HomeMy WebLinkAboutR13-093 Petitions for Abatement and Refund ' s
Commissioner O" -^ moved adoption
of the following Resolution:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
Resolution No. 2013 - 01
RESOLUTION CONCERNING TAXPAYER GENERATED
PETITIONS FOR ABATEMENT AND REFUND OF TAXES BEFORE
THE EAGLE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners for Eagle County, Colorado (hereinafter
referred to as the "Board") is responsible for hearing petitions for refund or abatement of property taxes
pursuant to C.R.S. §§ 39-1-113 and 39-10-114; and
WHEREAS,various petitions for abatement have been submitted to the Board by taxpayers for
the purposes of correcting alleged erroneous valuations for assessment,irregularity in levying,clerical errors
and/or overvaluations; and
WHEREAS, said petitions have been previously submitted to the Eagle County Assessor (the
"Assessor") for consideration and recommendation; and
WHEREAS,the Assessor has recommended approval of certain petitions for abatement and such
recommendations are attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Eagle
County, Colorado,
THAT, the Board hereby approves the recommendations of the Assessor for the schedule
numbers, the tax years and for the reasons set forth in the Assessor's recommendation sheets attached hereto
as Exhibit "A" and enters orders with respect to the petitions for abatement in accordance with such
recommendations.
THAT, for each order issued by the Board in which an adjustment to the respective Petitioners'
valuation is indicated, subject to approval by the State Property Tax Administrator where required by the
terms of C.R.S. §39-1-113(3),the Board directs the Assessor to adjust the valuation or take such other action
as more particularly set forth in the recommendations set forth and attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
MOVED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of
Eagle, State of Colorado at its regular meeting held the IC day of 06_,1(}Y.7 tf 2013.
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
BY:
Sara J. er, Chairma
ATTEST: cf •
*
V• H. Ry.n, Commi s'oner
• ""' 1
Teak J. Simonto , Clerk to the A A f ,�,
Board of County Commissioners Kathy C*ridler-Henry, Commissioner a
Commissioner �^ seconded adoption of the foregoing resolution. The roll having
been called, the vote was as follows:
Commissioner Fisher i1/--i
Commissioner Ryan A 14
Commissioner Chandler-Henry
2
•
ABATEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
• ASSESSOR GENERATED TAXPAYER GENERATED X
To: Mark Chapin, Eagle County Assessor
From: Sandy Skiles
Date: 1-Oct-13
Owner: CCI Funding I LLC
Schedule#: R031523 Tax Parcel#: 2107-014-01-013
The appraisal section has completed its review of the referenced property as of this date and here submits it's
findings and recommendations as stated below:
Denial XX Approval as Submitted
Abatement/Refund different than requested (Approval in part)
Assessment Rate: 7.96
TAX YEAR 2011 TAX YEAR 2012
Tax Area: SC068 Mill Rate: 106.1520 Tax Area: SC068 Mill Rate: 104.3750
• Actual Assessed Taxes Actual Assessed Taxes
Orig: $3,567,640 $283,990 $30,146.12 Orig: $3,567,640 $283,990 $29,641.44
Corr: $2,170,000 $172,730 $18,335.62 Corr: $2,170,000 $172,730 $18,028.68
Abate: $1,397,640 $111,260 $11,810.50 Abate: $1,397,640 $111,260 $11,612.76
The basis of the recommendation is:
The subject property is located at 220 Casteel Ridge in Cordillera Divide. The home has 18,103 effective square feet not
including patio,deck or porch areas. Construction on the home was started in 2007, but stopped when the owners ran out
of money for the project. Construction is at 50%completion and has been for since 2009. The roof was not finished and has
remained with only the tar paper covering which has allowed leaking into the structure. The property is now owned by the
lender.
In 2013 the property was appealed and inspected. Corrections were made to the record and the value was reduced at the
Assessor level. All of the same issues were present in 2011 and 2012 so the same adjustments to the record are required.
I am recommending that the abatement be approved for the petitioners requested value of$2,170,000.
EXHIBIT
I A
•
Appraisal Manager Approval: � r�� Assessor Approval:
G:/DOCS/Abatements/2013/AbatementRealForm.xlsx Revised 4-20-11 MJK
