to be developers. Chairman Stone reiterated to plan responsibly with regard to future development. He stated perhaps to use Open Space funds to preserve this land. Commissioner Menconi moved the Board approve File No. ZC-00067, incorporating the staff findings. Chairman Stone seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. TITLE: FILE NO.lPROCESS: LOCATION: OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF PLANNER: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Eaton Ranch SMA-00021 / Type A Minor Suhdivision Between 1-70 and Highway 6, west of the Edwards Spur Road Bruce C. Eaton and Grimshaw-Edwards, LLC Bruce C. Eaton and Grimshaw-Edwards, LLC PJA Land Planning Joe Forinash Approval with conditions 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: An application for a subdivision of this 91.9 acre parcel into to one 20 acre lot north of the Eagle River and a 71.9 acre lot south of the Eagle River. No new development is proposed on either lot. Approval of a companion application (File No. ZC-00067) for a change in zoning of that portion of the property which corresponds with the 20 acres north of the Eagle River from Resource (minimum lot size of35 acres) to Resource Limited (minimum lot size of 20 acres) is necessary. B. CHRONOLOGY: 1981 - Special Use Permit approved to allow gravel mining on a portion of this site south of the Eagle River. 1984 - Special Use Permit was amended to increase the area of the gravel mining operation south of the Eagle River by 4.12 acres. C. SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses I Zoning: East: Residential/Resource West: Agriculture and gravel mining / Resource North: Railroad corridor I Resource South: Commercial, Highway 6, Residential, public services / PUD Existing Zoning: Resource Proposed Zoning: Resource (R) and Resource Limited (RL) Proposed No. of Dwelling Units: No new development proposed Total Area: 91.923 acres Water: Private well Sewer: Individual Sewage Disposal System Access: Highway 6, Easement through Edwards Plaza Subdivision from Edwards Spur Road 2. STAFF REPORT A. REFERRAL RESPONSES: Eagle County Engineering Department . No comments. Eagle County Surveyor . Technical comments with respect to the final plat. Eagle County Wildfire Mitigation Specialist . The majority of the existing parcel is located in a Low WildfIre Hazard area with the exception of the northwest comer, which would be rated Moderate. . It appears that nothing will be added to the area which is rated Moderate, so mitigation would not be necessary_ Eagle County Address Coordinator . The address 0227 County Road for the proposed parcel north of the Eagle River is out of sequence with other addresses on the same street. There is some inconsistency on the name of the road. Address Coordinator recommends 0395 Eagle County Road. . Recommended address for the parcel south of the Eagle River is 33801 Highway 6. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers . In accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a Department of the Army permit is required for any discharge (including mechanized land clearing) of dredged or fill material in waters of the United States. Additional Referral Agencies: Eagle County Attorney, Eagle County Environmental Health, Eagle County Road & Bridge Department, Eagle County Weed and Pest Control, Eagle County Housing Department, Eagle County Assessor, ECO Trails, Old Edwards Estates HOA, Singletree HOA, Homestead HOA, Brett Ranch HOA. B. DISCUSSION: Pnrsuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-290.G.1. Standards for the review of a Type A Minor Subdivision: STANDARD: Consistent with Master Plan. [Section 5-290.G.I.a.] - The proposed subdivision shall be consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the FLUM of the Master Plan. Xl X2 x X x x x x - Contributes to a visually self-contained community land use pattern. x2- Site is located in an area designated as Community Center on the Future Land Use Map. EDWARDS AREA COMMUNITY PLAN Conformance Non-Conformance Mixed Conformance Not Applicable Land Use Xl . Housing x Transportation x Open Space X2 Potable Water and Wastewater x Services and Facilities x Environmental Quality X3 Economic Development X4 Recreation and Tourism x Historic Preservation x Implementation x Future Land Use Map X5 T . . x - Proposed subdiVISIon protects the qualIty of the natural and man made envIronment, and retams the umque vanety of lifestyle and quality oflife found in Edwards. Natural resources and environmental systems are not impacted by this subdivision. x2 - The proposed subdivision will maintain the open space on the site. X3 - Proposed subdivision will serve to maintain the visual quality of the environment. X4 - Proposed subdivision will allow continuation of existing agricultural uses on the site. X5 - The site is in areas designated as "residential medium density" and "mixed use". The proposed subdivision will permit these uses to occur at an appropriate time. EAGLE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PLAN Xl - Proposed subdivision is sensitive to open space values. x2 _ Proposed subdivision is compatible with the preservation of the visual quality of Eagle County. x3 - Proposed subdivision is in an existing community. x4 - Proposed subdivision does not encourage development on steep slopes or which present natural hazards. x5 - Proposed subdivision is compatible with critical wildlife habitat in the area. [+} FINDING: Consistent with Master Plan. [Section 5-290.G.I.a.] The PUD IS consistent with the Master Plan, and IS consistent with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). STANDARD: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-290.G.l.b.] - The proposed subdivision shall comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts. and Article 4, Site Development Standards. . Article 3, Zone Districts The proposed development complies with all of the standards and provisions of the Land Use Regulations, including Article 3, Zone Districts. Article 4, Site Development Standards en/a] Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards (Division 4-1) No development is proposed as a part of this application. These off-street parking and loading standards are not applicable. [n/a] Landscaping and Illumination Standards (Division 4-2) No development is proposed as a part of this application. These landscaping standards are not applicable. [nla] Sign Regulations (Division 4-3) No development is proposed as a part of this application. These sign standards are not applicable. [nla] Natural Resource Protection Standards (Division 4-4) No development is proposed as a part of this application, and no impacts on natural resources will result. No wildfIre hazard mitigation is required. The site is not located within an area of "possible ridgeline impacts" . [nla] Commercial and Industrial Perfonnance Standards (Division 4-5) The provisions of this Division are not applicable. [nla] Imt>rovement Standards (Division 4-6) No development is proposed as a part of this application. These improvement standards are not applicable [+] Impact Fees and Land Dedication Standards (Division 4-7) [nla] School Land Dedication Standards (Section 4-700) - No new residential development is proposed. [+] Road Imvact Fees (Section 4-710) - Payment of road impact fees will be required pursuant to this Section at the time any subsequent building pennits are issued. [+] Special Use (Section 5-250) - A Special Use Pennit is currently in effect for a gravel mining operation on a portion of the site south of the Eagle River. That Special Use Pennit will continue to be in effect after this proposed subdivision. . [+] FINDING: Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5-290.G.1.b.] Due to the lack of a demonstrated potable water source, it HAS been demonstrated that the proposed subdivision complies with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development Standards. STANDARD: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-290.G.1.c.] - The proposed subdivision shall be located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (1) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions shall be consistent with the utility's service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road extensions shall be consistent with the Eagle Countv Road Capital Improvements Plan. (2) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines shall be sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area in order to both avoid future land disruption, and the necessity of upgrading under-sized lines. No development is proposed on either parcel which would be created by this subdivision. Therefore, no inefficiencies have been identified. [+] FINDING: Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5-290;G.1.c.] The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. STANDARD: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-290.G.1.d.] -The property proposed to be subdivided shall be suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. No development is proposed on either parcel which would be created by this subdivision. However, the ro erty is suitable for the ro osed subdivision and a ears to be suitable for subse uent develo ment. [+] FINDING: Suitability for Development. [Section 5-290.G.1.d.] The property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. STANDARD: Compatible with Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-290.G.1.e] - The proposed subdivision shall be compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and shall not adversely affect the future developmen t of the surrounding area. No development is proposed on either parcel which would be created by this subdivision. However, the proposed subdivision is co atible with the surrOlU1din land uses. [+] FINDING: Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-290.G.l.e.] The proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and SHALL NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. STANDARD: Improvements Agreement. [Section 5-290.G.1.f.] - The adequacy of the proposed Improvements Agreement, where applicable. No public improvements are proposed on either parcel which would be created by this subdivision. An 1m rovements Agreement is not re uired. [+] FINDING: Improvements Agreement. [Section 5-290.G.I.f.] - An Improvements Agreement is NOT re uired. STANDARD: Conformance with Final Plat Requirements. [Section 5-290.G.l.g.] - Its conformance with the Final Plat requirements and other applicable regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines. The fmal plat conforms to the requirements of this Section and other applicable regulations, policies, standards and uidelines. [+] FINDING: Conformance with Final Plat Requirements. [Section 5-290.G.1.g.] - The Final Plat DOES conform to the Final Plat re uirements and other a licable re lations, olicies, standards and uidelines. Requirements for a Zone Chane:e. In Section 5-230.D., Standards, the Eagle County Land Use Regulations provide that "the wisdom of amending the. . . Official Zone District Map or any other map incorporated in these Regulations is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the Board of County COrpnllssioners and is not controlled by anyone factor." Based on the above analysis and other available information, Staff makes the following fmdings as provided in this Section of the Land Use Regulations: See the Staff Report for the accompanying zone change application, File No. ZC-00067, for a complete discussion of the requirements for a zone change. D. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: Commissioner Menconi moved the Board approve File No. SMA-00021, incorporating the stafffmdings and with the following condition, and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat: 1. Except as otherwise modified by these conditions, all material representations of the Applicant in this application and all public meetings shall be adhered to and be considered conditions of approval. Chairman Stone seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. PDS-00040, Fox Hollow PUD lena Skinner-Markowitz, Planner for Conununity Development, presented File PDS-00040, Fox Hollow PUD. TITLE: FILE NO./PROCESS: LOCATION: Fox Hollow PUD PDS-00040 / PUD Sketch Plan 32358 and 32400 Hwy 6, West Edwards (Formally two of three parcels approved as Woodland Hills PUD); west of the Eagle River Mobile Home Park. Robert Levine and Evelyn Pinney Owner Knight Planning lena Skinner-Markowitz OWNER: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF PLANNER: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval with Conditions 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. SUMMARY: The applicant wishes to create a mixed use PUD which is comprised of a maximum of 26 residences consisting of eight (8) duplexes and two (2) four-plexes, two employee housing units (above conunercial space) and approximately 28,000 sq feet of neighborhood conunercial space. The focal aspects of this proposal are: a veterinary clinic with ancillary uses; and five (5) of the eight (8) duplexes to be built by Habitat for Humanity. Fox Hollow is situated on two of the three lots and parcels which formally comprised a subdivision known as Woodland Hills PUD. Woodland Hills never received Final Plat approval. If this Fox Hollow proposal achieves Preliminary Plan approval the third Woodland Hills parcel will remain PUD, however, will be undevelopable until such a time as said parcel receives future Board of County Commission review, zoning and subdivision approval. B. CHRONOLOGY: 1974- 1980- 1998- RSL zoning was placed on the properties when Eagle County introduced zoning in September, 1974. Reynolds Minor Subdivision was approved which created one of the two lots proposed for Fox Hollow. The Deer Park PUD Sketch Plan was denied by the Board of County Commissioners. 106 townhomes and condominium units (12 units per acre) were proposed, along with a bus stop, trails and open space. The Woodland Hills Sketch Plan was approved (with conditions) by the Board of County Commissioners. An 88 unit multifamily development on an 8.81 acre site, recreation trail and open space was proposed. The Woodland Hills Preliminary Plan was approved (with conditions) by the Board of County Commissioners. A 76 unit multifamily development on an 8.81 acre site, recreation trail and open space was proposed. 2001- 2002- C. SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning: East: Residential: Eagle River Mobile Home Park / Unplatted / RSL West: Residential/ CenturyTel / Unplatted / RSL North: Residential/Unplatted / RSL & Resource South: Highway 6 Existing Zoning: RSL Total Area: 4.53 acres Water: Public- as proposed Sewer: Public- as proposed Access: Direct from Hwy 6 D. PLANNING COMMISSION DELIBERATIONS: The Eagle County Planning Commission had no real issues with this file; however, provided the applicants with suggestions to be incorporated in the Preliminary Plan. The suggestions are as follows: 1. Hours of commercial operation should be limited to 10 p.m., similar to the restriction placed on Edwards Comer. 2. The covenants should further limit commercial spaces/uses to ensure that the use is compatible with the neighborhood as well as for parking reasons (this is similar to how Edwards Village operates). 3. Applicant should consider methods to keep (free market units) affordable. 4. Reserved, usable open space (aside from the two (2) tot lots) should be increased in order to provide a place for all families/residents to use. E: PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Motion: [7:0] The Planning Commission Recommended unanimous approval of file PDS-00040, incorporating all Staff [mdings and conditions. 2. STAFF REPORT F. REFERRAL RESPONSES: (see attached) Colorado Geological Survey, memo dated June 21 st, 2004: . Colorado Geological Survey previously visited and reviewed this site at the sketch plan and preliminary plan stages when it was known as the Woodland Hills PUD. . Although the proposed building layout and uses for some parcels have changed, our previous comments remain valid. . As part of our previous reviews, we read LKP's "Preliminary Soil and Foundation Investigation" report (April 21, 1998), and a more recent geotechnical evaluation by H-P Geotech (September 19,2001). . The Fox Hollow application includes only LKP's report; the current applicant should try to obtain H-P's report, since it includes more detailed recommendations for foundations, floor slabs, compaction, underdrains, site grading, surface drainage, and specific recommendations for minimizing the risk of damage due to potential subsidence and collapse activity in the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlying this area. . H-P's recommendations remain applicable to this development. . Once grading is complete for each phase of development, individual soils analysis will be needed at each building site to obtain site-specific information regarding soil engineering properties. . This information is needed to determine maximum allowable bearing pressures and to design individual foundations and floor systems. Colorado Division of Wildlife, memo dated June 8th, 2004: . The following are recommendations to address possible wildlife impacts of this development. . The historical use and size of this parcel suggest wildlife impacts will be minimal; the most beneficial recommendations will be those which will benefit wildlife in years to come. . The parcel lies within historical range of bears, in an area which has had several human/bear conflicts. Therefore bears should be considered in the developmental design and operation of the commercial businesses, as well as the residential. . Most bear conflicts can be avoided if food items are not available for the animal. Bears are onmivorous, and while they eat mostly vegetation, they will eat almost anything. . Items such as human garbage, humming bird feeders, bird seed, grease from barbeques and pet food offer an easily obtainable food source for these animals. . Easy solutions, such as having bear proof trash containers, exist that minimize or resolve conflicts caused by these animals, which we can provide more details on to the applicant and residents. Eagle County School District, memo dated June 10th, 2004 . The Sketch Plan is proposing 16 duplex and 10 multi-family units. The units would result in the dedication requirement as follows: 26Duplex and Multi-family Units X .0025 acres per unit = 0.065 acres . As the land dedication acreage is minimal, the District will accept cash in lieu of land for this Subdivision Sketch Plan. . Per the recently revised County School Land Dedication Standards, the value of this cash payment will be determined by an appraisal of land provided by the developer with the application for Final Plat. Eagle County Sheriff, memo dated June 8th, 2004: . Advantages: . Homes for residences and vet clinic for pets . More job opportunities . Disadvantages: . Possible parking issues . No traffic control device off ofHwy 6 into development . Recommendations: . A good celebration of the entrance from Hwy 6 . Plenty of lighting within the parking lots and around buildings . Enough windows facing parking lot for natural surveillance . Good way fmding . Possible speed bumps for traffic calming . A void hiding places for burglars . Chain-link fence around dumpsters, if possible Environmental Health Department dated June 7th, 2004: . A 1041 may be necessary if the applicants cannot show sufficient evidence that the water and wastewater generation for Fox Hollow is less than or equal to the previously approved 1041 for Woodland Hills. . The Woodland Hills 1041 covered two sections of 1041; major extension of water and sewer; as well as efficient utilization of an industrial or municipal water project. Noting this aspect of the 1041 should emphasize the attention to be given to water conservation measures within the context of 1041. Housing Department Memo, dated June 4th, 2004: . Using the projected number of market residential units and estimated square footage of both market units and commercial space, the Fox Hollow development would require six (6) affordable housing units. . The current PUD Sketch Plan anticipates providing two (2) employee housing units and then (10) Habitat for Humanity units on site would meet the need for affordable housing. . The ten, low income, Habitat for Humanity units provides affordability to persons making 60% of the Area Medium Income. . These additional units are considered a benefit to the community as a whole and should be considered eligible for Affordable Incentives under the Eagle County Housing Guidelines. Engineering Memo, dated June 3rd, 2004: · It appears that the east-west road straddles the property line ofthe adjacent parcel that is not part of this development. Permission from that property owner needs to be submitted or it needs to be moved onto the development entirely. · The right-of-way for the private cul-de-sac is only 20 feet wide. This does not meet the Eagle County standards. All roads, both private and public, must meet Eagle County standards. · There is an access easement located on the east side of the parking lot. The owner of the easement has stated that he wants to continue to use that easement until his property redevelops. A phasing plan must be included that will allow for the continued use of the easement and for the development to meet the parking standards. · The State Highway Access Pennit will expire on November 6, 2004, and can not be extended again. A new State Highway Access Pennit will have to be applied for, concurrent with the Preliminary Plan submittal. Eagle River Fire Protection District, dated May 30, 2004: · The project is located within the fIre district boundaries. · The water supply for the project is identifIed as being provided by the Edwards Metro District. This is not confIrmed. · Documentation of adequate accessibility and turn-a-rounds for emergency vehicles needs to be provided based on the attached vehicle turning performance criteria for the Pierce Quantum. Colorado State Forest Service, dated May 26th, 2004: · The State Forest Service has given Fo~ Hollow a wildfIre rating ofIow. A low rating means that structures on the property will most likely not be threatened by average wildfIre a"tivity. · Vegetation on this property mainly consists of light fuels such as grasses and a few scattered shrubs. Trees are present on the north border of the property, but their numbers are insignifIcant in regard of fire hazard. These light fuels along with the absence of any slope both contribute to the low rating. However, even with this low rating we suggest noncombustible roofIng materials. Additional Referrals were sent to the following agencies and Homeowner's Associations: · Eagle County Attorney, Animal Control, Assessor . CDOT · Natural Resource Conservation Service · CenturyTel, KN Energy, Holy Cross · Edwards Metro District, Eagle River Water and Sand · ECOGE, Colorado and Eagle County Historical Societies, St. Clare of Assisi · Eagle River Mobile Home Park, Homestead HOA, Cordillera HOA, Singletree HOA, Riverwalk BOA, South Forty HOA, Lake Creek BOA, The Reserve BOA, River Pines BOA Staff has also received 34 letters of support from a variety of Eagle County residents and organizations, the majority of whom are from the Edwards community. G. DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS: Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F .J.e Standards for the review of a Sketch and Preliminary plan for PUD: STANDARD: Unified ownership or controL [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] - The title to all land that is part of a PUD shall be owned or controlled by one (1) person. A person shall be considered to control all lands in the PUD either through ownership or by written consent of all owners of the land that they will be subject to the conditions and standards of the PUD. The A licant has demonstrated that the entire area affected b this PUD Sketch Plan is in sin Ie ownershi [+] FINDING: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] The title to all land that is art of this PUD IS owned or controlled by one (1 erson and/or entity. STANDARD: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] - The uses that may be developed in the PUD shall be those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule", or Table 3-320, "Commercial andlndustrial Zone Districts Use Schedule, " for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these use designations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3.j, Variations Authorized. The subject properties are already zoned PUD. Most of the proposed uses were previously not contemplated as part of the currently governing Woodland Hills PUD (Woodland Hills was approved for 76 multi-family dwelling units and recreational amenities). This proposal contemplates 26 residences and a variety of commercial uses. Pursuant to the Edwards Community Master Plan, limited "neighborhood commercial" uses may be permitted in West Edwards. TIlls proposal contains a list of commercial uses found within a typical residential/mixed-use nei hborhood. [+/-] FINDING: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] The uses that may be developed in the PUD ARE uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in either Table 3-320, "Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule" or Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule". The residential uses ARE uses allowed in the currently governing Woodland Hills PUD; however, the commercial uses ARE NOT currentl ermitted in the underlyin zone district. STANDARD: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] - The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD shall be those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these dimensional limitations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3j, Variations Authorized, provided variations shall leave adequate distance between buildings for necessary access and fire protection, and ensure proper ventilation, light, air and snowmelt between buildings. The following Variations will be requested by the applicant in the Preliminary Plan application: 1. A Variation for the commercial use component of the Fox Hollow PUD. The previous planned unit development was solely a residential PUD. 2. Maximum lot, floor area and impervious coverages. As opposed to the previous PUD, Fox Hollow does not have an overall maximum square footage for lot, floor area and impervious coverages but instead provides percentages for Parcels A-E. These percentages vary by parcel (see pages 43-47 of the attached Fox Hollow PUD guide). 3. Setbacks. The proposed setbacks for Parcels A-D are equal to or more restrictive than what was proposed in the previous PUD. Parcel E, however, will need a Variation to allow 8 feet to be the minimum front setback versus 10 feet as is in the previous PUD guide. 4. Heights. The height limitation of the proposed buildings is actually less than the previous PUD (27 feet, down from 35 feet). Please note that Staff has requested a complete list of possible Variations from the applicant, but has not received that list as of the writing of this Staff report. More Variations could be requested at Preliminary Plan. [+] FINDING: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD ARE NOT those specified in the existing Planned Unit Development Guide for these properties; however, this finding may be found positive assuming a roval of the Variations b the Board of Count Conumssioners at Preliminary Plan. STANDARD: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] - Off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. A reduction in these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that: (a) Shared Parking. Because of shared parking arrangements among uses within the PUD that do not require peak parking for those uses to occur at the same time, the parking needs of residents, guests and employees of the project will be met; or (b) Actual Needs. The actual needs of the project's residents, guests and employees will be less than those set by Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. The applicant may commit to provide specialized transportation services for these persons (such as vans, subsidized bus passes, or similar services) as a means of complying with this standard. With the nature of this proposal, and the design of the buildings for the multiple uses, a site specific parking plan will have to be developed and submitted as part of Preliminary Plan. The parking plan must adequately address loading areas, residential, employee, visitor and commercial patron parking. The maximum number and viability of any shared-use arking s aces must also be addressed in the arkin Ian. [+] FINDING: AS CONDITIONED Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] Given the Sketch Plan level detail of the development plan, it is likely that the applicants WILL be able to demonstrate that off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD CAN comply with the standards of Article 4, Division I, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards, without a necessity for a reduction in the standards, at Preliminary Plan. STANDARD: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)J - Landscaping provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaving and Illumination Standards. Variations from these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that the proposed landscaping provides sufficient buffering of uses from each other (both within the PUD and between the PUD and surrounding uses) to minimize noise, glare and other adverse impacts, creates attractive streetscapes and parking areas and is consistent with the character of the area. A detailed landscaping plan is required to be submitted as part of the Preliminary Plan. That plan should detail all types and location of landscape materials to be utilized as part of this development. A cost estimate will also be necessary for collateralization purposes. Site lighting and illumination standards must also be satisfactorily addressed with the Preliminary Plan. [+] FINDING: AS CONDITIONED Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)J It WILL be demonstrated that landscaping provided in the PUD can comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards. Illumination standards must be considered as part of Preliminary Plan. . STANDARD: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (6)J - The sign standards applicable to the PUD shall be as specified in Article 4,Division 3, Sign Regulations, unless, as provided in Section 4-340 D., Signs Allowed in a Planned Unit Development (PUD), the applicant submits a comprehensive sign plan for the PUD that is determined to be suitable for the PUD and provides the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to and within the PUD. The applicant has made statements that signage will comply with Eagle County sign standards. Nevertheless, a Comprehensive Sign Plan will be required with the Preliminary Plan application because the commercial buildings are ro osed to contain multi Ie uses. [+] FINDING: AS CONDITIONED Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e(6)J The sign standards applicable to the PUD ARE as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations. ThePUD guide properly references that signs shall be as allowed pursuant to the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. A Co rehensive Si n Plan is re uired to be submitted with the Preliminary Plan a lication. STANDARD: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] - The applicant shall demonstrate that the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. Existing facilities such as electricity (telephone, gas, cable, etc.), solid waste removal (for the individual lot owners) and fire protection currently service the residents living on the proposed properties. In regards to water and wastewater service, it may be necessary for the Applicant to apply for a new 1041 approval. The Woodland Hills PUD was granted a 1041 which covered two sections of the 1041 regulations: (1) Major Extension of Water and Sewer; and (2) the Efficient Utilization of an Industrial or Municipal Water Project. Water and sewer for Woodland Hills would have serviced 76 residential units, landscaping, etc. Prior to the submittal of a Preliminary Plan application, the applicants must provide an evaluation in which the potential water and wastewater generation needs for the Fox Hollow PUD are compared against the Woodland Hills PUD 1041approval. Ifit appears that the projected water and wastewater generation for Fox Hollow exceeds the needs of the Woodland Hills PUD 1041, a new 1041 application will be necessary. In addition to the possible 1041 determination, an "Ability to Serve" letter from the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District must also be obtained prior to Preliminary Plan approval. The applicants have shown preliminary road layouts on their Sketch Plan which provide internal connections to future developments. As a condition of the Engineering memo date June 2004, the applicant is required to adhere to the Eagle County road standards, unless a Variation from those standards is approved with the Preliminary Plan. The applicants are also aware of the possible improvements to Hwy 6in regards to acceleration and deceleration turning lanes that they will have to construct; however, they do not have designs as of yet pending a detailed Traffic Anal sis. [+/-] FINDING: AS CONDITIONED Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)J The Applicant HAS NOT clearly demonstrated that the development proposed in this Sketch Plan for POD will be provided adequate facilities for solid waste disposal and roads. Further the applicant HAS NOT clearly demonstrated that the development proposed in the Sketch Plan forPUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable water and sewage disposal. It HAS demonstrated that the proposed PUD will be conveniently located in relation to schools, olice and fIre rotection,and emer enc medical services. STANDARD: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)J - The improvements standards applicable to the development shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards. Provided, however, the development may deviate from the County's road standards, so the development achieves greater efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts, when the following minimum design principles are followed: (a) Safe, Efficient Access. The circulation system is designed to provide safe, convenient access to all areas of the proposed development using the minimum practical roadway length. Access shall be by a public right-ol-way, private vehicular or pedestrian way or a commonly owned easement. No roadway alignment, either horizontal or vertical> shall be allowed that compromises one (1) or more of the minimum design standards of the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) for that functional classification of roadway. (b) Internal Pathways. Internal pathways shall be provided to fonn a logical, safe and convenient system for pedestrian access to dwelling units and common areas, with appropriate linkages oif-site. (c) Emergency Vehicles. Roadways shall be designed to pennit access by emergency vehicles to all lots or units. An access easement shall be granted for emergency vehicles and utility vehicles, as applicable, to use private roadways in the development for the purpose of providing emergency services and for installation, maintenance and repair of utilities. (d) Principal Access Points. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to provide for smooth traffic flow, minimizing hazards to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. Where a PUD abuts a major collector, arterial road or highway, direct access to such road or highway from individual lots, units or buildings shall not be permitted. Minor roads within the PUD shall not be directly connected with roads outside of the PUD, unless the County determines such connections are necessary to maintain the County's road network. (e) Snow Storage. Adequate areas shall be provided to store snow removed from the internal street network and from oif-street parking areas. This development wiIl have to meet all minimum County and/or Colorado Division of Transportation standards regarding road designs (including access entrance and highway 6 improvements), unless a Variation from Eagle County standards is granted by the Board of County Commissioners during the Preliminary Plan process. A new Hi hwa 6 access ernrit must be received u on the ex iration of the existin ernrit. [+] FINDING: AS CONDITIONED Improvements. (Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)J It HAS NOT been clearly demonstrated that the improvements standards applicable to the development will be as specifIed in Article 4, Division 6, IIIltJrovements Standards regarding: (a) Safe, EffIcient Access. (b) Internal Pathways. (c) Emergency Vehicles (d) Principal Access Points. ( e) Snow Stora e. ! STANDARD: Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] - The development proposed for the PUD shall be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. Currently, the underlying, residential property is compatible with the character of the lands surrounding it. The proposed uses such as a laundromat, day care, offices, and veterinary clinic are uses which could benefit the immediate neighborhood. This development, if properly executed, will be compatible with the West Edwards vicinity. Staff has received numerous letters of su ort from man Edwards residents and organizations. [+] FINDING: Com atibility With Surroundin Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9 ] . i I STANDARD: Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] - The PUD shall be consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The consideration of the relevant master plans during sketch plan review is on a broad conceptual level, i.e., how a proposal compares to basic planning principles. As a development proposal moves from sketch plan to preliminary plan review, its conformance or lack thereof to aspects of the master plans may not necessarily remain static. THE MASTER PLAN ANALYSES BELOW CONSIDER THE PROPOSAL AS SUBMITTED. EAGLE COUNTY MASTER PLAN x x x x x x FLUM- lCommunity Center. The Future Land Use Map indicates that Fox Hollow is within the designated Community Center. Community Center has a suggested residential density of 3-12 dwelling units per acre, in areas typically found along major transportation routes which are accessible public water and sewer, and have not been identified as sensitive lands. This designation promotes Community Centers as appropriate locations for affordable housing, with cluster and Planned Unit Developments being encouraged. Community Centers are also places where a mix of non~residentia1 activities takes place, including neighborhood commercial activities to serve the population of the Community Center and community-oriented commercial or service which may serve surrounding areas or the entire CountY. Development in a Community Center is primarily served by centralized water supply and sewage treatment facilities. Fox Hollow is not located in a recognized unique landform area of the county, nor is it located in a natural hazard area. Fox Hollow currently is in the "District" for water and wastewater service. The 'Ability to Serve' by the District will be required at Preliminary Plan. Most likely the applicant will provide cash in lieu of water rights the District and purchase water from sources in the Eagle River basin and Colorado River systems. If deemed necessary, 1041 approval must be obtained prior to Preliminary Plan approval to ensure efficient utilization of water and wastewater. It is not anticipated that the proposed development will compromise either the Eagle River watershed or the Eagle River. EAGLE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING PLAN VISION STATEMENT: Housing for local residents is a major priority of Eagle County. There should be a wide variety of housing to fulfill the needs of all its residents, including families, senior citizens, and those who work here. Elements of Eagle County's vision for housing are: · Housing is a community-wide issue. · Housing should be located in close proximity to existing community centers, as defined in the Eagle County master plan. · Development of local residents housing should be encouraged on existing transit routes. · Housing is primarily a private sector activity [but] without the active participation of government, there will be only limited success. · It is important to preserve existing local residents housing. · Persons who work in Eagle County should have adequate housing opportunities within the county for other infrastructure needs. · Development applications that will result in an increased need for local residents housing should be evaluated as to whether they adequately provide for this additionall1eed, the same way as they are evaluated. POLICIES: ITEM 1. Eagle County will collaborate with the private sector & nonprofit organizations to develop housing for local residents 2. Housing for local residents is an issue which Eagle County needs to address in collaboration with the municipalities. . . x 3. Steps should be taken to facilitate increased home ownership by local residents and workers in Eagle County Xl 4. Additional rental opportunities for permanent local residents should be brought on line. Some... should be for households with an income equivalent to or less than one average wage job X2 5. Seasonal housing is part of the problem & needs to be further addressed. It is primarily the responsibility of . . . employers. . . x 6. New residential subdivisions will provide a percentage of their units for local residents x3 7. Commercial, industrial, institutional, and public developments generating increased employment will provide local residents housing. The first preference will be for units on-site where feasible, or if not feasible, in the nearest existing community center. . . x 8. The County will seek to make land available for local residents housing in proximity to community centers 9. x Mixed use developments in appropriate locations are encouraged 10. Factory-built housing is an important part of Eagle County=s housing stock x 11. There is a need to segment a portion of the housing market to protect local residents from having to compete with second home buyers. Where public assistance or subsidies are provided for housing, there should generally be limits on price appreciation, as well as residency requirements x 12. Eagle County recognizes that housing for local residents is an ongoing issue XI- Habitat for Humanity will be building five (5) of eight (8) duplex units for low-income persons in Eagle County. X2- The proposed employee housing units will most likely be rental units. X3- See Xl. EDWARDS AREA COMMUNITY PLAN Conformance Non-Conformance Mixed Conformance Not Applicable Land Use X Housing X Transportation X Open Space X Potable Water and Wastewater X Services and Facilities X Environmental Quality X Economic Development X Recreation and Tourism X Historic Preservation X Implementation X Future Land Use Map X Land Use - The stated goal is, "The location and type of land uses balance the physical, social, cultural, environmental and economic needs of the current and future resident (& tourist) population. Land uses are located in a manner that protects and improves the quality of the natural and man made environment, ensures the timely, cost-effective provision of public facilities and services, and retains the unique variety of lifestyles and quality of life found in Edwards". This proposal does serve to balance the physical, social, cultural, environmental and economic needs ofthe entire Edwards Community, particularly in West Edwards. Housing - "Affordable" housing is anticipated in the current application; however, at this point, there is no indication of what rental or sales prices will be for the housing unit component of this application. Transportation - The applicant needs to work with the Eagle County Engineering Department and the Colorado Department of Transportation to secure appropriate access permits. A bus stop is not anticipated in or near the entrance of this development. Open Space - "Open Space preservation is promoted within the Edwards Planning Area through coordination with land owners, developers and other agencies and organizations". This proposal does not represent a coordinated effort to preserve any of the subject site as Open Space which, in turn, helps to define a buffer between developments; however, landscaping will be found throughout the development. Potable Water and Wastewater - Public potable water and sanitary sewer service is anticipated to be made available to serve the proposed development, however, according to the District, the applicant will have to become a part of the District before service will be provided. 'Ability to Serve' will be analyzed with the Preliminary Plan and possible 1041. Services and Facilities - This element of the Edwards Area Community Plan pertains to the management of solid and hazardous wastes and the support of public schools, occupational training and higher education. These particular goals do not apply to this development; however, Educational Facility is a proposed use by right in this development on Parcels A, B andD. Environmental Quality -This proposal does not necessitate the creation of any new wastewater or water supply facilities and it addresses stormwater runoff related issues, will be addressed in more detailed drainage plans to be submitted with the Preliminary Plan and possibly, the 1041 application. Economic Development - The proposal attempts to promote a balanced mix ofland uses in the Edwards community to encourage a diverse economy. According to the applicants, there has been discussion with various local professionals who wish to establish offices in this area of Edwards. Recreation and Tourism - The stated goal is, "Parks, river access, recreational facilities and open space are provided to meet current and future needs of the residents of Edwards and Eagle County. These are designed in such a way as to ensure increased accessibility and provide a more even distribution to the Edwards Planning Area's parks and open space system". This application does not offer any conununity recreational or open space amenities; however, Fox Hollow offers two tot lots, landscaped green spaces between and around buildings, allowance for a trail to run parallel to Hwy 6, and sidewalks through the development. Historic Preservation - No historic resources were identified on the subject property. At the time of this writing, neither the Colorado State Historical Society nor, the Eagle County Historical Society had provided conunent. Implementation - If approved, the proposed development will be required to efficiently utilize public infrastructure. Compliance with the Hwy 6 Access Control Plan is stronglyreconunended as well, with significant highway improvements to be constructed by the applicant. According to the applicant, water and wastewater services will be provided, although an 'Ability to Serve' letter hasnot been received from the District. Future Land Use Map (FLUM) -The proposed conunercial site is identified on the FLUM as an area appropriate for, "medium density residential development and minimal mixed use that would address the service, retail and office needs of specifically the surrounding neighborhood." This aspect of the proposal is consistent with this reconunendation, in that the intent for the "minimal mixed use" also states that the development should address the, "service, retail and office needs of specifically the surroundin nei hborhood"; this develo ment does include mixed uses. [+/-) FINDING: Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed Sketch is not entirely consistent with all stated purposes, goals, objectives and policies of applicable master plans, primarily beca11:Se none of the recreational or open space areas are reserved with this application aside from two (2) tot lots (only one is shown on the development plan), and "open space" areas around buildings and parking lots. The application does include potentially benefiCial uses for the West Edwards vicini . STANDARD: Phasing [Section 5-240.F.3.e (11)] - The Preliminary Plan for PUD shall include a phasing plan for the development. If development of the PUD is proposed to occur in phases, then guarantees shall be provided for public improvements and amenities that are necessary and desirable for residents of the project, or that are of benefit to the entire County. Such public improvements shall be constructed with the first phase of the project, or, if this is not possible, then as early in the project as is reasonable. The current phasing plan has not been evaluated to reflect all the necessary details such as timing on actual road construction and platting. E.g. which parcels will be platted in what order, etc. A more detailed phasing plan is required at Preliminary Plan application. STANDARD: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)]- The PUD shall comply with the following common recreation and open space standards. (a) Minimum Area. It is recommended that a minimum of 25% of the total PUD area shall be devoted to open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi-public. In addition, the PUD shall provide a minimum of ten (J 0) acres of common recreation and usable open space lands for every one thousand (1,000) persons who are residents of the PUD. In order to calculate the number of residents of the pun, the number of proposed dwelling units shall be multiplied by two and sixty-three hundredths (2.63), which is the average number of persons that occupy each dwelling unit in Eagle County, as determined in the Eagle County Master Plan. (h) Areas that Do Not Count as Open Space. Parking and loading areas, street right-ol-ways, and areas with slopes greater than thirty (30) percent shall not count toward usable open space. (c) Areas that Count as Open Space. Water bodies, lands within critical wildlife habitat areas, riparian areas, and one hundred (100) year floodplains, as defined in these Land Use Regulations, that are preserved as open space shall count towards this minimum standard, even when they are not usable by or accessible to the residents of the PUD. All other open space lands shall be conveniently accessible from all occupied structures within the PUD. (d) Improvements Required. All common open space and recreational facilities shall be shown on the Preliminary Plan for PUD and shall be constructed and fully improved according to the development schedule established for each development phase of the PUD. (e) Continuing Use and Maintenance. All privately owned common open space shall continue to conform to its intended use, as specified on the Preliminary Planfor PUD. To ensure that all the common open space identifiedjn the PUD will be used as common open space, restrictions and/or covenants shall be placed in each deed to ensure their maintenance and to prohibit the division of any common open space. (f) Organization. If common open space is proposed to be maintained through an association or nonprofit corporation, such organization shall manage all common open space and recreational and cultural facilities that are not dedicated to the public, and shall provide for the maintenance, administration and operation of such land and any other land within the PUD not publicly owned, and secure adequate liability insurance on the land. The association or nonprofit corporation shall be established prior to the sale of any lots or units within the PUD. Membership in the association or nonprofit corporation shall be mandatory for all landowners within the PUD. As quoted above, the Eagle County Land Use Regulations only recommend that 25% of the total PUD area be utilized as open space. The total acreage of Fox Hollow is approximately 4.53 acres. Development will occur on the majority of property, with minimal area left as useable open space. Landscaping will fill in any lands not covered by asphalt or buildings. Dwelling units willliave small green areas around the homes. With the exception for two (2) small tot lots near the residential four-plexes (only one is shown on the development plan), Fox Hollow does not plan to reserve areas for parks or passive recreation at this point; development of the site will be maximized, if approved, with the exception of the lawn areas that parallel Hwy 6 (which are drainage detention areas), and areas around buildings. Information regarding maintenance responsibilities has been provided as part of the PUD guide. The PUD guide submitted with the Preliminary Plan application should more specifically explain that maintenance includes items such as landsca in , roads, snow removal for arkin lots, etc. [+/-] FINDING: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] The PUD HAS NOT demonstrated that the proposed development will comply with the common recreation and open space standards with respect to: (a) Minimum area; (b) Improvements required; (c) Continuing use and maintenance; or (d) Organization. The Board of County Commissioners may find that 25% common open space would not further benefit this roject. STANDARD: Natural Resource Protection. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (13)] - The PUD shall consider the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards. Pursuant to the memo dated June 21 st from the Colorado Geological Survey, a site specific soil analysis will be required for each building site in Fox Hollow. CGS also suggests that the applicants for Fox Hollow obtain a previous geotechnical analysis as supplied for Woodland Hills, as the information it contained was more thorough and specific. Staff has conditioned this file requiring the developer of Fox Hollow to incorporate the Division ofWiIdlife recommendations as found in the memo from CDOW dated June 8th into the Fox Hollow PUD Declarations and Covenants. Recommendations ertain to bear- roof trash containers and the feedin of wildlife. [+] FlNDING: AS CONDITIONED Natural Resource Protection. [ Section 5-240.F.3.e (13)] The PUD DOES demonstrate that the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents available at the time the application was submitted, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as s ecified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards, have been considered. Several potential development proposal inquiries for properties in West Edwards have been presented to Staff since the adoption of the Edwards Area Community Plan. Although the following fmding from the Land Use Regulations has existed prior to this adoption, the language found in the Edwards Area Community Vision Plan makes this fmding even more important. The Edwards Area Community Plan, as previously discussed on page 13, states that, "These sites are appropriate for medium density residential development and minimal mixed use that would address the service, retail and office needs of specifically the surrounding neighborhood." To determine what uses would satisfy the needs of the surrounding neighborhood, Staff has requested the applicant to examine the attached PUD guide list (Attachment 3) of potential uses, and analyze them to ensure that they would benefit West Edwards ftrst and foremost. The fmding from the Eagle County Land Use Regulations is as follows: Pursuant to Section 5-240.F.2.a.(15).(a): (15) Any or all of the following requirements, as determined by the Community Development Director, based on the complexity of the proposal: (a) Supporting data to justify any proposed commercial and industrial elements in an area not so zoned; To date, justification of the commercial uses has been provided in regards to the veterinary aspect of the development only, and not for the remaining commercial uses; however, the types of potential uses thus far proposed as part of Fox Hollow, and the commitment from the applicant to require maximum square footages of 3,000 for each commercial use (therefore limiting types of potential uses), appear consistent with the goals of the Edwards Area Community Plan as far as providing, "....minimal mixed uses that would address the service, retail and office needs of specifical1y the surrounding neighborhood." Proposed businesses would readily serve the residents of Cordillera, Lake Creek Apartments, Brett Ranch and the Eagle River Mobile Home Park. HOUSING GUIDELINES. - On April]3, 2004, the Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution No. 2004-048 adopting Housing Guidelines to establish a framework for discussion and negotiation of applicable housing criteria. The Fox Hollow PUD features five (5) of eight (8) proposed duplexes to be built by Habitat for Humanity, and at least two (2) employee housing units. Habitat for Humanity builds housing for low-income families living in the community. Based on the current proposal, the Housing Department has stated that this development would require six (6) affordable housing units. With ten (10) Habitat for Humanity units, and two (2) employee units, the requirement for the provision of affordable housing has been satisfied. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz gave background ofthe Fox Hollow PUD Sketch Plan as stated in the Staff Report. Chainnan Stone stated that he didn't remember the BOCC approving 3 different lots, but that it was approved as a PUD. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that without a final plat there were 3 parcels involved in the approval. Chairman Stone asked how a portion of the PUD could be conveyed, but not the entire PUD. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz said the old PUD would be a defunct PUD with this approval. Chairman Stone asked if the parcel not in the red, on the map, would not be participating and what would happen to it. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated it would be non-Use oriented until something new comes in. Dianne Mauriello, County Attorney, replying to Chainnan Stone's concerns, stated that this is not a PUD amendment; that it is a PUD sketch plan, and they are starting from scratch, and that the commissioners should not be referring to the old PUD approval. Chairman Stone asked if this takes away all previous approvals for the third parcel of the PUD. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz said yes, and agreed a regular PUD would be needed Ms. Skinner-Markowitz showed slides of the existing sites, indicating the fourplexes, duplexes, and employee housing over commercial places. She stated that not all fmdings were positive, but were not needed for sketch plan approval. Staff recommends approval with conditions and the Planning Commission recommends approval with conditions. .~ Terrill Knight, planner for the applicant, reviewed that this is a previously approved project. The old plan would no longer be in effect upon approval of this plan. Habitat for Humanity is an integral part of this plan. He stated a good portion of the previous plan and conditions stilI exist in this sketch plan. Tom Boni, planner for the applicants, reviewed the plan and stated this current plan uses the new Eagle/Edwards community plan in the West Edwards area. He pointed out on a map the area and showed some slides of the area. Habitat for Humanity would be participating in the SW quadrant of the plan. The general area' has been neglected for some time. The development of the property has been a function of community involvement: Dr. Ron Gruber for a mobile vet unit, Habitat for Humanity, employee housing, multifamily residential including fourplexes and duplexes, and two buildings of approximately 20,000 square feet for neighborhood services, that would focus to the south. He spoke of the first phase as being the vet clinic and the construction of service-related vet needs in a building which would house 2 employee units on second floor. The second phase would be the development of the Habitat for Humanity of five duplexes. The additional duplexes are currently on the free market. The third phase of the project would be the commercial development of the two buildings. He stated the architecture for this project would have a rural, rustic look. Some landscaping would be retained between highway and the building. Commercial building would be I Yz or I % stories, residential-style. Some of the neighborhood services would be bilingual professional services, non profit resource center, educational uses (ESL, CMC satellite office), arts and crafts studios, beauty shops and other type businesses -low impact and neighborhood-related uses. The concern is o keep it local and no space could exceed 3,000 square feet in size. The design and landscaping would be ranch-style architecture to keep the rural feel, use or dormer windows and covered porches, landscaping for visual impact from the highway, water wise and native landscaping. The potential uses: medium-density residential, mixed-use to address needs of the Edwards' community. Fox Hol1ow fits and reinforces the character of the broader Edwards community, includes trail and I il i~ I ! bus connections, and is pedestrian friendly. Mr. Boni showed a drawing of the area, and stated he met with adjacent property owners and Eagle County Engineering Department to discuss a traffic access plan. He stated that it is a reasonable access plan. Commissioner Menconi asked about the remaining portion of Woodland Hills being designed and asked for clarification. Mr. Boni replied that there has been an application submitted to Eagle County for Completeness Review by the owners of the other property, but the two parties are working together for the planning and road connections and the county will be reviewing them together at the same time. He concluded that Fox Hollow PUD is consistent with the Edwards Area Community Plan, Eagle County Master Plan, Eagle County LUG, and socially responsible development. Chairman Stone asked for public input. Vickie Siefers, adjacent property owner, pointed out the property that she owned on the map, and stated that she was not contacted about this project. Her question is where the trails will go, where the roadways and how it will affect her property, and will the change from residential to commercial change her property's zoning. Tom Healy, executive director for Habitat for Humanity, stated his delight to be a part of this project. Finding property that is suitable for Habitat for Humanity housing is difficult to fmd. Chairman Stone asked Mr. Healy if the land is being donated to Habitat for Humanity. Mr. Healy stated the land is not donated, but they are buying the land at a very reasonable cost. The development costs are not completed as of yet. Mike Hazelhorst, adjacent property owner across the road, asked the BOCC why the area is being used the way it is. His concern is the lighting in the area and he would like to see this addressed so it doesn't affect the neighborhood. He took exception that the area has not been improved since 1974 because he puts a lot of effort into the upkeep of the area. At this point, Chairman Stone closed public comment. . Mr. Boni addressed Ms. Siefers concerns and stated this was not meant to be a comprehensive plan but to address the immediate neighbors to the east and west, as they would be receiving the most attention from the traffic. Ms. Siefers explained their access to the property by pointing it out on a map with use of a laser pointer, and stated that their access is not hindered but would like to see access on the west end of their property. Chairman Stone suggested perhaps access from the cul-de-sac of Fox Hollow to the Siefers property. Mr. Bonistated there is a need for the services that this project proposes and is sound planning principles in accordance with the Master Plan. He apologized and stated that Mr. Haselhorst has created a great image on his property. He stated this land is underutilized. He stated that lighting would be considered as this project proceeds and the lighting would be limited. Chairman Stone stated he could not answer the property valuations but that as surrounding property increases, then the adjacent property would also increase. However, the zoning would not change. Mr. Boni addressed the trail question. There would be pedestrian walks along the side of the roads, but no trails proceeding south along the Siefers property. Commissioner Menconi asked about the existing access easement. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated the access must be made for the existing residents. She showed the proposed access and indicated where the access would occur and where the access would to. Mr. Boni reviewed the phases and stated that the existing easement would be maintained. The existing access to Highway 6 would be used for phase 2. The third phase would cause the new access to be completed. Commissioner Menconi asked about the new plan for Woodland Hills and how the two groups are working together for traffic flow. Mr. Boni explained the access would have 25 foot right of way dedication combined with 25 foot road dedication making and East-West Road interconnecting the properties. He showed this on the map. Access and utilities are being coordinated with Woodland Hills and Fox Hollow. Commissioner Menconi asked about what is going on the third parcel of property. Mr. Boni stated that it would be commercial. Rob Levine stated he did not want the proposed Woodland Hills property to be tied to his property and that his request for approval should be judged on its own merits. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated she understands that the proposed access will go straight into the proposed Woodland Hills development. Commissioner Menconi asked how the new Woodland Hills and Fox Hollow will work in harmony with surrounding area and the traffic that will be generated, since there had been concern with the previous PUD about the amount of traffic that would be brought into the area. Justin Hildreth spoke of the shared access to these two properties and how these two property owners are working together to consolidate the accesses. Commissioner Menconi asked Helen Migchelbrink if this pun has a better, worse, or equal traffic flow plan compared to the previous one. Ms. Migchelbrink stated that this is the same as the previous one but less impactive. Commissioner Menconi asked about the specific numbers of traffic flow for the duplexes, fourplexes, and the commercial units. i . Ms. Migchelbrink estimated 10 trips per day for a residential unit, so 760 would be the estimate, for duplexes, the number is less, 6-7 trips per unit. It would be less impactive than the previous numbers. Commissioner Menconi asked if the access point was capable of handling all the traffic. Ms. Migchelbrink stated that she has not had time to evaluate the other usage plan, as of yet. Mr. Knight stated he is representing the Woodland Hills applicant and indeed both owners are working to provide the best access to both projects. Chairman Stone addressed Mr. Hazelhorst's issue with development. He stated this ~pplication is an improvement to the prior application. He asked if the introduction of the commercial aspect is setting a precedent for the future and how are the other properties affected by this introduction. He asked if there is enough right of way, multiple access points, and speed limits for the future. Mr. Hildreth stated there is enough right of way on Hwy. 6 by CDOT. He said this would be similar to Hwy. 6 in Arrowhead, with two through lanes and every exit has a turn lane and there is enough room for that. The applicant must design around CDOT speed limit not the other way around. Ms. Migchelbrink stated the interior roads may need more room depending on what happens with the Woodland Hills gray area. Chairman Stone again stated his belief that responsible development should be considered with each file. Commissioner Menconi stated this is an improvement from previous application, especially with the introduction of mixed use development. Commissioner Menconi moved that the Board of County Commissioners approve Eagle County File No. PDS- 00040 incorporating all Stafffmdings and the following conditions: 1. Except as otherwise modified by this Permit, all material representations made by the Applicant in this application and in public meeting shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. 2. The buildings should utilize finish materials and colors designed to "blend" in with the surrounding landscape, prohibiting bright fInish colors. 3. 'Ability to Serve' from the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District (the District) must be provided with the Preliminary Plan application. 4. Pursuant to the memo from the Eagle River Fire Protection District, dated May 30, 2004, a site plan showing adequate accessibility and turn-a-rounds for emergency vehicles must be provided with the Preliminary Plan application. 5. All comments pursuant to the Engineering Memo, dated June 3rd, 2004 must be adhered to with comments numbered 1-3 satisfied prior to Preliminary Plan application. 6. A Comprehensive Sign Plan shall be developed and submitted as part of the Preliminary Plan application. 7. A site specific parking plan shall be developed and submitted as part of the Preliminary Plan application. S. A detailed landscaping plan is required to be submitted as part of the Preliminary Plan application. 9. Lighting and illumination standards shall be addressed in PUD guide submitted with the Preliminary Plan application. 10. A detailed phasing plan shall be submitted as part of the Preliminary Plan application. II. The necessity for a 1041 application shall be determined by Eagle County prior to Preliminary Plan application. The determination shall be based on evidence, as supplied by the Applicant, which compares the projected water and wastewater generation needs of the Fox Hollow PUD against the approved 1041 of the Woodl~md Hills PUD: 12. Recommendations from the Division of Wildlife memo dated June Sth, 2004 should be incorporated in the Fox Hollow PUD Declarations and Covenants. Items to be addressed should include: bear-proof/wildlife- proof refuse containers; prohibition of any outside feeding of animals; barbeque grill maintenance (may include regular cleanings and that grills are to be kept grease-free); etc. 13. Soils Analyses are required at building permit for each building site in order to obtain site-specifIc information regarding soil engineering properties. 14. Hours of delivery for commercial use and buildings are incorporated. Chairman Stone seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. Mr. Knight thanked the Board for their insightful thoughts into future development and assured the Board they as planners are concerned about the same things, and they will take them into consideration when planning. PDF-00083 Arrowhead River Ranch: A Second Resubdivision of Tract B Jena Skinner-Markowitz, Planner for Community Development, presented File PDF-OOOS3, Arrowhead River Ranch: a second resubdivision of Tract B. TITLE: FILE NO/PROCESS: LOCATION: OWNER/APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: STAFF PLANNER: Arrowhead River Ranch: A Second Resubdivision of Tract B. PDF-00083 / pun Final Plat 0121,0147,0165,0203,0255,0301 Eagle River Road Arrowhead Valley Developers, LLC Same Jena Skinner-Markowitz STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The intent of this plat is to resubdivide Tract B of the Arrowhead River Ranch in order to create Lots 10, 11, 12, 14, 16 and 18, as well as the associated driveway easements for these lots. Tract B was originally created as part of the original plat for the Arrowhead River Ranch PUD. B. SITE DATA: Surrounding Land Uses / Zoning: East: Tract A (ROW): Miller Ranch Road West: Tract F: Residential: Filing 18 / Arrowhead at Vail PUD North: Eagle River South: Hwy 6 Existing Zoning: Arrowhead River Ranch PUD Total Area: 9.346 acres C. STAFF FINDINGS: Pursuant to Section 5-280.B.5.b (3), of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: (1) This [mal plat DOES conform to the approved Preliminary Plan for subdivision. (2) Required improvements ARE adequate. (3) Areas dedicated for public use and easements ARE acceptable and; Pursuant to Sections 5-280.B.3.e. of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: (1) Consistent with the Master plan. The proposed subdivision IS consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the Future Land Use Map of the Master Plan. (2) Consistent with Land Use Regulations. The proposed subdivision DOES comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4 Site Development Standards. (3) Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. The intent of this plat is to further subdivide a previously subdivided portion of the Arrowhead Rivet Ranch. a. Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions ARE consistent with the utility's service plan or shall be required prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road extensions ARE consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital Improvements Plan. b. Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines ARE sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption which would occur if under-sized lines had to be upgraded. c. Coordinate Utility Extensions. Utility extensions shall only be allowed when the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un-served area. This area IS presently served by the Arrowhead Metropolitan District, as well as other utilities. d. Suitability for Development. The property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural, or human-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, as well as existing and probable future public improvements to the area. e. Compatible with Surrounding Uses. The proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and DOES NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. This plat is the second subdivision for Arrowhead River Ranch Tract B. Tract B was originally subdivided in November of 2003. All development for the current plat, PDF- 00083, was contemplated previously on plats PDF-00074, PDF-00082, as well as within the Arrowhead River Ranch PUD Guide. D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: File No. PDF-00083: Ms. Skinner-Markowitz gave a background of the PUD plat. She stated that this would create Lots 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, and 18 and the associated driveway easements. Chairman Stone asked about Lot 13. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated that they had already been done or had been skipped. She showed how the lots will be created on the map and stated that all findings are positive. Chairman Stone opened up Public Comment. There was none, and Chairman Stone closed Public Comment period. Neither Commissioner Menconi, nor Chairman Stone had any comments. Commissioner Menconi moved the Board of County Commissioners approve File No. PDF-00083 incorporating the staff fmdings and authorize the Chairman to sign the Plat. Chairman Stone seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners, the vote was declared unanimous. ;_ I ,;~.:'::,!).~::"'i;" ,) ,~ There being no further business to b~~~t~~~~ the Board the meeting was adjourned until July 13, 2004. ~ ~./'~'\{.\,1J\'!'\ ~~ '.'......'\. ""'.."'.'.'."".' ) ""'.., :. "'~' \;/\,",;);-,7 tJ '. ~. Attest: } .... ,';,} +< tJ' <,. , . ~H'" I!f Cl..k to the Bm":;'",;~';;:~'" ChaO n "_,~~",,:,,,,"~,."r,.-E.