No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR09-004 Preliminary Plan Apprv Roundup River RanchCommissioner ~~ ~---~`f ut~ moved adoption of the following Resolution: BOARD OF EAGLE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION N0.2009- Q ~~- APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THE ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND ZONE CHANGE FILE NO. PDP-1634 and ZC-2091 WHEREAS, on or about October 23, 2008 the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, accepted for filing a PUD Preliminary Plan application submitted by the Roundup River Ranch (hereinafter "Applicant"); and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requested the approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan which would allow development as follows: The proposed Roundup River Ranch PUD (formerly known as the OK Corral Camp) is on an 85- acre parcel of land located between the Colorado River Road and the Colorado River approximately 8-miles north of Dotsero. Roundup River Ranch is an overnight camp that will provide a safe environment for children with chronic and life-threatening medical conditions where they can enjoy a safe, fun-filled Rocky Mountain camp experience. When fully operational, the camp will employ approximately 21 full-time staff; some of whom will be based at the campsite and others out of a satellite office located in the Eagle Valley. Additionally, up to seven full-time summer positions will be necessary. Initially, the summer staff will also include up to 18 counselors (for up to 60 campers) who will live on site. There will also be up to 20 volunteers per camp session. When the camp reaches capacity of 120 campers, the numbers of counselors and volunteer staff will also rise to approximately 36 and 40, respectively. It is planned that the Roundup River Ranch will eventually provide year-round programming to include eight one-week sessions in the summer, family and sibling weekends, and other need- specific programming over weekends throughout the year. The full programming schedule should be achieved within eight years. Camp activities include but are not limited to customary western camp activities such as arts & crafts, wood shop, ropes course, fishing, boating, a variety of games, talent shows, horse back riding, swimming and archery. Page 1 of 16 Additionally, the camp will provide careful unobtrusive supervision of doctors, nurses and trained support staff to assist, reassure and empower children with serious and life-threatening conditions. The camp provides these opportunities to children who cannot go to regular camp, or who may not be served by other existing camp programs due to severity or complexity of their illnesses. WHEREAS, at its public hearing held on December 3, 2008 the Eagle County Planning Commission, based on its findings, recommended approval of the proposed PUD Preliminary Plan; and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter the "Board") of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, on December 23, 2008. WHEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony, exhibits, and study of the Comprehensive Plan for the unincorporated areas of Eagle County, comments of the Eagle County Department of Community Development, comments of public officials and agencies, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and comments from all interested parties, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, finds as follows: That proper publication and public notice were provided as required by law for hearings before the Planning Commission and the Board; and, Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations, Section 5-240.F.3.e. Standards for the review of a Sketch Plan and Preliminary Plan for a PUD: Unified ownership or control. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (1)] The title to all land that is part of this PUD IS owned or controlled by one (1) entity. Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (2)] The uses that may be developed in the PUD ARE those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or allowed as a limited use in Table 3-300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource Zone Districts Use Schedule" for the zone district designation in effect for the property at the time of the application for PUD. Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (3)] All of the dimensional limitations defined with this PUD ARE consistent with those specified in Table 3-340, "Schedule of Dimensional Limitations", for the Resource zone district designation. Off-Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (4)] It HAS been demonstrated that off-street parking and loading provided in the PUD complies with the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. Landscaping. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (5)] Page 2 of 16 Landscaping provided in the PUD DOES comply with the standards of Article 4, Division 2, Landsca ing_and Illumination Standards. Signs. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (6)] The sign standards applicable to the PUD ARE as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations or have been modified in the PUD to meet the intent of providing appropriate signage for the PUD. Adequate Facilities. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (7)] The Applicant HAS clearly demonstrated that the development as depicted in the Preliminary Plan for PUD will be provided adequate facilities for electrical supply, solid waste disposal, fire protection, schools, and police and emergency provisions; as conditioned, adequate roads will be provided as well. Improvements. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (S)] It HAS been clearly demonstrated that the improvements standards applicable to the development will be as specified in Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards regarding: (a) Safe, Efficient Access. (b) Internal Pathways. (c) Emergency Vehicles (d) Principal Access Points. (e) Snow Storage. Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (9)] The development area of this PUD IS compatible with the character of surrounding land uses. Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (10)] As conditioned, this PUD IS consistent with the Master Plan, including, but not limited to, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). Phasing. Section 5-240.F.3.e (11) A phasing plan IS NOT NECESSARY for this development. Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (12)] The PUD HAS demonstrated that compliance with the common recreation and open space standards with respect to: (a) Minimum area; (b) Improvements required; (c) Continuing use and maintenance; (d) Organization. Natural Resource Protection. [Section 5-240.F.3.e (13)] Page 3 of 16 The PUD does incorporate many elements designed to protect natural resources pursuant to the recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural Resource Protection Standards. All referral responses and studies submitted HAVE been fully considered. Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-280.B.3.e. Standards for the review of a Sketch and Preliminary Plan for Subdivision: Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. The PUD IS consistent with the Eagle County Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Comprehensive Plan. Consistent with Land Use Regulations. The proposed subdivision DOES comply with all of the standards of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including, but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and Article 4, Site Develo ment Standards. Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. The proposed subdivision IS located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of development. Suitability for Development. The property proposed to be subdivided is suitable for development, considering its topography, environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public improvements to the area. Compatibility with Surrounding Uses. The proposed subdivision IS compatible with the character of existing land uses in the area, and SHALL NOT adversely affect the future development of the surrounding area. Pursuant to Chapter 2, Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5-230.D., Standards for the review of Amendments to the Text of the Land Use Regulations, as applicable. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. [Section 5-230.D.1 ]The proposed amendment considers the purposes and intents of the Comprehensive Plan, all ancillary County adopted Specialty and Community Plan documents, and is it consistent with all relevant goals, policies, implementation strategies and Future Land Use Map designations including but not necessarily limited to the following: Section 3.2 General Development Section 3.3 Economic Resources 0 Section 3.4 Housing Section 3.5 Infrastructure and Services Policies a, c, e, f, g, h, i and k Policies b, c, d, e, f, h, j, m and Policies a, d, e, g and n Policies a, c, g, i, j, k, m and o Page 4 of 16 Section 3.6 Water Resources Section 3.7 Wildlife Resources Section 3.8 Sensitive Lands Section 3.9 Environmental Ouality Section 3.10 Future Land Use Map Section 4 Adopted Area Community Plans FLUM Policies a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h and i Policies a, b, c, d,e,fandi Policies a, c, a and g Policies a, c and d Policy a All relevant goals, policies and designations Additionally, all relevant goals & policies of the following plans or such equivalent plans and/or future plans, which may be in effect at the time of application for zone change: Eagle County Open Space Plan Eagle River Watershed Plan Eagle Valley Regional Trails Plan Eagle County Trails Plan (Roaring Fork) Eagle County Comprehensive Housing Plan Eagle County Airport Sub-Area Master Plan Compatible with Surrounding Uses. [Section 5-230.D.2J The proposal provides compatibility with the type, intensity, character and scale of existing and permissible land uses surrounding the subject property. Dimensional limitations of the proposed zone district, when applied, should result in development that will be harmonious with the physical character of existing neighborhood(s) surrounding the subject property. Public Benefit. [Section 5-230.D.3J The proposal addresses a demonstrated community need or otherwise results in one or more particular public benefits that offset the impacts of the proposed uses requested, including but not limited to: Affordable local resident housing; childcare facilities; multi-modal transportation, public recreational opportunities; infrastructure improvements; preservation of agriculture/sensitive lands. Change of Circumstances. [Section 5-230.D.4J The proposal addresses or responds to a beneficial material change that has occurred to the immediate neighborhood or to the greater Eagle County community. Adequate Infrastructure. [Section 5-230.D.SJ The property subject to the proposal will be served by adequate roads, water, sewer and other public use facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, in a unanimous vote: THAT, the petition of the Roundup River Ranch for approval of a PUD Preliminary Plan and Zone Change for the Roundup River Ranch Planned Unit Development be and is hereby approved, Page 5 of 16 subject to compliance with the following conditions. This Resolution shall serve as an agreement binding the Roundup River Ranch Planned Unit Development to these conditions: 1. Except as otherwise modified by this Permit, all material representations made by the Applicant in this application and in public meetings shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. 2. All requirements and recommendations of the Eagle County Engineering " Department, as set forth in their letter dated November 25, 2008, regarding this application, must be satisfied prior to approval of a Final Plat. With respect to requirement/recommendation No. 3 of that letter, prior to adoption by the Board of County Commissioners of a Resolution approving the Preliminary Plan, the County and the applicant must approve an agreement satisfactory to the County Attorney and the County Engineer describing in detail and requiring that pending realignment of the approach road to the bridge (as determined by the County Engineer) and replacement and widening of the bridge by the County to accommodate simultaneous two-way traffic (as determined by the County Engineer), the applicant provide, at all times that Campers are picked up and dropped off during the eight summer Camp sessions, at the existing one-lane bridge trained and certified "flag persons" to assure safety of all persons approaching and using the bridge Such agreement, which shall be recorded at the time of recording of the Final Plat, shall provide for indemnification of County against liability arising from the provision of such flag persons. 3. All comments of the Eagle County Department of Environmental Health set forth in the memorandum dated November 17, 2008 must be addressed to the satisfaction of the Director of Environmental Health prior to site disturbance; 4. The camp facility must meet a minimum SCI score of `58' or otherwise satisfy the intent of the SCI as determined by the county's Green Building Specialist; 5. The applicant is required to implement the Roundup River Ranch Housing Plan as reviewed by the Managing Director of Housing and Development and as approved by the Board of County Commissioners; 6. All comments of the Colorado Division of Water Resources in its letter dated November 7, 2008 must be satisfied prior to application for Final Plat; 7. All Camp operations must adhere to the provisions of the Roundup River Ranch Wildlife Mitigation Plan dated November 6, 2008. All Colorado Division of Wildlife concerns shall be incorporated into the Roundup River Ranch Wildlife Mitigation Plan prior to recording the document. THAT the Board of County Commissioners directs the Director of Community Development to provide a copy of this Resolution to the applicant. THAT the Board hereby finds, determines and declares that this Resolution is necessary for the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado. Page 6 of 16 MOVED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, at its regular meeting held the 20th day of January, 2009, nunc pro tunc to the 23rd day of December, 2008. ATTEST: c4 ~-ccF~, ~ `' z By: Teak J. Simonton Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO, by and Through Its BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: Sara J. Fisher, Chairman By: r F. Runyon, C ission~` By: -- Commissioner ~~--r'<-~`'t seconded adoption having been called, the vote was as follows: Commissioner Sara J. Fisher ~-t~- ~ Commissioner Peter F. Runyon ~. M Commissioner Jon Stavney •. foregoing Resolution. The roll This Resolution passed by ~~~, vote of the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado. Page 7 of 16 EXHIBIT `A' ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH PUD GUIDE and PUD PLAN Intent of this PUD The intention of this PUD Guide is to allow for the development of Roundup River Ranch, an overnight youth camp intended to enrich the lives of children who have chronic or life-threatening illnesses by providing camping experiences, with appropriate medical support, that are fun, memorable, safe, and empowering. This PUD is intended specifically to allow for an overnight camp for medically challenged children with occupancy of 120 campers along with support staff. Purpose of PUD The purpose of the PUD Guide is to ensure the orderly use and development of the property in accordance with the standards, restrictions and regulations that govern the use of land within the Roundup River Ranch Planned Unit Development. This guide replaces the standard zoning provisions contained within the Eagle County Land Use Regulations in order to allow for site-specific land use restrictions that are more appropriate to the site and to the type of development proposed. The development standards and other provisions of this PUD Guide must be met in order to receive an Eagle County building permit. Incorporation of PUD Plan The attached graphic, titled "Roundup River Ranch PUD Plan" is intended to depict the general location of Development Areas listed in this PUD Guide. Development Areas depicted on the Roundup River Ranch PUD Plan correspond with the Development Areas outlined in this PUD Guide and along with the development standards outlined herein are the two most significant tools to guide the development to Roundup River Ranch. All permitted uses outlined below shall be located within the corresponding development area as depicted on the PUD Plan. In the case of the Barn/Arena and Fire Station uses listed as permitted uses in the Open Space Development Area, such uses shall be located within the building envelopes depicted on the PUD Plan. Development Areas The Roundup River Ranch PUD is comprised of four different Page 8 of 16 development areas. The following outlines the purpose, uses, density, building height, setback and parking standards for each of these areas. Any use not listed as a "permitted use" shall be considered a "prohibited use". The four development areas within the PUD include: Development Area 1-Camp Residential/Staff Housing Purpose The purpose of Camp Residential/Staff Housing is to provide a site for staff/employee housing, employee parking for the camp, along with other uses customarily accessory to permitted uses. Permitted Uses 1. Single family dwelling units; 2. Two family dwelling units; 3. Multi-family dwellings; 4. Dormitory-style dwelling buildings; 5. Storage buildings; 6. Sewage treatment "package" plant; 7. Landscaping, gardens, trails, berms and fences; 8. Utility installations; 9. Parking areas, and 10. Accessory uses customarily associated with permitted uses. Density A total of up to twelve dwelling units are permitted within the Camp Residential/Staff Housing Development Area. Unit types allowed in this Development Area shall be those listed as permitted uses. The total square footage of residential uses in this Development Area shall not exceed 13,000 square feet. Building Height Maximum building height shall not exceed 35'. Methodology for calculating building height shall be in accordance Eagle County Land Use Regulations. Setbacks There shall be no minimum setback requirements within this Development Area, provided however that all buildings shall be located within the Camp Residential/Staff Housing Development Area as depicted on the PUD Plan. Page 9 of 16 Parking No fewer than 20 and no more than 40 surface parking spaces will be provided within this Development Area. Development Area 2 - Camp Residential/Camper Cabins Purpose The purpose of Camp Residential/Camper Cabins is to provide sites for overnight lodging cabins for campers and counselors/staff along with other uses customarily accessory to permitted uses. Permitted Uses 1. Camper cabins; 2. Landscaping, gardens, ponds, trails, berms and fences; 3. Utility installations, and 4. Accessory uses customarily associated with permitted uses. Density A maximum of 12 camper cabins are permitted within the Camp Residential/Camper Cabins Development Area. Each camper cabin may include up to three sleeping areas with a maximum occupancy of 10 campers and up to 6 counselors/staff. Each camper cabin shall be limited to 2,500 square feet in size. Cowl-~~nlr~ There shall be no minimum setback requirements within this Development Area, provided however that all buildings shall be located within the Development Area as depicted on the PUD Plan. Building Height Maximum building height shall not exceed 35`. Methodology for calculating building height shall be in accordance Eagle County Land Use Regulations. Development Area 3 - Camp Central Purpose The purpose of the Camp Central Planning Area is to provide a central camp location wherein the majority of all camp activities will occur. By way of example, the Camp Central Planning Area will accommodate camp Page 10 of 16 administration, recreation and other activity buildings, dining facilities, health care facilities, etc. Permitted Uses 1. Administration building not to exceed 3,000 square feet; 2. Clinic, medical facilities not to exceed 6,000 square feet; 3. Dining hall and kitchen facilities not to exceed 12,000 square feet; 4. Indoor theater not to exceed 10,000 square feet; 5. Indoor recreation/pool and general activity buildings not to exceed 17,000 square feet; 6. Arts and crafts building not to exceed 5,000 square feet; 7. Single family dwelling unit; 8. Two-family dwelling unit; 9. Play fields; 10. Storage buildings; 11. Outdoor amphitheater and gathering areas; 12. Indoor/Outdoor pool; 13. Landscaping, gardens, ponds, trails, berms and fences; 14. Parking and loading/deliver areas, and 15. Accessory uses customarily associated with permitted uses. Density A total of up to two dwelling units are permitted within the Camp Residential/Staff Housing Development Area. Unit types allowed in this Development Area shall be those listed as permitted uses. The total square footage of residential uses in this Development Area shall not exceed 3,000 square feet. Building Height Maximum building height shall not exceed 35'. Methodology for calculating building height shall be in accordance Eagle County Land Use Regulations. co+-t-,~,.v~ There shall be no minimum setback requirements within this Development Area, provided however that all buildings shall be located within the Camp Central Development Area as depicted on the PUD Plan. Parking A minimum of 40 and no more than 60 surface parking Page 11 of 16 spaces along with parking/loading facilities associated with permitted uses shall be provided. Temporary over- flow parking may also occur within this Planning Area. Development Area 4 - Open Space Purpose The primary purpose of the Open Space Development Area is to provide sites for passive recreation uses and improvements, agricultural uses and to provide open space areas in order to protect natural resources and provide buffers between neighboring properties. A limited number of public purpose facilities are also permitted within the Open Space Development Area. Permitted Uses 1. Irrigated pasture and dryland pasture; 2. Barns, paddocks and corrals; 3. Covered or uncovered riding arena; 4. Maintenance buildings; 5. Teams/ropes course and other outdoor recreation facilities; 6. Access Roads; 7. Sewage treatment "package" plant; 8. Fuel storage; 9. Utility installations; 10. Parking areas; 11. Fire station and similar facilities; 12. Landscaping, gardens, ponds, trails, berms and fences, and 13. Accessory uses customarily associated with permitted uses. Density Residential uses are not permitted in the Open Space Planning Area. Building Heiqht Maximum building height shall not exceed 35'. Methodology for calculating building height shall be in accordance Eagle County Land Use Regulations. ~atharkc There shall be no minimum setback requirements within this Development Area, provided however that any maintenance buildings, barn and riding arena associated with the "horse center" shall be located within the Page 12 of 16 "Barn/Arena Building Envelope" as depicted on the PUD Plan and any fire station shall be located within the "Fire Station Building Envelope" as depicted on the PUD Plan. The "Fire Station Building Envelop" may be located within 30' from the Colorado River Road right-of-way. Parking A minimum of 10 parking spaces associated with the barn shall be provided. Lighting This section establishes standards for controlling illumination to prevent intense glare or direct illumination that would create a nuisance detract from the use or enjoyment of adjoining property or cause traffic hazards to motorists. Proper shielding will be used to eliminate glare towards adjacent properties. 1. Objectives The objectives of these lighting provisions are to provide quality, context-sensitive lighting and to minimize light pollution and light trespass beyond the boundaries of the camp. 2. Standards: A. All exterior lighting must provide cutoff shields to direct illumination downward and shall not cast glare directly onto adjacent properties. B. Low Pressure Sodium (LPS) lamps are the preferred exterior illumination source but other sources can be considered depending upon the filtering, shielding, height and number of sources. C. Streetlights used for illumination of roads, driveway intersections and parking lots must be downcast and 20 feet or less in height. D. All illumination of the building entrances and signage shall be downcast with concealed luminaries. E. External lighting fixtures on structures shall be limited to 20 feet or less above finished grade and as necessary to assure safety and conformance with applicable building codes. 3. Prohibited Lighting: A. All mercury vapor sources. B. Searchlights or laser lights use for the purpose Page 13 of 16 of advertising or as a beacon. C. Blinking, tracing or flashing lights are prohibited. D. High Intensity Discharge (HID) floodlighting. E. Exterior neon sources such that the source can be directly viewed are prohibited. F. Outdoor lighting used for decorative effects, (architectural illumination, flag and monument lighting, illumination of trees, bushes and similar landscape features). 4. Permitted Lighting: A. All temporary lighting used to identify hazards or roadway construction. B. All traffic signal lighting. C. Low voltage, low level ornamental landscape lighting. D. Low brightness, seasonal holiday lighting. E. Lighting for the purpose of identifying signs, security and outside special events. Authority and Enforcement The provisions of this Guide are enforceable by the authority and powers of Eagle County as granted by law. Enforcement actions shall be consistent with the authority and action defined in the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. All provisions of this Guide shall run in favor of the owners of land within the Roundup River Ranch PUD to the extent expressly provided in this Guide and in accordance with its terms and conditions. Interpretation and Conflict The specific provisions of this guide shall prevail and govern the use of lands within the Roundup River Ranch PUD, however, where the provisions of the Guide do not specifically address a subject the provisions of the Eagle County Land Use Regulations shall apply. The Community Development Director shall review, consider and render interpretation of this PUD Guide. In cases of dispute or ambiguity, the Board of County Commissioners shall hear, review, consider and affirm, modify or reverse appeals of interpretations or decisions made by the Community Development Director. Page 14 of 16 Minor Deviations and Amendments The Community Development Director shall approve minor Deviations from the approved Preliminary Plan for PUD. Minor deviations that are authorized are those that appear necessary in light of technical or engineering considerations discovered during development and that are not reasonably anticipated during the approval process, as long as they comply with the Eagle County Land Use Regulations. Minor deviations are those changes that will not alter the original project concept but which may result in minor change in the design of the PUD. Minor deviations shall not include reductions in the amount of required open space or required wildlife habitat protection or increases in the number of units or building square footage. Minor deviations may include but are not necessarily limited to internal road and trail alignment and parking locations. The addition of land uses not listed but determined to be similar in nature and impact to the listed uses. Building envelope amendments shall not require a PUD amendment and shall follow the County procedure for Amended Final Plat. All changes not qualifying as minor deviations shall be considered amendments and shall comply with the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, Amendments to Preliminary Plan for PUD. Severability Invalidation of any one of the provisions of this instrument by court order or decree shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. Page 15 of 16 rte'' ~~~.f;' ~ Land U~ S~~mmary '' ` AREA LAND USE ACREAGE } _ '< ~ ° Development Arca 1 Staff Housing 2.9 Ac ~~ "" DevelapmentArca2 Camper Cabins 3.7Ac ~ ~' ± ~ e -, Develapment Area 3 Camp Central 9.1 Ac. o, r ~ ~ ~ ~:~ ^, ~ ~ Development Area 4 Open Space 662 Ac. • ,~ ",4 „~ A, , . , ~ ~:`~ ~. Road Corridor Access 3 d Ac ~,y.5t~4, ~ .ate ~ `"•=-3~. .,~ Total 85.3Ac * ~, ~" ~''`" ~~#~ ~¢~~ Land use areas above comes d with land use ^+~ ~ ,~ ~~ ~. ~, ~ ~ ' ~ descriptions from the OK Corral I'UD Guide S iy k ~' r "~' _ - ~Tl v.~3..: r .e/"~ .z .,- :: f 4e~„ Y YZ.<i~'"" . 4 a i'aRC # r ' ~R4,le'; .,e 'a'~.+. #a~'„N,~~ ,try. - l'.~w i;~. l 'ltl ''~ f- ,,s ,;tom. ryf' ~ * F _°': ~ ` ~~~~ t ' ~ ~ ~ ~ a8t ~~' ~~ °~ ~ ~ w , t ~, ~E:~ a ~ ~ Road Corridor 3.4 Acres '~""`C ~~ Roundup River Ranch PUD Plan Eagle Caunty, Colorado .rtsitw~ October 2, 2008 weAm i;,.w~uee :s°`<~: ,; Nay '°>'` :;;~~.~~:'F: ~~ ~ssr: n'F~~ °,~ ~. _ ~ . _"' _ ~` .` _ _ ~~~'~~' Y ~~, ~.;, _~;~s .s~' . - _. =1V©vember 14, 20(}$ .: ;~~ Rotrrrdup Rrver Ranch t•I'rldlrfe .+llrtrgation Plan ,Vovenrber 1-f, <008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ i ( 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... ..1 % 2. Project Description ............................................................................................................................ ..1 3. Methods .............................................................................................................................................. ..2 ~ 4. Development Issues ........................................................................................................................... ..3 4.I Elk & Mule Deer Winter Range ........................................................................................................ ..3 - 4.1.1 Human Occupancy and Use Conflicts ................................................................................. ..3 ~ 4.1.2 Wildlife Damage Conflicts .................................................................................................... ..4 4.2 Avian Interactions With Power Lines ............................................................................................... ..4 4.3 Noxious Weeds ................................................................................................................................. ..4 4.4 Wildlife /Human conflicts ........................................................... .5 ..................................................... 4.5 Conflicts related to human development within riparian habitat. . .5 4.6 Conflicts related to stocking ofnon-native and non-naturalized gamefish ....................................... ..5 S. Wildlife Mitigation Objectives :........................................................................................................ ..5 6. Wildlife Mitigation Plan ................................................................................................................... ..6 ~ .... ... .......... ................... .... ...................................... 6 1 Elk and Mule Deer . . . . . ..6 . . . . ........... ... ...... ...... ..... . . . 6.1.1 Mitigation of Human Occupancy and Use Conflicts ............................................................. ..6 6.1.2 Mitigation of Wildlife Damage Conflicts .............................................................................. ..6 ~ ._ 6.2 Prevention of AvianJPowerline Interacfions .................................................................................... ..7 t 6.3 Noxious Weed Management ............................................................................................................. ..7 6.4 Landscaping and Reclamation ......................................................................................................... ..7 ~ 6.5 Fencing ........................................................................................................................................... ..8 ~ 6.6 Livestock .......................................................................................................................................... ..8 6.7 Pet Control Restrictions ..................................................................................................................... ..8 ~ 6.8 Nuisance Wildlife and Predators ....................................................................................................... ..8 6.9 Hunting ............................................................................................................................................. ..9 6.10 Fishing ............................................................................................................................................ ..9 6.11 CDOW Cooperative Management .................................................................................................. 10 6.12 Employee and Guest Education ..................................................................................................... 10 " 7. Amendment and Enforcement ......................................................................................................... 10 8. Assignment ......................................................................................................................................... 10 9. Endorsement ...................................................................................................................................... 11 10. Signature Page ............................................................................................................................... 11 11. References ...................................................................................................................................... 12 12. Figures ............................................................................................................................................13 Appendix A - CDOW Fence Specifications .......................................................................15 ~"QS1eYlt B%O/lOYil%CS LLC.M1`atural Resource :1/unagenaerrt Senvices Page r Roundup Rrner Ranch biildhfe hinigabon Plan ,~Voi~ember 1~J, 2008 ~` 1. INTRODUCTION ~ This Wildlife Mitigation Plan {WMP) is a legal agreement between the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW} and Roundup River Ranch, a Colorado non-profit Corporation, for the purpose of providing action items to avoid, minimize, and mitigate the wildlife impacts associated with the development of Roundup River Ranch in Eagle County, Colorado, near the unincorporated town of Dotsero. The 85.311 acre parcel is located almost 9 miles north of I-70 on the Colorado River Road (Eagle County Road 301), in Range 86 West, Township 4 South, Section 3, at the confluence of Sheep Gulch and the Colorado 4 River (Figure 1). f" 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Roundup River Ranch will provide a safe environment for children with chronic and life-threatening medical conditions to enjoy a safe, fun-filled camp experience, at no cost. The attached Figure (Roundup River Ranch L1) presents the Ranch's Master Development Plan. The Mission of the Roundup River Ranch is to enrich the lives of these children by providing camping experiences, with appropriate medical support, that are fun, memorable, safe, and empowering. The Roundup River Ranch will be geared towards serving children between the ages of 7-17 who have Arthritis, Asthma, Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, Epilepsy, Hemophilia, HIV, Sickle Cell Anemia, Spina Bifida, Respiratory Diseases, Brain Injuries, and Burn Injuries. Most of the campers will travel from The Children's Hospital in Denver, which serves children from Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, New Mexico, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, and Soixth Dakota. The Roundup River Ranch will also serve underserved children in the Western US including Texas and Utah. The Roundup River Ranch will provide activities such as fishing, horseback riding, arts and crafts, archery, ropes courses, talent shows, and much more. The primary goal is for each camper to regain a sense of confidence without feeling pressure from competition. Campers are able to find commonalities amongst peers and have fun just being kids. Not only can they gow personally, but also learn about and enjoy the outdoors. For children that are normally limited to their homes and/or hospitals, experiencing the beauty of the Rocky Mountains is an unforgettable experience, The Roundup River Ranch facility is projected to open in 2011. The Camp is currently a Provisional Member of the Association of Hole in the Wall Camps and intends to become a full member camp. The Association of Hole in the Wall Camps is the world's largest family of camps for children with serious illnesses and life-threatening conditions. Since the first Hole in the Wall Camp was opened in 1988 by Paul Newman, well over 100,000 seriously ill kids have attended the camps. Last year, 13,589 kids and 8,643 volunteers were touched by the magic that happens at a Hole in Western BIO)10/127CS LLC.'Vatural Resource .lfanagemerat Sen~rces Page 1 Roundup River Ranch GI'ildlrfe Rlilrgahon Plan ,Noremher 14, ~ 008 the Wall Camp. There are currently five Hole in the Wall Camps in the US (Connecticut, New York, North Carolina, Florida and California) and five Camps overseas. Once fully operational, the Camp will employ approximately 21 full-time staff members. Some of these staff will be based at the Camp site and others will be based out of an office located in the Eagle Valley. In addition, there will ultimately be up to 7 full-time summer positions (these people will not live at the Camp}. Initially the summer staff will also include up to 18 counselors (for up to 60 campers) who will live on-site. There will also be up to 20 volunteers per camp session. As the camper number grows to i20, so will the counselor and volunteer staff and eventually the counselor staff will be up to 36 and the volunteers will be close to 40. The Roundup River Ranch will eventually provide year-round programming to include eight one-week sessions in the summer. Family and sibling weekends, and other need-specific programming over weekends throughout the year will also take place (a total of approximately 8-i0 during the fall, winter ~ and spring season). It may take up to 8 years to achieve our full programming schedule. Initially after Fhase 1 construction, the Camp could serve up to 60 campers at any time and once full build out is achieved, up to 120 kids could be served at any one time. Programming would be typical western camp programming including arts and crafts, wood shop, a ropes course, fishing and boating in a pond, indoor and outdoor games, a "talent" show, horse back riding, swimming, archery and more. r What sets the Roundup River Ranch apart from a traditional summer camp is that all activities are done under the careful but unobtrusive supervision of doctors and nurses and with the support of a staff trained to work with and encourage kids with serious axed life-threatening conditions. The Roundup River Ranch wilt be a camp for children who cannot go to regular camp, or who may not be served by other existing camp programs due to the severity or complexity of their illnesses. The Roundup River Ranch will be a camp at which the kids with serious illnesses will be empowered, ~ allowing them to regain a sense of self and accomplish what they never thought possible. The Roundup ~ River Ranch will work with the medical community to go beyond the treatment of the disease and give ~ kids with serious illnesses their childhood back. 3. METHODS Prior to preparation of this WMP, pertinent background information was reviewed, individuals familiar with the project were interviewed, and relevant mapping and aerial photos were obtained by Western Bionomics. Based on this pre-field work, the OK Corral Natural Resource Baseline Report (Golfer 2007) was prepared (The OK Corral was the original name of the Roundup River Ranch). The Baseline Report provided a description of natural resource values on the Roundup River Ranch property, including an assessment of plant communities on the property, and their ability to provide habitat for wildlife species known or suspected to utilize the parcel. Surveys were conducted during spring of 2007 and the summer of 2008 to gather information on habitat use on the property, and the property was assessed for it's suitability to support the species that were identified as high priority species. Areas of potentially important wildlife habitat were targeted, and species presence or absence was documented. {'{'BSte/71 Bl0/t0771lCS LLC ~'a7ural Resource .4larragement Sen~ices Page 2 C Roundup Rrrer Rartclr ii~ildlrfe hlitrgahon Plan ,~'orernber 13, 2008 Based on the biological baseline conditions of the property, and upon conferencing with representatives of the CDOW, issues were identified that drove the development of this WMP. These issues are presented in the following section. Section 5 presents the objectives of the Wildlife Mitigation PIan. In Section 6 specific action items are presented that serve to meet the objectives of the plan. The next sections of this document describe the procedure for amending, enforcing, and/or assigning this plan. The final sections include a statement of endorsement and a signature page. Implementation of signatures on this document formalizes this mitigation plan as an agreement between the Roundup River Ranch and ~ CDOW. Through their signatures, the Camp and CROW agree that this plan provides acceptable ~ mitigation for the impacts that will result from the development. ;_ C 4. DEVELOPMENT ISSITES This section discusses wildlife issues that were identified during Master Development planning. These issues provide the focus and direction for the WMP. Issues were identified in consultation with CDOW personnel, and are summarized in the following paragraph. Amore detailed description of each issue, followed by presentation of mitigation items intended to minimize or eliminate the impact to wildlife, are presented in detail in the following sections. ~ 4.1 ELK ,fit MULE DEER WINTER RANGE The proposed camp would be located within an area mapped by CDOW as severe winter range for mule ~ deer and elk. Disturbance during the winter months can result in significant impacts to the well being of these animals. The CDOW defines elk winter range as that part of the overall range of elk where 90% of ~ the individuals are located when the annual snowpack is at its maximum and/or temperatures are at a ~ minimum in the two worst winters out of ten. The defmition is the same for mule deer. The CROW has mapped these areas where they occur throughout the State. Mapping in the vicinity of the Roundup River r Ranch is presented in the OK Corral Baseline Report. The Roundup River Ranch does not offer high quality winter forage or cover for elk. According to CDOW Wildlife Manager Brian Wodrich, the property does provide a river crossing point used regularly by elk during the winter. In wintertime, elk are frequently observed, ranging in numbers from 1 or 2 animals to over 100, crossing the Colorado River at the location of the Roundup River Ranch property. It is possible that development of the Roundup River Ranch may lead to a loss or reduction in perceived security for animals traveling across the property. However, the limited human occupation and use of the Ranch during winter will decrease this potential effect. In addition, a design feature of the ranch includes the intentional provision of a 250' wide undeveloped area on the north property line, north of the barn, that will facilitate wildlife movements from east to west across the property. Also, the mapped elk and deer severe winter range and winter concentration areas occupy literally thousands of acres, much of which is located on undevelopable BLM land. The federal land will presumably continue to offer secure travel, forage, and cover habitat for these animals well into the foreseeable future. 4.1.1 Human occupancy and Use Conflicts Sudden, unexpected disturbances to elk, such as human recreation (snowshoeing, hiking, skiing), Western BionoyltiCS LLC .M1'atzrral Resource ,4fanagemerrt Sen~ices Page 3 Rourvdup Ricer Ranch ti'rldlrfe Il/~t~ganora Plan ,~'ovenrber 1 d. _'008 ~ construction, and maintenance activities, represent potentially serious impacts to elk occupying winter range. During the winter, elk are typically in a weakened condition, food supplies are low, and the ability ~ to conserve energy is critical to an animal's survival. The sudden onset of activity can be stressful to ~ these animals, causing them to utilize energy reserves needed for survival in an undisturbed environment. Currently, elk utilizing the landscape in the vicinity of the Roundup River Ranch property during the ~ winter are subjected to minimal human disturbance. That disturbance is primarily related to automobiles, ( trains, and rural residential occupancy to which the animals have become habituated The Roundup River Ranch is not expected to be occupied or used during the winter to the extent it would ~ be during the summer. As a result of this limited use, winter conflicts on elk and deer are expected to be ~ minimal. 4.1.2 Wildlife Damage Conflicts r ~ Elk and deer cause damage by browsing on trees, shrubs, and other ornamental plantings; by feeding on ( alfalfa and grass in fields, pastures, and haystacks; and by running through fences. Because Colorado statutes require compensation to landowners for agricultural property damage by big game animals, CDOW personnel spend considerable time and effort preventing, investigating, and evaluating a variety of damage problems each year. Numerous preventative measures are available to minimize this conflict, including steps that can be taken before the damage occurs. These include crop alternatives, planting of lure crops, and changes in planting and harvesting techniques. Other options include steps that can be taken after the damage has started, including frightening devices, repellents, trapping, and hunting season modifications. In addition, habitat enhancement efforts can lure elk and deer away from ornamental plantings and agricultural crops. ~ Colorado State law does not allow landowners to bring wildlife claims for big game damage where the ( claimant has restricted hunting for the species causing damage. ` 4.2 AVIAN~NTERACTIONS WITHPOWER LINES ~ Within the proposed project's area there are populations of bald eagle, golden eagle, red-tailed hawk, and ~ other birds of prey, as well as greater sage grouse, owls, and great blue heron. Some of these species may be susceptible to risk of collision with power lines. Factors that influence collision risk can be divided into three categories: those related to avian species, those related to the environment, and those related to ` the configuration and location of lines. Species-related factors include habitat use, body size, flight behavior, age, sex, and flocking behavior. Heavy-bodied, less agile birds or birds within large flocks may lack the ability to quickly negotiate obstacles, making them more likely to collide with overhead lines. Likewise, inexperienced birds as well as those distracted by territorial or courtship activities may collide ~__ with lines. Environmental factors influencing collision risk include the effects of weather and time of day on line visibility, surrounding land use practices that may attract birds, and human activities that may flush birds into lines. Line-related factors influencing collision risk include the configuration and location ` of the line and line placement with respect to other structures or topographic features. While a developer does not have the ability to control the environmental and behavioral factors that make birds susceptible to impacts with power lines, they can control the visibility and location of power lines through use of appropriate overhead line locations and provision of visibility enhancing devices. 4.3 Noxrous WEEDS Noxious weeds can increase in abundance when land is disturbed during development. Weeds need to be managed to ensure that native vegetation will continue to thrive and provide food /cover for wildlife. W¢St¢I'it B%OJ10F/?%CS LLC ~'atural Resource N/anage~nent Sen~rces Page 4 RounduK Rrver Ranch Y[ildlrfe A/rtrgatron Plan N'overnber !3, 20(18 Noxious weeds negatively impact habitat productivity and can reduce the habitat quality for wildlife. Sorne landowners have expressed concern that weeds may increase with additional development of the property. 4.4 WILDLIFE /HUMAN CONFLICTS r ~~ r Most conflicts between wildlife and people are linked to careless handling of food and/or garbage, and can be easily avoided through the use of wildlife-proof containers. The Roundup River Ranch will take precautions to minimize conflicts with black bears and other species. Black bears are opportunistic omnivores and will eat almost anything, including human food, garbage, bird food, and pet and livestock food when available. Once a bear has found the easily accessible, consistent food source that human settlements can offer, it may overcome its natural wariness of people and visit regularly, increasing the chance of a human/bear encounter. Other animals can be attracted to areas of increased human habitation as well. Landscaping that limits the opportunities for such animals to seek concealment adjacent to remote areas of the camp can decrease the potential for unfavorable wildlife/human interactions. 4. S CONFLICTS RELATED TO HUMAN DEVELOPMENT WITHIN RIPARIAN HABITAT. The riparian fringe of the Colorado River provides important ecological services that benefit a suite of terrestrial and aquatic wildlife species. Riparian habitat makes up less than 3% of the land in Colorado, but is used by over 90% of the wildlife in the state during some phase of their life history. Preservation of Colorado's riparian river corridors is consequently an important step in conserving wildlife resources. 4.6 CONFLICTS RELATED TO STOCKING OFNON-NATIVE AND NON- NATURALIZED GAMEFISH Introduction of undesirable fish into private ponds and reservoirs has the potential to threaten sport fisheries in adjacent streams or rivers. The inadvertent escape of such fish may foster the expansion of their range and lead to adverse competitive interactions with native or desired fish that can preclude efforts to conserve their populations and/or habitat. 5. WILDLIFE MITIGATION OBJECTIVES: 'The primary goal of this WMP is to minimize the impact of the development on all wildlife species endemic to the property. Specific, measurable objectives to reducing the impact include: 1. Provide for continued wildlife utilization of habitat values that currently exist on the property. 2. Limit human disturbance to elk and deer on the property. 3. Maintain habitat connectedness with adjacent lands. weSteY/1 B'l0/10/YIlCS LLC' .'~'atzrral Resozare Alanagenrent Ser1•rres Page J Roundup Rrner Ranc/r {R'rldlrfe ,~lydgahon Plan November 14, '008 4. Preserve riparian and wetland habitat. 5. Minimize the wildlife habitat impacts of Roundup River Ranch facilities. 6. Minimize human/wildlife conflicts by implementing occupancy and use restrictions. __ _ 6. WILDLIFE MITIGATION PLAN ~~_ Several key element of the Roundup River Ranch Master Development Plan will provide mitigation for broad suite of wildlife species. These include preservation of a movement corridor on the north side of the Camp (Roundup River Ranch L1), utilization ofwildlife-friendly fencing throughout the property, and buffering the Colorado River riparian fringe from Camp facilities. The Camp's goal to minimize impacts `, to wildlife habitat and wildlife utilization patterns has, in lazge part, guided the planning of the development. To further mitigate the impacts of the development, the Roundup River Ranch will ,~ implement the following mitigation action items. 6.1 ELK AND MULE DEER 6.1.1 Mitigation of Human OccuQancy and Use Conflicts As described in Section 4.1, elk and deer are sensitive to disturbances during the winter months when food is scarce and energy reserves are at a minimum. Three mitigation items have been incorporated into the Development Plan to limit winter disturbance to these animals: l) Low wintertime occupancy and use. ~. 2) Preservation of movement corridor. 3) Avoid initiation of major construction/maintenance activities during winter months. First, the ranch will not be utilized during the winter to the extent of summertime use. This is the first and foremost mitigation item to decrease the impact of the facility on wintering animals. Secondly, a movement corridor has been incorporated into the Master Development Plan that will provide a 250 foot undeveloped space on the northern property line to facilitate continued movement of wildlife across the property. Finally, the Roundup River Ranch will commit to initiate major construction or maintenance activities only during the spring, summer, and fall. Major construction projects will not be initiated from November 15 through April 15. If a project is initiated prior to this time period, it may continue throughout the winter or until completed. This is to avoid creating stress to animals occupying the property or adjacent parcels during the winter. If the disturbance is ongoing once winter range occupation begins, the animals will be expected to either habituate to the disturbance or avoid the property entirely for the duration of the disturbance. 6.1.2 Mitigation of Wildlife Damage Conflicts Roundup River Ranch shall indemnify the CDOW from any and all future wildlife damage claims on the property, including those claims brought by any agricultural lessees. Furthermore, if necessary due to wildlife damage occurring in the future, the Ranch will cooperate with CDOW to manage habitat features under their control as may be recommended by CDOW. WBSfBYit B10110i/tICS LLC,~'atural Resoro~ce Alanagentent Sen~rces Page 6 Roundup Rrver Ranch Yi 4ldlr{e ,1lrtrgatrorz Plan .~'ovenrber I d. ?008 i 6.2 PREVENTION OFAVIAN/POWERLINE INTERACTIONS ~ The developer of Roundup River Ranch will commit to placement of bird flight diverters on any new j overhead power lines installed for the purposes of the camp which the CDOW feels map pose a risk to birds utilizing the property. 6.3 NOXIOZ~S WEED MANAGEMENT ~ Noxious weeds are present in generally light densities on the Roundup River Ranch property. These (` weeds and other weeds have the potential to negatively impact habitat productivity and can reduce the ~- habitat quality for wildlife. ~ An Integrated Weed Management Plan will be implemented on the Roundup River Ranch to integrate ~ control techniques into awell-planned, coordinated program to reduce the impact of weeds on the C property. The objectives of weed control and prevention include: ( 1. Containment and control of current infestations, 2. Prevention of further weed encroachment, 3. Detection and eradication of new introductions, ( 4. Site-specific revegetation in areas as necessary. t, _ Appropriate herbicides will be applied to identified weed infestations once per year during late summer/early fall. Followuxg initial application, any re-sprouting weeds will be cut or, where accessible, mowed aggressively throughout the remainder of the growing season to assist in depleting the root ( reserves and avoid flowering and seed production. Treatments of this type are expected to take a minimum of 5 years to completely eradicate weeds from small infestations, longer for larger infestations. Herbicides will not be applied near standing water, unless specifically intended for such use. Herbicides will only be applied under the direction of a certified pesticide applicator. ~ Revegetation of infested areas may be required to eradicate weeds in areas that do not support an understory of desirable species that could re-occupy the site after weeds are controlled. Such areas include piles of soil that are heavily infested, and sites that have been heavily disturbed. Species to be used in revegetation efforts will be dependent on adjacent vegetation. Typically, species native to the area will be used for this purpose. Exceptions would include sites dominated by introduced pasture grasses or planted as landscaping. i_ Eradication of weed infestations requires continual monitoring and evaluation to ensure successful r removal of all reproductive organs of the weed. Infested sites will be treated on an annual basis until no ~ weeds are found. Sites will be subsequently monitored for a period of 3 years following eradication of weeds to assess the success of control measures. Should noxious weeds be subsequently discovered, appropriate eradication measures will be re-instated. 6.4 LANDSCAPING AND RECLAMATION Wildlife habitat disturbed by construction activities outside of the building footprints will be reseeded or replanted with plant species native or naturalized to the area. Exceptions would include sites dominated by introduced pasture grasses or planted as landscaping. The camp intends to landscape primarily with native plant species. The Roundup River Ranch understands that they have proposed their project within currently occupied wildlife habitat and that species such as elk, deer, and porcupines may eat what the Employees and Guests plant. WeSteYlt BIOItOIt7ICS LLC A'atural Resource A/anagenrent Sen~rces Page 7 Rozrndzrp Rrver Razzch ~i'ildlrfe tifttrgatrora Plaza 1Voveszber Id, 2008 ~" - 6. S FENCING Fencing shall be restricted so as not to limit terrestrial wildlife movements. Any new fence constructed ~ for agricultural or other purposes shall meet CDOW fence specifications (included as Appendix A of this _ document). i" 6.6 LIVESTOCK ~ Wildlife-human conflicts often arise when hungry wildlife gain access to stored livestock forage. Hay ~ will be stored in a wildlife resistant enclosure designed to CDOW specifications. In addition, horse feed ~ such as oats, grain or other "horse candy" will be stored in bear-proof containers. ~ 6.7 PET CONTROL RESTRICTIONS r° ~ Uncontrolled pets are a significant source of wildlife disturbance and mortality in human-occupied ~J wildlife habitats. Dogs have the ability to harass and kill wildlife, including elk, deer, and grouse. ~"~ Domestic cats are a significant source of mortality for songbirds. The potential negative impacts from F this type of disturbance (particularly from dogs) increases in severity in winter range, breeding, and production areas. It is during winter that elk are most vulnerable to harassment. Thus, dogs and cats at Roundup River Ranch will be controlled by their owners and will not be allowed to roam free. Employees and Guests will be prohibited from harboring dogs unless they are kept within the house ar have secure containment facilities, such as a dog run, invisible fence, or kennel. Enclosed runs and/or invisible fences must be located immediately adjacent to the building. Dog runs shall not exceed 500 C square feet. If facilities are inadequate to contain the resident dog(s) then the animals will be immediately removed from the property until adequate structures can be built. Pet owners will be required to control their pets at all times. All dogs must be. on a leash or under voice command with the exception of hunting dogs during training or while actively hunting. Assistance dogs are not restricted. Visitors should be encouraged to not bring dogs on-site. ~. Contractors and subcontractors shall be prohibited from bringing dogs onto the property during the winter, even if the dogs are kept inside vehicles. Violation of this dog policy shall result in the immediate ~" eviction of the dog and the dog's owner or representative from the property. ~_ Dogs and other pets shall be fed inside buildings, and not on decks or similar enclosures, to avoid attracting nuisance wildlife or predators. ~- Guests and employees will be educated regarding the Roundup River Ranch pet policy. Eagle County and the CDOW may also control stray dogs and cats. Pet owners not in compliance with these pet restrictions will be responsible for any and all costs incurred by the Roundup River Ranch, Eagle County, and/or the CDOW while enforcing these provisions. Should the Roundup River Ranch knowingly fail to enforce these pet control restrictions, Eagle County and/or the CDOW may enforce the dog covenants and recover any and all costs incurred. 6.8 NUISANCE WILDLIFE AND PREDATORS The potential for wildlife-human conflicts always increases when humans move into occupied wildlife habitats. Techniques designed to minimize elk-human conflicts include landscaping with native vegetation and recreational restrictions. In addition to elk, the Roundup River Ranch parcel includes natural areas currently inhabited by black bears, coyotes, and mountain lions. Black bears are WeSteP» BID/1o-t7[CS LLC.~'atzrral Resource .Alanagenmzu Sen~rees Page 8 Roundup Rn~er Ranc/t i~4'ildl fe Ahtrgatron Plan ~;'orernher 1 ~1, .'.008 ~ ecologically adaptable omnivores attracted to a wide array of food sources. Nevertheless, black bears are not likely to become a problem if potential food sources, especially garbage, are kept secure and ~. inaccessible. Coyotes are also attracted to garbage, and may attack pets on occasion. While mountain ~ lions typically avoid residential areas, they are attracted to big game wintering habitat, and may enter ,, nearby residential areas. In addition, lions occasionally prey on smaller animals such as raccoons that ~ frequently are found in residential areas, and on occasion, lions attracted to residential areas have attacked ( pets. Eliminating the factors that attract wildlife and educating employees and guests are the two most effective strategies for minimizing wildlife-human conflicts. The following mitigation measures are designed to minimize wildlife-human conflicts: ~ 1. There shall be no outside storage of any trash or garbage, no matter how briefly (e.g., overnight), anywhere within Roundup River Ranch, unless it is contained within individual bear-proof containers that meet North American Bear Society, CDOW, or U.S. National Park Service specifications. 2. Prior to disposal, any refuse that might attract bears or other wildlife shall be kept within a building in a suitable receptacle with atight-fitting lid. Refuse shall not be kept within structures that are not ~ bear-proof Trash containers shall be taken to collection points (e.g., the end of driveways) on the ~` morning of collection, not the night before. Trash containers will be brought in prior to 7:00 pm the F same day of pickup. 3. Dumps or underground refuse disposal sites will not be permitted within the development. 4. Household and garden waste can attract bears. Employees and Guests shall be prohibited from using a garden compost pile, unless the compost pile is bear-proof, meeting North American Bear Society, CDOW, or U.S. National Park Service specifications. ~ 5. Pets shall not be fed outside. Bowls of pet food left on outside decks will attract bears and other ~ wildlife, especially coyotes, skunks and raccoons. These smaller animals may inadvertently attract mountain lions. 6. With the exception of bird feeders, the feeding, baiting, salting, or other means of attracting wildlife will be prohibited. 7. Employees and Guests shall be educated by the Roundup River Ranch about the importance of ` removing bird feeders on a nightly basis, and will be required to remove feeders when a building is not occupied for an extended period of time, including weekend trips. Feeder removal is especially critical with suet and hummingbird feeders. 6.9 HUNTING At the Camp's discretion, recreational hunting may be allowed on Roundup River Ranch during waterfowl or other game seasons. All hunting activities will comply with CDOW regulations. 6.10 FISHING - In order to avoid the introduction of undesirable fish species into the Colorado River, only native or naturalized fish species will be stocked in the proposed fishing pond. Prior to stocking any fish, Roundup River Ranch will obtain a fish stocking permit and a private lake license from CDOW. Copies of the [~Y'estenr Bionoinies LLC R'anrral Resource ,tlanagenaeru Sen~rces Page 9 _ ~~i{~!. "t':.: l~;,~. i~g+ `f~ ~f ;.. ~~1~. .~3.~d e., -..r.. r .,/~ ~ '~ _i,7%A~, application farms for these licenses are available at the CDOW website found on the World Wide Web at httos;//~~r3lcili#'e.st~.#c.co.His/RulsstZe~s/S~sciaalLLicenses/~lpolicatioras/A~plications.htm. The Ranch shall allow the inspection of the fish pond by representatives of the CDOW at any reasonable time. 6.11 'DOW COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT Roundup River Ranch commits to work in cooperation with the CDOW to facilitate beneficial habitat and wildlife management. 6.1 Z ~'MPLOYEEAND GUEST EDUCATION Education is the key to a successful wildlife management plan to enhance the area for wildlife while providing a safe environment for Employees and Guests. Employees and Guests will be educated by the Roundup River Ranch that the property provides critical wildlife habitat. They will also be educated in techniques to minimize wildlife-human conflicts. Employees will be educated about bears, mountain lions, coyotes, and other local wildlife via the CDOW's "Living with Wildlife" brochures. One copy of each brochure, along with this Wildlife Mitigation PIan and a recommended list of native plants for use in landscaping, will be provided to each employee at the time of hiring. This information may be provided either in hard copy or electronic copy. 7. AMENDMENT AND ENFORCEMENT It is understood that this WMP will be recorded. Furthermore, this WMP shall not be amended without the written consent of the local CDOW District Wildlife Manager and Eagle County Board of County Commissioners. No amendment shall require the approval of any owner except the Roundup River Ranch and their successors or assigns. No one shall be deemed to be a third party beneficiary of this WMP, nor shall this WMP be enforceable by any party, except the Roundup River Ranch and their successors or assigns. If any conflict occurs between the other documents and this WMP, the more restrictive provision shall take precedent. This entire WMP, specifically those sections addressing dogs, fencing, garbage management, and noxious weed control can be enforced by CDOW or Eagle County. 8. ASSIGNMENT The Roundup River Ranch may, from time to time, assign its rights and obligations under this WMP by an express assignment set forth in a recordable instrument to be recorded in the Eagle County records to any person or entity acquiring an interest in the Roundup River Ranch property. CDOW and Eagle County will be copied on any such assignments. From and after the date of such assignment, the assignee(s) shall succeed to all obligations arising prior to and after the date of this WMP. Any assignee(s) under this WMP may thereafter assign their rights and obligations under this WMP to other f :V%;1%U rt: i e r ..urlC'Y.• °>"i..r .. .. ~ %•)i:: IL7i1 ~ ...•F'r ::o£ i f-t ?ijE? a.'. , ___ ____ such assignee(s), subject to the terms and provisions herein by an express assignment set forth in an instrument in recordable form and recorded in the Eagle County records. ~. ~ ' . TTTT , . j.~~~_ j~ai~ ~~~~rr~~ . ..,~ .w , - _ r y,$ . ~ By its execution of this document, the CDOW hereby agrees that the wildlife impacts associated with Roundup River Ranch have been, and would be, addressed if this plan were implemented. ~F _ I af10111~ ~~mITIRIPAillilll - - _ ~ .._ ;= ~ 1Q.: SIGATI:f~E PAGE ~- For Roundup River Ranch, a Colorado non-profit Corporation: l (~ vat~v Ruth ohnso xecutive Director ~ 9 ~ Accepted and agreed to this ~Z day of ~~~ , 20(j8'. f ~_, For Colorado Division of Wildlife: ` Per ill, Area life Manage//r ~^~' Accepted an agreed to this~=-~_3ay of l~f~" 2008. ~~'Q51£!P}2 d3I$td1(?P$~IC:4 ~.1. i. 1•:lditi'cIt t?P,Si:rfi'i i? i ILe cd~::722;rf _=z•r 5 •:',~: c )~ r`,F. . Roundup Rrver Rancla .~'oremher 1.1. ?008 N ildlrfe Al~trguuon Plan 11. REFERENCES f F r f E Andrews, R, and R. Righter. 1992. Colorado Birds: A Reference to Their Distribution and Habitat. Denver Museum of Natural History, Denver, CO. 442 p. CDOW (Colorado Division of Wildlife). April 21, 2006a. Elk 2005 (Draft) -Observed post-season age/sex ratios. Colo. Div. Wildl. Denver, CO. CDOW (Colorado Division of Wildlife). April 21, 2006b. Deer 2005 (Draft) -Observed post-season age/sex ratios. Coto. Div. Wildl. Denver, CO. Colfer, K.S. 2007. OK Corral Natural Resource Baseline Report. On file at Eagle County, Finch, D.M. 1992. Threatened, Endangered, and Vulnerable Species of Terrestrial Vertebrates in the Rocky Mountain Region. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-215. Fort Collins, Colorado. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 38p. Fitzgerald, J.P., C.A. Meany, and D.M. Armstrong. 1994, Mammals of Colorado. Denver Museum of Natural History, Denver, Colorado. 468p. Hammerson, G.A. 1986. Amphibians and Reptiles in Colorado. Colorado Division of Wildlife. Denver, Colorado. 131p. Hammerson, G.A. 1981. An ecogeographic analysis of the herpetofauna of Colorado. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado. Boulder, Colorado. Harrington, H.D. 1954. Manual of the Plants of Colorado. Sage Books. Denver, CO. Kingery, H.E. 1998. Colorado breeding bird atlas. Colorado Bird Atlas Partnership, Denver, CO. 636p. NDIS (Natural Diversity Information Source). 2005. Colorado Division of Wildlife Website. Ryder, R.A. 1977. Nongame bird habitat information. Unpublished report. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region. Denver, CO. Smith, H.M., T.P. Marlin and R.L. Brown. 1965. Summary of the distribution of the herpetofauna of Colorado. University of Colorado Studies, Series in Biology, 1S:1-S2. Towry, R.K., Jr. 1984. Wildlife habitat requirements. In (R.L. Hoover and D.L. Wills, eds.) Managing forested lands for wildlife. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver, CO. 459p. USDA Forest Service. 1981. Wildlife and Fish Habitat Relationships, Vol. I. Narratives for Birds, Mammals, Reptiles, Amphibians, and Fish. Rocky Mountain Region. Denver, Colorado. Yi'estern Bioiro`nics LLC A'arural Resource .1lanagenaent Sennces Page !? RozrzzdzrR Rn•er Ranch !!'rldl~fe Alitigatio:z Plan ,b"orember 1 ~. '008 12. FIGURES Wesferfr Bio~7omics LLC :varzzra! Resource A-fazzagerazerat Services Page !3 ia'ta. ~ 4. ~ ~~ R „4 to f '1; ~~ ~`~- ` r . ` ' ~`~°` ` ~ ~ Horizontal Scale . ~, _ , ~: I ~ ;~ 5,000' 0 2,500' 5,(HNY 10,000' ~ ,i ~~. x .~ ~ Y ~r >F ;`, , , 1~~ = 5,000' <, SN EET NO 1 OF 1 a~nsarvs OK CORRAL Western Btionomacs, LLC Ha ~~~ ~~~ "¢""'¢t RQS"",~e M¢n¢g¢ment S¢rvaces ~~ FIGURE 1. 318 ftNFR ROM SIELLBOFi ~RpGB, CO 8048] 9]0 570-9071 G pew ENERAL VICINITY ~G~e~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ S H N ~ u" N (~" ~ E Q ~~ tl 4~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ R R R R R R R R R R R 0~ E~! E i E 1~ E! ~ & ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ & ~ ~ ~ ©~ a~~m~~~ ~€~~ ~ a~~~~~ ~~ `~~~ ~ a~f~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ f i ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ € ~ ~ `~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ §4 43 ~ 9g 0 0 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~~i ,~ l i /~ .\ '~~ ~ \, ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ \\ ~~ \ \ ~ ~\ ~~ \ ~ ~ .._.~ \. ~, ~ ~ ii- ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ 3 3 ~ Roundup River Ranch ~'~_,~~§~~ ~ ~ a T}};~ ~~ ~~~® ~ ~ .~i S a +~ ~ A HOLE IN THE WALL CAMP ~ ~!'- ii9~e " 1 ~ ~ i « ~~ EAQE CDUNIY COLORAD } BS a€S~ ~IB S - __ APPENDIX A - CDOW FENCE SPECIFICATIONS Fencing With Wildlife in Mind Understanding the Impact on Wildlife When Fencing Your Property FENCES AND WILDLIFE As our mountain and foothill communities continue to burgeon, pushing development into rural areas, we have an increasing responsibility to use the land in an environmentally responsible manner. Almost everything we do affects wildlife and its habitat, either directly or indirectly. Fences, coupled with the development of roads, loss of habitat, and encroachment of human activity, can contribute significantly to mortality of elk and deer. Fences act as a barrier to daily movement and seasonal migration offree-ranging animals. They often deter young and make them more vulnerable to predation and road kill. Apoorly-designed fence may lead to entanglement and eventual mortality, particularly during times of winter stress. LOW IMPACT FENCES "Fences have just one mission in life, to fall down ". -A Colorado rancher The loss of open space needed for healthy wildlife populations is of special concern. Studies show that fencing, coupled with the development of roads, loss of habitat, and encroachment of urban areas, contributed to mortality of both elk and deer. Fencing can also displace herds of animals by altering their established migration routes. This brochure provides recommendations by the Colorado Division of Wildlife on how to fence in a manner that will protect property and livestock, while at the same time reducing impacts on wildlife. It offers information of various types of low-impact fencing which will require minimal expense and upkeep. All the information provided has been field- tested by real people out in the field, by those who depend on fences to protect their land and livestock. If you build your fences in keeping with the information given here, you will benefit for years to come -with less time and money invested in construction and maintenance -and will have the satisfaction of knowing that your management decisions will not conflict with the environment. '' PLANNING YOUR FENCE In some instances, landowners build a fence for no other reason than because "it's the thing to do." Consider your needs. If you are not in an area that cattle graze, fencing your property may not be necessary; but would only be detrimental to the wildlife and scenery that you and others enjoy. What purpose will your fence serve? And how can you design that fence to meet your needs while at the same time living in a way that is environmentally responsible? Other than boundaries, where will you want fences? Would temporary fences suit your purposes, or is permanent fencing required? Are there sections f fence that cross know game trails - would a swing-back, adjustable or lay-down section be workable in this area? Consider whether the fence you're planning will separate wildlife from their accustomed water source, food source, fawning/calving ground, or security cover? (If so, realize that increased maintenance time and cost may warrant a careful design.) A 42'high top wire, and/or 16" bottom wire will hold livestock if fence is kept in good condition. Thinking through your goals and how you plan to achieve them, along with the consequences of each method. This will help you clarify which fencing option will best fit your operation. KEY INGREDIENTS The key to minimizing hassle is to keep fence wires taut at a height that allows game to cross safely. Often a 16' pole laid horizontally with the top wire, or vinyl ribbon hung on top of the fence in a heavily crossed area will help eliminate costly repairs. With any newly constructed fence, it is important to flag the fence immediately after construction. 'This will help protect your fence until wildlife and domestic livestock become accustomed to the new barrier. FENCING FOR DEER AND ELK The height of the fence and spacing of the top two wires are primary considerations in erecting a fence that will allow peaceful coexistence with elk and deer. If you are not keen on having these big animals entangled in your fence, keep the height of the fence under 42 inches with at least 12 inch spacing between the top two wires. (Deer and elk jump with their hind legs forward, so if the top strands are too close together or are loose, they'll often get hung up, resulting in injury or death and a lot of extra fence work for you.) Keep in mind the height of lower wires. Young deer and elk tend to go under, rather than over a fence; therefore, height of the lower wire can impede their movement. TYPES OF FENCING Electric Fence FENCING FOR ANTELOPE Your best bet for permanent fencing is usually three-wire construction, except for stretches where you anticipate heavy pressure from livestock, such as bull pastures on boundaries where afoot-strand fence may be necessary. Antelope are likely to seek out sections of fence with the greatest clearance between the ground and bottom wire - -even when that clearance is only a couple of inches higher than the rest. For any fence, a bottom wire at least 16-18 inches off the ground will provide antelope passage under normal conditions. Wherever traditional barbed wire is planned, the bottom wire should be smooth to allow antelope to pass without catching it and pulling down that wire. With electric fences, that bottom wire should be grounded. Using electric fence wherever possible, temporary or permanent, will save time and considerable money. Temporary fencing can alleviate conflict with wildlife while giving you more options in managing your livestock. For specific information on the cost and construction of temporary or permanent electric fencing, contact your local CSU Extension office for their detailed report, "Electric fencing for rangelands." Checklist: • Signs warning humans of electrical fence hazard. • Grounded bottom wire at least 16"above the ground. • At least 12 "between top two wires. • Top wire 40" or lower. • Flag newly constructed portions offence. • Don't use yellow or red insulators, which will attract some birds and may result in electrocution. ELECTRIC FENCES Not to scale aur.+~s - f8!]~il'+4~IC k'ru~r TYPICAL ANTELOPE PASS Not to scale Lay-down fence in snow country. Where damage from snow is severe on standard wire fences, alay-down fence has reduced maintenance costs by two-thirds on Black Mesa in western Colorado. Basically it is a standard 4-wire fence that can be laid down as a unit. One person working alone can let it down or put it up. r i~ FASTENING MECHANISMS for Adjustable Wire Fence LAY-DOWN FENCES During times of heavy snow accumulation in unused pastures, you can do yourself and all big game a favor by employing aswing-back section of fence, or possibly a segment of lay-down or adjustable fence or a pass structure, as shown above. 'The lay-down not only allows game to travel, it keeps your fence section intact through snows that might otherwise cause serious problems. LAY-DOWN FENCE Not to scale std --- ~i it I ~-~ ie I g ` ~•~-~ 'gym ~ to asa~'i-~xae~,eei e., i a TYPICAL SUSPENSION FENCE Not to scale ~) I~. I C STAPLE LOCK -Simple and effective on wood posts. Holds wire tight if standard fence staples are used. -` °--- HOOK -Made from large square-end staple. Quite adequate for bottom hook but difficult to drive into untreated portion of post. Use in conjunction with staple lock or metal clip. a METAL CLIP -Excellent on either wood or steel posts. Easy to install, no maintenance and allows fastest wire adjustment. Existing fences easy to modify with this clip. r i s+i P e ~1 WIRE CATTLE FENCES For three-strand wire fences, the CDOW recommends that the top wire be a 12 %2 gauge twisted, barbless type at a maximum height of 42" It is critical that the middle wire, which can be barbed, be located a minimum of 12" below the top wire for kick space, to prevent entanglement when elk and deer jump over it. Keep top wire tight - a loose top wire can cause an elk or deer's leg to become twisted with the next wire. The bottom wire should be 16" above the ground. ADJUSTABLE FOUR-STRAND FENCE Not to scale Standard Configuration Checklist: • Smooth bottom wire at least 16"above the ground. • At least 12"between top two wires. • Top wire 42 " or lower. • Use stays every 6' to 8'. • Flag newly constructed portions offence. TYPICAL 3 AND 4 STRAND CATTLE FENCE Use Recommended Wire Fasteners a~iQ~ ADJUSTABLE WIRE FENCES Adjustable wire fences have specially made clips attached to the posts that enable the wires to be lowered during times of wildlife migration. Raising or lowering one or more wires can be the most successful and efficient fence modification for elk and deer passage during periods when livestock are not present. The primary dependency on its hind legs for jumping. As the wire height approaches the length of a deer's legs (approximately 20"), this dependency on their hind legs nears zero. Lowering the top wire of a 42" fence by 17" and the second wire 5" reduces barrier height to about 25". This height can be negotiable by elk and deer under virtually all conditions. This type of fencing has the added benefit of not being damaged by wildlife crossings. Modification Allowing Nearly Free Movement TYPICAL POST & POLE FENCE Not to scale I~~ Ip II tG POST', POLE, & WIRE FENCE Not to scale High-tensile Wire Fencing High tensile can be a low maintenance alternative minimizing your annual fencing repairs. The CDOW recommends barbless top and bottom wires and barbed in the middle. Check list: • Bottom wire at least 16" above the ground. • At least 12"between top two wires. • Top wire 40" or lower. • Flag newly constructed portions offence. SMOOTH WIRE FENCE (HIGH TENSILE) Not to scale Rail Fencing Rail fencing presents unique problems for migrating elk and deer. Fawns and calves have significant problems crossing these fences because they can't jump high enough, and cannot fit through or under them. In winter conditions, snow can build up on the top rail, creating an artificial barrier that will deter elk and deer from crossing. To prevent this, the CDOW recommends that rail fences be constructed of three rails or fewer. All rails must be the rounded log-type (not a flat 2" x 10" or a split rail -where snow builds up easily). The fence should not be over 48" tall with spacing between each rail 16" for the younger animals to pass through. 2" x 10" planks or 2" x 12" planks are unacceptable because they visually create a barrier. BUCK & POLE FENCE Not to scale Vinyl Coated Wire T'he increased visibility of the wire helps elk and deer judge their jump better and either clear it or use another location to cross. It is recommended that this replaces the top wire in a fence and the color should be white. The vinyl coating comes in several sizes, ranging from 3/16" to 6". The internal wire should be high-tensile wire. It has been found vinyl wire will dramatically reduce damage to fences of all heights. "' II ~r ~I SLOPE Please realize that when wildlife encounter a 42" fence on a 50% slope, they have an obstacle 75" high to jump. -r-- ~ ~- ~~ a0 ~~ ~. t~~k. ~~4k~6 ~P~R 'r5° °~ ~ 1_ ~~ Barrier Height Increase of 42" Fence on Contour of Different Percent Slopes Elk Jumps These are made of corral poles stacked parallel to the ground to the recommended height of 40-42". Length can vary but shouldn't be shorter than 14'. Depending on the length of the poles, sets of two vertical poles to hold the stack in place should not be less than 12' apart. Removable fence sections and gates also help mitigate migration blockages. Simply removing sections of fence or opening strategically located gates will reduce blockages of critical migration routes for elk and deer herds during the winter months. This allows movement between various portions of winter range, providing access to food and shelter. Gates and Passes 5-'~P•~jYf,.R STILT ^.~~,a~,~~~1 i r ~T~w~.~a~~~~ s ~ ~Lt Don't Forget the Humans Aside from removable or sliding gates and fence sections, take into account where you might want to have access for people (especially if you are using public lands). Besides being handy for you, gates and passes that allow easy access for humans will preserve your fence as well as promote goodwill, and that can be worth a lot. ~, :tlr_ulaJ m.ll, 1z1.J1 P.n. WATER GAP AREAS With Very Little Water & Only Occasional Flooding ~~ Yr,~. W" Fp ~-L~ ~• 'Lmt an ilsc:e fENIC1E 5"III.E ~.'~~~-r~~~~~M ATE Ea~1uc#elt 6 r+®ltncti ~ 'eLltidlrl~ WIRE STRETCH GATE ~' min,, ~" rntin. ~^ t +• i+'~ ~" x 2" 441[+nsi Slrayn 1 E quQilK 5~aced ~° ~ mrn Stay Wrio/ ~~PF7M'~(I YVir~ ~P1141 OtM.d• Erld al i.atlm -,,, 1 t #i' C3a, TwLd^Ld ~$rb~le!! ~I0 ~4@t5 til Tvya o,cl t5ainrra, WATER GAP WITH LINE POSTS Allnrh ~'11~ f ns1 !a Lbra3L~ Ssrxie~n C+wr+`r+~1~enLn lfifnch ~ rrw FI-,d ~Lt to nn 6+ath 5ro.76 ,r ~]meHUwn Cnd PL:et V&'aF ~~,*ca9fwnre 1'tn~,l'n.~r1~L~ G'~tls~g q d ~ ^g~ ~inuge °4Y-sw {l~ee~ SL.ciw-/ep Qf4:0 af:{'~8~ re.a :~~ ;111 LM aB ~ ~ ~ yf 11 er'yr Clrs~lntcl Erytlnl `~''t"G ~.7" L"'rkodAnrJ ~7' F It'afidlM] I~if$Y714f1ak17'te SB~IIATI WATER GAP WITH ROCK ANCHORS yT' p""- hlFus3Tf (in.r ~~ F/a# ~a i : T~q~.lc F_rl~tcr D~arase~a~r End ~sl Wdilll CJ~,n~! In1~ f~ur~! SPfa~r~~,Y1 y ~ ~1°-0160 ~!n"'6i5n Clt~i" $G419t~ ~M+L' ~L~lf~. 71~nn e~ildPr+l:$ ~]"•'^ ! P wi ' IiNf ""~ nn uaa Iln ~+ ~IOSk .~MlS~'IQf .~+Ctii'YC~ (~+ ~JIfFfR4~ !hr 4? Iraq, ~inla dcRLhlel ~dteplalLd J9: Tn>,vlhl~d IdtaKJLad as ~wn- Flvc;n~ f~r~rakx~+ S~I.an STANDARD Y-GATE PLAN .R 4>-,.~.,-8.,. ...a.. .. 'Fl , ~ ., 'yFr baYA ei.w at ~,y~`..r, , 1~,• 's '~mr .- b ~ ., i .'.'~R, 4's.Y F The health and numbers of elk and deer in Colorado will diminish significantly unless three important elements are maintained. 1. Animals must remain undisturbed at critical times of the year; 2. Adequate major winter range is needed for winter survival; 3. Major migration routes must be maintained between winter and summer range. The design of fences is particularly important to ensure uninterrupted migration routes and the survival of elk, deer, and especially, you calves and fawns. During winters in the Colorado Mountains, deer and elk move to sagebrush and river bottoms to try to satisfy basic forage needs. Any forced movement will stress and increase energy demands on the animals, decreasing their chances for survival. Please avoid forcing animals to move, even unintentionally. This pamphlet is sponsored by the Habitat Partnership Program. The Habitat Partnership Program (HPP) is funded by the Colorado Division of Wildlife with money derived from the sage of big game licenses. The program is designed to assist in alleviating rangeland fence and forage conflicts between big game and livestock on private and public land. Local HPP programs are made possible through the cooperation and assistance of representatives from the local agricultural community, big game license buyers, and government agencies including US Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and Colorado Division of Wildlife.