HomeMy WebLinkAboutR12-019 Wolcott PUD Sketch Plan ApprovalEAGLE COUNTY, CO
201204066
TEAK J SIMONTON +� J oo J
Pgs: 15 04 =35: 17PM �G!�7! 1
REC= $0.00 DOC: $
11111111111111111111 111111111111
Commissioner ��` moved adoption
of the following Resolution:
BOARD OF EAGLE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 2012- 0 1 el
APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SKETCH PLAN
FOR THE WOLCOTT PUD
FILE NO. PDS -2714
WHEREAS, on or about April 10, 2010, the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, accepted
for filing a PUD Sketch Plan application submitted by Community Concepts Colorado (hereinafter
"Applicant "); and,
WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested approval of a Planned Unit Development
(PUD) Sketch Plan which would allow development as follows:
On a 373 -acre parcel of land, this PUD Sketch Plan proposes mixed -use residential,
commercial and municipal development on the Wolcott valley floor and on the south side of
Interstate -70. Presently, the subject property is largely undeveloped ranch land with the
exception of two existing residences, the Wolcott Rod and Gun Club and a U.S. Post Office.
The project proposes to create an entirely new unincorporated community consisting of four
primary land use components:
1) Residential — 679 dwelling units.
2) Mixed use commercial — 135,000 square feet of commercial, retail and service
commercial including space for local businesses, artisans and live work
opportunities.
3) Municipal and Community —5,000 square feet of municipal use 20,000 square feet
for a community church site, 5,000 square feet for a community Park Building, and
5,000 square feet to Regional Transit Center.
4) Private Active and Passive Open Space — 138 acres which is approximately 37% of
the total land area involved in this PUD request.
WHEREAS, at its public hearings held on August 17, 2011, September 7, 2011, September
21, 2011, October 5, 2011, October 19, 2011 and November 2, 2011 the Eagle County Planning
Commission, based on its findings, recommended approval of the proposed PUD Sketch Plan; and,
Page 1 of 14
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter the "Board ") of the County of
Eagle, State of Colorado, conducted public hearings for the Wolcott PUD Sketch Plan on December
13, 2011, January 12, 2012, January 31, 2012, and February 21, 2012.
WHEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony, exhibits, and study of the Comprehensive
Plan for the unincorporated areas of Eagle County, comments of the Eagle County Department of
Community Development, comments of public officials and agencies, the recommendation of the
Planning Commission, and comments from all interested parties, the Board of County
Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, finds as follows:
That proper publication and public notice was provided as required by law for hearings before the
Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners; and,
Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations, Section 5- 240.F.3.e. Standards for the review
of a Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plan for a PUD:
Unified ownership or control. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (1)]
The title to all land that is part of this PUD IS owned or controlled by one (1) entity.
Uses. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (2)]
The uses that may be developed in the PUD ARE those uses that are designated as uses that are
allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3 -300, "Residential,
Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule" for the zone district designation in
effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD.
Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (3)]
All of the dimensional limitations defined with this PUD ARE consistent with those specified in
Table 3 -340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations ", for the Resource zone district designation.
Off - Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (4)]
It HAS been demonstrated that off - street parking and loading provided in the PUD complies with
the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off - Street Parking and Loading Standards.
Landscaping. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (5)]
Landscaping provided in the PUD DOES comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2,
Landscaping and Illumination Standards.
Signs. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (6)]
The sign standards applicable to the PUD ARE as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign
Regulations or have been modified in the PUD to meet the intent of providing appropriate
signage for the PUD.
Page 2 of 14
Adequate Facilities. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (7)]
The Applicant HAS clearly demonstrated that the development will be provided adequate
facilities for electrical supply, solid waste disposal, fire protection, schools, and police and
emergency provisions; as conditioned, adequate roads will be provided as well.
Improvements. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (8)]
It HAS been clearly demonstrated that the improvements standards applicable to the
development will be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards regarding:
(a) Safe, Efficient Access.
(b) Internal Pathways.
(c) Emergency Vehicles
(d) Principal Access Points.
(e) Snow Storage.
Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (9)]
The development area of this PUD IS compatible with the character of surrounding land uses.
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (10)]
As conditioned, this PUD IS consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the
Future Land Use Map (FLUM).
Phasing. Section 5- 240.F.3.e (11)
A phasing plan IS NECESSARY and will be provided with application for PUD Preliminary
Plan.
Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (12)]
The PUD HAS demonstrated that compliance with the common recreation and open space
standards with respect to:
(a) Minimum area;
(b) Improvements required;
(c) Continuing use and maintenance;
(d) Organization.
Natural Resource Protection. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (13)]
The PUD does incorporate many elements designed to protect natural resources pursuant to the
recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource
Protection Standards. All referral responses and studies submitted HAVE been fully considered.
Page 3 of 14
Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5- 280.B.3.e. Standards for
the review of a Sketch and Preliminary Plan for Subdivision:
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. The PUD IS consistent with the Eagle County
Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Comprehensive Plan.
Consistent with Land Use Regulations. The proposed subdivision DOES comply with all of the
standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not
limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Development
Standards.
Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid
creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require
duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of
development.
Suitability forDevelopment. The property proposed to be subdivided IS suitable for development,
considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man -made hazards that may
affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public
improvements to the area.
Compatibility with Surrounding Uses. The proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character
of existing land uses in the area, and SHALL NOT adversely affect the future development of the
surrounding area.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners recognizes that PUD Sketch Plan approval
bestows no vested rights upon the subject property and due to the scale of the proposed Wolcott
Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan that it is not practicable to resolve all outstanding issues and
concerns at the PUD Sketch Plan level of review; and,
WHEREAS, the conditions of approval set forth in this resolution are intended as guidance
for the applicant in preparation of the subsequent Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan for
the Wolcott PUD; which shall be separately reviewed and considered in accordance with the Eagle
County Land Use Regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners ofthe
County of Eagle, State of Colorado:
THAT, the petition of Community Concepts Colorado for approval of a PUD Sketch Plan for
the Wolcott Planned Unit Development be and is hereby approved, subject to compliance with the
following conditions. This Resolution shall serve as an agreement binding the Wolcott Planned Unit
Development to these conditions:
Page 4 of 14
Standard Condition:
A. Except as otherwise modified by this Resolution, all material representations made by the
applicant in its application shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval.
Eagle County Engineering:
B. Comments set forth in the Eagle County Engineering Department response dated June
22 °d 2011, listed below, shall be adequately addressed prior to or concurrent with any
PUD Preliminary Plan application.
1. Appendix 9: Civil Engineering Design Report Section 3. Roadway Cross Sections
show 4'detached sidewalks. ECLUR Section 4 -630 requires 6' detached sidewalks.
2. Applicant confirms compliance with ECLUR Section 4 -650 Drainage standards
including but not limited to:
a. Detailed calculations to ensure historical flow
b. Detailed Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
In addition to the above Engineering Department requirements, the Eagle County
Planning Commission requests the following additional engineering - related conditions:
3. Pursuant to the Wolcott Area Community Plan, roundabouts be installed at the bottom
of the Interstate 70 interchange ramps. CDOT and Eagle County Engineering
Department, must determine the appropriateness of roundabouts located at the bottom of
the interchange ramps prior to application for Preliminary Plan, as well as, the timing for
installation relative to the overall project phasing plan.
4. Concurrent with any PUD Preliminary Plan application information must be provided
specifically addressing ongoing maintenance of all stormwater management
appurtenances, as well as, information about how the ongoing maintenance and operation
is to be accomplished by an entity such as a metropolitan district. The stormwater
management plans shall incorporate Best Management Practices, to ensure that
sedimentation due to stormwater runoff and snow storage /snow melt are captured to
prevent discharge into the Eagle River. Additionally, a management, maintenance and
monitoring plan for the stormwater appurtenances is necessary.
Page 5 of 14
ECO Transit:
C. With application for Preliminary Plan, the applicant shall establish one transit bus stop in
proximity to the town center within walking distance from residences and businesses
located on the valley floor. The proposed Transit Center on the south side of Interstate-
70 shall integrate with the existing CDOT Park and Ride location by providing
convenient pedestrian access for use by ECO Transit patrons.
In addition to the above ECO Transit condition, the Board of County Commissioners
appended the following additional transit - related condition:
Applicant will work with Eagle County and CDOT to explore possible relocation of
Edwards Rest stop to SE quadrant of the I -70 interchange where current park -n -ride
exists. This location is the only remaining major highway cross -road in the Eagle
Valley; as such could be a viable location to relocate the CDOT rest area thereby
allowing redevelopment in the core of Edwards for Transit Oriented Development. If
deemed infeasible through preliminary plan review, this condition shall expire. This
option should be explored in relation to a park -n- ride /regional transit center at both
Edwards and Wolcott.
Colorado Geologic Survey:
D. Comments set forth in the Colorado Geologic Survey response dated September 13, 2011
shall be adequately addressed concurrent with the PUD Preliminary Plan application.
Specific comments as below:
1. Additional geologic and geotechnical investigation studies are required prior to or
concurrent with application for PUD Preliminary Plan including additional test
borings /open trench investigations and analyses for the proposed Timbennill and
Pioneer Park neighborhoods on the south side of Interstate -70.
2. Existing inclinometer readings prepared for Vail Resorts for Red Sky Ranch shall be
provided if available concurrent with any PUD Preliminary Plan application.
Colorado Division of Wildlife:
E. Prior to or concurrent with application for Preliminary Plan for PUD the applicant shall
include a Wildlife Mitigation Strategy Plan. In addition to the CDOW recommendations
which have already been incorporated into the Sketch Plan application; pursuant to
discussion with CDOW through the Sketch Plan process, any combination of the four
following mitigation strategies shall be employed:
Page 6 of 14
I . Establish a Wolcott Wildlife Mitigation Trust funded by a Real Estate transfer fee to
be applied within the Wolcott PUD, or;
2. Explore mitigation opportunities in conjunction with the CDOW within game
management units 35, 36 and 44, or;
3. Explore mitigation opportunities in conjunction with the BLM and CDOW on private
or public lands.
4. The Eagle County Planning Commission favors avoidance of critical wildlife habitat
versus mitigation of wildlife impacts elsewhere within the PUD boundary and
especially off -site.
5. Establish wildlife fencing alignments associated with Highway 70 and Highway 6 to
provide for efficient wildlife migration.
6. Establish a preliminary Trails Plan with Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife and
the Bureau of Land Management to establish trail connections from within this PUD
to surrounding public lands.
ECOTrails:
F. The preferred alignment alternative of the Eagle County Planning Commission for the
ECO Trail, core trail alignment shall be as depicted in Alternative `D' proposed by the
applicant (attached) provided that the applicant:
1) Procures a signed easement commitment and ditch improvement agreement from the
Jouflas Families to provide ECO Trails with an easement for purposes of core trail
construction east of the east end of the Wolcott PUD (reference Exhibit `C',
attached).
2) Locates the core trail with a minimum 30 foot separation from the edge of US Hwy 6
asphalt, as realigned.
3) Provides Spur Trail connections from the core trail to the activity centers within the
PUD.
4) Extends the core trail to the west from the west end of the PUD to the Highway 131
Bridge utilizing CDOT right -of -way and /or private land as may be required. The
exact method of connecting with the Highway 131 Bridge is to be determined but a
highway crossing to the Hamlet should be incorporated into the design and
construction of this connection. The Planning Commission acknowledges that this
property is not within the PUD boundary and not controlled by the applicant therefore
approval of the PUD shall not be withheld on the basis of this condition (reference
Exhibit `C', attached).
Page 7 of 14
If an alternative use of the land area presently proposed for the South Meadow
Ranches is proposed with Preliminary Plan, then the preferred core trail alignment
should utilize the existing Hwy 6 alignment.
In'the event that the applicant is not able to satisfy the above conditions, EITHER the
cc re trail shall be constructed in the alignment depicted in the Eagle Valley Trail Plan and
olcott Area Community Plan OR the applicant constructs the core trail segment from
th east end of the PUD boundary to the west side of the Interstate -70 Bridges over US
H y 6, on the river side of US Hwy 6.
Tle ECO Trail core trail shall be constructed as part of Phase 1 of the PUD.
Affordable Housing:
G. T e current Eagle County Affordable Housing Guidelines are under review, and will be
an ended; the applicant shall either abide by the new Housing Mitigation Guidelines or
abide by the current Housing Guidelines to incorporate appropriate Affordable Housing
or Public Benefit into the plan. Affordable Housing stock provided within the PUD, if
any, should be integrated throughout the PUD and not segregated in one area. With
Pr liminary Plan application the applicant shall provide a list of public benefits and
amenities provided within the PUD that may be considered in lieu of housing obligations
ei er in whole or in part.
Utilities:
H. Concurrent with application for 1041 Permit and /or PUD Preliminary Plan, the applicant
shill address all comments and conditions set forth in the "Conditional Service Capacity
3, X010.
1.
2
3
letter from the Eagle River Water and Sanitation District, dated November
Non - potable water irrigation should be utilized throughout the development, if
practicable.
The Preliminary Plan and companion 1041 permit applications must site all major
infrastructure improvements required for build out including: Water and wastewater
treatment plants, all water and sewer lines, as well as a secondary water storage tank.
Architectural elevation and landscape plans are required for the water and wastewater
treatment plants as well as the water storage tank.
Water and sewer infrastructure improvements should be planned and designed to
accommodate surrounding properties.
Page 8 of 14
Emergency Services:
I. Prior to or concurrent with application for Preliminary Plan, the applicant shall coordinate
any and all future development design for the PUD with the Eagle River Fire Protection
District, Greater Eagle Fire Protection District, and the Eagle County Health Services
District. The emergency responders have indicated that the proposed PUD Sketch Plan
satisfies their concerns at the Sketch Plan level of detail. Prior to or concurrent with
Preliminary Plan submittal a Memorandum of Understating between all aforementioned
emergency service providers shall be executed to ensure logical and efficient services
without redundancy are provided to the residents of the PUD and greater Wolcott area.
Exorbitant costs shall not borne by the first residents and commercial uses constructed
within the PUD.
Eagle River Watershed Council:
Comments and recommendations set forth in the Eagle River Watershed Council letter
dated January 2, 2011 shall be incorporated into any future development design of the
PUD and shall otherwise be adequately addressed concurrent with any PUD Preliminary
Plan application specifically including information regarding ongoing maintenance of all
stormwater management appurtenances, as well as, information about how the ongoing
maintenance and operation is to be accomplished by an entity such as a metropolitan
district. Planning and installation of stonnwater management systems inclusive of regular
adequate maintenance, oversight and water quality sampling is necessary. Controlled
river access and a river access management plan should likewise be required with
application for PUD Preliminary Plan. The Eagle River Watershed Council letter
includes the following six recommendations:
The application notes that wetlands have not been delineated (excepting the North parcel
area along Ute Creek); therefore an estimate of actual impacted wetlands cannot be
provided at this time. Conceptually, it does appear that the majority of disturbance
avoids wetland and riparian areas, however should the application move forward wetland
and riparian areas must be delineated and proposed land use areas adjusted accordingly to
allow for appropriate setbacks. The PUD guide does specify that all compensatory
mitigation for filled wetlands shall be on site or with Eagle County.
2. We concur with the CDOW comment regarding the need for controlled river access, and
a river access and management plan may be appropriate should the application move
forward as proposed. Also, some areas indicated as 'river parks' may be more suitable as
less intense open space parcels (as defined by the draft PUD guide).
3. Without commenting on density and plan configuration, the application provides a good
Page 9 of 14
example of an integrated approach to designing stonnwater requirements for a project of
this magnitude and should be recognized for this aspect of the PUD proposal. The water
quality chapter of the PUD guide and the stonnwater design will require further details,
including information on maintenance of all facilities (including information on
maintenance and operation by a single entity like a metropolitan district), particularly if
the application advances to the next level of planning review. Planning and installation
of stonnwater systems should include regular adequate maintenance and oversight
(including water quality sampling).
4. While post- development stormwater is addressed in the North development area, the Ute
Creek drainage is one of several in the area that is moderate to highly erosive and
contributes a large however un- gauged amount of fine sediment to the Eagle River.
Development of this drainage is a concern in this regard, and the type and intensity of
controls that may be necessary to mitigate the existing and post - development stormwater
are unknown at this time.
5. Should any development in the Ute Creek area proceed to the next level of review, the
applicant might benefit the lower Eagle River by participating in a comprehensive study
for Ute, Alkali, and Milk creeks that could decrease sediment loads, protect habitat and
enhance the fishery.
6. Some concept level analysis of Eagle River water use pre and post development might be
beneficial in order to understand the impact of this community development on water
regimes along this stretch of the river, particularly as it might affect low flow periods and
in consideration of the requisite water and sanitation facility that would be constructed to
serve this project.
K. With application for Preliminary plan include a draft River Management Plan for parcels
along the Eagle River owned by the Jouflas' Families, including proposed governance
and funding mechanisms for enhancement and ongoing management. The Eagle River
and community overall would benefit from consolidation of other Jouflas Family river
front land holdings into the River Management Plan.
L. With application for Preliminary Plan details regarding riparian management, educational
programing, the Wolcott Environmental Trust, the Discovery Welcome Center, and
conservation easement locations shall be provided.
Wolcott Area Community Plan Conformance:
M. With application for Preliminary Plan, the applicant shall address the PUD proposal's
confonnance with the Wolcott Area Community Plan and justify all deviations from the
Plan's intents and purposes so as to warrant exceptions to the Plan.
Page 10 of 14
Additional Conditions:
N. Concurrent with application for Preliminary Plan, the applicant shall work with the G.
Jouflas Family to create a conservation easement for the G. Jouflas property west of
Preservation Park. Preferably, this Eagle River frontage property will be incorporated
into the PUD plan as well. The incorporation of this parcel into the PUD provides critical
continuity for management and preservation of the Eagle River Corridor. Likewise, the
BLM inholding on the east side of Preservation Park should be acquired from the BLM
and incorporated into the PUD. Eagle County will collaborate, as it deems appropriate,
with the applicant and BLM to achieve this goal.
O. The applicant shall incorporate appropriate square footage limitations for the South
Meadow Ranch Accessory Dwelling Units concurrent with any PUD Preliminary Plan
application.
P. The applicant agrees to adhere to a minimum 75' setback, or more as may be necessary to
protect the riparian zone, for the South Meadow Ranches from the high water mark of the
Eagle River, or the northern edge of the existing US Hwy 6 right -of -way; whichever is
more restrictive. For Ranch Lot 1 a 150' setback from the high water mark of the Eagle
River to the southeast corner of the building envelope shall be maintained.
With the Preliminary Plan application any possible site specific public amenity structures,
or features such as The Conservancy, or a river side restaurant should be identified and
may be allowed within the 75 foot stream setback with appropriate care and conditions.
Such amenities shall provide significant community or public benefit for which the
setback may be relaxed. While the stream setback is of great benefit to the river corridor,
it also precludes a community connection to the river. The Board of County
Commissioners may grant variations to the dimensional limitations as part of the PUD
Preliminary Plan approval, as appropriate.
Q. The applicant shall enter into discussions with the United States Postal Service (LISPS)
regarding relocation of the Wolcott Post Office into the future Village core area. The
applicant agrees to provide an alternate entry location to the existing post office facility
during the construction realignment of US Hwy 6. If the USPS does not agree to relocate,
then the applicant shall provide a new permanent access to the existing Wolcott Post
Office site. Any new permanent access to the existing Wolcott Post Office site shall be
evaluated with the Preliminary Plan application to ensure that the intent of the PUD will
be maintained and not compromised.
Page 11 of 14
The BLM inholding on the East side of Preservation Park, upon which the USPS office is
presently located, should be incorporated into the PUD. Eagle County will collaborate, as
it deems appropriate with the applicant, USPS and BLM to achieve these goals of
relocating the post office and facilitating the acquisition of the BLM parcel.
R. The applicant agrees to create a conservation easement(s) on the river side of the South
Meadow ranches and the open meadow portion of the South Meadow Ranch property.
The restrictions and uses allowed within the conservation easements will be developed
concurrent with the PUD Preliminary Plan application. Detailed maps and language
describing how the lands to be preserved will be maintained and controlled, as well as,
what entity will be responsible for the ongoing monitoring and implementation of the
conservation easement.
S. Prior to or concurrent with application for Preliminary Plan; the proposal shall
demonstrate in detail how the project addresses the Sustainable Community Index
incorporating the applicant's representations made through the Sketch Plan application
and as included in the staff report dated August 17, 2011. For each SCI point category,
the planning, design and implementation details, including how they will be incorporated
into the design, operation and maintenance of the future community, shall be provided.
The PUD Preliminary Plan and /or PUD Guide shall be amended accordingly, and where
practicable, to increase the project's adherence to the county's definition of Sustainable
Community. The Sustainable Community Index is a development review tool to
comprehensively analyze how new developments contribute towards sustainable
community development. The intent of the SCI is to give staff, developers and decision
makers an indicator as to the level of sustainability a project includes within it, as well as
its contribution to the broader community. The SCI does not apply to a building by
building evaluation.
T. With application for Preliminary Plan, the applicant shall provide a comprehensive map
depicting all wetland and riparian habitats and how the development may impact those
areas. If impacts are identified, then the applicant shall address how those impacts will be
mitigated. Wetlands are an integral part of the riparian zone, and may be incorporated into
the planning of beneficial public spaces.
U. Several adjacent and proximate non - conforming properties owned by the Jouflas families
either already exist or will be severed off of larger parcels of land if the proposed PUD is
approved. This outcome is inconsistent with the intent of the Wolcott Area Community
Plan to comprehensively plan the entire valley floor area at one time via one Planned Unit
Page 12 of 14
Development. The concern is that these remnant valley floor parcels will potentially be
developed in a piecemeal fashion and not be unified with the proposed PUD.
The use and development. of parcels located outside of the proposed PUD boundary is a
topic of interest. As a result, with application for Preliminary Plan the applicant shall, to
the extent feasible, address the future use of these parcels of land which are outside of the
proposed PUD boundary. Preferably all these remnant parcels Would be incorporated into
the PUD and connected to public water and sewer infrastructure with the goal of ensuring
appropriate buffer areas and land use transitions.
V. With application for Preliminary Plan, the applicant shall provide more definitive,.
updated viewshed and architectural analyses of the proposed development from various
perspectives including from the south side of Interstate 70 looking north, from the
existing US Hwy 6 looking south, east and west from 1 -70, within the proposed
development looking toward the proposed development on the southern hillside and
across the Valley Floor.
W. With application for Preliminary Plan, a well- screened community recycling collection
area facility shall be integrated into the plan.
X. As part of the Sketch Plan review the RE -50J School District has determined that a future
public school site is not needed in the Wolcott area. As such, fees in lieu of school land
dedication will be required. Additionally, the applicant should make provisions to allow
private schools and daycare facilities within the commercial area.
Y. With application for Preliminary plan the applicant shall delineate area(s) either on site or
off site dedicated to the storage of future residents' recreational vehicles and equipment.
THAT the Board of County Commissioners directs the Planning Director to provide a
copy of this Resolution to the applicant.
THAT the Board hereby finds, determines and declares that this Resolution is necessary
for the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado.
MOVED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of the
County of Eagle, State of Colorado, at its regular meeting held the �*4ay of
Page 13 of 14
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF
COLORADO, by and Through Its
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
fit► .�• 1 �•�
Teak J. Sini6nton "�ot�o Peter F. Runyon,
Clerk to the Board o
County Commis'
N-. OLA i" By:
USE
n *tavney, Cor
Sara J. Fisher, Vommissioner
Commissioner �T�1`'t seconded adoption of the foregoing Resolution. The roll
having been called, the vote was as follows:
Commissioner Peter F. Runyon "5rti i
CommissionerJon Stavney w
Commissioner Sara J. Fisher
Z
This Resolution passed by U vote of the Board of County Commissioners of the County
of Eagle, State of Colorado.
Page 14 of 14
