Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR04-119 Willits Bend PUD Approval •
1111111111111 900093
Page: 1 of 8
12/09/2004 04:09P
D 0.
Teak J Simonton Eagle, CO 370 R 0.00 D 0.00
Commissioner moved adoption
of the following esolution:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -_ // '
APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SKETCH PLAN
FOR THE WILLITS BEND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
FILE NOS. PDS -00039
WHEREAS, on or about January 29, 2004, the County of Eagle, State of Colorado,
accepted for filing applications submitted by Blue Crow LLC (hereinafter "Applicant ") for
approval of the Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan for the Willits Bend Planned Unit
Development, File No. PDS- 00039; and,
WHEREAS, the Applicant requested the approval of a Planned Unit Development
Sketch Plan for a proposed development consisting of 92,555 square feet of floor area for mixed
uses, including fabrication and trades, office, retail /restaurant and residential, on a 4.5 acre site
generally referred to as 1712 Willits Lane; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the Sketch Plan was given to all proper agencies and departments
as required by the Eagle County Land Use Regulations, Section 5- 210.E; and,
WHEREAS, at its public hearings held on May 20, June 17, July 22, and September 2,
2004, the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning Commission, based upon its findings,
recommended approval with conditions of the proposed PUD Sketch Plan; and
WHEREAS, at its regular public hearings of June 1, July 13, August 3, September 14,
and November 16, 2004, the Eagle County Board of Commissioners (hereinafter "Board "),
considered the proposed PUD Sketch Plan; associated plans; and the statements and concerns of
the Applicant, the Eagle County Community Development and Engineering staff, and other
interested persons; and the recommendation of the Roaring Fork Valley Regional Planning
Commission.
1
• •
BASED ON THE EVIDENCE BEFORE IT, and with the modifications
imposed by the conditions hereinafter described, THE BOARD FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5- 240.F.3.e. Standards for
the review of a Preliminary Plan PUD:
1. Unified ownership or control. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (1)] - The title to all land that
is part of this PUD is owned or controlled by one (1) person.
2. Uses. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (2)] - The uses that may be developed in the PUD are
those uses that are designated as uses that are allowed, allowed as a special use or
allowed as a limited use in Table 3 -300, "Residential, Agricultural and Resource
Zone Districts Use Schedule" for the zone district designation in effect for the
property at the time of the application for PUD.
3. Dimensional Limitations. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (3)] - The dimensional
limitations that shall apply to the PUD are not those specified in Table 3 -340,
"Schedule of Dimensional Limitations ", for the zone district designation in effect
for the property at the time of the application for PUD. However, variations of
these dimensional limitations may be authorized pursuant to Section 5 -240 F.3.f.,
Variations Authorized.
4. Off - Street Parking and Loading. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (4)] - It has been
demonstrated that off - street parking and loading provided in the PUD comply
with, or may be made to comply with, the standards of Article 4, Division 1, Off -
Street Parking and Loading Standards.
5. Landscaping. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (5)] - It has been demonstrated that the
landscaping proposed for the PUD may comply with the standards of Article 4,
Division 2, Landscaping and Illumination Standards.
6. Signs. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (6)] - The Applicant has demonstrated that signs
within the PUD will be as specified in Article 4, Division 3, Sign Regulations.
7. Adequate Facilities. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (7)] - It has been clearly demonstrated
that the development proposed in the Sketch Plan for PUD may be provided
adequate facilities for potable water, sewage disposal, solid waste disposal,
electrical supply, roads and fire protection.
8. Improvements. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (8)] - It has been clearly demonstrated that
the improvements standards applicable to the development may be as specified in
Article 4, Division 6, Improvements Standards regarding: (a) safe, efficient
2
• •
access, (b) internal pathways, (c) emergency vehicles, (d) principal access points,
and (e) snow storage.
9. Compatibility With Surrounding Land Uses. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (9)] - The
development proposed for the PUD is compatible with the character of
surrounding land uses.
10. Consistency with Master Plan. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (10)] - The PUD is
consistent with the Master Plan, and is consistent with the Future Land Use Map
(FLUM).
11. Phasing. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (11)] - A phasing plan has been provided for this
development.
12. Common Recreation and Open Space. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (12)] - The
Applicant has demonstrated that the PUD will comply with the common
recreation and open space standards with respect to (a) minimum area, (b)
improvements required, (c) continuing use and maintenance; and (d) organization.
13. Natural Resource Protection. [Section 5- 240.F.3.e (13)] - The PUD does
demonstrate that the recommendations made by the applicable analysis documents
available at the time the application was submitted, as well as the
recommendations of referral agencies as specified in Article 4, Division 4, Natural
Resource Protection Standards, have been considered.
Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5- 280.B.3.e. Standards for
the review of a Preliminary Plan for Subdivision:
14. Consistent with Master Plan. [Section 5- 280.B.3.e (1)] - The PUD is consistent
with the Master Plan, and is consistent with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM).
15. Consistent with Land Use Regulations. [Section 5- 280.B.3.e (2)] - It has been
demonstrated that the proposed subdivision may comply with all of the standards
of this Section and all other provisions of these Land Use Regulations, including,
but not limited to, the applicable standards of Article 3, Zone Districts, and.
Article 4, Site Development Standards.
16. Spatial Pattern Shall Be Efficient. [Section 5- 280.B.3.e (3)] - The proposed
subdivision is located and designed to avoid creating spatial patterns that cause
inefficiencies in the delivery of public services, or require duplication or
premature extension of public facilities, or result in a "leapfrog" pattern of
development.
3
• •
17. Suitability for Development. [Section 5- 280.B.3.e (4)] - The property proposed to
be subdivided is suitable for development, considering its topography,
environmental resources and natural or man-made hazards that may affect the
potential development of the property, and existing and probable future public
improvements to the area.
18. Compatible With Surrounding Uses. [Section 5- 280.B.3.e (5)] - With the
recommended conditions of approval, the proposed subdivision is compatible
with the character of existing land uses in the area and would not adversely affect
the future development of the surrounding area.
Pursuant to Eagle County Land Use Regulations Section 5- 240.F.2.a.(8), Initiation:
19. The Applicant has submitted a PUD Guide that demonstrates that the
requirements of this Section have been fully met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO:
THAT, subject to the conditions set forth below, the application for the Planned Unit
Development Preliminary Plan for the Heritage Park PUD be and is hereby approved:
1. The continuing use of existing structures and the uses allowed within them shall
be clarified in the proposed PUD Guide submitted with the PUD Preliminary Plan
application.
2. The Preliminary Plan shall include provisions to clearly demonstrate and
effectively ensure that adequate parking will be available as each phase is
developed, such as through limits (e.g., maximum floor area) to types of uses,
subsequent County review on a phase by phase basis, or other appropriate means.
3. The Preliminary Plan shall clearly demonstrate that all issues raised by the Eagle
County Engineering Department in its memoranda of April 20 and October 15,
2004, have been adequately addressed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer.
4. The Preliminary Plan shall clearly demonstrate that all the issues raised by the
Basalt & Rural Fire Protection District in its letters dated April 16 and October 4,
2004, have been adequately addressed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer.
5. The Detailed Landscape Plan submitted as part of the Preliminary Plan shall
conform to the requirements of Division 4 -2, Landscaping and Illumination
4
• •
Standards, and/or clearly demonstrate that, within the context of representations
made during the PUD Sketch Plan review, the proposed landscaping provides
sufficient internal landscaping and buffering of uses from each other (both within
the PUD and between the PUD and surrounding uses) to minimize noise, glare
and other adverse impacts, create attractive streetscapes and parking areas and to
be consistent with the character of the area.
6. The PUD Preliminary Plan shall demonstrate clearly the manner in which the
recommendations of the Colorado Geological Survey, in its letter dated April 16,
2004, have been adequately addressed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer.
7. The PUD Preliminary Plan shall demonstrate clearly the manner in which the
recommendations of the Colorado State Forest Service, in its letter dated April 28,
2004, have been adequately addressed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer.
8. The proposed road system shall be modified to conform to applicable
requirements of Article 4, Site Development Standards, of the Land Use
Regulations, or an application for appropriate Variances from Improvement
Standards, pursuant to Section 5- 260.G., Variance From Improvement Standards,
of the Land Use Regulations, shall be submitted prior to or as part of the
Preliminary Plan application.
9. The Preliminary Plan shall clearly demonstrate how it reflects consideration of
comments of the Town of Basalt in its letters dated May 3 and October 21, 2004.
10. The Preliminary Plan shall clearly demonstrate that common recreation and open
space appropriate and adequate to meet the needs of the owners and residents of
the development has been provided, and that all of the requirements of Section 5-
240.F.3.e (12), Common Recreation and Open Space, have been satisfied.
11. All outside work activity and outside storage of "artist product" shall only be
permitted consistent with guidelines and restrictions approved as part of the
Preliminary Plan.
12. The Preliminary Plan shall clearly demonstrate that all issues raised by the
Northwest Colorado Council of Governments, in its memorandum dated April 12,
2004, have been adequately addressed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer.
13. The proposed performance standards shall required to be effective at the
boundaries of adjacent uses, at any wall of the building from which any noise or
other environmental pollutants emanate, or the perimeter of the PUD site,
whichever is more restrictive.
5
•
14. Diagonal parking along the central roadway shall be at no more than 45 degrees
unless the drive aisles in each direction are widened accordingly.
15. Perpendicular parking may be permitted on the northern portion of the central
"roadway" until such time as a vehicular connection is completed to Valley Road,
Highway 82 and Original Road, at which time the parking shall be converted to
diagonal parking as allowed elsewhere on the central "roadway ".
Notwithstanding, for purposes of calculating available parking, all parking along
both sides of the central "roadway ", except for areas of proposed parallel parking,
shall be treated as diagonal parking from the outset.
16. The Preliminary shall provide an adequate right -of -way along the central
"roadway" which would include driving aisles, parking and sidewalks, along with
a construction and maintenance easement on either side of the right -of -way, to the
satisfaction of the County Engineer. In addition, setbacks from the central
"roadway" right -of -way may be reduced to 2 feet.
17. The Preliminary Plan shall propose a viable mechanism, including timing, for
conveying a public right -of -way for the central "roadway" and dedicating the
public improvements to Eagle County at such time as the connection through to
Valley Road, Highway 82 and Original Road to the north is completed.
18. The site plan shall be modified to provide durable access to the satisfaction of
Eagle County through the parking area along the western perimeter of the site.
19. The Preliminary Plan shall include an "autoturn demonstration" for all anticipated
truck movements on the site.
20. Except as otherwise modified by these conditions, all material representations of
the Applicant in this application and all public meetings shall be adhered to and
be considered conditions of approval.
THAT, the Willits Bend Live/Work Sketch Plan, dated October 29, 2004, attached hereto
as Exhibit "A ", be and is hereby approved;
THE BOARD further finds, determines and declares that this Resolution is necessary for
the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado.
MOVED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of the
County of Eagle, State of Colorado, at its regular meeting held the e ` day of 9pevwL/ ,
2004, nunc pro tunc to the 16 day of November 2004.
6
■MEN■
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF
COLORADO, by and Through Its
ATTEST: ��'`± �� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
o
T).
* N
go By'
Teak J. Simo n Tom C. Stone
Clerk to the Board of Chairman
County Commissioners
ichael L. Ga agher /
i an ssioner
: + . �coni
Commissioner
Commissioner / 1 .24f , seconded adoption of the foregoing resolution. The roll having
been called, the vote was as follows:
Commissioner Michael L. Gallagher
Commissioner Arn M. Menconi a
Commissioner Tom C. Stone at
i
This Resolution passed by ' 1 vote of the Board of County Commissioners of the County
of Eagle, State of Colorado.
7
- -- -- ; •
- \\ '� ms'µ " 1
I
8
s•_xe F•SonA`n
gyp
Q 11
NM SO F A w F /I ir ' : 1 MK
1
j 1 11 11111lVo 4,.,,4.-
- 's: ' v �
I /' \�` r
- . _ice/ i
- \ i
f
1
6
5175 Sq. R
ILEIHI
4 \ / t _Mt
r''''
,,,,,_,
,-,,,, . L. _� .
1 • ° . -
.._ ...;:...\
1 _. 1
1 z . ej
s, F � \ 3 ....„,..
cm I � ! / }`xF`
` ■ �-
` \ � / ✓ ■ m
._.s - N� 1 ".`� t .
El I
b' \.`\ / 2 t.
'*x. Fl / \\� \�
Exhibit "A"
/
\ / `v
i rk °3 5
t .
i
WILLITS BE '
LIVE/WORK
SKETCH PLAN
F.1. SOIq
V
OCTOBER 29,2004