The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 11/04/03 Present: Michael Gallagher Arn Menconi Tom Stone Diane Mauriello Jack Ingstad Teak J. Simonton PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 4, 2003 Chairman Commissioner Commissioner County Attorney County Administrator Clerk to the Board This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration GENERAL FUND 21 ST CENTURY PHOTO SUPPLY A & H GRAPHICS A. RIFKIN CO. ABC LEGAL MESSENGERS ADAM PALMER ADAMS MARK HOTEL AFFORDABLE PORTABLE AGENCY OF CREDIT CONTROL AILI FOSS ALL PRO FORMS INC ALL TEMP SERVICES, INC. ALLlANT FOOD SERVICE, INC ALPHA INTERACTIVE GROUP ALPINE CREDIT ALPINE PARTY RENTALS AMADEO GONZALES AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC AMERICAN TOWER CORP ANDIE WILKERSON ANDRIA L COLLINS ANIXTER COMMUNICATIONS APEX SECURITY APTA PASSENGER TRANSPORT AQUA TEC SYSTEMS ARMY & FACTORY SURPLUS ARTHUR AND PERLMUTTER ASPEN BASE OPERA TON ASPEN BOARD OF REALTORS ASPEN PUBLISHERS INC AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES AVON CENTER AT BEAVER CK AVON COMMERCIAL OWNERS AVON PET CENTER BAILEY FUNERAL HOME BALCOMB AND GREEN BARBARA BRUNDIN BARRY SMITH BASALT SANITATION DIST SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 1 November 4, 2003 667.30 90.00 532.08 25.00 74.87 55.00 186.00 5.00 21.66 3,895.26 344.51 6,009.69 200.00 5.46 1,600.00 37.35 1,500.00 875.00 113.85 113.85 179.00 227.50 272.00 406.30 26.98 43.02 77.00 6.52 707.94 5,850.19 1,864.53 4,227.55 10.00 870.00 8,890.39 134.55 500.00 135.00 BATTLE MOUNTAIN HS BATTLE MTN HS DANCE TEAM BATTLE MTN HS FOOTBALL TM BAUDVILLE INC BA YW A TER CONSULTING GROUP BCI COMMERCIAL BEAUDIN GANZE CONSULTING BEN GALLOWAY MD BENCHMARK ENGINEERING BERGLUND RUTH BERNICE WHITE BERTHA CAMPBELL BERTHOD MOTORS BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS BILL G BAKER BILL HEICHER BILL KLAUBER LLC BILL LOPEZ BLUE LYNX VENTURES BOB BARKER COMPANY BRADS ELECTRICAL SERVICE B RATW EAR BRC/HARRIS INC BRIAN BISHOP BROWN ELLS INC BROWNING FERRIS IND BRYAN TREU BUCHHOLZ FAMILY BUY DIG/WORLD WIDE DIRECT CAACO CAD-1 CALOIA & HOUPT PC CARMEN LOZOYa-VELEZ CASTLE PEAK RANCH CASTLE PEAK VETERINARY CENTRAL BAG AND BURLAP CO CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTURYTEL CFM SUPPLY CO CHARLES 0 JONES CO, INC. CHELEWSKI PIPE AND CHEMATOX INC. CHRIS GUNION CHRISTINE L MOTT CLIFF SIMONTON co ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION CO ASSOCIATION CO BAR ASSOCIATION CO COUNTY ATTORNEY ASSOC CO DEPT AGRICULTURE CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH AND COLORADO AVALANCHE COLORADO COUNTIES INC SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 2 November 4, 2003 120.00 720.00 2,900.00 280.67 150.00 4,673.80 397.75 2,860.00 1,230.00 113.85 90.00 50.00 566.42 170.34 226.98 145.00 720.00 9,200.00 293.00 1,779.80 311.50 160.50 841.00 11.29 190.13 811.30 86.25 4,865.35 250.95 225.00 844.00 1,710.60 155.25 1,100.00 7.41 221.20 1,094.73 12,993.27 1,251.00 3,050.00 86,643.42 880.00 430.71 3,950.00 51.90 3,117.00 175.00 105.00 300.00 255.00 216.00 530.75 1,000.00 1,319.85 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY COLORADO WEST MENTAL HL TH COLUMBINE MARKET COM-LINK CONSERVE A WATT LIGHTING CONTRACT PHARMACY SERVICE COpy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CORPORATE EXPRESS IMAGING COUNTY SHERIFFS OF CO CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DAN CORCORAN PLS DAN SEIBEL DAN STANEK DAVE MOTT DAVID A BAUER DAVID GUINNEE, DVM DAY TIMERS INCORPORATED DDM, INC. DEEP ROCK WEST DEFENSE FINANCE/ACCOUNTNG DELL INC DENVER NEWSPAPER AGENCY DEPT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS DIANA JOHNSON DIANA KAFKA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE DON OLSEN DOROTHY SAVAGE DOSIA LAEYENDECKER EAGLE AMOCO EAGLE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC EAGLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS EAGLE COUNTY CHARTER EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE DIRECT INC EAGLE PARK RESERVOIR COMP EAGLE PHARMACY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLE VALLEY ENTERPRISE EAGLE VALLEY GLASS AND EAGLE VALLEY HS BAND EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING EDWARDS BUILDING CENTER ELISA ACOSTA ELIZABETH BARGER ROSE EMILIA GONZALEZ ENERGY ABSORPTION SYSTEMS EPS DESIGN AND PRINT ESI, ELEVATOR SERVICE,INC EVANCHO PAINTING EVELYN PINNEY-LEVINE EXTENSION PROGRAM FUND SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES 3 November 4, 2003 3,276.32 10,295.81 800.00 90.00 25.19 184.53 2,022.33 106.98 3,068.40 797.70 150.00 112.05 3,710.00 124.20 27.70 90.00 25.00 3,679.27 77.94 72.00 231.93 504.64 10,775.65 666.30 40.00 84.00 91.77 50,921.70 19.10 171.12 80.40 198.43 9,064.00 7,005.00 1,990.00 943.97 1,414.00 607.00 119.28 251.31 10.00 245.84 1,220.00 2,664.00 28.30 275.31 580.50 105.75 339.00 583.26 90.00 720.00 94.19 1,275.46 FACTORY SURPLUS FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY FARRELL & SELDIN FEDERAL EXPRESS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG FIRKINS GARAGE DOORS FIRST BANKS FLO HABENICHT FLORIDA MICRO FLOWER AVIATION FORSYTHE SOLUTIONS FRANKLIN COVEY FRONTIER PRECISION INC G H DANIELS III & ASSOC GALLEGOS GALLS INCORPORATED GARDEN CENTER OF GYPSUM GE CAPITAL GIRL SCOUT TROOP #48 GIS JOBS CLEARINGHOUSE GLENDA WENTWORTH GLENWOOD SHOE SERVICE GORE RANGE NATURAL GRACE FINNEY GRAINGER INCORPORATED GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GREENBERG & ASSOCIATES GT ALLIANCE INC GYPSUM VALLEY FEED HALL KYLE HAMPTON INN DENVER WEST HART INTERCIVIC HASLERINC HAWTHORN SUITES HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES HEALTH CARE LOGISTICS HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELEN MIGCHELBRINK HERMAN MILLER INC. HIGH COUNTRY COPIERS HIGH COUNTRY NEWS HOCHST ADT STRAW STRAUSS HODGES BADGE COMPANY HOGAN & HARTSON HOLIDAY INN DENVER WEST HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOLME ROBERTS OWEN HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HORTON CONTROLS INC HUGHES SUPPLY, INC. ICC IMAGINIT EMBROIDERY IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS INSIGHT AMERICA SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 4 November 4, 2003 358.84 2,336.09 12.40 1,219.89 478.50 90.00 14,545.58 67.50 3,630.00 125.62 5,065.80 37.30 159.75 411.60 5,000.00 159.17 47.94 159.99 1,140.00 25.00 5.00 791.00 4,028.00 124.55 1,618.11 414.37 3.72 10,067.00 716.95 19.24 420.00 4,594.27 178.50 138.00 205.88 69.98 12,300.31 64.67 396.00 645.00 42.00 10.00 30.50 2,201.80 900.00 139.90 50.00 13,122.67 354.00 5.69 103.94 2,443.67 1,921.02 1,070.00 INTAB INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE INTERNATIONAL CRITICAL JACQUELINE ALLEN JANES INFORMATION GROUP JANET CONNORS JEFFERSON COUNTY JENNIE WAHRER JENNIFER CUEVAS JENNY WOOD JEROME EVANS PH.D JILL BARON JODIE BRANDT JOHN ANGLIN JOHN KING JOHN LOWERY JOHN M LASSALETTE JON HARRISON JOSEPH L FORINASH KARA BETTIS, CORONER KATHLEEN M HALLORAN KELLEY BLUE BOOK KELLY L1EKIS KEN NEUBECKER KERRY WALLACE KINDER MORGAN INC KIRK WHEATLEY LA QUINTA LANDS END INCORPORATED LASER JUNCTION LAURA FAWCETT LOS CHURCH LEARNING PROPS, LLC. LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC LESLEE SCOTT, INC LEXISNEXIS LIGHTNING SERVICES LINDA MAGGIORE LINDA NESTOR L1ZANNE LENNAN LORRAINE VASQUEZ LP DOCTOR M KELLY L1EKIS RN MACHOL&JOHANNES MAIN AUTO PARTS MAINTENANCE WAREHOUSE MARIA ANJIER MARIA WOOD MARKS PLUMBING PARTS MARLENE MC CAFFERTY MARRIOTT HOTEL MATT ROYER MATTHEW BENDER MBIA SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE 5 November 4, 2003 39.74 300.00 360.00 481.14 5.00 72.60 290.00 1,081.28 27.26 289.96 1,200.00 1,266.00 38.64 48.66 99.36 229.98 9.38 386.74 12.90 28.67 75.00 104.00 965.66 103.50 72.45 680.22 208.28 207.00 185.58 284.00 10.51 820.00 359.86 853.28 251.11 569.00 76.00 129.83 12.75 108.13 49.50 150.00 203.99 75.00 48.42 244.38 37.77 2,646.00 737.73 55.36 135.00 165.87 61.47 4,454.48 MCCAULLEY REBECCA T MCI WORLDCOM MEDI BADGE, INC. MEDICAL CENTER OF EAGLE MERCK A TL MESA EXTENSION FUND MICHAEL MCCLINTON MICHELLE BALL MICKE RUSSO MICRO WAREHOUSE MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORP MICROW AREHOUSE MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN MIKA CONSTRUCTION MIKE GALLAGHER MIKE KERST MIKES CAMERA INC. MILLER & COHEN MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOTHERS AGAINST MOTOR POOL FUND MOTOROLA MOUNTAIN COMMUNICATIONS MOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE MOUNTAIN MUSIC INC MOUNTAIN QUEST SPORTS MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES NAPA AUTO PARTS - VAIL NATIONAL EVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL HEALTH PROMOTION NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY NEWARK ELECTRONICS NOBEL SYSCO FOOD SERVICES NOBLE WELDING NORDIC REFRIGERATION NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT NORTHWEST COLORADO OLSON PROPERTY OMNIFAX OSM DELIVERY LLC PADDY O'DAYS PAINT BUCKET THE PAINT'N PLATES PALIN EQUIPMENT, CORP. PAPER WISE PARAMOUNT DISTRIBUTORS PAT NOLAN PATRICIA HAMMON PEAK PERFORMANCE COPIER & PEGGY GRAYBEAL PEN-LINK L TO PEPPERBALL TECHNOLOGIES PETTY CASH PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 6 November 4, 2003 159.16 6,985.04 96.20 1,585.00 920.85 150.00 69.00 417.10 14.15 404.51 95.00 1,360.00 1,174.91 150.00 265.56 325.86 2,848.85 7.44 255.94 17.71 85,512.26 39,623.06 1,997.85 1,141.55 102.00 849.90 4,528.15 95.28 85.00 610.00 327.00 41.25 3,733.51 510.00 103.18 28.53 600.00 6,030.00 168.40 418.00 137.31 627.55 262.00 610.00 279.50 66.90 184.92 93.15 198.00 160.00 6,500.00 700.00 92.32 2,020.85 PINNACLE GLASS CO PITNEY BOWES INCORPORATED POSITIVE PROMOTIONS POSTMASTER EAGLE BRANCH PRCA PRCA MOUNTAIN STATES PRECINCT POLICE PRODUCTS PRIMEDIA WORKPLACE PROPERTY IMAGING, LLC PSS, INC PURCHASE POWER QUEST DIAGNOSTICS QWEST QWEST INTERPRISE NETWRKNG R L POLK & COMPANY RAMONA AND RAFAEL MACIAS RANGER JOES INTERNATIONAL REBECCA LEONARD RED CANYON HIGH SCHOOL RED RIVER COLLECTION REGION 8 HSA REINARZ & ASSOCIATES RENTAL SERVICE CORP RICH CUNNINGHAM RIVENDALL SOD FARM RIVER OAKS COMMUNICATIONS ROBERT KURTZMAN DO ROBERT NARRACCI ROBINSON TEXTILES ROCKY MOUNTAIN REPROGRAPH ROCKYNET.COM INC RON GRUBER DVM ROSALIE HARRISON ROSIE MORENO ROSS & WHITE COMPANY ROSS PRODUCTS DIVISION RSC SANDRA L SKILES SANDY EINSPAHR SARAH SCHIPPER SAWAYA AND ROSE SCAN AIR OF COLORADO INC SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP SCHUTZMAN COMPANY, INC. SCHWAAB SCULL YS ART OFFICE AND SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHAINHOL TZ TODD HODS SHEAFFER KAREN SHERATON COLORADO SPRINGS SIGNATURE SIGNS SINTON DAIRY COMPANY SMITH EDWARD SNOWHITE LINEN SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE 7 November 4, 2003 31,582.00 201.58 1,247.70 1,644.99 400.00 1,000.00 135.20 776.00 4,317.00 1,327.95 8,115.00 232.92 8,424.84 270.00 504.00 250.00 176.47 60.00 1,700.00 6.20 45.00 1,700.00 107.88 336.96 467.74 12,144.14 700.00 40.12 3,447.00 339.82 150.00 10.00 9.47 166.48 128.24 354.52 943.00 189.75 37.95 447.89 28.72 141.68 2,195.76 154.52 41.55 96.35 97,738.97 2,723.20 1,174.96 138.00 404.15 937.75 113.85 152.38 SOFTWARE SPECTRUM SPECIAL PROTECTION INC SPECIALIZED POOL & SPA SPRINT STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF COLORADO STEAMMASTER STEPHANIE GLENWRIGHT STEPHEN 0 FOSTER STEPHENS NURSERY STEVENS HOME CARE INC STUVER & LeMOINE SUE FRANCIOSE SUE MOTT SUMMIT COUNTY SENIORS SUMMIT LUMBER SUN RAY SUPPLY CACHE SUSAN SPEICHER SUSPENSE FUND SYBIL SETTERlIND TENIE CHICOINE TERENCE J QUINN ATTY AT L TERRI BIERSDORFER THE BASALT STORE THE BASKET PROVIDERS THE DENVER POST THE FRENCH PRESS THOMAS & MEANS THOMAS C BARRETT TIMEMARK INC TOM C STONE TOM TALBOT, DEPUTY TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED TOWN OF BASALT-WATER FUND TOWN OF EAGLE TOWN OF REDCLlFF TOWN OF VAIL TRANE COMPANY TRANSCOR AMERICA INC TRI COUNTY FIRE TRI COUNTY STEAM CLEANING TRITRONICS INC UNIFORM KINGDOM UNITED METHODIST CHURCH UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED REPROGRAPHIC UNITED STATES TREASURY VAIL DAILY THE VAIL ELECTRONICS VAIL LOCK AND KEY VAIL MOUNTAIN COFFEE VAIL MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROU VAIL MOUNTAIN SCHOOL SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE 8 November 4, 2003 5,754.70 135.00 186.85 4,149.85 500.00 800.00 566.55 58.80 50.00 110.50 1,027.50 11.28 170.01 90.00 9,149.00 501 .77 734.00 172.00 160.00 115,274.63 90.00 79.20 25.00 30.00 120.00 50.00 82.95 700.00 845.00 25.00 128.82 60.15 252.10 424.26 61.50 4,873.00 1,037.50 50.00 19,884.34 2,762.37 858.00 280.00 998.12 860.73 225.00 337.16 320.16 1,521.12 11.70 4,530.00 56.94 311.80 348.15 1,940.00 VAIL RECREATION DISTRICT SERVICE 4,800.00 VAIL VALLEY EMERGENCY SERVICE 1,350.00 VAIL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTR SERVICE 3,122.95 VAILNET INC SERVICE 67.80 VALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 286.32 VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL SERVICE 839.30 VAN DIEST SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 55.80 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 2,208.27 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 11.28 VIRGINIA CERISE REIMBURSEMENT 17.25 VISIBLE COMPUTER SUPPLY C SERVICE 52.41 VOTEC CORPORATION SERVICE 20,624.34 WALTER MATTHEWS IV REIMBURSEMENT 600.00 WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 98.65 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPO 406,788.24 WENDY JO HASKINS REIMBURSEMENT 77.63 WEST GROUP SERVICE 757.00 WESTERN EAGLE COUNTY SERVICE 900.00 WESTERN PAGING SERVICE 16.00 WHITE RIVER PAINTING SERVICE 2,830.00 WIND RIVER TREES SERVICE 14,753.96 WOODFIELD SUITES SERVICE 118.00 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS SERVICE 330.00 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 2,575.64 XCELENERGY SERVICE 56.25 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 8,590.63 YAMPA VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICE 116.79 YOUR PERSONAL CHEF SERVICE 1,225.00 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES SERVICE 1,046.01 PAYROLL FOR OCTOBER PAYROLL 20 & 21 & 22 944,745.61 2,403,208.09 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 19.95 ALPINE SNOW REMOVAL & SERVICE 1,495.00 ASPEN MESA HOMEOWNERS REIMBURSEMENT 1,235.00 BENCHMARK ENGINEERING REIMBURSEMENT 2,005.50 BROWNING FERRIS IND SERVICE 35.24 BRUCE WALLACE REIMBURSEMENT 165.13 BURLSTONE INC SERVICE 35,157.00 COLORADO PUBLIC UTILITIES SERVICE 10.00 COPY PLUS SUPPLIES 40.10 DAVID IRWIN REIMBURSEMENT 2,100.00 DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICE 45.20 DONALD M CHAPLIN REIMBURSEMENT 250.00 EAGLE VALLEY MEDICAL SERVICE 211.00 ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO SERVICE 10,999.20 ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS REIMBURSEMENT 50.00 FITZ AND GAYLORD REIMBURSEMENT 250.00 GMCO CORPORATION REIMBURSEMENT 19,442.60 GONZALES CONSTRUCTION CO. REIMBURSEMENT 55,172.44 9 November 4, 2003 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SERVICE 2,690.57 HEAL TH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 988.99 HEATHER 0 RAWLINGS REIMBURSEMENT 100.00 HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI REIMBURSEMENT 100.00 HOL Y CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC SERVICE 428.05 INTERWEST SAFETY SUPPLY SUPPLIES 708.19 JOE STRIEFEL REIMBURSEMENT 100.00 KATHLEEN M HALLORAN REIMBURSEMENT 150.00 KEMP AND COMPANY INC SERVICE 692.00 KINDER MORGAN INC SERVICE 9.60 KOLBE STRIPING INC SERVICE 12,841.63 LAFARGE CORPORATION SERVICE 21,131.37 MONICA BENDERL Y REIMBURSEMENT 450.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 5,684.76 NAPA AUTO PARTS-CARBONDLE SUPPLIES 32.44 ROARING FORK V ALLEY COOP SERVICE 47.00 SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICE 2,656.77 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 16.80 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 8,447.01 TAMRA OR JOHN DEWIND REIMBURSEMENT 250.00 TOWN OF GYPSUM SERVICE 482.13 V ALLEY LUMBER SUPPLIES 17.99 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPO 35,111.69 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 52.05 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 278.86 PAYROLL FOR OCTOBER PAYROLL 20 & 21 & 22 84,678.95 306,830.21 SOCIAL SERVICES FUND AMERICAN PUBLIC HUMAN SERVICE 95.00 ARLlSS SIMS REIMBURSEMENT 143.10 BETH HERVEY SERVICE 300.00 BONJOUR BAKERY SERVICE 15.50 BOULDER COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICE 22.60 CATHERINE CRAIG REIMBURSEMENT 272.47 COLORADO WEST MENTAL HL TH SERVICE 1,025.09 COLUMBINE MARKET SERVICE 22.98 CORPORATE EXPRESS SUPPLIES 34.17 CRAIG SMITH REIMBURSEMENT 111.10 EAGLE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFF SERVICE 180.72 EAGLE VALLEY PRINTING SERVICE 351.00 EC SOCIAL SERVICES SERVICE 20.00 EDWARDS IMMEDIATE SERVICE 156.00 FAMIL Y SUPPORT REGISTRY REIMBURSEMENT 2,215.24 GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF SERVICE 35.00 GENERAL FUND SERVICE 95.25 HEAL TH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 1,175.12 HELLO DIRECT INC SERVICE 99.99 ISABEL SANCHEZ REIMBURSEMENT 8.84 JENNIFER WORCESTER REIMBURSEMENT 44.14 JERRI OLSON REIMBURSEMENT 204.57 10 November 4, 2003 JOEL KARR REIMBURSEMENT 1,380.00 JOHN C COLLINS PC SERVICE 4,922.88 JOSE BANUELOS SERVICE 480.00 KATHY REED REIMBURSEMENT 152.49 LABORATORY CORPORATION OF SERVICE 378.00 LIFT UP OF ROUTT COUNTY SERVICE 1,500.00 LITERACY PROJECT, THE SERVICE 3,726.36 LOAF N JUG SERVICE 17.99 LYONS KATHLEEN REIMBURSEMENT 183.39 MARIAN MCDONOUGH REIMBURSEMENT 178.00 MICHAEL CLAUSSNER SERVICE 720.00 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 851.25 MOUNTAIN FAMILY CENTER SERVICE 1,000.00 MOUNTAIN STATES EMPLOYERS SERVICE 1,260.00 ONTIVEROS, LUPE REIMBURSEMENT 264.62 PEAK PERFORMANCE COPIER & SERVICE 162.00 PETTY CASH ACCOUNTING SERVICE 17.50 QUILL CORPORATION SUPPLIES 89.99 RENEE FIELDS REIMBURSEMENT 922.40 RITA WOODS REIMBURSEMENT 122.75 RUBY EHRMAN REIMBURSEMENT 20.00 SCHUTZMAN COMPANY, INC. SERVICE 126.42 SIGNATURE SIGNS SERVICE 55.80 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 9,705.62 SYLVIA SALAZAR REIMBURSEMENT 93.15 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 309.83 VIRGINIA AVILA REIMBURSEMENT 198.03 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPO 27,660.15 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 603.59 Z DELI INC SERVICE 38.50 PAYROLL FOR OCTOBER PAYROLL 20 & 21 & 22 59,922.89 123,691.48 WRAP FUND COLORADO WEST MENTAL HL TH SERVICE 240.00 240.00 RETIREMENT FUND SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 98,369.91 98,369.91 INSURANCE RESERVE FUND ALPINE COLLISION INC SERVICE 7,090.59 COUNTY TECHNICAL SERVICES SERVICE 10,029.90 DOWLlNGS SERVICE 779.00 EAGLE RIVER AUTO BODY SERVICE 811.05 GYPSUM AUTO BODY SERVICE 1,961.00 11 November 4, 2003 20,671.54 OFFSITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ARROWHEAD VALLEY SERVICE 1,600.00 1,600.00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND AMERICAN CIVIL CONSTRUCTR SERVICE 133,624.99 AMERICINN LODGE & SUITES SERVICE 335.00 AQUA PRO IRRIGATION SERVICE 1,140.56 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES PC SERVICE 635.53 BAND B EXCAVATING SERVICE 208,523.11 BLUE MOUNTAIN TURF FARM SERVICE 1,122.00 BRATTON ENTERPRISE, INC. SERVICE 197.45 CARPETIME SERVICE 60,599.16 CIVIL CONTRACTORS INC SERVICE 8,952.00 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 20.00 EAGLE RIVER WATER AND SERVICE 100,000.00 ELAM CONSTRUCTION INCORPO SERVICE 101,164.52 FORSYTHE SOLUTIONS SERVICE 85.80 G H DANIELS III & ASSOC SERVICE 285.00 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SUPPLIES 1,255.96 GYPSUM VALLEY FEED SUPPLIES 45.00 HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNI SERVICE 3,005.50 HYDROSYSTEMS INC SERVICE 480.00 IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICE 2,957.20 ISLEY SERVICE 41,079.00 JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC SERVICE 14,785.69 MARTIN/MARTIN CONSUL TING SERVICE 1,107.00 MCGRAW HILL COMPANY SERVICE 608.85 MICRO WAREHOUSE SERVICE 2,058.50 MOUNTAIN TEMP SERVICES SERVICE 4,256.53 ROCKY MOUNTAIN REPROGRAPH SERVICE 401.00 SIEMENS BUSINESS SERVICES SERVICE 94,574.50 SIGNATURE SIGNS SERVICE 1,144.00 STEVENS HOME CARE INC SERVICE 48,882.08 SUMMIT LUMBER SUPPLIES 106.47 TRI PHASE ELECTRIC SERVICE 34,560.00 VAIL DAILY THE SERVICE 321.92 WRIGHT WATER ENGINEERS SERVICE 16,464.43 884,778.75 SALES TAX E.V. TRANSP. ACE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY SERVICE 83.35 ACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 36.00 ANDREA VESQUE REIMBURSEMENT 85.80 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES SERVICE 514.43 BROWNING FERRIS IND SERVICE 123.39 12 November 4, 2003 CASTA CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING COLLETTS COLORADO DEPT REVENUE COLORADO MOTOR PARTS COPY PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN DAVID B LOSH 001 EQUIPMENT DEEP ROCK WEST DOCTORS ON CALL DRIVE TRAIN INDUSTRIES EAGLE COUNTY CHARTER EAGLE COUNTY MOTOR POOL EAGLE RIVER AUTO BODY EAGLE RIVER WATER AND EAGLEBEND HOUSING ELEMENT K JOURNALS FEDERAL EXPRESS G & K SERVICES GAY JOHNSONS INC GILLIG CORPORATION HASLER INC HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS JANET FIELD JAY MAX SALES KINDER MORGAN INC KINETICO WATER PROS KZYR-COOL RADIO LLC LAB SAFETY SUPPLY LAMINATION SERVICE INC LAWSON PRODUCTS LIGHTS ON BROADWAY MAIN AUTO PARTS MOTOR POOL FUND MOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL QUILL CORPORATION QWEST RADISSON HOTEL DENVER RON E BECK SAFETY KLEEN (WHICITA) SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SNAP ON TOOLS SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF GYPSUM UNITED STATES WELDING VAIL TRAIL THE VAIL VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE 13 November 4, 2003 125.00 116.04 341.31 350.00 34.08 86.40 313.31 1,703.64 21.70 193.04 20.90 185.00 3,288.38 275.00 14,446.51 379.00 2,250.00 5,125.00 107.00 132.90 374.04 3,052.96 10,610.26 187.00 1,836.01 209.85 1,498.91 44.00 53.55 130.80 33.62 35.00 333.00 139.67 3,516.75 1,399.84 716.00 53.49 6,685.47 188.80 1,091.85 216.39 385.90 89.00 1,700.00 135.82 96.86 9,303.42 479.61 14,094.33 1,688.35 26.91 400.00 167.05 VERIZON WIRELESS, SERVICE 27.32 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPO 66,599.78 WHITEALLS ALPINE SERVICE 39.00 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 37.92 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 309.56 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SUPPLIES 92.38 PAYROLL FOR OCTOBER PAYROLL 20 & 21 & 22 162,642.23 321,059.88 SALES TAX E.V. TRAILS A CUT ABOVE FORESTRY SERVICE 245.00 COLORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS SERVICE 212.20 COLUMBINE MARKET SERVICE 2.99 COPY PLUS SERVICE 8.97 EAGLE PHARMACY SERVICE 19.75 FEDERAL EXPRESS SERVICE 28.10 FELSBURG HOL T & ULLEVIG SERVICE 1,555.60 HEAL TH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 8.04 IMPACT GRAPHICS & SIGNS SERVICE 586.66 LEAGUE OF AMER BICYCLISTS SERVICE 30.00 NEXGEN CONSTRUCTORS SERVICE 107,401.58 NORMAN R HELWIG PC SERVICE 744.20 PEAK LAND SURVEYING INC SERVICE 500.00 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 237.79 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPO 1 ,509.62 YEH & ASSOCfA TES INC SERVICE 8,833.35 121,923.85 SALES TAX R.F.V. TRANSP. ROARING FORK SERVICE 68,060.33 68,060.33 SALES TAX R.F.V. TRAILS ROARING FORK SERVICE 7,562.26 7,562.26 AIRPORT FUND 4fMPRINT SUPPLIES 677.02 AIRPLANNERS, LLC SERVICE 5,706.76 AMERICAN ASSOC AIRPORT SERVICE 2,650.00 AMERICAN AVIONICS INC SERVICE 986.00 ARFF WORKING GROUP SERVICE 125.00 ASMI SERVICE 8,055.00 B & H SPORTS SERVICE 866.40 BALCOMB AND GREEN SERVICE 2,703.90 14 November 4, 2003 BERTHOD MOTORS BRIAN SCHOFIELD CALOIA & HOUPT PC CENTURYTEL COLORADO DEPT REVENUE COLUMBINE MARKET COpy PLUS CORPORATE EXPRESS CROUSE HINDS AIRPORT CUSTOM COAXIAL SERVICES DAY TIMERS INCORPORATED DEBORAH CHURCHILL DEEP ROCK WEST DIVISION MINERALS GEOLOGY DOCTORS ON CALL DOLPHIN CAPITAL CORP DRAGONS BOOT & SHOE EMBASSY SUITES FLORIDA MICRO GALLS INCORPORATED GATEKEEPER SYSTEMS GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND GYPSUM TOWN OF HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELEN M LINDOW HILL & COMPANY HOGAN & HARTSON HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC IDENTIX JAMES EPPERSON JIM JACKSON KINDER MORGAN INC LANDS END INCORPORATED LAWSON PRODUCTS LIGHTNING SERVICES M & M AUTO PARTS MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING MARKOS PIZZERIA MCI WORLDCOM MICROW AREHOUSE MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC MOTOR POOL FUND NEXTEL OSHKOSH TRUCK CORPORATION OVERLAND AND EXPRESS COMP PAINT BUCKET THE SERCO MANAGEMENT SERVICES SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SEVERSON SUPPLY CO., INC. SHAW CONSTRUCTION SOFTWARE SPECTRUM SUMMIT LUMBER SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE 15 November 4, 2003 159.31 336.00 194.68 4,660.57 211.45 153.25 6.00 489.29 1,449.27 1,878.00 291.89 15.67 191.90 281.00 220.00 543.54 186.92 1,559.52 5,515.00 229.84 1,875.00 8.39 419.48 684.96 20.50 2,590.88 3,361.92 351.16 2,259.50 3,550.00 75.00 1,750.00 229.31 45.00 76.20 470.00 61.45 3,615.32 212.38 159.26 970.94 38,350.00 1,168.56 595.18 410.52 1,574.00 38.35 158.80 2,322.98 6,012.29 315,202.88 927.59 7.77 2,832.41 THE OLD GYPSUM PRINTER SERVICE 474.00 TOOL CLINIC INCORPORATED SERVICE 32.80 TRI COUNTY FIRE SERVICE 102.50 URS CORPORATION SERVICE 42,221.71 VAIL VALLEY JET CENTER SERVICE 2,000.00 WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICE 315,191.90 WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 600.00 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPO 16,808.46 WORKRITE SERVICE 1,108.44 XEROX CORPORATION SUPPLIES 85.00 PAYROLL FOR OCTOBER PAYROLL 20 & 21 & 22 39,574.49 850,930.46 MICROWAVE MAINTENANCE FUND HUTTON COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 611.50 LEGACY COMMUNICATIONS INC SERVICE 4,210.76 MOTOROLA SERVICE 37,177.00 41,999.26 CONSTRUCTION FUND EATON SALES & SERVICE SERVICE 124.22 ENVIROTECH SERVICE 30,000.00 FIRKINS GARAGE DOORS SERVICE 2,400.00 PEAK CIVIL ENGINEERING IN SERVICE 860.00 33,384.22 LANDFILL FUND 21ST CENTURY SEEDERS INC SERVICE 5,087.69 ALPINE ROOFING CO, INC REIMBURSEMENT 391.15 BEAUDIN GANZE CONSULTING SERVICE 3,368.38 CO DEPT PUBLIC HEALTH & SERVICE 15,000.55 DEEP ROCK WEST SERVICE 81.95 DOWN V ALLEY SEPTIC SERVICE 360.00 GRAND JUNCTION PIPE AND SERVICE 1,836.00 HEAL TH INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 483.38 KRW CONSUL TING INC SERVICE 1 ,804.55 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 1,238.76 PEAK CIVIL ENGINEERING IN SERVICE 467.50 ROAD AND BRIDGE DEPARTMEN SERVICE 157,261.45 SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SERVICE 5,077.41 SUSPENSE FUND SERVICE 2,391.05 WELLS FARGO PAYROLL EXPO 9,084.83 WYLACO SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 56.91 XEROX CORPORATION SERVICE 123.00 YARGER SERVICES LLC SERVICE 500.00 PAYROLL FOR OCTOBER PAYROLL 20 & 21 & 22 23,216.27 16 November 4, 2003 MOTOR POOL FUND AL-JON INC AUTO BARN BONNEVILLE EQUIPMENT CO BRODY CHEMICAL BROWNING FERRIS IND BRUCE WALLACE CASTLE PEAK AUTOMOTIVE CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CENTURY EQUIPMENT COMPANY COLLETTS COLORADO MOTOR PARTS CUMMINS ROCKY MOUNTAIN EAGLE AMOCO EAGLE RIVER WATER AND FABIAN LOPEZ FARIS MACHINERY CO G & K SERVICES GATEWAY INN AND SUITES GAY JOHNSONS INC GIL GILBERT GLENDA WENTWORTH GLENWOOD SPRINGS FORD GOODYEAR WHOLESALE TIRE HANSON EQUIPMENT HEALTH INSURANCE FUND HELEN MIGCHELBRINK HENSLEY BATTERY HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOC HONNEN EQUIPMENT J J KELLER KINDER MORGAN INC LAWSON PRODUCTS MACDONALD EQUIPMENT CO MOTOR POOL FUND NOVUS AUTOGLASS POWER EQUIPMENT COMPANY POWER MOTIVE REY MOTORS INCORPORATED SAFETY KLEEN (WHICITA) SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF THE SERVICEMASTER CLEAN SHERATON COLORADO SPRINGS SUSPENSE FUND TOWN OF GYPSUM UNITED STATES WELDING VEEDER-ROOT COMPANY WAGNER EQUIPMENT COMPANY WEAR PARTS EQUIPMENT WELLS FARGO 227,830.83 SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE REIMBURSEMENT SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL EXPO 17 November 4, 2003 864.77 1,262.17 87.67 90.00 91.09 10.00 582.70 309.17 74.53 47,708.92 1,576.16 2,731.41 84.00 2,250.00 75.00 43.26 663.23 719.88 503.58 48.28 37.75 32.93 1,470.29 242.98 399.20 31.80 566.90 1,106.65 2,291.77 160.05 24.82 215.91 121.52 1,036.32 723.00 835.06 1,381.27 1,004.16 297.24 96.91 6,868.86 207.00 2,784.41 1,246.51 266.30 99.00 1,796.03 213.04 11,268.31 WHITEALLS ALPINE SUPPLIES 30.90 WYLACO SUPPL Y COMPANY SUPPLIES 415.47 PAYROLL FOR OCTOBER PAYROLL 20 & 21 & 22 31,194.15 128,242.33 HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DENMAN GREY AND COMPANY SERVICE 1,025.00 EAGLE COUNTY REGIONAL SERVICE 1,438.05 EAGLE COUNTY TRAILS FUND SERVICE 80.74 GENERAL FUND SERVICE 1,310.21 MOTOR POOL FUND SERVICE 3,390.92 MOUNTAIN STATES ADMIN. SERVICE 35,719.65 PROVIDENT LIFE/ACCIDENT SERVICE 4,092.87 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND SERVICE 499.32 UNITED STATES LIFE INS SERVICE 4,981.00 4 52,537.76 ENHANCED E911 FUND CENTURYTEL SERVICE 365.50 JOHNSON KUNKEL & ASSOC SERVICE 897.75 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES SERVICE 49.74 QWEST SERVICE 19,626.15 TOWN OF VAIL SERVICE 279,517.00 300,456.14 5,993,377 .30 Executive Session Chairman Gallagher stated the first matter before the Board was an Executive Session. Commissioner Stone moved that the Board adjourn into Executive Session for the purpose of receiving legal advice on specific legal questions concerning Eagle County's ownership of Eagle Park Reservoir Company Shares and for the purpose of receiving legal advice concerning Bolts Lake Reservoir and finally for the purpose of discussing pending litigation between Eagle County and Remonov & Co. all of which are appropriate topics for discussion pursuant to c.R.S. 24-6-402(4) (b) and (e). Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Stone moved that the Board adjourn from Executive Session and reconvene into the regular meeting. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Consent Agenda Chairman Gallagher stated the next matter before the Board was the Consent Agenda as follows: A. Approval of bill paying for the weeks of November 3 and November 10, 2003, subject 18 November 4, 2003 to review by the County Administrator B. Approval of payroll for November 13,2003, subject to review by the County Administrator C. Approval of the minutes of the Eagle Board of County Commissioners meetings for October 7 and October 14,2003 D. Resolution 2003-140, for Release of Assignment of Certificate of Deposit for Road Cut Permit No. 3007 for Joe B. Jamar E. Early Head Start Application: Year 6 F. Aviation Systems Maintenance Inc. Maintenance Agreement G. Agreement with Wright Water Engineers to provide professional civil engineering services for the Berry Creek Pond H. Agreement with Easter Owens, a Colorado Corporation, to provide maintenance services for the jail electronic locking system at the Eagle County Detention Center I. Agreement with HDR Engineering for the Cooley Mesa Road Realignment Study J. Change Order #2 to the Contract for the Miller Ranch Road/Highway 6 Intersection Improvements K. Animal Control Contract with Town of Vail L. Animal Control Contract with Town of Gypsum M. Animal Control Contract with Town of Eagle N. Joint Funding Agreement between Eagle County an the US Geological Survey for operation and maintenance of gaging station No. 09064600 near Minturn, CO O. Microsoft Premier Support Agreement. Chairman Gallagher asked the Attorney's Office if there were any changes to the Consent Agenda. Diane Mauriello, County Attorney, requested items G & H, the agreements with Wright Water Engineers and Easter Owens, be pulled as they have not been signed. She stated they will be rescheduled for another day. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented, omitting items G & H. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Plat and Resolution Signing Cliff Simonton, Planner, presented the following plats and resolutions for the Board's consideration; Resolution 2003-141, To Approve an Amendment to the Amended and Restated Guide for the Berry Creek Ranch Planned Unit Development, Eagle County File No. PDA-00045. The Board considered the Applicant's request on October it, 2003 Commissioner Stone moved to approve Resolution 2003-141, To Approve an Amendment to the Amended and Restated Guide for the Berry Creek Ranch Planned Unit Development Eagle County File No. PDA-00045. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Resolution 2003-142, To Approve a Site Specific Plan for an Entry Monument Sign on Winslow Road in the Berry Creek Ranch Planned Unit Development, Eagle County File No. PDA-00045. The Board considered the Applicant's request on October 7,2003 Commissioner Menconi moved to approve Resolution 2003-142, a Site Specific Plan for an Entry Monument Sign on Winslow Road in the Berry Creek Ranch Planned Unit Development, Eagle County File No. PDA-00045. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. 19 November 4, 2003 Resolution 2003-143, To Approve a Site Specific Plan for an Informational Sign for the Berry Creek Ranch Planned Unit Development, Eagle County File No. PDA-00045. The Board considered the Applicant's request on October 7, 2003 Commissioner Stone moved to approve Resolution 2003-143, a Site Specific Plan for an Informational Sign for the Berry Creek Ranch Planned Unit Development, Eagle County File No. PDA- 00045. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Final Settlement - J. P. Trucking Diane Mauriello presented Final Settlement for J. P. Trucking, Inc. for supplying, loading and hauling of road base material to Eagle County roads: Dagget Lane, Gypsum Creek Road, Cabin Creek Road, Trough Road, Frying Pan River Road, Red Table Acres, Elk Range, Deer Trail and Fawn Drive. She stated this matter published and no claims have been received. Commissioner Menconi moved to approve Final Settlement for J. P. Trucking, Inc. for supplying, loading and hauling of road base material to Eagle County roads: Dagget Lane, Gypsum Creek Road, Cabin Creek Road, Trough Road, Frying Pan River Road, Red Table Acres, Elk Range, Deer Trail and Fawn Drive. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Final Settlement - Stevens Home Care a/k/a Mountain Top Ventures, Inc Diane Mauriello presented Final Settlement for Stevens Home Care a/k/a Mountain Top Ventures, Inc. for installation of trees along Miller Ranch Road, Edwards, Colorado. She stated this matter was published and no claims have been received. Commissioner Stone moved to approve Final Settlement for Stevens Home Care a/k/a Mountain Top Ventures, Inc. for installation of trees along Miller Ranch Road, Edwards, Colorado. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Stone moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and reconvene as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Liquor License Consent Agenda Earlene Roach, Liquor Inspector, presented the liquor license consent agenda for November 4, 2003 as follows: A. Vail Food Services Inc Mid Vail Restaurant This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license with optional premises. This establishment is located on Vail Mountain. There have been no complaints and disturbances during the past year. B. Vail Food Services Inc Eagle's Nest This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license with optional premises. This establishment is located on Vail Mountain. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. C. Beaver Creek Food Services The Inn at Beaver Creek 20 November 4, 2003 This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license. This establishment is located at 10 Elk Track Rd in Beaver Creek. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. D. Beaver Creek Food Services Zach's Cabin This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license. This establishment is located on Beaver Creek Mountain. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. E. Marquez Restaurants, Inc. Fiesta's New Mexican Deli & Restaurant This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license. This establishment is located along Edwards Access Road in Edwards. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. F) Beaver Creek Food Services, Inc. Red Sky Ranch Member Clubhouse Restaurant This is a change of trade name from Red Sky Ranch Member Clubhouse Restaurant to Silver Sage Restaurant. Staff has no concerns with this application. Basically, the local authority (you) just signs off on the application. This is a State function. G) Beaver Creek Food Services, Inc. Trappers Cabin This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license with optional premises. This establishment is located on Beaver Creek Mountain. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. H) Beaver Creek Food Services, Inc. Toscanini This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license with optional premises. This establishment is located in the village of Beaver Creek. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. I) Beaver Creek Food Services, Inc. Allie's Cabin This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license with optional premises. This establishment is located on Beaver Creek Mountain. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. J) Beaver Creek Food Services, Inc. Arrowhead Alpine Club This is a renewal of a hotel & restaurant license. This establishment is located on Beaver Creek Mountain. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. K) Wolcott Market L TD Wolcott Liquors This is a renewal of a retail liquor store license. This establishment is located along Highway 6 in Wolcott. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. L) Wolcott Market L TD Wolcott Market This is a renewal of a 3.2% off premise beer license. This establishment is located along Highway 6 in Wolcott. There have been no complaints or disturbances during the past year. 21 November 4, 2003 Commissioner Menconi moved to approve the Liquor License Consent Agenda for November 4, 2003 as presented. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Ray's Earlene Roach presented a new application for a hotel & restaurant license for Ray's X Bar Fly, Inc., d/b/a Ray's. The first order of business is to establish the neighborhood and then the needs ofthat neighborhood. Staff recommends the neighborhood be from the 1-70 Interchange, south along Edwards Access Road, spreading east and west to include Riverwalk Subdivision, Riverfront Subdivision, South 40 Subdivision and Edwards Village Center and Homestead Subdivision. Commissioner Stone moved the Board establish the neighborhood "as from the 1-70 Interchange, south along Edwards Access Road, spreading east and west to include Riverwalk Subdivision, Riverfront Subdivision, South 40 Subdivision and Edwards Village Center and Homestead Subdivision" for Ray's X Bar Fly, Inc., d/b/a Ray's. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Ms. Roach stated the next order of business is to establish the needs of the neighborhood. The Board has a petition with a total of 184 signatures Commissioner Menconi moved the Board establish the needs of the neighborhood as evidenced by the submitted petition and testimony at this hearing for Ray's X Bar Fly, Inc., d/b/a Ray's. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Ms. Roach stated Peter Mueller, applicant, is present for the hearing. She stated staff has no concerns with this application. All applicants are reported to be of good moral character. Staff recommends approval. Chairman Gallagher asked if staff has reviewed the alcohol management plan. Ms. Roach answered yes. She stated that Mr. Mueller also owns Sato Sushi in Edwards and she does not have any problems with that establishment. She has no concerns with this new application. Commissioner Stone move the Board approve an application for a new hotel & restaurant license for Ray's X Bar Fly, Inc., d/b/a Ray's. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Commissioner Menconi moved to adjourn as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority and reconvene as the Board of County Commissioners. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Employee Lottery to Rent the McCoy House (36 Mile House) Carla Budd, Director of Human Resources, stated the next matter before the Board the employee lottery to rent the McCoy House. Ms. Budd stated there is only one name who wants to rent this house. Kelsey McCoy is the winner of the lottery for rental of the McCoy House. Letter of Support, Kobe Bryant Issue Jack Ingstad, County Administrator, requested the Board authorize the Chairman to sign a letter on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, to the District Court, supporting the request from the media in the Bryant matter. The request would allow the press and their vehicles to park in the upper parking lot newly constructed at the Justice Center. He stated the Judge is considering the request Thursday or Friday. The parking would start in December because the Gallegos lot is being used until then. He also requested having the Attorneys look at if it is appropriate to file legal papers. He stated he believes they do have the right to file those because he is specifically named in the decorum order. 22 November 4, 2003 Chairman Gallagher asked if they are planning on joining the press in their request. Ms. Mauriello stated it is simply a request for the court to amend its order that they be able to relocate and manage the press through the upper parking lot. Chairman Gallagher asked if the press was going to be charged for the use of the lot. Mr. Ingstad stated the intent would be to charge for power, telephone lines and those type things and not the use of this public lot. He recommended they not charge for renting the lot. The Board concurred. Abatement Hearings Jon Harrison, Assessor's Office, presented a petition for abatement for John K. Skeen schedule No. R028819. Mr. Harrison stated the property was appealed at the Assessor level in May 2003. It was found that a clerical error occurred when the improvement square footage was incorrectly entered at the time the home was completed. A new drawing from plans as well as a site inspection June 3, 2003 was performed. Data corrections to the property record have been completed and are now reflected in the 2003 record. Pursuant to CRS 30-10-114, it is the recommendation of the Assessor's Office that this abatement be granted for the 2001 and 2002 tax years as follows: 2001 - the original assessed value was $807,190 with a tax amount of$55,266.68, with an abatement of$188,770 assessed value with a tax amount of$12, 924.70, leaving a balance of$6l8,420 assessed value with a tax amount of $42,341.98. 2002 - the original assessed value was $807,190 with a tax amount of$56,530.76 with an abatement of$188,770 assessed value with a tax amount of $ 13,220.34, leaving a balance of $618,420.00 with a tax amount of$43,310.42. Commissioner Stone moved to approve the abatement for schedule number R028819, John K. Skeen as presented. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Mr. Harrison presented petitions for abatement for SK Realty LLC, schedule numbers R048005 and R048007. He stated for schedule R048005, the value given to the subject property is supported by the sales from the appropriate time period. The subject property is located in the Lodge at Brookside Condominium Complex and does not possess a river view which may affect the value ofthe property. The sales date sheet includes three sales from the subject complex which also do not possess river views. The Assessor recommended this abatement be denied. Schedule R048007, the comparable sales for the time period in question support the value given for the 2002 tax year. The sales for the time period of the 2003 reappraisal support the lowered market value. Pursuant to CRS 39-1-104 this abatement should be denied. Stewart Kleinman, petitioner, stated he disagrees and felt there was room for compromise. Considering the assessment is $50,000.00 more than what he purchased the unit for in 2001, he does not believe it is fair. Chairman Gallagher stated they must deal in real statistics. Mr. Harrison stated they used comparable sales for the 2001 and 2003 values. He stated he listed sales as an example and based their appraisal on sales in the same complex. He stated he would be glad to share any information with the petitioner. He stated the misunderstanding is with the sales they used. By Statute they must use sales from 1999 and the first half of2000. Mr. Kleinman stated he does not believe he can negotiate a purchase of $50,000.00 less than the appraised value. He believes the values should be fair and reasonable. Chairman Gallagher stated the Statutes do not give the Board the option to set the value at what was paid for the property. It is not something they can use. Mr. Harrison stated the sale that occurred in 2001 for the property is germaine to the value they set and they will certainly consider that sale for future years but cannot consider it for this time frame. 23 November 4, 2003 Commissioner Menconi stated if he looks back to one of the submitted charts they show three sales and it seems the comps were from Brookside and were also units that were not facing the river. Mr. Harrison stated that was correct. Commissioner Menconi asked about the square footage of the units. If there are three units in the complex with the same square footage and none of them have a river view, they would come out with an appraisal of $360,000.00. Mr. Kleinman's unit is appraised less than that. Mr. Kleinman asked about other step or options. It does not seem right that you buy something for one price and you have to pay taxes on a higher value. Commissioner Menconi stated in looking at other scenario's he apologized to the petitioner but they are held by Statute as to what the appraisal can be. Mr. Kleinman stated it does not seem right and does not seem fair. Mr. Harrison stated the real issue of contention is that they are looking at a 2001 sale and the Assessor's Office can only look at sales from 1999 and 2000. Mr. Kleinman used a comparable of buying stock and you would not purchase that stock if they had to use previous values. Chairman Gallagher stated the County is a slave to state law and must do appraisals on how the State of Colorado tells them to. Mr. Harrison stated the value of properties in Eagle County have been going up every year. State Statute usually favors the petitioner. Commissioner Menconi moved to deny schedule numbers R048005 and R048007 as recommended by the Assessor. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. Jon Harrison presented a petition for abatement for Jodie Lynn Frank, schedule number R014345. Mr. Harrison stated the owner of the subject property appealed the value during the 2003 appeals process. The Assessor's Office corrected the square footage for this condominium complex and recalculated the 2003 values based on market date. The corrected square footage was then used to review the values in the 2001 and 2002 tax years. Based on the comparable sales within the appropriate time frame, the assigned value for the subject property is fair and equitable. Pursuant to CRS 301-10- 114 it is recommended this abatement be denied. Commissioner Stone moved to deny schedule number R014345, Jodie Lynn Frank, as recommended by the Assessor. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. File PDF-00082, Final Plat, Arrowhead River Ranch PUD Cliff Simonton presented file number PDF, Arrowhead River Ranch PUD. He stated the applicant is requesting final approval of a subdivision Plat that would reconfigure Tract B, Tract C and Eagle River Road of the Arrowhead River Ranch PUD. Eagle River Road, which provides internal access to the 20 home subdivision, has been slightly re-aligned, which changes the configuration of both Tracts B and C. Tract B is additionally being subdivided to create 7 single family lots, the layout for which is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plan for Arrowhead River Ranch. The development site is located 1.3 miles east of the intersection of US Highway 6 and the Edwards Spur Road, immediately adjacent to and north of US Highway 6. The chronology is as follows: The Preliminary Plan for the Donovan Parcel PUD (since renamed the Arrowhead River Ranch PUD) was approved on July 30,2002. The companion 1041 file (No. 1041-0043) was approved on the same day. The final plat for the Arrowhead River Ranch PUD was approved on October 22, 2002. 24 November 4, 2003 This plat is the second plat for Arrowhead River Ranch PUD, and is the first that establishes single family home sites. All development for this plat was contemplated by, and is consistent with, the approved Arrowhead River Ranch PUD Preliminary Plan and the Arrowhead River Ranch PUD Guide. Pursuant to Section 5-280.B.5.b (3), Final Plat for Subdivision - Action bv the Board of County Commissioners of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: This final plat DOES conform to the approved Preliminary Plan for subdivision. Required improvements ARE adequate. Areas dedicated for public use and easements ARE acceptable and; Pursuant to Sections 5-280.B.3.e., Standards of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations: 1) Consistent with the Master plan. It has previously been determined that the proposed subdivision IS consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan and the Future Land Use Map of the Master Plan. 2) Consistent with Land Use Regulations. It has previously been found that the proposed subdivision DOES comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including but not limited to the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4 Site Development Standards. 3) Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. It has previously been determined that the proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. (a) Utility and Road Extensions. Proposed utility extensions ARE consistent with the utility's service plan or shall require prior County approval of an amendment to the service plan. Proposed road extensions ARE consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital Improvements Plan. (b) Serve Ultimate Population. Utility lines ARE sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under-sized lines. (c) Coordinate Utility Extensions. Utility extensions DO provide the entire range of necessary facilities. 4) Suitability for Development. It has previously been determined that the property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural, or human-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, as well as existing and probable future public improvements to the area. 5) Compatible with Surrounding Uses. It has previously been determined that the proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area and DOES NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Sonny Jorgensen, representing the applicant was present for the hearing. Chairman Gallagher asked if Eagle River Road was accepted by the Fire Department. Mr. Simonton answered yes. Chairman Gallagher asked for public comment. There was none. He closed public comment. Commissioner Stone moved the Board approve File No. PDF-00082, Arrowhead River Ranch PUD, Final Plat, incorporating Staff findings, and authorize the Chairman to sign the Plat. Commissioner Menconi seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. PDS-00036 Edwards Storage Facility lena Skinner-Markowitz, Planner, presented file number PDS-00036, Edwards Storage Facility. She stated the applicant wishes to create a mixed use PUD which allows two (2), 35,000 sq. ft., enclosed RV and mini storage buildings with a 2,000-3,000 sq. ft. dwelling unit attached to each building. This development is to be built on 2.339 acres in west Edwards. One ofthe dwelling units is to be used for the property manager/caretaker, with the other unit to be offered as a rental. The chronology of the application is as follows: 25 November 4, 2003 1960- A single family home was built on the unplatted, 2.339 acre area ofland of the proposed development. 1974- RSL zoning was placed on the property when Eagle County introduced zoning in September, 1974. The Planning Commission was primarily concerned with the proposed application's lack of conformance with the intent and goals of the Edwards Area Community Plan. They also took issue with the large size of the proposed storage building, and that a residential area was not an appropriate location for this type of use normally found in the commercial/industrial zone districts. The Planning Commission recommended denial of this proposal, noting the following caveats, as stated by Dan Seibel: "We are concerned with the size of the footprint and mass of the buildings, lot coverage percentages, industrial type use in residential area, lighting that would go along with security in a residential area, (and a) change in the character of the neighborhood." Referral responses are as shown on staff report and as follows: Eagle River Water and Sanitation District/Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority, dated August 12, 2003: At the Sketch Plan level of detail, water and wastewater are mentioned briefly. The sanitation service entity is Eagle River Water and Sanitation District, not the Eagle Valley Sanitation District. Our updated District boundary maps indicate that the project property is not located within the District; inclusion will be required to serve the proposed development. At Preliminary Plan, the District would like the opportunity to review for Ability to Serve issues. Barbara Troxel, Adjacent Property Owner, dated August 25,2003: We purchased land in October, 1962, when the Valley was mostly farming land. The land was surveyed by a professional Surveyor. Geneva and Cleaver Kettrey, from whom we purchased the land granted us easements: one curved across their property, one from Hwy 6 straight to our property. The two easements are described in the Warranty Deed (reception no. 96573), paragraph 2, and on the scaled diagram, also part of the deed. This development greatly decreases the value and residential comfort of my property. This area is a residential area and not a mini storage area; I highly disapprove of this development. I have owned land for 41 years and feel developers should never push me out. This residential area should remain the same. Eagle River Fire Protection District, dated August 27,2003: Please provide a site plan showing the attached vehicle turning radii to confirm accessibility. Road width for the one-way on the east side is called out at 14' on the landscape plan, and 16' on the site plan. Please confirm the actual width and if it meets County requirements. Hydrant locations need to be called out and verified. Due to the size and use of the buildings, additional hydrants and fire sprinklers may be required to meet fire flow requirements. A wildland fire assessment is required (NFPA 1144 form). Engineering Memo, dated August 29th, 2003: A State Highway Access Permit will be required for the proposed access onto HWY. 6. The access must meet the requirements in the State Highway Access Code. It is recommended that the access permit be submitted concurrently with the preliminary plan submittal. Eagle County in cooperation with the Colorado Department of Transportation are in the process of finalizing the HWY. 6 Corridor Feasibility Study. This study will likely recommend that access in this area be consolidated and a circulation road be constructed so each parcel does not have to directly access onto HWY. 6. This will improve the existing capacity ofHWY. 6 and make it safer. 26 November 4, 2003 As proposed, the road will serve at least four lots in this area of West Edwards. Additionallots may connect to this road as this area redevelops because of the limitations of accessing HWY. 6 in this area. As a result, the road will have to meet the standards in the Site Development Standards Section of the Land Use Regulations. Colorado Geologic Survey, dated August 29,2003 This site is underlain with Eagle Valley Evaporite. Subsidence due to collapsible soils, hydro compaction, existing sinkholes, and formation of solution cavities are a serious concern. Careful attention will need to be given to site preparation and foundation design for the new buildings; observations of all buildings and property should be made on a regular basis during and after construction. Early detection of foundation distress and timely remedial actions are important in reducing the cost of remediation. A design-level subsurface investigation including sampling, lab testing an analysis will be needed to determine alluvium thickness or depth to competent bedrock, and to characterize the soil and rock engineering properties such as density, consolidation potential, bearing capacity and soil corrosivity. This information is needed to determine max bearing and dead-load pressures and to develop final design criteria for foundations, floor systems, and pavements. Additional foundation damage due to compaction and differential settlement can occur if water infiltrates the soils as a result of landscape irrigation and run-off. It is imperative that proper grading, compaction and drainage are incorporated into the development plans. Depth to the groundwater should be determined during site-specific investigations as the site is located approx. 500 ft from the Eagle River. Groundwater levels could fluctuate to shallow depths seasonally, and during storm events. Foundation perimeters drains are recommended to help control wetting of potentially expansive or collapsible soils in the immediate vicinity of the substructure; the systems should be sloped to discharge to a gravity outlet, storm sewer of sump pump location. Northwest Colorado Council of Governments, dated September 3,2003 My review focused on whether the application met the recommendations of the Area wide Water Quality Management Plan (208 Plan), which I believe Eagle County has adopted. Overall, the proposal meets with the policies and recommendations of the 208 Plan. It does not necessitate the creation of any new wastewater or water supply facilities and it addresses storm water runoff related issues. I do have a few suggestions and comments that may strengthen the project's adherence with the 208 Plan: The application does not mention whether they will need to get a CDPES discharge permit for storm water control on a construction site from the Colorado Department of Health. This is required for any development project creating site disturbance of more than one acre. In general, a detailed erosion control plan that meets both CPDES and Eagle County requirements needs to be developed and implemented. Post construction storm water runoff is addressed primarily by installing a detention basin. According to the application the detention basin design is to attenuate peak runoff to historic, pre-development levels. If the basin included a water quality feature such as a riser with gravel pack it would serve the additional function of providing for enhanced water quality. The detention basin should be one of the first features installed during site development in order to provide protection from sediment associated with the clearing of the site. It could be roughed in during construction then the outlet works described above could be installed later to provide for treatment of storm water runoff from the finished proj ect. Additional Referrals were sent to the following, with no response: Eagle County Attorney, Environmental Health, Sheriff and Assessor CDOT, Forest Service and Colorado State Division of Wildlife 27 November 4, 2003 CenturyTel, KN Energy, Holy Cross Edwards Metro District ECOGE, Colorado and Eagle County Historical Societies Eagle River Mobile Home Park, Homestead HOA, Cordillera Valley Club HOA, Lake Creek Apts., Brett Ranch HOA, Cordillera HOA, Singletree HOA, Riverwalk HOA, South Forty HOA, Lake Creek HOA, Old Edwards Estates HOA, The Reserve HOA, Red Mountain Ranch HOA, River Pines HOA, Miller's Creek HOA, Arrowhead HOA, Creamery Gulch HOA Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-240.F.3.e Standards for the review of a Sketch and Preliminary plan for PUD: STANDARD: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] - The title to all land that is part of a PUD shall be owned or controlled by one (1) person. A person shall be considered to control all lands in the PUD either through ownership or by written consent of all owners of the land that they will be subject to the conditions and standards of the PUD. The Applicant has demonstrated that the entire area affected by this PUD Amendment is owned by Rodmart Properties, LLC. [+] FINDING: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] The title to all land that is part of this PUD IS owned or controlled by one (1) person and/or entity. STANDARD: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] - The uses that may be developed in the PUD shall be those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule", or Table 3-320, "Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule, "for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these use designations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3j, Variations Authorized. Mini and/or RV Storage is not a residential or agricultural use, as is currently found in this area under the current RSL zoning. These uses are commercial and industrial uses. Pursuant to the Edwards Community Master Plan, limited "neighborhood commercial" uses may be permitted in West Edwards; however, there is no evidence to support the need for storage in Edwards. H FINDING: Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] The uses that may be developed in the PUD ARE uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-320, "Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Use Schedule", however, these uses ARE NOT uses allowed in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule" applicable to the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of this application for PUD. STANDARD: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] - The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD shall be those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Variations of these dimensional limitations may only be authorized pursuant to Section 5-240 F.3j, Variations Authorized. provided variations shall leave adequate distance between buildings for necessary access and fire protection, and ensure proper ventilation, light, air and snowmelt between buildings. The proposed structures are approximately 37-38,000 square feet each (this includes the storage building with the attached dwelling unit). With the addition of the parking and roadways, it will be necessary to have the Board of County Commissioners approve several Variations in order for this development to occur. Those Variations include: Per Current RSL Zoning As Proposed Ratio I Square Footage Proposed I Square Footage Gain in Square Maximums Ratio Maximums Foota2e 28 November 4, 2003 Lot I : 20 1 : 75 Coverage (20% ) 20,377.37 (75%) 76,415.13 56,037.76 Building 1 : 20 1 : 80 Covera2e (20%) 20,377.37 (80%) 81,509.47 61,132.10 [-] FINDING: Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD ARE NOT those specified in Table 3- 340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD, however, this finding will be positive upon approval of the Variations by the Board of County Commissioners. STANDARD: Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] - Off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loadinf! Standards. A reduction in these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that: (a) Shared Parking. Because of shared parking arrangements among uses within the PUD that do not require peak parkingfor those uses to occur at the same time, the parking needs of residents, guests and employees of the project will be met; or (b) Actual Needs. The actual needs of the project's residents, guests and employees will be less than those set by Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. The applicant may commit to provide specialized transportation services for these persons (such as vans, subsidized bus passes, or similar services) as a means of complying with this standard. With the nature of this proposal, and the design of the buildings for the multiple uses, a site specific parking plan will have to be developed and submitted as part of Preliminary Plan. The parking plan will recognize loading areas, residential, employee, storage unit visitor parking, and parking spots for people to wait in (overflow), ifthe interior ofthe buildings are occupied with drop offs and RV parking. [-/+] FINDING: AS CONDITIONED Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e 4)] It WILL be demonstrated that off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD complies with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards, without a necessity for a reduction in the standards, at Preliminary Plan. STANDARD: Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] - Landscaping provided in the PUD shall comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaving and Illumination Standards. Variations from these standards may be authorized where the applicant demonstrates that the proposed landscaping provides sufficient buffering of uses from each other (both within the PUD and between the PUD and surrounding uses) to minimize noise, glare and other adverse impacts, creates attractive streetscapes and parking areas and is consistent with the character of the area. A detailed landscaping plan is required top be submitted as part of the Preliminary Plan. That plan should detail all types, location of all materials to be planted as part of this development. A cost estimate will also be necessary for collateralization purposes. [-/+] FINDING: AS CONDITIONED Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] It WILL be demonstrated that landscaping provided in the PUD can comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards. STANDARD: Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (6)] - The sign standards applicable to the PUD shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations. unless, as provided in Section 4-340 D., Signs Allowed in a Planned Unit Develovment (PUD). the applicant submits a comprehensive sign plan 29 November 4, 2003 for the PUD that is determined to be suitable for the PUD and provides the minimum sign area necessary to direct users to and within the PUD. The applicant has made statements that signage will comply with Eagle County sign standards; however the draft PUD Guide in the current application does not contain statements regarding signage. A PUD sign code will be necessary at Preliminary Plan. [-/+] FINDING: AS CONDITIONED Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e(6)] The sign standards applicable to the PUD ARE NOT as specified in Article 4, Division 3, fugn Regulations. However, the Edwards Storage Facility PUD will make reference to a comprehensive sign plan within the PUD Guide to be submitted at Preliminary Plan. STANDARD: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] - The applicant shall demonstrate that the development proposed in the Preliminary Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. Existing facilities (electricity, telephone, gas, cable, etc) currently servicing the residents living on the proposed property are available, and currently exist; however, a letter dated August 12,2003 from the Eagle River Water and Sand District, indicate that this property is not located in the District at this time, and that the "Ability to Serve" of the District will be analyzed at Preliminary Plan. There are also questions regarding the proposed road layout as stated in the memo from the Eagle River Fire Protection District, dated August 27,2003. The memo questions adequate turning radii, and if the roads meet County standards. The Fire Department will also require fire hydrants and fire sprinklers. Failure to obtain water from the District would be problematic with the Fire Department requirements as well. The applicant will be required to provide additional information regarding water consumption of the proposed use in order to assess the need for a 1041 process. [-] FINDING: Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] The Applicant HAS NOT clearly demonstrated that the development proposed in the this Sketch Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for sewage disposal, and roads; the applicant HAS NOT clearly demonstrated that the development proposed in the Sketch Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for potable water, solid waste disposal and fire protection. In addition, the Applicant HAS demonstrated that the proposed PUD will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. STANDARD: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] - The improvements standards applicable to the development shall be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards. Provided, however, the development may deviate from the County's road standards, so the development achieves greater efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts, when the following minimum design principles are followed: (a) Safe, Efficient Access. The circulation system is designed to provide safe, convenient access to all areas of the proposed development using the minimum practical roadway length. Access shall be by a public right-of-way, private vehicular or pedestrian way or a commonly owned easement. No roadway alignment, either horizontal or vertical, shall be allowed that compromises one (1) or more of the minimum design standards of the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO) for that functional classification of roadway. (b) Internal Pathways. Internal pathways shall be provided to form a logical, safe and convenient system for pedestrian access to dwelling units and common areas, with appropriate linkages off-site. (c) Emergency Vehicles. Roadways shall be designed to permit access by emergency vehicles to all lots or units. An access easement shall be granted for emergency vehicles and utility vehicles, as applicable, to use private roadways in the development for the purpose of providing emergency services and for installation, maintenance and repair of utilities. 30 November 4, 2003 (d) Principal Access Points. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to provide for smooth traffic flow, minimizing hazards to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. Where a PUD abuts a major collector, arterial road or highway, direct access to such road or highway from individual lots, units or buildings shall not be permitted. Minor roads within the PUD shall not be directly connected with roads outside of the PUD, unless the County determines such connections are necessary to maintain the County's road network. (e) Snow Storage. Adequate areas shall be provided to store snow removedfrom the internal street network and from off-street parking areas. According to recorded documents from Barbara Troxel, (see memo dated August 25,2003), an access easement exists on the northerly portion of the development property, currently shown on the application site plan under a portion of the first dwelling unit, landscaping features, and roadway. As this is a legal easement, the development does not have the right to build on top of it unless evidence is produced which demonstrates that this easement is no longer valid, or a Vacation has been approved by the Board of County Commissioners. As such, the development will have to be re-designed to accommodate the easement prior to Preliminary Plan submittal, if the applicant receives Sketch Plan approval. There is a concern from both the Fire Department and Engineering Department with the roadway standards as contemplated with this Sketch Plan. This development will have to meet all County standards, unless a Variance is granted by the Board of County Commissioners during the Preliminary Plan process. [-] FINDING: Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (8)] It HAS NOT been clearly demonstrated that the improvements standards applicable to the development will be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards regarding: (a) Safe, Efficient Access. (b) Internal Pathways. (c) Emergency Vehicles (d) Principal Access Points. (e) Snow Storage. STANDARD: Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] - The development proposed for the PUD shall be compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. Currently, the underlying, residential property is compatible with the character of the lands surrounding it. The proposed uses, however, are not those customarily found within a residential neighborhood. Storage is most often found on the out-skirts/fringe of a town in either a business or industrial park, in either Eagle or Eagle-Vail. The Edwards Area Community Plan, Vision Report states that: ". . . these sites represent the transition zone from the higher densities of the core to lower densities.. ."; "These sites are appropriate for medium density residential development and minimal mixed use that would address the service, retail and office needs of specifically the surrounding neighborhood"; and, ".. . any development should fit in and reinforce the character of the broader Edwards community." This development, although potentially providing some residents with additional storage, is not compatible with the master plan as proposed. "...these sites represent the transition zone from the higher densities of the core to lower densities..." This development is not a residential development, and does not act as a transitional use. The scale of these buildings and lack of open space prevents the storage to act as a visual transition of the core to the smaller residences of the surrounding neighborhood. "These sites are appropriate for medium density residential development and minimal mixed use that would address the service, retail and office needs of specifically the surrounding neighborhood." Increasing both the floor area and lot coverage by 56,037.762 and 61,132.104 square feet respectively, does not provide for a minimal, mixed use development. As mentioned previously, evidence to support the need of this development has not been presented to Staff; RV storage would 31 November 4, 2003 draw business from a much larger vicinity and, therefore, is not strictly a neighborhood need. The intent for the "minimal mixed use" also states that the development should address the, "service, retail and office needs of specifically the surrounding neighborhood"; this development does not encompass all those uses. ". ..any development should fit in and reinforce the character of the broader Edwards community." Immediate neighborhoods surrounding the proposed development site consist of a mobile home park, Lake Creek apartments, and several single family homes, many which have existed prior to zoning. The "broader Edwards community" consists of newer, single family, duplex and some multi- family subdivisions, as well as a centralized, commercial core. Edwards Storage Facility proposes two (2), 35,000 square foot buildings be built next to the mobile home park. In looking at the scale of the immediate neighborhood, although consistent in height with some of the near-by buildings, the storage buildings far exceed the lot coverage and bulk scale of any surrounding building in visual range, outside of the Edwards commercial core. These buildings will not "fit in and reinforce the character of.. . Edwards", as the character in the immediate vicinity is residential, and these uses (except for the two dwelling units) are commercial. Please note that the only zone district allowing mini-storage as a use by right is the Industrial zone district, which Edwards does not have. The proposed use could compromise the character of this vicinity of Eagle County. [-] FINDING: Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9) The development proposed for the PUD IS NOT compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. STANDARD: Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] - The PUD shall be consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The consideration of the relevant master plans during sketch plan review is on a broad conceptual level, i.e, how a proposal compares to basic planning principles. As a development proposal moves from sketch plan to preliminary plan review, its conformance or lack thereof to aspects of the master plans may not necessarily remain static. THE MASTER PLAN ANALYSES BELOW CONSIDER THE PROPOSAL AS SUBMITTED. EAGLE COUNTY MASTER PLAN Environmental Open Spacel Develop Affordable Transport Community FLUM Quality Recreation ment Housing ation Services Conformance Commu X X X X X nity Center 1 Non Conformance Mixed X3 Conformance Not Applicable FLUM -ICommunity Center. The Future Land Use Map indicates that the Edwards Storage Facility is designated Community Center. Community Center has a suggested residential density of 3- 12 dwelling units per acre, in areas typically found along major transportation routes which are accessible public water and sewer, and have not been designated as sensitive lands. This designation promotes Community Centers as appropriate locations for affordable housing, with cluster and Planned Unit Developments being encouraged. Community Centers are also places where a mix of non- residential activities take place, including neighborhood commercial activities to serve the population of the Community Center and community-oriented commercial or service which may serve surrounding areas or the entire Count;. Development in a Community Center is primarily served by centralized water supply and sewage treatment facilities. 32 November 4, 2003 2The statement from the Master Plan, ".. . community-oriented commercial or service which may serve surrounding areas or the entire County", is in conflict with the recommendations of the Edwards Area Community Plan, where neighborhood commercial is for the needs of the, ".. .immediate neighborhood" only. 3Low impact service commercial uses are recommended to be located in designated business parks. Land Use Open Space Unique Char. Visual Development Hazards Wildlife Cooperation Provision Preservation Quality Patterns Conformance X X X X X X Non Conformance Mixed Conformance Not X Applicable EAGLE COUNTY OPEN SPACE PLAN Edwards Storage Facility is not located in a recognized unique landform area ofthe county, nor is it located in a natural hazard area. EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED PLAN Water Quantity Water Quality Wildlife Recreation Land Use Conformance X X X X Non Conformance Mixed X Conformance Not Applicable Edwards Storage Facility currently is not in the "District" for water and wastewater service. The Ability to Serve by the District will be analyzed at Preliminary Plan. EAGLE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING PLAN VISION STATEMENT: Housing for local residents is a major priority of Eagle County. There should be a wide variety of housing to fulfill the needs of all its residents, including families, senior citizens, and those who work here. Elements of Eagle County's vision for housing are: Housing is a community-wide issue. Housing should be located in close proximity to existing community centers, as defined in the Eagle County master plan. Development of local residents housing should be encouraged on existing transit routes. Housing is primarily a private sector activity [but] without the active participation of government, there will be only limited success. It is important to preserve existing local residents housing. 33 November 4, 2003 Persons who work in Eagle County should have adequate housing opportunities within the county for other infrastructure needs. Development applications that will result in an increased need for local residents housing should be evaluated as to whether they adequately provide for this additional need, the same way as they are evaluated. EDWARDS AREA COMMUNITY PLAN Conformance Non- Mixed Not Applicable Conformance Conformance Land Use X Housing X Transportation X Open Space X Potable Water and Wastewater X Services and Facilities X Environmental Quality X Economic Development X Recreation and Tourism X Historic Preservation X Implementation X Future Land Use Map X Land Use - The stated goal is, "The location and type of land uses balance the physical, social, cultural, environmental and economic needs of the current and future resident (& tourist) population. Land uses are located in a manner that protects and improves the quality of the natural and man made environment, ensures the timely, cost-effective provision of public facilities and services, and retains the unique variety of lifestyles and quality of life found in Edwards". This proposal does not serve to balance the physical, social, cultural, environmental and economic needs of the entire Edwards Community; however, it may offer storage relief to some people, like those of who live in the mobile home park and do not have residential storage facilities. Housing - "Affordable" housing is anticipated in the current application, however, there is no indication of what rental prices will be. Transportation - The applicant needs to work with the Eagle County Engineering Department and the Colorado Department of Transportation to secure appropriate access permits which will function within Eagle County's parameters. Open Space - "Open Space preservation is promoted within the Edwards Planning Area through coordination with land owners, developers and other agencies and organizations". This proposal does not represent a coordinated effort to preserve any ofthe subject site as Open Space which, in turn, helps to define a buffer between developments. 34 November 4, 2003 Potable Water and Wastewater - Public potable water and sanitary sewer service is anticipated to be made available to serve the proposed development, however, according to the District, the applicant will have to become a part of the District before service will be provided. Ability to Serve will be analyzed at Preliminary Plan, and must be in place prior to final approval. Services and Facilities - This goal pertains to recycling of solid wastes and provision of public schools, occupational training and higher education and, as such, is not applicable. Environmental Qualitv -This proposal does satisfy many of the stated objectives. According to NWCCOG, overall, the proposal meets with the policies and recommendations of the 208 Plan. It does not necessitate the creation of any new wastewater or water supply facilities and it addresses storm water runoff related issues. NWCCOG, however, has the following comments: the applicants need to get a CDPES discharge permit for storm water control on a construction site from the Colorado Department of Health. This is required for any development project creating site disturbance of more than one acre.; a detailed erosion control plan that meets both CPDES and Eagle County requirements needs to be developed and implemented; post construction storm water runoff is addressed primarily by installing a detention basin; the detention basin design is to attenuate peak runoff to historic, pre-development levels. If the basin included a water quality feature such as a riser with gravel pack it would serve the additional function of providing for enhanced water quality. Economic Development - The proposal does not promote a balanced mix of land uses in the Edwards community to encourage a diverse economy. This is not applicable to this type of commercial use. Recreation and Tourism - The stated goal is, "Parks, river access, recreational facilities and open space are provided to meet current and future needs of the residents of Edwards and Eagle County. These are designed in such a way as to ensure increased accessibility and provide a more even distribution to the Edwards Planning Area's parks and open space system". This does not apply to this development as the property does not contain any natural recreational amenities. Historic Preservation - No historic resources were identified on the subject property. At the time of this writing, neither the Colorado State Historical Society nor, the Eagle County Historical Society had provided comment. Implementation - If approved, the proposed development will be required to efficiently utilize public infrastructure. Compliance with the Hwy 6 Access Control Plan is strongly recommended as well. Access may be a primary concern at Preliminary Plan, when the development is analyzed for traffic and road layouts, etc. Future Land Use Map (FLUM) - As discussed previously on Page 8 (Compatibility), the proposed commercial site is identified on the FLUM as an area appropriate for, "medium density residential development and minimal mixed use that would address the service, retail and office needs of specifically the surrounding neighborhood." This aspect of the proposal is not consistent with this recommendation, in that the intent for the "minimal mixed use" also states that the development should address the, "service, retail and office needs of specifically the surrounding neighborhood"; this development does not encompass all those uses, nor can it be determined "minimal" with the proposed storage buildings being the largest buildings in the area. Most importantly, the primary land use intent for this area is residential. Under the current zoning, it may be possible to develop 5-6, single family dwelling units, plus lock [+/-] FINDING: Consistent with Master Plan. The proposed Sketch CANNOT be entirely shown to be appropriate for its proposed location and be consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of applicable master plans -offs on 15,000 sq ft lots for purchase, vs. two units for rental purposes. STANDARD: Phasing [Section 5-240.F.3.e (11)] - The Preliminary Plan for PUD shall include a phasing plan for the development. If development of the PUD is proposed to occur in phases, then guarantees shall be provided for public improvements and amenities that are necessary and desirable for residents of the project, or that are of benefit to the entire County. Such public 35 November 4, 2003 improvements shall be constructed with the first phase of the project, or, if this is not possible, then as early in the project as is reasonable. Not applicable and/or necessary with this proposal. The Edwards Storage Facility is not expected to expand in the future and is to be constructed all at once. [+J FINDING: Phasing Section 5-240.F.3.e (11) A phasing plan IS NOT necessary for this development. STANDARD: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] - The PUD shall comply with the following common recreation and open space standards. (a) Minimum Area. It is recommended that a minimum of25% of the total PUD area shall be devoted to open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi-public. In addition, the PUD shall provide a minimum of ten (10) acres of common recreation and usable open space lands for every one thousand (1,000) persons who are residents of the PUD. In order to calculate the number of residents of the PUD, the number of proposed dwelling units shall be multiplied by two and sixty- three hundredths (2.63), which is the average number ofpersons that occupy each dwelling unit in Eagle County, as determined in the Eagle County Master Plan. (b) Areas that Do Not Count as Open Space. Parking and loading areas, street right-of ways, and areas with slopes greater than thirty (30) percent shall not count toward usable open space. (c) Areas that Count as Open Space. Water bodies, lands within critical wildlife habitat areas, riparian areas, and one hundred (100) year floodplains, as defined in these Land Use Regulations, that are preserved as open space shall count towards this minimum standard, even when they are not usable by or accessible to the residents of the PUD. All other open space lands shall be conveniently accessible from all occupied structures within the PUD. (d) Improvements Required. All common open space and recreational facilities shall be shown on the Preliminary Plan for PUD and shall be constructed and fully improved according to the development schedule establishedfor each development phase of the PUD. (e) Continuing Use and Maintenance. All privately owned common open space shall continue to conform to its intended use, as specified on the Preliminary Plan for PUD. To ensure that all the common open space identified in the PUD will be used as common open space, restrictions and/or covenants shall be placed in each deed to ensure their maintenance and to prohibit the division of any common open space. (/) Organization. If common open space is proposed to be maintained through an association or nonprofit corporation, such organization shall manage all common open space and recreational and cultural facilities that are not dedicated to the public, and shall provide for the maintenance, administration and operation of such land and any other land within the PUD not publicly owned, and secure adequate liability insurance on the land. The association or nonprofit corporation shall be established prior to the sale of any lots or units within the PUD. Membership in the association or nonprofit corporation shall be mandatory for all landowners within the PUD. The total acreage of Edwards Storage is approximately 2.339 acres. Development will occur on the majority of property, with minimal area left as open space. Landscaping will fill in any lands not covered by asphalt or buildings. Dwelling units will have small lawns around parking areas. Maintenance of landscaping has not been addressed in this application. The applicant has stated that the nature ofthe development does not warrant the dedication of open space, with, "...a strong landscape program for the property would be more appropriate than active recreation." Staffs only real concern is the lack of safe, useable, open space for families that may rent the two dwelling units; children may end up playing in the access or parking areas of the development. [-J FINDING: Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] The PUD HAS NOT demonstrated that the proposed development will comply with the common recreation and open space standards with respect to: (a) Minimum area; (b) Improvements required; 36 November 4, 2003 (c) Continuing use and maintenance; or (d) Organization. STANDARD: Natural Resource Protection. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (13)] - The PUD shall consider the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards. According to the memo from the Colorado Geologic Survey, dated August 29, 2003, careful attention will need to be given to site preparation and foundation design for the new buildings, because of collapsible soils (see attached memo). The applicant will have to provide a Geologic Hazards Report which, "considers a design-level subsurface investigation including sampling, lab testing and analysis will be needed to determine alluvium thickness or depth to competent bedrock, and to characterize the soil and rock engineering properties such as density, consolidation potential, bearing capacity and soil corrosivity" and other comments, as stated. [+] FINDING: AS CONDITIONED Natural Resource Protection. [ Section 5-240.F.3.e (13)] The PUD DOES demonstrate that the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents available at the time the application was submitted, as well as the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards, have been considered. Pursuant to Section 5-240.F.2.a.(15).(a), which states: (15) Any or all ofthe following requirements, as determined by the Community Development Director, based on the complexity of the proposal: (a) Supporting data to justify any proposed commercial and industrial elements in an area not so zoned; Staff has requested supporting data to justify the necessity for RV/mini-storage, but has not received anything validating these uses. This is important information when considering the spatial dimensions of the storage buildings are based on the need to accommodate large RVs and storage drop- offs. Pursuant to the newly adopted Edwards Area Community Plan, any commercial development proposed in West Edwards is supposed to be "neighborhood commercial". If R V s are coming to park here from other areas of the County, or even other Counties, this use does not comply with the intent of the Edwards Area Community Plan. This would also impact traffic through Edwards as RVs from other areas would be coming in and out of West Edwards, where previously they were absent. Tom Boni, Knight Planning, introduced Roddy Jones, applicant, and Michael Dunlevie, Attorney for the applicant. He stated the applicant has been more responsive than most applicants. He is trying to build a more attractive and quality building. He stated any development in Edwards will have to present a quality image. They came up with several options. He had a power point presentation, showing a resident managers unit, the timber trimmed garage door and the building in general. He stated this project shares a boundary with the Eagle River Mobile Home Park. He spoke to the property to the South, owned by Barbara Troxel and the Centurytel building. He stated in looking at the Master Plan, several changes have been made to the application. It is identified as a community center on the Future Land Use Map. On the Edwards Community Plan, they identity that these sites are appropriate for residential development or minimal mixed use. The Edwards Access Control Plan, indicates that drives should be shared. They have addressed consolidation of driveways. There are three aspects of the plan. The upper levels were for mini storage. The bottom level was for storage of recreational vehicles. As they have proceeded to look at the market, they are agreeable to lowering the building height and have the first floor respond to mini storage needs. They are architecturalizing treatment of the outside of the building. They have met with the manager of the Eagle River Mobile Home Park who felt this was something that the community needed. He stated they met with the Centurytel people who have submitted a letter of support. He presented the letter to the Board. The property analysis shows this as low density development. In speaking with developers they believe this type of market exists for this 37 November 4, 2003 property. They believe storage is a use that makes sense in this community and can be attractive and create a break between the mobile home park and residential development. He stated there are two residential units attached. This was the original plan submitted which was changed after the Planning Commission's concern's by reducing the size of the building. He stated with community feedback they have received favorable comments. He showed two different designs that were proposed. The property owner to the South has raised objections around a number of issues. There was the construction of an easement that has not been built yet so they have moved the building as not to encumber that easement. There was also concern with the height of the building. They have planted evergreens to cover that side of the building. They have added landscaping. He pointed out the shared driveway. Commissioner Stone asked how big their building was. Mr. Boni stated 100 feet by 155 feet and they will have a residence in this building. As a use that bookends the western side, this proposal addresses a community need. This can fit closer into the community. The PUD approach allows the community to control the use of the building, With the reduction in size they have created significant landscaping. Michael Dunlevie spoke to the easement which is a prescription only easement and is from 1962. This grants two easements one on the western boundary which is being used and the curved one which is not being used. With the joint access with Centurytel they are getting rid of another access point and the easement is being preserved. This project does nothing to harm the easement that it is place. Mr. Mauriello asked about encroachment on the easement. Mr. Dunlevie showed the easement and explained indicating they have preserved the right to use the easement. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz pointed out a detention pond in the middle of the easement. Mr. Boni stated they moved the single family residence and explained the detention pond will be located in another open space on the property. Mr. Jones stated he has been coming to Eagle County for thirty some years. When looking at this property it does not look pretty right now. He is not trying to break new ground. They wanted to build something nice and will keep the building maintained. Mini storage is not enticing but this building would be made to look nice and access to the storage units would be from inside the building only. Chairman Gallagher asked for public comment. Dana Williams, resident on the Southern parcel, stated he uses the secondary easement quite frequently. If they are going to landscape as planned he is concerned it will block the view of the mountain. There will be a loading dock. He pointed out the house he lives in. There is also a third house and he is concerned with traffic. He stated he does not want to lose his secondary access. Chairman Gallagher questioned the 18 feet from the deck to the road. Mr. Williams stated the comer of the deck is 18 feet from the road and there will be increased traffic. Tom Harned, area resident, stated he has visited the site and it is not very appealing and family housing would not be easy to sell. He personally has a 6,000 square foot building in Eagle, a home with a full basement, a four car garage, a two car garage and two barns and still has to lease storage space. This fills a great need and will dress up the site. There is a lot of restricted areas in this County where you are not allowed to park recreational vehicles and this would be perfect for those items. Brian O'Dell, Edwards resident, stated he sold the property to the applicant. It is not a whole lot better today but it will be a wonderful addition to the properties to the west. It will be a good benefit for the valley. There is definitely a need for this type of facility. It does offer a good transition. Chairman Gallagher closed public comment. Mr. Boni stated they have included a landscape component and they would like to meet with Mr. Williams and address all his concerns. Lighting will have to be presented and approved by the Board. Commissioner Stone asked if the applicant agrees with the conditions of approval. Mr. Boni stated they agree 38 November 4, 2003 Commissioner Stone asked about condition number four, eliminating the RV Storage.. Mr. Boni stated they agree but would like to come back to address the smaller RV storage. Commissioner Stone questioned the Edwards Community Plan. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated there is information in staff report on page nine and page twelve. Commissioner Stone asked if this is next to the Woodland Hills project. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz answered that was correct. Commissioner Stone asked what the density of that project was. Mr. Skinner-Markowitz stated 10 units per acre. Commissioner Stone asked when that file expires. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated the preliminary plan will expire in August 2007. Chairman Gallagher asked for a graphic of the Edwards Area Community plan and the zone districts. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz explained the zoning to the Board. Chairman Gallagher asked if this was equivalent to the Master Plan adopted by the Planning Commission. He asked about the three parcels shown on the map and if they were all part of Woodland Hills. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz answered yes. Chairman Gallagher asked about community centers. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated the Edwards area is as shown on the map and the immediate vicinity pertains to the western portion shown on the map. Chairman Gallagher asked about water and sewer. Mr. Boni stated they have three water taps from the Edwards Metropolitan District and there is a sewer main close they plan to hook to. He stated in preparing this application they reviewed the Edwards Area Master Plan and they are site 10 which identifies this area as low density, however there is text that allows for commercial services and retail that service a need for the community. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated at the bottom of page nine it does discuss the uses for that area. Chairman Gallagher asked how seriously they take what part of what Master Plan. He stated because it is a mobile home park it must be accepted as Industrial. The idea that it is less than a residential property is not accurate. The Centurytel building would be light industrial and putting this building between those two does not legitimize anything someone would want to do. The appropriate use is what is to be addressed. He stated the Planning Commission was correct in saying this does not comply with the Master Plan. He stated this use would be better in Wolcott. Commissioner Menconi asked if there was a recommendation from staff to the Planning Commission. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated staffs recommendation to the Planning Commission was for denial based on the same reasons. She read a quote from the Planning Commission. Commissioner Menconi asked about the discussion where it was indicated there may not be staff approval. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated staff did discuss the concerns with the applicant. Commissioner Menconi asked about staff recommendation of approval for Woodland Hills and denial for this project. Ms. Skinner-Markowitz stated it was the acreage. The original Edwards Master Plan used for Woodland Hills was the old one but it did apply to that project. She stated since that time a new community plan was developed and must be used for this application. There are similarities and differences with the two proposals. Commissioner Menconi asked about the 2.3 acres and how much is not parking, building, etc. Mr. Boni stated building coverage was changed and the open space is 30% to 33%. He stated this application does respond to a need in the community. He stated they believe the Master Plan does not rule out community uses. 39 November 4, 2003 Commissioner Menconi stated he concurs with the staff and planning commission recommendations. The work that has been done with the Master Plan indicates this is not the type of direction they want to go. There was discussion at the Woodland Hills file about this area. He would not disagree that storage is necessary but he does not believe this is the appropriate location. Commissioner Stone stated he must agree with Dan Seibel's comments from the Planning Commission. This project would be sandwiched between two residential uses. Mr. Jones asked if they would be allowed to come back with a proposal for mobile homes. Commissioner Stone stated he believes showing the size of the Gallegos building hurt this applicant. He stated he does not know what is happening with the Woodland Hills project. These long narrow lots makes it difficult to come up with a plan that includes access. He stated the best answer would be to have one owner own all of those long strips and create a master plan development. He continues to struggle with what he would think would be a good development there. It is a tough call because they already have a patchwork quilt. The Board responds to applications as they are brought in. They cannot force development of private property. He stated he would consider a lesser density modular home development which might be keeping with the Woodland Hills development. Chairman Gallagher concurred with Commissioner Stone that they will not comment on what the applicant should do with his property. He would be much more inclined to approve something that is consistent with the Master Plan. Commissioner Menconi moved that the Board of County Commissioners deny file PDS-00036, Edwards Storage Facility, incorporating all Staff findings. Commissioner Stone seconded the motion. The vote was declared unanimous. There being no further business to be brought before the Board the meeting was adjourned until November 18, 2003. Ch~.~ 40 November 4, 2003