Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07/26/93
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
100 Leaves
FORM 50 C. F. HOECKEL B. B. 8: L. CO.
PUBLIC HEARING
JULY 26, 1993
Present: George "Bud" Gates
James Johnson, Jr
Absent: Johnnette Phillips
Jack Lewis
Mary Jo Berenato
Sara J. Fisher
Chairman
Commissioner
Commissioner
County Manager
Deputy County Attorney
Clerk to the Board
This being a scheduled Public Hearing the following items were presented to the
Board of County Commissioners for their consideration:
Cordillera Metropolitan District
Squaw Creek Metropolitan District
Chairman Gates opened the hearing stating the first item on the agenda was
consideration of the service plans for the Cordillera Metropolitan District and
Squaw Creek Metropolitan Districts.
Keith Montag, Director Community Development, stated this matter was tabled
from July 6, 1993 to allow the Board time to consider this application. He stated
the Board will need to make findings based on the criteria presented.
Jim Fritze, County Attorney, stated the Board of County Commissioners has
received two additional pieces of information; one is a letter from Andrew Kane
regarding his opinion relating to estimated increased bond costs with one district;
two, is a memorandum discussing some of the same issues as in the memorandum from
Mr. Fritze to the Board.
Gerry Engle, Kensington Partners, summarized the difference between one
district verses two districts. He requested the Board permit the formation of two
districts for the following reasons:
01) Amendment One, council has advised a single district would be
obligated to expend all funds, including needed operating funds.
02) Liability, two districts will protect operations of the district.
Chairman Gates questioned if a resolution had been drafted.
Jim Fritze stated the proponents have submitted a form resolution for the
Board.
Jim Ware, Ware, Rosen and Travers, stated he is the Attorney for the Homeowners
Association. Mr. Ware stated there will be agreements between the homeowners
association and the developer which will protect the homeowners, homeowners
association and the developer, whether there is one district or two districts. He
believes with two districts it will be less expensive to the homeowners and there
will be public accountability. He requested the Commissioners approve the two
districts allowing the proponents to go forward with an election.
Chairman Gates asked if the Eagle County Master Plan is against proliferation
of additional special districts.
Keith Montag read from the Master Plan, under Public Services section, stating
a proliferation of small districts should be discouraged. New service districts
should not be allowed when services are available from an existing district. He
informed the Board Staff believes this application is a proliferation of structure
in the district.
Chairman Gates questioned if Staff had the advice and information currently
before the Board would the Master Plan be different.
Mr. Montag stated the Master Plan was created ten (10) years ago and did not
take Amendment One into consideration.
Corrmissioner Johnson moved to approve the Cordillera Metropolitan District,
incorporating the powers of the Squaw Creek Metrol?olitan District and to deny the
Squaw Creek Metropolitan District. This motion wlll allow one district to provide
the services.
Commissioner Phillips stated she understands the Master Plan did not take
Amendment One into consideration. She stated the homeowners are asking for two
districts and are aware of the consequences of two districts but are just asking for
an election. She does not believe the Board should say no if the homeowners are
requesting two districts.
Chairman Gates seconded the motion for discussion.
In discussion, Chairman Gates asked if the applicant was stating they will save
approximately two (2) million dollars by having two (2) districts.
Mr. Engle stated the two (2) million dollars is an estimate. He stated
Kensington Partners want approval to move forward and have an election. It does not
mean the concept of the two district will pass.
Chairman Gates asked if there were corrplications as far as the County servicing
two districts rather than one.
Allen Sartin, Finance Director, stated the+ewould be two district on the books
which would be administered by both the Assessor. and Treasurer, but the
administrative work would not be significant. .'. He stated it is the applicants intent
to issue bonds every three to four years over;the next twenty-five years. He stated
the savings depends on the bond market at the time the bonds are issued.
Commissioner Johnson stated he has a problem with creating two districts for
the purposes of skirting Amendment One. He stated the voters wanted to have
control. He stated he believes if the Board approves this application they will see
a proliferation of districts if there is not a challenge in Court. Five Board
members would control the proposed Squaw Creek District which in his opinion does
not allow for enough taxpayer control.
Mr. Engle stated Squaw Creek Metropolitan District cannot float a bond issue.
Chairman Gates called for the question on the motion. Corrmissioner Johnson
voting yes and Corrmissioners Phillips and Gates voting no. The motion was defeated.
commissioner Phillips moved to approve the service plans for the proposed
Cordillera Metrol?0litan District and the Squaw Creek Metropolitan District with the
following conditlons
01) The assets shall be transferred from the developer without charge as
represented in the memorandum dated July 20, 1993 from Gerald Engle. That portion
of the proformas attached to the Service Plan would show payment for those assets
that are now being transferred without charge, be deleted.
02) All three Board members shall be authorized to sign the proposed
resolutions.
Chairman Gates seconded the motion.
In discussion, Chairman Gates stated he believes Kensington Partners has enough
legal advice to request the two districts.
Chairman Gates called for the question on the motion. Commissioners Gates and
Phillips voting yes and Commissioner Johnson voting no.
Consent Calendar
Chairman Gates stated the next item on the agenda was the consent calendar as
follows:
01) Bill paying subject to approval by County Manager
02) Agreement between Eagle County and Matt McKinney
03) Agreement between Eagle County and Richard Cram, dba/Satellites
04) Agreement between Eagle County and Airborn Duo
05) Agreement between Eagle County and Billy Parker
06) Agreement between Eagle County and Beaver Creek Children I s Theater
07) Agreement between Eagle County and Concert Concepts productions
08) Agreement between Eagle County and John Sandrock
09) Resolution 93-83 concerning County's redemption of certificates of
purchase, resulting from erroneous sales of tax liens
10) Application to Bureau of Land Management for Amendment to right-of-
way grant for Colorado River Road
11) Ratification of Articles of Association of Northwest Colorado Council
of Governments
12) Amendment of Resolution 93-28, authorizing the return of collateral
for Leto Subdivision.
Corrmissioner Johnson moved to approve items one (1) through twelve (12) on the
consent calendar as presented.
Chairman Gates seconded the motion. Of the two voting Corrmissioners the vote
was declared unanimous. Commissioner Phillips was not present for the afternoon
session of the hearing.
Commissioner Johnson moved to adjourn as the Board of County Commissioners and
reconvene as the Eagle County Local Liquor Licensing Authority.
Chairman Gates seconded the motion. Of the two voting Corrmissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
Bella Mia
Mary Jo Berenato, Deputy County Attorney, presented the modification of
premises for Bella Mia, Inc., dba/Bella Mia. She informed the Board this matter was
tabled from a previous hearing to allow photographs to be taken of the proposed
patio area. She stated Bella Mia was in compliance with the inspection performed
before this hearing, with the exception of the food service license and the federal
tax starrp not being posted.
Howard Gunther, applicant, related why he wanted to include use of the patio
for alcohol service. He stated the patio will give him another twenty-four seats.
He informed the Board liquor will only be served in the enclosed patio and not on
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
100 Leaves
FORM 50 C. F. HOECKEL B. B. & L. co.
the deck.
Earlene Roach, Liquor Inspector for Eagle County, explained the difference
between the patios for other establishments and the proposed patio for Bella Mia.
She stated she contacted Mr. GLmther about the corrplaint of individuals drinking
outside the establishment and he was very cooperative and stopped i:r;dividuals ~rom
carrying their drinks outside. She expressed concerns of control wlth the patlo
area.
Ms. Berenato expressed concerns of control and setting precedent of approving a
patio and other liquor establishments also wanting a patio to serve alcohol.
corrmissioner Johnson stated he would like assurances that customers would not
be carrying drinks back and forth from inside to outside, but would rather see only
the errployees carrying the drinks., . ,.
Mr. Glmther informed the Board only hlS Staff would be the only lndivlduals
carrying drinks.
Corrmissioner Johnson moved to approve the modification of premises for Bella
Mia, Inc., dba/Bella Mia.
Chairman Gates seconded the motion. Of the two voting Corrmissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
Corrmissioner Johnson moved to adjourn as the Local Liquor Licensing Authority
and reconvene as the Board of Equalization.
Chairman Gates seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
Resolution 93-E-001, Board of Equalization
Mary Jo Berenato presented Resolution 93-E-001 regarding the petitions to the
Board of Equalization, appointing hearing officers, recommendations and following up
with the petitions. She requested the Board approve and sign the Resolution.
Commissioner Johnson moved to approve Resolution 93-E-001, regarding petitions
to the Board of Equalization, appointing hearing officers and recommendations and
follow up with the petitions.
Chairman Gates seconded the motion. Of the two voting Commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
Mary Jo Berenato asked the Board how they would like to handle the process of
abatement petitions with recommendations from the hearing officer.
The Board related they had reviewed the petitions and had no questions.
Ms. Berenato read the following schedule numbers for the Board's approval as
follows:
16708
18131
23760
09774
09637
13338
22437
11145
14348
29888
09699
09788.
07487
M33893
20312
22182
13738
10095
11540
18204
26808
10830
19756
17129
07964
23190
26279
05516
27795
08365
33082
12720
08560
18189
21123
32771
13867
33122
19526
24611
07493
19756
32501
13501
25909
Corrmissioner Johnson moved to approve the petitions for abatements, schedule
numbers a,s read by Ms. Berenato, as recorrmended by Ed Smalley, Hearing Officer.
Chalrman Gates seconded the motion. Of the two voting commissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
Corrmissioner Johnson moved to adjourn as the Board of Equalization and
reconvene, as the Board of County Corrmissioners.
Chalrman Gates seconded the motion. Of the two voting Corrmissioners the vote
was declared unanimous.
brought before the Board the meeting was
~ I,?
~~ft~J~/?'
al .