No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR00-108 amendment to Blue Ridge PUD1J �f I Commissioner moved adoption of the following Resolution: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE BLUE RIDGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND APPROVING AN AMENDED PUD CONTROL GUIDE DATED MAY 22, 2000 EAGLE COUNTY FILE NO. PDA -00021 WHEREAS, on or about August 3, 1999, the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, accepted for filing an application submitted by Kevin Tucker and Tammy Tucker (hereinafter "Applicant ") for amendment of the Blue Ridge Planned Unit Development located at El Jebel, Colorado (hereinafter the "PUD "), Eagle County File No. PDA - 00021; and WHEREAS, the Applicant requested the amendment of the PUD for the purposes of revising the site plan and certain features of the PUD, specifically to: 1. Remove all commercial uses from the existing PUD Preliminary Plan. 2. Provide a 121 unit mixed residential development consisting of 2 and 3 bedroom townhomes and condomiriiums. WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendment was mailed to all owners of property located within and adjacent to the PUD and was duly published in a newspaper of general circulation throughout the County concerning the subject matter of the application and setting forth the dates and times of hearings for consideration of the application by the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado (hereinafter the "Board "); and WHEREAS, at its public meetings held October 7 and October 21, 1999, the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission, based upon its findings, recommended denial of the proposed PUD Amendment; and WHEREAS, at its public meetings of November 22 and December 13, 1999, the Board considered the PUD Amendment application, associated plans and the statements and concerns IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII " III 11111111111111111 742347 10/24/2000 11:38A 370 Sara Fisher 1 of 11 R 0.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 Eagle CO i C of the Applicant and the Eagle County staff, and remanded the file back to the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, at its public meetings held February 17 and March 16, 2000, the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission, based upon its findings, recommended denial of the proposed PUD Amendment; and WHEREAS, at its public meetings of April 17, May 1 and May 22, 2000, the Board considered the PUD Amendment application, associated plans and the statements and concerns of the Applicant and the Eagle County staff; and WHEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony, exhibits, review of the Eagle County Master Plan, the recommendation of the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission and staff, and comments from all interested parties, the Boards finds as follows: Pursuant to Section 5- 240.F.3.m., Amendment to Preliminary Plan for Planned Unit Development Eagle County Land Use Regulations: (1) The modification, removal, or release of the provisions of the plan are consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire Planned Unit Development. (2) The modification, removal, or release of the provisions of the plan does not affect in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the planned unit development or the public interest. (3) The modification, removal, or release of the provisions of the plan is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any one person. Pursuant to Section 5- 240.F.3.e, Standards for the review of a Preliminary Plan for PUD, Eagle County Land Use Regulations: (1) Unified ownership or control The title to all land that is part of the PUD is owned or controlled by one person. (2) Uses Uses that may be developed in the PUD are those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3 -300 or Table 3 -320 for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD, or are those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed within the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for the PUD Amendment. 2 (3) Dimensional limitations The dimensional limitations that shall apply to the PUD are not those specified in Table 3 -340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations." _ However, the dimensional limitations are those specified for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for the PUD Amendment. (4) Off -Street Parking and Loading It has been demonstrated that off -street parking and loading provided in the PUD comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off -Street Parking and Loading Standards (5) Landscaping Landscaping provided in the PUD does comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards (6) Signs The PUD sign standards are as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations (7) Adequate Facilities The applicant has demonstrated that the development proposed will be provided with adequate facilities for potable water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal, electrical supply, fire protection and roads; and will be conveniently located in relation to schools, police and fire protection, and emergency medical services. (8) Improvements The improvement standards applicable to the development are as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards; or the development achieves greater efficiency of infrastructure design and installation through clustered or compact forms of development or achieves greater sensitivity to environmental impacts: (a) Safe, Efficient Access It has been demonstrated that there is safe, efficient access to all areas*of the proposed development. (b) Internal Pathways Internal pathways do form a logical, safe and convenient system for pedestrian accesses with appropriate linkages off - site. (c) Emergency Vehicles It has been demonstrated that the roadways are designed to permit access by emergency vehicles to all lots or units. (d) Principal Access Points The principal vehicular access point is not designed to provide for smooth traffic flow, minimizing hazards to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. However if the build -out of the development is limited to 60 percent of that approved until a sufficient 3 M 1 additional access from Highway 82 at Willits Lane is provided to the _ southeast of this development, the principal vehicular access point will provide for smooth traffic flow, minimizing hazards to vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. (e) Snow Storage Areas have been provided for adequate snow storage. (9) Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses The development proposed for the PUD is compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. (10) Consistency with Master Plan The PUD is consistent with the Master Plans, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). (11) Phasing The PUD does not require a phasing plan for the development. (12) Common Recreational and Open Space The PUD does comply with the following common recreation and open space standards: (1) Minimum Area The open air recreation or other usable open space, public or quasi- public ", is at least the recommended 25% and the PUD provides the minimum common and usable open space land. (2) Improvements Required All common open space and recreational facilities are shown and shall be constructed and fully improved according the development schedule established for each development phase. (3) Continuing Use and Maintenance It has been ensured that all privately owned open space shall continue to conform to its intended use and it has been demonstrated that restrictions and/or covenants shall ensure their maintenance. (4) Organization Adequate provisions for organizational controls of maintenance, administration, operation, and insurance are provided. (13) Natural Resources The PUD has considered the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents, as well as the recommendation received by responding referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5- 280.B.3.e., Standards for the review of a Preliminary Plan for Subdivision: (3) Consistent with the Master Plan The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Eagle County Master Plan. 4 C ) (2) Consistent with the Land Use Regulations The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. (3) Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient The proposed subdivision is located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication of premature extension of public facilities, or result in a `leapfrog" pattern of development. (a) Utility and Road Extensions It can be shown that the proposed utility extensions are consistent with the utility's service plan or that County approval of a service plan will be given; or that road extensions are consistent with the Eagle County Road Capital Improvements Plan (b) Serve Ultimate Population It can be shown that utility lines will be sized to serve the planned ultimate population of the service area to avoid future land disruption to upgrade under -sized lines. (c) Coordinate Utility Extensions Utility extensions are such that the entire range of necessary facilities can be provided, rather than incrementally extending a single service into an otherwise un -served area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO: THAT, the application submitted by Kevin Tucker and Tammy Tucker for amendment of the Blue Ridge Planned Unit Development be and is hereby conditionally granted subject to following conditions of approval: (1) An updated Board Resolution be prepared to address improvements to Blue Ridge Lane from the site to the realigned intersection of Highway 82 and Willits Lane. 2) The development shall result in a density no greater than 100 units. 3) The development shall include a 100 foot building and parking set back along Highway 82. 4) The Applicant shall build no more than 60 units until Blue Ridge Lane has been extended from the site to the realigned intersection of Highway 82 and Willits Lane. THAT, the Board hereby approves the Amended Planned Unit Development Guide revised and dated May 22, 2000, and attached hereto as Exhibit "A "; and 5 C11 C'; THAT, the Board directs the Department of Community Development to provide a copy of this Resolution to the Applicant; and THAT, the Board hereby finds, determines and declares that this Resolution is necessary for the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Eagle County. MOVED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commission of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, at its regular meeting held the ay of , 2000, nunc pro tunc to the 22" day of May, 2000. tv COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, by and Through Its ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: Clerk to the Boi&d of Tom C. Stone County Commissioners Chairman Michael L. GaZ Commissioner ' ' Commissioner seconded adoption of the foregoing Resolution. The roll having been called, the (Dote was as follows: Commissioner Tom C. Stone Commissioner Michael L. Gallagher Commissioner Johnnette Phillips This Resolution passed by (3 ' Q vote of the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado. 6 M �l BLUE RIDGE PROJECT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONTROL GUIDE May 22, 2000 1. PURPOSE: To allow for medium and high density residential development in the El Jebel village core. 2. USES BY RIGHT: A. Condominiums and townhouses plus accessory uses, including but not limited to: 1. A Managers unit 2. A coin operated laundry 3. Recreational facilities 4. Open Space B. Open Space for the use of tenants and guests only. 3. MINEM[UM SETBACKS: As shown on the approved PUD Preliminary Plan or as follows for setbacks from property lines. A. Townhouses & Condominiums 1. Front 20.0 feet 2. Side 20.0 feet 3. Rear 20.0 feet 4. MAX[MUM BUILDING HEIGHTS: To mid -point of roof. A. Townhouses 40.0 feet B. Condominiums 40.0 feet 5. ROAD RIGHTS OF WAY: A. Blue Ridge Drive 50.0 feet B. All other roads are private roads. 6. SIGNAGE: The following shall apply to all identification signs in the Blue Ridge Project: A. Two (2) project identification signs shall be allowed with one side only to a maximum of 64 sq.ft. See Site Development Plan for location 9 BLUE RIDGE SUBDIVISION/PUD CONTROL GUIDE B. All signs for identification of buildings shall be a maximum of 10 sq.ft. C. All signs, whether lighted or unlighted, will use a contrasting background for legibility. D. No temporary signs may within 10 feet of buildings except temporary construction signs. E. Temporary sale signs must be designed as part of the overall project and not larger than 10 sq. ft. 7. FENCING: For the multi - family residential, no fence, wall or similar type barrier exceeding 36 inches in height of any kind shall be constructed, erected, or maintained on any Lot, except such functional fences or walls as may be approved by the Homeowners Association as an integral or decorative part of a building. 8. LIGHTING: All lighting shall be indirect with minimum glare to pedestrian and auto areas. No moving or flashing light systems will be permitted. Incandescent light sources are recommended for pedestrian areas. Public parking areas will be provided with downward direct and street lights. 9. PARKING: A. Multi - family residential with 2 or 3 bedrooms 2.5 spaces per unit B. Multi- family residential= 1 bedroom 2.0 spaces per unit C. Office 2 spaces 10. TRASH STORAGE: For the multi- family area, all trash must be enclosed in garages or trash enclosures. 11. USE AND MAINTENANCE OF THE OPEN SPACE: The open space, as designated on the Overall Development Plan, shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association. It shall be for the private use of the owners, tenants and guests of the multi - family units. The maintenance of the open space, including bike paths, pedestrian paths, picnic areas, easements and irrigation system, shall be the responsibility of the Homeowners Association or its representatives. 12. LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be as specified on the Overall Development Plan and any revision thereof. The developer shall supply and maintain all landscape materials within the multi- family open space areas. Maintenance shall be the responsibility of its Homeowners Association. BLUE RIDGE SUBDIVISION/PUD CONTROL GUIDE 14. POLLUTION CONTROL: There shall be no discharge of toxic or thermally abnormal substances or emitting of smoke, gas, dust, or other particulate matter to a level which would be likely to cause an adverse impact on the environment. No wood burning fireplaces shall be allowed, only gas fireplaces.